I do agree with your points; I just see too many people moaning over how they cant stand the wo/man they married or how hard it is to leave when after a little bit of questioning reveals that they got married when they only knew each other for 6 months. I maybe a little bit weird but vowing to spend the rest of my life with someone is not something any rational or sane person should do if they've only known each other for 6 months, hell a years is not enough time in my opinion. It really irritates me to see someone complain about the situation they got themselves into with almost no forethought.
Sorry to bring in my own personal disgust for those who jump right into the deep end.
then, i postulate, those people who believe such got into the situation knowing full well what would happen. people who delude themselves and then cry for help do not seem to elicit sympathy from me. call me cold hearted, i guess.
not to be argumentative but i can not think of any relationship that i know of that became abusive after people got married, wouldn't the better solution be to not get married to someone who is abusive?
It would be more formidable with civilian computers, I would imagine that most govt computer systems are going through choke points to limit attack vectors. That should mean limited attack vectors out as well. You would get more distributed with civilian computer systems.
I'm Surprised that they are not doing this already. That begs the question, who's computers would host the bots? Patriotic Americans who allow the govt to install software on their machine to attack the enemy is all well and good but what happens when the alphabet soup figures out that the govt has software on most of America's PC's?
I wonder how this waar will develop in the coming months, will it lead to real hostilities or just peter out? open hostilities, akin to waar, should be taken seriously. I am beginning to wonder if cyber space is going to be the battle ground where there are very few real consequences and as such hostilities there escalate at an alarming rate.
I know I'm just nitpicking but is all that applicable to the version of Exchange that the administration is using? cause but the way the article reads one gets the impression that it was done in 2003, a good many years before Exchange 2007 was released.
I'm sure you meant to copypasta from the help file of an earlier Exchange faq.
on the bright side, if you did put PLEASE HACK ME in flashing red letters at the top of the form you'd figure out where you security is lacking pretty fast. ^_^
I'm pretty sure that 99.9% of Life Insurance policies have a Suicide clause. Otherwise if you thought that to get your family 1 million you could off yourself for just a onetime payment of whatever the going rates for human life is now.
actually some time in the 6th century bc some nice men in robes in greece measured the world to with in a few hundred miles of its actual circumference, and they knew and proved the world is round. that whole flat earth thing was will full ignorance foisted upon the people by a overbearing church.
Stalin changed the course of human history. So did Alexander the Great. As did Socrates. Mohammad changed the world. And so did this guy who became the Buddah. Consider that the vast majority of humans on planet earth do not believe in that humble man who changed the Roman Empire(I'm not sure how thats such a large deal, Caesar changed Rome as well). I find it silly to say that Christ changed the Roman Empire, Atila the Hun torn down the Roman empire which had a far greater affect upon the western world and ushered the dark ages. It takes a narrow view to see the changes brought about by just one man and refuse to see that he is but one part of a much much larger tapestry which is human history, which is a smaller part, infinitesimally smaller part, of the history of the universe.
i think its a far stretch from mathematical curiosity to "kookdom"; even with no real applications of non euclidean geometry no one could contest the validity of it, and it had passed rigorous inspection as to its validity. on the other hand you have a theory that can not be tested or disproved, ever. holding onto a theory where there can be no validation nor falsification is not science.
If I am being billed for each individual packet them when I am reading/. does that mean I am paying my ISP to deliver ads to me?, i'm not sure that I should pay someone to view their ads. Also what happens if some script kiddy takes over my computer and uses it to send out a few million emails of spam. Who is liable for that? Me? Or the hacker in Russia? What happens if some one decides to DDOS me ? How is that metered?
Am I to pay for every Packet that is inbound to me? I can not control who sends what to me. If someone wants to flood my connection with packets then am I honestly to be charged for that? How can they ISP tell the difference between packets I request and Packets that are just being sent to me from some yahoo in china?
When you can solve those problems I might listen to your proposal for metering the internet usage by amount downloaded.
Here Here! I fully agree on both the assessment of Lynch's Dune v SciFi's and Kubrick's The Shining v whatever-horrible-miniseries-that-i-could-not-stand. Just as in with video games you have to sacrifice some realism to make the game fun so too while directing a movie it may be better to go a different route with certain aspects of the translation. Keep to the spirit as best as you can but some things will never translate well. something that comes to mind is Red Dragon by Thomas Harris, the most recent version of it was very well done, it lacked the Dragon's voice in the guy's head (sorry its been a long while since i've read this one) which should have been included however how does one visually show what happens when the fakes suicide in front of the blind girl? how do you visually describe what she felt as she was running her hands over him and finally reaches the face (or lack there of)? some things really do not translate well.
I agree, the time constraints are just too much for something like dune. I personally loved the David Lynch version of it, it may not have been the more perfect adaptation and it does leave out a lot, but the feel of the movie and the acting is, at least to me, far superior to that of the mini series. there was, to me, something just a bit off in the mini series. I was happy that they were able to take their time with the story but it just felt off. The book is far superior to either version. hopefully this next telling will be the best version yet.
you all is a bit broad, not every american had a hand in putting those who have consistently striped away the rights of americans. some of us have done their best to advocate for those rights in spite of the cowering masses who think that giving up their right to speak their mind, think how they want to think and believe what they want to believe will somehow guarantee themselves a safe and happy life. I wish I lived in a state like New Hampshire that has the gusto to proclaim together some of the ideals of this country. it's on every single one of their license plates.
I always wondered by over throwing ones own government always means that one must defeat its military. my thought would be that using arms must be a last resort to over throwing the government. only when a government is so corrupt and so resistant to change that trying to work within the constitution does not work, or if in fact the constitution is ignored, then one must take arms against this rogue government that seeks to impose tyranny upon its people. it is not for any other government to help us with this should the situation in the US ever come to that point. it is not for us to give liberty to the peoples of any other nation. if you do not earn your liberty then you will not believe in it, you will not value it, you will not defend it; it will disappear as soon as those who gave it to you leave.
given that, i don't mean to be discriminatory here but i maybe vulgar, some crazy religious fanatics(or crazy communists in vietnam) in a desert can give our mighty war machine such a run for its own money and cost it so dearly, if those who pay the paychecks of those who fight cease to pay them, and start fighting them and bringing them with in the ranks of those who dissent, then you can fight on a fair ground.
i can not seriously believe that if the country is so far gone that it comes to arms that the whole of the military will comply with their orders from above to fire on Citizens. some will choose to do so, but all will not.
Slashdot Mirror
wait, its not?? NNOOO!!!
I do agree with your points; I just see too many people moaning over how they cant stand the wo/man they married or how hard it is to leave when after a little bit of questioning reveals that they got married when they only knew each other for 6 months. I maybe a little bit weird but vowing to spend the rest of my life with someone is not something any rational or sane person should do if they've only known each other for 6 months, hell a years is not enough time in my opinion. It really irritates me to see someone complain about the situation they got themselves into with almost no forethought.
Sorry to bring in my own personal disgust for those who jump right into the deep end.
then, i postulate, those people who believe such got into the situation knowing full well what would happen. people who delude themselves and then cry for help do not seem to elicit sympathy from me. call me cold hearted, i guess.
not to be argumentative but i can not think of any relationship that i know of that became abusive after people got married, wouldn't the better solution be to not get married to someone who is abusive?
It would be more formidable with civilian computers, I would imagine that most govt computer systems are going through choke points to limit attack vectors. That should mean limited attack vectors out as well. You would get more distributed with civilian computer systems.
I'm Surprised that they are not doing this already. That begs the question, who's computers would host the bots? Patriotic Americans who allow the govt to install software on their machine to attack the enemy is all well and good but what happens when the alphabet soup figures out that the govt has software on most of America's PC's?
I wonder how this waar will develop in the coming months, will it lead to real hostilities or just peter out? open hostilities, akin to waar, should be taken seriously. I am beginning to wonder if cyber space is going to be the battle ground where there are very few real consequences and as such hostilities there escalate at an alarming rate.
I wish I had mod points. You Sir, I tip my hat to you. Damned funny. It's much to hard to stop laughing.
I know I'm just nitpicking but is all that applicable to the version of Exchange that the administration is using? cause but the way the article reads one gets the impression that it was done in 2003, a good many years before Exchange 2007 was released.
I'm sure you meant to copypasta from the help file of an earlier Exchange faq.
on the bright side, if you did put PLEASE HACK ME in flashing red letters at the top of the form you'd figure out where you security is lacking pretty fast. ^_^
I'm pretty sure that 99.9% of Life Insurance policies have a Suicide clause. Otherwise if you thought that to get your family 1 million you could off yourself for just a onetime payment of whatever the going rates for human life is now.
HELP!! HELP!! I'm being repressed!
sorry, it was the first thing that passed through my head.
actually some time in the 6th century bc some nice men in robes in greece measured the world to with in a few hundred miles of its actual circumference, and they knew and proved the world is round. that whole flat earth thing was will full ignorance foisted upon the people by a overbearing church.
Stalin changed the course of human history. So did Alexander the Great. As did Socrates. Mohammad changed the world. And so did this guy who became the Buddah. Consider that the vast majority of humans on planet earth do not believe in that humble man who changed the Roman Empire(I'm not sure how thats such a large deal, Caesar changed Rome as well). I find it silly to say that Christ changed the Roman Empire, Atila the Hun torn down the Roman empire which had a far greater affect upon the western world and ushered the dark ages. It takes a narrow view to see the changes brought about by just one man and refuse to see that he is but one part of a much much larger tapestry which is human history, which is a smaller part, infinitesimally smaller part, of the history of the universe.
i think its a far stretch from mathematical curiosity to "kookdom"; even with no real applications of non euclidean geometry no one could contest the validity of it, and it had passed rigorous inspection as to its validity. on the other hand you have a theory that can not be tested or disproved, ever. holding onto a theory where there can be no validation nor falsification is not science.
I imagine that Ballmer is quite happy with ISO plugging their ears and going "La la la" I mean thats gotta feel pretty good.
If I am being billed for each individual packet them when I am reading /. does that mean I am paying my ISP to deliver ads to me?, i'm not sure that I should pay someone to view their ads. Also what happens if some script kiddy takes over my computer and uses it to send out a few million emails of spam. Who is liable for that? Me? Or the hacker in Russia? What happens if some one decides to DDOS me ? How is that metered?
Am I to pay for every Packet that is inbound to me? I can not control who sends what to me. If someone wants to flood my connection with packets then am I honestly to be charged for that? How can they ISP tell the difference between packets I request and Packets that are just being sent to me from some yahoo in china?
When you can solve those problems I might listen to your proposal for metering the internet usage by amount downloaded.
Don't forget "Dead Alive" or "BrainDead" depending on where your from.
"I Kick Ass for the LORD!"
GO GO KUNG FU ZOMBIE PRIEST!
Here Here! I fully agree on both the assessment of Lynch's Dune v SciFi's and Kubrick's The Shining v whatever-horrible-miniseries-that-i-could-not-stand. Just as in with video games you have to sacrifice some realism to make the game fun so too while directing a movie it may be better to go a different route with certain aspects of the translation. Keep to the spirit as best as you can but some things will never translate well. something that comes to mind is Red Dragon by Thomas Harris, the most recent version of it was very well done, it lacked the Dragon's voice in the guy's head (sorry its been a long while since i've read this one) which should have been included however how does one visually show what happens when the fakes suicide in front of the blind girl? how do you visually describe what she felt as she was running her hands over him and finally reaches the face (or lack there of)? some things really do not translate well.
I agree, the time constraints are just too much for something like dune. I personally loved the David Lynch version of it, it may not have been the more perfect adaptation and it does leave out a lot, but the feel of the movie and the acting is, at least to me, far superior to that of the mini series. there was, to me, something just a bit off in the mini series. I was happy that they were able to take their time with the story but it just felt off. The book is far superior to either version. hopefully this next telling will be the best version yet.
how very true, sad and true
you all is a bit broad, not every american had a hand in putting those who have consistently striped away the rights of americans. some of us have done their best to advocate for those rights in spite of the cowering masses who think that giving up their right to speak their mind, think how they want to think and believe what they want to believe will somehow guarantee themselves a safe and happy life. I wish I lived in a state like New Hampshire that has the gusto to proclaim together some of the ideals of this country. it's on every single one of their license plates.
I always wondered by over throwing ones own government always means that one must defeat its military. my thought would be that using arms must be a last resort to over throwing the government. only when a government is so corrupt and so resistant to change that trying to work within the constitution does not work, or if in fact the constitution is ignored, then one must take arms against this rogue government that seeks to impose tyranny upon its people. it is not for any other government to help us with this should the situation in the US ever come to that point. it is not for us to give liberty to the peoples of any other nation. if you do not earn your liberty then you will not believe in it, you will not value it, you will not defend it; it will disappear as soon as those who gave it to you leave.
given that, i don't mean to be discriminatory here but i maybe vulgar, some crazy religious fanatics(or crazy communists in vietnam) in a desert can give our mighty war machine such a run for its own money and cost it so dearly, if those who pay the paychecks of those who fight cease to pay them, and start fighting them and bringing them with in the ranks of those who dissent, then you can fight on a fair ground.
i can not seriously believe that if the country is so far gone that it comes to arms that the whole of the military will comply with their orders from above to fire on Citizens. some will choose to do so, but all will not.
Yes, its why I chose the quote. You can not really argue intent of the text when you have an author of the text clarifying it.