Slashdot Mirror


RAM Manufacturers Fined for Price Fixing

TufelKinder writes "From Law.com: 'In the largest fine ever obtained by San Francisco antitrust prosecutors, a Korean company has agreed to plead guilty and pay $185 million for its role in a conspiracy to drive up the price of computer chips.' Micron and Infineon have also been fined for their role in the scheme." From the article: "It's the third-largest fine of its kind in the United States, and it could be just a preview of even bigger penalties. The far-reaching computer chip investigation, which alleges wrongdoing from 1999 through 2002, affects thousands of consumers."

216 comments

  1. Your honor, I don't have that memory by ishmalius · · Score: 5, Funny

    Honest

    1. Re:Your honor, I don't have that memory by game+kid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Prosecutor: "Did you, at any moment, raise your RAM prices?"

      Defendant: "I do not recall, sir."

      Prosecutor: "So you're a memory company and you don't remem--"

      Attorney: "Objection!"

      Judge: "What grounds?"

      Attorney: "Argumentative."

      Judge: "Overruled. You run a memory company, at least buy some of your product, dammit."

      Defendant: "Understood, Your Hon--"

      Judge: "You, just shut up."

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  2. Thanks a lot.... by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So the money goes to who, instead of the customers?

    1. Re:Thanks a lot.... by michael+path · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, no, no. This money goes to WHOM.

    2. Re:Thanks a lot.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The money goes to more gay marriages and blog registrations.

    3. Re:Thanks a lot.... by VivianC · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Lawyers. It always goes to the lawyers. We'll get stupid coupons or something.

      --
      Viv

      Gmail invites for ip
    4. Re:Thanks a lot.... by Sheepdot · · Score: 4, Funny

      Enforcing DMCA litigation in San Francisco. What?!? Did you really think the government would give it back to you?

      Of the 185 million, half goes to the court costs on the part of the government (92.5 million). Half of that goes to lawyers (46 million). Half of that goes to the expert witnesses (23 million). Half of that goes to the "betterment of society" committee, that takes a look at how RAM prices affect San Francisco's children (11 million).

      Another half gets lost in the bureaucratic mix (6 million). Half of that goes to fun a failed municipal wireless project (3 million). And the other 3 million goes back to the good citizen's of San Francisco in the form of a park or statue or something else people can look at and talk proudly of how their government provides them with so much.

      Just makes you damn proud to be an American, doesn't it? I know I am!

    5. Re:Thanks a lot.... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Enforcing DMCA litigation in San Francisco.

      I call FUD. This issue has nothing to do with the DCMA and everything to do with illegal, anti-competitive practices. Price fixing is when companies get together to agree on an artificially inflated price, just so that their competition with each other doesn't drive prices down. This is *highly* illegal and doesn't involve copyrights in any way.

    6. Re:Thanks a lot.... by Sheepdot · · Score: 1

      Oh ok, so the court costs taking a huge chunk of the 185 million isn't going to the government, who enforces the DMCA. I get it. The original poster asked where the money is going to go, and I answered the question for him. It'll go to a ton of places, DMCA enforcement being one of them. Is that really all that hard to believe?

    7. Re:Thanks a lot.... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Informative

      Got 'ya. The way it was phrased, I thought you were saying that the money was coming from DMCA enforcement. I hereby retract my comment about "FUD" and offer an apology.

    8. Re:Thanks a lot.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just out of curiosity, how do you suggest that money should be doled out to the victims?

    9. Re:Thanks a lot.... by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      The money is, in a manner of speaking, being doled out to the victims. Every dollar the government gets from this fine (beyond the cost of the litigation, of course) is one dollar that it doesn't have to bring in by raising your taxes. It's one dollar that can be spent on programs that help the public---better schools, better roads, better...

      Wait... who am I kidding....

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    10. Re:Thanks a lot.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since it's San Francisco, doesn't Willie Brown get at least 1 million?

    11. Re:Thanks a lot.... by wocket44 · · Score: 1

      Woohoo! I needed more coupons to pad my empty wallet!

    12. Re:Thanks a lot.... by Anna+Merikin · · Score: 1

      Since I live in SF, let me clarify:

      Willie Brown has been out of office since the election of 2003. You may remember the new mayor, Gavin Newsome, made some waves by marrying gays on Valentine's Day last year.

      The DMCA is hated in SF, whose City Council is investigating going WiFi city wide.

      That same august body has decided, in its infinite wizdumb, to regulate blogs under the new federal election funding law called McCain-Feingold. Which is not the same as the DMCA. But I see your point.

      SF in an unusally liberal city. Here, a conservative is someone who thinks prostitution ought to be legalized; the rest seem to think it ought to be made mandatory.

      Just funnin' about that.
      ____________________
      Anna Merikin -- the last heterosexual left in San Fracisco.

    13. Re:Thanks a lot.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nay! The money goes to whom?

    14. Re:Thanks a lot.... by Monkelectric · · Score: 1

      My kind of town. Im sick of the california suburbs where the bible thumpers are hiding out.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    15. Re:Thanks a lot.... by Sheepdot · · Score: 1

      No problem. I see what you're saying now that I re-read it. Sorry for any confusion.

  3. Wow by koreaman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ram is pretty cheap as it is, it's gonna be awesome if somehow prices drop even more because of this.

    1. Re:Wow by Hatta · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ram is pretty cheap as it is, it's gonna be awesome if somehow prices drop even more because of this.

      I have plenty of ram as it is. What the hell am I gonna do with 2gigs?

      Anyway, what I'm wondering is if this company made more from the price fixing than it lost from the fine. Somehow I suspect it did.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    2. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The price fixing took place from 1999-2002 around when the investigation started. Its doubtful there is price fixing going on now that these companies are under scrutiny.

    3. Re:Wow by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Eh? My perception is the opposite. RAM prices seem to have hardly budged in a year, which is strange.

    4. Re:Wow by lilmouse · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Ram prices will be going down, sure...

      But if I don't want to buy ram from Price Fixers, and I don't want to buy untested ram, what the heck am I supposed to do?

      --LWM

    5. Re:Wow by Archon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I have plenty of ram as it is. What the hell am I gonna do with 2gigs?

      I'm old enough to remember a Radio Shack employee telling me that I'd never need more than 4K of RAM. Or of an Apple employee telling me some years later that I'd never need more than a 5 MB HD. Or now of you, asking what they'd ever do with 2 GB of RAM.

      The more RAM, the less has to be done in a HD. I don't ever turn my computers off as it is and leave as many apps running as possible. Things are always just a click away and my access to things is nearly instantaneous. This is what I want, and I always want more.

    6. Re:Wow by Intron · · Score: 1

      Someday this will all be just a bad memory.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    7. Re:Wow by Jorkapp · · Score: 2, Funny

      2 gigs? You can do amazing things with 2 gigs.

      To start, you can cache Windows to a ramdrive to speed things up a little, or if you're a linux zealot, you can cache an entire Knoppix LiveCD to a ramdrive, and have all the more space on your HD.

      Of course, you could always cache pr0n videos to a ramdrive for uber-smooth playback.

      --
      Frink: Nice try floyd, but you were designed for scrubbing, and scrubbing is what you shall do.
    8. Re:Wow by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      Or you could actually let the kernel do a reasonable amount of disk caching and not manually copy anything to a ramdisk and get better performance on -everything-.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    9. Re:Wow by lilmouse · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I like puns, but that's not going to be enough for me to get my fix.

      --LWM

    10. Re:Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think ram is very cheap at all. I think it was cheaper a few years back. Maybe this will bring it down to cheap though.

    11. Re:Wow by Thing+1 · · Score: 1

      Ram is pretty cheap as it is, it's gonna be awesome if somehow prices drop even more because of this.


      I bought 4 x 512 GB PC133 RAM 4 years ago for $42 apiece (including shipping).


      Pricewatch now has them at $40. I haven't checked in the interim, but they basically haven't budged, judging solely from these two data points.


      My though is actually the opposite: this fine will increase the cost of doing business to the suppliers. The coming class-action suits will add to their expenses. I wouldn't be surprised to see them pass these expenses on to the consumers. "We were gouging you before, but we got caught and have to pay all these fines and can't afford them, so we're passing them on to you US citizens who purchase the bulk of our sales."


      Which, in the end, boils down to the US government fining their citizens.


      And spending how many millions in taxpayer dollars to set up the fine? ("to set up the fine" == using the court system.)


      No, I'm not cynical; I've come to expect this from my wonderful, best-that-money-can-buy government.

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    12. Re:Wow by rapidweather · · Score: 1
      Ok, I want another GB for my Dell 4600.

      If I run my livecd distro in the RAM, with the "toram" boot option, then I run out of ram if I try and burn a cd of near 700 MB with K3B. If I plan on doing that, I cannot do "toram", and that slows things down.

      Another GB on top of the 1 GB I already have would be interesting.

      Kingston says the 512 MB sticks are $65.00 each, and are available April 25. They have to be installed in pairs. Wondering if I might wait, and see if a new, lower price is posted in a month or so.

      I'll have to admit that the $65.00 is a lot lower than we used to have to pay for RAM like this.

    13. Re:Wow by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      I'm not all that surprised by the lack of a RAM price drop. I'm not surprised by the statement, "What the heck am I going to do with 2GB of RAM?" My point to this is, I bought a computer nearly 4 years ago. I put 512MB of ram on it. Since then, I have not felt the need to push it beyond that. Sure, if I played Everquest (huge memory hog for textures) then I _might_ think of getting more. Still major PC manufacturers are still building PCs with 256MB of RAM, and have been doing this for at least 2 years.

      Sure, with more memory, software can load its bloated self there and run a lot faster, but if the software was written a few years ago, it probably isn't aware that it could load its entire bloated self into memory (unless the programmers were forward thinking.)

      These are my reasons RAM hasn't increased in price, and probably won't drop. There is a happy medium in the economy of memory.

    14. Re:Wow by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      I have plenty of ram as it is. What the hell am I gonna do with 2gigs?

      Officially Apple supports 8 gig in the G5, but that's just because there was only 1 gig sticks when it came out. I've heard anecdotal evidence that it actually supports 2 gig sticks. It's rumoured that the memory controller can actually address 32 gig when 4 gig sticks come out if they make 4 gig sticks for PC 3200.

      I'd love to be able to have even 8 gig in my G5 just to stop all the hard disk usage when rendering DVD video.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
  4. So by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will they pass the cost onto the consumer?

    1. Re:So by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

      they'll find a new way to screw us to get their money back.

    2. Re:So by Evil+Butters · · Score: 1

      Actually, there will be no difference. Any "savings" by now charging a fair or reduced amount will be offset by the additional charge to cover the lawsuit or fine costs. /sarcasm

      --
      Homer no function beer well without.
    3. Re:So by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Naw. And they're sending Halle Berry to your house to blow you, too.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  5. US retailers by Isopropyl · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "Last year, nearly $8 billion worth of DRAM was sold in the United States. Customers touched by Hynix's illegal activities include Dell Inc., Compaq Computer Corp., Hewlett-Packard Co., Apple Computer Inc., International Business Machines Corp. and Gateway Inc., according to the Justice Department."
    This affects a lot of consumers. I wonder what the involvement of each individual retailer was?
    1. Re:US retailers by hawk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Pretty much the same: paying too much for RAM.

      hawk

    2. Re:US retailers by Sheepdot · · Score: 2, Informative

      This affects a lot of consumers. I wonder what the involvement of each individual retailer was?
      Well, here's what Dell did. My guess is that most just paid up, or took Dell's route and closed certain models and re-released. It looks like Apple actually raised the price of a few models to compensate.

      A good deal of them actually just side-stepped the companies altogether after some time. A few million is pocket change to a company like Hynix with a market cap of 5.8 billion. They'll just release a few hundred thousand new shares or so. Doesn't look like their stock price has been affected at all. Up 4.99% today.

    3. Re:US retailers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It looks like Apple actually raised the price of a few models to compensate.

      I'm new here, but it seems to me that you cannot possibly say this seriously.

  6. Well done, lads. by blueadept1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This has got to be a wake-up call to major corporations. This goes to show that price-fixing will not be tolerated in the tech industry. Now perhaps we could get this to extend to other industries such as DVD's/CD's, and maybe even OIL!

    Okay, okay, I admit it, I'm drunk.

    1. Re:Well done, lads. by StratoChief66 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, they probably made ten times that from the price fixing, so the cost of doing the price fixing is still less than the benifits, so it was still worth it. Corporations don't have morals, they have cost/benifit analysis depts.

      --
      Frylock: "We should have cloned twenties, Jackson wouldn't have given a fuck."
    2. Re:Well done, lads. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Except it's only illegal in the US because collusion is illegal. OPEC isn't subject to our laws.

    3. Re:Well done, lads. by Intron · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The next generation wafer fab lines will cost ~$10B. All of which has to be paid off out of the sales of RAM chips. Since memory is a commodity part, buyers will always go to the cheapest source, so whoever is willing to accept the lowest margins wins. Unless everyone agrees to a minimum price.

      This isn't a cost/benefit argument, its a life or death decision to the manufacturers.

      --
      Intron: the portion of DNA which expresses nothing useful.
    4. Re:Well done, lads. by Danse · · Score: 1

      The next generation wafer fab lines will cost ~$10B. All of which has to be paid off out of the sales of RAM chips. Since memory is a commodity part, buyers will always go to the cheapest source, so whoever is willing to accept the lowest margins wins. Unless everyone agrees to a minimum price.

      This isn't a cost/benefit argument, its a life or death decision to the manufacturers.


      Well, if not everyone is buying a new fab, then some memory will be better than others, and therefore fetch a premium price. If they want to just sell the same old stuff, then they don't need a new fab, right?

      --
      It's not enough to bash in heads, you've got to bash in minds. - Captain Hammer
  7. Memory is already cheap by ZeeExSixAre · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Comparatively, I thought even high-quality memory was cheap compared to other components of a computer, especially since they usually run at higher clock speeds than the processor. That they were price-fixed comes at a bit of a surprise to me.

    What does this mean for RAM prices in the near and far future?

    Will OEMs keep prices where they are now and pocket the difference? Or will they lower prices?

    1. Re:Memory is already cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Memory is cheap now, but...

      I paid nearly $300 for two 128MB sticks of PC100 RAM in 2000.

      Foutunatly DDR took off quickly, otherwise Rambus would still have us paying prices like that today.

    2. Re:Memory is already cheap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the hell does the ratio of clock speed of memory to CPU have to do with RAM's cost relative to other components?

      Are you smoking the dilithium crystals again?

  8. well thats just great by 1evilmonkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yay so I can use the money I will save on RAM and put it towards high gas prices.

    --
    crap
  9. Finally! by eieken · · Score: 1

    I can break even on all that old EDO memory I've got!

    --
    Meet new people, and kill them.
  10. I remember this by Sheepdot · · Score: 1, Troll

    It was like RAM was a commodity. I was buying RAM on huge price drops on Pricewatch and selling a few sticks a couple months later when the price ran back up on Ebay. It was great. I wasn't aware that it was just a Korean issue though, I thought some Hong Kong and Taiwan companies were involved.

    Following links have more info:
    http://tinyurl.com/8umy3
    http://tinyurl.com/b4k7m


    1. Re:I remember this by mikael · · Score: 2, Interesting

      RAM is a commodity, much like LCD displays, CPU's, and GPU's.

      By itself, it isn't very useful, but when combined with other systems (desktops, laptops, PDA's, mobile phones, handheld consoles), it becomes a very useful item.

      As with all commodities, the price will always go up whenever demand exceeds supply. And the suppliers will always try to achieve this; either by sophisticated marketing to boost demand (eg. the diamond market, the power generators warning of a shortage of electricity) or by matching reducing supply to match demand (OPEC, the RAM market).

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  11. I'm waiting by waldoiverson · · Score: 3, Funny

    *looks at $2.00 per meg PC-133 chips* ... ... ... *waits for class action lawsuit notification*

    1. Re:I'm waiting by DeathPenguin · · Score: 1

      Interesting you mention PC-133 in specific. It was extremely expensive to begin with, but then all the sudden the market tanked and RAM was at an all time low. I think that was back when Hynix was recieving their illegal subsidies from the Korean government and were underselling everyone else. I remember buying 128MB of Micron/Crucial memory for about $35. They posted huge losses and cut thousands of jobs.

      Now DRAM prices seem to have stablized. If the manufacturers haven't learned their lessons by now to keep the market fair and to make sure nobody is doing anything illegal, then I really can't feel much pity for them should the same thing happen in the future.

  12. Re:Price Fixing... by FFON · · Score: 1, Insightful

    yah, but GW didn't make money from RAM or ties to RAM producing families.

    OIL SON!... kill kill kill.

    --
    .cig
  13. Re:Price Fixing... by ZeeExSixAre · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Don't you mean gas countries?

    Gas is not a global commodity. Only a small percentage of countries around the world hold oil beneath their surface. They (OPEC) can control the rise and fall of gas prices.

  14. National Security by DigiShaman · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I did hear a small blurb in the media about price fixing this last week, but that was it. But well...that was it. I would THINK the media would be jumping on this with more force then with happend with Enron. So that leaves me thinking one of two things.

    1. It was all made up and thus gained no support.

    2. The government stepped in and "unofficially" told the media to keep shut on this subject. If word got out on price fixing, we could end up with a panic and people rushing to the gas pumps like in the 70s. Such an event would really be a problem out of interests of national security and destabilization of our ecconomy.

    I'm not saying those in the oil industry shouldn't be punished. But would it really be wise to get all in a frenzy over it at this point in time?

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:National Security by geekoid · · Score: 1

      3. Doesn't sell as well as famous persons court cases.

      4. Thousands of people didn't loose there life savings over night.

      Yes, a fucking frenzy is exactly what this country need right now. People need to wake the fuck up and look at how they are being screwed.
      Then help fix it.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:National Security by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      When I said frenzy, I ment exactly just that. Back when every in the 70s rushed to fill up their gas tanks, the stations couldn't keep up with the demand spike. As a resault, hundreds of people were lined up waiting at the pump. They waited and waited and...well, fist-fights even broke out and total anarchy ensued in some places. Though of course, it was rare but it did happen.

      Personally, I don't want to deal with that shit. If I drove my car to the station and ran out of gas... Well fuck it, I'll just leave it there and walk home till the issue clears up. I would imagine many people would be home and not working.

      Although this is a worst case scenerio, it could happen.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    3. Re:National Security by mp3phish · · Score: 1

      I would imagine many people would be home and not working.

      maybe they can find a job closer to their house.. rather than commuting to a different city every day.

      Or they could stop driving those wanker SUV's on a 1 hr commute every day to their office.. pretty lame if you ask me.

      --
      Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
  15. Excellent. by northcat · · Score: 1

    This is good. While Japanese anti-trust "watchdogs" taking a look at an American company is bad.

    1. Re:Excellent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      link?

  16. $185M sounds like a lot, but... by pr0t0 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How much did they make during that time?

    I'm often dissappointed in fines like this when I find out that the execs did a little jail time, paid a fine, but still have 6 Lamborghinis in the garage. It's important to implement fines that are severely punishing...like the people involved would have been WAY better off not pulling this kind of crap. The should be destitute. I can't stomach the wealth accumulated on the backs of the bruised.

    I'm not saying that's what is going on here, I don't know. It just makes me sick when most people involved still come out ahead, and there is maybe one or two sacrificial lambs.

    --
    I'm sorry, but your opinion seems to be wrong.
    1. Re:$185M sounds like a lot, but... by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 1

      Corporations should be subject to potentially having their corporate charter revoked. Theoretically corporations are people -- so why should "they" not be subject to the equivalent of life imprisonment (or the death penalty, depending on the jurisdiction)?

    2. Re:$185M sounds like a lot, but... by pr0t0 · · Score: 1

      Sorry for the reply to my own post, I should have done some quick homework before posting.

      According to Hoovers, Hynix's NET income for 2000-2002 was $7.5 Billion with a "B".

      I'm not an accountant, and I'm sure there is a ton of expenses to come out of that figure...still, $185M just doesn't seem like that much.

      --
      I'm sorry, but your opinion seems to be wrong.
    3. Re:$185M sounds like a lot, but... by wallykeyster · · Score: 1

      The fact that they agreed to plead guilty means that they negotiated the fine. They are unlikely to accept a fine that makes them destitute or removes those six sports cars from the garage. You can be sure that the fine is insignificant to the corporation.

    4. Re:$185M sounds like a lot, but... by timeOday · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Theoretically corporations are people -- so why should "they" not be subject to the equivalent of life imprisonment (or the death penalty, depending on the jurisdiction)?
      The intention is good, but IMHO the Corporate Death Penalty is based on a false assumption - that corporations really are people. They aren't, regardless of the law. Corporations don't have feelings or free will, so putting them to death is no deterrent if all the principals just move on to other opportunities (while the lower level workers, who had little say in the first place, are hit much harder).

      No, I think the solution is to reconsider the conception of the corporation as a person, and its role as legal scapegoat. Let's see some accountability for the real people behind the corporate misdeeds.

    5. Re:$185M sounds like a lot, but... by WinterSolstice · · Score: 1

      It's probably even tax deductible.

      -WS

      --
      An operating system should be like a light switch... simple, effective, easy to use, and designed for everyone.
    6. Re:$185M sounds like a lot, but... by KliX · · Score: 1

      I don't want them to be destitute, but I wish there was an easy way to make them [anyone who profits via ripping people off] start out again. e.g. Get caught in some price fixing / rip off scheme like this and you're back at uni in a shared room, wondering if your flatmate is going to crap in the sink.

      We need some baselines :)

    7. Re:$185M sounds like a lot, but... by HardCase · · Score: 2, Informative

      How much did they make during that time?

      Hynix: lost $7.5 billion
      Micron: lost $2.8 billion
      Infineon: lost $2 billion
      Elpida: no net profit data available
      Samsung: who knows? They make every dang thing in the world. They don't lose money, but I'd bet that they didn't make any from memory back then.

      Anyway, draw your own conclusions...

    8. Re:$185M sounds like a lot, but... by martin100 · · Score: 1

      you are entitled to things that are not yours at the price you think is fair? i thought the person who owned the item could choose to sell (or even not sell) at any price they wanted. yunno, freedom.

    9. Re:$185M sounds like a lot, but... by Squiggle · · Score: 1

      So can someone explain how they were operating at a loss and also price fixing? Was everyone in the industry operating at a loss or just the companies listed?

      Only thing I can think of is that the industry decided as a whole to inflate prices and spend all their price fixed profits on new infrastructure.

      Anyone know some real details and not just wild guesses?

      --
      Complexity Happens
    10. Re:$185M sounds like a lot, but... by loraksus · · Score: 1

      Well, if you pay your CEO and board of directors salaries of a couple million a year it isn't terribly difficult to lose money.

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    11. Re:$185M sounds like a lot, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh...they were losing Billions. And I know that Micron, at least, paid its CEO nothing during most of that time.

  17. Re:Price Fixing... by utexaspunk · · Score: 1, Troll

    What evidence do you have that the gas companies are price fixing? That gas is expensive? It's a finite resource in high demand. Welcome to the way economics works. The infrastructure to drill for, transport, and refine oil into gasoline costs billions of dollars, and yet how much do you pay per gallon for bottled sugar water? Not to mention that here in the US ~$.30/gallon is tax...

  18. Re:The Name by ZeeExSixAre · · Score: 1
    And why have you got "manufactureS" in that headline.

    If you bothered to RTFA, you would know.

  19. DMCA by Sheepdot · · Score: 1

    $185 bucks says that $185 million will go towards funding DMCA litigation in San Francisco.

  20. Re:Price Fixing... by gunnk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The cost of gas is shooting up to sky-high levels for many reasons:

    a) OPEC has too much pricing power over crude oil
    b) available supply is falling (it's finite)
    c) demand is climbing (China, anyone?)
    d) it's REALLY hard to get permission to build refineries in the U.S.

    If seems to me that claiming "price fixing!" in this case is perfect example of the H.L. Mencken quote:

    For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong.

    --
    Life is short: void the warranty.
  21. Clever move by Micron by ctk76 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    After joining/initiating price fixing with its competitors and making good profits, you rat out on your competitors without paying the fines.

    1. Re:Clever move by Micron by FuturePastNow · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm sure it was a crucial part of their plan.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    2. Re:Clever move by Micron by 1000baseFX · · Score: 0

      Crucial, Ha I get it! Crucial is a subsidiary of Micron

    3. Re:Clever move by Micron by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the Kings gave a ton of money for... aw, fuck it.

  22. heh by Renraku · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Actually, the price of RAM will probably go up after this so said companies can afford to pay off their fines without reaching into their own pockets.

    When a telephone company gets fined, where does the money come from? Increased prices/fees.

    When an energy company gets fined, where does the money come from? Increased prices/fees.

    When a car maker gets fined, where does the money come from? Increased prices/fees.

    Why do you think this will be any different? They're just going to do it again, and not get caught.

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    1. Re:heh by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It depends. Telephone companies are still somewhat regulated in many areas. Same with energy companies. Among those regulations are price regulations.

      If one carmaker gets fined, and they raise their prices, that makes the competitor's cars more attractive.

    2. Re:heh by Indian · · Score: 1

      The argument holds only if *ALL* the companies manufacturing RAM are involved in this price fixing and therefore fined.

      Even if there is just one company that has not been involved (or atleast not proven in court of law) in this price fixing, it stands to gain. That is the way the market punishes and rewards. At least that is how it is supposed to work.

    3. Re:heh by jafac · · Score: 1

      So what's your solution?

      Just not punish price-fixing?

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  23. How much!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    185 million for 'thousands of consumers.' Isn't that a bit steep? I assume that meant millions of consumers. Anyway, I thought that memory makers hardly made any money. Perhaps price-fixing was the only way to keep the market survivable?

  24. Re:Hey by Reignking · · Score: 0, Troll

    Um, the government can do more than one thing at a time. So, you think the Japanese company should've gotten away with the price fixing, then?

    --
    One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
  25. Re:Price Fixing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ha! cool quote. thanks.

  26. Re:Hey by DaHat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The problem with such a plan is nations that are part of OPEC are full members, not some company mind you, but the government itself. Regulation of the oil industry would be far harder as it would directly involve the host nations who tend to like to do what they want on their own soil where they directly make the laws.

  27. Re:Price Fixing... by MHobbit · · Score: 1

    d) it's REALLY hard to get permission to build refineries in the U.S.

    It's not just that. People stopped building refineries in the US because there was no profit to be gained from the industry. It always ends up having the profits less than the total cost it takes to refine the oil. No profit, no business.

    --
    Debugging? Klingons do not debug. Bugs are good for building character in the user.
  28. Re:Price Fixing... by DustyShadow · · Score: 1

    I heard that when you take inflation into account, gas is actually the cheapest it's been since the 80s. It still doesn't make feel good about paying $40 to fill up my car.

  29. Re:Price Fixing... by blueadept1 · · Score: 0

    *scared of a negative offtopic mod* Simply due to the fact that prices can be $0.60 a litre (CAD) over the border in USA, when they are $1.05 (CAD) right here in Canada. Surely that much of our oil can be coming from different sources than USA.

  30. Wainting for the fines for LOW-priced RAM by davidwr · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting for fines for low-priced RAM.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
  31. Re:Price Fixing... by mbourgon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Allow me to add another Mencken quote:
    The American public knows what it wants, and deserves to get it. Good and hard.

    --
    "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
  32. Re:Price Fixing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    " What evidence do you have that the gas companies are price fixing?"

    WTF do you think OPEC does, pick daisies?

    (OK OK mod me down)

  33. this wasn't a class action by hawk · · Score: 3, Informative

    This was the government. It's a fine. Fines go to the government.

    There have been additional claass action suits filed, which will make the ambulance chasers, err, plaintiff's lawyers, wealthy while producing almost nothing for the customers.

    hawk

  34. Will the LAW bite? by bogaboga · · Score: 1
    They have agreed, but as we all know, there could be some other conditionalities to be met in the "lawyer language". Besides, I wonder whether there will be a mechanism put in place to prevent this from ever happening again. What those companies will do [down the raod], is to hike the price of chips in some way in order to cover these fines.

    I am sure there is gonna be an individual hired to do precisely this. These companies NEVER lose...after all where else will we get RAM from?

  35. Re:give it back! by Humorously_Inept · · Score: 2, Informative

    It absolutely does, minus the 184 million dollar legal fee the lawyers get for enabling justice on your behalf, of course.

    --

    ~Someday, I hope to be an aspiring author.
  36. Re:Price Fixing... by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

    check again- how much of what you pay in Canada is tax?

  37. Re:Price Fixing... by wgaryhas · · Score: 1

    d) it's REALLY hard to get permission to build refineries in the U.S.
    It's not just that. People stopped building refineries in the US because there was no profit to be gained from the industry. It always ends up having the revenue less than the total cost it takes to refine the oil. No profit, no business.

    --
    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." - H.L. Mencken
  38. Re:Price Fixing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Look at gas prices near the Illinois/Indiana border. With the taxes that Cook county has there should be no way that the prices in Indiana cities close to the border should be anywhere near the prices of those on the Illinois side.

    Yet for some reason they are on most occasions the same price or even slightly higher.

  39. You know... by rootedgimp · · Score: 3, Insightful

    this stuff happens all the time. its just usually there isnt enough hard evidence to do anything about it. as scary as it sounds, though, in big business nothing is a mistake. i bet you 186 million that that money is going to end up back in the hands of the people that started this price fix to begin with. anyway, maybe im over paranoid when it comes to money. perhaps it has something to do with the fact that the federal reserve isnt owned by the usa, and every president that attempted to change that died under odd circumstances or was assassinated. anyway, nothing to see here, go back to earning your ink'd papers. god help us all.

    1. Re:You know... by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      " the fact that the federal reserve isnt owned by the usa, and every president that attempted to change that died under odd circumstances or was assassinated"

      Someone forgot their foil hat today..

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:You know... by X.25 · · Score: 1

      " the fact that the federal reserve isnt owned by the usa, and every president that attempted to change that died under odd circumstances or was assassinated"

      Someone forgot their foil hat today.

      Why?

      Federal Reserve is not owned by the USA Government (nor is majority owned by US banks). It is, basically, privately owned company (which earns money; well, taxpayers' money).

      You didn't know it?

    3. Re:You know... by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      The part that sounds foil-hatty is the whole "odd circumstances" thing.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  40. Re:Price Fixing... by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

    they don't fix the prices, they control production. the market determines the prices. they could suck it all out of the ground as fast as they could build more wells and flood the market w/cheap oil, but they'd be screwing themselves and the rest of the world over. there's a reason that production is where it is, because that's the optimal balance of production and demand.

  41. As settlement, each San Fran resident... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...will receive a 32MB stick of PC 66 memory.

    1. Re:As settlement, each San Fran resident... by Construct+X · · Score: 1

      I'll take every precious stick I can get to run my OS smoothly!

    2. Re:As settlement, each San Fran resident... by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Nah, they'll get one 512kB 30-pin fastpage SIMM and they should count themselves lucky! Whiny fuckers, who do they think they are, wanting to be customers of a company making products for sale, anyway?

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  42. How much profit? by ehiris · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wonder how much they profited. The fine for the top music industry companies was about $143 million but due to price fixing consumers were overcharged $480 million. That's a profit of about $337 million.

  43. Re:Price Fixing... by LPrecure · · Score: 1

    >What evidence do you have that the gas companies are price fixing? That gas is expensive? It's a finite resource in high demand. Welcome to the way economics works. The infrastructure to drill for, transport, and refine oil into gasoline costs billions of dollars, and yet how much do you pay per gallon for bottled sugar water? Not to mention that here in the US ~$.30/gallon is tax... Um, the fact that the price goes up and so does EVERYBODY'S profits? The fact that NO ONE is taking advantage of the situation to lower their prices by a penny and increase market share? Just a thought.

  44. Re:The Name by Urusai · · Score: 0

    Hie thee unto an aulde Englishe lexicon anonce, verily and alle thate...

  45. Re:The Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    What? Infineon *last year*?

    All that's news today is Hynix has been fined. The headline's only good if there had been more named.

  46. That sound... by CarrionBird · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Was the joke flying right over your head. *WOOSH!*

    --
    Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
  47. Re:Price Fixing... by argel · · Score: 1
    If seems to me that claiming "price fixing!" in this case is perfect example of the H.L. Mencken quote . . . .

    Isn't it amazing how gas proces can jump up 10 cents or even 20 cents in one day yet take months to fall back down?

    --

    -- Argel
  48. Off Topic by wgaryhas · · Score: 1

    about your sig: would this work?
    And is there a way to send a private message instead of posting off-topic in the future?

    --
    "For every complex problem, there is a solution that is simple, neat, and wrong." - H.L. Mencken
    1. Re:Off Topic by mbourgon · · Score: 1

      If there is a way, let me know. I don't think so. Fortunately, no one ever reads this deep, and the one other guy who did loved the comment, so I'll take that as a net gain.

      NWN module: doesn't look to be it. This lets you level your character up and the like, it doesn't seem to help make Epic modules, though I could have missed something in the mod.

      --
      "Sometimes a woman is a kind of religion, she can save your soul & set you free from all your sins" - Bad Examples
  49. I always thought it wierd that... by cryptocom · · Score: 1

    ..RAM was so expensive, and the prices only got higher over time. For really good, reliable RAM from a trusted manufacturer you really have to pay out the nose.

    --
    It takes just a moment and an action to destroy. It takes some time and thought to create.
  50. Cartels by jeff_schiller · · Score: 2, Funny

    "This case shows that high-tech price-fixing cartels will not be tolerated" But oil cartels? Bring it on...I'm paying $2.30/gallon out here in the midwest...

    1. Re:Cartels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      those damn americans with their dirt-cheap gas.
      i hate it!

      it's more like $3.5/gallon here in estonia.

    2. Re:Cartels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You do realise that that is less than half as much as Europeans are used to pay for their petrol?

    3. Re:Cartels by ebrandsberg · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the cost of the oil is still controlled by a cartel. It's the European governments that tax the hell out of the oil that raises the prices to the level where they make more money than the cartel does.

  51. RE: ITEM 'D' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Existing refineries would be adequate were it not for the 1001 recipes that various state and local govts. have required, by law. To bad that getting together and agreeing on a few recipes is not politically profitable.

    How about we do a open refinery project just across the border in Mexico. What with NAFTA and all we shoulf make out like non-profit banditos.

  52. Re:Price Fixing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All of the above may be true (although I think the last one may only be an issue in places like Califorina), but YOU CAN STILL HAVE PRICE FIXING. Never underestimate the power of people to cheat when there is profit to be made.

  53. Re:Price Fixing... by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 2, Informative

    The cost of gas is shooting up to sky-high levels for many reasons:

    Don't forget - the devaluation of the American dollar.

    Even though oil is officially priced in US dollars, that does not make its pricing tied to the value of the dollar. Since oil has intrinsic value, if the value of the US dollar goes down, the price of oil must go up so as to roughly maintain value parity.

  54. Re:Price Fixing... by timeOday · · Score: 3, Insightful
    What evidence do you have that the gas companies are price fixing? That gas is expensive? It's a finite resource in high demand. Welcome to the way economics works.
    By "the way economics works," I hope you don't just mean fair market forces like supply and demand.

    First, a lot of oil comes from OPEC, which is (openly) a cartel. They have well-publicized meetings every few months to fix oil prices.

    Then there are the brokers and refiners. We have audio tapes of Enron execs laughing as they caused California's energy crisis of a few years ago by needlessly shutting down suppliers, in order to drive prices through the roof.

    Then there's geopolitics. i.e. invading Iraq and then declaring Frace won't be getting any of the oil because they're uncooperative, then getting mad when we discover they weren't obeying our Oil For Food program.

    I'm not saying basic economics is irrelevant, but let's not pretend Econ 101 is the real world either.

  55. More like millions by OSXexpert · · Score: 0

    Where did the author get thousands of users? Maybe thousands of thousands? From 99 to 2002 my guess is these companies sold in the neighborhood of a few hundred million DIMMS or DRAMS.

    --
    --- Old Time NeXThead
  56. Re:Price Fixing... by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1
    d) it's REALLY hard to get permission to build refineries in the U.S.

    It's not just about permission either. Sometimes it is about the economics of the situation. Startup costs for a refinery is measured in the hundreds of millions of dollars. And by the time the plant is built, the oil situation might have changed so that now there is a glut and not a shortage.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  57. Hey let's file a class action suit by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

    so we can each get a $2 off coupon for RAM from the offending companies.

  58. Wrong logic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    They are currently charging as much as they feel they can without losing market share.
    Your logic implies every one of your examples should have been selling their products at a higher rate, because all you need to do is raise prices to make more money.

    On the other hand, if all memory manufactures agree that they need to raise prices to make up for the fines....

  59. Backwards by parasonic · · Score: 1

    Not to sound like flamebait or anything, but... Wouldn't it be interesting if they let it be a little laissez-faire? Even if they KNEW exactly what was going on, if it were absolutely evident that two RAM companies were in a price-fixing collusion. A third and fourth company might come along and sell much closer to cost, tearing Infineon et al to shreds and causing them to learn their lesson.

    1. Re:Backwards by composer777 · · Score: 1

      There are five major record companies, when is the last time you've seen a new retail CD price below the typical 15-20 for music? So much for the prisoner's dilemma. The prisoner's dilemma only works if there is a strong incentive to break the rules. In this case, all of the incentives point to keeping prices high. After all, how can you apply the prisoner's dilemma when it's tough to tell where one prisoner ends and the other begins?

      You seem a bit naive, as your model assumes that large corporations are atomic entities that exist only to compete with each other. I think that you are missing a key element here, and that is class, with the next key element being that corporations are atomic in name only, in terms of ownership, they blend together. Most business owners are in the same social class. They know each other, are often friends, and many times, large corporations will own pieces of each other. e.g., Microsoft owned a part of apple for a while. If you own 60% of company A, and 30% of company B, why would you run company B into the ground for the sake of company A? Wouldn't it be better for all of the companies you invest in to just get along?

      Businesses don't exist to teach each other a lesson, they exist to make a profit. If you really believe that a new company would come along and get rid of infineon, and out of the goodness of their own hearts keep the margins low, then do yourself a favor and don't ever own a publicly traded company, as your investors would take you to the cleaners for not giving them the highest return on their investments.

      Businesses have several choices. They can wipe out their competitors, and become a monopoly, which will result in heavy government oversight, and possibly a breakup. Or, another choice is that when they reach the stage that there are only a handful of "competitors" left, they can relax the competition and rake in the profits. Most big businesses choose to do the latter, since it's quite likely that you own part of your competition anyway.

    2. Re:Backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True laissez-faire would allow hits. The hitman has a good, he finds a willing buyer, he executes his job. How far are you willing to take laissez-faire?

    3. Re:Backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You've already got the class-war answer, but there is actually a sound economic reason why that wouldn't make sense in this case: setting up a RAM company costs billions of dollars and takes years. By the time you've got production running at sufficient efficiency to be able to undercut the established players, they've been raking in the money for years. Guess what they are going to do next? Right, just as you're starting to finally get some cashflow, the established competitors lower their prices as low as necessary to drive you out of business.

      Unless you've got some kind of technology advantage that allows you to produce RAM with a significantly better efficiency (better quality and/or lower production costs), as a newcomer your chances of success are small. On top of that, if your business model is to undercut established companies, the profits you can expect in case you are successful are most likely not worth the risk.

  60. American corporations going to be hit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or will it just be foreign corporations, because I don't think there is going to be a problem with American corporations price fixing because they are simply helping the American economy... that's okay. But it's not okay for other countries to make lots of money in unethical ways.

  61. What am i missing by waldoiverson · · Score: 0, Troll

    Ram...korean company...it has been a long week but I could have sworn that Dodge is an American company. Just kidding. However...why do we never learn where these huge fines go? I mean, $160 million is a fair amount of money and I'm certain someone will enjoy collecting it. sadly, i will still be working away without receiving a cent.

  62. Now for the Kimchi Manufacturers by derfel · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Prices are too high. Must be fixed. I love that stuff.

  63. How about diamonds? by grumpyman · · Score: 2, Insightful

    de Beers has been doing that for years without getting sued.

    1. Re:How about diamonds? by erikharrison · · Score: 1

      Ahhhh no. Not really. de Beers is a monopoly. While that does require that they behave in certain ways, it makes it practically impossible for them to form a conspiricy to fix prices.

      There is no one to conspire with.

      De Beers keeps the price up not so much by artifically inflating the price (which would be illegal) but by actively choosing not to exploit their diamond mines (of which they own something like 90% in the world) This guarentees smaller supply, and they very cleverly manipulate media to keep demand high (like pushing small stones as elegant when large numbers of large stones are found, or making small stones be a sign of poverty when large mines of small stones are found).

    2. Re:How about diamonds? by Alchemar · · Score: 1

      Where is it illegal? de Beers gets away with it because they absolutely never do business in the USA. If you want diamonds you have to go to them. If I remeber right, there are only about 30 people in the USA that have a contract that will allow them to go to de Beers, and then de Beers presents them with a lot of diamonds and a price. If a particular type of diamond is losing value. Then none of that type of diamond will be included in any of the lots for several years. If de Beers ever tried to export diamonds to the USA, then they would be hit with the lawsuits.

  64. Re:Price Fixing... by blueadept1 · · Score: 0

    Well, you have a decent point there. Ours in Canada is about $0.30 / litre. Calculating off of what the original poster said of $0.30 / gallon in taxes ($0.40 CAD approx). That would be about $0.10 / litre. That would make the raw cost in USA about $0.50 (CAD) / litre, and ours is $0.70 / litre.

    To me, that $0.20 difference is too much to ignore.

  65. Re:Price Fixing... by utexaspunk · · Score: 1

    The Enron thing in California had nothing to do with oil.

    I'm not saying it's Econ 101 simple, and it's certainly more complex than most markets, but we can't really do anything about OPEC controlling the amount of supply, so then it really comes down to the companies that do the stuff WITH the oil (i.e., make gas) and that is as basically as supply-and-demand as any other market. In a way, though, OPEC's really controlling the supply as best as they can- they could flood the market with cheap oil, but it would seriously screw things up. Likewise, they could drive the price even higher and it would seriously screw things up, too. It sucks, but it's really about as good as it can get...

  66. Awesome! by ryanw · · Score: 3, Informative

    So now they have a REAL reason to charge more for the memory. Sounds like a solution to benifit the consumers for sure! How much of the $185 million went to lawyers and lawfirms and how much of that is going back to the consumers? $0.18 checks aren't worth crap to the consumer that bought the memory at the 'fixed rate'. Cause in the end, the consumers get nothing back from a suit like this except paying more for the memory in the future because of the impact of the lawsuit. The lawyers make out like a bandit! Why else do imagine these lawsuits exist?

    1. Re:Awesome! by geekoid · · Score: 1

      so Next time they think about doing it, they will think twice.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Awesome! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, they'll do it again! They make money from price fixing and from "recovering costs of doing buisness related to lawsuits". It's Win/Lose/Win which in the end is a still a WIN.

    3. Re:Awesome! by ryanw · · Score: 1
      so Next time they think about doing it, they will think twice.
      Why would they think twice about it? In the end, the consumers pay back the money lost to lawsuits. Doesn't hurt the company in the end.

      When is Apple going to be stiffed with PRICE FIXING? I don't understand exactly what pricefixing is and what is illegal about it, but I do know that gasoline companies all agree on prices for gas all over the nation. Ever notice how the gas price goes up and down the exact same morning across all gasstations?
  67. Re:Price Fixing... by grumpyman · · Score: 1

    We are not running out of oil. It's demand and supply. The current oil price probably has more to do with the Iraq war and SE Asia growth than price fixing. Oh, I forgot to blame MS :)

  68. Re:Price Fixing... by Leiterfluid · · Score: 1

    No, they control the rise and fall of crude oil prices, which are hella-cheap, relatively speaking.

    It's the companies that run the refineries that take advantage of "supply-and-demand" concepts to drive up prices at the pump.

    i.e. "we had to produce xxx gallons of heating oil, and so we couldn't produce enough gasoline"

    But what they don't tell you is that they intentionally shut down the refineries to drive demand and raise the market price.

    I voted for GWB, and don't regret my decision, but I'm no fool about where the bucks are being spent.

  69. Codswallop (mostly) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a) OPEC actually is having less and less control over the pricing of crude with other sources coming on line.
    b) This is true (and most likely the principle cause). While there are signifigant discoveries still being made, the are in areas that are VERY difficult to produce in. And by difficult, I mean expensive. The financial analysis just does not make sence until the price of oil goes up.
    c) Until the needs of China / India / East Timor / Boogymanoftheday out strips that of the US, we will have a hard time pointing our fingers at other's consupmtion. Odd that you do not hear any timeframes for when China's demand will outstrip ours. You hear even the shakiest estimates on Social Security or Medicare running out quoted as gospel, but nothing on when China's demand will be the 800 pound gorilla.
    d) This denys the fact that more refineries have closed in the past 30 years than permits filed to build new ones. The number of refineries in California alone has decreased by an order of magnitude. Even world-wide, grass roots refinery projects are the exception rather than the rule. It is much easier from a technical, financial, and regulatory stand point to ramp up the production at an existing refinery that to build a brand new one.

    (how the hell did we get so far off topic?)

  70. Re:Price Fixing... by Leiterfluid · · Score: 1

    Your math is off though. Canada is a socialist economy, you pay a much larger percentage of tax then the US does.

  71. Re:Price Fixing... by dgatwood · · Score: 2, Informative
    I think "inflation" is a misnomer. We don't have inflation... at least not really. IMHO, we have a general trend towards deflation, with a few markets that are going up so much that they more than make up for the general trend.

    The things I can think of that are going up in price these days are:

    • Food
    • Petrol
    • Automobiles
    • Housing
    • Other luxury items
    With the exception of the first two (food and fuel), everything else is an extremely high-ticket item that you buy very rarely. The day-to-day cost of living expenses like cheap manufactured goods, clothing, etc. have been tending to decrease in price as we find more third-world countries to exploit^w^w^w^w^w^wcome up with newer, more automated means of production to reduce the cost.

    The cost of electronics is the most extreme example, showing a very severe downward trend, but this deflation applies to other things as well. All that sweat-shop clothing has driven textiles way down. Chinese knock-offs are starting to really cut the prices on random non-electronic equipment---I bought a precision torque wrench for $12 that would have cost $60 ten or fifteen years ago, and a Chinese-made ribbon mic for less than the cost of a replacement ribbon for a vintage ribbon mic....

    I'm not saying everything is going down, but I would say the majority of things are, from what I've seen. The ones that aren't are either things that can't be reasonably manufactured overseas and imported (food, beverages, fuel) or are situations where the supply is being artificially stifled to drive up prices (fuel again, automobiles, housing).....

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  72. Re:Price Fixing... by Leiterfluid · · Score: 1

    I don't get that. How can "illegally invading" an oil producting nation can we have HIGHER oil costs. The anti-war folks shouted from their SUVs "No Blood For Oil" but now they complain that prices are too high because demand isn't being met.

  73. Parentheses mean a LOSS by HardCase · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to Hoovers, Hynix's NET income for 2000-2002 was $7.5 Billion with a "B".

    Better look at those numbers again. Hynix's net LOSS was $7.5 billion over that time period.

  74. Do you remember back then when by geekoid · · Score: 1

    you would be in Radio shack, and that old guy would be talking about how he remember when you had to wait for everything to warm up because of tubes and you would roll your eyes?

    Your being that old guy.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:Do you remember back then when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your being that old guy.

      "You're".

  75. Re:Price Fixing... by Macadamizer · · Score: 1

    Which is exactly why there is a problem in the U.S. In Canada and Europe, prices are high to begin with because of taxes; in the U.S., the tax burden on gar is relatively low. But that means that if gas goes up by $0.50 a gallon in the U.S., it should also go up by that much in Europe and Canada as well, if the price of gas is really driven purely by supply-and-demand economics. But it doesn't -- the U.S. gas prices have gone up much faster than the prices in Canada and Europe. Profits are high in the U.S. -- without price fixing, one of the oil companies would almost be certain to trade a few cents per gallon of profit for market share -- but it doesn't happen, they are keeping the prices high in order to keep profits high, and they are almost certainly working together to do so.

    The argument could be made that gas is too cheap in the U.S. compared to other countries -- but at least in those other countries, higher gas prices mean more money to fix roads and stuff, rather than simply more money to pay the shareholders of the oil companies...

    --

    "That's not even wrong..." -- Wolfgang Pauli
  76. There are also applications that can use it by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I do work with music synthesis and man, can that shit eat RAM. I have a sample DVD of a drumkit, just a normal trap set with 5 toms, a selection of cymbals and so on. It's 2.4GB, oh and it's the small one. Their full one, with all different styles of kits (like using brushes instead of sticks) is 35GB (comes on 4 DVDs). The same company makes an orchestral sample set with basically all instruments from an orchestra in 3 different mic positons. 68GB.

    Now the sampler technology is advanced enough that it can load just the start of the samples in RAM and then stream off the disk as needed, but there's limits to that (only so fast the disk can go) and you still need part in RAM. Eating up the 2GB I have is cake, and I don't even have the really big sample sets.

    Now pro apps like those aside, normal apps will grow to use the memory, if it's available. Games can almost always use more memory, if for no other reason than to eliminate any kind of load times (by loading more data further ahead). I'm sure most game makers would like to use more RAM than they do. However, you won't sell many games if you require something most people don't have. If RAM prices go down and amounts go up, they'll start using more.

    Some games already do. World of Warcraft just isn't happy unless you have a GB of RAM. It'll run on less, but you'll find it lagging and stuttering as it scrambles to get the graphics off the disk. You give it a GB, it gets pretty happy and smooth.

    1. Re:There are also applications that can use it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there's limits

      "there're" or "there are".

      (I wouldn't have bothered with such a trivial case had you had a less contemptible sig. BTW, the word "nazi" isn't capitalized unless it means a member of the National Socialist Party.)

    2. Re:There are also applications that can use it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some games already do. World of Warcraft just isn't happy unless you have a GB of RAM. It'll run on less, but you'll find it lagging and stuttering as it scrambles to get the graphics off the disk. You give it a GB, it gets pretty happy and smooth.

      Been playing that game since the beta on an Athlon 1800+ with 512M, & cable modem. I often get lag (and see the disk churning away), even though I've got nothing else running. Bought a $300 video card, which didn't help at all, and now I'm kicking myself for not just grabbing another 512 stick of RAM. I've looked at the task manager, and it usually shows the game running on about 2-300M.

  77. Re:Price Fixing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The cost of gas is shooting up to sky-high levels for many reasons:

    a) OPEC has too much pricing power over crude oil
    b) available supply is falling (it's finite)
    c) demand is climbing (China, anyone?)
    d) it's REALLY hard to get permission to build refineries in the U.S.


    http://money.cnn.com/pf/features/lists/global_ga sp rices/price.html

    Why is it so much cheaper in VENEZUELA?

  78. Re:Price Fixing... by dhakbar · · Score: 1

    Inflation refers to the increase of prices as a whole in the economy. It is a measure of the average increase, not of particular markets.

    Inflation is not a misnomer for the trend to compensate for when rating gas prices today versus their price 20 years ago.

  79. They price fixed a smaller loss by sunbane · · Score: 1

    Your problem is that during this time they were losing their shirts! Look it up, Hynix, Infineon, Micron were all losing billions of $$$ during this time period. So maybe they got together and said, look guys, we are all gonna be bankrupt if we don't cut production to try and slow this bleeding... And then dell complains cause the memory cost more per box and sicks the government at them. Their profits were in jeopardy. Anyhow, my point is that there would have been no third or fourth company as you postulated selling closer to cost - cause that would have meant their prices were higher! Everyone seems to be lynching the memory companies for wanting to at least break even on things... Ridiculous. Infineon lost billions and got fined for not losing trillions. I think they learned their lesson.

    That 185 million dollar fine Hynix got doesn't come close to the multi billion dollar bailouts the Korean banks gave them right after the banks were bailed out my the IMF w/ your tax dollars.

  80. Re:Price Fixing... by jimi+the+hippie · · Score: 1

    c) demand is climbing (China, anyone?) Let's not forget the absolute necessity of owning an SUV. Afterall, they're not about carrying people, they are made simply to burn gas. Everyday I see people driving around (BY THEMSELVES) in huge-ass trucks only getting 15 miles to the gallon. They could just as easily be in a smaller car getting 25-30 mpg, but then they think they have the right to bitch about gas prices. THEY ARE CAUSING IT.

  81. Close... by jgardn · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Some of the reason you listed for gas prices are wrong.

    (a) Crude oil costs only accounts for about 1/3 of the total price. If oil prices double, then you'll pay about 1/3 more at the pump. If they halve, you'll pay about 1/6 less at the pump. The price of crude is rising due to China and the rest of the world recovering from stagnation in the early 2000's. OPEC has been producing more to try and lower the price, but their supply cannot keep up.

    (b) Federal and state taxes contribute about 1/3 of the cost as well. While these are fairly static, they are still gradually rising. Consider that many gas taxes are implemented over time (ie, a few cents more each year is taxed.)

    (c) The remaining third go to the costs of distribution and profits for the companies involved. The reason this is so high is because of environmental regulations are very strict, requiring several different types of blends be used in different parts of the country at different times of the year. Combined with the bottleneck that you can't store gasoline and use it the next year, and it's really hard to build more refineries, we run into a bottle neck every summer where we just can't refine the oil fast enough.

    As far as the oil supply being finite, that may or may not be true. But noone has suggested that supply is actually decreasing today, nor will it for the next several decades. More and more oil is discovered every year, and exciting new ways of extracting oil from previously useless sources are being explored. If crude prices remain above about $30, we can begin extracting it from shale and it will be profitable.

    If we begin drilling in ANWR and restart the pumps throughout Texas, California, and other states, we can do a lot to lower the price of crude. But this won't solve the problem of refining. We need to lighten the regulation and we need to allow more and bigger refineries to be built. We should also allow people to stockpile refined gasoline to help smooth out the peaks and valleys of demand and supply. It would help a lot if we could build more supply lines and upgrade the ones we have now as well.

    You'll notice a common thread: It is environmental activism that is really causing the most significant increase in your gas prices. Get rid of that and you can enjoy your sweet nectar for a more reasonable price. And remember: The purpose of the environmentalists wackos is not to fix the environment, but to shut down our economy and destroy our capitalism.

    --
    The radical sect of Islam would either see you dead or "reverted" to Islam.
    1. Re:Close... by Draknor · · Score: 2, Informative

      If we begin drilling in ANWR and restart the pumps throughout Texas, California, and other states, we can do a lot to lower the price of crude.

      And if we don't, as the price of crude continues to rise alternative energy sources will become more economically feasible and attract greater investment.

      You'll notice a common thread: It is environmental activism that is really causing the most significant increase in your gas prices. Get rid of that and you can enjoy your sweet nectar for a more reasonable price. And remember: The purpose of the environmentalists wackos is not to fix the environment, but to shut down our economy and destroy our capitalism.

      Wow - way to go FUD-Master! You should see if Microsoft or the RIAA is hiring....

      No, environmentalists are not out to "destroy our capitalism." At its economic heart, environmental regulations seek to minimize externalities You can build a refinery, but that refinery is going to cause air pollution, water/ground-water contamination, and environmental degradation. It's going to affect the plants and the animals in the immediate area as well as downwind or downstream. It's going to cause health problems for people.

      TANSTAAFL - if you're going to build a refinery, you've got to pay for all of these damages you are going to cause, or pay to prevent them. Gov't regulations are one mechanism to force you to do that, because you're not going to do it out of the "goodness" of your profit-seeking capitalistic heart.

      I hope gas prices keep going up, and that creative entrepreneurs in this country find new ways to generate and conserve energy in a profitable way. These are your true capitalists - not Exxon Mobil, Shell, and BP.

    2. Re:Close... by jafac · · Score: 2, Funny

      We need to lighten the regulation and we need to allow more and bigger refineries to be built.

      I've ggt a good idea!
      Let's install the refinery in YOUR backyard, with no environmental regulations. 'k?

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    3. Re:Close... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      And remember: The purpose of the environmentalists wackos is not to fix the environment, but to shut down our economy and destroy our capitalism.

      Written another way: The purpose of Big Oil is not to provide oil byproducts for Americans, but to pollute and destroy as much as possible, all for the purpose of making a quick buck.

    4. Re:Close... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do you anti-environmentalists hate out country? In particular, why do you feel that capitalism is the wrong path? As an investor in our country, I recognize that pollution is a waste of my investment dollar as finite resources "go up in smoke". I don't appreciate you trying to destroy my ROI. Go back to Russia and live with your Uncle Joe, you Stalinist,

  82. Re:Price Fixing... by dgatwood · · Score: 1
    I realize that inflation is an average. That's my whole point. The problem is that calling our current economy an inflationary one is bad mathematics. In proper statistics, you throw away outliers when calculating an average. Thefore if only a handful of very narrow sectors are increasing and everything else is decreasing, the true average is decreasing even though the raw mean is increasing.

    Thus, IMHO, those narrow inflationary sectors should be ignored for the purposes of calculating inflation, since it produces the impression of inflation when, in fact, the reverse is true..

    --

    Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  83. And yet Microsoft by gillbates · · Score: 2, Insightful
    can put others out of business running an illegal monopoly, and get off scott free...

    Something tells me these folks didn't buy the right judges...

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
  84. Higher clock speeds ? by vlad_petric · · Score: 1
    Let's be serious. DDR400 means 200MHz.

    Memory is so slow these days, that the cost of an L2 miss for can be as high as 400 cycles. Basically, a load that hits in the L1 can be as fast as 2-3 cycles of latency. If it misses all the way to the main memory, it's ~400cycles. Two orders of magnitude.

    Small is fast; large is slow.

    --

    The Raven

  85. Lousy summary, even for SlashDot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The summary shows the name of two RAM manufacturers, but not company fined. Come on, it's not like Hynix is an unknown company.

  86. Re:Price Fixing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Due to environmental regulations (not saying they're bad) many oil refineries had to spend billions to meet new requirments and many companies just let them shutdown instead of renovate. To make things even worse companies aren't investing in new refineries because they can't make a good buisness case for it. At least thats what the evil oil men told me.

  87. What the hell am I gonna do with 2gigs? by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Boot longhorn?

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  88. Re:Price Fixing... by zeromemory · · Score: 1

    Although I agree with your general point, you seem to have gotten things mixed up:

    Then there's geopolitics. i.e. invading Iraq and then declaring Frace won't be getting any of the oil because they're uncooperative, then getting mad when we discover they weren't obeying our Oil For Food program.

    The Oil For Food program violation occured prior to the United States invading Iraq.

  89. And we got.. what? by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    Like $21.65 each.

    CD prices haven't gone down at all, and the music industry is back to claiming piracy & lost sales and suing customers.

    The price fixing lawsuit that they were slapped around with didn't phase them one bit.

  90. FINALLY!! thank god. by KillShill · · Score: 1

    i can't believe so many clueless users are saying ram prices are so low etc etc. apparently they don't remember that ram prices were even lower 2+ years ago... and if you can extrapolate, that would mean that today it should even be lower. instead its been going up quite a bit to level off where it is now. i cannot believe the lack of outrage among the people here. 512megs of ram used to be around 50 bucks in 2002... now you'd be lucky to find pc2700 (low end) ram at that price. they must be trying to lower prices recently in order to fool the short-term memory of the public. i'd price fix their asses if it were possible. those f*****s need to give back all the money they legally stole from the public that had no alternative. i'm dreaming but still, its good to dream.

    --
    Science : Proprietary , Knowledge : Open Source
    1. Re:FINALLY!! thank god. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i can't believe so many clueless users are saying ram prices are so low etc etc. apparently they don't remember that ram prices were even lower 2+ years ago... 512megs of ram used to be around 50 bucks in 2002... now you'd be lucky to find pc2700 (low end) ram at that price

      I just ordered Viking 512meg ddr400 for $40.00 from Newegg. I could have saved $10.00 going generic. Now would be a good time to buy.

  91. Re:Price Fixing... by fermion · · Score: 1
    So the quote matches the facts exactly.

    The statements above are simple, neat, and so misleading as to be wrong. I do agree with your conclusions, but the argument is really weak.

    OPEC wants to make a profit, but has been trying not to make the same mistakes it did in the 70's that resulted in average US fuel economy increase from around 15 to around 25 miles per gallon. Thier main purpose seems to be to ration the supplies so that current prices are not too high, and supplies last as long as possible. There is some price fixing going on, but on balance, I think they serve a useful function, and probably do much to try to keep prices stable. The US mucking around in Iraq probably has more to do with it.

    Available supplies are falling, but overall output is remaining rather steady. In fact, the 2004 numbers I have seen shows an increase in output. So supplies are falling, but has anyone really counted that. True, accounting fibs showed us that there was less oil that we thought, but what commodity is truly priced on output 10 years down the road?

    Demand is climbing, and china plays a big part. So do bigger houses in the US, and a fall in US fuel effeciency. The demand is not responding to increased price, this is wierd, and it is much bigger than china.

    As far as building new refineries, I am sure it is more a matter of need and money than anything else. After the 70's, i believe the US was overcapcity. No refinaries were needed for many years. It appears from what I have read that maybe 10 years ago old refinaries were brought back online and upgraded. We now seem to be in a situation in which we need more capacity, and there is money availble to create it. However, due to the rules the oil industry created, rules that pretty much assumed that new capacity would not soon be needed, it is very difficult to build a new refinery.

    The reality is that we are in a bizzare situation in which the normal rules of supply and demand seem to be suspended. People in the west are buying huge cars and huge houses, even if they will require huge amount of hugely expecsive fuel to run. China is lending money to the west to buy chinese products that are produced in factories that will require huge amounts of fuel to create, and, in the end, will unlikely turn a profit. It is a wacko world. It may end soon, and badly, as we are unlikely going to build more capacity, fuel costs will continue to rise, and only a major crash will bring us to out senses.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  92. Yes, of course - here's why by billstewart · · Score: 1

    You didn't think this huge judgement was to protect consumers did you? It's to punish people who sell products to consumers at unfairly low prices. So that does mean that any RAM you buy from them in the next year will be more expensive than it would have been without this fine.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
    1. Re:Yes, of course - here's why by MustardSauce · · Score: 1

      You have it backwards. The judgement was fixing the prices upward, as is clearly indicated in the summary.

  93. Re:Price Fixing... by jafac · · Score: 1

    Your explanation is also wrong.

    The price of gas is shooting up to sky-high levels for many reasons:

    a) Terrorists blowing up pipelines and oil infrastructure, mostly in Iraq, but also in other countries as well.

    b) Industry is NOT investing in expanding capacity, at a time of high demand. Free Market theory says that they will. We've had 5 years of inflated oil prices, and no indication of any oil companies (outside of China) expanding capacity.

    c) FTC and SEC regulators turn a blind eye to industry collusion and price-fixing (as was done during the 2000 California energy crisis - it's proven that the market was manipulated, so where's the convictions? where's the fines? where's the tearing up of fraudulent contracts?)

    The bugaboo of "Its really hard to get permission to build refineries in the US" is bullshit. Bullshit bullshit bullshit. Yes, there are environmental regs. If they want the benefit of protection of the US military, they can comply with US law, or they're perfectly free to build their refinery in some third-world shithole, without US environmental regs, and ship the gasoline here. Why don't they do it? Because they're afraid of a revolution, and losing the refinery to nationalization, or they're afraid of guerilla/insurgent/sabotage action (ie, they want US-taxpayer-funded military security). At a time of record profits for the industry, they don't want to invest in expanding capacity. Why not? Because they know damn well that working together, they can keep prices at a profitable level, and they also know that reserves are going to be in decline from here on out (Hubbart Peak).

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  94. Re:Price Fixing... by MobyDisk · · Score: 1

    Do not confuse technological improvement with deflation. Today, I can buy a gig of ram for $100. 10 years ago, it would have cost me $10000.

    That's not deflation. The product has changed, not the price.

    A more accurate comparison is to say that today I could buy "a reasonable amount of RAM" for $100, and that 10 years ago that same "reasonable amount of RAM" would have been $100 well.

    The only trend toward deflation in this industry comes with the general increase in demand due to computers getting easier to use and more people using them.

  95. Re:Price Fixing... by homer_ca · · Score: 1

    Just as soon as they get the California powerplant operators to refund the overcharges from 2000-2001. Refiners have US drivers by the balls same way now. Don't like the price of gas? Here's the answer: *buy less gas*!

  96. Re:Price Fixing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Blow it out your ass, jerk wad.

    Find something in that to critique.

  97. And to think by Nonillion · · Score: 1

    When I bought a gig PC-133 back in 2000 it cost me nearly $1024

    --
    "I bow to no man" - Riddick
  98. Shit, my first thought was Samsung by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like Samsung. I think they make excellent products, for the price. I'm thankful that my...uh....shit....I'm hesitant to say this, but....faith in Samsung is still intact. I have no doubt they've done some underhanded shit and just haven't been caught, yet.

    But Hynix and Rambus are a load of complete fucksticks. Even I know that. To see Hynix caught in their ass is good for morale, but I want to see people (read: the managers and CEO) beat with canepoles on live television. I want humiliation and personal well-being at stake, to get some deterrence on this issue in the future.

  99. Re:Price Fixing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm half cocked, and read this differently first time I read it and made me laugh more than when I read it more sober.
    The American public knows what it wants, and deserves what it gets. Good and hard.

  100. Price Fixation by salmonz · · Score: 1

    Does this explain why 128MB ram shot up from $14 CAD to $40 CAD within a year during 1999-2002? The DRAM manufacturers *flooded* the market with DRAM chips and then artificially cut production to raise prices when everyone was hooked to the low price. Higher DRAM prices just made everyone go in a panic and started to buy all the DRAM chips at the lowest price while the price was rising.

  101. Re:Hey by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Refuting someone who was Offtopic and Redundant is considered a Troll? That just doesn't make sense.

  102. Re:Price Fixing... by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

    I think the main evidence is that all of the gas stations charge relatively the same price for gas.

  103. Re:Price Fixing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you been reading any news lately? Probaly not.
    Opec is going to raise oil production by 500,000 barrels around May,in order to help bring down the price of oil per barrel.
    In my opinion, its the traders in oil stock that is keeping oil artifically high due to pure speculation. Because as you oil companies are making record profits.

  104. Re:The Name by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or if he bothered to read three lines below the headline!

  105. Re:Price Fixing... by pizzaman100 · · Score: 1
    yah, but GW didn't make money from RAM or ties to RAM producing families.

    Are you sure about that? Texas Instruments is a big defense contractor, and designed a number of the laser guided bombs used in Iraq and Afganistan. And Texas Instruments was a major DRAM company a few years back before selling to Micron, and Micron was accused of price fixing. ;)

  106. Re:Price Fixing... by mp3phish · · Score: 1

    I can assure, it wasn't the anti war peoploe in the SUV, it was the screaming redneq turned commuter.

    The anti war people all drive honda civics and hyundai's.

    --
    Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
  107. Re:Price Fixing... by mp3phish · · Score: 1

    They do?

    Last I checked, each person pays 15% of their paycheck to SS and medcaid. Then the lowest tax bracket is 10%. that is 35% for the poorest people. Then about 5% to the state and another 5% to sales tax. State taxes rival the federal income tax pretty easilly. Don't even get me started on property tax.

    Considering there are much higher than 10% tax brackets, we pay a lot of taxes.. (of course most "small busineses" write it all off and never pay a tax but that is another story altogether). We pay so much yet have nothing to show for it except a bunch of schools shutting down because of ignorant presidents.

    --
    Your ignorance is infinitely greater than you realize.
  108. $3 trillion in fake US fed notes found... by cheekyboy · · Score: 1

    http://www.abs-cbnnews.com/topofthehour.aspx?Story Id=3274

    he National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) on Thursday said it has arrested two British nationals with $3 trillion fake US federal bank notes in their possession, DZMM reported.

    NBI Director Reynaldo Wycoco identified the suspects as Paul Edward John Flavell and Sam Beany. The two listed their address as Unit 305 CEO Apartments in Jupiter Street, Makati City.

    The suspects were not physically present during the press conference called by Wycoco at the NBI office in Taft Avenue, Manila. Only the suspects' photographs were shown to reporters.

    Wycoco said NBI agents have also launched a manhunt for two other British nationals involved in the syndicate.

    The two other suspects are Seki Mehmet Bayram and Peter Whittkamp.

    Flavell and Beany's arrest came following a tip from international cargo forwarder DHL Philippines Inc. on April 14, Wycoco said.

    The tip was about a shipment consigned to two foreigners, which was pending at the company warehouse.

    The forwarder said the cargo was bound for Zurich, Switzerland.

    The NBI dispatched a team to the DHL office. The agents were able to chance upon the suspects as they were paying the airway bill amounting to P53,967.

    Company records show the suspects paid using a credit card.

    Wycoco said Flavell and Beany did not resist arrest after they were made to open the cast-iron boxes containing bogus federal bank reserve certificates.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  109. Bush? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wasn't George bush part of this?

    i remember reading a while ago about him putting a tax on imported ram cause some korean company was selling ram at a price lower than what micron was producing it at. conveniently, micron had donated 180 million dollars(ballpark, not 100% sure about the figure. this was a while ago.) to the bush campaign for 2000.

  110. Re:Price Fixing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Tell me why every gas station in my area ALWAYS has the same prices set? When one changes the price, they all match it. What happened to competition?

    The price of the $1 chocolate bars doesn't change every day, why should gas.

  111. Re:Price Fixing... by millennial · · Score: 1

    But Shell's gas is always mysteriously one cent more expensive...

    --
    I am scientifically inaccurate.
  112. Correction on the summary by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1

    This announcement is for Hynix only. The writer of the summary adds the following misinformation, "Micron and Infineon have also been fined for their role in the scheme." Infineon did plead guilty and settle for a fine, but Micron and Samsung are the two manufacturers that haven't settled yet.

    --
    We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds