The Jews have a tendency to be clannish, and you have Jews talking about converts as "not real Jews" since they were not born Jewish. They have a bizarre system where you are Jewish if and only if (a) your mother is a Jew or (b) you convert. This has some rather strange consequences: Mom converts in here labor room, and so you are born Jewish and there is nothing you can do about it (once a Jew, always a Jew). The mother bit can from the far past where the Jews were raped and pillaged in Europe, and needed a way to define their own (you can't tell the father, but you can always tell the mother). Anyway, the confusion of the religion with ethnicity (or race you know what I mean, don't get hung up on definitions here) has many Jews talking about Jew converts and Jews.
When does a year start? January 1st, (Gregorian year), US Labor day (US school year), fourth Sunday before Christmas (Christian year), the eleventh new moon before the winter solstice (Chinese new year), October 1st (US government fiscal year), some arbitrary annual event or season (some other year). You are being obtuse.
A very wise person once pointed out to me that it doesn't matter how cool or great a product you have; if you can't convince someone to buy it it's useless.
Many parts of this market is zero-sum, yet predicated on the fallacy of "infinite-growth". You cannot have it both ways, my friends. It must fail, and that can "easily" be shown mathematically.
Which are zero sum? And please, I want the "easily" shown proof of failure. I'm not holding my breath.
It sounds like those people were talking about the ideas of M0-3 and trying to extend it to debts. There is a reason M3 is no longer measured: as you go up the scale, the values become more and more meaningless/useless.
Okay, your link says 418,260 football injuries, without saying how many participants; absolute numbers are misleading (as doti said). Further, the topic is deaths, not injuries, which was what the linked article refers to.
It shows that the government, in at least one case, has caused those present to be fearful about speaking out, and that such pressures to keep silent can be subtle. To him, the risk multiplied by the cost of losing legal status in this country was more than he was willing to test. The USCIS is extremely fickle, and you do not want to rock the boat in any way. Publicly expressing anti-US sentiment (in the eyes of some)? I can see why he would not want to do that.
Anchor babies are in reference to people living outside the US while having a child with US citizenship, say, as a result of having a child while attending school here or perhaps visiting. Thus, what you said does not apply.
While citizenship is highly likely, he is not guaranteed citizenship. That was the point. There are a number of questions on the application regarding activities harmful to the US government, and having a child that is a US citizen does not change that the application could be denied.
One of the many reasons I have trouble 'fitting in', especially at social gatherings, is my inability to detect sarcasm. It can be terrifying when someone says something that could be interpreted 'literally' as demeaning or cruel but is only 'joking around' etc.
A lot of normal people have problems understanding others' intentions; I know I sometimes do. I usually respond with some form of "Are you joking?", "You're joking", or some such. I also will simply not respond if that is possible, like when in a group.
I also tend not associate with those who say things I do not like. That tends to fall out of me being rather open with how I think: a possibly mean/joking comment sometimes gets a "That's not nice" in a light-hearted tone, which is taken as a joke by those who were joking and a rebuff by those who were serious.
Oh, and thank you for your post. I find it very instructive to know how others think/feel. It helps me understand the world and how to make it a better place. And good luck.
Wikipedia claims 90 indirect fatalities and single digit direct fatalities per year for American football with an estimated 1.8 million participants, which is.00005%-.000005%. This is orders of magnitude different the 3.4% and 2.5% quoted in the article, so even if the numbers are off on Wikipedia by two orders of magnitude, the point stands. Further, the football death rates still can not be compared, since the rates for climbing are per climb, not per year, and there are many football games each year. We do not have a 2.5%-3.4% mortality rate for football players per game. Sorry, your statement of "more people die from football injuries every year than climbing" is nonsense, exactly in the way the GP describes.
Oh, and I couldn't figure out what "AAC" means: the top ten Google hits don't seem to make sense in this context.
Yes, but probably because I did not mention it explicitly. I am talking about how they have taken things like Apache, forking and internalized them. They do not contribute their changes back or otherwise help the Apache community.
On a serious note, some old Macs do actually require MacOS on them to properly initialize hardware that Linux can't. It is kind of weird: the Mac goes halfway through the boot process, and then it acts like it is rebooting and goes into Linux.
Slashdot Mirror
If every programming language were a religion, atheism would be using machine code.
Nihilism is believing the computer doesn't exist.
You forget the wikipedia link to The Holy C.
The Jews have a tendency to be clannish, and you have Jews talking about converts as "not real Jews" since they were not born Jewish. They have a bizarre system where you are Jewish if and only if (a) your mother is a Jew or (b) you convert. This has some rather strange consequences: Mom converts in here labor room, and so you are born Jewish and there is nothing you can do about it (once a Jew, always a Jew). The mother bit can from the far past where the Jews were raped and pillaged in Europe, and needed a way to define their own (you can't tell the father, but you can always tell the mother). Anyway, the confusion of the religion with ethnicity (or race you know what I mean, don't get hung up on definitions here) has many Jews talking about Jew converts and Jews.
When does a year start? January 1st, (Gregorian year), US Labor day (US school year), fourth Sunday before Christmas (Christian year), the eleventh new moon before the winter solstice (Chinese new year), October 1st (US government fiscal year), some arbitrary annual event or season (some other year). You are being obtuse.
A very wise person once pointed out to me that it doesn't matter how cool or great a product you have; if you can't convince someone to buy it it's useless.
AKA "Real artists ship."
Many parts of this market is zero-sum, yet predicated on the fallacy of "infinite-growth". You cannot have it both ways, my friends. It must fail, and that can "easily" be shown mathematically.
Which are zero sum? And please, I want the "easily" shown proof of failure. I'm not holding my breath.
It sounds like those people were talking about the ideas of M0-3 and trying to extend it to debts. There is a reason M3 is no longer measured: as you go up the scale, the values become more and more meaningless/useless.
AAC=American Alpine Club.
Thank you.
Your Wikipedia link refers to professional football.
Actually, it is all football. Please reread.
See, http://www.livescience.com/health/060614_sport_injuries.html for injury stats.
Okay, your link says 418,260 football injuries, without saying how many participants; absolute numbers are misleading (as doti said). Further, the topic is deaths, not injuries, which was what the linked article refers to.
He did say "a bit south of canada".
Nah, those got filtered before the RIAA went forward.
NYCL is a L (from NYC), and therefore is going to be careful what he says.
And so's your wife! (That's what she said.)
but there is little new here.
Especially since it isn't any good for the stated purpose. From his site:
It shows that the government, in at least one case, has caused those present to be fearful about speaking out, and that such pressures to keep silent can be subtle. To him, the risk multiplied by the cost of losing legal status in this country was more than he was willing to test. The USCIS is extremely fickle, and you do not want to rock the boat in any way. Publicly expressing anti-US sentiment (in the eyes of some)? I can see why he would not want to do that.
Anchor babies are in reference to people living outside the US while having a child with US citizenship, say, as a result of having a child while attending school here or perhaps visiting. Thus, what you said does not apply.
While citizenship is highly likely, he is not guaranteed citizenship. That was the point. There are a number of questions on the application regarding activities harmful to the US government, and having a child that is a US citizen does not change that the application could be denied.
One of the many reasons I have trouble 'fitting in', especially at social gatherings, is my inability to detect sarcasm. It can be terrifying when someone says something that could be interpreted 'literally' as demeaning or cruel but is only 'joking around' etc.
A lot of normal people have problems understanding others' intentions; I know I sometimes do. I usually respond with some form of "Are you joking?", "You're joking", or some such. I also will simply not respond if that is possible, like when in a group.
I also tend not associate with those who say things I do not like. That tends to fall out of me being rather open with how I think: a possibly mean/joking comment sometimes gets a "That's not nice" in a light-hearted tone, which is taken as a joke by those who were joking and a rebuff by those who were serious.
Oh, and thank you for your post. I find it very instructive to know how others think/feel. It helps me understand the world and how to make it a better place. And good luck.
Wikipedia claims 90 indirect fatalities and single digit direct fatalities per year for American football with an estimated 1.8 million participants, which is .00005%-.000005%. This is orders of magnitude different the 3.4% and 2.5% quoted in the article, so even if the numbers are off on Wikipedia by two orders of magnitude, the point stands. Further, the football death rates still can not be compared, since the rates for climbing are per climb, not per year, and there are many football games each year. We do not have a 2.5%-3.4% mortality rate for football players per game. Sorry, your statement of "more people die from football injuries every year than climbing" is nonsense, exactly in the way the GP describes.
Oh, and I couldn't figure out what "AAC" means: the top ten Google hits don't seem to make sense in this context.
Yes, but probably because I did not mention it explicitly. I am talking about how they have taken things like Apache, forking and internalized them. They do not contribute their changes back or otherwise help the Apache community.
Firefox 2.0.0.18 is just fine.
Really, that would be like saying no one would get "Han shot first."
Helen O'Loy?
Apparently there is a northern counterpart to this: ANTARES, though the article on Km3net says that that is a pilot project for Km3net.
There's nothing there. ANWR actually has wildlife.
You probably think watched pots never boil either.
On a serious note, some old Macs do actually require MacOS on them to properly initialize hardware that Linux can't. It is kind of weird: the Mac goes halfway through the boot process, and then it acts like it is rebooting and goes into Linux.