Yes, and geology inescapably concludes that the earth is more than six thousand years old. As does astronomy and physics. And maths says that if you divide the circumference of a circle by its radius twice, you get a number that is a little bit larger than three. All of which is contradicted in the bible. So why focus on evolution ? There is plenty of 'controversial' theory about in academia.
I can only imagine two outcomes to this: the perpetrators are found, and are found to be _not_ (in the pockets of) the Chinese government, and they are found precisely because of this: I mean, we're talking about *Google*, the *US* and *China* man ! To hell with ordinary malware creators and spamhouses that no law enforcement ever seems to be able to nail, this is important !
Or, they are (suspected to be) still of the Chinese government, in which case it likely dead-end somewhere.
Both outcomes would make me kind of cynical, but that's just me.
I know I could Google it, but I'd much rather have an expression of US 'sentiment' if you will - perhaps things are different across the ocean. I don't see a market for this thing and it leaves me puzzled. My question is this: does anyone there actually own something that could be seen as a precursor to this machine ? Is every other person in the US walking around with an e-book reader, that they are ready to replace with an iPad or something ? I mean, the iPod was launched in an existing portable MP3-player market, the iPhone was launched in an existing (even crowded) mobile phone market. This makes me wonder, since I do not have anything that looks like an iPad already (I don't need it) - is there a widespread need for this product ? I mean, I have a netbook, but i wouldn't compare that - it is much more capable.
So long as you can balance the blocking waits on your solid state calls with the sending of a TCP/IP data packet, that must be doable. I like to have an OS for that, though.
NEVER, EVER, in the US, forego oversight when it comes to things infratructural. It just doesn't work. There are too many people around that will see money and nothing else and who don't care who dies so long as it isn't them. It's a fine country, and an enormous economic catalyst, but some things can't be left to the market alone. This is one of them.
So essentially, they wanted to throw the book at him and this was all they could find, and it happened to artificially fit the definition of a law that is really only randomly enforced. The guy may be a perv, but he did his time and this is no reason to put him away.
Why is the leaking of Google data dependent on a flaw in a browser ? That doesn't sound an awful lot like defensive, secure programming on Google's side to me.
I agree he's being too picky. Like all big-city slickers, he's acting like the poop from his town is the only one that don't stink, and also his preference for a university degree is too chauvinistic (if not hopelessly naive) - there are plenty of people that are fun and interesting to be with, even if they didn't go to college. The same goes for attractiveness (of the 'objective' variety, I mean) - hopelessly overrated in a partner.
Eh, the one doesn't really have anything to do with the other. What you're talking about is 128 bit AES, which is symmetric encryption, which is shifting, xoring, and otherwise the making of chaotic of a block of data (16 bytes, in this case). RSA asymmetric encryption/decryption is more like a calculation that you miss certain parts of and therefore can really only be performed one way. To put it another way: symmetric encryption sees a block of data as a bits to be pushed around, while asymmetric encryption sees a block of data as a number to perform a calculation on. A really big number. Strengths of keys in amount of bits are useless in a comparison of both algorithms.
Slashdot Mirror
You find out what it's supposed to do according to functional spec, and you write a test-suite against it. Two birds with one stone.
But then again - it was a joke. They tend to depend at least a little on good understanding.
Well, except for that little Vietnam thing. That was a bit stupid, in retrospect.
Yes, and geology inescapably concludes that the earth is more than six thousand years old. As does astronomy and physics. And maths says that if you divide the circumference of a circle by its radius twice, you get a number that is a little bit larger than three. All of which is contradicted in the bible. So why focus on evolution ? There is plenty of 'controversial' theory about in academia.
I can only imagine two outcomes to this: the perpetrators are found, and are found to be _not_ (in the pockets of) the Chinese government, and they are found precisely because of this: I mean, we're talking about *Google*, the *US* and *China* man ! To hell with ordinary malware creators and spamhouses that no law enforcement ever seems to be able to nail, this is important !
Or, they are (suspected to be) still of the Chinese government, in which case it likely dead-end somewhere.
Both outcomes would make me kind of cynical, but that's just me.
For some people, wars never stop.
I know I could Google it, but I'd much rather have an expression of US 'sentiment' if you will - perhaps things are different across the ocean. I don't see a market for this thing and it leaves me puzzled. My question is this: does anyone there actually own something that could be seen as a precursor to this machine ? Is every other person in the US walking around with an e-book reader, that they are ready to replace with an iPad or something ? I mean, the iPod was launched in an existing portable MP3-player market, the iPhone was launched in an existing (even crowded) mobile phone market. This makes me wonder, since I do not have anything that looks like an iPad already (I don't need it) - is there a widespread need for this product ? I mean, I have a netbook, but i wouldn't compare that - it is much more capable.
Couldn't you expose your filesystem as a block device to another USB host with proper locking ?
You groundfucker you.
"Nobody ever though them this." Tsk tsk tsk.
So long as you can balance the blocking waits on your solid state calls with the sending of a TCP/IP data packet, that must be doable. I like to have an OS for that, though.
NEVER, EVER, in the US, forego oversight when it comes to things infratructural. It just doesn't work. There are too many people around that will see money and nothing else and who don't care who dies so long as it isn't them. It's a fine country, and an enormous economic catalyst, but some things can't be left to the market alone. This is one of them.
That's very interesting. Are you sure you should be posting this ?
You must be airforce.
So essentially, they wanted to throw the book at him and this was all they could find, and it happened to artificially fit the definition of a law that is really only randomly enforced. The guy may be a perv, but he did his time and this is no reason to put him away.
'You are da bomb baby, and I'm going to totally blow you.' Well no, not /you/.
"and that an ethical line needs to be drawn somewhere."
Eh. No.
Why is the leaking of Google data dependent on a flaw in a browser ? That doesn't sound an awful lot like defensive, secure programming on Google's side to me.
Funny, mine is located lower still.. but hey - wasn't this an Asimov story ?
I agree he's being too picky. Like all big-city slickers, he's acting like the poop from his town is the only one that don't stink, and also his preference for a university degree is too chauvinistic (if not hopelessly naive) - there are plenty of people that are fun and interesting to be with, even if they didn't go to college. The same goes for attractiveness (of the 'objective' variety, I mean) - hopelessly overrated in a partner.
If we're using too much power now, that means that we're not getting our bandwidth's worth - right ?
Anybody posted the http://www.theonion.com/content/news/more_u_s_children_being_diagnosed - youthful tendency disorder link yet ?
They are good Car particles and bad Car particles - they cancel each other out when they collide, producing energy that the car runs on.
Eh, the one doesn't really have anything to do with the other. What you're talking about is 128 bit AES, which is symmetric encryption, which is shifting, xoring, and otherwise the making of chaotic of a block of data (16 bytes, in this case). RSA asymmetric encryption/decryption is more like a calculation that you miss certain parts of and therefore can really only be performed one way. To put it another way: symmetric encryption sees a block of data as a bits to be pushed around, while asymmetric encryption sees a block of data as a number to perform a calculation on. A really big number. Strengths of keys in amount of bits are useless in a comparison of both algorithms.
Wait. There are intel chips now that do AES ? Like VIA's padlock ? 256 bit AES ?