a stark contrast to Debian's recent "don't release at all" policy.
Mickey Mouse/Bob Cratched: "P-p-please, Mr. Scrooge? M-might I have a piece of c-c-coal to warm my hands?"
Scrooge McDuck/Scrooge: "I gave you a piece of coal last week! Get back to work."
hawk, wondering if the debian he installed on his 486 laptop in 1998 or so is still the current release (but not curious enough to rush home and fix the power supply)
No one will buy them, because whoever buys them is liable to IBM in the counter suit.
That just isn't true.
Whoever bought them would almost certainly hold the stock, rather than fold SCO into itself. That still leaves SCO as a distinct entity from its parent. The Gotterdammerung scenario just leaves the new owner with worthless stock.
I am a lawyer, but this is not legal advice. If you need legal advice, see an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
P.S. If you have a document pertaining to a lawsuit, but you don't declare it, you go to jail for obstruction of justice.
Perhaps in some really exotic circumstances, but civil litigation would rarely, if ever, fit the requirements for obstruction of justice.
In civil litigation, there *might* be a contempt citation, but more likely it would stop with sanctions--which could be monetary, or perhaps prohibitting the use of certain other evidence, or a summary ruling against you on the issue in question, or even striking your entire complaint or answer (thus granting a win to the other side).
But why would IBM want them? IBM has already made the decision that an open source unix better serves their purposes than their internal one. The last thing they need is a second internal unix to not use . ..
In Iowa, they actually ran commercials in the theater to let you know which *brand* of real butter they used . . . and then another theater opened with genuine yellow goo . ..
But you've identified the core problem: it's not getting the food to the country, but the distribution once there. Last I checked, there weren't any countries, not even the ones with famine, that weren't getting enough food. Getting it to those that need it is the problem--and there seems to be little support for using foreign military power to do get it there.
The bare information that a terrorist, even a high-grade one, wants to steal a plane is about revealing as the information that a five year old would like an ice cream cone . ..
This was the government. It's a fine. Fines go to the government.
There have been additional claass action suits filed, which will make the ambulance chasers, err, plaintiff's lawyers, wealthy while producing almost nothing for the customers.
There have been cases, for example, of people ending up underwater for extended periods in swimming pools and being brought back. The explanations were to the effect that they were hibernating (or something very close).
However, given the sparsity of reported cases, don't try this at home . ..
This might also have some application for trauma cases where the victim needs a lengthy transport . ..
BTW... a language like Fortran, that doesn't have pointers at all, is much easier to vectorize; that's one of the reasons a lot of scientific codes are still in Fortran.
Fortran has had pointers for fifteen years now (Fortran 90).
However, they're much more limited than C pointers--by design, not by defect. And you've hit the reason, too: it allows stronger assumptions to be made when optimizaing that can be made with C.
There is a serious feedback issue between dress and behavior. School uniforms, for example, are not just about costs, cliques, and keeping gang paraphenelia out; they're also abou tkeeping students serious.
As a general rule (riddled with exceptions), when people dress up, they tend to act the part.
a stark contrast to Debian's recent "don't release at all" policy.
Mickey Mouse/Bob Cratched: "P-p-please, Mr. Scrooge? M-might I have a piece of c-c-coal to warm my hands?"
Scrooge McDuck/Scrooge: "I gave you a piece of coal last week! Get back to work."
hawk, wondering if the debian he installed on his 486 laptop in 1998 or so is still the current release (but not curious enough to rush home and fix the power supply)
hawk, dating himself
No one will buy them, because whoever buys them is liable to IBM in the counter suit.
That just isn't true.
Whoever bought them would almost certainly hold the stock, rather than fold SCO into itself. That still leaves SCO as a distinct entity from its parent. The Gotterdammerung scenario just leaves the new owner with worthless stock.
hawk
I am a lawyer, but this is not legal advice. If you need legal advice, see an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
P.S. If you have a document pertaining to a lawsuit, but you don't declare it, you go to jail for obstruction of justice.
Perhaps in some really exotic circumstances, but civil litigation would rarely, if ever, fit the requirements for obstruction of justice.
In civil litigation, there *might* be a contempt citation, but more likely it would stop with sanctions--which could be monetary, or perhaps prohibitting the use of certain other evidence, or a summary ruling against you on the issue in question, or even striking your entire complaint or answer (thus granting a win to the other side).
hawk
But why would IBM want them? IBM has already made the decision that an open source unix better serves their purposes than their internal one. The last thing they need is a second internal unix to not use . . .
hawk
Ah-HAH!
Now if we can just find the other one
hawk
The bloat-rate for Microsoft's Office and Windows alone accounts for that . . .
hawk
hawk
hawk
In Iowa, they actually ran commercials in the theater to let you know which *brand* of real butter they used . . . and then another theater opened with genuine yellow goo . . .
hawk
hawk
hawk
In some cases, it's rebels.
But you've identified the core problem: it's not getting the food to the country, but the distribution once there. Last I checked, there weren't any countries, not even the ones with famine, that weren't getting enough food. Getting it to those that need it is the problem--and there seems to be little support for using foreign military power to do get it there.
hawk
The bare information that a terrorist, even a high-grade one, wants to steal a plane is about revealing as the information that a five year old would like an ice cream cone . . .
hawk
Even on websites targeted towards the intelligent, people post replies to news item.
:)
This also happens on sites like slashdot
hawk
And for good measure, again on a week from Tuesday . .
hawk
Yeah, but "just works" has been built in to mac for over 20 years. It's a new idea for MS :)
hawk
Pretty much the same: paying too much for RAM.
hawk
This was the government. It's a fine. Fines go to the government.
There have been additional claass action suits filed, which will make the ambulance chasers, err, plaintiff's lawyers, wealthy while producing almost nothing for the customers.
hawk
hawk
There have been cases, for example, of people ending up underwater for extended periods in swimming pools and being brought back. The explanations were to the effect that they were hibernating (or something very close).
.
.
However, given the sparsity of reported cases, don't try this at home . .
This might also have some application for trauma cases where the victim needs a lengthy transport . .
hawk
This h0t plck has already doubled, and may do so again by tomorrow! Call our co-conspirators, err, representatives to buy now!
hawk
BTW ... a language like Fortran, that doesn't have pointers at all, is much easier to vectorize; that's one of the reasons a lot of scientific codes are still in Fortran.
Fortran has had pointers for fifteen years now (Fortran 90).
However, they're much more limited than C pointers--by design, not by defect. And you've hit the reason, too: it allows stronger assumptions to be made when optimizaing that can be made with C.
hawk
There is a serious feedback issue between dress and behavior. School uniforms, for example, are not just about costs, cliques, and keeping gang paraphenelia out; they're also abou tkeeping students serious.
As a general rule (riddled with exceptions), when people dress up, they tend to act the part.
hawk
hawk