Hasn't this already happened with Microsoft Reader? Since you can no longer activate a copy to open drm'd content you could be stuck with worthless files which you spent hundreds of dollars on. Not to mention those media sites that have since died.
The public doesn't care. As far as they know, or ever will know, the only way to run osx is on a mac. The fact that Stevey and co are litigation happy doesn't bother them.
The post didn't bother breaking down all the categories, relying on the whitehouse's breakdown. Which as I mentioned doesn't even include the 162 billion asked for Iraq and Afghanistan. Kind of a big chunk to ignore isn't it? Of course if you include it Bush's budget can't be "balanced" by 2012. But he never let math get in his way. Even if you simply add that to the defense alotment that the white house is throwing around then it becomes the largest part of the budget.
According to http://www.warresisters.org/piechart.htm it's 54%. They went through and totaled the amounts for military spending that the presidential budget put in other departments. Then they include the 162 billion asked for by Bush just for the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (not included in his budget at all). Or for a fun representation you could check out http://www.truemajority.org/oreos/
btw we know you're a republican, you don't need to reinforce the idea by calling social programs entitlements.
You're right, the Daily fucking tech has proven global warming to be false. Even though the majority of scientists say it is real. Even though a study by NASA showed that something like 9 or the 10 hottest years in the past 100 were in the last 10. The Daily Tech clearly is on the forefront of the issue.
check out the bad astronomer, he debunks this article pretty neatly in a paragraph (and he's an astronomer, imagine what a climate scientist could do) or maybe the original blog that dt took the graphs from, down on the bottom the original compiler mentions that it hasn't erased anything, its just anecdotal
While that was true Gore went out of his way to make his house more eco-friendly since the story broke (yes it is shady, and we know it, but at least he never got someone killed occupying a country). Not to mention comparing old construction to new is like comparing apples and oranges. Plus you have to take location into account (I live in a cold place so I use a lot more energy to heat my house than either of them). If we wanted to be as energy efficient as possible we would all live in adobe in the southwest with no electricity.
Besides no republican should ever think of discussing hypocracy (they love Jesus and bombing stuff; Limbaugh hates drug users and says they should be locked up, he's been busted 3 times for drugs; they are all about family values, except Larry Craig, Bob Packwood, Clarence Thomas and whats his name from Florida who tried to hook up with underage pages; they love this country but hate the constitution; they are for fiscal conservency, but they raise taxes and leave giant debts; Bill O'Reilly said to boycott pepsi because of Ludacris for his language, but he's been sued for sexual harrassment, twice; etc.)
Quite a few Reservations here (Minnesota) have switched to wind power and they apparently love it. You see some of us live in states where it is windy (Minneapolis has an average wind speed higher than Chicago) and we have land (farms can easily slap a wind turbine in the corner and power several farms, which is also becomming kind of popular here). Granted its not exactly plug it in and ignore it, but it is cheaper than buying your power (long term) and it is "cleaner" than any other method (unless a migrating flock of birds cuts through, which means you didn't do a proper analysis of migration patters). But hey why bother, when we can just leave radioactive waste laying around for a couple hundred centuries.
The military is the largest part of the budget and they generate a grand total of zero revenue. So if the PTO money is going to the general fund then the military would most likely be where it ends up. Or rather in the hands of some contractor since the soldiers get paid dick.
The rich get great treatment. But overall we barely rank above Cuba (a country with dick for resources). But we spend more than anyone else. And have a shorter lifespan than before the invention of the HMO. And one of the worst infant mortality of any developed nation (and higher than many developing nations in the Americas).
And if you manage to get care without insurance it cripples you financially. 7 or 8 years ago a friend of mine slipped down some stairs and broke his clavicle (sp). He went to the emergency room. After waiting for a couple of hours they took and x-ray and gave him a sling. Then they told him to come back in 6 weeks. He never went back because before his 6 weeks was up he received his bill, $2500. A lot of money for a 19 year old with a job that paid $7 an hour. With no insurance of course (once his 90 days was up he went from 40 hours a week to 32 thanks to his company not wanting to provide benefits). He ended up paying the bill, a few years ago when he joined the army and went to Iraq (Falujah I believe). He paid it off with his military pay checks. Of course for some reason dental care wasn't made available to him while in the army so the two teeth he lost (thankfully thats all he lost) haven't been replaced with fakes.
Remember when IE had a similar problem with links opening other browsers. I bet you blamed MS, but now that FF has a similar problem its a QT problem.
I for one blame apple and not FF, but I didn't blame MS before so I'm not a hypocrite.
I have used my gmail for messenger since I got it a couple of years ago. I have never been forced to switch it. And before that I used my yahoo account for messenger for a couple of years. You must've been singled out for a fucking.
So by your logic because there is a Eula, as opposed to nothing, MS is on the hook for your whims? Incredible. If you don't want windows don't buy a computer with windows. I don't want a mac or linux so I won't buy a computer with mac or linux.
I don't want to use Zune software, guess what I didn't buy? A fucking Zune.
Can you buy a computer that doesn't come with Windows? Yes. End of story. Go buy a fucking mac or something that ships with linux and shut the fuck up. But you can't do that can you? No, you can't. You have to bitch that you're being forced to pay for windows.
How about you bitch about important shit your forced to pay for. You're forced to pay for this quagmire of a war, or you go to jail (tax evasion is illegal no matter what some nut jobs believe). You're forced to pay for the political campaigns of people you hate (matching funds anyone?). You're forced to line the pockets of Haliburton, Blackwater and a dozen other companies thanks to rich no bid contracts. Rather than bitching about any of that you focus on a fucking operating system. You are a great asset to humanity.
btw I noticed you're from the UK so much of the above list of stuff you have to pay for doesn't apply to you specifically, but to other whiners like you. But hey at least you get to help fund that war I was talking about.
I thought the EULA just meant that you could return the computer. It doesn't entitle you to a refund. In the case of the pre-built machine its a package, don't like the bundled software. Fine, remove it. But don't expect your money back.
Time to break out the classic analogy. I want a Ford with a Chevy engine, should Ford take back the engine and give me back a portion of my money? No, thats stupid.
How about I buy a mac, should Apple refund me the cost of the OS since I want windows? They'd just smile and send me a link to boot camp (or whatever they're calling it now).
Student and teacher edition is $125 and even cheaper at the many colleges that have agreements with Microsoft (I bought it from my college for $7). And btw the teacher would've accepted.doc, which can I believe can be made with OO.o along with a bunch of other applications.
Maybe he should've just dropped the class rather than treating it like a religious issue. Besides he probably knew how the professor wanted the papers turned in before the class even met for the first time, or at least on the first day when he got a syllabus.
They did sequels long before Halo. Marthon had a sequel. Myth had a sequel. The only one that didn't was Oni, cause it sold 3 copies. So don't act like MS forced Bungie to make 3 Halo games.
Thats what I'm planning on trying. But I'll run a side by side myself. Sorry but I never believe it when I read someone say this is faster than that. Especially when MS is involved.
I didn't say it was better than vmware, I said it was better than vmware player. The free product meant for end users, that only allows you to run pre-made virtual machines. Virtual PC lets you make your own virtual machines and is also free.
I don't care if everybody on here hates IE, that doesn't mean they're right. Its a piece of software, software some of us prefer over other browsers. And yes I've tried them all, for years, but I still prefer ie.
Gmail is better, its what I use. But where was it 10 years ago? Or even 5? And yahoo, pre-gmail, sucked just as bad as hotmail. I know I used to use it. My point is its stupid to attack free software and services. Bitch about stuff you have to pay for but free stuff you can choose not to use? stfu about.
Gaim, kopete, trillian, miranda, etc. are just clients, messenger is a protocol, thats comparing apples to oranges. I use miranda, which I like a lot, but messenger has some features that I kept it around for. Nothing like playing a quick game with a buddy over chat. And again see my point about free software above.
Star office hasn't been free for a long, long time. They started charging to make it look more legit. Thats why oo.o was spun off. My point, if you bothered to read it, was that 5 years ago works was the only two options if you wanted an office suite was works or star office. And with star office your choices were downloading it, most likely over dial up (look at broadband penetration in 2002) or paying $40 for software others were getting for free and feeling like a sucker. btw since you are clueless about star office and now oo.o I'll explain to you how people paid for it. Retailers carried a cd version of it that listed at $40. Same way they carried a $50 cd version of redhat, which no one buys because people don't like feeling stupid by paying for software that is "free". Generally they were stuck in a crappy box and shoved on a shelf somewhere and none of the employees would know what it was. When I worked at compusa I remember wandering the floor one slow day (I worked in the tech shop, so I didn't get out of it much) and noticed we had oo.o for sale. I mentioned it to a co-worker, who's job was to sell computers and software, and he had no idea what it was. I did a quick poll and 5 out of 5 salesmen had no idea what it was. Hell some of my co-workers in the shop didn't know what it was. But I must be a troll since I choose to use microsoft products. Or maybe a reasoning adult who has tried the alternatives and doesn't like them as much.
Hasn't this already happened with Microsoft Reader? Since you can no longer activate a copy to open drm'd content you could be stuck with worthless files which you spent hundreds of dollars on. Not to mention those media sites that have since died.
Enlighten us all, what is some first rate fantasy then.
The public doesn't care. As far as they know, or ever will know, the only way to run osx is on a mac. The fact that Stevey and co are litigation happy doesn't bother them.
The post didn't bother breaking down all the categories, relying on the whitehouse's breakdown. Which as I mentioned doesn't even include the 162 billion asked for Iraq and Afghanistan. Kind of a big chunk to ignore isn't it? Of course if you include it Bush's budget can't be "balanced" by 2012. But he never let math get in his way. Even if you simply add that to the defense alotment that the white house is throwing around then it becomes the largest part of the budget.
According to http://www.warresisters.org/piechart.htm it's 54%. They went through and totaled the amounts for military spending that the presidential budget put in other departments. Then they include the 162 billion asked for by Bush just for the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan (not included in his budget at all). Or for a fun representation you could check out http://www.truemajority.org/oreos/
btw we know you're a republican, you don't need to reinforce the idea by calling social programs entitlements.
You're right, the Daily fucking tech has proven global warming to be false. Even though the majority of scientists say it is real. Even though a study by NASA showed that something like 9 or the 10 hottest years in the past 100 were in the last 10. The Daily Tech clearly is on the forefront of the issue.
check out the bad astronomer, he debunks this article pretty neatly in a paragraph (and he's an astronomer, imagine what a climate scientist could do) or maybe the original blog that dt took the graphs from, down on the bottom the original compiler mentions that it hasn't erased anything, its just anecdotal
While that was true Gore went out of his way to make his house more eco-friendly since the story broke (yes it is shady, and we know it, but at least he never got someone killed occupying a country). Not to mention comparing old construction to new is like comparing apples and oranges. Plus you have to take location into account (I live in a cold place so I use a lot more energy to heat my house than either of them). If we wanted to be as energy efficient as possible we would all live in adobe in the southwest with no electricity.
Besides no republican should ever think of discussing hypocracy (they love Jesus and bombing stuff; Limbaugh hates drug users and says they should be locked up, he's been busted 3 times for drugs; they are all about family values, except Larry Craig, Bob Packwood, Clarence Thomas and whats his name from Florida who tried to hook up with underage pages; they love this country but hate the constitution; they are for fiscal conservency, but they raise taxes and leave giant debts; Bill O'Reilly said to boycott pepsi because of Ludacris for his language, but he's been sued for sexual harrassment, twice; etc.)
Quite a few Reservations here (Minnesota) have switched to wind power and they apparently love it. You see some of us live in states where it is windy (Minneapolis has an average wind speed higher than Chicago) and we have land (farms can easily slap a wind turbine in the corner and power several farms, which is also becomming kind of popular here). Granted its not exactly plug it in and ignore it, but it is cheaper than buying your power (long term) and it is "cleaner" than any other method (unless a migrating flock of birds cuts through, which means you didn't do a proper analysis of migration patters). But hey why bother, when we can just leave radioactive waste laying around for a couple hundred centuries.
The military is the largest part of the budget and they generate a grand total of zero revenue. So if the PTO money is going to the general fund then the military would most likely be where it ends up. Or rather in the hands of some contractor since the soldiers get paid dick.
The rich get great treatment. But overall we barely rank above Cuba (a country with dick for resources). But we spend more than anyone else. And have a shorter lifespan than before the invention of the HMO. And one of the worst infant mortality of any developed nation (and higher than many developing nations in the Americas).
And if you manage to get care without insurance it cripples you financially. 7 or 8 years ago a friend of mine slipped down some stairs and broke his clavicle (sp). He went to the emergency room. After waiting for a couple of hours they took and x-ray and gave him a sling. Then they told him to come back in 6 weeks. He never went back because before his 6 weeks was up he received his bill, $2500. A lot of money for a 19 year old with a job that paid $7 an hour. With no insurance of course (once his 90 days was up he went from 40 hours a week to 32 thanks to his company not wanting to provide benefits). He ended up paying the bill, a few years ago when he joined the army and went to Iraq (Falujah I believe). He paid it off with his military pay checks. Of course for some reason dental care wasn't made available to him while in the army so the two teeth he lost (thankfully thats all he lost) haven't been replaced with fakes.
Remember when IE had a similar problem with links opening other browsers. I bet you blamed MS, but now that FF has a similar problem its a QT problem. I for one blame apple and not FF, but I didn't blame MS before so I'm not a hypocrite.
I have used my gmail for messenger since I got it a couple of years ago. I have never been forced to switch it. And before that I used my yahoo account for messenger for a couple of years. You must've been singled out for a fucking.
So by your logic because there is a Eula, as opposed to nothing, MS is on the hook for your whims? Incredible. If you don't want windows don't buy a computer with windows. I don't want a mac or linux so I won't buy a computer with mac or linux.
I don't want to use Zune software, guess what I didn't buy? A fucking Zune.
Can you buy a computer that doesn't come with Windows? Yes. End of story. Go buy a fucking mac or something that ships with linux and shut the fuck up. But you can't do that can you? No, you can't. You have to bitch that you're being forced to pay for windows.
How about you bitch about important shit your forced to pay for. You're forced to pay for this quagmire of a war, or you go to jail (tax evasion is illegal no matter what some nut jobs believe). You're forced to pay for the political campaigns of people you hate (matching funds anyone?). You're forced to line the pockets of Haliburton, Blackwater and a dozen other companies thanks to rich no bid contracts. Rather than bitching about any of that you focus on a fucking operating system. You are a great asset to humanity.
btw I noticed you're from the UK so much of the above list of stuff you have to pay for doesn't apply to you specifically, but to other whiners like you. But hey at least you get to help fund that war I was talking about.
I thought the EULA just meant that you could return the computer. It doesn't entitle you to a refund. In the case of the pre-built machine its a package, don't like the bundled software. Fine, remove it. But don't expect your money back. Time to break out the classic analogy. I want a Ford with a Chevy engine, should Ford take back the engine and give me back a portion of my money? No, thats stupid. How about I buy a mac, should Apple refund me the cost of the OS since I want windows? They'd just smile and send me a link to boot camp (or whatever they're calling it now).
Student and teacher edition is $125 and even cheaper at the many colleges that have agreements with Microsoft (I bought it from my college for $7). And btw the teacher would've accepted .doc, which can I believe can be made with OO.o along with a bunch of other applications.
Maybe he should've just dropped the class rather than treating it like a religious issue. Besides he probably knew how the professor wanted the papers turned in before the class even met for the first time, or at least on the first day when he got a syllabus.
Way to over-react. You're exactly why many people hate college students. You have no real strife in your life so you manufacture it over bullshit.
Go watch telly.
No but Spaceballs the Crayons are copyright (or would be if it was a real product).
They did sequels long before Halo. Marthon had a sequel. Myth had a sequel. The only one that didn't was Oni, cause it sold 3 copies. So don't act like MS forced Bungie to make 3 Halo games.
Apple seems to be doing fine.
So why not just bid more than you're actually willing to pay in the hopes that the 2nd highest bid was more reasonable?
Thats what I'm planning on trying. But I'll run a side by side myself. Sorry but I never believe it when I read someone say this is faster than that. Especially when MS is involved.
Thats cool, I hadn't looked at vmware since ms released virtual pc for free. I guess I'll have to go back and compare performance.
I didn't say it was better than vmware, I said it was better than vmware player. The free product meant for end users, that only allows you to run pre-made virtual machines. Virtual PC lets you make your own virtual machines and is also free. I don't care if everybody on here hates IE, that doesn't mean they're right. Its a piece of software, software some of us prefer over other browsers. And yes I've tried them all, for years, but I still prefer ie. Gmail is better, its what I use. But where was it 10 years ago? Or even 5? And yahoo, pre-gmail, sucked just as bad as hotmail. I know I used to use it. My point is its stupid to attack free software and services. Bitch about stuff you have to pay for but free stuff you can choose not to use? stfu about. Gaim, kopete, trillian, miranda, etc. are just clients, messenger is a protocol, thats comparing apples to oranges. I use miranda, which I like a lot, but messenger has some features that I kept it around for. Nothing like playing a quick game with a buddy over chat. And again see my point about free software above. Star office hasn't been free for a long, long time. They started charging to make it look more legit. Thats why oo.o was spun off. My point, if you bothered to read it, was that 5 years ago works was the only two options if you wanted an office suite was works or star office. And with star office your choices were downloading it, most likely over dial up (look at broadband penetration in 2002) or paying $40 for software others were getting for free and feeling like a sucker. btw since you are clueless about star office and now oo.o I'll explain to you how people paid for it. Retailers carried a cd version of it that listed at $40. Same way they carried a $50 cd version of redhat, which no one buys because people don't like feeling stupid by paying for software that is "free". Generally they were stuck in a crappy box and shoved on a shelf somewhere and none of the employees would know what it was. When I worked at compusa I remember wandering the floor one slow day (I worked in the tech shop, so I didn't get out of it much) and noticed we had oo.o for sale. I mentioned it to a co-worker, who's job was to sell computers and software, and he had no idea what it was. I did a quick poll and 5 out of 5 salesmen had no idea what it was. Hell some of my co-workers in the shop didn't know what it was. But I must be a troll since I choose to use microsoft products. Or maybe a reasoning adult who has tried the alternatives and doesn't like them as much.