I'm not sure what you were replying to or what you were trying to say. Your grammar is reasonable. Perhaps it's because our language hasn't evolved to accommodate clarity? You'd think it could have after all this time.
Languages generally don't evolve to accommodate clarity. Or brevity. Or logic. Or consistent spelling. They evolve according to the needs of the culture using them, and those needs are most often to accommodate new meanings.
I do not think that word means what you think it means.
Unless you've never read any comic books or watched any comic book movies, this is pretty much _exactly_ what you expect to happen to someone who tries to do good.
Say what you will about Walmart; but they deal hard.
I believe that's precisely what people say about Walmart. They deal hard, and that's hard on individuals, hard on communities, and hard on whoever they have to run over to make a quick buck, which given their size, is pretty much everybody.
While I agree that your post is hilarious, it might not be all that far off. I can certainly see Comcast running some sort of automated image-detection algorithm (or outsourced Indian Manual image-detection algorithm) on the feeds, and targeting ads on their highjacked DNS pages to what would become an *extensive* database of your brand tastes.
Not that I disagree with your philosophy, but this is rather like saying "Don't develop for real-world conditions. Develop for our theories! I don't care that the real world doesn't conform to our theories, it really should." and then being surprised that whatever you're building doesn't actually work.
I'm not sure what you were replying to or what you were trying to say. Your grammar is reasonable. Perhaps it's because our language hasn't evolved to accommodate clarity? You'd think it could have after all this time.
Languages generally don't evolve to accommodate clarity. Or brevity. Or logic. Or consistent spelling. They evolve according to the needs of the culture using them, and those needs are most often to accommodate new meanings.
I do not think that word means what you think it means. Unless you've never read any comic books or watched any comic book movies, this is pretty much _exactly_ what you expect to happen to someone who tries to do good.
Say what you will about Walmart; but they deal hard.
I believe that's precisely what people say about Walmart. They deal hard, and that's hard on individuals, hard on communities, and hard on whoever they have to run over to make a quick buck, which given their size, is pretty much everybody.
While I agree that your post is hilarious, it might not be all that far off. I can certainly see Comcast running some sort of automated image-detection algorithm (or outsourced Indian Manual image-detection algorithm) on the feeds, and targeting ads on their highjacked DNS pages to what would become an *extensive* database of your brand tastes.
Automated Gun Turrets would make me consider subscribing, making sure they were connected only to my LAN, and then unsubscribing.
There's a growing body of anecdotal evidence that I'm great in bed. (That doesn't make it true.)
Not that I disagree with your philosophy, but this is rather like saying "Don't develop for real-world conditions. Develop for our theories! I don't care that the real world doesn't conform to our theories, it really should." and then being surprised that whatever you're building doesn't actually work.
"The operative word here is 'owned,'" Dunn told Fortune.
You care about punctuation but can't even be bothered to punctuate correctly.
You care about the metric system, but can't even be bothered to punctuate correctly, except where abbreviations of 'fucking' are concerned...