Jersey Shore aired in Dec 2009. The nearest star, Proxima Centauri, is at 4.2421 light years distance. The knowledge about Jersey Shore can not reached have reached any exoplanet host systems.
Here is a video of a researcher that sliced the brain so you can see the individual neurons, and trace their connections (~1000 connections per neuron). He flies through those connections in the recovered mapping. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNyDSx14yIQ
There may be a marginal legit use, but the vast majority of items is illegal, mostly contraband drugs. And if you read the site's wiki it is clear that they aim for "illicit activities".
It is surprising though that the largest market seems to be "soft drugs" and meds (probably pain killer addictions).
Am I missing something? From the article via Twitter:
younger devs today are about POSS – Post open source software. fuck the license and governance, just commit to github. - James Governor (@monkchips) September 17, 2012
Ah, yes, eloquently stated. And, you know, it's totally okay to do that but let's assume that you've "fucked" the license and governance and your code is great and popular. Now, what stops a company from taking your code
Copyright law.
And that's why we have open source licenses. So those are out there and if you're lazy or whatever you can just download this file (or the corresponding OSS license you like) and put it in the root directory of your source tree. Are you really too lazy to include a simple txt file in your source tree?
Yes some people are too lazy for that. And that's because more people are writing software and putting it up for other people to look at. Which is great!
You are free to copy that software down for your own use if someone uploaded it to github. The only problem you have is redistribution. Just ask the author if he or she would be happy with you re-using the code under a BSD/GPL license. Usually if they don't care about uploading a LICENSE file, they are happy with anyone using it. With their agreement, fork it on github and put a LICENSE file next to it, perhaps with a annotation in the README that the original author gave permission. That is not revocable and you are save now.
If the author says no to all licenses you proposed, you still haven't lost anything. Be happy you can look at someone elses solution. The problem does not come from people not upping their license, it comes from people copy-pasting code from third-parties without worrying whether licenses are compatible or the code you make can ever be shipped. If you are only making software for your own use, that's a non-issue.
A great trip report is the Google Talk by Siegfried S. Hecker, nuclear scientist (Los Alamos) and advises the US government on the nuclear proliferation w.r.t. North Korea. And on one of the last trips, they proudly show him what they have.
Yeah, the headline is kind of weird. It sounds like it goes like this:
> Oh, we detect cyber warfare! (a term we invented so I don't have to understand the difference between information and people/materials). > More and more computers are attacked! (because we attack other nations and stifle their industry for our own security and economical interests). > More attacks mean we need to be better prepared to attack more! (because we are not smart enough to make attacks pointless, and don't understand that a resourceful attacker can be rendered harmless by being defensive and smarter. No I must use old military strategy, attack the attackers, we need to have the best technology!)
So, hidden momentum and dark matter... What other concept will we invent to explain we dont know anything?
Dark matter is not an invented concept, it is a name for something we observe. Galaxies just rotate faster than from what is there in normal matter. So something is going on, and this something is called "dark matter", just because it does not produce/interact with light but behaves like a mass.
Now in what way you explain this (new physical laws, new elementary particles) is still an open question. But it's there and needs to be addressed. Dark matter is just the name of the problem.
Serious question, since you have the insight: Would you get in trouble becoming an atheist again, leaving Islam? There is the whole discussion on punishment on apostasy. How is that seen in your community?
I don't mind religions, many have very kind people that I gladly share this planet with. What I have a problem with is disrespect for human rights (as per the Universal Declaration).
I have no respect for people who conflate mainstream Sunni Islam with an extremist Twelver Shiite branch. Neither should anyone else.
Educate yourself people.
Pfft. Some believer in magic is telling us all to educate ourselves.
Listen. The burden is on you. It's your religion. You want to improve your religion's image?
No, it's not my job to separate someone else's point of view from my point of view because you are too ignorant to distinguish the two. I do not have the burden to explain my point of view to you just to not be insulted by you.
Religion is just one form of freedom of speech. Take another example that would be closer to your heart. Say you are a gamer. Someone says "You have to stop gaming! All these violent games cause school massacres.". Lets assume that justification were true, but you only play minesweeper. Is it your job to explain and defend yourself? No, the burden is on ignorant people to inform themselves, and refrain from general statements.
If you outlaw religion, you outlaw free speech. There are many forms of religion, not all are simplistic, anti-science and magical like your world-view would like them.
Finally, Muslims do have that dialogue with radicals, and are shaking their head about the killings. This perspective is just never shown on Western TV and newspapers, contributing to a outside view of "they all are the same".
Ah, slight problem. We can't go after the producers, if they are overseas. After all, the places where the servers are want their tax cut. If we really went after them, the other countries would retaliate. Not only that, the producers would up sticks, and move their servers. For example, if you use AWS for your servers, you can move them in seconds. Who are you going to tax now?
If you impose a tax on having data (in accordance to the practice of data minimisation), what you say is only true if only France would introduce such a tax, and EU countries would not work together.
If you host data on EU citizens, this data has to be hosted inside the EU. If you don't comply, you can't make business in the EU. And while you might not mind skipping France, the EU is a huge market, too large to ignore.
So it would be possible to introduce such a law, even though it would have troubles (e.g. how do you check?). It may successfully discourage free services such as Facebook to unnecessarily collect personal data though.
Oh please, it's also true in western courts that an insult does not have to be explicit. An implied insult, or embarrassing someone in a way everyone understands without spelling the name out is perfectly liable to prosecution unless protected by free speech rights (which may not be the case if it is repeated, connected to a financial loss or just slander).
On sourceforge, you have to select a open-source license, which guarantees that all projects hosted can be downloaded, used and forked (but not necessarily combined).
Re:Any progress on the file system front?
on
CentOS 5.9 Released
·
· Score: 2
You can compile on another server (e.g. the testing system). Look at the BINHOST documentation.
What happened? Most of these exploits seem to rely on rewriting methods / accessing byte code... how about disabling that access for applets as a temporary measure?
If you have a web proxy (e.g. squid) with user authentification, you probably are also using NTLM for sending hashed one-time passwords. The only other alternative is Digest authentication, which only few client programs support. The NTLM version used depends on the client machine.
If we learned anything, software dies. Twitter, Facebook, Flicker and whatever flavor of the times websites eventually be forgotten like MySpace, Geocities, AOL and Yahoo
Google is a prime example of trying out fancy things (even buying companies with awesome ideas), and being very happy to let them die, abandoning users. That would all be fine, if another company could pick things up, but software patents in the US are stupid.
The video was intended to show hypocracy, highlight the nastier aspects of the Qur'an, and show inflame Muslims (who are insensitive and increasingly violent to Copts). The real problem is not the video, it is: the oversensitivity of Muslims to any criticism, eg. they immediately turn to violence; and the craven cowardice of supposedly free societies who do not stand up for free speech and instead appease the violent who are clearly breaking local laws. This may sound harsh, but free speech requires the right to offend, even with a dumb and insulting (but scripturally accurate, AFAIK) video. Ignoring violent acts because of a video is not what the police should be doing - but they are currently cowed. How is this healthy in the long term?
You are showing plenty of ignorance yourself. There is a small minority doing the protests that occasionally turn violent, yet take up 100% of the TV images, and you say "all Muslims are like this". Second, it always depends on the interpretation of the scripture. Find a Muslim who believes the aspects you want to criticize, but don't criticize all Muslims from outside for something they might not believe in. Free speech has a limited right to offend, and defamation and hate speech are such limitations.
I just read up the law (TKG, should be similar to the European law). I learned two things
- Anyone can become a ISP/telecom. You have to register, but the gov doesn't stop you.
- Participants have the right to taken into records (written or electronic, to be made available to other ISPs/telecoms+gov) of each participant: Family name, name, academic title, address, ID, and, if the participant wants, occupation. (18 p1-1, 69 p3)
But apparently, this is only a right of the participants, so it does not say anywhere that you are not allowed to provide anonymous services. In fact, participants have the right to have their records deleted too.
Solution: Register your Tor exit node as a communication service. If records are requested, say that your participants all don't want their records stored. Caveat: You have to provide your services to anyone, and people who insist on having their names stored have a right on that. Why anyone would want to use Tor and be identified is beyond me though. Finally, you may have to comply with data retention laws, i.e. store connection data (not records) for 6 months. Since nobody will be able to use this data anyways, with Tor nodes overseas, that's not a killer.
Slashdot Mirror
Jersey Shore aired in Dec 2009. The nearest star, Proxima Centauri, is at 4.2421 light years distance.
The knowledge about Jersey Shore can not reached have reached any exoplanet host systems.
Use a 2 for extra security. Computers can only find ones and zeros.
Here is a video of a researcher that sliced the brain so you can see the individual neurons, and trace their connections (~1000 connections per neuron). He flies through those connections in the recovered mapping.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uNyDSx14yIQ
Category | Pct.
-----------------
Weed | 13.7%
Drugs | 9.0%
Prescription | 7.3%
Benzos | 4.9%
Books | 3.9%
Cannabis | 3.6%
Hash | 3.4%
Cocaine | 2.6%
Pills | 1.9%
Blotter (LSD) | 1.8%
Money | 1.7%
MDMA (ecstasy) | 1.6%
Erotica | 1.6%
Steroids, PEDs | 1.5%
Seeds | 1.5%
Heroin | 1.5%
DMT | 1.4%
Opioids | 1.4%
Stimulants | 1.2%
Digital goods | 1.1%
Items sold stat from http://arxiv.org/abs/1207.7139 (research conducted about SR)
There may be a marginal legit use, but the vast majority of items is illegal, mostly contraband drugs. And if you read the site's wiki it is clear that they aim for "illicit activities".
It is surprising though that the largest market seems to be "soft drugs" and meds (probably pain killer addictions).
Am I missing something? From the article via Twitter:
younger devs today are about POSS – Post open source software. fuck the license and governance, just commit to github. - James Governor (@monkchips) September 17, 2012
Ah, yes, eloquently stated. And, you know, it's totally okay to do that but let's assume that you've "fucked" the license and governance and your code is great and popular. Now, what stops a company from taking your code
Copyright law.
And that's why we have open source licenses. So those are out there and if you're lazy or whatever you can just download this file (or the corresponding OSS license you like) and put it in the root directory of your source tree. Are you really too lazy to include a simple txt file in your source tree?
Yes some people are too lazy for that. And that's because more people are writing software and putting it up for other people to look at. Which is great!
You are free to copy that software down for your own use if someone uploaded it to github. The only problem you have is redistribution. Just ask the author if he or she would be happy with you re-using the code under a BSD/GPL license. Usually if they don't care about uploading a LICENSE file, they are happy with anyone using it. With their agreement, fork it on github and put a LICENSE file next to it, perhaps with a annotation in the README that the original author gave permission. That is not revocable and you are save now.
If the author says no to all licenses you proposed, you still haven't lost anything. Be happy you can look at someone elses solution. The problem does not come from people not upping their license, it comes from people copy-pasting code from third-parties without worrying whether licenses are compatible or the code you make can ever be shipped. If you are only making software for your own use, that's a non-issue.
A great trip report is the Google Talk by Siegfried S. Hecker, nuclear scientist (Los Alamos) and advises the US government on the nuclear proliferation w.r.t. North Korea. And on one of the last trips, they proudly show him what they have.
lol, Customer Reviews from https://itunes.apple.com/app/vine-make-a-scene/id592447445
Maybe there are other problems to attend to first.
What's the point of having the video sharing only within the app, not accessible through browsers?
Yeah, the headline is kind of weird. It sounds like it goes like this:
> Oh, we detect cyber warfare! (a term we invented so I don't have to understand the difference between information and people/materials).
> More and more computers are attacked! (because we attack other nations and stifle their industry for our own security and economical interests).
> More attacks mean we need to be better prepared to attack more! (because we are not smart enough to make attacks pointless, and don't understand that a resourceful attacker can be rendered harmless by being defensive and smarter. No I must use old military strategy, attack the attackers, we need to have the best technology!)
So, hidden momentum and dark matter... What other concept will we invent to explain we dont know anything?
Dark matter is not an invented concept, it is a name for something we observe. Galaxies just rotate faster than from what is there in normal matter. So something is going on, and this something is called "dark matter", just because it does not produce/interact with light but behaves like a mass.
Now in what way you explain this (new physical laws, new elementary particles) is still an open question. But it's there and needs to be addressed. Dark matter is just the name of the problem.
Serious question, since you have the insight: Would you get in trouble becoming an atheist again, leaving Islam? There is the whole discussion on punishment on apostasy. How is that seen in your community?
I don't mind religions, many have very kind people that I gladly share this planet with. What I have a problem with is disrespect for human rights (as per the Universal Declaration).
Pfft. Some believer in magic is telling us all to educate ourselves.
Listen. The burden is on you. It's your religion. You want to improve your religion's image?
No, it's not my job to separate someone else's point of view from my point of view because you are too ignorant to distinguish the two. I do not have the burden to explain my point of view to you just to not be insulted by you.
Religion is just one form of freedom of speech. Take another example that would be closer to your heart.
Say you are a gamer. Someone says "You have to stop gaming! All these violent games cause school massacres.". Lets assume that justification were true, but you only play minesweeper. Is it your job to explain and defend yourself? No, the burden is on ignorant people to inform themselves, and refrain from general statements.
If you outlaw religion, you outlaw free speech. There are many forms of religion, not all are simplistic, anti-science and magical like your world-view would like them.
Finally, Muslims do have that dialogue with radicals, and are shaking their head about the killings. This perspective is just never shown on Western TV and newspapers, contributing to a outside view of "they all are the same".
Ah, slight problem. We can't go after the producers, if they are overseas. After all, the places where the servers are want their tax cut. If we really went after them, the other countries would retaliate. Not only that, the producers would up sticks, and move their servers. For example, if you use AWS for your servers, you can move them in seconds. Who are you going to tax now?
If you impose a tax on having data (in accordance to the practice of data minimisation), what you say is only true if only France would introduce such a tax, and EU countries would not work together.
If you host data on EU citizens, this data has to be hosted inside the EU. If you don't comply, you can't make business in the EU. And while you might not mind skipping France, the EU is a huge market, too large to ignore.
So it would be possible to introduce such a law, even though it would have troubles (e.g. how do you check?). It may successfully discourage free services such as Facebook to unnecessarily collect personal data though.
If we just plug up the volcanos, everything will be fine!
Humans emit 100 times more CO2 than volcanoes. The ash clouds of volcanoes typically cause a temporary cooling.
false. But I don't understand how it ever became 127, because it is of type boolean.
Oh please, it's also true in western courts that an insult does not have to be explicit. An implied insult, or embarrassing someone in a way everyone understands without spelling the name out is perfectly liable to prosecution unless protected by free speech rights (which may not be the case if it is repeated, connected to a financial loss or just slander).
On sourceforge, you have to select a open-source license, which guarantees that all projects hosted can be downloaded, used and forked (but not necessarily combined).
You can compile on another server (e.g. the testing system). Look at the BINHOST documentation.
What happened? Most of these exploits seem to rely on rewriting methods / accessing byte code ... how about disabling that access for applets as a temporary measure?
It doesn't have to, it is GPLv3, not v2. Unless they modified it. see here if you don't believe me
If you have a web proxy (e.g. squid) with user authentification, you probably are also using NTLM for sending hashed one-time passwords. The only other alternative is Digest authentication, which only few client programs support. The NTLM version used depends on the client machine.
If we learned anything, software dies. Twitter, Facebook, Flicker and whatever flavor of the times websites eventually be forgotten like MySpace, Geocities, AOL and Yahoo
Google is a prime example of trying out fancy things (even buying companies with awesome ideas), and being very happy to let them die, abandoning users. That would all be fine, if another company could pick things up, but software patents in the US are stupid.
The video was intended to show hypocracy, highlight the nastier aspects of the Qur'an, and show inflame Muslims (who are insensitive and increasingly violent to Copts). The real problem is not the video, it is: the oversensitivity of Muslims to any criticism, eg. they immediately turn to violence; and the craven cowardice of supposedly free societies who do not stand up for free speech and instead appease the violent who are clearly breaking local laws. This may sound harsh, but free speech requires the right to offend, even with a dumb and insulting (but scripturally accurate, AFAIK) video. Ignoring violent acts because of a video is not what the police should be doing - but they are currently cowed. How is this healthy in the long term?
You are showing plenty of ignorance yourself. There is a small minority doing the protests that occasionally turn violent, yet take up 100% of the TV images, and you say "all Muslims are like this". Second, it always depends on the interpretation of the scripture. Find a Muslim who believes the aspects you want to criticize, but don't criticize all Muslims from outside for something they might not believe in.
Free speech has a limited right to offend, and defamation and hate speech are such limitations.
A better analogy would be: Can a newspaper printing plant decide to black out an newspaper ad someone enlisted?
The buyer of the newspaper might want that (has the right to not listen), but at the very least the reader must be allowed to opt out!
This is correct. Current jurisdiction is that downloading anything for personal use is legal; uploading / distributing in large quantities is not.
I just read up the law (TKG, should be similar to the European law). I learned two things
- Anyone can become a ISP/telecom. You have to register, but the gov doesn't stop you.
- Participants have the right to taken into records (written or electronic, to be made available to other ISPs/telecoms+gov) of each participant: Family name, name, academic title, address, ID, and, if the participant wants, occupation. (18 p1-1, 69 p3)
But apparently, this is only a right of the participants, so it does not say anywhere that you are not allowed to provide anonymous services. In fact, participants have the right to have their records deleted too.
Solution: Register your Tor exit node as a communication service. If records are requested, say that your participants all don't want their records stored.
Caveat: You have to provide your services to anyone, and people who insist on having their names stored have a right on that. Why anyone would want to use Tor and be identified is beyond me though.
Finally, you may have to comply with data retention laws, i.e. store connection data (not records) for 6 months. Since nobody will be able to use this data anyways, with Tor nodes overseas, that's not a killer.