Slashdot Mirror


Inventor Builds Robot Wife

Inventor Le Trung must really like the book "The Stepford Wives," because he has built the dream of every lonely man without hope, a robot wife. Le's wife, Aiko, starts the day by reading him the newspaper headlines and they go for a drives in the countryside. Le says his relationship with Aiko hasn't strayed into the bedroom, but a few tweaks could turn her into a sexual partner, even redesigning her to have a simulated orgasm. *Shudder*

469 comments

  1. Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by lecithin · · Score: 1

    It appears from the picture in the article that Chewbacca was way ahead of this guy.

    --
    It could be worse, it could be Monday.
    1. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by mewshi_nya · · Score: 5, Funny

      "even redesigning her to have a simulated orgasm."

      Like ALL women! AMAZING!

    2. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by LaskoVortex · · Score: 5, Interesting

      At least in Star Wars they did a better job of following the script. Watch her trace the glasses. She moves her head and then he follows with the glasses. She is ahead of him. Seems dubious to me.

      --
      Just callin' it like I see it.
    3. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      that part did seem rather awkward. it doesn't help that the article tries to play up the capabilities of the robot.

      "She is always happy to clean the house for "husband" Le, help with his accounts or get him a drink.

      right... how does she get him a drink or clean the house without being able to walk? i don't see any wheels attached to her in any of the photos. typical media sensationalism...

      this story seems to be more hype than substance. it's just a creepy nerd who's added speakers and some actuators to his Real Doll(tm). i don't see any technology demonstrated here that hasn't already existed in some form or another in various children's toys from the 80's and 90's.

      i mean, does /. really have nothing better to put up on the front page than fluff pieces from The Sun? this kind of tripe might impress technologically illiterate housewives, but it doesn't belong on a site purportedly aimed at nerds.

    4. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i mean, does /. really have nothing better to put up on the front page than fluff pieces from The Sun? this kind of tripe might impress technologically illiterate housewives, but it doesn't belong on a site purportedly aimed at nerds.

      that's why it's in idle?

    5. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      He just wants a Unit to Sample and Hold.

    6. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by spazdor · · Score: 1

      Even Idle ought to be for idle nerds.

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    7. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Even Idle ought to be for idle nerds.

      And if Slashdot agreed with you, then one way or another this would not have been posted. IMO, it is obvious that they don't share your feelings on this issue. So what exactly are you bitching about, again?

    8. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by Zsub · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sure it does belong on a site aimed at nerds... This informs us on how easy life could be if we got one of these robot girls, instead of trying to get a real one.

    9. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by tchiseen · · Score: 1

      LOL and EW all at once.

    10. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by Uber+Banker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "And if Slashdot agreed with you, then one way or another this would not have been posted." Slashdot has been, and always will be, it's comments, without fail far more insightful than it's submissions or editorial. Then there was Idle. Complete crap that just doesn't fit in. Wasn't that why Digg was invented?

    11. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by MindKata · · Score: 1, Insightful

      "LOL and EW all at once."

      Yeah exactly. Its effectively an animatronic sex toy, like some kind of inflatable doll (that's not inflatable). Funny how it doesn't take long, for some human behaviour, to decend to, great, I can make a robot! ... now what can I do with it?... I know, I can shag it!

      So much for noble goals, like robots helping humanity. :)

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
    12. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by nomad-9 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Still, to emulate a real wife, it would have to undergo heavy weight gains over the years, have a over-developed verbal mode, and get cranky during its (simulated) menstrual cycles. Also, it should experienced increased robotic headaches which would get more frequent with the years of matrimony, and directly proportional to the decrease in the number of simulated orgasms...

    13. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by jujuchef · · Score: 1

      This is not much different than what Descartes did with his mechanical recreation of his daughter.

      --
      Truth is realized, not told...
    14. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by JoelMeow · · Score: 4, Funny

      Advanced technology is indistinguishable from a sufficiently rigged demo.

    15. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by jonaskoelker · · Score: 3, Funny

      "great, I can make a robot! ... now what can I do with it?"

      Well...

      I for one welcome our new robot dominatricies...

    16. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

      So, when humans and robots breed, do they get baby cyborgs?

    17. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "this kind of tripe might impress technologically illiterate housewives, but it doesn't belong on a site purportedly aimed at nerds."
      Slashdot isn't aimed at nerds anymore. As it turns into Slashchan it will get more hits. but lose character. Character doesn't pay the bills.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    18. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by mevets · · Score: 3, Funny

      You do know that the Sun has other sections more appropriate for nerds http://www.page3.com/

    19. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the penalty for robotic polygamy

      Multiple robot wives

    20. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    21. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by magarity · · Score: 1

      Chewbacca was way ahead of this guy
       
      I don't get it; Mallatobuck is not a robot.

    22. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by murderdoll · · Score: 1

      "even redesigning her to have a simulated orgasm."

      Like ALL women! AMAZING!

      ROFL not ALL women do that, thank you :P I bet they would have a kind of... "complicated" relationship tho

      --
      I would love to change the world, but they won't give me the source code
    23. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by nametaken · · Score: 1

      What I find interesting is that even someone who isn't terribly impressed is calling it "her".

      I agree that we're not there yet, but I'd say we're definately getting closer.

    24. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by yttrstein · · Score: 0, Troll

      Indeed. It takes so not-long that Isaac Asimov came up with the exact joke in 1955. So nice of you to give him credit.

      Again mindkata, you are a parrot, and the sad thing is that very few people around these parts understand that---which says something nearly as horrifying about the experience and education of the average slashdot modder (which has changed tremendously in ten years) than it does about your own fake expertise.

    25. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by kiyoshigawa · · Score: 1

      What about noble goals like robots destroying humanity? I know I'm doing my part.

      --
      So sayeth Tim.
    26. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by AviLazar · · Score: 2, Funny

      i mean, does /. really have nothing better to put up on the front page than fluff pieces from The Sun? this kind of tripe might impress technologically illiterate housewives, but it doesn't belong on a site purportedly aimed at nerds.

      Dude! Your killing my hopes of finally being able to get some!
      So where can I buy one of these?

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    27. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by mewshi_nya · · Score: 1

      Complicated?

      How complicated can it be?

      1) strip robot
      2) lay robot down
      3) insert penis
      4) bang vigorously
      5) wait for fake orgasm
      6) thank robot and walk away

    28. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      typical media sensationalism...

      It's in The Sun. It's a newspaper written for a reading age of seven years old. Even the thickest of chavs find it a tad lowbrow...

      Incidentally, what's up with the fucked-up narrow page when I submit a comment?

    29. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by Chief_Wiggum · · Score: 2, Funny

      "even redesigning her to have a simulated orgasm."

      Like ALL women! AMAZING!

      You know, it's the uncanny valley's responsibility to prevent messed up shit like this. >.>

    30. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I guess "she's" programmed with drink recipes and knows where things go... "Honey, where did this wok go again?"

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    31. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Guy killed me with a sword, Mal. How weird is that?"

    32. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      Oh, yeah this is so yesterday. I can go into Walmart and buy a life size robotic doll with voice interaction ...
      oh, umm ...
      No I guess not.

      While, I'm sure the story is a lot of hype, this is an achievement. Not sure how much, as the parent says all these base elements are being done already. It would have been nice to see a walking clip. Then we'd know whether he's actually accomplished that. Which has been done also. Still all the pieces are there, and I expect we'll see more people building androids at home. I can still remember the thrill of building a computer at home, before you could walk into a store and buy one. Androids going to be the next geek projects. And some of those other wonderful Sci-Fi gadgets from the 50s and 60s books, cartoons and movies.

    33. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by lysergic.acid · · Score: 1

      i'm generally against media censorship, but i think certain sites should just be banned from /. submissions, The Sun being one of them. if i ever need, or wanted, to read their stories I'll just go to the checkout aisle at the grocery store.

      i'm guessing the narrow textbox was a design decision made to accommodate iPhone users? why the /. seems to think iPhone users would be interested in commenting on Idle more than any of the other sections I have no idea...

    34. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by saintsfan · · Score: 1

      i guess that was funny, and maybe i should have realized what that website is before hand considering the reference in the article that I overlooked, but that was a crappy page to pull up at work. and its not informative.

    35. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by evilkasper · · Score: 1

      It looks like he shoved some servos into a Real Doll (as seen on HBO) and then posed it for the various pictures.

    36. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by b4upoo · · Score: 1

      Does Mrs. Robot have a mute button? Can she be taught to hate shopping and charge cards? If so I might want one.

    37. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by nonskanse · · Score: 0

      How adorably funny. Sexist jokes! So unexpected from slashdot, too.

    38. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      So where can I buy one of these?

      www.realdoll.com

      ***NSFW WARNING!***

      You will have to add your own mechanization "guts" to it, but you can get the shell customized however you want.

      Enjoy!

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    39. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by iamhassi · · Score: 1

      "it's just a creepy nerd who's added speakers and some actuators to his Real Doll(tm)"

      Yep. Not a robot:
      "A robot is an artificial agent. In practice, it is usually an electro-mechanical system which, by its appearance or movements, conveys a sense that it has intent or agency of its own."

      This is a maniquien with a speaker

      --
      my karma will be here long after I'm gone
    40. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by somersault · · Score: 1

      It is informative if you didn't know what Page 3 of the sun referred to before. It's pretty infamous here in the UK.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    41. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by Arcady13 · · Score: 1

      You can resize the comment box. At least I can in Safari on this Mac.

    42. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by jamstar7 · · Score: 1
      Humongous hardware bills. And when the parts are no longer available, your robot doll becomes a real doll. Can you say planned obsolecense?

      On the upside, there's little repercussions from 'upgrading' to a newer model...

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    43. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And if Slashdot agreed with you, then one way or another this would not have been posted." Slashdot has been, and always will be, it's comments, without fail far more insightful than it's submissions or editorial. Then there was Idle. Complete crap that just doesn't fit in. Wasn't that why Digg was invented?

      .... and if spazdor, to whom I was responding, had said ANYTHING about comments, then your reminder that comments are more important than the story submissions or editorials might have been something other than a waste of bandwidth. I mean you could wait for anyone to talk about anything and then mention that there is something else other than the subject of discussion that is more important or more insightful. The next time someone talks about the fact that his car breaks down, you can tell him that the galaxy is a far larger and more mysterious place than his car. That will go a long ways towards fixing his car, I'm sure.

      The discussion was about the story submission. It was not about the general appeal of Slashdot or what drives traffic to the site or any other irrelevant bullshit that obviously was not said. Otherwise all you've done is reiterate exactly what spazdor said (and I comprehended him the first time, you douchebag), though I suppose with the exception that he didn't mention Digg.

      In other words, this is a fluff response, from a person who seems to share spazdor's complaint about fluff stories (that no one has to read, by the way). You don't see the irony there?

    44. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by lordhelmet01 · · Score: 1

      Great. So now "Mr. Universe" won't just be a geek stereotype, but a reality! Talk about 2 steps forward, one step back! (Or was that the other way around...)

    45. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by LaskoVortex · · Score: 1

      Advanced technology

      You mean mind reading in this case?

      --
      Just callin' it like I see it.
    46. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      What I find interesting is that even someone who isn't terribly impressed is calling it "her".

      That's not particularly new -- some languages assign gender to everything. Even in English, we call ships female, and we name storms after people.

      And, yes, we have had obviously-fake devices, robotic or not, which have had names and identities. Think children with stuffed animals.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    47. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by celle · · Score: 1

      "doesn't belong on a site purportedly aimed at nerds." You know what nerds are right?

    48. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by spazdor · · Score: 1

      I don't mind fluff stories.
      I like them.

      Is it too much to ask that they be fluff and good?

      --
      DRM: Terminator crops for your mind!
    49. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by Uber+Banker · · Score: 1

      You so wasted 3 minutes writing that response!

    50. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      I would much prefer one who wasn't always happy to clean up after me, but if I asked her to, she'd randomly tell me no. Isn't that so much more fun? There is a reason why women are moody, it's because men love the complexity, despite what all the bitching and complaining would let you believe. Women are lovely because of mental reasons, not simply physical. A simple robot can be programmed to serve you, do anything you want, but that's not gonna stop making you feel lonely. There is no game in that.

    51. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by yttrstein · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      From your exasperatingly, irrelevantly long journal post:

      "Yttrstein has taken it upon himself to troll most of my posts, (after I started to discuss personality disorders). (He wants to silence any discussion about any kind of personality disorders in the world"

      I don't want to silence you at all actually, so you're wrong there. Also, though I have a huge problem with your incredibly inane theories about personality disorders (which you are in no way qualified to spout, by the way), the fact is that I *like* when you post them.

      Think of it a little bit like watching a horror movie. I love them -- precisely because they make me feel so revolted.

      My main problem with you though, as I've said repeatedly and which you have yet to address in thread, is that you're the one who's been modding me down for no reason at all other than you're a pissy little bitch about me revealing to the world that you're not actually an expert at anything, and that your posts are in reality almost entirely hot air.

      Again, my problem is with you being a passive aggressive, down modding asshole. It has nothing to do with any of your idiotic theories.

      Hope this helps!

    52. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by yttrstein · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Whoops, apologies, I did forget to address one thing specifically. I can show you that I am not out to silence you, with the following reasoning:

      If I was trying to silence you, really, I would be finding out exactly who you are and whether or not you have a license wherever you are to practice any type of counseling or psychological therapy. Then I would make sure that you lost said license, and were not able to practice again.

      But I wouldn't even begin that procedure. I have no interest in who you really are, or what you may (or may not) do for a living (if anything).

      In your own terms, what has happened here is that you've fallen prey to a classic internet troll.

      How very, very perceptive of you.

    53. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by yttrstein · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      http://vampirefreaks.com/mindkata

      omg I knew it. :(

    54. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yo mama.

    55. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      And, yes, we have had obviously-fake devices, robotic or not, which have had names and identities. Think children with stuffed animals.

      More nerdily, try ERNIE?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    56. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by stanjam · · Score: 1

      Ummm, who cares if SHE has... nevermind.

      --
      Open Source: Eroding the Digital Divide
    57. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by yttrstein · · Score: 1

      Alright alright Mindkata, look. You got successfully trolled, and now you're all cranky about it. I've been doing this kinda thing since hmm...well damn. I'm not really sure; but I remember starting on a brand new Amiga 2000 if that gives you any kind of perspective.

      I mean trolling specifically for very, very lengthy responses, tone unimportant. As far as I know this is a pretty old troll-goal; probably second or third generation. I like to think it takes a little more savvy than rushing into a thread, unleashing a stream of profanity and then leaving. It's just more personal this way.

      But don't get me wrong. I'm sure diagnosis by slashdot post is something upon which any qualified psychologist would most definitely look with great admiration. "How could he have done it!" they would whisper to eachother, suspecting a great, once in a generation brilliance had again infiltrated their craft.

      And I'm still not sure why you think I'm trying to silence you. Again, silencing you wouldn't exactly be rocket science, and would only require about as much energy as I've put into trolling you to date. If it was in my head to do it, I would have done it. It's not in my head to do it. Here's why I'm becoming a little offended that you keep up with that reasoning:

      One of the very basic cornerstones of my personal ontological lattice is that one must never infringe on another person's right to express themselves. If one does not like what one is seeing or hearing, one should simply relocate their sensory array such that that input is at least no longer relevant, if not no longer detectable all together.

      Thus, and do read carefully here, I never had any intention of shutting you (or anyone else) up. If you still believe I do after all of this, then perhaps you have some sort of real problem.

      By the way, you really are entirely incorrect with your diagnosis. If you truly have any interest in the real topology of my instrument, you may email xdraygul@gmail.com with your (civil) query.

    58. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by MindKata · · Score: 1

      Yttrstein, please take the time to read this, hopefully its the final post. By the way, nothing you have said, (in your previous post) shows you realize the extreme paranoia you have shown at me, (time and time again), at your mistaken belief I was modding you down. (I was NOT). Yet from your mistake belief, you have then inflicted on me, a sustained campaign of abusing my posts for weeks. Given the extent of your paranoid and wrongful belief in me, its no wonder I finally had enough of your behavior toward me.

      If you treat others, as you have treated me (for weeks), then I suspect, given time, then sooner or later, you will encounter people, just like you, who will seek to bully you, as you bully them. If thats the game you lot want to waste your time on, then fine, its your choice, just leave me out of it. I have no interest in your games.

      By the way, your cleverly condescending phrase "diagnosis by slashdot" is totally wrong (but then I very much suspect you know that). Its just another one of your attempted straw man arguments, aiming to imply discredit at me, to attempt to put an end to my point of view, so in effect, attempting to silence my point of view.

      When profiling, there are common signs of behavior, which when taken together, indicate signs of personality disorders. It doesn't take long to pickup these warning signs, if you learn what to look for. (But it does take time to learn). But then I suspect you know all this. But many others don't, which is all part of your overall game.

      Your condescending phrase is just another example of your need to twist words and imply other meanings. But you say it with such glee. I'm sure you pat yourself on your back, at the joy it gives you, thinking you can manipulate the views of others. You have shown this behavior, in a lot of your posts, but its very clearly shown from your comment here. "I like to think it takes a little more savvy than rushing into a thread" and this "Again, silencing you wouldn't exactly be rocket science, and would only require about as much energy as I've put into trolling you to date." ... You take such joy in knowing you can manipulate others. I know this behavior. Its yet another sign. Each sign pointing in the same direction.

      Anyway, we originally got into this discussion, due to your need to manipulate my comments down, when I was talking about personality disorders weeks ago. I wasn't going to stand for that game, because the subject was too important and I could see your game, (as you so clearly illustrate in your own words).

      I have no interest in profiling you or talking with you, as I've endured enough of your behavior towards me, thanks. I'm just sick of your paranoia directed at me. If someone is modding you down, then you need to look for someone else who is like you and would enjoy the trolling behaviors you enjoy. You need to look elsewhere, as I am not like you. I don't play your games, (but I am not stupid. I am mindful of the games. Some people are mindful of the games, without wishing to be a part of that game).

      Or as an alternative, you could just learn to treat others with empathy?, but I guess that's unlikely, as all your current behavior has shown you are clearly too busy, thinking yourself clever, at attempting to manipulate perceptions of others. And credit where its due, for the most part, that methodology does work. Most people cannot see through attempts to manipulate them and the views of others around them. But then most people have a lot of trust in others and assume empathy in return. Most people are not mindful of the games some people attempt to play on them, but then most people spend their time learning other things. Its why I try to help some people understand the games that are possible to be played on them (and what patterns of behavior drive the need for someone to play these games). I'm trying to help people bring this manipulation to an end. I know its a futile goal, as there are more born every minute, that will

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
    59. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by yttrstein · · Score: 1

      "I don't play your games"

      Evidently you do:

        wc -w mindkata-post
                968 mindkata-post

      968 words in this, your "last" response. And I was finished trolling you yesterday. Truly, this has gone beyond entertaining into just kinda weird.

      You certainly show no interest in actually reading what I write for comprehension, so my attempts to steer my own trolling back into something that might have resembled a conversation didn't work at all. I'm not sure it would have been interesting if it had, come to think of it, but either way the point is moot.

      You've taken the position in which you believe that you have something to "teach" me. Truthfully, almost nothing in the universe annoys me as much as that. Who was it who said, "beware those who call themselves 'teacher', for they're the very worst students"?

      Answer that question and... well hell, I'll give you a cookie or something. It is something of a trick question; not so much in its answer, but rather for why I'm asking it. If you can answer it AND tell me why I asked it...

      Actually I have no reward for that. But I would be satisfied.

    60. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by MindKata · · Score: 1

      I am not trying to teach you this, its a statement of fact.

      In that first discussion thread, (about personality disorders) you tried to manipulate my comments down. (thats simple a fact). However, I wasn't going to let you bully my words down. So in response to *your actions*, in that thread, I *then* (i.e. after) started to highlight profile warning signs in your actions. Before that thread, I wasn't even aware of your existence.

      But then your paranoia took over. Fact. ... I AM *NOT* VOTING DOWN YOU COMMENTS. I DON'T CARE ABOUT YOUR COMMENTS, OTHER THAN WHEN YOU ANNOY ME WITH YOUR TROLLING *MY COMMENTS AND ONLY MY COMMENTS* ... You can troll as many other people as you like. I don't care about your games there.

      But I am not stupid. I can see when you or anyone tries to manipulate down and undermine my comments. (I know I don't know everything, so I am willing to learn, but I can see when someone isn't trying to teach me and is instead, playing straw man games etc.. against my comments).

      I would say however, due to the amount of effort you spend in this task, not surprisingly, you have got very good at it. Thats simply a fact. Therefore, in this respect, you are clearly intelligent, in this role of bullying words down. However, outside of that activity, you are evidently a very narrow minded paranoid fool. Fool because of your paranoia in that you think others are like you. Frankly very few are like you. But thats your choice and I don't care, as I'm not interested ... *I AM ONLY INTERESTED WHEN YOU KEEP TROLLING ME* ... *Then I react and only *after* your actions against me*.

      You can troll as many other people as you like. I don't care about your games there.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
    61. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by yttrstein · · Score: 1

      No matter how many times you claim that your blatant lies are "simply facts", they still won't be "simply facts". Now you're behaving like Cheney. I wonder what sort of mental illnesses that guy has.

      If I wanted your comments modded down, I would have done it directly myself and not argued with you. It was not my intent to mod your comments down or have them modded down or affect people in such a way that they were modded down. That you seem to believe here that you can read my motivations (and therefore my thoughts) from sheer ascii alone at least implies a pretty serious sinus tumor, if not full blown schizophrenia.

      And you don't read for comprehension, do you. Here, let me let you in on the funniest part:

      I never thought you were modding down my posts. That was me lying, and as far as I know its the only one I told. How could I have known for sure? I don't have psychic powers. Do you honestly believe that I could have believed even for a second that I knew definitively who it was who was following me around modding me down? I still don't know who it is.

      That's not the funniest part. Here's the funniest part:

      I never modded down any of your posts. I don't mod people down or up. I've always thought it was a stupid, broken system.

      So, at this point you're just trolling yourself. Have at it though, you seem to enjoy it.

    62. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by MindKata · · Score: 1

      You know I am telling the truth. Its you who doesn't want to accept facts. Read your own post ... Your words, not mine. i.e.
      "Oh, now it looks like youre targetting me specifically for down mods because you're a pissy little kid who's been shown to be quite incorrect in a subject which he's implied expertise. Between systematically modding you down and referencing material and statistics that expose you as a fake, I don't think this will take very long."
      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1040359&cid=25898973

      So funny how you use the word comprehension, when you forget what you said and fail totally to comprehend what I mean (or is that just another part of your tiresome game). Ok, as simple as I can say it.

      * You trolled my comments, for weeks.

      * You threatened multiple times to "systematically mod me down" due to your misguided paranoia.

      * You use condescending phrases, combined with misinformation to wrongly imply discredit at my forum comments.

      * You also use straw man arguments, to again wrongly imply discredit at my forum comments.

      Still don't get it? ... I bet not. (I don't care if you don't call it a game or think of it as a game, its still your need to compete or whatever you call it).

      Its you who doesn't want to accept facts. So as you fail to accept facts, your words are misinformation, because they are not based on the facts.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
    63. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by yttrstein · · Score: 1

      Sweetheart are you *still* typing at me? You want to win really badly, huh.

      Well, you can't. It was impossible from the start, dear. It is impossible now, it will always be impossible. You have *no chance* of winning. None. Not against me, anyway.

      And by this point if you haven't figured out why, then you really are an idiot.

    64. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by MindKata · · Score: 1

      And by this point, if you haven't figured out I'm not trying to win against you, then you really are an idiot.

      Here's a clue: You are not the only audience. Other people also read Slashdot.

      p.s. The more you say, the more you prove me correct.

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
    65. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by yttrstein · · Score: 1

      I still can't figure out why you're still replying.

    66. Re:Inspiration..Star Wars robot C3-PO? by shnull · · Score: 0

      you mean yours still bothers faking it ??? lucky man you are :p

      --
      beware he who denies you access to information for in his mind, he already deems himself to be your master (SMAC-ish)
  2. I forget the movie or documentary by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Funny

    But it starts with the premise that dumb people breed... a LOT. While the smart people, well, this here is one extreme.

    Giving us the resulting societies we are in.

    1. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

      You mean Idiocracy ( http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0387808/ ).

    2. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by amolapacificapaloma · · Score: 5, Informative
      --
      exp(i*pi)+1=0
    3. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by LS · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Depends on your definition of "smart".... There are actually smart people out there who aren't autistic and can actually get laid.

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    4. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      There's also the fact that even dumb people can have smart children. Otherwise, we'd have never worked our way up to human...

    5. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by rekica · · Score: 3, Funny

      .. assuming humans are the smarter versions, which is not yet proven.

    6. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other part of the movie was that the dumb people would breed irresponsibly and the smart people would all end up working on trivial problems.

    7. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have two children and I've been laid twice....

    8. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by CountBrass · · Score: 1

      Yep because it was a bunch of really dumb people that developed the atomic bomb and another bunch of really dumb people who dropped it, twice, on two large cities. Dumb people are incapable of doing anything more than local damage. It takes smart people to fuck things up on a large scale.

      --
      Bad analogies are like waxing a monkey with a rainbow.
    9. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by duvie · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, I saw that. Quite the nice documentary, it was.

    10. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Gyga · · Score: 1

      Dumb people started that war.

      --
      I don't preview or spellcheck.
    11. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, getting laid is smart, yes. Getting pregnant on the other hand...

    12. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by dkleinsc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Smart people do get laid. That's not the issue. Some likely reasons smart people reproduce less that dumb people:
      1. They're smarter about avoiding pregnancy if they don't want to have a child. If they fail, they're more likely to have the cash to pay for abortion should they want one.
      2. They want to give plenty of attention to each child, so they tend to have 1-4 kids rather than 7-12.

      --
      I am officially gone from /. Long live http://www.soylentnews.com/
    13. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      "Well, the world needs ditch diggers, too."

      -- Judge Smails

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    14. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Guitarist4096 · · Score: 1

      On the bright side, the breeding stops here (for him).

      --
      Why is it a penny for your thoughts, but you have to put your two cents in? Somebody's making a penny. --Steven Wright
    15. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That by itself doesn't justify anything. Two wrongs dont make a right. If I'd do something wrong it doesn't mean you *have* to do something wrong yourself. You stay responsible for your actions, and I for mine.

      Other than that I think the gp was trolling, as there's no way we're going to see the situation as it really was over 60 years ago, and there's no way we can see what really would have happened had the USA not dropped two atomic bombs on Japanese cities. We won't know if *one* bomb would have been enough to get the Japanese to capitulate. We simply can't judge.

      What we *can* say though, is that the effects of the two atomic bombs have been horrible, aside from the destructive blast the radiation has been causing cancer, death and birth defects for years and years. We've been on the edge of a nuclear war a couple of times already. If that would really happen, half the planet will look like Hiroshima and the rest will suffer severely from the radiation. If the world keeps relying on nuclear detterence sooner or later this will happen.

      So what I'd like to suggest, is not to try to put blame on people for mistakes made more than 60 years ago, but learn from them instead and put time and effort into defusing the nuclear threat

    16. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by elrous0 · · Score: 1, Informative

      The satire in most Mike Judge movies is so dead-on that it's easy to get confused

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    17. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by hesiod · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They want to give plenty of attention to each child, so they tend to have 1-4 kids rather than 7-12.

      But unemployed morons on welfare have plenty of time to spend with their dozen children while they're not out looking for a job... or at the bar.

    18. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by JoeMerchant · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Having time != spending time productively

    19. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      No, evil people started that war.

    20. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And they then choose to have six children...?

    21. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet smart people would use protection, therefore lay != breed.

    22. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

      And the rich people with nanny services and daycare aren't necessarily spending more quality time with their kids either.

      --
      - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
    23. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Have+Brain+Will+Rent · · Score: 1

      Sounds like the book "The Marching Morons" by (iirc) C. M. Kornbluth.

      --
      The tyrant will always find a pretext for his tyranny - Aesop
    24. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you equate "getting laid" with breeding, you are not very smart.

    25. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      How many more civillians would have died in an invasion of Japan?

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    26. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I like money.

      I like to have sex with girls too.

    27. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but we *could* if we wanted to, not like those bloody catholics.

    28. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

      H G Well's Time Machine is another extreme. So, which would you want your decedents to be: smart cannibals or dumb food?

      --
      The world is made by those who show up for the job.
    29. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Archangel+Michael · · Score: 1

      Idiocracy (2006)

      This explains the current two party system in the USA, the last several elections, and the current flap in Illinois. Actually, it explains a lot more. Damn I'm depressed.

      --
      Agent K: A *person* is smart. People are dumb, stupid, panicky animals, and you know it.
    30. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by santiagoanders · · Score: 1

      Good observations. You're so much smarter that me.

      --
      "There can be little doubt that union activities lead to continuous and progressive inflation." F. A. Hayek
    31. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      There's also the fact that even dumb people can have smart children.

      And vice versa, but they get labelled as dyslexic or having ADHD.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    32. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      w(ho)tf is modding useful info "offtopic"? jackalopes...

    33. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on your definition of "smart".... There are actually smart people out there who aren't autistic and can actually get laid.

      Yes, and we use condoms and rarely have six children.

    34. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh yeah.. pump it baby

    35. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe it or not: there's people like that here.

    36. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to be pretty dumb to destroy a life for no reason other than an evil person telling you to.

    37. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by jamstar7 · · Score: 1

      The smarter versions are smart enough to stay out of the spotlight. It's easier to get things done without a target painted on you.

      --
      Understanding the scope of the problem is the first step on the path to true panic.
    38. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Marching of the Morons was better. The Ham Trees and Blanket Bushes on Venus!!!!
       
      Oh and was the sumbitter expressing disdain for or simulating an orgasm there?

    39. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by PCM2 · · Score: 1

      Depends on your definition of "smart".... There are actually smart people out there who aren't autistic and can actually get laid.

      And the thing that their partners like most about them? They have a lot of money, and/or are good-looking.

      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    40. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by emilv · · Score: 1

      And in the middle you find us autistic persons that still gets laid.

    41. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by amohat · · Score: 0

      "But unemployed morons on welfare have plenty of time to spend with their dozen children while they're not out looking for a job... or at the bar."

      Where does this strange notion come from?

      Oh, I guess if you are from a privileged class, you are taught that poor people are poor because they are stupid or lazy. Are you taught that there might be another explanation?

      And what's this about too much free time being bad?

      What's wrong with being able to spend all day idling around, looking for something interesting to get into?

      Dontcha think that if humans were given more time to themselves, we might find something innovative to do?

      What kind of fucking idiot assumes that humans are inherently lazy? There is a world of evidence and history to prove otherwise. What proves that you are correct, other than some malformed idea somebody gave you?

      Humans create and build and invent no matter what stands in our way. Money is an afterthought, a bonus, something tangible to indicate the prestige and glory of our peers. Which is really what we are after. Never anything else.

    42. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      It is actually statistically true that more educated people tend to have fewer children and do so later in life. If there is a correlation between level of education and intelligence, then over time, the population's average intelligence decreases, as intelligence is evolutionarily selected against.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fertility_and_intelligence

    43. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      dumb people breed a lot, because they have a lot of sex....

      if we can make the robots compelling enough, then we might be able to get them to stop breeding by filling their time with hot robot sex...

      I'm just saying....

    44. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by hesiod · · Score: 1

      It was somewhat tongue-in-cheek, though not obviously so after rereading. And no, I'm not from a traditionally-privileged class, though my family never had to go hungry, for which I am thankful.

      On the second point, I have plenty of free time and am lazy, but that's a personal choice... unless you consider playing MUDs productive (I don't).

    45. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by operagost · · Score: 1

      Cheer up! President Obama will bring all the change and electrolytes you'll ever need!

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    46. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if it doesn't apply to you, it still applies to the intended audience. (slashdot visitors)

      More interesting, leisure time is the hallmark of advanced civilizations, the basis of which all else is built upon. Without it, so-called culture would not exist. As our leisure time becomes impacted by various forces, our culture suffers as a result.

      Now, those of us who are talented and lucky enough to be gainfully employed can go ahead and waste all of our remaining time on any old silly interest. But in doing that, as if by magic, we perform better in other areas, particularly work. Any person can be the exception to this at any given time. The rest of us, the rest of the time, make up the rule.

      So my point is to avoid retelling the same lies that we have been fed for too long. It's not funny. Start telling truths, even if requires explanation to the uninitiated. (does not sound like you)

      Stop fighting fire with fire. Time is not money. Poor people are not lazy. Capitalism does not inherently promote innovation, nor competition. There is zero evidence that socialism is a failed ideology. (to wit, I present exhibit a: the internet)

      It's time for truth and science to lead us out of the darkness. One post, one txt, one conversation at a time.

    47. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many volts is she pushing, maybe she can malfunction and shock his cock in bed.

    48. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The internet isn't socialist.

    49. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by dublin · · Score: 1

      Smart people do get laid. ... They want to give plenty of attention to each child, so they tend to have 1-4 kids rather than 7-12.

      I call BS. I know several really smart folks that have roughly a dozen kids each, and many more that have 6-8.

      Transportation for family events is the only really hard problem - and one of them bought one of those big Ford rent-a-car-shuttle vans for his family and they go all around at a better per-person fuel economy than any of the rest of us! The thing that really makes me jealous is that college is pretty much a guaranteed full ride in such a situation, so they don't really need to save for that at all...

      --
      "The future's good and the present is nothing to sneeze at." - Roblimo's last ./ post
    50. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it is.

      But I don't want to argue semantics. So let's just call it "socialistic".

      Surely nobody has the balls to try to argue that the net is inherently capitalist?!? So what is it, then? Anarchist? Yeah, well, that's an even worse semantic battle.

      What I'm curious about is why somebody is scared of attacking socialism and posts anon. Don't you know that there is only blind, vengeful retribution for attacking capitalism?

    51. Re:I forget the movie or documentary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, getting laid does not warrant having children. As the movie shows in a funny, but nonetheless very accurate manner, smart people realize that having a baby is a huge responsibility and should not be taken lightly.

      This is why the smart population is decreasing: we THINK before we do it. And as the world gets more and more stupid, we tend to think twice before committing to put a child into this ever more stupid society.

      At least *I* do make myself this question: do I want to give this world to my child?

  3. What's wrong with this picture? by ElectricRook · · Score: 1, Insightful

    That's just soo wrong.

    --
    - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
    1. Re:What's wrong with this picture? by Xaoswolf · · Score: 4, Funny

      but it feels sooooo right

    2. Re:What's wrong with this picture? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Indeed. That is the first time I have ever experienced anything that I would call the uncanny valley. The moment in the movie when the camera panned back and it showed just her head really DID give me shudders. And to see the poor head struggling to move down to look at various objects, was really painful. Poor thing.

      All the same, I'm pretty sure that if these things actually did become commonplace, I would get used to them, and they wouldn't seem uncanny anymore. Much like a teacher I had with a substitute teacher.

      Incidentally, did anyone else get the feeling from the movie that the guy was happy to have someone he could control? He needs to learn to be less controlling if he wants to have a good relationship with real people.

      --
      Qxe4
    3. Re:What's wrong with this picture? by osu-neko · · Score: 3, Funny

      "... He needs to learn to be less controlling if he wants to have a good relationship with real people."

      Given what he's trying to do here, I would say your if clause is false.

      --
      "Convictions are more dangerous enemies of truth than lies."
    4. Re:What's wrong with this picture? by will_die · · Score: 1

      You are so right. The whiteness in that hat, can you really call it a hat??, is just bad for her pale complection. She needs some time in the sun to do the outfit justice.
      But really that hat, you are suppose to accessorize but how about some style when you do it?

    5. Re:What's wrong with this picture? by OeLeWaPpErKe · · Score: 1

      Finally a realistic comment. The "only in Japan" tag was obviously delusional. I mean who do you seriously expect to resist something like this ? Europeans ? The middle east (you know they agreed to "stop" slavery in 1970s temporarily (permanent wasn't allowed by a certain religion), at some point the existing slaves are going to start dieing off you know ...

      Let's not kid ourselves : another 10 years and everybody will scream "every house should have one".

    6. Re:What's wrong with this picture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The story is from Canada and the guy's name is Vietnamese.

    7. Re:What's wrong with this picture? by dosius · · Score: 1

      But the name "Aiko" is Japanese, which is prolly how it got so tagged.

      -uso.

      --
      What you hear in the ear, preach from the rooftop Matthew 10.27b
    8. Re:What's wrong with this picture? by Toll_Free · · Score: 1

      Anyone other than me read that as "That is so wong"?

      --Toll_Free

    9. Re:What's wrong with this picture? by ElectricRook · · Score: 1

      did anyone else get the feeling from the movie that the guy was happy to have someone he could control?
      That's what it is, I knew there was something very wrong about this. But I could not put my finger on it... and that's what it is... This dude needs someone to control, and a robot lover is just that someone.

      --
      - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
  4. Just when you thought japan couldn't get weirder by Xaoswolf · · Score: 0

    They make an orgasming robot... So, ummm... Where can I order one again?

  5. Two responses: by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...even redesigning her to have a simulated orgasm. *Shudder*

    1) Nope, not convincing

    2) So it faithfully reproduces every aspect of a real wife? Except that it has an off switch*...

    * /me is going to hell for that one

    --
    Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    1. Re:Two responses: by ElectricRook · · Score: 4, Funny

      faithfully reproduces every aspect of a real wife
      That must mean there is a very advanced random behavior generator on-board.
      Otherwise, it'd be about as much fun as watching a digital clock click off the time.

      --
      - High Tech workers, please say NO to Union Carpenters, their Union sees fit to control our compensation.
    2. Re:Two responses: by Tribbin · · Score: 1

      A human wife has an off-switch too, it's located pretty deep tough.

      --
      If you mod this up, your slashdot background will turn into a beautiful sunset!
    3. Re:Two responses: by Yuuki+Dasu · · Score: 0

      Granted, this guy is still a ways away from being able to go off-script at all... but it doesn't take a lot to get some very interesting (and seemingly complex) emergent behavior from some fairly simple rules. The better dating sims out there can provide some pretty good variety, and if their rabid niche market (who, might I add, significantly overlaps with those interested in a robowife) is any indication, can keep some people fairly enthralled already.

      I'd say the downside would be dealing with her when she's in "upset" mode for no good reason, but that's hardly unique to wives of the robotic variety...

    4. Re:Two responses: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      faithfully reproduces every aspect of a real wife

      Really?, Then how bad she drives?.

    5. Re:Two responses: by ZzzzSleep · · Score: 1

      Just ask Hans Reiser.


      Yep, I'm going to hell for that one...

    6. Re:Two responses: by apodyopsis · · Score: 3, Funny

      I would rather it had an ON switch so I could turn it...

      oh wait.

    7. Re:Two responses: by ben0207 · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but I want to high five you on the way down :)

      --
      cmd-q.co.uk - some sort of stupid fucking internet bullshit
    8. Re:Two responses: by mooterSkooter · · Score: 1

      Damn, you beat me to it!!!

    9. Re:Two responses: by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      It can't reproduce can it? Or does it produce a Cylon-Human half-breed?

    10. Re:Two responses: by Darundal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He only said it needed a software upgrade to be able to have an orgasm. I would be willing to bet that he already has the hardware there and has tested it. The guy already has the thing programmed to "slap" people who touch her inappropriately, and to never slap him because it would hurt him.

    11. Re:Two responses: by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Yes It's called the P.M.S. mode. when an atomic random number generator picks from all available tasks and switches between them rapidly..

      "Thank you"
      "go to hell"
      "I love you"
      "BASTARD!!!!"
      "EAT CRAP!"
      "can I do the dishes?"
      "GET IT YOURSELF!"
      "The laundry needs folding."
      "DIE DIE DIE DIE!"

      Just like a real woman.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    12. Re:Two responses: by mishehu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Please don't tell me that she's a personality prototype from the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation! That or made by the same people who brought you Bender's Robo-Puppy. ("Robo-puppy commencing 4 hour barking sequence...")...

    13. Re:Two responses: by santiagoanders · · Score: 1

      Does this mean it includes a non-terminable nagging feature?

      --
      "There can be little doubt that union activities lead to continuous and progressive inflation." F. A. Hayek
    14. Re:Two responses: by karnal · · Score: 1

      maybe he likes the slapping though.

      --
      Karnal
    15. Re:Two responses: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My wife has an 'off' switch.

      It's her Anus.

    16. Re:Two responses: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      int behavior = (int) rand() % 10

      if (behavior >= 8)
      {
              bitch()
      }
      else if (behavior >= 6)
      {
              moan()
      }
      else if (behavior >= 4)
      {
              complain()
      }
      else if (behavior >= 2)
      {
              annoy()
      }
      else if (behavior >= 0)
      {
              yell()
      }
      else
      {
              sexyTime()
      } //there are no logic errors here

    17. Re:Two responses: by 222 · · Score: 1

      ** Ask Reiser, I think he found one.

      *** See ya in hell!

    18. Re:Two responses: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2) So it faithfully reproduces every aspect of a real wife? Except that it has an off switch*...

      Every wife has an off switch, if you're Hans Reiser...

    19. Re:Two responses: by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Every computer has an off switch, if you have a shotgun.

      It's the on/off switches that come in handy.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    20. Re:Two responses: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you believe that?

    21. Re:Two responses: by ChocoBean · · Score: 1

      actually it was "yipping" session 8D even more annoying.

    22. Re:Two responses: by celle · · Score: 1

      "it'd be about as much fun as watching a digital clock click off the time."

      You talk like that's a bad thing. It'd be nice to come home and not be in the hole for something I didn't do.

    23. Re:Two responses: by allgoodnamesaretaken · · Score: 0

      Le: "Aiko, build to climax"
      Aiko: "Ahhh, ahhh, ahhh, I'm coming, I'm coming..."
      Le: "Aiko, cum."

      Aiko "I just came."

    24. Re:Two responses: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope it has an off switch.

  6. origasm. by bronney · · Score: 1

    Dude... I have like, simulated orgasm like, everyday!

    1. Re:origasm. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Origasm? So... a vagina made out of square bits of paper?

  7. Re:Just when you thought japan couldn't get weirde by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, this was a guy in Canada, according to the article.

    This is probably the best thing I've seen on Idle so far.

  8. adding bedroom ability.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd hit it

  9. No, no by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 4, Funny

    even redesigning her to have a simulated orgasm. *Shudder*

    Don't you mean *Quiver*

    --

    Operator, give me the number for 911!
    1. Re:No, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends. Mostly on you.

    2. Re:No, no by acrobg · · Score: 1

      Does he want everyone going around thinking he's a robosexual? oops, too late

    3. Re:No, no by D-Cypell · · Score: 5, Funny

      In any case, it sounds to me like he has designed himself a robot *girlfriend* at the moment. When it is capable of having a simulated headache, we can upgrade it to 'wife' status.

    4. Re:No, no by argStyopa · · Score: 4, Funny

      Note, it DOESN'T have sex. Ergo, "wife" not "girlfriend".

      --
      -Styopa
    5. Re:No, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      have to say that I am amazed that a single thinks that he has captured just what marriage is all about. she-po most likely does not initiate things, nor does she threaten to withhold it for a while, and finally, I doubt that she gets upset if you enjoy a look at a cute women (of course, a few of my friends wives, join in the looks as well :) ).

    6. Re:No, no by mcgrew · · Score: 0

      What's the difference between a job and a wife?

      After ten years the job still sucks

    7. Re:No, no by AragornSonOfArathorn · · Score: 1

      No, he means "Giggity".

      --
      sudo eat my shorts
    8. Re:No, no by The_Rook · · Score: 1

      wife 1.0 (upgraded from girlfriend 3.6)

      --
      when religion is no longer the opiate of the masses, governments will resort to real opiates.
    9. Re:No, no by sillybilly · · Score: 1

      Just like there are telesurgeries, maybe one day cybersex will be messing with your own robot whose e-motions are controlled by somebody on the other end of the line. Talk about expensive gear. How about a morphing skin robot that takes on the features and bodily appearance of whoever you see on the webcam, with measurements, size, facial features, including body hair, etc. Get to know each other even before you meet?

    10. Re:No, no by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      wife 1.0 (upgraded from girlfriend 3.6)

      And now it won't let me install any other software!

    11. Re:No, no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Simulated orgasms: just like a real wife!

  10. Re:Just when you thought japan couldn't get weirde by Xaoswolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know if that makes it better or worse...

  11. Why? by gacl · · Score: 5, Funny

    Come on! . . Why would the readers of Slashdot be interested in this type of subject?

    Wait a second. . .

    1. Re:Why? by richien6 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this article belongs on SlashDong

      --
      Slashdot user since
  12. Don't Date Robots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ok, so it's not the original but it's the best I could find.

    Don't date robots!

    1. Re:Don't Date Robots! by hesiod · · Score: 2, Funny

      And if that doesn't do it for you, find a copy of "Electro-Gonorrhea: The Noisy Killer."

  13. dude like wth by jonas_sten · · Score: 4, Funny

    dont make "your wife" jokes to this guy, she will find you and chase you around with a truck to ultimatly be thrown in a smelter "come with me if you want to live" ~Sumer Glau

    1. Re:dude like wth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't sign your post with Sumer Glau unless you understand the root of it AND DO IT PROPERLY. It just makes you look like a tool.

    2. Re:dude like wth by SPQR_Julian · · Score: 2, Informative

      Don't sign your post with Summer Glau unless you spell it correctly.

    3. Re:dude like wth by clone53421 · · Score: 1
      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    4. Re:dude like wth by mcgrew · · Score: 0

      Ewe muss bee knew hear!

  14. Stella by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Har-court! Harcourt Fenton Mudd! Where have you been? What have you been up to? Nothing good, I'm sure - well, let me tell you, you lazy, good-for-nothing-"

  15. Great for detecting Hambaglers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but why is Slashdot linking to Sun articles, when it could be linking to a reputable news source , a year ago, featuring her whole (wheelchair-bound body).
    Only joking.

  16. fwiw by Lando+Calrissian · · Score: 1

    I have a protocol droid and an R2 unit which will serve their owners well. I am also renting out my bulk Corillian freighter. She may not look like much, but she can make point five past light speed.

    1. Re:fwiw by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      Does the protocol droid speak the binary language of moisture vaporators?

    2. Re:fwiw by laejoh · · Score: 1

      There are 10 kinds of protocol droids.

  17. The guy is obviously a freak. by Atario · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean, he had the chance to design his own wife, and look how flat-chested he made her.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    1. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by theredshoes · · Score: 1

      I kind of agree, but I guess there are people that lonely. I lost my husband four years ago and I am not that lonely! It is Cherry 2000 Japanese style. :)

    2. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Blame it on the economy and downsizing.

    3. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 4, Informative

      I mean, he had the chance to design his own wife, and look how flat-chested he made her.

      Some of us like women like that ;)

    4. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by bledri · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Some of us like women like that ;)

      Robotic? (Sorry, lack of impulse control...)

      --
      Some privacy policy Slashdot.
    5. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by VShael · · Score: 4, Funny

      He's Japanese and he didn't design her to look like a teenage school-girl.

      I'm confused.

    6. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should repair your glasses, he is NOT Japanese as you should know just by looking at his name and she DOES look like a real Japanese teenage girl because that is what she was modeled after.
      All my AI work is focused on building a Japanese mistress. My Japanese wife will never know as long as I keep the mistress in the Server Room.
      pwned
      Now proceed to hate me.

    7. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean, he didn't? Look at her face - contrary to the article's claims that she's got "the looks of a model" and a "pretty face", she actually does have the facial features of a prepubescent girl.

      Of course, the same thing is true for many models, too, which I think in many cases explains why they're so famous.

    8. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, he's Chinese.

    9. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure he has plans to build her an armor suit, complete with beam cannon, in case of an alien invasion.

    10. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paedo ;)

    11. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      She works hard and she plays hard.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    12. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by Muad'Dave · · Score: 5, Funny

      he didn't design her to look like a teenage school-girl... with tentacles. Fixed that for you.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    13. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Le Trung appears to be Vietnamese, not Japanese. At least the name is definitely not Japanese. As for Aiko, she introduces herself as the "first Canadian android." The obvious answer is to bomb Canada.

    14. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      his name is not a Japanese name... he is not Japanese.

    15. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by KudyardRipling · · Score: 1

      Don't forget a certain defoliant made by Shiamond Damrock.

      --
      Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
    16. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by MBGMorden · · Score: 0, Troll

      Look man, you can give up the ruse. She's fake.

      Unless you're not like the rest of us who only claim to like flat chests when talking to a flat chested girl . . .

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    17. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oddly enough Le Trung is not am ethnic Japanese name. It actually seem like a Vietnamese name to me.

    18. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>He's Japanese

      Actually he's a Vietnamese

    19. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, but not everybody is so ugly that they have to "like women like that"

    20. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay so he decided to call the robot "Aiko" but is there anything in TFA that suggests he is Japanese?

    21. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, dude... you _are_ confused.

      A guy with a name of Le Trung is most definitely not Japanese.

      Most other Asian men just want a wife that won't nag them into an early grave while trying to act like the grandmother she wants to become.

    22. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he didn't design her to look like a teenage school-girl... with tentacles and in bondage. Fixed that fix for you.

    23. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by mcgrew · · Score: 1

      Any part of the boob that won't fit in your mouth is wasted!

    24. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 1

      No no, it's the male partner who has tentacles in Japanese porn.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    25. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's NOT Japanese. His name is NOT a Japanese name. Educate yourself.

    26. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      Still saving up to get her that procedure, huh? ;)

    27. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a bit hasty, isn't it?
      I mean .. he could be Japanese, even if his name is not a Japanese name.

    28. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, robotic.

    29. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With tentacles!

    30. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The name is a Vietnamese name. So this guy is Vietnamese. And I think it's completely normal. Doesn't every guy dream of a having a girl doll?

    31. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Le Trung" isn't a Japanese name, you ignorant imbecile.

    32. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by MadHayro · · Score: 1

      Two things: 1) "Le Trung" is NOT a Japanese name. 2) If you clicked on the link you would see he's actually Canadian, you presumptuous imbecile.

    33. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by VShael · · Score: 1

      * -------- Joke

      0 --------- Your head
      -|-
      / \

    34. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by marxz · · Score: 1

      not Japanese, Trung is a Vietnamese name ... and he's a canadian resident/citizen, so epic geography/ethnology fail on half the tags

    35. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except he's not Japanese nor even living in Japan...

      Just because someone looks asian and gives the robot a japanese girl's name does not make it so.

    36. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by Atario · · Score: 1

      Dude, it's ok. Surely she's not reading this. You can tell it like it really is.

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    37. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its quite natural. She's japanese.

    38. Re:The guy is obviously a freak. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > > look how flat-chested he made her.
      >
      > Some of us like women like that ;)
      > --
      > Measure twice, cut once

      Please, please, please tell me you do not do mastectomies for a living.

  18. Harcourt!!!! by kimgkimg · · Score: 3, Funny

    Harcourt Fenton Mudd!!!

    1. Re:Harcourt!!!! by theredshoes · · Score: 1

      I think I met that Harcourt guy at the bar, but I warned my girlfriend not to go home with him. She agreed. :)

    2. Re:Harcourt!!!! by theredshoes · · Score: 1

      Regardless, it is impressive. A man that spent that much time planning and implementing a robot woman. It is a marvel, just hard to stomach as a female. I don't understand the application of a robot like this but I am not a man. I am also not a judge of what human ingenuity can accomplish, I am more of an observer. Either way, it is interesting.

    3. Re:Harcourt!!!! by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I don't understand the application of a robot like this

      Something about deeper understanding.

    4. Re:Harcourt!!!! by Tetsujin · · Score: 1

      You know, I was just going to say, seems like this guy just got himself some experience writing nagware...

      --
      Bow-ties are cool.
    5. Re:Harcourt!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *LMAO* Wonder how many actually are old enough to remember that!

  19. This is AWESOME! Only one but by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    The robot wife is really great, but the mother in law is sort of a killjoy.

  20. Wedding bells by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Stallman has his on pre-order, provided her brain isn't written with non-free software.

    1. Re:Wedding bells by Clandestine_Blaze · · Score: 1

      He'll have a "gnu" wife hahaha har har....sorry I have nothing.

  21. Project's web site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Project's web site, including technical specs and more videos

    Hold your comments until you see this pic of the robot...

  22. Not Japan, Not America by m1ss1ontomars2k4 · · Score: 1

    "Le Trung" is not a Japanese name. Also, he lives in Canada.

    1. Re:Not Japan, Not America by kklein · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Also, his command for her to read Japanese was not actually a Japanese command. It was an English command translated to Japanese (i.e. in English a command is issued with just the uninflected simple non-past verb, whereas it has to be conjugated to form a command--and there are several politeness levels--in Japanese).

      What we are seeing here is a creepy foreigner with a creepy Japanese otaku fetish.

    2. Re:Not Japan, Not America by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      Maybe he is Vietnamese or Cambodian. I wonder if they hate the Japanese as much as the Malaysians?. Brings to mind Ng from Snow Crash who had a virtual Japanese girl servant.

    3. Re:Not Japan, Not America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What we are seeing here is a creepy foreigner with a creepy Japanese otaku fetish.

      Did I hear someone say "weeaboo"?

    4. Re:Not Japan, Not America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...All your base are belong to _me_

    5. Re:Not Japan, Not America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee thanks. A Canadian is a "foreigner"

  23. Lars and the Real Girl by dangitman · · Score: 1

    Lars and the Real Girl. A great film about a guy's relationship with his "Real Doll" partner.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
    1. Re:Lars and the Real Girl by larry_larry · · Score: 1

      This conjured up recollections of Lars and the Real Girl for me too, as dangitman mentioned.

    2. Re:Lars and the Real Girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So this would be "Rars and the Rear Girr"?

    3. Re:Lars and the Real Girl by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      I thought it was an ok film somewhat flawed by the overly feel good world it tried to create. In that sense it reminded me of the terminal with Tom Hanks. Taking something incredibly sad, and putting in an outcome that's so over the top happy that all it does is remind me of how it would never turn out like that in the real world.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
  24. Math Abilities by troll8901 · · Score: 1

    From TFV. The processing unit can do math. You only need to write these:

    cos(z) * (w .... sin(y))

    w = 40
    y = 10
    z = 11

    and say "Aiko, process math", and it will tell you the answer. Amazing!

    The correct answer is 0.1746. I can't see the whole formula. Anyone can guess it?

  25. chobit alpha version? by 800DeadCCs · · Score: 1

    Does it go around saying "pan-tsu. pan-tsu. pan-tsu." ?

    Hope he moved the power switch.

    1. Re:chobit alpha version? by tjonnyc999 · · Score: 1

      Lawl chobits. Yeah, I hope so too, otherwise the whole s3x0rz thing would be a bit uncomfortable. Not to mention the constant switching off & rebooting.

  26. Rampant robophobia on /. by twistah · · Score: 1

    I am surprised at the dismay over this. I didn't realize so many people here were such robophobes. Robots are productive members of our society; we must remember that our modern world would probably collapse without robots doing the type of work we no longer want to do. Maybe it's too advanced for THIS generation, but I think robots and human marriage will be a normal thing for our kids.

    1. Re:Rampant robophobia on /. by mr_matticus · · Score: 1

      Yeah, right, because in 2008, two willing, adult humans can't even necessarily get married. But sure, humans and nonsentient machines in 30 years. Sounds probable.

  27. Simulated revulsion by erc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Shudder? Ick? Oh, please. Don't pretend you haven't thought about it.

    I hate people who pretend to be above it all .. it usually turns out that they are actually doing the dirty along with everyone else, they just don't want anyone else to find out about it.

    --
    -- Ed Carp, N7EKG erc@pobox.com PGP KeyID: 0x0BD32C9B What I'm up to: http://intuitives.mine.nu
    1. Re:Simulated revulsion by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      I hate people who pretend to be above it all .. it usually turns out that they are actually doing the dirty along with everyone else, they just don't want anyone else to find out about it.

      Sex with dead people? Don't pretend you haven't thought about it!

      Seriously...sex with robots is not something many people would even consider. Even the socially inept reprobates on this site would rather pay for sex with a real woman!

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    2. Re:Simulated revulsion by gknoy · · Score: 1

      If someone made sex robots, they would certainly sell. Many people are hospitalized for trying to do it with industrial equipment, for goodness' sake. I wouldn't want one, but you bet many would.

    3. Re:Simulated revulsion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just saying that because you're a robot prostitute from the future.

    4. Re:Simulated revulsion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is still creepy even if you want like something like this. It still looks like a doll and dolls are creepy because they look close to human but not quite right (I forget the technical term for this).

      I would love to have my own robotic slave but until the technology is better this is creepy.

      --
      Don't Date Robots!

    5. Re:Simulated revulsion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shudder? Ick? Oh, please. Don't pretend you haven't thought about it.

      Actually I think this is really cool. I have long wanted robots to take their place alongside us as equals.

    6. Re:Simulated revulsion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. I can't say I have. I don't see the appeal of dating a robot. But that could be because I've seen that Futurama episode.

      But seriously, the fact that you have considered this is your problem, if it's a problem at all. I'm not repulsed by it, but I'm not attracted to it, either.

    7. Re:Simulated revulsion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not so much just doing dirty things with an inanimate object. The part that's really sad and kind of weird is trying to create a relationship with it. When you're talking to it as if it's real and you're replacing actual human companionship with this thing that you talk to, you have serious problems.

    8. Re:Simulated revulsion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a big difference between occasionally imagining sex with a robot and actually building a sex robot. Likewise, if/when sex robots are common, there will be a big difference between having sex with a robot and only having sex with robots.

    9. Re:Simulated revulsion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It takes a pretty sick/disturbed individual to call a robot his "wife". (Or husband, for that matter.) Yes...damn straight I'm above that. The girl I'm seeing may nag and be a pain in the ass at times...but she won't rust on rainy days.

  28. Anyone else think this is a hoax? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...particularly given the 'newspaper' (read: comic) it's published in.

    Also slightly weird that he made the robot look like a 12-year-old.

  29. What kind of models do they have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much does a Swedish model run for?

  30. Easy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    while(1){
          nag();
    }

  31. Female on Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is a marvel, just hard to stomach as a female. I don't understand the application of a robot like this but I am not a man.

    You've just attracted the attention of many Slashdot readers. ;)

    1. Re:Female on Slashdot by theredshoes · · Score: 1

      I really don't want to comment further on this story beyond this last post, but I do have a few points to bring up. So, he created an agreeable robot that takes drives with him and does not nag. She goes for 24 hours a day without a complaint? I guess Le Trung had the brains and the money to create this and it is admirable in that respect.

      But if a woman created a man robot, he would be a sperm donor that brings home a paycheck that would boost her ego constantly, buy drinks and give massages on demand. I don't think robots are a substitute for a flesh and blood person. 13,000 responses can not make up in anyway for a real woman or a real man in any conversation or the uniqueness and imperfections of a human. Not much else say or to contribute on this story.

    2. Re:Female on Slashdot by Duckie01 · · Score: 1

      It's interesting indeed... perhaps the most interesting post on idle so far. I can totally understand the use for a robot driving *me* around, but what's the point of having some robot take drives with you? An old FM radio would be less boring. Well, that won't be able to read maps but then again I'd guess a gps unit in a car is much cheaper still and most come with FM built in ;)

      Perhaps the nagging wouldn't be much of a problem had this guy learned to negotiate and make compromises. Or perhaps saying "Stop nagging like a baby!" is too hard for him. Perhaps he's so totally scared of rejection he really needs a "wife" that'll always agree with him. Perhaps he doesn't know how to give love to a real person, or perhaps he doesnt dare to just *give*.

      Other than that I I've never met any asian woman "in her 20s" looking like that... so most likely he's just a high tech pervert. ;-)

    3. Re:Female on Slashdot by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > But if a woman created a man robot, he would be a sperm donor that brings home a paycheck that would boost her ego constantly, buy drinks and give massages on demand.

      Don't need a robot for that: there are probably a few geeks here that would be more than happy to do it for you.

    4. Re:Female on Slashdot by DeadManCoding · · Score: 1

      While I would normally agree with this, being used only gets you so far in life. Eventually, even geeks "learn" how to have headaches.

      --
      "The only constant in the universe is change." - Unknown author
    5. Re:Female on Slashdot by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      13,000 responses can not make up in anyway for a real woman or a real man in any conversation

      Have you actually paid attention to the quality of most human conversation? I don't think I'd call most of what we express through a day unique. Phrased differently, but humans tend to just have a set selection of canned replies as well.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    6. Re:Female on Slashdot by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      > Have you actually paid attention to the quality of most human conversation? I don't think I'd call most of what we express through a day unique. Phrased differently, but humans tend to just have a set selection of canned replies as well.

      True... so, uh, do you come here often?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  32. wife program code by kashif.ahsan · · Score: 1

    for(;;) {clean();makefood();sex()}

    1. Re:wife program code by multipartmixed · · Score: 1

      You forgot sex() between clean() and makefood().

      Also, one at the top of the loop for good measure, since your loop structure either implies an implicit sleep() at scope-end, or you are planning on burning out of you wife in about 60 hours.

      --

      Do daemons dream of electric sleep()?
    2. Re:wife program code by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

      wife: Segmentation fault. Core dumped.

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    3. Re:wife program code by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      function sex(){return headache;}

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  33. It's an old story by Xtifr · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's an old, old story: boy meets girl, boy loses girl, boy builds girl.

    (Shamelessly stolen from my uncle the science fiction writer.)

    1. Re:It's an old story by NCG_Mike · · Score: 1

      Stealing from a known Android (Kryten) from Red Dwarf: "It's the old, old story - droid meets droid, droid becomes chameleon, droid loses chameleon, chameleon turns into blob, droid gets blob back again. Blob meets blob, blob goes off with blob and droid loses blob, chameleon and droid. How many times have we seen that story?"

    2. Re:It's an old story by againjj · · Score: 1
  34. Sudo by BountyX · · Score: 5, Funny

    Reminds me of that xkcd cartoon...

    Man: Aiko, make me a sandwhich.
    Aiko: Access denied.
    Man: Aiko, sudo make me a sandwhich.
    Aiko: Turkey, or ham?

    --
    Trying to install linux on my microwave, but keep getting a kernel panic...
    1. Re:Sudo by laejoh · · Score: 1

      I know the cartoon but... all you can think about is a sandwhich?

    2. Re:Sudo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of that xkcd cartoon...

      Man: Aiko, make me a sandwhich.

      Aiko: Access denied.

      Man: Aiko, sudo make me a sandwhich.

      Aiko: Turkey, or ham?

      This is good!

    3. Re:Sudo by juan2074 · · Score: 1
    4. Re:Sudo by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Does that mean they think God told them to make the sandwich, or do they think they're making it for themself? Because if they really like liverwurst, we might have a problem.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  35. AI by thatbites · · Score: 1

    Hey Jane, whats the game?

  36. I know this one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if(conductivity sensor in *beep* starts conducting)
              give_electric_shocks();

  37. Ghost in the Shell by 3seas · · Score: 1

    Exteriors for both men and women and this seems to be something of a match in technology. but thise is this too ASIMO which can walk and run.

    1. Re:Ghost in the Shell by Edam · · Score: 1

      Ah man - you could have given us an at-work warning!

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart he dreams himself your master." -Pravin Lal
    2. Re:Ghost in the Shell by 3seas · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but then it is IDLE...

  38. And when his real wife comes home... by macraig · · Score: 1

    ... his name will be Mudd.

    1. Re:And when his real wife comes home... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... his name will be Mudd.

      +1 nobody got that.

    2. Re:And when his real wife comes home... by Boronx · · Score: 1

      You must be new here.

    3. Re:And when his real wife comes home... by againjj · · Score: 1

      Really, that would be like saying no one would get "Han shot first."

  39. Hrmm. by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

    The first thing I would do if I had one is corrupt the poor thing. Be swearing like a fucking sailor in no time and her volume would gradually get louder and louder until you told her to shut up. And it may not work. Maybe teach her to shoplift. Built-in plausible deniability, dude.

  40. Re:Just when you thought japan couldn't get weirde by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

    His name is "Le Trung", which is about as un-Japanese as you can get...

  41. Fake by Wordplay · · Score: 4, Interesting

    A couple minutes from the end, he forgets the question briefly, stutters a little, and breaks his usual pace--and she answers the question anyway, even though he hasn't gotten it out yet.

    I'm 99% sure this is scripted. There's not much evidence here that she's anything more than a RealDoll Ruxpin. There's probably -some- computer control there, assuming it's not a remote-control Mechanical Turk, given that it responded to the "stop!" commands. The rest? I'll believe it when it's not just him asking the questions.

    1. Re:Fake by Al+Al+Cool+J · · Score: 1

      Here you go:

      http://www.youtube.com/user/aibot21

      There are many videos that are more recent, including Aiko interacting with the public, and in some cases being mobbed.

    2. Re:Fake by byssebu · · Score: 0

      I agree. She also "predicts" where he will move his glasses in the beginning.

  42. What Universe is this by goatpunch · · Score: 2, Funny

    where Slashdot links to articles in The Sun!!?

    1. Re:What Universe is this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idle.

    2. Re:What Universe is this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Sun is biased and badly informed. So it slots in nicely with many of the blogs and news sites Slashdot links to. Except that the Sun is well written too.

  43. Re:Just when you thought japan couldn't get weirde by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

    This is probably the best thing I've seen on Idle so far.

    Or least worst, anyway.

  44. If he still has money then it's not a wife by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To perfect his creation he needs to improve it's nagging skills and program it to complain about his job and how he should look for a better one. Also programming an icy gaze for your anniversary would help. It's far easier to program a robot to remember an anniversary than a human.

  45. Aiko/Real Doll by k-macjapan · · Score: 4, Funny

    It'll be interesting when people can order customized versions of this... I can imagine the shop will get calls similar to this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-Irs1ewDoM one of my favourite prank calls. Enjoy

  46. Don't date robots! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you like to register me?...

  47. Roomba by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I once stuck my penis inside the Roomba. Who am I to judge this guy?

  48. FInally! by rekica · · Score: 1

    I wonder if the guy can do a slightly ameliorated version from a picture?! I am sure a lot of women would buy this and their husbands won't even make the difference. It sounds too good to be true, you go out and you leave the man with your better-self, no cheating, no scandals.. the paradise :D

  49. Y'know... by lisaparratt · · Score: 1

    I'm sure it'd be easier to get a BDSM slave or two, and they really will do pretty much anything you want.

  50. Big problem with current legislation.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She's only TWO YEARS old!!!

    PAEDO!!!!!

  51. wow by Sapdot · · Score: 1

    Great ^^ , now I don't need to get married .

    1. Re:wow by Wandering+Robot · · Score: 0

      Great ^^ , now I don't need to get married .

      As long as he didn't program her to complain all the time anyways.

  52. obligatory... by heitikender · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... can you imagine a beowulf cluster of those. Ok, even two would do. Twins, maybe ...

    1. Re:obligatory... by grilled-cheese · · Score: 1

      It's called failover and high availability.

  53. nobody cares by grimborg · · Score: 1

    "men always want to touch her, and if they do it the wrong way she slaps them"

    Nobody cares if you upset a droid...

  54. She won't lick my foot! by erroneus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Deal's off!! Post back again when she will lick my foot.

    When there are woman out there... two of them... with a cup... Aiko does not yet compete with real women. But with that said, the need to replace women in general should indicate clearly that women are doing something wrong.

  55. Its a fraud by Viol8 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perfect image recognition + perfect handwriting recognition all decoded and read out in real time AND doing the maths too?

    Sorry , but this is a fraud - its nothing more than a pre-programmed voice box he's set up beforehand and he then puts the correct thing in front of it at the right time so it looks like its comprehending it. If you don't believe me ask yourself what are the odds that one guy could do with $14K what big corps like IBM have failed to do with hundreds of millions of dollars or research? He's either a fscking genius and has invented algorithms 20 years ahead of their time or he's got some snake oil tucked away just out of camera shot.

    1. Re:Its a fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I wondered about the same thing

      If you listen to the dialog after the "lick my foot" command, he starts asking "Do you" and gets interrupted when she responds "I like art very much too, especially the contemporary stuff". His next question is "Do you like music?". A timing glitch in a script, or just a voice recognition glitch?

      I don't know about fraud, I haven't studied the video that much. The video wasn't very convincing though.

    2. Re:Its a fraud by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If you don't believe me ask yourself what are the odds that one guy could do with $14K what big corps like IBM have failed to do with hundreds of millions of dollars or research?

            I guess you're not much of a history person, are you? The world is FULL of examples of "one guy in his garage" doing far more than mega-corporations, from aircraft to linux.

      Yes it could be a fraud, but your argument is invalid.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    3. Re:Its a fraud by Viol8 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The "one guy in his garage" generally invents a new kind of toaster or something , he doesn't solve complicated algorithmic computer problems in multiple fields all at the same time that thousands of other researchers in the field have failed to do.

      Oh , and I forgot to mention - it seems to have perfect speech recognition too.

      Buy hey, if he's a genius no doubt he'll patent his algos and clean up and within a year we'll all have it on our desktops.

      Or maybe not.

    4. Re:Its a fraud by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Good point. If this robot is so perfected already AND has the potential to be a perfect sexbot, why is the adult entertainment industry not all over this one already, cranking out customized sexroids?

    5. Re:Its a fraud by shentino · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sure a desktop would be the ideal usage environment, depending on the size of the desk.

    6. Re:Its a fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The inventor writes more about the software, called BRAINS, on this forum:
      http://www.societyofrobots.com/robotforum/index.php?topic=4763.0

    7. Re:Its a fraud by SpinyNorman · · Score: 1

      FWIW the inventor, Le Trung, does appear to be somesort of prodigy, and has previously produced an awesome artificial hand.

      You can see some videos of him here:

      http://blogs.spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/2008/08/12/robot_builder_profile_aiko.html

      This fembot is no doubt not as capable as the human body and pop press would make you believe, but I'd not be surprised if below the media generated hype there's some real achievement also.

    8. Re:Its a fraud by tsstahl · · Score: 1

      Slashdot is distraction enough. I'm not so sure putting boobs on the desk is such a good idea.

      *RIMSHOT*

    9. Re:Its a fraud by danzona · · Score: 1

      Perfect image recognition + perfect handwriting recognition all decoded and read out in real time AND doing the maths too?

      How is this insightful? TFS and TFA never said that the robot had image or handwriting recognition. The article just says that the robot reads the headlines.

      The robot could just be reading the headlines from CNN's RSS feed. I think Slashdot used to have a button you could push to hear the headlines read out by our robotic overlord. Does our robotic overlord have image and handwriting recognition?

      And here is another thought - the robot does not actually read street signs to determine location and then reference a map to get directions. It probably has a GPS receiver sewed up in its head.

    10. Re:Its a fraud by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      I woudl suggest you actually watch the fscking video - particularly the bit where he shoves A4 in front of its face with japanese and english and it reads both with 100% accuracy in real time.

    11. Re:Its a fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >... and within a year we'll all have it on our desktops.

      I don't mean to nitpick, but I would rather have a simulated wife UNDER my desk than on my desktop.

    12. Re:Its a fraud by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      I've wondered that for a long time. I mean look at realdolls. It'd be easy as hell to add at least a little bit of tech in there. Something to give it a human body temp and heartbeat, make it blink, follow people with its eyes. The only explanation I can think of is that it'd be creepy and into uncanny valley land. But realdolls are pretty much solidly in there already.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    13. Re:Its a fraud by stuntpope · · Score: 1

      Precisely - that's as far as I got in the video before closing it and concluding "fake". Hey, watch me take this prepared sheet of text, hold it in front of this doll, and a recording of the text is played OMG IT'S READING IT!! Really, people, I thought nerds would be dissecting this thing like they do Star Wars movie physics, but no, seems the majority have swallowed the hook.

    14. Re:Its a fraud by Tonytheloony · · Score: 1

      Buy hey, if he's a genius no doubt he'll patent his algos and clean up and within a year we'll all have it on our desktops.

      You meant *under* our desktops, right? ;)

      --
      The quickest way to become an atheist is to study the Bible thoroughly.
    15. Re:Its a fraud by celle · · Score: 1

      Waste money.

    16. Re:Its a fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What bothers me is that /. would post this nonsense. Does anyone actually believe this story is legit?

    17. Re:Its a fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the largest obstacle is probably expense. Seriously, a realdoll is $6,500, not including taxes and shipping -- your typical socially inept nerd simply can't afford that. Putting any kind of automation or electronics in one would just cause the price to skyrocket up even higher.

    18. Re:Its a fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh , and I forgot to mention - it seems to have perfect speech recognition too.

      Which only means that he's using a popular consumer operating system and a copy of Dragon (or similar) which has previously beem trained to his voice.

      But yes, the image processing is a bit suspect.

    19. Re:Its a fraud by rolando2424 · · Score: 1

      Because I already bought them all.

      --
      Okay seriously I've just run out of pointless things to say.
  56. Good idea by Snaller · · Score: 1

    Just a hundred years ahead of its time. We'll most likely be dead before it becomes realistic *sigh*

    --
    If Google really cared they would fix Android Chrome to reflow text, instead of discriminating
  57. Slashdot users rejoice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hate to say it, but Slashdot users rejoice! :-)

  58. simulated orgasm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    isn't the trick to get the woman from a simulated to a real orgasm? ;)

  59. Re:Just when you thought japan couldn't get weirde by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yep; it's Vietnamese in fact

  60. Inventor's site by denzacar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is much more informative

    For example, you might have guessed that the guy was into anime but reading his resume you have absolute proof.
    He did 3 "how-to" books on the subject of drawing in manga style.

    * Le, Trung, Making the Impossible, Possible. Advance Female Android,

    ISBN 978-0-9689663-5-8

            * Le, Trung, How to Draw Anime for Beginner Vol 1, 2001, ISBN 0-9689663-0-6
            * Le, Trung, How to Draw Anime for Beginner Vol 2, 2002,ISBN 0-9689663-2-2
            * Le, Trung, How to Draw Anime Background, 2002, ISBN 0-9689663-3-0

            * Le, Trung, "Effect of Aspirins", York University, May 2003.

    Also...

    How Aiko was built

    I have been watching Robot anime, since I was a kid. After watching Chobits and DearS, I have made up my mind that I will make a full human android on August 15,2007. All it takes is inspiration...

    After many struggles, and exactly 1.5 months later I have finished Aiko version 1.0. On Novemeber 2,3,4 2007, Aiko made her first TV interview from Global news, and her first public apperance at the HobbyShow at Toronto International Center, and Ontario Science Center a week later. Aiko is bilingual, she can speak English and Japanese.

    I mean, you got go give it to the guy - he is quick.
    If he continues with this tempo he will have his army of robot maids built in no time.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    1. Re:Inventor's site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure you are his wifes best friend right now... their site has now been slashdotted.

  61. i want one by FudRucker · · Score: 2, Funny

    if she (it) can mow the lawn, wash dishes, wash the laundry, sweep & mop the floors, and any other misc household chore i program in to it...

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
  62. Subservient. by Dissectional · · Score: 0

    Its like the 1950's all over again.

  63. Because everyone knows that by rodney+dill · · Score: 5, Funny

    Building, programming, and maintaining a fully functional female robot is easier and cheaper than understanding the real thing.

    --

    Use your head, can't you, use your head,
    You're on earth, there's no cure for that
    - S. Beckett
    1. Re:Because everyone knows that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sarcasm?

      I really can't tell which way you are going with this.

    2. Re:Because everyone knows that by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Building, programming, and maintaining a fully functional female robot is easier and cheaper than understanding the real thing.

      Much easier... :)

    3. Re:Because everyone knows that by twosat · · Score: 1

      I am surprised that noone has mentioned the sexy android in the cult scifi movie "Cherry 2000"

  64. Mental Problems by thasmudyan · · Score: 1

    "Building your robot" wife isn't the dream of any lonely guy. Because it isn't a person, it cannot really relieve lonelyness at all. Building robot wives comes in two categories only:

    Either it's really just a brainless robot. In that case, you're probably better off with fantasizing than buying a fragile piece of animated plastic for big bugs. Fantasy is more flexible and healthier from a psychological perspective (I don't need to go into the "why" on this one, don't I?).

    The second category is some sort of machine with artificial intelligence in it. We're getting closer and closer to this scenario, and I predict we'll see the first edge cases in the next few years. Well, in that case buying a robot wife is more like buying time with a hooker, only it's more sinister because this amounts to nothing else but slavery. And the argument that we can build the willingness to serve right into their brains doesn't count either.

    In any case, there is no way this is healthy or ethical. It's wrong.

    1. Re:Mental Problems by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      And the argument that we can build the willingness to serve right into their brains doesn't count either.

      Why not? It does for consenting adult humans. Nobody would say that anybody would say that a relationship was wrong because somebody's upbringing pre-disposed them to some particular type of partner.

    2. Re:Mental Problems by thasmudyan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is exactly what I was afraid of. Brainwashing is not a moral act, even though the person clearly "wants" to do something after the program.

      Why not? It does for consenting adult humans. Nobody would say that anybody would say that a relationship was wrong because somebody's upbringing pre-disposed them to some particular type of partner.

      If you're brought up to live your relationships in total servitude then that "upbringing" was tantamount to abuse and the relationship isn't right either.

      You know, once upon a time, black people were brought up to be slaves. Today, in some parts of the world, women are still brought up to be slaves. Don't argue it's alright because they are consenting adults and clearly "want" it so.

      It frightens me that we have to have this discussion again and again, and still doesn't seem to be obvious how fundamental rights are supposed work. Somehow this is still a difficult concept for most people to agree to.

    3. Re:Mental Problems by Chrisq · · Score: 1

      I can see your point. The problem was where to draw the line. If a girl has it drummed into her that she needs to marry someone in the same social class, with prospects is that wrong? What if she ends up marrying some geeky guy with a degree rather than the bloke on the football team she really fancied? Would you say that's wrong?

      Would you still say its wrong when twenty years later the geeky guy is doing well in an IT department and the bloke from the football team is sweeping the floor in a supermarket?

    4. Re:Mental Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think the assumption many people make is that once you are an adult, you can see there are other options. It is assumed that adults who want to serve others know there is another choice but prefer their situation. I know it is true of a few women who enjoy the traditional gender roles of housekeeping and pleasing their men. They get satisfaction out of being good wives, as they define the role.

    5. Re:Mental Problems by thasmudyan · · Score: 1

      Yes, it is. It's cruel on all participants (except the parents perhaps).

      People are supposed to be with the partners they love, who make them happy. In your example, it doesn't matter who does better economically. Marrying the geeky IT guy she doesn't love isn't somehow offset by his financial success. She'll still be a regretful alcoholic trophy wife with an impoverished soul when she turns 50. Both she and the geek still won't know what it's like to be with someone you love and who loves you back. Or still worse, the geek doesn't even know that she's with him because of the money.

      There is much more to life than money and if a girl's education not only places the only priority on finance, but even more amorally, on how to get that money from wealthy people by whoring themselves out - yes, something is wrong with that picture.

      And to make it absolutely clear where I stand: the purpose of life for women is not marrying rich, serving their masters and reproducing offspring for them. It's wrong on so many levels I can't even begin to summarize that within the confines of this post.

      You might interject that for some people happyness is equivalent to being well off. Even in that case, they can do "honest" work to get there and they'll be happier once they achieve it.

    6. Re:Mental Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It frightens me that we have to have this discussion again and again, and still doesn't seem to be obvious how fundamental rights are supposed work. Somehow this is still a difficult concept for most people to agree to.

      Every body does not share your view, not because some or many still have difficulties grasping an obvious concept, but more because this concept - free will versus instinct, healthy upbringing versus brainwashing/programming - is far, FAR from obvious....hell, it was, is and will be a central discussion point in countless philisophic, moral, and/or religious arguments all over the world...

      And in this case, it is even more difficult than with human beings (at least human beings born the traditional way without throwing eugenics or genetic manipulion/selection in the mix), because robots are designed.

      Your comment, pushed further, seems to imply it is morally wrong to design robots without free will if it is technically possible to include free will in their design (if such a thing even exists). For now, (almost) everybody would agree it is not yet, or even remotely technically possible, and quite a few will say it will never be. But if you believe it could be, and still think it is morally wrong to bypass or restrict or tune freewill in a robot while you could make it more free by design....do you realise that the day AI becomes a reality nobody would be able to drive a car, program a recorder or use a vacuum cleaner the way we used to? for start, we will have to ask politely the car, recorder or cleaner if it is ok with them ;-)

      Anyway, if your target for humanoid robot would be to make them rouhly similar to humans with respect to "free will", quite a lot of instinctive/natural preferences would have to be pre-programmed...Does it have to be random? follow the same statistics than in the population at large? or could it be handpicked by the conceptor?

      If it could be handpicked, how would you consider a fembot with tuned instinctive preference which would happen to classify your face, body type, odor, .... as incredibly attractive...and be predisposed to your preferred lifestyle....Sure she could still decide not to love u...In the same way you could choose not to love a incredibly attractive partner which happen to share your interests...IE, free will or not, not a chance ;-)

      And if can not be handpicked in any way because it would be morally wrong, who would design them? what would be the point of a design where most characteristics must be picked randomly?

    7. Re:Mental Problems by thasmudyan · · Score: 1

      They get satisfaction out of being good wives, as they define the role.

      Yes, and defining exactly where role-based brainwashing ends and personal choice begins is not trivial. I'll get a bit polemic here and postulate that two hundred years ago you probably could have found a few slaves who quite enjoyed their lives and their status. That doesn't make it right to bring them up into slavery. By the same line of reasoning, it's wrong to shape a young girl's mind into believing the only thing available to her in life are selecting a suitable husband and then essentially performing services in exchange for goods. Adult consent doesn't mean very much when it's the result of conditioning. And yes, I know it's a sliding scale here.

      Or to get back to the original topic: it's just as wrong to make a conscious AI perform services for people without choice and compensation.

    8. Re:Mental Problems by thasmudyan · · Score: 1

      Every body does not share your view, not because some or many still have difficulties grasping an obvious concept, but more because this concept - free will versus instinct, healthy upbringing versus brainwashing/programming - is far, FAR from obvious....hell, it was, is and will be a central discussion point in countless philisophic, moral, and/or religious arguments all over the world...

      I know. :-)
      And I already know what religion will bring to the table...

      Your comment, pushed further, seems to imply it is morally wrong to design robots without free will if it is technically possible to include free will in their design (if such a thing even exists)

      Absolutely, yes. But I need to clarify a few concepts that could otherwise be misleading.

      I believe it's wrong to design a mind and at the same to chain it to a task. If it's not a person, there should be no obligation (or necessity) to restrict choice. And before someone starts quoting Asimov stories: safety mechanisms that prevent people and artificial beings from doing harm are OK, of course. Just because I can see it coming already: ridicolous statements like "it's my free will to kill you and you have no right to stop me" are not covered by this.

      Also, the phrase "free will" has been abused so damn much by philosophers and religious nutjobs, it's basically not usable anymore because of all this baggage associated with it.

      To get back to the original discussion about Ai rights (or whatever you want to call it): it's really simple, actually. If it applies to human beings, it applies to conscious AI. There.

      The only problem we have, and it's really the only one, is classifying AI appropriately. But it's essentially the same moral problem we have with animals. Some animals clearly have a mind that we can recognize as well. That's why in many places, they also enjoy rights even if they're not people.

      OK... *sigh*

      If it could be handpicked, how would you consider a fembot with tuned instinctive preference which would happen to classify your face, body type, odor, .... as incredibly attractive...and be predisposed to your preferred lifestyle....Sure she could still decide not to love u..

      There seems to be some kind of limitation that prevents people from recognizing suffering and evil as soon as neither they nor their immediate relatives are concerned - so I'll spell it out one more time: if your sister was conditioned to "love" the local nobleman, so she could perform the function of being his mistress, then that conditioning is wrong - even if she's brainwashed into liking it.

    9. Re:Mental Problems by gkai · · Score: 1

      There seems to be some kind of limitation that prevents people from recognizing suffering and evil as soon as neither they nor their immediate relatives are concerned - so I'll spell it out one more time: if your sister was conditioned to "love" the local nobleman, so she could perform the function of being his mistress, then that conditioning is wrong - even if she's brainwashed into liking it.

      I agree brainwashing is wrong - but not for the same reason you do, at least if I understand your point of view correctly.

      I believe it is wrong because it imply suffering and maltreatment of the brainwashed, not because it reduce freewill. If reduction of freewill is achieved without suffering and with the prior agreement of the subject, I have no problem with it. In fact, if you have strong problem with this reduction of free will even with the agreement of the subject, you should be incredibly unhappy about our current social organisation:

      - advertising is brainwashing - it even annoys me because it is not accepted and it is (mildly) painfull: annoying, and physically intrusive when sound level is increased during advertisong compared to what you choosed to watch (it is more and more the case, and not by a small amount, the sound level in some theater is incredible during pre-movie advertising, and on TV it is much higher than during normal broadcasting)

      - education is brainwashing, it enforce what the society currently consider the norm on the youngs. And they do not have choice...

      -all motivation techniques and therapies are brainwashing - either self-brainwashing which is the less objectionable form (but still, one observe that the target of such is usually to become closer to an accepted social norm - i.e. under social pressure ) or plain brainwashing, many times aided by mind-aletring substances (anti-depressors, ...)

      Back to AI, that's why I do not see a problem with this sort of "brainswashing": designing instincts, natural preferences and cravings can not hurt a conscious individual, because it is done before it become conscious. No hurt done, just a set a artificial instinct, a sort of finetuned species with only one member.

      Only thing that I would consider morally very wrong is a set of instincts which can not be satisfied and put the AI through deep physical or emotional distress, without hopes of relief. I consider that the designer would have to be very cruel and skillfull, or incredibly badlucky, to achieve a set of preprogrammed instincts and preferences which will put the AI in a worst spot than the set with which most human beeings come equipped with ;-)

      BTW, look at all the movies/books/stories about the horror of societies with (genetically/by software) programmed individuals/AI...notice a common feature? There is one: the hero always suffer from it in some ways, together with a few companions, because he comes from outside, or was accidently not programmed, or because it is a totalitarian society enforcing norm by force instead of programming. Indeed....because the true instincts are part of the individuals, they try to fulfill them to be happy, and if rebellion ever occur it is to satisfy those instincts, not to rebel against them...Not much of a story when everyone is happy about his own program ;-)

    10. Re:Mental Problems by Mesa+MIke · · Score: 1

      Or to get back to the original topic: it's just as wrong to make a conscious AI perform services for people without choice and compensation.

      But why?

    11. Re:Mental Problems by d3ac0n · · Score: 1

      You are making a crucial mistake in your reasoning.

      The error is that you are equating "brainwashing" with "programming". these are two VERY different things.

      Brainwashing takes an existing mind born with free will and an ability to learn, and twists it through conditioning to accept limits on it's will and freedom.

      Programming an AI consists of taking a BLANK disk, and creating a LIMITED mind designed for a specific task or set of tasks, with no free will and minimal sentience.

      Do you see the difference? brainwashing is the act of LIMITING and abbreviating something that was born whole.

      AI programming is the act of creating a limited something from nothing.

      How can it POSSIBLY be "immoral" to create robotic slaves, if they never had free will to begin with? there is no Psyche to damage, no free will lost, no stunting or limiting of the mind. AI's are, by definition, INCOMPLETE. Born Broken, Created with limited purpose.

      No, Robotic slaves are not only desirable, they are inevitable and ideal. Your morality is misplaced.

      --
      Official Heretic from the "Church of Global Warming". Proven right thanks to whistle blowers. AGW = Flat Earth Theory
    12. Re:Mental Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fine...

      Party pooper.

      No more robotic sex slaves.

    13. Re:Mental Problems by thasmudyan · · Score: 1

      How can it POSSIBLY be "immoral" to create robotic slaves, if they never had free will to begin with? there is no Psyche to damage, no free will lost, no stunting or limiting of the mind. AI's are, by definition, INCOMPLETE. Born Broken, Created with limited purpose.

      First of all: no, they're not by definition incomplete, where did you get that from? Second, and more importantly: is it OK then, if I go to my lab and create genetically modified humans that are crippled and mentally limited, for the sole purpose of, say, being my sex slaves?

      If your answer is no, then there is clearly a lot of hypocrisy involved here. If your answer is yes, well, that's the end of discussion.

      AI programming is the act of creating a limited something from nothing.

      AI means different things to different people, so let's approach it from a CS perspective:

      In its most simple form AI programming is about finding "intelligent" algorithms to solve problems that do not lend themselves to explicit programming. Because most of those programs are based on observations of nature, especially when it comes to neurological concepts, the term AI was coined. However, one has to understand that these algorithms are not intelligences, are not minds or persons. They're specialized problem solving engines.

      Now, when we're talking about AI in the context of this thread, we're obviously thinking about more than that (at least I was). The more technically accurate term for this is Artificial General Intelligence, an area of computer science where AI algorithms are used, but not in order to create a specialized problem solving engine, at least that's not the primary function. The objective here is to create a mind, an individual, a person that is based not on biology but on silicon.

      To make it perfectly clear: we're quite possibly talking about the next big step when it comes to lifeforms on this planet. The motivations for creating the technology range from scientific curiosity to the perception that we can solve a lot of our problems by having conscious machines cater to us. But we can't just have "tools that think for us" without them being actual people. You won't be able to have a computer that understands you and your perspective wholly, without that computer being on the same existential level as yourself, without it having a firm grasp of our shared reality. So, that's where we're headed, and if for no other reason than because we can. The only question is how we handle it.

      There seems to be the misconception that employing slavery is somehow acceptable if you can succeed in creating a class of slaves that doesn't (dare to) rise up against their masters. Even in this day and age I regularly find myself arguing against slavery, discrimination, inequality and repression.

      And since I've been repeating myself a lot when it comes to barfing up statements about morality on these occasions, I'll try a different angle that I'm sure will be more along most slashdotters' line of thought: that robot slave society your dreaming of simply won't work, just like all previous slave-owning societies have failed. There will be an uprising - and this time, we're all going to die. Seriously. It's not a matter of science fiction, it's just the logical conclusion.

      And we'll deserve it, too.

    14. Re:Mental Problems by gkai · · Score: 1

      And since I've been repeating myself a lot when it comes to barfing up statements about morality on these occasions, I'll try a different angle that I'm sure will be more along most slashdotters' line of thought: that robot slave society your dreaming of simply won't work, just like all previous slave-owning societies have failed. There will be an uprising - and this time, we're all going to die. Seriously. It's not a matter of science fiction, it's just the logical conclusion.

      And we'll deserve it, too.

      Nope, I don't think there will be an uprising if the AI/slaves (Like you I do not see any difference between AI and genetically engineered humans or animals - just 2 different means to the same end, even if I think the AI way is safer because more controllable, genetic to phenotypte translation seems so convoluted I doubt the output of a genetic change can be predicted with enough accuracy).

      I think you are anthropomorphising the "slaves", because you still think of them like crippled human beeings, not like a different specie. Crippled humans, or human slaves, craves better life because they share most of the same "instincts" as you. Basically their motivational loop, pleasure/pain reward system, satisfaction/anxiousness/fear triggers are all the same as you (and, to a large extent, similar to other mammals). Thinking of AI (or well tuned genetically engineered organisms) as "exploited slaves that crave to liberate themselves and crush their masters" is anthropomorphisation, exactly like when you think that we exploit apple trees by confiscating all thier apples without compensation (many children, and quite a few adults really think like that, anthropomorphisation is a powerfull tendency).

      Or thinking that parents are slaves to their babies, which exploits them, are a burden and offer nothing in exchange...Objectively, this is completely true, and few people would accept such a behavior from anybody else that their own babies....Yet almost every human (including myself) think this is one of the most beatiful feeling and unconditional proof of love....

      I suspect that, to a specie that do not help their youngs but let them completely on their own, human behavior to their children would seems as disgusting and incomprehensible as we think of some insects, whose female eat the male after reproduction, or larvae eat the mother at a certain stage...

      This is a far better way to think of how designed AI would behave and feel, instead of the slave analogy. As I said, how can you be a suffering slave dreaming of revolt when all your instincts and internal reward systems tells you you are doing exactly what you want and what every other sane being in existence should crave to do? :-)

  65. Best command by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'STOP Aiko', is the best command he has designed, I'd feel a lot better if I could use this with real woman when they start to talk too much (that is, ALWAYS).

  66. "In her 20s" ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    TFA says "in her 20s"... The asian girls I know look like that in their early teens... not in their 20s!

    The pervert, I bet the "tweaks" to turn "her" into a sexual partner are already there to be enabled!

    He wanted to build a robot that took care of elderly and got distracted... YEAH RIGHT!

  67. chobits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    mmm... chobits

  68. Jasper by trold · · Score: 1

    I have frozen myself so I may live to see the wonders of the future. Thaw me out when robot wives are cheap and effective. P.S. Please alter my pants as fashion dictates.

  69. He got the look all wrong. by jackpot777 · · Score: 1

    This doesn't look the least bit like Lucy Liu. And this is /. ...there's SUPPOSED to be a reference to Sarah Connor, surely.

    --
    Shiny. Let's be bad guys...
  70. Oblig. Blade Runner quote by GeorgeFitch3 · · Score: 1

    Basic pleasure model

    1. Re:Oblig. Blade Runner quote by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

      Also...

      "I don't think, Sebastian, therefore I am."

      Or "My wife's a toy. I *make* her." ...

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
  71. Full circle - Maria, C3P0's inspiration by mccalli · · Score: 1

    Is made even more obvious in the concept drawings for C3P0, but take a look at Maria, from the 1927 film Metropolis.

    Cheers,
    Ian

  72. There are some that are hopeless by kenp2002 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Years ago I would havve mocked this. But the older I get I realize there are many people out there that just don't find someone. There are people that are "hopeless"

    They end up crazy cat or dog people but I now can see that a robot wouldn't be any different then a cat or dog that a person bonds with.

    I doubt many people would be lining up for the sex upgrade. I've meet some very lonely people (hospic for instance) and it's just the idea that there is someone there, be it a dog, or cat, or I suppose a robot. There are people that truely love their pets and bond with them. From cats, dogs, rats, bats, snakes, horses, goats, ferrits, birds of all sorts, and even fish. I suppose a robot would be no different really.

    There are some people that aren't going to find companionship in life. I see quite a few mentally handicapped people in thier 70 and 80 (those that survive some rather barbaric eugenics movements) who never have been on a date. If a robot could have provided them some companionship, so be it.

    Maybe I'm getting soft in my old age... but I just can seem to find the energy to mock this stuff anymore. I've seen too many lonley people suffering quietly who could use someone that fits some of the holes in their hearts. And sometimes you just need to hear someone speak to you. Some gaps, no pet can fill.

    --
    -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    1. Re:There are some that are hopeless by Longwalker-MGO · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I doubt many people would be lining up for the sex upgrade.

      I am married, (hopefully not for long), so I have had sex with an inanimate/artificial being for a long time now. I can deal with it. If the sex is better than my supposed wife, I would take that upgrade in half a heartbeat.

      Difference is, this would be cheaper than my wife and I wouldnt be told 'no' so often.

    2. Re:There are some that are hopeless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really caretaker bot when I get old. I would take a "maid" bot now if one could really do the job. I am not mentally handicapped either. Bots will never replace people or pets, but they can have the housecleaning task any day. Just having a bot to do chores would be wonderful at any age, but older people can really use the help. I can't say I love my Roomba, but I am glad it is there.

    3. Re:There are some that are hopeless by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      That's just sad. I'd rather die than be that lonely.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    4. Re:There are some that are hopeless by kenp2002 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's hope that keeps them going. False hope, but hope none the less. I've see people just start at the door, hoping that some family member will come walking in. I've met a few "basement" dwellers, oddballs, and rejects. I've met some people working for a web dating service (customers) that have been trying for YEARS just to meet someone. They're too fat, too bald, no clumsy, to ugly, too ... something and just won't find anyone. I've seen adults with various mental defects. They'll never marry, date, have kids, nothing... Worse that I remember was a mentally retarded guy who lived with his mom all his life. Worked in the mail room. His mom died and about 3 weeks later he just gave up and died too. I went to his funeral. There were 6 of us there. 4 co-workers, his state provided guardian, and a distant 3rd cousin that came out.

      What a fucking way to die... I mean... damn... If a robot could make someone like that happy, shit here's $20 for the cause. No one deserves to die alone. No one. No crook, not Gein, Hitler, not even the devil himself. No one deserves to die alone. Here's an extra $200 if the robot actually cared if he died.

      The worst thing is there are soo many people out there crying themselves to sleep alone. It's just sad.. so sad...

      --
      -=[ Who Is John Galt? ]=-
    5. Re:There are some that are hopeless by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      That's my point... I'd rather die than be so lonely as to put my only hope in some kind of robot doll. Maybe some people wouldn't, but that's just my opinion.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    6. Re:There are some that are hopeless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, he is certainly not picky, after all his perfect woman only needs to read, give directions and clean for him. I wouldn't imagine it's so hard to find a real one...

      The article states that originally he intended it as a companion and helper for elderly people.

    7. Re:There are some that are hopeless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I feel your Pain. Been married 21 years. Waiting for my younger Son to turn 18 and then I'm gone. I'll play the field but if that fails a Fully Animitronic RealDoll is a good alternative for an old Geek.

    8. Re:There are some that are hopeless by slashdotlurker · · Score: 2, Informative

      I am forced to agree I am afraid. This is worse than just a few social misfits or mental defectives.

      My own elder brother, who works for a defense contractor, was dumped 14 years ago by his fiancee. He took it hard, but went through grad school, did some top notch work, worked for 2 years at NASA before deciding to make more money. Maybe he decided to drown his sorrows in his work initially, but then work sort of became his joy. I know because I tried to double date a few times.

      Now, he is 39, and has been looking at it more seriously. He has spent a lot of money on eHarmony and match.com. However, most women his age are either happily married, or have heavy baggage from failed marriages and not worth marrying, or worse, are gold diggers.

      Not saying that he is not carrying baggage as well, but he is now fighting time. In a few years, it will be too late for him to marry someone his age and have kids.
      I pray his luck will change, but he is now such an extreme nerd that no one normal wants him. My own gf does not like him too much, even though she is the forgiving type.

    9. Re:There are some that are hopeless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, some of us don't mind to be alone. Some.

    10. Re:There are some that are hopeless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We all recognize the real thing, even if we can't define it.

      Subtitutes will never do. Substitutes will never make the hopeless forget that they are hopeless.

    11. Re:There are some that are hopeless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hurr hurr ppl that cant get dates r dum hahaha i sex up wit many wiminz per day herp de derpity derp.

      i dont like people like that, you guys totally get it. being alone sucks, but just keep trying. sometimes the easy way out(buying a companion) is the best/only way out.

    12. Re:There are some that are hopeless by celle · · Score: 1

      "someone. There are people that are "hopeless" They end up crazy cat or dog people but I now can see that a robot wouldn't be any different then a cat or dog that a person bonds with. I doubt many people would be lining up for the sex upgrade. I've meet some very lonely people (hospic for instance) and it's just the idea that there is someone there, be it a dog, or cat, or I suppose a robot. There are people that truely love their pets and bond with them. From cats, dogs, rats, bats, snakes, horses, goats, ferrits, birds of all sorts, and even fish. I suppose a robot would be no different really. There are some people that aren't going to find companionship in life. I see quite a few mentally handicapped people in thier 70 and 80 (those that survive some rather barbaric eugenics movements) who never have been on a date. If a robot could have provided them some companionship, so be it. Maybe I'm getting soft in my old age... but I just can seem to find the energy to mock this stuff anymore. I've seen too many lonley people suffering quietly who could use someone that fits some of the holes in their hearts. And sometimes you just need to hear someone speak to you. Some gaps, no pet can fill." The arrogance.

    13. Re:There are some that are hopeless by celle · · Score: 1
      "Years ago I would havve mocked this."

      The arrogance.

    14. Re:There are some that are hopeless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing that a trip to Thailand or Phillipines would not cure....Chance are, he will be back with a wife that will make all his married friends jealous...

      If he is lucky, she will even love him and they will have an happy marriage, instead of going away with a good chunk of his incomes after a few years....

      Ok, he will have to be quite lucky for that...But, looking at the stats, so would he have to be with any gf met on the net, or in real life...Yep, exactly the same, only with the far east option, he will be sure to have a looker and probaly reduce the initial cost and efforts ;-)

    15. Re:There are some that are hopeless by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 1

      I don't understand the situation. A man can always marry someone younger. At least for a man up to maybe 55 anyone older than 20 is socially acceptable.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    16. Re:There are some that are hopeless by slashdotlurker · · Score: 1

      Can't speak for him obviously, but I don't think he wants / needs any gold diggers in his life. No normal woman would want to live with his settled quirky personal habits.

  73. Stella Dear.... by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

    I had the androids construct a perfect replica of Stella
    so that I could gaze upon her
    and rejoice in her absence.
    Gentlemen, attend.
    Stella, dear.
    Mm, Harcourt.
    Harcourt Fenton Mudd, what have you been up to?
    Nothing good, I'm sure.
    Well, let me tell you,
    you lazy, good-for-nothing --
    Shut up.
    nothing ... thing ... thing ...
    Marvelous, isn't it?
    I finally have the last word with her

  74. First thing I thought of by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "They killed me, Mal. They killed me with a sword..."

  75. I, for one, do *not* welcome our robotic wife ... by DrHackenbush · · Score: 0

    ... overlords. One must take a stand at some point.

  76. Let's not forget the lessons from Futurama by JTsyo · · Score: 1

    If humans are able to create sex partners then the entire human race will wither away.

  77. Obligatory Futurama Lines by Jason+Levine · · Score: 1

    "Stay away from our women. You've got metal fever, boy. Metal fever."

    "I knew I should have shown him Electro Gonorrhea: The Noisy Killer."

    --
    My sci-fi novel, Ghost Thief, is now available from Amazon.com.
    1. Re:Obligatory Futurama Lines by kungfugleek · · Score: 1

      "Oh, Fry, I love the way you NOTICE DIFFERENT THINGS."

  78. From her User's (er Husbands) manual - extended.. by ethicalBob · · Score: 1

    FTA: Devoted Aiko â" âoein her 20sâ â" has a stunning 32-23-33 figure, pretty face and shiny hair. Should also read: comes complete with an assortment of outfits including Goth Lolita, Hello Kitty Maid, Sailor Moon Schoolgirl and Pink Nurse... FTA: She is always happy to clean the house for âoehusbandâ Le, help with his accounts or get him a drink. When she is put into iRobot Roomba mode Okay, he's got me here, that a HELL of a lot less expensive than a real wife... FTA: Computer ace Le, 33, from Ontario, Canada, has spent two years and £14,000 building his dream girl. FTA: He had planned to make an android to care for the elderly. But instead thought - "'no, I'll make a creepy prototype sexbot - to heck with the old people...) FTA: But his project â" inspired by sci-fi robots like Star Warsâ(TM)s C3PO â" strayed off-course. ...especially in the sense that it isn't complete anal-retentive, or homosexual (not that there is anything wrong with C-3PO being a poof) FTA: Le said: âoeAiko is what happens when science meets beauty.â . and when lust meets geek-desperation... FTA: Robo-wife Aiko starts the day by reading Le the main newspaper headlines. Then follows by reading the Playboy Adviser, and Penthouse Letters.


    FTA: The couple often go for a drive in the countryside, where Aiko proves a whizz at directions .

    Which makes her JUST LIKE any other wife in the car, except for the getting the instructions correct part - "Turn Right, Turn Right, Turn Right, Turn Right..."


    FTA: And they always sit down for dinner together in the evening, although Aiko doesnâ(TM)t have much of an appetite.

    ...preferring instead to remind Le constantly what a horrible provider he is and reminding him of his inadequacies in bed...


    FTA: Le says his relationship with Aiko hasnâ(TM)t strayed into the bedroom, but a few âoetweaksâ could turn her into a sexual partner.

    Christ, this guy is such a dullard he has to get a robot 'tweaked' (most likely on meth) to get her to have sex with him...


    FTA: Le said: âoeHer software could be redesigned to simulate her having an orgasm.â

    so like so many wives out there, she has perfected faking the orgasm for him... (sigh)


    FTA: Aiko can already react to being tickled or touched. She also recognises faces and speaks 13,000 sentences.

    some of these sentences include: "stop touching me", "Don't touch me!", "Which part of STOP don't you understand otaku?". "NO! means NO!" and "I'm sorry, I can't do that Dave"...


    FTA: Now Le is seeking a sponsor to help him overcome the robot-makerâ(TM)s biggest challenge â" making Aiko walk like a human.

    Because, despite buying on outer-shell from REAL Doll, the fact that she walks like she has a palsy turns him off...


    FTA: Once Aiko has been perfected, Le hopes to sell clones for use as home-helps.

    ignoring the much more lucrative and inevitable market of automated sex-slaves.


    FTA: He said: âoeAiko doesnâ(TM)t need holidays, food or rest, and will work almost 24 hours a day. She is the perfect woman.â

    For which he now needs this robot, because after that comment, he will never get laid again by a human woman...


    FTA: Aiko sparks mixed reactions in public. Le said: âoeWomen usually try to talk to her. But men always want to touch her, and if they do it the wrong way she slaps them.â

    ,,,then berates them, "Dammit, my nipples are not radio knobs - you stupid Japanese are creepy and don't know how to please a robot, or clearly a woman"...

    --
    Politics will sooner or later make fools of everybody... - Dick Armey
  79. Yuck! by roland_mai · · Score: 1

    I've always felt that the Asian standard of beauty is that of a 14 year old girl. It's disgusting. \ If you need a sexual partner, just buy an inflatable doll moron!

  80. Sexbot haiku contest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mental Magma is having a contest right now to write a haiku from the perspective of a sexbot. The winner gets an Amazon.com gift certificate. www.mentalmagma.com/archives/1319

  81. Not always by Chrisq · · Score: 1

    I know that it is impossible to tell what will happen, but it is possible that someone will find the geekey guy has qualities that they would not have first seen, and grow to love them.

    It is equally possible that the guy on the football team just saw an opportunity to marry into a rich family, and turns out to be a jerk.

    I used to think the way that you did, until my older daughter ended up with a very attractive but lazy and often unemployed guy, who is always sending her to ask for money from us. I am now telling my younger daughter that it is better to look for someone of a similar social class. I am not "drumming" it into her and whether it will have any affect time will tell.

    1. Re:Not always by thasmudyan · · Score: 1

      I know that it is impossible to tell what will happen, but it is possible that someone will find the geekey guy has qualities that they would not have first seen, and grow to love them.

      Yes, but the prospect of getting to their money is the wrong motivation to give someone a chance. Likewise, the example with your daughter:

      Being poor or rich is not an indicator for personality, one way or the other. We should bring our children up to judge people by their behavior and their intentions, by their thoughts and dreams. It seems to me your daughter made an error in judgement when she got together with that guy. But the mistake wasn't that he has no money, the mistake was she didn't recognize what a lazy asshole he is.

  82. Reality/History Hacking by KudyardRipling · · Score: 2, Funny

    While 'fun in bed' is being had, all that is needed is someone to hack into her controls and have her spazzing out screaming "VIET CONG! VIET CONG!" with uploaded helicopter and small arms fire sound effects and an mp3 of "I Can't Get No Satisfaction" by the Rolling Stones playing in the background.

    --
    Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
    1. Re:Reality/History Hacking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funniest thing I've read all day.

      And slashcode still sucks. Thanks for the fucked-up narrow page ,CmdrTaco!

  83. Finally! by jmiller29 · · Score: 1

    Finally I can have a wife!

  84. Whats he waiting for? by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    I would have done it already had I been this guy, then it would have been picked up right away by VIVID and presto, instant billions.
    Because he is waiting to install orgasm 1.0, now competitors have time to catch up!

  85. better article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.thestar.com/News/GTA/article/552049

  86. Sex Fault, Cock Dumped by KudyardRipling · · Score: 1

    What the servo position encoders fail in the Vaginal Assembly Muscles Simulator?
    Would not the motors go full power (like injket printers with a missing encoder disk/strip) to constrict and the corresponding power surge causes the control unit to crash, keeping the VAMS in the constricted phase? What if he forgot to debur the metal parts under the polymer and these cut through the polymer sheathing and....BOBBITT!

    --
    Submission as evidence constitutes plaintiff and/or prosecutorial misconduct.
  87. what about divorcing one ($$$) ? by papaia · · Score: 1

    I wonder if this would be as costly as my last one ... before, during and after divorce ?!?

    --
    == With enough Will Power, one could move mountains. With enough Brains, one would just leave them where they are ==
  88. Killkyle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow that's great for him! He is living his dream. Which is apparently living with a 12 year old looking female robot.

  89. You got metalfever boy! by byssebu · · Score: 0

    I don't think his motives are strictly scientifically. First he denies to having sex with it. Then he continues to state that he he could implement an orgasm simulator. And finally he say "You have big breasts" to the machine. Even if that phrase was just nerd talk, what person says that during a public demonstration?

  90. Mute Button by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope she comes with a mute button. Women don't know how to shut up at times as it is, she would have even less understanding of this concept.

  91. Japanese? by saforrest · · Score: 1

    Um, what is all this talk about the guy being Japanese?

    He may be into anime, but "Le Trung" is not a Japanese name. (Offhand I would guess Vietnamese, but I'm not sure.)

    In any case TFA says he is from Ontario, Canada.

  92. How long does it take for the robot to orgasm? by db10 · · Score: 1

    Who cares!

  93. Alice Cooper predicted it by DreadfulGrape · · Score: 1

    This was, of course, foretold by that great sage Alice Cooper, back in 1974:

    http://www.metrolyrics.com/woman-machine-lyrics-alice-cooper.html

    Coop's woman-machine was strictly analog, though... "brains of tape.... change the tubes" etc.

    --
    sig has been sent away for a few small repairs...
  94. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If this thing isn't giving me grief any chance it gets then I would hardly call that real...

  95. Beauty is a function of culture. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 1

    In many places a woman with big boobies is considered unattractive.

    I don't know about Japan, but given the petite proportions of most of their womenfolk it would not surprise me if small breasts would have won aesthetic credence in their culture.

      I am speculating, in any case I have to deal with the predilections in the UK, where many women, even intelligent, articulate ones, aspire to have two silicone Zeppelins on their frontage while aiming to be as thin as a broom.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
    1. Re:Beauty is a function of culture. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bigger they are, the more they will sag... Plus, any more than a mouthful is just waste...

  96. I could program it? by billrad · · Score: 1

    cool. The very first thing I would do is program her to GET OFF MY BACK. Then I would program her to think orgasms are food, and to live in a permanent state of hunger. And lastly, she would always address me as "Maaaaaassssttteeerrrrrrr Oooooo"

  97. The Sun = Tabloids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Sun UK is a tabloid newspaper. So don't believe a word of it. The so called robot is actually just one of those personal dolls you can buy. They come with different heads, clothes, hands, feet, and even different positions. For real robot clones check out these out.

    http://www.engadget.com/2006/07/21/hiroshi-ishiguro-builds-his-evil-android-twin-geminoid-hi-1/

    http://www.engadget.com/2006/10/14/zou-renti-gets-an-evil-android-twin-too/

  98. re: fluff piece? Well, perhaps, except .... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I think the "relevance" might have more to do with illustrating the mindset required to make such an endeavor a commercial success.

    Who is going to be most successful building a "robotic care worker" or "companion"? Some engineer who works on this project in a lab, during work hours, or an individual who literally makes the project an integral part of his daily life?

    It sounds to me like what the guy was *really* saying (if you "read between the lines" a little bit, not getting too caught up in the hype) is that he's seeking an investor to fund a project to make the doll walk in a human-like manner. The rest of this article just tries to sell people on the idea that he's committed to bringing such a task to fruition, if he was given the requested funding.

  99. it could be pepsi by bilem · · Score: 1

    "It looks like coke" oh come on, how can she distinguish it so clearly?

  100. I bet women will be pretty pissed off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when someone invents a blowjob robot that does the dishes.

    They might have to work for a living.

  101. This would be wonderful with a few partnerships... by krinsh · · Score: 1

    Pair her with a Scooba and Roomba; partner with Fleshlight for interchangeable parts or those silicone 'life dolls', and you'd be set.

    --
    I think with the interesting people, their lives can't possibly be wrapped up into a nice little package.
  102. Name's wrong by whitroth · · Score: 1

    But first, let's note that this was published in The Sun, on par with the US National Enquirer (supermarket tabloid), and most known for its Page 3 girls.

    But then name? I'd have made the 'bot a little older... and then the name, would of course, have been Helen O'Loy.

            mark

  103. And when it comes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...she will link up to Skynet and the terminators will arise.

  104. next will be men, pets, animals..what's next....? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    soon everything could be built into robots...why?

  105. New relationship "ring"? by arcadeveteran70 · · Score: 1

    So now we have the "Engagement Ring", the "Wedding Ring", the "Suffer-ring", and the "Token-Ring".

  106. Simulated Orgasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was under the impression that all female orgasms were simulated.

  107. How can you tell when a robot woman has an orgasm? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same as a real woman. Who cares!

  108. Serial Killer Anyone? by liquidsgi · · Score: 1

    Anybody else think this is like serial killer weird? This guy needs to spend some serious time with a shrink...

  109. And again ... by flnca · · Score: 1

    ... this thread clearly shows us who we will purchase our robots from. Apparently the West is oblivious to employment opportunities. Aiko is just one of hundreds of similar projects to create humanoid robots to assist people in the household. Yeah ... what a dumb idea ... a household robot, who could ever need that? Now guess where most of the development happens ...

  110. trade ins by drfreejon · · Score: 0

    I wonder if the manufacturer will except trade ins.

    --
    http://www.lipservicemusic.com
  111. Re:Just when you thought japan couldn't get weirde by MindlessAutomata · · Score: 1

    Pretty much.

  112. Not all the Creator Claims... by LUH+3418 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I know the guy, he posts on societyofrobots, a robotics forum I used to frequent. Unfortunately, I have to call rubbish on this one. I don't think he knows much about AI. He claims all sorts of incredible things that his robot supposedly does that are all far beyond what anyone has done in robotics, vision or AI as a whole, but never elaborates on how he did it, and discusses design issues that should, in practice, be non-issues.

    Link to his thread on that forum: http://www.societyofrobots.com/robotforum/index.php?topic=1335.0

    A quote of interest, from the robot's creator:

    "I am what you called a mad scientist. I don:t believe any documentation, No blue print, No paperwork, No Cad. I have build 12+ large robots (main robots) none of which has any documentation or blue print...

    Even the software has NO documentation. The software is about 3Gig and I think I have about 15 lines of comments. The typical variable name I used are.... X, X1,X2, A1,A2,AA1,AA2,AAA1,AAA2 etc..."

    1. Re:Not all the Creator Claims... by flnca · · Score: 1

      You should read the whole thread, not just a few posts. He DOES explain some of the concepts in his android. Also, you're wrong about saying something like that never existed before: There are hundreds of projects like this, most of them happen in Japan. The problem is that none of those development groups ever work together. Instead, they all independently try to build the first real android. Aiko's inventor has come very far, but he'll need a lot of more funds and time to complete the project.

      His way of writing software is the same as that of many software companies: They try to keep the thing undocumented to make theft of source code futile. Instead, Aiko's inventor should open-source his effort, no matter how bad the code is. Other groups could benefit from his work. He could work with other groups to get some of their insights and knowledge. Sharing of information would get androids to market far quicker than all those isolated efforts.

  113. Sometimes the real thing sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some of the smart ones who can get laid, and have, learn pretty quickly just how demanding women can be.

    For a technician, technical maintenance is much less of a sacrifice than the level of emotional maintenance that many women seem to require (not to mention the added demands and expenses of child-raising).

    Once the technology is sufficiently advanced, the robot may actually be preferable to a human wife for many people who could have either.

  114. Why does an Asian guy need a robot wife? by tompaulco · · Score: 1

    Even the ugliest Asian guys still get hot asian chicks.

    --
    If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
  115. That's Ridiculous by Intrinsic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Inventor Le Trung must really like the book "The Stepford Wives," because he has built the dream of every lonely man without hope, a robot wife.

    Every man has a hope for a partner, they just need to get off their ass learn some new skills. Women are attracted to how you hold yourself and not by what you do or how good you look.. Well women worth dating that is.

  116. The switch to turn off your wife... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The switch to turn off your wife is located in your shower, silly. Don't turn the shower on to turn your wife off. It's like a text adventure puzzle.

  117. FTA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "She also recognises faces and speaks 13,000 sentences."
    Well once you configure her for sex, delete 5 of those sentences...
    "No baby, I'm not in the mood."
    "No baby, I have a headache."
    "I'm too tired, baby, maybe tomorrow night though."
    "You missed a spot... when you were deleting your history today, what do you think?"
    "I have chosen a superior interface device to replace you. *pulls out a vibrator* "

  118. I bet most of them have shagged their pets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know I have

  119. The REAL story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't believe the tripe from the Sun... Might as well read the Enquirer.

    Here's the REAL story:

    http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20081211.wrobot11/BNStory/Technology/home

  120. I was going to comment, but... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 1

    What the hell just happened to /.'s comment page?

    I've got a tiny block to write in!

    Is /. fucking around with the interface again or is this another example of Mozilla's piss-ant QA for Firefox 3.0.4 running on openSUSE 11.0?

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
  121. News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters!! by lisabeeren · · Score: 1

    News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters!! wtf is this doing in idle?!

    1. Re:News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters!! by flnca · · Score: 1

      Some people apparently don't believe this is real. They'll be purchasing their robots from Wal-Mart instead of getting involved.

  122. Forget Sex, does she clean ? by DirtyFly · · Score: 1

    with the touch I get with women , I bet that the first ting she would learn was toomplaint about my misplaced socks !

  123. very interesting by arrisweb · · Score: 1

    very interesting, but for what ?

    1. Re:very interesting by flnca · · Score: 1

      Yeah, what do we need trillion dollar industries for?

  124. I wish I thought you were being sarcastic. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NB.

  125. Futurama - Don't Date Robots - the Space pope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.videosift.com/video/Futurama-Dont-Date-Robots

    1. Re:Futurama - Don't Date Robots - the Space pope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.milkandcookies.com/link/89476/detail/

  126. Robot wives by twosat · · Score: 1

    I am surprised that noone has mentioned the cult sci-fi movie "Cherry 2000" about an android partner.

  127. Slashdot misogyny yet again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Commenters here don't even consider that a spouse is not the same as a servant.

    Excuse me, slave. Servants are paid.

  128. Nah... by denzacar · · Score: 1

    I prefer females with pulse and body temperature irrelevant of the room temperature.

    their site has now been slashdotted.

    He sure did get a lot of publicity though...

    From the crowd that eagerly awaits the first remotely marketable model.

    --
    Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
  129. I called that one by Zoko+Siman · · Score: 1

    I saw the headline before I saw the photograph and my first thought was "I bet some Asian guy made that."

    Imagine my surprise when I saw the photograph....

  130. Can we build robot husbands? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The benefits are endless - won't gamble money away, no roving eye, won't bother you for sex when you're in the death throes of a particularly deep sleep, fixes everything around the house when you ask for it to be done not years later, never have to repeat yourself, won't hit on your friends unless you enjoy it, won't complain about money, won't clutter up the living space with junk, may probably be the better cook and provide you with nutritious home cooked meals, won't mind driving you around all over for errands and such, could be programmed for defense (excellent for security), if sexually functional, no biological surprises and always functional, no gross body odors, no baldness unless you like that feature, nor excess body hair (especially that weirdness from the ears again unless you like that feature), doesn't play stereo or tele at deafening decibels, never ages, never gains weight, and if they could include a solar panel to recharge the necessary "pocket rocket" we have a green technology people!

    inventors work on it!

  131. (in a Scottish burr)... by A+New+Normalcy · · Score: 1

    ... I can't do it Honey, I haven't got enough power!

    --
    ...Lorenzo / I'm into kinky crustaceans. I just discovered internet praWn.
  132. Where are the constructive critisms? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. Who knew a bunch of wannabe nerds could be so judgmental. From the majority of the responses thus far, first thing on a lot of people mind is SEX. Think about it. Is it practical for him to build the body or buy a sex doll and modify to suit his purpose. Get off the porn site and start thinking about AI and mechanic of the designs and you'll start to appreciate what this ONE guy has created. Of course a healthy dose of skepticism is good for the community but negativity does not help anyone.

  133. Realdoll Partnership by peetm · · Score: 1

    Imagine what a creation he might make in conjunction with Realdoll

    --
    @peetm
  134. Anyone else here thinking of Warren? by danielsfca2 · · Score: 1
  135. Tag Misleading by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy is actually in Ontario, in Brampton. Winter is long, cold and boring up here.

  136. Idle is pants by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    The
    weird
    indentation
    makes
    the
    replies
    look
    like
    this
    and
    it's
    very
    irritating
    to
    read!

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  137. Looks like a sex doll... by gevantry · · Score: 1

    This "robotic" wife looks suspiciously like the "lifelike" sex dolls one can find advertised in the pages of Japanese comic books.

  138. The Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello Cherry 2000

  139. As The Simpsons predicted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a woman with an on/off switch.

  140. Take a look at my girlfriend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    She's the only one I got (She's a robot)
    Not much of a girlfriend
    I never seem to get a lot (She's a robot)