It is just that war is a natural state for humans. Just look at Europe today. No matter how open and welcoming a society can be, there will always come along someone who demands subservience to the will of their sky pixie.
...as to what platforms you run will still influence the direction of the human race? The man has to beyond the pursuit of pure profit by now. Shouldn't the legacy he seeks be about beneficence, not personal gain about now?
....are very similar, probably because the human body responds to different threats in similar manners. Self diagnosis is, at least today, the only way to busy bodies out of ones private business sadly.,
Those are the costs of "connected" healthcare. Humans are a hateful venfeful bunch and maybe those qualities served them well in the past by ridding themselves of the ill suited for humanhood, but today the homogenity these qualities aspire to will also lead to mankinds demise. Diversity is the key to survival, not "sameness".
Can you prove a negative? How would you go about proving that Gods/God does not exist? Even if you can account for everything that has been attributed to sky faeries over the centuries you still can't prove that those sky faeries just didn't sit back and observe it all.
Harmful to human pathogens thrive in the environmnet that you you feel comfortable in. It was your desire for warmt that made you sick, not the temperature.
I keep my house at 62F during the winter, and it never ceases to amaze me when my guests demand the heat be turned up. It's as if they don't understand that there are real costs involved when warming a space up. Besides, those who are cold can add any number of layers of clothing, those who are too warm can only strip so far.
If, as you say, drunks have gotten away with driving 80 times before getting caught, the I'm In the punishment should be 80 times harder. I'm against the death penalty based on the possibly innocent factor, but the roads must be kept safe for everyone at all hours.
Life is not a game, you either or alive or you or not. If the inconvienence of you taking a cab is too much for you protect another than you being dead would be best for the rest of us.
Their freedom to drive will never outweigh the lives of the innocents they might take by their inebrieted lack of concern for others lives. I'll defend your right to free speech, I'll defend your right to protest, but I will not defend your right to kill another human being.
If you think it is crazy to want to keep drunks from murdering innocents, then you should have backed off a long time ago. How many lives are you willing to sacrifice to ensure the freedom to drive impaired?
Those who drive impaired demonstrate that they have no regard for the safety of others. Their punishment should include whatever pain it causes them to escape that envelope.
Slashdot Mirror
It is just that war is a natural state for humans. Just look at Europe today. No matter how open and welcoming a society can be, there will always come along someone who demands subservience to the will of their sky pixie.
...as to what platforms you run will still influence the direction of the human race? The man has to beyond the pursuit of pure profit by now. Shouldn't the legacy he seeks be about beneficence, not personal gain about now?
...in just about any language,
....are very similar, probably because the human body responds to different threats in similar manners. Self diagnosis is, at least today, the only way to busy bodies out of ones private business sadly.,
Those are the costs of "connected" healthcare. Humans are a hateful venfeful bunch and maybe those qualities served them well in the past by ridding themselves of the ill suited for humanhood, but today the homogenity these qualities aspire to will also lead to mankinds demise. Diversity is the key to survival, not "sameness".
Just because some humans still want to believe in God/Gods doesn't mean that He/She/They exist.
Can you prove a negative? How would you go about proving that Gods/God does not exist? Even if you can account for everything that has been attributed to sky faeries over the centuries you still can't prove that those sky faeries just didn't sit back and observe it all.
Harmful to human pathogens thrive in the environmnet that you you feel comfortable in. It was your desire for warmt that made you sick, not the temperature.
I keep my house at 62F during the winter, and it never ceases to amaze me when my guests demand the heat be turned up. It's as if they don't understand that there are real costs involved when warming a space up. Besides, those who are cold can add any number of layers of clothing, those who are too warm can only strip so far.
So you don't think getting maimed or killed by a drunk driver isn't violent?
If, as you say, drunks have gotten away with driving 80 times before getting caught, the I'm In the punishment should be 80 times harder. I'm against the death penalty based on the possibly innocent factor, but the roads must be kept safe for everyone at all hours.
Drunks made the decision to get drunk, think about that you dolt.
Life is not a game, you either or alive or you or not. If the inconvienence of you taking a cab is too much for you protect another than you being dead would be best for the rest of us.
Their freedom to drive will never outweigh the lives of the innocents they might take by their inebrieted lack of concern for others lives. I'll defend your right to free speech, I'll defend your right to protest, but I will not defend your right to kill another human being.
Absolutely not, but driving drunk IS a choice. If you are impaired before you get behind the wheel, don't get behind the wheel.
Nope, only loft off all the heads who think they can drive drunk.
Simple, make what cellphone users do when driving as illegal as driving drunk.
Drunks have a choice, most others dont'.
If you think it is crazy to want to keep drunks from murdering innocents, then you should have backed off a long time ago. How many lives are you willing to sacrifice to ensure the freedom to drive impaired?
...but call a freakin' cab!
We are talking drunks here, people who don't give a shit about killing others if it interferes with their own pleasure.
Those who drive impaired demonstrate that they have no regard for the safety of others. Their punishment should include whatever pain it causes them to escape that envelope.
Yes, anything that will keep the impaired off the roads is okay in my book.
The goal here is to do away with idiots who drive impared or distracted.
That just means the penalties are too low. Perhaps forfeiting 100% of your assests would be the best punishment?