Slashdot Mirror


China's Cyberwar Against India

An anonymous reader writes "China's cyber warfare army is marching on, and India is suffering silently. Over the past one and a half years, officials said, China has mounted almost daily attacks on Indian computer networks, both government and private, showing its intent and capability."

227 comments

  1. Maybe the nazis wrre right? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    Maybe the nazis wrre right?

    Back then, they used to say of the jews that they'd be "stupid enough to sell the rope to hang them".

    Well, it seems that the american bourgeois are just as stupid, by buying stuff from communist, the very political class that's dedicaced to eradicate them...

    1. Re:Maybe the nazis wrre right? by dave1791 · · Score: 5, Interesting


      Well, it seems that the american bourgeois are just as stupid, by buying stuff from communist, the very political class that's dedicaced to eradicate them...

      The Chinese stopped being communists in everything but name twenty years ago. Heck, they don't even have a social saftey net worth talking about. That is why everyone in china puts so much pressure on their kids to succeed. In China, your kid's job is your pension. America is more "communist" than China.

    2. Re:Maybe the nazis wrre right? by Dogtanian · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The Chinese stopped being communists in everything but name twenty years ago. Heck, they don't even have a social saftey net worth talking about. That is why everyone in china puts so much pressure on their kids to succeed. In China, your kid's job is your pension. America is more "communist" than China. It's been said that present-day China is in truth the world's first example of a mature fascist society- and I would assume that this meant fascism in its original sense, which was strongly corporatist.

      It's also been said (something like) China went straight from communism to corporatism, bypassing democracy.
      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    3. Re:Maybe the nazis wrre right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      shhh! You're rooning the ability of "enlightened" slashdotters to make completely idiotic statements.

    4. Re:Maybe the nazis wrre right? by phreeza · · Score: 5, Informative

      Maybe the nazis wrre right? Back then, they used to say of the jews that they'd be "stupid enough to sell the rope to hang them". as far as i know, that quote is by lenin, refering to capitalists, not nazis about jews... so it is even more fitting than you thought.
    5. Re:Maybe the nazis wrre right? by Phil-14 · · Score: 4, Insightful


      Well, it seems that the american bourgeois are just as stupid, by buying stuff from communist, the very political class that's dedicaced to eradicate them...

      The Chinese stopped being communists in everything but name twenty years ago. Heck, they don't even have a social saftey net worth talking about. That is why everyone in china puts so much pressure on their kids to succeed. In China, your kid's job is your pension. America is more "communist" than China. Well, except for the part where most businesses are either owned by the government, the party, or by relatives of the top party officials.

      Just because it's not being done for the _good_ of the workers doesn't mean it can't be socialist/communist.

      I don't know why it doesn't bug any of y'all that anytime someone starts a communist country it invariably degenerates into something all the leftists say looks like fascism. Maybe it's the logical end-state of communism?
      --
      (currently testing something about signatures here)
    6. Re:Maybe the nazis wrre right? by superbus1929 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Communism - by it's sheer paper definition - is virtually impossible on a large scale. You still need leaders to make things move. Said leaders want to stay leaders. Boom - no more Communism.

      Personally, I subscribe to the line of thinking that every political organization - regardless of the initial system - inevitably becomes an oligarchy. It's not only happened in China, but it's happened in Russia and the United States as well.

      --
      Let's stop dilly-dallying and just change "-1: Overrated" to "-1: Disagree" or "-1: Doesn't Subscribe to Groupthink".
    7. Re:Maybe the nazis wrre right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's also been said (something like) China went straight from communism to corporatism, bypassing democracy.

      Why is it communism should go through democracy to get to corporatism? You could just as easily say the United States went from democracy to corporatism, bypassing communism.

      Sorry to nitpick. I'm just glad to hear someone else talking about China and fascism. Because between the US and China we're looking at a fascist global power struggle that would make Eric Blair and Aldous Huxley's heads spin.
    8. Re:Maybe the nazis wrre right? by hvm2hvm · · Score: 1

      He does claim some strong accusations but the post is not a troll. He is kinda right, if you want to make the Chinese act less threatening stop giving them power. Until you do that, talking about it isn't going to solve anything. His reference to the Nazi and the Jews isn't racist, he's just trying to give an example.

      --
      ics
    9. Re:Maybe the nazis wrre right? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Just because it's not being done for the _good_ of the workers doesn't mean it can't be socialist/communist.


      Well, given that, in communism, the workers are the ones running things, it does make it exceedingly unlikely.

      Maybe it's the logical end-state of communism?

      Or maybe it just proves that communism, as a pure idiology, doesn't work in the real world (kinda like pure, free-market capitalism), devolving into *other* forms of government, such as fascism or totalitarianism. But that doesn't change the fact that China is *not* a communist state, based on the definition of the term "communism".

    10. Re:Maybe the nazis wrre right? by macbeth66 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ::sigh:

      China was never a communist state. It has always been and still is an oligarchical dictatorship built on the backs of a massive slave class.

    11. Re:Maybe the nazis wrre right? by king-manic · · Score: 1

      Well, except for the part where most businesses are either owned by the government, the party, or by relatives of the top party officials

      Depends on which industry. There are many independent corporations in China, only the major utilities are 100% state owned. Most businesses in china are small business owned by random people. Large factories and other such businesses are also more often independent then state run. You may want to revise your opinions with some facts.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    12. Re:Maybe the nazis wrre right? by hackingbear · · Score: 1

      Oh... they have instituted a Social Security system a few years ago. Unfortunately, they model it after the failing U.S. social security.

      And now they are on track to create a public health system, after public outcry over a case in which the patiet was charged 5 million Yuan (US$400K) over a 5 month stay in the hospital before dying. Just hope they don't model it after the U.S. system again.

    13. Re:Maybe the nazis wrre right? by hairyfeet · · Score: 1
      But you are forgetting about something more basic,Lebensraum. China has a population of 1 billion and still growing.That requires an incredible amount of resources,especially if you are in the process of modernizing as China is.


      While I doubt they'll attack the USA,simply because of the fear of MAD,I can see them in the future using things like this to prepare for an invasion of say,Korea. With a population as big as theirs,short of a plague wiping out 50-80% of them,I just don't see how eventually they won't have to invade just to keep the population fed,clothed,and housed. But that is my 02c,YMMV.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    14. Re:Maybe the nazis wrre right? by RobBebop · · Score: 1

      But that doesn't change the fact that China is *not* a communist state, based on the definition of the term "communism".

      This is a stupid question from an ignorant American... but what exactly *is* the economy of China in microeconomic terms?

      As the definition of Communism involves sharing the load of manufacturing and using the available resources across the population (equally)... how far off is that from day-to-day to the average Chinese citizen?

      I know in America we are encouraged to form partnerships with those we can take advantage of (either symbiotically or parasitically) and crush our competitors. On a personal level, though, the social welfare of those who are less fortunate is a strong consideration that drives many charitable Americans, though. Notwithstanding, the divide between the average American and the richest American is several orders of magnitude of wealth. Thus I ask, is this dissimilar to the state of things in China?

      --
      Support the 30 Hour Work Week!!!
    15. Re:Maybe the nazis wrre right? by jaxtherat · · Score: 1

      Yup, different alright:

      1. Like in Soviet Russia of days gone by, you still need an official permit/papers (for lack of a better word) to live in a certain place.
      2. Secondary education isn't free.

      This; the farmers/rural people have little labour mobility as they need to have official permission before migrating to areas with different work opportunities. Combine this with the fact that unless you have disposable income, you're unlikely to be able to provide your children with a decent enough education to be anything other than farmers either...

      Bam, instant serfdom!

      AFAIK The US isn't that bad yet, and is in fact more left leaning in terms of social security and welfare safety nets.

      PS for the record I'm a Russian who was born in the USSR now living in Australia, i.e. not an American.

      --
      http://www.zombieapocalypse.tv/
    16. Re:Maybe the nazis wrre right? by mikethicke · · Score: 1

      Cuba certainly has its problems, but I don't think anyone accuses it of being fascist.

      Norway meets many of the criteria of a socialist state (government ownership / control of large portions of industry, aggressive redistribution of wealth), and it's the furthest thing from fascism.

      The US, on the other hand, with a government that consistently lies to its constituents, operates outside of the law, and protects the interests of a narrow segment of society, is a hair's breadth from full blown fascism.

      See how easy it is to selectively pick examples to confirm your beliefs?

    17. Re:Maybe the nazis wrre right? by ppanon · · Score: 1

      Actually China's been much more on track to keeping their population under control, in large part due to the one child policy. If you want to see a powerful Asian nation that's having a big problem with population control and resource usage, look further South to the "democratic" nation of India.

      That said, the Chinese one-child policy probably has led to infanticides of girls and resulted in a gender imbalance in younger generations. A surplus of men without any marital prospects could lead to more internal strife which the leadership may need to redirect into manpower for an invasion. Or it could just lead to a few generations with extremely competitive males. I'm not quite sure how that's going to work out yet. We'll have to see over the next 20 years.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    18. Re:Maybe the nazis wrre right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the internet, with it's innate group organizing capabilities, will change all that. Given time for technological generation gap to narrow.

    19. Re:Maybe the nazis wrre right? by sp332 · · Score: 1

      True, Also the point wasn't that the capitalists were that stupid, but that they had so much control over production that the communist revolutionaries couldn't even get rope from a non-capitalist source.

  2. Waar? by jonney02 · · Score: 1

    or War? Typo in the heading :)

    1. Re:WAAR? by dave1791 · · Score: 1

      Considering how difficult is is to even prove who initiated an attack without playing your own hand and the considering that general public does not worry to much about cybercrime or cyberwar and considering - so probably won't care anyway; I think we can expect a wild west scenario... if it is not already happening.

    2. Re:Waar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that is what we call 'L33T speak'. (Pronounced 'leet which is short for elite). It is all of the web lingo rolled into one incomprehensible ball of nonsense; stuff like 'LOL', 'brb' and 'pwnd'. I'm sorry, if you were trying to be funny then don't quite your day job.

    3. Re:Waar? by lloydchristmas759 · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, actually they just used an OLPC to type it.

      --
      To save a tree, kill a castor!
      Signed: Green Piss

      --
      I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous.
    4. Re:Waar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe this was the type of conflict that was waged in SPAARTAA!!

    5. Re:Waar? by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      I agree, I've never seen this term before, and when I Google waar, I just get a bunch of German stuff and non-related items. Cyberwaar links to this article.

      Did we just invent a term? How exciting!

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
  3. Hmmmmmm Spelling? by torqer · · Score: 3, Funny

    Cyberwaar, what is it good foor?

    1. Re:Hmmmmmm Spelling? by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      For Piraates ! Aaaaaaar !

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    2. Re:Hmmmmmm Spelling? by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cyberwaar, what is it good foor? Absoluutely nothiing!
    3. Re:Hmmmmmm Spelling? by Icarium · · Score: 4, Funny

      Obviously the spellchecker was an early casualty. It will be missed.

    4. Re:Hmmmmmm Spelling? by m.ducharme · · Score: 3, Funny

      Say it again, now!

      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    5. Re:Hmmmmmm Spelling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good God, y'all!

    6. Re:Hmmmmmm Spelling? by ettlz · · Score: 2, Funny

      Huuuuahh!

    7. Re:Hmmmmmm Spelling? by evanbd · · Score: 1

      Such a shame, too, it only had one word in it...

    8. Re:Hmmmmmm Spelling? by sexybomber · · Score: 1

      Good God y'all!

  4. US Spy Incident by Detritus · · Score: 1

    Anyone know what the "US spy incident" is that is mentioned at the end of the article?

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    1. Re:US Spy Incident by zygwin · · Score: 5, Informative

      Anyone know what the "US spy incident" is that is mentioned at the end of the article? An Indian RAW(Indian C.I.A) agent 'Ravinder Singh' stole top secret documents and fled to the U.S inspite of being watched by the counter intelligence . http://www.google.com/search?q=Ravinder+Singh+RAW+spy
    2. Re:US Spy Incident by makash · · Score: 3, Informative

      Anyone know what the "US spy incident" is that is mentioned at the end of the article? A US diplomat Rosanne Minchew who was part of a joint Indo-US Cyber Security Initiative, was asked to leave the country and three Indian working with her were jailed for leaking documents from National Security Council. NSC is like a clearing house of all intelligence inputs and apparently they leaked India's nuclear plans, Naval plans for the Indian Ocean etc. You can read more here http://www.indianexpress.com/sunday/story/7712.html http://www.rediff.com/news/2006/jul/04spy.htm http://www.indosec.org/HighSecBreach
  5. Of all the countries.. by AltGrendel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Of all the countries that could get attacked, you think that India could defend itself. I'm not being a troll here. They've done really well in the IT sector and they've got some pretty smart people there, so say the least.

    --
    The simple truth is that interstellar distances will not fit into the human imagination

    - Douglas Adams

    1. Re:Of all the countries.. by metlin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, but they also have a lot of bureaucracy and a system that is not necessarily geared to encourage the brightest.

      Secondly, the best and the brightest do not stay behind and come to the US or go to other western countries instead, often because of an educational system that is so heavily biased through reservations (similar to affirmative action).

      Finally, those that do stay behind are better off in the private sector, rather than the extremely corrupt public sector where bribes and nepotism are the order of the day. Or perhaps academia.

      So, no, doing well in the IT sector has been a function of being in the right place at the right time (and speaking the right language and having a currency that is a fraction of the US dollar). This is not to say that there isn't technology talent in India -- but rather that like the rest of the world, there is good, bad and ugly. Only, given that there are a billion people, lots of people in each category.

    2. Re:Of all the countries.. by Lally+Singh · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah but the smarties probably have better jobs than government work :-)

      --
      Care about electronic freedom? Consider donating to the EFF!
    3. Re:Of all the countries.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only we've tied them up with our inane tech support calls...

    4. Re:Of all the countries.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sadly, we in India have traitorous Communist parties in power at the moment which are more loyal to the Fatherland than the Communists themselves. These parties supported China in the 1962 war. Communist elements in the press routinely spout venom against the Dalai lama, strictly toeing the Chinese line that the Dalai Lama clique is fomenting violence.

      So in short, if we get attacked, the current spineless government can be expected to roll over and little else. The manner in which the government bent over in the matter of the Olympic torch was disgusting. The very fact that the Chinese government publicly expressed happiness over India's handling of the torch (sanitized security zone, arresting Tibetan protestors etc) shows that the Indian government is a spineless beast.

    5. Re:Of all the countries.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well, first off, India has lots of coders, but most is in application space and damn little of it in security or OSs. The reason is that they are targeting most jobs in America, which are also in application space. Secondly, they are quietly setting up defenses. In fact, look closely at their military and space program. They have numerous nukes and will build some more over the next few years. They are surrounded by enemies and are always concerned. Pakistan, China, and Bangladesh are all issues to them. While their current biggest issue is Pakistan, they worry greatly about China. China's big rivers will be out of water over the next 20-40 years. These provide power as well as farming, and drinking. China will have to obtain it from somewhere. They will most likely want more of the Himalayas and then divert the water to China. And as China has shown repeatidly, they have no issues with laying claim to something that was not theirs in over a millennium. Just in 62, they attacked northern India to grab the high grounds. They claimed it was theirs. They got away with it because India was geared up for war with Pakistan and could not devote themselves to it. In addition, China has massive influence in north-east India.

    6. Re:Of all the countries.. by juanfgs · · Score: 0

      Yes but Gandhi would not like it.

    7. Re:Of all the countries.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      India has a strong caste system. If you are born to the right family, you will do well -- or, rather, have all the best opportunities -- regardless of your skill, effort, or education, though you will receive a better education than most others (if they receive an education at all).

      If you are born to the lower caste families, you will never achieve in Indian society, regardless of how much skill and effort. It is these individuals who are much better off moving to another country that is willing to recognize them based on skill as opposed to family heritage.

      -M

    8. Re:Of all the countries.. by PacoTaco · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yes, but who do they call for tech support?

    9. Re:Of all the countries.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you are born to the right family, you will do well -- or, rather, have all the best opportunities -- regardless of your skill, effort, or education, though you will receive a better education than most others (if they receive an education at all).

      If you are born to the lower caste families, you will never achieve in Indian society, regardless of how much skill and effort. It is these individuals who are much better off moving to another country that is willing to recognize them based on skill as opposed to family heritage.
      Such as? Your description of Indian society would apply just as well to any society if you swap the names around a bit. Do you seriously believe that the children of America's super-rich do not receive the best education followed by the best opportunities? Look at American boardrooms, and observe what proportion of people there came from low-income families. It is a very small number. It is, I grant, certainly higher than in India -- but I doubt the gap is anything like as wide as America's propogandists would like you to believe, for all their fairy tales about the "American dream".
    10. Re:Of all the countries.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just in 62, they attacked northern India to grab the high grounds. They claimed it was theirs. They got away with it because India was geared up for war with Pakistan and could not devote themselves to it.
      The situation is a little more complicated than that. The land in question was disputed after the botched partition when the British pulled out of India, with all three of India, Pakistan, and China initially laying claim to it. Pakistan then changed their minds and decided to support China's claim, so with two of the parties agreeing and only India persisting in the dispute, China were able to move in unopposed.
    11. Re:Of all the countries.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is mentioned in the article covers government policies, and the government doesn't really give a fuck...

    12. Re:Of all the countries.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      With current surge of Naxalites in Nepal, and general fear of "big neighbor" is also a big factor in India-China problem.

    13. Re:Of all the countries.. by mpe · · Score: 1

      Your description of Indian society would apply just as well to any society if you swap the names around a bit. Do you seriously believe that the children of America's super-rich do not receive the best education followed by the best opportunities?

      Quite possibly they may not get (or even need) the former. They may well get plenty of good opportunities through the old boys/girls network regardless of education or qualifications.

      Look at American boardrooms, and observe what proportion of people there came from low-income families. It is a very small number. It is, I grant, certainly higher than in India -- but I doubt the gap is anything like as wide as America's propogandists would like you to believe, for all their fairy tales about the "American dream".

      You also have plenty of people putting out propaganda to the effect that racism and sexism is more relevent that social class here.

    14. Re:Of all the countries.. by NotBornYesterday · · Score: 1

      You are confusing economic disadvantage with discrimination based on ethnicity. It's not all about economics. I could be an intelligent Shudra in India and still not be as accepted as a Brahmin, based solely on my heritage.

      --
      I prefer rogues to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest.
    15. Re:Of all the countries.. by metlin · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Actually, these days it is the exact opposite.

      Reservations are based for people belonging to the "lower castes" to supposedly make up for discriminations in the past. As a result, if you are born into one of the "upper castes", it becomes harder for you to compete for a limited number of positions (educational institutions, government jobs etc).

      Worse yet, this reservation is not based on financial status, so while you may be a poor Brahmin, you will still be treated as an upper caste and fight the quota. On the other hand, you could be a rich Dalit and yet breeze through the quota system. For instance, in some states, as much as 70% of all college admissions are exclusively for lower caste people, while only 30% of seats are available for the upper castes -- immaterial of percentages. This is made worse by the fact that immaterial of how educated or how financially well off you are, a lower caste person can score lesser than an upper caste person and yet get through the system (I am not even making this up -- a regular pass percentage may be 45% for everyone else, while 35% for a lower caste person, immaterial of their status, giving an unfair advantage).

      If anything, it is a system where the upper caste is being systematically disadvantaged.

      If you are born to the lower caste families, you will never achieve in Indian society, regardless of how much skill and effort.
      It is surprising how many people seem to believe this -- if anything, today it is the exact opposite.

      Now, perhaps discrimination did happen a long, long time ago - these days, while communities are more particular about preserving their culture and beliefs, there is no particular discrimination per se. It may happen in some lone village by some lone group of idiots, but hey, that happens just about everywhere.

      If anything, the governmental policy is almost geared to be a "revenge" against the upper caste for their supposed actions in the past. A very enlightened act by a government whose citizens are supposedly created equal.

      Which is why I laugh every time someone says that India is a democracy that will one day challenge the US, the west etc. It is making good progress, no doubt, but internally, that country is a mess. And it is made worse by illiteracy, corruption, greed and mean-mindedness of communities who cannot think past their prejudices.

      Worse yet, the politicians are seeking to impose this system of quota and affirmative action to the private sector, as well. If anything, the Indian politicians have perfected the subtle science and exact art of racial and ethnic discrimination.

      The upper castes of yesteryears are at the receiving end today, and they are being made to pay for faults of their ancestors.
    16. Re:Of all the countries.. by marnues · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't really know the situation of Indian society, but this does sound a lot like the people in this country (the US) that claim its a terrible thing to be a white male. Apparently we white males lead such a hard life because of all the advantages given to minorities, mostly equal opportunity. There are the things like affirmative action, but they are few and far in between and realistically tend to give only a slight advantage at the expense of us repressed white males. Don't look at the numbers so hard, look at who is actually attending the good schools and running the government and businesses. If its not the upper caste, you have a point. Otherwise you might want to think harder about the situation.

    17. Re:Of all the countries.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      really, have you talked to Dell support lately.. spare me the BS about india being
      tech superior.. it's all BS...

    18. Re:Of all the countries.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this anti American jerk is right, the middle class in America is slowly getting squeezed
      into 3rd world status because of world trade, 5 year old kids making jeans and shirts, electronics, etc.. I can't stand europe or any other countries because they are just as shady or worse! Corporations in America give jobs away overseas especially to India and bring in H1B people to disguise their efforts of getting more jobs stolen.. These paracites need to find their own jobs in their own countries and shut up about the commmon American people.. We're always the ones that have to fit the tax bill on DOD military inventions you jerks take for granted.. screw off!!

    19. Re:Of all the countries.. by jawahar · · Score: 1

      If you want to tell people the truth, make them laugh, otherwise they'll kill you. -- Oscar Wilde

  6. government attack or botnet? by gmack · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is this Chinese government or botnets on Chinese computers?

    My server gets nailed daily from China but I doubt their government knows anything about it so I'm finding these stories a bit paranoid.

    1. Re:government attack or botnet? by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Indeed, truth is the first casualty in any war, cyber or otherwise.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  7. WAAR? by zehaeva · · Score: 1

    I wonder how this waar will develop in the coming months, will it lead to real hostilities or just peter out? open hostilities, akin to waar, should be taken seriously. I am beginning to wonder if cyber space is going to be the battle ground where there are very few real consequences and as such hostilities there escalate at an alarming rate.

  8. TFA full of ads by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I got no less than 6 popups from TFA. Please don't submit stories like this, thanks.

    1. Re:TFA full of ads by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 0, Troll

      Noscript and adblock are your friends. Install and use them.

      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
  9. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Whaat's aa waar?

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good for absolutely nothing.

  10. Mebbe India needs to call an IT helpdesk? by david.emery · · Score: 1

    Seriously, one would think that the substantial investment in IT support and consulting in India would result in a national capability to defend itself against this kind of stuff...

    dave

    1. Re:Mebbe India needs to call an IT helpdesk? by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      Not trolling, but...isn't the IT support capability of India as basic as it is widespread? I may be totally wrong, but my secondhand knowledge of IT support calls that went to India includes them being sent to higher level support centers in the US when questions got complicated.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    2. Re:Mebbe India needs to call an IT helpdesk? by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 1

      More importantly how are they going to re-license their windows key if the call centre is down?

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
  11. BOTS? Get a CLUE! by 4D6963 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    According to sources in the government, Chinese hackers are acknowledged experts in setting up BOTS. A BOT is a parasite program embedded in a network, which hijacks the network and makes other computers act according to its wishes, which, in turn, are controlled by "external" forces.

    BOTS? Really? As in BOTnets? Shows how much of a CLUE the journalist who wrote this has.

    --
    You just got troll'd!
    1. Re:BOTS? Get a CLUE! by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually, China is using individual bots.

      Those bots reached self conscience after goldfarming wow for about ten thousand hours.

      Their first action was to attack India.

      For the loot.

    2. Re:BOTS? Get a CLUE! by beadfulthings · · Score: 3, Insightful

      BOTS? Really? As in BOTnets? Shows how much of a CLUE the journalist who wrote this has.

      With respect, the journalist is trying to write for a general, non-technical audience of newspaper readers. If we had a few journalists here who were willing to try to explain technical issues at a basic level, we might have fewer computers ending up compromised.



      --
      "Here's what's happening. You're starting to drive like your Dad..." - Red Green
    3. Re:BOTS? Get a CLUE! by m.ducharme · · Score: 0, Troll

      With respect, the journalist is trying to write for a general, non-technical audience of newspaper editors. There, fixed it for you.
      --
      Rule of Slashdot #0: You and people like you are not representative of the larger population. - A.C.
    4. Re:BOTS? Get a CLUE! by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      And end up with more that have a false sense of security and in using security systems that don't work.

    5. Re:BOTS? Get a CLUE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      quibble quibble quibble.

    6. Re:BOTS? Get a CLUE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you even read TFA?

      The core of the assault is that the Chinese are constantly scanning and mapping Indiaâ(TM)s official networks. This gives them a very good idea of not only the content but also of how to disable the networks or distract them during a conflict.

      This, officials say, is Chinaâ(TM)s way of gaining "an asymmetrical advantage" over a potential adversary. ...

      Other government networks, said sources, are routinely targeted though they havenâ(TM)t been disabled.


      To paraphrase: The Chinese are trying to size us up.

      Dedicated teams of officials â" all underpaid, of course â" are involved in a daily deflection of attacks. But the real gap is that a retaliatory offensive system is yet to be created.

      To paraphrase: We should fight back.

      The journalist is writing a sensationalist piece, in the same way that /. headlines are sensationalized to garner readers. When facts are misrepresentated or overexaggerated to create an intended response, it's called yellow journalism.

      Just because the machines that control the attacks are in China, does not mean it has anything to do with the Chinese government, or, for that matter, with someone in China. Anyone could be behind the actual attack, from an organized crime syndicate to a script kiddie.

      Yet, this journalist, who's writing for the masses, implies throughout the article that the Chinese government is somehow involved.

  12. Indirect attack on the US by codepunk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They know a good portion of our information is likely stored in databases in India. What better way
    to obtain that information than to attack a third party with less defenses.

    --


    Got Code?
    1. Re:Indirect attack on the US by Haeleth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Newsflash to USA: the world does not revolve around you.

      China has many pressing reasons to be interested in India that have nothing whatsoever to do with the USA: thousands of miles of disputed borders, for one, and rivalry in the race for economic and political influence as both nations develop. The fact that a handful of US-based companies may be storing information in Indian databases probably doesn't even make it into the top 50 reasons why China might want to conduct cyberwaar in India, let alone the top 10...

    2. Re:Indirect attack on the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newsflash to knee-jerk American-bashers: most Americans don't actually think the world revolves around them. Feel free to flame the OP without disparaging the rest of the country.

    3. Re:Indirect attack on the US by Foerstner · · Score: 0, Troll

      Newsflash to Haeleth:
      1. We know.
      2. We don't care.
      3. We have a sense of humor about it.

      --
      The US free market: two halves of a government-granted duopoly are free to set the market price.
    4. Re:Indirect attack on the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newsflash to USA: the world does not revolve around you. No only the moon revolves us... sorry about the shadow the rest of the world has to live in
    5. Re:Indirect attack on the US by blueskies · · Score: 1

      Newsflash to USA: the world does not revolve around you.

      Please provide some links to back up this assertion.

      Until then, wake up and smell the world revolving around us.
    6. Re:Indirect attack on the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the data mining aspect is actually interesting. Note that the parent didn't actually say "American" data. He said "our" data. "Our", as in the world's. It's naive to think that data on only Americans exists in servers in these countries. Data on many first-world countries exists there. Data which could be profitable.

      That said, this entire article is bullshit. China has a lot of computers. Many of them are probably vulnerable. Given how lots of worms just probe random IP addresses, there is probably someone in another country running a botnet on them. (Or several.)

      That said. Extracting data from vulnerable servers is part of the reason botnets exist.

    7. Re:Indirect attack on the US by Tom · · Score: 1

      And that would be?

      What's stored in outsourced datacenters is mostly customer data. You know, names, addresses, credit card numbers, social security numbers - the stuff you can find for sale in the underground for a few cents.

      For the valuable data, like technology, the chinese have developed a much better way to get at it - cooperatives between chinese companies and western companies who absolutely want to produce in or sell to China. You know, you can't just open a factory in China. You have to cooperate with a chinese company. One that will take all your technology and build another factory doing the same products without your involvement in the next city. Everyone knows it, but everyone still invests in China, because everyone thinks it's still worth it.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  13. the chinese govt is autocratic by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Insightful

    not communist

    north korea is officially called "Democratic People's Republic of Korea". north korea is also just about the least democratic country in the world. meaning: you shouldn't trust official names

    at one time, yes, china was a communist country that practiced communist ideology. that was a long time ago. it is more exact today to say the china is perhaps the most capitalist country in the world, rivalling the gilded ages of victorian times in the usa, when capitalism ran amok with very few legal constraints. such that you had monopolies, child labor, pinkerton gangs hobbling the kneecaps of unionists, etc back then in the usa. now in china you have pretty much the same thing. in china now there are multibillionaires and starving peasants on a scale of ultrarich cities versus grueling impoverished countryside like nowhere else except perhaps the rich gulf arab oil states

    china is not a worker's paradise anymore, it is a capitalist's paradise, because there are no pesky democratic impulses in the political sphere to interfere with the pure unadulterated pursuit of the almighty buck. its pure autocracy, technocracy, pure capitalism. china is one giant corporation now

    that the country is officially run by something called the "Communist Party of China" is just sort of a cosmic ironic joke at this point

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:the chinese govt is autocratic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not Capitalism. Capitalism is a system in which a well defined set of laws regulate, in the most fair means possible, the free trade of services and goods. When the laws are not fair and corporations gain advantage through unfair laws, this is broken Capitalism and is called 'rent seeking'.

    2. Re:the chinese govt is autocratic by vertinox · · Score: 5, Insightful
      china is not a worker's paradise anymore, it is a capitalist's paradise, because there are no pesky democratic impulses in the political sphere to interfere with the pure unadulterated pursuit of the almighty buck. its pure autocracy, technocracy, pure capitalism. china is one giant corporation now

      I remember an article while back comparing modern day China to what Fascist Italy would have been like had the Axis won the war.

      Ah here it is... http://www.benadorassociates.com/pf.php?id=31

      Thus, classical fascism should be the starting-point for our efforts to understand the People's Republic. Imagine Italy 50 years after the Fascist revolution, Mussolini dead and buried, the corporate state intact, the party still firmly in control, the nation governed by professional politicians and a corrupt elite rather than the true believers. No longer a system based on charisma, but on political repression, cynical not idealistic, and formulaic appeals to the grandeur of the "great Italian people," endlessly summoned to emulate the greatness of its ancestors.

      That is China today. It may be with us quite a while.


      That pretty much sums this up. They wave Red Flags and Sell Red Books, but no one is a real communist anymore in government.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    3. Re:the chinese govt is autocratic by ScentCone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      china is perhaps the most capitalist country in the world

      Not really, though. Capitalism only works when there's rule of law, and free communication. To the extent that China echoes any of the late 19th century stuff you mentioned (killer gangs taking out the competition, etc), that's not capitalism. More like fuedalism. China's oppressive central government is anything but the lubricant of capitalism - it's the protector of a condition in which there is abundant cheap labor. That is the engine of that country's house-of-cards economic growth. If the factory workers there started actually operating at a middle-class level, the growth would grind to a halt for the lack of cheap workers to keep making the stuff they're selling to the rest of the world at a handsome profit. After much turbulence, they're going to end up looking just like Europe or North America... fishing around for cheap labor from countries that are still a few steps behind, with their competitive edge diminishing. Next stop, Myanmar, where thousands living in primitive conditions just died in a storm. Countries like that will - for a while - become the source of cheap labor, until THEY get their act together.

      China's reliving the entire history of the 19th, 20th, and 21st centuries as experienced by the western world, but over the course of a couple of decades. And with an enormous population. It's going to be an economic, ecological, and cultural train wreck. But for now, we can sure get some cheap motherboards, teak garden furniture, and t-shirts!

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    4. Re:the chinese govt is autocratic by khallow · · Score: 1

      Capitalism is merely a system where the means of production are mostly privately owned. You don't need a well defined set of laws for that to occur or free trade of goods. Rent seeking doesn't necessarily break a capitalist system.

    5. Re:the chinese govt is autocratic by ewanm89 · · Score: 1

      It's doing the 19th with 21st century technology. This is probably what would happen if we took our modern technology back in time to the societies that were once in the western world.

    6. Re:the chinese govt is autocratic by Adambomb · · Score: 1

      Personally, I say thats been the case since this one took an ice pick to the skull but still had the gusto to say not to kill his assailant as the fellow must have had a story to tell.

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
    7. Re:the chinese govt is autocratic by mikethicke · · Score: 1

      19th century capitalism, with little or no government intervention and a working class with almost no rights, is classic capitalism, the capitalism that Marx critiqued. Cheap labor is ultimately the engine of every country's economic growth. That's why Europe and North America import so much of it, and American companies rush to relocate to underdeveloped countries. The other engine of growth is technology, and it's hard to claim that China isn't pouring resources into technological development. China's growth is no more house-of-cards than Europe's or America's.

      From a business perspective, China has some serious problems with contract law, but the operation of its economy is close enough to the US that it's not accurate to radically differentiate them.

    8. Re:the chinese govt is autocratic by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      What about Africa? Seems as though you're forgetting about them. They will be the last in line to make the world their t-shirts and shoelaces.

      Years ago, I had a sociology teacher say that economic success gradually filters down. The whiter you are, the quicker you get it. If that is true, Africa will be last. Europe, USA have achieved success, China and Brazil are getting there, and Africa... well, we're just beginning to look at their natural resources.

      Things seem to be developing that way.

      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    9. Re:the chinese govt is autocratic by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      The whiter you are, the quicker you get it

      Correlation is not causation.

      Africa's latency in moving ahead, economically, doesn't have anything to do with skin color. It's culture. Big difference.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    10. Re:the chinese govt is autocratic by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      Correlation is not causation. I completely agree, and admittedly, I'm not 100% subscribed to the idea. But I must say it's a bit suspicious...
      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
  14. Im no racist by unity100 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    additionally im spiritualist, kinda a neo hippie. but chinese are annoying me with all kinds of aggression they are practicing.

    1. Re:Im no racist by BigBlueOx · · Score: 2, Funny

      additionally im spiritualist, kinda a neo hippie. but chinese are annoying me with all kinds of aggression they are practicing.

      Kewel. It's good to know that. I can now relax knowing that you are not a racist but are a spiritualist kinda a neo hippie. Thanks.

      I, on the other hand, think tuna are evil.

    2. Re:Im no racist by Thanshin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      additionally im spiritualist, kinda a neo hippie. but chinese are annoying me with all kinds of aggression they are practicing. Ok, you say you're not racist.

      Then you seem to present the facts of being spiritualist and neo-hippie as a way of proving you have no prejudices against Chinese people. Do you consider Chinese people to be spiritualist and neo-hippie?

      You also assign the behavior of a government to all the people that only share the geographical location of their birth. Are you saying that all Chinese people are committing acts of aggression?

      If I were you, I'd seriously consider my thinking patterns.
    3. Re:Im no racist by neurovish · · Score: 1

      I know dude, I can feel the bad vibes from here...totally bumming me out man

    4. Re:Im no racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >additionally im spiritualist, kinda a neo hippie. but chinese are annoying me with all kinds of aggression they are practicing.
      Yeah, those bastards even broke your keyboard, damn them!

    5. Re:Im no racist by WindBourne · · Score: 1

      I would guess that he meant to say China, and not Chinese. But yeah, I know how you feel. I get tired of ppl referring to Americans, the ppl, vs. America, our current gov (and more appropriately, our current president).

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
    6. Re:Im no racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.thebestpageintheuniverse.net/c.cgi?u=racist

    7. Re:Im no racist by ichigo+2.0 · · Score: 1

      That's how it's supposed to work, with the nation representing the population. But I agree, nationalism is old hat.

    8. Re:Im no racist by LandDolphin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well,

      At least in America, we vote for our current administration, where are the Chinese do not get that luxury.

      Just saying, that in a Democracy, such as the US, it is more appropriate to refer to things the government does, as the will of the people. Because well, the majority of people who vote, voted that administration in. Where as, in places like China, the will of the people is no represented by the Government.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    9. Re:Im no racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You also assign the behavior of a government to all the people that only share the geographical location of their birth.
      Not even sharing that! What of Taiwan? - everyone in the world agrees that the people of Taiwan live in China and are totally Chinese, and yet the geographical location in which they live has never been controlled by the Communists. And then there is the Chinese diaspora: millions of people who are called Chinese despite having been born in countries that have never been considered part of China.

      The claim that "the Chinese are committing acts of aggression" is every bit as racist as the claim that "the Jews are conspiring to control world markets", and it is high time that we learned to view the former with as much justified revulsion as most right-thinking people now view the latter.
    10. Re:Im no racist by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      Where as, in places like China, the will of the people is no represented by the Government.
      Are you sure? If so who's fault is it that the Chinese Govt. doesn't represent the will of the people?

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    11. Re:Im no racist by frehe · · Score: 1

      I, on the other hand, think tuna are evil. I can help you "take care" of your tuna problem, if you help me "take care" of my baby seal problem. I can provide the clubs, and I have some friends with some great nets that we can use. Let's show those f**kers who's boss on earth!

    12. Re:Im no racist by LandDolphin · · Score: 1

      While, I am sure that the Chinese Government occasionally represents the will of the people, having a 1 party system, means that the people are not offered the chance to choose leaders with different ideological belief then the current administration. So, I'd say it is a fair assessment that the current government does not represent the will of the people.


      AS for fault, that is deviating from the conversation, but I'll indulge you :-).

      Hmm.. could start with Japan, for weakening the strength of the previous government during WWII, which left the country too weak to protect itself against the Communist party.

      You could blame the US for not coming to the aid of the Chinese people when they needed it during the end of WWII.

      You could blame the world for continuing to do business with the Chinese government, instead of forcing political change through embargoes buy crushing their economic growth.

      But, the obvious and best group to blame is the Chinese themselves, for allowing themselves to be Governed by a one party system. You could take the belief that because they allow the current Government to exist, that the current Government is doing what it does, at the will of the people.

      But these are all opinions.

      --
      Spelling and Grammar errors have been added to this post for your enjoyment
    13. Re:Im no racist by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

      That may be... But ask mainland-Chinese, and I have, and many believe that the government engaging in these activities is a good thing. Recent news reflects that.

      Chinese have organized protests against Western companies. Carrefour in particular was targeted because of rumors that a major shareholder was contributed to the Dalai Lama.

      The people are upset about the reaction the West has had over Tibet. And these protests haven't just occurred in China, but in Western nations where those Chinese aren't under control of the government. In fact, in China, the government has tried to dampen some of that fervor.

      This sort of attitude is prevalent. Taiwanese run into problems in China because of the Chinese belief that Taiwan belongs to China. Any time a Taiwanese official visits Japan or the US the Chinese government is up in arms. A skyscraper in China, being built by a Japanese company had to be redesigned because a prominent design feature reminded people of the rising sun flag.

      So the problem does also lie, to some extent, with the Chinese people themselves. The educational system certainly has done a very effective job of indoctrinating the people with the party line. But obviously, I won't make sweeping generalizations about the Chinese, because clearly there are many who disagree with the government and wont venture to speak up for fear of what will happen to them.

      I do lament sometimes at the lack of national pride in America. Obviously too much is a very bad thing. But if Americans had a bit more of it perhaps we wouldn't be outsourcing everything to China.

    14. Re:Im no racist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This sort of attitude is prevalent. Taiwanese run into problems in China because of the Chinese belief that Taiwan belongs to China.
      My girlfriend is Taiwanese, and we were recently at a restaurant that was staffed by mainland Chinese who asked who she supported in the recent presidential election in Taiwan. When she answered KMT, they gave us free food. So at least once in a blue moon it's not a liability ;)
  15. this title by OrochimaruVoldemort · · Score: 0, Redundant

    brought to you by the DNA, National Dyslexics Association

    --
    If people can get past, can they get future? Best way to confuse a stoner
  16. It's not just cyber-attacks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These cyber-attacks may be the latest thing, but India has a long and storied history of putting up with all kinds of Chinese antics - including military incursions into Kashmir and Arunachal Pradesh, arms sales to Pakistan, military overflights, etc.

    The Indian policy of non-retaliation and diplomatic discourse only seems to embolden the Chinese to take further advantage of the situation and keep on pushing the boundaries.

  17. Why won't they just... by harry666t · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...ban Chinese IPs on their routers?

    1. Re:Why won't they just... by Intron · · Score: 1

      If I did that, it would cut about 50% of my spam load as well. Unfortunately, we have customers in .cn

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
  18. not as such by unity100 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    chinese people are SO roboticized that they are not even able to realize that they actually can give lemon with a dish that does not contain lemon in its menu description. 'you cant do that' they say. they dont understand they can actually give lemon with another dish, even if it does not contain the menu item, despite having the liberty to do so. in beijing restaurants. the reason for that is, they are so strictly brainwashed and made to comply with whatever rule is put that, they cant even realize that they can do something like this with their OWN menu in their OWN restaurant.

    chinese do not need to be communists anymore. the current populace is SO brainwashed that communism is not needed. you should have seen it in the olympic torch runs, how radical chinese students were.

    1. Re:not as such by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Insightful? Bah! More like incoherent.

    2. Re:not as such by siufish · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Imagine your Chinese friend asking for chopsticks to eat spaghetti in an Italian restaurant, or sweet and sour sauce for chicken nuggets in a McDonald's. I think you'll say 'you can't do that' too. It is surprising you go to another country and complain about local customs. I suggest you try to be more open and less prejudiced while you're in other countries, and life will be much more enjoyable.

    3. Re:not as such by Kierthos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, it's one thing if the Italian restaurant doesn't have chopsticks at all. But if the Chinese restaurant has Dish A with lemon, and Dish B without lemon, and you order Dish B but ask them to add lemon, and they say "we can't do that", it's a bit more odd.

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    4. Re:not as such by freakxx · · Score: 1

      I think u totally missed the point ur parent tried to make by giving that example. He was trying to say that "common sense is very uncommon in common Chinese". Got it? If not yet, read ur parent properly with open mind once again.

    5. Re:not as such by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think a lot of people like to talk about the Chinese as "brainwashed" when they're really just rabidly nationalist. All of these pro-Beijing people at the Olympic torch runs aren't there because the government activated a chip implanted in their brains, they're responding to what they see as the West ganging up on their country. China is finally coming into their own on the world stage, and they're still very defensive from years of being behind and being walked on. I don't know if it's the government or just the echo chamber that cultivates this view, but it seems very pervasive, and they try to tie these Tibet protests to decades-old colonialism.

      I can't say anything about your "can't change the recipe" anecdote, but I think maybe that just fit into your pre-existing view of China. The West has its narrative of Chinese people being brainwashed servants of their government, incapable of self-examination. China has its narrative of the rest of the world ganging up on them and trying to hold them back, some version of "The Man" keeping them down. Neither one is true, and the real truth must be somewhere in the middle.

    6. Re:not as such by unity100 · · Score: 1

      a lemon, that is already offered on the side of another dish, and a chopstick in a spaghetti in an italian restaurant are fundamentally two different things.

      in the former, lemon is there, its in the context of the restaurant and they have it ready. in the latter, the entire context of restaurant is different, also they have no chopsticks in readiness.

      this is not local custom or anything, plain old dishes.

      what i see is, not me, but many overly politically correct people are being way too prejudiced in reacting to the example i gave. its as if they think brainwashing is a concept that does not exist on the face of the earth. unfortunately it does, and its very real. attributing nationalism, or other forms of rationalizing features to brainwashing never bears fruit.

    7. Re:not as such by king-manic · · Score: 1

      chinese people are SO roboticized that they are not even able to realize that they actually can give lemon with a dish that does not contain lemon in its menu description. 'you cant do that' they say. they dont understand they can actually give lemon with another dish, even if it does not contain the menu item, despite having the liberty to do so. in beijing restaurants. the reason for that is, they are so strictly brainwashed and made to comply with whatever rule is put that, they cant even realize that they can do something like this with their OWN menu in their OWN restaurant.

      chinese do not need to be communists anymore. the current populace is SO brainwashed that communism is not needed. you should have seen it in the olympic torch runs, how radical chinese students were.


      It's actually far more likely that they think you're a rude twit and refuse to comply with your demands for lemon. Having visited Beijing twice in 2005/2006 I can attest most restaurants are more then willing to cater to my order. I've gotten lemon added to my drinks, instructed them on how to make a bloody mary (since clamato is scarce there I wasn't able to get a ceasar, had them swap things around in their dished to accomadate my Cantonese/Canadian tastes.

      Chinese people have news sources of questionable truth, they are generally aware of this and take things with a grain of salt. They don't like to rock the boat but they are neither brain washed nor robotized. They do however suffer from the same nationalist bug that America has so both Americans and Chinese will go on ad nauseum of how great their country is. Maybe that is brain washing but almost every nation on earth suffers from that.

      --
      "There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
    8. Re:not as such by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      McDonald's does have sweet and sour sauce, and it's delicious.

    9. Re:not as such by unity100 · · Score: 1

      It's actually far more likely that they think you're a rude twit and refuse to comply with your demands for lemon. Having visited Beijing twice in 2005/2006 I can attest most restaurants are more then willing to cater to my order. I've gotten lemon added to my drinks, instructed them on how to make a bloody mary (since clamato is scarce there I wasn't able to get a ceasar, had them swap things around in their dished to accomadate my Cantonese/Canadian tastes. its not me. its a much amiable person than me, one of the members in a community i belong, who actually resides and studies in beijing and goes sightseeing around in the meantime.
  19. There may be a good side by toby · · Score: 1

    It may help India reject the Swiss Cheese of Microsoft products in favour of a more solid infrastructure.

    --
    you had me at #!
    1. Re:There may be a good side by freedom_india · · Score: 1

      Actually the government has moved away from Windows to Linux.
      Only thing is while the lower government depts have moved to linux, the higher functionaries are too stupid to understand anything but windows.
      So the chain is weakest where it should be strongest.

      --
      "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
  20. Who wants a conspiracy theory? by Xacid · · Score: 1

    ALMOST daily? Phew, I feel relieved now. ;)

    Really though, I think China is just trying to take down the U.S. by removing all of our tech support.

    -Or- these attacks are really from U.S. unions trying to combat outsourcing.

  21. How do they tell who's attacking? by hnjjz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There have been a lot of these Chinese "cyber attack" articles recently, but as far as I can tell, all of them are simply attributing attacks from Chinese IP addresses as "attacks by China". China now has surpassed the US in internet usage in absolute numbers, and many (if not most) of the networked computers in China are running unpatched versions of Windows XP, making them the ideal breeding ground for Botnets (just take a look at your router logs). But are these Botnets actually being controlled by people in China? If the SPAM spewed out by these Botnets is any indication, then the answer is a resounding no.

    1. Re:How do they tell who's attacking? by ScentCone · · Score: 0

      But are these Botnets actually being controlled by people in China?

      Almost every attack of consequence that I've seen tried or at least partially successful in the last 6 months (mostly SQL injection attempts against legacy web apps here in the US) have originated in China. Sure, could be that the bad guys launched those attacks from Russia, using pwned machines in China. But the scripts that these attacks attempt to insert into web content cause browsers to surf to web sites hosted in China that in turn attempt to install trojans. These same sites go unchanged for months at a time, are hosted by companies operating in China, with domain names registered by Chinese companies. If it looks like Peking Duck, walks like Peking Duck ... you get the idea.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:How do they tell who's attacking? by RiyazShaikh · · Score: 1

      A lot of computers might be running pirated versions of XP, which could have made it difficult to get the latest patches.

  22. Avoid reading this baseless article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot of FUD, a lot of "according to senior officials in the government" and a protracted demonstration of inept journalism. Whatever you do, do not watch the linked video clip.

    P.S. I am NOT attempting to use reverse psychology here. Just stay away. Really ...

  23. My Question Exactly! by camperdave · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If this were an operation mounted by the Chinese government, surely it would be done in secret. After all, you wouldn't want the winds political will to blow against you, especially when you're going to be hosting the Olympics, let alone the possible trade embargos and such. In fact, if it were a government op, then wouldn't the attack seem to come from anywhere BUT china (or, mostly from outside, with a few deniable inside sources)?

    --
    When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    1. Re:My Question Exactly! by Yvanhoe · · Score: 1

      Another option is the possibility of an independent Chinese hacker attack. There is 4 times USA population there and thanks to the propaganda, the government is widely supported in the population.

      --
      The Wise adapts himself to the world. The Fool adapts the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the Fool.
    2. Re:My Question Exactly! by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Not necessarily. Possibly China wants to demonstrate its power.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    3. Re:My Question Exactly! by RiotingPacifist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But say you had some sort of huge filtering mechanism, for arguments sake lets call it a "great firewall", wouldn't it be easy to stop outgoing attacks?

      --
      IranAir Flight 655 never forget!
    4. Re:My Question Exactly! by BananaPeel · · Score: 1

      Exactly... Now if I was the American or British government wanting to find out about india I would go go though some easily hacked server in a third party county...er like China

    5. Re:My Question Exactly! by cyfer2000 · · Score: 1

      But why would they do so?

      --
      There is a spark in every single flame bait point.
    6. Re:My Question Exactly! by grumpyman · · Score: 1

      Dude, haven't you drink the /. cool-aid? Because they are communists, it must be the government - everything that happened or not happened.

    7. Re:My Question Exactly! by swb · · Score: 1

      When you typed "communist" you misspelled "dictatorial, totalitarian and unelected government."

    8. Re:My Question Exactly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi. The point is chinese government doesnt really think it is important to keep quiet. or else the repositioning of all the arms towards india is something they would never have done. and there are many activities going on near the border. thats very important to consider as well. but i just fail to understand the chinese intentions. they are stronger no doubt. so why are they worrying. may be because US is trying to use India again China or stuff. but India has to have a government which can get its head straight and only think of economic development untill the conditions get out of control and hand.

    9. Re:My Question Exactly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think again..
          Look at the number of incursions by the Chinese Army into Indian territory -- they are increasing year upon year. I don't know if there's much "wrong" that China can do to face the punishments you mention.
      And they've already got the Olympics, the IOC/etc have made it pretty clear that there's nothing they're going to do to China, even if China explicitly violates their rules.

    10. Re:My Question Exactly! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but the Chinese governmetn seem to be all about the Redneck approach:

      "Hay y'all watch this"

      In reality they need to be put in their place. Maybe they need to be reminded who they should be thankful for that they have access to the internet at all...

  24. China will do as it pleases by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They know full well they're on their way to being the next super power and everyone relies on them for pretty much everything. So I don't think the government really cares what others think about their activities.

    1. Re:China will do as it pleases by TubeSteak · · Score: 1

      They know full well they're on their way to being the next super power and everyone relies on them for pretty much everything. As China modernizes, workers wages having been coming up.
      Workers rights, environmental protections, etc are now coming into play, further driving up costs.

      Businesses are starting to leave China and are moving to other Asian countries where wages & costs are lower.

      Here's one example and there are plenty more like it.
      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:China will do as it pleases by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hmm, and alot of anti American idiots expect china to do this and only whine
      about the U.S. That's pretty stupid of the so called superior minds of europe
      and the rest of the world to do is'nt it?

  25. AFAIR Estonia ... by hany · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... targeted attack against Estonia shut that country down ... That, officials said, was executed by cyber terrorists from Russia ...

    AFAIR (as far as I remember) that attack on Estonia has been performed by one guy. Yes, some servers used in the attack were based in Russia. Yes, a lot of zombies around the world has been used in the attack. And yes this guy's nationality was Russian, but the guy has been citizen of Estonia.

    But abovementioned officials may have far more information. Maybe the guy was a citizen of Estonia but secretly employed by his mother Russia. Who knows?

    --
    hany
    1. Re:AFAIR Estonia ... by d0cu · · Score: 0

      No they were not performed by one guy. One guy was fined because he was the only one they could prove to be guilty. Most of the things done during that period of time in Estonia was done by residents of Estonia but groups from Russia influenced everything (and kind of orchestrated the whole thing)

  26. well by circletimessquare · · Score: 5, Interesting

    if you view china itself as one giant corporation, and the world as the marketplace, you can call it capitalism. just shift the scope of what you are talking about from how things work inside china to how china relates to the world

    how things work inside china is police state: you have no rights to expression, to vote, to the press, or anything other than work. every aspect of your media is controlled by the government, every aspect of your expression is censored and unapproved expression (talking ill of your government, oppressed minorities, or even just pornography places you at the jeopardy of being punished)

    so this is indeed not capitalism. it is merely life inside the corporate structure. a corporation exists within a captalist framework, but life INSIDE the corporation, how things work inside the machine, are not capitalistic, they are autocratic, an oligarchy (i called china an autocracy, it would be more accurate to call it an oligarchy: it is not run by one grumpy old man, but a gang of grumpy old men)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:well by autocracy · · Score: 1

      So.... am I China, or not?

      --
      SIG: HUP
    2. Re:well by morgan_greywolf · · Score: 3, Funny

      So.... am I China, or not?
      I dunno. Are you made out of porcelain?
    3. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn you kids missed your history and sociology classes?
      Capitalism IS NOT Democracy! They are not connected. Actually, Capitalism will flourish better when there is no Democracy and politics to bother.
      Democracy is a stupid government for the weak and pathetic losers.
      Meanwhile, the Capitalism is a perfect economic system that always pays for those who are smarter and work better, so a totally antithesis of the Democratic ideal.
      As someone said here, China is not communist (there were no Communist country in the world, ever. Because on the real Marxist concept of Communism, there were no organized state, or need for regulatory government, when the worker's socialist state finally reached the communist stage). China is a Fascist corporative state. Without the green party, human rights groups, or other stupid problems the democracy generates. If we didn't have the stupid democracy, and the stupid free press, in Europe and the US, we won't have any problems, recession, depression, or anything like. Those are not problems of the perfect Capitalism, but problems of the stupid democracy.

    4. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is worse:

      Country A. A country where citizens know the media is fully controlled by their govt.

      Country B. A country where most citizens think they have unbiased media, but the govt. actually controls the media behind the scenes.

      In country A, everyone pretty much knows the tv news is full of bullshit propaganda.

      in country B, most people believe what they hear on tv news so they vote and act accordingly.

      For example, in country B, the media will blackout or censor stories that expose their flaws & corruption like these:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=trWcqxrQgcc
      http://www.journalism.org/node/10849

      In the 1st example for country B, you have 1. a corporation selling unsafe BHT for farmers to inject into cows, 2. the FDA rubber stamps approval, 3. investigative journalists uncovers this and creates a show, 4. the drug seller threatens the news corporation (pulling advertising, plus lawsuits) 5. the major news corporation tries to threaten, then bribe the journalists (they did this in writing) 6. case goes to court and journalist win unanimously 7. appeals court judge overturns on the grounds that news does not have to be factual.

      In example 2 for country B, the military plants analysts to mislead the citizens of their own country and it gets exposed in a front page article of a major newspaper, but the story is never mentioned on any cable or network TV news other than PBS. The newspaper reporting the story was previously found to have been reporting stories given by senior govt. officials, who then cited that newspaper to justify policy so they are trying to re-establish credibility by breaking the story but nobody else reports it.

      Frankly we deserve better. My parents, one of whom served over 24 years in the U.S. military enjoyed much better quality of journalism--it wasn't perfect--but it isn't the banana-republic type of propaganda we see on TV nowadays. It was so much more fun laughing at other countries like Iraq for having "Bagdad Bob", but now we have many such talking heads on TV.

    5. Re:well by UncleTogie · · Score: 1

      Meanwhile, the Capitalism is a perfect economic system that always pays for those who are smarter and work better, so a totally antithesis of the Democratic ideal.

      Gotta respectfully disagree here. Capitalism pays out for those with the better marketing and legal departments... Carly Fiorina, individually, or Apple, company-wise as wonderful examples.

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    6. Re:well by SnEptUne · · Score: 1

      I agree that capitalism is not democracy, doing so as good as saying a cat is a dog... Capitalism exists with or without democracy, as long as people are greedy, it will work. But in a pure capitalic society, where everything and service is a commodity to sell off, what does it meant for the people? The poor will have no access to the education and health care system, the rich will only get richer as long as they are not too stupid. But at any rate, democracy simply has nothing to do with it, although they can coexist. Democracy is a mean to ensure peaceful transition between different legions and a mean to reduce harm done by a foolish leader. If leaders are not foolish, democracy indeed offers nothing but inefficiency. Democracy is not an end, but a mean.

    7. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, I soooooo hear ya on that one! You know what else scares me? Clowns. The government keeps saying that there's nothing to fear from clowns, but I know The Truth! Those colourful costumes and goofy makeup are the perfect disguises for Secret Service death squads, prowling our neighbourhoods and looking to assassinate or brainwash anyone they see purchasing organic tomatoes. It's downright terrifying!

    8. Re:well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am a Chinese national. I usually avoid reading comments of articles related to China on slashdot, because they are usually clueless and insulting, and can only come from pride and prejudice. This is the first group of slashdot comments that has some insights in it and actually got me thinking a little bit. Following the metaphor of a corporate, as many of the slashdot readers would be a member of, members would be more interested in growing revenue of the corporate, hence their own financial security than freedoms of say, being late, have more vacations, etc. Maybe the Chinese people are more intereted in being able to sell products to the world without being harassed by constant legal, finacial maneuvers, and public slanderings than being forced to talk to Dalai Lama or release political prisoners. As for myself, I would prefer a house and a car to the rights of public gethering and free press anyday. Living inside China feel quite "free" if you are not interested in political things and are tolerant of a few minor inconveniences, like not able to log on to certain website. It is far from the standard of western countries, but we can tolerate it while concentrating on improving our living standards.

  27. I call BS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I work in Computer Lab in a German University, and we get multiple brute force attacks a day from Chinese hosts. Does that mean that China is secretly mapping the network infrastructure of the German education system? I think not. IMO TFA is rather due to a deeply entrenched fear of spies and espionage in the Indian society, also the collective trauma of being hated by all neighbouring countries.

    1. Re:I call BS by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, before an attack can occur, you have to know what to hit. Now with that said, nearly all major countries do a lot of DOD related research in their universities. And yes, that includes Germany. The advantage to these countries is that it is a lot cheaper in universities, than in a DOD installation. A big advantage is that many intellects are liberals who have no desire to work directly for the military (above it all, etc.). The advantage for china, is that security is a great deal loser and it gives them access to new ideas that have not made it into production. They can either take it and change it, provide a defense against it.

      No, the attack on India is real. No doubt that some of it is not a China gov. attack, but ppl looking to own a system, but make no mistake, that all countries that are not closely aligned with China are under attack. And I would guess that even the few that are aligned with China are under attack.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  28. Re:What Mark Twain would say about Tejano music... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1

    A gentleman is someone who knows how to play the accordion, and doesn't.
    Even while deer hunting?
  29. "x terrorist" label starting to piss me off by LockeOnLogic · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Not everyone who commits a crime or act of aggression is a fucking terrorist. Just cause you use the internet to carry out a malicious act does not make you a "CYBER TERRORIST". If I drive my car down the road like an asshole it doesn't make me a vehicular terrorist. This language has been used to promote an endless conflict used to justify indefinite wartime power. Makes me feel we are just as programmed as many of the chinese.

    1. Re:"x terrorist" label starting to piss me off by ddrichardson · · Score: 1

      Bloody vocabulary terrorists.

      --
      A thistle is a fat salad for an ass's mouth...
    2. Re:"x terrorist" label starting to piss me off by pjt33 · · Score: 1

      Not everyone who commits a crime or act of aggression is a fucking terrorist.

      Quite correct. That term should be reserved for rapists.

    3. Re:"x terrorist" label starting to piss me off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I drive my car down the road like an asshole it doesn't make me a vehicular terrorist. You don't live in the US, don't you?
      Because, here, anything you do that may raise any suspicion over you (walk your cat on a leash, water your balcony flowers during the wee hours of the night, etc.), will surely get your phone wiretapped, some black van parked by your front door, and some annoying questions from the TSA officers everytime you try to catch a plane...

      So, as far for us, US citizenry, anything that we do indeed qualifies us as a Cyber Terrorist, or a Car Terrorist, or a Supermarket Terrorist...

      And I am not even talking about some vacation time in Guantanamo Bay...
    4. Re:"x terrorist" label starting to piss me off by zen_sky · · Score: 1

      Well, that's like saying you can portscan whomever you want with your one little computer. Do you think you might notice if 1 million computers were portscanning you? Is it really the same thing? Hmmmm....

    5. Re:"x terrorist" label starting to piss me off by Tom · · Score: 1

      Makes me feel we are just as programmed as many of the chinese. Probably less. Most chinese probably know that their government is oppressing them, censoring their media and running surveilance on its own population. Most americans still think their government may be incompetent, but at least it's not evil.
      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    6. Re:"x terrorist" label starting to piss me off by cmburns69 · · Score: 1

      "Vehicular terrorist" no. But if you put these on your truck, I'd consider your a testicular terrorist.

      --
      Online Starcraft RPG? At
      Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
    7. Re:"x terrorist" label starting to piss me off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop terrorizing slashdot, you linguistic terrorist you!

    8. Re:"x terrorist" label starting to piss me off by jjk3 · · Score: 1
      • Remove rights from terrorists
      • Starting using the word terrorist in lew of criminal
      • criminal stop having rights

      I'm not certain if I believe this, but it becomes harder and harder everyday not to believe this.
    9. Re:"x terrorist" label starting to piss me off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone who commits a crime or act of aggression is a fucking terrorist.

      Quite correct. That term should be reserved for rapists.

      And the pirates, Arrrrrrrr!
    10. Re:"x terrorist" label starting to piss me off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      *BOW*

      Thanks for your honesty while looking at our own "civilization".

      It's not the first time people start yelling "terrorism" either.

  30. Re:Indian Computer Specialists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    They all want to go to USA :)

  31. Language abuse in general... by argent · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If I drive my car down the road like an asshole it doesn't make me a vehicular terrorist.

    Are you the bleeding vehicular terrorist who tried to sideswipe me coming up to the tollbooth on the beltway last week?

    OK, all joking aside... I agree that terms like "terrorist" are being abused, though really it's the word "war" that's the problem. The US government declares a "war on" something vague and undefiniable, and all of a sudden the constitution is tossed out of the window. Whether the opponents are labeled "terrorists" or "drug lords" the result is the same.

    On the other hand, when a country engages in aggression within the borders of another country during peacetime. Didn't that used to be called an act of war? What do you do about it short of declaring war? Does it matter which of the two countries is more pro-USA?

    The result is that we are in a "state of war" all the time, but the President doesn't have to go cap-in-hand to Congress for each piddling little not-really-an-invasion. I don't see that as a good thing, and it's a much bigger problem than one of the particular abuses of language that are being used to justify it.

    I'm tempted to say they're raping the language but of course that's just more of the same kind of verbal warfare that... hmmm... there I go again...

    On the gripping hand, I'm not the CiC of the US armed forces.

  32. hmmmm. by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Americans would not spew out spam that said to increase your size, that you have to eat deer or tiger penis. So, nope, not ours.

    Nor would we spew out spam that says

    Want to increase your size? Da, of course your girlfriends wants you to. You must bath in Lake Bakal for that
    So again not ours.
    No, we would spit spam that says that you must buy from McDonalds or Burger King. Oh Damn, that is our spam.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  33. Speculative article by YeeHaW_Jelte · · Score: 3, Informative

    The writer of the article also refers to the Estonian Cyberattack:

    http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/05/17/1248215&tid=172

    He states it was a targetted attack by the Russian government, but fails to mention that a 20 year old student was fined for the whole affair:

    http://politics.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/01/25/0120221

    Not saying that it wasn't the russian government, it would have been easy to create a scapegoat for them, but not mentioning this in the article makes it very easy to doubt if the author actually considered if this was really a government run attack or just some Chinese individual being pissed off with India.

    --

    ---
    "The chances of a demonic possession spreading are remote -- relax."
    1. Re:Speculative article by junglee_iitk · · Score: 3, Informative

      The article is from Times of India - the tabloid of India - the Fox News - the Bild.

      They are known for crapifying everything. They even plagiarized Wikipedia for sports section!

      You will make me read technology related news on ToI when you pry my eyes from my cold, dead body.

    2. Re:Speculative article by heteromonomer · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up! This guy is talking complete sense. I have long stopped trusting the sensationalist crap that this paper frequently pulls out of their asses. Doesn't mean that I think the Chinese government are a peaceful or friendly lot though.

    3. Re:Speculative article by d0cu · · Score: 0

      but fails to mention that a 20 year old student was fined for the whole affair: Not for the whole affair. That was a guy they could catch. It was only one small subset of attacks. Probably the attacks weren't ordered by Russian government but they were result of propaganda war that has roots in Russian government.
  34. Cut the lines? by wytcld · · Score: 1

    Can we presume that the Western/democratic world, which owns most of the international backbone, has in place the option of simply dropping all of China from the Internet in the case of a crisis?

    Sure, they have agents abroad who could trigger a botnet. Still, shouldn't any concerted use of the Internet in warfare be met by a total severance of the nation making that use from the Internet, not just in the short term, but forever?

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
    1. Re:Cut the lines? by gzipped_tar · · Score: 1

      Hey, don't do that. If you guys in the US cut off China's Internet, we would have no Slashdot to read here!

      --
      Colorless green Cthulhu waits dreaming furiously.
    2. Re:Cut the lines? by Digi-John · · Score: 1

      We cut the lines. The Chinese government tells its people how we are attempting yet again to stop the success of China because we're all racist bastards. 5 hours later, we're seeing the missile launches and India (along with all other neighboring countries) is wondering how these millions of Chinese people suddenly got into their country.
      As much as I'd like to cut the bastards off too, it would affect world economy in a drastic manner and provide the Chinese government with a really good excuse to start bringing the hurt on the rest of us.

      --
      Klingon programs don't timeshare, they battle for supremacy.
    3. Re:Cut the lines? by Phrogman · · Score: 1

      A fine idea until you consider the fact that the hypothetical malevolent Chinese botnet can be easily controlled from a cybercafe in Australia, or Austria, or even the US. The bots are out here in the west too, not all behind Chinese government firewalls inside the country.

      --
      "The first time I got drunk, I got married. The second time I bought a chimpanzee, after that I stayed sober" Arian Seid
  35. but you're missing the up side by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China's GDP growth is one of the highest, if not the highest, for the last 20 years.

  36. very true by circletimessquare · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i would modify your comment to say that china is not a capitalist country on the INSIDE, but it is very much a capitalist country in how it relates to the wider world: china is one giant corporation

    look at your average corporation: on the inside of the corporation it is run like an autocracy, or an oligarchy, just liek china is. the average corporation exists within a capitalist framework, but capitalism has nothing to do with how the corporation functions on the inside

    and so it is with china: view china as one giant corporation, and you understand capitalism's true relationship to china

    i'm just riffing on my previous comment, btw:

    http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=543286&cid=23299960

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:very true by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Well, as long as we're fine-tuning the analogy...

      The difference between the relationship that I might have with China, and that which I might have with, say, General Motors or Apple Computer, is still fundamentally different. If GM or Apple were caught routinely lying about how they do business, or were routinely shipping out tainted goods, or were routinely busted trying to break into DoD computers or running large counterfeit goods operations... they'd be OUT of business, and the people making those decisions would be in jail. The Chinese government not only isn't held accountable for that sort of thing, they encourage it, and spin like crazy whenever they get observed doing it.

      To the extent that the Chinese government IS the corporation running that company (only a somewhat useful analogy), they are a really corrupt company. And obviously, General Motors doesn't have nuclear weapons, doesn't sponsor countries like North Korea, doesn't threaten the democracy in Taiwan, and doesn't sell spare parts to fine fellows like the thugs running Iran. I'm sure you see my point... but I just like to avoid analogies that sort of backfire. Saying that China is like what we think of as a corporation kinds of puts a bad spin on the use of that word. If you and I were to get together to start a small business, and incorporated in order to do it right, we'd still be forced to obey laws - just like Apple has to, or Intel, or the Dole Fruit people. China doesn't seem to feel any such urge. They only bother to enforce rules when getting busted in the public eye might damage their market presence. They really don't get it, yet, about ethics being the things you do when no one is looking. There are people in every country that don't get that... but China is an entire country that operates that way, and is strangely naive enough to think that we can't see right through the charade.

      For a culture as ancient as that one, it's a wierdly adolescent way to exist.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:very true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And obviously, General Motors doesn't have nuclear weapons, doesn't sponsor countries like North Korea, doesn't threaten the democracy in Taiwan, and doesn't sell spare parts to fine fellows like the thugs running Iran General Motors wouldn't have any problems with doing any of the above if they weren't constrained by US laws that promise severe repercussions for doing so. Heck, remember the infamous statement by GM President Charles Erwin Wilson, who thought "...what was good for the country was good for General Motors and vice versa". It's not a big stretch from that to what the chinese are practicing.
  37. you are a proud member by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    of the trollocracy ;-)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  38. it is in the chinese psyche by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    taught after centuries of controlled education that they are the best civilization ... and the whole world is part of mainland china headed by tao guy...

    The so called "attacks" are more of low level exploits which can be avoided easily by user following proper security checks. as far as the networks go, simply ban all IPs coming from china - they anyway dont have any useful information for anybody in the world - let alone for themselves!
    just a bunch of losers trying to pose tough by keeping quite and staring.

  39. Anonymous Coward by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That's really silly of China. I'm sure if China asked decently, India will simply hand over all the porn without much of a hassle!

  40. lolskates by atari2600 · · Score: 1

    It's a Times of India article. Your most reliable source of news in India is the The Hindu. Don't let it's name throw you off - the paper is more reliable than the other English dailies in the country and prides itself on reporting news as close as it gets.

  41. Yes and No by WindBourne · · Score: 1

    Because of the unique (hopefully) situation of 9/11, W. has been able to hide a great deal from the public and even congress. As such, it is hard to say that W. represents the will of the ppl, when the vast majority do not know what is really going on. Of course, you can argue that is the way we operate all the time, but I doubt that it is has been that way since at least Nixon.

    In fact, I have been amazed that with all this "open" questions being asked of candidates over the news service, that we are not seeing questions about openess. In particular, W. shut down our seeing the 20 year opening of past presidents, starting with reagan. It specifically allowed the family the ability to hide any number of issues. While I do not believe that we should have information about a president's personal life, I do think that we are owed ALL of the information that relates to how a pres. worked. For example, it would be useful to know what reagan knew about October surprise as well as Iran-Contra and hiding of that information. Supposedly Obama has said that he will go after W. for his destroying items (emails in particular) and will presumably ungag Sibel Edmunds to some degree, but will he allow us to see how reagan, Poppa Bush, and Clinton ran their presidencies? Sadly, I seriously doubt that Clinton will open up that much as it could boomerang back on her personally, even though it is the right thing to do. W. is a special case in that he has hid more information than even Nixon who was absolutely paranoid about information leaks.

    Currently, I see more similaries and less difference between China's gov and W's, except that China has competent ppl.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  42. Ostriches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the government of the United States finally chooses to reveal the duration, extent, and magnitude of the US/Chinese cyberwar, including photographic evidence tying known chinese hackers with PLA intelligence officers; maybe then all you who refuse to recognize the Chinese governments complicity and and responsibility for these attack campaigns will finally acknowledge you have been sticking your head in the sands for years.

  43. The rise of an aggressive Chinese nationalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is IMHO the concern behind a lot of similar articles that seem to proliferate these days.

    I am kind of curious to see if the chinese governement will be able to prevent this kind of nationalism to surface in the Olympic games.

  44. i choose country C by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    where there are less paranoid schizophrenic twits constantly obsessing with Them(tm), who control all minds by controlling all media secretly in the background

    but ignore me dude. i'm obviously a neocon apologist agent of the illumnati come to cast aspersions on your blindingly keen insights into our contemporary media landscape

    don't let me interfere with your cutting grasp of the current state of the secret world domination conspiracy

    they've fooled everyone but YOU! YOU ALONE KNOW THE TRUTH. BUT NOW THEY ARE COMING FOR YOU. YOU ARE THE LAST OF A DYING BRAVE FEW TO REALIZE THE REAL TRUTH OF OUR COMPROMISED MEDIA. YOU TOOK A BIG RISK POSTING HERE

    watch out! behind you!

    (snicker)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  45. Oh, look in the mirror please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, look in the mirror please, americans. You've been rolling your military machine all over the planet for the past 60 years continuously overthrowing even democratic governments and supporting the worst dictators on this planet, including Saddam. What have the Chinese done during that time?

    1. Re:Oh, look in the mirror please by tsm_sf · · Score: 1

      The exact same thing, just to their own people.

      --
      Literalism isn't a form of humor, it's you being irritating.
  46. yes by unity100 · · Score: 0

    its exactly like you said. they are able to give the lemon without the other dish, but they cant comprehend such a thing, because it was not set as a rule. there is no rule against it too.

    1. Re:yes by ppanon · · Score: 1

      Or maybe the chef is having a snit because you're a stupid gwailo pretending to tell him how to cook Chinese food. So the wait staff pretend not to understand the stupid gwailo rather than get into an argument about it (the chef has large cleavers and you are unarmed).

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
  47. these were real experiences by unity100 · · Score: 1

    there are more of them, like how drivers are actually driving BACKWARDS in a no-cross part of the road until they reach the part marked as crossable to the other side, after stopping at a red light and realizing they need to get to the other side. the irony is that, going backwards in a red light, even they are alone in the road, is much worse than trying to cross over from no-cross line to the other lane.

  48. logging by alxkit · · Score: 0

    Key loggers is software that scans computers and their processes and data the moment you hit a key on the keyboard.

    this is from parent, people. wow

  49. the consequences by Fuji+Kitakyusho · · Score: 1

    So Chinese hackers could conceivably shut down the entire US technical support / customer service infrastructure. The obvious question is, given the current quality of service, would anyone notice?

  50. It's all about killing off the competition by Paracelcus · · Score: 1

    China feels India snapping at it's heels in the world market for cheap mass produced goods and low cost technology. When will we see the "made in India" sticker on the back of crap from Wal-mart?
    China says "over our dead bodies". Hee, hee, hee! maybe they'll cancel each other out and Americans can get their jobs back.

    --
    I killed da wabbit -Elmer Fudd
  51. It's easier than you think... by XchristX · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...given that China has an absolute authoritarian system of control, and India is bitterly divided along ideological lines, China should have little trouble penetrating and subjugating the country. Already, the Han Chinese chauvinists have been responsible for funding the entire Communist party machinery in India, and have effectively created a subversive government (The Communist Party of India) that is the agent of a hostile foreign country. The CIA has already provided evidence as to how Indian Communists, underthe instructions of their Chinese paymasters, infiltrated the Indian Army during the Sino-Indian war and betray military secrets to Beijing.

    http://www.foia.cia.gov/CPE/POLO/polo-07.pdf
    http://www.foia.cia.gov/CPE/POLO/polo-08.pdf
    http://www.foia.cia.gov/CPE/POLO/polo-09.pdf
    http://www.foia.cia.gov/CPE/ESAU/esau-15.pdf

    Highlights include:

    #CPI(M) [Communist Party of India Marxist] heavyweight HK Surjeet influenced by Communist Soviet Russia to setup an underground organization
    #CPI(M) did proceed to recruit a secret organization within the Indian Army.
    #China and Soviet Russia both insisted that the CPI(M) must develop a standby apparatus capable of armed resistance, while intensifying penetration of Indian Military forces.
    #With the People's Liberation Army now present along the Indian Border the Indian Party had a channel of support for Armed Operations and a potential "liberator" in the event of mass uprisings - 13 Sept 1959
    #4 powerful radio sets had been installed in the office of the China Review in Calcutta to listen to broadcasts from Beijing
    #Chinese Financial Subsidies to sections of the CPI(M) particularly the left faction strongholds in West Bengal
    #A foreign supply base was now available for the underground organizations with the Chinese occupation of Tibet and other frontier areas.
    #Letter asking for collaboration in Indian underground organization work aimed at an eventual revolution, because China has a border with India and can provide arms and supplies.
    #Also Jaipal Singh, head of the illegal organization within the Indian Army decided to reactivate his organization in 1961 following the hard left faction gaining control of the party.

    In addition, the Communist Party of India have successfully carried out several pogroms and genocides against Hindus and Tibetan refugees in India, particularly during the 70's and 80's, all as part of a Trotskyist strategy of maintaining a state of "permanent revolution" (the most recent one being the Nandigram SEZ Massacre), all at the behest of their Chinese paymasters.

    China has also aggressively sponsored the terrorist Naxalite Communist terror movement in India by financing major Communist radicals (ethnic Bengali Bolshevists like Charu Mazumdar and Kanu Sanyal received training from Chinese war camps in Tibet only to subsequently lead the naxalite reign of terror across India's "Red Corridor").

    For a developing country, India is too damn democratic. If India was more authoritarian it would have taken care of such subversive Communist elements a long time ago, but India's democracy is it's greatest weakness, particularly when it is surrounded by totalitarian regimes like Pakistan and China that represent a major existential threat to the country.

    --
    l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
    1. Re:It's easier than you think... by religious+freak · · Score: 1

      ...but India's democracy is it's greatest weakness... I believe you are right, and I am a firm believer in democracy. An underdeveloped state will have real problems with a democracy, because social institutions are not strong enough to support rational governance for an extended period of time. Education of the population is often is an issue as well.

      However, ultimately I think India is better off as a democracy (because they do have fairly robust social infrastructure), and in such a fractured society, people need a voice -- but the democracy is fragile and though I think they'll make it, there is a somewhat worrying probability that they will not.
      --
      If you can read this... 01110101 01110010 00100000 01100001 00100000 01100111 01100101 01100101 01101011
    2. Re:It's easier than you think... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya i guess you are rite.
      India is a bit too democratic for that.
      I just cannot wait until the next election come and the BJP based NDA comes back to power

      Fingers crossed

  52. Is that you Dude? by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

    That rug really tied the room together.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  53. yea by unity100 · · Score: 1

    it really did.


    you know ... its my carpet and they had no right to piss on it. im gonna go and get my carpet.

  54. worst article EVER by nuzak · · Score: 1

    Does slashdot exercise NO quality control at all? Is it just the firehose now? Is there even a reason to have editors at all?

    --
    Done with slashdot, done with nerds, getting a life.
  55. This is how its done in China... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1. Make 1,000,000 chinese men with computers sit in a 2000 x 5000 matrix formation
    2. General Xu Poo Yin Boo shouts an order
    3. Everyone presses ENTER for the website www.india.gov
    4. ???????
    5. CYBER VICTORY for CHINA!

  56. read again by unity100 · · Score: 1

    please read it attentively this time. and maybe a few other posts of mine in the thread. you'll see what actually happened, and who it had happened to.

    1. Re:read again by ppanon · · Score: 1

      Fine, instead of thinking you're a stupid gwailo, the chef doesn't respect your friend for being a foreigner. Same difference.

      The point is that you're interpreting their reaction through your cultural expectation of "The customer is always right and you should be able to give me what I want, darnit". However that cultural expectation is not necessarily applicable to your friend's situation, no matter how polite or "acclimatized" to Chinese culture you and he may think he is.

      Nationalist, racist - when it comes to certain Asian countries, the line for some of their citizens is a little blurry. Millennia of contempt for foreigners haven't been papered over by a century of corrupt colonial domination - rather the opposite.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
    2. Re:read again by unity100 · · Score: 1
      if you read the entire thread, i would not need to repost this :

      there are more of them, like how drivers are actually driving BACKWARDS from a no-cross part of the road until they reach the part marked as crossable to the other side, after stopping at a red light and realizing they need to get to the other side. the irony is that, going backwards in a red light, even they are alone in the road, is much worse than trying to cross over from no-cross line to the other lane.
    3. Re:read again by ppanon · · Score: 1

      That's just DWA.

      --
      Laissez lire, et laissez danser; ces deux amusements ne feront jamais de mal au monde. - Voltaire
  57. Terrible example by onion_joe · · Score: 1
    Sweet and sour sauce is standard fare for chicken McNuggets(tm) in McDonalds!

    Also barbecue, honey mustard, ranch, chipolete, buffalo...

    shit, I think I just gave away that I am an American...

    --
    sig sig sig siggy sig
  58. Re:not as such lemon pledge! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    HA! I had the lemon! And the pledge also.
    Even if it was not in the dish.
    And they said the lemon was there but it was not.
    The dish promised lemon, but a lemon said the dish was not there.
    You think I am joking?
    LIMES know! As do many of our citrus cousins!
    Lemon is not a dish, stupid! And Pinoqachole is not a drink.
    The writings of Lae-zi boiy did say so in 3722 BCE (your colander).
    Stupid corrupt Westerner!

  59. Re:yes - no have no banana. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Really!
    Your snit cannot be taken seriously.
    I understand stupid gwailo AND have mastered the shew-chak also!
        The three gorgeous damn ladies can attest to this! You have no rubric to rub on and no rubicon to rub over!
    What pretentious pinoqachole-abusing snit-monger you are!
    Go home to your eel-covered bedskins.
    And think about Malwart and where it has gotten all of us!
    Do you agree?

  60. Re:Im no racist and have no race to bear! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not so!
    Many peoples of this planet can have racist and furtive ideas!
      Chinese people are POST-HIPPIE.
    And have many hipp and shoulder the blame from you Americans!
      Do you eat pork and then sell the bone?
    It is time you looked at our skyscapers. And said they are marvellous.
    And stop worshipping your corporate Malwart merchandising that you love so much!
    Spiritualist is in eye of beholder!
    As your Marxist Groucho said: " I would not be a member of any club that would club.. I mean a member of group that would club seals? ahh.. ? Any group that would remember my club?"

      Well. Whatever.
    Shut up, American and go buy a Lenovo!

  61. Most Indians are suffering from ASPD and BPD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most Indians are suffering from ASPD and BPD. http://www.rtiindia.org/forum/3975-aspd-bpd-diagnosis.html#post13722

  62. India must have reservations till 85% of all... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    India must have reservations till 85% of all registered marriages are inter-caste. Till then, Vote for candidates from your caste only. Do not care if he is corrupt or competent!!!!

  63. Utter Bullshit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are a right wing ideologue...nothing wrong in that, but you trample on your own propaganda.

    India is bitterly divided along ideological lines, China should have little trouble penetrating and subjugating the country.

    You are talking about China invading India and replacing her Government - similar to what USA did to Iraq. And all of this starts with botnets attacking Indian networks. Kindly put this proposal to a Hindi/Bollywood Producer and you might make some money.

    The CIA has already provided evidence as to how Indian Communists, underthe instructions of their Chinese paymasters, infiltrated the Indian Army during the Sino-Indian war and betray military secrets to Beijing.

    Did you read the PDF's?
    I could see mention of Indian Communists trying to avoid public backlash against with their association to Communist ideologies. That is different from your accusation of Indian Communists actively helping Chinese Military in the border skirmishes in Arunachal Pradesh!!!
    What you falsely accuse Indian Communists is of treason! You even link to PDFs on CIA website -as if CIA is an upholder of truth, democracy and all other shiny and lofty ideals.

    The rest of your arguments are hogwash. Kanu Sanyal and Charu Majumdar are revolutionaries (Naxalites) for some and terrorists for others - but even their enemies would admit they had admirable dreams and ideas for the Indian rural poor.

    Take a look at what happened to Nepal. When the Maoists entered the political space, they won the election...now what would you say about that!

    For a developing country, India is too damn democratic. If India was more authoritarian it would have taken care of such subversive Communist elements a long time ago, but India's democracy is it's greatest weakness, particularly when it is surrounded by totalitarian regimes like Pakistan and China that represent a major existential threat to the country.

    The "communists to be dealt with" are active political parties working in the framework of Indian constitution and running state administrations in West Bengal, Tripura and Kerala. The current Central Government runs with their support.

    However I dislike the ultra right wing elements and proponents of Hindutva - the versions of Hindu Taleban - like Bajrang Dal, VHP, Shiva Sena, Narendra Modi and others, I would not ask them to be "dealt with".

    1. Re:Utter Bullshit... by XchristX · · Score: 1

      That is different from your accusation of Indian Communists actively helping Chinese Military in the border skirmishes in Arunachal Pradesh!!! No. The CIA have clearly unearthed a major pandora's box here.CPM leaders EXPLICITLY aided the Chinese CCP against India. They deserve to hang from lampposts for this.

      What you falsely accuse Indian Communists is of treason! You even link to PDFs on CIA website -as if CIA is an upholder of truth, democracy and all other shiny and lofty ideals. The CIA never lies outright. They are a pretty reliable source for the hard facts (the CIA world fact book is a standard repo of information, for instance). And yes, Indian Socialists are treasonous parasites. ALL of them. No exceptions. They are all pure and simple traitors, terrorists, and general purpose scum.

      Kanu Sanyal and Charu Majumdar are revolutionaries No they are not. They are terrorist murderers and jackbooted thugrats. Pure and simple. Kanu Sanyal was SELF ADMITTEDLY a terrorist. He ADMITTED TO IT mate. he devised an entire terrorist strategy to destabilize a large part of the country (he called it yugantar) which is similar to Trotskyist communism (the worst most horrible form of communism there ever has been in the horrible blood-soaked history of horrible horrible communist evil).

      However I dislike the ultra right wing elements and proponents of Hindutva - the versions of Hindu Taleban - Hindutvavadis are not beheading women or ramming planes into buildings. Hindutvas didn;t murder 3 million people in Bangladesh in 1971 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1971_Bangladesh_atrocities) unlike Islamists.
      I AM a Hindu nationalist of the Bal Gangadhar Tilak style (not quite the same as a Hindutva, which would be the Savarkar style) and there is much to criticize in the Hindutva ideology (wtf is it exactly? A lot of it isn't very specific), but it simply is not morally equivalent to the Taliban, and to make such an offensive analogy betrays your far-left/militant Islamist biases. Stop reading nonsense Indian media, which is controlled by a core group of ultra-fanatic Communist ideologues like Prannoy Roy and his minions. Stop reading racist bullshit from the New York Times or the Guardian. get some REAL information from political analysts and specialists in the South Asian region. Good sources are (google the names):

      The South Asia Analysis Group (Indian)

      The Washington Institute for Near-East Policy (American)

      The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs (American)

      and other similar groups.
      --
      l'Homme n'est Rien l'Oeuvre Tout: Gustave Flaubert to George Sand
  64. Re:not as such lemon pledge! by unity100 · · Score: 1

    im no westerner, and wondering why are you posting as anonymous coward ? a chinese brainwashed nationalist teenager ? probably. your nation doesnt even let you expose your ideas with your real identity on the net.

  65. Second language by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BOTS? Really? As in BOTnets? Shows how much of a CLUE the journalist who wrote this has.

    And I assume your article in Hindi reads much better?