I've found that it's common for libertarians to deny the horrors of, and even romanticize the Gilded Age and the early 1900s before the New Deal. It really saddens me that time travel was proven impossible, because I'd love to send them back there with nothing but a reel of bootstraps and a six-pack of self-determination.
After reading the title I thought they bought $22k worth of average home routers and put them in schools, and imagined a big truckload of routers. Maybe a decent router that can run DD-WRT/OpenWRT.
And yet all those lighting sources and electricity all operate at exactly c, which our current understanding of physics says cannot be exceeded...unless you're a theoretical physicist you think inside this box.
You can't transmit meaningful information with quantum teleportation alone, you still need a classical channel that operates by conventional means unless you want to transmit uncontrollable random garbage.
Once a search engine becomes any more advanced than the grep tool, there are algorithms involved to quantify relevance that make the results subjective.
It's also worth considering that the primary cause of censored search results in the world is DMCA takedown notices.
They won't be completely accident-proof but they could certainly give better crash statistics than human-driven cars, even with the high-speed close-quarters driving.
I'm posting from a low-power PC in an office building with a gray water system and I drive a short commute with 30-40MPG cars. You're the one who's talking about destroying civilization and not doing anything.
I really want to get my PDA onto solar-only just for such posts.
It's not just about the number of cars on the road. It's about traffic lights, trouble merging, lag in following the car in front, etc, and self-driving cars would address all of this. Cars could drive around at high speed without the need for traffic lights, like a choreographed stunt driving routine, vastly improving traffic flow.
Unfortunately that would scare passengers so it will never happen.
If the car can recognize a loss of control due to a mechanical failure as quickly as a person can, it could warn other cars in time. Suspension damage or lost wheels shouldn't be a problem on the street. If the car simply sets a certain cruising speed when crossing the intersection then engine failure won't change the speed too much. With good enough optical recognition, cars could dodge others with less reliance on inter-car communication.
One thing we'll never have is autonomous cars driving fast or flying through uncontrolled intersections inches apart from each other, because unfortunately it scares the shit out of people.
Using powerful waves of stupid aimed through a waveguide. Rush Limbaugh, Lord Monckton and Anthony Watts all donned the stupid-conduction helmets to power the weapon while doing their best supervillain laugh.
Slashdot Mirror
LOL I'm Rui Maciel now? And I live in Portugal?
+1 Go kill yourself. Or at least go fuck yourself.
I've found that it's common for libertarians to deny the horrors of, and even romanticize the Gilded Age and the early 1900s before the New Deal. It really saddens me that time travel was proven impossible, because I'd love to send them back there with nothing but a reel of bootstraps and a six-pack of self-determination.
After reading the title I thought they bought $22k worth of average home routers and put them in schools, and imagined a big truckload of routers. Maybe a decent router that can run DD-WRT/OpenWRT.
Then I read the summary :-(
And yet all those lighting sources and electricity all operate at exactly c, which our current understanding of physics says cannot be exceeded...unless you're a theoretical physicist you think inside this box.
LOL
You can't transmit meaningful information with quantum teleportation alone, you still need a classical channel that operates by conventional means unless you want to transmit uncontrollable random garbage.
He may not be bonch this time, remember there are MS shills operating on here too.
Once a search engine becomes any more advanced than the grep tool, there are algorithms involved to quantify relevance that make the results subjective.
It's also worth considering that the primary cause of censored search results in the world is DMCA takedown notices.
They won't be completely accident-proof but they could certainly give better crash statistics than human-driven cars, even with the high-speed close-quarters driving.
I'm posting from a low-power PC in an office building with a gray water system and I drive a short commute with 30-40MPG cars. You're the one who's talking about destroying civilization and not doing anything.
I really want to get my PDA onto solar-only just for such posts.
It's not just about the number of cars on the road. It's about traffic lights, trouble merging, lag in following the car in front, etc, and self-driving cars would address all of this. Cars could drive around at high speed without the need for traffic lights, like a choreographed stunt driving routine, vastly improving traffic flow.
Unfortunately that would scare passengers so it will never happen.
If the car can recognize a loss of control due to a mechanical failure as quickly as a person can, it could warn other cars in time. Suspension damage or lost wheels shouldn't be a problem on the street. If the car simply sets a certain cruising speed when crossing the intersection then engine failure won't change the speed too much. With good enough optical recognition, cars could dodge others with less reliance on inter-car communication.
One thing we'll never have is autonomous cars driving fast or flying through uncontrolled intersections inches apart from each other, because unfortunately it scares the shit out of people.
Is no Google-related thread safe from MS shills?
If you have ADD or dyslexia read the first question CAREFULLY. Apparently I think water is HO2 -_-
Already enjoying some Canadian beer I see :-P
Look at the name of the account in the URL. There's some character trickery going on.
Using powerful waves of stupid aimed through a waveguide. Rush Limbaugh, Lord Monckton and Anthony Watts all donned the stupid-conduction helmets to power the weapon while doing their best supervillain laugh.
I agree but I can still appreciate the large boobies :D
She's not super-hot overall, but her epic rack is world-famous.
Image search "Christina Hendricks," should be self-explanatory from there ;-)
Mobile service is irrelevant. Nobody actually WORKS from their phone or tablet.
Hey speak for yourself man. Not all of our phones or tablets are dinky little media consumption devices.
Enough time to set up a torrent download for the movie and let the regret of purchasing set in.
Damn right.
It's a bit of a paranoid argument but technically correct.