Slashdot Mirror


User: CoolVibe

CoolVibe's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,292
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,292

  1. Re:This is some of what $cientology is trying to h on Scientology vs. Panoussis Ruling · · Score: 1
    There's actually a scientific evaluation of this, and it claims the same that you are claiming. Some of the volcanoes mentioned didn't indeed exist then.

    Can't remember the URI, someone help me out here?
    --
    Slashdot didn't accept your submission? hackerheaven.org will!

  2. MOD THIS UP! please? on Scientology vs. Panoussis Ruling · · Score: 1
    Right... :)

    Can someone mod that up? This is the OT3 from the fishman affidavid. It's hilariously silly.

    Read it. Think about it. Roll of your chair laughing.

    Actually, Co$ can't so anything about this, because the fishman affidavid can be freely published, according to my lovely Dutch law system. Thank miss Karin Spaink for that ;)
    --
    Slashdot didn't accept your submission? hackerheaven.org will!

  3. Re:10,000 hour life on Sony's OEL Thinner And Better Than Today's LCDs? · · Score: 1
    I mean 50hrs per week average TV viewing * 52 weeks says these puppies croak in four years of average use.
    Yeah, but replacing them should be a snap, and wouldn cost that much. (in 4 years the price of these screens will surely haved dropped somewhat)
    --
    Slashdot didn't accept your submission? hackerheaven.org will!
  4. Re:Profiteering/squatting on X-Box Name Dispute In The Works · · Score: 1
    (common guys, I gues typing something like grep -i xbox , or something like that, is not that difficult, is it?)
    Microsoft Winders doesn't ship with something as incredibly useful as grep(1) per default. Makes you wonder, huh? :)
    --
    Slashdot didn't accept your submission? hackerheaven.org will!
  5. Re:Wow... on Interview With Eric Allman And Kirk McKusick · · Score: 1

    No, not hot girls, it can also be a *female* AC that dates lots of guys. :)
    --
    Slashdot didn't accept your submission? hackerheaven.org will!

  6. Re:Wow... on Interview With Eric Allman And Kirk McKusick · · Score: 3
    Yeah, I was surprised too. I'm heterosexual, but it's great to see a highly respected geek who is responsible for most of the smtp traffic in the world being so open about his sexual preference.

    Swallow that, you filthy homophobes! :)

    Next time I hear someone go hard on gay people, I will remind them that some gay person is responsible for his/her e-mail delivery.

    That'll teach 'em...
    --
    Slashdot didn't accept your submission? hackerheaven.org will!

  7. Re:whoa, deja vu on DIY Railgun Projects · · Score: 1

    Watch it, people! The above is a goatse.cx link...
    --
    Slashdot didn't accept your submission? hackerheaven.org will!

  8. Re:already /.'ed cached here on DIY Railgun Projects · · Score: 1

    That's because it not a railgun, that page is about a golf putter called 'the railgun'. This thing can make dents in stuff, but only in close range compared to a *real* railgun :)
    --
    Slashdot didn't accept your submission? hackerheaven.org will!

  9. slashdotted already? on A Love Song For Napster · · Score: 1

    ...or is it just me? This sucks, because I was kinda looking forward to reading the damn article. Well, I guess I'd have to wait for a while... Unless some people dare to post mirrors of course.
    --
    Slashdot didn't accept your submission? hackerheaven.org will!

  10. Re:My own patent idea on GeoWorks Patents Wireless Web Browsers · · Score: 2
    Right...

    I'm going to patent the 20% Oxygen and 80% Nitrogen mixture as "Inhalable substance that can sustain survivability for extended periods of time" when I get the chance.

    Every time you breathe, you would have to pay...

    It occurs to me that if they have a description that a layperson can't make any sense of the patent office okays it. That really shows what kind of people are running the thing, don't it?
    --
    Slashdot didn't accept your submission? hackerheaven.org will!

  11. Re:slashdotted already?!? on KDE 2.1 Beta 2 and Nautilus PR 3 - are out · · Score: 1
    You can also download the damn thing and just try it! (I'm posting this from the new Nautilus, BTW)

    It works great. Haven't stumbled onto anything nasty yet. No doubt I will soon :)
    --
    Slashdot didn't accept your submission? hackerheaven.org will!

  12. Re:The bottom line (was: FUD) on Linux Is Going Down · · Score: 1

    Novell, OS/2 and Mac OS aren't exactly free you know. The free OS's don't really share that burden. And I said Linux *practically* won the serverroom. Maybe that was a bit of a misnomer. Just do a sed -e s/linux/free operating systems/g on that sentence.
    --
    Slashdot didn't accept your submission? hackerheaven.org will!

  13. Re:The bottom line (was: FUD) on Linux Is Going Down · · Score: 1
    Whoah there. I said we won because they finally see Linux as a threat. From now on, Microsoft will go down hill. They are trying to beat a omnipresent ghost called Free Software. I really hope they will put all their energy in trying to discredit us. They can't beat our price, and userfriendlyness will be here soon.

    We practically won the serverroom already, now let's take the desktop from them :)
    --
    Slashdot didn't accept your submission? hackerheaven.org will!

  14. Re:On the other hand... on Linux Is Going Down · · Score: 1
    Before they had akamaized DNS servers they were off the net, remember? That was *without* linux.

    Your turn.
    --
    Slashdot didn't accept your submission? hackerheaven.org will!

  15. Re:Leading on Linux Is Going Down · · Score: 2

    Yeah, and .NET isn't even officially released yet. Who are they kidding? Typically Microsoft to say that they are leading iwth *vapourware*
    --
    Slashdot didn't accept your submission? hackerheaven.org will!

  16. The bottom line (was: FUD) on Linux Is Going Down · · Score: 1
    We Won

    What was that saying again? The one from Ghandi? First they laugh at you... (finish it yerself)
    --
    Slashdot didn't accept your submission? hackerheaven.org will!

  17. Oh dear... on Linux Is Going Down · · Score: 1

    Let the shitslinging begin! I can't wait to see what M$ will dredge up. Put on your debunking hats! We got work to do! :)
    --
    Slashdot didn't accept your submission? hackerheaven.org will!

  18. Re:Mouse on OS X on x86? · · Score: 1
    Bullshit claim alert! :)

    I use a Logitech 3 button USB mouse with my Mac, and both Mac OS = 9 and Mac OS X PB are able to use all buttons of it. Even the mousewheel works (although not with Carbon apps in OS X *grmbl*)
    --
    Slashdot didn't accept your submission? hackerheaven.org will!

  19. Re:Oh no, not again... on OS X on x86? · · Score: 1
    stuff it, troll boy...

    What the hell has *my* website to do with some people that want to run Mac OS X on intel machines?

    Get a life.
    --
    Slashdot didn't accept your submission? hackerheaven.org will!

  20. Re:Reminds me of...A BIG mistake by Apple on OS X on x86? · · Score: 1

    Strange, I have been running Mac OS X PB on my iMac (G3 350Mhz) for a few months now, and no performance problems whatsoever. (Yeah you need 128 MB, but that's also what the minimal system requirements say, so I'm right up to spec)
    --
    Slashdot didn't accept your submission? hackerheaven.org will!

  21. Oh no, not again... on OS X on x86? · · Score: 1
    I'll probably get modded down for this, and my karma will go to hell, but I'm gonna post it anyway... (Like I care about karma... *NOT*)

    Every once and a while I hear of some nuts wanting Mac OS X on Intel. Although I don't blame them, Apple probably won't do that. Apple isn't *just* a OS vendor, it's a hardware vendor as well, just like Sun. Sun has the serverroom, and Apple owns the desktop. Apple would loose a considerable amount of money if they release Aqua for the x86.

    Although Darwin seems to run on Intel (only one tested configuration though), why would you think Aqua + the rest would? There are lots of issues, like hardware support for instance. Right now there are only supported Apple machines and there are a finite number of combinations, which is easier to support. With x86 you have too much diversity for the OS to be straight plug and play. Just look at the Windows Plug and Play fiasco to see what I mean. Mac OS X works right out of the box, and all your peripherals work right away (as long as they are Apple peripherals).

    Just face it, we can whine and scream all you want. My bet is that Apple won't give in. They got too much at stake to do such a geek-friendly move. Apple is consumer oriented, and with consumer I mean your next door computer-illiterate (yes, the irritating luser kind that still outnumber us geeks).

    Surely I do not oppose having Mac OS X on my turbocharged x86 box, but I just don't see this happening in *this* life. Not that Apple is being stupid and childish, they have a buisness to run.

    End of rant
    --
    Slashdot didn't accept your submission? hackerheaven.org will!

  22. Very OT on Space War 2017: US v. China · · Score: 1
    Is fuck-you.org down? Did you find the guy that stole your bike?

    Sorry for the offtopicness, mod it down if you like.
    --
    Slashdot didn't accept your submission? hackerheaven.org will!

  23. ObLoginDanceCircumventionPost on New Boxes For Captain Crunch · · Score: 2

    username: dotslash
    passwd: slashdot

    Have fun...
    --
    Slashdot didn't accept your submission? hackerheaven.org will!

  24. Re:Why bother? on 15th IOCCC Results Posted · · Score: 1
    For me this shows the problm with open source - people are more interested in playing silly games than actually getting something constructive done.
    Time enjoyed wasting is *not* wasted time. Think about it...
    --
    Slashdot didn't accept your submission? hackerheaven.org will!
  25. Re:Taco on Microsoft's DNS Down · · Score: 1
    Knowing how Exchange performs and *loses mail* under high load, that doesn't surprise me...

    Thank god I converted my company to use postfix

    --
    Slashdot didn't accept your submission? hackerheaven.org will!