The whole thing is worthless, as soon as you burn it to disk, because as soon as you do so, its now out of date - i.e, it subject to flaws. Or are you going to force the user to download all the patches everytime they run the thing? What if it needs a kernel upgrade/reboot? It'll never work?
Lets talk again when group policies are present in Firefox/Chrome?
Like it or not, for big IT, these are must haves:
Ability to specify proxy servers and prevent users from modifying them?
Ability to restrict settings, etc etc etc
Ability for Firefox to use the internal windows cert store
The problem is not that IE6 sucks, it is that there are barriers preventing Firefox/Chrome from having a place on the corporate desktop. Why they don't address these I'll never understand.
Then if I was the insurance company, i'd be supplying like-for-like, and not an upgraded model...
(I would imagine deliberate coverage is covered in the fineprint)
There is the community edition which does have these, but i totally agree, while Chrome or Firefox don't ship a version with group policy i'll never understand.
Sound advice. For those new to perspectives, it uses notary servers, and compares the thumbprint of the SSL cert with what 4-5 other points on the internet see.
This should at least prevent localised MITM, even with a trusted CA issuing the MITM cert.
It looks like that campaign was supposed to end last year, on Dec 31st.
Why should we waste time answering your questions now, given the seemingly unrealistic goal, when you can't even format a donation box?
Or is the a scheme to get money out of stupid geeks by driving traffic to your website?
So it's more like dmoz? They link to copyright material as well- it's up to the user to judge if they have a valid license to view the work.
Newzbin is a service that can aid copyright holders, nad allow them to get usenet posts cancelled with the newsgroup providers.
once was for a 3G data card, true, but other times it was clothing etc etc. In one shop they were unable to sell us gumboots because their point of sale couldn't cope with us refusing a postcode.
Oh no, they still wanted to know my postcode, even when i paid by cash. I walked out of two stores saying i didn't have one, and if i did have a postcode, i wouldn't be sharing it.
I was visiting the UK last month as a tourist. I have lived there, and moved away about 5 years ago, around the time Chip & PIN was first appearing.
Frankly, I was treated like some kind of crinimal subversive for presenting a credit card that didn't have a CHIP on it. I was told by some retailers (a Mobile phone co) that they could not except my card as ALL card HAD to be Chip & PIN. It took a bit of experimenting with other retailers for them to work out that if you inserted a non C&P card into the chip slot, it asked you to swipe it. Although, some terminals didn't have swipe-y bits.
It seemed to be a shock to many that not all countries have cars with chip and pin on them.
Many retailers refused to believe, or be able to sell to me if i didn't have a postcode. (i'm visiting. Why do you need a postcode? I don't have one!).
This was outside the main tourists bits perhaps- (West Midlands), but still...
Easy to mark troll, but it's worthy of examination.
Is there a centralised 'Al Qaeda' which plans and executes missions a la SMERSH (which seems to be the common message sold in the media).
Probably not.
The other claim is around a shared 'philosophy' of Al Qaeda- which apparently seems to mean an intense dislike of US foreign policy, and violent means to oppose it.
Arguably, but then you'd be calling many anti-capatalists protestors 'Al Qaeda'.
There certainly seems to be a militant brand of Islam which calls for a nationalist/self-determinest approach to defeating american foreign policy through violent means, but it does appear to be high fragmented, and non centralised. Call that Al Qaeda if you like, but lumping it together seems highly misguided.
Slashdot Mirror
The whole thing is worthless, as soon as you burn it to disk, because as soon as you do so, its now out of date - i.e, it subject to flaws. Or are you going to force the user to download all the patches everytime they run the thing? What if it needs a kernel upgrade/reboot? It'll never work?
There is a FreeMidgetPorn AP in Central Wellington, New Zealand. I sort of suspect it is near or in the TradeMe offices....
Repos in Linux are not just collections of software- they're a store of trust.
You can (should?) trust that they won't break other programs, they won't install malware.
That is impossible in the Closed source model, really.
(unless you have differnet users for each app, and lock down each install directory?)
RSS?
Yes, but only in the UK.
How could you set a proxy preference in Firefox, and not allow it to be changed by the user?
IE8 has a mode for IE7 compatibility, not IE6, as i understand it.
Lets talk again when group policies are present in Firefox/Chrome?
Like it or not, for big IT, these are must haves:
Ability to specify proxy servers and prevent users from modifying them?
Ability to restrict settings, etc etc etc
Ability for Firefox to use the internal windows cert store
The problem is not that IE6 sucks, it is that there are barriers preventing Firefox/Chrome from having a place on the corporate desktop. Why they don't address these I'll never understand.
Then if I was the insurance company, i'd be supplying like-for-like, and not an upgraded model... (I would imagine deliberate coverage is covered in the fineprint)
Perhaps they're losing group to OSX?
There is the community edition which does have these, but i totally agree, while Chrome or Firefox don't ship a version with group policy i'll never understand.
I've seen one in Wellington, NZ titled 'FreeMidgetPorn'.
To be honest, set your favicon to look a SSL padlock, and most people can't tell the difference anyway. Much easier to MITM http...
Sound advice. For those new to perspectives, it uses notary servers, and compares the thumbprint of the SSL cert with what 4-5 other points on the internet see. This should at least prevent localised MITM, even with a trusted CA issuing the MITM cert.
It looks like that campaign was supposed to end last year, on Dec 31st. Why should we waste time answering your questions now, given the seemingly unrealistic goal, when you can't even format a donation box? Or is the a scheme to get money out of stupid geeks by driving traffic to your website?
So it's more like dmoz? They link to copyright material as well- it's up to the user to judge if they have a valid license to view the work. Newzbin is a service that can aid copyright holders, nad allow them to get usenet posts cancelled with the newsgroup providers.
once was for a 3G data card, true, but other times it was clothing etc etc. In one shop they were unable to sell us gumboots because their point of sale couldn't cope with us refusing a postcode.
Oh no, they still wanted to know my postcode, even when i paid by cash. I walked out of two stores saying i didn't have one, and if i did have a postcode, i wouldn't be sharing it.
Frankly, I was treated like some kind of crinimal subversive for presenting a credit card that didn't have a CHIP on it. I was told by some retailers (a Mobile phone co) that they could not except my card as ALL card HAD to be Chip & PIN. It took a bit of experimenting with other retailers for them to work out that if you inserted a non C&P card into the chip slot, it asked you to swipe it. Although, some terminals didn't have swipe-y bits.
It seemed to be a shock to many that not all countries have cars with chip and pin on them.
Many retailers refused to believe, or be able to sell to me if i didn't have a postcode. (i'm visiting. Why do you need a postcode? I don't have one!).
This was outside the main tourists bits perhaps- (West Midlands), but still...
Children are individuals with their own rights, not property of parents.
The state has the absolutely responsibility to protect the children's right to a decent education, and not be at the mercy of whack-job parents.
Rubbish. There exploits are commonly deployed via ad networks or 0wned legitimate sites. There is no such thing as a "safe" page and/or site.
Quite right. There is an excellent Book called Flat Earth News on how news is collected/created these days.
It's well worth a read. Paywalls are not the problem, but the dross passed off as 'news'.
Easy to mark troll, but it's worthy of examination. Is there a centralised 'Al Qaeda' which plans and executes missions a la SMERSH (which seems to be the common message sold in the media). Probably not. The other claim is around a shared 'philosophy' of Al Qaeda- which apparently seems to mean an intense dislike of US foreign policy, and violent means to oppose it. Arguably, but then you'd be calling many anti-capatalists protestors 'Al Qaeda'. There certainly seems to be a militant brand of Islam which calls for a nationalist /self-determinest approach to defeating american foreign policy through violent means, but it does appear to be high fragmented, and non centralised. Call that Al Qaeda if you like, but lumping it together seems highly misguided.
Check out the awesome photo selection on this article.
God knows why they're using a distorted aspect-ratio video screen cap for Mr Cable thou down the bottom.....