It's an open source thing: see also 'Xdialog'. A perfect tool. Finished. No bugs. But you can't have that in open source land! Gotsta have a tool that's only just under development and has bugs. Otherwise it's not open source enough. Or something. Too finished is icky - please use 'zenity' from now on. At least it has bugs and can't do what you want it to do, but no, we're not shipping with xdialog anymore. That's olden.
You must *love* using a database client to peer directly into your tables. Nothing but base64 gibberish in there. Do you actually store numbers, calculate with them, compare them ?
As there are no real (trustable) sources in terms of the Japanese nuclear catastrophe it wouldn't suprise me if there is a complete melt down of No. 3 and no public information available on the real scale of the disaster (e.g. plutonium 235, its byproducts and other radioactive material and spreading across continents and oceans).
Isn't there a US warship nearby that performs independent measurements ?
Yeah. It's a(n almost) closed system. Much like MS, Apple are, and Java used to be. But unlike MS and Apple, it's easy and free to get into, to use and to extend. How much more do you want ?
I don't think you understand my question. If the issue is expensive certs and user-hassle (clicking away that authentication popup), can we not make a 'slightly lower level' level of security ? Currently, security encompasses authentication and encryption. The encryption goes automatic, the authentication does not. And even if it does, the way with which you can just get certs makes the whole things a bit laughable - what does a domain name of an unknown site tell you anyway ? And known sites have other ways to determine you are you and they are they (assuming they're doing anything important). So why not allow for a subset of the protocol, that only does an exchange to determine session-key for the encryption and be done with it ?
It seems that the biggest beef is expensive certs. Can we not do without host-authentication ? Encryption as such doesn't require it. You send me a public key, I send you one, we agree on a session key, done. Doesn't matter if the host isn't who he says he is - let's say that there are other (more personally bound) ways to ascertain that - or maybe given the context it really doesn't matter. Only protection from eavesdropping.
Some people use their computers seriously. GPG encrypts my whole disk - something Apple does only crappily itself (why Apple, why ?). It's a third party app, but if it wanted to, it could do more than crash my machine. Much more.
The difference is in the 'used to' and the fact that currently, the Catholic church, or Catholic followers, do not kill those who wish to leave it. Sometimes questions of degree matter, you know - you can't be 'a bit dead'.
Those people would have otherwise died a week later from something else. Generally, people who die from flu are old and/or weak. But you knew this, didn't you ?
But it's also slower. And somehow, the cleanliness of the design wouldn't suggest that. I think you're putting a wee bit too much overhead in your html.
But then, if the moon really is formed out of stuff from earth (which contains a lot of iron ore), and it *does* have a liquid core (making that iron spin) - then why does it not have a proper magnetic field ? Is its rotation too slow ?
It's not about *you* buffering - it's about the machine in the middle buffering. When that machine buffers instead of drops, your TCP connection will never become aware that it has to play nice and lower its transmission window.
No, the higher level is going to be an archive file with multiple PDFs and a manifest giving you the details of what is for whom. But then, you purposely misunderstand, I suspect.
Slashdot Mirror
*reads up*
Ah. This is the story of how every now and then the kids rediscover DBMs, that's it.
That's not remotely similar to secure; that is secure. Or at least as-secure-as. I see SHA being broken before RSA.
It's an open source thing: see also 'Xdialog'. A perfect tool. Finished. No bugs. But you can't have that in open source land! Gotsta have a tool that's only just under development and has bugs. Otherwise it's not open source enough. Or something. Too finished is icky - please use 'zenity' from now on. At least it has bugs and can't do what you want it to do, but no, we're not shipping with xdialog anymore. That's olden.
You must *love* using a database client to peer directly into your tables. Nothing but base64 gibberish in there. Do you actually store numbers, calculate with them, compare them ?
As there are no real (trustable) sources in terms of the Japanese nuclear catastrophe it wouldn't suprise me if there is a complete melt down of No. 3 and no public information available on the real scale of the disaster (e.g. plutonium 235, its byproducts and other radioactive material and spreading across continents and oceans).
Isn't there a US warship nearby that performs independent measurements ?
Yeah. It's a(n almost) closed system. Much like MS, Apple are, and Java used to be. But unlike MS and Apple, it's easy and free to get into, to use and to extend. How much more do you want ?
You write ? Lots ? Professionally ? On an iPad ? I don't believe that.
I don't think you understand my question. If the issue is expensive certs and user-hassle (clicking away that authentication popup), can we not make a 'slightly lower level' level of security ? Currently, security encompasses authentication and encryption. The encryption goes automatic, the authentication does not. And even if it does, the way with which you can just get certs makes the whole things a bit laughable - what does a domain name of an unknown site tell you anyway ? And known sites have other ways to determine you are you and they are they (assuming they're doing anything important). So why not allow for a subset of the protocol, that only does an exchange to determine session-key for the encryption and be done with it ?
It seems that the biggest beef is expensive certs. Can we not do without host-authentication ? Encryption as such doesn't require it. You send me a public key, I send you one, we agree on a session key, done. Doesn't matter if the host isn't who he says he is - let's say that there are other (more personally bound) ways to ascertain that - or maybe given the context it really doesn't matter. Only protection from eavesdropping.
Some people use their computers seriously. GPG encrypts my whole disk - something Apple does only crappily itself (why Apple, why ?). It's a third party app, but if it wanted to, it could do more than crash my machine. Much more.
The service manual probably says: Throw away. Replace.
But you can never prove that code is not going to smash the stack. Or the context that I'll be in, when that happens.
You could still be saved by others though, after those fifteen seconds. In space, the question is for how long.
The difference is in the 'used to' and the fact that currently, the Catholic church, or Catholic followers, do not kill those who wish to leave it. Sometimes questions of degree matter, you know - you can't be 'a bit dead'.
Isn't the delivery address good enough ?
Those people would have otherwise died a week later from something else. Generally, people who die from flu are old and/or weak. But you knew this, didn't you ?
Some people love teaching. Some people know that teaching well is a hard-won skill in itself.
But it's also slower. And somehow, the cleanliness of the design wouldn't suggest that. I think you're putting a wee bit too much overhead in your html.
He probably bought it. There was some trading in low slashdot ids for a while some time ago.
The sixties did that, with their neo-Rousseauism. And psychiatry, in a sense, when they allowed for mission-creep and defined the 'NERD' personality.
My wife and kids and the CD player in the car are the problem. I love them over CDs though.
But then, if the moon really is formed out of stuff from earth (which contains a lot of iron ore), and it *does* have a liquid core (making that iron spin) - then why does it not have a proper magnetic field ? Is its rotation too slow ?
It's not about *you* buffering - it's about the machine in the middle buffering. When that machine buffers instead of drops, your TCP connection will never become aware that it has to play nice and lower its transmission window.
He meant psychology.
No, the higher level is going to be an archive file with multiple PDFs and a manifest giving you the details of what is for whom. But then, you purposely misunderstand, I suspect.