Slashdot Mirror


Uwe Boll To Quit Making Movies With 1M Signatures

An anonymous reader writes to mention that Uwe Boll, the infamous German director behind such video game adaptations as House of the Dead, BloodRayne, Dungeon Siege and Postal, has recently admitted that he would retire from making movies if enough people want him to stop. When FearNet mentioned to Boll a petition online signed by 18,000 people requesting that he cease making films, Boll responded that '18,000 is not enough to convince me.' So how much would be enough? 'One million,' Boll said."

355 comments

  1. Signed, signed, SIGNED! by OMNIpotusCOM · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where do I sign? Do you need blood? Money? A donation? How many times can I sign? Fucking I'LL SIGN!

    1. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Androclese · · Score: 5, Informative
    2. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by eldavojohn · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Where do I sign? Do you need blood? Money? A donation? How many times can I sign? Fucking I'LL SIGN! I reacted slightly differently. At first, yes I was eager to sign this ... but then I paused ... what about the Mystery Science Theater 3000s and Cinematic Titanics of the future? Where will they buy the rights to destroy movies for a couple thousand dollars?
      --
      My work here is dung.
    3. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by OMNIpotusCOM · · Score: 5, Funny

      Thank you, ok, clicked the link. Sign petition button... they want my name... alright, Wil...Wheaton... email, wil@...wilwheaton.net... comment. Oh, this should be good. Alright, "Dr Shitboll, if the Special Olympics had a movie-making competition, you would win a medal... and not just one for participation like Wes Anderson."

      There, that should do it. Well now Wil can't petition... he probably wouldn't use his own name anyway. I'm sure he'd go with Brent Spiner or something. Ok, done and done.
    4. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      what about the Mystery Science Theater 3000s and Cinematic Titanics of the future? Where will they buy the rights to destroy movies for a couple thousand dollars? Obviously you haven't been keeping up with Hollywood's latest technology. At this point you could do a whole season of MST3k just by hitting IMDB and doing a search for any movie featuring a dragon.
    5. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by glwtta · · Score: 3, Funny

      what about the Mystery Science Theater 3000s and Cinematic Titanics of the future?

      The problem is, there's nothing "so bad, it's good" about his movies, they are in what I like to call the "Shat Out With the Least Amount of Effort" category - not much MST3K can do with that.

      --
      sic transit gloria mundi
    6. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Psmylie · · Score: 2, Funny

      And won't someone please think of all the B-movie actors who would be out of a job?

      --

      psmylie's dictionary: Godzillion (noun) Any number large enough to destroy Tokyo

    7. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Indeed. And think about those of us who love groaners, and can't think of a better way to spend an evening than watching a horrible B movie. Uwe Boll is the Ed Woods of the aughties, and deserves praise. Where do I sign up to make him continue making movies?

      And who knows -- he might one day come up with a real masterpiece too. Remember that Peter Jackson got his fame from "Bad Taste".

      Regards,
      --
      *Art

    8. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 3, Funny

      Come on spammers and botnet scammers, we need your l33t skills to get 1 million names entered in. Just use the ones you put in the "from" line.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    9. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It just hit ~68K.

      It seems to have a rate of ~100 signatures a second.

      If that keeps up we should hit 1M with three hours.

      (here's hoping)

    10. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by SoulDrift · · Score: 5, Funny

      he probably wouldn't use his own name anyway .

      Yeah, he'd probably come up with some sort of clever nickname.

    11. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Poltras · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is there a C-movie category for him? Because even B-actors often regrets having been in one of his movies...

    12. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Just fodder for his next movie?... he was a director on the edge.... then they closed the loophole... Uwe Boll and Matt Damon star in Fluster Cuck II the reckoning.

    13. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by ezzzD55J · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Haha, that's funny. No mod points now unfortunately. (feel free to mod offtopic, I would)

    14. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Bob9113 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I reacted slightly differently. At first, yes I was eager to sign this ... but then I paused ... what about the Mystery Science Theater 3000s and Cinematic Titanics of the future? Where will they buy the rights to destroy movies for a couple thousand dollars?

      Nothing wrong with him making crap films. The problem is with making crap derivative works. Crap derivative works that the original artists in most cases are opposed to.

      But, then, that's more a problem with copyrights being owned by corporations. The artists get boned and the lawyers and MBAs get paid. And oh how those (sociopathic, since we increasingly select for that in the corporate world) lawyers and MBAs love to sell their children to cannibals for a few bucks.

      Copyright to support the progress of the useful arts? If that is truly the goal (and I'm not saying it is, or should be, just if it is), then give the artist more non-transferrable authority.

    15. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Peeet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      what about the Mystery Science Theater 3000s and Cinematic Titanics of the future? Where will they buy the rights to destroy movies for a couple thousand dollars? Honestly, I am more worried about ruining the video game-to-movie adaptation genre than I am a shortage of parody ripe movies. There is definitely no shortage of bad movies while there is a shortage of good video game adaptations.

      At the current rate of signature growth (~ 1 per second, it should reach a million within 2 weeks. If we ALL go and sign it now, then I think the slashdotting of the online petition website might send an even stronger message to Mr. Boll.
    16. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, he'd probably come up with some sort of clever nickname.

      Your humor is wasted on these moderators who most likely won't get it.

    17. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Alcoholic+Synonymous · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, I recently made good on a promise that if they released Bloodrayne back in my store, I would buy both 1 & 2 since they come with the opposite PC game. About a month later, we had both.

      I watched them, and the movies took me back to the low budget films of my youth and how much fun they were to watch. Then as a young adult, working with a low budget film company, how much fun they were to make.

      I can appreciate that people don't like the way he is butchering licenses, but honestly, I have seen far worse films than his, and enjoyed them.

      Bloodrayne was my introduction to Uwe Boll, and after all of the ruckus on /. about him, I had very low expectations. The film wasn't that bad. It was better than some of those b-flicks I like. Bloodrayne 2 lowered the bar substantially, but it was the same vein of steaming crap that some of us out there actually love.

      I'm not saying the man is a genius, but he does have a place in the film world. Maybe instead of quitting, he should just give up direct video game adaptions and make derivative films instead. I would pay to see more so-bad-it's-good films from him.

      And also, we really need to get back to hating the fucker's that made the Doom movie. It takes real effort to make something that bad, and defiantly piss off the fan base before you have even began shooting. (No, really, who did they think was coming to see this movie?) If we get them, it may serve as a "scared straight" program for the rest working on game-to-film adaptations.

    18. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      But a "so bad, it's bad" movie can still be MST3Ked--some of their most memorable episodes come from that. Manos: The Hands of Fate, Red Zone Cuba...there was nothing "so bad it's good" about those movies. None of unintentionally funny ridiculousness of an Ed Wood film.

    19. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Teflon_Jeff · · Score: 4, Funny

      And now I've signed. This may be the best use of the internet ever. I knew Al gore invented it for a reason.

      --
      "Teach a man to build a fire, and he's warm for a day. Set a man on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life."
    20. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by multisync · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      (feel free to mod offtopic, I would)


      There's a "topic" in this thread?
      --
      I don't care why you're posting AC
    21. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that /. started a signature war on petition online: http://www.petitiononline.com/uwelive/petition.html

    22. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only that, but I've managed to avoid his movies altogether. It's not hard to just not watch them.

    23. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Lunatrik · · Score: 1

      Manos causes physical pain to watch. Nothing better than Joel popping up with his cloak painted with feet on it, though :)

    24. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ahahahaa!! good one...

    25. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by kris.montpetit · · Score: 1

      THANK YOU

    26. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meh, he'll probably demand a recount and win the electoral college.
      Whoop, who were we talking about again, Mr. POTUS?

      If only it were as easy as collecting one million signatures........

    27. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by debatem1 · · Score: 1

      Amen to the Doom comment. I mean, damn, if you can't make Hell (on Mars!) scary, you really need to have a hole or two put in your head.

    28. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by debatem1 · · Score: 1

      I dunno- I can just imagine Joel patting Servo on the head, only to have him explode in a shower of what appears to be pink tempera, ala bloodrayne. I'd laugh.

    29. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by megaditto · · Score: 1

      As they say, Gentlemen, fire up your botnets (not that I know WTF Uwe is).

      --
      Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    30. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by RespekMyAthorati · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can you say publicity stunt?

      For fuck's sake, don't give this clown any more publicity.It's all he lives for.

    31. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by theneb · · Score: 0

      I checked on IMDB, there is not a single movie above 5.0 rating. In fact i think many of the reviewers are pissed at IMDB for not having a negative scale rating system, so they can push all his movies into bottom 100. I think its sorta having a striesand effect, i am curious to see one of his films now, before i review it on IMDB and fuck up all his ratings.

    32. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by bemo56 · · Score: 1

      But "Bad Taste" is in that so horrible it's actually good category. Looking past the bad acting and slow start, I have to say i really enjoyed that one possibly more than some of the garbage Hollywood seems to dump on us lately.

    33. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by davetd02 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's the modern version of "vote early and vote often."

    34. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by kesuki · · Score: 1

      76889 to 425

      i think the 425 are people that live and work because of boll.

    35. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by kesuki · · Score: 1

      the problem is all his films follow the SAME FORMULA... 'more chase scenes please' is the basic formula of his scripts.

      the video game could be about unlocking doors with special colored keys after solving logical puzzles, AND HE'D REQUIRE 20 chases scenes.

      seriously, he doesn't need to make more films, how can you MSTK formula pictures? do too many and you'd be a tired setup.

    36. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by ToastBusters · · Score: 1

      We don't need that anymore, we can just use services like http://rifftrax.com/

    37. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Zencyde · · Score: 1

      Ouch. Was that a reference to D-wars? That was an atrocious movie. I'm glad I theater hopped over to Resident Evil that day...

      --
      What day is it? Could you please tell me?
    38. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Valdrax · · Score: 1

      You know, we have Applebee's for a reason.
      (What else are you supposed to do with a Fine Arts major?)

      --
      If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    39. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Does anyone believe for a minute he would really give up no matter how many signatures?

      He would just say: All these people SAY they hate me, but it means a million people know who I am and have seen my movies. Doesn't matter whether they like them or not, I still get paid.

      As Oscar Wilde said, "There is only one thing in life worse than being talked about, and that is not being talked about".

    40. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unfortunately, that's not how Uwe Boll makes movies. He takes A-list actors, and turns them into B-list actors by featuring them in C-list movies...

      --
      'Sensible' is a curse word.
    41. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      according to imdb Uwe Ball has three movies in production and another three in post-production.
      http://imdb.com/name/nm0093051/

      fake

    42. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by arth1 · · Score: 1

      But "Bad Taste" is in that so horrible it's actually good category.

      Apparently you haven't seen "House of the Dead", then.
      Trailer here (flash).
    43. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by MBaldelli · · Score: 1

      81849 Signatures Total at the time I signed this... Nice!

      --
      "The truth points to itself." - Kosh, Babylon5
    44. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone is starting one of those 1,000,000 strong facebook groups to direct traffic to it too, should help speed things along if everyone adds all their friends.

      http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=23872638056

    45. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      Signed (86K now).

      I don't hate Uwe Boll.
      I just hate everything he does.

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    46. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      At the very least the next boxing match should be less one sided. I'm bringing a baseball bat.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    47. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Khaed · · Score: 2, Funny

      I still don't know how they fucked up Doom so bad. they turned a movie about demons and hell into a movie about... pretty much the same type of zombies that were in the Resident Evil movie, or (insert 90% of zombie movies).

      It's such a damn simple script:

      Guy (or even the typical hollywood team-captain-planet crew) trapped on Phobos. He (they) find out that the moon base is directly over hell. It was easier than making Ramen, and they fucked it up. One of the cooler parts of Doom? The creepy-ass "Hell" parts. Like some of the twisted wall textures in the game. It had a mood to it. There was no "omfg a virus that makes you CRAZY!" in Doom.

      But as to Turd Boll, see his Alone in the Dark movie. THAT is fucking horrible. I saw it before I realized he was involved, and I rented it without realizing Tara Reid was in it. there's not even any "this is so bad, it's good." It was like all the worst parts of every movie I've ever seen condensed into one shitfest. The only way it could have been worse would be if it had a full on hardcore sex scene between Michael Moore and Jabba the Hut. Actually, in retrospect, I'd probably watch that over Alone in the Dark if I had a gun to my head.

    48. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Not worth it. I mean, who will make a GOOD movie based on Dungeon Siege, if two years ago a BAD one was already made?

      A sequel is one thing, it can and should follow closely. A remake is entirely different, it requires at least a decade of delay.

      It's the same crime as that of a domain-squatter. He takes a title and fills it with hopeless content, so and nobody can take the same title and fill it with good content.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    49. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Jellybob · · Score: 1

      I may just not have got far enough through, but it's not like Dungeon Siege had a deep and involving storyline as a game. I got bored of the formulaic medieval RPG plot about 2 hours into the game.

      Seriously, how *do* you make a good film of something like that?

      Obligatory Penny Arcade link

    50. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by zehaeva · · Score: 1

      Don't forget "Dead Alive" or "BrainDead" depending on where your from.

      "I Kick Ass for the LORD!"

      GO GO KUNG FU ZOMBIE PRIEST!

    51. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by electrictroy · · Score: 0, Troll

      So this Uwe Boll guy is German?

      Hmmmm. Yes. His movies would probably be a lot better with Nazi logos and goose-stepping soldiers. Maybe he could do a 1984 remake. (Or Medal or Honor, the Swastiki Strikes Back.)

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
    52. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by unablepostAC · · Score: 0

      Actually he get prime time actors for is movies

    53. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by plutonick · · Score: 1

      Here is a Don't Stop Uwe Boll campaign
      http://www.petitiononline.com/uweboll0/petition.html

      If you don't sign, Uwe Boll personally will roundkick you in the face. And then Chuck Norris will roundkick you in the face.

    54. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by flitty · · Score: 1

      Resident evil 3, right? Why, did you enjoy zombie crows? Oh, and what about the zombie shipping crate that was found in the middle of what used to be the las vegas strip? It was nice of all those zombies to line up inside that shipping container until some more brains showed up. Oh, and the guy with a whang for an arm. Wow, I'm sad I watched that whole thing.

      --
      Whether or not there is some sort of god, I'm not supposed to say/god is a word and the argument ends there-Smog
    55. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Hey now! I wouldn't sell my children to cannibals for less than a grand!

    56. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by ari_j · · Score: 3, Funny

      I have no idea who he is. I'm signing the petition anyhow because I believe in calling bluffs.

    57. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by edward2020 · · Score: 1
      Come now, come now. The freight container was there b/c the bad guys put it there in order to trip up the sexy protagonist. And I'm not even sure the film showed us the zombies lining up inside. And I mean, come on, what's better than undead crows? I found it to be somewhat enjoyable - note that I was watching it on QSS (god forbid paying for that crap) while I played WoW.

      stage6 RIP

      --
      Don't worry about the mule, just load the wagon.
    58. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by edward2020 · · Score: 1

      I've got to agree. Alone in the Dark is truly painful to watch. Has to be one of the worst movies I've had the unfortunate luck to watch. I'd rather watch 'romantic comedies,' 'Summer Blockbusters,' and 'Movies for the whole family' in a kinda Clockwork-Orange-having-things-that-keep-your-eyes-open marathon.

      --
      Don't worry about the mule, just load the wagon.
    59. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by Khaed · · Score: 1

      The most redeeming part of Alone in the dark:

      Watching and thinking "How can he POSSIBLY make this movie worse?"

      Then not thirty seconds later, Tara Reid opens her mouth to try and be Hollywood Badass Chick. Or Christian Slater tries to look pensive and ends up looking constipated. Or the movie just continues down the path of shit, in a car made of shit, on the way to shittytown.

      Fair warning, however: I watched ALL of Alone in the Dark. I could only watch ten minutes of Highlander: The Source before turning it off in disgust. So there are shittier movies. They just take a LOT of effort to produce.

    60. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by bemo56 · · Score: 1

      But "Bad Taste" is in that so horrible it's actually good category.
      Apparently you haven't seen "House of the Dead", then. Trailer here (flash).

      I apologize, after watching that I promise to never throw around the word "horrible" again so lightly!

      I intended to say that Bad Taste was so bad it was good, that clip was so bad i no longer wish to watch movies

    61. Re:Signed, signed, SIGNED! by electrictroy · · Score: 1

      That was a JOKE, not a troll. (Ya know, as in, laugh or smirk.)

      Jeez; grow a sense of humor.

      --
      The government is not your daddy. Its purpose is not to raid middle-class neighbors' wallets and give it to you.
  2. Good lord... by Otter · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    That, you autistic dorks, was what normal people call a "joke".

    1. Re:Good lord... by Svenne · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Do you see the Foot icon to the right of the article? What do you think that means?

      --

      Slagborr
    2. Re:Good lord... by tachyonflow · · Score: 2, Funny

      That, you autistic dorks, was what normal people call a "joke". Those of us with a sense of humor find signing the petition to also be quite funny. :)
    3. Re:Good lord... by Fred_A · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yeah. Do you see the Foot icon to the right of the article? What do you think that means? What ? He's going to make a movie version of the Gnome desktop ?

      Ok where's that petition ?
      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    4. Re:Good lord... by strabes · · Score: 1

      Wow, I haven't laughed that hard on the internets in a long time. "Movie version of the Gnome desktop." Hilarious.

      --
      Its = possessive. It's = "it is"
    5. Re:Good lord... by dintech · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it would be about as fun as the rest of his movies.

    6. Re:Good lord... by einstein · · Score: 1

      I thought that movie was called "Antitrust". Had Miguel in it and everything.

  3. Sign the petition! by JediLow · · Score: 4, Informative
    1. Re:Sign the petition! by CogDissident · · Score: 2, Informative

      Its just a PR stunt. Stop pandering to the tax-loophole-exploiting jerk.

    2. Re:Sign the petition! by dvanduzer · · Score: 2, Funny

      He can't possibly challenge all of us to boxing matches, right?

    3. Re:Sign the petition! by sherpajohn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Its just a PR stunt. Stop pandering to the tax-loophole-exploiting jerk. A PR stunt it may well be, but I take exception to your characterization of his financing methods. At least according to his Wikipedia entry, he is one of the few people in Germany using the German tax laws in regards to German film fiancing on the way the German government intended it. the article states most "German" film financing using these "tax-loopholes" are mere exploits used to finance American films.

      His movies may suck, but at least he is using the money and tax laws as they were intended!
      --

      Going on means going far
      Going far means returning
    4. Re:Sign the petition! by nine-times · · Score: 1

      Doesn't seem like much to me. This has already been on some really popular sites, and only has 60k signatures. When you get 10 times that, you'll be a little more than halfway towards the goal.

    5. Re:Sign the petition! by STrinity · · Score: 1

      I have the signature page in a tab set to reload every 5 seconds. It's climbing between 5 and 10 signatures per reload.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    6. Re:Sign the petition! by pugugly · · Score: 1

      No one of us can take him

      SO WE'LL HAVE TO GANG UP ON HIM - C'MON GUYS!!!

      boot to the head . . .

      --
      An Invisible Entity of Vast Power whose existence must be taken on faith alone: Liberal Media
    7. Re:Sign the petition! by Kozz · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ed Gruberman, is that you?

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    8. Re:Sign the petition! by Ucklak · · Score: 0

      I barely know about this guy, I've never seen his films, I couldn't care less if he makes films or not.
      However, if his films suck that bad, how is he able to get funding and provide jobs? I see that as a good thing for the crew at least.
      Just don't watch them if they suck. It's like turning the channel on your TV or using adblock for your web browser.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    9. Re:Sign the petition! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      If he just made crappy movies, I couldn't care less. Hey, there's thousands of people out there making crappy movies.

      What bugs me is that he takes a game I love and turns it into a horrible, horrible movie. It's not nearly as bad as having a beloved relative's memory being trampled into the mud, but it comes quite close.

      What's even worse, though, is by using the name of the game, he makes it impossible for anyone else to make a good movie of the game. Usually he has the "movie rights" to the stuff and nobody else can make a movie. Worse, yet, even if someone could make a movie, would they take the risk? Would they risk it that someone reads "House of the Dead movie" and brushes it aside since he expects the horrible crap Boll made out of it?

      Which sensible movie maker would take the risk? None, I tell you. So you're stuck with the only movie ever been made of the game that was an important part of your youth being a piece of crap not even worth being shown on your butt while you take a dump.

      It's a bit like loving a book and then seeing what movie was made out of it. If you like Dune, you know what I'm talking about.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    10. Re:Sign the petition! by cgenman · · Score: 1

      His movies may suck, but at least he is using the money and tax laws as they were intended!

      I thought they were intended to promote German arts at home and abroad, while establishing a strong local foothold for the industry. His legacy to the German film industry is a string of bombs and just awful films that the world will be deriding for years. Not only that, he has failed to help the German film industry become self-sustaining, as is evidenced by the recent announcement of returns to tiny budgets for the filmmaker.

      He didn't explicitly cheat the system like most people, true, but it is pretty obvious that what he was doing was exploitive.

    11. Re:Sign the petition! by 1u3hr · · Score: 1
      So you're stuck with the only movie ever been made of the game that was an important part of your youth being a piece of crap

      Okay. But, really, what game movies have been any better?

      I sort of enjoyed the "Super Mario Bros" dinosaur movie, but I must admit it was pretty silly. And that was about the best game movie I've seen. The rest -- unwatchable.

    12. Re:Sign the petition! by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      What bugs me is that he takes a game I love and turns it into a horrible, horrible movie

      Don't watch it, then. No-one's forcing you to, although that's a pretty good premise for a B-movie.

      What's even worse, though, is by using the name of the game, he makes it impossible for anyone else to make a good movie of the game.

      You can't copyright a title. There's nothing stopping me from making a movie about a shark and calling it Jaws. If I was directly ripping off plot and thematic elements of an existing movie of the same name, there would be a problem. Since Uwe Boll's movies are already derived from existing work, there isn't really a problem. Also, what's he going to do, sue you? What's he going to pay the lawyers with?

    13. Re:Sign the petition! by hweimer · · Score: 1

      A PR stunt it may well be, but I take exception to your characterization of his financing methods. At least according to his Wikipedia entry, he is one of the few people in Germany using the German tax laws in regards to German film fiancing on the way the German government intended it. First of all, most money for his films was spent in the US or Canada, hardly what the German legislators intended. Second, it unclear whether Boll's films were actually profitable for the investors, even when considering tax reductions. And third, the law was changed in 2005, so there will be no more Boll films financed with "stupid German money".
      --
      OS Reviews: Free and Open Source Software
  4. What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by oncehour · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Having never seen a Uwe Boll movie, can someone tell me what's so bad about him? He's got some serious hate going on on the internet, and I'm just a bit curious as to why?

    1. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by JediLow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He makes your eyes bleed... seriously. (I've tried to watch some of his stuff, I couldn't take it)

    2. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by downix · · Score: 2, Informative

      His non-videogame based movies aren't bad. The problem is he tries his hand at videogame adaptations and they always turn out the same, overpriced and underwhelmed.

      --
      Karma Whoring for Fun and Profit.
    3. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Svenne · · Score: 4, Interesting

      His movies are bad. Really, really bad. Unfortunately, they're not bad in the kind of way that they become unintentionally funny, they're just mindnumbingly bad.

      Please, take my word for it. Don't watch any of them just to find out. I'd hate to have another human being waste 2 hours on that dreck if I can help it.

      --

      Slagborr
    4. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by diegocgteleline.es · · Score: 1, Funny

      Uwe Boll is the worst director EVER.

      Which is why you shouldn't sign the petition. His films are so bad that they're wonderful. Don't listen the gamers.

    5. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by jollyreaper · · Score: 5, Funny

      Having never seen a Uwe Boll movie, can someone tell me what's so bad about him? He's got some serious hate going on on the internet, and I'm just a bit curious as to why? Imagine a modern hog factory farm, imagine the veritable rivers of semi-liquid feces squelching downhill from the oinking, shuffling pigflesh. Imagine a rope around your leg, the far end attached to a speedboat. Imagine being pulled backwards through that stinking mass, mouth clenched tight against your bile but still the runny shit makes it up your nostrils and down your throat, between your eyelids, burning your retinas, the impact of the brown waves against your body like sledgehammers.

      If you can tell me what's so bad about that, I can tell you what's so bad about Uwe Boll movies.
      --
      Kwisatz Haderach
      Sell the spice to CHOAM
      This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
    6. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Schnapple · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Having never seen a Uwe Boll movie, can someone tell me what's so bad about him?
      • -His movies are bad. Really, universally accepted as terrible.
      • -He keeps getting handed video game franchises to make movies out of, which is problematic because video game fans hate to see their favorite franchises turned into crappy movies, but it has further reaching implications in that it states, essentially, that the movie industry has no respect for the video game industry since they keep letting this man make shitty movies (that lose money, no less)
      • -His initial career was only made possible due to a loophole in German tax law which allowed him to spend other people's money on his bad movies since they could write off the loss for tax purposes. Once that loophole was closed, he decided to stop making expensive ($1M+) movies
      • -He's quite arrogant and usually pretty angry (which you might be too if people kept shitting on your movies
      • -He lured critcs out to a charity fight and then beat the snot out of them, sending one to the hospital
      On a deeper level, whereas people like you and me have to work our asses off, he's rich off his no-talent works because of a (now closed) loophole. He wipes his asses with video game franchises (the Postal movie actually made 9/11 jokes) and he's a pretty despicable human being (see the Wired article above).
    7. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Coryoth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Having never seen a Uwe Boll movie, can someone tell me what's so bad about him? He's got some serious hate going on on the internet, and I'm just a bit curious as to why? He engenders the degree of hate (particularly on the internet) that he does for a couple of reasons. The first is that his movies are bad -- and I mean really, painfully, teeth-grindingly bad. Of course that alone doesn't generate that much hate; there are, after all, an endless supply of incredibly bad movies and abysmal movie makers in the world. The second point is that Uwe Boll has a great love of "adapting" computer games for the screen, and he is highly prolific at doing so. This manages to piss of geeks by raping their fond memories of games (Boll has a habit of going after older games, as far back as the 80s) by butchering what made the game good and simultaneously making something that, while attractive from the title, is painful to sit through. For those who have wised up and don't attend his films, there's still the niggling fact that, by producing so many video game based films that are so very bad, Boll has gone a long way toward discrediting both video games, and the idea of making films based on video games (in this latter point he is hardly alone of course). Since internet geeks and video game geeks have a nice large overlap, this makes internet based Boll hate something that gets noticed.
    8. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 4, Funny

      He makes your eyes bleed... seriously. (I've tried to watch some of his stuff, I couldn't take it) Maybe he should change his name to Ewe Bola!
      Ba-dum-dum!
      Thanks, I'll be here all week!
      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    9. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by norton_I · · Score: 3, Interesting

      His movies are really, really bad. But I would never sign the petition. Better to try making moving and totally suck that be a bunch of whiny jerks on the internet who can "hate" someone for simply making movies which they can choose not to watch.

      As for "loophole tax shelter"--it was never a loophole, it was an incentive to get people to make movies in germany, which he did. If I were a tax paying german, I could see being upset by this, but since I am not, I don't really see any reason to do this.

      Yes, I am being whiny jerk on the internet. That doesn't affect whether what I say is true or not.

    10. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine an idiot with no talent in any art, imagine he's an accountant, then imagine german filming tax breaks also include a very profitable loophole that can be exploited by making shite movies, but passing alot of money through them.

    11. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      I saw BloodRayne.. I didn't think it was that bad. It was at most ok, but I've seen far, far worse movies than that.

    12. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by dougmc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm not sure it's entirely his fault. After all, video game movies have a history of sucking, even before Uwe started making them. But you would think he'd either 1) get the hint and stop, or 2) find out why they suck and fix it and if #2 is impossible, there's always #1.

    13. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by iluvcapra · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As someone who actually works in the film industry, I'm not too quick to complain, since all of his films generally result in people working....

      But on the other hand, his films are some of the most cynically exploitive junk you've ever seen. He uses a provision in the German tax code to get tax credits and free money, and uses those to bootstrap foreign distribution pre-sales and video-game tie in deals. In effect, he's made money before he even starts rolling the camera, and so the quality of his film itself is irrelevant as long as it cuts a good trailer, will have a good poster, and has enough "bankable" stars in the project to stimulate box office. It's essentially the Roger Corman model, just without the class and punk authenticity.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    14. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by dougmc · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Nothing wrong with 9/11 jokes. A Postal movie *should* be un-PC.

      (Not that I'm saying his movies haven't sucked. Or that video game movies didn't have a history of suckage even before he started making them.)

    15. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine Ed Wood with a lot more money and less talent. The hate comes from the fact he turns out god awful films based on a material that has the potential to make decent films and he spends a bundle doing it. I'd say he needs practice but he seems to actually get worse with time.

    16. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 4, Funny

      > Having never seen a Uwe Boll movie, can someone tell me what's so bad about him?

      Perhaps this review of his version of Alone in the Dark will be instructive (as well as entertaining).

    17. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by eldavojohn · · Score: 1

      -He lured critcs out to a charity fight [wired.com] and then beat the snot out of them, sending one to the hospital It's a bit worse than that, from the trivia page of Postal, he had also planned on capitalizing off of that by using it as footage in the movie:

      In June of 2006, Uwe Boll publicly announced a challenge to his numerous critics to "put up or shut up." Based on certain criteria, Boll will select five of his harshest critics to fight in a series of multi-round boxing matches to be held in Vancouver, British Columbia that will be broadcast over the Internet. He planned to use footage from these fights in this movie, but it was soon discovered that they don't fit into the plot of the movie, so the idea was dropped. Itâ(TM)s claimed that they might be part of the DVD when itâ(TM)s released. Is it a "charity" fight when you are planning on making money off of it?

      Also as further proof, I offer up another bit of trivia from Postal:

      Uwe Boll only shot 3 to 5 takes of every scene in the movie. He thought that the biggest strength in comedy is the emotion behind the acting, which cannot be kept when trying the scenes too often. That little snippet may remind you of Ed Wood.

      I assure you, I watch a lot of movies. He is up there in the worst director/writer category. Thank god Germany got its laws straightened out!
      --
      My work here is dung.
    18. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Otto · · Score: 1

      BloodRayne was probably the crowning achievement of his career. Then he followed it up with BloodRayne 2 and Postal...

      Seriously, this guy has made his name by taking decent games and making completely shit movies out of them. I'm saddened to learn he's been working on an adaptation of Far Cry.

      http://imdb.com/name/nm0093051/

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    19. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by scooter.higher · · Score: 1

      I'm with you... I haven't seen any of his movies either... but then again, he has yet to make a movie based on "The Legend of Zelda," "Super Mario Bros.," or "Tetris" - at least not that I know of.

      A Zelda movie... now that would get me to go back to the theater instead of waiting for DVD releases!

      --
      Ramen
    20. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      It just takes one. I had no idea who he was, and innocently walked into island of the dead. It was horrible, just amazingly bad. I've never felt so disoriented after watching a movie. It was like this giant vortex of suck and fail. It's as close as a person can come to actually being mentally attacked by a movie. I know how it sounds, but I can understand how people could carry a grudge.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    21. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Pojut · · Score: 1

      I personally don't think his movies are all that bad, to be honest...it's his bastardization of the original story and events that happen within a video game that make him such an ass.

      Most of his movies are merely ok...but considering they are supposed to be based on video games, they tend to have only the name in common. I can't speak for others, but that is why he pisses me off.

    22. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by kabocox · · Score: 3, Interesting

      His initial career was only made possible due to a loophole in German tax law which allowed him to spend other people's money on his bad movies since they could write off the loss for tax purposes. Once that loophole was closed, he decided to stop making expensive ($1M+) movies
      He's quite arrogant and usually pretty angry (which you might be too if people kept shitting on your movies
      He lured critics out to a charity fight and then beat the snot out of them, sending one to the hospital


      This guy is my new hero. WTH does it matter that you or I don't like his movies or that they were funded by a tax loop hole? Nada. There are similar tax loops here in the US. One of my college professors made movies using the US version of this. He was pretty up front about all of it. Yep the people who fund him don't care about money or where their money is being spent because they just need to lose some for tax purposes.

      I'm impressed that this guy had the guts to beat the snot out of his critics. Most of us would B.S. about it or try to bluff our way out of something, but we just wouldn't have the balls to do that. I'm sorry, but that's great. It doesn't matter how bad his movies are. He's defending them and some one is obviously paying him to make them. This guy now ranks above Cmdr Taco in my people that deserve respect for doing something that I should have done/would like to do book.

    23. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by phallstrom · · Score: 4, Funny

      You work for the US Government's Torture Oversight Committee don't you?

    24. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by ewhac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uwe Boll is the worst director EVER.

      No. Harold P. Warren is the worst director ever.

      Schwab

    25. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by RingDev · · Score: 1

      To be fair, anyone who gets into a ring with another person set on a competition of combat prowess, for what ever reason, should be there to fight. Charity or not, they are fighting.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    26. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Links to get ewe boll movies on bt. (he said not to watch so here's to helping us all watch them.)
      reverse psychology you know.

      http://www.mininova.org/search/?search=house+of+the+dead/4
      http://www.mininova.org/search/alone+in+the+dark/4
      http://www.mininova.org/search/bloodrayne/4
      http://www.mininova.org/search/in+the+name+of+the+king/4
      his other two movies 'heart of america' and 'blackwoods' weren't on mininova , and google couldn't find them either, and others said they were his better works too.

    27. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by KillerBob · · Score: 1

      No... Ed Wood remains the worst director ever... and his movies actually *are* so bad they're good.... Uwe Boll's movies are just bad.

      --
      If you believe everything you read, you'd better not read. - Japanese proverb
    28. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 5, Funny

      Imagine a modern hog factory farm, imagine the veritable rivers of semi-liquid feces squelching downhill from the oinking, shuffling pigflesh. Imagine a rope around your leg, the far end attached to a speedboat. Imagine being pulled backwards through that stinking mass, mouth clenched tight against your bile but still the runny shit makes it up your nostrils and down your throat, between your eyelids, burning your retinas, the impact of the brown waves against your body like sledgehammers. Or to put it another way, if you were to take the paragraph above and adapt it as a screenplay, the result would be better than any Uwe Boll movie.
      --
      Soylent Green is peoplicious!
    29. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by aniefer · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, they're not bad in the kind of way that they become unintentionally funny, they're just mindnumbingly bad.
      They are bad, but unintenionally funny may be a personal preference.
      I have a copy of BloodRayne. I laughed and enjoyed its horribleness. The whole idea of it is just filled with awesome..
    30. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by dpninerSLASH · · Score: 1

      What's the point in signing a petition? Wouldn't it be easier to just not watch his movies?

    31. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Gravatron · · Score: 1

      Having seen the live action mario movie, I'm honestly not sure if his version could be any worse.

    32. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      I rarely waste two hours of my life on a bad movie. If it's in the theatre, I go out for a popcorn refill and return to a different screen.

      If it's home, I leave it on in the background and run 14 loops for another RoTP. What the heck...

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    33. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm impressed that this guy had the guts to beat the snot out of his critics. Most of us would B.S. about it or try to bluff our way out of something, but we just wouldn't have the balls to do that. I'm sorry, but that's great. It doesn't take a whole lot of guts to beat up a guy with no fighting experience who gets lured into the ring thinking the whole thing is a publicity stunt rather than an actual fight.
    34. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by seriesrover · · Score: 1
      I've not seen any of his movies either but I gather they're bad so I think I'll do better things with my time


      Nonetheless, what I don't understand is this; isn't the "slashdot\geek way" to not censor or ban things and let him get on with it? Isn't it the normal response to say "just dont watch the movie if you don't want to" and just because you think its bad doesnt mean he should stop making the movies? Should GFA be banned if 18K parents sign a petition?

    35. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Toonol · · Score: 1

      Honestly, I saw a preview of Postal and it looked far, far better than anything else he's done. Maybe stupid lowbrow humor is his niche; making quality action/adventure films sure isn't.

    36. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Wizard+Drongo · · Score: 5, Funny

      Heh, brings to mind a description on a torrent site of the first (and co-incidentally last) I ever saw. I had to download it after I saw this. I thought it couldn't be that bad... I was wrong. Here's the quote: "Without doubt, this is the worst film ever made, and probably that will ever be made. It is not worth the cost of a cinema ticket, it is not worth the cost of the power it took to keep my computer running to download it, it is not worth the cost of the power to keep your tv on as you watch it. It is not even worth killing the electrons that power that tv's tube, infinitesimal though their brief, tortured lives were. Avoid."

      --
      The truth shall always be free: Boris Floricic is Tron.
    37. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Schnapple · · Score: 1

      To be fair, anyone who gets into a ring with another person set on a competition of combat prowess, for what ever reason, should be there to fight. Charity or not, they are fighting.
      I can't find his exact quote but Lowtax, one of the four that fought, was apparently told that this was just all a big gag and that Boll wasn't taking it seriously. Lowtax got beat up pretty bad and reports that two of the other fighters continued to get punched by Boll even after it was clear that they were injured and no longer in any shape to continue the fight. That's not fighting, that's revenge.

      True, it wasn't the best idea for these critics to get in the ring in the first place but Boll is a complete scumbag, even by fighting standards.
    38. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1

      His initial career was only made possible due to a loophole in German tax law which allowed him to spend other people's money on his bad movies since they could write off the loss for tax purposes.

      According to Wikipedia, that law was there specifically to encourage German citizens to produce German movies. I can't fault him for taking advantage of a tax law by doing exactly what that law was designed to make him do.

      He lured critcs out to a charity fight and then beat the snot out of them, sending one to the hospital

      One of the "charity fighters" was a trained amateur boxer (and Boll won anyway). Seriously, a guy famous for his temper who happens to hate yo u invites you to fight him in public. He shows up and pounds you. How can this possibly be surprising to anyone?

      I agree with another poster: I never liked the man before this. Now I file him in the "entertaining crackpot" category. I'm still not going to watch his movies, but maybe, just maybe, he's not such a bad guy after all.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    39. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by rk · · Score: 1

      Eh, I think we all understand that this is a joke. They could get 10 million signatures, and Boll could say "Screw you guys, I'm going to make MORE bad movies!" and I'm not going to be up in arms about it, even though I did sign the petition, because I think it's funny.

      Even if it weren't a joke, it's not censorship if he voluntarily does it. It's one thing if I say "I'll quit making movies if you get a million to sign a petition." It's quite another to say "I've got a million to sign a petition that your product should be banned. I'm going to pass a law and ban it."

    40. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by drydirt · · Score: 1



      -He keeps getting handed video game franchises to make movies out of, which is problematic because video game fans hate to see their favorite franchises turned into crappy movies, but it has further reaching implications in that it states, essentially, that the movie industry has no respect for the video game industry since they keep letting this man make shitty movies (that lose money, no less)

      I agree and disagree with this. I don't think he's ruined beloved franchises-- I mean how many rabid Dungeon Siege, Postal and Bloodrayne fans are there, we aren't talking about Metal Gear or Fallout-- and while he's certainly an asshole, he's just one of a thousand people like him in "the industry" and is really no worse than, say, Brett Ratner.

      I think most of our outrage is because of the damage he's done to the video game industry as a whole. Not monetarily, of course, but he's really done a lot to make movies based on games a sub-B level ghetto and given the Eberts who think storytelling in games can't rise to the level of movies plenty of ammunition.

      Also,

      He wipes his asses with video game franchises (the Postal movie actually made 9/11 jokes) and he's a pretty despicable human being (see the Wired article above).

      Calling him out for 9/11 jokes is a bit unfair, as he's hardly the only one who's made them-- for example Family Guy has at least a dozen per season. Irreverence is a staple of comedy, after all. Boll's crime here isn't making jokes in bad taste-- it's making unfunny, hamhanded and completely terrible jokes in bad taste.

    41. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Martin+Blank · · Score: 1

      Comic book movies had a long history of sucking, too, until serious people such as Sam Raimi started to get involved and decided to not just make a good adaptation, but to make a good movie aside from the adaptation.

      There are some games that likely would not make good movies no matter what you do. Doom, for example, probably is never going to rate to the level of X-Men or Spiderman. But there are examples where there was a serious attempt which, while falling short of the mark and not parroting the game's plotline, didn't totally suck (Silent Hill, for example). Far Cry might have worked, and Half-Life would probably work well (with the change that Gordon would actually have a voice). But they have to have a crew that is dedicated to and experienced in making good movies.

      --
      You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
    42. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by boris111 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The more we hate him the stronger he becomes!

    43. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Schnapple · · Score: 1

      Calling him out for 9/11 jokes is a bit unfair, as he's hardly the only one who's made them-- for example Family Guy has at least a dozen per season.
      True, but Family Guy never featured a scene of a janitor in one of the WTC towers looking out of the window two seconds before the plane hit and destroyed him. Or at least that's what was in the trailers. That takes it a bit far, IMO.
    44. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Mitreya · · Score: 1
      He engenders the degree of hate (particularly on the internet) that he does for a couple of reasons. The first is that his movies are bad -- and I mean really, painfully, teeth-grindingly bad. Of course that alone doesn't generate that much hate; there are, after all, an endless supply of incredibly bad movies and abysmal movie makers in the world. The second point is that Uwe Boll has a great love of "adapting" computer games for the screen, and he is highly prolific at doing so

      If only all that hate could be harnessed to finance a good adaption of a game (and finding a person to direct it). I am yet to see a good one, and I would argue that Bloodrayne was of similar quality as, say, Hitman... Despite of IMDB rating it as 2.6 vs 6.3 :)

    45. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by justme8800 · · Score: 1
      Not be the devil's advocate here, but what exactly is so bad about the 9/11 joke? That it doesn't demonize the terrorists as much as we'd like? Is it too soon? It's been almost 7 years. Despite the humor being distastefully black, it was pretty funny, and arguably appropriate for a "postal" movie. We need to move beyond the automatic shunning of anyone who dares make light of a dark situation... "respect to the victims" can only be stretched so far. Do you shun Mel Brooks for turning the Spanish Inquisition into a comedy skit?

      I'm not trying to say that Boll is a good filmmaker, I haven't seen any of his films. But give credit where credit is due; as you say, there are plenty of legitimate reasons to not like Boll, so you don't have to create any more of them that don't exist.

      ~Justme8800

      [PS, no disrespect meant to the victims of 9/11 (or the Spanish Inquisition) or their families.]

    46. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1, Funny

      [...] Thanks, I'll be here all week! ...I was afraid you were going to say that after a lame pun!
      Remember, kids, puns are the lowest possible form of comedy with the sole exception of 'lolcatz'. Rickrolls, now those are funny!
      --

      If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

    47. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Omestes · · Score: 1

      There are a couple good ones out there though, like Silent Hill and the first Resident Evil movie. Granted they weren't stellar, but they were amusing and somewhat faithful.

      He, though, butchers them beyond belief. Bloodrayne was watchable, but not as enjoyable as all the other movies in the crappy "ninja chick in latex fight evil" genre. The rest of his movies were among the worst I have ever seen, and thats saying something. Watching the Dungeon Siege movie was like getting a root canal, but without anesthesia, and by a bum in the alley behind the dental office who scrounged his instruments out of a dumpster behind a Home Depot.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    48. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by glittalogik · · Score: 5, Funny

      The problem is not that he's making movies, it's the movies he's making. He's being put at the helm of some of our favourite game franchise crossovers, and then butchering them mercilessly.

      Imagine your favourite game in the world. You've beaten it on Legendary 15 times. You've read every spinoff novel. You've unlocked every single outfit and cooking utensil. Not only have you rescued the princess, you've persuaded her to get hot-coffee-mod-freaky with you. You own figurines of every single character AND the entire dev team. There's a personal dedication to you on the inside cover of the walkthrough. You've taken out whole battalions with 100% headshots using a catapult and a bag of frozen peas.

      This game is your everything. Others might not understand, but it makes you happy, and that's all that counts. Then you find out that there's going to be a movie. On a given release date in the near future, your life will be complete. You impose a media blackout on yourself - no previews, no trailers, no interviews. Nothing that will spoil the anticipation, the cloud of pure joy on which you're floating. This is going to be the best shit ever.

      The day arrives. You're at the first screening in the country, sitting front and centre. You've driven 1500 miles to be there. Your hands are shaking. You can't stop grinning. ...

      Two hours later, your eyeballs are bleeding. The only reason you're still alive is that you chewed your own foot off. All that you know and love lies in smoking ruins.

      The credits roll... "Directed by: Uwe Boll"

      You get where I'm going with this, yeah?

    49. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      Yes, somebody says your movie sucks so you beat him up. That's very... constructive.

    50. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You end comedic drum fills with a cymbal crash, nooblet.

    51. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      I hear theatre earnings are falling. Play too much crap and the whole industry gets a bad name. That generally results in people NOT working in the long run.

    52. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Apotsy · · Score: 1

      Uwe Boll only shot 3 to 5 takes of every scene in the movie. He thought that the biggest strength in comedy is the emotion behind the acting, which cannot be kept when trying the scenes too often. That little snippet may remind you of Ed Wood Or Steven Spielberg. He did all the dialogue scenes for the original Jurassic Park in 3 takes or less. He also brought the movie in ahead of schedule. Not saying Boll is as good as Spielberg, just saying that's a poor metric for comparison.
    53. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Your+Pal+Dave · · Score: 5, Funny

      Imagine your favourite game in the world. You've beaten it on Legendary 15 times. You've read every spinoff novel. You've unlocked every single outfit and cooking utensil. Not only have you rescued the princess, you've persuaded her to get hot-coffee-mod-freaky with you. You own figurines of every single character AND the entire dev team. There's a personal dedication to you on the inside cover of the walkthrough. You've taken out whole battalions with 100% headshots using a catapult and a bag of frozen peas.

      [...]

      You get where I'm going with this, yeah? Umm, you really need a girlfriend?
    54. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or to put it another way, if you were to take the paragraph above and adapt it as a screenplay, the result would be better than any Uwe Boll movie. Unless that screenplay was then given to Uwe Boll.

      OK. That's not fair.

      Unless that screenplay was used for the basis of a video game which in turn was the basis for a Uwe Boll movie.
    55. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A publicity stunt where you're getting into a boxing ring and punching each other? Come on--Uwe Boll isn't a champion boxer or anything. You take a man up on a challenge, at least put in some time learning how to throw a punch.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    56. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by MukiMuki · · Score: 5, Informative

      Never mind that once someone with actual fighting experience stepped up to the challenge (and barely weighed less than Uwe), the fight was denied. Boll only accepted entrants who weighed significantly less and had no idea what they were doing.

    57. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      I didn't say the other guys aren't morons; I just rejected the idea that what Boll did "took a lot of guts." It didn't.

    58. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by WarPresident · · Score: 1

      He lured critcs out to a charity fight [wired.com] and then beat the snot out of them, sending one to the hospital

      So, they pretty much felt just like I do after watching one of his movies?

      --
      Here come da fudge!
    59. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tarantino? Is that you?

    60. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To give some idea, even knowing that Kristanna Loken would be topless, Bloodrayne was completely unwatchable.

    61. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was a bass cymbal.

    62. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is destined to become one of my all time favorite posts. Thank you.

    63. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by kesuki · · Score: 1

      Well kinda, http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0173840/ was my favorite movie of 2001, it got horrible reviews, people said it was trash, it did so bad at the box office that every other final fantasy movie has been the 'straight to dvd' variety...

      But IT GOT ME A REAL DATE! With a pretty girl, no less!!!! she was probably only an 8 on a scale of 10, but I'm only a 7.5 according to hot or not... plus I'm overweight (but for guys that doesn't matter as much)

      the movie could have been bad enough to make my eyes bleed and it would have been my favorite movie.

      all my other movie dates, were with long time internet friends when i drove to Texas.

      they don't compare to actually succeeding on asking a girl out on a date.

    64. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Petskull · · Score: 1

      This is exactly what happened when I timed my R&R vacation time from Iraq to watch Hitchhikers Guide to the Universe. I could have killed someone and no one would have ever convicted me. The girl couldn't figure out why I was so damn pissed. I was seriously livid. I'd seriously, no joke drop some huge coin to have that director never work again and die cold and alone..

    65. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      Naww, Uwe Boll's movies are so bad that they're so good that they teh suck.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    66. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by cgenman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Watch This. I challenge you to watch the whole thing without skipping. Yes, that includes the part where they recap the current scene twice.

      Now realize that this is probably the *best* scene in the movie, mainly because it isn't filled with lines like "Guys, check out this book. Looks pretty old, maybe it'll help us!" and "We finally got to the boat but it wasn't there."

      Avoid at all costs.

    67. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by indiechild · · Score: 1

      I think people should be rating your post as Funny rather than Insightful.

    68. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by iluvcapra · · Score: 1

      But thats the point, his movies are like Dead Souls, and he's Chichikov. His movies don't have to make a dime in the theaters because he makes a profit off of the very act of making the movie, without regard for selling the movie or entertaining anyone.

      All that money came from the German taxpayer to make German cinema, to give it artistic license. As I said, I'm not against people working, but imagine if the money for Bloodrayne was spent on The Lives of Others.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Baltar.
    69. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by jalefkowit · · Score: 1

      They could get 10 million signatures, and Boll could say "Screw you guys, I'm going to make MORE bad movies!" and I'm not going to be up in arms about it, even though I did sign the petition, because I think it's funny.

      It's actually worse than that; Boll comes out ahead no matter what happens:

      • Most likely outcome: petition picks up a few thousand signatures and then fizzles out. Boll can now point to it as evidence that the "geek backlash" against his work is overblown.
      • Less likely alternate outcome: petition picks up a million+ signatures. Boll can now point to it as proof that he is "edgy" and "controversial", which is useful since his latest project appears to be an attempt to offend as many people as humanly possible. "The movie that a million people tried to keep you from seeing" makes a great pitch line to entertainment "reporters".

      The only way it could possibly be any more useful for Boll is if he himself set up the petition and is using it to gather the email addresses of people who hate him. Working email addresses fetch a pretty penny on the spam market, so it becomes like printing free money.

    70. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't tell you. Too busy keeping my mouth clamped shut as I throw up in my mouth.

    71. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by indi0144 · · Score: 1

      Here! Bleed!

    72. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by zoips · · Score: 1

      I killed myself at the 2 minute mark. I'm gonna haunt you so hard...

    73. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have been at the same party with me this past weekend, damn that was a good time!

    74. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by RingDev · · Score: 1

      If someone was mislead into getting into the rung under the premise that it was an act, yeah, that's shady. But if they were given the oppertunity to box him, and they went into the ring with out prepairing, it was a dumb decision on their part. If the cornermen weren't smart enough to toss in the towel for their boxers, it was a dumb decision on their part. And if the ref didn't call the fight as soon as it was clear that it was over, it was a dumb decision on his part.

      Sue who you like, but it was a whole lot of dumb decisions going on, and for once, I don't think it was Uwe. Although waving the rules for a 17 year old was pretty damn stupid.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    75. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Geno+Z+Heinlein · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The day arrives.... Two hours later, your eyeballs are bleeding.

      You've just described the day I brought my friends to see Highlander 2.

    76. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was beautiful.

    77. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by FornaxChemica · · Score: 1

      I don't think House of the Dead, BloodRayne, Dungeon Siege and Postal are many people's favorite games. I haven't seen any of them as films but I wonder if they can compete in terms of lameness with had been done with Street Fighter, Double Dragon and Mortal Kombat in the 90's. No one had gone after the directors as aggressively as some people on the Net are going after Boll though. It's a persona issue here, they just can't stand the guy and there's a rhetorical exchange between him and his Net-based opponents. At least you have to concede he's facing his critics.

      Paul Anderson, who's been doing the same game-to-movie stuff as Boll except less actively, doesn't get a tenth of the hatred Boll gets, even though he turned a heavy-weight Japanese franchise such as Resident Evil pretty much into his own happy-crappy little series. And now, as a producer, he's even going to take on Castlevania. It may look like those guys are having fun bathing in mediocrity and making video games look stupid but I think the problem is broader than that, video games are too action-packed and tightly defined to make good films. Proof is, not a single talented director is interested in making films out of games, and when there is finally such a possibility, like Peter Jackson with Halo, whether the director leaves his directorial seat to another person, whether the project is abandoned altogether.

      Signing this petition to stop bad video game adaptations to be made is pointless. With or without Boll, they will go on until good directors eventually get interested in the venture, which might never happen. Those who sign the petition, I think, have an old score to settle with Boll.

    78. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Or Steven Spielberg. He did all the dialogue scenes for the original Jurassic Park in 3 takes or less.

      There's a good reason for that. The only real way you can tell if a particular set of lines is going to work is to have the actors say them. You can't do it yourself, because you haven't got the same diction as the actor. If a line is hard for the actor to say, but you force them to grind through 27 takes until you get one exactly as written, then you're going to have dull, stilted dialogue in your movie and it will suck. Steven Spielberg lets his actors improvise to an extent, paraphrasing lines where the script needn't be followed precisely. That way you get more natural dialogue - rather than just reading lines off a page they're responding to the other actor in the scene.

    79. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      What about Alan Smithee?

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    80. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of a great Harrison Ford comment to George Lucas on the Star Wars script.

      "You can type this shit, George, but you sure can't say it."

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    81. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by coder111 · · Score: 1

      That was the funniest shit I have read in a looong time.

      Thanks, you made my day.

      --Coder

    82. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by WetFreud · · Score: 1

      Well, take a look at the current ratings of his films at http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0093051/
      House of the Dead: User Rating: 2.0/10 Bottom 100: #35
      Alone in the Dark: 2.2/10 Bottom 100: #64
      BloodRayne: 2.6/10
      Seed: 1.9/10 Bottom 100: #30
      BloodRayne 2.6/10
      BloodRayne II 2.3/10 Bottom 100: #76
      Of course, statistics is one thing, but you can't truly appreciate how painfully bad they are until you actually watch one. Alone in the dark did it for me. Even now, three years later, I still get angry just thinking about how he violated one of my cherished childhood gaming memories.

    83. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Grimbleton · · Score: 1

      I got this for a Christmas gift 2002 from my then-girlfriend's parents, and proceeded to bang the hell out of her while watching it with her in their living room Christmas night. I, too, love this movie. (And not just for the sex I got during it. It was more than decent.)

    84. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by alecwood · · Score: 0

      But surely this is nothing different to what American film directors have been doing to countless book for decades, and also to historical facts, U571 etc. Simple answer, don't watch his films. I don't.

      --
      Real happiness lies in the completion of work using your own brains and skills.
    85. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Jellybob · · Score: 1

      It may look like those guys are having fun bathing in mediocrity and making video games look stupid but I think the problem is broader than that, video games are too action-packed and tightly defined to make good films.


      I think you've just got to the root of things there. I've never seen a good movie adaptation of a computer game, and that's the reason.

      How do you turn "run around, killing everything you see, waiting for a storyline element to turn up at some point" into something people want to sit and passively absorb for 2 hours?

      There are very few games I can think of that would work as a film. That's ok though, because films generally don't work well as games either.

      Maybe Half-Life could get away with it (I always thought it played like a B-movie), but they'd need to give Gordan some dialogue... and someone to tag along with him through Black Mesa.
    86. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Jellybob · · Score: 1

      Sorry, you lost me when you mentioned X-Men as being a good film.

      Maybe it's because I never read the comics, but that series always struck me as below average action, without much of a plot.

    87. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Schnapple · · Score: 1

      Yeah you're right, but I just meant that the 9/11 joke in Postal was waaaay more over the top than Family Guy (whose jokes centered on Guiliani). But yeah, being offended to the point of thinking he should not be making movies any more is more of a "ammo for the argument" thing.

    88. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by ghostlibrary · · Score: 1

      > Watch This. I challenge you to watch the whole thing without skipping.

      It was actually pretty entertaining. I had no problem with the dialog, either.

      Of course, I was watching it with the sound off. Maybe I should watch his movies that way, with the sound off.

      It was oddly like watching someone play a videogame, poorly.

      --
      A.
    89. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Fafnir43 · · Score: 1

      He used to be an amateur boxer, though, which makes him considerably tougher than the average Internet critic.

      --
      To know recursion, you must first know recursion.
    90. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Doctor+Faustus · · Score: 1

      Remember, kids, puns are the lowest possible form of comedy with the sole exception of 'lolcatz'
      I nominate the fart joke.

      I rather like LOL Cats, as long as that grammar stays there. And really, they'd be just as funny without the LOL-speak. This wouldn't, though:
      http://lolcode.com/

    91. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Hubbell · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He refused to appear on Attack of the Show after saying he'd fight one of the hosts. The hosts called Seanbaby up and had him come and guest host the show, and Seanbaby used to train heavily in muay thai and the like, and as soon as Uwe Boll found out he refused to appear. The guy is a pussy.

    92. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Sethus · · Score: 1

      About a year ago, I was in a similar position to yours. I was at Penny Arcade expo, and they brought Uwe Boll out to speak about video game movies... in a hall full of people who hated him. I really didn't understand as I thought making video game movies was actually a good thing(I think I'm the only one who loved the Mario Bros movie). But after a bit of rough interviewing, he actually posed a few good points as to why he keeps making movies; people pay out the ass to see them. Can you fathom what it means to make a movie that makes millions?

      That being said, right after he showed a trailer for a movie he was making, a very dry sort of humor, making fun of the USA and the war on terror. A good premise for a satire, but just.. TERRIBLY made, none of the jokes were funny in the trailer. My friend and I literally walked out, more important things to do at PAX than watch that.

      --
      Posting with out proof reading since 2001.
    93. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That seems like a strong reaction from someone that doesn't remember the name of the movie.

    94. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but anybody willingly walking into an event that they think is set up to give Boll publicity deserves to be sent to the hospital.

    95. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Mastadex · · Score: 0

      Where do I sign this petition??

      --
      A morning without coffee is like something without something else.
    96. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by J.R.+Random · · Score: 1

      I've only seen one Uwe Boll movie -- Bloodrayne, on TV. What made the movie really, really bad was that it was a totally literal rehash of the video game. Every other person was a vampire. That's typical of videogames, where you need lots of opportunities to level up, but it's a totally unrealistic predator - prey ratio. Every stereotype of the genre you could want was there, including a potion room. The dialog must have been lifted straight from the canned text in the video game. You won't be surprised that the finale is where Bloodrayne kills the boss monster.

      The only redeeming feature is that the heroine wears a skanky outfit throughout the entire movie.

    97. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by steelfood · · Score: 1

      Where does one sign up?

      I weigh less than 140 and am 6 feet tall. I also don't use gloves, and he's free to do the same.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    98. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by rholland356 · · Score: 1

      Those with modern hog factory farm experience can tell you that is the smell of money.

      Those who make modern B movies to feed the insatiable cable channel beast can tell you that is the smell of money.

      Your contribution to this situation? As a consumer, it is YOUR money that keeps the troughs full.

    99. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ZING!

    100. Re:What's so bad about Uwe Boll? by CTachyon · · Score: 1

      Hey, now! Mortal Kombat was actually fun if you didn't stare at it too hard, Resident Evil was tolerable for at least one viewing, and Street Fighter was... well, Street Fighter had MST3K comedy value. (Oh my God! They killed Raul Julia! You bastards!)

      Having deliberately not watched a Boll movie from start to finish due to an utter lack of appeal for what I saw, I can't say for sure that they don't have any redeeming qualities, but they certainly seem at least one notch lower on the bad movie hierarchy than that.

      I mean, sure, Paul Anderson has turned out some utter shite -- AvP comes to mind as one of his shiniest polished turds -- but he's never sunk to the Highlander-level depths of "Oh my God, now I have to invent a time machine just to retroactively kill myself and thereby never see this movie", or even to Vercingétorix levels of "Please remind me again why we're watching this".

      --
      Range Voting: preference intensity matters
  5. Does he know about Teh Internets? by whoever57 · · Score: 1

    Does this guy know about the Internet, and the fact that there are millions of people using it, including people who do random things such as siging online petitions?

    I don't care about his movies, but like many, it would be fun to see someone give up his job just because a million people clicked a button on a webpage somewhere..... such a feeling of power!

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    1. Re:Does he know about Teh Internets? by peragrin · · Score: 1

      I have seen a couple of his flicks. it is time I wish i had back. For the record I signed three times, one with each of my email addresses. Of course even if the petition gets two million signatures he won't quit.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    2. Re:Does he know about Teh Internets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Does this guy know about the Internet, and the fact that there are millions of people using it, including people who do random things such as siging online petitions?

      I doubt there are one million people who care enough about who this guy is.

    3. Re:Does he know about Teh Internets? by dougmc · · Score: 4, Funny
      To be fair, if the list does hit one million, he'll just claim fraud. And based on your comment, he'd actually be right.

      Way to go! Uwe Boll will continue making video game movies, even if the petition reaches one million signatures -- and it'll be YOUR, peragrin's, fault.

      (Granted, I don't expect him to stop even if the petition does hit one million unique, verifiable signatures, but still, I'll blame you.)

    4. Re:Does he know about Teh Internets? by unablepostAC · · Score: 0
      He knows the internet, after all he hates web critics.

      But internet petitions signatures, like if no one would sign twice

      So I bet he would say, FAKe, and move over that petition

    5. Re:Does he know about Teh Internets? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually I think if he is able to get 1 million signatures then that proves that 1 million people are interested in his work. As a marketing tool 1 million people saying anything for or against you can be used to make money. This petition stinks of marketing so before you put your name on the list think about this: If I go to advertisers and say look I have this list of 1 million people who have an "opinion" on my work...that my friends is power. And with this power he can go to investors and make more movies. I find it laughable if anyone really thinks signing this petition will make him stop making movies...on the contrary he will be able to make more!

      - Ex-investor
      - Ex-marketeer
      - Ex-exec

      -ac

    6. Re:Does he know about Teh Internets? by peragrin · · Score: 1

      that's okay I get blamed all the time for shite I didn't do, at least I will be at least partially guilty in this case. A day after slashdot aired it it is only at 93,000 signatures. they won't hit a million at that rate.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
  6. Regardless of the petition by joeflies · · Score: 1

    How come the studios don't stop him from making movies? It's not like they're drowning in the money he's raking in with Bloodrayne. They have focus groups that must be universally telling them that fans of the original property don't want to see his movies. And the reviews, well the reviews speak for themselves.

    1. Re:Regardless of the petition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He must be making those movies on the cheap. So it is entirely possible his movies actually make money.

      "House of the Dead" is not actually terrible, but I have never seen the game, on the other hand stuff like "Alone in the Dark" is so bad I could hardly watch it half way. I could live with cheap movies, but he totally destroys the story line without any good reason whatsoever.

    2. Re:Regardless of the petition by Akaihiryuu · · Score: 1

      Actually, his films *did* make money. They just didn't make money in the *ahem* "traditional" way. He made money off his films by using creative accounting and German tax loopholes...basically the more money his movies lost at the box office, the more everyone could write off on taxes and make a profit (well, simplified explanation).

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uwe_boll

    3. Re:Regardless of the petition by OMNIpotusCOM · · Score: 1

      A very sensible question. I think, all things being equal, whenever a big-name studio says that their movie made no money, and given that money is a lot like energy in that you cannot create or destroy either, a Uwe Boll film makes money. Something like that anyway.

    4. Re:Regardless of the petition by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      How come the studios don't stop him from making movies? It's not like they're drowning in the money he's raking in with Bloodrayne. I have asked that question of people in the know some time ago, and as I recall it had something to do with German tax loopholes. This meant that the movie could turn a profit (for the right people, presumably it was a huge loss in many books) no matter how badly it did. Have a look at Boll's IMDb entry and note how many films he has in production or post-production right now. He's not slowing down, he's speeding up.
    5. Re:Regardless of the petition by kesuki · · Score: 1

      I thought someone had said that the German tax loophole was closed, so why would he be ramping up production?

      and bloodrayne has done 3 movies with him now, i can understand tricking people once, but going for a bad directory your gamer community hates, for a third time?

      seriously, with all the internet hate against him, how does the guy wind up making money for the content owners while loosing money at the box office if his past tax loophole strategy went out the window? has he switched countries with a different tax loophole?

    6. Re:Regardless of the petition by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      I must be missing something with all this "tax loophole" stuff I keep seeing in this discussion.

      My wife and I own several rental houses, so I'm not unfamiliar with business expenses on my income taxes. Deductions, when you can claim them, are nice because they reduce the amount of tax you pay, but it's generally stupid to spend money to get more deductions, because you're not going to get all that money back, only the amount taxed.

      For instance, if I spend $3000 on a new A/C system on one of my houses, I can claim a $3000 deduction on my taxes for that house, and end up getting maybe 25% of that back in taxes at the end of the year (depending on my tax bracket). But I'm still losing money, just not the entire 3k. A deduction is not a credit (a credit is where some amount is taken off your actual taxes, and not your income).

      If there's something in the tax code that lets you actually save more money in taxes than the total you spend on a bad investment, there's something seriously wrong with that tax code. You're not supposed to be taxed on your losses, but you're not supposed to profit from them either.

    7. Re:Regardless of the petition by kesuki · · Score: 1

      Ahh wikipedia

      "It is not known if this will have any effect on Boll's funding as the new laws only seek to punish investors who are abusing the law for tax purposes; Boll's activities appear to be well within the legitimate usage of the tax shelter."

      See even though he's producing films in America, they only tried to close the loophole for companies that didn't really produce movies. So the German tax law, would essentially mean that Uwe Boll as one of the few legitimate tax shelters for producing films, would be seeing a dramatic increase in funding from Germany.. not a shrinking.

      crazy mad, because his company actually produces movies, and pays big money to the owners of the video game movie rights. it doesn't matter to the German government that people can give millions to Boll, and he makes movies that no one wants to see, but he's not a fraudulent company, his company actually makes movies with the money, they suck, they hemorrhage money like a sieve... but because he really truly does make movies with the money, he's still legit as far as Germany is concerned.

  7. Link To Petition by shawnmchorse · · Score: 0, Redundant

    I think this is it:

    http://www.petitiononline.com/RRH53888/petition.html

    Somehow, I think it might succeed with the goal of one million now...:-)

  8. The REAL reason he's quitting by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Boll is actually quitting because the German government recently closed the tax loophole that allowed Boll and other German filmmakers to set up their "films" as tax shelters for businessmen (with no intent of ever making any money). The gravy train has dried up and the scam is over.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:The REAL reason he's quitting by Sam1230 · · Score: 3, Informative

      That link doesn't say anything like that...

    2. Re:The REAL reason he's quitting by New_Age_Reform_Act · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is a better article explaining the loophole.

      http://www.cinemablend.com/features/Uwe-Boll-Money-For-Nothing-209.html

      --
      "The New Age. The New Beginning."
  9. Focus Group by electricbern · · Score: 1

    If you say you like it, you get free pizza.

    --
    alias possession='chmod 666 satan && ls /dev > il && tail daemon.log'
  10. A Challenge by whisper_jeff · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bad move. Never challenge geeks. We'll always find a way to overcome.

    1. Re:A Challenge by calebt3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh of course. We stopped OOXML's ISO fast-tracking cold.

    2. Re:A Challenge by dougmc · · Score: 1

      What's sad is that it's probably geeks who went to see the movies he made. Granted, Doom didn't make much money, but it did make some money -- and it wasn't grandma who went to go see it.

    3. Re:A Challenge by grahamd0 · · Score: 1

      Doom wasn't directed by Uwe Boll. It's not nearly as bad as any Uwe Boll movie (not that that makes it any good).

    4. Re:A Challenge by San-LC · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, tell that to Ron Paul.

    5. Re:A Challenge by r_jensen11 · · Score: 1

      Bad move. Never challenge geeks. We'll always find a way to overcome. Overcome what? A massive slashdotting?

      If this doesn't revive the slashdot effect, nothing will.
  11. Puny Earthlings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Morbo stop making fun of Earth of 1 million puny earthlings sign up to be Morbo's slaves.

  12. sign with your email, we'll keep it private! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Explanation of Email Address Privacy Options:
    - "Private" means your email address is stored in a secure private location, for signature validation only. Yeah, right! As if they do more than a regex to check, and why not delete after the regex? Even if they send confirmation mail, why not delete the mail after confirmation??
  13. SIGNED! by harshmanrob · · Score: 1

    SIGNED!!!! Also...go see "ebeeto" on youtube.com for his educational video on how to produce this sorry mother fucker's name.

    1. Re:SIGNED! by harshmanrob · · Score: 1

      I meant to say PRONOUNCE his name, but, oh well...who cares. He just sucks and every piece of trash he has created sucks too.

    2. Re:SIGNED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      he's done more with his life than you've done with yours. you're just another slashfag who sits on high passing judgement on those who are out there applying themselves instead of running their faggot mouths about how smart they think they are.

      keep on sucking dicks you bitch. we've seen your ass around here before. fucking queer. you've never completed a crossword puzzle let alone anything useful or creative.

    3. Re:SIGNED! by harshmanrob · · Score: 1

      Who exactly is "we"? Please let me know. I would love to know who you losers are. Be a man and establish an account as I have and maybe your chicken shit ass might have some creditability.

    4. Re:SIGNED! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i already have more credibility than you do by simply not crapping on people who are being creative. go shove it you loser.

    5. Re:SIGNED! by harshmanrob · · Score: 1

      Note your score for your posts and tell me who the loser is.

  14. It's Like Wrestling by dcollins · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, yeah, I've seen this a bunch of times when pro wrestling is promoted. The heel "retires" and then comes back as a celebrity referee or manager, so he's still in your face all the time. C'mon, people!

    --
    We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    1. Re:It's Like Wrestling by esocid · · Score: 1

      Exactly. If he does in fact "retire," I want a contract that gives his firstborn up for sacrifice if he doesn't keep his word.

      --
      Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
    2. Re:It's Like Wrestling by kalidasa · · Score: 1

      Exactly. If he does in fact "retire," I want a contract that gives his firstborn up for sacrifice if he doesn't keep his word.

      That wouldn't stop him - he'd just film it.

  15. just let him be by nguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't get it. Why petition the guy to stop making movies? Maybe his movies will be quickly forgotten, maybe they'll be cult classics 50 years from now. As long as he manages to finance them somehow and stay in business, who cares? If you don't like his movies, do what I do: just don't go.

    1. Re:just let him be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He finances them with German tax dollars.

      Or did, anyway. The loophole was closed, and hey look, now he's talking about retiring.

    2. Re:just let him be by Spuds · · Score: 1

      I don't get it. Why petition the guy to stop making movies? Maybe his movies will be quickly forgotten, maybe they'll be cult classics 50 years from now. As long as he manages to finance them somehow and stay in business, who cares? If you don't like his movies, do what I do: just don't go. Dog crap on the sidewalk isn't so bad either, just don't step in it.
    3. Re:just let him be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He finances them with German tax dollars.

      He finances 50% with German tax dollars

      Or did, anyway. The loophole was closed, and hey look, now he's talking about retiring.

      What loophole? That's what the tax break was there for. Despite all the complaining, Boll seems to have done better internationally than other recent German directors. I mean, what was the last German movie to gain any kind of international attention? Run Lola Run?

      Maybe Boll lives by Oscar Wilde's rule: the only thing that's worse than being talked about is not being talked about.

    4. Re:just let him be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      I don't get it. Why petition the guy to stop making movies? Maybe his movies will be quickly forgotten, maybe they'll be cult classics 50 years from now. As long as he manages to finance them somehow and stay in business, who cares? If you don't like his movies, do what I do: just don't go.

      You're missing the point. As long as he's in the business, no one's favorite videogames are safe from being turned into horrible movie adaptations, preventing decent adaptations from ever being made. It's self defense. ; )
    5. Re:just let him be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Because they hand him the sole rights to video game franchise movies that might actually have been GOOD if someone else had made them.

    6. Re:just let him be by esocid · · Score: 1
      I don't go. But I'd rather he stopped shoveling filth onto the screen and perverting the video game industry. He already has 3 new movies in production, and 3 in post-production according to imdb. His newest:

      "Zombie Massacre", based on a Wii-Action Shooter, revolves around three punk rockers and a police officer. They have to fight their way to a city - filled with zombies - with their old-timer, on which they transport a nuclear bomb, which should detonate in the city, to destroy the zombies.
      --
      Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
    7. Re:just let him be by SydShamino · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As long as he manages to finance them somehow and stay in business, who cares? If you don't like his movies, do what I do: just don't go. I've seen Uwe Boll but never a Uwe Boll film. The problem as I understand it is that he doesn't write original scripts. Instead, he is often handed a gaming franchise, which he then proceeds to shit upon.

      So, if you've played a video game and loved the story, environment, characters, you're already invested in the franchise and, bluntly, "care". To see Uwe Boll shit on something you care about makes you angry. Plus, it is very unlikely that a video game whose movie fared poorly in the theater will get a second motion picture in the next few decades, potentially preventing us from ever seeing a movie about a story we love.

      You're point would be valid if Uwe Boll did what Woody Allen does - write his own stories - because then we could just all ignore them.
      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    8. Re:just let him be by J.+T.+MacLeod · · Score: 1

      I would agree with you if he only made his own movies.

      The problem is that there are people--people who make decisions on movie production--who don't realize how terrible his work is and keep giving him licenses to work with. This not only keeps more talented people out of work, but sullies the reputations of any one who might one day produce a work in the same genre that could be licensed in the future.

    9. Re:just let him be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because he's ruining great franchises.

      And he's an asshole about it.

      He also admitted to making bad movies ON PURPOSE for the german tax loophole.

    10. Re:just let him be by Idaho · · Score: 5, Informative

      What was the last German movie to gain any kind of international attention? Run Lola Run?


      How about these for example:

      - Good Bye Lenin! (2003) - nominated for Golden Globe (ok, perhaps that doesn't amount to much, but it's a nice movie)
      - Der Untergang (2004) - oscar nomination for "best foreign language film of the year" (where "foreign" means "not english")
      - Das Leben der Anderen (2006) - won the oscar for "best foreign language film", as well as many other awards in several international film festivals (Great Britain and Canada among those)

      That's quite a few movies since Lola rennt (1998). Looks like there are quite a few German directors who are actually doing better after all... those movies are all very much worthwhile watching, by the way (though quite disturbing).

      P.S. I'm not German so I'm bound to have missed several more good movies.
      --
      Every expression is true, for a given value of 'true'
    11. Re:just let him be by Gravatron · · Score: 1

      Right. He's doing more than any other director to destroy the whole idea of a movie based on a game property. You can't tell me that games don't have the material to work with as for as story and characters go, as they often have the same if not more depth to them then your average novel. I just think hollywood doesn't seem to 'get it' as to what made people like the game. But so long as the stigma created by Uwe sticks around, no serious director or producer is going to watch to touch a game movie.

    12. Re:just let him be by nguy · · Score: 1

      So, if you've played a video game and loved the story, environment, characters, you're already invested in the franchise and, bluntly, "care". To see Uwe Boll shit on something you

      I know what you mean: I often have the same experience with movies based on books I like. Why get upset about it?

    13. Re:just let him be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is, he makes it so serious video game to movie adaptations aren't happening and aren't being taken seriously. And some of those he's already done had decent POTENTIAL to be good movies... And it's likely they'll never be attempted again because "the first try didn't work".

    14. Re:just let him be by fm6 · · Score: 1

      The problem is, his worst movies are all based on video games. Once you've played the game, you're required to see the movie. It's, like, a law or something.

    15. Re:just let him be by riskeetee · · Score: 1

      What was the last German movie to gain any kind of international attention? Run Lola Run? I believe it was Triumph of the Will. That movie sure got people to sit up and take notice!
    16. Re:just let him be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the list does hit 1 million, his movies probably WILL become cult classics just due to that fact...

    17. Re:just let him be by TheMaTrIxBEL · · Score: 1

      The problem for me is that he and directors like him are ruining the only type of movie genre I'm actually willing to spend money on watching. There are so many movies that would make great games, but with people like Uwe at the helm, all that will come out of these adaptation projects is eye melting excrement's.

    18. Re:just let him be by TheMaTrIxBEL · · Score: 1

      The problem for me is that he and directors like him are ruining the only type of movie genre I'm actually willing to spend money on watching. There are so many movies that would make great games, but with people like Uwe at the helm, all that will come out of these adaptation projects is eye melting excrement's. I ment many games that would make great movies :p
    19. Re:just let him be by PlasticArmyMan · · Score: 1

      Remind me again, which video games have good enough stories to transition to movies? ...

      *cricket cricket*

      Half life? Hmm... no. Doom? Hell no. Dungeons and Dragons? Nope. FEAR? Nope.

      LEMMINGS?! Nope. Street Fighter II was ok wasn't it? ... nope.

      Can't forget Mortal Kombat can we? ... ah yes.

    20. Re:just let him be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      good german movie?

      http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0349047/
      could habe been a new spaceballs
      but the fun is to a good part in the language and differend dialects (like the bavarian speaking crew and the east-german speaking Jens Maul) so a (good) dub would have been necessary
      subtitles wouldnt do it

    21. Re:just let him be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um himmelswillen! the only good joke in the entire movie was "mars macht mobil". new spaceballs...in bizarroworld maybe

    22. Re:just let him be by frission · · Score: 1

      The Lives of Others was actually good, it got the Oscar last year (2007) for best foreign film. I was so pissed that it beat Pan's Labyrinth for the Oscar, that I had to watch it to see what the fuss was about. So, although it still WASN'T as good as Pan, it was still good.

    23. Re:just let him be by rsadelle · · Score: 1

      Bella Martha (2001; English title: Mostly Martha), which is ten times better than the American remake (No Reservations, which should have been better given the cast).

    24. Re:just let him be by caluml · · Score: 1

      Das Experiment too. Very good.

    25. Re:just let him be by Sciros · · Score: 1

      Final Fantasies, Mass Effect, Zelda, Elder Scrolls, Ultimas, Halo, etc. If you *adapt* those well, you can end up with very decent screenplays.

      Adapting them well, that's another issue altogether. But the source material IS there, and it's rather abundant to be honest.

      A lot of games have very weak stories, as do films. But many don't.

      --
      I like basketball!!1!
    26. Re:just let him be by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      Why get upset about anything you're passionate about? Why care if the author of the first two books in a trilogy decides to not write the third one? Why care if the television shows you watch jump the shark in the third season and become sitcoms? Why care if your movie trilogy is started by Stanley Kubrick but ended by Brett Ratner?

      I think your answer indicates a general lack of passion that you have in your life for creativity in general. I don't think it shows anything about the rest of us.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
  16. That's got to hurt by Devin+Jeanpierre · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd never sign such a petition. He can make whatever films he wants, so long as people are willing to pay. It's a lot more hurtful to try to convince him to stop with 1 million people asking. That's... well, that kind of thing hurts. The only thing that could lessen it is the whole idea that, chances are, the petition wouldn't really have had 1 million people sign it, but maybe 300 000 sign it 3 or 4 times on average.

    --
    -Devin Jeanpierre
    1. Re:That's got to hurt by Ortega-Starfire · · Score: 1

      "I'd never sign such a petition. He can make whatever films he wants, so long as people are willing to pay. It's a lot more hurtful to try to convince him to stop with 1 million people asking. That's... well, that kind of thing hurts. The only thing that could lessen it is the whole idea that, chances are, the petition wouldn't really have had 1 million people sign it, but maybe 300 000 sign it 3 or 4 times on average."

      No, he needs to stop. If he so much as TOUCHES Deus Ex with a 10 foot pole, I will kill him.

      --
      ---- Liquid was a patriot ----
    2. Re:That's got to hurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contrary to what you might think, the internet is not in fact serious business.

    3. Re:That's got to hurt by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      I agree. Deus Ex must be protected!

    4. Re:That's got to hurt by apharmdq · · Score: 1

      Normally I would agree. Let the poor guy do what he enjoys doing. It's not like he's being rewarded for it anymore (as his movies flop regularly), and it is kinda harsh to get the entire world telling you you suck at what you love to do . . .

      But then Deus Ex was mentioned and I decided it was best not to tempt fate.
      *Signs Petition*

  17. There's nothing that bad about Uwe Boll by goldcd · · Score: 4, Interesting

    He makes averagely bad straight-to-video style films - yet rises above the mass of other jobbing directors with his ability to drum up publicity. FFS - how may other 'directors of his calibre' can you name? Reason he's working (putting aside tax breaks), is that he takes a relatively small amount of money from producers, rights for a computer game and makes them all money on the film he produces.

    1. Re:There's nothing that bad about Uwe Boll by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      FFS - how may other 'directors of his calibre' can you name? Hmm.... Ed Wood?

      Sorry, that's all I got.
    2. Re:There's nothing that bad about Uwe Boll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't call the "average bad", really. Worse. They are worse because they somehow manage to be insulting.

      When you walk away from american ninja 4, you shrug and say "hey that was a waste of time".

      When you walk away from an Uwe Boll movie, you A) Want to hurt Uwe Boll, and B) feel sorry for the actors and writers, because you sense that the movie could have been at least "OK", but isn't.

  18. Wanna bet? by Lilith's+Heart-shape · · Score: 1

    My signature was number 62041. There probably are a million gamers online who are more familiar with Dr. Uwe Boll than they ever wanted to be. Personally, I hope his last film will be Springtime for Hitler.

  19. Do your part by kryptKnight · · Score: 1

    The petition can be found here.

    --
    Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. -Aldous Huxley
  20. and after all this time by joeflies · · Score: 2, Funny

    I never realized that the "Springtime for Hitler" scam in The Producers was for real!

    1. Re:and after all this time by canajin56 · · Score: 1

      They don't even bother with making sure the movie flops. For example, did you know that films like Spiderman 1 usually lose millions, even hundreds of millions. The method is simple. You take your accounting books. You see "Oh, it cost us $50M to make the movie" then you wait until its in theaters. Oh SHIT FUCK ASS SHIT SHIT SHIT it made $150M! That's A-fucking-mazing. And the governments going to take it! So QUICK, warm up your pens, it's time to write down $250M as your salary in that column you left blank. *phew*, now the film lost $150M and you can apply to the government for an emergency bailout. Too bad to Stan Lee and Marvel Comics, since the film lost money you don't get your contracted share of the profits. The IRS doesn't care because the individuals still pay taxes until the use their own loopholes to get out of them. I don't think that in the past 50 years at least, there has been a single movie in the USA that has made even a single cent thanks to the power of fraud. Sir Alec Guiness didn't get paid for his role in Star Wars for the same reason, he was suckered into a contract that paid him a share of the profits, and of course we all remember how hard Star Wars tanked, that's why they couldn't afford to make any more.

      So no, the plot for "The Producers" doesn't really happen, but that's only because "The Producers" incorrectly assumed that the IRS and the FBI would care about multimillion dollar accounting fraud, and the scamming of investors and contracted employees.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
  21. Free publicity by HexRei · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is nothing but a scam to get Uwe more publicity. Right now he's a hack director, I doubt a million people are even really all that aware of him.

    1. Re:Free publicity by shrikel · · Score: 1

      Maybe not, but I'd guess a million non-existent, script-generated names may nevertheless end up on the petition, after this slashdot posting.

      --
      Any sufficiently simple magic can be passed off as mere advanced technology.
    2. Re:Free publicity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No it's not a scam.

      It was started over 3 years ago by a member of RPGCodex.
      Here is the original thread and post:
      http://www.rpgcodex.net/phpBB/viewtopic.php?p=97499#97499

      Apparently it was submitted to Slashdot back then, but was ignored.

    3. Re:Free publicity by shagnak · · Score: 1

      Shhhhhhhhhhhh

    4. Re:Free publicity by HexRei · · Score: 1

      I was talking about Uwe's suggestion that he would quit if a million signatures made the list. The average person has no idea who the man is so he can only benefit by someone advertising his name to enough people to garner a million signatures.

  22. In All Fairness... by sking · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This only makes sense if there is a petition to sign asking him to KEEP making movies.

    And does it really matter? Nobody has to watch the movies he makes. Let the market decide.

    --
    The AntiJoey
    1. Re:In All Fairness... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the problem, because his movies are subsidized/tax write-offs, the market isn't deciding.

    2. Re:In All Fairness... by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

      the market decided he should stop, too... but he isn't listening - he keeps making bad movie adaptions of games...

      --
      The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  23. botnets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know one of you slashdotters are in command of one of those massive bot-nets. This is where your purpose comes into play my friend, this is where your purpose comes into play...

  24. He's holding the world hostage for.... by madhatter256 · · Score: 1

    He's holding the world hostage for... one million dollars!

    bwuaahahahaha... bwuahahahaha... BWUAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.. *cue austin powers music*

    --
    Previewing comments are for sissies!
  25. Where by unablepostAC · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Where do I sign?

  26. Internet petitions... by jandrese · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If my grandmother rolls her eyes at the idea of internet petitions, what reason is there to think that Uwe would stop making movies from one? Just because someone name Soukin McCocksoff said he's a bad man and should go away on the internet means he'll do it.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:Internet petitions... by Ridirich · · Score: 1

      If my grandmother rolls her eyes at the idea of internet petitions, what reason is there to think that Uwe would stop making movies from one? Just because someone name Soukin McCocksoff said he's a bad man and should go away on the internet means he'll do it. 1) He is NOT the worst movie producer ever. Obviously you have never heard of The Asylum (ref: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Asylum) 2) If they're THAT horrible, simply don't watch them. Quite frankly, I can see people complaining about The Asylum, as they rob titles as other movies come out, but this guy doesn't lie to you, he just puts out his movies. 3) Again, have the sense to avoid what you don't like and let others judge if they do. If you want to complain, cool. Everyone's entitled to their opinion, but is there really a reason to go out of the way to do it? Quite frankly it's a waste of everyone's time involved, both the readers and the complainers. 4) Signing a petition only empowers him into knowing how many people watch his movies. If you signed his petition, you're a fool and followed blindly along like the rest of the sheep. To be able to actually stop him....DON'T FUND HIM. If his movies don't sell, he can't put out more. As for the loophole, yes that's wrong, but how many of us exploit loopholes? We drive 10 miles above the speed limit to get to work every day because the police won't ticket us unless we're going 11...etc. 5) Some people actually like his movies. I, personally, own Blood Rayne and I enjoy watching it on occasion. It's a B movie and there's a certain novelty to it. That, and quite frankly if you don't her rack, you're probably queer (she has a topless scene). So, for the same reason Under Siege with Steven Segal got popular, so did Blood Rayne. Boobs.
  27. YHBT YHL HAND by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was at the premier for Dungeon Siege and Postal, and I met the man himself.

    Postal is a good movie for what it is, and for the rest of them you can't expect much from movies based on games, it just isn't the format they were meant for.

    Uwe himself is pretty nice, but not in a way everyone can appreciate. He is like a real life troll and hes good at it.
    He pushed peoples buttons and lets them make fools of themselves, like at the charity fight, he beat them good(or badly), but it was a fight, and he came prepared to fight, he has nothing to apologize for that or his movies. (but it would be nice if a challenger appeared, and I think he would agree.)

  28. what's the loophole? by nguy · · Score: 1

    If the German government kicks in x% for a film, that means that they believe that producers can't break even if they have to pay those x% themselves. That's not a "tax loophole", it's government subsidies working as intended, keeping the German film industry in business and keeping actors and film crews from starving between the occasional blockbuster. Of course, most of the subsidized movies will be trash, but it's either lots of bad movies with the occasional good movie, or just commercial, generic US imports.

    1. Re:what's the loophole? by kesuki · · Score: 2, Informative

      no no, it's a 'tax shelter' if you donate 12 million of your 'income' to this 'tax shelter program' they reduce the amount of tax you owe by 6 million.

      you don't really make a whole lot of money doing it that way, but consider this, if you're $5,000 into the next tax bracket, and you donate $10,000 to drop you down to the next lower tax bracket, and dropping yourself down to the next lower tax bracket saves you from paying $20,000 in taxes total, you would do it in a heart beat.

      and the worst of it is as long as the company who owns the rights to the movie is in Germany, and as long as they produce actual films, the tax loophole HAS NOT CHANGED. consider too, that since the holding company is German, they have to pay German taxes on profits. Obviously Uwe Boll doesn't make profits, but his holding company may very well make profit on the books, and have to pay German taxes. since they pay X for rights, and lease the rights for y. if y is greater than x then they pay taxes, but if both companies are owned by boll, then x would equal y... unless that jeopardized his loophole as far as the government is concerned... and it might.

      so far they haven't closed the loophole if the production of the film is done in America. If they do, boll will bolt from making movies in America and will make them in Germany the way the law intended.

      And because tax laws always lag behind a growing economy, this means there are a lot of people who if they donate X dollars they get Y dollars more back from the government, where Y is greater than X. So potentially he could be raising hundreds of millions of dollars just for saving a few million Germans a few grand every year. Ironically what the government did change about the loophole, is that they made it a crime to fraudulently claim you donated money to a company that never produced films. so now Boll has even more money to spend, because he's the real deal, and the fraudsters can't compete unless they start making bad money losing films too.

    2. Re:what's the loophole? by nguy · · Score: 1

      And because tax laws always lag behind a growing economy, this means there are a lot of people who if they donate X dollars they get Y dollars more back from the government, where Y is greater than X.

      That's the way it's supposed to work.

      and the worst of it is as long as the company who owns the rights to the movie is in Germany, and as long as they produce actual films, the tax loophole HAS NOT CHANGED.

      So? It keeps German actors and film crews employed so that, very occasionally, they can make a good movie.

      What do you prefer? Some government bureaucrat picking movies? Or would you rather German actors and film crews to all become cab drivers and waiters because they can't make a living?

    3. Re:what's the loophole? by kesuki · · Score: 1

      you apparently didn't get the point. Uwe Boil is an American citizen, and all his movies are produced in America.

      Not Germany.

      Germans wishing to save money on their taxes, are supporting American movie production, thanks to Uwe Boll, the changes made, were to 'reduce fraud.'

      But boll's American Production Company, and his German Title Holding company. although not supporting the German film industry are not committing fraud either.

      Let me explain, Boll's title company gets 75 million dollars in donations, for example, the title company 'acquires the rights' to the movie for 40 million, then pays 5 million for boll's American production company to make the film.

      This is all legal and above board, when the film is done, the Title company pays theaters 30 million dollars to show boll's films, with an agreement that they pay standard percentage of gate fees to the title company. the film rakes in for the title company 5 million dollars (and theaters soon drop the film) the tile company pays taxes on the 5 million, but in essence, this is a way to turn 75 million German dollars into a 5 million dollar film, all above board and within the law.

      It's sad really, really really sad. A bad producer found the perfect loophole to support his films that nobody wants to see.

    4. Re:what's the loophole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you might be wrong about that, the production company is in fact a German company.

      the problem was major movie studios in the US were making puppet companies to own the copyrights in Germany and had do nothing in terms of producing real blockbuster American movies...

      Since Uwe's companies are real German companies, then they are likely within the law, even though the movies are (from what i can tell) filmed and marketed in the united states.

    5. Re:what's the loophole? by nguy · · Score: 1

      you apparently didn't get the point. Uwe Boil is an American citizen, and all his movies are produced in America.

      Oh, please, get your facts straight:

      http://www.nndb.com/people/066/000087802/

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uwe_Boll

      http://www.boll-kg.de/

      Film locations seem to be Romania, Croatia, Canada, and South Africa, not USA. There seem to be a significant number of German actors. Maybe you can dig up where the film crews and post-production are based.

      but in essence, this is a way to turn 75 million German dollars into a 5 million dollar film, all above board and within the law.

      Well, so in their effort to support German movies through tax breaks, they screwed up in how they defined the kinds of projects that get support. I have news for you: lawmakers, like programmers, make mistakes. Unlike programmers, they don't have the luxury to test before release, their adversaries aren't pimply script kiddies but highly paid lawers, and they can't just push out a new release overnight. That's real life, deal with it.

  29. Reverse Pyschology by Herkum01 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I would think the fewer number of signatures would result in him having an increased chance of quiting. If they got 1 million signatures, that would mean that nearly 1 million people actually heard of him! He could claim that he has the presence to draw large numbers of people to his movies!

    If he was only able to get 20~ 25,000 signatures no studio is going to look at and say "His works are so beloved that they are not complaining about him!" His career would be over.

    The opposite of love is indifference. If you want his career over ignore him.

  30. What about Dungeon Siege? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I happened to like Dungeon Siege. Sure, bloodrayne sucked, but every director makes a movie that tanks. Look at spielburg, and most of his movies suck. James Cameron - He directed Titanic which has got to be the WORST movie ever! (Think of all the times that stupid song gets played... )

    1. Re:What about Dungeon Siege? by mdenham · · Score: 1

      Think of all the times that stupid song gets played... My Fart Will Go On?
  31. I wouldn't do it by blind+biker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't care what kind of movies he did - it doesn't really matter. What matters is to have self-esteem, and that means noone is going to tell me what I should or should not do. It's not a democracy; when it comes to my life, I am the only one responsible to make the decisions. If I feel that my movies have a value, then just because there's lots of people who disagree doesn't mean much. You know the saying: eat shit - one billion flies can't be wrong.

    --
    "The agriculture ministry is not in charge of Gundam" - Japanese ministry official.
    1. Re:I wouldn't do it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If every person that you know kicks you in the nuts and calls you an asshole, maybe you should listen to what they're trying to say.

  32. Anyone who beats up on critics can't be all bad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    He improves civilizations in some ways, degrades it in others.

    Like most of us.

    1. Re:Anyone who beats up on critics can't be all bad by pionzypher · · Score: 2, Funny

      He improves civilizations in some ways [Citation Needed]

      --
      I'll believe in corporations having personhood when Texas executes one... - advocate_one
  33. Cult Classics? by AioKits · · Score: 1

    For some reason the thought of this cult just scares the shit out of me.

    --
    "Quote me as saying I was mis-quoted." -Groucho Marx
  34. spreadfing this to everyone.. by s0litaire · · Score: 1

    Signed and sent requests to everyone i know to sign this!! :D

    --
    Laters Sol "Have you found the secrets of the universe? Asked Zebade "I'm sure I left them here somewhere"
  35. Over 62,000 signatures now... by Assmasher · · Score: 1

    LOL... I doubt he'd stop anyhow, but I signed. What a tool that guy is.

    --
    Loading...
    1. Re:Over 62,000 signatures now... by rholland356 · · Score: 1

      LOL... I doubt he'd stop anyhow, but I signed. What a tool that guy is.

      The difference between these two tools is one sniggers at his PC, the other laughs all the way to the bank.
    2. Re:Over 62,000 signatures now... by Assmasher · · Score: 1

      Ewe, is that you? LOL. I already laughed all the way to the bank last year, thank you though :).

      --
      Loading...
  36. Ever try to set up 950,000 Gmail accounts? by edwardpickman · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's a lot of work but worth it.

    1. Re:Ever try to set up 950,000 Gmail accounts? by compro01 · · Score: 1

      hasn't that capcha been broken already?

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  37. Ah more publicity, the last thing he needs... by kentrel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This kind of hatred over a filmmaker who's creating something is really sad, pathetic and unhealthy. No, his movies might not be very good, and yes they are in fact terrible, but they're hardly the worst films ever made unless you've never seen 90% of the horror\musical genre, or anything made for youtube.

    Filmmaking was and never ever has been a democracy. This idea of writing petitions to DEMAND that he stop making movies that you don't ever have to watch or think about is pathetic. 99% of movies are released weekly around the world that you'll never ever know about, simply because you don't care enough. His movies aren't mass-marketed, they're not shoved in your face on TV or fast food restaurants. The only people who are shouting about Uwe Boll loud enough for ANYONE to hear are the people who hate him. Stop hating him, stop shouting about him, and he'll likely go away a lot faster. In fact, if he had been ignored like most other filmmakers he may have gone a long time ago.

    No member of the public has a say in who gets to make movies. It's not a democracy. If they want to vote, vote with their dollar. If enough people still pay to see the movies, such that the filmmaker is still in work, then nobody has a right to demand that he goes, except his business partners. That's life. Suck it up. There are bigger injustices in the world to worry about.

    Signing a petition is just hilarious and pathetic, and will probably have the opposite effect people intend. This kind of hatred is unhealthy. Have some perspective people. He's not answerable to any of you. Fanboys need to stop kidding themselves into thinking that they have any say in what filmmakers do. They don't. Filmmaking has been a business since its inception, and still is. Even if there were a million signatures he's under no obligation to do anything that a bunch of deluded movie geeks "demand" of him.

    He could make a movie where he prints those signatures out, laughs at them, tears them up, and posts the resulting video on youtube. Don't fanboys ever see that the more they are outraged at something inconsequential like this the more ridiculous and hilarious they appear to the rest of us? Pick your battles.

    1. Re:Ah more publicity, the last thing he needs... by TheAngryIntern · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You are forgetting one thing....he's the one that brought it up first. He said he would stop making movies if enough people wanted it to, it was at *THAT* point they mentioned there was a petition out there already, and then he made the comment about it would take a million signatures, that 18,000 was not enough. BTW, that number has jumped to over 65,000 as of a few minutes ago. It's not that his movies are the worst ever made (although some might be close) it's that he insists on taking video game franchises that are well loved by their fans, and he makes absolute craptastic film adaptations, most of which barely have anything to do with the game it's based on. Granted, most video game -> film adaptations are pretty bad (Tomb Raider, anyone?) but his are exceptionally bad, like he's doing it on purpose. That being said, I have actually heard some good things about his latest, Postal. I've heard it's pretty funny and not nearly as bad as his previous efforts. Even if he does get the million signatures (doubtful) I'm betting he won't quit making movies for the simple fact that he gets huge sums of subsidy money from the German government to make movies. I wouldn't quit if I was him either.

    2. Re:Ah more publicity, the last thing he needs... by kentrel · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Again, these fans need to suck it up. They have no right to complain if the movie version of a video game is bad. Many of these fans have an unhealthy obsession with this issue, and need to stop. They have no right to demand that the filmmaker stop making movies. Regardless if Uwe Boll brought up or not (and in the history of him versus fanboys, he probably didn't) by signing that position people are asking that he stops making movies.

      Why?
      If they love their video game franchises write to the people who OWN the rights and ask them to pretty please not to sell them to any production company that uses Uwe Boll as director.

      But guess what. They'll sell the rights anyway, because they don't care about the fans either. They are about the money. Filmmaking has always been about the money. The only way these sad fanboys can affect any change is voting with their dollar. It's the only vote that counts.

    3. Re:Ah more publicity, the last thing he needs... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But voting in writing as well as with money is better than only voting with money.

      If the studio gets enough people writing in saying "We'll forever hate you and your children if you license our beloved franchise XYZ to Uwe Boll, and we'll never buy your games again", that's more powerful than simply not seeing the movies.

      Someone else pointed out as well that if Uwe Boll makes a craptastic film "version" of a video game, the chances that someone who is capable of making a good movie making a good film version of that video game is virtually zero.

      The moral of the story is, if I want someone to make a good film version of Half-Life, to pick a random example, I'd better complain loud and incessantly if Valve mentions possibly licensing the franchise to a crappy director. Only if the complaints and letters fail would I have the need to vote with my wallet.

      They're two separate forms of protest used at different times. Sometimes, neither is sufficient without the other.

    4. Re:Ah more publicity, the last thing he needs... by Frangible · · Score: 1

      Well said. Why does what he makes bother anyone else? No, I don't like his movies (other than the 5 seconds of nudity in BloodRayne) but there is something very disturbing about the popularity of this "censorship through the will of the majority" thing going on here. I think most of the people who take this petition thing a bit too seriously just need to go watch Rand's "The Fountainhead" on loop until they understand or start getting Bioshock twitches. But yeah. Everyone is quite correct in stating his movies suck. How he got so many (relatively) big actors for his terrible Dungeon Siege movie is completely beyond me. I certainly don't feel a need to petition that, though. There are many causes worthy of a petition. Hatred towards an irrelevant movie producer is not one of them. It's not like he's kicking out modern equivalents of Triumph Des Willens or Birth of a Nation anyway... they're video game movies, people.

  38. let's not get our hopes up.. by U121 · · Score: 1

    Petitioning online may be as useful as [insert really useless concept here], but let it be known that I signed, and that I intend to get as many friends as possible to sign as well.

  39. Why I would sign... by swordgeek · · Score: 1

    (Disclaimer: I just don't care enough one way or another to bother with something this silly. Of course, discussing it on /. is another matter entirely!)

    If I were to sign this petition, it would be as an indication of encouragement. "Uwe," my signature would say, "your movies really aren't any good. There's probably something else out there that you'd be MUCH better at, and why not dedicate your resources to finding that instead of spending more of your life on bad films? It's just not your forte, man."

    The take-home message here, is that I have a terribly eloquent signature.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  40. An old saying from my country by black_lbi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "If someone says you're drunk, he might be wrong. But when two people say you're drunk, maybe it's time to go to bed."

  41. It's Star Wars Christmas Special All Over Again by Prien715 · · Score: 1

    By now, most everyone is reviled by some attempt by George Lucas to destr^H^H^H develop his Star Wars franchise. But at least it was Lucas's to make and to break, as it were. Bolle has the distinct role of the parasite who takes on a piece of property for the sole purpose of making the worst possible film out of it.

    If he wants to make his own terrible video or own terrible moving using only his ideas, I'd say more power to him.

    --
    -- Political fascism requires a Fuhrer.
  42. This will never work.... by porkmusket · · Score: 1

    Uwe Boll's wobble, but they don't fall down.

  43. How many signatures .... by PPH · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... will it take to stop Vista SP2?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  44. I thnk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll wait for the John Woo petition.

  45. The Streisand/Boll effect. by leoxx · · Score: 1

    No kidding, I think it is hilarious how Uwe has once again managed to turn the people who hate him into a free source of publicity.

  46. 1 mmillion signatures, 1 million viewers by unablepostAC · · Score: 0
    It has come to my attention, that if a person sign to make uwe boll stop making movies, that means that person has seen an uwe boll movie, so every signature is a movie viewer.

    So the more people sign, the proof that more people have seen his movies.

    1. Re:1 mmillion signatures, 1 million viewers by mh101 · · Score: 1

      I've never seen an Uwe Boll movie to my knowledge, and I signed the petition.

      I guess you could say I signed to ensure I never see an Uwe Boll movie.

      --
      Duct tape is like the Force. It has a light side, a dark side, and it holds the universe together.
    2. Re:1 mmillion signatures, 1 million viewers by Ortega-Starfire · · Score: 1

      I saw a couple of them, then I learned to start checking who directed the movie before I waste my money.

      --
      ---- Liquid was a patriot ----
  47. 1M... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...should be a piece of cake for /.

  48. It's working! by Cervantes · · Score: 1

    The petition has exploded to over 65,000 signatures. Good work, geeks!
    Here's a sampling of some of my favourites:

    Aaaaabk Wheaton: Your movies make my eyes bleed.
    Aaaaabl Wheaton: Every time you make a movie, God kills a kitten.
    Aaaaabm Wheaton: It is dark. You are likely to be eaten by a Grue.
    Aaaaabn Wheaton: Your father was a hamster, and your mother smelled of elderberries.
    Aaaaabo Wheaton: Don't be a dick.

    --
    If I knew the wedgies I gave you back in 6th grade would have resulted in this . . . I might have taken a moments pause.
    1. Re:It's working! by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      I wonder if Wheaton would have a different opinion if he was acting in one of Uwe's movies or wrote the script for it?

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  49. SAVE BOLL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  50. STOP by loafula · · Score: 2, Interesting

    what the hell is the point of this, aside to prove what a dick you are? if you don't like his movies, don't watch them. you don't have to go signing petitions against the man. and fyi, i have never seen a single one of his movies.

    --
    FOXTROT UNIFORM CHARLIE KILO
    1. Re:STOP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay, countered.

      I'm going to take your favorite book. You love this book. You read it several times a year.

      Now I'm going to make it into a movie.

      This movie is going to be, intentionally, a very very horrible movie that has no hopes of paying for itself. Just so I can collect free money from the government and walk off with a profit.

      I don't mind bad directors. Some of my favorite movies ARE bad movies.

      But they had bad writers too. And they usually were bad by accident.

      They didn't take something that ALREADY had a GOOD storyline and butcher it.

    2. Re:STOP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny, that's the point. What the hell is the point of getting upset over this? Perhaps you like being a stick in the mud?

    3. Re:STOP by rholland356 · · Score: 1

      It's not funny. That's the point. It's a dull-witted self-referential joke between Uwe Boll and his fanbase.

      This drudge is consuming mindshare on /. that is better spent on the political depravities of that horrible, horrible Communist mega-nation that manufactures every bit of pop culture fluff merchandise that you hold so near and dear.

      So, the point is, STOP, and go to your room and think about it. And don't let me catch you playing with your collection of toys while you are on time out. You'll catch your death of lead poisoning.

  51. Bloodrayne- funniest sex scene ever by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 1

    Well the ladies burst out laughing first but then we joined in...

    It was basically
    "Hey, your hot- and there is a jail door behind you"

    "okay let's do it!"

    and off they went.

    Without actually saying those words even.

    Ahh... if life were only that simple.

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
  52. If I had to guess... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Where will they buy the rights to destroy movies for a couple thousand dollars?

    YouTube. There's an endless sea of crap.

    I'm surprised someone hasn't done it already, honestly. Oh wait, I think some have, albeit not quite in MST3K format.

  53. How many signatures.... by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

    .... for him to kill himself?

    10 million?

  54. Postal is funny... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I saw Postal at a movie festival, and it was good. So I won't sign...

  55. There's already a counter-petition! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    While the petition to stop him just reached 72000 signatures, the one to save him clocks in at 6, I repeat, six signatures. See for yourself:

    http://www.petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?bollsave

    I'm all nerves watching this...

  56. if Uwe wants my signature... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he'll have to fight me for it.

  57. One MEELION by illuminatedwax · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I don't think people realize just how much one million actually is. If this had any chance of succeeding, I would expect it to be in the six-figure range by now, especially after hitting Digg, Slashdot, and Reddit. One million is a lot of people.

    --
    Did you ever notice that *nix doesn't even cover Linux?
    1. Re:One MEELION by steelfood · · Score: 1

      It appears to have hit 6 figures (~108K, at an increase of ~1 signatures per second), but what'd you expect if the petition itself is not on the front page of /. ? I'll bet there'd be at least another 50K signatures if the petition itself had been on the front page this whole time.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  58. Areck Bardwin! by jameskojiro · · Score: 1

    Yeah and Uwe Boll will stop making movies the same time Arek Bardwin moves to Canada due to the results of the 2004 erection!

    --
    Tsukasa: All I really want, is to be left alone...
  59. Can someone explain exactly why we should care? by argent · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Can someone explain exactly why I should care if some filmmaker stops making movies based on video games or not?

    No, really, I don't understand why this is "stuff that matters".

    1. Re:Can someone explain exactly why we should care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Think of it this way. You have a kitten (videogame) that you love dearly. Uwe Boll comes along and screws your kitten mercilessly while you cry. Uwe Boll destroys the things that we love.

    2. Re:Can someone explain exactly why we should care? by argent · · Score: 1

      Um, we're talking about games like "Postal" here? Don't they come pre-goatse'd?

  60. I've seen this before. by Minwee · · Score: 1

    I'm still waiting for the referendum to legally change Stockwell Day's name to Doris.

    Once Doris bows to the will of the Canadian people, then I will start to believe in Uwe Boll. And the Tooth Fairy. And the Easter Bunny. And all that other stuff that Doris believes in.

  61. Career by ThurstonMoore · · Score: 1

    This guy's film making career is about to get slashdotted.

  62. That isn't how tax brackets work. by Mr2001 · · Score: 2, Informative

    consider this, if you're $5,000 into the next tax bracket, and you donate $10,000 to drop you down to the next lower tax bracket, and dropping yourself down to the next lower tax bracket saves you from paying $20,000 in taxes total, you would do it in a heart beat. That's not how it works. Tax brackets mean the first X dollars of your income are taxed at A%, the next Y dollars are taxed at B%, the next Z dollars after that are taxed at C%, and so on.

    If you have $5000 of your income in the C% bracket, and you donate $10,000 to drop down to the B% bracket, your net income after taxes will decrease, not increase -- because the higher C% rate only applied to that last $5000, not your entire income.
    --
    Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  63. Who's Uwe Boll? by nrlightfoot · · Score: 1

    If he's any relation to Heinrich Boll, I'll sight the petition. I hate The Clown.

    I haven't even heard of any of the movies mentioned in the summary, so I guess that must mean they are pretty awful.

    --
    what sig?
  64. Obligatory by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

    Sign my petition or I'll follow you home and kill your cat
    </postal2>

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  65. ouch... by CaptainNerdCave · · Score: 0

    you seem pretty broken up about that experience; want to talk about it?

  66. Snopes' Take by ecavalli · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I think Snopes' entry on internet petitions sums this whole thing up nicely:

    Claim: Signing and circulating online petitions is an effective way of remedying important issues. Status: False.
    1. Re:Snopes' Take by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that Uwe Bollocks has said that he'll quit if he gets a million signatures. No doubt he'd go back on his word if he did, but you can't blame us for at least trying when there is hope.

  67. My own Uwe Boll story by PCM2 · · Score: 1

    I saw the world-premiere screening of "House of the Dead" here in San Francisco. It was before the movie even had a national distribution deal.

    Of course, at that time nobody knew how bad Uwe's movies could be, because this was his first major feature. But we figured, "Hell ... it's a zombie movie based on a videogame. How good could it be?" So we bought a pint of Jim Beam before the flick to sneak into the theater.

    On the way in ... uh-oh. There's a guy at the entryway to the theater, and he's frisking everybody in line. People are being asked to open their bags and the whole bit.

    We don't have much choice at this point, so my friend dutifully submits to the pat down and: "What's THIS? What's in your back pocket??!" He: "Uh..." and he sheepishly removes the bottle from his pocket and shows it to the guy. The man inspects it and says, in a funny accent, "Ah, BOOZE! Booze iss fine, ve chust want no cameras." And with that, we were in.

    It wasn't until the Q&A session after the screening that we realized that the man who patted us down was Uwe Boll.

    So for that alone, I say I WILL NOT sign this petition. (But, having seen "Alone in the Dark," I can tell you there's precious few other reasons not to.)

    That, and his film adaptation of "Postal" is supposed to be so bizarre, creatively deranged and twisted that it's a genuine gem.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:My own Uwe Boll story by hesiod · · Score: 1

      > So for that alone, I say I WILL NOT sign this petition.

      Because he felt you up or because he gave your booze back?

  68. In The Interests of Fairness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I for one would like to encourage Uwe Boll to continue making films that I will never see, because hearing people's reactions to them is worth the money I didn't pay for a ticket.

    http://www.petitiononline.com/RRH53666/petition.html

    Also, I think people should get over cross-media flops already. Complaining about Uwe Boll's House of the Dead film seems to me like complaining about Christina Aguilera's Hay Wain album.

  69. We missed our chance to stop him by Badmovies · · Score: 1

    If we really wanted to stop him from making movies, the time was during the "Raging Boll" boxing matches. Putting somebody in the ring against him that could actually throw down should have been the goal. Try to pound Uwe's head hard enough to cause brain damage.

    That would have either stopped the movies from coming, or, at the very least, improved their quality.

    --


    Andrew Borntreger
    Champion of cinematic disasters
    1. Re:We missed our chance to stop him by ShadowsHawk · · Score: 1

      He 'declined' to jump in with anyone that had an ounce of skill. Just another reason to hate the bastard.

  70. Forget Uwe, by nedder · · Score: 1

    Michael Bay needs to be stopped much more so than Uwe Boll.

  71. There is no way in hell Uwe Boll will ever stop by Grendel_Prime · · Score: 1

    You can't collect 1 million *anything* from the brain-dead morons that watch this guy's movies. 90% of them can't even properly spell their own names, much less sign a petition. Good luck!

  72. 900k to go!! by ClientNine · · Score: 1
    100691 Total Signatures as of time()==1207666217.

    10% there! We can do it! DO IT FOR THE CHILDREN!!

  73. Yeah, like this will have any effect by JoeD · · Score: 1

    Online petitions aren't worth the paper they aren't printed on.

    You can sign whatever you want, but as long as his movies make money, he'll keep making them.

    Hint: If you don't like his movies, don't watch them.

  74. This sounds like a job for anon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WE are legion! We are Anonymous! Oh wait, how the hell does anon sign this thing?

  75. Why be internet bullies? by rholland356 · · Score: 1

    This goes out to the 100,000+ ppl and memes who signed that anti-Boll petition:

    WTF? For a class of people who are soooooo concerned about their rights to free expression, you SOBs sure are quick to saddle up the horses in some ill-conceived internet attempt to run Uwe Boll out of town.

    Look, just because it is EASY to join an internet petition, that doesn't absolve you of the responsibility to THINK about the consequence of your action.

    Yeah, I realize this petition against Boll is the latest in-joke. But humor is so very hard to do--leave it to the pros. Is this what /. has devolved to? Promotion for stupid self-referential gags?

    If you signed the petition as a serious statement, then I'll remind you that it is a very easy thing to avoid seeing the films that Boll makes. Let the man continue to fill his niche, and you go about your life filling your niche and each can live in freedom.

  76. Schadenfreude by whiplashx · · Score: 1

    Doesn't anyone here watch his movies to laugh? To me, its a lot of fun to sit down with some friends and some booze, laughing at Uwe Boll movies.

  77. the Market by dcrockerjr · · Score: 1

    Sometimes the market doesn't get a choice. I remember when we went to see Bloodrayne; I still remember parts (such as the absurdly short "sex" scene) being hilarious in a MST3K sort of way. But our "votes" (tickets) never counted because of the way the theater we went to was operated. On the dates Bloodrayne was showing so was Broke Back Mountain, so for whatever reason (lower royalties/personal preference of ticket stand operators/ etc.) the ticket sellers only gave out BBM tickets reguardless of what was requested. The ushers were familiar with the situation so there was no problem actually going to the movie we intended to see, but I've always felt bad that the royalties were mis allocated. We've switched to buying tickets from those computer terminals to avoid such problems in the future.