The people outsourcing the companies are doing it because government meddling and taxes have made it too expensive to run any kind of competitive business here. And we're just about to get another dose of that.
Though of course, it may even be yet another site responsible for the problem.
Someone posts on their blog "Hey, [link to search engine with 'love beads'] love beads are great.
Google then follows this link to the search engine. The page returned from the search engine contains search results and an affiliate link to "Buy 'love beads' at Target" linking to the target search page. Google follows this link and voila, we have the issue at hand.
No malice on Targets part (though they could do more to make sure it's not indexed).
Search for something (on Google for example) over on the right you'll see a bunch of links. (Some of) those links will be to a site with a term that specifies the search term you searched for even if the site doesn't actually carry that.
I propose that this may be where such links arise from. Maybe not from searches on Google itself but from other sites that offer similar linking schemes.
Amend this to "You could get other suckers to pay for your glasses on the NHS. But they were shitty looking because the government was in charge of it and you couldn't just go to specsavers on the high street and they cost the people who did pay them more than necessary because, again, the government was in charge of it"
I quite like "Killing in the Name" but it is fairly contrived and hardly really subversive, just exploiting standard youth feelings of rebellion, alienation and frustration.
It does fill me with glee to see the charts subverted this way though.
Definitely this. I always cut pizza square these days. Not everyone needs the same amount, it's easier to get right and, if the pizza's a little soft, you don't get it folding and big lumps of cheese sliding off. You also get more, smaller pieces helping avoid over-consumption for those who care
Sure you end up with a few small crusty triangles but there's always someone hungry enough to eat those.
If I were having to interact with other parties besides myself, I'd agree with you. In this case, however, there's only me, doing something nonstandard on a nonstandard port.
If something blows up, I'll drive to a location of your choice so that you can say "I told you so" to my face.
And as for blue ray and 2x blue ray. first 3d info should not take double the bandwidth. There's only a little added information (depth usually) since the RGB and intensity (nearly all the bits) are the same for most objects in the scene. (things like velvet and pearlescence being exceptions that don't look right anyhow in Binocular vision 3D and can only be differentiated for foreground pixels anyhow.
Only for planar surfaces. Depth is not enough. One eye will see things the other eye doesn't see all over the image.
The image appears to vary in position in the Z axis therefore 3D. If another technology comes along, you may need to qualify the 3Dishness (fixed point 3D vs limited angle 3D vs full sphere 3D for example) or come up with a new term.
Not only that but a camera image DPI is entirely arbitrary. a 4000x3000 image has no actual physical size as an image file and any DPI is simply a setting in the file and could be changed with appropriate software without otherwise affecting the image.
Definitely this. My ISP changed their upstream provider and *their* network was intercepting requests on port 53. Luckily, I also administer DNS on another network so set up a bypass on port 54. Personally, I think providing false DNS information should count as fraud.
Slashdot Mirror
I believe that gives you automatic access to level 4 Country and Western
The people outsourcing the companies are doing it because government meddling and taxes have made it too expensive to run any kind of competitive business here. And we're just about to get another dose of that.
And that he's a he.
"Target's" for the apostrophe Nazis.
Though of course, it may even be yet another site responsible for the problem.
Someone posts on their blog "Hey, [link to search engine with 'love beads'] love beads are great.
Google then follows this link to the search engine. The page returned from the search engine contains search results and an affiliate link to "Buy 'love beads' at Target" linking to the target search page. Google follows this link and voila, we have the issue at hand.
No malice on Targets part (though they could do more to make sure it's not indexed).
Search for something (on Google for example) over on the right you'll see a bunch of links. (Some of) those links will be to a site with a term that specifies the search term you searched for even if the site doesn't actually carry that.
I propose that this may be where such links arise from. Maybe not from searches on Google itself but from other sites that offer similar linking schemes.
Here's a hint: They're only calling it the colonies when they know an American is listening.
win32s?
He'll be remembered as the guy who has his shit together enough that he's not having to deal with problems at 5pm all the time.
Amend this to "You could get other suckers to pay for your glasses on the NHS. But they were shitty looking because the government was in charge of it and you couldn't just go to specsavers on the high street and they cost the people who did pay them more than necessary because, again, the government was in charge of it"
Needs +1 insightful.
I quite like "Killing in the Name" but it is fairly contrived and hardly really subversive, just exploiting standard youth feelings of rebellion, alienation and frustration.
It does fill me with glee to see the charts subverted this way though.
Even just crossing the atlantic, it lost an "I"
Definitely this. I always cut pizza square these days. Not everyone needs the same amount, it's easier to get right and, if the pizza's a little soft, you don't get it folding and big lumps of cheese sliding off. You also get more, smaller pieces helping avoid over-consumption for those who care
Sure you end up with a few small crusty triangles but there's always someone hungry enough to eat those.
There are no hyperlinks in text/plain.
As do SIRDS in fact.
I meant for common use. I am aware there have been many experimental and development and special use displays over the years.
3D: 3 Dimensions. X,Y,Z. Stereoscopic counts in my book.
And if everyone jumped off a bridge...
If I were having to interact with other parties besides myself, I'd agree with you. In this case, however, there's only me, doing something nonstandard on a nonstandard port.
If something blows up, I'll drive to a location of your choice so that you can say "I told you so" to my face.
And as for blue ray and 2x blue ray.
first 3d info should not take double the bandwidth. There's only a little added information (depth usually) since the RGB and intensity (nearly all the bits) are the same for most objects in the scene. (things like velvet and pearlescence being exceptions that don't look right anyhow in Binocular vision 3D and can only be differentiated for foreground pixels anyhow.
Only for planar surfaces. Depth is not enough. One eye will see things the other eye doesn't see all over the image.
The image appears to vary in position in the Z axis therefore 3D. If another technology comes along, you may need to qualify the 3Dishness (fixed point 3D vs limited angle 3D vs full sphere 3D for example) or come up with a new term.
So when you're trying to get your toast out of the toaster, use a stainless steel knife rather than a silver one.
They are doing it for lookups that fail though. It's like a global typosquat.
Not only that but a camera image DPI is entirely arbitrary. a 4000x3000 image has no actual physical size as an image file and any DPI is simply a setting in the file and could be changed with appropriate software without otherwise affecting the image.
Definitely this. My ISP changed their upstream provider and *their* network was intercepting requests on port 53. Luckily, I also administer DNS on another network so set up a bypass on port 54. Personally, I think providing false DNS information should count as fraud.
So the government decided that only the government can own slaves. Quel surprise