Man, I love the/. mod system.
Guy telling about hot girl-on-girl action (offtopic, but interesting): +1, Interesting.
Then he replies to himself, adding another detail: -1, Offtopic.
Then AC tells him to shut up: +1, Informative. Indeed.
"Sir, you are required to remove the cooling liquid from the computer, put it into this container, which we'll put into this sealed bag. After landing you are free to put it back."
You just didn't mention the magic word MS calls this feature: USN journal
Try the command fsutil usn to play around with it. Of course, it's pretty useless if there's no app relying on it. (but very useful if there is, like for backups as parent said).
I'm not sure, but OS X might have something similar in HFS+, and use it for Time Machine and also Spotlight (know quickly which files were changed and reindex them).
In fact, journaling is a performance breaker in pretty much every i/o intensive scenario, such as database servers.
Ext2 is still the preferred choice on servers here.
Ext2 itself is kind of a performance breaker:)
Don't get me wrong, I like ext2/3, I use only ext3 on all my machines and other machines I install, it's the only Linux fs I really trust. (back then when Suse defaulted to install reiserfs, I always changed that:) But we have to admit that it's not the best-performing fs on Linux.
And to continue that, why the f*** should Gnome or gvfs take care of browsing the fuckin Windows network? Gnome is a GUI or desktop environment or whatever, why the fuck should it touch the network? And then, accessing files from the network via this avesome gvfs thing makes it really braindead. If the user wants to access a file, just mount it ffs, that's why we have cifs support in the kernel.
OWA in IE:
There is an option on the login page that says:
Client (what's this?hide explanation)
[ ] Premium
The premium client provides all Outlook Web Access features.
[ ] Basic
The basic client provides fewer features than the premium client but offers faster performance. Use the basic client if you're on a slow connection.
OWA in other browsers: there's no such option. You'll get the Basic stuff, obviously.
Using ad-blocker is simply stealing. And yes I do call it stealing because you are incurring a cost on the content provider without compensating them. Its no different from stealing at a store with poor security.
So, is using links/lynx/w3m stealing too? Is turning off images in Firefox and not installing flash stealing too?
Slashdot Mirror
None of those have significant marketshare.
Except Darwin, under the hood of the fruity OS. It's just that many Mac users don't even know it's there.
Well, I could think of some interesting use cases for the Wiimote in an adult game...
Oh yeah. IE lets you browse the internet, and vice versa.
Uh, never mind.
It kinda works for me on Leopard (PPC Mac), but it refuses to mount read/write ext3 filesystems with the dir_index feature. So, just read-only for me.
Your post just cancelled the mod. So, no kingdom for you.
"from the avoid-saving-passwords dept." ???
Man, I love the /. mod system.
Guy telling about hot girl-on-girl action (offtopic, but interesting): +1, Interesting.
Then he replies to himself, adding another detail: -1, Offtopic.
Then AC tells him to shut up: +1, Informative. Indeed.
You misspelled BSD.
There. Anonymity doesn't affect anyone.
I would say "Post anomymously" doesn't affect anyone.
or maybe they are just paranoid.
I've used OpenWrt on a WRT54GL, and IPv6 seemed to work just fine. The kernel was 2.4 of course. What's the problem?
"Sir, you are required to remove the cooling liquid from the computer, put it into this container, which we'll put into this sealed bag. After landing you are free to put it back."
Try the command fsutil usn to play around with it. Of course, it's pretty useless if there's no app relying on it. (but very useful if there is, like for backups as parent said).
I'm not sure, but OS X might have something similar in HFS+, and use it for Time Machine and also Spotlight (know quickly which files were changed and reindex them).
In fact, journaling is a performance breaker in pretty much every i/o intensive scenario, such as database servers. Ext2 is still the preferred choice on servers here.
Ext2 itself is kind of a performance breaker :)
Don't get me wrong, I like ext2/3, I use only ext3 on all my machines and other machines I install, it's the only Linux fs I really trust. (back then when Suse defaulted to install reiserfs, I always changed that :) But we have to admit that it's not the best-performing fs on Linux.
AST, is that you?
And to continue that, why the f*** should Gnome or gvfs take care of browsing the fuckin Windows network? Gnome is a GUI or desktop environment or whatever, why the fuck should it touch the network? And then, accessing files from the network via this avesome gvfs thing makes it really braindead. If the user wants to access a file, just mount it ffs, that's why we have cifs support in the kernel.
Then you post this experience on /. and you get modded Insightful.
Client (what's this?hide explanation)
[ ] Premium
The premium client provides all Outlook Web Access features.
[ ] Basic
The basic client provides fewer features than the premium client but offers faster performance. Use the basic client if you're on a slow connection.
OWA in other browsers: there's no such option. You'll get the Basic stuff, obviously.
Using ad-blocker is simply stealing. And yes I do call it stealing because you are incurring a cost on the content provider without compensating them. Its no different from stealing at a store with poor security.
So, is using links/lynx/w3m stealing too? Is turning off images in Firefox and not installing flash stealing too?
I'm sure he'll bring some developers developers developers, developers developers developers, developers developers developers with him.
Oh, this PrettyQuickTime must be some open source QuickTime clone!
1. You may want to check your drive history, because you're mistaken.
[Citation needed].
we can expect Chinese knockoffs of a similar quality within months.
I've already seen those. The brand is "Ligao" and their blocks fit perfectly with the original Lego ones.
Maybe because the first 500 GB drives appeared somewhere during 2006 and the first 500 GB laptop drives just this year?