Slashdot Mirror


Debian Founder Ian Murdock Has Died (docker.com)

Unknown Lamer writes: It has been confirmed that Debian founder Ian Murdock has died. From the Docker blog: "It is with great sadness that we inform you that Ian Murdock passed away on Monday night. This is a tragic loss for his family, for the Docker community, and the broader open source world; we all mourn his passing. ... Ian helped pioneer the notion of a truly open project and community, embracing open design and open contribution; in fact the formative document of the open source movement itself (the Open Source Definition) was originally a Debian position statement. It is a testament to Ian's commitment to openness and community that there are now more than 1,000 people currently involved in Debian development."

464 comments

  1. Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So all the race baiting about police brutality and how nobody believed him because he was white (and not a "n*gger" - his words) leading to a massively publicized suicide-note-rant-against-the-police on his twitter, that was actually covered on a similar website to this one, was legit? And nobody stepped in or did a gd*** thing?

    1. Re:Whoa by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      So all the race baiting about police brutality and how nobody believed him because he was white (and not a "n*gger" - his words) leading to a massively publicized suicide-note-rant-against-the-police on his twitter, that was actually covered on a similar website to this one, was legit?

      What do you mean by "legit"? Are you asking if he actually said it, or are you asking if what he said was a resaonable description of actual events?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:Whoa by HarrySquatter · · Score: 1

      It was in response to people trying to claim previously that Ian's Twitter was hacked after he started threatening suicide and posting racist shit.

    3. Re:Whoa by shadowknot · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think OP is referring to the speculation that Ian's Twitter may have been compromised and that it wasn't him who was posting the seemingly out of character tweets.

    4. Re:Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And now it's being covered up. His twitter account is gone, and his blog has been scrubbed clean. The discussion he wanted to grow out of this won't happen, because some people find the subject too embarrassing. It's fucking tragic.

    5. Re:Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When all the evidence to point that he was a racist amounts to events that occurred within 24 hours of a 42 year long life absent of this behavior...it seems a little unreasonable to assume that these events are anything but symptoms of a nervous breakdown or mental illness driven episode.

      What's tragic is that you are this stupid.

    6. Re:Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never said he was a racist; in fact, I've argued heavily against that accusation all day. But you go right on tossing around ad hominems like "stupid" while displaying the reading comprehension of a field mouse, Einstein.

    7. Re:Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Twitter's ban on hateful content is a bit overly harsh, if this is the result.

    8. Re:Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And now it's being covered up. His twitter account is gone, and his blog has been scrubbed clean. The discussion he wanted to grow out of this won't happen, because some people find the subject too embarrassing. It's fucking tragic.

      Tragic, indeed - I posted to an LMDE forum two days ago asking if anyone could confirm/deny that the twitter postings were indeed made by Ian. I noticed, after checking back today, that my post and any possible answers or comment had been removed by the moderator. I didn't even get a private message explaining why. Now that we know that he has died, and that the postings may well have originated from Murdock, any speculations have been removed. I didn't read anything racist at all in the tweets, though I certainly thought they were out of character for the easygoing, intelligent style his public posts generally possessed. I think he, like a lot of other folks these days, was concerned about out-of-control police in the US. Police have probably been getting away with this sort of stuff for a long time, but with the advent of social media and smart phone photography, they're being exposed for who they truly are. Anyway, I suspect that once the truth surrounding his death comes out, the censoring will have to cease. He was too large a personality in the Linux and software communities to be ignored. R.I.P., Ian Murdock. You were a class act.

    9. Re:Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not dead. Obviously you never watched MacGyver.

    10. Re:Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Whereas you are frantically posting here trying to defame a dead man who was violently attacked by the police before committing suicide.

      You are a bad person.

    11. Re: Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm a bad person, but I've never bullied anyone to suicide for using the N-word. This is the first real-life lynching by the progressive liberal movement, and you might as well own it.

    12. Re: Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet I bet you think George Zimmerman is a racist for his actions in the last 24 hours of his life that led up to killing Trayvon Martin.

    13. Re: Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh for fuck's sake, what a load of shit.

    14. Re: Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Earl Silverman.

    15. Re:Whoa by rubycodez · · Score: 2

      racist shit?

      the use of the word "nigger" in that last tweet could just be emphasizing the point of view that many have that police brutality against blacks doesn't matter.

      plenty of people use the word "nigger" in contexts without any racial hatred.

    16. Re:Whoa by Hognoxious · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or they were too busy trying to get systemd to work.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    17. Re:Whoa by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      If songs count there's Bob Dylan & Elvis Costello.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    18. Re:Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we need to get over this idea that describing someone as "a racist" makes sense in most cases.

      Sure, there are a people whom you could legitimately call "a racist". We can all think of examples. In the vast majority of instances, it doesn't really make sense.

    19. Re:Whoa by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      How is it that he wasn't on a 5150 hold? If the police know that you threatened suicide, they are going to be knocking on your door, wanting to haul you away to be supervised in a suitable location (hospital).

      When are the ****ing /. developers going to fix the problem that logs me out between opening a window to write a post and submitting it?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    20. Re: Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was definitely suffering from some form of mental illness. Judging by what he wrote it was undiagnosed bipolar imo. We must stop the stigma of mental illness so we can avoid tragedies like this one and people can get help. . BTW I suffer from mental illness.

    21. Re: Whoa by demented_hedgehog · · Score: 2

      No it doesn't, e.g.

      Black people in the United States used to be called niggers. Originally from the latin "niger" for black. It's use is considered highly offensive.

      Also why is it only white people who aren't allowed to use the word?

      As a liberal I do think someone's right to use slurs is more important than those who are hurt by it. I regard your comment as offensive. I'm not going to run off to the court of popular opinion to try and whip up a witch hunt. We're grown ups now. If you don't like what someone is saying I suggest you: (optionally) politely point out to them what they've said that offended you and why, and then move on. The right to freedom is (in my humble opinion) more important than protecting people from being offended (because there's no line in the sand which you can draw where no one will be offended it just keeps moving). it never ends. We just keep restricting what can be said.

      The word nigger has highly pejorative overtones. I suggest to anyone reading this that they not use it just as a matter of common courtesy. I strongly believe people should be allowed to use it however.

    22. Re:Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the Elvis Costello song "Oliver's Army" uses the term "white nigger". Is that still racist?

    23. Re: Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Kudos for such well considered response, but I do take exception to one statement:

      As a liberal I do think someone's right to use slurs is more important than those who are hurt by it.

      That sounds more conservative than liberal. If you took out the first 3 words, you could imagine a Libertarian saying that.

    24. Re: Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Words don't hurt people, they're just WORDS. When someone claims being hurt by words they really mean offended.

      I'm offended by people telling me what words I am allowed to use.

    25. Re: Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slurs are just words. Even if you truly were offended by some words I hope you have the capacity to understand that free speech is more important than your feelings.

    26. Re: Whoa by imboboage0 · · Score: 1

      What the fuck does being white have to do with it?

      --
      Honesty may be the best policy, but by process of elimination, dishonesty is the second best policy.
    27. Re:Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You cannot send the police to someone who threatens with suicide because he was beaten up twice by the police.

    28. Re: Whoa by Fwipp · · Score: 0

      Gee, I wonder. Maybe there's some sort of, idk, historical connection? Like, hear me out, maybe white people were uniquely positioned to enact and enforce anti-black racism for hundreds of years here? In a way that, like, other black people, or native Americans or Asian people etc etc were not.

      Food for thought.

    29. Re: Whoa by Fwipp · · Score: 1

      "Allowed to"

      bud, I hate to tell you this, but you certainly are "allowed to" be vile and say it as often as you like. The rest of us are also "allowed to" find you reprehensible for doing so!

      The KKK still exists, as do many neo-nazi groups, and they haven't been arrested. Go join them if you wanna be gross to black people, they'll be happy to have you. But you might not be welcome at thanksgiving dinner anymore.

      Your whole bit here is "I should be allowed to be caustic and intentionally inflammatory without anyone telling me I'm bad."

      Society has been very clear that using that word, as a white person, is not okay. To choose to use it anyway, and then act surprised when you're called on it, is just ridiculous. Nobody is fooled.

    30. Re: Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Wrong, the slave trade supply was mostly black people capturing other blacks and then selling them to whites for shipment, or to whites after shipment. Look it up, slavery made possible by blacks. All races have practiced slavery. And whom is the largest group that murders, steals, rapes from blacks at the present? answer, other blacks -- rubycodez

    31. Re: Whoa by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Wrong, you only show how tiny your mind is. Words have context, people have motives and reasons for the words they use. No one has to live by your silly childish notions when having adult conversation.

    32. Re:Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sure, as long as you flag the N word without meaning or context then yes.

    33. Re:Whoa by unencode200x · · Score: 1

      Screen shots of the his Twitter account are here: https://img.sauf.ca/pictures/2...

      --

      Chance favors the prepared mind.
      Perfect is the enemy of good.
    34. Re:Whoa by unencode200x · · Score: 1

      I have no knowledge about the case or anything like that. Assuming his Tweets were real, I'd speculate that the police collected as much evidence as they could and asked people to take things like your post down. Or perhaps it's his family doing it.

      --

      Chance favors the prepared mind.
      Perfect is the enemy of good.
    35. Re:Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You cannot send the police to someone who threatens with suicide because he was beaten up twice by the police.

      Cannot? heck yes you can.
      "Should not" is a different topic and begs another question.

      Training and departmental policy seem to be the single largest problem.
      I recall a thread where officer candidates with too high an IQ can be excluded from enrolling
      in or applying to police departments. The dumber the force the greater the liability and
      responsibility there is for the higher ups in theses departments.

      Consider the recent public statements in Chicago that state a criminal can draw
      and fire in 1/3 of a second. The world record is 0.252 seconds and is clearly a special
      case. One law enforcement competition has a five second 12 shot reload once drill.
      Anyhow a criminal might or might not be able to draw this fast and an officer should
      be able to draw, aim and then decide to discharge his weapon.

      In the recent Chicago departmental review it is clear that the officer broke from
      cover and placed himself in harms way. His training should have been to maintain
      cover behind the vehicle and review the situation.

      It is clear that the officer moved with a single trained purpose to execute the individual and
      eliminate the threat. That may be his training given the dispatch code. If so the dispatcher
      was conducting an execution via proxy.

      Officers do need full body shields and vehicles need bullet resistant side panels. The current
      run and gun strategy makes sense in a war zone but not in a healthy society. Oh wait... war
      on drugs, war on poverty, war on .........., war on humanity.

    36. Re:Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He had what is termed "affluenza". It basically means that he was a spoiled brat.

      Go look at his Twatter messages from right before he offed himself. He was going on and on about how rich he was and how he couldn't believe that a rich white man like himself could ever be arrested and put into jail. He was so full of himself that he put up $25K bail rather than do an over nighter. He also said something to the effect that his life was ruined because he was arrested and spent a couple hours in a cell.

      He was a true case of narcissism. He couldn't stand the idea that he had even the slightest blemish on his life, so he ended it.

    37. Re:Whoa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL @ "n word". Just say "nigger". It's just a word. Words aren't inherently good or bad and aren't exclusive to a single language.

      For example, the word for "that" in Mandarin is "nigga". I've seen idiots pretend to get insulted and angry when they heard me say it. I told them to fuck right off and go read a book for once in their life.

    38. Re: Whoa by nobodie · · Score: 1

      The history is deeper than this. Slavery in the new world was entirely different from slavery around the Mediterraean or in Asia and the Middle East. There were slaves in England, but they were called "Indentured Servants" and signed agreements to a limited time slavery. This was fairly common around the world. If your luck turned very bad it was an option that could save your life.
      But new world slavery, that was entirely different. There was no agreement between the parties. There was a racial element that did not exist in the rest of the slave trade. In fact, the word "slave comes from "Slav" in other words Slavic people! They hit on hard times during the middle ages and sold themselves as slaves all over the world, and were white. Other differences: your children were born into slavery in the new world, but not in most other versions of slavery. Your marrieage was not legal, you could not educate yourself, or be educated by your owner in the new world. All of this marked a new kind of slavery that was easy to distinguish because of race.
      So, that old argument, often used by racists and repeated but others who don't have all the facts (like me when I was young and unschooled in the world) can should be put to rest by the members of slashdot.

      --
      Subversion of spatial scale luxury decoration ideas.
    39. Re: Whoa by demented_hedgehog · · Score: 1

      You don't want anyone being vile but if they are you're going to be vile to them? I don't follow the logic. Your problem is that people are vile and your solution is to be vile as well? As soon as one person is vile everyone gets to be? Your train of thought is reminiscent to me of people who kill abortion doctors to save lives.

    40. Re: Whoa by demented_hedgehog · · Score: 1

      Also is there any need for the false camaraderie.. "bud"? and the KKK comments. All I'm saying is that people should be allowed to express their thoughts and if you disagree the appropriate response is not to call them names but to argue the point. And your response to that is to denigrate me. I don't think your behaviour is any better than the people you are attacking.

      As far as "society" is concerned I think that it is a made up thing that you and your friends have invented so that you can make arguments based on an appeal to authority. Why do you get to decide what society thinks? To quote Margaret Thatcher "There is no such thing as society: there are individual men and women, and there are families."

    41. Re: Whoa by demented_hedgehog · · Score: 1

      Liberalism, is a political philosophy or worldview founded on ideas of liberty and equality. (from wikipedia)

      . I might argue that the idea of being a liberal subsumes the right to freedom of speech. I'm not going to, however, as it's an extremely broad term by the looks of it. You're quite right. I should have said libertarian - my intent would have been far clearer.

  2. Dat's racist by HarrySquatter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And what great parting words he left for us:

    Maybe my suicide at this, you now, a successful business man, not a NIGGER, will finally bring some attention to this very serious issue.

    1. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You have to be in a seriously fucked up place in your head to commit suicide in the first place. Completely out of character twitter posts are not the strangest thing that suicidal people do. Though the posts are fucked up, I'm willing to cut a little slack given the mental state he would have had to be in to do this. It's not the best way to go out but, suicide never is.

    2. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what great parting words he left for us:

      Maybe my suicide at this, you now, a successful business man, not a NIGGER, will finally bring some attention to this very serious issue.

      So he used the N word. Big deal. Black people need to let that shit go.

    3. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And what great parting words he left for us:

      Maybe my suicide at this, you now, a successful business man, not a NIGGER, will finally bring some attention to this very serious issue.

      There are very few situations under which I'd condone the use of that word. This is in the grey area. What he meant in the context of his suicide (on which he blames, in large part, his mistreatment by the SFPD) was that we're a sufficiently fucked-up society that we ignore police brutality against poors and minorities, and maybe now we'll start paying attention when we realize that even the wealthy have something to fear.

      That's not an endorsement of privilege, it's a refutation of it. Niemoller wasn't fascist or anti-semitic for saying "First they came for the Socialists / Trade Unionists / Jews ..." his point was that sooner or later, they'll come for you.

      Ian chose his words poorly and under great emotional strain. But his point remains: if you ignore police misconduct when it's only happening to a group you consider "the other," pretty soon you'll find "the other" expands to include a group you do care about.

    4. Re:Dat's racist by dos1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Great job at posting stuff out of context.

      What he said was among the lines of "look, now it's happening also for a successful white man, you cannot ignore it like you did when they were beating up NIGGERS".

      That's more like "stop belittling the problem with your racism, it's not about who is being beaten, it's about police". Of course given his situation, he was more focused on trying to show the police abuse than fighting the racism and without all these sudden emotions you would definitely find better words to use, but saying that he was racist in those posts is MASSIVE misinterpretation and cruelty.

    5. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "You have to be in a seriously fucked up place in your head to commit suicide in the first place."

      And you know so much about suicide? How?
      Where did you get your M.D.?
      Where did you get your Ph.D.?
      Where did you get your Psy.D.?

      Suicide, for some people, is a rational choice based on the information that they have at hand.
      To label all suicides as "...seriously fucked up..." shows not only a tremendous lack of understanding and experience with suicide but a Great Bigotry toward people who attempt or commit suicide. The reason more people don't seek help is the unrealistic expectations and stereotyping from people like you.

      You should be Ashamed at yourself!

    6. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No sympathy for racists. All white racists deserve death.

      But black racists are ok? You're retarded.

    7. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's not racist, you fool.

      I don't know his reasons and suicide is not the answer. But who knows what kind of persecution he was suffering. We will find out, and there is little more that we'll be able to do, like in Aaron's case.

      But as I understand he wants exactly to say this is not a racial problem. He's outside the category of negros who are more commonly slain (in my country, too) and he's acknowledging a problem that affects all of us. Alas, it's very unfortunate to claim he's a racist, because that is part of the problem. Until we attribute the problem to the victim being negro or jew, nothing will be done. If someone is killed while being human, that should affect me -- whatever color I have.

      Whoever talks about racism (and also systemd, BTW) is just a sad opportunist. Even if Ian was a racist (highly improbable, me thinks), that phrase above is not a racist one. Don't shout racism every time you read nigger, or we won't be able to sort this out.

    8. Re:Dat's racist by Vapula · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And that word has been used in an "anti-racist" way...

      I read his comment "until now, people complaining were discarded as "niggers" but here, it's not the same so it can't be discarded that way", putting the "nigger" word in the mouth of the protagonists.

    9. Re:Dat's racist by Lord+Kano · · Score: 0

      Individual black people can be racists. What black people cannot do, at this stage in history, is engage in institutional racism against others.

      There is a difference.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    10. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blacks can't be racist. Educate yourself before you let your ignorance out of your mouth.

      Yes they can. You've been brainwashed.

    11. Re:Dat's racist by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Interesting

      FWIW, in context, he was (after implying he had a fairly substantial confrontation with the SFPD) saying that police misbehavior might be taken more seriously now that a successful white male, rather than black person, was the victim of it.

      It's poor wording, but I don't think the choice of word there was meant maliciously or in any racist sense, rather than a comment upon the SFPD's and general publics perceptions of whose word is worth taking seriously.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    12. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blacks can't be racist. Educate yourself before you let your ignorance out of your mouth.

      A person that hates another person because of their race is a racist. Period. It has nothing to do with a particular race's perceived power. How about you try thinking for yourself?

    13. Re: Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait what?! Racism has no skin color. One race hating another is racism. ..

    14. Re:Dat's racist by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I'm in the western hemisphere.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    15. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well in my area my President, Governor, Mayor, City Council, and Police Chief are all black. The entire governmental institution is black. So how is it not possible at "this stage in history"?

    16. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Blacks can't be racist."

      Okay, I'm going to start calling myself trans-black and begin spewing racist comments from my anonymous social media accounts that are directed at my black brothers and sisters, directed at mexican americans and directed at jewish americans.

      This is okay since I'm now trans-black, right?

    17. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To read that as racist, you must not be able to read above a fourth grade level. Even out of context, as you've presented it, it's crystal clear that he's presenting a dichotomy -- a comparative example. I.e.: if a "successful business man" can't escape police brutality, then what chance does a "nigger" have?

      But it doesn't matter now, because it's all been deleted. The conversation he wanted to provoke won't happen, partly because of ignorant fools like you who would rather be offended by the innocuous use of words to spark debate, and partly because of people who would rather bury that debate than suffer the uncomfortable truth of confronting it. Congratulations on being part of the problem.

    18. Re:Dat's racist by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      And in what way does that equate to institutional racism?

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    19. Re:Dat's racist by IMightB · · Score: 2

      If you bother to read and think a bit instead of going off in some kneejerk reaction. It appears he had some sort of altercation with the police where he receieved a righteous ass whuppin. Then was charged for assaulting the cops. When he got home, he claims they kicked his ass again and had to go to the hospital for stitches.

      If you read his last comment and *try* to put even a little bit of context around it, it appears that he felt that he was trying to say something like "it doesn't just happen to black people" it happened to me. etc etc etc

    20. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Suicide IS irrational, unless you are going to include selfless acts of heroism, i.e. throwing your body on a grenade to save everybody else in range

      Suicide is a response to short-term hardships which the person does not want to/know how to deal with.

      It is a tragedy that he did not know how to deal with the situation that he got himself into, and a tragedy that he did not have faith in his ability to outlast any bad outcome that he was facing

    21. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's... pretty clever. I expect to see a "trans-black" movement emerge in the next few years, populated entirely by skinheads. My LOL meter will be seriously depressed if this does not happen.

    22. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, as a white person, have faced more kindness and altruistic behavior in black communities than I have seen demonstrated on a daily basis to black people in the majority of white communities

      If that is racism, then we would be lucky if it was more common

    23. Re:Dat's racist by Kjella · · Score: 1

      What he said was among the lines of "look, now it's happening also for a successful white man, you cannot ignore it like you did when they were beating up NIGGERS".

      That part was clear... but what was less than stellar clear is if it was "You think you can beat me up the way you beat up NIGGERS? I'm going to raise hell." or "You think you can beat up people, but now you picked on a person who is not a NIGGER and can raise hell."

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    24. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who holds the institutional power over you? The President, the Governor, Mayor, City Council, city government and Police Chief ARE the political institutions that affect you on a daily life. What do you think "institutional" means?

    25. Re: Dat's racist by LesFerg · · Score: 1

      Not immediate death... They deserve the chance to learn that they were raised by and/or among ignorant people. Older generations maybe cannot be expected to change the racist views they were imprinted with, but younger people in this bigger more communicative world should be expected to see beyond that crap, and also be able to see that people of any race can be an arsehole.

      --
      If I had a DeLorean... I would probably only drive it from time to time.
    26. Re: Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should be ashamed of *yourself* for a total lack of understanding relating to suicide and the deep well that is depression.

      Get fucking real, as if a degree on your wall makes a goddamn difference when it comes to talking about depression.

      Many people have practical experience with both suicide and depression, and it doesn't have shit to do with what you picked up talking with your professor after class.

    27. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's quite obvious when you read the rest of his feed from that night that he is claiming the police and the apathetic public are the racists. Even in that quote alone, addressed to a reader who presumably doesn't care about brutality when it happens to black people, as most middle-class whites feel. You idiots seem to think any use of the word 'nigger' is an ultimate condemnation, as if the meaning of words is innate to their very letters, instead of being determined in relation to the rest of their contacts. Your motivation for doing so is highly questionable considering that Murdock was beaten by police, twice, and then fucking killed himself in protest against them. If you can only conclude 'racism' from this tragedy, then bad news for you: you're the racist.

    28. Re:Dat's racist by Lord+Kano · · Score: 0

      Again, where is the evidence of racism?

      In the western world, black people do not make up enough of the population to engage in institutional racism.

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    29. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously he is attributing the perception of black people as 'niggers' to the police.

    30. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't say they were racist. I meant that black people are CAPABLE of institutional racism because they control the institutions in some areas. You said it wasn't possible. It doesn't matter if they "make up enough of the population". Do you think the English weren't racist in India even though they made up 0.0001% of the population when they controlled that country via the INSTUTIONS? Idiot.

    31. Re:Dat's racist by bytesex · · Score: 1

      Wait. Is that real? Is that really his twitter account (and not some impersonator, like what happens quite often actually)?

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    32. Re:Dat's racist by mark-t · · Score: 1

      You touch on one right idea, that it can be caused by a hardship that the person does not know how to deal with, but gloss over it by suggesting that this should be considered synonymous with does not *want* to deal with the problem. It is not inconceivable that the hardship at hand has been quite thoroughly rationally analyzed, and living through it, perhaps because it is not so terribly short term at all, simply would make every conscious moment nothing but a burden. Death represents freedom from that. It may be seen as the easy way out, but in some all-too real cases it is the *only* way out. Suicide merely expedites the process.

    33. Re: Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      What if it's a long term state the person committing suicide is reacting to? Say they tracked their desire to be alive on a daily basis for years and it was 80/20 against. Would it be rational then?

    34. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Racists like you need to be stripped of power and your job. I'm reporting you to your employer for your racism.

    35. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7MysRW_YJjA

    36. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't be transblack, that's cultural appropriation.

    37. Re:Dat's racist by Orgasmatron · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Wrong on two counts.

      1) He is not attributing it to the police, but to us, his audience. Or to "the American people" or most broadly speaking, "everyone". His intended scope is not clear here because this clause is written in the passive voice with no explicit owner. "bring attention to this issue" - Whose attention? Dunno.

      2) There is no perception that black people are 'niggers' in this sentence. The perception (our perception) is that police violence isn't important (to us) because it is happening to 'niggers'.

      (Note that I'm not making any claims beyond the meaning of the sentence as written.)

      --
      See that "Preview" button?
    38. Re: Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yeah the difference is you're weaponizing the phrases of racism in order to otherize your opposition while being immune to such claims yourself.

      Not a single person who says racism requires institutions of power is doing so to bring greater specification to a matter saturated in ambiguity, they are, and you are, making the discussion worse by trying to silence your opposition by ad hominem.

      Tell me, what's my moral imperative to oppose ethnic oppression? If you're one of the many morally retarded (and this is a crucial word, for though I am contemptuous of the roots of political correctness I appreciate and support an increase in compassion,) for lack of a better word, not only by literal definition but the visceral connotation accompanying it. The morally retarded who believe in imperatives but have no codified ethos and indeed even explicitly espouse consequentialist ethics while unironically demanding deontological treatments and all the while never establishing the source of their moral authority.

      So what's my moral imperative? If I follow deontology, the ideological roots of these movements are gutted, while if I follow consequentialism I don't have any obligation except to identify what ultimately does the most useful thing for humanity, regardless of how many it maims or kills along the way.

    39. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      'Want' has a lot to do with it, but in many cases, such as crippling illness, wanting to end your life is not considered suicide

      The range of behavior that I was referring to was, I do not want to spend the next 20 years in jail, I do not want to face the consequences of my actions, I do not want to live without my 'name of addiction here'

      There are plenty of examples of people who have survived, even succeeded in each of those cases in the second set, and certainly at least as many who have followed not wanting to deal with it and ending their life with suicide

      It may be quibbling, but in the first case it is euthanasia, in the second suicide

      fwiw, 'Death represents freedom from that' is much more of a statement of belief than of fact

    40. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit.

      That fact that beings like you throw a hissy fit over that word proves it is bull shit.

      To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize. - Voltaire

    41. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not actually advocating that people spew any bigotry or hurtful comments.

      I'm trying to point out that a philosophy that forgives all bad behavior by a group of people "because they cannot be racist" is not based on rational thought.

      Tumblr has always been in la-la land, but just recently it has become a racist and sexist la-la land where wishing death on all white males is an accepted viewpoint.

    42. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing that it's because the police stripped him and then raped him.

      Now in my mind this means they forcefully used a baton and inserted it somewhere a baton should never be inserted.

      This incident is going to explode in a massive way

    43. Re:Dat's racist by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      Ask the people in Rwanda if that's true or not.

    44. Re:Dat's racist by Nutria · · Score: 0

      police misbehavior might be taken more seriously now that a successful white male, rather than black person, was the victim of it.

      Murdock was a relatively anonymous white male who took the coward's way out when faced with police abuse. If he killed himself so as to "raise awareness" of police brutality, then substitute "coward's way out" with "silly fool with grossly overblown delusions of his own self-importance".

      With great certainty, I predict no general outrage over this.

      --
      "I don't know, therefore Aliens" Wafflebox1
    45. Re:Dat's racist by mars-nl · · Score: 1

      Thanks for saying this.

    46. Re:Dat's racist by KGIII · · Score: 2

      No, Black people can have institutionalized racism. Just not in your location. By the way, as I've said before and my hair indicates, I'm part black. If you don't believe that black people can effect institutionalized racism then I'd encourage you to step out of your bubble and visit somewhere that has black people as the majority. South Africa would be a great place to get some experience, perhaps Nigeria, Somalia, Ghana, or Senegal will help you understand it.

      The willful, it can be nothing less, ignorance expressed by some people just astonishes me. Any *people* can be racist, in congregation or individually. They don't even have to be in power to be racist. There's a dictionary available for free and online. I'd suggest using Oxford or M-W. There's a whole host of history and current events reading to be had - you can select your site(s) as you wish but I'd suggest a broad source to ensure you get a better picture as everyone is biased.

      To think that there are no areas with institutionalized racism that elevates black people is absolutely silly. I'm not sure if you're a troll or just haven't actually stepped outside of your bubble so I'm trying, really hard, to give you the benefit of doubt. We'll see, should you choose to respond.

      That said; Does anyone know if there's something to be done to help his family in their time of sorrow? I'm not sure that it is needed but I can toss a few bucks at them.

      On a personal note; I did not find his usage of the word "nigger" to be offensive. It looked, to me, as if it was intended to shock people into noticing that even white people can be subjected to abuses by authorities and that there's no reason to believe you're immune because you are not black. If anything, and this is just from a few prior contacts, I'd expect that he's purposely doing so in order to bring attention to the matter.

      And, in closing, it's disappointing to see the moralizing by the feelings police on the subject of suicide. You have a right to life, the opposite is also be true. One should be able to do so in a dignified manner and not need to resort to methods that may not succeed and may leave one severely handicapped. Because one should have a right to end their own life, I strongly support something known as PAS (Physician Assisted Suicide). Not allowing people to control their life is the ultimate reduction of liberty. Had policies been in place to allow one to peacefully go with minimal pain and with respect then, perhaps, this sort of thing could have gone much better.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    47. Re:Dat's racist by KGIII · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, that's how I read it. However, I spent about an hour catching up and reading a few other things before I felt like I had enough information to actually opine in this thread. I've also had personal interactions with Ian and have found him insightful and intelligent. We never met in person - our communication was via email.

      My reading is that it was an attempt to open the dialogue and things went steadily downhill from there. Well, things were already going downhill at that point. As mentioned above, I'm partially black and not even remotely offended by the word in the way that it was used. Then again, I'm not actually offended by words - only deeds. Words don't offend me one bit, how they're said may.

      Unfortunately, this will be maligned to make all sorts of conclusive statements, probably none of which were the intended statement, and nothing will change. It looked to be a cry for notice - that the police are abusive authoritarians with far more power than they should have. It looked to be an attempt to say, "I'm not even a nigger, it happened to me!" Could it have been better said? I don't know - would it have carried the weight?

      That said, hopefully more and more people will start to get the opportunity to notice. We've got someone up thread who's claiming black people can't be racists, they even claim they can't have institutionalized racism. We've got people claiming that the account was hacked. We've got people thinking that the guy's a racist and are hell bent on social justice. We've got others who are saying that it's about time the stupid fuck learned that niggers were evil. So, I'm pretty sure nothing will happen and that nothing good will come of this.

      It's unfortunate. It is what it is.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    48. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's nothing morally wrong with suicide, historically the religions don't like it because it weakens their hold on the masses (if you can just exit the game instead of being opressed then maybe your god isn't such an all powerful one after all). As a rule you should provide for your dependents though, by setting up a proper trust fund for your children if any, and by ensuring you have a prenuptial agreement before you get married (that makes it easier to choose to die without others laying claim on your actions).

    49. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've commented 7 times on this story, each time trying to show that a man who just committed suicide was a racist.

      What is your agenda? It's sad to see somebody using their +2 moderation bonus to shape the comments in such a malicious direction.

        http://pastebin.com/yk8bgru5

    50. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Until we attribute the problem to the victim being negro or jew, nothing will be done.

      I meant "while" not "until". If a victim is human, that's wrong, period.

      I'm not sure about myself, but I hope Ian gets his well deserved award in a good place, for all the good he started. One thing is one man doing the Right Thing, another much more impressive is gathering his fellow men to also do good.

      Bless him for all the good things stemming from his work... he lived a truly fruitful life!

    51. Re: Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I, as a white person, have zero power from any "patriarchy". Nor do I benefit from institutionalized racism. On the other hand, anyone who is not white or male tends to get a lot of free money and more support for their hardships in life. Hmmmm, so where was that power and privilege again? Certainly not in White America's hands.

    52. Re: Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now why in the world are the "old" people safe from treating people like decent human beings?

      Sure, we're all raised with extra baggage, but as soon as we're 18 years old we are supposed to be responsible for our own actions. Why do old people get a pass?

      Oh...and...how old is "old people"? People over 50? People over 80? Only people in triple digits?

      Your comment makes zero sense.

    53. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Any *people* can be racist, in congregation or individually.

      "Hassen Sie leichter ein Kollektiv oder eine bestimmte Person und hassen Sie lieber allein oder im Kollektiv?" - M. Frisch

    54. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, that's fucked up.

      If you're going to kill yourself because the cops mistreated you or someone else, don't just kill yourself.

      KILL AS MANY COPS AS YOU CAN ON THE WAY OUT.

    55. Re:Dat's racist by mark-t · · Score: 1

      Do you seriously think that 20 years is "short term"?

    56. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ask Nelson Mandela, he spent nearly 30 years in jail and emerged stronger despite a whole lotta people who wanted him dead

    57. Re:Dat's racist by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Machine translation butchers the hell out of that:
      Hate easily a collective or a particular person, and hate you rather be alone or collectively?

      I'm otherwise entirely unfamiliar with it. Do you have a paraphrase or more enlightening translation for me?

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    58. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Murdock was a relatively anonymous white male

      We all knew who he was. *Every* $100K+ IT person in every intelligence agency around the world knew who he was. Fuck everyone else.

    59. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was an excellent choice of wording: provocative in using what is considered a highly negative term to provoke attention to the plight of those it is typically applied to as a detriment.

      The public doesn't listen unless people are provocative. The intelligentsia and left especially, and given Ian's history and importance enough people of standing with ties to them were likely made to pay attention right along with anyone else who ran into his tweet.

      On another note, your reaction as evinced by your statement shows how poor we are literarily. Reminds me of the time a bunch of niggers started slandering someone who had a political position they just didn't like as an "Uncle Tom" when he was the damn nigger who was the hero of the story about enslaved niggers, who sells himself into slavery to keep his own niggers out of slavery.

      You also realize that 'niggers' was only a negative term in America until the morons of America's left started exporting their own expectations and feelings from a history that wasn't comparable elsewhere, right?

      Idiots.

    60. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look everyone! Another Linsux asshat is trying to save the reputation of a racist asshole!!!!
       
      You people fucking floor me. Defending racism in the name of Linux? Jesus fucking Christ. What a bunch of shitheaded assholes. Go fuck yourself you klansman bitch.

    61. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Detroit

    62. Re:Dat's racist by mark-t · · Score: 1

      I make no argument to the morality of it, I only dispute the notion that suicide induced by hardship is necessarily an irrational act.

    63. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It seems you just wanted an excuse to write NIGGER while implying he's the racist one...

    64. Re: Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      False assumption that somehow your n=1 experience represents a majority. Nor does your post address the legacy of institutional racism in the US' recent history.

    65. Re:Dat's racist by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I thought the same thing. You can interpret his use of the word as putting words in the mouth of someone who dismisses the issue of police violence because "well, it's only happening to [insert terms of racial abuse here], so who cares". When you only have 140 characters, that's a very powerful way of putting it.

      --
      sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
    66. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're doing nothing but repeating dogma. Have you tried thinking about what you said?

    67. Re: Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bet you live in the West or North or The Great Canadia.

      I grew up in the south, in a state that is 37% black. There are hundreds of black majority towns all across the south, where black people are the firemen, the teachers, the judges, and the cops.

      I've been hassled and threatened on the streets for being white in the wrong neighborhoods. I've been pulled over by black cops for being a white guy driving through the black side of town because I "must be looking for drugs" - I was taking a coworker home after my shift ended.

      It must be nice to live in your sheltered little lily white world where black people are as rare as unicorns and you can set them up on a pedestal.

      But the rest of us live in actual reality, the one where black people are people are actual, real people in our lives - meaning that they are burdened with the same buckets of prejudices and racism and shitty attitudes and beliefs that every other fucking human being on this planet has.

    68. Re: Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TIL Linux is racist

    69. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was a friend of mine. There is no racist bone in his body. He was in a bad place and thought he was doing the right thing with that comment.

      He was in a really, really bad place.

      Please give him the benefit of the doubt.

    70. Re: Dat's racist by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Bet you live in the West or North or The Great Canadia.

      Pennsylvania.

      It must be nice to live in your sheltered little lily white world where black people are as rare as unicorns and you can set them up on a pedestal.

      No... I'm black. In America.

      But the rest of us live in actual reality, the one where black people are people are actual, real people in our lives - meaning that they are burdened with the same buckets of prejudices and racism and shitty attitudes and beliefs that every other fucking human being on this planet has.

      I have never denied that there are racist black people. My first post on this topic conceded that there are. My point is that there aren't enough black people in this society to engage in institutional racism.

      Yes, an individual cop may hassle you because you're white. His partner may turn and look away because he assumes the worst of you too. Even under the worse of circumstances, you're not going to face two racist black cops who can kill you at will and with impunity because the majority of society will assume that you were a dangerous criminal because of the color of your skin. If they arrest you on a bogus charge, you will not face a prosecutor and judge who are predisposed to assume that you're guilty because of the color of your skin. You're most likely not going to face a jury pool that is made up of people who not only are not members of your racial group but harbor preconceived notions about you based on the color of your skin. The trial will not be covered by news media who make their money by playing to black-held stereotypes about white criminality.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    71. Re:Dat's racist by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      I originally posted this in reply to another comment but it applies to yours as well, so I'll duplicate it here:

      Yes, an individual cop may hassle you because you're white. His partner may turn and look away because he assumes the worst of you too. Even under the worse of circumstances, you're not going to face two racist black cops who can kill you at will and with impunity because the majority of society will assume that you were a dangerous criminal because of the color of your skin. If they arrest you on a bogus charge, you will not face a prosecutor and judge who are predisposed to assume that you're guilty because of the color of your skin. You're most likely not going to face a jury pool that is made up of people who not only are not members of your racial group but harbor preconceived notions about you based on the color of your skin. The trial will not be covered by news media who make their money by playing to black-held stereotypes about white criminality.

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    72. Re: Dat's racist by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Yeah the difference is you're weaponizing the phrases of racism in order to otherize your opposition while being immune to such claims yourself.

      Not a single person who says racism requires institutions of power is doing so to bring greater specification to a matter saturated in ambiguity, they are, and you are, making the discussion worse by trying to silence your opposition by ad hominem.

      That's not what I did, at all. In my original post, I conceded that racism can be present in the behavior and actions of individuals.

      Racism can happen anywhere. Minorities cannot engage in institutional racism.

      So what's my moral imperative?

      That's not for me to determine.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    73. Re:Dat's racist by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      South Africa would be a great place to get some experience, perhaps Nigeria, Somalia, Ghana, or Senegal will help you understand it.

      You raise a valid point. In those places where black people are the overwhelming majority, institutional racism against non-blacks (and even against non-native born blacks) happens.

      In my original post on this subject, I didn't clarify that I was talking about in western society and I should have.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    74. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are very few situations under which I'd condone the use of that word. This is in the grey area.

      Nigger please

    75. Re:Dat's racist by DarkTempes · · Score: 1

      In the case of Murdock we really just don't know enough to make any sort of judgment about his twitter posts.
      We know he was arrested, treated by EMTs, and bailed out of jail.
      We have reports that he was drunk but there is no verification of that.
      We know he died and that's about it. We need more facts to really understand why he died.

      I agree that if he was facing potential jail over the tickets and arrest and killed himself because of that then it's truly an irrational tragedy. I suspect there was a lot more going on.

      With regards to suicide, as someone who has personally experienced severe depression and most of the range of suicide ideation, I can tell you that you are very mistaken. Suicide and suicidal thoughts can be both rational and irrational. Hardship, short or long-term, is not even necessary.

      Thoughts of self-harm can be sporadic irrational desires that sneak up on you unwanted, and unacted on, sort of like a craving for junk food that you ignore.
      These sorts of thoughts, at least in my experience, don't have to be in response to short-term hardship and certainly not because one doesn't want to deal with something. Many medications even warn about giving them to teenagers because they are correlated with an increase in such thoughts.

      My understanding is that they're also the least serious form of suicidal ideation. I'd guess that they're simply a chemistry fuck-up. It's pretty amazing that we're theoretically conscious self-determining beings in a (mostly?) deterministic universe so a few glitches are ok with me.
      Ending your life because of such urges doesn't make any sense and it is truly tragic if anyone dies from that.

      Thoughts of ending your life can also be well-thought out and quite rational. You can end up playing in your head what you think your future will be like, even if you persevere, and seeing only more suffering. Your judgment on the issue might be sound or it might not be

      I haven't personally experienced severe, incurable, chronic pain or a terminal illness so I can't pretend to understand that mental state. I know that most non-religious people would agree that there is nothing wrong with ending your life with dignity in the face of terminal illness.
      I suspect that the U.S. hospice system has a lot of "dirty" little practical secrets where overdoses are given to ease suffering and speed up dying -- which would not be politically acceptable by the religious masses.

      I can say that I have dealt with illness and lifestyle changes that ended up with me taking both a very irrational/emotional and rational look at the new path of my life and if taking it was acceptable to me.

      First, rationally, life has no meaning and is pointless (unless you irrationally believe in religion.) The obvious purpose of the state of life might be existence but almost certainly nothing you do will matter and in a few billion years humanity won't exist anymore. As the saying goes: life's a bitch and then you die.

      That said, one sometimes has to find or give their own meaning to life. I personally think the meaning of life is to enjoy yourself (and before you think that's selfish -- I find joy in others finding joy.)

      In the absence of ability to do that either due to environment or emotional state then suicide can certainly seem like the rational choice.

      I think the strongest rational argument against suicide is that, statistically, one probably enjoyed life at some point and thus continued existence holds the chance of enjoying life again. Hell, even people with terminal illnesses sometimes survive.

      Lastly, it's really hard to talk about suicide in our society because of how it's reacted to by authorities. People get angry at those who commit suicide, frequently calling the deceased selfish, and asking why the person didn't just talk to them.
      Well, if you talk to someone and then they go behind your back to the authorities because they don't agree with you, you can end up losing (at least in the short term) your right to self-

    76. Re:Dat's racist by juanfgs · · Score: 1

      I thought the same but good luck trying to explain that to a crowd.

      RIP Ian

    77. Re: Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, what part of "majority black town with black cops and judges" - which also implies majority black judges - do you have trouble understanding?

    78. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I suppose the fact that both his Twitter account, as well as the post linked to in this very article have both gone missing are just coincidence, not indicative that Debian was about to be embarrassed by the racist ramblings of their mentally ill founder? Hell, the poster above you had to link to a cached copy of his remarks because, like I said, the account has mysteriously vanished along with the "mourning Ian Murdoch" article.

      Try and talk your way out of it all you want, try to rationalize it all you want, but the way I see it the world just lost one racist fuck. I don't think that's a bad thing and apparently the Debian folks don't either.

    79. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the way you see it and fortunately that only indicates how terrible person *you* are.

    80. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your friend was a violent, racist drunk.

      Truth hurts almost as much as the fact he killed himself to _prove_ how racist he was, doesn't it? "NIGGER" was one of his last, parting words to the world. Now his bones are destined for a box where he won't have any opportunity to spew hatred again. Ever.

      Good fucking riddance.

    81. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What could be the greater good that you rationally choose to sacrifice your life for? When you're dead you have nothing else left. So suicide is irrational in itself.

    82. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you prefer to hate a group or an individual, and do you prefer to hate as a group or an individual?

    83. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Liberia's citizenship law is not institutional racism?

    84. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the matter Orgasmatron, afraid to back your opinions up with your actual account? I'd make one myself but hey, this is Slashdot. It's full of losers in denial like you, I'd rather not be associated with trash.

      Hey, maybe I'm a terrible person but at least I'm not a dead, racist fuck. Keep up the passive aggressive act though, Jizzmachine. It's fucking hilarious. Ooh, I'm a terrible person, however will I get through the day knowing that some low ID luser on Slashdot thinks less of me?

      Ian Murdoch was a racist. Ian Murdoch is now a dead racist. "Fortunately that indicates" the world is a bit of a better place today. Benefit of the doubt my ass, Murdoch just made himself a martyr to his own, racist cause and you have so much trouble believing it, you have so much trouble believing that your beloved friend was in reality the sort of frothing-mouthed racist that the Stormfront folks would be embarrassed of, that you're trying to rationalize it any way you can. It won't work. Unfortunately, despite having erased his Twitter account, you can't erase these:

      http://webcache.googleusercont...

      Truth hurts, doesn't it Orgasmatron? Pour yourself up a drink and try to forget, hopefully it won't work out for you the same way it did for Murdoch.

    85. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Max Frisch was a Swiss writer. This is from his questionnaire (1967):

      14. Which do you find it easier to hate, a group or an individual? And do you prefer to hate individually or as part of a group?

    86. Re:Dat's racist by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Not the above AC nor do I really get the point they were trying to make; but here's a translation:

      Do you more easily hate a collective or a particular person and do you prefer to hate alone or in a collective?

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    87. Re: Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe they are actually more likely to be violent criminals. You know, like every fucking crime statistic tracked in the western world shows?

      You're a fucking racist and a liar.

    88. Re:Dat's racist by KGIII · · Score: 1

      Thanks to you - and the others, for responding. I was awfully confused.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    89. Re:Dat's racist by Orgasmatron · · Score: 1

      When you sober up, please explain what you were trying to say here. It may help to read what I wrote, and the post to which I was replying, too.

      P.S. I'm posting on my actual account. Between my 4 digit user ID and the quality of your post, it is entirely possible that I've been posting here since before you were born.

      --
      See that "Preview" button?
    90. Re:Dat's racist by Orgasmatron · · Score: 1

      Wait, sorry, I figured it out. You weren't replying to me, but to an anonymous post that you thought was from me.

      I'm not posting anonymous in this thread. I didn't know Ian, never met him, don't really know anything about him except what I've heard anecdotally. (Patrick Volkerding has a story about him, from back when Debian was just an idea.)

      For all I know he was a raging racist, but I haven't seen any evidence to suggest that. I reject the notion that using the word "nigger" automatically makes a person a racist, and I've already posted my analysis of the sentence in question.

      --
      See that "Preview" button?
    91. Re: Dat's racist by LesFerg · · Score: 1

      You would have to judge how old is too old, by meeting some of the racist old bastards who unfortunately have too much influence on others around them. I was not excusing them by any means, simply stating that, in my opinion, the older people are, the less likely they will be to change the attitudes that have been ingrained in them by their family or peers all of their lives.

      --
      If I had a DeLorean... I would probably only drive it from time to time.
    92. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not a very good liar, Orgasmatron. You're not particularly smart either.

      Keep checking that anonymous posting box coward. A coward like your friend Murdock. Your dead, racist friend.

    93. Re:Dat's racist by niftymitch · · Score: 1

      Wrong on two counts.

      1) He is not attributing it to the police, but to .................

      Not clearly correct on many counts.
      The most disturbing is that: mind set, policies and procedures work hard to remove
      any testimony except that of trained story tellers in blue. This process of content
      editing begins in police academies where reporting is taught. University writing
      is full of flaws to the point that a thesis review committee is held to sort it out.
      Department heads educated with MS and PhDs will aspire to a review board in
      kind.

      Other story tellers have their cameras damaged and stolen. Digital and
      undeveloped film records are deleted, altered or lost. Reports are edited and
      reviewed for internal consistency. Reports written with the likes of Word shall
      have revision history enabled by the records system in addition to the lame
      history mechanism in Word itself. Safety barriers are erected so far from the action
      that no third party will have access. Remote cameras get run over or knocked down
      or stolen.

      The single largest problem is the code of silence on both sides.

      Juries are led to believe that an airtight case should be expected and that
      invites parallel reconstruction from well controlled sources. A big hint that
      there is reasonable doubt is a total lack of loose strings. Especially if much
      of the evidence is digital.

      Twenty years plus ago an animator then at ILM commented that the days of
      video evidence being incontrovertible were passed with the foot note
      that it was currently expensive but that would change.

      Editing equipment in the presence of law enforcement is problematic.
      At no time should edited material be entered into evidence without the
      original. Evidence lockers lack facilities for storage of digital content
      including pass word management.

      --
      Truth is stranger than fiction, but it is because Fiction is obliged to stick to possibilities; Truth isn't. Mark Twain.
    94. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think suicide is very often a logical decision, but rarely a rational one. I think some people here might be confusing the terms for one another.

      There are certainly rational and logical reasons for wanting to end ones own life though. Everyone's minds conjure up different imagery when they hear about suicide, so these kinds of misunderstandings are bound to happen. It's bad when people refuse to see a valid point when it contradicts with their simple truths though. Happens to me all the time. -.-

    95. Re:Dat's racist by Orgasmatron · · Score: 1

      LOL. Are you sure you understand how the "Post Anonymously" box works?

      --
      See that "Preview" button?
    96. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes I do. Feel free to make silly remarks about age making you superior in some way, however, all it tells me is that all things being equal, you're closer to being dead than I am. Good for you. Good for everyone really, people who sympathize with racists are no better than the racists themselves.

      Speaking of being dead, Ian's still a corpse by the way. Just thought I'd remind you. A racist, rotting corpse.

      Bonus. Feel free to make another witty retort like "LOL," if it makes you feel better about your impotence.

    97. Re: Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, ever heard of apartheid?

    98. Re: Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be careful brother. This forum is heavily surveiled. Anonymity is an illusion.

    99. Re:Dat's racist by Orgasmatron · · Score: 1

      I have this mental picture of you cursing at me from your mom's basement. You should probably get out more if you think I'm being witty. Ask her if she can drop you off at the mall.

      --
      See that "Preview" button?
    100. Re:Dat's racist by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      Don't try explaining anything to a crowd in units of 140 characters. Twitter might be quick and easy, but it is a fucking stupid idea for anything more complex than "I'm pissssed. Summmun gemmme uh taxi"

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    101. Re:Dat's racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You either cannot read, are stupid or simply hated Ian. There's no other explanation for the non-sense that you're writing.

  3. 42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Spy+Handler · · Score: 1

    In this day and age, it's highly unusual for healthy 42 year olds to die all of a sudden. TFA says nothing about how he died, just that he died.

    Car accident, drug overdose, heart attack, or ???

    1. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Car accident, drug overdose, heart attack, or ???

      ??? = none of your business?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by bluegutang · · Score: 4, Informative
    3. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by HarrySquatter · · Score: 0

      He committed suicide after going mentally unhinged on Twitter.

    4. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by HarrySquatter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How is it non of their business? The dude was threatening suicide on Twitter. That hardly is a bastion of privacy.

    5. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      he was threatening suicide yesterday... apparently it wasnt a hoax.

    6. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Anti systemd assassins, no other explanation.

    7. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      In this day and age, it's highly unusual for healthy 42 year olds to die all of a sudden. TFA says nothing about how he died, just that he died.

      Car accident, drug overdose, heart attack, or ???

      Suicide

    8. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      The police most certainly know, or at least have 2 plausible theories, but I think its up to the family whether anything is actually publicly acknowledged.

    9. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by rubycodez · · Score: 3, Informative

      what? biggest demographic for suicide is white males 35-64, and since 1999 up 30+ percent

      over police brutality he says, hmmm maybe some other things and this plus some substance abuse was trigger

    10. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How is it non of their business? The dude was threatening suicide on Twitter. That hardly is a bastion of privacy.

      His family is asking for it now and there's no reason not to honor that. It changes nothing and gives them the space they need and deserve.

    11. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I hear is that he had an episode and the police turned up.
      The police turned up and he "mysteriously died".

      I don't know if his suicide was successful but at this point I'd start looking for barb puncture marks, burn marks, or indications of blunt force trauma.

    12. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > He committed suicide after going mentally unhinged on Twitter.

      Yea, Twitter will do that to you :P

    13. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by ArmoredDragon · · Score: 3, Funny

      My theory is Hans Reiser.

    14. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      All indications are that it was a suicide. He even announced on Twitter that he would be committing suicide.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    15. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2

      His family asked for privacy. People are trying to give it to them.

      That said, there's a The Register Article that implies some erratic mental state. All the more reason to not pry and not guess. They're having a very hard time. Our best tribute to what Ian has done is not to make his family worse off.

    16. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by IMightB · · Score: 2

      It looks like He blamed it on Police Brutality. Some sort of incident happened where he claims(ed) he was beaten by the police badly enough to go to the hospital, got home, was assaulted again by police.

      http://pastebin.com/yk8bgru5

    17. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      He committed suicide after being beaten up by police (requiring hospitalization as a result) and then charged with assaulting a police officer. I'm not sure where "going mentally unhinged on Twitter" comes from, but his last tweets were angry, not unhinged.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    18. Re: 42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by cyber-vandal · · Score: 1, Insightful

      SJWs are very obnoxious when I point out that white men have problems too. They don't want to include us in their "equality" conversations unless we're abasing ourselves for existing. This is part of the reason why President Trump is a possibility.

    19. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There's every reason not to honor it: it was the last wish of the deceased that we use his death as a springboard to discuss issues that the was, at least at the end, very passionate about. Fuck the family. Fuck their discomfort with the topic being cause to cover up the reason behind this man's death. He had his own values and wishes, and they should be respected; not whitewashed to make a few soon-wealthy beneficiaries a little more comfortable.

    20. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by adolf · · Score: 1

      The Reiser Uncertainty Theorem.

    21. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When they don't say - you don't have to ask, it's suicide.

    22. Re: 42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is what I hear from your comment - 'wah wah wah'

    23. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or an overdose.

    24. Re: 42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by cyber-vandal · · Score: 0

      Your lack of empathy Is very sad.

    25. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      If what he says was true, that the police followed him home from the hospital to beat him up again, I think they just straight up murdered him.

    26. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was raped to death by a butch lesbian police officer, this much is quite obvious.

    27. Re: 42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      no long term worries, the typical SJW is tumblr femi-nazi who won't reproduce. their kind is going to be Darwined out of existence in one generation

    28. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by jbolden · · Score: 1

      FWIW Ian was anti-systemd so it would have been pro-systemd assassins if it wasn't the police.

    29. Re: 42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your social justice filth movement is nothing but a giant bitch-fest

      I have never seen so many failures blame others for their weakness.

      Hell, if MLK were alive today he'd probably condone a bullet in the head of a SJW.

      SJWs are a bunch of losers trying to target individuals for their intellectual impotence.

      Hint losers: the ones who matter in what's wrong with society don't give a flying fuck about your neo-feminism "white men cause all bad things". It's a shell game and you idiots are too busy licking each other's cis-gendered clits to know.

      A good start to ending climate change is voting all SJWs off the planet.

    30. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      "systemd is roko's basilisk" --wonkey_monkey

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    31. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

    32. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      quit being a fuck-tard. Just because you don't want to use one tool over here right now for some purpose doesn't mean you are against the tool. For fuck's sake.

    33. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Most likely, yes, and the fine blurb does a disservice in stating "passed away". Certain euphemisms are just out of place.

    34. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If his family don't want us to focus on the circumstances of Ian's passing, we can focus instead on how they (his family) obviously failed at addressing his obvious call for help.

    35. Re: 42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, you would never sink so low as to politicise someone's death.

    36. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Lakitu · · Score: 2

      No, there is every reason to honor their wishes. His family presumably wants privacy because they don't want to see anyone's memory of him be tarnished, and most likely that's because he obviously committed suicide in a non-suspicious manner after having some kind of mental breakdown. Which may have been the culmination of some kind of ongoing series of mental breakdowns that they'd rather not have him be remembered by.

      The guy threatened suicide, and ranted about the police, and then stated that "my career is over now, so I'll be gone soon". It's fucking idiotic to suggest that the family is in on a police coverup of his murder or whatever the fuck crazy ideas people are having all because they might inherit some dollars, or that they're threatened, or that they just feel so terrible about him being murdered that they don't want to ever think about it again.

      The guy's last wish was to kill himself. I wish it hadn't happened, because he did a hell of a lot for Linux. Doing a little bit for his wife and kids and family in return is the least anyone could do. Go fuck yourself if you're some kind of conspiratorial moron who would use his name to feed your fantasies without a SINGLE piece of evidence otherwise.

    37. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Lakitu · · Score: 1

      I'd say it was pretty unhinged. He threatened to kill himself because he thought his career was over, which he presumably thought was because of a bogus arrest?

    38. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or rectal trauma.

    39. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by gerald.edward.butler · · Score: 1

      Or maybe, he died of a brain bleed or brain swelling brought on by being roughed up my the cops. Or maybe, the cops went to his house and put him out of their misery to shut him up There are lots of possibilities. Everyone should demand a thorough investigation by an independent (from the SFPD) investigator.

    40. Re: 42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by gerald.edward.butler · · Score: 1

      This is what I hear from your comment, "...."....never mnind, I'm not free to speak my mind without the threat of persecution.

    41. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      He didn't "threaten" anything. And believing your career is over in the fact of criminal charges that can lead to imprisonment if successfully prosecuted is fairly normal. You think assaulting an officer is a trivial crime?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    42. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck the family.

      Wow, that's low even by Slashdot's standards.

    43. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no reason to honor the wishes of the family. Relatives don't own a dead person. If they want "space" they can just remain silent. Hushing up the truth is always dangerous. From what I gather, he killed himself in a psychotic episode that also caused (and/or was triggered by) an altercation with police.

    44. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bah, he tried to open source his death, that's what we should respect. Nobody is suggesting his family murdered him. But they're trying to delete the record of what he went through in his last days, which is just wrong.

    45. Re: 42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Along with all the faggot-ass ruby coderzzzz.

    46. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, he probably assaulted an officer's fist with his face. A very serious crime in any police-state. The officers also have a right to feel pissed that they cannot execute him now as he has taken that away from them.

    47. Re: 42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by gweihir · · Score: 2

      Everybody has problems. Everybody deserves consideration form them. SJWs are just the ultimate in racism, sexism, etc. and are at heart fascists that want to humiliate and destroy everybody except their chosen group "victims". A force of evil and destruction to be sure.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    48. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Lakitu · · Score: 1

      He threatened to kill himself. And then he threatened to kill himself again because his "career was over".

      While successful criminal charges may be life-changing, they are not automatically an end to your career, especially not a unique and special one as Mr. Murdock had. His career was one which he created for himself, which he was the main driving force of, and which was based on his accomplishments and reputation in the Linux and Open Source communities where it was basically unassailable, as should be obvious from a lot of the replies about his death.

      There's a drastic leap of logic here needed to believe any of this to be true.

      You think assaulting an officer is a trivial crime?

      Well, instead of just emotionally asserting "facts", as you seem to want to do, let's take a look and see how serious it is. A quick google search reveals that:

      Battery on a peace / police officer is typically a misdemeanor in California law. The potential penalties are up to one (1) year in county jail, and/or a fine of up to two thousand dollars ($2,000).4

      But if the battery causes an injury requiring medical treatment, then this crime becomes a wobbler (that is, a crime that may be charged as a misdemeanor or a California felony).

      If it is charged as a felony, battery on a peace officer carries a potential sentence of sixteen (16) months, two (2) or three (3) years in county jail, and/or a fine of up to ten thousand dollars ($10,000).5

      Seeing as no police required medical treatment, and that the description of his arrest(s) and treatment don't seem to be out of the ordinary, he wasn't likely to be charged with a felony and wasn't likely to see jailtime. Considering he was in good standing with the community and had no prior arrests (?), he was probably going to receive IF FOUND GUILTY some combination of probation, fines, community service, or mental health treatment. Do you consider that to be "serious"? Or worth taking your life over?

      The entire argument against this being anything other than a tragic suicide rests on making up "facts" and emotionally appealing to the state being able to do anything it wants, with the proof being the same thing as the question in the first place: that they just murdered Ian Murdock and are conspiring with his family members to cover it up.

      I'm going to go with option (b) here, which is that his family desires privacy because he tragically took his own life in a way that never needed to happen and they don't want to drag his name through the mud. His family has more reasons than anybody to pursue the truth here.

    49. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Lakitu · · Score: 1

      Or maybe, he died of a brain bleed or brain swelling brought on by being roughed up my the cops. Or maybe, the cops went to his house and put him out of their misery to shut him up There are lots of possibilities. Everyone should demand a thorough investigation by an independent (from the SFPD) investigator.

      It's possible, sure. But you're 100% wrong that "everyone" should demand a thorough investigation. Everyone should be following the wishes of his family here, whether that be them demanding a thorough investigation or whether it means they want to remember him as the good, productive, inspiring man that he was for decades before his suicide.

      His family has more reason to see this investigated than anyone, so if they are content in believing it was an unsuspicious suicide, which is what it sounds like, then you probably should be too.

      reply to AC below:

      Nobody is suggesting his family murdered him.

      People are suggesting that his family is partaking in the cover up by not demanding an investigation and "whitewashing" the announcements of his death. To suggest that they would do this for anything other than benign reasons absolutely is suggesting that they were involved in, complicit with, or are helping to cover up his murder. It's insane and incredibly disrespectful both to him and to his family.

    50. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GNU/Linux was the trigger. Developers and users alike have higher suicide rates for many reasons ranging from feeling alienated to looking at ugly fonts all day long.

    51. Re: 42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SJWs had nothing to do with this. He tried to break into the same apartment twice and resisted arrest. You are the one with the victim complex gweihir.

    52. Re: 42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by gweihir · · Score: 1

      If you had any actual intelligence, you would have noticed that I commented on SJWs and not on the case at hand. But I guess that distinction flies right over your head, despite being glaringly obvious.

      --
      Most ACs are not even worth the keystrokes to insult them. Be generically insulted by this and ignored otherwise.
    53. Re:42 year old dies and nobody asks why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is ok to have privacy for family. No one ask them anything, but ian is a public person, many of us want to know why he did this. Also familiy relations can be complex. I don't think he would have died if his family was close to him and supported him. He was alone, everyone was busy or don't even care him.

  4. Did he commit suicide? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are reports elsewhere that he tweeted about being beaten up by police and threatened suicide and was going to blog about what happened.

    1. Re:Did he commit suicide? by HarrySquatter · · Score: 2

      Yeah he did:

      Maybe my suicide at this, you now, a successful business man, not a NIGGER, will finally bring some attention to this very serious issue.

    2. Re:Did he commit suicide? by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      Others have already pointed out that said message is posted with a domain name that isn't known to be associated to him and is designed to look like it is his normal domain (imurdock versus ianmurdock) and which doesn't match any of his previous twitter posts.

      This makes the messages entirely of suspicious origin.

  5. Apt-get tears by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    make tears

  6. Circumstances surrounding his death disturbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    I know it's considered inappropriate to speculate on the death of Mr. Murdock but the circumstances surrounding his sad demise was extremely disturbing.

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10803924
    https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/3yktcg/ian_murdock_debian_founder_is_threatening_suicide/

    If there's anything we could reconstruct out of the fragments, he probably suffered torture at the hand of police.

    It's inappropriate to speculate at this moment of sadness, but it's only fair to ask why. If that's what happened, it could happen to all of us.

    1. Re:Circumstances surrounding his death disturbing by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      wouldn't a successful businessman with money normally go round up the lawyers normally and stay out of town and retaliate from the outside. unless he went on a bender right after and never sobered up, going into depression spiral

    2. Re:Circumstances surrounding his death disturbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That depends. Seems like fucking up a white boy is the only thing that cops get held responsible for, even if it takes years.

      You can't tell the cop you're going to do that, otherwise in a few minutes you will be committing "suicide" with two shotgun shells to the back.

    3. Re:Circumstances surrounding his death disturbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He went online after his "interaction" with the police and posted that he was going to spend the rest of his life fighting police brutality.

      Mission accomplished.

    4. Re:Circumstances surrounding his death disturbing by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If there's anything we could reconstruct out of the fragments, he probably suffered torture at the hand of police.

      I think about the most we can say right now is that he probably wasn't in a rational state of mind.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    5. Re:Circumstances surrounding his death disturbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      This does not look like your traditional suicide: http://webcache.googleusercont...
      Some choice quotes from his twitter timeline the day before he died:
      • * This was right after the female officer ripped off my underwear.. I guess that's not considered rape if you're not a woman being raped.
      • * The rest of my life is to fight against the police.. they are NOT friends, so don't ever ever believe otherwise.
      • * then followed my home from there
      • * then they pulled me out of my house and did it again

      This is not your average suicide note.

    6. Re:Circumstances surrounding his death disturbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think about the most we can say right now is that he probably wasn't in a rational state of mind.

      Most people cling to the belief that life has some sort of purpose. But different people come to believe in vastly different purposes.

      Some people say that the purpose of life is to do as much as you can for yourself (to be as selfish as possible) while people say that the purpose of life is to do as much as possible for others (to be as generous as possible). Some people say that the purpose of life is to change the world, and perhaps also to be remembered forever, other people sat that the purpose of life is to have as little impact on the world as possible, leaving only some scattered ashes and the memories of a few close friends. Some people say that the purpose of life if to live it to the fullest (to be as busy as possible) while other people say that the purpose of life is to be relaxed and peaceful (to do as little as possible). Some people say that the purpose of life is to have as many children as possible while other people say that the purpose is to not have any children at all. And then there's the whole religion / culture thing layered on top of all the underlying complexity and confusion.

      So what if life doesn't actually have a purpose? What if the truth is that a lot of people have more pain than pleasure in their lives - and there's no purpose to it? What if, for many people, the rational conclusion is, in fact, that life really isn't worth living?

      Now, for those of us who are alive, we typically have strong emotional attachments and would be very sad if other people were to die. So, from a purely selfish perspective, we don't want the people we like to conclude that life isn't worth living and go off and kill themselves. It's a difficult situation: life is hard but if we end it then we hurt the people we care about. It's unfortunate that there isn't the option to get on a time-machine phone and call up our parents and tell them to use protection - that we would prefer not to be born at all.

      There is immense horrible suffering in the world. Somewhere around 20,000 children a day die of poverty. But then the "rational" view is that life is good and makes sense and whatever happens must, somehow, be happening for a reason. I understand that most people can't bring themselves to acknowledge the true horror of human existence. But it does seem to add insult to injury to accuse people who do see the true horror of human existence simply being crazy.

    7. Re:Circumstances surrounding his death disturbing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was a good verbose answer, but you didn't seem to catch a much simpler angle. Sometimes when your enemies are too powerful, suicide is the option that involves the least suffering. I'm one of those people crazy enough to assume that the NSA must have had extra 24/7 visibility into his life. I doubt I'll ever remotely understand and believe what really happened. Look at where we are with Snowden's revelations years after the fact.

    8. Re:Circumstances surrounding his death disturbing by Lakitu · · Score: 1

      he probably suffered torture at the hand of police.

      Torture? He didn't even suggest that. It sounds like he was arrested against his will. He suggested that the arrest was unnecessary or illegal, not that there was torture.

      It's certainly fair to ask why, but presumably his family has done that or feels it is unnecessary because the why is already obvious. I'd rather not see his decades of effort bettering society being minimized if he had some kind of substance abuse or emotional issues and ended up taking his own life.

    9. Re:Circumstances surrounding his death disturbing by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Sometimes when your enemies are too powerful, suicide is the option that involves the least suffering.

      And sometimes people just go crazy.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  7. Re: Died? Just restart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Just how fucked up are you anti systemd people to take Murdocks death as an opportunity to spread your ideas?

    Murdock had nothing, nothing to do with systemd what so ever.

  8. Rest In Peace by LocutusOfBorg1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Goodbye from a Debian Developer. Thanks for all the fish

    1. Re:Rest In Peace by godrik · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just a Debian user. But thanks Ian. That's a great thing you did with Debian!

      So long. And thank you for the fish.

    2. Re:Rest In Peace by unixisc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      RIP, Ian

      Thanks. This is the first decent post I read on this thread about someone's death. Everybody before this just trolled about either racism, or the circumstances of his death. Can't people be more civilized in paying homage to him, regardless of what they think regarding Debian, systemd, Wayland or anything else?

    3. Re:Rest In Peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a soulless piece of shit. I pity your mother.

    4. Re:Rest In Peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a time for sympathy to be sure, but how many people in the community simply assumed he was hacked or ignored what happened? I know I assumed it was a hack, but I didn't know him and I have no connections to the Debian community.

      It is just shocking to watch something like this happen over the course of several hours where nobody acts. This should go down in psychology textbooks as an example of the dangers of mob mentality.

      Forgive the other posters for being a little more callous in addressing that reality.

    5. Re:Rest In Peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On your watch, you created Debian, which I had used a lot. Debian has since strayed, but that discussion is for another time. From a Buddhist, I wish you a good rebirth.

      Thank you for your work & my prayers are with you and your family.

      GreekGeek.

    6. Re:Rest In Peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As bad as dependency hell was in the early stages of Debian it was still so much better than the dependency hell that came before it.

    7. Re:Rest In Peace by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2

      RIP, Ian Murdoch from an Ubuntu user. Thanks for the father of my fish.

      --
      Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
    8. Re:Rest In Peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Explain to me why I should pay homage to a violent, delusional racist who just killed himself in order to try and drive home...how violently racist he was.

      Incidentally, not only is his Twitter account gone, the article "mourning" his passing on Debian's own page has been deleted as well. Even they are embarrassed by Fearless Leader's behaviour, even they don't want to be associated with him.

      I refuse to pay homage to one of the racist lunatics that are destroying this country. Good riddance.

    9. Re:Rest In Peace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Goodbye, Ian. Debian made a huge mark on the Linux world, and the world in general. His impact won't be forgotten.

  9. Note to self by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Note to self:

    Never, never give up after torture, abuse or rape. Few can send a real signal by killing himself. Suicide destroys the meaning of one's suffering.

    Live to the end. Live and fight the injustice. Live and tell the truth.

    1. Re:Note to self by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Mental illness is a terrible thing. The torture he endured almost certainly originated in his own troubled mind. He couldn't fight it.

    2. Re:Note to self by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for this post. I NEVER reply to AC's but today is different. These are some of the wisest words in this post. Carry on.

    3. Re:Note to self by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mental illness is a terrible thing. The torture he endured almost certainly originated in his own troubled mind. He couldn't fight it.

      This is Slashdot. Even amongst the decay and rot, that kind of stupid spin won't fly here. Ian Murdock was as important to Cyber Security as Edward Snowden. If anyone at the god damn NSA had had Snowden's initiative a decade sooner, it's possible many people like Ian would have wisely stayed the hell away from things that the god damned NSA takes so very fucking seriously.

    4. Re:Note to self by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because someone commits suicide doesn't mean they had a mental illness.

    5. Re:Note to self by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I don't understand is why people who suicide because of abuse or injustice, don't turn their anger toward the abuser first. Why didn't he try to attack the cop who harassed him and get revenge; possibly leading to suicide by cop too, but at least his message would be even more clear and a bit of justice would be served against the abusive "thugs with a badge".

    6. Re:Note to self by rahvin112 · · Score: 2

      You might never give up but you will surrender to torture. Everyone does.

      The soldiers tortured during Vietnam without exception gave the Vietnamese torturers what they were asking for. They also gave them a pound of garbage for every real thing they gave them, because that's what torture does, forces the torturee to provide invalid and garbage intelligence to make the torture stop and it's the reason there is little to no point in doing it.

      There is no dishonor is surrendering to torture or other forms of abuse.

    7. Re:Note to self by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You might never give up but you will surrender to torture. Everyone does."

      Bullshit.

    8. Re:Note to self by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Because we live in a society filled with propaganda telling people that anyone who takes such actions is a bad person and not worth listening to - the majority of people either believe that or believe that the majority of people believe that so the net effect is nill.

  10. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by greenfruitsalad · · Score: 5, Interesting

    i remember him as a genuinely nice guy. 15ish years ago, when i was a naive youngster just starting with gnu/linux (progeny linux), i often got stuck on pretty basic stuff. one day i simply emailed him and asked these absolutely beginner's questions about partitioning and debian installer. he, the legendary debian founder, took his time and patiently explained things to me. we exchanged over 50 emails that year. i wish i still had that mbox file. we kept in touch until he started working for sun.

  11. RIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your uptime was shorter than normal, but you were a master of creation and you served the community well.

    1. Re:RIP by Max+Sinister · · Score: 1

      RIP, Ian.

    2. Re:RIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He wasn't that old.

    3. Re:RIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Connection reset by peer.

    4. Re:RIP by rewindustry · · Score: 1

      this one, on a t-shirt.
      thank you.

  12. Something is very fishy by tloh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The bizarre nature of those last tweets and the fact that the attached email domain on those was imurdock.com rather than his actual website which is ianmurdock.com makes this situation very suspicious. I hope more information is release soon as it seems highly likely foul play is involved.

    --
    Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
    1. Re:Something is very fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was he murdered?

    2. Re:Something is very fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is little information from anywhere other than the tweets, which do appear completely out-of-left-field. Won't stop everyone from speculating wildly though.

    3. Re:Something is very fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention he was hospitalized by a police officer that wanted Ian dead.

      The SFPD has a known track record, proven numerous times, of stealing personal property, fraud, murder, rape, and every computer related crime on the books.

      Let me guess, the SFPD claims suicide from 8 bullet wounds in the back of the head. Funny that.

      I have no doubt in my mind it was the murderer/rapist cop that stole Ian's cell phone while he lay bleeding unconscious on the street, and specifically made both tweets.

      Once the cop makes it look like Ian was threatening suicide, they have legal justification for locking him away in prison for the rest of his life, under no criminal charges so no courts or release dates involved, and so they can invoke asset forfeiture and steal the rest of his worldly possessions.

      Make no mistake, this was yet another murder at the hands of a petty vindictive criminally insane police officer of the SFPD.

    4. Re:Something is very fishy by Drakster · · Score: 3, Informative
    5. Re:Something is very fishy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was waiting for that.

    6. Re:Something is very fishy by SkunkPussy · · Score: 1

      Ian Murdock, of course, being different to Ian Jackson,

      --
      SURELY NOT!!!!!
    7. Re:Something is very fishy by tloh · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. Still, there is so much that doesn't make sense. There is talk of mental illness being involved. The family has asked that people respect their privacy. But doesn't appear to be any indication that Ian has been unwell recently... has there?

      --
      Stay sentient. Don't drink bad milk.
  13. This is what mental illness looks like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    and I am ashamed to live in a society where there was no one around to help him find a better way through this.

    1. Re:This is what mental illness looks like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read his racist crap on Twitter?

      No. Please point to any if there is.
      NB: just using the word 'nigger' doesn't make a statement racist.

      No, he was just a racist asshole. [snip] Good riddance.

      I just realized I got trolled. Posting this anyways, if it helps others notice the reverse propaganda :(

    2. Re:This is what mental illness looks like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's people like you that spark the need for a fascist state where we can take you and your thug kind and exterminate them for bio fuel.

      The streets will be cleansed with the blood of thugs and their SJW defenders. Your like will be the first against the wall.

      Yours in disgust,
      Wolf Bearclaw Hitler II

    3. Re:This is what mental illness looks like... by Fwipp · · Score: 0, Troll

      NB: just using the word 'nigger' doesn't make a statement racist.

      Yeah, it does.

    4. Re: This is what mental illness looks like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it doesn't.

      Richard Pryor's "That Nigger's Crazy" is a funny record. So is "Bicentennial Nigger."

    5. Re:This is what mental illness looks like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and I am ashamed to live in a society where there was no one around to help him find a better way through this.

      I would be sad to live in a society where "society" took it upon itself to make sure "someone" was always around me, in case society thinks I need help finding a "better way." That's pretty silly and unrealistic.

      That's not to say that "society" doesn't or shouldn't have a role in suicide prevention, but that role isn't to never leave people alone.

      Family and friends are the first line of support for potential suiciders, but sometimes the mental health decline of a person is so sudden that an incident is virtually unavoidable.

    6. Re:This is what mental illness looks like... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think he want to die. I want to someone come to him and see him. But no one did..

  14. Re:Systemd's first victim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, because who would believe that Ian would have the cops called on him for physically threatening his neighbors and then be roughed up when he became belligerent to the police?

  15. Thank You, Ian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am very, very sad to hear this news. Debian GNU/Linux has brought much joy to my life. Thank You and Rest in Peace, Ian Murdock.
    -drew (@pdp7)

    1. Re:Thank You, Ian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I am very, very sad to hear this news. Debian GNU/Linux has brought much joy to my life. Thank You and Rest in Peace, Ian Murdock.
      -drew (@pdp7)

      This. Thanks, drew, for posting a little sanity here. RIP, Ian.

  16. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His tweet seems to say that "police brutality is so rampant that it can even hurt educated whites", with the use of the N-word indicating the view he thinks police take of African Americans. Given the political climate right now, that's stupid, but doesn't necessarily show he's racist.

    Of course, we don't know the background. It sounds like he may have had a mental problem. If so, that may be the reason the police hassled him in the first place, and then led him to suicide.

  17. Re:So, what happened? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Too soon!

  18. schizophrenia likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    It sounds to me like he was clinically schizophrenic and went off his medication. That would explain why he interacted with police (odd behavior in public), was restrained and then released, why the tone of his Twitter messages changed abruptly, and why he subsequently committed suicide (schizophrenics are at high risk for suicide).

    1. Re:schizophrenia likely by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are going to be as 'specific' as 'schizophrenia', at least do fill in more details about 'odd behavior in public'. I'm certainly close enough to Schizophrenic that I see a motive related to Snowden and general control over cyber. Linux and FOSS not being taken seriously in terms of 'national security context' was a nice facet of the past, but it's definitely the past. A modern day Hitler would definitely only achieve a dystopia after dispensing with any well known person with a spine. Ian struck me has having one hell of a backbone.

  19. Not sure about suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    5:13pm: i'm committing suicide tonight.. do not intervene as i have many stories to tell and do not want them to die with me #debian #runnerkristy67
    5:14pm: watch my blog later http://ianmurdock.com/
    5:17pm: https://t.co/I1CSCJErWf
    5:20pm: I'll write more on my blog later. But the police here beat me up for knowing on my neighbor's door.. they sent me to the hospital.
    5:20pm: Then beat me up some more.
    5:21pm: My bail for "assault against a police officer" are all that: $25,000.
    5:22pm: I'll write more much later. They still don't have cameras on all police so I'm going to use my somewhat celebrity to hopefully stop this.
    5:23pm: Quote: "We're the police, we always win."
    5:25pm: My career is over now, so I'll be gone soon.
    5:27pm: Maybe my suicide at this, you now, a successful business man, not a NIGGER, will finally bring some attention to this very serious issue.
    5:30pm: I'm not committing suicide today. I'll write this all up first, so the police brutality ENDEMIC in this so call free country will be known.
    5:34pm: if anyone wants to come over and see what the police did to me i would be more than happy for that
    5:35pm: they beat the shit out of me twice, then charged me $25,000 to get out of jail for battery against THEM
    5:36pm: i had to go to the hospital
    5:36pm: they followed me home
    5:36pm: then they pulled me out of my house and did it again
    5:37pm: i had to have swtitches
    5:37pm: then followed my home from there
    5:38pm: i asked if they had cameras
    5:38pm: they said no
    5:45pm: shall i post pictures for all my bruises from my against the police officers?
    5:45pm: where they put you in a cell with absolutely no instructions whatever aside from the spell on the floor in piss?
    5:48pm: Writing up my experience for others to hopefully prevent others from police abuse then you won't hear from me again
    6:00pm: @jacksormwriter wants me dead
    6:06pm: i'm going to post my case on my blog.. if anyone can post it on hacker news or wherever i would apprieciate it
    6:07pm: i'm hoping coming from a successful white guy it will help everyone
    6:31pm: (1/2) The rest of my life will be devoted to fighting against police abuse.. I'm white, I made $1.4 million last year,
    6:33pm: (2/2) They are uneducated, bitter, and and only interested in power for its own sake. Contact me imurdock@imurdock.com if you can help. -ian
    6:41pm: The police are uneducated, evil, and sadistic. Do not trust them.
    6:42pm: The rest of my life is to fight against the police.. they are NOT friends, so don't ever ever believe otherwise.
    6:49pm: What does one have to get education wise to become a police officer.. asking for a friend.
    7:03pm: "We're the police, we can do whatever the fuck we want.."
    7:08pm: This was right after the female officer ripped off my underwear.. I guess that's not considered rape if you're not a woman being raped.
    7:12pm: I am a white male, make a lot money, pay a lot of money in taxes, and yet their abuse is equally doned out. DO NOT CROSS THEM!

    People deciding on suicide for real rarely make future plans, but his last tweets were full of them. I wonder about head trauma, mostly because of the extreme confusion here. Note his first line. He didn't want anyone to stop him from killing himself, because he had stories that he wanted to tell.

    1. Re:Not sure about suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like he was gang-stalked by the police, and they finally got a neighbor to turn on him and then assaulted him after arresting him.

    2. Re: Not sure about suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First

    3. Re: Not sure about suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, you have little reason to believe he was making plans. He TALKED about plans, but no idea if he was being truthful or genuine about them.

      Second, it's not true that suicidal people don't make plans. By their very definition they do not behave rationally in what they do.

      Perhaps he was behaving rationally (perhaps drunk, too) and intended to leave a trail of "future plans" so that his suicide might be specifically thought of as suspicious, so as to draw attention to the incident.

      But at the end of the day, if you think you can know the impossibly complex thoughts of a man who just (allegedly) experienced trauma at the hands of the police, was obviously not in his right mind, and committed to commit suicide BY HIS TWEETS, then you've got levels of intuition in you that are unsurpassed.

      The ONLY thing we know is that he was apparently distressed, wanted people to know/think he was distressed, and was not acting in a rational manner.... ASSUMING that it was even him.

      If you can tell that much about the psyche of a man based on a few sentences posted online, you should commit to helping mankind solve its communication problems...

    4. Re:Not sure about suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think. Carefully.
      The cops went to his house twice. They beat him up.
      Ian would have been furious, and would have told the cops he was going to "tell his story"
      Then he starts posting on his social media.
      The cops, now angry and in a hurry to shut him up, came to his house a third and final time, caught him posting to social media, and executed him, and posted the suicide missive.
      Ian was making plans to be an activist against police brutality.
      Read his rhetoric from another viewpoint. This could have been a murder, and please stop taking his tweets as a statement of fact.
      The cops were at his house twice. Three times a charm.
      Cops regularly set up drug busts, murders, etc..They are masters at deception.
      I knew Ian. He did not kill himself .He would have never posted that he was "ruined"
      The final tweets bear no similarity to any post, tweet, blog entry Ian ever made in his almost 20 years of public profile.
      Why would he say he plans to kill himself and tell his story, both in the same disjointed sentence.
      Guys, please...ask hard questions....start looking at the final tweets as a cover up by murdering badge wearers.

    5. Re:Not sure about suicide by Aleksej · · Score: 1

      People deciding on suicide for real rarely make future plans, but his last tweets were full of them.

      How far is "future"?

    6. Re:Not sure about suicide by Bite+The+Pillow · · Score: 1

      Suicide intervention takes focus and energy away from processing and logging information. It makes sense, in a strange way, to request not being interrupted.

      Looking for the autopsy, which the family will surely release, and the lawsuit.

    7. Re:Not sure about suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like he was gang-stalked by the police, and they finally got a neighbor to turn on him and then assaulted him after arresting him.

      Exactly. Same thing happened to me for the last 2 1/2 years. Same area.. very similar progression/character traits/careers but I was a bit more defiant and able to luck out on a motorbike they bought me with bitcoin... to induce me to play more.... but I figured out how to ride it better than they planned... and I am a good runner/hider....

        I am lucky to be alive. Oh and thye can read this. They have my IP now if they didn't before.. oh and FUCK YOU YOU FUCKING DICKLESS FUCKS! FUCK THE USA POLICE STATE!

      oh another thing.. notice the stop gang stalking website disappeared and was replaced with judeo christian-esque conspiracy nutter bullshit?

    8. Re:Not sure about suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is another wise person here. That is exactly how they do it.

      They attempted to murder me 3 times. Yes those specific folks over in that specific part of the world..

      heres the point:

      you people pay for your crime.

      the CORRUPT and ILLEGAL and POWERFUL ARMED OMNIPOTENT DOMINANT police and the KINGLY judicial economy (because its capitalism) are creating the society you see around you.

      you pay them to drive free cars and hotrod all around town looking for action
      they dont need to have drivers licenses
      they dont need to register their vehicles
      they dont need insurance
      they dont have internal affairs or answer to any citizens or committees who guide them or punish them
      they do everything in secrecy
      they have a 1% chance of going to court for every 100 people they murder. IF they are caught. IF. Oh the stat? Go look it up yourself if you dont believe me... idiots.
      they are the main cause of homelessness
      they are the main cause of economic ruin
      they steal with impunity
      they use drugs and they sell drugs
      they take money from organizations just like Serpico pointed out so long ago... thats still happening!
      they use people who are at "rock bottom" as scapegoats and as income generators.
      they LOVE SADISM.. listen to them talk together when they think they arent being watched or listened to..they are sick people.
      they love to kidnap people and put them in rape dungeons
      they sexually assault someone daily "searching" for things they really have no business searching for
      they will set you up
      they will slander you.
      they will steal your house because you snorted a line of coke
      think about that... what is the bigger crime? ever hear of something called equitable reactions?
      we are actully doning horrificly and socially enourmously unforgivable FAR FAR WORSE crimes to people for the small mistakes we all make.. if they are unlucky and its their turn to have everythign stolen from them after theya re sent to a concentration camp.
      hey have I made you mad? I just compared your jails and prisons to concentration camps. IS THERE A REAL IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE? or are you a racist?
      they are the abusers that we allow abusers to send to harm the abused when we cant take the time to help ourselves or the abused fix things
      they are NOT PROBLEM SOLVERS -- THEY DONT CARE!! FUCK YOUR PROBLEM! Ask them!
      they step into a bad situation, and fix it?? NOOOOOOOO!! THEY CREATE EVEN MORE PROBLEMS! OBVIOUS! FUCKING DANGEROUS AND LIFE THREATENING ESCALATIONS TO BOOT!
      Drunk driving causes less deaths annually then a LOT of SILLY things... things suck as hospital deaths caused by hospital MRSA. No shit!
      Drunk driving is a money maker. FUCK MADD. FUCK COPS. FUCK YOU! You buy into this game if you drink too! They love it!
      I was told by a cop i was working for to THINK LIKE A PREDATOR! No SHIT! THAT was how he said they theink and he thought I should change my life to adapt to that... this is NOT a lie.
      Predators are cannibalistic...
      you guys pay people to break the law, to steal, to kidnap, to molest, to murder, to ruin, to demoralize, to perpetuate racism, to give sociopaths someone to call when they want a gun to be pointed at someone they want to hurt, to make people look like scum without knowing what they are going through as some sort of morality object lesson.
      jail... prison... all stupid ideas! you are playing your taxes to crate up people GOOD PEOPLE yep.. "criminals" are good people mostly. you just dont see what you are doing to people to make them into criminals when you turn on your TV and watch "cops" or law and order or CSI or any other show that glorifies this mockery of freedom you claim to have.. your neighborhoods are overrun with gangs. in cars. with guns. with automatics. with military grade tools to kill you. to watch you. to hunt you. nobody answers for their crimes. there are FALL GUYS. they take the fall. who looks like a winner? who looks righteous? the man covered in mud and blood and tattoos (that he wears to descr

    9. Re:Not sure about suicide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > i'm going to post my case on my blog.. if anyone can post it on hacker news or wherever i would apprieciate it

      he is asking for help.

      > I'm not committing suicide today. I'll write this all up first, so the police brutality ENDEMIC in this so call free country will be known.

      Change of mind, he want to fight injustice.

      > if anyone wants to come over and see what the police did to me i would be more than happy for that

      Again, looking for help.

      He waited 2 hours for help. Why did no one reach out to him ? Maybe police realized what they done wrong and killed him for cover up.

  20. Could this have been an assassination? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is it possible this was an assassination and the twitter "rant" was part of the cover-up? Faking suicides seems like an ideal way for agencies to act.

  21. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That is one of the most spectacularly stupid things I've ever read. Well done.

  22. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by bytesex · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why is Barack Obama not white? Is it because he has more than zero drops of native Kenyan blood in him? If that is the case, aren't you in all actuality subscribing to the 'one drop of blood / white is the norm' position? And if you don't - because that would be quite racist - then why is Obama black? He has a 'white' mother after all... And if your position is that 'he identifies as black', then can he change his mind tomorrow? And if he can't, then at what age do people get to choose their 'race'? And if he can, what in the name of bloody bollocks does an outdated concept of 'race' even mean outside the industry that breeds cats, dogs and horses?

    Race is a load of meaningless crap. Humans like to fark too much for it to exist. It has no concept in biology, and even in its last hold-out - sociology - it can easily be degraded to meaninglessness, see the reasoning above.

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
  23. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by epyT-R · · Score: 0

    Sure, just like christianity makes total sense if you believe that god exists and the bible is his inerrant word. Just because tripe like that was taught as 'education' for centuries doesn't make it correct. The same applies to your progressive claptrap being taught as 'education' at the local university. If anything, this proves the dominance left wing social engineering has on the media, education, and government policy, today. Now, it's your protected castes that have 'power and privilege'. White males aren't allowed to criticize anything anymore. When they do, they're universally demonized, shitcanned from their jobs, and their accomplishments nullified. Meanwhile, while we squabble, the ruling elites laugh as they tread on our liberty. There's nothing equitable in that.

  24. RIP by vikingpower · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Old programmers never die. They redirect to /dev/null. RIP, Ian.

    --
    Religous speak to God. Insane are spoken to by God. When all shut up, one can finally hear Shostakovich in peace
  25. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by epyT-R · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Sounds like you are a victim of newspeak reeducation. Racism is the use of race as a discriminator either for or against an individual or group.

  26. Re: Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is a nonsense ideological position rooted in ignorant sophistry (I know, quite the ostensible contradiction)

    The point of saying non-whites can't be racist isn't to form a more cogent and useful definition of racism (as we see in replacing LGBTQA into GSA) but so neoprogressive zealots can call people racist while themselves being racist.

    And it's dumb anyway, "racism" can't be cause _and_ effect, if racism is systemic oppression by the powerful then you can't say it'd caused by racism, you have to say it's caused by prejudice and thus it's meaningless to call individuals racist because the term only applies to edifices of power. But of course as already said the point isn't for better definitions, it's to call people racist and then say "lalala you can't call me racist back."

  27. Ok, what I make of it by bytesex · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    He dove into a psychotic episode, went raving to the neighbor's house, who called the cops on him, who handled him like they would. But instead of institutionalizing him, they left him at his house, perhaps going/waiting for backup. Then they were called on him again, or they returned and they manhandled him again. Like they would. Then, still in his paranoid, psychotic mindstate, he committed suicide. And it all could have been prevented with the proper application of a straitjacket, a padded room, a nurse, some intravenous medication, and a bit of time and sleep.

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    1. Re:Ok, what I make of it by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Interesting

      This is based upon what exactly?

      Given he was hospitalized that night - because of injuries from his confrontation with police - and given he was subsequently released, it seems improbable he was on some psychotic bender.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    2. Re:Ok, what I make of it by tomhath · · Score: 1

      But instead of institutionalizing him, they left him at his house

      It is very, very difficult to institutionalize someone against their will - personal freedoms and all that.

      Why do you think there are so many homeless people wandering the streets? Everyone agrees they are mentally ill and need help, but you can't force help on them unless they are violent.

      Would you want the police to have the authority to decide you need to be locked away and drugged into a stupor?

    3. Re:Ok, what I make of it by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Everyone agrees they are mentally ill and need help, but you can't force help on them unless they are violent.

      I wonder if you could replace "force help on them" with "get the money to help them."

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    4. Re:Ok, what I make of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It is very, very difficult to institutionalize someone against their will - personal freedoms and all that.

      Why do you think there are so many homeless people wandering the streets? Everyone agrees they are mentally ill and need help, but you can't force help on them unless they are violent.

      Would you want the police to have the authority to decide you need to be locked away and drugged into a stupor?

      Bull-fucking-shit. You'd be amazed how easy it is to get locked up for over a week because of false statements from a pathological liar.

    5. Re:Ok, what I make of it by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      Would you want the police to have the authority to decide you need to be locked away and drugged into a stupor?

      They won't. They will drag you away to be assessed by a mental health professional. Look it up.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    6. Re:Ok, what I make of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mr "I make 1.4 million a year" could've just went through the LEGAL system to get some kind of redress for his complaints, but no, he decides to immediately fold and take himself out? That makes zero sense, unless he has the fortitude of a wet noodle. Would I be mad if I got allegedly beat up? Sure, but there's ways to document the event even if you don't have video evidence of them doing it. There HAD to be someone who witnessed him being taken, put into the car, etc..

      Also, being taken more than once in a short period of time would've shown up somewhere as a paper trail. But no, he can't see past the trees and decides to go self-destruct? That's insane, I'm sure he had more than enough reserves to retain a competent lawyer, which is exactly what he should've done, instead of bitching like a little girl to twitter.

    7. Re:Ok, what I make of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he decides to immediately fold and take himself out?

      Or when he posts that he's going to spend the rest of his life fighting cops, the cops make sure it's a short one.

      Looking forward to the cop autopsy saying he shot himself point blank in the temple and the family autopsy saying he was shot three times in the back.

    8. Re:Ok, what I make of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He might have had an ongoing condition, and had been taking meds for that - it's possible that the hospital screwed up, and deprived him of his regular meds, or gave him something with a bad interaction. It's also possible that he sustained a brain injury during the beating, and then the hospital screwed up by failing to diagnose that, and maybe they did these things (provided substandard care), BECAUSE he was on the wrong side of an argument with police.

      It's likely we'll never know.

      There's always also the conspiracy theory, that as a SystemD opponent, maybe the CIA dosed him with some crazy drug either before, or during his fight with police.

  28. No official report after 48 hours+ ? by dickens · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I certainly will not believe any official reports - the fact that they're late means they're being cooked, without doubt. Some multi-millionaires out there need to make sure to get all the way to the bottom of this.

    1. Re:No official report after 48 hours+ ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I certainly will not believe any official reports - the fact that they're late means they're being cooked, without doubt. Some multi-millionaires out there need to make sure to get all the way to the bottom of this.

      Any high profile (and bizarre) situation will be handled delicately with regards to the public. The fact that it's late could just as easily mean that they are taking sure to get it absolutely right.

    2. Re:No official report after 48 hours+ ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the 'murcan fascists were most certainly the cause of Aaron Swartz's suicide. Ian's death is still an unknown.

    3. Re:No official report after 48 hours+ ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      indeed

  29. i'm confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if the police beat and violated him why didn't he just kill the pigs? you'd think pigs would get put down every day in this country given how many people they abuse. he could have done the rest of us a favor and taken some of them out before offing himself.

    1. Re:i'm confused by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He wasn't a silent killer like Hans Reiser.
      Hans Reiser has our respect, he did the right thing.

      Ian killed himself.

  30. RIP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQri8DxF3u0

  31. Ian was arrested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    redwards510 on hackernews said:

    Well, it appears his arrest was real, not a delusion. This is all the information they had on VINE.

    https://www.vinelink.com/vinelink/detailsAction.do?siteId=50...

    Offender Name: IAN ASHLEY MURDOCK Offender ID/CDCR:608067 Date of Birth:04/28/1973 Age: 42 Race: White Gender: Male

    Custody Status: Out of Custody Date: 12/27/2015 Reason:Bonded out

  32. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

    Looks like SJWers on 4Chan were egging him on last night:

    https://archive.is/2Cdj1

    https://i.imgur.com/A1xlnVi.pn...

  33. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you. I read Slashdot 4x a day. Fuck Ian in his dead racist ass.

  34. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    kill yourself?

  35. Re: Ian Murdoch was a racist by bestweasel · · Score: 1

    You are mistaking plain stupidity for being progressive or left-wing. Stupidity and ignorance are not restricted to the left.

  36. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Racism is the groundless use of race as a discriminator either for or against an individual or group.

    That one word is important. Not all distinction making on base of race is racism. In medical matters it happens all the time, for good reason.

  37. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You racist reactionaries are the worst. More projection than an IMAX theater,.

  38. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by swillden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And if your position is that 'he identifies as black', then can he change his mind tomorrow? And if he can't, then at what age do people get to choose their 'race'? And if he can, what in the name of bloody bollocks does an outdated concept of 'race' even mean outside the industry that breeds cats, dogs and horses?

    These question contain a raft of invalid assumptions.

    Clearly, race is a social construct, not a genetic one, and anyone who tells you otherwise hasn't looked closely enough at the question. This means that to a large degree people do choose what race they are. Obviously there is no age by which people must make that choice, but that's not because there is no choice to be made, but because they're perfectly free to change their choice at any point in time. Racial identity is really just a form of tribalism, and people absolutely can choose to move from one tribe to another.

    However, that in no way implies that changing tribes is easy, because what tribe you're a member of depends less on what you think than on what the other members of the tribe think. Tribal boundaries are fluid, dynamic and context-dependent, but they shift based on group decisions, not individual decisions. Witness the public hue and cry over Rachel Dolezal.

    But, in fact, people do change their racial identity. A 2010 study found that going to prison can turn white people black. Specifically, people who previously self-identified and were identified by researchers as white committed crimes, went to prison, and subsequently self-identified -- and were identified by researchers -- as non-white, in most cases black.

    Could Barack Obama decide to be white? Sure. He could decide to self-identify as white, and he could announce that to the world. The response would be a mixture of bafflement, outrage and laughter, and no one would buy it, because his tribal membership is too strongly and publicly established.

    Race is a load of meaningless crap.

    Any notion of genetic, objective race is meaningless crap, sure. But tribal identity is very, very far from meaningless. For many people racial identity is a central part of their individual identity. Identity is powerful... people befriend, ostracize, even kill over identity.

    Note that I'm not saying this is good, or right, or in any way desirable. We'd all be a lot better off if everyone discarded racial identity from their personal worldviews. But that's not the world we live in, and calling it meaningless, ostrich-like, is foolish.

    --
    Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
  39. All his twitter comments from Pastebin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Puts his last comments in context. RIP.

      http://pastebin.com/yk8bgru5

  40. Re:Systemd's first victim by jeffmflanagan · · Score: 1

    Professional police don't rough anyone up. That's what goon police forces do.

  41. Re: Died? Just restart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I was just reading a post from 2013 (via the Linux is Still Crap thread) where he decided that systemd wasn't good enough for Debian. But no, nothing to do with systemd. Instead, this seems to be about a man killing himself after experiencing brutality at the hands (feet, batons, tasers, who knows?) of the SFPD. Maybe he deserved it in some way, behaving in a mentally ill fashion within sight of a police officer.

    If he had been a N*, doubtless the police would have provided the full service and killed him too.

  42. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    not to be too contrarian, but go watch Hotel Rwanda and dwell on your emphasis of 'meaningless'. The movie both makes your style points (some arbitrary nose measurement distinction used to divide and conquer) and I think reveals part of the large meaning race has had for our world in our age. I would emphasize the 'propaganda tool used to divide conquer and exploit' angle rather than the 'meaningless' angle. Though even there, I imagine there probably are biological examples where amongst other populations, some equally arbitrary (plumage color?) obvservation has been used by competing evolving organisms. I guess the takeaway is that often the 'meaningless' still is the bottom line between comfort and starvation and death throughout the jungle and natural world.

  43. Black lives murder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yup. Dead at 42. Cause isn't given but it was that he was killed by a black man who considered him a racist. Strangely, that didn't improve his opinion of blacks, nor did it improve that of his family or friends.

  44. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    my money would be on intelligence communities that saw value in his exiting the stage being the ones passing out the eggs.

  45. Ian's twiiter posts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    http://pastebin.com/dX3VSPkM

  46. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by 0100010001010011 · · Score: 1

    I read Slashdot 4x a day

    .

    Which is why you're posting as AC.

    Fuck Ian in his dead racist ass.

    Did you even read his posts in context? They make perfect sense, should he have put quotes around "Nigger", would you have understood it then?

  47. Re: Ian Murdoch was a racist by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    I didn't say they were.

  48. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by epyT-R · · Score: 0

    If race is used as a discriminator then it's racist, no? The problem is that agitprop has abused the term to the point where it has negative connotations. It shouldn't have them.

  49. Far better comments elsewhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10813524

    Apparently everybody here thinks "HarrySquatter" and his accusations of "racism" are somehow important. This is a story about police brutality and a tragic suicide. I cannot imagine why people think race is important here.

    1. Re:Far better comments elsewhere by NoOneInParticular · · Score: 1

      That's because he used the N-word while white. If you're black you can say 'nigger' all you want, but when you're white you can't. American English has become a racist language.

  50. That's real by Demena · · Score: 1

    Thank you.

  51. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by penguinoid · · Score: 1

    Nope, sorry, choice of words has little to do with racism, it's how you arrange them that counts. Plenty of racists say very nasty things using flowery nice-sounding language, it's far worse than your average racist but no one calls them out on it because they didn't use any banned words. In this case Ian was warning that police brutality can affect successful white men too, and not just [short word for "who cares, it's just poor and/or black people"].

    --
    Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
  52. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by fche · · Score: 1

    "Race is a load of meaningless crap. Humans like to fark too much for it to exist. It has no concept in biology"

    The first and third parts of that are a lie.

    That interbreeding occurs does not diminish the concept. It just means that the concept doesn't apply as cleanly to as many individuals as it used to.

  53. Whoosh, whoosh, and whoosh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blacks can't be racist.

    By "can't be racist" I'm pretty sure he meant that society doesn't treat crimes equally. If a group of whites beats up a black it's a hate crime that requires a federal investigation; if a group of blacks beats up a white it's just street crime.

  54. Re: Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're one of those special people, right?

  55. Ignorant and thoughtless by Demena · · Score: 0

    Why throw your body on a grenade when you can throw the body of the person next to you? Your chosen "rational" act turns out to be irrational. You did not think that through.

    How do you know the hardship is short term? Pretty ignorant assumption.

    You also presume to dismiss and override entire fields of study and replace with your opinion as "fact".

    It is a tragedy that you post as an anonymous coward. I would seem that you are either a troll or an idiot. Could you please explain which?

    1. Re:Ignorant and thoughtless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's nice of you to post as yourself, so we can all spot an asshole

      When in a room, bunker, or any area with more than one other person in it, covering the grenade is the only logical choice. Medal of Honors have been given for it, people in the club in Paris did it and many military units would expect it.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falling_on_a_grenade

      When a human can live for gt 80 years, any fraction less than 1/2 is short term

      Please supply you 'facts' right now you just offer weak dribble and call it fact

    2. Re:Ignorant and thoughtless by Demena · · Score: 1

      So, why are you not posting as yourself? Rhetorical question. You live up to your name and it is you that does not want their goose cooked. I stand by my words. You do not.

      In most circumstances self sacrifice (by males) is common and instinctive. I have actually put my body between harm and someone else. When you have actually expected to die protecting some one, then you can talk. I have actually been there, "manned up". Have you? Do you actually know what you are talking about? Self sacrifice may be the right, respectable, whatever, thing to do but it is never, never rational. Logic has nothing to do with it. Not at life and death level. If you think that it is then you have never been in that place.

      Well, I am getting on towards to 80 but it is doubtful I will actually get there. When my health problems get too bad I will make a graceful exit.

      Facts? Why facts? I never claimed any, you did. I just demonstrated (1) Your lack of intelligence (2) Your immaturity. Your dishonesty and trollishness are there for everyone to observe.

      As a matter of curiosity, why are you like this? I mean you could be something useful if you wanted to be. Why choose negativity?

    3. Re:Ignorant and thoughtless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As near as I can tell from reading your posts you have both supported suicide and using a bystander over self-sacrifice if faced with a lethal threat

      Where are you coming from, and why would my stating that suicide is irrational be choosing negativity?

    4. Re:Ignorant and thoughtless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Why throw your body on a grenade when you can throw the body of the person next to you? Your chosen "rational" act turns out to be irrational."

      That is completely ridiculous. There are numerous situations where throwing ones own body on the grenade is more rational than throwing the person next to you, one glaring example being if the person next to you is one of your offspring.

    5. Re:Ignorant and thoughtless by Demena · · Score: 1

      Which one of my offspring?

      Of course it is ridiculous. It was meant to be ridiculous. It is called sarcasm and is part of the English language that most people understand. Sorry, I did not realise you were sarcasm impaired. Point I was trying to make is that jumping on the grenade might not be the best decision and that different people might make different decisions. The same one you just redundantly tried to make.

  56. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Fwipp · · Score: 1

    SJW's, on /pol/? Come on. They're calling *him* a SJW on there.

  57. Re: Died? Just restart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    classic false flag smear. Ian Murdock certainly was involved with the much larger debate around how to best utilize systemd. I read so many tech journalism articles about that saga that I can smell the false flag here.

  58. Of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it was a Microsoft employee, it would be in the news for days.

  59. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you daft? Race is not a social construct. Have you ever seen black people? They have a completely different skin colour from white people. That's a fact, not a social construct. It proves that different races of human beings exist.

    Your SJW attitude to *facts* is appalling, retract it.

  60. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Race is a load of meaningless crap.

    This bears repeating.

  61. Killed by feminism. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Police woman humiliated him when he was drunk.
    He arab spring'd

    https://archive.is/cPE6h

  62. Cause of death. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No man with a (white) afghan child bride kills himself.

  63. great now maybe systemd will die by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    great maybe systemd will die now as well!

  64. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    No, using race as a discriminator occurs all the time in medicine, there's nothing racist about it. You're the racist for insisting that any form of race recognition is automatically the one thing that you think about. I'm not joking. You're racist, even if you're against the actions of some racists, because you still buy into the simplified binary worldview and you can't conceive of a multitude of alternative worlds where race exists without a social subjugation component one way or the other.

  65. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Look at any rich rapper or sports game player who isn't white then. That's privilege and power right there.

    Oh and define "white". Would you say a rich and powerful Oriental person can be racist? How about a Jew? Or is it only limited to Anglo-Saxons and Nords?

  66. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's a matter of perspective who the SJW is. The word is about as meaningful as "troll", and means about the same, it's just limited to opinions on social issues.

  67. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only reason you keep saying that is because you are a lazy piece of shit and want to have an excuse to receive handouts.

  68. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have seen black people, I have seen white people, and I have seen people who don't neatly fit into a "race".

    What race is Tiger Woods? What race is Rashida Jones? What race is Cher?

  69. Re: Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just because something is a continuum rather than discrete categories doesn't mean it doesn't exist.

  70. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Have you seen a chihuahua? Have you seen a bulldog?

    They exist, and they're quite easy to tell apart - try kicking one in the butt. And yes, I know what a mongrel is, and no, that doesn't disprove the existence of St Bernards and greyhounds.

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  71. Fuck the SFPD by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This hits very close to home for me. I was also arrested for felony battery and held by the SFPD. (The San Mateo County sheriffs, who police Caltrain, were the ones to make the arrest, but I was taken to the SFPD jail.) That's the only time I've ever been in jail, and it seriously fucked with me. I always thought that I would be able to handle jail/prison - hah, wrong! It's a completely dehumanizing experience.

    When I first got there, I was thrown in the drunk tank and left for hours. (After a false felony battery charge, why not a false drunk in public charge?) Like Ian, I couldn't find out anything about my situation. The guards refused to answer any of my questions. There was a phone in the cell, but it was next to useless because everyone I called was unable to navigate the byzantine collect call system. (I briefly wrote about this in a previous comment in an earlier story.) The only things to do were to ponder how truly fucking scary it would be if I were eventually tried and convicted or stare at the ceiling and wonder if the stains were feces or peanut butter from the disgusting sandwiches they provided. I'm a self-confident, mentally-stable person, but that started evaporating disturbingly fast.

    Things got a little better for me once they moved me from the drunk tank to a regular cell. I finally made some progress on getting bail. They took my mugshot and started processing the fingerprint/background checks. At this point, at least there was a light at the end of the tunnel. While things were looking up for me, at this point I started seeing the more fucked up shit other people were going through. The majority of the people in my new cell were making phone calls to anyone who would answer (this phone made local calls free) trying to scrounge together bail. While I was mad as hell that I was throwing away >$2,000 in bail (10% of the $25k that Ian mentioned), I'm well-off and would have spent far more to get the hell out of there. This was a Friday night, and you wouldn't get arraigned until Monday morning if you couldn't make bail. It was heartbreaking to watch these guys make call after call for bail money that they just didn't have. In retrospect, maybe I should have helped them out, but at the time I was doing my best to keep to myself.

    The low point for me was one point when I saw a number of guards rushing to some situation. I couldn't see what was going on, but it was a few minutes of a lot of shouting and one voice yelping in pain. I then saw 5-6 officers manhandling an inmate to lead him to a cell. They were forcing him to do some reverse crabwalk sorta thing with his wrists chained down by his ankles, all while he's clearly in pain and protesting that he didn't do anything. This is when it really dawned on me how much these corrupt fucks can control your lives. I was confined to this cell of thick glass and concrete because of a lie. Once in jail, there's virtually nothing stopping them from using further lies to justify abuse. I have no clue if the inmate actually did something wrong or was being abused by sadistic guards, but I sure as hell wasn't going to believe the guards (who are sheriffs) just after being falsely arrested by one of their fellow officers.

    Eventually my bail went through, the background check came back clean, and I was going to be released soon. For some reason I don't understand, they again transferred me to another cell. When we got there, it was full of what I stereotyped as mentally ill homeless people. One dude was lying on the floor drooling and shaking. I could not deal with this and froze up. Ignoring that this man clearly needed to be in a hospital instead of a jail, all I could do was ask to go back to the previous cell. Thankfully, it wasn't a sheriff but an administrative employee moving me around at this point, and he was sympathetic enough to take me back to the previous cell. That was the only shred of humanity I saw from anyone who worked at the jail, and it's not

    1. Re:Fuck the SFPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fascinating.

      It's always the keyboard warriors that are all "fuck the police" until they actually NEED the police. Whatever happened to rational thought and logic? You were in jail "on a lie", so it wasn't the officers fault, it was your accuser.

      Here's a statistical exercise for you, in a given population 'n', how many are shitty cops and how many are good cops? You see, you'd actually have to admit that some are good. If your screed had been a bit more balanced in the realization that in every organization there are good/bad people, we'd see eye to eye. But the end result was, you posted bail, got the hell out - and didn't get beaten down.

      So, first world dropped charges problems? Give me a frickin' break, man.

    2. Re:Fuck the SFPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      GEE MAYBE YOU SHOULDN'T GET DRUNK AND CAUSE TROUBLE ON THE TRAIN. Oh let me guess: "you didn't do anything".

      No, don't fuck the police, FUCK YOU. I'm glad you got a dose of the real world you fat surburban fuck.

    3. Re:Fuck the SFPD by trybywrench · · Score: 1

      you guys expect jail to be like going to the dr office and sitting in the waiting room. It's jail, there's no customer service in jail, no one smiles at you in jail, no one wants to chat with you, no one really gives a fuck because it's jail.

      I got picked up by a state trooper with a warrant I had forgot about (old traffic tickets) and was taken to Denton county jail. I sat in holding ( the drunk tank ) for about 10 hours before i was processed and could see a judge, once i paid my fines I was then released.. to the parking lot at about 3am, my car had been towed to a place across town and I only had my two feet to get there ( this was before i had a cell phone ). Jail is not a pleasant experience, stay out of it.

      --
      I came to the datacenter drunk with a fake ID, don't you want to be just like me?
    4. Re:Fuck the SFPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, he didn't expect jail to be a pleasant place. The point of the story was to relate a story about reality, to whomever might be amenable to waking up.

    5. Re:Fuck the SFPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Boo hoo. How dare your life be inconvenienced when you commit a crime. Next time, think about how inconvenient getting arrested is before you engage in fisticuffs. I'd trust the testimony of the police over a typical neckbeard slashdot poster any day of the week.

    6. Re:Fuck the SFPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure what Ian went through and nobody may ever now. RIP.

      Your depiction is fairly accurate and it's not until you are in this situation. Unlike the movies portray making a phone call to get out is not that easy. You have to make a collect call but how can you make a collect call when so many people no longer have regular phone lines? Call someone on their cell phone collect? Do you even know anyone's number any more? If you are lucky to get arrested on Friday you sit there the entire weekend waiting for a hearing on Monday. If you have the money you make bail. If you don? Well you just sit there until you have a trial or some family member comes up with the money.

    7. Re:Fuck the SFPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for sharing your story. Legal system need to be more transparent. With current system, these guys can do anything, they always win because they are police, that need to be changed.

    8. Re:Fuck the SFPD by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 1

      You were in jail "on a lie", so it wasn't the officers fault, it was your accuser.

      I screwed up and left that part out of the story. I was accused of felony battery against a police officer. The officer alleged that I bumped into him on a busy train platform. When he started questioning me and I wasn't sufficiently submissive to his ego, he arrested me.

    9. Re: Fuck the SFPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I smell bacon!

    10. Re:Fuck the SFPD by BlackPignouf · · Score: 1

      Thanks a lot for your story.
      I had a similar experience in Germany. It was definitely feces on the wall :-/
      I spent half a night in a cell, only knowing that the charge was something like "sexual assault" and that a witness said I kinda looked like the culprit. You *really* don't want to land in jail as a foreign rapist, even for just a night.
      They released me after 4 hours, not telling me anything else. I received a letter after 1 month, inviting me as a "witness".
      Those assholes actually wanted to take pictures of me, and I realized too late I was still a suspect.
      My lawyer asked for the files, and told me the sexual assault was "boob gropping", and that the victim described the culprit as being 16 (I was 28 at that time) and about 20 cm shorter than me.
      WTF?
      Oh yes, fuck the police.

      PS: RIP Ian, and thanks for the hard work.

    11. Re:Fuck the SFPD by T.E.D. · · Score: 1

      The one and only time (so far) I got arrested was about 30 years ago in New Orleans. Not a good place to get arrested. (For the curious, it was for making an illegal left hand turn in traffic with an out of state license. Yes, I was polite as could be.)

      While in the communal holding cell I particularly remember one black kid they brought in. He was probably about 5'6 or so, and perhaps 130lbs tops, and was bleeding a bit from the nose. The cops of course were all huge heavy guys, so it didn't take much imagination to figure out how he got that way. One of the guys in the cell got worried about him possibly having internal injuries, so he convinced the kid to ask for medical help. The cops just laughed at him, because they said he wasn't complaining about that when they brought him in.

      Of course some times you're damn glad to have those big cops around. They brought in one guy who was probably 6-3, 300lbs and was clearly on something. I'm guessing PCP. The single most violent human being I've ever personally witnessed. It took 5 big cops to wrestle him into the cell. The body language of everyone in the holding cell went from "I'm tough don't mess with me stay out of my space" to "Please Jesus don't let them put him in here" in an instant. Would have been funny if I wasn't one of them. Thankfully he got his own personal cell.

  72. Bizarre by hackus · · Score: 2

    You know I asked my grandfather about the weird banker deaths, Swartz's death and now this one this evening and he had a interesting response:

    "During the purge in the 1930's lots of people went missing. Mainly individuals in societal roles that some in society are not happy with."

    I replied: "But these people had families and nobody hated them they did interesting things and certainly were not criminals."

    His response?

    "Not criminal perhaps to you and me, but those in power have their own rule of law."

    --
    Got Geometrodynamics? Awe, too hard to figure out? Too bad.
    1. Re:Bizarre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like Swartz, Murdock committed multiple crimes and like Swartz was such a pussy that instead of facing any accountability for his actions he chose to go an hero. You neckbeard fuckwits just have gotten yourselves a new tin messiah in Murdock. Being a white male Linux user evidently means you are the special snowflake that can't do time in jail.

      The fact that a significant portion of the Linux community believes that Murdock was killed as some sort of conspiracy theory perpetrated by SJWs in conjunction with the state shows how badly the linux community has degenerated into nothing more than a group of paranoid delusional self important fools. Murdock acted like meth head white trash. He got treated like meth head white trash like he deserved. Oh no, you can't accept that reality. Cops are supposed to recognize that when he was acting like a lunatic beating on people's doors trying to break in that he was a special linux tech god and deserved a special break. After all, if Ian Murdock wants to break into someone's home, you'd better let him because he is obviously a superior human being because he founded a linux distribution.

      Murdock can't be someone who couldn't be the face the aftermath of his humiliating public meltdown and opted for suicide. In your batshit insane world, the police had to kill him rather than admit they erred in daring to use force to arrest a violent combative white rich male tech millionaire.

  73. A Requiem for Ian Murdock by bkuhn · · Score: 4, Informative
  74. Stupid subject is stupid by osiaq · · Score: 0

    Muricas time is finished. The shortest, like 50 years, empire in the history. No, you dont do this to the guy who created your nervous system. This is a country of unbelievable stupid people in power. By any logic this just cant prevail. Mindless puppets should not be allowed to even stay close to the knowledge and intelligence contributors like Ian. This is obvious: country like that cant hold a superiority for more than a generation of idiots granted with enormous power. Roman Empire was calling and asking for Vandals

    1. Re:Stupid subject is stupid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      America is A CUntry.

    2. Re:Stupid subject is stupid by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      Peace sells, but who's buying?

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
    3. Re:Stupid subject is stupid by wjcofkc · · Score: 1

      If there's a new way, I'll be the first in line.

      --
      Brought to you by Carl's Junior.
  75. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

    No, the third part is pretty much correct. Biologically speaking, "race" isn't a thing.

    There are genetic traits that run in families, and this effect does scale up. There is no trait or collection of traits that correlates with whatever "race" means this decade.

    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  76. Any more information? by AbRASiON · · Score: 2

    Any sign of the bruises / beating? When did it occur? I'm curious wtf happened and when it happened
    Also, nothing on his web page, did someone revert it? Anyone got a cached copy?

  77. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by quantaman · · Score: 2

    Are you daft? Race is not a social construct. Have you ever seen black people? They have a completely different skin colour from white people. That's a fact, not a social construct. It proves that different races of human beings exist.

    Your SJW attitude to *facts* is appalling, retract it.

    Is Obama black or white? Are Kazakhs arab, asian, or a different race? What about Moroccans? Are the East African ethnicities that dominate the marathon the same race as the Jamaicans who dominate sprinting? Their skin colour is the same but the body types are drastically different.

    You can draw a dividing line one the colour scale and call every darker than that "black" and everyone lighter "white" or some other ethnicity, but it's not nearly as meaningful as we imagine. We use that characteristic because it's the easiest to see, but if we started grouping by some other gene variants then we would get a drastically different set of races.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  78. Just that? by jsse · · Score: 1

    I'm very shocked that the death of Ian got so little attention or coverage. He died on Monday, but the world was notified until Wednesday, without any more detail regarding his death. All you guys talking about was criticising him being racist, what's wrong with this world?

    1. Re:Just that? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I'm very shocked that the death of Ian got so little attention or coverage.

      When a major event occurs and you don't even hear about it, don't be surprised. It's just the world continuing the way it usually does because we don't pay enough attention to the corrupt bastards in charge. We should all have taken up our torches and pitchforks and marched en masse on the places of power long before now. And by that, I mean the homes of the ultra-wealthy.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  79. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  80. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by quantaman · · Score: 1

    You can draw a dividing line one the colour scale and call every darker than that "black" and everyone lighter "white" or some other ethnicity, but it's not nearly as meaningful as we imagine. We use that characteristic because it's the easiest to see, but if we started grouping by some other gene variants then we would get a drastically different set of races.

    In the context you are talking about, is race only color? Race has also had the meaning of a subgroup within a species sharing characteristics. In the terms you are talking about, is only characteristic superficial skin color?

    When referring to humans race is almost exclusively used to refer to colour, in which case it isn't much use outside of an often harmful social construct. If we start talking about ethnicities then it becomes more useful, but at the end of the day it's important to remember we're just referring to probability distributions of genes.

    --
    I stole this Sig
  81. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude, to be a Poe, you actually have to be convincing. Contrary to popular belief, it is possible to "parody" MRAs and SJWs in such a way that they can't possibly be mistaken for the real thing. SJWs and MRAs (respectively) do it all the time, and it's always painful to watch.

  82. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

    Of course that person was trying (and failing) to parody what they think a "SJW" (whatever that means these days) would say.

    Ask practically anyone that you would consider to be a "SJW", and they would no doubt agree that both Ted Cruz and Ben Carson are a) not white (by the standards of a white supremacist), b) privileged and powerful, and c) prone to racism, at least when it comes to Syrian refugees.

    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  83. Read again by Demena · · Score: 1

    One one hand, most decisions are made on an emotional not a rational basis. But it is almost impossible to entirely separate them as we will rationalise the emotional decision. But in urgent, emergency situations it is almost purely emotional. So, jumping on the grenade is a purely emotional decision. Rationally, throwing someone else on the grenade would produce the same result - one death - but you would survive. A thick steel table would be even better. But there is no time to examine data, to think, in a hand grenade situation so whatever action is taken it will not be rational.

    On the other hand, I knew a few people who have exited this world of their own accord. At least one of them I could have prevented with a few days or a week's searching. I did not make the effort and he died. Yet I do not feel guilty that I failed to act out of my own self (and family) interest. I waited for him to return. He chose not to return. That was his choice and he made it rationally, painless and carefully planned. Wether it was a good solution for him or not I will never know but it was reasoned and rational.

    In the gripping hand ,we have we have those who for various reasons choose euthanasia (still suicide). A good solution for some intractable problems and a rational response to them.

    So, rational/irrational, good/bad all depend on circumstances. No generalisations are possible and peoples opinions of each case will differ wildly. You would think an atheist and a deist might even agree - but for very different reasons.

    The negativity (as I see it) comes from having fixed attitudes with not a lot to support them. "This is right and all else is wrong" is a bit damn religious for me. Little turns out to be black and white in reality. That is one part of the negativity. Also, In this thread I have been called an asshole, and attacked because someone desired to win an argument irregardless (and no, that does mean the same thing as regardless). That seems negative to me.

    Sorry if I have offended you but it is hard to discuss things when I do not know which person is posting. AC is generic. If you have something to say then at least use "a" name. I do not care if it AC451 but unless I have some sort of identifier I tend to be flippant. Okay, more than you wanted to know. Sorry.

    1. Re:Read again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "One one hand, most decisions are made on an emotional not a rational basis. But it is almost impossible to entirely separate them as we will rationalise the emotional decision. But in urgent, emergency situations it is almost purely emotional. So, jumping on the grenade is a purely emotional decision."

      You start from the beginning drawing a dichotomy that isnt there. Your assumption from the start is that emotion and rationality are mutually exclusive - that is absurd.

      Emotions arent things that just flutter about in the air and randomly inhabit people. They exist because of thousands of years of adaptation. They are actual, real physical phenomena in ones body and they didnt come about by accident. All emotions ultimately are derived from biological and thus 'rational', imperatives.

      Rationality is not determined by whether emotion is involved or not - rationality is determined by how one acts upon ones emotion. Emotion - and thus biology - is the motivating factor for all action, whether it perceivedly rational or otherwise.

      Someone walks up to you on the street and smacks you in the face, you're going to feel emotion - some people fear, some people anger, most a mixture of both. How you act/react, or not, to that emotion may or not be rational - but the motivating factor in whatever you do is the underlying emotion you felt.
       

    2. Re:Read again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Original AC here, I post AC since Dice took over /. because I do like posting here, but I do not like Dice

      If you (Demena) do not want to be civil, then that is your choice

      To summarize:
      All suicides are not the same I will throw them into three buckets, you can suggest more
      1. Altruistic Suicide (eg Falling on a grenade), this is highly valued in society as demonstrated by the high number of Medal of Honor, etc given for the action
      2. Euthanasia, 'calling it quits' at end of life is slowly gaining legal acceptance, the law requires rational arguments, and legal precedence
      3. The rest, responding to non-life threatening stimulus, depressed mood, harassment, stress, etc...

      Categories 1 and 2 are accepted by society (to varying degrees), category 1 receives little acceptance by society, and for good reason. This is because it is an irrational act, an over-reaction to a situation that fails to take into account the short-term effect of the depression and the long term advantages of being alive.

      In regards to emotional/rational thought... if a person wants to be rational (it is a choice) they can choose to analyze and put aside their emotions in order to gain rational insights. It may not be perfect, but it is much better in the long run because emotional choices are frequently biased and wrong

    3. Re:Read again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoopsy, meant to say, category 3 receives little acceptance by society

    4. Re:Read again by Demena · · Score: 1

      You do understand what ratiocinate means? If you want to rewrite the language to win an argument then you lose without me even competing (or desiring to do so).

    5. Re:Read again by Demena · · Score: 1

      "Original AC here, I post AC since Dice took over /. because I do like posting here but I do not like Dice" Bzzzzt! So you only want to make toss-away remarks? Well, OK. But stop then trying to claim you were the original AC. You want things both ways. World does not work like that. You choose to be unidentifiable and then want to be identified.

      Neither rationally or emotionally is there any need for anyone to respect that (just demonstrated) hypocrisy.

      I like civility. Posting as an AC lacks civility in my opinion. Here am I "risking my reputation" and you are slipping notes under the door. Yet you accuse me of lack of civility. I am civil, but not servile.

    6. Re:Read again by Demena · · Score: 1

      "Whoopsy", yes, right. That single character was crucial to the meaning of the post. Since we are talking civility, please have the common decency to check the mission critical parts of your post. /. forces you to review your post and you cannot even make the effort to make sure your post means what you want it to mean. It is insulting that you would allow such a mistake. How do you expect to be taken seriously when your very competence is in doubt.

  84. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

    Did you know that there are actually standards which define terms like "chihuahua"? That's because dog breeds are marketing terms, not descriptions of phenomena found in nature.

    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  85. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

    Just like "troll" (ah, the Golden Age of Usenet, I remember it well), the term "SJW" used to mean something specific. The Urban Dictionary definition is the best one I've seen.

    Today it's meaningless, and that's a shame, because we've lost a really good word. The distinction between real-world activists who are honestly trying to make the world a better place as they see it, and those who forcefully regurgitate half-understood material exclusively online in return for kudos points, is still a distinction that exists. We just don't have a good word for the latter any more.

    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  86. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SJW's, on /pol/? Come on. They're calling *him* a SJW on there.

    that's /g/, not /pol/

    for those who don't hang out on 4chan, /g/ is short for "guro", a kind of Japanese porn involving sexualization of gore. You can tell it's not /pol/ because /pol/, like the other SFW boards, has an orange background, while /g/ and the other NSFW boards has a blue background.

  87. Block all ACs? by execthis · · Score: 0

    There is no setting to block all ACs?

    1. Re:Block all ACs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      man suicide
      No manual entry for suicide

      nope

    2. Re:Block all ACs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better question: why is there no setting to block people who suggest blocking all ACs? :D

  88. Re: Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "social construct" does not equal "smorgasbord of ideas" that an individual can choose from at will.

  89. Horrible by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is horrible.

    Having gone through the data I could find this evening, it appears that Ian was a victim of mental illness and perhaps substance abuse which initiated two interactions with police. I do not have sufficient information to say if police conduct was at fault.

    He was a very bright and creative guy who, unfortunately went through lots of ups and downs. He didn't deserve to end this way. Nobody does.

    1. Re:Horrible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> I do not have sufficient information to say if police conduct was at fault.

      Oh come on. Read this comment for a dose of reality, if you don't believe 'police conduct' might be 'at fault': http://linux.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=8551885&cid=51213309

      Deep down inside you know it's true, you know the police are thugs, and out of control. The US police forces are being militarized. There's mass surveillance in every country that's capable of setting it up. Please wake up.

      Reality is not like the movies, where cops risk their lives to catch the bad guys. Here in the real world, most of them become cops to get power over people, and to get to abuse us little serfs like they did Ian. In other words, they are psychopaths. Besides, actual bad guys shoot back and don't just meekly take abuse like us 'good citizens' do.

    2. Re:Horrible by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 1

      you know the police are thugs, and out of control

      Unfortunately this is indeed the case for some number of individual police officers and police departments. It does not mean, however, that we can assume police brutality in every case of a police interaction resulting in injuries. I also know a lot more of Ian than you do.

      Ian was a victim of mental illness.

  90. apt-get and dselect..... the first apt-store by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll never forget the first time I did 'apt-get update '. It was on dial up.
    My computer somehow just fired up some dial up script (wvdial?), connected to the internet and before I knew it.. I was downloading updates.

    I was mystified how it was all so automated. I spent hours on dselect playing with whatever packages seemed interesting.

    I see the way that the apple app store works now and I can't help but think how debian was waaaay ahead its time for a centralized app repository.

    RIP Ian and thank you for debian.

  91. Re: Ian Murdoch was a racist by silentcoder · · Score: 1

    > "racism" can't be cause _and_ effect

    Of course it can, that setup happens in the real universe on every level all the time. Science is filled with examples in every field - it's called a "feedback loop". With a completely artificial man-made construct like race, if anything, it's simpler. Physical feedback loops need two components - x causes y which causes another x. With a made-up idea, that idea can perpetuate itself indefinitely and x can cause more without even needing that intermediary y.

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  92. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by silentcoder · · Score: 1

    Yes... but you are basically claiming that a brown bulldog and a white bulldog are not the same breed !

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  93. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by silentcoder · · Score: 1

    Simply put - studies have repeatedly found that there is far more genetic diversity *within* races than *between* races.

    --
    Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
  94. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by camg188 · · Score: 1

    Racism is the belief that one race is superior to another.
    Your talk about "a social relationship of white supremacy" is bullshit.

  95. What is wrong with you people? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    A man is dead. A good man who did great things in our lives. He's dead. At only 42 years old. The cause is unknown, and the information shared publicly is either a cover up or very disturbing. As a big community, the only thing we should be talking about is why. Was he at a mental breaking point, did something terrible happen to him, was he murdered? These are are legitimate concerns we should have, not your petty juvenile banter about his supposed words or your topically incorrect assumptions about racism. He's dead people, and at least those in the peanut gallery really don't understand why. Please, get over yourselves and start asking the right questions.

    1. Re:What is wrong with you people? by labradort · · Score: 1

      I agree the majority of the coverage and comments don't get it. I think there is a sense that we want to respect his family's wishes for privacy and not make this into a CNN parade. I think people feel that tributes to his legacy are more fitting to remembering him than a media treatment. At the same time, I think there is an unresolved question around police brutality which needs to be answered. Someone in the know should say something to confirm what was happening in his life. I can imagine many things which may have contributed to his mental state spiralling down, but I don't know if any of the possibilities are likely. A person might say he did some stupid things, but if you look at it another way, the first responders only helped the people who complained of noises, they did not help the person who was at the source of the issue. Did he need counselling, did he need detox, did he need to talk to a friend, did he have any friends he could rely on? If I had a personal issue, I would not take it to twitter, but to family or friends. Around Christmas, many people suffer from loneliness. Maybe this, family matters, other issues, piled up? Hard to know when no one is talking about it.

  96. Linux developers don't die... by ewhenn · · Score: 1

    Linux developers don't die, they just become part of /dev/null

  97. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by camg188 · · Score: 1

    Obama identifies as black because of the way he looks. If you put his picture in a pile of 100 other pictures of random people and asked people to separate the pictures by race, Obama's picture would be put in the black pile every time.

  98. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by RoLi · · Score: 1

    Yeah right, that's why whites profit a lot from Affirmative Action and hate crime penalties are only instituted when a white person is the victim.

  99. As Bernie Taupin Prof'ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm getting bored
    Being part of mankind
    There's not a lot to do no more
    This race is a waste of time

    People rushing everywhere
    Swarming around like flies
    Think I'll buy a forty-four
    Give them all a surprise

    Think I'm gonna kill myself
    'Cause a little suicide
    Stick around for a couple of days
    What a scandal if I died

    Yeah I'm gonna kill myself
    Get a little headline news
    I'd like to see what the papers say
    On the state of white man blues

    A rift in my family
    I can't use the car
    I gotta be in by ten o'clock
    Who do they think they are

    I'd make an exception
    If you want to save my life
    Brigitte Bardot gotta come
    And see me every night

  100. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    People calling other people SJW doesn't seem to use the expression within its meaning. It is like people using autism as an insult. They just throw it in at any opportunity they can find.

    It has reached a point where I just disregard anyone who throws the SJW card as an idiot.

  101. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This link

    https://archive.is/2Cdj1

    gives a "451 Unavailable For Legal Reasons".

  102. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by konohitowa · · Score: 1

    You need to go back and read what he said. Very slowly and very carefully. If at that point you don't see that your response makes no sense, return and read it again. And again. And again.

  103. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by fche · · Score: 1

    "There is no trait or collection of traits that correlates with whatever "race" means this decade."

    Haha, ok, then y'all modern types are trying to redefine the word "race", and not claiming that the normal, plain meaning of the word has no biological basis. That's circular reasoning. #wrongskin

  104. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

    right, and we share 97% of our DNA with mice

  105. Fuck this website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bunch of cunts. Thinking you're so smart but you're without wisdom. A guy died and your egos want to dance on his grave, wanna be know it alls. Fuck you.

  106. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The difference between what you said and what I said, is that what I said is scientific fact.

    That's why humans don't *have* "races" in the biological sense, we do have what biologists call "klines". The difference is important. Races have unique genes not found in other groups while clines are merely concentrations of genes which are, nevertheless, found in other populations of the species.

    There is not a single racially unique gene in the entire human genome anywhere. Asians have a high concentration of the slanty-eye gene, but you still get Asians with round eyes and you get people born with slanty eyes in every *other* ethnic group as well just not nearly as often.
    Scandinavian and Germanic whites have the highest concentration of the "blonde hair" gene - but you get blondes born in every other racial group as well - hell there is a village in Mongolia that has blonde-haired blue-eyed girls at a rate of about 3 per generation. Yes you do get natural blonde black and aboriginal people - they are rare, but they exist.
    There is no gene unique to any population group anywhere in the human race. Concentrations with no unique genes are klines, they are *not* races by the definition of those terms.

  107. Re: Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like blond Africans or red head Chinese, let's not get over excited with the we are all humans war cry

  108. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by fche · · Score: 1

    "That's why humans don't *have* "races" in the biological sense, we do have what biologists call "klines". The difference is important."

    Please explain why the difference is important. One sounds like the normal civilian language and the other professional jargon, but both have the same meaning & effect.

  109. Re:Systemd's first victim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Protip: If you start a fight with the police, expect to be taken down.

  110. Re: Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, they would make up some "Uncle Tom" bullshit excuse for their behavior, and blame it on white people.

  111. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by epyT-R · · Score: 1

    No I don't. You need to reread what I said to him slowly and carefully. Then you'd realize I was discussing it with him.

  112. Re: Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can't tell if sarcasm, or incredibly fucking stupid.

  113. Re: Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck you, autistic SJW racist.

  114. Re: Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Guess you are the stupid one then.

  115. Re: Ian Murdoch was a racist by Fwipp · · Score: 1

    First link, not the second.

  116. Rest... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another master samurai has laid down to rest. Be at peace, Ian; and thanks for such great software!

  117. Your post is oxymoronic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "... people absolutely can choose to move from one tribe to another. "

    Contrary to your later assertion, that statement does in fact strongly imply that racial identity is merely a matter of a persons individual choice.

    "Could Barack Obama decide to be white? Sure. He could decide to self-identify as white, and he could announce that to the world. The response would be a mixture of bafflement, outrage and laughter, and no one would buy it, because his tribal membership is too strongly and publicly established."

    And here you contradict yourself, invalidate any point you are trying to make and obliterate any meaningful content in your post.

  118. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by konohitowa · · Score: 1

    That was intended for AC. Not you.

  119. Dammit, Ian, why'd you have to use That Word by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A good indication Murdock had a clinker in his thinker was his decision to use That Word, which (just witness this thread!) did nothing but spiral the discussion in unfortunate and unproductive ways. It dissipated the vector of whatever it was that Murdock was trying to achieve ...assuming he wasn't just ill. Which is how it's looking.

    It's damning that no friends have spoken up to describe his brutality experience, comportment, appearance, injuries, and so on. Someone who is right in their head would have turned to allies, family, friends, colleagues. Casting bytes into the abyss of Twitter instead... not a rational response.

    Perhaps he had no one? What would that indicate, if so?

    In that way, all the indicators (the banging on neighbors' houses, the interactions with the cops, the rants, That Word, and ultimately suicide) indicate far more about Murdock and his mental state than about the cops or anything else. Unfortunately it also adds up to a blank slate upon which the agenda'd can cast their own dysfunctions.

    Seems his passing adds up to a waste. Pity.

    1. Re:Dammit, Ian, why'd you have to use That Word by ebvwfbw · · Score: 1
  120. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Public Service Announcement: This guy is a psychopath troll. He's not *actually* that fucked up in the head, he just wants you to think so, to get you to waste time and effort trying to explain reality to him. To him, it's a fun little game.

  121. Re: Ian Murdoch was a racist by KenHansen · · Score: 1

    Why is Barack Obama not white? Is it because he has more than zero drops of native Kenyan blood in him? If that is the case, aren't you in all actuality subscribing to the 'one drop of blood / white is the norm' position? And if you don't - because that would be quite racist - then why is Obama black? He has a 'white' mother after all...

    Read his autobiography (I forget which one it's in), he 'choose' to be black.

  122. hi everyone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    KGIII thank you for your perspective.. thats the CORRECT PERSPECTIVE you assholes!
    Heres another one... that's going to surely be misunderstood and ignored for its substance and intentionally broken into puzzle pieces as I have to say something but cant say everything in a linear way safely. Either way I have to say something.. I have been silent too long and I need to for Ian.

    I am white, I am not racist. There is one race... human race. Species.
    We use the word race... oddly nobody ever points out that the word race isn't even meaningful. What is a race?

    Now that I have spent time saying stuff people will scroll past... here is my point.

    I had to leave S.F. and everything/everyone I ever cared about recently. ... that is all the things I have built/created/owned.
    I used to be a person who had a career. I used to be a person who created jobs and who also was in the same position as Ian in life.
    It felt great to be that man. I was generous, I was able to be thankful, grateful. I did drugs too and also I was a liberal forward thinking hacker/activist.
    I did a lot of things that would get the attention of the NSA, etc. (hi guys!) unintentionally... then when I knew that they were watching me I changed my thinking and became ultra paranoid. My life fell apart. I was harassed. I was abused. I was kidnapped I was robbed I was treated like a black man. I interviewed a lot of black men when I was in jail. I debated with them the problems and came up with solutions. I was overheard.. and punished severely for getting people to respect themselves. To stand up to these scum we pay to harm people. They have a word for this type of egghead in jails... "jailhouse lawyers".
    I was not allowed to get a job. I was recruited to work on the east coast. They will find me after they see I posed this. I don't care anymore. Come and get me. I'll fucking kill myself too before you do because I have nothing left to lose (thay took it all from me.. everything.).
    So... I left SF after an altercation with police that nearly got me killed. I have been in hiding ever since.. it was all based on a position I took as an activist and professional to stick up for what I believed in. I was defending this to the death. I am now like people who are "lower class" (but merely look like they are.. intentionally? NO. usually after courts and police activity caused them to take some fall.. it becomes a targeting thing after that.. it snowballs and can wreck an organized and financially stable person in a matter of months.) I got (more than few times in a year) chased, hunted, robbed, beaten, kidnapped, harassed, stalked, manipulated, slandered, and all of the very things that make me look like I amdelusional when I speak about them. I know people like me are and have been killed every day. DHS has what they call "waste" like me cleaned up like clockwork... people are being set into little algorithmic traps.. being pushed down stairwells into sewers to find when they wake up, a motorcycle then explodes when you hit 30mph. Yes that last sentence was an allegory of sorts.

    Sorry if my post is selfiswh but Ian is like me and to see this makes me want to speak out for myself but mostly for Ian in the way that I wish I could give him some advice.. and rescue him but that chance is gone now.

    Until someday when I have money again... so I can buy my way back to the US.

    Just kidding... I'm never going back. Fuck the USA. Fuck the police state. Fuck your oil wells and your military and most of all fuck your "freedom" that you never had. Its not like people are fighting for it.. you have to know it isnt cool for you all to sit at home while people are protesting in Oakland... when cops are running and gunning down mortorcyclists on the 280. Did i just say that? Yeah. You guys will just watch this kind of thing on your morning cvommute and make a guy like Ian think that you all are complicit and part of the operation at hand. If you cared you wouldnt be so fucking comfortable in your mercedes... or blame the guy being shot at in the lane next to you.

  123. Re: Ian Murdoch was a racist by LinuxLuver · · Score: 1

    racist ËreÉsÉst/Submit noun 1. a person who believes that a particular race is superior to another. "I had a fear of being called a racist" synonyms: racial bigot, racialist, xenophobe,

    --
    Only boring people are ever bored.
  124. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

    Haha, ok, then y'all modern types are trying to redefine the word "race", [...]

    It's not so long ago in the United States that Irish people were not considered "white". European Jews still aren't, to most racists.

    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  125. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Pseudonym · · Score: 1

    If we start talking about ethnicities then it becomes more useful, but at the end of the day it's important to remember we're just referring to probability distributions of genes.

    Exactly.

    To pick one famous example, we tend to associate sickle-cell anemia with people of Sub-Saharan African ancestry, but the incidence is higher in Saudi Arabia than it is in (say) Somalia or Lesotho.

    --
    sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f(q{sub f{($f)=@_;print"$f(q{$f});";}f});
  126. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by fche · · Score: 1

    A merely lexical analysis of your sentence contradicts your claim of non-existence of races. (If they didn't exist, you couldn't differentiate diversity within / between them.)

    And if you retreat to word games ("race" didn't mean "race"), then note that the existence of "far more diversity" with respect to some genes says nothing whatsoever about the existence of less-diverse shared other genes in various populations.

  127. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A mere 30 IQ is enough to differentiate meanings in context. When I spoke of diversity within/between them I used race in the coloqial sense, in the latter post I used the proper biological definitions and pointed out that humans actually have clines, not races.

    So if we use proper biological terminology there is more genetic diversity within any particular cline than there is between them.

    The two statements are both true - but they are not about each other, they say two unrelated truths about the same topic - both truths however support the fact that biologically humans do not have races.

  128. christ, ian... by rewindustry · · Score: 1

    where is open source when we need it, eh?

    i'm bleeding inside, i NEED to hear you out, to KNOW what happened for you, from you.

    i need to see your code.

    all i get is these damned twitter messages, where is the REST?

    i'm sure i understand a little of where you have been, have been there myself, i feel, many times.

    like most of us, i live in debian, love it because i can read EVERY WORD of it's story.

    i need to know yours now, please show us where to find it.

    thank you, ian, from the bottom of my heart,

    all the best, out there..

    another debian user

  129. Who killed JFK? Freemasons/zionists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The assassination plot was planned in the freemasons lodge of London because Ian refused to give up Debian's security. As you all know, the freemason govs are really bothered from the Internet because it is the only thing that you could not control! RIP Ian.

  130. Demand an independent investigation! by jmcvetta · · Score: 1

    I encourage everyone reading this, regardless of where you live, to contact California Assemblyman David Chiu. Chiu is a the California state legislator for the district including San Francisco. He is a mainstream elitist Democrat, but historically he has been close to the Silicon Valley tech community.

    When you call Chiu's office, politely explain the Murdock case if the staffer you speak with is not familiar. Mention that the SFPD is widely known to be corrupt. Then - again, politely - ask that the Assemblyman work to have the incident investigated by an independent investigator from outside the San Francisco Police Department. A state assemblymember does not have direct legal authority to appoint an investigator - but for sure, if an elected legislator speaks out, many people will listen.

    Assemblyman Chiu's office phone number is (916) 319-2017. His staffer was interested and courteous when I called earlier today. You can also contact Chiu electronically thru his official website

  131. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your SJW attitude

    I've been wondering about this for a while... Since when is justice a bad thing?

  132. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the dominance left wing social engineering has on the media, education, and government policy

    From an international perspective, there is no left wing in the US. There is right-wing and further-right-wing.

  133. Re:Ian Murdoch was a racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When people use the goal of obtaining "justice" to actually impose tyranny.