Slashdot Mirror


Lego Loses Its Unique Right To Make Lego Blocks

tsa writes "The European Department of Justice has decided that the Danish company Lego does not have exclusive rights to the lego building block anymore (sorry, it's in Dutch). Lego went to court after a Canadian firm had made blocks that were so like lego blocks that they even fit the real blocks made by Lego. The European judge decided that the design of the lego blocks is not protected by European trademarks and so anyone can make the blocks." If true, hopefully this will open doors for people interested in inexpensive bulk purchase of bricks of specific sizes and colors. Perhaps at long last I can build a life-sized Hemos statue for my office.

576 comments

  1. makes sense by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lego was naar het Europese Hof van justitie gestapt in de strijd tegen de Canadese concurrent Mega Brands, die een blokje op de markt heeft gebracht dat past op die van Lego. Het Hof oordeelde vandaag dat het ontwerp van Lego niet is beschermd door het Europees merkenrecht en dat er dus geen sprake mag zijn van alleenrecht.

    Can't really argue with that....

    --
    This guy's the limit!
    1. Re:makes sense by cowscows · · Score: 5, Funny

      Damn. I'm only 28 and already I'm so old that I can't make sense of this "leet-speak" that kids are using these days.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    2. Re:makes sense by 10e6Steve · · Score: 3, Informative

      Lego had stepped to the European Court of Justice in the fight against the Canadian competitor Mega fire, which a cube on the market has brought that watches out which of Lego. The court judged today that the design of Lego has not been protected by the European merkenrecht and that there can no talk be therefore of exclusive right.

      From the babelfish

    3. Re:makes sense by snspdaarf · · Score: 4, Funny

      Can't really argue with that, either!

      --
      Why, without your clothes, you're naked, Miss Dudley!
    4. Re:makes sense by genner · · Score: 3, Funny

      Can't really argue with that, either!

      I could argue that....but I don't feel like it.

    5. Re:makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah? Get off my lawn!

    6. Re:makes sense by Rigrig · · Score: 2, Funny

      Guess you're right, I'm 25 and I understand it just fine.

      --
      **TODO** [X] Steal someone elses sig.
    7. Re:makes sense by jonaskoelker · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can make out this:

      Lego was at the European Court gestapt in the fight against the Canadia competitor Mega Brands, who has brought to the market a block that passes for those from Lego. The court oordeelde vandaag that the ontwerp van Lego isn't proctected through the European trademark and that er dus geen sprake mag is van exclusive right.

      Run that through dict-freedict-nld-eng and a copywriter to get some sensible english. Or run it through kenny to get

      Pmfmppmfmppf fppmmmfmm mmmfmp fmpmfpmpp Mppfmfpffppfpfmmppmmmppp Mmfppffmfpfffmp mfmmppfmmfmpmmmpfmfmp mffppp fmpmfpmpp mpfmffmfmmfpfmp mmmmfmmmmmffpppfmmfmp fmpmfpmpp Mmfmmmpppmmmmpmmffmmm mmfppfppmpfmmppfmpmfffmpppfpff Ppmmppmfmmmm Mmppffmmmpppmpmfmm, fppmfpppf mfpmmmfmm mmppffppffmfmfmmfpfmp fmpppf fmpmfpmpp ppmmmmpffpmpmppfmp mmm mmppmfppfmmfpmp fmpmfpmmmfmp pfmmmmfmmfmmmppfmm mpfppfpff fmpmfpppffmmmpp mpfpffppfppm Pmfmppmfmppf. Fmpmfpmpp mmfppffmfpfffmp ppfppfpffmpmmppmpppmfmpmmpp fpmmmmpppmpmmmmmmmmfm fmpmfpmmmfmp fmpmfpmpp ppfpppfmpfppmpppffpfm fpmmmmppp Pmfmppmfmppf mfffmmppp'fmp pfmpffppfmmffmpmppmmffmpmppmpm fmpmfppffppffmfmfmmfp fmpmfpmpp Mppfmfpffppfpfmmppmmmppp fmppffmmmmpmmppppmmmmpffpmp mmmpppmpm fmpmfpmmmfmp mpppff mpmfmffmm mfmmppmppppp fmmpfmpffmmmpmpmpp ppmmmmmfm mfffmm fpmmmmppp mppfpfmmfpmffmffmmmfffpmmpp pffmffmfmmfpfmp.

      (apt-get install filters)

    8. Re:makes sense by dragonjujotu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Lego was to the European Court of Justice and were active in the fight against the Canadian competitor Mega Brands, which is a block on the market that fits that of Lego. The Court ruled today that the design of Lego is not protected by the trademark and that there should be no question of monopoly.

      Ubiquity translate command - get with the times

      --
      Yes, I am obsessed with ellipses.
    9. Re:makes sense by digitig · · Score: 2, Funny

      Perhaps it's clearer in Swedish -- Swedish Chef, that is... Legu ves neer het Ioorupese-a Huff fun joostitie-a gestept in de-a streejd tegee de-a Cunedese-a cuncoorrent Mega Brunds, deee-a iee blukje-a oop de-a merkt heefft gebrecht det pest oop deee-a fun Legu. Het Huff oourdeelde-a fundeeg det het oontverp fun Legu neeet is beschermd duur het Ioorupees merkenrecht ee det ir doos geee spreke-a meg zeejn fun elleenrecht.

      --
      Quidnam Latine loqui modo coepi?
    10. Re:makes sense by pcolaman · · Score: 1, Funny

      Such as, therefore, the Iraq, Legos, South Africa, blowtorches, like such as.

    11. Re:makes sense by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Lego lost in European courts to the Canadian Mega Brands, having previously been the only maker of Lego blocks. The decision against Lego opens the door in the European market and that speaks well of things being ok.

      I don't know, I just guessed...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    12. Re:makes sense by dontmakemethink · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Can't really argue with that, either!

      Just because they can't, doesn't mean they won't. It works for Microsoft every day.

      --

      War as we knew it was obsolete
      Nothing could beat complete denial
      - Emily Haines
    13. Re:makes sense by sharkey · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I like the Crash Test Dummies too.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    14. Re:makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Pmfmppmfmppf fppmmmfmm mmmfmp fmpmfpmpp Mppfmfpffppfpfmmppmmmppp Mmfppffmfpfffmp mfmmppfmmfmpmmmpfmfmp mffppp fmpmfpmpp mpfmffmfmmfpfmp mmmmfmmmmmffpppfmmfmp fmpmfpmpp Mmfmmmpppmmmmpmmffmmm mmfppfppmpfmmppfmpmfffmpppfpff Ppmmppmfmmmm Mmppffmmmpppmpmfmm, fppmfpppf mfpmmmfmm mmppffppffmfmfmmfpfmp fmpppf

      You called my mother a what??!!

    15. Re:makes sense by DevConcepts · · Score: 1

      Obligatory BORK BORK BORK
      Ya Ya Ya I know, Danish not Swiss......
      Still makes as much sense...

    16. Re:makes sense by Duckie01 · · Score: 1

      Rofl. I'm Dutch... I had to laugh about your joke... I'll humbly attempt to translate this piece :)

      Lego went to the European court of justice to battle Canadian competitioner Mega Brands, who released a block onto the market that will fit onto Lego's blocks. Today, the court ruled that the Lego's design is not protected by European trademark law, so any exclusive rights are out of the question.

      It will be very interesting to see what happens in Legoland in the next few years. Disney grew strong by getting the lifetime on their protected trademarks prolonged and prolonged. What will happen to Lego now, and their market? Will it force Lego to come up with better designs and more attractive stuff now there's competition? Will there really be cheaper Lego-like blocks available at the toy stores? Will this new open market in Lego blocks produce good designs and nifty things, or will the cheap copycats take over? Will Lego's annual sales of 1,049 billion Euro dry down so quickly they're bankrupt in a couple of years? Would that really hurt the economy at large, or would it improve the situation for everyone but Lego?

      I mean, it might answer some of the very basic questions that are quite often at the core of the discussions about trademarks. Talk is cheap, this is the real thing happening.

    17. Re:makes sense by neoform · · Score: 1

      I could argue that....but I don't feel like it.

      I argued with it, wasn't worth it.

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
    18. Re:makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      translation:

      Lego went to the European Court of Justice to fight the Canadian competitor Mega Brands, who manufactured & sold a block which is fitting on one of the Lego Blocks. The Court decided today that the design of Lego is not protected by the European Brand-Right (?) and therefore, it's not allowed to have an exclusive-right.

    19. Re:makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lego was naar het Europese Hof van justitie gestapt in de strijd tegen de Canadese concurrent Mega Brands, die een blokje op de markt heeft gebracht dat past op die van Lego. Het Hof oordeelde vandaag dat het ontwerp van Lego niet is beschermd door het Europees merkenrecht en dat er dus geen sprake mag zijn van alleenrecht.

      Can't really argue with that....

      Did anyone else read that and automatically add "Bork! Bork! Bork!" to the end of it in their heads?

    20. Re:makes sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lego was naar het Europese Hof van justitie gestapt in de strijd tegen de Canadese concurrent Mega Brands, die een blokje op de markt heeft gebracht dat past op die van Lego. Het Hof oordeelde vandaag dat het ontwerp van Lego niet is beschermd door het Europees merkenrecht en dat er dus geen sprake mag zijn van alleenrecht.

      LEGO rocks, but some shitty European judge decided those Canadian f-ers MegaBrands that make Mega (crappy) Bloks get to rip them off a bit more than they were able to yesterday. Mr. Hof ordered a vat of Lego for himself because he got fed up with the non European version (Megablocks) falling aprt on him after he accidentally bought a "cool" set that doesnt actually stick together. The irony was lost on him due to his being a "vroondenfarger"

    21. Re:makes sense by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Will there really be cheaper Lego-like blocks available at the toy stores?
      There already are. Afaict this is just lego losing (or failing to be granted, I can't really tell from the poor translations) an appeal.

      Mega blocks are the main competitor and is typically a bit cheaper than lego. I've also seem some really cheap unbranded basic bricks.

      Now if lego had won this lawsuit that would have been really big news.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  2. first block! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one 1x1

    1. Re:first block! by MindKata · · Score: 2, Funny

      Great, time to open source Lego! ... err... not sure how, but it sounds great in theory!

      --
      There are 10 kinds of people in the world... those who understand binary and those who don't.
    2. Re:first block! by atomicthumbs · · Score: 4, Funny

      one 1x1

      Flat or tall?

      --
      http://pinopsida.com
    3. Re:first block! by Windows_NT · · Score: 1

      1x1 = XxY == flat
      1x1x1 = XxYxZ == tall

      --
      Go go Gadget Nailgun!
    4. Re:first block! by Gulthek · · Score: 1

      Smooth top or bump?

    5. Re:first block! by JayGuerette · · Score: 1

      You're obviously not a real Lego person.
      Surely, you meant: plate or brick?

    6. Re:first block! by smegged · · Score: 1

      Come on you can do better than that - plate, brick, tile, decorated tile, clip, cylinder, cylinder plate or special?

    7. Re:first block! by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the 1x1 bricks with the hole in the side... what were those called?

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  3. in english by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The decision can be consulted in English as well at the ECJ's website: http://curia.europa.eu/

    (and Lego hasn't had such exclusive right for quite a while...)

  4. English translation by jschen · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.dw-world.de/dw/article/0,2144,3784225,00.html The news is not that generic blocks didn't previously exist. It's that Lego is unable to retain the trademark.

    1. Re:English translation by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Lego is unable to retain its trademark

      • on the shape of the blocks

      (or, in particular, the red, 2x4 block). So it sounds like others will be able to make compatible blocks.

      Had Lego lost their trademark on the Lego name, that would have been much worse.

    2. Re:English translation by alta · · Score: 1

      Doesn't seem that valuable to me... So now I'll be able to buy massive boxes of red 2X4 blocks. Big deal, I want more than just red!

      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are subtle, and quick to anger.
    3. Re:English translation by gregbot9000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, I'm surprised they were able to have anything like that this long. They have been around 50 years, any patent should have ran out years ago. Interesting they would try to trademark the block, which doesn't run out, good thing it didn't work, for the consumer at least.

      I see Lego announcing a change in which country it resides in, to one more favorable towards corporations in trademark laws. That or outsourcing few plants to China to stay competitive.

      And whats with all the toy stories and polls? Is /. gearing up for some big holiday push?

    4. Re:English translation by Rary · · Score: 1

      Doesn't seem that valuable to me... So now I'll be able to buy massive boxes of red 2X4 blocks. Big deal, I want more than just red!

      You can already get whatever you want.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    5. Re:English translation by Omestes · · Score: 1

      I doubt this will happen.

      Lego will lose minimal market share because of this. Their brand name alone ensures that they will remain dominant in the market for a long time to come. Actually I don't see their business dropping much at all in the short-to-mid term. Having 6,000,000 types of bathroom tissues that are exactly the same as Kleenex didn't hurt them too much (even though I would now rule even their trademark dead), nor does it hurt Clorox that all bleaches are pretty much the same.

      I'm guessing that Lego's other lines will not be hurt much either, such as Technix and Mindstorms.

      I also doubt them moving to China very much, since they are one of the few eco-conscious companies out there. And I'm guessing finding lead-based Legos would be a much worse hit to their market than this.

      Also... This is abuse of trademark law, IMO, so we do we protect it here on Slashdot, is it just because Lego is a sacred cow to us geeks? What if Microsoft pulled something equivalent? Would we be sad?

      Also, Legos suck now. The only thing worth buying is their bulk "regular" blocks, all their kits are nothing but specialized shapes, that really are only good for one configuration, within the one set. I actually would be more likely to buy generic blocks for that reason alone, especially if I had children. Legos is about imagination, not mock-building movie tie-ins.

      --
      A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    6. Re:English translation by jimicus · · Score: 1

      I see Lego announcing a change in which country it resides in, to one more favorable towards corporations in trademark laws. That or outsourcing few plants to China to stay competitive.

      Have you seen any of the Gizmodo videos?

      http://gizmodo.com/5022769/exclusive-inside-the-lego-factory

      99% of their plant is mechanised, from grey plastic chips coming in right the way through to coloured plastic blocks all neatly sorted and warehoused coming out. Not really the kind of thing that lends itself to Chinese mass production.

    7. Re:English translation by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      You can already get whatever you want.

      I don't see any options for metal blocks there.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    8. Re:English translation by jack2000 · · Score: 1

      Listen to this man!

    9. Re:English translation by steelfood · · Score: 1

      This attempt at extending their trademark was exactly a result of their patent running out some time ago.

      And Lego isn't going to move to China, of all places. They are very protective of their molds. If they move any manufacturing to China, we can expect Chinese knockoffs of a similar quality within months.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    10. Re:English translation by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      IIRC the patent DID run out, and that's why Mega Bloks are kosher.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    11. Re:English translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They have been around 50 years, any patent should have ran out years ago.

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't patents designed to be an incentive to publish inventions, rather than keep them a trade secret?

      Ooooh, Lego, with their secret design of interlocking blocks! Please publish your secret, Lego, please! We just don't know how you do it!

    12. Re:English translation by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      Considering the vast difference in elasticity, etc. between plastic and metal, would metal LEGO blocks fit together correctly anyway?

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    13. Re:English translation by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      It would depend on the metal. Some alloys may be pliable enough to snap together without permanent deformation. Aluminum might work. For steel, maybe embed little magnets in the posts, or make them rough enough to give friction without giving way (a small clamp could be used to force them together), or just apply enough heat to soften them up a bit. Solder them together?

      Then again, a metallic finish on the smooth sides may be enough. Chrome would be nice to have: your LEGO bathroom could have mirrors. They've done chrome for plastic model car parts.

      I guess you could paint them yourself with metallic paint, but that would probably upset LEGO art purists. On that point, what is the feeling about using partially melted LEGOs to get more organic shapes? Or melting holes through the join pegs with a hot needle for wiring for structure or electronics? LEDs inside blocks?

      How about a mold for making your own blocks out of ice for a LEGO hockey rink? With a functioning LEGO Zamboni? Maybe with a LEGO mobster figure trapped under the ice?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    14. Re:English translation by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      For steel, maybe embed little magnets in the posts, or make them rough enough to give friction without giving way (a small clamp could be used to force them together), or just apply enough heat to soften them up a bit. Solder them together?

      All of those defeat the purpose of having interlocking posts to begin with. If you need special tools (and especially potentially dangerous ones, like torches or soldering irons), they're not really toys, you know?

      Lego actually does have chrome and metallic-colored bricks.

      On that point, what is the feeling about using partially melted LEGOs to get more organic shapes?

      If you deform the brick, it probably won't fit together correctly anymore. Those things are made to a 2-micrometer tolerance, you know.

      Or melting holes through the join pegs with a hot needle for wiring for structure or electronics? LEDs inside blocks?

      Actually, they have those already; you can just buy them.

      How about a mold for making your own blocks out of ice for a LEGO hockey rink? With a functioning LEGO Zamboni? Maybe with a LEGO mobster figure trapped under the ice?

      I'm not sure why you need a mold for that. Zambonis are designed to scrape the ice smooth, so they wouldn't do well if you made LEGO-shaped ice cubes (with posts). And if you made smooth ice cubes, then, well, you don't need a special mold anymore!

      Plus, ice LEGO bricks would melt too fast to be useful, under normal conditions. It might be useful if they decided to put an ice hotel in Legoland, but that's about it.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    15. Re:English translation by Jorophose · · Score: 1

      LEGO doesn't need much in terms of ressources, so being in Danemark gives them a lot of good press, steady oil from Norway, possibly tax cuts, is pretty much seen as one of those cool Danish things, so I can't see them going off to the People's Republic either (nor to Taiwan).

      The plastic is high-quality. I've always noticed that; MegaBlocks are weaker and thiner, whereas the LEGO bricks feel better. It's worth the extra pennies/brick.

    16. Re:English translation by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm surprised they were able to have anything like that this long.
      They haven't, this is just a failed appeal, no big news.

      Basically after legos patents ran out they have tried and failed to use trademarks to squash clones of the lego brick.

      Legos soloution has been largely to diversify, while they do still make the basic bricks their main buisness nowadays seems to be themed sets with lots of special peices.

      Afaict they do already have some special bits made in china but thier main factories are still in countries where trade secrets can be protected. Afaict the exact dimensions and formulas used to make the lego bricks are a tightly kept secret and they are very carefull about the desposal of thier moulds.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    17. Re:English translation by Panaphonix · · Score: 1

      Interesting they would try to trademark the block, which doesn't run out, good thing it didn't work, for the consumer at least.

      There is something very wrong here:
      1) Millions of dollars, years of work, childhood memories, all go into the Lego brand. For this they receive a trademark to prevent market confusion and exploitation of their brand equity.
      2) Mega Brands comes out with Mega Bloks, which looks just like Legos and even interlocks with Lego blocks. This company is able to sell blocks in great quantity by piggy-backing off the Lego brand.
      3) The EU court rules in favor of Mega Brands. How could this happen?

      FTA:

      But the judges ruled that consumer perception was not relevant to an analysis of the functionality of the design. EU trademark law "precludes registration of any shape" that is "sufficient to obtain the intended technical result", the court ruled, "even if that result can be achieved by other shapes".

      So basically the Canadian company won on a technicality and erased billions of euros of brand value. Way to go EU.

    18. Re:English translation by Atti+K. · · Score: 1

      we can expect Chinese knockoffs of a similar quality within months.

      I've already seen those. The brand is "Ligao" and their blocks fit perfectly with the original Lego ones.

      --
      .sig: No such file or directory
  5. End of legoes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And here comes the end of the Lego story. Too bad, they won't be able to make a decent profit and get good media deals (Star Wars sets, etc) if they don't have a decent monopoly on blocks.

    1. Re:End of legoes by lysergic.acid · · Score: 0, Redundant

      yes, god forbid a multi-billion dollar corporation comes up with more than one innovative idea in ~70 years. lego bricks aren't a natural monopoly, and you certainly don't need a monopoly to make a profit (otherwise why would anyone try to compete with Lego?). if they can't survive without a monopoly then, oh well--that's free market capitalism, right?

      besides, they're still the most recognizable makers of construction brick toys. their company name is well-known throughout most of the world, and they are immediately recognizable as the "original" lego toy makers. if anyone wanted to market a licensed lego-based construction set based on their IP, then they will go to Lego first, not just for the name-recognition, but also for their established distribution and marketing network.

      if not, then future Star Wars, Indiana Jones, etc. lego sets will be sold by a different company who won't be able to charge as much money for them. either way consumers will still get what they want, and probably for cheaper.

    2. Re:End of legoes by moderatorrater · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why not? Any company that wants to compete with them will still have to turn a profit, which means that they won't be able to drive Lego out of business unless Lego's simply less competitive. It'll be decades before the word "Lego" is no longer synonymous with building blocks that snap together. Further, they retain the rights to the "Lego" name, just not to the blocks themselves, so they'll still have a ridiculous amount of mindshare. If you're going to release buildable models, do you want to release them under the name of "Lego", or do you want to release them under the name "FunBlocks!"?

      This is a huge blow to Lego, but it shouldn't be deadly by any stretch of the imagination.

    3. Re:End of legoes by TheRaven64 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      There are three ways in which a company could undercut Lego:
      1. Better economies of scale.
      2. Lower production quality.
      3. Cross-subsidy.

      Option 1 doesn't look feasible - you can't get better economies of scale than the market leader easily. Option 2, from the comments in the last story about this, seems to already be happening. All this does is strengthen the Lego brand - they are the people who make bricks that actually stick together and don't cause toy structures to collapse. Option 3 is also a possibility, but what can you sell more of by selling cheap construction bricks?

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    4. Re:End of legoes by owlstead · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that Lego is almost synonymous with quality. I got some "fake" Lego blocks some time ago (as a gift from a company), but the blocks were much more rigid than those from Lego and didn't sick together as well. Those kind of blocks you only buy once. My old Lego is currently used by my nephew (and I got some robotics kit myself I don't use). Of course, he's short on "lights" as well :)

      Yes, Lego is expensive, but it simply won't break down as easily as other toys.

    5. Re:End of legoes by m1ss1ontomars2k4 · · Score: 1

      That, and they probably have the best lego brick-making techniques in the world. The "fake legos" I've bought in the past are really quite crappy.

    6. Re:End of legoes by Kane+Devaid · · Score: 1

      Competitors don't have to undercut them. For example, I would quite happily pay more for metal or re-inforced sections, axles, etc, which is something I've wanted for years. I always had a problem with too much torque on axles.

      I'm sure someone will suggest Meccano, but I could never be bothered with all thoses little screws.

    7. Re:End of legoes by Megane · · Score: 1

      The only bricks up to Lego quality have been the Tyco blocks. (That's Tyco the toy company, not Tyco the electronics company.) They have the same sharp and shiny ABS look as genuine Lego, only without the Lego logo. I think Tyco got sued out of making them before Ritvik/Mega Blocks came out. But Mega Blocks are made of inferior plastic. The only good Mega Blocks are some of the parts from the Dragons series, especially the 2x4 "stone" brick and the baseplates.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  6. Cheap = Good for parents by TrickFred · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My kids have been playing with Mega Bloks for years. When you can buy big buckets of them for $20 when Lego costs $100 or more for the bigger sets, well, the choice is obvious.

    1. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Black+Cardinal · · Score: 4, Informative

      We bought some Mega Bloks for our son, but the plastic they used (polypropylene?) is too soft to keep a good grip. Duplos are made out of ABS plastic that holds its shape much better, so the blocks stay locked and structures stay together. We can't even build a simple staircase out of Mega Bloks without frustration. Constructions have to have twice as many Mega Bloks as Duplos to have the same strength.

      While though the Mega Bloks are cheaper, we'll probably stick to Duplo and Lego for the future.

    2. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by GrumpyOldMan · · Score: 0, Troll

      As long as you are selfish, and don't mind buying things made in 3rd world sweatshops, then yes the choice is obvious.

      One of the reasons we purchase legos (both for our son, and as gifts for other kids) is that they are one of the few toys you can easily purchase which are still made in the first (or at least second) world. I suspect this will drive them to do more offshoring themselves, to reduce their costs. ...Sigh

    3. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Fishead · · Score: 4, Informative

      I agree. Mega blocks are crap.

      We picked up a huge bin at a garage sale last summer. Most of it was Lego, but there was just enough Mega Blocks to frustrate you. They don't fit right, they don't hold very good, and the colours suck.

      I am a big fan of competition. Hopefully this drives down the price of real legos.

      If they lost the trademark though, Mega Blocks can start marketing their product as lego. That would suck.

    4. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Pope · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My parents always bought me real Lego bricks, and I have practically all of those bricks/sets 30+ years on. They still click and snap like new. Good luck getting that kind of lifespan from the cheap knock-offs.

      Quality costs money, pure and simple. So, no, the choice isn't "obvious" at all.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    5. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by dubbreak · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly. This is old news. Mega Blocks have been around for years and this issue came up in north america quite a while ago. Lego lost their suit because they don't have a patent on the block design. Claiming that a block the same shape and size is a trademark infringement is a bit of a reach. The proper IP vehicle would have been a patent (though maybe the lego block design was unpatentable?).

      --
      "If you are going through hell, keep going." - Winston Churchill
    6. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Shrubbman · · Score: 1

      Even if the design was patentable, said patent would have expired decades ago by now anyway.

    7. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by tim_darklighter · · Score: 3, Informative

      When I was about 12 years old (1993), Megablocks used stickers as opposed to the painted-on details that LEGO used. The stickers would fall off within a few days, so things like faces and such went blank on Megablocks, whereas it took a lot more time to scratch the paint off of LEGO blocks. Megablocks also seemed very light and never seemed to snap together as tightly as my LEGO blocks. In short, even as a 12 year old, I thought they were inferior and continued asked for LEGO specifically since I didn't like the Megablocks that my friends had. LEGO bricks were just more fun.

      If these points are still true concerning both companies, then I am still willing to pay for a bin of $100 LEGO because they are the superior product. (Granted, I'm sure the $20 to $100 difference is exaggerated).

      On a related note, most of my LEGO are still in good shape, so I can just mix in my old blocks with my kids' new blocks, and voila, a cheaper alternative to buying whole new buckets.

    8. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by ettlz · · Score: 1

      One of the reasons we purchase legos (both for our son, and as gifts for other kids) is that they are one of the few toys you can easily purchase which are still made in the first (or at least second) world.

      ...BY ROBOTIC SLAVES. When Skynet gets serious, you realise that we'll all be forced at gunpoint to operate injection moulding machines?

    9. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      They're not going to lose the Lego trademark. The bricks themselves can't be the trademark, though.

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    10. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      "Second world" usually referred to the realm of Soviet Russia's control. It's an obsolete term, and Denmark wasn't in Soviet hands anyhow.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    11. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And this is the crux of the issue, IMHO.

      Pro: More companies will produce LEGO compatible parts, bring prices down and push availability up.

      Cons: LEGO has an incredibly high standard of quality for their product, and you can pretty much bet no other company will have that same commitment to quality.

      You get what you pay for.

      That said, though... Does this include their TECHNIC line of parts? 'cause they really don't seem to be producing the kits they used to. I wouldn't mind more bulk / non-specific project style boxes being available.
      =Smidge=

    12. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by 2short · · Score: 5, Informative

      "I agree. Mega blocks are crap.

      We picked up a huge bin at a garage sale last summer. "

      Older Mega blocks are crap. Mega Blocks produced in recent years are just as mechanically good as Lego, and after this decision might start looking as good too.

      Lego has had various varieties of legal protections on their blocks in various countries. They had some patents on elements of their production process that prevented others from making good blocks cheap; hence the crappy Mega Blocks. Those patents expired a while ago, so MegaBlocks became good.
          Lego still had a trademarks in various countries on the look of the iconic red brick. Hence the different colour scheme you don't like. That trademark is now gone, so expect Mega Blocks to start looking nice.
          Lego still has, and presumably always will have, a trademark on the name "Lego". So they'll continue to benefit from their (well deserved) reputation for quality, and charge more for their bricks. But MegaBlocks might, now, be just as good.

    13. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Arthur+B. · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably not, Lego factories are entirely robotized. Labor costs are not a big part of the production cost.

      That being said, your consuming choices reflect ignorance of economics, stick to selfish choices, you're smart enough to make those.

      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    14. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by jmhoule314 · · Score: 1

      (or at least second) world

      You mean communist countries under soviet power during the cold war?

    15. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Fallingcow · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I got a huge Mega Blocks tyrannosaurus set one year for Christmas.

      I never managed to assemble it--not for lack of trying, but because the blocks weren't capable of supporting the structure. Legos would have done it, no problem, but the Mega Blocks invariably came apart around 1/3 to 1/2 of the way through. Any more, and they'd fall apart under the weight. My parents even tried glueing some parts when they saw how much it sucked, but that didn't help; it would just break in different places.

      No grip. Can't build anything big with them. Certainly can't move even mid-sized things constructed from them, let alone play with your constructions. LAME.

    16. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incredible.

      That is a genuinely interesting and insightful comment apparently coming from Smidge207. But, in order to avoid wrecking his terrible karma, he goes A/C. What an odd personality.

      A/C 'cuz this has nothing to do with Legos...

    17. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by drquoz · · Score: 1

      Agreed. Mega Bloks don't even stick to themselves, let alone Legos. Well, every once in a while it'll work, but not often enough that you can build something by mixing sets. I wonder if this ruling extends to that abomination known as Bionicle....

    18. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It was in fact patentable iirc and patented, and it did expire. Shrug. Lego should get a life - they still make the best _quality_ blocks, using plastic that apparently doesn't age rapidly (unlike cheap-ass megablox). Fully lego-compatible pieces have been on sale here *in europe* since the late 1980s IIRC (it's just easier to distort the market in the USA due to even more ridiculously pro-corporate laws there). Fancy restaurants still do well even though McDonalds exists. Apple still exists even though PCs do. etc. etc.
      Lego should just position itself as the high-grade high-quality block maker and keep on trucking. Oh wait, they already did. Shrug.

      It's not irrational for them to fight it in the USA - what have they got to lose by trying to take maximal advantage of the shitty system? - but at the same time it's not the end of the world for lego.

       

    19. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As long as you are selfish, and don't mind buying things made in 3rd world sweatshops, then yes the choice is obvious.

      One of the reasons we purchase legos (both for our son, and as gifts for other kids) is that they are one of the few toys you can easily purchase which are still made in the first (or at least second) world. I suspect this will drive them to do more offshoring themselves, to reduce their costs. ...Sigh

      That's right. We shouldn't be sending manufacturing to those Third World Sweat Shops! Those people should be cutting down their Rain Forests for the exotic wood so that Yuppie Wannabes can have their fancy paneling, boat decks, furniture, etc...! They should also be poaching the endangered animals in their forests and seas! Both of which pay peanuts compared to working in a sweat shop!

      Indeed, we need to stop exploiting those poor people and let them go back to ruining their national treasures and destroy the World faster!

      Yeah, it would be so much simpler if the World could be judged by one issue at a time. Something most activists fail to comprehend.

    20. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Black+Cardinal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Older Mega blocks are crap. Mega Blocks produced in recent years are just as mechanically good as Lego, and after this decision might start looking as good too.

      We bought our Mega Bloks new two years ago. Unless they changed their materials very recently, I think they are still pretty bad.

    21. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by fractoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I can guarantee you that quality from one supplier who has an exclusive license costs a lot more money than quality amongst competition from different suppliers.

      Also, if it's protected by copyright then only cheap knockoff companies manufacturing in third world sweatshops will be willing to risk a lawsuit, whereas classier, higher-quality shops will shy away. Without IP encumbrance, you'll be able to get... more expensive knockoffs. ;)

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    22. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by scifigod · · Score: 1

      Unless Mega Blocks stepped up their game in the last decade quality was always the biggest justification for the price difference between the two. With LEGO unless someone/thing had been chewing on or intentionally deforming the bricks you could be almost certain that two randomly selected bricks from your pile would fit together well. Mega Blocks on the other would be lucky to have them fit together at all let alone stay together.

    23. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by mowall · · Score: 1

      We picked up a huge bin at a garage sale last summer.

      So, it was you!

    24. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by TrickFred · · Score: 1

      Still cheaper to buy Mega Bloks and refresh/replace them every year when they start to get worn inside. We usually have to buy a new bucket full once a year or so anyways, due to the inevitable 'shrinkage' - vacuum cleaner, swept up with other detritus when cleaning, spread around the house, or the Bermuda Triangle Effect (they just seem to disappear slowly after a time, just like all the forks in our house - frickin' weird).

    25. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      Lego blocks are made in Denmark. Where are Mega Bloks made? Perhaps they're manufactured in a 3rd world country? Where adding lead or poisonous chemicals is ok if it helps cut costs? Do your kids ever put those blocks in their mouths? Just wondering.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    26. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by 2short · · Score: 2, Informative


      I notice in your other post, you mention Duplo: one of Lego's oversize, toddler-frienly lines. MegaBloks also makes some over-size toddler blocks, but I don't know if they have a specific name for them. My experience with those is that Duplo blocks hold together better, but are harder for little, poorly coordinated hands to stick together. So I take that to be an intentionally different design decision.

      In any case, the trademark decision at hand, and my post, is not about the toddler blocks. It's about the little blocks, which Lego calls "Lego" and MegaBloks confusingly just calls "MegaBloks" too. For those, MegaBloks are just a direct knockoff of Legos. In my judgment, a mechanically indistinguishable one in recent years.

    27. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by TrickFred · · Score: 1

      No offense meant at all, but my kids are 8 and 2, and aren't anal-retentive collectors that keep everything pristine - they're rough on their stuff, like normal kids, and lose pieces frequently, and I'm more willing to pay Mega Blok prices to replenish the stocks than Lego prices.

    28. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by sorak · · Score: 1

      Was it that they lost their trademark, or that the block specs are not considered part of the trademark? The word "Lego" appears to be the only thing that ever should have been trademarked in the first place. The rest of it could have been patented, however (<laughs>).

    29. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by MouseR · · Score: 1

      The first MegaBlocks were really crappy. In recent years, though, they've upped the quality of the plastics considerably.

      They also have nice designs but tend to be more specific pieces rather than generic reusable ones across models.

      Time will tell if MegaBlocks will withstand the test of heavy usage.

      Lego blocks have a strong reputation as being near-indestructible.

    30. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by idontgno · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, Comrade, the industrial design trademark was based on the red 2x4 bloc. You tell me.

      (Cue the "in Soviet Europe" jokes...)

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    31. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Loozrboy · · Score: 1

      Although I swore off Mega Blocks as uselessly shoddy Lego imitations after one purchase, as far as I'm aware (and for what little it's worth, Wikipedia backs me up on this), Mega Blocks are made in Canada, which is not, technically, a third world country. Not even Quebec!

    32. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Spand · · Score: 1

      They have production, packaging and distribution facilities in Poland (which I guess could be called 2nd world country).
      LEGO has been very busy in outsourcing any production in the last 10 years. The company has been bleeding for a long time and its only recently they seem to be doing better. Pretty sure we wont have any LEGO left in Denmark in 10 years :(
      Well, except for LEGOLAND which they dont even own anymore.

    33. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Black+Cardinal · · Score: 1

      I guess I was talking about the toddler version of Mega Bloks, which is what we have. At least, they are the same size as Duplo. They are still just called "Mega Bloks" on the tub, though.

      I've never used the Lego-sized version of Mega Bloks, so I can't comment on them.

      You're right about Duplo (and Lego) sticking together so solidly that they can be hard to take apart. I'd rather help my son with that part than have him frustrated by blocks that keep falling apart on their own when he's trying to build something, though.

    34. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhmm, sorry to disappoint you, but they closed the Assembly facility in CT or whereever it was, and last I'd heard were producing the majority of their new bricks in Malaysia or China or somewhere due to insufficient profit from manufacturing them in first world countries due to cost of living.

      This was on slashdot a while back in fact.

    35. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Pope · · Score: 1

      None taken. I wasn't a 'collector' as a kid either, routinely building my own versions of "Smash 'em Up Derby" with my friends, or more likely building cars with the sole purpose of hurling them off tall ramps and seeing how far they could go.

      I'm still of the opinion that fewer, better quality toys is the way to go, regardless of age :)

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    36. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No grip. Can't build anything big with them. Certainly can't move even mid-sized things constructed from them, let alone play with your constructions. LAME.

      No wireless, either...

    37. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      We picked up a huge bin at a garage sale last summer.

      So, it was you!

      Don't they call them car-port sales there?

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    38. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by vux984 · · Score: 1

      My kids have been playing with Mega Bloks for years. When you can buy big buckets of them for $20 when Lego costs $100 or more for the bigger sets, well, the choice is obvious.

      Cheap = Good for parents

      More != Better

      Why do you hate your children? Megabloks don't hold together at all. You turn something upside down, or try and actually play with it, and it just falls apart. When I was a child I'd rather receive a small set of Lego than a big bucket of megabloks.

    39. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LEGO has gone to stickers. Even the eye bricks are stickers. It's not so bad. The stickers are nice quality. The only complaint I've got is that they are putting out some stickers that straddle multiple bricks.

    40. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Older Mega blocks are crap. Mega Blocks produced in recent years are just as mechanically good as Lego, and after this decision might start looking as good too."

      Strongly disagree - bought my son a pirate ship set last christmas and the thing has no cohesive capabilities whatsoever - Lego kicks Mega Bloks out of the water.

      It was so bad that in the end, I glued the ship together.

      The plastic used by Mega Bloks is incredibly cheap.

    41. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Shome · · Score: 1

      We bought Mega blocks for my son about 18 months back. I don't remember the colour etc, but the build quality was poor. I remember my son complaining about the quality - the structures build were not as stable as one expects them to be. Last week, he wanted a Lego for Christmas and I offered him to look at Mega as alternative - the same amount can buy something bigger etc... He flatly refused to consider on the ground of quality. Some lesson for Mega there...

      --

      ~Once you have your choices narrowed down, the rest will fall into place.
    42. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Rorschach1 · · Score: 1

      I was in China last year and picked up a knock-off Lego set for my daughter. I wound up helping her put it together, and from what I remember the bricks were nearly indistinguishable from Lego. They seem to be ABS as far as I can tell, though I didn't do a flame test or anything. The big flat base pieces were too thin and a little unstable maybe, but the bricks themselves (while being restricted to the variety of styles Lego had maybe 30 years ago) were just fine.

      So, Mega Bloks aside, expect to see more of these knock-offs in the very near future if this decision sticks.

    43. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      I played with Legos extensively before getting married at 30 :) Seriously, I bought hundreds of dollars of Legos in my 20s, and my kids now build the most fabulous things out of them. I still have my original set which is about 35 years old at this point, and still in great shape. I'm giving you this background to let you know that Legos are just something I give my kids, they are something with which I am intimately familiar.

      On occasion, my kids will receive megabloks as a gift from someone. While the blocks are the same size, and fit with Legos, it's obvious that the plastic is of a different quality. They don't lock as well and have a different luster to them. They feel brittle. My kids have only a few of them, yet I can easily spot them in a pile of bricks.

      Anyway, we don't buy them. I don't want to sound like a snob, but I just like the look and feel of Legos better, and the fact that mine are still like new after 35 years says a lot.

    44. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by spike2131 · · Score: 1

      Granted, I'm sure the $20 to $100 difference is exaggerated

      Its not. We got a tub of 250 Mega Blocks for about $22. A 90 piece Duplo set sells for $139 on Amazon.

      On the other hand, in addition to a somewhat lower quality, the Mega Blocks have a pretty uninteresting assortment of blocks, while the Duplos come with a bunch of specialty pieces.

      Still, if you are going for volume, Mega Blocks is way more economical.

      --
      SpyDock: Scientific Python in a Docker container
    45. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by TrickFred · · Score: 1

      Quality over quantity is definitely valid, I concur. But my kids' better quality toys are books (My 8 year old asks for books for Xmas, bless his heart), so I don't feel guilty cheaping out on the 'knock-off' blocks which aren't taken care of nearly as well. Hope that helps justify my position - that, and Lego must be more expensive in Canada then the US, since I seem to be the only one mentioning the obscenely high price. :D

    46. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      for some reason my son loves the smallness of Lego-original. I gave him hydrox(big ones) once he didn't take to them.

      Its that small=cute factor.

    47. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Truder · · Score: 1

      Claiming that a block the same shape and size is a trademark infringement is a bit of a reach.

      I can't help but think of the iconic Coca Cola bottle. That particular shape of bottle is trademarked. Why would that be different from the shape of Lego bricks?

    48. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Ifandbut · · Score: 1

      I have to submit a counter example. My parents bought me a Aircraft Carrier set from Mega Blocks years ago. It had over 1000 pieces. It went together like a champ and to this day I can pick it up and carry it with one hand on each end (it is almost 2ft long). It does feel lighter then I would think a similar model made from Legos would but it was a) cheap and b) took me a good 2 or 3 days to put it together.

      I found it on amazon.com: http://www.amazon.com/Mega-Bloks-Pro-Builders-Nimitz/dp/B0006H60HO

    49. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Yuan-Lung · · Score: 1

      I have a hunch that the toddler line of Mega Blocks is aiming at an even lower age group. The difference maybe more in the design requirement.

      My son (3yro) an daughter (1yro) can easily construct simple structures with the softer and more lose fitting Mega Blocks that we had purchased at various garage sales.

      We also got a bucket of oversized lego, which are more rigid and fit tighter. They prefer the Mega Blocks because the lego is "too hard". I've packed the lego away and plan to have them try again maybe in another year or two.

      Also that I would never buy lego other than from garage sale and second hand stores. They are usually way overpriced and the newer kits are so full of specialized pieces that they leave little room for imagination.

    50. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      We picked up a huge bin at a garage sale last summer.

      So, it was you!

      Don't they call them car-port sales there?

      Car boot sales (a boot being english for the "trunk" of a car) are different to American Garage sales because, as the name suggests to put all your junk in the car, drive it to a field along with a couple of hundred other people and try to sell your stuff out of the back. The concept of a garage sale (i.e. putting all your stuff in the front garden and trying to sell it from there) doesn't really exist over here.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    51. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      Bionicle = Lego.

    52. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I've never used the Lego-sized version of Mega Bloks, so I can't comment on them.

      I can. They suck too.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    53. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by PitaBred · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is exaggerated IMHO. 650 basic pieces including wheels and a base and windows and such for $30 in the US... that's not too bad, especially since you know the quality is going to be top-notch. If you don't want all the do-dads and just want a plain rectangular based block assortment, that's only $25 for 650 pieces.

    54. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      No grip. Can't build anything big with them. Certainly can't move even mid-sized things constructed from them, let alone play with your constructions. LAME.

      Less space than a nomad...

    55. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Tom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I can guarantee you that quality from one supplier who has an exclusive license costs a lot more money than quality amongst competition from different suppliers.

      They thought that when they opened the energy, telecom, train and many other markets.

      Judging from today's perspective, it turns out that the telecom market is the only one where something along the lines of what was promised has actually happened. In most of the other markets, quality has dropped, prices have gone up. Whoops, the exact opposite of what should have happened.

      Why? Two reasons.
      One, it turns out the former state-owned monopolies did actually take in monopoly rent, but since they had no compulsion to make profit, they spent it again and often on good things, such as quality, employee satisfaction and research. All things that make the product better.
      Two, the promised "market competition" doesn't happen in markets that naturally favour monopolies or oligopolies. Any market with huge entry costs works like that, because after consolidation few players ever enter the market again. Energy market is the prime example here.

      So, in other words, no, competition alone will not necessarily make the product any cheaper nor better.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    56. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by drquoz · · Score: 1

      I know. I was just wondering if this ruling also includes Bionicle, because they're not really like Legos even though Lego makes them.

    57. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Just the block shape/size. "Lego" is still trademarked.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    58. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      The design is patentable, the product isn't...

      An identical product by a different process wouldn't violate the patent.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    59. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Legos can often be bought cheaply at garage sales if you don't mind getting some Mega Blocks mixed in with them...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    60. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do they use Mindstorms robots in the factories?

    61. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be unpatentable now in the US - it is not new or non-obvious, it known & on sale here for many years - but it has also been well more than the term of patent and would have expired already.

    62. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by jabithew · · Score: 1

      Don't they call them car-port sales there?

      I have lived in England all my life and I've never heard "car-port". What does it mean?

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    63. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by jabithew · · Score: 1

      The energy market and train market examples are misleading. The "train market" doesn't exist. The rail network is a heavily regulated network of private monopolies. The prices are rising because the government mandates that fares have to rise a minimum 2% over inflation p.a. in order for the rail companies to pay them for the privilege of running a railway*.

      The energy market is liberalised *in the UK*. The rest of Europe still has massive taxpayer-subsidised behemoths which just came in and took over. State interference in the energy market hasn't gone, it's just different states**. Also, we have no gas storage capacity, which has caused other problems.

      I think your argument about natural monopoly is a good one, especially with railways. There's little reason the energy market couldn't be dramatically liberalised though.

      * Source:The Private Eye
      **E.ON, npower are German, EdF French.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    64. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by maestroX · · Score: 1

      I can guarantee you that quality from one supplier who has an exclusive license costs a lot more money than quality amongst competition from different suppliers.

      Nice theory, but it's the quality that will suffer. You pay the same or more, because you'll have to purchase again and again (insert favorite router,car,electronics reference here).

      Lego is the deal of a century, because it lasts a century.

    65. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Rary · · Score: 1

      If they lost the trademark though, Mega Blocks can start marketing their product as lego. That would suck.

      This is about a trademark on the design of the block, not a trademark on the name "Lego". Also, they didn't lose a trademark. They were applying for a new trademark on the design and it was turned down.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    66. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by initdeep · · Score: 1

      i have a friend with two different carriers and the space shuttle models sitting in his den.

      they've moved houses with him as assembled pieces....

      i think they work just fine.

      me personally, i stopped supporting lego when it became near impossible to just build something out of one of their sets.

      i have 30 sets from my youth and can remember building all kinds of things with the sets because they came with a few specialized pieces and then a whole bunch of regular pieces.

      the galaxy commander comes to mind.

    67. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Lego uses a red 2x4 standard block as their trademark. They were using trademark law to prevent others from making red 2x4 blocks. This new ruling means that they have lost the ability to prevent others from manufacturing red 2x4 blocks, simply because that is their trademark.

      The blocks were patented, however these patents have expired. Perhaps it is this patent expiration that is behind the move from generic blocks to "dedicated" sets.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    68. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Xtifr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Primarily because the shape of the Lego brick is functional, while the shape of the Coca Cola bottle is not. You cannot trademark functional elements. Thus, while the cosmetic curves and ribbing of the bottle may be trademarked, the fact that it is a hollow, more-or-less cylindrical shape, narrowing at the top, cannot.

      This also means that many specialized Lego bricks could probably be trademarked, but the generic ones cannot. Of course, with the specialized ones, they might have to show that they actually are associated with their brand, and not just random shapes that happen to carry the brand.

    69. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Rary · · Score: 1

      Where are Mega Bloks made? Perhaps they're manufactured in a 3rd world country? Where adding lead or poisonous chemicals is ok if it helps cut costs?

      According to Wikipedia: "Most blocks are manufactured in Canada, but some of the more specialized elements are made in China."

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    70. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Faylone · · Score: 1

      from wikipedia: A carport is a structure used to offer limited protection to vehicles, primarily cars, from the elements. The structure can either be free standing or attached to a wall. Unlike most structures a carport does not have four walls, and is mostly commonly found with only two. Carports offer less protection than garages but allow for more ventilation.

    71. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Arthur+B. · · Score: 1
      --
      \u262D = \u5350
    72. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by icebrain · · Score: 1

      Instead of an enclosed garage, some houses just have a covered area under which the car is parked.

      --
      The meek may inherit the earth, but the strong shall take the stars.
    73. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Legos? What's a Legos?

      Peoples from the USAs keep calling Lego 'Legos'. I don't know why they do its. It sounds very sillys to someones from Europes.

    74. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seen this really beautiful solar tower yet? Here's the best picture I could find of it in operation.

      That's still not really cheap, and it wont replace all gas/oil/cole/nuclear plants... but imho it's another nice step into the right direction :)

    75. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      It also would have cost $800 if were a Lego set.

    76. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by PolygamousRanchKid+ · · Score: 1

      My parents always bought me real Lego bricks, and I have practically all of those bricks/sets 30+ years on.

      Similar story with me, except that my nephew has all those bricks/sets . . . and is old enough that he doesn't use them any longer.

      They still click and snap like new.

      That's what my nephew says . . . we'll see in a couple of years what my grand-nephew says.

      --
      Schroedinger's Brexit: The UK is both in and out of the EU at the same time!
    77. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      Canada.

      I'd be more worried about what's in the Putine than what's in the bricks.

    78. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by B+Nesson · · Score: 1

      Considering that a few weeks ago, for the first time in my life, a set I bought contained a slightly defective piece, and one email to LEGO got a replacement part in the mail immediately, no questions asked, yeah I think the choice is obvious.

      I'm willing to pay a premium for the kind of quality control that keeps a regular purchaser from experiencing any issues with missing or defective pieces for a quarter of a century.

    79. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Smidge207 · · Score: 0, Informative

      *YOU* are not Smidge.

      =Smidge=

      --
      Is it just my observation, or is eldavojohn an idiot?
    80. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be nice to have lego-compatable bricks. But legos will still be of higher quality. (Unless they get stupid about price wars or something.)

      The way I'd see it is that the real Lego bricks will be used where fit or finish really matters, but the cheapo yet compatable knock-offs will be used for filler. This means you could build bigger models, because large areas of walls are made of the cheap blocks where it doesn't matter, but where the doors and windows are, use the real Legos. Same for vehicles, fill in space with cheapos, but any moving parts will have to be the real deal.

    81. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by toxfox · · Score: 1

      Granted, MegaBloks don't hold together at all, but sometimes this is a plus. MegaBloks worked better for us in the toddler years, when the child's goal is simply building and destroying basic towers. Duplo was actually frustrating for our toddler - the building process could get your fingers pinched and the structures were far too well assembled to allow for satisfying destruction. As you move further into the preschool and design becomes a consideration, that's the time to move to the far superior Duplo/Lego sets.

    82. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by mrwolf007 · · Score: 1

      So how come the price tag is $999.99 for it on amazon?

    83. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by David+Nabbit · · Score: 1

      Perhaps the GP meant car park.

      --
      "Her idea of wit is nothing more than an incisive observation humorously phrased and delivered with impeccable timing."
    84. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      Because they don't make it anymore.

    85. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      While they were obviously thinking about size compatibility with lego from the start mega blocks original product (now called maxi) was actually a size that as far as I can tell lego never produced, then they moved down the sizes first to duplo size, then to lego size.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    86. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      In my experiance that depends what you want to do with the lego bricks. If you just want to build houses or similar then yes, if you want to do anything more complex then no. I've had plenty of designs fail to work correctly because of tooth marks making the effective size of the bricks ever so slightly taller and thereby jamming things up.

      I notice modern lego technic/mindstorms seems to have largely abandoned the brick together design and I wonder if this is the reason.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    87. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mega blocks are for n1ggers.

    88. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by superbeeper · · Score: 1

      Mega Blocks produced in recent years are just as mechanically good as Lego

      ...and even if they don't break...THEY WON'T FIT! If any of the true lego nerds out there have ever tried to build anything relatively substantial with a combination of Mega Bloks and Lego, they have probably come to notice that, when stacking "standard" bricks, which have a thickness 3x that of "plate" bricks, the Bloks are actually slightly short, not necessarily enough for one to notice in one layer, but just enough to create a frustrating lopsided-ness and structural flaws in big enough models. This offset also tends to be by some impossible increment, such as 1/6th of a brick-height... SO THERE.

    89. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by Megane · · Score: 1

      That's called a "flea market" here over in the USA. Except for the bit about selling right out of the car. A proper flea market has tables for you to put your stuff, where it is easier to see.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    90. Re:Cheap = Good for parents by VJ42 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, there are usually tables at ours as well, but AFAIK it's up to the stall holder to bring their own, so somtimes stuff is layed out on the ground instead, and if you look closely you can somtimes spot bargins that are still in the car because the stall holder hasn't put them on display yet, or has run out of display space etc.

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
  7. Re:Obligatory by airedalez · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Maybe I meant... All your blocks are belong to us...

  8. Hardly a shocker by Xeth · · Score: 1

    There have been Lego knockoffs for years. But they're just not as high quality. Lego blocks are expensive because they are made to exacting tolerances, and last for a long time.

    Don't expect that off-brand statue to stand on its own, Rob.

    --
    If your theory is different from practice, then your theory is wrong.
    1. Re:Hardly a shocker by Kamokazi · · Score: 1

      I agree. Even as a kid, the offbrands didn't feel as sturdy as lego bricks. And their set variety sucked and was not as interesting.

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    2. Re:Hardly a shocker by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      I had some brand of knock-offs that were indistinguishable in quality from Lego. There are only a couple ways to tell them apart: No "lego" printed on the tops of the studs, and they were based on half-heights instead of 1/3 heights. So the full height blocks were indistinguishable, construction-wise. Now, if I could just remember the name of the brand....

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    3. Re:Hardly a shocker by Mr+Z · · Score: 1

      Sounds like Tyco blocks to me.

    4. Re:Hardly a shocker by 2short · · Score: 1

      "There have been Lego knockoffs for years. But they're just not as high quality."

      Because Lego patented their production process, and trademarked the color scheme; people couldn't make good knockoffs if they wanted to. These legal protections have now expired: the patents a while ago, the trademarks with this decision.

      "Lego blocks are expensive because they are made to exacting tolerances, and last for a long time."

      I believe you're judging the knockoffs by the ones you had years ago (or which were made years ago). Modern, post-patent expiration MegaBlocks are as good as Lego. Of course, there's a lot of old, crappy Megablocks out in the world, so I expect Lego can keep charging a premium for the perceived superiority of their brand.
          But if you're buying new blocks today, you can potentially save yourself a lot of money by comparing the products as they are today.

  9. ISO Standard by ryanguill · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think they ought to take the ruling in stride and just open source the bricks. Make them an ISO standard, but continue to provide quality over quantity. Then let the Canadian company do the cheap bricks so that we can build whatever we want out of bulk. Wish they would do this with the mindstorm stuff too!

    1. Re:ISO Standard by amorsen · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's actually damn hard to make the bricks. Lego found this out when they outsourced production a few years ago. It turned out to be a bad deal both for Flextronics and Lego, so now the factories are all back under direct Lego management.

      --
      Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    2. Re:ISO Standard by WillDraven · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I used to do QA for Flextronics, so it's no surprise to me that it didn't end well. The majority of their workforce gets brought in from headhunter temp services like Manpower, told they'll be offered a permanent position when their temp contract runs out, and then let go right beforehand. The result is a never ending stream of untrained employees trying to adapt to a new position. The line i was testing (pill dispenser machines for walgreens pharmacies) had so many problems it was a miracle we shipped any machines at all.

      On a slightly related note, those pill machines seemed rather unsafe to me. They had a robotic arm such the pills out of a hopper through a plastic tube and shoot them into a waiting pill bottle. While it sounds like a nice idea in principle, the longer i worked there the more i thought about how real pills wouldnt be as resistant to breaking up or just rubbing in the tube and leaving drug residue all on the insides as the plastic fake pills we tested with. The risk for harmful interactions from contamination made me resolve to never get my prescriptions filled at walgreens anymore.

      --
      This is my sig. There are many like it but this one is mine.
    3. Re:ISO Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if that explains my 50th anniversary set that the blocks won't stay locked together for crap.

    4. Re:ISO Standard by laederkeps · · Score: 1

      The new NXT generation of Lego Mindstorms is open source.
      You may download the source code for the operating system of the "intelligent brick".
      They released an "SDK" as well as binary format specs to be used for making your own programming environment; that is, you can make your own tools that generate programs for your robots
      They even released specifications and plans for the hardware in use, as well as documentation for the interfaces between sensors and the NXT, among other things.
      How much more of a warm, fuzzy feeling can you get?
      Source for the above

    5. Re:ISO Standard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The dose is the poison" - Paracelsus
      Minute residue of drugs is not likely to hurt you at all. It's probably more dangerous drinking tap water with its harmful poisons like chlorine. :)

    6. Re:ISO Standard by jimicus · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the US, but in the UK I can't remember the last time I had a prescription drug that was dispensed in one of those small generic bottles by the pharmacist who had a dirty great tub of the pills round the back.

      Most tablets these days seem to come packaged in push-through-foil type packaging.

    7. Re:ISO Standard by brianosaurus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That will probably happen in a few years. First, the TBAA (Toy Brick Association of America) will have to bribe the government to pass new trademark laws protecting the sanctity of Lego Bricks. Next they can build clout by suing any children found interlocking Lego bricks with other brands, mostly in John Doe cases, with mass subpoenas sent to preschools and day care centers in effort to discover the identities of potential offenders.

      After that action *totally* works, the TBAA can then get the US Congress to put pressures on the Europeans to bring their trademark laws "up to date", and allow Lego to continue bringing in the revenue they deserve.

      If it works as well as it did for the RIAA and MPAA, we should have open source bricks before too long. :)

      --
      blog
    8. Re:ISO Standard by Ifandbut · · Score: 1

      That's really cool. I kinda want to get the new generation now. My old Mindstorms brick became a brick a few years ago.

    9. Re:ISO Standard by Neoprofin · · Score: 1

      Might not be the best time to bring up the research from earlier in the year that shows tap water is rife with prescription drugs that people have flushed down their toilets.

  10. Huge Lego Block Nelson Says Ha-Ha! by resistant · · Score: 1

    Forgive me, O! All-Father of Trademarks. I shall do penance with a huge Lego block construction of Marge looking sad and concerned.

    --
    A truly excellent pizza parlor is a delight unto the heavens. Treasure the sauce and the toppings!
    1. Re:Huge Lego Block Nelson Says Ha-Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not make it entirely out of Blocko brand assembly fun blocks?

    2. Re:Huge Lego Block Nelson Says Ha-Ha! by cthulu_mt · · Score: 1

      Krusty(TM) Brand Super-Flammable Carcinogenic Fun Blocks(TM)!

      Now with 30% more choking hazard!

      Hey! Hey! Kids!

      --
      Virginia is for lovers. EVE is for griefers.
    3. Re:Huge Lego Block Nelson Says Ha-Ha! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Warning!

      Electrocution hazard, do not leave in reach of children.

  11. Inexpensive Legos? by demonbug · · Score: 1

    Yay, time for some cheap Chinese knock-offs. Just watch out for the lead paint!

    I wonder if there will soon be a whole section of Lego-compatible bricks in the toy store.

    We zijn net opgekocht door een Nederlands bedrijf, dus moet ik borstel op mijn Nederlands.

    1. Re:Inexpensive Legos? by Aliencow · · Score: 1

      I don't know if you just said that because it's obvious this is going to happen, or were you making a point about the fact that Mega-Brands was involved in the Chinese crap / knockoff lead scandals recently?

      They almost went bankrupt too!

    2. Re:Inexpensive Legos? by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      We zijn net opgekocht door een Nederlands bedrijf, dus moet ik borstel op mijn Nederlands

      Een goeie idee, zeker... maar ik moet het zeggen dat de beste kans voor Nederlands leren is een mooie Nederlandse meisje als vriendin te hebben (het lukte voor mij!) ;)

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
    3. Re:Inexpensive Legos? by simplu · · Score: 1

      They already are. Totally compatible. Very cheap plastic, not so carefully painted. But almost 10 times cheaper.

      --
      L.
  12. OLS by Ambiguous+Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So, what Lego needs to do now is publish the OLS, or Open Lego Standard. Seriously, when it becomes obvious you're going to lose the battle, maybe it's time to embrace the alternative? Instead of fighting to keep your ideas out of the hands of others, fight to make sure that *everyone* uses your idea. It makes your assets valuable in a different way. This way, they'll still have control over the standard, and if products meet the standard, they get branded with "OLS Compliant!" and consumers know that if they buy "OLS Compliant!" parts, they'll work with their other "OLS Compliant!" parts, which makes consumers very happy, which makes the standard valuable.

    -G

    --
    Their may be a grammatical error, misspeling, or evn a typo in this post.
    1. Re:OLS by CRiMSON · · Score: 0

      But this makes sense, and therefore can never come to pasture!

      --
      oogly boogly!
    2. Re:OLS by hansamurai · · Score: 1

      Let's send this idea through ISO now, I'm sure it can be fast tracked into a real ISO/IEC Standard before Lego Open Standard realizes what hit them.

    3. Re:OLS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OLS Capable
      OLS Ready
      OLS Compliant
      OLS Certified

    4. Re:OLS by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      OLS For Sure

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    5. Re:OLS by philspear · · Score: 3, Funny

      This way, they'll still have control over the standard, and if products meet the standard, they get branded with "OLS Compliant!" and consumers know that if they buy "OLS Compliant!" parts, they'll work with their other "OLS Compliant!" parts, which makes consumers very happy, which makes the standard valuable.

      Times have really changed. Back when I was buying legos, I was only concerned with whether or not I'd have enough to build a spaceship. Kids these days with their obsession with open source... They should just stick with microsoft legos.

    6. Re:OLS by mumblestheclown · · Score: 1

      While your comment is sure to be modded up in slashdot, it is beyond naive in the extreme. "OLS compliance" has no value whatsoever as far as lego is concerned. Rather, lego has to do quite the opposite - they need to continue polishing their OWN band in other to be able to extract prices higher than the competitive equilibrium price. it would take about a microsecond of thought to realize that this is worth more than any royalties lego would receive for "OLS compliance" certification. I suspect the people who run lego actually have business degrees, and didn't graduate from the slashdot school of naive blather where "make sure everybody uses your idea" street cred is worth more than actual money.

    7. Re:OLS by Constantine+XVI · · Score: 1

      I know I'm killing the mood, but Lego actually seems to be sorta OSS friendly, they opened up the firmware for the Mindstorms NXT bricks and you can program them in nearly anything

      --
      "I think an etch-a-sketch with an ethernet port would beat IE7 in web standards compliance."
    8. Re:OLS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What test cases need to be present in OLS compliancy test suite?
        * 2x4 Red color scheme compatibility test?
        * How about technic compatibility? Is that add-on module or compulsory test suite?
        * Bionicle extension module?

    9. Re:OLS by Ambiguous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Wow, you're kind of a prick when you disagree with someone. :)

      So what you're saying is that, even though as time progresses, it looks more and more like they can't win this, they should just keep sinking money into it, even after it's long-since dead? At some point, they're going to lose the exclusive right to make these things, I absolutely guarantee it. I would *hope* that anyone with an actual business degree (rather than a degree from the aforementioned slashdot school of naive blather) would have the foresight to realize this and start pursuing alternative venues before they are actually needed. If you wait until you can't survive without it, you're too late. All I did was suggest one possible option, but thanks for chiming in.

      Are you one of these actual-business-degree-holders? If so, you don't happen to work for Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac, do you? That might explain something.

      -G

      --
      Their may be a grammatical error, misspeling, or evn a typo in this post.
    10. Re:OLS by dtabraha · · Score: 1

      But then Mega Bloks can come out with a competing format OBF (Open Block Format) and get it fast tracked through ECMA! (See ooxml vs. odf)

    11. Re:OLS by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 1

      The tricky bit is that what makes Lego lego isn't rocket science, there's nothing about the the mechanical design that 10 minutes and a set of calipers wouldn't tell you; but fiddly adherence to fine tolerances and materials is absolutely necessary. Lego's own attempt to outsource production didn't go well, and I have a hard time imagining it going better for others.

    12. Re:OLS by jimicus · · Score: 1

      But what's the business benefit?

      Any idiot can figure out what specifications a block needs in order to interoperate with Lego. All you need is a few bricks and a reasonably accurate vernier gauge. Pushing an open standard would cost Lego money - and seeing as many aspects of their blocks don't benefit from any form of IP protection, they'd wind up being one certifier amongst many.

      And besides which, when was the last time a particular certification made any difference to what people buy when they see a shelf full of toys? We're talking about individual parents here, not businesses who want to meet ISO standards.

      Now, mass producing high quality blocks that last 20 years or more with no significant distortion or colour change - that's a little more tricky. And it's something that Lego have got pretty well worked out.

    13. Re:OLS by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      The value of the standard is meaningless to Lego, because Lego can't sell the standard.

    14. Re:OLS by Ambiguous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Right, so Lego can offer a certification process. Not only do your pieces have to physically interconnect, but they also have to meet some standards, such as flammability, rigidity, durability, age-appropriateness, etc. And going through this certification process may very well be expensive. But in the end, your pieces are endorsed by Lego--THE Lego.

      This would offer the same benefits as any other product-certification. I'm guessing companies don't certify products from other companies just because they get a big kick out of it. There's a business model here, and Lego is in a position to exploit it.

      And as for the end-user, the parent, I imagine that would come down to marketing. Convince the market that non-lego-certified is shit (i.e. old-skool megabloks) and people will buy the certified ones instead. Why do you think store shelves are lined with Lego products instead of the cheap knock-offs? There are perfectly legal Lego-like products out there, and they're cheaper, but they just don't have the acceptance f Lego. This would potentially allow Lego to sell that product acceptance to those willing to pay the price.

      Or even better, forget the end-users entirely. Contract with the distributors (i.e. Wal-Mart, et. al.) to only sell the Lego-certified product lines. For the right price, I bet they'd be willing to, and that gives the Lego-certified lines total market dominance.

      That may run afoul of anti-competitive behavior laws, though, but hey, that's why you have lawyers, to figure those piddling details out. ;)

      -G

      --
      Their may be a grammatical error, misspeling, or evn a typo in this post.
    15. Re:OLS by jimicus · · Score: 1

      And as for the end-user, the parent, I imagine that would come down to marketing. Convince the market that non-lego-certified is shit (i.e. old-skool megabloks) and people will buy the certified ones instead.

      Except that nobody to my knowledge has ever successfully done this. The IT industry is actually quite a good example - it's full of certifications like USB 2, and logos that actually mean something - yet we still see cheap knock-off hardware without the certifications, without the logos in the shops that frankly should never have left the factory.

    16. Re:OLS by Yvan256 · · Score: 1

      They can sell the standard, the logo and the approbation, much like VESA does for TV wall mounts.

    17. Re:OLS by Ambiguous+Coward · · Score: 1

      But isn't that going to happen no matter what? I guess the question is: would you rather have nothing but rocky shoals, or would you rather have rocky shoals with a lighthouse, even if some ships choose to ignore it?

      -G

      P.S. The ships are the customers in this analogy. Just so you know. :P

      --
      Their may be a grammatical error, misspeling, or evn a typo in this post.
    18. Re:OLS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect the people who run lego actually have business degrees

      Not at the top. It's a family business and people like Kjeld Kirk Kristiansen (CEO from 1979 to 2004) learned in the real world. I don't have much faith in the current crop of MBAs. They seem clueless about the real world and full of arrogance about the importance of their educations.

    19. Re:OLS by B+Nesson · · Score: 1

      2008: Year of Megablocks on the Desktop!

    20. Re:OLS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somehow I don't think kids or parents are going to take notice of stuff like "OLS Compliant!"

    21. Re:OLS by DriveMelter · · Score: 1

      I wonder if such a standard would include the use of other materials. If we had steel lego in long thin beams 1 x 200 then interesting bridges could be made.

    22. Re:OLS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then again: every printer from the past 30 years is Centronics compatible, but have you seen a Centronics branded printer lately?

  13. Bets on how long Legos exist? by Nylathotep · · Score: 1

    Now that they can't charge $50 for a few dozen bricks, I can't imagine them surviving. Expect layoffs and diminished lines.

    On one hand, it's kinda cool, because for a very long time their product has been way overpriced.

    On the other hand, it'll be an end of an era.

    Too bad they aren't a US company. We probably could of just given them a 75 billion dollar bail out.

    1. Re:Bets on how long Legos exist? by nasch · · Score: 1

      There are already knockoff Legos, and Lego is still doing just fine. They are not going to halve their prices, they are not going to shut their doors, and people will continue to buy their products.

      Start worrying about Lego when somebody else starts making totally compatible, equally high quality pieces in interesting sets for less money.

    2. Re:Bets on how long Legos exist? by operagost · · Score: 1

      Actually, here in the US we like to punish our corporations by seizing their "windfall profits." Meanwhile, foreign companies are allowed to rape us with impunity.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:Bets on how long Legos exist? by RingDev · · Score: 1

      If the product was priced such that it was sufficient to maintain their opperations, then how exactly was it over priced?

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    4. Re:Bets on how long Legos exist? by khellendros1984 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've always had respect for Lego. I feel like their prices are high because they refuse to take the cheap-ass manufacturing shortcuts (like production in a 3rd world country). They sacrifice price for quality, and I find that admirable. Not to mention the fact that they are providing jobs within their own country.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    5. Re:Bets on how long Legos exist? by dragonjujotu · · Score: 1

      Now that they can't charge $50 for a few dozen bricks...

      Really only a few dozen? The sets I see at Wal-Mart, or anywhere else for that matter, are about 10 cents a block, so your $50 set typically has around 450-550 bricks, unless it came with a big/specialized part (no I'm not including the Mindstorms or Duplo). But what do I know, I have only ogled all the ones I don't have since I was 6.

      --
      Yes, I am obsessed with ellipses.
    6. Re:Bets on how long Legos exist? by RingDev · · Score: 1

      The US's inability to stand up to the world bank and level the playing field through tarrifs and inport duties would alliviate much of the problem you mention.

      -Rick

      --
      "Most people in the U.S. wouldn't know they live in a tyrannical state if it walked up and grabbed their junk." - MyFirs
    7. Re:Bets on how long Legos exist? by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Yeah... the larger the set, the more likely you'll fall below that $0.10/piece threshold.

      The really small sets are ridiculously expensive if you judge it piece by piece.

      With few exceptions, I buy in bulk, either off bricklink or at the local store (we're lucky enough to live near one). The bulk pricing at the store isn't all that great, either, though, and the selection rotates so sometimes you can get a great deal and sometimes it's just pieces you can't possibly use... and of course, those stay around the longest.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
  14. About time by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to play Blocko Star Wars next year.

  15. Re:Obligatory by 77Punker · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's more like this:

    All of your blocks are belong to us, but so are some blocks from someone else, too.

  16. This is the truth by Moryath · · Score: 1

    I had a lot of these when I was a kid - both the real, and the knock-off types. I can't remember how many times something fell apart because I'd accidentally gotten a knock-off brick in a bad spot and it didn't hold properly. The knock-offs just can't hold properly when you use them to make a hinge...

    1. Re:This is the truth by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      TYCO blocks would just about shoot off any LEGOs they were clipped to, if you used only one brand together they seemed to work better.

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    2. Re:This is the truth by Moryath · · Score: 1

      Funny. My TYCO blocks barely held on to each other.

    3. Re:This is the truth by mdm-adph · · Score: 1

      Wow, Tyco blocks -- that brings back some memories.

      I remember during a particularly hard time financially for my parents (hey, it was the Reagan years -- still waiting for that wealth to trickle down), I was given a big set of Tyco blocks instead of Lego bricks for Christmas -- it was this big Tyco "tank" thing.

      They were obviously cheap ripoffs of Lego blocks (and poorly made, to boot), however even at the age of eight or nine I somehow knew enough to keep my mouth shut and just say "thank you." (Beats the hell outta me why I didn't just whine and scream like kids that age usually do.)

      That being said the damn things wouldn't work with my small already existing collection of Lego's worth a shit.

      --
      It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
    4. Re:This is the truth by OrangeTide · · Score: 1

      True enough. They never were very consistent. Sometimes you had to pound them on to get them to stick, and other times they would just fall off (usually because they had a crack from being pounded on).

      --
      “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
  17. Hemos Lego Statue by lbmouse · · Score: 1

    The questions is, would it be an anatomically correct Hemos statue?

    1. Re:Hemos Lego Statue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn, you beat me to it. It is an obvious follow-up question though.

    2. Re:Hemos Lego Statue by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny

      They don't make a small enough brick.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    3. Re:Hemos Lego Statue by Keramos · · Score: 2, Funny

      The questions is, would it be an anatomically correct Hemos statue?

      Quoting Black Cardinal, above:

      We bought some Mega Bloks for our son, but the plastic they used (polypropylene?) is too soft to keep a good grip

      So, yes, there's a good chance it would be :-)

    4. Re:Hemos Lego Statue by mdm-adph · · Score: 1

      Anatomically correct and fully functional?

      As a statue.

      So it functions well if it stands.

      --
      It is by my will alone my thoughts acquire motion; it is by the juice of the coffee bean that the thoughts acquire speed
    5. Re:Hemos Lego Statue by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 1

      I would hope it would be an anatomically correct statue .. of Hemos .. getting eaten by a Shark .. that's being held by a bear.

      --
      Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  18. Not for long by DesScorp · · Score: 1

    Most parents buy on price, not quality or brand name. If Chinese Legos cost a third of real Legos, they'll buy the Chinese version. Which is a shame because Legos' core sales helped fund some of their other intellectually interesting Lego projects, like the mindstorms stuff. If Lego stays in business, they'll have to reinvent themselves, but they wont be in the plastic brick business for very long now.

    --
    Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    1. Re:Not for long by wcb4 · · Score: 1

      knock offs have been around for years. I'm 40, and I remember getting knock offs as a kid. The plastic was softer and the bricks were not completely solid (they had small holes between the pips on top. My parents had always bought us Legos, then one Christmas, we got these huge, 2000+ piece buckets of some knockoff. They fell apart. My dad played with the kids' Legos too, as I am sure many of us dads do today, so we will notice that the really cool r2 d2 we spent 2 hours building for our kids just simply falls apart when they move it. We never got anything but true Legos afterward. I will never buy my kids the knockoffs for that reason. I think that you have to give the consumer a little credit on this one. If this were a new toy, the store might be different, but today's dads grew up with these things, and we still play with the kids because Legos are just so damned cool, and WE would not want to play with the knock-offs. Don't expect Lego to go out of business any time soon. We are not the only people in the world to think that Lego makes a superior product. Every person who has ever played with both the real thing and a knock-off know it.

      --
      I reject your reality ... and substitute my own.
    2. Re:Not for long by mrslacker · · Score: 1

      They've already reinvented themselves to some extent - Bionicles, which aren't really anything like their classic products, are now a huge part of their sales.

    3. Re:Not for long by jimicus · · Score: 1

      Most parents buy on price, not quality or brand name.

      Really?

      Most kids choose on brand name, association with something else they like (tie-ins with films or TV shows, for example) and possibly quality - one thing the human brain is very good at is pattern recognition, and expecting kids not to notice that the knock-off blocks never fit together properly is probably asking a bit much. Price seldom enters into the equation - particularly not if it's someone else's money.

      Many kids are also extremely good at getting what they want.

  19. Lucky for Slashdot by ebcdic · · Score: 1

    Maybe they won't get sued for using the 8-blob Lego brick as a icon for stories about toys.

  20. brand name = quality by smellsofbikes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have mixed feelings about this. I have 38 years' worth and hundreds of thousands of LEGO bricks, which cost an enormous amount, and it'd sure be nice to get vats of cheap bricks so I can build some of the things I want. (I'm halfway through making a 3-D printer using chocolate, that has a working space of about 9 cubic feet, and boy does that take a lot of blocks.)

    But at the same time, companies will rush into the space formed by LEGO losing their trademark, build cheap bricks, outcompete LEGO, LEGO will go out of business, and then we'll be stuck with lots of cheap imitators who aren't making the beautiful stuff LEGO created, and that could end up destroying exactly what makes LEGO worthwhile.

    There is a value to having a single entity driving a market -- a planned economy in miniature.

    --
    Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    1. Re:brand name = quality by zappepcs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Perhaps, but that economy was built on the quality and diversity of product, not simple market forces. It's kind of like Walmart. They have all the stuff that people normally buy, or most of it, and at cheap prices. When you want something that people don't normally buy, you have to shop somewhere else. So, yes, that drives the price up, but also creates special products.

      I have concerns about imitators diluting the value of the market that Lego has built, to the point that it is no longer viable to create the special parts that Lego does create. I'm not talking about flag poles for ships or castles. Rather I'm talking more of the technic line of parts. If you want active models or robots etc. you need special parts, not just blocks. For example: to build a car Lego provides many wheels/tires/tank treads, Ackerman steerage, differential gearing, shock absorbers etc. The Lego gear-motors are awesome. Lego provides gears, axles, chains, even flex-shafts, worm-gears and housings, pneumatics, .... In fact, blocks are good, but to make really awesome geeky stuff you need all those special parts. I hope this does not mean an end to the specialty parts.

      It would truly be the end of an era if those specialty parts go out of production.

    2. Re:brand name = quality by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      I've taken to using aluminum sheet to fill in for large quantities of blocks, when I need to make a stiff, large structure. I can replace mass quantities of blocks. But, yeah, there's no way I can replace power transmissions, reduction units, all the things that make LEGO such a useful machine prototyping tool. I already miss the days when I could go to a local toy store and buy a Technic 871 set and get a dozen gears and axles. Something comparable from Smallparts.com would run $400 and wouldn't be anywhere nearly as universally useful.

      The thing is: I don't think 95% of the people buying LEGO bricks are doing that. They're just getting a toy for their kids. Another toy, that has bricks but costs 30% less, will substitute perfectly. If you're buying for yourself, you get much better stuff than when you're buying for your kid or someone else's kid because you know they'll just eat them, melt them, or make LEGO catapults and launch the parts into next week.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    3. Re:brand name = quality by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Ooh, I get to use a car analogy to refute your specious claims!

      Do you think someone out to buy a Bentley is going to seriously consider buying a Hyundai just because it's cheaper? What about someone who wants a lower-end luxury car, like a BMW 3-series or Mercedes C-class? Those companies may make cars just like Hyundai does, but they're not competing with Hyundai at all.

      Same with Lego bricks. As long as their bricks are made of higher quality material, they'll have a niche. It might end up being a little smaller than it is now, but they'll still have it. And if they're smart, they'll start their own knock off brand to compete against the cheaper brick manufacturers.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    4. Re:brand name = quality by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      I have come across the same problems, but Lego has accounted for this in an off-hand way, if I say so myself. The pieces that are about 1mm thick, rounded ends, and have anywhere from 2-9 holes - I don't know what to call them. Some are straight, some at 90 degree bends. These can be used with the appropriate pins to cinch a section of technic bricks together. If you have say 5 courses of technic bricks stacked, you can place these orthogonally to the stack, and using pins hold the top course to the bottom course. If you do this in strategic spots, it does not add much thickness but it does add great strength.

      I built a robot, 4WD that was strong enough to carry around 52 AA batteries for over an hour of continual movement without suffering any damage to the structure or any part of the robot actually. It was in-tact as though I'd just put it together after a grueling hour+ workout with a large amount of weight on it. 52 was not a typo.

      There are several techniques for strengthening your build, but it does take those special parts, most of which come from the Technic sets. I will be quite sad if they go out of production.

    5. Re:brand name = quality by ThrowAwaySociety · · Score: 1

      But at the same time, companies will rush into the space formed by LEGO losing their trademark, build cheap bricks, outcompete LEGO, LEGO will go out of business, and then we'll be stuck with lots of cheap imitators who aren't making the beautiful stuff LEGO created, and that could end up destroying exactly what makes LEGO worthwhile.

      Why do you Lego fanboys insist on defending the company's business model? Can't you see that competition from cut-rate competitors is always a good thing, always, without question? Intellectual property laws are evil!

    6. Re:brand name = quality by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      I've done the same thing: I built a 4WD car back in, I dunno, 1988, and getting the front drive system to hold together was a *nightmare*. I ended up pinning stuff like you're talking about, using orthogonal links, and rubber bands. (I almost resorted to, gasp, superglue.) That's actually almost the only complaint I have with LEGO, that the height isn't an easy multiple of the length/width. It'd be so nice if you could take bricks with holes in the side and just snap another brick along the side, to bind them all together vertically. (Although it'd mean you couldn't have axles of the current size going through the bricks, now that I think of it, so maybe every other row...)

      My use of aluminum is simply that I don't have enough bricks to build stiff structures that are a meter on a side and half a meter tall. If I could do a solid shell, that'd be strong enough, but, dude, that's a whole lot of bricks. The gantry head on the thing I'm building right now is made of long runs of girder bricks, the longest LEGO bricks made, triangulated along the sides with other girder bricks, so it looks just like a crane. It's nowhere near stiff enough, but given my brick quantity limitations, it'll have to do. I'm considering buying DUPLO bricks just because they're cheap for their size.

      The other thing that sucks is wearing out axles from insufficient bearing area: anything spinning at high RPM for any length of time, you end up with axles with big smoothed-out patches (and they get really rattly as they wear smaller and no longer run concentric.)

      But overall, still a great prototyping tool.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    7. Re:brand name = quality by jabithew · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but that economy was built on the quality and diversity of product, not simple market forces.

      Erm, they are market forces?

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    8. Re:brand name = quality by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      true... It should read "competetition" rather than 'market forces'... mea culpa

    9. Re:brand name = quality by jabithew · · Score: 1

      ...mea culpa

      ...
      I love you, and I want to have your babies.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
    10. Re:brand name = quality by zappepcs · · Score: 1

      ...mea culpa

      ...
      I love you, and I want to have your babies.

      Would that make you my 'Latin lover' ?

      Please don't be a priest. I don't want to end up having to write to Craigslist

    11. Re:brand name = quality by smellsofbikes · · Score: 1

      What I'm claiming is that 90% of LEGO purchases are by people who don't care about quality, just about price, and the company can't survive on that remaining 10%.

      Consider Cray vs. PC's. Or even Sun. There might just not *be* a market niche that can support a company. And then we're all stuck with PC's, and I think it's possible that in this particular case, it's the quality of LEGO that's creating a market, and if they went away, the poorer-quality imitations would be insufficient to maintain a market, coz they'd just be bricks. LEGO is having enough problems already maintaining market share against video games and such, and it's possible it's only their research and advertising that keeps a market open.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    12. Re:brand name = quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Lego could do what smart business people do and that's leverage what they do have, a reputation and a brand. They could license the name "Lego" to these other companies. They'd get a percentage, the other company gets a marketing advantage, everybody wins. Lego would just have to make sure their brand doesn't make it onto low-quality products.

  21. Lego tried an end-run around the law by topham · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Lego tried an end-run around the law.

    Copyright couldn't cover their bricks.
    Patents ran out eons ago.
    But Trademarks, Trademarks are perpetual... so they 'Trademark' a physical object instead of a name & logo. anybody wonder why they lost?

    1. Re:Lego tried an end-run around the law by Ecuador · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They just didn't their idea far enough. If their studs were some sort of "Lego" monogram instead of simply circular then others would have to "print" their trademark on their products to make them compatible, breaking the law.
      What? At least it is a better idea than installing rootkits on customers etc...

      --
      Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent. Polar Scope Align for iOS
    2. Re:Lego tried an end-run around the law by burris · · Score: 1

      It's not an end run around the law. It's perfectly legitimate to trademark the shape and appearance of your product if it is unique. The most famous example is the Coke hobble skirt bottle, which has been a registered trademark since 1960.

      Patents are different from trademarks. If Coke had licensed their patents and allowed other companies to package soda other than Coke in the bottle, then it wouldn't have been exclusively associated with Coke and wouldn't have been eligible for trademark protection.

      Trademarks are not perpetual. You can lose a trademark if you fail to enforce it. I believe this is what happened with the Lego brick. Knockoffs have been made for so long that it is no longer exclusively associated with Lego.

    3. Re:Lego tried an end-run around the law by MrSquishy · · Score: 5, Funny

      Maybe Lego should change their name to:
      oooo
      oooo

    4. Re:Lego tried an end-run around the law by One+Louder · · Score: 1

      It's perfectly legitimate to trademark the shape and appearance of your product if it is unique.

      Not if the shape or appearance is functional, as it is in the case of the LEGO brick. The Coke bottle appearance is not patentable, but the stud/tube elements of a LEGO brick are.

    5. Re:Lego tried an end-run around the law by Kjella · · Score: 1

      But Trademarks, Trademarks are perpetual... so they 'Trademark' a physical object instead of a name & logo. anybody wonder why they lost?

      It's not quite as straight forward as that. Companies do register trademarks on should we say "unique characteristics" like for example color trademarks. If you tried selling cars that are Ferrari red - not just any red but exactly the same shade, you can expect to hear from Ferrari's lawyers. If VISA ever tried to pull a "Priceless!" commercial you bet they'd be sued by MasterCard.

      What they have tried to argue, which is a "nice try" but not quite as strange as you make it sound, is that the shape of the LEGO block is so characteristic in and by itself, that anyone which made a block of the exact same shape would be causing the very confusion in the marketplace that trademark law is supposed to prevent. I certainly see a possibility that if someone was playing with a bunch of these blocks without the packaging they came in and they turned out to be of poor quality, lego could be blamed by the shape alone.

      On the other hand, you have the fact that making a product shouldn't let you control interoperability. Having a ford card shouldn't mean you're forced to buy ford tires, ford windshield wipers and buy ford gasoline. The shape is in essence tradmarking interoperability, and lego could identify genuine lego blocks in some other way. I therefore think this decision is correct, but not because tradmarking physical shapes should be forbidden as such.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    6. Re:Lego tried an end-run around the law by bugnuts · · Score: 1

      so they 'Trademark' a physical object instead of a name & logo. anybody wonder why they lost?

      You *can* trademark shapes.

      Maglight shape and lettering around the top are trademarks (so they claim).

      IIRC, Pace won a trademark case against a competitor picante sauce that made a confusingly similar bottle shape.

      The only thing we need now is a Mickey Mouse-shaped lego that references Harry Potter.

    7. Re:Lego tried an end-run around the law by burris · · Score: 1

      You're right about functional shape and appearance not being subject to trademark. However, is the Lego brick shape and appearance entirely functional? Couldn't competitors make equally functional, if incompatible, building blocks with square or hexagonal studs? Has not the image of the 2x4 block with round studs been used in Lego advertising for decades? Don't kids instantly recognize the brick as "Lego?" I don't think this case is necessarily so straightforward. Of course, the article is in Dutch and doesn't provide the Courts reasoning in this case anyway. I can't tell if they lost trademark protection from dilution or if the Court determined that the shape of the brick isn't trade dress.

      BTW, Coke had a design patent on the bottle shape prior to registering it as a trademark.

    8. Re:Lego tried an end-run around the law by burris · · Score: 1

      s/dilution/infringement/

    9. Re:Lego tried an end-run around the law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what you're trying to say is that Lego is now "shitting bricks?"

    10. Re:Lego tried an end-run around the law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A few years ago, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that what Lego was trying to do was equivalent to the inventor of the bicycle having a trademark on the basic design of two wheels, one in front of the other. That would have given them a perpetual monopoly on bikes. The court held that things which were part of the functionality of am item cannot be part of a trademark and are instead in the domain of patents, which expire.

    11. Re:Lego tried an end-run around the law by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > You're right about functional shape and appearance not being subject to trademark.
      > However, is the Lego brick shape and appearance entirely functional? Couldn't
      > competitors make equally functional, if incompatible,

      No. In this context "entirely functional" means "entirely compatible". Competitors are free (in the US) to duplicate any feature of the Lego blocks that are necessary for their blocks to interoperate with the Lego blocks.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    12. Re:Lego tried an end-run around the law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I submitted a "rather good" idea to Lego a few years ago. After some discussion an NDA was signed - followed by total silence. Turned out they were only after securing the idea and the NDA was a five year gag order.

      Think twice before dealing with them specially their legal department.

      One for the "dont bother submitting ideas to large companies again"

    13. Re:Lego tried an end-run around the law by eweu · · Score: 1

      Then Audi or the IOC would sue them.

    14. Re:Lego tried an end-run around the law by Ellis+D.+Tripp · · Score: 2, Informative

      Couldn't competitors make equally functional, if incompatible, building blocks with square or hexagonal studs?

      Studs that aren't round would pose a problem when you tried to build a hinged assembly, where one block pivots on the stud of another.

      --
      Remember "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters"? Help make it a reality again! http://soylentnews.org
    15. Re:Lego tried an end-run around the law by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > I certainly see a possibility that if someone was playing with a bunch of these blocks
      > without the packaging they came in and they turned out to be of poor quality, lego could
      > be blamed by the shape alone.

      By that reasoning anyone who can maintain a monopoly for long enough can use trademark to extend it forever.

      Lego can prevent confusion by printing their trademark-protected "Lego" logo on each block that they sell.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    16. Re:Lego tried an end-run around the law by Kjella · · Score: 1

      By that reasoning anyone who can maintain a monopoly for long enough can use trademark to extend it forever.

      A trademark is a very narrow monopoly on selling confusingly similar products, if you want to put it that way. Except usually you consider a monopoly something broad enough to cover a market, which it isn't. Noone should doubt that they can make "connectable blocks" that compete in the same market as Lego, the same way GM or Ford compete with Ferrari. But GM or Ford wouldn't be allowed to make cars exactly like Ferrari, the question is whether this company should be allowed to make blocks that are exactly like Lego's.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  22. I thought by Thelasko · · Score: 4, Informative

    If true, hopefully this will open doors for people interested in inexpensive bulk purchase of bricks of specific sizes and colors.

    I thought you could already do that.

    --
    One of our competitors trademarked the term "hypothesis". From now on, we will call them "boneheaded ideas".
    1. Re:I thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If true, hopefully this will open doors for people interested in inexpensive bulk purchase of bricks of specific sizes and colors.

      I thought you could already do that.

      Worst interface imaginable, but still awesome!

    2. Re:I thought by compro01 · · Score: 1

      19-22 cents for a 4x2 brick isn't very inexpensive when you're talking about large bulk orders (tens of thousands).

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    3. Re:I thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bulk,yes.

      Inexpensive, no. They're pieces of plastic, marginally different than the millions of bottle caps that tossed away each day. Lego's prices are nothing but inexcusable greed.

      Dumbass.

      Dipshit.

      Testicle skank.

      Fart Phreaker.

      ghey.

    4. Re:I thought by AliasMarlowe · · Score: 1

      If true, hopefully this will open doors for people interested in inexpensive bulk purchase of bricks of specific sizes and colors.

      I thought you could already do that.

      Depends what you mean by inexpensive. The bulk blocks are about the same price from lego.com as they are in department stores. For example, the standard 2 by 4 brick costs SEK 1.17 at your link, which is about EUR0.20 or $0.25 each. That's not exactly cheap.

      On a related note, we wanted to order some kits from lego.com, only to discover that they refused to sell them to us based on our country of residence. The kits we wanted were made in Denmark, and available in the UK, but apparently not for sale to Finland. So even the items on offer vary by country, which is both inexplicable and foolish.

      --
      Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. - Voltaire
    5. Re:I thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10p/brick really isn't inexpensive.

    6. Re:I thought by jimicus · · Score: 1

      19-22 cents for a 4x2 brick isn't very inexpensive when you're talking about large bulk orders (tens of thousands).

      I tried that, but you can only put 999 of any one item in your cart.

      Now whether or not Lego would be prepared to negotiate on price if you literally are buying tens of thousands I don't know - but I do know that you'll seldom get the best available price if your needs are that extreme by looking on a website.

    7. Re:I thought by White+Flame · · Score: 2, Informative

      Better prices and selection through bricklink. It's not just used parts, there are tons of brand new pieces there too (I presume bought in bulk from Lego stores).

    8. Re:I thought by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Good post... I know Lego is expensive because they use better plastic and higher quality manufacturing process, but they DO keep prices artificially inflated, not only by not selling certain sets in certain places, but by playing the "beanie baby" game of limited releases and retiring sets regardless of popularity.

      So... think of it this way; they already have some machines tooled and set up to manufacture the monorail, and they release a couple of monorail sets, and now you can't buy them anymore.

      You can't by the 9V trains anymore, you can only by the RC with the plastic tracks.

      They'd do limited releases of the train engines.

      The did limited releases of some Star Wars sets (notably the Naboo Fighter with silver pieces instead of gray...)...

      Playing games like that, IMO, actually costs them money as they have to retool manufacturing and packaging, as does their insistence on including specialized pieces in each set nowadays instead of basing their models on a standard core set of bricks.

      I'm still a Lego fan, but the prices are just too high for me to buy anywhere near the quantity I'd like to build some of the huge structures I'd like to build; and the knock-offs just aren't the same quality. If they ever get there, though, then sorry Lego... I'm not a brand name loyalist if I can get the same quality elsewhere.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    9. Re:I thought by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      I tried that, but you can only put 999 of any one item in your cart.

      Yeah... I've bought 2000 1x2's for less than a penny a piece off bricklink... Lego.com is no great shakes unless you're buying a regular set, and even then it's just avoid getting your lazy ass to the store.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    10. Re:I thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats because your buying tens of thousands.

    11. Re:I thought by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Inexpensive, no. They're pieces of plastic, marginally different than the millions of bottle caps that tossed away each day. Lego's prices are nothing but inexcusable greed.

      Use those, then, if they're so marginally different.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    12. Re:I thought by richlv · · Score: 1

      they're still quite expensive, though. some 'mass order discount' would help.

      oh, and they don't ship to my country as well, even though we are only 500 or slightly more km apart.

      --
      Rich
  23. This isn't ALL good by cbreaker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was a lego boy when I grew up. I had a lot of legos.

    I also had some imitation blocked made by Tyco. These immitation blocks never fit together well. You'd build something and it would fall apart. Although the bricks looked almost identical, the Tyco bricks just sucked.

    So, I do worry about imitation blocks. Lego blocks are the best because they have impossibly high standards during manufacturing in order to avoid the frustration I experienced with the Tyco blocks.

    If someone else is going to start really making sets to compete with Lego, let's hope they go the distance and implement quality control like Lego does.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    1. Re:This isn't ALL good by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was a lego boy when I grew up. I had a lot of legos.

      And then... what? Your fairy godmother made you a real boy?

    2. Re:This isn't ALL good by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      I think that the extra blocks I had were Tyco. I never had a problem with them; they interlocked well....except for a few gray pieces I have, that don't have the middle-of-the-block "tubes" that provide extra locking force.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    3. Re:This isn't ALL good by box4831 · · Score: 1

      posting to undo bad mod

      :(

      --
      Miller Lite tastes like water that's somehow managed to rot.
    4. Re:This isn't ALL good by JoelisHere · · Score: 1

      Ah, yes I remember the awful Tyco bricks.

    5. Re:This isn't ALL good by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      No, you sarcastic prick.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    6. Re:This isn't ALL good by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 1

      Oh my! I seem to have upset the little thing.

  24. Cheap = Good? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I for one am looking forward to the explosion of availability of cheap melamine and lead-laced lego-like blocks for young toddlers.

    Mmmm, mmmm! Nothing says safe, wholesome and tasty like cheap imports from third-world sweat-shops.

  25. Lego didn't invent them in the first place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    The plastic building block we associated with "LEGO" was actually invented and sold in the late 1940's by an English toy designer named Hilary Page under the "KIDDIECRAFT" brand. He failed to patent it outside the UK and LEGO started manufacturing them without acknowledging their origin.

    After Hilary Page commited suicide, LEGO purchased the expired patents from Page's estate so they could pretend they invented them in the first place.

    LEGO did invent and patent the little tube on the bottom of the brick, which wasn't in Page's original design, which allows for more connection possibilities. Once that patent expired, other companies, such as Canada's MEGA, (creator of Mega Bloks) created clones. LEGO, of course, sued for trademark infringement. In the US, they lost, because you can't trademark and patent the same things - functional elements, which are covered by patents, can't be trademarked. Other countries treat this issue differently, hence LEGO enjoys some trademark protection even for the purely functional elements.

    Apparently, LEGO's view is that a patent should be valid as long as the company holding the patent continues to manufacture the product, and tends to be pretty aggressive about it. The irony they they effectively violated the patents of the original inventor is completely lost on them.

    Posting anonymously because I've had previous run-ins with LEGO's lawyers.

    1. Re:Lego didn't invent them in the first place by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 1

      That reminds me of the story behind Monopoly. Corporate greed at its worst.

      --
      "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
    2. Re:Lego didn't invent them in the first place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Posting anonymously because I've had previous run-ins with LEGO's lawyers.

      You mean you lie about Lego and they try to sue you for libel?

      That certainly adds to your credibility.

    3. Re:Lego didn't invent them in the first place by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2, Informative

      because you can't trademark and patent the same things - functional elements, which are covered by patents, can't be trademarked

      Functional elements cannot be trademarked: true

      Non-functional elements cannot be patented: false.

      There are design patents that cover non-trademarked, non-functional parts of devices. I think that's what razor companies use to lock me into their replacement blades.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    4. Re:Lego didn't invent them in the first place by MartinSchou · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He failed to patent it outside the UK [...] he irony they they effectively violated the patents of the original inventor is completely lost on them.

      How did they effectively violate his patent? You said it yourself - he failed to patent it outside the UK.

      That's like saying that European software developers are effectively violating US software patents. Fuck you - they aren't in effect here.

    5. Re:Lego didn't invent them in the first place by Sockatume · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Your timeline is incorrect, based on most of the sources I can find. Lego-to-be obtained samples of Page's blocks back around '47, and although Page hadn't bothered to patent them outside the UK and France (where he had businesses), Lego-to-be obtained the rights to produce the blocks from Kiddicraft anyway, in '49. The started selling their own that year. Both sets of bricks were abysmal failures by any reasonable measure. Page didn't commit suicide until '57, and Lego didn't introduce the central "tube" until '58. Lego acquired all of Kiddicraft's remaining plastic block patents in ninteen eighty one, almost twenty-five years after Page's suicide, as an aid to their impending litigation.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    6. Re:Lego didn't invent them in the first place by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      Addenum: Actually I'm having trouble finding particularly solid sources that Lego acquired the rights to the Kiddicraft blocks. At any rate, there were no exclusive rights on the mainland to purchase, and by the time the Lego "system" appeared (which led to the product's success), many of Page's patents had already expired, and he was deceased.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
    7. Re:Lego didn't invent them in the first place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would argue that the little tube does much more than "provide other connection possibilities". It helps to lock the bricks together by partially surrounding the cylinder on the top of the brick. It's a major part of why Lego blocks work so well.

      I grew up with Legos (BTW 'Lego' is a concatenation of the Danish words lege (play) and godt (good or well)). I think there's a real lesson for kids who grow up with them and that is that there is no substitute for quality. My Legos were passed on to my nephew and despite years of almost daily use, still functioned well. Most of my other toys either broke or wore out in short order.

      These days (and for many years), I have been building speakers for fun using Danish woofers and tweeters and the quality of those components is rock-solid, year after year. They're not as cheap as some alternatives, but they sound wonderful and after having built over 25 systems using them, I have never had a single failure. There's a connection here. Both products are exceptionally well-engineered and manufactured. In the end, they provide a very satisfactory experience that can't be duplicated by knock-off products.

    8. Re:Lego didn't invent them in the first place by One+Louder · · Score: 1
      From http://www.lego.com/eng/info/default.asp?page=corporate

      "Only the best is good enough" was the motto of Ole Kirk Christiansen, founder of the company and inventor of LEGO bricks, and today we still involve that spirit in every way we operate.

      Apparently LEGO would prefer to rewrite history.

    9. Re:Lego didn't invent them in the first place by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      proof and reference please. :(

    10. Re:Lego didn't invent them in the first place by smellsofbikes · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There were other, similar blocks well before Hilary Page invented Kiddicraft. I have a box of 2000 pressed wooden blocks called "American Bricks" from 1938, that are similar in size and identical in layout (ratio of height, width, and length, with 2x4 blocks, with 8 studs on top and matching holes on the bottom.) I've read previously that they went back into the late 1920's, and there were others like them beforehand.

      It wasn't the idea of stackable, interlocking bricks like Page's and others, that made LEGO successful. It was learning how to do precision plastic injection molding that allowed the bricks to stick together very tightly, and precision chemistry that allowed them to last through thousands of attach/detach cycles, that made LEGO enormous. A friend of mine was a plant manager for an old Samsonite plant that licensed the manufacture of LEGO bricks from 1968-1972, and he said that the LEGO plastic injection molding equipment, used for making toys, was superior to the best American plastic injection molding equipment used for medical equipment at that time.

      --
      Nostalgia's not what it used to be.
    11. Re:Lego didn't invent them in the first place by Dan541 · · Score: 1

      A credible source would have no problem with accountability.

      --
      An SQL query goes to a bar, walks up to a table and asks, "Mind if I join you?"
    12. Re:Lego didn't invent them in the first place by stupkid · · Score: 3, Informative

      This page supports this story:

      http://www.hilarypagetoys.com/


      But this is just the internet so...

    13. Re:Lego didn't invent them in the first place by One+Louder · · Score: 1

      Check out the "links" page - there are links to PDF files of some of the court rulings in some of the litigation (Lego v Tyco, Lego v Megabloks) confirming much of this.

    14. Re:Lego didn't invent them in the first place by One+Louder · · Score: 1
      Based on the above post, here's what some googling comes up with:

      From http://www.megabloks.com/en/corpo/pdf/20040802.pdf :

      The block was originally created by Harry Fisher Page of the UK company Kiddicraft Ltd. in the late 1930â(TM)s, and later reproduced and marketed by Lego, Mega Bloks and other traders in the toy business.

      From: http://www.marquedor.com/telemarque/archives/02-06-01b_en.htm :

      In 1947 or 1948, Ole Kirk Christiansen and his son Godtfred Kirk Christiansen, respectively grandfather and father of Kirk Kristiansen, obtained samples of KIDDICRAFT self-locking toys and these samples led them to make the first LEGO toys. KIDDICRAFT brick construction sets with cylindrical knobs were designed, manufactured and sold by Mr. Harry Fisher Page, a British citizen, and protected by patents in the United Kingdom, Canada and France . These patents were obtained between 1940 and 1952.

      From: http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc65/2005scc65.pdf :

      From The LEGO toy business was founded in 1932. In 1949, Kirkbi produced its first toy building blocks. Those blocks were derived from a British product, the Kiddicraft blocks, which used a system of interlocking blocks. Kirkbi bought the patents covering the Kiddicraft system a few years later.

    15. Re:Lego didn't invent them in the first place by Sockatume · · Score: 1

      That's a bit disingenuous, sure, although literally true (Page's blocks, and Christiansen's original derivatives, were rather different from the modern Lego brick). However their own history of the brick is pretty clear that it was derived from Page's blocks.

      --
      No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  26. Translation by KasperMeerts · · Score: 5, Informative

    Finally, I knew all this Dutch my parents learned me would pay off! This had better give me some free karma.

    Lego loses it's unique right to make Lego blocks

    Luxemburg - It'll be hard to swallow for the Danish manufacturer Lego now that the European Court of Justice has decided Wednesday that everyone can make a block that fits the original legoblock.

    Lego had gone to the European Court of Justice battling against the Canadian competitor Mega Brands, who has brought a block on the market that fits Lego's. The Court ruled today that the design of Lego is not protected by European trademark and that there can be no such thing as an unique right.

    The Lego block was invented in 1932 by Ole Kirk Christiansen in the Danish city Billund. The name LEGO is derived from the Danish words "LE GOdt" (play good). Later the word appeared the word could be interpreted in Latin as "I gather" (or 'I choose' or 'I read').

    LEGO is a Danish toy manufacturer that became famous because of the colored plastic blocks. The blocks are sold under the name "Lego"; that way they refer not only to the manufacturer, but it also became a generic brand. The manufacturer is the biggest toy manufacturer in Europe with a revenue of 7823 billion Danish Krone ( 1049 billion Euro or 1337 billion dollars ) in 2006. Meanwhile, LEGO has won the price "Toy of the Century" twice.

    The LEGO Group is the fifth biggest toy manufacturer in the world.

    --
    As long as there are slaughterhouses, there will be battlefields.
    1. Re:Translation by Michael+O-P · · Score: 1

      Thank you for making this readily readable, since most of us don't speak freaky-deaky Dutch.

      --
      I'm Peggy.
    2. Re:Translation by garett_spencley · · Score: 1

      "revenue of 7823 billion Danish Krone ( 1049 billion Euro or 1337 billion dollars ) in 2006"

      Oh common now ... is that an accurate translation or did you do that on purpose ?

      If it's accurate then once again someone else is living my dream :(

    3. Re:Translation by KasperMeerts · · Score: 1

      According to Google: 1049 euros is 1 336.7407 U.S. dollars. I just rounded it up correctly.

      --
      As long as there are slaughterhouses, there will be battlefields.
    4. Re:Translation by raddan · · Score: 1

      1337 billion dollars? Next you'll be telling me that they've manufactured 80085 billion LEGOs.

    5. Re:Translation by VeNoM0619 · · Score: 1
      Here's the sentence from the article:

      De fabrikant is de grootste speelgoedfabrikant van Europa met een omzet van 7,823 miljard Deense Kronen (1,049 miljard Euro) in 2006.

      He must have been doing some extra translation?

      --
      Disclaimer: I am not god.
      We may not be created equal
      But we can be treated equal.
    6. Re:Translation by KasperMeerts · · Score: 1

      I could have misplaced a comma. I never quite figured out how they work and what the difference is between , and . .
      But you're right 1,337 billion dollars is more likely.

      --
      As long as there are slaughterhouses, there will be battlefields.
    7. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally, I knew all this Dutch my parents learned me would pay off!

      English lessons come next, I hope?

    8. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "LE GOdt" should be "LEg GOdt"

    9. Re:Translation by KasperMeerts · · Score: 1

      My English is fine. I was just in a hurry to translate it before it would be lost in the sea of inane AC comments.

      --
      As long as there are slaughterhouses, there will be battlefields.
    10. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great, but it must be millions of money, not billions. If it were 7823 billion Danish Krone LEGO would produce roughly 300% of Denmarks GDP. It seems more likely that they produce 0.3% of GDP.

    11. Re:Translation by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Whoosh.

      Hint: 1337.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    12. Re:Translation by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Commas are used as thousands separators and periods are used as decimal separators in the US.

      Periods are used as thousands separators and commas are used as decimal separators in a lot of the rest of the world.

      Therefore, 1,049€ billion = $1.31096 billion (using the current exchange rate, which is apparently slightly different than when you did the calculation).

      Yes, you're allowed to be confused...

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    13. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then, I guess, LEGO could bailout both US and Europe and still have some change left :)

      That

    14. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Dutch your parents *taught* you ;)

      *learned* you is Dutch, I bet :)

    15. Re:Translation by kevinadi · · Score: 1

      a revenue of 7823 billion Danish Krone ( 1049 billion Euro or 1337 billion dollars ) in 2006

      That number is seriously wrong. A Danish company making more than $1 TRILLION per year? That's 10% of the US GDP. I think you're missing a dot there: should be 1.337 BILLION.

    16. Re:Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finally, I knew all this Dutch my parents learned me would pay off!

      I only they had learned you some English too...

  27. Fitted? by fucket · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fitted? Really?

    1. Re:Fitted? by 6Yankee · · Score: 1

      Really. In the UK at least, the past tense of "fit" is "fitted". The past tense of "spit" is "spat".

      "Fit" and "spit", when used as the past tense, just look weird to me.

  28. Chinese Legos by OrangeTide · · Score: 5, Funny

    Made for children, by children.

    --
    “Common sense is not so common.” — Voltaire
    1. Re:Chinese Legos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...out of children?

    2. Re:Chinese Legos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The largest, middle, small toy manufacturer in Chinese are gathering around in big convention and make a BIG announcment: HOOORAY!! Let's make Lego brick!

      So, I think we gonna have flood of lego bricks in next coming months?

    3. Re:Chinese Legos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I will be able to afford to build my house out of LEGOs finally.

  29. Not Likely by hardburn · · Score: 1

    Lego is a high-quality product. There have been knockoffs out there for a while, but Lego holds dominant because they have an excelent recipie for the plastic (held as a trade secret) and are fit to extremely tight tolerances. They might be more expensive than Megablocks, but they're worth it.

    --
    Not a typewriter
  30. Legos for adults by RemoWilliams84 · · Score: 1

    Finally, someone can start making those adult themed legos! I can finally make that square boobed (and whatever else females have) lego robot I've always dreamed of.

    --
    "I don't have to think. I only have to do it. The results are always perfect, but that's old news." - Meat Puppets
  31. This story is completely wrong. by amorsen · · Score: 5, Informative

    Lego hasn't had a monopoly on the bricks for decades. (They have a monopoly on making bricks that actually work, but that's not for legal reasons, that's just because their competitors are incompetent.)

    Lego has used a red 2x4 Lego brick in advertisements, and they believed that this particular brick could be used as a trademarked "logo". The European Department of Justice decided that the brick picture is too generic to be trademarked. The decision will be appealed.

    So all it means is that competitors are allowed to put that particular brick in their advertisements and on their boxes. They already had the right to produce the brick.

    --
    Finally! A year of moderation! Ready for 2019?
    1. Re:This story is completely wrong. by compro01 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They have a monopoly on making bricks that actually work, but that's not for legal reasons, that's just because their competitors are incompetent.

      Actually, I'm pretty sure one of the main things is their trade-secret plastics formula(s) and molding techniques, which I doubt the others have, which allow for their really tight manufacturing tolerances.

      Even with the trademarks and patents out of the picture, I doubt the competition is going to be able to match quality, barring some industrial espionage.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    2. Re:This story is completely wrong. by 2short · · Score: 1


        Industrial espionage is exactly what trade secret law protects you from. It doesn't protect you from the other guy hiring some smart researchers and figuring stuff out for themselves; for that you need patents. You can't have both, so eventually competition will be able to match quality if they choose to.

      Lego did have patents that have now expired. They have trade secrets that Megabloks may or may not have figured out indepently. For whatever reasons Megabloks quality have improved substantially and in my opinion, are currently of similar quality to Lego. I'd expect Lego to be more expensive for a while though. There are so many older, lousier Megabloks out in the world brinign down perceptions.

    3. Re:This story is completely wrong. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Little known fact:

      Each shape/color combination of Lego bricks has its own mold. Why? Because the pigmentation changes (ever so slightly) the shrink rate of the plastic as it cools. Therefore, to get the consistent quality that is missing from all of the 'off-brand' bricks a yellow brick has to be cast in a different mold than a red brick. This is also why Lego bricks are more expensive than 'off-brand' bricks.

  32. Re: MS Blocks! by TaoPhoenix · · Score: 4, Funny

    Following their pattern of Wait & BadlyCopy, Microsoft will announce the need for the strategic purchase of Mega so they can Embrace the Blocks, Extend, and Extinguish Lego!

    --
    My first Journal Entry ever, in 8 years! http://slashdot.org/journal/365947/aphelion-scifi-fantasy-horror-poetry-webzine
  33. Finally! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I can make big custom LEGO blocks filled with isolating material to build my dreamhouse and change the floorplan whenever I feel like it.

  34. Chinese Lego by bshensky · · Score: 2, Interesting

    http://www.mocpages.com/moc.php/18382

    Probably won't help with the pirates. Real pirates!

    --
    Makin' money, makin' friends, makin' whoopee and wearin' Depends
  35. Danish!=Dutch by avoiceinthewildernes · · Score: 1

    Danish!=Dutch

    1. Re:Danish!=Dutch by swordgeek · · Score: 1

      Um...your point is what exactly?

      Lego is a Danish company. The article is in Dutch. A Dutch website wrote about a Danish company.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    2. Re:Danish!=Dutch by YttriumOxide · · Score: 1

      Correct... but the article is written in Dutch, and it's about the Danish company Lego. There's nothing wrong with the summary on that account.

      --
      My book about LSD and Self-Discovery
      Also on facebook as: DroppingAcidDaleBewan
  36. Betta Bilda? by tetranz · · Score: 1

    When I was a kid in New Zealand, we had something called Betta Bilda which was very similar to Lego.

  37. It's a somewaht unique case and sad really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know we're supposed to think whatever benefits the consumer is good but Legos is an unusual situation. They have a company built on a unique product. They spent many years promoting the product and were very successful doing it. Now anyone can produce their product and use their name since it's now a generic term, Lego. Ultimately whoever can produce them the cheapest will win and it's highly unlikely Lego will survive. The competing companies will even benefit from free advertising since Lego company advertising will effectively promote companies that simply call their product Legos. I think the courts signed the company's death warrant. In the end all that will be left are companies making cheap knock offs. Where this doesn't benefit consumers is the knock off companies aren't innovators they are in effect parasites feeding off the creations of others. If creation and innovation dies because of a lack of market protections then the consumer looses. It may mean cheap crap but ultimately it'll just mean a lot of crap available. Already with small business your only real protection are lawyers and if you can't aford them you are defenseless. You can spend a lifetime creating a unique product only to have it knocked off in less than a year. It'll cost you all your profits to defend your rights against the parasites and in the end you'll probably have to file Chapter 11. Without protections the parasites will always win.

    1. Re:It's a somewaht unique case and sad really by Dunbal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Now anyone can produce their product... ...and it's highly unlikely Lego will survive.

            I'm having trouble reconciling that statement. It's essentially the mantra chanted by lobbyists for many "protected" industries, like for example the pharmaceutical industry. Funnily enough, anyone can make and sell acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) nowadays, and Bayer is still in business. There are plenty of denim pant manufacturers, and Levi's is still in business. I simply don't buy the "protect me" argument. Oh sure, they each make less money than in a monopoly situation, but they all still make money.

            In a truly free market, if Lego Group has grown so inefficient that it can't compete, then it DESERVES to go bankrupt. The REAL free market rewards efficiency - in production, marketing and distribution. Tampering with the free market in any way allows inefficiencies to creep in. These inefficiencies incur a hidden cost for all of us, since resources are tied up that could have been used by society elsewhere.

            However I guess the US has forgotten what a free market is. Just looking at the headlines is a daily reminder. Enjoy your United Socialist States of America, and continue to "protect" as much as you can... me, I live in a country that protects very little by law - but allows me a great deal of personal freedom.

      --
      Seven puppies were harmed during the making of this post.
    2. Re:It's a somewaht unique case and sad really by Dave+Tucker+Online · · Score: 1

      I live in a country that protects very little by law - but allows me a great deal of personal freedom.

      What country is that? I may want in.

  38. No, not Hemos by CaptainOfSpray · · Score: 1

    at long last I can build a life sized [Hemos] Tux statue for my office
    FTFY

    --
    "Cock Up Your Beaver" does not mean what you think. This sig is intended to clog filters and annoy do-gooders
  39. Let me attempt to translate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lego was naar het Europese Hof van justitie gestapt in de strijd tegen de Canadese concurrent Mega Brands, die een blokje op de markt heeft gebracht dat past op die van Lego. Het Hof oordeelde vandaag dat het ontwerp van Lego niet is beschermd door het Europees merkenrecht en dat er dus geen sprake mag zijn van alleenrecht.

    My shot at it:

    Lego was near hot European Hasselhoff just in time to gestate in the stride generator concurrent with the Canada geese Mega Brands, ...okay, I give up...

    1. Re:Let me attempt to translate... by NuclearError · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, it's "My European Lego hovercraft is fulls of eels."

      --
      Nuclear engineers build weapons. Civil engineers build targets.
    2. Re:Let me attempt to translate... by msh104 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Lego was naar het Europese Hof van justitie gestapt in de strijd tegen de Canadese concurrent Mega Brands, die een blokje op de markt heeft gebracht dat past op die van Lego. Het Hof oordeelde vandaag dat het ontwerp van Lego niet is beschermd door het Europees merkenrecht en dat er dus geen sprake mag zijn van alleenrecht.

      Perhaps less fun..
      But here is the more correct ( though quick and quite literal ) translation:

      Lego went to the "Europese Hof" (a very high justice department in europe) in a battle against the Canadian competitor Mega Brands, who created a brick that fits on the lego brick. The "Hof" decided today that the design of Lego is not protected by the European Market rights, and that there thus cannot be any case for exclusive ownership.

    3. Re:Let me attempt to translate... by theaveng · · Score: 5, Informative

      Babel Fish to the rescue:

      "Lego had stepped to the European Court of Justice in the fight against the Canadian competitor Mega fire, which a cube on the market has brought that watches out which of Lego. The court judged today that the design of Lego has not been protected by the European merkenrecht and that there can no talk be therefore of exclusive right."

      Hmmm. Well my fish is almost 40 years old.

      "Lego was, according to the European Court of Justice objected in the fight against the Canadian competitor mega brands, which is a cube on the market that has brought shall apply to those of Lego. The Court ruled today that the design of Lego not protected by the European trademark law and that there is no question of exclusive rights."

      Nope. Still sounds like nonsense.

      Here's what Deutsche Welle says: "The European Union's Court of First Instance turned down Lego's appeal to force the EU's trademarks and designs office to reissue its trademark for the shape of its standard red Lego brick with eight cylindrical knobs.

      "The EU court, however, sided with a 2004 decision made by the EU agency, which had canceled Lego's trademark after rival toy maker Canada's Mega Brands Inc. filed an appeal to Lego's application. Mega Brands produces similar plastic building blocks that compete with Lego."

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    4. Re:Let me attempt to translate... by corbettw · · Score: 5, Funny

      The "Hof" decided today that the design of Lego is not protected by the European Market rights, and that there thus cannot be any case for exclusive ownership.

      You know, I knew David Hasselhof was popular in Europe, but I had no idea he was so powerful!

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    5. Re:Let me attempt to translate... by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2

      Here's what Deutsche Welle says: "The European Union's Court of First Instance turned down Lego's appeal to force the EU's trademarks and designs office to reissue its trademark for the shape of its standard red Lego brick with eight cylindrical knobs. "The EU court, however, sided with a 2004 decision made by the EU agency, which had canceled Lego's trademark after rival toy maker Canada's Mega Brands Inc. filed an appeal to Lego's application. Mega Brands produces similar plastic building blocks that compete with Lego."

      About. Fucking. Time.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    6. Re:Let me attempt to translate... by KidHash · · Score: 4, Funny

      That'll teach them to Hassle the Hof

    7. Re:Let me attempt to translate... by Gr8Apes · · Score: 1

      Close:

      Europese Hof van justitie = European Court of Justice
      merkenrecht = TradeMark rights
      alleenrecht = exclusive rights

      --
      The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    8. Re:Let me attempt to translate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hof = Court. (same in German). For example, Hofbrau = court brewery, from medieval times (brau = brewery).

    9. Re:Let me attempt to translate... by nuke-alwin · · Score: 4, Informative

      Luxembourg - The Danish manufacturer will have to swallow hard as the European Court of Justice decided on Wednesday that anyone may produce a block which fits on the original Lego block. Lego went to the European Court of Justice in a battle against the Canadian competitor Mega Brands who have brought a block to market which fits to those of Lego. The Court decided today that the design of Lego is not protected by European trademarks and that there can be no exclusive rights. The rest of the article is historical information about Lego.

      --
      "Have no fear for Atomic Energy" - Bob Marley in Redemption Song
    10. Re:Let me attempt to translate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't speak the language but that's easy as fuck to get the gist of.

      "Lego has brought a case to the European Court of Justice in the strife against the Canadian competitor Mega Brands, that have thrown a block on the market that fits onto the Lego."

    11. Re:Let me attempt to translate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dialectizer to the rescue:

      Jive:

      Lego had stepped t'de European Court uh Justice in de fight against da damn Canadian competito' Mega fire, which some cube on de market gots brought dat watches out which uh Lego. 'S coo', bro. De court judged today dat da damn design uh Lego gots not been protected by de European market and dat dere kin no rap be derefo'e uh exclusive right. Man!

    12. Re:Let me attempt to translate... by Gilmoure · · Score: 0

      Lego = One legged mud skipper fish?

      --
      I drank what? -- Socrates
    13. Re:Let me attempt to translate... by hairyfeet · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      And for all of you texters,AOLer translator to the rescue!

      DA AU COURT HOWAVER SIEDD WIT A 204 D3CISION MAED BY DA 3U AEGNCY WHICH HAD CANC3LAD LEGOS TRAEDMARK AFTER RIVAL 2Y MAEKR CANADAS M3GA BRANDS INC!11!11 OMG LOL FIELD AN APEAL 2 LEGOS APLICATION!!1!!! LOL MEGA BRANDS PRODUC3S SIMILAR PLASTIC BUILDNG BLOX TAHT COMP3T3 WIT LEGO!!!!111!! OMG

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    14. Re:Let me attempt to translate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lego was naar het Europese Hof van justitie gestapt in de strijd tegen de Canadese concurrent Mega Brands, die een blokje op de markt heeft gebracht dat past op die van Lego. Het Hof oordeelde vandaag dat het ontwerp van Lego niet is beschermd door het Europees merkenrecht en dat er dus geen sprake mag zijn van alleenrecht.

      My shot at it:

      Lego was near hot European Hasselhoff just in time to gestate in the stride generator concurrent with the Canada geese Mega Brands, ...okay, I give up...

      Lego went to the European Court to accuse the Canadian competitor Mega Brands [of violating their (registered) trademark], who brought pieces of lego-like blocs to the market which fit with real lego pieces. The [European] Court's verdict was that the design of Lego [pieces] is not protected by the European Trademark law and thus Lego can't have a monopoly [on producing lego-like blocs].

      (not a literal translation)

    15. Re:Let me attempt to translate... by eam · · Score: 1

      Not everyone will agree with me, but I still look for LEGO on the brick. If it doesn't have that, it's crap. I've got bricks that are older than I am and they still work fine. I have trouble believing some garbage maker like Mega blocks will be able to manage that.

  40. D&D Insider ad by CmdrPorno · · Score: 1

    "If true, hopefully this will open doors for people interested in inexpensive bulk purchase of bricks of specific sizes and colors."

    Given the D&D Insider Magazine ad at the top of the Slashdot discussion page, I'm guessing that a girlfriend-shaped and colored block would sell very well.

    --
    Sent from my iPhone
  41. Leet-speaking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The manufacturer is the biggest toy manufacturer in Europe with a revenue of 7823 billion Danish Krone ( 1049 billion Euro or 1337 billion dollars ) in 2006.

    1337 billion dollars?

    Now that's some leet amount of money, eh?

  42. Re:Obligatory by smitty97 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fixed it:

    All your baseplates are belong to us

    --
    mod me funny
  43. Good for your wallet, but poor quality by hellfire · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Personally, I hated megablocks, because the bricks are not made with the same quality as Legos. Legos have a very exacting standard they make for each brick, to guarentee they fit together and stay together when you want to, and come apart when you need them to. Megablocks I found are looser, and don't stay together as often. I'm anal. I played with Legos when I was young, but when I grew up, my son and I put together some megablocks sets he got from someone else. The comparative quality was very poor.

    However, in terms of business, a competition between Megablocks and Legos is a good thing. Legos wants (I hope) to be a higher quality toy, while Megablocks is for those who are less anal and more frugal. They have carved out their own niches and provide choice for the consumer. Additional players in the market should help.

    At the same time, I hope someone tackles with the idea that lego sets are too specialized now. There are so many specialty pieces that it limits the amount you can create with a single set, and limits the replay value. Back in the 80s, there were tons of new pieces that weren't all just bricks, but those pieces could still be creatively used to build new models from your imagination. The odd shaped clear plastic panel that curls around the model just so and only has one real use is annoying.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:Good for your wallet, but poor quality by Reziac · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Agreed on all counts. I call this "one function only" type of "creativity" DOING THE PLAYING FOR THE CHILD. It actively *prevents* kids from being genuinely creative.

      Better to have to figure out how to create the specialty object from the generic parts -- now that's the way to stretch a kid's brain!

      [Buy my "Home Brain Stretcher", built entirely from Legos and available for only $199.95!]

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    2. Re:Good for your wallet, but poor quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, yes and er, yes. Take a MB plate, and flex it a bit - immediately you can see the stress in the plastic, and it will snap without any real effort.

      Do the same with a Lego piece, and it will flex right back (well, a few times anyway). The MB plastic is very soft.

      If you want a better comparison, look at Tyco bricks; they aren't as quite robust as Lego, but they're still a world away from MB.

      However, as an AFOL and a Lego purist (It's not "Legos", American fools) I try to discard anything that isn't 100% Lego if I pick up a mixed lot of bricks.

      As for the price - yes, brand new it is "expensive", but Lego can last for 30+ years - not many toys can say that, and just recent I saw a mint 1980s set go for over $1000 on eBay. But Lego doesn't have to be expensive - cheap can be found all the time at yard sales, Craigslist, etc, even eBay if you're patient.

    3. Re:Good for your wallet, but poor quality by 2short · · Score: 1

      "Personally, I hated megablocks, because the bricks are not made with the same quality as Legos. "

      Their blocks *were* not made with the same quality as Legos. Then Legos patents expired. Their blocks weren't made in quite the same colors as Lego either; now this trademark decision.

      There is no longer any legal reason MegaBloks can't make blocks that are entirely intercangeable with Lego (short of the name). At that point, it's a low-margin price race, which, compared to the past, sucks for Lego.
          This is (arguably) the cause of the over-specialized pieces you despise: The profit margin isn't there on basic bricks anymore.

    4. Re:Good for your wallet, but poor quality by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Some good points.

      But until I'm sure that I can buy a MegaBlocks set with the same quality as Lego, it's not going to happen.

      I also agree that the specialty parts, while probably giving Lego a short term gain, are antithetic to the core principle.

      The biggest boost to Lego exposure is in movies or TV shows where people make these grand structures... movies like Elf, where they make a replica of some huge buildings in NY. Not only couldn't they ever have really done that even using all the sets on the shelves of a typical department store, but if you calculated the cost of really doing those buildings it would be in the thousands.

      I think a lot of people would purchase bulk bricks for reasonable prices.... the profit margin might not be as high, but the alternative is me not buying at all as opposed to my buying other sets. And I know I'm not alone... although I'm not stupid enough (although I am pretty stupid) to believe that there's enough people like me to make it worthwhile, either.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    5. Re:Good for your wallet, but poor quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, GP used the correct tense. Quality may have improved, I don't know. But implying they are Lego quality is a sad joke.

      Our kid received some megablocks as a gift. I was skeptical, remembering their horrible quality from my own experiences. We tried them out anyway. They were unusable. Our kid hated them. I hated them. We tried to give them away. No one wanted them. We ended up throwing them out.

      Don't hold your breath for megablocks to ever be LEGO quality. It will be two or three generations before they live down their reputation as an inferior product. They'd be much better off developing a higher-quality line under a new name.

    6. Re:Good for your wallet, but poor quality by PitaBred · · Score: 1

      Go to www.lego.com and you can buy a lot of the older "generic" stuff. The sets are what sell... people want a theme, they want Harry Potter or Star Wars, rather than creativity. Lego's not stupid, they make and market mostly what sells the best... but they still have the good stuff for us geeky types, we just have to look a little harder for it.

    7. Re:Good for your wallet, but poor quality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

      GP was saying "one use only" pieces limit the value of a single set. The same basic idea built in more generic pieces would be more flexible and therefore more valuable. You're saying children can't use that single piece creatively. The difference is subtle, but those are two different things.

      My child, and I'm sure she's not alone, has taken many of those specialty pieces and designed really interesting things that have nothing whatever to do with the original purpose of the piece.

    8. Re:Good for your wallet, but poor quality by Rich0 · · Score: 1

      Agreed - I grew up as a lego nut. However, when I happen to look at lego sets in the store today I get the impression that they just design some molded plastic toy that could be made as one piece, and then chop it into 10 pieces for somebody to assemble, using the lego tab and slot mechanism.

      What's the point? I'm all for having lots of interesting parts beyond just blocks, but let's keep the pieces small and interchangable.

  44. Re:makes sense, meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, on the one hand, the race to the bottom wins again.

    On the other hand, Lego is a socially responsible company with zero waste, excellent pay and bennies for all employees, and an all around good company. I hope this doesn't mean the collapse of the Danish economy. I mean, they pretty much have Legos, Bang and Olfsen, Hans Christian Anderson... and that's about it.

  45. Possibly Tyco by georgeha · · Score: 1

    Tyco are the only clone bricks I've come across that are close to Lego.

    I'd throw out any Megablocks I find, but my parents wanted them for a friend's kid.

    1. Re:Possibly Tyco by khellendros1984 · · Score: 1

      Yes, I think they were Tyco. Someone else lower on the page reminded me.

      --
      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
  46. Trademark by Adrian+Lopez · · Score: 1

    The design of Lego bricks is functional. It should never have been a trademark to begin with.

    --
    "In prison you just have to shut your eyes and take it. Here you have to shut your eyes and give it."
    1. Re:Trademark by otis+wildflower · · Score: 1

      The Lego(tm) logo on each pip is legit, though I wonder when the patent on the block formfactor expired?

  47. Lego usually NOT made in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was thrilled to discover that Lego boxes are clearly labelled indicating the source(s) of their plastic blocks. Some indicate that blocks were made in China but most are not... so I could vote with my dollars for (presumably) safer product for my child.

    Losing this case means the company will no doubt have to compete on price, to lower quality and to cut corners thereby safety concerns.

    At some point in the future we'll be hearing about toxic lego blocks outgassing neurotoxins that give kids seizures or some such thing.

  48. I'm up on Mega, down on lego, pine for Am. Bricks by MickLinux · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We use the mega blocks and duplo blocks, both. There both okay for pretending.

    However, I've found that both I and my kids cannot easily take legos apart. In addition, the form factor of legos makes it easy to make their intended toy (if you want to spend the time), but comparatively hard to make other things.

    I remember the days of American Bricks, though, when we'd make marble machines, spaceships (tiny, med, large, and super), ships, and whatnot. Yeah, it didn't have all the specialized parts that lego has. But that's what imagination is for. I remember playing the Children's Space Revolution (in 1972, with a theme song that was remarkably similar to that which came out for Star Wars), and other stories that we made up as we went.

    I never saw that with legos -- not with my brothers, not with my oldest son. We gave it up. The kids do pretend with Mega Bloks. As a parent, I'd much prefer something that falls apart every so often, to something that you can't get apart without tremendous effort.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  49. This is very bad! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is bad, now all the âforeignâ(TM) companies that use bad chemicals and poison our children will be selling knockoffs. I trust the Lego brand, and would hate to see a Chinese made knock-off.
     

  50. From Google Translate by chikanamakalaka · · Score: 1

    Lego loses exclusive right to make lego cubes Luxury Ohio - It will be the Danish manufacturer Lego to swallow are now the European Court of Justice has ruled Wednesday that everyone must make a box that fits the original lego bit. Lego was to the European Court of Justice and were active in the fight against the Canadian competitor Mega Brands, which is a block on the market that fits that of Lego. The Court ruled today that the design of Lego is not protected by the trademark and that there should be no question of monopoly. he stone is lego in 1932 by Ole Kirk Christiansen in the Danish town of Billund mind. The name "LEGO" is derived from the Danish words "Leg Godts" (play well). Later it was found the word in Latin to interpret as "I collectables" (including "I choose" or "I read"). LEGO is a Danish toy manufacturer that has become familiar with colored plastic cubes. The cubes are under the name "Lego" sold, thus the name refers not only to the manufacturer, but is also a generic name for the toys become. The manufacturer is the largest toy manufacturer in Europe with a turnover of 7823 billion Danish kroner (1.049 trillion euros) in 2006. Meanwhile, LEGO twice the price "toys of the century" won. The Lego Group is the fifth largest toy manufacturer in the world.

  51. Quality by CokeJunky · · Score: 1

    I am not too worried on behalf of Lego -- I have used mega blocks many times, and frankly while they are compatible, the quality and tolerances are not even close to lego. They don't even stick to each other all that well.

    Basically, while this might mean there is a flood of cheap bricks on the market, I will stick the to orgiginal for my kids when I have the choice because the quality is so much better.

    Besides, when I step on them in bare feet, I want to curse their damn legos all over the floor -- it sounds better than damn mega blocks..

    --
    More Caffeine. NOW
  52. Re: OLS 2.0! by TypoNAM · · Score: 1

    OLS 2.0 Full Speed
    OLS 2.0 Hi-Speed
    "Original OLS"

    OLS Universal Host Controller
    OLS Enhanced Host Controller

    Wait... What were we talking about again?

    --
    This space is not for rent.
  53. Re:makes sense, meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, that's not "about it".

  54. Lego can't compete by a.ameri · · Score: 5, Informative

    The problem is, Lego might be a household name, indeed in some countries it is a generic name for building blocks, but it is still a family-owned business. It's CEO and Chairman is a cool-looking grandson of the founder, and it resides in a rural town in Denmark called Billund, with a population of about 27,000 where nearly 90% of its manufacturing still occurs. The town is almost entirely dependent on Lego.

    Lego is among the world's best employers (if not outright best). Equal opportunity in action. Employees, including the CEO, do not have reserved parking spots at the HQ's carpark, offices mostly resemble community areas rather than walled rooms, free food and drinks are all over the place, not to mention some of the best sporting and health facilities provided to employees. Blue collar workers receive the same treatment, for most things from gym membership to access to the health clinic, there is no difference between the executives and simple manufacturing employee. People don't wear name tags, they nearly always wear casual, unless they have a meeting with an outside party.

    Lego has Idea Labs where people just experiment with new toys. It employs scientist, from chemists to child psychologists just to carry out all sorts of experiments. It is such a fun place, you'd be forgiven if you thought you where in Wonderland. It has a museum full of toys that it invented but failed to manufacture, mostly due to safety concerns. I can understand why some of them might have been thought of as dangerous, but boy are they cool!

    Of course, with all the above, with the cost of employing and manufacturing in Europe, it can't compete with the cheapest-of-the-cheap Chinese factory which just mass produces plastic blocks. I understand that in this case, IP laws do not really cover its business, and anyone is legally able to copy them, but IMO it's rather sad to see that such companies can't really exist in this world, that consumers don't value the history and the culture of a company. They just look at a price tag and make their decision solely based on that.

    Everyone I met at Lego is aware of these issues. They have carried massive restructuring plans since 2005, but they know they can't compete against most rivals whose costs are simply lower; yet they really want to preserve the unique culture that has made Lego, Lego for the past generations. Short of outsourcing manufacturing to some place in China, closing its museum and laboratory and airport and with it the town and becoming just another plastic manufacturer, I can't think of a way for them to survive. As I said, it's rather sad.

    --
    -- /* Those who don't underestand Unix, are condemned to reinvent it poorly */
    1. Re:Lego can't compete by Tom · · Score: 1

      Brand awareness is a cool thing. Lots of people buy lots of stuff not from the cheapest sources. Clothes are a very obvious example, where the simple fact that your jeans was manufactured by X means it can cost 5x or 10x as much as the no-name jeans from China, and still more people will buy (brand) than chinese no-name.

      Cheap production also isn't always an advantage. Many parents are quite sensitive about the possibility of toxic stuff in toys, and would rather buy a brand name (any brand) than a cheap no-name product. Some might even decide simply by price that if it's a little more expensive, it is probably better quality, not toxic, etc. - it happens in other markets.

      Finally, within a few years, with the globalisation and "predator capitalism" (as a former German head of state once called it) party over and oil prices rising due to peak oil, etc. - local production might become a competitive factor again.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    2. Re:Lego can't compete by a.ameri · · Score: 1

      Dude, what's with the attitude? Calm down, it's Lego we are talking about.

      Who is talking about "government keeping them in business" and "government forcing them to exist"? Which government are you talking about? They are a family owned business, and they've been profitable in the past two decades. Yes, they are facing rising competition from copy-cats, but they understand that that's their business. What's all this government nonsense you are talking about? Did you somehow think that everyone in Europe lives off government subsidies?

      Fuck the town? Why? It's a small town, it's where Grandpa the Founder was born and grew up in. The town has grown with Lego. What's wrong with that?

      I had been lucky to have observed Lego first hand for a couple of weeks, while I was working as a research assistant studying their IS project development methodologies. I thought since the discussion was about Lego, I'd share some of my stories here.

      You wanna go and by cheap Lego-like bricks? Fine, who is stopping you? Good luck with your spaceship dude, and don't overreact to everything you hear please, it helps the conversation.

      --
      -- /* Those who don't underestand Unix, are condemned to reinvent it poorly */
    3. Re:Lego can't compete by alvinrod · · Score: 1

      Lego can continue to do just as well, even without government help. In a free market consumers are able to choose what they will and what they won't buy. Occasionally I'll be able to find a product at one store for less, but will do business elsewhere simply because another company has better customer support. The same can be said with product quality as well.

      If people want cheap, Lego knockoffs then they can buy them. They'll get exactly what they pay for though. You're entirely right that Lego doesn't deserve to be in business if they can't complete, but as long as they can offer quality, or something else that the competition can't, they'll remain in business. The margins might be tighter, but that's what competition does. Hopefully it will drive Lego to find methods to produce their product at the same quality while reducing their cost.

      It seems like any time a company gets a free pass to rest on their laurels and past successes, they fail to produce anything new or truly useful and generally end up spending their money keeping others from doing just that.

      The only problem with Lego is that their product may be too good. I probably won't need to buy my children very many Lego sets simply because they'll be able to use all of the ones I had as a child because they'll still work just as well now as they did then.

    4. Re:Lego can't compete by CorporateSuit · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, those free food and drinks, museum, airport, and culture all make a box of 45 blocks cost $15 instead of the $1.50 it would cost if built with whips and child labor.

      --
      I am the richest astronaut ever to win the superbowl.
    5. Re:Lego can't compete by realisticradical · · Score: 1

      Something I missed here, why can't they manufacture in China and design in Europe? Everyone else does it that way.

    6. Re:Lego can't compete by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah boo hoo.

      They don't get their free food, drinks, health and sporting facilities. Guess they don't get to experiment on children any more too.

      I'm crying here at all the free and somewhat questionable things they no longer get to have and do.

    7. Re:Lego can't compete by Dretep · · Score: 1

      Damn, did someone screw up your coffee order this morning? Been suffering from caffeine withdrawl for a while and just needed to clear your chest? Or could it be that Daddy didn't get you the Lego set you wanted as a child and now any reference to Lego causes you to go bi-polar. In any case, go see a doctor and get some medication for that!

    8. Re:Lego can't compete by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      The government saying "you cannot make the same thing this guy is making, even if you can do it better and cheaper", and continuing to do so because "if others could make the same thing, it would destroy the town!" [Which pretty much sums up your original post.] would be, well, fucking stupid.

      "But Lego is a really great company!" is not a reason to deny others the right to compete.
      "But Lego has been really great quality!" is not a reason to deny others the right to compete.
      "But Lego would be able to hold its own even if it had competition!" is certainly not a reason to deny others the right to compete.
      "But Lego is a really REALLY great company!" is not a reason to deny others the right to compete.
      "But competition would destroy Lego!" is not a reason to deny others the right to compete.

      etc etc etc

      I've no apologies for saying "You know what? Fuck you." when you say that I should ignore the rights of others to protect the petty desires of the obsolete. It doesn't matter how great Lego is, they've had exclusive rights long enough and should NOT get to trample all over others just because of your fond childhood memories.

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    9. Re:Lego can't compete by Moldiver · · Score: 1

      Because they want quality and are behaving social.

    10. Re:Lego can't compete by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      Or maybe I think assholes saying "LUL BUT I 3 LEGO", ignoring basic rights because of it, should fuck off.

      I did get that Lego set I wanted as a child. I love Lego. I plan on bringing boxes of them 4000 miles to my new home in a couple of weeks.

      But a lot more than I like Legos, I like governments not telling people that they aren't even allowed to try to do better than what's currently out there.

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    11. Re:Lego can't compete by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 1

      True that Legos have always been superior to every similar brick. I can't help but wonder if MegaBlocks suck so much because they weren't allowed to make something that worked like Lego.

      Legos are definitely generation-worthy: I can't think of one non-flat lego peice that I've broken.

      But everyone wants _more_ legos, what's wrong with you? :)

      --
      -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
    12. Re:Lego can't compete by syousef · · Score: 1

      Sad that a company that has maintained employee friendliness by reaming the customer by selling a product at roughly 5 times its value can't exist? I can understand people being upset that the quality of bricks will decline but I don't understand why people should feel sad that employees will no longer get a lot more than they're worth.

      What's really sad is that I do think they can survive by getting a better sense of balance. Make the bricks 1.5-2x the price of cheap knockoffs and cut the perks out to something a little more reasonable (with less waste) and you can still have a nice family company even if the gym membership isn't quite what it use to be.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  55. Google Translation by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lego was to the European Court of Justice and were active in the fight against the Canadian competitor Mega Brands, which is a block on the market that fits that of Lego. The Court ruled today that the design of Lego is not protected by the trademark and that there should be no question of monopoly.

    Here's the translated page. And no, BabelFish did not produce a translation of the same quality.

    Google frightens me sometimes. Almost every day now.

    --
    May the Maths Be with you!
    1. Re:Google Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      now the European Court of Justice has ruled Wednesday that everyone must make a box that fits the original lego bit.

      Well, fuck. Do I have to start right away, or is there some kind of deadline?

    2. Re:Google Translation by wiredlogic · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, Google and Babelfish were both using Systran and produced identical results. At least for Japanese.

      --
      I am becoming gerund, destroyer of verbs.
    3. Re:Google Translation by dorfsmay · · Score: 1

      >Google frightens me sometimes. Almost every day now.

      Nothing to be afraid, relas, as a matter of fact, you should take it easy in the next few days, because Google tells me you are getting the flu.

    4. Re:Google Translation by CubicleView · · Score: 4, Funny
      From the Google translation

      LEGO twice the price "toys of the century" won.

      Don't be frightened, Yoda wouldn't work for anyone evil.

    5. Re:Google Translation by mrwolf007 · · Score: 1
      From the page:

      The manufacturer is the largest toy manufacturer in Europe with a turnover of 7823 billion Danish kroner (1.049 trillion euros) in 2006.

      Once MS hears this they will stop producing software. Year of the Linux desktop coming after all.

    6. Re:Google Translation by fm6 · · Score: 1

      The Google toolbar comes with a button that feeds the current page to Google Translate. Saves steps.

      I'm constantly impressed by Google's ability to come up with cutting edge software that does things their competitors can't even approach. I'm less happy with their total inability to polish off the rough edges, document features properly, stomp bugs, and think through their GUI designs.

      Maybe I'm just jealous because Google hires only brilliant computer scientists (like whoever came up with with Google Translate) and has no room for unimaginative drudges (like me). The problem with that approach is that your products never mature, because there's nobody to do the scutwork that separates a mature product from a permanent beta.

    7. Re:Google Translation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google's translation service is so effective because of the MASSIVE amounts of data to which Google as a company have access. The more data you have, the better your algorithms can learn.

      Here's a video on youtube of Peter Norvig (Director of Research at Google) talking about the same subject last year (warning: LONG! :D)

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nU8DcBF-qo4

      _AC

    8. Re:Google Translation by darc · · Score: 1

      Unlike other translation services such as Babel Fish, AOL, and Yahoo which use SYSTRAN, Google uses its own translation software.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_Translate

      --
      Tired of legitimate data sources? Try UNCYCLOPEDIA
  56. It's "LEg GOdt", or play *well*. by jonaskoelker · · Score: 1

    The name LEGO is derived from the Danish words "LE GOdt" (play good).

    "Le godt" [pron: ~~~"meh gut", s/m/l/] means "laugh well". "Leg godt" [pron: ~"lie gut"] means "play well".

    "godt" also means "good", but "well" is the right word to use here.

  57. lego vs cheap knock-offs by loafula · · Score: 2, Informative

    From the perspective of a man who grew up with legos and duplos- The legos were waaaaaay easier to snort.

    --
    FOXTROT UNIFORM CHARLIE KILO
  58. Here is a link by mikesd81 · · Score: 1
    --
    That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
  59. Taco is out of the closet? by alexborges · · Score: 1

    Really? A life sized Emo statue?

    Modeled after CowboyNeal?

    (shivers)

    --
    NO SIG
  60. Re:makes sense, meh by koalapeck · · Score: 1

    Tempur-Pedic as well (yes I know they say "swedish mattresses and pillows" but their european factory is in Denmark.

  61. ahh, I keed by poetmatt · · Score: 1

    I can't help but think of those leg'go my eggo commercials.

    "Leggo my trademark!"

  62. Re:makes sense, meh by theaveng · · Score: 4, Funny

    You forgot the red-light districts.

    Not that I've ever been there. Nope. Uh huh. Nyet. I'm just a Puritan American and have no clue what "red light" means. Yep.

    --
    FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
  63. Bionicle by Hythlodaeus · · Score: 1

    What does it matter when all they're pushing is the Bionicle stuff these days?

    --
    For great justice.
    1. Re:Bionicle by 0x4a6f6e43 · · Score: 1

      Wow are you out of the loop. Go to lego.com and see what they are making today. They've been undergoing a major product line improvement for the last few years and they now have several key themes that are very popular among the kids. The big ones for the kids I know are: 1) Star Wars. Loads of models based on all eras of the Star Wars saga. Very collectable. 2) Spies. Loads of models based on a James Bond like spy setup. 3) Cities. Loads of models based on a city theme. Like SimCity for legos. 4) Indy Jones. The latest movie sucked but every kid I know thinks the legos are cool.

    2. Re:Bionicle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My local Target has a much greater variety of Lego sets than Bionicle. Sure, many of them are themed Star Wars or Harry Potter sets, but there still a lot of generic space and city sets, and of course you can still get buckets of regular bricks. Where are you shopping? (posting anon because I already modded some posts....)

  64. Where does it say that? by argent · · Score: 2, Interesting

    OK, I don't speak Dutch, but...

    The competing companies will even benefit from free advertising since Lego company advertising will effectively promote companies that simply call their product Legos.

    Is the decision about the *shape* of the toys, or the *name* of the toys?

  65. Re:I'm up on Mega, down on lego, pine for Am. Bric by jimicus · · Score: 1
  66. The AWFUL truth about LEGO by zoomshorts · · Score: 5, Funny

    My son had LEGO blocks, but I soon discovered that they have sharp
    pointy edges, and hurt when you step on them barefooted in the dark.

    Needless to say, any block I encountered in the dark disappeared. Soon
    he had none. That never did teach him to pick up his toys. Grrrrr.

    1. Re:The AWFUL truth about LEGO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Denying a kid Lego is paramount to child abuse.

    2. Re:The AWFUL truth about LEGO by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 5, Funny

      One Christmas I spread my Lego bricks around the Christmas tree and on the stairs, to try to catch Santa.

      At about midnight there was a lot of swearing, and I found out that Santa wasn't real. :(

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    3. Re:The AWFUL truth about LEGO by WillyDavidK · · Score: 2, Funny

      hahaha, there's a unique story. Tho, as funny as that is, I can't help but wonder what your parents were doing while you were setting up your .. er .. trap...

      --
      For lack of a better signature...
    4. Re:The AWFUL truth about LEGO by Max+Romantschuk · · Score: 1

      I had a heavy Lego phase during primary school. The floor in my room was basically a sea of Lego, with a trail going from the bed to the door... ;)

      --
      .: Max Romantschuk :: http://max.romantschuk.fi/
    5. Re:The AWFUL truth about LEGO by Tacticus.v1 · · Score: 1

      The correct response is to wait until your son has grown up and has his own spawn

      then show up unannounced and tip it on the floor for his kids

      I dread the revenge of my parents

  67. If to use lego we need p2p by WEGAH · · Score: 0

    Let me see. If i just open my p2p program, to get my ubuntu iso or another kind of legal share, iam sued by 1000000 Lawyers, that tell i do a crazy crime for download a more than 50y old music and i need to pay some kind of U$ 300000000, and all my kids will be at street asking for food. ITs ok. THE LAW of GREAT FREEDOM NATION seems to be good enough to be used all around globe by the US PUPPIES ( well if i have luck, they can say that iam a crazy terrorist/pedofile to, what mean is do my life ends).. now Lego one of most know trademark around globe, cant do use of old and well done patent? Great ( at last no one send the police to get out all lego from BIG REPOSITORY in allegation is free to public now). wondering what will happens with windows when the right of use go.. Microsoft will end?

  68. Re:makes sense - Translation by WarwickRyan · · Score: 0, Redundant

    >Lego was naar het Europese Hof van justitie gestapt in de strijd tegen
    >de Canadese concurrent Mega Brands, die een blokje op de markt heeft
    >gebracht dat past op die van Lego. Het Hof oordeelde vandaag dat het
    >ontwerp van Lego niet is beschermd door het Europees merkenrecht en dat
    >er dus geen sprake mag zijn van alleenrecht.

    Here's a translation, I've tried to use more English expressions where I can:

    Lego has been to the European head of justice in the battle against Canadian competitor Mega Brands, who have put Lego-compatible blocks on the market. The head decided today that Lego's design isn't protected on the European market and that there is no talk of them having a monopoly....

  69. Re:I'm up on Mega, down on lego, pine for Am. Bric by carypearson · · Score: 1

    Do you have a disability of the hands? Are you extremely weak? I have seen 3 and 4 years that are able to take Lego blocks apart without issue...the only time I have seen that there is a problem is if it is a small plate attached to a small plate... The form factor making only the intended toy? http://www.brothers-brick.com/ take a look at what people do with this limited form factor bricks...

  70. uhm, no... by slew · · Score: 1

    | one 1x1
    Flat or tall?

    I'm afraid the original options for 1x1 were square and round...
    Flat came much, much later...

  71. Re:makes sense, meh by gfxguy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Yeah... I look at this as a mixed blessing.

    I have a substantial collection of Lego, and I have a single MegaBlocks model... as much as I hate to say it, there's really a difference in quality. The Lego plastic is actually superior, and the quality of the molds must be better, too.

    So while I'd like to be able to buy bulk packs of pieces (which I've done via bricklink for some years now) at cheap prices (at an average approaching $0.10 piece for a little piece of molded plastic?), I certainly wouldn't accept lower quality just to get cheaper pieces.

    I'm all for competition, though. If Lego reduces prices (I know they whine they are barely making it... which is just baffling to me), then I'll be all over it. I mean, go ahead and charge $50 for a 400 piece Star Wars set... but let me buy bulk bricks to build my mega (no pun intended) structures, and I'll be a happy guy.

    Sometimes on bricklink you can find pieces you like for less than a penny a piece... unfortunately, while I admit I don't look very often, I haven't seen that kind of deal in some time.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  72. Re: Smash 'em Up Derby by Lonewolf666 · · Score: 1

    So did I as a kid, and we actually managed to break some of the Lego parts. Not the classic 4x2 bricks, but some of the more fragile ones. So there is an argument for cheap replacements ;-)

    --
    C - the footgun of programming languages
  73. Not really by mrslacker · · Score: 1

    The choice of bricks in Lego's shop might seem large, but it's actually quite limited, compared to the number of types of bricks which have ever been products (over 10000 at a guess).

    Try here instead: http://www.bricklink.com/

    1. Re:Not really by Rary · · Score: 1

      The choice of bricks in Lego's shop might seem large, but it's actually quite limited, compared to the number of types of bricks which have ever been products (over 10000 at a guess).

      I suspect that most people who buy bricks by the bag are interested more in the standard generic bricks for multi-purpose building, rather than the bricks that are designed for a single specific use in a single specific set. Personally, I'd only be interested in few dozen different types of bricks.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

  74. Re:makes sense, meh by TheLink · · Score: 1

    I believe they also export cheese and pork in various forms.

    In fact, Danish cheese is the only Danish stuff I can recall buying in the past few years.

    --
  75. Re:makes sense, meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm just a Puritan American and have no clue what "red light" means. Yep.

    It means 'if you accelerate real fast maybe nobody will notice you blowing through the intersection'.

  76. Electronic Lego by archshade · · Score: 1

    It would be good if companies to find someway of adding value while still staying compatible to lego so the blocks still stuck together
    I for one love to see Lego blocks with electronic components built in that way you could build a a house which also lit up or summit. You could have some simple stuff like capacitor resistors diodes/LEDs ans slightly more complex stuff like op-amps etc

    A O O O
    O O O C

    This type of layout could be used for simple 2 pin components (the A is the anode and C is cathode If relevant, O are blank or just pass though signals)

    more complex components could be easily accommodated using example of simple op-amp

    + V O O
    - O G o/p

    (where + is non inverting input - is inverting input, V is connected to 5V, G to ground and o/p is output)
    Maybe a good easy way to get kids into analogue/discreet electronics without giving them some components and a bread board

    --
    Most Damage is done by people who are AWAKE
  77. Chinese bricks: they can block x-rays!!! by cpotoso · · Score: 1

    Seeing how all made-in-china stuff tends to have lead in them... perhaps they can advertise this feature (superman cannot see through your china-lego bricks).

  78. Nothing from Lego is prebuilt by Maarek+Stele · · Score: 1

    In all of my lego collector items, you had to build everything including the people(arms, legs, head, hat, cape, etc). Mega Blocks contain pieces that are prebuilt and will on fit the intended design. All the gears, hinges, and sturdiness are from the individual pieces and how they fit together.

    My Lego Star Wars Collector's TIE Interceptor comes with a stand that you have to build put together from lego pieces. Mega Blocks look like Lego's Duplo set that a 2yr old would play with.

    --
    "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind." -Dr. Seuss
  79. Sears used to put out Brix Blox by Rastl · · Score: 1

    It may not have been spelled exactly like that. You'll have to forgive me since I've had mine for over 30 years and the original boxes are long gone.

    I've hauled around a five gallon bucket of these things for years. For quite a while they were just part of the stuff to move but now I'm using them as temporary framing for building miniatures. So I'm technically still playing with them!

    The fit can be a bit loose on some of them but overall I had nothing but fun with them when I actively played with them. They even have a motor and gears to make moving stuff.

    Lego will still have their licensing deals so while you might get basic sets the special ones (Star Wars, etc.) will probably still be theirs and theirs alone. I can see generic Galaxy Wars sets but kids want the things they see in the movies.

  80. Metal blocks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Forget cheap plastic. What about titanium? Alunium? Stainless steel?

    1. Re:Metal blocks? by redscare2k4 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and gunpowder! Who wants a robot when you can build a frigging machinegun!!

  81. Lego moved ops to czech republic and mexico by slew · · Score: 3, Informative

    I also doubt them moving to China very much, since they are one of the few eco-conscious companies out there.

    Although Lego is still a danish company, I believe they moved all their production operations from Billund, Denmark and the US into the Czech Republic and Mexico back in 2006... So for what it's worth, maybe not China, but Czech republic and Mexico aren't known as hot-spots of eco-consciousness either...

    1. Re:Lego moved ops to czech republic and mexico by ben0207 · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they are both first world countries with very thorough labour laws. It might be cheaper to make stuff there, but I bet there's not too many corners being cut*

      *you don't want corners cut with Lego involved - it makes the models look stupid

      --
      cmd-q.co.uk - some sort of stupid fucking internet bullshit
  82. People from Denmark are very much not Dutch by Thirsteh · · Score: 1

    And here I was, frustrated and ready to clarify that Danish != Dutch, but what do you know -- that story actually is Dutch! Touche.

  83. Mega Blocks = horrible stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We recently bought our first Mega Blocks set for our son, who has a big collection of Lego/Duplo bricks.

    The Mega Blocks set was missing two pieces (and had two other wrong pieces instead). After a month's use, one of the main pieces broke! I don't remember this happening to me with Lego in 25+ years of use, so differences are quite obvious...

  84. lego is like music industry, too rich by cellurl · · Score: 1

    I guess the judge said, "Lego has enough money". So I wish they would do that with the music industry. Q: Why can't I use any song like Happy Birthday like I can Mozart!

  85. Whoa... by Any+Web+Loco · · Score: 1
    Completely off topic but this

    When I was about 12 years old (1993)

    made me feel *old*!

    1. Re:Whoa... by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      I was 10 years old in 1993 (well, 9 years old for most of it).

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
    2. Re:Whoa... by tim_darklighter · · Score: 1

      As a grad student teaching 18-19 year olds, I feel old already. It's depressing that I don't know the lingo anymore.

      All this talk of LEGO blocks is making me want to go to my folks' house and find my bin of blocks and snatch them so I can play with them while writing my dissertation. It is quite soothing to make random spaceships, throw them against the wall (large monster attack or some such thing) and then put them back together perfectly from memory.

  86. Re:makes sense - Translation by demonlapin · · Score: 1

    You know, it's sad people have to do this. You can easily get a sense from Babelfish or Google, and Dutch and English are not so radically different that you can't piece together some of the rest. I don't speak Dutch at all, but I've learned "het" for "the" and have gotten a bit more adept at recognizing cognate words between the two.

  87. Re:I'm up on Mega, down on lego, pine for Am. Bric by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    To this day, I have longish fingernails, and I think that's one reason why. I never usually had too much trouble taking Legos apart, but heaven help me if my fingernails were just cut.

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  88. Re:makes sense - Translation by WarwickRyan · · Score: 1

    Well, the grammer's very different, but there are so many English words (ESPECIALLY in IT) that English-speakers can make sense of it...

  89. Re:I'm up on Mega, down on lego, pine for Am. Bric by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Pfft. Look through any sizable collection of legos belonging to someone under, say, age 8.

    Give me a nickle for every brick with teeth marks on it.

  90. Re:makes sense, meh by mollymoo · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have a substantial collection of Lego, and I have a single MegaBlocks model... as much as I hate to say it, there's really a difference in quality. The Lego plastic is actually superior, and the quality of the molds must be better, too.

    Lego are utterly fantastic at making their bricks. They're mind-bogglingly good, in fact. To work properly, Lego bricks must be made to a tolerance of one micron, otherwise models would fall apart or the bricks be too hard to separate. Those little plastic bricks are as precisely engineered as the most precisely engineered components in the most expensive Swiss watch. They've been making them exactly the right size since the 1960s - the bricks you or you parents had in the 60s will still work perfectly with the bricks they make today.

    --
    Chernobyl 'not a wildlife haven' - BBC News
  91. Re:makes sense, meh by ChaosDiscord · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Lego plastic is actually superior, and the quality of the molds must be better, too.

    So why is it a mixed blessing? If Lego's products are better, they'll win on quality and be worth the price. Or perhaps the general public doesn't value the difference, in which case the public gets what it wants. This is capitalism working well: competition, with competitors competing on quality and price and consumers having options.

  92. Re:makes sense, meh by steelfood · · Score: 3, Interesting

    According to one interview I read somewhere, the most expensive Lego parts to manufacture are the mini-figs. I believe they cost something like a little over $1 US to manufacture.

    Lego uses very precise molds. It is the key to the Lego bricks' distinctiveness, and why they fit well. Old molds are destroyed by burying them in the concrete foundation of buildings. They also have several different kinds of plastic to create different specialized bricks and pieces. People can replicate the design of the bricks and sell them cheaper, but I don't think they can replicate the manufacturing process and not be forced to raise prices.

    I have yet to read TFA (go figure), but I'm guessing this has something to do with Lego trying to maintain IP protection on their brick design by claiming that their trademarked logo is on the stud, and therefore the idea of a stud is trademarked as well.

    --
    "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
  93. Tyco Blocks? by Vohar · · Score: 1

    I remember having a huge bucket of Tyco bricks when I was a kid, about 20 years ago. Good quality plastic and fit, but I don't know if they would have fit with actual Lego blocks though. Other than possibly the size they were identical. It only had generic blocks, base plates, and slanted-top ones for roofs. In hindsight that was probably more fun than Lego's specialized space, boat, etc pieces since I had to get more creative to make things look like what I wanted. I made power armor for my GI Joe figures. That's the creation I'll never forget.

    1. Re:Tyco Blocks? by Megane · · Score: 1

      From reading other posts, apparently Tyco produced both some good bricks and some bad bricks. I only know what I've seen from skimming bins at thrift stores, but the good ones were the ones that had the Tyco logo on them, so they are they only ones I know of as being from Tyco. The ones I've found tended to have pastel colors, perhaps having been sold in "for girls" sets. But they put their logo on the brick between the studs, so I can't be sure if a given 1x1 block is Tyco or not, only that it's not Lego. In any case, I keep them in a separate (and small) collection, away from the Lego.

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
  94. Instead of copying Legos, go remake Construx by Legion_SB · · Score: 1

    I'll be having children in a few years, and I'm not thrilled about bringing them into a world that is without Construx.

    --
    'a';DROP TABLE users; SELECT * FROM DATA WHERE name LIKE '%'... if you're reading this, it didn't work.
  95. maybe... by moderatorrater · · Score: 1

    Option 3 is also a possibility, but what can you sell more of by selling cheap construction bricks?

    Condoms? *walks away, lost in a dream world*

  96. I have already seen Chinese knockoff lego's by John+Sokol · · Score: 1

    They were brand less, but interchangeable with Lego's.
    The problem was the tolerances where not as good and so they didn't lock together as well.

    Lego has one large advantage which is quality precision plastic molding. I don't think many low end toy companies will be able to make blocks of the same quality that are dramatically cheaper.

    Still I do hope the costs will come down.
    Some of these sets are getting ridiculously expensive for such a small amount of blocks.

    --
    I am always doing that which I can not do, in order that I may learn how to do it. - Pablo Picasso
  97. Re:makes sense, meh by owlstead · · Score: 4, Funny

    Uh, I did not know that the Dutch red light district had any competition from the Danish red light district. Unless you mean to have sex with Lego figures, that is.

  98. Already there. by Comboman · · Score: 2, Informative

    I see Lego announcing a change in which country it resides in, to one more favorable towards corporations in trademark laws.

    They're already in one. Lego has been able to keep Mega Blocks from selling in Europe until now via this bogus trademark law, but that was the last holdout. Most countries have already ruled against Lego on this issue.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
    1. Re:Already there. by 7+digits · · Score: 1

      > Lego has been able to keep Mega Blocks from selling in Europe until now via this bogus trademark law, but that was the last holdout.

      Uh ? I have seen Mega Blocks everywhere in France, since at least 2002...

  99. Re:makes sense, meh by initdeep · · Score: 1

    *whoooosh*

  100. Re:makes sense, meh by gfxguy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's a mixed blessing because of exactly what you point out...

    I think people will go for low prices, and before they realize it was a mistake, Lego will already be out of business. You'll say the customers have chosen (they have), but even most of them will realize they chose wrongly only after it was too late.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  101. Re:makes sense, meh by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 2, Funny

    You like Danish cheese? I love Cheese Danish.

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  102. Re:makes sense, meh by legirons · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Lego plastic is actually superior, and the quality of the molds must be better, too.

    They were pretty famous for being obsessive about mold quality and tolerances

    slashdot article about manufacture:

    http://entertainment.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=08/07/21/1716239

  103. Re:makes sense, meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    They've been making them in high quality since the mid 70's. I have Lego sets ranging from around the 50's to sets made in 2004 (albeit only a few in the 1965-90 and 1997-2004 ranges). The ones from the 1950's show quite a bit of wear and tear (structurally, not aesthetically), and will actually degrade large structures built using them (not as badly as Megablocks, but still weaker than newer Legos). It's not until (late) 1970 stuff that blocks start improving in quality, such that I can't tell the difference between a worn 1979 block and a worn 1999 block.

    They've only been making them excatly right since 1980.

  104. Re:makes sense, meh by erroneus · · Score: 1

    For generic building activities (of which I have not done any) I would buy mega blocks if they were significantly cheaper. But for specific building sets, I don't buy anything but Lego. "Lego" is not replaceable in my opinion.

    It might be fun to duplicate various lego sets with mega blocks pieces if they are cheap enough though. After all, the Lego Death Star, AT-AT walkers and Star Destroyers are so expensive!

    I guess my "moral/emotional" loyalty to Lego ends at about $50... after that I would look to the competition.

  105. Re:makes sense, meh by WillyDavidK · · Score: 1

    What about their muffins?!

    --
    For lack of a better signature...
  106. This is bad, imo by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

    Lego blocks are quality and most people taking advantage of this will probably make cheap blocks which will in turn bring down Lego's quality to compete.

    This is only one Lego. Anything else is junk.

  107. Re:makes sense, meh by gfxguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    [i]According to one interview I read somewhere, the most expensive Lego parts to manufacture are the mini-figs. I believe they cost something like a little over $1 US to manufacture.[/i]

    I believe it, but it's still mind boggling that, after all this time, despite how precise their molds are, that it costs so much for a molded piece of plastic.

    Even if the plastic is super high quality, you're only getting a couple of grams of it.

    How long does it take for a high quality mold to require replacement when it's just molding plastic? I don't know.

    Still, it seems to me that technological advances should make it cheaper for them to be able to produce those parts... ultimately it's still just molded plastic.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  108. Re:makes sense, meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have been to one and can attest that the lights are actually green.

  109. Re:makes sense, meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...well, you are forgetting about
    Carlsberg, the 5th largest brewery group in the world.
    Maersk, largest container ship operator. 131 on Fortune 500.
    Vestas, largest wind turbine manufacturer in the world.
    Grundfos, the world's largest pump manufacturer.
    Danfoss, components and solutions for Refrigeration & Air Conditioning, Heating & Water. ...so Danish economy is not likely to collapse from these news.

  110. Re:makes sense, meh by x102output · · Score: 4, Informative

    Just visited a LEGO store at a mall in San Jose. They have a wall of Lego piece dispensers all individually filled with unique common Lego pieces. You can grab a cup for 7 bucks, or a bigger one for 14 bucks, and fill it up with as much pieces as you can fit. Definitely beats bricklink. check it out!

  111. Re:makes sense, meh by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The Lego plastic is actually superior, and the quality of the molds must be better, too.

    So why is it a mixed blessing? If Lego's products are better, they'll win on quality and be worth the price. Or perhaps the general public doesn't value the difference, in which case the public gets what it wants. This is capitalism working well: competition, with competitors competing on quality and price and consumers having options.

    Quality doesn't win in this market. You can win on marketing, but not on quality. This ruling means there will soon be lead-tainted Lego-compatible pieces made in a certain Asian country and sold mostly through Walmart. Yeah, they'll break, discolor, and not fit together all that well, but they'll be significantly cheaper than genuine Legos, because Lego can't get away with paying its employees $2500 a year. And these new parts will soon outsell Lego. Now Lego does have a good marketing position, given their great brand recognition, and they'll make a lot more money per part. This will slowly erode, however, until Lego branded parts are a either niche market for elitist liberals who buy their groceries at farmers markets, or it will go away entirely.

    Just so you know.

    --
    "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
  112. Resale value by eleuthero · · Score: 1

    As many have noted already, Lego bricks are more expensive and have a tendency to be higher quality. As an adult collector, I could care less about Megablocks as cheap imitations of a good product that easily break. Lego sets, on the other hand, have a huge resale value, often garnering the collector more than the original Lego price (especially for sets in the Space / Castle genres). Parents who buy megablocks for their kids today because they are "cheaper" will never gain back any of their lost money, but the parent who ensures that only a few pieces in a lego set are lost is likely to regain most if not all of their investment--if they watch their kids carefully and keep the box hidden away somewhere for ten or possibly even five years, they'll recoup their investment on most models completely.

  113. Re:makes sense, meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget their pastries! I love me a good danish!

  114. fabathome by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think I'll just get one of these:

    http://fabathome.org/wiki/index.php?title=Main_Page

    and set up in my garage.

    Maybe I'll change my name to "The Hof" while I'm at it.

  115. Re:makes sense, meh by gfxguy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have one of those stores here (in GA), and it's actually very conveniently located for me...

    I go there all the time, but there's only a few dozen types of pieces at a time, and those ROUND cups they have make it difficult to effectively use the space in them.

    But I have bought pieces there plenty of times... but it surely doesn't beat bricklink when I want black or white or even gray 2x4 bricks and all they have is pink or purple 2x2 and 2x3, some fence pieces I don't want... the small car plates (but no wheels)...

    But they rotate inventory in and so I do go there occasionally.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  116. Re:makes sense, meh by hvm2hvm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    He as a guy who values quality over price(or quantity if you want) sees this as a mixed blessing since people would probably care more for quantity. That would make Lego lower their prices which might lead to a diminish in the quality of the work.

    Usually when something is produced by many companies in big numbers marketing starts to take over and quality is most of the times compromised for flashiness or ease of use and other idiot friendly things.

    An example that comes to mind is digital cameras. Most cameras these days have more megapixels than they can handle and most parameters are automatic which in IMHO is retarded. It's really hard to find a camera that lets you set the focus and exposure as you like. Instead they have features like print directly from the camera, post on hi5 or something like that... That happening to Lego would make it a joke and destroy one of the only toys that actually educates children instead of dumbing them down (or brainwashing if you want to be more extreme).

    PS: Before you start flaming me about the camera example, I am OK with having an automatic focus/exposure/etc. But not including a slider that lets you select 1/100 seems stupid since it's a simple UI element and if you can program an automatic system for the focus you should be able to make it manual. Also, when I said "more megapixels than they can handle" I was talking about the noise that appears because the CCD is just too small for the resolution they are cramming on it. There is a proven limit on the resolution that depends on the lens size and CCD size and as far as I can tell most cameras exceed the limit.

    --
    ics
  117. Re:makes sense, meh by BrentH · · Score: 0, Redundant

    At least they have multiple Legos, so no matter if one goes down, there are always others.

  118. Re:makes sense, meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I totally agree. We recently "polluted" my son's Lego collection with MegaBlocks, and after several tearful episodes ("They won't stick together!" "They don't fit!") have decided to root this evil from our house. They're a scourge.

  119. Re:makes sense, meh by bogjobber · · Score: 1

    On the other hand, Lego is a socially responsible company with zero waste, excellent pay and bennies for all employees, and an all around good company.

    They give all their employees excellent pay *and* drugs? I can't see how that would be socially responsible, but my resume is in the mail.

  120. Re:makes sense, meh by rthomanek · · Score: 1

    If Lego's products are better, they'll win on quality and be worth the price. Or perhaps the general public doesn't value the difference, in which case the public gets what it wants. This is capitalism working well: competition, with competitors competing on quality and price and consumers having options.

    No.

    First of all, you did not consider the fact that the general public is often unaware of the quality difference; what the general public sees is (1) the price, (2) the ads saying that (in this case) "our bricks are just like Lego, just cheaper"; any serious thoughts about quality usually come several years later (and it's usually way too late for the original company which is floating belly up by that time). In general, it's naive to think that competitors really compete on the quality plane.
    Lego is a perfect example of this; actually, given the current price of these toys, it's a low hanging fruit every toy producer in the world is or has been thinking of.

    And, don't get me wrong: I think Lego (the company behind it) deserves a good ass-kicking, if not for the exorbitant prices (that I doubt is only high enough to make up for the high quality), then at least for the dumb marketing practices (who the fsck needs Star Wars sets with only a handful of bricks, most of them custom at that? where are the generic bricks?).

    I am just pointing out that it has nothing to do with "beneficial" effects of capitalism.
    And, Lego is unlikely to survive it, at least as we know it today.

  121. Re:makes sense, meh by jellomizer · · Score: 1

    Being most of their uses by kids to make small cars and towers Megablocks probably do the job good enough. However even for the Lego artist they can save some money by using the Megablocks as filler and the Legos as the outer casing and main structure support. Also Giving kids incompatible blocks can make them Brand Snobs learning X does work with Y means their X is better then the others Y. Yes kids to think like that.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  122. Most kids stuff is crap... by alexhmit01 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Once a week my son goes and plays at my parents house for a few hours. The Brio trains from when I was a kid still work great, but the cheap knock off add on parts my parents bought to have more for him are crap... they had to find an affordable retailer online to get more stuff. As he's moving past the real little kid blocks and into Duplo, the fact that everything from my childhood held up is remarkable.

    However, just about everything that we buy on the market at this point, is cheap and crappy. It's gotten to the point that we just buy whatever is cheapest at Walmart, because trying to get the higher end stuff isn't higher end, just more expensive. Why pay twice as much for the same falling apart plastic junk from the same factories in China? After churning through $100+ car seats, we not just get the $40 ones at Walmart, and when they go, we replace them. I have two kids, 18 months apart, and just about none of the stuff gets handed down because EVERYTHING on the market is poorly made.

    It's easy to blame consumers, but a lot is a function of smaller family sizes. The generation born in the 70s was born when average family sizes were over 2.5 kids, so 2-3 was normal, and plenty of families of 4-5 existed. Family sizes for middle class families (the ones that buy this stuff) are probably under 1.5 right now... If most of your customers won't have a second kid, why would they pay more for quality, it's not getting passed down.

    America just isn't child friendly anymore... and we have fewer kids in each family... can't put 3 kids in a normal sized sedan, need either a giant sedan, SUV, or minivan with a third kid, and kids under 13 aren't supposed to ride up front... WTF? The sedan was the quintessential family car... now a mom running small carpool with 4 kids in her car needs a minivan because you can't put one up front and 3 in the back, something that was routine for us growing up as kids.

    Alex

    1. Re:Most kids stuff is crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Just to go off on tangent ... the real 'child-unfriendliness' isn't inside the car like you describe. The real pain comes from neighborhoods that are designed to make cars comfortable, and therefore are dangerous to children. Kids don't play outside, don't walk, don't explore ....

    2. Re:Most kids stuff is crap... by illegalcortex · · Score: 1

      Isn't the only reason you can't put a young kid up front because of the airbag? Don't most airbags have a disable function these days, even in cheaper cars?

    3. Re:Most kids stuff is crap... by honkycat · · Score: 1

      can't put 3 kids in a normal sized sedan, need either a giant sedan, SUV, or minivan with a third kid, and kids under 13 aren't supposed to ride up front... WTF? The sedan was the quintessential family car... now a mom running small carpool with 4 kids in her car needs a minivan because you can't put one up front and 3 in the back, something that was routine for us growing up as kids.

      While I agree with much of the sentiment in your post, I don't think this is a sensible thing to flame about. Most cars will properly disable the front air bags (or have a switch option, don't know exactly what the current standard is). Still, the back seat is a safer location for a car seat. It always has been, it just wasn't recognized (or cared about) 30 years ago. Furthermore, it's an overwhelmingly good thing that the typical sedan is not sized for more occupants than a typical sedan driver needs. It is much more economical as a result. If you actually need the extra space, then buy a specialized vehicle like a minivan or larger sedan. Making sedans larger so the few people who actually need the space don't need to choose carefully is a ridiculous solution, quintessential as it may be.

    4. Re:Most kids stuff is crap... by ryanov · · Score: 1

      Don't shop at that awful store, for starters. Shop at a store where they sell reach merchandise. One can still buy plenty of stuff that is made in the USA. It is possible to blame the consumer here. And before folks start in on "that's the only thing around where I live," no one told them to live where that was the only store either.

    5. Re:Most kids stuff is crap... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      REAL merchandise, not reach. Doh.

    6. Re:Most kids stuff is crap... by KlomDark · · Score: 1

      Please inform us of one of these stores! I've got no idea where to buy real (quality) merchandise that is made in the USA.

    7. Re:Most kids stuff is crap... by ryanov · · Score: 1

      There's a lot of information on the web.

      You can get a couple of chapters of an eBook here about buying American: http://www.howtobuyamerican.com/index.php

      You can buy online a lot of places -- though I suppose it's not too easy to tell whether the place is being honest:
      http://www.buydirectusa.com/
      http://www.usstuff.com/
      http://www.madeinusa.com/
      http://www.americanapparel.net/

      Shopping at Walmart should really be the absolute last option (below not buying whatever thing at all).

      And here's a blog where a guy appears to be attempting to make a list:
      http://madeintheusabyamericans.blogspot.com/2008/04/my-new-blog.html

    8. Re:Most kids stuff is crap... by alexhmit01 · · Score: 1

      The sedan hasn't gotten smaller, the car seats have gotten bigger. This massive monstrosities are hard to install, and NOT SAFE. According to the propaganda, 95% of car seats are installed improperly. WTF? That's not user error, that's a design flaw. 95% correct, 5% wrong means 5% user error.

      It's absolutely NOT safer to have the car seat in the back... it's ONLY safer if you get into an accident. It's way more dangerous because when the kid throws something down and starts screaming, you can't reach them (especially when the seat in rear facing), which means driving with a screaming child... sure if you're in an accident, you're slightly better of, but you are WAY more likely to be in an accident because of the safety measures.

      Smaller, economical vehicles are a good thing for commuters that don't have passengers... For a while, the wife drove the minivan, I drove a coupe for commuting. However, once I had to help with car pool, getting kids in and out of the back was a pain, and now I'm in a much larger (and fuel inefficient) vehicle. OTOH, if the government didn't listen to Ralph Nader and make cars death traps for children in return for making them slightly safer for passengers that don't wear a seat belt, I would still be getting twice the mileage in my coupe, because it is only one kid that I've been transporting the past 6 months.

      Once I need a big guzzler, might as well drive something I enjoy, and now we have two fuel inefficient vehicles on a truck chassis... Given that they want children in a car seat/booster until age 12, it doesn't seem like a small niche to be able to transport two children safely.

  123. Re:makes sense, meh by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

    Buying ripoff Lego is like making your own play-do. It's just not the same.

  124. Re:makes sense, meh by TWX · · Score: 1

    So while I'd like to be able to buy bulk packs of pieces (which I've done via bricklink for some years now) at cheap prices (at an average approaching $0.10 piece for a little piece of molded plastic?), I certainly wouldn't accept lower quality just to get cheaper pieces.

    I'm all for competition, though. If Lego reduces prices (I know they whine they are barely making it... which is just baffling to me), then I'll be all over it. I mean, go ahead and charge $50 for a 400 piece Star Wars set... but let me buy bulk bricks to build my mega (no pun intended) structures, and I'll be a happy guy.

    Well, the real problem here is that, as Walmart has proved, people are willing to sacrifice quality and the legacy of a good product from good people in favor of cheap plastic crap made overseas in bad conditions, with materials that will possibly harm them, in a factory that pollutes like crazy, in order to save themselves a couple of dollars. So, consumers will go into Walmart or other big-box stores, see Lego at X price, and see "Fully compatible with Lego!!!!" at 65% of X price, and go, "I can save money!" even if their purchase pollutes, is made in sweatshop conditions, and will wear out with use.

    In a couple of ways I'm lucky. First, I don't have time to play with Legos anymore even though I still have a couple of rubbermaid tubs full of 'em (and with most of my vehicles still assembled from 20 years ago), and second, we're probably going to be able to afford to buy the real thing, rather than the knockoff, when we do finally have kids, as we'll compromise where it doesn't matter and hold to our principles where it does. The very few legos that I broke as a kid were pretty much all intentional; even leaving them out in the weather, in the mud, or the sand box, or on hot concrete or asphalt didn't really cause problems.

    Lego needs to start selling bulk pieces cheaply. By all means, continue to sell kits and directions and special things for a premium, but I think that it's an easy decision to buy a bunch of Lego when expansion sets are reasonable.

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
  125. Re:makes sense, meh by randyest · · Score: 3, Insightful

    To work properly, Lego bricks must be made to a tolerance of one micron, otherwise models would fall apart or the bricks be too hard to separate.

    Source? Sorry, no one in their right mind will believe this without more data than some random /.'er claiming it. I mean, sure, there's a tolerance, and according to LEGO company (Warning: PDF, see page 18) it's "as small as 2um" (twice a loose tolerance as your claim.) To me, the "as small as" bit means "no smaller than, and often larger than" so please share why you think it's always twice as accurate as LEGO claims it sometimes is.

    --
    everything in moderation
  126. Re:makes sense, meh by v1 · · Score: 3, Informative

    they make good quality legos too. I was waxing nostalgic last year and bought a generic bin of legos at kmart or something, it wasn't lego brand but looked identical, and they held together like crap.

    I remember taking my 2x8 blocks and seeing how far I could get them to extend horizontally while stacked, and could get over 50 sometimes. The crappy new ones were lucky to see 10.

    I also made things that required proper tolerance. I made a working lego lock. Tried to make one with the new blocks but they kept catching on each other. crap I say. Pay the money and get the real Lego.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  127. Re:makes sense, meh by Neoprofin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The problem is when you buy a set of Legos most of the premium you pay isn't going for superior build quality, it's going for licensing because you're getting "Harry Potter" or "Star Wars" wrapped up in the deal, but don't worry they're nice enough to spread the cost to all their lines.

    You also have to deal with the politics of Lego. No modern weapons, no Nazis for Indiana Jones to foil. I love my Legos, and the build quality is superior, but there are plenty of other reasons to shop Megablocks.

  128. Re:makes sense, meh by winwar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "That would make Lego lower their prices which might lead to a diminish in the quality of the work."

    It may but it doesn't have to. After all, the basic blocks haven't changed for probably 50 years. It can't cost much to make plastic blocks from standard dies.

    The new stuff, sure. And if Walmart carries legos, they will squeeze them anyway, competition or no.

  129. vat you say? by Liath · · Score: 1

    Achtung! Alles turisten und nonteknischen lookenpeepers! das legodeschien ist nicht fur der gefingerpoken und mittengraben! oderwise ist easy to schnappen der springenwerk, meldenpoolen und poppencorken mit spitzensparksen. ist nicht fur gewerken bei dummkopfen. der rubbernecken sightseeren keepen das cottonpicken hander in das pockets muss. ZO RELAXEN UND WATSCHEN DER APPEALS COURT RULING

  130. Legos Megas by ZekoMal · · Score: 1

    I had three construction related toys when I was just a little bit younger: Legos, K'nex, and 1 set of Mega Blox.

    The K'nex were unrivaled in their ability to bruise the tips of my fingers with frustrating 'square peg in round hole' construction, but at the same time the motorization made it extremely fun.

    The Legos always snapped together, and even though most of my legos came from sets, I was able to piece together just about anything from it (for the longest amount of time, I had a black Arwing).

    The one Mega Blox set I had, was pretty fun. The parts took a bit longer to snap in, but it worked fine. Until, however, I tried to use the parts with Legos. They were slightly bigger and clunkier, and they didn't snap in as well. In fact, I had a few pieces break, and the figurines had a higher probability of their limbs just popping off.

    It's kind of like trying to play Doom on Windows XP; if you don't have jDoom, it works, but it's a little like pulling teeth at points.

  131. Re:Cheap = Crap by Rhys · · Score: 1

    The color doesn't matter. I could go blind and I could still accurately sort Lego vs Mega/Tyco/Etc blocks. The plastic feels very different to the touch. The clones (even recent models I've gotten in bulk lot buys) just aren't quite as quality as real Lego bricks.

    Lego themselves have had some quality issues as they've moved their brick production into other cheaper countries (one in I think what was Chech Republic and one in Mexico? I'd have to go look it up in the book I saw it in...). I suspect it is more of a QA issue; that they have the same problems in Denmark but are much better at catching and removing them before they get to consumers. Or maybe the Danes are just more skilled at machine maintenance.

    --
    Slashdot Patriotism: We Support our Dupes!
  132. Re:makes sense, meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about those cookies that come in a tin that my Grandmother used to give me at Christmas?

  133. bye bye R&D... by mwoliver · · Score: 1

    You know, I love capitalism and letting the market do it's thing, but in those few cases where you have a great company that does all the right things and takes the profits from their admittedly expensive product and invests it in neat tech like Mindstorms, or my beloved Ferrari F1 cars, this makes me sad. All this will really do is take the R&D money out of Lego's pockets and send it to the lowest bidder. I, and I hope many others, will stick with the Lego brand if for no other reason than the superior products and devotion to expanding minds instead of pockets.

    I have seen their manufacturing plants on TV (can't remember if it was How Do They Do It? or one of the other shows like it) and the tolerances, rate of part rejection, etc. are just astounding. Also, the white rooms where the creative minds sit and play with Lego pieces all day, dreaming up new toys... it is simply wonderful.

    Quality before quantity, please.

    --
    Mike O, KT2T
  134. Re:makes sense, meh by hairyfeet · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you want some Nazis or guns to go with your Legos here you go. From what I've seen very quality build work too. Enjoy!

    --
    ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
  135. Re:makes sense, meh by publiclurker · · Score: 1

    They have one of those stores around here also. While the back wall has a lot of unique pieces, they always seem to be a little lacking on the more common ones. When one box is filled with door frames, other with doors, and yet another with little plastic flowers, there just isn't much room for square bricks.

  136. Re:makes sense, meh by anubis7733 · · Score: 1

    I agree completely. LEGOs are one of the best toys out there IMO. Without them, I may not have ended up being an engineer. They used to be the obvious gift for me for Christmas and my family would always end up getting me two or three sets. Even now that I'm 21, I still love these little bricks. Now I just tend to look for the more detailed sets like the Ultimate Collectors sets. I will be really sad if LEGO is driven out of business b/c of this decision.

  137. Re:makes sense, meh by randyest · · Score: 0, Troll

    Alas, now pointing out an error of 2x magnitude is now being a cunt, is it? Sounds like my post was the straw that broke the exaggerator's back. If you're so tired of being corrected, perhaps you should be more careful with your claims?

    You may also find yourself further insulated from the corrections that you find so painful by resisting the fallacy of the excluded middle. That is, there is a happy land of accuracy between "it's got 1um tolerance" and "it's totally shitty and unimpressive." In this case, this happy middle-land is known as "as low as 2um tolerance."

    Or you can carry on with the hurling of invectives and names and whining like a baby when corrected. It's up to you, champ!

    --
    everything in moderation
  138. Re:I'm up on Mega, down on lego, pine for Am. Bric by clone53421 · · Score: 1
    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  139. Re:Let me attempt to translate... BRICKING PAIN? by davidsyes · · Score: 0, Redundant

    So, without even going to Harry's Hofbrau, the Canadian company did a EU-DOJ (sort of Hail Mary) on the Lego Company, and pulled an Apple "Brick Job" on the Legos. So, effectively, any former Lego protections have been BRICKED.

    Now, Legos can be embraced and extended, and extended and embraced.

    But, a burning question? How many Lego bricks equal an approximate veritable "ton of bricks"?

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  140. Re:makes sense, meh by BlackCreek · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Because the market selects for lemonade. Seriously. This work won a Nobel prize: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Market_for_Lemons

    Though one could argue that in this case, you can make informed shopping of quality bricks. So I guess, this is not directly what the linked article relates to, but more like expensive big iron main frame computers, which most people don't actually need, so most people don't actually pay for it.

  141. Re:makes sense, meh by Eccles · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm just a Puritan American and have no clue what "red light" means.

    There are a lot a drivers around here like that.

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  142. Re:I'm up on Mega, down on lego, pine for Am. Bric by Kane+Devaid · · Score: 1

    There are certain peices which are difficult to separate - such as the half-connector in anything, or the half connector/half cross-section-axle peice inside a T-peice. However, in my day there was a page in the instructions which detailed a set of tricks to separating these.

    Admittedly, I ignored them and used my teeth for everything. This left all of my Lego with characteristic teeth marks.

  143. Chinese Clone Bricks by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Full of lead.

    No thanks, ill stick with the real Lego brand.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  144. Re:makes sense, meh by gfxguy · · Score: 1

    They'll be reduced to Bionicles and "Lego" branded video games.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  145. Lego Rules, nothing changes... by Phizzle · · Score: 1

    Crappy Lego knockoffs have been available for a long time, thats not what the original article is about. As a parent I have to say that giving your kid any of the cheap crappy Chinese dull colored poorly made knockoffs that all apart is sort of like giving your kid a crappy Chinese MP3 knockoff instead if an iPod. I got 3 happy kids with 3 iPods and about 4 cubic meters of REAL LEGOS :) PS. If someone claims comparable quality between Legos and crap like Megablocks, they never played with them both.

    --
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.
  146. A lot of LEGO stories lately by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    seems there have been a lot of LEGO stories lately. It's a wonderful toy product (won the poll with good reason)

    A refreshing change from (Useful) Stupid $TECH_PRODUCT Tricks. :P

    P.S. Thanks for the Bricklink mentions

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  147. Taste Like Waffles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That Canadian firms blocks can be toasted or baked, so you know they have no scruples.

  148. Re:makes sense, meh by Chelloveck · · Score: 1

    Yeah, they'll break, discolor, and not fit together all that well, but they'll be significantly cheaper than genuine Legos [...]

    Yeah, that pretty much describes MegaBlocks, all right. And after a couple bad experiences even my kid knows to avoid them now. I don't think LEGO has a lot to fear.

    --
    Chelloveck
    I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
  149. Re:makes sense, meh by Xero_One · · Score: 3, Informative

    For your modern weapon LEGO needs, I would check out this site: http://www.brickarms.com/Toys/Weapons.aspx

    They claim it's made from the same plastic as real LEGOs, but I haven't used them. Anyways they seem pretty cool.

    They also happen to make Nazi figurines for your enjoyment: http://www.brickarms.com/Toys/Minifigs.aspx

  150. Re:makes sense, meh by Suppafly · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to one interview I read somewhere, the most expensive Lego parts to manufacture are the mini-figs. I believe they cost something like a little over $1 US to manufacture.

    I seriously doubt that. They'd be selling them at a loss otherwise.
    http://shop.lego.com/

  151. Re:makes sense, meh by Suppafly · · Score: 1

    Megablocks are great in the larger (duplo, quantro style) sizes. The smaller lego size is where they suck. The tolerances don't need to be as good on the larger sizes, and megablocks are a lot easier to find in stores than duplo and quantro blocks.

  152. Re:makes sense, meh by Suppafly · · Score: 1

    Lego needs to start selling bulk pieces cheaply.

    While that would make sense to you or me, Lego is not in the business of selling anything cheaply. Selling official lego cheaper, would just make them lose money.

    As with anything else, there are two types of people, those who are willing to buy generics and those who aren't.

  153. Re:makes sense, meh by Taibhsear · · Score: 1

    One in a suburb near chicago as well. Sadly my neices and nephews seem to have usurped our lego collection or I'd have gotten many more buckets (seeing as I'm an adult now and can choose not to wait til christmas or birthdays for legos). Although I'm starting to wonder if it was them or my brother (their father) who is really pilfering them to play with...

  154. Re:makes sense, meh by Kulilin · · Score: 1

    The problem is also that, since Lego has been the only game in town for many years, the average Joe will think that everything that fits Lego blocks *is* made by Lego even if it really is a cheap knockoff. That will dilute the Lego brand itself, which is probably one of the things Lego wanted to avoid by taking these guys to court.

    I had a friend working for 3M at the customer support lab for vinyl films. When some vinyl film didn't turn out right, this guy was in charge of inspecting samples sent by the customer and finding out what the problem was. He told me that most of the stuff customers complained about was vinyl film all right... but not 3M's vinyl film.

    If this happens with something you buy yourself (vinyl fim) and use professionally, guess what will happen with things (toy bricks) kids usually don't buy themselves but get as a present.

  155. Re:makes sense, meh by Neoprofin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh man!

    Years on slashdot and finally something to show for it!

  156. Mega-Sucks by Russ+Nelson · · Score: 1

    Ever used MegaBlox? More like MegaSux.

    --
    Don't piss off The Angry Economist
  157. Lego only please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've got bins full of Lego, if it doesn't have 'Lego' written on each of the nodules, I throw it in the bin, I don't want my collection tainted by the unclean!!!

  158. Re:makes sense, meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fight! fight! fight! fight! fight!

  159. Montini by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

    More than 40 years ago, I played with Montini, which was a British version of these blocks, made of nylon - a much superior product to Lego's polystyrene blocks. They went bust, since they could not compete with Lego's cheap blocks.

    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    1. Re:Montini by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Lego's polystyrene blocks

      Wrong. LEGO blocks are made from ABS.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  160. No blulk purchases there by cnaumann · · Score: 2, Informative

    True, they have quite a few elements there and in quite a few colors. However, they nowhere near all the common elements listed, and there are no bulk purchases. Sure, you can by a 1x1 yellow plate for about 10 cents. That is a pretty good deal if you need a single plate. But if you need 500 or 1000 such plates it is still about 10 cents a plates. That is not such a good deal. Sadly, they used to have some bulk packs with reasonable per-element prices. Those have all gone away.

    LEGO does not understand how to market to Americans.

  161. Re:makes sense, meh by snaz555 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's definitely a race to the bottom, because most parents have no clue what they buy their kids. The #1 goal of buying something is to shut the kid up. The #2 goal is to surprise the kid with a gift. And a $10 CrapKit will do either just as well as a $50 quality one. Toys are considered disposable. And the kid has no clue about concepts like quality and functionality - as long as it looks the part. (Brand recognition is a factor.) The kid will play with the CrapKit, find it difficult to proceed beyond the basics, and will likely grow tired of it because of its limitations. The parent will observe that the hotly desired toy stops being played with after a few days or weeks and pats themselves on the back for being cheap and wonders why anyone would buy the expensive version. They leave this to the people with more money than sense. It's a self-reinforcing spiral, simply because the average person is average intelligence, which means if you even bring up the subject of developing intelligence they'll look at you like you're from a different planet. It's just not something that they ever spend a single brain cycle on. Hey, they came out alright... right?

    I always played with Legos when I was a kid. Well, to my parents it was playing, to me it was construction projects. As I got older they became ever better planned and thought out, and I'd carefully plan around the parts available. My parents never saw that part. They viewed Lego, I'm sure, as the equivalent of a crayon and a sheet of paper.

    By the time I was 10 or so I built things like flexible suspension bridges (suspended with string) that could carry my HO size train set across 3 feet or more, to replicas of buildings I read about. Lego is a fantastic tool for early development of an innate sense of force distribution; in particular how to design for forces to distribute into compression with little pulling (depending on axis) and close to zero twisting. It encourages focusing on difficult problems somewhat beyond the current skill, then learning through failure and developing an innate sense for how to further improve something that a bystander might already be impressed by or think is beyond good enough.

    My take on it is that every parent should buy their kid real, quality Lego. Mostly generic blocks. At least give it a try. Because if the kid takes to it - boy are you getting something of real value for dirt cheap!

  162. Play - d'oh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must have used the wrong recipe. We made our own Play-doh, it was far superior to the real stuff. It felt better, worked better, looked better, and cost 10c to make ten pounds.

  163. European Department of Justice? by 3247 · · Score: 1

    There is not European Department of Justice. The correct translation is European Court of Justice.

    However, that's the correct translation but still wrong. The judgement was not made by the Court of Justice but by the Court of First Instance. Lego can still appeal to the Court of Justice.

    --
    Claus
  164. Re:makes sense, meh by Myopic · · Score: 1

    I think you're splitting hairs. If the tolerance is measured in microns, then the OP was close enough. We're talking about orders of magnitude here. And if the OP said one micron, and you think its two microns... seriously, that's close enough.

  165. Re:makes sense, meh by 7+digits · · Score: 1

    > After all, the basic blocks haven't changed for probably 50 years. It can't cost much to make plastic blocks from standard dies.

    This is not true. Lego bricks changed for the better until the 80's, then stayed at constant quality. 3 or 4 years ago, Lego opened new factories (moved to cheaper countries), and bricks quality went down (most visible thing is color differences between bricks, but the feel of the plastic, the quality, and the tolerance went down too). New bricks don't fit as firmly as old ones.

    I stopped buy Lego due to that, so I can't comment if they fixed that or not. It lasted at least a couple of years, until I gave up buying sets for my children.

  166. Re:Cheap = Bad for kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does this mean we will see some mass produced cheap a$$ lead impregnated plastic crap coming from chiner?

  167. Re:makes sense, meh by Bonobo_Unknown · · Score: 2, Informative

    Carlsberg?

    --
    We don't believe in radical loony monotheistic religions from the middle east -- we're Christians.
  168. Re:makes sense, meh by morari · · Score: 2, Funny

    I remember going through the Great MegaBlocks Purge as a child. My brother and I had each received a fairly neat looking set for the holidays, but were quickly disappointed with not only the quality of the plastic, but the inability of the block to properly fit with Legos, let alone themselves. Our parents contacted MegaBlocks with these concerns and they made it up to us by sending us a ton more of their product. Well, eventually my brother and I decided to go through our tubs and tubs of blocks and sort out all of the MegaBlocks so as to be cast aside. There was much rejoicing in Lego Land.

    --
    "He who can destroy a thing, controls a thing." --Paul Atreides, Dune
  169. Re:makes sense, meh by thechao · · Score: 4, Informative

    Probably too late for a proper reply. An old roommate of mine used to occasionally make dies. Like anything in manufacturing, pick two of three: accurate, hard-wearing, cheap. For high-speed production you need to make especially costly dies; even a cheap die for something the size of one Lego brick would set you back several hundred dollars, and you couldn't expect to use a very dense/high-quality plastic with it (due to injection pressures), nor expect it to last much beyond a few dozen or scores of casts for any sort of reasonable accuracy. I suppose for very high tolerances, sharp narrow edges (which Lego have), high speed, and hard plastics you would be paying many thousands (or more?) for the die; the costs grow enormously if you want a die for large pieces, i.e., more than a few square cm. And you would have to replace the die fairly often. The cost of the plastic is trivial compared to the capital cost of the die.

    As for technological advances... well, there's only so much you can do to make tooling steel better; basically, it is a materials-science question, and the advances there are not quick. For instance, except for CAD/CAM there have not been significant advances in tooling that would help in the manufacture of the die, that I know of, for probably the last 50 years.

  170. Re:makes sense, meh by randyest · · Score: 1

    Oh, we're well below the diameter of human hair, which is ~20um even for the finest flaxen hair :)

    Maybe it's because I do nanometer-scale semiconductor design, but claiming something is 1um when it's really "as low as 2um" is significant to me. (Especially when the "as low as 2um" is as specified by the LEGO company itself, in a list of trivia designed to show how awesome LEGO are.)

    --
    everything in moderation
  171. Re:makes sense, meh by peterhoeg · · Score: 1

    And we were the first country in the world to legalize porn - I'm sure that's quite an achievement in the eyes of the /. crowd.

  172. Re:makes sense, meh by petermgreen · · Score: 1

    mega blocks have been selling thier products (which are IMO probablly the best of the clones but still inferior to real lego) for many years accross the world.

    While i'm sure lego would love to kill mega blocks thier failure to do so does not seem to have killed them so far and I somewhat doubt it will going forward.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  173. Re:makes sense, meh by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2, Informative

    The problem is also that, since Lego has been the only game in town for many years, the average Joe will think that everything that fits Lego blocks *is* made by Lego even if it really is a cheap knockoff. That will dilute the Lego brand itself, which is probably one of the things Lego wanted to avoid by taking these guys to court.

    Too bad, so sad. I don't know European trademark law, but in the US, the Lego trademark is not the actual bits of the brick that make it compatible with the other bricks. That's functional anyway, so trademarks would never protect it. You'd want patents instead, and they are no longer available in this case. Using the functional parts of the brick in a dilutive way is perfectly okay. Now, when they use the word LEGO in some fashion, since that's actually a trademark, then we can begin to discuss dilution. Although saying "LEGO-compatible" is a nominative use, so that's also okay, if it's true.

    Incidentally, what you were describing is actually customer confusion, which goes to trademark infringement; dilution is when there is no confusion, which is why it's kind of bullshit.

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  174. Re:makes sense, meh by Mozk · · Score: 1

    I agree that he should cite a source, but you say that as though manufacturing plastic bricks within tolerances the size of a single bacterium is so much less accurate than doing so within tolerances of half a bacterium. Either way it's amazing (at least to me, with no knowledge of plastic molding, let alone the different methods).

    --
    No existe.
  175. Re:makes sense, meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The rest of the world speaks in orders of magnitude. I'm glad you've got your language, but when speaking with the rest of us, it helps if you understand ours.

  176. Re:makes sense, meh by moosesocks · · Score: 1

    That explains so much about Boston....

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  177. There was also Torro by lennier · · Score: 1

    A brand of bricks we had in NZ in the 1970s-80s, before import restrictions were relaxed and when Lego was insanely expensive.

    They weren't plug-compatible. The standard brick had 8 studs on top and 8 matching tubes underneath. The plastic was softer and often a stud would warp and get stuck in a tube.

    But they sure were fun.

    --
    You are not a brain: http://books.google.com/books?id=2oV61CeDx-YC
  178. Re:makes sense, meh by Ithelrand · · Score: 1

    I've seen Mega Bloks for sale alongside Legos for years. However, Mega Bloks suck. They wear out faster and don't fit together as well because they use a lower-grade plastic. I got Tyco blocks for Christmas back in 1984, and they didn't kill Lego either. If Lego dies, it won't be because of shoddy imitations from Mega Brands.

  179. Re:makes sense, meh by Ithelrand · · Score: 1

    but it's still mind boggling that, after all this time, despite how precise their molds are, that it costs so much for a molded piece of plastic.

    You mean ten or more pieces of molded plastic? Lego minifigs have a fair number of moving parts, not to mention the faces and other designs painted on. I'm impressed that it's as cheap as $1.

  180. I may have been 'different', but... by A+New+Normalcy · · Score: 1

    ...as a young lad in the 50s I disliked cheap $#!t. A rainy Saturday with a large Erector set, building 3 foot Howe trusses, then sitting in the center. Yowza!

    --
    ...Lorenzo / I'm into kinky crustaceans. I just discovered internet praWn.
  181. Re:makes sense, meh by zeugma-amp · · Score: 1

    This ruling means there will soon be lead-tainted Lego-compatible pieces made in a certain Asian country and sold mostly through Walmart. Yeah, they'll break, discolor, and not fit together all that well, but they'll be significantly cheaper than genuine Legos, because Lego can't get away with paying its employees $2500 a year. And these new parts will soon outsell Lego.

    I can't say I disagree with this assessment I'm afraid. The biggest problem Lego will face is that the people buying most of the cheap knock-offs won't be the ones who will be building with them, unfortunately. I recall buying some of those Mega brisks for my daughters, and realized after helping them put together one model that they were useless junk. Never bought any more of them because they simply do not hold up like real Lego when building things. The only reason I know how bad they were is because I was down there building with them myself and saw how bad it was.

    I'd imagine that most parents wouldn't get the hands-on experience to know the difference.

    --
    This is an ex-parrot!
  182. Trademarks are not patents by Artifex · · Score: 1

    I wonder why lack of continued trademark-ability was used to say the design is now open. Did Lego not patent the design? Maybe they did, so long ago that it fell back out again?

    --
    Get off my launchpad!
    1. Re:Trademarks are not patents by clone53421 · · Score: 1

      Designs can't be patented.

      Plans can be copyrighted; processes can be patented; end products aren't really protected.

      That means if you can recreate a product (without infringing the copyright) using a different process (so as to not infringe the patent), you're free and clear.

      The only thing that remains to prevent you from ripping off the original company is trademark, which is supposed to protect companies from imitators whose products might be confused for (and possibly damage the reputation of) the real thing. Trademark still doesn't protect the product, though; it just protects the name and logo.

      --
      Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  183. redundant? by davidsyes · · Score: 1

    And, ndobody else said it the way i did. pathetic bunch...

    --
    Previously: "Linux... Toward the Sunrise..." Now: "Linux... Toward the-- No, now, part of Every Sunrise"
  184. If it's nazis you're after... by titzandkunt · · Score: 1
    --
    Political language ... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable...
  185. Re:makes sense, meh by SoupIsGoodFood_42 · · Score: 1

    While I agree with you about the silly megapixel race, I think there are plenty of decent cameras out there with manual control, including compact cameras.

  186. Re:makes sense, meh by JAlexoi · · Score: 1

    WTF! Capitalism does not imply competition! Capitalism without competition is not an inconceivable idea. And monopoly is any capitalist's wet dream.

  187. Re:makes sense, meh by Carewolf · · Score: 1

    There are no red light district in Denmark though. While prostitution is legal, pimping is not, and this prohibits most types of brothels.

  188. Re:I'm up on Mega, down on lego, pine for Am. Bric by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

    Heh, when I was 15-16 working on something with Legos, I'd use my teeth to separate blocks I couldn't pry apart with my hands. Welcome to Legos =)

  189. Re:makes sense, meh by xtracto · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was going to mod this funny... but I rather share the joke with others...

    Go ahead and read parent post with the voice of Comic Book Guy.

    Fantastic!

    --
    Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
  190. Re:makes sense, meh by MrZaius · · Score: 1

    More importantly, Wal-Mart already carries compatible blocks. This is a non-issue in the US market - The toys already exist.

  191. and also... by spectrokid · · Score: 1

    Tuborg/Carlsberg (beer), Novo (insuline), Maersk (shipping), Rockwool (insulation), Novozymes (enzymes for your washing powder), Vestas (windmills), Velux (windows), GN Resound (hearing aid), Coloplast (compeed plasters),...

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  192. Re:I'm up on Mega, down on lego, pine for Am. Bric by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    Could have sworn the coin was spelled differently than the element.

    Ah well. In the grand scheme of the internet, a single typo isn't even a statistical anomaly...

  193. 1337! by mmerlin · · Score: 1

    I always knew lego was 1337

    1337 billion is uber-1337!

    --

    smile, it makes everyone else wonder what you're up to :-)
  194. Oh God.. by richien6 · · Score: 1

    What the hell is this? Just because Lego doesn't have a patent for it, does it mean that everyone can now make their own Loge just because of that? Seriously, this is ridiculous...

    --
    Slashdot user since
  195. Re:makes sense, meh by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

    "On the other hand, Lego is a socially responsible..."

    It is not socially responsible to trademark functional aspects of a product, as it is not socialy responsible to trademark-troll companies out of the market.

    Does it matter how a company spend its money when it was illegaly gained to start with?

  196. Re:makes sense, meh by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    That wouldn't really surprise me (unfortunately that link doesn't name a price... I tried to find one that does and I couldn't, probably because it depends on so many factors).

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  197. Fuck you, Lego. by j00r0m4nc3r · · Score: 1

    Greedy fuckers. Enough said.

  198. Re:makes sense, meh by discogravy · · Score: 1

    Best. Non-moderation. Ever.

  199. Re:makes sense, meh by soboroff · · Score: 1

    By the cup? At the Baltimore Science Center, there is currently a K'nex exhibit along with tables where you can build your own models. If you want to take it home, you pay by the pound. Makes much more sense than selling by volume.

  200. Re:makes sense, meh by gfxguy · · Score: 1

    Yup... while I still have some megablocks, there is strict block apartheid in my house.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  201. Re:makes sense, meh by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
    They do offer bulk brick assortments, though, and always have. While the usual price-per-piece ratio for most new sets typically works out to around ten or fifteen US cents per brick (with wide variation depending upon the specific parts, of course), it's certainly possible to get assortments that work out to around five or six cents a brick, and sometimes it gets lower. I bought four copies of the wonderful bulk tub 4679 - Bricks and Creations a few years ago for $20 each; that's 1513 wildly varied pieces for a little over 1.3 cents apiece, and I got four copies. Of course, seeking out specific bricks rather than whatever they put in those assortments is another matter, but still...

    What does this legal judgement mean, as far as how things will be different? There've already been copycat brands like Mega Bloks, Best-Lock, and perhaps any number of others I'm forgetting or never heard of, and they've been around for years, even decades. Is this legal decision just putting a capper on the previous litigation? IANAL, naturally...

  202. Re:makes sense, meh by Sockatume · · Score: 1

    It's been quoted as anything from one to five microns for moulds, depending on the source. Generally speaking, newer sources quote around the one micron figure, so I think they update the press materials as they improve the manufacturing process. It's not clear how this translates into the tolerances for bricks. They could buy molds with a tolerance of +/-2 microns and produce bricks with a tolerance of +/-1 micron. It's probably cheaper to manufacture inaccurate moulds and recycle 5% of your bricks, after all. Still, he had the right order of magnitude.

    As for that source you quote, I wouldn't trust something which supposes a tolerance can be quoted as "no better than" a certain value, which is surely the exact opposite of a manufacturing tolerance. I suspect a marketing copyeditor got their hands in there.

    --
    No kidding!!! What do you say at this point?
  203. Re:makes sense, meh by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1

    Alas, I have yet to be able to visit a LEGO Store anywhere (though I hope to soon!), but as I understand it, the US stores have the cups, but European LEGO Stores have bags, and one pays by weight.

  204. Re:makes sense, meh by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1
    Indeed, it's now impossible to find Quatro in stores; the whole line appears to have lasted only from 2004 to '06. I recently wanted to find some Quatro sets to introduce my new niece to LEGO (got to start kids off right ;) and was agog to discover not only could I no longer find Quatro sets in LEGO's online store, but people were offering them secondhand online, and asking outrageous prices, like multiple hundreds of dollars for tubs of a few dozen bricks. I had no idea the line had been discontinued so quickly, and no idea people were asking the same sorts of prices for these they'd ask for discontinued Star Wars sets, sets from the old Classic Space and Castle lines, etc.

    Duplo sets are still easy to find, though, in my experience. That line's been around a lot longer than Quatro, too, and doesn't seem to be slowing down. I think Duplo will be around a long time to come.

  205. Re:makes sense, meh by DaVince21 · · Score: 1

    Well, duh. You don't lack a sense of humor, right? :)

    --
    I am not devoid of humor.
  206. Re:makes sense, meh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't speak for the rest of the world, nitwit. You may not have noticed that your previously 100-lb. wife had gained weight until she was 1000lbs., or until her diameter or waist size was 10x previously, but the "rest of the world" would surely pick up on the change even before 2x.

    I suggest you see someone about your inability to resolve differences of less than 10x. Or just shut up and stop embarrassing yourself.

  207. Re:makes sense, meh by clone53421 · · Score: 1

    I must admit I've always been confused as to why "order of magnitude" assumes we're speaking in terms of log(10).

    --
    Alexander Peter Kristopeit bought his basement from his mommy for one dollar.
  208. Where are the cherished toys? by leedsj · · Score: 0

    is not just that we - as a society - have become more greedy, more obsessed with consumption? When I had a lego kit, it was my main - indeed sometimes only (in the case of the fabulous Technic Car Chassis) Christmas/birthday present, and I prized it. In our rush to own more, it seems we don't cherish anything.