If its used to lock you the computer owner out of the program, its DRM.
If its used to lock the hackers out of the program (or in the program out of the rest of the system) its security.
The big difference between protected processes and Jails is root on the main system can access anything in a jail where as I doubt you can do that in windows (if you can that its useless as DRM so the argument is moot).
There isn't necessarily anything wrong with 50 billion incenses, but something really does need to be done about the compatibility problem.
Optimally we need a license that is somehow compatible with both BSD and GPL, but I don't think thats even possible since GPL is restrictive and BSD is free.
FreeBSD has a system called jails that do provide the security people are looking for in chroot. In addition to doing a chroot, they also prevent processes from seeing each other and can restrict network functionality.
Its like a virtual machine, but shares the same kernel (with restrictions) so there isn't the performance of full emulation.
If you choose to not watch the movie that is a decision that affects only you. Movie theaters censoring affects their customers and the creators of the films.
Just because its a business decision doesn't make it not censorship.
Darwin, the lower levels of OSX (the ones based off FreeBSD and OPENSTEP) are released open source under the Apple Public Source License.
The nice upper layers of the OS are closed source, but they didn't really benefit from the open source comunity so its not like they are taking and not giving back.
he ads aren't pay-per-view, they're pay per click. No click, no money... Many ads (most graphical ones) are pay per view not pay per click.
The publisher still makes money if you don't click them.
Site with ads usually aren't selling anything -- the ads are the money. So the "customer" is the one who clicks/views the ads.
Loss of a user base that uses resources without generating revenue isn't much of a loss.
And web servers can serve a limited number of clients. It's not as direct as taking a chair in starbucks, but it certainly does affect things like page load times on a busy server.
Slashdot Mirror
They do have the same. But Blu-Ray also has the BD+ DRM in addition to the standard kind they both share.
"having all of my hardware work..."
I guess you are a windows fan then.
If its used to lock you the computer owner out of the program, its DRM.
If its used to lock the hackers out of the program (or in the program out of the rest of the system) its security.
The big difference between protected processes and Jails is root on the main system can access anything in a jail where as I doubt you can do that in windows (if you can that its useless as DRM so the argument is moot).
There isn't necessarily anything wrong with 50 billion incenses, but something really does need to be done about the compatibility problem. Optimally we need a license that is somehow compatible with both BSD and GPL, but I don't think thats even possible since GPL is restrictive and BSD is free.
FreeBSD has a system called jails that do provide the security people are looking for in chroot. In addition to doing a chroot, they also prevent processes from seeing each other and can restrict network functionality.
Its like a virtual machine, but shares the same kernel (with restrictions) so there isn't the performance of full emulation.
It'll be fun when somebody writes a crack for the PC version to work with console servers so just this can happen.
If you choose to not watch the movie that is a decision that affects only you. Movie theaters censoring affects their customers and the creators of the films. Just because its a business decision doesn't make it not censorship.
Or you could do better and set a password and turn off remote logins. Or just put it behind a NAT/Firewall.
"Sorry, Mom, the mob has spoken!"
The labels may be giving them a deal to gain leverage against apple.
Have my pen knife my good man.
No it runs on magnetic fields.
I call the big one Bitey.
And Brockway and Ogdenville
Wholesale long distance to most of the world is less than one cent a minute. Its just pure profit for them.
How is it revolutionary? There are lots of sites that offer free storage.
The BSDs actually share a lot of code with each other (at least Free and Open do, not as sure about Net)
Hmm, looks like you are right, gcc does appear to be part of the base system. I'm surprised this is allowed with the license incompatibility. My bad.
Sounds good to me.
Darwin, the lower levels of OSX (the ones based off FreeBSD and OPENSTEP) are released open source under the Apple Public Source License.
The nice upper layers of the OS are closed source, but they didn't really benefit from the open source comunity so its not like they are taking and not giving back.
There is: cc
It's what FreeBSD (and afaik the other BSDs) use. GCC is available in ports (and is a dependancy of some ports) but isn't part of the base system.
Site with ads usually aren't selling anything -- the ads are the money. So the "customer" is the one who clicks/views the ads. Loss of a user base that uses resources without generating revenue isn't much of a loss. And web servers can serve a limited number of clients. It's not as direct as taking a chair in starbucks, but it certainly does affect things like page load times on a busy server.
Rule 34?