And the headline is self-contradictory. If there's a leak, then the container obiously doesn't hold. See also nuclear apologists' arguments that Fuckupshima was a non-lethal accident.
No, start with the Hebrew bible and continue from there, via christianity, especially through the writings of the doctors of the church and popes in times of great wars in Europe and Levant.
It doesn't really, in strict sense, although one might by an honest mistake simplify it thus, exist, but rather, in a word, it is not non-existent. So to understand it better you have to exclude things it's not supposed to be diffrent from. I hope that clarifies things.
No. You just need to know physics. A sufficiently long vertical tunnel fed with water from a river will generate the required power. You're always converting potential energy of water into electricity, so the maximum sustainable output will be proportional to river flow and height of the tunnel. No dams required.
But even in worst-case scenario a catastrophic failure of a solar panel or wind turbine is limited to an acre or two. Compare that to say, Fuckupshima.
They're close to losing control over their own country, either because the population is rising up (unlikely here) or because they're out of resources because they've built a state system filled with people used to divert state resources to personal ends (very likely the case here).
This won't end well, as it will force China and the US into a confrontation when the cleanup happens.
I'm lost... Why are you calling the U.S. a communist dictatorship?
Slashdot Mirror
No Linux distro on the planet uses the stock kernel.
Slackware uses/can use vanilla kernel. Also, LFS.
Well, that's proprietary software for you. I mean capitalism. I mean exploitation.
Because Debian uses stable packages.
FTFY. Security updates are always current.
Ubuntu is spyware. And it's VERY UNSTABLE and UNRELIABLE.
Look at the headline. Much ado about Israel. Got it now, dimwit?
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hyperbole
The noise is well-focused.
You can see whom I was replying to by clicking "Parent."
Of course lack of situational awareness is only a small part of your communication problem.
Oh, boy! You're so perfectly above and beyond! My, my.
No. Greasemonkey/filter. KTHXBAI.
And the headline is self-contradictory. If there's a leak, then the container obiously doesn't hold. See also nuclear apologists' arguments that Fuckupshima was a non-lethal accident.
No, start with the Hebrew bible and continue from there, via christianity, especially through the writings of the doctors of the church and popes in times of great wars in Europe and Levant.
There was no opportunity at all for negotiations.
There were many years of opportunities to avoid that attack (if it was in fact from outside).
Indiana Jones IV The Fate of Atlantis - very replayable.
It doesn't really, in strict sense, although one might by an honest mistake simplify it thus, exist, but rather, in a word, it is not non-existent. So to understand it better you have to exclude things it's not supposed to be diffrent from. I hope that clarifies things.
The reason why it hasn't caught on earlier is that it's discriminatory.
On the contrary. It's logical and objective. It's not aimed against anyone. It's reasonable.
No. You just need to know physics. A sufficiently long vertical tunnel fed with water from a river will generate the required power. You're always converting potential energy of water into electricity, so the maximum sustainable output will be proportional to river flow and height of the tunnel. No dams required.
How about a new water reservoir?
Doeasn't this mean that easily scalable sources/designs win? Like say, solar/wind?
They would not have built them, if they didn't make financial sense...
They don't. About the bribes though...
New designs use up nearly all the fuel and very little waste is left over.
And they are being deployed by thousands worldwide. Yeah, right.
Nuclear Energy is dangerous, it produces a lot of hazardous wastes.
And solar doesn't?
Not in this scale. Worlds easier to recycle/reprocess. And it's less risky when scaled into ZWhs.
They're not impact-free.
But even in worst-case scenario a catastrophic failure of a solar panel or wind turbine is limited to an acre or two. Compare that to say, Fuckupshima.
They're close to losing control over their own country, either because the population is rising up (unlikely here) or because they're out of resources because they've built a state system filled with people used to divert state resources to personal ends (very likely the case here).
This won't end well, as it will force China and the US into a confrontation when the cleanup happens.
I'm lost... Why are you calling the U.S. a communist dictatorship?
COST =/= PRICE