Slashdot Mirror


Real Life Super Hero Arrested

First time accepted submitter Pat Attack writes "In an ironic twist of fate, Phoenix Jones, a self-styled super hero from Seattle, has landed in jail. Jones happened upon a group of people fighting in the street and tried to stop the fight using pepper spray. He was arrested by police on four counts of assault. The New York Daily News quotes Jones: 'I've been shot once and I don't really want it to happen again. I've been stabbed twice, hit with a baseball bat and had my nose broken,' he says. 'But in all those incidents I helped someone who was in danger. If someone is going to take that punishment it should be the guy in body armor,' he said."

590 comments

  1. Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by alphatel · · Score: 5, Funny

    Phoenix, his eyes closed. Phoenix, when the walls fell.

    --
    When the foot seeks the place of the head, the line is crossed. Know your place. Keep your place. Be a shoe.
    1. Re:Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      >If someone is going to take that punishment it should be the guy in body armor,' he said."

      His eyes wide open!

    2. Re:Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The river alphate in winter

    3. Re:Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1

    4. Re:Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hate it when I can't remember which NG episode that is from... Brilliant!

    5. Re:Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

      It was the one where you were sitting there banging your fists on the table in utter frustration at Picard's density.

    6. Re:Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      The beautiful thing about this is that one has to assume the premise for the comment to be meaningful.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    7. Re:Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      It was the one where you were sitting there banging your fists on the table in utter frustration at Picard's density.

      I though that was every episode in which Picard forgets about the Picard Maneuver (the FTL one, not the uniform fix).

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    8. Re:Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you are the true hero, sir. thank you for making me smile today.

    9. Re:Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, heheheehee. Phoenix, wincing in pain, when in the cell, his roids swelled......

    10. Re:Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL!! Awesome comment!

    11. Re:Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by suso · · Score: 3, Informative

      I hate it when I can't remember which NG episode that is from... Brilliant!

      Darmok

    12. Re:Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      This is why the PADD app on my ipad is useful. Worth every penny. You may now mock me if you wish.

      --
      Good-bye
    13. Re:Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      I know the reference, I just don't see how it applies to this article. Can someone enlighten me?

    14. Re:Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Here's the video of the incident: http://vimeo.com/30307440 It's gotten a lot of air time here in Seattle. The people he broke up the fight on said to the responding police that they were just "dancing in the street" and the officer that showed up apparently had some personal dislike for Phoenix and booked him. Hoping the arraignment hearing tomorrow goes well for him as it clearly should. Also completely ignored by police is the video evidence of the dancing people getting in their BMW and trying to hit the guy they were fighting with.

    15. Re:Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by sortadan · · Score: 1

      Here's his fan page if you want to throw a thumbs up his way.

    16. Re:Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Witty.

    17. Re:Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by tripleevenfall · · Score: 0

      Phoenix, his nostrils wide

    18. Re:Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by bferlin · · Score: 1

      Nice reference. One of my favorite episodes.

      --
      - Brett
    19. Re:Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Ummm, the one called "Darmok?"

    20. Re:Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

      Thanks for that laugh, I almost pissed my pants. I have to admit that I never cared for that episode but it sticks in your head.

    21. Re:Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by failedlogic · · Score: 1

      A police offier geneally yells police shows up in a flashing lights and a badge implies the police are there.

      This guy just runs up on the group and starts to pepper spray them all. He doesn't say who he is or why he's there.

      I don't blame them for wanting to run over the dude with a car.

      This superhero dude doesn't seem to give a shit.

    22. Re:Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by Electricity+Likes+Me · · Score: 2

      I don't blame them for wanting to run over the dude with a car.

      This superhero dude doesn't seem to give a shit.

      Uh what? You don't blame a bunch of guys for trying to kill someone?

    23. Re:Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by Scott+Scott · · Score: 1

      His eyes wide open!

      Phoenix on the ocean!

    24. Re:Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROTFLOL.Phoenix at court - the court of silence. .

    25. Re:Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love Star Trek next generation. Nice play on one of the lines, not sure the name of episode though.

    26. Re:Darmok and Jalad at Seattle by Zapotek · · Score: 1

      For my money, if someone willingly enters into a fight he has accepted all risks.
      And if I happen to be involved in an altercation and someone comes running and pepper-sprays me then hurting him becomes justified self-defence.

      Which is why I avoid violence in general...

  2. HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    For those wondering about these new "superheroes," it's actually a movement of sorts. There was an excellent HBO documentary on them a while back. They're even forming groups now. When I heard about the documentary, I just expected to laugh at these guys. But it's actually a very interesting portrait of some well-meaning, though often a little deluded, guys who really do want to make the world a better place. I ended up feeling both sorry for them and a little envious of them at the same time.

    One of the best points they made was that they are "patrolling" areas where the cops really don't give a shit. For example, at one point in the documentary a homeless guy gets run over by a car during one of the superhero group patrols. It's the "superheroes" who stop to help him. But when they call the cops to report it, they don't even show up. Even when they try to flag down a cop car as the guy is still laying on the ground bleeding, the cops just keep driving. It's the "superheroes" who take him to the hospital and then even track down the car that hit him (driven by an obviously intoxicated driver). But, again, when they call the cops on the drunk driver, they're basically told to fuck off.

    As crazy as these guys are, I can't say that I don't understand why they do what they do. It's not just a bunch of losers wanting to be the comic book heroes of their fantasies. Some of them really do look around and say that the world NEEDS superheroes, especially the neighborhoods where no one else (including the cops) seems to give a shit. Part of me wishes I could have their faith in humanity. They may be deluded, but they're certainly not do-nothing cynics.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by esocid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They may not be do-nothing cynics, but the last thing we need is deluded people with "martial arts training" running around macing people.

      --
      Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
    2. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Maquis196 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There should be a legal way of being a "superhero", which lets face it, unless they have something wrong with them means the person is not a vigilante but just wants to help.

      For example, I live in London and here we have something called special constables who get regular police training and donate their spare time to being a police officer with all the privileges and titles of that role. For this they get free travel and expenses (basically lunch/dinner). Would it be so hard for cities all over the world to have similar programmes? If someone can pass the training AND they're doing it for free, they can be that superhero patrolling the neighbourhoods that career police aren't interested in, hell; if you keep patrolling the same neighbourhood you get attached to it and the people to you which means you can learn more as well about what needs to be done. We also have something called Safer Neighbourhoods for this as well, it can work in places outside of London I'm sure.

      Spoken as an ex- community support officer in London so I might be biased for police slightly. /Maq

    3. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by tmosley · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I would say we need these guys a lot more than we need thugs assaulting each other or random people in the streets.

      If I got jumped by a bunch of guys, I would rather have someone in body armor show up with mace than no-one at all.

    4. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Xacid · · Score: 1

      Full video here: http://vimeo.com/30307440

      And yeah, given the response we're seeing in these articles by the police even after seeing the video ourselves it just shows precisely what these guys are trying to change.

      From another article I read they wouldn't even hear about the hit and run you see on the video let alone everything else that's clearly an altercation going on.

    5. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by appmudpie · · Score: 0

      At least he's not FARTMAN.

    6. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by elrous0 · · Score: 2

      You might be pretty happy to see them if you were in trouble and the cops just kept driving. I'd rather have some well-meaning, if a little deluded, "superhero" help me out than some lazy-ass cop who acts like I'm waking him up from nap-time when I dial 911.

      Fortunately I live in the kind of neighborhood where I can dial 911 and the cops will show up in minutes and call me "sir" to boot. But not everyone does.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    7. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by DarkOx · · Score: 2

      There should be a legal way of being a "superhero", which lets face it, unless they have something wrong with them means the person is not a vigilante but just wants to help.

      Contact you local police force and find out if they have an "Auxiliary"

      I don't know about London but lots of US police forces have Auxiliarys that citizens can join. They usually volunteers, they get some weekend training, but nothing on the level of an actual office, and some more limited police powers, depends on the state and local laws.

      --
      Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
    8. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, one of the most poignant lines in Kick Ass is where he's valiantly trying to fight off a bunch of guys kicking the shit out of someone (and him too). One of the assailants says "The fuck is wrong with you, man? You'd rather die for some piece of shit that you don't even fucking know?" and he replies "The three assholes, laying into one guy while everybody else watches? And you wanna know what's wrong with me?"

    9. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by daid303 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Superheroes my ass. These people are not superheroes. Superheroes are people with special powers they use for good.

      These guys are better then superheroes. They are real life heroes. They do good things, just to help people, and not because they have special powers, they do it without special powers! Calling them superheroes like they are from a comic book with special powers doesn't do them right.

    10. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It occurs to me that Batman is pretty much the same as these guys. It kind of changes what makes the comic so fantastic. It's not the existence of Batman, but the fact that he's well known and accepted as (more or less) normal.

      What happens if we get used to superheroes? Batman ceases to be fantasy, beyond simple exaggeration.

    11. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by TheGratefulNet · · Score: 1

      yup, much better to have cops with tasers 'running around' using only their own judgement.

      hey, at least those thugs are better dressed and all in same-looking gang attire, too! they don't go by name but instead by number (although their friends know their real names). hmmm, yeah, is it kind of gang like, isn't it?

      --

      --
      "It is now safe to switch off your computer."
    12. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I would say we need these guys a lot more than we need thugs assaulting each other or random people in the streets.

      I only half agree. If groups of thugs want to kill each other off, I don't have a problem with that. It's only when they start attacking other people that it's a problem...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    13. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by mr1911 · · Score: 1

      So, you are against the police?

      Oh wait, too many of the donut eaters couldn't survive a single, serious martial arts workout. So we give them Tasers and guns. But that didn't do anything about the delusions. And yes, many of them are more deluded than the "superhero" group.

      You look down on these guys and call them deluded when the are helping others. The folks they helped are exceptionally grateful these guys are around.

      Hopefully you never need someone bigger and stronger to defend you. If you do, please inform your defender that you think he is delusional before he helps you. That way he can let you get beaten or killed rather than receive help from someone you mock.

      --
      This post comes with a double-your-money-back guarantee!
      Any offense taken to this post is at your sole discretion.
    14. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by KDEnut · · Score: 1

      In my day, they were called vigilante militias.

    15. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      They have super powers. They have the power 99.99% of us lack to actually try and do something about it.

    16. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Inda · · Score: 3, Informative

      We have two sorts plastic policemen in the UK.

      The Specials (not the yellow bus type) - full body amour, full powers, part timers, normally attend Friday and Saturday night pissed up punch-ups and football matches. Hated because they do it for free - it's all about gaining power and gold stars.

      Community Service Officers - no power, only report crimes. Jumped up little Hitlers. The next step up from a traffic warden. Useless waste of money as they get paid a wage.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    17. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Superheroes are people with special powers they use for good.

      *nerd hat on*

      What about Batman or the Green Arrow? Unless 'having lots of money' is a special power, they didn't have any. They just put on body armour and went and helped people - making them a much better role model than someone like Superman who is basically invulnerable.

      *nerd hat off*

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    18. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by 2fuf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Reading the news lately feels more and more like reading the Onion

    19. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by ElectricTurtle · · Score: 1

      ... and then you'll be privy to all the excitement of setting up traffic detours and hanging around construction sites! Auxiliary police do nothing but harmless gopher work.

      --
      I support the Slashcott and will not be reading or commenting from 2/10/14 to 2/17/14. Beta is steaming pile of dog shit
    20. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have one of those stationed at the school I work at. Does wonders for intimidating the little brats sometimes. Sure, a CSO's powers are limited... but the pupils don't know that.

    21. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Hijacked+Public · · Score: 1

      It wasn't until I read your comment that I realized the guy you replied to was describing the bad guys.

      I thought he meant the police.

      --
      "Sacrifice for the good of The State" - The State
    22. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Pretty much. The idea of a superhero is someone that can do good against the odds and live another day to do it all over again. It's the classic morale boosting story about how good can always overcome evil. This is why such stories are mainly presented to children. It's uplifting. Unfortunately the real world isn't so kind with reality siding with evil as being effective. And let's face it, there have been many evil men and regimes that have been very very effective at accomplishing their goals. But yes, these guys are real heros for going up against bad people against the odds. Firemen, police officers, and even the peace corps rank among heros.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    23. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Depending on the city and the police force you call even nice neighborhoods get ignored. I live in a relatively nice middle class neighborhood in one of the top 5 cities in the US by population. Cheap houses are $200K and expensive ones are $300K-$500K (after the bubble collapse). We have a deal with the local county cops where we pay them or donate to police charity or something and they patrol our area (which IMO ought to be illegal but apparently isn't and no I'm not talking about taxes) but we are also covered by city cops.

      I had someone (most likely joy rider car thieves according to the cops) shoot a round and hit my house a couple of years back. We called the city cops and reported it. I also called the county as well because my home owners group had drilled it into us that we were paying for them so use them. The cops we were paying showed up in about 2-5 minutes despite the fact that we clearly told them the danger had passed and no one was injured. They came rolling in with 3 cars, lights going, obviously making a show of responding and agreed to handle filing the reports and talking to the city cops (these guys were county cops) and getting all the paperwork straight. The city police woke me up 10 hours later and was irritated that I had called another group despite the fact that both are responsible for the area.

      Now I'm not for the way my HOA has donated to have one set of cops on speed dial and I think it's just another example of how everything in modern society to some degree or another is corrupted by money but if I lived in a neighborhood where the police response time was 10 hours (like the official emergency service where I live) I'd be thankful that these deluded guys or even regular old neighborhood watch was trying to do something. When the cops start responding to all neighborhoods in a timely manner then I won't care what happens to these guys but its hard not to at least partially appreciate even a deluded idiot who is trying to do something that others won't even when it is their job.

    24. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you need to re-watch that part. The homeless guy being hit and the drunk driver are different incidents.

    25. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Aeros · · Score: 1

      I don't know, you might want to ask the homeless guy who got run over what he thinks.

    26. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Serenissima · · Score: 5, Insightful

      *nerd hat off*

      If you're posting on Slashdot, I'm pretty sure that hat doesn't come off ;)

      --
      Give a man a fire and he'll be warm for a day. But light a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life.
    27. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by chronoglass · · Score: 1

      We have a deal with the local county cops where we pay them or donate to police charity or something and they patrol our area (which IMO ought to be illegal but apparently isn't and no I'm not talking about taxes) but we are also covered by city cops.

      My cousin is a sheriff in CA and the county in most places won't pay overtime. Instead they offer "rent-a-cop" time. I am very against "the rich" abusing "their power" but this is something I completely understand and agree with. If a community wants to organize and "vote with their wallets" there isn't any reason they shouldnt be allowed to.. since it also ends up helping the officers in most cases.

      are there exceptions? of course. but they should be handled harshly. regardless of whether you are on real time, or "rent a cop" time.. you're still a cop, and you enforce for everyone, not JUST that community.

    28. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Shotgun · · Score: 1

      The most venome you'll ever get in life will be when you point out that someone, who claims to deserve a high wage for being a professional, is worthless, by doing the same job off-handedly as a volunteer.

      --
      Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
      Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
    29. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by kikito · · Score: 1

      Batman's being able to do what he does for more than one season is already a superpower.

      Any normal human being, even with the extreme training and the suit, would have stopped in 6 months or so. They would fall bad and get a sprain. They would accumulate small traumas on the head. Those things pile up. He either has super-damage-avoiding, super-regeneration, or simply super-luck.

      Not to mention that in addition to being extremely fit, he's allegedly extremely intelligent and cultivated. I'd call that super-getting-things-done :P.

      He also seems to have mild anti-aging powers. For all the things he's supposed to have done, he'd need decades.

      Green Arrow, I know nothing of him.

    30. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Cops rarely assault cops. Blue wall and all that.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    31. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Dekker3D · · Score: 1

      "Having lots of money" actually counts, in my eyes. At least, if it's inherited. It's still something that just happens to you, that most people aren't blessed with. It also makes the decision to fight crime a lot easier, since you can afford proper equipment.

    32. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I grant that the official story is that Batman and Green Arrow do not have superpowers, but no normal human could ever in a million years do what they do. Batman is impossibly skilled, impossibly durable, and impossibly well-prepared. Green Arrow can perform trick shots that no human archer could ever hope to duplicate no matter how many times they attempted it, with no preparation, while people are shooting at him, and like Batman is an impossibly skilled and durable martial artist. They "don't have superpowers" only because the comic book authors somehow claim that these abilities are "natural".

    33. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Maquis196 · · Score: 1

      Heh, I agree about the Community support officers! I was amongst the 3rd batch trained and when I passed a laughably short training the police had no idea on how to use me. Took them 2yrs to really figure it out and by then I got bored, decided that becoming a regular wasn't for me and moved into IT. The CSO's really are quite bad (even if a lot of them have their heart in the right place at least).

      Specials in every city _would_ make the world a better place, simple as that. Career police tend to be the bullys. Hell, I wouldn't want to be a regular officer but I'm tempted as hell to be a special because they do get the full training. Just don't try and become a regular officer when you're a special since HR will hold that against you (why pay for something that you do for free).

      I do take offence at calling special's plastic sir. It's the PCSO's that are plastic/diet coke/margarine of the police world :lol:

    34. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by alexo · · Score: 0, Troll

      It wasn't until I read your comment that I realized the guy you replied to was describing the bad guys.

      I thought he meant the police.

      The police *are* the bad guys.

    35. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what makes you think they are deluded? Just because they are doing something? They are standing up for weaker people?
      Actually saving people instead of those worthless twats in police cars that most of the time couldn't care less about people unless they got paid?
      These people have more balls than most cops combined.

    36. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by sheehaje · · Score: 1

      Batman had super money. And a super chip on his shoulder. I guess that's not a super power, but well above ordinary joe that wants to help people.

    37. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you read the Onion lately? I've tried to, but there doesn''t appear to be much reading any more.

    38. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Specials have to patrol with a real police officer, so that doesn't work.

      But CSOs are pretty much the same as these superheroes - civilians who have no authority. Except CSOs seem to spend most of their time hassling underage drinkers and pursuing other victimless crimes, rather than doing anything particularly "super".

    39. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by __aaklbk2114 · · Score: 1

      ++

    40. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by tgd · · Score: 1

      For example, I live in London and here we have something called special constables who get regular police training and donate their spare time to being a police officer with all the privileges and titles of that role.

      Contrary to (their) popular belief, in the US cops can't beat the shit out of people because they're breaking the law.

    41. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by tgd · · Score: 1

      Its called "superballs"

    42. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe what you need is someone with a speciall super pen. One mighty enough to FIRE all those COWARDS dressed in blue.

    43. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by geekoid · · Score: 0

      Groups of thugs killing each other off? Great. That pretty much describes the middle east. Well done.

      Here is a clue: Groups of thugs don't just appear, they are made, and they ALWAYS involve innocents. Always.

      A group of thugs fighting in the street isn't exactly the best way to improve society,. Solid examples of good behavior is how you improve society.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    44. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by geekoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No they aren't. Some are.

      I know far too many police officers who do there job to help uphold the law.

      They are a group of people. Do they need strong control? yes. Do they need solid regulations? yes. Are they perfect? no.

      Saying the police are the bad guys is like saying blacks are the bad guys. It's complete nonsense.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    45. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Bruce Wayne is supposed to be all of those things. A 7-sigma human. But no magic is involved.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    46. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by lysdexia · · Score: 1
      /me hands TheRaven64 some Bactine and butterfly bandages.

      Yeah, I know man, It really hurts when you pull those nerd-hat staples out of your skull. It took mine about a week to heal, and that first haircut was pretty gruesome.

    47. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      No kidding. Looks like they're phasing out the print edition altogether and creating some sort of CNN parody site. Everything is geared towards their TV show now, not the print edition. Almost every story is video-only now.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    48. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Culture20 · · Score: 2

      Well said. They wouldn't be thugs if they were just beating each other up; they'd be a fight-club or something.

    49. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Hatta · · Score: 2

      There should be a legal way of being a "superhero",

      Perform a citizens arrest on Lloyd Blankfein, and you'll be a real super hero.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    50. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by geekoid · · Score: 1

      That's not the case at all. Those volunteers aren't regulated, don't have a reports to file, aren't monitored, don't respond to the variety of other things that police do. They don't have to make decisions like 'DO I help the tax payer or the homeless guy, because there is only one of me, and I have several calls.

      Seriously, who do you want the police to help? The homeless guy, or the tax payer?

      Ideally, both. But there isn't always time for both.

      Deal with that fucking hard decision every day.
      Reality,. its complicated. Anyone who every breaks it down into black and white is lying to you.
      To me, if you are in a situation where you have to make that decision, you need more police, and better community service. But that means taxes, and while everyone wants to help the homeless guy, they turn into Scrooge the moment you say it will cost them an extra 10 bucks a year.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    51. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Ambitwistor · · Score: 1
    52. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Green arrow has a super level of accuracy.

      Batman has a super level of toughness, intelligence and drive.

      I also suspect Batman juices.

      And yes, money IS a super power.

      BIll gates is saving many thousands of lives.
      SO I take my hat off and say "Thank you for your heroic work, Money."

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    53. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Do they train in martial arts? I guess what I'm asking is, "are they smart about it"?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    54. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by morari · · Score: 1

      What about them? Batman never was and never will be a superhero. It must really suck for him being in the Justice League, around real superheroes. At least characters like Iron Man can keep up with his peers byway of mech suit. Batman's only real gadget is a grappling hook. :P

      --
      "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
    55. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by TheCarp · · Score: 0, Troll

      Its nice when things are so black and white. Things seldom are.

      Let me tell you another story of a "Super Hero". She is a hair dresser most days, but on her day off, she got involved and helped an old lady who was taken advantage of by a car dealer. She drove that lady down to the dealership, when her own family wouldn't, and gave them holy hell. She even went back the next day, crying and pleading with them to make right with the old woman. A true american....oh wait....

      Thats right, that woman was my grandmother. Oh and they "took advantage of her" by doing some body work on her car, fixing it up, and somehow not magically predicting that the fuel pump was going to die 3 weeks later, at which point, they told her that it wasn't worth fixing. Then what did these bastards do? Well, after she told them to junk it, and couldn't find the title.... they did her a favor (afterall, the service manager was a friend of the family) and found someone who would take it for junk without the title.

      Real bastards eh? Well after she watched some TV and heard some guy saying he would pay $400 for a junked car, decided that they had screwed her and they got $400 that she should have gotten. It doesn't help that she is 87 and sometimes looses it a bit. Hell, the day after she went down to the dealership to give them hell, she was telling my mother and I how she had been laying around the house in bed for two whole days.

      My grandmother is totally wrong in this deal, doesn't really remember what happened very well (she doesn't remember telling them it was ok to junk it, though we all know she did, we talked with her about it before she did it), but, she doesn't know that. She is heading into senile at the ripe old age of 87.

      However, the wanna be super hero, she is in her 20s and while well meaning, got involved without understanding the whole story, and went way overboard, got her all riled up, and completely embarrassed a long time friend of the family at his work.

      Knowing what to do when three guys are beating the snot out of one guy is easy, and its sad that more people are not willing to stand up. However, thats a rare and fantastic situation that doesn't come up every day. Real situations are far more complex.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    56. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Batman is fighting crime in the worst way possible.
      How many 'Wayne sponsored' private patrol could be funded with that money? How many 3rd party group could he hired to investigate the police? Hell, he could become Mayor and clean house in the PD.

      Batman is a psychotic thug, by real world standards. Fortunately, he live in the DC universe.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    57. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some places (like Phoenix) have a similar program, and it has been featured in several news stories.
      Volunteers take a long extended version of normal police training (weekends only, basically, for a really long time), and they then basically are serving just the same as normal LEOs, but with a different schedule.

      Quite a number of them are lawyers :)

    58. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be joking. If not, you're an idiot.

    59. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's because The Onion isn't satirical, it's predictive. For example, IIRC a story about a guy suing McDonalds for making him fat went from the Onion to slower news media in about fourteen months.

    60. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Fned · · Score: 1

      Unless 'having lots of money' is a special power, they didn't have any.

      *looks around at current events*

      Uh, yeah, "having lots of money" IS a special power.

      - Only a rare 1% possess it
      - It can invisibly control the weak-minded from a distance
      - It's passed down to their decendants, but they can only use it when they turn 18, like the X-Factor gene
      - It can change the world for good or evil in ways that no individual without it can even dream of

      Sadly, none of the people with this power are superheroes.

      Almost all of them are supervillains.

    61. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by OrangeCowHide · · Score: 0

      That's not entirely accurate. People don't choose to become black guys because it will give them a position of power and authority and a gun to make people have to listen to them,

      --
      Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains. - Evilest Doe
    62. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do take offence at calling special's plastic sir.

      Really? I take offense at needlessly inserting apostrophes into plurals. That's wrong on either side of the pond.

    63. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by nedlohs · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Have they ever turned a blind eye to another copy doing something wrong? Then they are just as bad.

      It would be pretty difficult to be a cop without being bad, I suspect you can only arrest your fellow officers (and superiors) so many times before you either leave or accidentally get shot.

      But "The X *are* Y" in English (unlike in mathematics) doesn't actually mean every single member of X is a member of Y. It just means overall they average out to being in Y.

    64. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by nedlohs · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The homeless guy obviously. It really isn't difficult or complicated.

      Showing tax payers that there aren't enough resources is the only way you are going to get more resources. So do that, while still doing your damn job.

    65. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      Agree here. Cops have a pretty awful job and I have to say I'm happy someone is trying to do what they do. Their day is full of difficult conversations and meeting people who have questionable moral ethics. Rarely are police called upon to help someone -- usually it's to arrest someone after the fact. If you want to know why cops can be such jerks upon arrival it's because they don't know what they are walking into. Do you have a knife? A gun? Which one of you three is actually the problem? So you take control quickly and that generally means telling people what to do in a brusque manner.

      Friend went through the academy and one scenario is police being called to handle what seems to be a domestic dispute. You knock, the door opens, and you see the person who opened the door, another person sitting on a chair, and someone in the back out of sight. There's a knife sitting on a table out of reach of the person on the chair but further from you than him. So you really have no idea what's going on, there's a dangerous weapon in sight, and an unknown in the back room. I believe the proper way to handle it was to request backup, ask permission to enter, place yourself between the knife and everyone else, call the person from the back room with his hands empty, then start trying to find out what happened. But what if someone reaches into their coat pocket, or even behind them -- are they going for a gun?

      Job sucks.

    66. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      Interesting story, I love the twist on you dis'in your own g-mother. But pertanent to the topic? Questionable.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    67. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by binford2k · · Score: 0

      Now I'm not for the way my HOA has donated to have one set of cops on speed dial and I think it's just another example of how everything in modern society to some degree or another is corrupted by money

      Isn't this the ideal that the libertarians are all in a froth to promote?

    68. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by txgunslinger · · Score: 1

      It's not even 'the rich'. My apartment complex has a sheriff that gets free rent to patrol the place after hours.

    69. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Patch86 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Vigilantism is illegal for a good reason. Vigilantism in a funny costume is still vigilantism.

      Generally the people who get involved in vigilantism are either crazy or thugs just looking for an excuse (my guess is our Marvel/DC friends are the former). They either target the wrong people, or end up abusing their position of power, or end up using grossly disproportionate force. In areas policed by vigilantes (and counting militias, religious zealots, and lynch mobs, this is still common in many places in the world) you're often as likely to fall foul of a vigilante as a "criminal". We get around this problem in civilized society by handing out specific powers to specific people (police, rentacops, private eyes, bounty hunters, etc.), and tightly monitoring these groups to keep them in check.

      It's all very amusing when it's some deluded guy dressed as a Green Lantern, but it doesn't make it any different- you've still got some (probably mentally ill) guy roaming around the streets with weaponry and "martial arts training", looking for people to fight.

    70. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Counterexample: the LAPD

    71. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wish that movie had stayed with the tone established in the first half by scenes like that one, instead of turning into a Matrix-y kung-fu movie with the appearance of Big Daddy and Hit Girl. Good characters, but really ruined the promise the movie had up to that point. But I guess you can't go the semi-realistic hero-gets-beaten-to-shit route once you involve a 10 year old hero... which is why they shouldn't have...

      With these real-life costumed vigilantes, I understand where they're coming from, but I don't really agree with where they go to. They put on costumes to protect their identity, but it also grants anonymity (up until they get arrested) and a sense of being separate and special. So they're more likely to intervene in cases where they really shouldn't. Like, perhaps, this one.

      By the way, I heard on the news the 911 call Phoenix Jones made to report the fight. The dispatcher asked "What are you wearing?", and the awkward pause before he answered "A yellow and black rubber suit" was precious. :)

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    72. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by uniquename72 · · Score: 1

      Undoing accidentally negative moderation...

    73. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by binford2k · · Score: 1

      I watched the video too. I think you're seeing what you want to see in it.

    74. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      sure they "can" They're just not suppose to, and sometimes there are consequences for doing so.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    75. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by modecx · · Score: 1

      Well, money is a sort of power, after all. It's the power to get things done; and most people have to buy it, in exchange for their time. Inheriting ludicrous sums of cash might as well count as a super power.

      First off, a poor chump couldn't afford either the Batman's or Green Arrow's toys--which went along way in giving these characters actual crime fighting ability.

      Secondly, if you have to work to keep a roof over your head and food on your plate, you probably don't have a lot of time left to devote towards extensive training.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    76. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by X0563511 · · Score: 2

      If you think that every (or even just the majority) of cops join for that reason, then I don't envy the view you must have.

      A few bad apples and all that. You damn well know it's a bad minority ruining it for everyone.

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    77. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      And yet, contrary to your dishonest Fox-News fueled propaganda, in many cities they do stand for that.

    78. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by sonicmerlin · · Score: 1

      Obviously you didn't glean the proper message from Unbreakable.

    79. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by operagost · · Score: 2

      Yeah... this is probably why we don't have a superhero named "Small Claims Court-Man".

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    80. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Hentes · · Score: 1

      In Batman the writers just changed 'magic' for 'technology'. A lot of the stuff he has can't be bought IRL, not even for a fortune.

    81. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Things aren't so black and white, except when they *actually are*, and some attitudes needs violent readjustment.
      When they aren't, we can get TheCarp on the case.

    82. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by sonicmerlin · · Score: 1

      His ability to go beyond the law and typical bureaucracy is a key in his fight against his city's unique super villains.

    83. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by entoke · · Score: 2

      And the rest of the cops, the "good cops" are the ones who cover for them.

    84. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Intropy · · Score: 1

      Similarly, many Sheriff's departments in both large and small counties have volunteer deputies, often called reserves.

    85. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      It really does. Day after day they have to deal with the scum of society. Just watch Cops and imagine doing that day after day. It is probably one of the few just that can give you a worse opinion of the human race than tech support.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    86. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by OrangeCowHide · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Of the 10 or so people I have known who went on to become police officers, every one of them had that particular kind of rationale. They wanted to prove that they were important and people should listen to them. No one I have ever known became a cop because they wanted to help serve and protect the citizens, or even just because they needed a job, they all wanted power over people.

      Obviously, this is anecdotal. I am sure there are literally dozens of police officers who did it for the right reasons.

      --
      Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains. - Evilest Doe
    87. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      > [my grandmother is senile and some idiot tried to help her]

      Cool story, bro.
      What does it have to do with superhero wannabes taking on crime in shitty neighborhoods?

    88. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by dyingtolive · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's a civil issue. If she 'loses it sometimes', perhaps it would be best if a trusted friend or relative were in control of her affairs.

      That's not watching someone beat the shit out of his girlfriend in a car across from a crowded bar patio screaming loud enough you can hear him two buildings down with the windows closed and the AC on. Not fun coming upon that and realizing that people have been watching doing nothing.

      That's not watching a bunch of guys beat on a single person. That's not even watching any number of the hit and runs I see out front while I'm standing on my balcony smoking.

      I don't know about 'super' heroes, fancy costumes, or 'martial arts', but I do know this: The world needs heroes of some sort or another. The world needs good people who are not willing to stand around saying, "Well, I've got mine, and he's got his." The world needs people that THE CHILDREN (yeah, I know, I know) can look up to, outside of their parents. Right now, the only people they have are sports players, politicians, and what's presented to them via television. Not exactly the kind of role models I would want for my kids.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    89. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by interval1066 · · Score: 1

      "There should be a legal way of being a "superhero".

      I have a hard time with this. One one hand, I'd like to say 'Yes, there should.', but on the other hand should we create even more legal nonsense? I want to say there is a legal way of being a super hero, become a cop, and then the cynic in me laughs and laughs. We've been wrestling with the issues regarding crime for going on 50 years now. I keep coming back to the same solution, decriminalize drugs.

      --
      Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
    90. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Of course -- the frothing ones, at least. They're all about having the 'freedom' to corrupt everything with money, because they all have or assume they will have the money so it will work out in their favor. They don't consider the ramifications of having the "freedom" to be at the mercy of criminals because they can't afford police protection -- that won't be them, so they don't care. Even though it will affect them, in their walled-off and policed enclaves. Just like the lawlessness in northern Mexico affects us here.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    91. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by muridae · · Score: 1

      Of course not! No card carrying libertarian needs some goverment-like HOA to organize their protection. The home owners should be doing this themselves, not being forced into doing it by a clause tied to the deed of their land. I mean, can the home owner choose not to pay protection money, and get different service? If they can't, it's not rabid libertarianism.

    92. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by hoggoth · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, I never got the love for Superman either. Nothing can hurt him, so how is he heroic?

      It used to crack me up when the old black-and-white Superman TV show had him stand there chest out while the bad guys shot at him, then when they ran out of bullets and threw the gun at him HE WOULD DUCK to dodge the thrown gun!?

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    93. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 2

      In non-violent situations, absolutely. Cannot agree with you enough.
      However, in cases of violence in public, stepping in isn't so much "being a superhero" as it is just being a good Samaritan.
      Whether the situation is violent or non-violent makes a HUGE world of difference.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    94. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by suso · · Score: 2

      It doesn't help that she is 87 and sometimes looses it a bit.

      Let me tell you another story of a "Super Hero". He is a Slashdot poster most days, but on his day off he got involved and tried to illustrate a counterpoint without knowing how to spell.

      Actually, my favorite superhero is Spellmaster. He has a 6th sense to know when someone has just fiddled a few letters and can jump in the situation in a moments notice using the super speed of his OC-192 connection, usually posting anonymously because he's a superhero after all so he doesn't need to take credit for his deeds. And he doesn't take shit from no one. Usually he's as nasty as possible to make sure that evil spellers don't return.

    95. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Yeah, because three guys beating one guy to a pulp is totally equal to a senile old lady out maybe $400 bucks. You don't have any sense of proportion, do you?

      Yes, you just made the two equal, regardless of your intentions.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    96. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 2

      Agreed, usually vigilantism is extremely misguided, we have judges for a reason. Unfortunately, law enforcement in this Country has its problems.
      Going out dressed up trying to find people to "bring to justice" isn't a good idea. Batman itself addressed his, he was constantly in trouble with Gotham PD. As well he should be. A rich man waging a private war is a plan for disaster.

      But that said, when people are being violently hurt in public, SOMEONE needs to step in, immediately. Sadly between the bystander effect and fear, people will usually ignore what is happening. In these cases, somebody needs to stand up. Somebody needs to care.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    97. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by kikito · · Score: 1

      Indeed. And since that's impossible for a normal human being, he's due to have some kind of super powers.

    98. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where I live (US), people can become specially appointed sheriff's deputy's in a similar manner. While we do have conceal carry laws (handguns only; not weapons or other guns), Police can carry in more cases. Particularly in the weapon category I know people who find it handy (although they always have a gun on them also).

      I don't think my county does it as we're a major city and there is liability. I know city police wise we're the largest district and have the fewest officers; we're not rich enough to get extra patrols and we're not bad enough. We are the largest block watch and as such when asking for extra resources for a limited time, we tend to get them as they assume we do care and thus when the politicans run they'll get votes, when they ask for help with resources, we'll be there etc. so they try to help us. It also means I have the personal cell phone of the officer in charge of our district; since 911 has told me my street doesn't exist, that's a nice back option (I wouldn't ask he come out; merely he call the 911 operator and explain to them my street does exist).

    99. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Any cop who sees another cop engage in illegal activity and does nothing is also a bad cop. There is far too much police abuse to assume the good cops are doing their job.

      --
      Good-bye
    100. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      A sheriff? That's an elected official taking a bribe isn't it?

    101. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This isn't vigilantism. "any person who takes the law into his or her own hands, as by avenging a crime. "

      This is not avenging (judge, jury), this isn't even crime prevention. This is people stopping actual crimes in progress. If you try to break up a fight, is that vigilantism? If you stop a robbery is that vigilantism? If you stop a little girl from being kidnapped?

      People like you who confuse stopping a crime in action with vigilantism are just stupid idiots who need to be shouted down and humiliated for being idiots.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    102. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by niko9 · · Score: 2

      I would say we need these guys a lot more than we need thugs assaulting each other or random people in the streets.

      If I got jumped by a bunch of guys, I would rather have someone in body armor show up with mace than no-one at all.

      Then I would say you and these self anointed "super heroes"are supremely ignorant of the laws governing the use of force, deadly force and self-defense. There is centuries of well established law (dating back to medieval England) governing when it is appropriate for civilians to use force and deadly force against assailants.

      Anybody who likes to consider them a well informed citizen should read Massad Ayoob's "In the Gravest Extreme: The Role of the Firearm in Personal Protection". Read this even if you have no intention of ever owning a gun. Amazon: http://www.amazon.com/Gravest-Extreme-Firearm-Personal-Protection/dp/0936279001

      If I got jumped by a bunch of guys, I would rather have someone in body armor show up with mace than no-one at all

      But how do these Super Yahoos know who is who in a situation like that? In the aforementioned 3 against 1 scenario, were the 3 the instigators or did the 1 try to rob the three and then had the tables turned on him?

      Is that husky male who appears to be beating a woman a rapist? Or is he a vice cop who is trying to arrest a combative prostitute (who are known to yell "Rape!" when being handcuffed as to create a distraction)?

      See the problem? You don't think do-gooders like these Yahoos have ended up in prison for getting involved in something they knew nothing about? You think just because he "only" carries mace that some individual might not end up dead from a head injury because of their actions and end up being charged with murder or manslaughter?

      Use your Google Foo and look up Massad Ayoob's Ayoob Files. He's been writing about this stuff for years in an effort to educate the public about the use of force and deadly force. Ayoob is my "Super Hero": all research, writing. educating and no glory.

    103. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was totally into Spellmaster until the secret of his dark Nazi past was revealed. I mean come on, frozen in a u-boat for 50 years?

    104. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 2

      "vigilante militias" usually said by people who think government should have all the power, not the people... unless they are protesting Wall Street, then they think the government shouldn't have any power ... until health care is mentioned and then government should have all the power.. until ....

      As I've said before, stopping a crime in progress is NOT vigilantism. I would hope we all try to stop crimes in progress, be it a street fight or a little girl getting kidnapped. Vigilantism is specifically acting as Police, Judge and Jury, serving VENGEANCE.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    105. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      We at slashdot recognize the need for police, that does not mean that we ignore the EXTREMELY wide spread corruption. That does not mean we ignore the situations where one cop is clearly acting illegally and 5 other cops stand around and do nothing. When was the last time we saw a cop stop another cop and arrest him in the act of something clearly illegal (i.e Kelly Thomas). Several officers of the law stood around while 2 of them beat a homeless/handicapped man to death. Why in the fuck did not one of them intervene? Have you seen the pics of what they did to him? You are telling me thats right?

      --
      Good-bye
    106. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Unequivocal · · Score: 1

      Doesn't Superman get cats out of trees sometimes when he's not busy fighting crime? Seems similar enough if the topic is the behavior of superheroes?

    107. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And proper lawyers, and proper bribes. Essential things for Not Getting Caught, which is very important for being a vigilantee superhero. You can't go around beating up scum - even scum you catch red-handed in the middle of a violent crime - if they are going to then sue you for assault.

    108. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... and then you'll be privy to all the excitement of setting up traffic detours and hanging around construction sites! Auxiliary police do nothing but harmless gopher work that frees up real police officers to do what they are paid to do (in the ways they should be doing them).

      There, FTFY.

    109. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by metrix007 · · Score: 1

      Batman trained constantly for 12 years and is one of the most expert martial artists in the DCU, not to mention his intellect and accumulated knowledge. The other non-powered superheroes had similar amounts of training or something else to elevate them to that super level. Besides a costume. Could a real life super hero exist? Sure, but these guys are ordinary, except for the costume.

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    110. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by metrix007 · · Score: 1

      Actually know. Maybe you missed the whole part of why having a symbol is important in fighting crime?

      --
      If you ignore ACs because they are anonymous - you're an idiot.
    111. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2010/09/nj_police_salaries_rank_highes.html

      In my area we pay cops over six figures. reaching 120-130k in some counties, to patrol crime-less suburbs filled with middle-class on up suburbanites.

      In Newark, we pay cops around 60k or less where shootings occur regularly, and the police force was dramatically reduced. It's nuts.

      I have sympathy for cops in the rough neighborhoods. The cops in the other neighborhoods are overpaid bullies.

    112. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not a hat it's called a scalp

    113. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      I have the personal cell phone of the officer in charge of our district; since 911 has told me my street doesn't exist, that's a nice back option (I wouldn't ask he come out; merely he call the 911 operator and explain to them my street does exist).

      Call him now, while nothing's going on. Do you really want risk another few minutes of fire or other danger while you're screaming over the phone to the officer "please call 911 and tell them I exist!"? Get the error corrected in their system before it's too late. If the problem is that your street isn't official, hit up your city council and get it on the map.

    114. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by mugnyte · · Score: 1

      The Specials (not the yellow bus type) - full body amour, full powers, part timers, normally attend Friday and Saturday night pissed up punch-ups and football matches. Hated because they do it for free - it's all about gaining power and gold stars.

      Community Service Officers - no power, only report crimes. Jumped up little Hitlers. The next step up from a traffic warden. Useless waste of money as they get paid a wage.

      Sounds like both groups provide no value to society in your eyes. I wonder if you can rephrase your comment from their perspective.

    115. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Pi1grim · · Score: 1

      Ah, come on, you missed the point completely. He calls the cops about the crime in progress and then steps in to prevent it. That is just what a modern citizen and a good person should do. Since a number of people doing that is very low, the ones that do care — start patroling. And it was just a matter of time before they got sued for assault. Thugs nowadays know that they can play the victim all too well. Heck, even if the victims defends successfully, then the thug automatically becomes the victim.

    116. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by hey! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, but the problem is with vigilantes is that there's no guarantee they'll agree with you what an "asshole" is in less clear-cut cases. Sure, if a vigilante rescues me from being beaten up, I'd be grateful. But what if he "rescues" me from buying liquor, or porn, or having an abortion? The fantasy of being a vigilante isn't limited to doing good, it includes getting to decide what *is* good to do. And without somebody looking over your shoulder, it's easy to screw that up.

      Take this case. If you watch the video (http://vimeo.com/30307440), you see a bunch of people -- probably drunk -- standing around while a couple of guys are doing the bear-hugging drunk fight thing. Then Mr. Jones wades in with his Jumbo-sized can of pepper spray. Who's to say he didn't do more harm than these guys were going to do to each other?

      When we imagine ourselves as superheroes, we imagine ourselves with superhuman traits to go with it. Even if that doesn't include obvious superpowers, it includes non-obvious ones: superhuman judgment (always being right) and superhuman luck (always winning in the end). The reality is that people are fallible. Of course the cops are fallible too, but they have one big advantage: numbers. Even if they don't arrive in force, even a single cop has the promise of dozens of others at his call. The best way to end a fight like this is overwhelming force, which Mr. Jones does not possess. He has to bring a weapon into the fight, thus *escalating* the conflict.

      Everything you don't like about cops can be true of vigilantes, except they don't regard themselves as accountable to anyone else even in *principle*.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    117. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      Green Arrow, maybe. He's just a good shot, with a few trick arrows.

      Batman? He (like Tony Stark) has the power of deus ex machina. Need to decipher ancient mayan script? Piece of cake, Batman already learned it in his spare time between being Bruce Wayne during the day, and Batman at night. He also keeps current in multiple fields at a PHD level, practices in multiple martial arts, designs, tests, and builds his own equipment, maintains relationships/surveillance on a global network of friends/foes, olympic physical training, and does it all...during the hours between day and night.

      He has the power of retroactive timetravel. Anything he needs to have had done, has already been done retroactively. Tony Stark is equally bullshit. In his spare time, he designed an /anti-spiderman-device/. Just in case he needs to fight off his closest ally who had given up /everything/ to support him, he takes the time to build a device specifically to stop him, and carries it around with him everywhere he goes? It's like the ridiculous Bat-shark-repellent that Batman carried around on the tv show.

    118. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

      How many 'Wayne sponsored' private patrol could be funded with that money? How many 3rd party group could he hired to investigate the police? Hell, he could become Mayor and clean house in the PD.

      First, it's not an either or proposition. Wayne Enterprises does everything you say. He doesn't run for office himself, but he supports the right candidates, funds plenty of social programs, and works to get rid of corruption.

      Batman does two things nobody else can do: He can apparently deal with specific threats better than a swat team can, which may not be realistic, but is fact in the DC universe. He also provides something mysterious for criminals to fear and for the people in the city to look up to as a source of hope, since they're far too jaded about police and politicians. Now, Nolan did a good job in his movies to show the unintended consequences of that approach, but you should still be able to see how Bruce Wayne could choose to do what he does without being a psychotic thug.

    119. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Baby+Duck · · Score: 1

      "Last" thing? Seriously? LAST? I can think of tons of things off the top of my head I would want way, WAAAAY less!

      --

      "Love heals scars love left." -- Henry Rollins

    120. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Kelbear · · Score: 1

      FYI, Batman is currently touring the world to recruit and support a network of "Batpeople" around the world using his riches.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Batman_Incorporated

      The Robin #1/Nightwing/Dick Grayson is wearing the Batman outfit and taking care of Gotham for him.

    121. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Xacid · · Score: 1

      At a minimum you should at least be able to see the car speed by and hit someone. Pretty sure I didn't make that up.

    122. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      The fact that police abuse is reported on, and prosecuted shows this isn't a total police state. And the fact that you do have the freedom to question police proves it isn't a police state.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    123. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Baby+Duck · · Score: 1

      "I also suspect Batman juices."

      You obviously never read the Venom storyline from the early days of Legends of the Dark Knight. In that story, he enhances with designer drugs, but it also gives him rage where he doesn't know his own strength and impairs his judgement. He eventually tells Alfred to hole him up in the Batcave for a month while he detoxes cold turkey. In a cruel twist of fate, the villain Bane comes years later to break Batman's back, juiced up by the next generation of the chemicals Batman once took, and at much, much higher doses pumped directly into his bloodstream.

      So, no, Batman doesn't juice (anymore).

      --

      "Love heals scars love left." -- Henry Rollins

    124. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Yup, the libertarian approach isn't to call the police, but to BE the police.

      I don't know that they'd argue that home owners need to necessarily do the law enforcement themselves, but rather that they'd hire the cops. So, your apartment building gets together and hires a bunch of armed guys to respond to crime reports. Basically like how an office building might hire security guards. If somebody starts damaging company property at your office I bet the security guards won't take 10 hours to respond, because they know who is paying them.

      I'm not sure I'm all for whole-hog police privatization, but the issue here is that cops are essentially completely unaccountable to the general public, since their jobs are basically secure regardless of performance. They aim to keep their bosses happy, and they're so many steps removed from a taxpayer that nobody cares. If somehow police responsiveness becomes an election issue then perhaps things might change a little, for a little while.

    125. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Whenever the law isn't upheld and justice isn't in sync with what people think is just and "right", something like this happens.

      Watch the news, soon someone will come and lynch some bankers.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    126. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      I want the police to help the human being. Since when is the worth of a human measured in his participation in the GDP?

      Sorry, I forgot what country I'm talking about, I withdraw the question.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    127. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here in "E Division" BC, Canada, there is a similar program for RCMP Auxialiary constables. They get partial RCMP training (unarmed defence, rules of evidence, laws, etc, but NO code 3 driving or firearms training), then get uniform minus the guns and go on patrol with regular officers and/or do public education. Also, they have "peace officer" legal standing (and responsibilities). To apply you have to have a valid and clean drivers license, medical clearance, a current first aid certificate, and an "enhanced" background check. I've been considering it; and I've already had an enhanced background check before (for clearance to work on CATSA (airport security) equipment).

    128. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How's that the same as trying to stop people from bashing each other up, or stop people from bashing one person up?

    129. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Xacid · · Score: 1

      "To me, if you are in a situation where you have to make that decision, you need more police, and better community service."

      That to me really is the root of the issue. No town should *need* a "superhero". But if citizens are feeling that their local government isn't providing an adequate amount of resources to combat what appears to be a very real problem then these guys might just be the temporary stop gap that's required.

      However, one point you touch on is that these guys aren't regulated in the same way cops are (/should be). What I find ironic though that someone else mentioned is that this guy might actually get a heftier punishment for doing the same thing an officer recently did at the recent protests (pepper spraying folks that were clearly not being aggressive in the slightest).

      And don't get me wrong - I'm not some cop-hater. I wholeheartedly respect what they do and absolutely love the good ones that do their jobs. But I also realize they simply cant be everywhere all the time.

    130. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by AmberBlackCat · · Score: 1

      They may not be do-nothing cynics, but the last thing we need is deluded people with "martial arts training" running around macing people.

      No need for cop-bashing. There has to be a few good ones out there.

    131. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      Maybe I missed the point, but you don't seem to know what your point is or know how to communicate it. What are you saying? What you just replied with... I think I agree with completely... I'm not sure what you're trying to say.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    132. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      * tophat and monocle on *

      having lots of money is an amazing super power. it can grant you access to otherwise off-limits transport, equipment, personnel, and services and render you immune to litigation and common law.

    133. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Ok, so how many of these superheroes are going around and arguing with businesses in civil situations like this? Zero?

      It seems like these guys are doing the jobs the cops are supposed to do, but don't. Similarly, if you call the cops on this wacky situation involving your grandmother, they'll tell you it's not their problem, and to hire a lawyer; cops don't handle civil matters. But if you start beating the business owner, the cops will deal with that. Same goes for the superheroes.

      When violence is involved, yes, it really is a black-and-white situation. No, you may not know who started it, but you do know that you can't just sit back and let it happen, you have to get the situation under control, and then the finger-pointing can come later. The cops obviously aren't doing their jobs, so these superheroes are stepping in and doing what the cops should have.

    134. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Wrong. It's mostly bad apples, because the allegedly good apples will always stand up to protect the bad ones, and that makes them bad by association.

    135. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Obviously, this is anecdotal. I am sure there are literally dozens of police officers who did it for the right reasons.

      Maybe, but they were either corrupted by the power-hungry abusers, or forced out by them.

    136. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by hairyfeet · · Score: 0

      And if we HAVE a reason? still got a scar on my head from being slammed against a cop car by a bully with a badge that said first, and I quote "I don't know which I hate worse, God damned niggers or fucking worthless hippies". My crime? Having a black person in the car makes you suspicious apparently. It didn't matter that the black in question was actually a Baptist minister that I was driving to a revival as a favor or that we hadn't done a damned thing, nope just another piggie drunk on power.

      I've lived in good neighborhoods and bad, dealt with junkies and cops and you know what? i'll take the junkies over the cops ANY day of the week. junkies are frankly chickenshit and a firecracker can scare them off, but the cops I've found go out looking to start shit so they can show what a "big man" they are. And like an above poster everyone I knew from HS that decided to become a cop did it for power, that's it. No helping people, no protecting the law, they wanted the ability to crack skulls and get away with it, and you know what? they did and they do.

      Maybe this video will open some eyes, but I doubt it. I've had people that were so hard on for the police they actually said I deserved what i got for having a black in the car. So much for civil rights huh?

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    137. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      But that said, when people are being violently hurt in public, SOMEONE needs to step in, immediately. Sadly between the bystander effect and fear, people will usually ignore what is happening. In these cases, somebody needs to stand up. Somebody needs to care.

      Two recent cases in my city where good Samaritans have suffered for their efforts. One broke up an alcohol-fueled many-on-one fight at 3am, the thugs turned on him and he suffered serious but non-life threatening head injuries.

      Another case where a guy simply told two 19 year olds to return the pumpkin he just saw them steal from a display outside a supermarket. The punks attacked him, causing him to fall back and hit his head. He fell into a coma and died a week later.

      In both cases someone cared enough to intervene, but police said the "right" thing to do is call 911 and not get directly involved. You can bet they'd be roasted alive if they'd suggested this in response to a good Samaritan getting beaten up for breaking up a sexual assault.

    138. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      A lot of people think it's "vigilantism" to even defend yourself against a criminal.

    139. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is to say that a meteorite spun out of it's orbit 1.57392 million years ago doesn't land on the morons that are bear hugging, causing permanent testicular damage to one, and cauterizing the other guy's eyes shut open.... you get drunk, you fight, or you watch fights ..I think you've already placed yourself at a higher risk level. If a superhero gets involved with your private business, and you die in a freak accident or misunderstanding ...oh well.

      sucks to be you.

    140. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately there's no proper catch-all response for situations like this. Sometimes, you should have helped, because you could have saved somebody. Other times, you shouldn't help, because you just get hurt and don't actually change anything. Hindsight is 20/20, but in the heat of the moment is anything but.

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    141. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      I'm shocked the news reports don't mention this, so I watched it a few more times. The car definitely hits a cone. The person is jumping out of the way of the car. I'm not sure if the car ends up hitting him or not. But the car drives right past two people in the street and whips a quick u-turn. Either they were drunk out of their minds, or they were trying to hit someone.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    142. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they get some weekend training, but nothing on the level of an actual office

      The sad fact is, most people believe police are highly trained. The truth is, the vast, vast majority of them are not. Most cops barely pass gun proficiency; which is frequently one of the reasons cops tend not to shoot with the general public at ranges. Frequently the largest difference between a cop and a security guard is a gun and a mail in rebate for a badge. Seriously though, people have it in their head that police are highly trained. With the exception of paramilitary groups like SWAT, most people are about as well trained to be a cop as you are; with only a slight exaguration there.

    143. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

      In the police and civilian firearm training world, Massad Ayoob is a rockstar. I wouldn't say "no glory". He's sort-of like the Pedro Sauer of defensive handgun training doctrine (as Jeff Cooper is like Helio Gracie).

    144. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have a similar thing in the states. Also citizens can create an official police force fairly easily. Unfortunately there are many areas where these provisions are abused and the local "posse" is who you have to watch out for.

    145. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      We get around this problem in civilized society by handing out specific powers to specific people (police, rentacops, private eyes, bounty hunters, etc.), and tightly monitoring these groups to keep them in check.

      No, we don't. With a little Google searching, I can point to countless cases where cops beat and murder people with little to no repercussions. Have you forgotten about Rodney King? That kind of thing happens all the time. You complain about vigilantes using grossly disproportionate force, but apparently you're perfectly OK with cops doing the same thing?

    146. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      I must've explained my point poorly. 'Super'powers involve magic. Superman can fly (oh, right, 'psionic' not magic...), Wonder Woman can call on Hera, etc.

      Bruce Wayne is an exceptional human being, one in a billion, but there's no magic involved. He has extraordinary abilities/powers, but not superpowers.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    147. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      But how do these Super Yahoos know who is who in a situation like that? In the aforementioned 3 against 1 scenario, were the 3 the instigators or did the 1 try to rob the three and then had the tables turned on him?

      Is that husky male who appears to be beating a woman a rapist? Or is he a vice cop who is trying to arrest a combative prostitute (who are known to yell "Rape!" when being handcuffed as to create a distraction)?

      See the problem?

      No, I don't see the problem at all.

      In situation 1, even if the 1 guy was trying to rob the three, that doesn't justify the 3 beating the shit out of him. You're only allowed to use force to defend yourself, not to exact revenge. Beating the shit out of someone is revenge; 3 guys should easily be able to restrain 1 robber and keep him from assaulting them further.

      There's simply no question: if 3 guys are beating the shit out of 1 guy, the 3 guys are in the wrong, period. There is NO justification for that. So if someone shows up and pepper-sprays the whole bunch, he's doing the right thing by preventing further violence, and probably saving the 1 guy from life-threatening injuries. It helps that pepper spray doesn't have any permanent effects.

      In situation 2, the husky male is in the wrong for assaulting a woman. It doesn't matter if she's a prostitute; did she use any violence against anyone? No. So the cop is the one in the wrong for assaulting her. It doesn't matter if there's a law against her activity, the law is wrong. Besides, if you want to take down a prostitute, maybe you should be using a team of uniformed female police officers, not an ununiformed burly male. The whole concept of ununiformed "vice" cops is wrong on many levels, and it's really no tragedy at all if something happens to them, just like it was no tragedy when something happened to one of the Waffen SS.

    148. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      The problem is that basically this equates to having hired guns protecting you, except that they're also employees of the government. The government is supposed to provide us with police services (not hired thugs), at all hours, at no cost except for the regular taxes you pay. If you're having to pay cops overtime pay to get police services you're supposed to have by default, then society has broken down, and we really aren't any better a country than Mexico or Somalia.

    149. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      He probably meant to say "deputy". There's only one Sheriff in a county, but all his employees ride around in cars that say "Sheriff", but they're not really sheriffs, they're his deputies. People frequently call them "sheriffs" however, even though when questioned they do seem to understand there's only one true Sheriff.

    150. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Basically, the frothing libertarians want this place to be just like northern Mexico. It's a libertarian paradise there: the people with the most money (the cartel bosses) make the rules.

      What's sad is that this makes the rest of us, who actually agree with some less-extreme libertarian principles (like those of us who call themselves "social libertarians", because we don't want government dictating things like reproductive rights, religion, drug use, etc. or instigating foreign wars) look bad by association. So we have two parties, who both want big government partnered intimately with big corporations, controlling every aspect of our lives, and the people who want freedom look like kooks, because too many of them have taken the concept way too far and want to throw out government entirely and replace it with anarchy and feudalism.

    151. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like the police and the military? I agree.

    152. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The problem in London is that their biggest superhero, Angle Grinder Man, does things the police aren't allowed to do.

    153. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by alexo · · Score: 1

      The fact that police abuse is reported on, and prosecuted shows this isn't a total police state. And the fact that you do have the freedom to question police proves it isn't a police state.

      Patience, my friend. Give it time...

    154. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you seen the movies? These guys apparently know acrobatics and martial arts to a degree that is UNACHIEVEABLE in in real life, so yeah, they have super powers, at least as far as the movies and comic books go.
      Let's see. Never age, never have physical problems, and can effectively dodge bullets, survive unrealistic falls, display superhuman strength and ability (Climb up a vertical wall? Not normal).
      "Holy Optional Gravity, Batman" or the like.

    155. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Wrong. They do it all the time. Did you forget Rodney King? That's one of countless examples. Police beat the shit out of people (law-breakers and otherwise) with grossly disproportionate force all the time, with few or no consequences. At the very worst, if they murder someone, they might get fired and have to get another job, perhaps as a cop in another county. That happened here in Chandler AZ with Dan Lovelace.

    156. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by alexo · · Score: 1

      Day after day they have to deal with the scum of society.

      You mean their co-workers?

      Just watch Cops

      I have more realistic things to watch.

    157. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Wrong. You must have totally forgotten about Batman. No special powers there, just muscle and technology, which really isn't different from the cops with their guns, tasers, body armor, and radios.

      What makes them superheroes is their willingness to help the weak, at great risk to themselves, and for zero pay.

    158. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      making them a much better role model than someone like Superman who is basically invulnerable.

      It seems to be the whole DC vs. Marvel thing. DC superheroes are basically demi-gods (nearly invulnerable to exterior forces, seemingly limitless powers, but no omniscience); their true weakness and vulnerability is within. Marvel superheroes are people with super-powers, but very limited and focused ones.

      Of course, both Batman and Jean Grey are exceptions to this rule.

    159. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The problem here is that the same goes for most Hollywood movies and TV shows; people in them are always avoiding serious injuries and traumas, and when they do happen, they heal overnight.

    160. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Of course not! No card carrying libertarian needs some goverment-like HOA to organize their protection. The home owners should be doing this themselves, not being forced into doing it by a clause tied to the deed of their land. I mean, can the home owner choose not to pay protection money, and get different service? If they can't, it's not rabid libertarianism.

      There's nothing un-libertarian about a contract requiring someone purchasing a home in a development to have to abide by certain rules, including clauses requiring exclusive use of a particular police service (or jus primae noctis for that matter). If the home buyer doesn't like the terms of the contract, they can simply purchase a home somewhere else! To disallow this kind of contract would be to restrict the land developer's right to dispense with their property in any way they see fit.

      In Rabid Libertarianism, the only law is property and contract law, and there are no restrictions on contract law because that's unnatural regulation. The escape from situations like the above is always simply "You can choose to live somewhere else" or "You can work somewhere else". As I said in the other post, this only makes sense if you see yourself as always being in the position to do so, or even better see yourself as being the one in the advantageous position in any contract negotiations.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    161. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Well, no, the last thing we need is deluded people with no training mugging people. Deluded people with martial arts training can put a dent in that, or at least spare us the hassle by tying up some of their population. Figuratively. Unless they have bat-ropes. Or phoenix-ropes.

    162. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Can't be bought, or can't be made? If it's impossible to make with current technology, that makes it either sci-fi or magic, which does put it into the same category as super-powers. If it's possible to make with current technology, but no one's bothered to do so, that's neither sci-fi nor magic. I don't recall anything in Nolan's Batman movies that was clearly impossible, though the motorcycle was a little ridiculous.

      There's a lot of things that are completely possible, but no one's bothered to do them yet. For instance, personal rapid transit like SkyTran, which could replace 90% of cars with all-electric fully-automated vehicles, eliminating most automobile deaths which number around 50,000 every year in the USA alone. The technology is already available, but no one's bothered to spend the money or do the development necessary to bring it all together and deploy it on a large scale. Same goes for a lot of space technologies, such as asteroid mining, moon bases, space stations with artificial gravity (a la 2001), etc. Even the Space Elevator isn't very far beyond current technology now that we've developed carbon nanotubes and are figuring out how to make useful things with them.

    163. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Batman's superpower was living in a make-believe universe where money could buy magic and criminals have shitty aim or attack like they took a number and waited their turn.

    164. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      No, police officers do not rank among heroes. They use grossly disproportionate force (e.g. Rodney King), murder unarmed people, fabricate evidence, and then cover for each other. And that's just here in America, where the police are relatively uncorrupt (with big emphasis on "relatively"). Compare this to someplace like Mexico, where the police are nothing more than criminals with uniforms.

    165. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by ErikZ · · Score: 2

      Give me a break Mr Lawyer.

      Oh NO. He's saving me from buying liquor! How exactly are you seeing that happening? He charges into the store and points and you, shouting "Stop!"

      You worry about super heroes doing things that so far, only the government has been successful at.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    166. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the story about Gillette making a 5-bladed razor.

    167. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Duradin · · Score: 1

      Call your local (landline) telecom company, if they don't handle the MSAG for your street there's a good chance they'll know who does.

    168. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by sjames · · Score: 1

      At least they're not executing drunks in the rail system.

    169. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by cusco · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of course the cops are fallible too

      Cops have an extreme disadvantage as opposed to vigilantes: lack of local knowledge. Vigilantes, whether it be these 'superheroes' or community policing organizations or just a bunch of neighbors, KNOW who is the bad guy because they live there. They're not coming from some precinct house ten miles away, they're not driving in from their homes in suburbia, they live down the street and see the crack dealer on the corner every evening, see the pimp smacking 'his' girls around, talk to the neighbor who saw the little weasel crawling in the broken window. They're not cruising down the main street in a squad car, they walk down the alley and stand at the bus stop, they ride their bike down the hill and shop at the grocery store, have a drink at the bar, hang out at the ice cream stand. No police force in North America (and damn few elsewhere) will ever have the local knowledge necessary to do their job adequately, they're just not set up that way.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    170. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      For most of humanity's history, it was perfectly legal, and even expected, of common citizens to prevent legal wrongdoing. They weren't supposed to punish offenses, but what we today call "citizen arrest" was par for the course. The notion that only professional police force should deal with criminals in all matters, and regular citizens should just call the police and then mind their own business (extending to the point where self-defense itself becomes borderline criminal in some countries) is a relatively recent invention.

    171. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      Just to back up your points, a plain clothes vice cop may initiate contact with a prostitute, but they would never make the arrest unless it was in an enclosed space. Vice stings are usually run like an assembly line. The plain clothes cop and the pro go somewhere semiprivate, uniformed officers take over arrest and separate the two, the plainclothes "john" is set free to find another girl. Why would they blow his cover to bring in a working girl that will be out of jail the next day?

      And in any of these cases a short exchange of shouts would let most bystanders determine the gist of what is going on before they decide to pepper spray the whole crew.

    172. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by cusco · · Score: 2

      We have a number of police departments as customers, and I pretty much have to agree. The ugliest thing, to me anyway, is that they really **DO** believe that 'Thin blue line' foolishness. If asked almost any of them will declare that without them society would devolve into a 'road warrior' type of society overnight, that they're all that stands between civilization and chaos. Don't argue the point with them, by the way, they get really pissed off.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    173. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Duradin · · Score: 1

      We at /. just turn "There Exists" into "For All" when talking about corruption of authority figures.

    174. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Interesting, and totally makes sense.

      After all, if you saw some big guy with no uniform physically restraining a prostitute, it seems like you'd totally be within your rights to punch the guy because it looks like he's assaulting her (the fact that she's a prostitute is irrelevant) and is probably one of those serial killers who preys on prostitutes. But yes, the whole thing about the cop blowing his cover I'm sure is the biggest factor of all.

    175. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by tgd · · Score: 1

      Chandler, AZ?

      I suppose that explains the reading comprehension problem.

    176. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They may not be do-nothing cynics, but the last thing we need is deluded people with "martial arts training" running around macing people.

      Oh, you mean like the police?

    177. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but the problem is with vigilantes is that there's no guarantee they'll agree with you what an "asshole" is in less clear-cut cases. Sure, if a vigilante rescues me from being beaten up, I'd be grateful. But what if he "rescues" me from buying liquor, or porn, or having an abortion? The fantasy of being a vigilante isn't limited to doing good, it includes getting to decide what *is* good to do. And without somebody looking over your shoulder, it's easy to screw that up.

      Actually, it's easy, watch boondock Saints, they explain it well.

      Connor: Now you will receive us.
      Murphy: We do not ask for your poor, or your hungry.
      Connor: We do not want your tired and sick.
      Murphy: It is your corrupt we claim.
      Connor: It is your evil that will be sought by us.
      Murphy: With every breath, we shall hunt them down.
      Connor: Each day we will spill their blood, 'til it rains down from the skies.
      Murphy: Do not kill. Do not rape. Do not steal. These are principles which every man of every faith can embrace.
      Connor: These are not polite suggestions. These are codes of behavior, and those of you that ignore them will pay the dearest cost.
      Murphy: There are varying degrees of evil. We urge you lesser forms of filth, not to push the bounds and cross over, into true corruption, into our domain.
      Connor: For if you do, one day you will look behind you and you will see we three, and on that day you will reap it.
      Murphy: And we will send you to whatever god you wish.

      Connor, Murphy and Il Duce: And shepherds we shall be, for Thee, my Lord, for Thee. Power hath descended forth from Thy hand, that our feet may swiftly carry out Thy command. So we shall flow a river forth to Thee, and teeming with souls shall it ever be.
      Il Duce: In nomine Patris
      Connor: et Filii
      Murphy: et Spiritus Sancti.

      --
      How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
    178. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Zeroedout · · Score: 1

      You're almost right. Maybe your jurisdiction is different but in mine police can use tasers to stop someone who is being violent. They're bringing weapons as well. I prefer cops though since we have all their info and do something if they screw up or get abusive.

    179. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by TheCarp · · Score: 0

      I did? Excuse me? I think your lack of comprehension did that. I made no statement on the subject. What I said was that situations like that, where "what to do" is completely visible, on the surface of the event, without any context are not all that common.

      Shit what did the police say to him? Stop going around macing people in situations where he doesn't have all the facts. If you somehow think that comparing this to another situation where someone acted with the best of intentions, but without enough context, and fucked up in the process makes them "equivalent", then I must say that.... I know that word, and I don't think it means what you think it means.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    180. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by cusco · · Score: 1

      If a community wants to organize and "vote with their wallets"

      And if the community is poor and can't afford to? That's where these 'superheroes' are working, the neighborhoods that the police don't serve because the wealthier neighborhoods are paying for increased coverage. There is a reason why locally-organized community policing squads are misidentified as 'vigilantes'; the organized protection rackets called 'police departments' don't like the competition.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    181. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Oligonicella · · Score: 1, Interesting

      But what if he "rescues" me from buying liquor, or porn, or having an abortion?

      When you start your screed with such a tepid, tepid example, you lose a helluva lot of moral steam.

    182. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      You're going to call 911, for someone stealing a *pumpkin*?

      What kind of emergency is that?

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    183. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymus · · Score: 1

      It's a modern form of the police state. I don't believe any first world country will ever deal with a serious police state as seen (for example) in Nazi Germany, but don't delude yourself into thinking it's not still a police state. Sure you can say what you want (in designated free speech zones, provided it's not actionable in any way) and file complaints (which will be completely ignored by both the people and power and the media they control) but neither of which will come to anything whatsoever. The abuse will continue, the abusers will never face any punishment, and nobody will rise up and fight against them, because in this modern police state people are kept just comfortable enough.

    184. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Well... what did the police say to the man? He shouldn't get involved in situations where he doesn't know the facts.

      The twist was intentional, glad someone appreciates a little writing style.

      It was simply a story to illustrate the point of what can happen when people get involved without knowing the facts. Not the least of which, that I didn't mention as I figured would be obvious, is the absolute jaw dropping response that everyone else in the family had. The "how dare she involve herself in a family matter"

      Maybe these guys don't get involved like that, maybe they really do show restraint and only involve themselves in obvious problems. That said... I would not be happy if I locked my keys in my car and some dude tackled or maced me while I was trying to jimmy the door. Or if a friend of mine and I started sparing or wrestling in the park and suddenly got maced... etc.

      However, the impression that I get from the things the article claims the police have said to him, makes me think that this has not exactly been the case.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    185. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      No. In non-violent situations stepping is is being a good Samaritan. In violent situation, stepping is is being a Hero.

    186. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there is not afforded to those special community support officers extreme oversight and supervision, then it is absolutely irresponsible of a community to turn them loose on the general public when police training can be completed in only a matter of a few weeks, security guards, much less, learning only the most basic of training. That is why there is a chain of command to oversee that laws are adhered to so that hopefully everyone is provided a blanket of protections by law and you don't end up with a bunch of hot headed cowboys bashing skulls in without provocation.

      At the same time sending them into harm's way is equally irresponsible for their sake if not carefully considered by the highest in Command or most experienced or trained, except only in extreme circumstances and times of impending emergency. That is why the phrase, an ounce prevention (preparedness) is worth a pound of cure or (OH Shit!) still rings true especially today.

    187. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Hentes · · Score: 1

      Well, you can't make wingsuits that allow you to land safely without a parachute and you can't make a vest that will protect you if you fall down from a scyscraper or resist automatic weapons for long. There a many fishy things in Batman.

      There isn't artifical gravity in space odyssey, they used rotation and velcro boots.

    188. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Well yes..... but that they are not the same is obvious. My point is... situations where 3 guys are beating up one guy are rather rare. In fact, sutiations that are easily cut and dry are fairly rare..

      I mean seriously.... in my entire life I have witnessed a handful of actual violent situations, and the majority were over faster than anyone could "do anything about it" or were ridiculous fighting that wasn't going to go anywhere and just ended in someone getting a few bruises. Or, as my own martial arts instructor, who earned his citizenship training troops for hand to hand combat used to say.... a real fight is over in seconds.

      So I seriously question....if these guys really are ONLY involving themselves in actual dangerous/violent situations where everything is easy, cut and dry, and someone is really in danger.... then they are utterly useless in that there is so little for them to do and so little chance they will ever be in the right place at the right time to do any good.

      On the other hand, if they are entering any other area, they are probably acting out of ignorance... like say... the situation where they attempted to intervene between a "drug dealer and a citizen".

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    189. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      A set of facts rapidly being shown to no longer be facts.

      Or did the rondey king trial, the recent sprees of polic officers destroying smartphones, or police precincts filing wiretapping charges not open your eyes?

    190. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      I would say that your sample is very small a preselected to support your conclusion.
      In other words, your bigotry is showing.
      In no way different than when you see a person of a certain race acting in a criminal way saying that all people with that same skin color are criminals.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    191. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Oh, there are many heros among the police force. Criminals too as you've pointed out. Some of the filth these guys have to walk into (drug infested slums and dark alleyways) takes a serious set of balls. Personally, I think they do it for the adrenaline rush. No wonder many burnout and get jaded over time.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    192. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't seem to understand, the chances that fools are having a nice drunk punch out fight between themselves is far out-weighed by a "superhero" with "superhuman judgement" and "superhuman luck" coming to help you 100-1 ratio my friend.

      It's like having an abortion because you flail and wail that you were raped or whatever. That ratio is 100-1 from people claiming to be raped and those who simply factor a baby as an inconvenience on their lifestyles.

      No logical superhero is going to try and stop you with pepper spray for buying porn or liquor btw

    193. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by dyingtolive · · Score: 1

      I get what you're saying, though I gotta say, your initial example didn't do your point justice. My first anecdote, the one about the guy and his girlfriend in their car happened to me a week ago. I was actually getting ready to go to sleep when I heard commotion outside. I called the cops and stood outside making damn sure the guy could see me until they got there. That was the point in which that I realized that the dispatcher wasn't aware of the situation in spite of people having been obviously watching outside their windows and from across the street at the bar. That REALLY pissed me off.

      I'm not saying that we need people with 'hero' in our titles. I'm not saying that we need to go looking for trouble. I'm just saying we need to have the fortitude to act when we find ourselves in a situation where we are the only able or willing to, because no one else is.

      --
      Support the EFF and Creative Commons. The war is coming, and they're supporting you...
    194. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>What about Batman or the Green Arrow? Unless 'having lots of money' is a special power, they didn't have any.

      And they are not SUPERheroes..

      From Wikipedia:

      By most definitions, characters strictly require actual superhuman powers to be deemed superheroes.[3] However, this term can be applied to characters who perform the same functions but are devoid of such powers and abilities who are alternately referred to as costumed crime fighters; examples of the latter are characters such as Batman and Green Arrow. Such characters were generally referred to as "mystery men" in the late 1930s and 1940s (a period historians and fans call the Golden Age of Comic Books), to distinguish them from characters with super-powers.

    195. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      The right to swing your first extends to the tip of my nose. That isn't a police state.

      When we went to war with Iraq in 2003, protesters were laying down in streets of New York to block traffic. They have every right in the world to express their displeasure. They don't have the right to stop other people from going to work. So while it seems evil to tell protestors to stand in a designated area (only done for particularly large protests designed to interfere with other people and events) it is actually a means of protecting everyone's rights.

      But it sure is sexier to sell it as some notion that you don't have a right to free speech.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    196. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [[ We get around this problem in civilized society by handing out specific powers to specific people (police, rentacops, private eyes, bounty hunters, etc.), and tightly monitoring these groups to keep them in check.]]

      And tightly monitoring these groups to keep them in check? No, we don't. We let them do whatever they want because we either can't be bothered or it costs too much or their unions won't allow the monitoring. Then when citizens complain they're abused at these specific peoples' hands, we have an outside group start an investigation, typically find something that had been wrong for a decade, and sanction one guy who was about to retire or die anyway, if it doesn't turn out that the law was insufficiently explicit to even make the abuse a crime.

      For all the horrors of vigilantism, have any of these "self-styled superheroes" gunned anyone down for just being drunk in public, or for there being nobody looking over their shoulder for the moment because there was a big storm? If not, then they're less dangerous than the police.

    197. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      In Okinawa a few Marines raped a 14 year old girl which sparked controversy that all Marines were rapists. The base in Okinawa was almost closed permanently. As a Marine, I assure you I don't rape 14 year old girls, and the actions of some don't reflect the actions of everyone.

      There are over 800,000 full-time law enforcement officers in the United States. I've never suggested there aren't corrupt cops. But that doesn't make every cop corrupt. And the fact that cops can be found accountable and charged means it isn't a police state.

      How do you know about the offenses of the police department? People are free to criticize the police department, and report corruption. The current debate about is an important one. Refusing to allow people to take pictures or video of police officers could help lead to a police state. But that is why these laws are being challenged. I don't imagine they will remain very much longer.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    198. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He has a 6th sense to know when someone has just fiddled a few letters and can jump in the situation in a moments notice using the super speed of his OC-192 connection, usually posting anonymously because he's a superhero after all so he doesn't need to take credit for his deeds. And he doesn't take shit from no one. Usually he's as nasty as possible to make sure that evil spellers don't return.

      That's "moment's". Unlike plurals, possessives generally do call for apostrophes.

      My work here is done.

    199. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Good points; I forgot about the wingsuit, and yes, our ballistic vests won't protect you from a continuous barrage of rifle rounds, only one or two.

      However, there is artificial gravity in 2001; it's implemented using rotation. It's not true gravity per se, but close enough; someone walking around inside probably can't tell the difference. If we ever build such a space station, people then will probably call it "artificial gravity". It won't be until we develop true artificial gravity (a la Star Trek) when people will need to make a real distinction. Heck, we don't even really know what gravity is at this point, only that it seems to correlate to mass.

    200. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by bondsbw · · Score: 1

      Community Service Officers - no power, only report crimes. Jumped up little Hitlers. The next step up from a traffic warden.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law

      No matter how big these "Hitlers" are, I doubt they kill even one person. Let alone millions who are innocent and undeserving.

      --
      All my liberal friends think I'm a conservative, all my conservative friends think I'm a liberal.
    201. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      If Batman and Green Lantern aren't superheroes, how did they get into the Super Friends? Even those pussy-ass Wonder Twins had more in the way of superpowers than them (worthless as they were).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    202. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      If the issues inquestion were isolated, and not systemic as implied, then it would remain individual officers attempting such legal shennanigans, and not whole precinct offices.

      Likewise with military proceedures. Last I had heard, the wikileaks documents reported numberous instances of "improper conduct" like the okinawa rape you just mentioned, that were discretely hushed, and not punished.

      Naturally, the people who were supposed to act on such offences, even on simple charges of same regardless, are the ones most angered by said leaks. I find that quite telling.

      While you were a marine, and also not a rapist, does not mean that such problems are becoming systemic due to a lack of due dilligence, and delusional attempts to maintain public image. (Eg, "we dare not prosecute, because that would only prove that rapists exist in the service. It is politically safer to deny, and cover up. We don't want the reputation of our armed service men to be tainted like that, so 'no rape happened'.")

    203. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      eah, I never got the love for Superman either. Nothing can hurt him

      They can't hurt him, but they can hurt the people he loves.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    204. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Hentes · · Score: 1

      I think it depends on your definition of 'gravity'. If you define it as a force pulling youto the ground, then yes. But there are many differences between rotation and gravity on Earth: for example, if you jump backward at the same speed as the station rotates, you can glide around like Superman.

    205. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      Not high up on the scale, for sure, but at least it's to report a crime in progress. Unlike, say, calling to ask a 911 operator for a date.

      The police stressed that the man did nothing wrong. Their point was that you don't know when a situation will get out of control and turn on you, and it's best to leave it to the professionals. But, in reality that is of course totally out of line with what they can or will actually respond to in a timely fashion.

    206. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Systemic?

      What percentage of the 800,000 full time law enforcement agents would have to be participating in such offenses to be considered systemic?

      And can you demonstrate it is actually happening on that scale?

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    207. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by alexo · · Score: 1

      I would say that your sample is very small a preselected to support your conclusion.

      I don't recall our conversation touching on the points of evidence or supporting conclusions. As far as I understand, we were discussing entertainment: you suggested I watch a TV "reality show" (COPS) and I responded with stating that I prefer watching more realistic videos, where the participants are not aware they are being filmed. Concluding that my distaste of police is based solely on some internet videos is small-minded.

      In other words, your bigotry is showing.

      Interesting. You never asked for the reasons behind my statement, never mind given any, yet you have me all figured out. Truly, you have a dizzying intellect.

      Would you have similarly accused me of bigotry if I had said that, for example, the GAI, were bad guys (without stating my reasons for thinking so)?

      Would you accuse me of bigotry if I stated for the record that, so far, I am not terribly impressed by your logical thinking and reasoning prowess?

    208. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cops have a pretty awful job and I have to say I'm happy someone is trying to do what they do. Their day is full of difficult conversations and meeting people who have questionable moral ethics.

      And that's just in the precinct house.

    209. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      While unpopular, it is also important to ask the question:

      "If X% (majority) of persons in prison are of $Race, is it possible that $Race's demographic commits the most crimes?"

      It is important to know why $Race has such a skewed statistical distribution in the penal system. Assuming it has to do with racial biggotry without investigating other correlates first is not a rational answer, however popular and simple that answer may be.

      It might have something to do with $Races's culture, or with their living and family conditions. (Eg, we can compare similarly maligned demographics and see what factors they appear to share. For instance, in the US we have a rather poignant cultural phenomenon in the "gangsta" subculture, which seems to be prominent among inner city african americans, which glorifies criminality. In Europe, you have a similarly maligned "Roma" demographic, which does the same thing. The skin color does not match. "Race" does not seem causal for the disproportionate arrests. The proclevity to romanticize criminal behavior however, does.)

      Be this as it may, noting the correlate between skin color and criminality, due to a widely held cultural behaviorism, does not make one racist unless they substitute caution for abuse.

      If people of a specific racial group are commonly associated with criminal activity, and they don't like it, the rational thing to do is to divorce themselves from the cultural elements that foster that criminal activity with which they are associated. Not playing the race card. (Eg, stop trying to be "gangsta")

      In the case of cops being corrupt brutalizers, the cops need to divorce themselves from the "thin blue line" culture that protects and prevents punishment of such practices. Doing so would properly punish crooked cops, and retain the civil dignity of their vocation.

      Similarly, if politicians dislike being cast as impulsive liars who engage in backroom deals, they should divorce themselves of the culture that gives rise to those behaviors.

      The men and women in law enforcement need to realize that their fellow officers are the most in need of being held accountable, due to the authority they wield. As such, they need to respond with integrity to violations of the law, regardless of the vocation of the offender. This currently does not happen, which is why the stereotype exists.

    210. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      You statement that a video showing police possibly committing criminal acts was more realistic and representative of the actions of police officers as a whole than cops. Thus making an attack on on police officers.
      I was using the show Cops not to showcase the officers but the types of people and problems they have to deal with.
      If I was wrong and you where not trying to cast police officers in general in a negative light then I drew the incorrect conclusion from your statements. However since in the post that this is in reply too you state you have a distaste for the police and it is highly improbable that you have had experience with the majority, or even a significant percentage of the individual police organizations in your nation much less officers your statement on examination still seems to be bigotry. Now if am interpreting that incorrectly I am mistaken. So do just to clear it up.
      Do you have a general dislike of the police based on your limited dealings with them or not.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    211. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by wisty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What separates a "vigilante" from other people is that they take justice into their own hands. Breaking up a fight is legal. Making a citizen's arrest is legal (provided you do it legally - there's laws). In some jurisdictions, holding a rioter down until the cops get there is legal (detention to prevent a breach of the peace). Walking around with a mag-light and a mobile phone, and calling the cops if you see a crime is legal.

      Breaking up a fight using excessive force, then kneecapping the guy you think was responsible is not.

    212. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that was funny but it's because the bullets weren't real and the gun was so if the actor let the gun hit him it would actually hurt. lol!

    213. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by bjorniac · · Score: 1

      One in a billion? Holy shit, there should be 7 Batmen running around now!

    214. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      Why should entire police departments get involved in prosecuting private citizens for simply recording a police officer while on duty?

      If it is as you say, a simple matter of just a few bad cops tarnishing the badges of all the others, wouldn't it make more sense for the impacted departments to viggorously investigate and punish such wrongdoing when caught red handed performing such acts, so that the integrity of the department remains unimpeachable?

      The only reason why this would not be so, is if the sheer number of such individual violators is itself an embarassment, such that such integrity would be completely phyrric in nature. ("We had to sack 2/3 of our force because they were involved in slim eddie's money laundering scheme!" Etc..)

      This is why I say that the behavior at the department and even state levels is what strongly suggests it is systemic. It is either that or they are run with a complete disregard for occupational and civil integrity. (The latter naturally leading to the former given enough time.)

      The "thin blue line" bullshit is literally poisoning the police's good name, because it fundementally destroys the integrity of the public trust they are sworn to uphold. Any officer that does that is not a good cop, and does not respect his or her badge, nor the badges of any other officer.

    215. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Fned · · Score: 1
    216. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Rennt · · Score: 1

      The God Damn Batman? That's all the superpower you need.

    217. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, most of the cops I've ever known have a very keen sense of who the troublemakers are in the areas they patrol... from the "domestic disturbance" guy on one corner to the bar owner you know is dealing meth on the other. Regardless of whether or not you've caught them in the act.

      The thing that makes police (maybe) less effective, is a thing called due process. It's a big pain in the ass, but we have it for very good reasons.

    218. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Some of them really do look around and say that the world NEEDS superheroes

      The world just needs normal citizens to stand up and do the right thing by society. And yes, occasionally this means taking the law into your own hands.

    219. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      I doubt it takes an entire police department to handle a single case.

      That being said, I think laws forbidding citizens from videotaping cops make zero sense. Thankfully those laws are being challenged.

      You still haven't shown how every cop in the world is this evil thug you make them out to be.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    220. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      They may be, but without Bruce Wayne's fortune to buy them kevlar suits and bullet proof cars, they don't last long...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    221. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by wierd_w · · Score: 1

      I never said they were. Even in nazi germany, there were wholesome police amongst the rabble.

      All I am pointing out is the downhill trend. You are demanding proof of an absolute. Such proof is not necessary.

    222. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I trade you for the "nobody's seen nuttin'" guys with guns in my town? The wannabes in tights scare me less.

    223. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by tmosley · · Score: 1

      If the system is set up poorly, social pressures will cause 99+% of people to turn evil, even if they are good.

      For a real life example, one need look no further than the Stanford Prison Experiment: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_prison_experiment

    224. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're talking about the police, right?

    225. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Ayoob and "Police State" are your super"heroes". You would rather allow someone to be beaten to death in a back alley than simply ALLOW SOMEONE ELSE to go help them. You are a crook, sir, and you don't deserve the peace you have in the Western world.

    226. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Wandering+Idiot · · Score: 1

      It's like having an abortion because you flail and wail that you were raped or whatever.

      Christ, what an asshole.

    227. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've known lots of cops in my life, and I can count on one hand the number of them who had any shred of accountability. The vast majority of them will resell the drugs they bust from people, lie in court to get you convicted, buddy up with each other to pick on someone they don't like, and other typical high school jock bullshit. Because that's where the vast majority of them come from, and their only desire is to increase their apparent power. Becoming a cop is a very easy and low-bar way to do that.

    228. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You've got it right about how it works in the generally well-adjusted areas. But then... in those areas, the law and law enforcement system is working, so by definition there isn't really a reason for vigilantism.

      The opposite extreme is like the post a few up from here claimed, where there are places that the cops refuse to go and calls the cops refuse to deal with. In that kind of situation, vigilantism is the pushback against some blatant systemic lack of justice.

      IMO, most honest debate about vigilantism is about where that threshold is; when the vast majority of society thinks justice is already being done, they'll be calling for the vigilante's head, and when the vast majority of society is dissatisfied or afraid, they'll cheer the vigilante on. But when it's near the tipping point from state to the other, you'll get both reactions simultaneously (and often some calls from both extremes won't even be honest, but used for some ulterior motive. For example, a corrupt government member would be vehemently anti-vigilante...)

      Basically the comic book stuff's social messages were always deeply based in reality. It's only the superpowered wish fulfillment element that comes from fantasy.

    229. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some police departments here in the states do the same but call them Reserves. Full sworn officers who work for $1 annually.

    230. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anguirel · · Score: 1

      I suspect that was a reference to the "Hitler Jugend", not Hitler himself.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hitler_Youth

      Like a slightly more military version of the Boy Scouts, and heavily encouraged to turn in anyone that spoke out against the Reich (including family members).

      --
      ~Anguirel (lit. Living Star-Iron)
      QA: The art of telling someone that their baby is ugly without getting punched.
    231. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yeah, but the problem is with vigilantes is that there's no guarantee they'll agree with you what an "asshole" is in less clear-cut cases"

      And the cops are any different?

    232. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Caraig · · Score: 1

      Some counties don't elect the sherriff; they're appointed or hired by the county seat. Not sure what the ratio is between elected sherrifs and appointed.

      --
      "I am an Adept of Tantric VAX."
    233. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by zippyspringboard · · Score: 2

      Law enforcement used to be encouraged to be part of the community. They were given fixed beats, and everyone knew them by name. They knew the people in the community. And there was a problem with corruption of the officers. SO the solution was to rotate beats, bring the cops in from elsewhere. The thought being that the officers would be more impartial, and difficult to corrupt if the didn't know the people they were policing. And it worked.... The officers are less corrupt than in the past, but on the other hand they have no F'ing clue who the bad guys are. And everyone hates them. Public relations have never been worse. So the pendulum is swinging back towards trying to integrate officers into the community again. Expect cops to start playing golf with the bad guys again :)

    234. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      situations where 3 guys are beating up one guy are rather rare. In fact, sutiations that are easily cut and dry are fairly rare..

      I recommend you shut it until you watch the video of the incident, linked above. If it is so rare, what is it the exact situation here?

    235. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      Where are my mod points.

      If the bad cops were the small minority, the good cops would be turning them in, no looking the other way or covering for them. Almost never happens. There's a reason. There are freaking few 'good' cops.

    236. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      A vigilante is somebody who metes out punishment for wrongdoing, not a volunteer who apprehends wrongdoers for them to be processed through the normal criminal justice process.

    237. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      ...the actions of some don't reflect the actions of everyone.

      That isn't the accusation, generally. It is that the actions of members of the group reflect the group as a whole. Actions that harm the local community that are committed by a member of the group, are a result of the group being in the community.

      That it doesn't reflect every member of the group individually is a straw man.

    238. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      Of the available catch-alls, many do in fact keep working in all situations.

      Off the top of my head I'll write one.

      Always attempt to intervene to stop crime while harming no-one and meting out no Justice or punishment. Accept any harm that comes to you, trusting in Justice to be served. If someone is killed while non-violently protecting their community, honor their memory by continuing to fight for a peaceful community.

    239. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Aighearach · · Score: 1

      A lot of people think it's "vigilantism" to even defend yourself against a criminal.

      A lot of people are stupid.

    240. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by internic · · Score: 1

      You would accept "masked adventurers"?

      --
      "You call it a new way of thinking; I call it regression to ignorance!" -- Operation Ivy
    241. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I would say we need these guys a lot more than we need thugs assaulting each other or random people in the streets.

      If I got jumped by a bunch of guys, I would rather have someone in body armor show up with mace than no-one at all.

      The problem is after a while, you cant tell which is the vigilante and which is the thug.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    242. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by mjwx · · Score: 1

      We have two sorts plastic policemen in the UK.

      I prefer the sound of "Hobby Bobby" myself.

      But they are the stupidest idea ever. I'm glad Australia didn't go down the same path. We have enough trouble with private security, basically the same as the "specials" you describe sans armour and rank, but on just as much of a power trip.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    243. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      People like you who confuse stopping a crime in action with vigilantism are just stupid idiots who need to be shouted down and humiliated for being idiots.

      spoken like a vigilante

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    244. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

      i'll take the trained, professional, and most importantly accountable police without local knowledge, over the local idiot with a dubious agenda, a weak perceptive ability, and a questionable grasp on morality

      --
      intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    245. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by tehcyder · · Score: 0

      But what if he "rescues" me from buying liquor, or porn, or having an abortion? When you start your screed with such a tepid, tepid example, you lose a helluva lot of moral steam.

      Okay twatface, how about "what if he 'rescues' me from talking to a black friend by shooting him in the guts because in his demented, fascist, racist eyes he thinks all black people are criminals"?

      Un-tepid enough?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    246. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      You're going to call 911, for someone stealing a *pumpkin*?

      What kind of emergency is that?

      Obviously it's better to get into a fight over a near worthless piece of someone else's property and get killed for your efforts. God forbid you should depend on the evil government cops.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    247. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 2

      I've also known lots of cops (5 off the top of my head) and none of them would even consider doing anything like that.

    248. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      This is not avenging (judge, jury), this isn't even crime prevention. This is people stopping actual crimes in progress. If you try to break up a fight, is that vigilantism? If you stop a robbery is that vigilantism? If you stop a little girl from being kidnapped?

      People like you who confuse stopping a crime in action with vigilantism are just stupid idiots who need to be shouted down and humiliated for being idiots.

      But people who walk around wearing stupid costumes and carrying weapons are vigilantes, and the likelihood of them stopping a little girl being kidnapped is approximately zero. You're the one who is confusing vigilantism with civic duty.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    249. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      Right, because watching 30-second clips obtained via searching for "police brutality" will give you a non-biased view of the situation.

      Did you also know that all hospitals abuse their patients? I mean it MUST be true, just look at all the proof!

    250. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by initialE · · Score: 1

      Then what you are looking for is Super (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1512235/), that's a more realistic take, and perhaps a better movie even.

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    251. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      A lot of people think it's "vigilantism" to even defend yourself against a criminal.

      Who exactly?

      Oh, that's right, more or less no one apart from a few extreme religionists.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    252. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      We get around this problem in civilized society by handing out specific powers to specific people (police, rentacops, private eyes, bounty hunters, etc.), and tightly monitoring these groups to keep them in check.

      No, we don't. With a little Google searching, I can point to countless cases where cops beat and murder people with little to no repercussions. Have you forgotten about Rodney King? That kind of thing happens all the time. You complain about vigilantes using grossly disproportionate force, but apparently you're perfectly OK with cops doing the same thing?

      No, it doesn't.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    253. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      In situation 2, the husky male is in the wrong for assaulting a woman. It doesn't matter if she's a prostitute; did she use any violence against anyone? No. So the cop is the one in the wrong for assaulting her. It doesn't matter if there's a law against her activity, the law is wrong. Besides, if you want to take down a prostitute, maybe you should be using a team of uniformed female police officers, not an ununiformed burly male. The whole concept of ununiformed "vice" cops is wrong on many levels, and it's really no tragedy at all if something happens to them, just like it was no tragedy when something happened to one of the Waffen SS.

      You change the law then. In the meantime, the police uphold the existing laws.

      But of course, you vigilante-loving libertarian think all laws are wrong and that everyone should just sort things out with their guns.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    254. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by KDEnut · · Score: 1

      Oh so very, very wrong. Your troll-fu is weak.

      Use whatever label you will, but dressing up (in costumes or in your favorite dungaree's), arming yourself (Be it with rope & Pistol, or a can of pepper spray), and then roaming the streets looking for trouble: It's still vigilanteism. From Merriam: a member of a volunteer committee organized to suppress and punish crime summarily. Notice the word "Suppress". From Dictionary.com: 1. a member of a vigilance committee. (vigilance: Watchfulness).

      I'll give you that it does strongly *Conotate* revenge and lawlessness as a salve though.

    255. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Being a special constalbe wouldn't fit in with the vigilante mindset, you have to believe that you are uniquely good, brave and strong and are fighting against a corrupt system, of which the cops are just another part. Plus, you want to design your own weirdy-pervy outfit in moulded rubber and get to carry whatever weapons you think you can get away with.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    256. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      For most of humanity's history, it was perfectly legal, and even expected, of common citizens to prevent legal wrongdoing. They weren't supposed to punish offenses, but what we today call "citizen arrest" was par for the course. The notion that only professional police force should deal with criminals in all matters, and regular citizens should just call the police and then mind their own business (extending to the point where self-defense itself becomes borderline criminal in some countries) is a relatively recent invention.

      Yes, and for most of humanity's history we hanged people for stealing bread, tortured women to death to get them to confess to witchcraft, branded people for criticising those in power and sent six year old children down the mines because they could get in smaller spaces.

      Whatever conservatives might like to think, there is in fact such a thing as progress.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    257. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      The problem in London is that their biggest superhero, Angle Grinder Man, does things the police aren't allowed to do.

      If you want a demonstration of mental illness, take a look at his website.

      "Rescuing" people from paying fines for parking illegally makes him a superhero in the same way that shitting in a bucket makes me a rocket scientist.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    258. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      They have super powers. They have the power 99.99% of us lack to actually try and do something about it.

      I think their main super power is the complete absence of embarrassment at wearing a black and yellow rubber/leather costume other than on a sportsbike orat a gay nightclub.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    259. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I must've explained my point poorly. 'Super'powers involve magic. Superman can fly (oh, right, 'psionic' not magic...), Wonder Woman can call on Hera, etc.

      Bruce Wayne is an exceptional human being, one in a billion, but there's no magic involved. He has extraordinary abilities/powers, but not superpowers.

      Plus, he's not fucking real.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    260. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      His ability to go beyond the law and typical bureaucracy is a key in his fight against his city's unique super villains.

      Why do I get the creepy feeling that a lot of people here think Batman is a real person?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    261. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Off topic but, I have to say, Slashdot is pretty bloody good tonight.

    262. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Well, you can't make wingsuits that allow you to land safely without a parachute

      The fact that no one has done it yet doesn't mean conclusively that it can't be done. If you used some kind of ground effect it might well be possible if you had comic book materials science.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    263. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Builder · · Score: 1

      > but the last thing we need...

      You're right. What we actually need is a police service who uphold the law without fear or favour. But we don't have one :(

    264. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      In California you can still, in theory, make citizen's arrests, although in the eyes of the cops this feature exists for the benefit of security guards — so that they can exercise this power without having to give them any actual cop powers, which is obviously a bad idea.

      The way it works is that while a cop can arrest you if he has reason to believe you have commited a misdemeanor, a private citizen must have witnessed you commit a misdemeanor or have reason to believe that you have committed a felony before they may execute a citizen's arrest. At that point, you may exercise "any necessary force" to make the arrest. In practice, if you hold someone against their will or anything similar, it had better be for an extremely serious crime, like murder. Interfering with a citizen's arrest is supposed to be equivalent to interfering with a real one, so one of the times I would think it would definitely be a good idea would be if you are outnumbered. It might give one or two of your opponents pause. If you are dealing with a trespasser who won't vacate, a citizen's arrest is a legitimate way to deal with the situation and it is likely to get the PD interested in the incident more rapidly.

      Obviously this sort of thing is dangerous both physically and legally; know what you're getting yourself into. But there's lots of situations where I would attempt to initiate a citizen's arrest. And by the letter of the law, in my state it would apply to a situation like this one. YMMV.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    265. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Builder · · Score: 1

      Excuse me !?

      Community Service Officers - no power, only report crimes. Jumped up little Hitlers. The next step up from a traffic warden. Useless waste of money as they get paid a wage.

      Step _up_ from a traffic warden ? Sheesh ! :p

    266. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Saying the police are the bad guys is like saying blacks are the bad guys. It's complete nonsense.

      It's complete nonsense because "the bad guys" don't exist. It's just a bunch of individuals who sometimes act with a common will. Some people do things that make people happy more of the time than they do things that make people sad, and vice versa.

      With that said, corruption is endemic in our local PD (ask anyone and they've got a story... it goes way beyond anecdotal) and anyone who supports it is a Bad Cop. Stereotypically, we've got a new sheriff in town who's been shaking things up (long term, does he really want to change things, or is it for political gain? who knows, not me) and the results have been fascinating.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    267. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by TheCRAIGGERS · · Score: 1

      By the way, I heard on the news the 911 call Phoenix Jones made to report the fight. The dispatcher asked "What are you wearing?", and the awkward pause before he answered "A yellow and black rubber suit" was precious. :)

      Granted, I have not listened to this call, but this just lends further weight to my thought that there is some kind of (misplaced?) animosity between these "superheroes" and the police & dispatchers. If I call in an ongoing crime, I wouldn't normally expect the 911 operator to inquire on my current dress.

      Nor would I expect them to ignore my call, as seemed to happen frequently in that HBO documentary.

      More power to these people. I wish I had their guts and sense of humanity.

    268. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, screw Batman!

    269. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Chris+Burke · · Score: 2

      Granted, I have not listened to this call, but this just lends further weight to my thought that there is some kind of (misplaced?) animosity between these "superheroes" and the police & dispatchers. If I call in an ongoing crime, I wouldn't normally expect the 911 operator to inquire on my current dress.

      The dispatcher didn't know the caller was a costumed crime fighter, or at least maybe not until they mentioned the rubber suit. They probably asked about clothing so that when the police arrive they can find the person who called.

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    270. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      There are also other similar movies to Super like Defendor and Special. I liked all three myself (didn't care much for Kick Ass though). But I have to say that Special is probably my favorite of the bunch, just for the great ending.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    271. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Their point was that you don't know when a situation will get out of control and turn on you...

      Welcome to life. You will NEVER know when any situation will get out of control and turn on you. From driving to work in the morning, to waking up in the middle of the night to a sick child.

      If you can't deal with that, you are not an adult, you are a child. And you rightfully should run to someone to take care of things for you.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    272. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by TheCRAIGGERS · · Score: 1

      Thanks, that's another avenue I hadn't considered. And it's a simpler answer, so it's probably correct.

    273. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Perhaps that is a suggestion as to the nature of American society? Parent poster did after all specify 'civilized society'.

      Mart

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    274. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by heathen_01 · · Score: 1

      From Merriam: Definition of AND 1 —used as a function word to indicate connection or addition especially of items within the same class or type ; used to join sentence elements of the same grammatical rank or function

    275. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      . You complain about vigilantes using grossly disproportionate force, but apparently you're perfectly OK with cops doing the same thing?

      Of course I'm not. But at least *in theory* these groups are tightly monitored, new members vetted, procedures in place to catch misconduct, etc.

      Obviously it doesn't always work. But that's like saying you approve of people torching houses with flame-throwers because, heck, we allow them to own toasters and they set fire to houses all the time...

    276. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Patch86 · · Score: 1

      This isn't vigilantism. "any person who takes the law into his or her own hands, as by avenging a crime. "

      This is not avenging (judge, jury), this isn't even crime prevention. This is people stopping actual crimes in progress. If you try to break up a fight, is that vigilantism? If you stop a robbery is that vigilantism? If you stop a little girl from being kidnapped?

      If you're walking down the street getting about your normal business and you happen to see a crime in progress, I don't think anyone would call you a "vigilante" for trying to be a good citizen and helping out the victim.

      If you get together with a few friends, make an armour-plated uniform with "Dennis the Avenger" stitched on the front, equip yourself with an electric stun baton, taser, and tear-gas sprays, and go strolling around bad neighbourhoods looking for "wrongdoers" to use your new toys on, then that makes you a vigilante. I honestly can't think of a single more text-book example of a vigilante. Hell, the dictionary definition I've just looked up is:

      noun
      A member of a self-appointed group of citizens who undertake law enforcement in their community without legal authority, typically because the legal agencies are thought to be inadequate.
      http://oxforddictionaries.com/definition/vigilante

      If you don't believe that this is at least a mild example of vigilante behaviour, then I struggle to believe what you *would* classify as vigilantism. Would it make a big difference to you if he were carrying a (completely legal and registered) firearm instead of a stun baton? What if he and his friends patrolled together, rather than separately? What, basically, is the line to you?

    277. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yes, but unfortunately they frequently have a hand in writing the laws, so you have places like the UK where it's illegal to defend yourself against an attacker, and are required to just let him do whatever he wants to you or else you're violating his civil rights. Lots of people there have gone to prison for defending themselves against home invaders.

    278. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Good point, but how many "civilized societies" does that leave on the earth? Probably not many; Japan and a handful of European countries and that's it, and I'm not even sure about those.

    279. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      That's not the same at all. It would be like you saying you approve of people torching houses with flame-throwers, because even though there's some law against it somewhere, it's never enforced and in reality people torch houses with flame-throwers quite frequently and nothing is done about it.

      This is exactly how it is with cops. You claim that these groups are tightly monitored, new members vetted, etc., but in reality there's no evidence for this at all, and instead there's tons of evidence that a large number of them are nothing more than violent thugs, and there's tons of evidence that when they do commit misconduct, that either nothing is done or they get a far less severe punishment than a civilian.

    280. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Can you explain what exactly is wrong with citizens helping to prevent crime in the manner I've described (i.e. helping to detain likely criminals and preventing crimes in progress, rather than extrajudicial punishment such as lynching), or defending themselves with lethal force?

      Not all things that people used to do in the past are inherently evil, you know. Also, I wouldn't know what conservatives might like to think, because I'm not one.

    281. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

      The world NEEDS good cops. They're filling a gap that really shouldn't be there. It's sad that the gap IS there.

      --
      I am not devoid of humor.
    282. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by mvdwege · · Score: 1

      Well, that leaves indeed not a lot of societies that I would consider 'civilised' in that definition, no.

      But then again, I think we've been backsliding ever since the Sixties or so. Even my home country of the Netherlands, which used to be a sensible place where people conferred and violence was rare, has become an insane asylum with paranoid citizens and ever more authoritarian bullies in government.

      Mart

      --
      "I know I will be modded down for this": where's the option '-1, Asking for it'?
    283. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I wonder how much of that is because of the huge influx of Muslims into western European countries. You can't take people straight out of violent, uncivilized countries, throw them into a civilized country where violence is rare and people believe in freedom of religion, and expect them to get along and suddenly turn into civilized citizens. A few Theo van Gogh incidents and it's understandable why citizens would become paranoid.

    284. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Hentes · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter what material you use, the drag is proportional to the area, wich is limited.

    285. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      The Spleen!

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    286. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      One in a billion? Holy shit, there should be 7 Batmen running around now!

      Well, you've got Batman, Green Arrow, and Green Lantern. The other 4 were born in 3rd world countries and never afforded the opportunity to excel.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    287. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by seantide · · Score: 1

      Um... so do the cops. They are, after all, local too.

    288. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by alexo · · Score: 1

      You statement that a video showing police possibly committing criminal acts was more realistic and representative of the actions of police officers as a whole than cops.

      I do state that a candid filming of unaware people is more realistic than a TV "reality show".
      Anything regarding "representative" is your editorializing.

      Do you have a general dislike of the police based on your limited dealings with them or not.

      First tell me, have you stopped beating your wife yet?

      Ignoring the issue of improperly formulated and loaded questions, let's address the issue:
      Do I have a general dislike of the police? Yes, I do.
      Is it based on my (limited or otherwise) dealings with them? Not really. It is mostly based on other things.

      Let's start with human nature.

      I do believe that Lord Acton's saying that power corrupts is true, that peer pressure and pressure by authority are powerful forces, and that dehumanizing "foes" helps deal with the cognitive dissonance of their immoral, unethical and outright criminal treatment; as demonstrated by the "third wave" experiment, the Milgram experiment, the Stanford prison experiment, etc. as well as the more recent Abu Ghraib incident.

      Then, let's see how it applies to police.

      Police, nowadays, have enormous power and almost no accountability. There are countless reports of people being excessively and unnecessarily tasered, maced or beaten, protesters being arrested en masse and then released without charges (after a couple of days in custody), and so on. I am not talking just about youtube videos, but major national newspapers and public TV and radio channels as well.

      What bothers me most is that such abuses are almost universally buried, or, when too overt, downplayed. The perpetrators are not charged and are usually "punished" by their own system by giving them paid vacations (a.k.a "suspended with pay"). When (very rarely) such cases do reach the court of law, coworkers and superiors have no problem lying, suppressing or manufacturing evidence and otherwise subverting justice and get away with it. I often follow such cases years after the events only to find out that, once any media brouhaha has died out, they were quietly swept under the rugs.

      Now, you may say that these are the exceptions rather than the rule, a few "bad apples" if you will. Fair enough, but an organization is judged by the way it treats its outliers. Instead of trying to clean up the ranks, police just closes them; they either actively protect their own or, at best, turn a blind eye -- even when the "their own" in question are better cast out. Which proves, to me, that the police is a thoroughly rotten organization.

      But what about the "good cops"? I claim that there are none, because those that do no oppose evil, enable it by their inaction and are therefore no better than the "bad ones".

      I was using the show Cops not to showcase the officers but the types of people and problems they have to deal with.

      Nietzsche wrote: "Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And when you look long into an abyss, the abyss also looks into you". Here's a small example I ran across while reading a police forum. The guy justifies planting a drop gun because "the bad guy came from a long, long line of local criminals and knew he had it coming". First you rationalize breaking the law because it puts away a crook, then it is to help a fellow officer who got a bad break, then it is for your own benefit and finally, you're so used to doing it, you no longer need a justification.

      And if you insist on something from my own experience, I can volunteer the following anecdote. I drive a quite a bit on roads with speed traps. I also witness a lot of police cruiser drive o

    289. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by cusco · · Score: 1

      Not if the population of your community is more than about 500. I live in Bellevue, WA. Some of the "local" police live in Tacoma, Seattle, Everett, North Bend, and even further away. Even the ones who actually live in Bellevue don't know where our neighborhood is, the city's too big. They're sure as hell not going to know the skateboarder down the hill who tags the utility boxes, the autistic kid who likes to break down street signs, the asshole across the street who lets his dog out to attack the dog walkers, or the old gentleman who occasionally gets lost when he leaves the house without his wife. They only know the couple around the corner who have gotten in drunken screaming matches a couple of times.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    290. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by quacking+duck · · Score: 1

      Tell that to the cops saying this, not me. In case you totally misread the tone of my posts, I disagree with their "we'll take care of everything" attitude.

    291. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you could make a movie about police zombies. That would be great.

    292. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      Generalizations are always stupid.

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    293. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Which one is the one initiating aggression upon people on the street?

      It's not that hard, unless you are just really, REALLY stupid.

    294. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by TheCarp · · Score: 1

      Clearly you are unfamiliar with the difference between the concept of a "rare event" and something which "never happens".

      Oh and did I mention that violent crime, overall, has been on the down trend since the 80s?

      In any case...lets take an example....

      Mothers who make their kids fat by feeding them fast food all the time are real and common, thus constituting a social problem, but not a newsworthy event each time it happens.

      Mothers who murder their children and leave them in dumpsters are fantastically rare, thus constituting a freak show on the news.

      See the difference? One happens every day, to hundreds of thousands of people, and can be seen easily in any city. The second happens a handful of times a year in a population of hundreds of million.

      Now maybe you would like to review your single point of evidence against this standard and tell class which category something supported by a single event goes into?

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    295. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Do you have a general dislike of the police based on your limited dealings with them or not.

      First tell me, have you stopped beating your wife yet?
        That is not a loaded question. Not really the equivalent. The equivalent would be "Do you beat your wife?" And answer could have been no.

      "I believe that a good cop is like spider-man:
      1) They are both aware that with great power there must also come great responsibility [comicvine.com]
      2) They are both fictional characters."

      So why all the yapping a whining? The answer was yes you are a bigot. All the rest is justification. Really why did you waste all of our time?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    296. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by alexo · · Score: 1

      The answer was yes you are a bigot.

      I don't really care about your opinion. You have made up your mind before we started this discussion and nothing I would have said would have changed it. Just out of curiosity, you wouldn't happen to be religious, would you?

      All the rest is justification.

      Call it what you will, but I couldn't help but notice that you failed to even try to refute my observations and, instead repeatedly resorted to name-calling. I must say that it fits the profile.

      Really why did you waste all of our time?

      What's this "our" you speak of? Are you royalty? Or perhaps you're a spokesperson for some group? Or maybe you've got tapeworm?

      Contrary to what you may believe, it is not -- and never was -- about you. I've written you off as a lost cause. However, this is an open forum and somebody may stumble across my post, read it, think about it (imagine that!), maybe do some research and form an opinion. Therefore, I consider my time writing the post reasonably well spent. Whether your time was is not my concern.

    297. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      But they are also extremely useful, for those of us who are not omniscient anyway.

    298. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by KingBenny · · Score: 1

      nightlife here could be pretty hectic sometimes, i stopped jumping in for other people for exactly the same reason, and definitely after i beat up a guy for trying to take my money (and i got convicted for battery, not him for attempted robbery lol, well, it wasnt very lol actually) i guess police needs a special gene, like serial killers are supposed to have ?

      --
      Free speech was meant to be free for all... how can anyone grow up in a nanny state ?
    299. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by gottabeme · · Score: 1

      (I was half-joking, by the way. Did you detect the irony?)

      But seriously, stereotypes often say more about those who subscribe to them than those whom they're about.

      --
      "Those who consume the bulk of goods are those who make them. We must never forget this secret of our prosperity."
    300. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Funny but I figure you are also a lost cause.
      You can not know every police officer yet you judge them all by a limited sample. That is bigotry.
      If you say that you do not like x police officer or even X police force that you have had experience with then it is fine.
      You see it is simple logic bigotry is the dislike of all members of a group. You do not like all police officers because of some reasons justified and some reasons that are fuzzy thinking at best. It is the dislike of all police officers that makes you a bigot.
      Let me guess you have never taken any formal logic or critical thinking courses at the university level?
      If so I suggest you just from it as a logical syllogism and you will see that yes you are a bigot.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    301. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by alexo · · Score: 1

      My, my... This is getting entertaining.

      Funny but I figure you are also a lost cause.

      Coning from you, I take it as a complement.

      You can not know every police officer yet you judge them all by a limited sample.

      Reading comprehension failure. I did not base my dislike on a sample, limited or otherwise.

      That is bigotry

      Have you noticed that you used this word and variations thereof four times in this post? Looks to me like a need to constantly reaffirm an unsubstantiated belief.

      You see it is simple logic bigotry is the dislike of all members of a group. You do not like all police officers because of some reasons justified and some reasons that are fuzzy thinking at best. It is the dislike of all police officers that makes you a bigot.

      I also dislike the Cosa Nostra, the Soviet Communist Party (yes, I am old enough), the National Socialist German Workers' Party (I am not that old but I speak from historical perspective) and the Hell's Angels. I guess that makes me even more of a bigot in your eyes.

      Let me guess you have never taken any formal logic or critical thinking courses at the university level?

      You would be wrong.

      If so I suggest you just from it as a logical syllogism

      I have, you were just too dense to see it. Basically it goes like this: The police has a responsibility to uphold the law. Every cop that breaks the law, or does apply it equally, is a bad cop. Every cop who is aware of bad cops and does not actively work to cleanse the force of them is also a bad cop. A good cop, if one exists, will come into conflict with the bad cops, and such conflict will continue until the force becomes homogeneous. I see no evidence of such conflict (and believe me, I search for it), nobody can point me to evidence of such conflict and yet I see cops breaking the law almost daily.

      Since I am talking about police as a group, I am willing to admit the possibility that individual "good cops" exist. However, their number, if any, is negligible and does not change the conclusion.

      and you will see that yes you are a bigot.

      Are you going to try and refute my observations or, perhaps, present any facts, or will you continue your imitation of a broken record?

    302. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Not at all. You see you have changed your story now. You are saying that some good cops may exist the rest of your assumptions are at best unsubstantiated and the logic is shaky at best.
      But the key here is that you have started to change your statement.
      You went from saying that a good police officer is a fictional character and that IS exactly what you said to saying that they are extremely rare. You have also changed in that you are referring to them as a group and not as an all inclusive group. If you keep working on it you may actually come to a more balanced view point. Once you get to the point that they are individuals and some are good, some are bad, some have issues, and some are jerks you will be finally face that fact that your earlier statements where biased and that you where acting like a bigot. Not an easy step to make but you are at least on your way.
      Maybe you are not hopeless after all.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    303. Re:HBO "Superheroes" documentary on these guys by alexo · · Score: 1

      But the key here is that you have started to change your statement.

      No, I haven't.
      If (and that's a big if), there are a handful of good cops, my chances of meeting one are still negligible and, for all intents and purposes, I may still treat them as fictional characters. However, even that said, I admitted the *possibility*, not the actual existence. Same as I admit the possibility that a 3-headed cat may exist (2-headed kittens and a 3-headed turtle were documented), does not mean that I acknowledge their actual existence.

      The *only* reason that I even mentioned the possibility is because you seem fixated on my words to the point of completely ignoring my assertions. And once again, you did not disappoint. Are you sure you're not a bible thumper?

      Once you get to the point that they are individuals and some are good, some are bad, some have issues, and some are jerks

      I have come to the conclusion that you are engaged in mental masturbation. So here's a challenge: either refute my assertions or, by failing to do so, show the /. community that you cannot.

      I predict that you will not.

  3. Incorrect title. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    "Real Life Superhero"? I think a more accurate title would be 'Man in Superhero Costume Arrested"

    1. Re:Incorrect title. by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      "Real Life Superhero"? I think a more accurate title would be 'Man in Superhero Costume Arrested"

      'Man in Risible Faux-Superhero Costume Arrested After Running Around Like a Girl and Macing Some Drunk Chicks' more like.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  4. Why Shaktiman did not save him? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The TV in India was in the firm grip of the Govt of India till about the early 1990s. All programming was decided by bureaucrats drawing a govt salary with absolutely no incentive to worry about how well the audience liked it. So most Desi[*] kids were protected from the knowledge about super heros. One of the things that happened along with liberalization of India was the first super hero TV serial named "Shaktiman" (loosely translated as powerful man), who flew into the rescue of all the helpless. Well, suddenly a few Desi kids jumped off their balconies hoping to be rescued by Shaktiman. Caused quite a stir and media flurry then. I think one of those kids landed on its head, got deranged and grew up to the Phoenix Jones.

    [*] Desi is a better term than Indian. Thanks to Columbus' misnaming, native Americans are also called Indians. Desi is not a derogatory reference. Use if freely and get it into OED.

    --
    sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    1. Re:Why Shaktiman did not save him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PJ is black, not Desi.

    2. Re:Why Shaktiman did not save him? by Quantum_Infinity · · Score: 1

      'Desi' does not mean Indian. It is a common noun of Hindi that simply means 'native' or 'of one's own country'. So anybody can use it regardless of their nationality.

    3. Re:Why Shaktiman did not save him? by pigsflew · · Score: 1

      I'm Indian; they're Native Americans. My country is named India (unfortunately, no one in English remembers that it's also Bharat); Theirs is named America, because they didn't have a name which they all agreed upon for their entire continent. I'm not a "South Asian Indian", not an "Eastern Asian". I'm Indian.

      Someone in college once told me that Native Americans actually do prefer to be called "Indians" as the PC term. I think they're wrong to argue for it, and I'm not sure why they wouldn't prefer "First Peoples" or "First Nations" anyway, as is sometimes used in Canada.

    4. Re:Why Shaktiman did not save him? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 2
      All we need is a word to describe Indian Indians from Native Americans. You can lay the claim to the word Indian and fight the whole world if you want to. But all I want is a neutral, i.e. non derogatory, non confusing term to gain currency.

      BTW you should look up how you ended up with the monicker Indian. It is named after the river Indus, which is the European pronunciation of the Desi name "Sindhu". So you should fight to be called Sindhi or Sindhian. And "S" becomes "H" in Persian compared to Sanskrit, like "V" becomes "B" in Bengali compared to Hindi. That is why your religion is called Hindu (Sindhu) by the non-Desis. You should also fight to restore the ancient name for your religion "sanadhana dharma". The language you call Hindi, should actually be called Sindhi because Hindi is the word Iranians assigned to your language. Fight for that too.

      Mumabi done. Kokotta done. Bengalooru done. Chennai done. OK time to go on with more of your name restoration crusades.

      Best wishes on all your personal crusades.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    5. Re:Why Shaktiman did not save him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Desi sounds too much like DESY -- Deutsches Synchrotron.

    6. Re:Why Shaktiman did not save him? by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      The safest way is to find out the actual tribe or ethnic group a person belongs to and call them by that name, e.g. Cherokee. They do not recognize themselves as a single ethic group, let alone one that includes the Eskimo (a name with similar issues as "Indian") and the peoples of South America.

    7. Re:Why Shaktiman did not save him? by pigsflew · · Score: 1

      Yes, but this is just a translation to English. This happens for every country; the Chinese call America "Mei Guo", or "Pretty Kingdom", and its people "Mei Guo Ren". English speakers refer to those people from Deutschland as "Germans". A translation is acceptable. The problem is this translation, "Indian" refers to "people of the Indus"; it refers to Indians. It's very specific. Sorry for the rant, it just really annoys me when I say that someone is Indian and someone else asks me "Oh, what tribe?" and then I have to specify, "No. Indian. From India."

    8. Re:Why Shaktiman did not save him? by pigsflew · · Score: 1

      Yes, but when you know someone is from Eastern Europe but you don't know if they are Polish or Ukrainian or what, you can just say "Eastern European", which is a useful grouping.

      Just because the First Nations didn't have a word for this doesn't negate the need for such a word. We'd use a translation for "The Land" or "The World", except they all spoke different languages so it's not easy to do that either.

    9. Re:Why Shaktiman did not save him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was called out at a party by a man of partial Native American descent because I had said "Indian". I told him I was sorry and I didn't know it was an offensive term. I hoped he would be willing to forgive me for using a term I was brought up with, a term I had never been told was insensitive. Maybe it was the atmosphere (party, drinking, etc.), but the guy was a complete asshole about it. Later someone told me he was ready to fight me!

      I learned two things: First, no matter how nice you talk, you've already offended someone. Second, many of the people who get offended are simply looking for a way to vent frustration, and don't actually care what you think. They WANT you to be a bigot so they can hate you.

      So, I don't mind using "Desi" if that's more appropriate. However, it is not derogatory to call someone from India, Indian.

    10. Re:Why Shaktiman did not save him? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      "Native American" is a worse term than "Indian". I am a Native American. I was born here. My parents were born here. Just because my grand parents were not born here doesn't not make me an alien. Claiming the name "Native American" by a group because their genetic line has been on this contenent longer than mine is no better than the stereo type jerk that brags that he is more "American" because his family came over on the Mayflower.

    11. Re:Why Shaktiman did not save him? by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      Yes, but when you know someone is from Eastern Europe but you don't know if they are Polish or Ukrainian or what, you can just say "Eastern European", which is a useful grouping.

      Likewise, people from eastern Russia are Asian, right? And Caucasians are from the Caucasus Mountains? No, ethnonyms are more complicated than you suggest, subject to historical accident, whim, and connotation as much as universal rules.

      Just because the First Nations didn't have a word for this doesn't negate the need for such a word.

      There are several terms for the aboriginal peoples of the United States, all of which have some problem. "First Nations" is a Canadian term and the Assembly of First Nations is a Canadian organization. That's fine for Canadians, but don't pretend that isn't a problem for people in the US.

    12. Re:Why Shaktiman did not save him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ...super hero TV serial named "Shaktiman" (loosely translated as powerful man), who flew into the rescue of all the helpless.
      Or more loosely as "The Flying Khalsa"

        In Sihkism the principle of ahimsa(non-violence) is to actively prevent violence, not to simply stand by idly whilst violence is being done.

    13. Re:Why Shaktiman did not save him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you are not a Native American, you are a native American. Note the capitalisation, you only capitalise proper nouns in the middle of a sentence.

      Why do you want to call yourself a native American? Although native can mean born in that place, it is more typically used to refer to indigenous people. I'm English, I was born in England and so were my parents, but I have never felt the need to refer to myself as a native Englishman, so it makes me curious as to why you feel the need to label yourself as a native of your country/continent.

    14. Re:Why Shaktiman did not save him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [*] Desi is a better term than Indian. Thanks to Columbus' misnaming, native Americans are also called Indians. Desi is not a derogatory reference. Use if freely and get it into OED.

      Is it exclusive in any way? Like: does it exclude the 'untouchable' caste? Does it exclude any persons living in India of that region's decent? Also, north american natives are increasingly called native americans, indigenous or first peoples*, so the renaming of indians may not be entirely necessary.

      * First Peoples [ironic]: As in we were here before you, but were not necessarily first. See: Inuit overrunning the Dorset people in the arctic.

  5. Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    If they were fighting in public, surely they were breaking some law themselves, and he was attempting to stop it. Granted I'm sure he broke some law too, but did the fighters get arrested as well as they should have? It seems kinda like the cops had a vendetta against the psycho in a funny costume but not against the original criminals. I guess superhero comics are accurate.

    1. Re:Hmmm.... by mr1911 · · Score: 2

      Why would the cops want to stifle someone who is doing their jobs better than they are without pay? There is certainly no conflict of interest there.

      --
      This post comes with a double-your-money-back guarantee!
      Any offense taken to this post is at your sole discretion.
    2. Re:Hmmm.... by Newander · · Score: 1

      From the article:

      According to the statement, a group of men and women were leaving a downtown Seattle club at 2:32 a.m. Sunday and "were dancing and having a good time" when an "unknown adult male suspect came up from behind and pepper sprayed the group," the statement said.

      So to paraphrase. Group of friends walking down a street at night. Guy in a Halloween costume runs up and pepper sprays them.

      --

      Jesus saves and takes half damage.

  6. Ironically or maybe sadly by Dyinobal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Ironically or maybe sadly he got more of a punishment than that NYC cop who maced those protesting girls, for no reason.

    1. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Officer Anthony Bologna has yet to be given his comeuppance.

    2. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can not wait until he has been.

    3. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by Surt · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you mean Tony Boloney.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    4. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by orphiuchus · · Score: 0

      From the video it looked like he was trying to shut them up, and I'm sure some comeuppance is on the way, but lets not go nuts about the severity of the macing.

      I've seen hundreds of people sprayed and never once have I seen anyone actually need medical treatment. I've seen dozens of hand to hand take-downs following careful training guidelines, and I've seen several broken limbs and a broken neck so severe that it caused an internal decapitation.

      I'm glad that Tony Bologna sprayed those girls instead of trying to shut them up another way. People recover from being maced.

    5. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by Captain+Hook · · Score: 2

      Why did they need shuting up in the first place?

      --
      These comments are my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the other voices in my head.
    6. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The women were penned in, standing still with their hands close to their own bodies, and one of them were saying "oh my god!". Saying that at least Tony Bologna only sprayed them in the eyes instead of taking them down physically is as reasonable as saying that at least he didn't shoot them, or at least he didn't rape them and then murder them. Yes, that would have been worse and no, that is irrelevant. Would Tony Bologna let a protester go who mased him based on the reasoning "at least he didn't physically take me down?" The answer to that is obvious. It doesn't matter what he might have done, it matters what he did. It is only by fortune that this was all caught on camera. If a high ranking police officer feels comfortable casually attacking people who are no threat from behind a barrier in full view of the public, then something is very wrong at the police department.

    7. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by Dyinobal · · Score: 1

      What you don't understand isn't so much that the macing itself is unwarranted, it was the violation of civil liberties by the NYC police force that was the real issue. If you want to support the macing of peaceful protesters that's your prerogative but I for one don't.

    8. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by alexo · · Score: 1

      From the video it looked like he was trying to shut them up, and I'm sure some comeuppance is on the way, but lets not go nuts about the severity of the macing.

      I've seen hundreds of people sprayed and never once have I seen anyone actually need medical treatment. I've seen dozens of hand to hand take-downs following careful training guidelines, and I've seen several broken limbs and a broken neck so severe that it caused an internal decapitation.

      I'm glad that Tony Bologna sprayed those girls instead of trying to shut them up another way. People recover from being maced.

      You, sir, are the lowliest piece of shit I have ever had the displeasure to run across on slashdot.

    9. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by Hatta · · Score: 3, Insightful

      From the video it looked like he was trying to shut them up,

      Ah, so he's trying to deprive them of their freedom of speech. Deprivation of rights under color of law is a federal crime. (Title 18, U.S.C., Section 242)

      I'm sure some comeuppance is on the way, but lets not go nuts about the severity of the macing.

      Assault is assault. If I were to mace a police officer without cause, what do you think would happen to me? Why should this officer get off any lighter?

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    10. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent up. !!

    11. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      You, sir, are the lowliest piece of shit I have ever had the displeasure to run across on slashdot.

      You forgot to use the Foe modifier.

      Shun the misanthropes.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    12. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I don't know, what where they saying?
      And the probably didn't, but Bologna did decide to shut them up, and of all the tools he has, that was the least harmful.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    13. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "shut up, crime!"

    14. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhmm . . because they're girls. Believe me, if you only knew my wife . . .

    15. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

      Definitely not ironically. Irony is when the opposite of what you expect happens, not when exactly what you expect happens.

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
    16. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      I'm glad our government only takes our money and our rights. We still have our lives! hurray!

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    17. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      I would prefer he not assault people at all.
      They should throw the book at him. At least two counts of assault with a deadly would be about right. People have died from reactions to OC.

    18. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      If you watched that video, he only sprays tiny, cute, very young women. Tony has a problem with girls he can't screw. Tony Baloney likes to hurt girls he wants but can't screw. Tony needs his ass kicked, badly. And Tony will get away with it.

    19. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by Catbeller · · Score: 2

      You can hear another cop in the video saying to another cop, "I can't believe he just maced those girls."

    20. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by orphiuchus · · Score: 1

      Holy shit, what is wrong with the reading comprehension on slashdot these days? At no point do I say that the spraying was justified, all that I said was that of the tools he could misuse that was the least harmful.

      Jesus Christ, now I remember why I don't come here anymore.

    21. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How do you know so much about what other people expect?

    22. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

      I know things about pigeons.

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
    23. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by Chris+Burke · · Score: 1

      Holy shit, what is wrong with the reading comprehension on slashdot these days? At no point do I say that the spraying was justified, all that I said was that of the tools he could misuse that was the least harmful.

      Yeah, you just played down the severity of macing innocent people in the face by saying that at least he didn't shoot them or break their neck. Because apparently that was on the table?

      Why don't you come over here and let me mace you in the face, and see if you don't "go nuts about the severity of the macing" because I didn't use my pocket knife to stab you for no reason instead.

      Here's a free clue for you: The reason the officer didn't shoot the girls or beat them with his truncheon or throw them down on the curb is because mace does have the least harmful effect and thus the least oversight. It's why tasers are used so much more often than guns (in the absence of taser availability), because the post-facto justifications needed for doing so are vastly less. Which is why arguments of the form "better the taser than the gun", like you're making here, are utterly retarded.

      Jesus Christ, now I remember why I don't come here anymore.

      Where is it that "Hey, let's not get riled up over the cop macing innocent girls in the face, he could have killed them instead you know" plays well, so I can make sure to never ever visit?

      --

      The enemies of Democracy are
    24. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      And did those police officers arrest the violent attacker? Clearly they know that he had committed a crime. Or did they become accomplices by being an armed intimidating force to prevent anyone else from stopping the crime?

    25. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh wow, that hadn't occurred to me. So I guess if anyone was wondering how someone could have so much pent-up rage... now we know. How bad must he have gotten his ass kicked his whole life?

    26. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by Surt · · Score: 1

      Credit where due to the daily show for that one.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    27. Re:Ironically or maybe sadly by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      He didn't shove bamboo under their fingernails either. He's a great guy. I don't know why people were complaining about some mace. He could have gotten severely medieval on them.

  7. Walter Kovacs responds: by orphiuchus · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dog carcass in alley this morning, tire tread on burst stomach. This city is afraid of me. I have seen its true face. The streets are extended gutters and the gutters are full of blood and when the drains finally scab over, all the vermin will drown. The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout "Save us!"... and I'll look down and whisper "No." They had a choice, all of them. They could have followed in the footsteps of good men like my father or President Truman. Decent men who believed in a day's work for a day's pay. Instead they followed the droppings of lechers and communists and didn't realize that the trail led over a precipice until it was too late. Don't tell me they didn't have a choice. Now the whole world stands on the brink, staring down into bloody Hell, all those liberals and intellectuals and smooth-talkers... and all of a sudden nobody can think of anything to say.

    1. Re:Walter Kovacs responds: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You obviously don't understand the meaning of communism and liberal.
      Please don't confuse them with what passes for communism and liberal in the U.S.

      Now, the story is about the problem with a society where everyone just looks out for themselves and doesn't care about human value.
      This has nothing to do with capitalism vs communism or liberalism vs fascism. All of them can exsist freely without people caring for each other.

    2. Re:Walter Kovacs responds: by orphiuchus · · Score: 2

      *Woosh!*

    3. Re:Walter Kovacs responds: by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

      You got whooshed!

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    4. Re:Walter Kovacs responds: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've obviously not seen "the Watchmen"... it's the movie he's quoting you bleeding heart liberal.

    5. Re:Walter Kovacs responds: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rorschach sucks!!!

      **couldn't help myself......

    6. Re:Walter Kovacs responds: by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Seen... Movie?... Read a comic book.

    7. Re:Walter Kovacs responds: by gad_zuki! · · Score: 0

      >Hell, all those liberals and intellectuals and smooth-talkers.

      Stupid liberals with their non-discriminatory laws, weekends, and social safety nets. Stupid intellectuals who don't believe in god or starting a posse!

      > Decent men who believed in a day's work for a day's pay

      Funny how that didn't work out too well during the industrial revolution when the market was in charge and it took regulation and labor unions as well as massive protests before that was even possible.

      Ugh, I love how Rorschach went from being a complete and utter right-wing psychopath to the posterboy of "common sense" in America. Wow, just wow.

    8. Re:Walter Kovacs responds: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...are you *actually* a moron, or do you just play one on Slashdot?

    9. Re:Walter Kovacs responds: by Oyjord · · Score: 1

      >Hell, all those liberals and intellectuals and smooth-talkers.

      Stupid liberals with their non-discriminatory laws, weekends, and social safety nets. Stupid intellectuals who don't believe in god or starting a posse!

      > Decent men who believed in a day's work for a day's pay

      Funny how that didn't work out too well during the industrial revolution when the market was in charge and it took regulation and labor unions as well as massive protests before that was even possible.

      Ugh, I love how Rorschach went from being a complete and utter right-wing psychopath to the posterboy of "common sense" in America. Wow, just wow.

      I'm out of points, someone please mod gad_zuki! up.

    10. Re:Walter Kovacs responds: by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      Part of what made Rorschach so scary is that he made sense a lot of the time, and that ultimately, he was the only "just" member of the group.

    11. Re:Walter Kovacs responds: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love it. You must think Stalin was a Reaganite.

    12. Re:Walter Kovacs responds: by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Just because you're crazy, doesn't mean you can't say something that's true.

      And second, what kind of right wing meetings have YOU been going to where they use him as a posterboy? I've only seen him mentioned twice, and slashdot is one of those times.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    13. Re:Walter Kovacs responds: by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I've never seen the movie, or read the comic book, but even I could tell he was quoting something, to be funny, ironic, or sarcastic, and not making a post with his honest opinion.

  8. Video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is the video of what happened. It is not clear that these people were fighting btw: according to some accounts they were "dancing and having fun".

    1. Re:Video by Newander · · Score: 1

      Those reports being the statements of the pepper sprayed people in the police report.

      --

      Jesus saves and takes half damage.

  9. It's a Bird... by satuon · · Score: 1

    It's a Bird...It's a Plane...It's Pepperman

  10. Bound to happen to this guy sooner or later. by Chas · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously. I understand what he's trying to do and "say".

    In the society we currently inhabit, people are encouraged to be complete assholes to one another. As such, he was going to get arrested sooner or later for something like this.

    Jumping on someone to stop battery is, itself, battery. So all one of these drunk little hooligans needed to do was tell the cop they wanted to press charges.

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:Bound to happen to this guy sooner or later. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exactly. To paraphrase many movies: That's why superheros hide their identity. So they don't have to faces charges and pay for the cleanup.

    2. Re:Bound to happen to this guy sooner or later. by PRMan · · Score: 1

      If it was felony battery they were committing then he should be OK on a citizen's arrest.

      --
      Peter predicted that you would "deliberately forget" creation 2000 years ago...
    3. Re:Bound to happen to this guy sooner or later. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, we should encourage unhinged individuals to go around pepper spraying people, that's bound to work out.

      Vigilantism makes good movies, but bad real life. Shame some people can't distinguish the two. We have an authorized police force with limits on their power for a reason.

    4. Re:Bound to happen to this guy sooner or later. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He should have put ALL of those hooligans in the hospital. They sure would not care and even laugh about putting you or me in the hospital so what makes them special?

      They were in the commission of a crime. I firmly believe that if someone is in the commission of a crime and they get their rights violated while in the commission of the crime then they should have no rights. They are after all perpetrating a crime on society. They need to get their ass kicked, locked up and sentenced appropriately as to remove the threat that they pose to society.

      There is a difference between someone stealing a loaf of bread to feed their family vs. a gang of thugs beating the hell out of someone for the hell of it...

      The way to break gangs is to punish them severely. For instance, in South Carolina there is a 'lynching' law. Basically, if two or more people jump on someone then they are guilty of lynching. Lynching in SC carries 7 years in the penitentiary. It's a very effective law when dealing with gangs.

    5. Re:Bound to happen to this guy sooner or later. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reminds me of the Episode of Stargate SG-1 where Til'c get's an apartment, and the Air Force has to tell him to stop helping his neighbors because he's drawing too much attention as a local super-hero.

    6. Re:Bound to happen to this guy sooner or later. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worse than assholes, they're trained to ignore each other, even if one is in dire need. 9/11 only occurred because the people on the plane didn't think to endanger themselves to fight back. Part of why the TSA is useless. The only that is needed to, or indeed capable of, preventing another 9/11 is the change in mindset of the passengers.

      100 relatively unarmed people on a plane can defeat 3 people with box cutters. 30 people in/around a bar can break up a fight between 2 drunken idiots outside the bar. One person can buy a mentally disturbed homeless person a sandwich.

    7. Re:Bound to happen to this guy sooner or later. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, we should encourage unhinged individuals to go around pepper spraying people, that's bound to work out.

      Vigilantism makes good movies, but bad real life. Shame some people can't distinguish the two. We have an authorized police force with limits on their power for a reason.

      Vigilantism is following the criminal home and punishing him for the crime. Justice can only be served by the courts. Stopping a crime in progress isn't vigilantism, it's being a good citizen.

      If you're being jumped and getting beat up by a bunch of thugs, you don't want to wait for the cops to arrive. You want people to call the police and go help you in the meantime.

    8. Re:Bound to happen to this guy sooner or later. by Chas · · Score: 1

      If it was felony battery they were committing then he should be OK on a citizen's arrest.

      A citizen's arrest doesn't involve said citizen tackling people and spraying them down with pepper spray.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    9. Re:Bound to happen to this guy sooner or later. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you'd rather a crowd of people stand back when a gang is raping or mugging one innocent individual? Go look in the mirror. YOU are what's wrong with society.

    10. Re:Bound to happen to this guy sooner or later. by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Jumping on someone to stop battery is, itself, battery.

      Doing it to stop them from jumping on someone else is a legal justification.

    11. Re:Bound to happen to this guy sooner or later. by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I firmly believe that if someone is in the commission of a crime and they get their rights violated while in the commission of the crime then they should have no rights.

      So if someone is smoking a joint, it's OK to cut their head off?

      There's a reason Hammurabi came up with his "eye for an eye" code.

    12. Re:Bound to happen to this guy sooner or later. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to disagree with "jumping on someone to stop battery is, itself, battery." It is self defense as the self defense laws include defending another. Usually this involves someone related but the laws usually are not that specific. I'd have to advise checking your local laws before doing anything like this as state and local laws vary a lot. I imagine there may be some places where anyone who hits anyone unless he's wearing a badge is going to serve 5-10 for assault but not most places.

    13. Re:Bound to happen to this guy sooner or later. by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      Jumping on someone to stop battery is, itself, battery. So all one of these drunk little hooligans needed to do was tell the cop they wanted to press charges.

      Not all battery is unjustified though. Washington state law provides the use of force to prevent force, but only as long as that force is not an escalation of force. Thus, I can commit battery on you to keep you from committing battery on another person (so I can use it to prevent a crime) but I cannot commit battery with a weapon (mace/pepper spray) to keep you from committing unarmed battery on another person. That would be an escalation of force.

      Also, the force needs to be no more than that necessary to stop the crime from occurring. (Namely, holding someone back is technically battery, but we all accept that it is reasonable application of force to stop someone from committing a serious crime.)

      While I'm kind of down with Phoenix Jones, because the SPD really doesn't care about or care to respond to "petty" crime, he needs to have some legal training to understand why he cannot walk into a fight with pepper spray to break it up, and what his proper procedure should be to ensure he is operating within the law.

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    14. Re:Bound to happen to this guy sooner or later. by Chas · · Score: 1

      If you're defending someone else, BY DEFINITION it's not "self defense" any more than having someone give you a lecture about bettering yourself is "self help".

      And yes, it IS still battery. Sorry. The only differentiation factor here is that the cops weren't allowed to look the other way because the hooligans wanted to press charges.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    15. Re:Bound to happen to this guy sooner or later. by Chas · · Score: 1

      So you'd rather a crowd of people stand back when a gang is raping or mugging one innocent individual? Go look in the mirror. YOU are what's wrong with society.

      Read what I said. That isn't what I said.

      I said that jumping on someone, even for the right reasons, is still battery and is still prosecutable.

      Be that as it may, in your narrowly defined situation, I'd probably jump on the SOB and try to chase him off. If I got arrested for battery, I'd deal with it and have no regrets.

      Please stop trying to pick an internet fight.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    16. Re:Bound to happen to this guy sooner or later. by Chas · · Score: 1

      Jumping on someone to stop battery is, itself, battery.

      Doing it to stop them from jumping on someone else is a legal justification.

      True. But that doesn't mean it's not battery and not prosecutable.

      If Jones has a fair court hearing, this should be an open and shut case with a dismissal or, at worst, a verbal reprimand.

      I mean, let's face it. Most judges, even the ones that try to portray themselves as easy-going guys tend to be pretty straight-laced. So some guy running around in body armor and a mask is going to probably going to trip every one of his "I must lecture" triggers.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    17. Re:Bound to happen to this guy sooner or later. by Chas · · Score: 1

      Jumping on someone to stop battery is, itself, battery. So all one of these drunk little hooligans needed to do was tell the cop they wanted to press charges.

      Not all battery is unjustified though.

      Agreed!

      Washington state law provides the use of force to prevent force, but only as long as that force is not an escalation of force. Thus, I can commit battery on you to keep you from committing battery on another person (so I can use it to prevent a crime) but I cannot commit battery with a weapon (mace/pepper spray) to keep you from committing unarmed battery on another person. That would be an escalation of force.

      Also, the force needs to be no more than that necessary to stop the crime from occurring. (Namely, holding someone back is technically battery, but we all accept that it is reasonable application of force to stop someone from committing a serious crime.)

      While I'm kind of down with Phoenix Jones, because the SPD really doesn't care about or care to respond to "petty" crime, he needs to have some legal training to understand why he cannot walk into a fight with pepper spray to break it up, and what his proper procedure should be to ensure he is operating within the law.

      Agreed as well.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    18. Re:Bound to happen to this guy sooner or later. by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      Hey JERK! We don't AGREE with people here on slashdot! I better see a good argument for why I'm a stupid idiot now, or else, I'm going to report you to the "too nice to be on slashdot" police. ;)

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    19. Re:Bound to happen to this guy sooner or later. by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Depends on the particulars. Since he was out looking for crime, that kicks in whatever local laws there are about vigilantes; then you add samaritan laws and whatnot. And he was, according to the witnesses, incorrect in assessing the situation as a fight. It's also not likely to be his first visit to that courthouse. And the publicity is only going to amplify the judge's sense of putting a lid on the fantasy. I'd be surprised if all he gets is a talking-to. Probation is likely, maybe a significant if not stiff fine. Jail doubtful. Mandatory community service would be very poetic, and maybe therapeutic. Channel that ego to where it can do good for people suffering without the glamor or airplay.

      BTW, if the prosecutor knows that the battery is done to stop a battery, and knows the law says that's legal, then it's not prosecutable in any sense other than the one in which any prosecutor can charge anyone with anything to waste the court's time and the state's money and ruin his own job rating. So no, it's not prosecutable. There'd have to be some nuance to the facts, like: dude says he thought it was a crime in progress but it wasn't.

    20. Re:Bound to happen to this guy sooner or later. by Chas · · Score: 1

      BTW, if the prosecutor knows that the battery is done to stop a battery, and knows the law says that's legal, then it's not prosecutable in any sense other than the one in which any prosecutor can charge anyone with anything to waste the court's time and the state's money and ruin his own job rating. So no, it's not prosecutable. There'd have to be some nuance to the facts, like: dude says he thought it was a crime in progress but it wasn't.

      Maybe not in criminal court. But he can still be prosecuted in civil court. Even if he wins, it'll still cost time and money.

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    21. Re:Bound to happen to this guy sooner or later. by Chas · · Score: 1

      My bad! I am a bad Slashdotter!

      And you're wrong! WRONG WRONG WRONG!

      Because...uhhh...because...

      *Looks at the BoFH calendar*

      Because the moon is aligned with Mercury!

      SO NYAH!

      --


      Chas - The one, the only.
      THANK GOD!!!
    22. Re:Bound to happen to this guy sooner or later. by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      You are young. I can tell.

      Before 9/11, of anyone took over a plane, the major thought was "oh, this is going to be inconvenient, being delayed while we fly to Cuba". Airplane hijackings, with a few notable exceptions, almost always ended peacefully. No one fought back because they assumed from past episodes that the only likely issue they would have was loss of a day of travel time. Hell, Sinfield even had an episode where it happened to Elaine. No one thought to endanger themselves because they didn't think they were in any real danger to begin with. Only the folks on the 4th plane were informed that things had changed and they were in actual danger.

    23. Re:Bound to happen to this guy sooner or later. by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1

      Defence of another is usually a subset of laws of self defence, and sometimes referred to as Self Defence depending on the laws in the local jurisdiction.

    24. Re:Bound to happen to this guy sooner or later. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously. I understand what he's trying to do and "say".

      In the society we currently inhabit, people are encouraged to be complete assholes to one another. As such, he was going to get arrested sooner or later for something like this.

      Jumping on someone to stop battery is, itself, battery. So all one of these drunk little hooligans needed to do was tell the cop they wanted to press charges.

      I was in a city park a few weeks back, practicing Kendo with a friend of mine, and some busybody called the police and reported "two guys trying to kill each other with swords in the park". (note- we were using bamboo practice swords, not even metal ones) The cops had a good laugh about it with us.

      This clown would have found out the hard way, that a bamboo practice sword will easily cause some major damage.

    25. Re:Bound to happen to this guy sooner or later. by heathen_01 · · Score: 1

      How do you propose one should stop an in progress felony battery instead?

  11. Sounds sort of like a militia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Sounds sort of like a militia, or community policing. Seems almost sensible except for the costumes.

    1. Re:Sounds sort of like a militia by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, in the U.S. at least, the Guardian Angels have been around for decades.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    2. Re:Sounds sort of like a militia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was actively recruited by the Guardian Angels in Boston. To my shame I was to afraid to join. That's one of those decisions I've come to regret. I know that riding home on the Orange Line late at night felt safer with the Guardian Angles on the train.

    3. Re:Sounds sort of like a militia by homesnatch · · Score: 1

      Are guardian angles acute or obtuse?

    4. Re:Sounds sort of like a militia by BenLeeImp · · Score: 1

      Neither - they are right.

    5. Re:Sounds sort of like a militia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of them are acute, some are ah-ugly. You are obtuse.

    6. Re:Sounds sort of like a militia by cusco · · Score: 2

      Yes, and the police have hated them every minute of their existence. Of course they have plenty of reason to. Imagine that someone was willing to do your job, do it better than you, do it in areas that you were afraid to go, and do it for free. You might hate them too, then.

      --
      "Think about how stupid the average person is. Now, realise that half of them are dumber than that." - George Carlin
    7. Re:Sounds sort of like a militia by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And the Guardian Angels have had nothing but disdain for the cops, which is the reason for their existence. Imagine that you (as a taxpayer) were paying someone unwilling to do their job, who does it worse than you, who won't even go into the neighborhoods where their presence is needed most, even for money. You might think they were a bunch of bitches, too.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Sounds sort of like a militia by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      They're cops. They have it in their union contracts that no "policing" will be required of them.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  12. Re:What a fucking idiot by plsenjy · · Score: 1

    Sounds like the musings of a Real Life Supervillain.

    --
    Glad I could help.
  13. Sod super heroes by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    Sod super heroes. I want a super-vilain.

    1. Re:Sod super heroes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The Koch brothers already claimed that mantle.

    2. Re:Sod super heroes by Fast+Thick+Pants · · Score: 1

      Unless you want to count Murdoch, I think Richard Branson's our best bet. After somebody runs over his cat or something.

    3. Re:Sod super heroes by Nadaka · · Score: 1

      Florida Elected a Lex Luthor clone as governor, his name is Rick Scott. Defrauding medicare, kicking puppies and trying to get rid of aliens like superman.

    4. Re:Sod super heroes by orphiuchus · · Score: 1

      What about Scorpio? Didn't he conquer the east coast in the 90s?

    5. Re:Sod super heroes by tmosley · · Score: 1

      Look no further than the arch-villian, "The Bernank".

    6. Re:Sod super heroes by Thud457 · · Score: 1

      oh come on!
      Elon Musk just sounds like a bond villian name.
      And he's got cool cars.
      he's building "rockets" come on, you know he's actually building an arsenal of ICBMs... it all makes sense now

      --

      the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    7. Re:Sod super heroes by Fned · · Score: 2

      I'm pretty sure that Monsanto has a gigantic skull-shaped hovering fortress hidden in a swamp someplace.

    8. Re:Sod super heroes by BJ_Covert_Action · · Score: 2

      Well there is upward of 500 Lex Luthor wannabes in Congress at the moment, from what I can tell...

    9. Re:Sod super heroes by blair1q · · Score: 1

      And does "Roger Ailes" really believe we don't know he's Jabba the Hutt in pink face paint?

  14. Who watches the Watchmen? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or Rain City Superhero Movement in this case...

    1. Re:Who watches the watchmen? by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

      same as internet dickwad theory?

      --
      How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
    2. Re:Who watches the watchmen? by jockeys · · Score: 1

      exactly. but with violence and harm instead of name-calling and dickotry.

      --

      In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
    3. Re:Who watches the watchmen? by DRAGONWEEZEL · · Score: 1

      Interesting. I think on some level I agree. I couldn't do the X-Alt thing, even though it's in my heart, I know I'd fail. I've allways had a hard time w/ the phrase "The path to hell is paved w/ good intentions." But this is the case where it really comes to light. It takes 1 copycat, improperly trained, to screw something up and get himself or someone else injured or worse.

      Though I do have an Idea for a porcupine costume... It'd be funny as hell to watch people try and assault you only to stab themselves!

      --
      How much is your data worth? Back it up now.
  15. This was a Rorschach test. by drainbramage · · Score: 2

    Your response seems odd to me.
    Must have missed it.

    Who watches the Watchmen?

    --
    No brain, no pain.
  16. Phoenix does NOT represent us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Phoenix Jones does NOT represent the typical "real life superhero". He is sponsored and equipped by media companies, he "patrols" with reporters and cameramen in tow, and he is a professed "outsider" who claims to be "better" than the rest of us, even thought he is among the newest of us - he's only been around for a year or so.

    SOME of us don't go for the publicity, don't dress up, and don't wear masks, but we still patrol our neighborhoods and help people when we can. Some of us don't even call ourselves "heroes", just concerned citizen patrolmen, extreme altruists (X-Alts), and other less-lofty titles. Some of us have been doing this under your collective noses for as long as 20 years, and have never been in jail, or had any complaints. Especially from those we help. Some of us dress in colorful costumes and do nothing but homeless outreach, keeping people alive on the streets (like Thanatos in Vancouver, look HIM up!). The costume is used to draw attention to the cause. Some of us simply do outreach or neighborhood crime fighting without costumes. Some of us are animal right activists, some are environmentalists, some just help by shoveling snow off of people's drives.

    A great many of us are trained in relevant fields - we have tons of soldiers, cops, EMT/Paramedics, nurses, security guards, firefighters, private investigators, high-level computer geeks, etc. Sure, we have our share of basement-dwelling kids and thrill-seekers, but those tend to get weeded out pretty quickly if their heads and hearts aren't in the right place. Phoenix stands apart, both by choice and consensus. Most of us predicted he'd end up in jail, and unfortunately, he has.

    Point is, we come in all flavors, from quiet and in the background, to media-hounding insanity.
    So while you guys are yukking it up, try to remember that this man is NOT typical in our group.
    Find out the real truth for yourselves.

    1. Re:Phoenix does NOT represent us... by broken_chaos · · Score: 1

      Thanatos in Vancouver, look HIM up!

      I saw a short documentary on him a while back (on a Canadian scifi/fantasy TV channel). From that, he seems like a nice, albeit slightly oddball, genuinely compassionate guy. For those who didn't bother to look him up, most of the time he takes is spent late at night on Vancouver's east side (lots of prostitutes, homeless, etc.) handing out water bottles, some granola bars, and occasionally blankets/similar.

    2. Re:Phoenix does NOT represent us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm the OP, posting as AC again to protect myself.

      Thanks for the comment!
      Definitely - Thanatos is the real deal. He is very highly respected by pretty much all of us. He gives nothing to dislike, unless you just have a thing against people in costume. He spends his own money and time to help those who the rest of society scorns or spurns. He's an angel of mercy in death-drag! :)

      We have several folks who walk the walk, WITHIN the scope of the law: Knight Owl, Superhero, Cognito and Moxie, Silver Sentinel, Dark Guardian, Rock n Roll, E0N, and lots of us have the necessary training and the moral compass and knowledge of the law to stay both helpful -and- out of trouble.

    3. Re:Phoenix does NOT represent us... by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Uh...yeah....no.

      If I'm sleeping off a bender in a cardboard box in an alley, haven't taken my thorazine for a couple of days, and the DTs are coming on, do I really want to be woken up by this guy handing me a sandwich?

    4. Re:Phoenix does NOT represent us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanatos dons the garb of death because as he says "that's all those people have to look forward to".

      It makes sense, and I doubt you've ever walked a mile in their shoes.
      His town loves him, especially those he helps. And that's ALL that matters.

    5. Re:Phoenix does NOT represent us... by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      Your super-hero name is "The Anonymous Coward".

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    6. Re:Phoenix does NOT represent us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, you can't have an autograph.

    7. Re:Phoenix does NOT represent us... by blair1q · · Score: 1

      He could probably do the same job dressed up as Superman, and people would dig it.

      I just want a little heads-up that he's in town.

    8. Re:Phoenix does NOT represent us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A great many of us are trained in relevant fields - we have tons of

      Three people in your basement does not make an army

    9. Re:Phoenix does NOT represent us... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I did that for two years in the western hemisphere's worst slum. So, I guess I'm allowed to say he has mental issues.

    10. Re:Phoenix does NOT represent us... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Some of us are animal right activists, some are environmentalists, some just help by shoveling snow off of people's drives.

      Fuck me, I'm a superhero and I didn't even know it.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    11. Re:Phoenix does NOT represent us... by F69631 · · Score: 1

      Essentially, you consider yourselves to be concerned citizens who have seen the crime, etc. around and patrol the streets. Fine. Where I live, we have some superheroes like that. Some far right activists have noticed increased amount of crimes in areas with a lot of immigrants so they patrol - in groups - the streets of these areas, looking for immigrants that act somehow suspiciously in their opinion... And that's scary as hell. I'm sure that they - just like you - think that they're doing something good for the society and that world needs more people like them.

      Now, how do I tell "the superheroes" and "the far right citizen patrols" apart from each other? I can't. From my point of view, there is no other indicator between "superheroes" and "a phenomenon I fear more that petty crime" than your word that you only do what is REALLY good while the other guys just THINK they do what is really good. Even more... even if what you say is true, I'd be willing to bet that increase in the positive kind of vigilantes also leads (through more media coverage, cultural attitude shifts, etc.) to the increase in the negative kind.

      This is nothing personal: It might be that the total effect of everything YOU have done and will ever do ends up being positive. Let's hope for that. But "super heroes" aka. vigilantes who patrol the streets and act based on their definition of good and righteous... it's just something that we as a society don't need and shouldn't accept.

  17. The Irony by Wattos · · Score: 1

    Had this guy been beaten to death and had he not worn a costume, he would be now hailed as a hero and probably given a medal or two.

    Since, this guy survived and hides his identity (one way or another) he is treated like a common thug.

    WTF? Its ******** pepper spray. It is not like he has caused any irrepairable damage. Such treatment only discourages people from helping each other >_>

    1. Re:The Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's been doing this for years and has received a lot of attention, much of it praise, and has not been arrested for superhero activities before.

    2. Re:The Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From what I see in the video, most of the aggression was targeting "Phoenix Jones". Since no one has come forward to defend his intervention, I think it is likely that he misinterpreted the situation and escalated the level of violence.

      If you had been out with your friends, having a good time, and suddenly some guy in a mask started shouting at you and using pepper spray, I would imagine that you'd be on the other side of the argument. Yes, pepper spray avoids physical damage, but that doesn't make it any less of an assault.

    3. Re:The Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an asthmatic, I resent your attitude about OC spray. That stuff can be more or less directly lethal under particular situations, the same as CS. It's entirely possible that if someone sprayed me randomly, I might react with lethal force in the first five seconds and find myself explaining the reaction to a jury afterwards that I was in an immediate fear for my life. There's nothing that causes panic faster than being invisibly choked to death.

      Perhaps not the most common situation people expect. But when combined with police callousness and public attitudes, it's a lot more dangerous than it should be when there's riot police that can't or won't tell the difference between wheezing and tears.

      The fact that it's routinely used by police as an area denial weapon makes it only worse, because often times your only choice may be to flee those few seconds while it's possible to avoid the very possible risk of death in flexicuffs.

      Now...this guy--was neither of those, and the situation likely does not apply. I would rather see people use OC than a firearm. But I'd rather not see ANYONE use OC in a situation where it would not be appropriate to use a firearm. Maybe I'm just dreaming here--but calling something "nonlethal" does not always make it so. In this case, it sounds wholly possible that the use of force was inappropriately escalated, regardless of where I feel OC belongs in the UoF continuum.

      So yeah...don't just go around blasting the OC because it's convenient for you.

    4. Re:The Irony by Fned · · Score: 1

      I would rather see people use OC than a firearm. But I'd rather not see ANYONE use OC in a situation where it would not be appropriate to use a firearm. Maybe I'm just dreaming here--

      You are, pretty much. Firearms and OC aren't appropriate in the same situations. The only reason to try to use one in a situation where the other would be appropriate, is if you don't have access to both.

    5. Re:The Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WTF? Its ******** pepper spray. It is not like he has caused any irrepairable damage. Such treatment only discourages people from helping each other >_>

      Y'know, I'd be willing to bet you're the same sort of person who flew into conniption fits and inarticulate rage the very second Tony Baloney pepper-sprayed the protesters in New York.

    6. Re:The Irony by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you had been out with your friends, having a good time, and suddenly some guy in a mask started shouting at you and using pepper spray, I would imagine that you'd be on the other side of the argument.

      Did you even watch the video?

      He went to break up a fight, was assaulted by two different bitches, and as he was following them to keep track of them on the camera, was assaulted again, then was approached by a couple of tough guys, who were WARNED REPEATEDLY TO BACK OFF, and then they came at him and THEN he peppered them.

      If I frankly had the physical prowess to do a superhero-type stunt like that, I wouldn't have waited so long to mace the fuckers. In fact, it seems he was really holding off on the 'mutual' side of the combat to make certain he was in the right, and it was all on camera.

      Guess the cops just want to make an example out of people who want to do right in the world (but don't have a shiny badge to give them permission).

  18. Re:What a fucking idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For example: If my wife and I are arguing and we come to blows (which can happen -- she's bigger than me) and some asshole tried to break it up -- both of us will fucking pummel him and be within our rights to claim self defense. Yes, we'll say we weren't fighting and will press charges over the principle of him interfering with our personal argument.

    This is probably similar to what happened in this case. He had it coming.

    Where does it end? If he hears shouting in a home, does he commit breaking and entering? He definitely needs shot in that hypothetical.

    I was modded -1. Censorship for posting an unpopular opinion. Typical slashdot hypocrisy. This is why the world doesn't listen to you geeks.

  19. Article is Wrong - Guy Has Become a Pest by iggymanz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Officer at scene says there was no fight. Friends involved said there was no fight. This "super hero" in fact is just a self-filled Super Pest, who is becoming obnoxious and running up to people being boisterous and having a good time and spraying them with pepper spray. This character did some good in the past but now he's delusional and a nuisance. Police have warned him before that if he continues to jump into situations of which he has no understanding, he'll be arrested for assaulting people with pepper spray. Add to this that this "super hero" is a mixed martial artist, that makes him dangerous to the public. He should be locked up, he's crossed the line.

    1. Re:Article is Wrong - Guy Has Become a Pest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like he's a problem. I would think the first rule of being a superhero would be to make sure the person you're "rescuing" is actually in need of rescue.

    2. Re:Article is Wrong - Guy Has Become a Pest by kangsterizer · · Score: 1

      The event's video is all over youtube tho, and people are hitting him and he appears to tell them to stop til he has to use spray. Odd.

    3. Re:Article is Wrong - Guy Has Become a Pest by Aeiri · · Score: 4, Informative

      Uhhh.... okay. Friends claim there is no fight, fine. They still hit a random guy with their car: http://vimeo.com/30307440 I'm no fan of vigilantism and I think he was being a self-righteous ass in this instance, but there WAS crime being committed, people were getting attacked.

    4. Re:Article is Wrong - Guy Has Become a Pest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add to this that this "super hero" is a mixed martial artist, that makes him dangerous to the public. He should be locked up, he's crossed the line.

      what does having mixed martial arts experience have anything to do with it? The article said he pepper sprayed people, not kicked them in the face. Should all mixed martial artists be locked up, as they could be dangerous to the public? How about collegiate (or olympic) wrestlers? middle school karate students? Armed service veterans?

    5. Re:Article is Wrong - Guy Has Become a Pest by evil_aaronm · · Score: 1

      One small point: "mixed martial artist" seems to carry a lot of weight - "Ooh, don't mess with him; he's a mixed martial artist" - but it's not black-and-white. I coached wrestlers for years and not all "wrestlers" are the same. Like any other distribution, you'll have some very good, lots of average, and some that just plain suck. Same with MMAs, too.

      Now, if you said this guy makes GSP piss his pants in fear, then you'd have something.

    6. Re:Article is Wrong - Guy Has Become a Pest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      IANAL, but I've read the relevant RCWs
      That was after the assault though. The only defenses he has are both affirmative:

      Defense of Another or Mistake of Fact (reasonable belief of Defense of Another)

      The problem is, that doesn't help him on the charges for assaulting the people he doesn't claim were fighting, and for the ones he does claim, it's down to if they were actually fighting or if a reasonable person in the situation would have believed they were fighting.

      As affirmative defenses, it's his burden to prove one or both beyond a preponderance of the evidence, as he's pretty much already removed reasonable doubt with regards to having committed the assaults in the first place. Doubly unfortunate, the shaky cam isn't clear on what the group was doing, though the guy saying there is a fight may help, since it would go to a reasonable belief in there being a fight in the minds of those who heard it.

    7. Re:Article is Wrong - Guy Has Become a Pest by Hentes · · Score: 1

      They recorded it and while I'm not sure it does indeed looked like fighting. The police arrived later I believe. Also, he only used the spray in self-defence, after being hit, and after warning. He might have been wrong about those people fighting, but they did attack HIM, so it's not like they were innocent. As for knowing martial arts, I did not see him hitting anyone.

    8. Re:Article is Wrong - Guy Has Become a Pest by Enderandrew · · Score: 2

      The issue I think stems from the very beginning of the video. He sees a large argument and jumps in the middle of it and apparently sprayed pepper spray early on to break up the group. People then follow and harass him for ten minutes because they were upset they were sprayed to begin with.

      The people arguing in the street to begin with might have been friends that got drunk and starting screaming/pushing. It wasn't necessarily a mugging, or some random guy getting beat senseless by a group. It looks like he was so eager to find a situation to get involved in, that he overreacted.

      And if he was a hero, he should have focused primarily on the guy hit by a car. Grab the license plate real quick if you want, but attend to the injured man. No one seemed focused on that.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    9. Re:Article is Wrong - Guy Has Become a Pest by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      The cops didn't seem concerned with that, but neither was Phoenix Jones. He reported it, but never did he stop to check on the guy hit by the car to see if he needed medical attention.

      It wasn't clear if the guy getting hit by the car was a result of some drunk not paying attention, or was related to the fight. News reports of the incident say everyone involved denies there was a fight. But if someone intentionally hit me with a car, I'd be pretty dang upset. So I'm not sure it was related to that group of friends.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    10. Re:Article is Wrong - Guy Has Become a Pest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      After what the press has reported or failed to report in Operation Occupy Wall Street, and many other cities, I do not believe anything the press says.

      After what the police have been filmed doing at those peaceful protests, I do not believe anything the Police say either.

      I support those who are heroes. Putting their lives at risk, not just from the criminals, but from the police, and everybody else as well.

    11. Re:Article is Wrong - Guy Has Become a Pest by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      It may be there wasn't a serious fight. The video isn't too clear, but it does look like some punches/slaps were being thrown. Maybe these were drunk friends getting upset, but they weren't going to seriously beat each other to a pulp.

      However, it is hard for the officer to say a fight never occurred when he showed up 13 minutes after it broke up. The fact that the video shows these friends chasing down Phoenix, hitting him and throwing rocks at him shows that they should have all been arrested and charged with assault. Were they?

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    12. Re:Article is Wrong - Guy Has Become a Pest by TheLink · · Score: 1

      He might have been wrong about those people fighting, but they did attack HIM, so it's not like they were innocent.

      If some crazy guy in tights rushed in and gatecrashed your party, I think it's justified if he gets hit in the process - they could say they were trying to do to him what he claims to be trying to do to them.

      He should have made sure he had evidence that they were fighting first (and not just play fighting too - yes people do play fight with each other).

      As is the video isn't clear enough. Maybe someone needs to use the Adobe software to un-motion-blur the frames :).

      --
    13. Re:Article is Wrong - Guy Has Become a Pest by Pat+Attack · · Score: 1

      In my original submission of this post, I linked to that video. In the beginning it's a little shaky. Still, it looks a lot like a fight to me. I even had my wife watch a small clip of it, knowing nothing of the story. She said that she thought it looked like a fight to her. We shall see what the courts say.

    14. Re:Article is Wrong - Guy Has Become a Pest by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      It may be there wasn't a serious fight. The video isn't too clear, but it does look like some punches/slaps were being thrown. Maybe these were drunk friends getting upset, but they weren't going to seriously beat each other to a pulp.

      However, it is hard for the officer to say a fight never occurred when he showed up 13 minutes after it broke up. The fact that the video shows these friends chasing down Phoenix, hitting him and throwing rocks at him shows that they should have all been arrested and charged with assault. Were they?

      Before I got bored watching the whole thing, what was most noticeable was that it wasa mixed group with several young women involved, and the whole thing bore no resemblance to a real fight/assault at all, just some drunkish people getting pissed off when Mr Condom arrives and starts pepperspraying them.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  20. Re:What a fucking idiot by tmosley · · Score: 1

    More like a low class henchman.

  21. Re:Getting maced isn't THAT bad. by Bieeanda · · Score: 2

    Nobody gets hurt, unless they're asthmatic, or have an allergy to oleoresin or capsaicin, in which case you're probably fucked because the stuff causes airway constriction by default and allergic reactions can cause anaphylactic shock. It's not like giving your cat a spritz of water for trying to eat the houseplants.

  22. Cosplaying Whackjob Assualts Group of Friends by rubycodez · · Score: 2

    Phoenix used to do some good, but now runs up to innocent people horsing around and douses them with pepper spray, as in this case. His fantasy has run away with himself, he is now a public nuisance. Being charged with assault and battery might wake him back into reality.

    1. Re:Cosplaying Whackjob Assualts Group of Friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that's what the cops say... and probably pro-cop journalists like that J.Jonah Jameson.

    2. Re:Cosplaying Whackjob Assualts Group of Friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Phoenix used to do some good, but now runs up to innocent people horsing around and douses them with pepper spray" basically what your saying is because of one incident all the prior do good things he has done is now worthless? You also say it like its something he does all the time. Nice.

    3. Re:Cosplaying Whackjob Assualts Group of Friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, I couldn't help but laugh. This bears striking resemblance to "has Superman gone evil???" :)

    4. Re:Cosplaying Whackjob Assualts Group of Friends by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      ...or transform him into Dark Phoenix, supervillain.

    5. Re:Cosplaying Whackjob Assualts Group of Friends by Zaphod+The+42nd · · Score: 1

      I wonder who submitted all those pictures of Phoenix to the paper...

      --
      GCS/MU/P d- s:- a-- C++++$ UL++ P+ L++ E+ W++ N o K- w--- O M+ V- PS+++ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5- X R++ tv+ b++ DI++ D++ G+ e++ h-
    6. Re:Cosplaying Whackjob Assualts Group of Friends by SoTerrified · · Score: 1

      Either you die a hero, or you live long enough to become a public nuisance. ;)

    7. Re:Cosplaying Whackjob Assualts Group of Friends by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, the cops say he's guilty? I didn't see that, never mind. We all know cops never lie. And corporations want to sell you quality goods at a fair price. And the government only wants to keep you safe and happy.

    8. Re:Cosplaying Whackjob Assualts Group of Friends by blair1q · · Score: 1

      "Spider-Man: Threat or Menace?" - The Daily Bugle

    9. Re:Cosplaying Whackjob Assualts Group of Friends by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1

      Judging by the video, the people he sprayed got pissed and collaborated to get him into trouble. There were a bunch of Russians in a group, its not unforeseeable they would make shit up. I am not trying to profile people, but the Russian's Ive met before tend to have a higher percentage of hoodlums, most likely because they had a rough life over in Russia. I see nothing wrong with pepper spraying people when someone is in danger. Its this fucked up society that makes it so you can't do anything to protect yourself or others, or if you do you have to worry about bogus lawsuits, meanwhile the police have no obligation to protect you. Don't believe me? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia AND http://vimeo.com/30307440

      --
      That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
    10. Re:Cosplaying Whackjob Assualts Group of Friends by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      not one incident, but a few recent ones.

    11. Re:Cosplaying Whackjob Assualts Group of Friends by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Judging by the video, the people he sprayed got pissed and collaborated to get him into trouble. There were a bunch of Russians in a group, its not unforeseeable they would make shit up. I am not trying to profile people, but the Russian's Ive met before tend to have a higher percentage of hoodlums, most likely because they had a rough life over in Russia.

      AKA "I'm not a bigot or xenophobe, but..."

      Maybe Captain Condom there thought he was protecting America from godless commies?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  23. Bicyclerepairman by tinkerton · · Score: 1

    he's a superhero. I recall he had superhearing abilities for one. And useful for the community.

  24. Re:What a fucking idiot by tonywong · · Score: 1

    So the person who's trying to break up physical violence is the asshole? Then you'd conspire to lie about it in order for the intervening party to face charges? Way to be narcissistic. Let me guess, you'd see some guy raping a girl in the back alley and you'd keep walking because you'd be interfering.

  25. Where's the Super Hero? by MrRobahtsu · · Score: 1

    I read an article about a delusional criminal and kept waiting for a hero to show up. I never saw one.

    Now, I've been called lots of names because I carry a gun every day, but I'm not a vigilante. Intervening in that situation was just plain stupid. No, criminal. And it could have been much worse. There's the story of the guy who heard a woman screaming rape, so he came and shot her assailant. Turned out she was a prostitute and the guy he shot was an undercover cop.

    I will defend myself and my family. Intervening when you have no idea who is the good guy and who is the bad guy is a good way to end up in jail or dead. For no good reason:
    http://www.stoppingpower.net/commentary/comm_dangers_in_intervention.asp
    http://www.thetruthaboutguns.com/2010/09/robert-farago/dont-shoot-three-reasons-why-you-shouldnt-sav-a-stranger/

    1. Re:Where's the Super Hero? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's the story of the guy who heard a woman screaming rape, so he came and shot her assailant. Turned out she was a prostitute and the guy he shot was an undercover cop.

      So if he's not wearing his gang colors, it's perfectly alright to go around raping prostitutes. Good to know.

    2. Re:Where's the Super Hero? by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Then you are a coward.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    3. Re:Where's the Super Hero? by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      Sure sounds like the undercover cop was abusing his position to rape prostitutes. And I'm not one who assumes all cops are evil.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    4. Re:Where's the Super Hero? by MrRobahtsu · · Score: 1

      Eh, no, he was just a cop doing his job trying to arrest a prostitute. IIRC, there were other under-cover cops around, also. The prostitute was just trying to get out of getting arrested. The point is, if you don't know for damn sure who the bad guy is and you intervene, you're very likely to get it wrong. She was in no danger of being raped despite the Internet Armchair Quarterback protestations otherwise.

    5. Re:Where's the Super Hero? by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      The link you provided is a hypothetical, not an actual example. So you're adamant you know what happened in a hypothetical situation.

      You've somehow turned a fictional narrative into a real life story whose details you know.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    6. Re:Where's the Super Hero? by MrRobahtsu · · Score: 1

      No, it really happened. They CCW'er was convicted. It happened a few years ago, and I can't remember the guy's name, so I can't find the link. Just because you don't like the outcome doesn't mean it didn't happen.

    7. Re:Where's the Super Hero? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Looking at the story of the guy who shot an undercover cop, I don't think this story means we shouldn't try to help victims of ongoing crimes.

      First, the prostitute in my opinion is guilty of falsely crying "rape" and falsely accusing the cop.
      Second, the cop willingly took risks when he decided to do his police duties without wearing a uniform. Undercover police work is a controversial subject for many reasons and there are many people who think that it should not be done despite the possible benefits. I'm not saying the cop was at fault, but maybe the CCW'er isn't at fault either for confusing the cop for a criminal.

      Now I don't know how it went down. Maybe the CCW'er pointed his gun at the cop, told him to back off, maybe the cop refused to let go of the person he was arresting, maybe he did something that caused the CCW'er to feel threatened by a person he suspected was a rapist, and that's why the CCW'er shot him. In that case, I don't think the CCW'er is at fault. If we can't help someone who is being assaulted anymore because there's a small chance the 'assailant' is an undercover cop, then we're in trouble. The cop, working undercover, should have know the risks and dangers and he should have know that he could be mistaken for a criminal by honest citizens. He should also have know how to defuse and get out of such situations. Did he scream "Undercover police officer" when he saw the CCW'er intervening or did he try to threaten or attack the CCW'er?
      What if the cop had shot the CCW'er and claimed self-defense? There would be an outcry against undercover police work because it endangers innocent citizens who try to help people in danger.

      But maybe the CCW'er was a trigger happy asshole who shot the "rapist" immediately without trying to defuse the situation peacefully. If so, the CCW'er should be in jail because he wanted to punish/get revenge on the "rapist" instead of just stopping a crime. However, this doesn't mean that you shouldn't try to stop a crime when you see one. There's a difference between helping/stopping crimes and taking the law into your own hands. There's nothing wrong with helping innocent people, but remember that self-defense only works as a legal defense if you are indeed in danger.

  26. Re:What a fucking idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was modded -1. Censorship for posting an unpopular opinion.

    You were modded -1 because you're a fucktard who can't fucking express a fucking opinion without fucking it up, fucker.

    Consider http://idle.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2472348&cid=37689780 who managed to dissent without sounding like a juvenile little prat who learned a new word to piss off mommy and daddy. Right now, he's at +1.

  27. Who watches the watchmen? by jockeys · · Score: 2

    Where is the line between hero and vigilante? I want to believe that people like this are a good idea, but having seen human nature, I simply cannot.

    Human nature + anonymity + enough time = unpardonable act of vigilante "justice"
    Watch and wait.

    --

    In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
  28. Superhero saved my life by kangsterizer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know, sounds as cheesy as it can get.

    Still - I, for one, already got into a fight with bad people. 6v1 with knifes kind of bad people, who just wanted my belongings and more likely, just something to hit, because I'd gladly leave my belongings and keep on living like anybody else.

    As it was inside a moving train, I "resisted" for a few minutes, and people just went away (mind you, no one called for help, police, guards, etc), leaving me with my problems. It became bad when they took out the knifes.
    Well, lucky day, that's when a super hero came in and kicked them out. An ex military, and the kind you just see in movies. It was easily won 2v6 (and I'm no fighter).

    I'm glad he was there. Next time he'll call 911 instead and watch me die, right? Thanks for the tip police it sounds like the right thing to do!

    I'm telling you, in any situation like that where you know you're actually able to help (obviously this guy was) - fucking do it. If you're not, then do call 911.

    1. Re:Superhero saved my life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When seconds matter, the police are just minutes away.

    2. Re:Superhero saved my life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uuh ? moving train ? and you didnt push the emergency stop button, pull the emergency window open tabs (which cause an alert to the driver) or hit the alarm ?

    3. Re:Superhero saved my life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, because six guys can't stop you or make it difficult for you to move around in a commuter train..
      While I personally haven't had someone pull a knife on me, I've been a situation where that "emergency button" is too far out of reach. You do what you can in those situations.

      Now, having said, someone else could have hit the button on his behalf.

    4. Re:Superhero saved my life by Swordsmanus · · Score: 1

      Did the 6 knife-wielding robbers also so happen to be trannies?

    5. Re:Superhero saved my life by kangsterizer · · Score: 1

      It's actually a true story. So no.

    6. Re:Superhero saved my life by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      Call 911 so they can fill out the paperwork for your death? There is another option. My superhero's name is Ruger. He can take out over a dozen bad guys.

      "An armed society is a polite society - Heinlein"

    7. Re:Superhero saved my life by cstacy · · Score: 1

      Where I live, it's a liberty-loving place, so we're allowed to carry concealed handguns. I have one on me all the time. Problem solved.

    8. Re:Superhero saved my life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, look around for the emergency stop button or fiddle with the latches. Don't worry about trying to dodge the knives the bad guys have. You are a genius.

    9. Re:Superhero saved my life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The old west was polite? Seems like just a lot of gunfights.

      Remember, Heinlein wrote fiction.

    10. Re:Superhero saved my life by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      But did you and the hero get the bad people taken to court, tried and convicted and thus no longer a threat to others for a few years?

      That's why we have police, courts and so on.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    11. Re:Superhero saved my life by KozmoStevnNaut · · Score: 2

      So do all the liberty-loving bad guys. The net result is an escalation in the level of violence and a greatly increased risk of death.

      All your gun-loving place has achieved by this is a populace that is perpetually scared that the guy next to him on the train has a gun and intends to use it. Therefore, he better get a bigger gun! And so on and so forth.

      Guns have no place in the modern world.

      --
      Eat the rich.
    12. Re:Superhero saved my life by kangsterizer · · Score: 1

      No, they ran off and the police (or us) couldn't identify them

    13. Re:Superhero saved my life by kangsterizer · · Score: 1

      I'm happy that in my place those guys didn't have guns because they're hard to get by (and not legal) ;-)
      That said some people have them (for defense and for offense), but only the bad guys carry them around, concealed

    14. Re:Superhero saved my life by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      You are allowed to help people in distress. However, no one can force you to fight. In many cases calling for help is the right thing to do. Moving away and not helping (which happens occasionally) is illegal. If I am right it is called "nonassistance of a person in danger". So it looks like that the "super hero" thing in the news is somewhat different from that.

    15. Re:Superhero saved my life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thewe's a difference between a good person, a decent samaritan who steps in and does the right thing at the right time, and a vigilante. If we had more of the first, we wouldn't be wondering if we need more of the second.

    16. Re:Superhero saved my life by rubycodez · · Score: 1

      your "old west" being hollywood fiction? crime goes down where carry (concealed or open) allowed.

    17. Re:Superhero saved my life by Swordsmanus · · Score: 1

      I got a few of the details mixed up. There's a guy that supposedly repelled four hammer-wielding trannies on a train that were stomping and kicking a guy in a subway car. The story's here [calguns.net].

    18. Re:Superhero saved my life by Swordsmanus · · Score: 1

      I got a few of the details mixed up. There's a guy that supposedly repelled four hammer-wielding trannies on a train that were stomping and kicking a guy in a subway car. The story's here.

    19. Re:Superhero saved my life by kangsterizer · · Score: 1

      What the cop said is that no one should attempt to assist, just call the police, instead of assist (if they can) and call the police. I think the morale is wrong, and back it up with a real life example that has happened to me.
      Doesn't really have to dress funny to be a super hero of course. But guys who can take out many armed people to save another aren't exactly common - thus they're super heros to me.
      im pretty sure the 10 guys in the train i was in could have assisted too, specially together. But that's against the morales we have too. They didn't call the police either for that matter. They just went away. I can understand the reaction, but I can't say its the rightful one.

  29. Third law by alexo · · Score: 1

    Ironically or maybe sadly he got more of a punishment than that NYC cop who maced those protesting girls, for no reason.

    To every super-hero there is always an equal and opposite super-villain.

  30. Overkill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Police spokesman Jamieson said Jones' actions were overkill."
     
    I agree! He should take a cue from the NYPD and only use pepper spray on women protesting peacefully on the sidewalk.... not people trying to beat each other up.

    1. Re:Overkill? by rrossman2 · · Score: 1

      Yes.. just like my wife who witnessed a child custody exchange go wrong. The one lady swung and hit the other in the face (my wife knows both ladies), and so in "self defense" the punched lady got the other in a head lock and took her to the ground to hold her there. My wife tried to break it up/split the girls apart, and in the processes accidentally pulled the girl who punched's hair.

      The state police officer who arrived gave me wife a citation for assault... all because the hair was pulled. Moral of the story, don't try to help anyone as you'll get a citation and have to plead guilty or not guilty plus pay $$ in the end. (And this was even though no one pressed charges..)

  31. Re:Getting maced isn't THAT bad. by Beelzebud · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Coward cops need to use pepper spray, or physical restraints on unarmed, non-vilolent women? You volunteered to have military grade OC sprayed in your face, they did not.

  32. LARPers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think we should have LARPers police our streets instead of "real-life super heroes."

  33. The world is full of gang-stars, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and the cops are just part of the biggest gang around. The days when the cops were out to stop bank robbers, and keep you safe at night are long gone. The cops will stop you if you license plate is out of round. They will arrest you if you hang a light bright on an overpass. They will arrest you if you try to buy some drugs from the guy on the corner in your 74 pinto. On the other hand they will ignore the guy on the corner selling because he looks kind of tough. They will arrest the 16 year old meth-head selling herself. On the other hand, they will ignore the guy walking 20 paces behind her and pimping her out. They will arrest you if you have an unlicensed fire-arm in your home. On the other hand, they will sell filled down guns to the street thugs for a hefty profit. Cops and Gang-stars work hand in glove. If you want to protect your neighborhood, you better protect it yourself. Thugs aren't afraid of cops. They might be afraid of the citizens if they would take a stand. Just be aware that if you do try to protect yourself, you are going to be attacked on three fronts. From the thugs, from the cops, and from the faggoty ass media industrial complex.

    Obviously this is not the case everywhere. But in many places it is. If you live in one of these places, you already know all this, or should.

    -I am going to my Ninja outfit today.

    1. Re:The world is full of gang-stars, by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      I live in a relatively low crime city (Omaha). And I believe the cops are good guys for the most part. But I've personally witnessed a cop beating a handcuffed 14 year old who did nothing wrong to begin with. The cops stopped three teenagers who were walking down the street because they looked like punks. Then the officers handcuffed them, put them on the curb and started smacking them around because they felt the kids simply weren't respectful. Shit like this happens, ends up on YouTube, and then the world hates all cops.

      There is a corner (24th and Leavenworth) where 2-3 cop cars sit all day, and yet prostitution and drug sales occur openly in front of the cops daily. And honestly, it sure seems like the cops have an arrangement to allow it in one location to keep it out of other locations.

      I don't think all cops are corrupt or perfect. And I think some compromises are made in an almost impossible job. Such is the way of life. But I do applaud the good officers who put their ass on the line to protect me and mine. I won't disrespect their sacrifices.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
  34. In reality by jlebrech · · Score: 1

    In real life the ideal superhero is someone who nobody sees and who nobody can press charges against.

    If nobody knew his real identity, he could have just escaped the police.

    1. Re:In reality by Enderandrew · · Score: 1

      The problem is if he flees the scene of a crime and can't tell his side of the story, then he looks guilty. The other parties blame everything on him, and if he is caught just once, then he is screwed.

      There is a fine line to walk because most cops don't want vigilantes. I'd organize a neighborhood watch. I'd start up a Guardian Angel chapter. I'd sign up to be a reserve sheriff. But the moment you jump into a fight you know nothing about and pepper spray everyone involved, you are inviting trouble.

      --
      http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    2. Re:In reality by jlebrech · · Score: 1

      So it's better to be a Punisher type of hero. one who waits for the outcome of a fight. When the fight is over then the hero comes down hard on them.

  35. Re:Getting maced isn't THAT bad. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Was the reaction to how much pepper spray hurts, or to the out of control high ranking police officer spraying noxious chemicals with wild abandon?
    There's no good reason to use out of control cops in any situation.

  36. Re:Getting maced isn't THAT bad. by O('_')O_Bush · · Score: 2

    As was pointed out above, you have a pretty twisted sense of justice. It would be the same ass me going to your house and pepperspraying you in the face for disagreeiing with me, then justifying it because at least I didnt physically restrain you. Police have no more right to violate the law or human rights than I do.

    --
    while(1) attack(People.Sandy);
  37. "Ironic"? by Phyridean · · Score: 1

    I do not think that word means what you think it means. Unless you've never read any comic books or watched any comic book movies, this is pretty much _exactly_ what you expect to happen to someone who tries to do good.

  38. Re:Getting maced isn't THAT bad. by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    a) There was no reason for him to do that.
    b) You are telling me it didn't hurt when you got sprayed? if you are, you are a fucking liar, and a disgrace. Pepper spray hurts, a lot. You had to undergo special training to deal with it, civilians do not. I also have undergone training, and have been maced, and tear gassed. It hurts and takes someone right there telling you not to touch your eyes.
    c) There was no situation to pacify.

    There is nothing wrong with proper use of pepper spray, that is NOT the issue. Abuse is the issue.
    You are basically saying "Hey, he abuses people in the least abuses way possible, so no big deal."

    This particular person has a recorded history of abuse.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  39. Re:Getting maced isn't THAT bad. by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    But...but...it was a girl, and those were PEACEFUL protesters trying to force their way through a police barricade.

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  40. Re:What a fucking idiot by residieu · · Score: 1

    This is why you don't talk about Fight Club.

  41. There are others by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guardian_Angels

  42. what's good for Wall street is good for America! by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Funny

    ok, let's get the facts straight, these uppity women were out disturbing the peace. And even worse, they were out in public not escorted by a older male relative. And they were dressed like sluts.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  43. Video of Incident by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  44. Not very smart "superheroes" by DesScorp · · Score: 2

    "Some of them really do look around and say that the world NEEDS superheroes"

    They may even be right, but they seem to have forgotten a core tenant of super-heroing: the secret identity. Spider-Man and Daredevil and Batman don't go on TV shows, use their real names, or wait for cops to arrive. They wear a mask, keep their identity secret, kick the crap out of bad guys, and then get out of dodge before the police arrive (a heavy subplot of the early days of Batman is that the cops were trying to nab him as hard as the criminals, remember?)

    If you're going to be a costumed vigilante... a risky thing, no matter what, perhaps even dangerous to the point of stupid... then wear a mask, hang out in the shadows, and when you beat up the bad guys (or in this case, pepper sprayed them), leave, stat. Because with all of the red tape in the legal system, you're as likely to be arrested or locked up as a looney or as the bad guys you're trying to protect people from. That's life. There's no place where lawyers and red tape don't reach. If you can be arrested for using force for defending your own property (and in many places, yes, you can), then you're certainly going to get no slack when you wade into a bunch of punks. The law is going to see you as just another guy making trouble, arrest you, and charge you.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    1. Re:Not very smart "superheroes" by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      um, it's not a core tenant. It's just something super heroes do to protect their families from super villains.

      It's not a requirement.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    2. Re:Not very smart "superheroes" by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      The pepper spray move was pretty smart, too: unlike a superhero who kicks the crap out of bad guys and could be liable for damages if he injures one of them (and which would be doubly worse if one of the bad guys wasn't actually a bad guy like he thought), pepper spray doesn't cause any permanent damage, just temporary impairment. So it gets everyone to stop fighting and no one gets hurt.

    3. Re:Not very smart "superheroes" by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      True. Do any of the X-Men hide their identities?

    4. Re:Not very smart "superheroes" by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      In real life you can't just "hide in the shadows" and just pop-out to fight. In real life, even finding street crime is actually rather difficult. You basically have to patrol around the shittiest neighborhoods busting drug-dealers, hang around the bar district breaking up fights, etc. And, unlike comic books, there aren't always convenient places to hide when you're walking around in an urban environment looking for crime-especially when you don't have superpowers or miraculous Bat-vehicles to rely on.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    5. Re:Not very smart "superheroes" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, kind of like a hit and run? The judicial system is not perfect and you aren't either. You moronic asshole.

  45. Re:what's good for Wall street is good for America by Captain+Hook · · Score: 1

    If you weren't responding to my own post I would have modded you funny.

    --
    These comments are my personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the other voices in my head.
  46. Link to the full unedited video by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.vimeo.com/30307440

    This should be included with the original story, not just the CNN video.

  47. Superhero oversight comittee of one by TiggertheMad · · Score: 2

    Cops have a pretty awful job and I have to say I'm happy someone is trying to do what they do.

    Really? Someone is trying to do what they do, but isn't actually bothering to go through the steps to become a cop? All the responsibility and power of being an a arbiter of justice, but without any vetting or checks? Does that really sound like a good idea?

    This guy has a record of being pretty level headed and all, but how long before someone with a short fuse and a chip on their shoulder decides to join in and help? The problem with vigilantes is that they are self appointed. Do you really want some random stranger who might be packing a gun roaming the streets at night looking for trouble so he can 'help'?

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Superhero oversight comittee of one by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      What vetting or checks? I don't see much vetting of cops, and certainly no checks: once they're in, they get all kinds of perks and no consequences if they screw up, and for instance kill someone while driving drunk (it happened here in AZ a few years ago).

      It sounds like at least the superheroes have the sense to only carry pepper spray and not lethal weapons like the cops, who are frequently known to shoot unarmed people in the back, like Dan Lovelace here in Chandler AZ who shot an unarmed woman in the back for shoplifting, killing her, and his punishment was only being fired, so that he could be rehired in another county.

    2. Re:Superhero oversight comittee of one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you really want some random stranger who might be packing a gun roaming the streets at night looking for trouble so he can 'help'?

      No. I call these people 'cops.'

    3. Re:Superhero oversight comittee of one by lymond01 · · Score: 1

      Really? Someone is trying to do what they do, but isn't actually bothering to go through the steps to become a cop?

      That's a misread -- I mean I'm happy there are people who want to be police. Superheroes (or people trying to be heroes dressed in superhero-like costumes) are interesting and my internal jury is still out on whether vigilantism is useful.

  48. Seattle Bad by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    Seattle should be totally ashamed of themselves. Not just the police and justice system, but the citizens who tolerate this kind of police and judicial system. How long before it will become illegal to even defend yourself up there?

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  49. school support officer by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    Many of the middle and high schools in my area have one officer from the regular city police around
    I suppose that with relatively older kids the troublemakers are more serious

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    1. Re:school support officer by Reverand+Dave · · Score: 1

      All of the schools in my state have SRO's or School Resource Officers, and I live in freaking Idaho. Every school has a police presence and while I don't think is it a great idea, i do see a use for them.

      --
      I got here through a series of tubes
  50. American Indian vocabulary too by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    Many of the American Indian tribes' names for themselves translate as "the people" or similar in their own language
    Thus, someone else speaking in that language would presumably use the same word.

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  51. Re:super-vilain by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You're right, we need a new one now that Steve Jobs is gone.

  52. Why wear a mask? by Lando · · Score: 1

    Regardless of whether the guy is in the right or wrong, half if not more of the reason super heroes wear masks is so that they can protect their identity so that they aren't liable for the things they do, ie cops as well as "bad guys." I mean in the comic books, don't heroes cause wholesale destruction of property? If everyone knew who they were they would be sued to the point that they couldn't afford any of their toys and what's a superhero without toys. The most important difference of course, is that with super powers they can get away from pesky police, lawyers, etc and don't have to stick around and be accountable, get arrested, respond to court summons.

    Dealing with whether he is right or wrong is a different matter of course. Vigilante justice is seldom good as the punishment doesn't necessarily fit the crime and the potential for abuse is fairly high. I suppose the primary problem is having a police system that isn't accountable to the public who they are supposed to be serving. Unfortunately, the police respond to politicians who themselves are not accountable to the public and so there are problems with the system. One thing to keep in mind though, when we hear about people being jailed for video taping police and abuses of police power, they tend to be the exception rather than the rule and so are newsworthy. Most police departments are probably fairly run, but it's the bad apples that get press time. The bad part about that though is that a few bad apples can spoil the rest of the barrel, if abuses go unchecked and others see no response then they are more likely to start abusing authority as well.

     

    --
    /* TODO: Spawn child process, interest child in technology, have child write a new sig */
    1. Re:Why wear a mask? by Fned · · Score: 1

      Vigilante justice is seldom good as the punishment doesn't necessarily fit the crime and the potential for abuse is fairly high.

      Stopping crimes in progress, on the other hand, isn't vigilante justice, and has nothing to do with punishment.

      (the potential for abuse is still present; just not as high)

  53. We need more of these guys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Non-violent milicia ! Im in, I just wish I could afford some protection!
    Fortunately I never have been even witness to violent hate/stealing crime.

    I happen to live in a small city with few crimes, but yet I encourage people to speak up/act/fight when comfronted by evil.

    This has to stop...

    Long live Phoenix Jones and his super hero group.

  54. Re:Getting maced isn't THAT bad. by orphiuchus · · Score: 1

    I'm asthmatic and I was fine.

  55. Re:Getting maced isn't THAT bad. by orphiuchus · · Score: 0

    A. Learn to fucking read.
    B. Learn to fucking read.
    C. Learn to fucking read.

  56. superhero book. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey slashdotters! i wrote a book on Real-Life SuperHeroes this spring called Penny Cavalier. i'm sorry to say Phoenix Jones isn't in it, but it's a fascinating and unique look at their global sub-culture. please check it out on amazon at tinyurl.com/pcprint - thank you!

  57. Re:Getting maced isn't THAT bad. by Antisyzygy · · Score: 1
    --
    That brings me to an interesting point, / . is just "the ramblings of socially-inept, technology-literate news-mongers".
  58. Police == revenue streams != Protecors of justice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These days if its a poor area who the fuck cares right!? Police are more profitable keeping high income homes and sidewalks free of poor people who may have ventured down the wrong path.

    There is an ever increasing division of class in north america. and with the continuing failure of the american economy and financial practices its only a matter of time before we the common become the soylent green

  59. you just messed with the DAWG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he should have used bear mace, and call himself the DAWG!!!

  60. Shut Up Crime! by Plastic+Pencil · · Score: 1

    Where's Boltie when you need her? No butts!

  61. Steps to become a Superhero by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Step 1: Profit
    Step 2: ???
    Step 3: Become a superhero

    1. Re:Steps to become a Superhero by SomePgmr · · Score: 1

      The Bruce Wayne model?

  62. Almost 500 comments. by blair1q · · Score: 1

    Admit it.

    Most of you want to buy a rubber-coated armored suit with comedy abs and a cowl right now.

  63. This is nonsense. There are REAL criminals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When somebody in a mask takes down the banksters and the plutocrats, I'll be impressed. Until then, this is just a WWF bullshit distraction.

    Bread and circuses while Rome burns.

  64. dvd box set by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://dvdboxset.co/
    Cheap dvd box set online sales in Canada Shop

  65. Castle just did this plot a couple weeks ago by neminem · · Score: 1

    I'm aware that it didn't come up with the concept of real-life superheroes, but it did just have an episode recently that featured the concept highly. I won't spoil it here, but if anyone is reading this and thinking, "that'd be a neat idea for a show"... go watch the episode, it's called "Heroes & Villains".

  66. An Alleged Eyewitness Account by slickriptide · · Score: 1

    An account of the incident with Phoenix Jones, whose author claims to have been on the scene and peripherally involved, can be found at http://heroesinthenight.blogspot.com/2011/10/statement-on-phoenix-jones-patrol.html. It's interesting to hear a complete description of the whole incident. Is it all true? The blogger is writing a book about "real life superheroes" and potentially has some stake in making Phoenix and his crew look interesting. Still, the account given by the blogger in question sounds pretty plausible and it accounts for all of the known facts. Maybe the most interesting thing about it is how the "superhero" and his crew could see a fight in progress (Phoenix seems to be stretching the truth a bit about stopping attempted murder,but one guy does get hit by a car) while the police arriving later would see a group of citizens assaulted with pepper spray without sufficient cause. I'm afraid that the video of Phoenix dodging the attack by the woman who was angry about being maced or angry about her boyfriend getting maced or both, isn't doing much for his public image. Of course, the plain truth is that most of these guys don't have a public image to begin with, despite whatever publicity they've had. (I say that as a resident of the greater Seattle area. I don't mean that they have "bad" image, I mean that they have almost no public recognition beyond "there are some guys in town who style themselves as superheros".)

  67. A Vigilante is a Vigilante by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enforcement of the law must follow due process and derive from an authorised warrant to do so. The reason for this is simply that it makes the enforcer traceable an accountable under the law they are enforcing.

    No vigilante is well meaning, they're thugs, taking the law into their own hands for their own reason. Doing it in body armour only makes it worse. Jail 'em all.