And then half of them that think they know don't actually know the correct definitions. As it doesn't mean Polynomial vs. Not Polynomial (common belief). It means Polynomial vs. Non-deterministic Polynomial time.
I don't know how I would react if a guy rear ended me, and when we were getting out of the cars to exchange information, his pants were down and there was no one else in the car. I'd be a little perplexed to say the least. And then jealous.
Dennis Miller: I don't want to go on a rant, here, but America's foreign policy makes about as much sense as Beowulf having sex with Robert Fulton at the first battle of Antietam. I mean when a neo-conservative defenestrates it's like Raskolnikov filibuster deoxymonohydroxinate... [Peter is watching this on TV] Peter: What the hell does rant mean?
In 21 states the difference was less than 10%, and its this red state/blue state electoral college delineation that I believe is a huge polarizing factor on the country and isn't good for our political system.
In the book "Super Crunchers", one of the fields they covered was the movie industry, and discussed firms that would be able to predict the success of a movie by reading its script? One example of this was a script that was going to be filmed at too many locations, was predicted to be unprofitable because its filming cost was too high, and the number of locations would confuse the viewer. Have you looked into any of these ideas of using statistics and data mining to predict the popularity/profit of your scripts, and if so, any success/failure stories, and if not, why not?
Assignment vs. equality check strikes again! Does that mean you can get the SEC to stop watching by doing assignment instead of equivalence? Because that would pretty cool.
if (isAboutToCommitFraud == true) {
isSECWatching = false; }
Slashdot Mirror
And then half of them that think they know don't actually know the correct definitions. As it doesn't mean Polynomial vs. Not Polynomial (common belief). It means Polynomial vs. Non-deterministic Polynomial time.
I don't know how I would react if a guy rear ended me, and when we were getting out of the cars to exchange information, his pants were down and there was no one else in the car. I'd be a little perplexed to say the least. And then jealous.
About the only case where diagrams are helpful are FSM diagrams.
Flying Spaghetti Monster Diagrams?His noodly appendages don't take kindly to being diagrammed you insensitive clod.
Linky? Not that I don't believe you, I just would be really interested in reading this.
Documentation Problems? Just google them.
Oh... wait.
What the hell does "response" mean?
(Family Guy Reference)
Dennis Miller: I don't want to go on a rant, here, but America's foreign policy makes about as much sense as Beowulf having sex with Robert Fulton at the first battle of Antietam. I mean when a neo-conservative defenestrates it's like Raskolnikov filibuster deoxymonohydroxinate...[Peter is watching this on TV]
Peter: What the hell does rant mean?
Amazon? :-).
You have to call them shallow and pedantic.
In a real world example: "I find this meatloaf rather shallow and pedantic."
Family Guy
My iPhone has fallen down a flight of stairs, and you can't tell. No scratches, no nothing. It is very durable.
Linky: http://arstechnica.com/reviews/hardware/iphone-review.ars/13
And we'll call it Digg. And there will be blackjack, and hookers.
That's because red and blue states are a terrible way to reference individual states.
If you look at the electoral votes in all the states in the various elections, the majority of most are between 51% and 55%.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_2004#Election_results
In 21 states the difference was less than 10%, and its this red state/blue state electoral college delineation that I believe is a huge polarizing factor on the country and isn't good for our political system.
That's generalization, and as most generalizations it is also incorrect. It's disproven by existence of orphanages in Russia (and Ukraine).
BTW, I'm Russian currently living in Ukraine. Not necessarily, as the mother could have died, but it was a generalization.
The paper is an interesting read, but your results from it were wrong.
According to page 109, radio listeners had the best detection with 73.4, then print with 64.2, finally television with 51.8 (just better than chance).
Transmission.
http://www.transmissionbt.com/
I can't wait to run an OS named "Killer"! I'm looking forward to Whale Man.
I was going to say Mr. Bigglesworth needs to be in there before partner pet names.
You have to be nice to it, it's its birthday :-).
In the book "Super Crunchers", one of the fields they covered was the movie industry, and discussed firms that would be able to predict the success of a movie by reading its script? One example of this was a script that was going to be filmed at too many locations, was predicted to be unprofitable because its filming cost was too high, and the number of locations would confuse the viewer. Have you looked into any of these ideas of using statistics and data mining to predict the popularity/profit of your scripts, and if so, any success/failure stories, and if not, why not?
http://www.randomhouse.com/bantamdell/supercrunchers/
To those who modded me Flamebait, I go to school in Pittsburgh, it's hard not to think like that.
You can do it with Python: http://xkcd.com/353//
Maybe it should go back to how it was :-).
You measure it in Courics. Good luck beating Bono.
if (isSECWatching = false) {
commitEgregiousFraud();
}}
Assignment vs. equality check strikes again! Does that mean you can get the SEC to stop watching by doing assignment instead of equivalence? Because that would pretty cool.
if (isAboutToCommitFraud == true) {
isSECWatching = false;
}
I like this system.
Who knows, maybe you'd get broadband so you get your Doctor Who faster.