While that is true, I showed that to my GF who is from Hong Kong and knows English as a second language, cannot do it at all, but she can read perfectly and a bit faster than me
Yea they use it. Hell when I saw that I thought it was BS and a phishing attack to I bailed on that and just bought a calling card instead. (needed to call internationally)
hat doesn't seem fair to me is the notion that companies can terminate an employment contract and expect provisions of that terminated contract to continue to be in effect, but hey, when was the last time anyone seriously thought the legal system was "fair"?
Because that's what an NDA is
But we consumers are not the mindless drones that marketing execs would like us to be. Usually when we buy something, it provides us with a benefit. In this case, the benefit isn't big enough to qualify.
I don't think so, there is nothing inherently wrong with a self signed cert. The issue is if you goto a fake bank site and all you notice that the "security lock" is on and you just trust that lock.
When it comes down to it what the user need to know is, is there 3rd party verification, which is what a CA will provide.
The Lock only indicates that encryption is used, it doesn't indicate 3rd party verification. What's really needed is a different "security lock" that indicates 3rd party verification, because that check is what is really needed for users.
But there's one problem you understand what the error message says and means.
My parents couldn't get past that message even after I explained it. I had to downgrade FF because they would freak out when they saw that message.
From a usability point of view its terrible.
Slashdot Mirror
It's news because its unexpected but I don't understand why they are doing it either
It would still be cheaper
While that is true, I showed that to my GF who is from Hong Kong and knows English as a second language, cannot do it at all, but she can read perfectly and a bit faster than me
5 multimillionaires then?
My mother's maiden name was 12345
Just like every other war?
All that's needed is some almost plausible BS to go in.
and the converse is also true.
Just saying
Lets not forget that Has Solo made "I Know" and appropriate response to "I love you."
What did he do to Aliens?
As long as they didn't do it with ICAAN
Damn and I'm all out of mod points
their motto is "Don't be evil"
Kinda funny when you think about it, the backups are stored locally and the working copies are stored far away.
Usually you have to enter the password twice too
God I remember playing a bit rough with a frog when I was 6 and it died, thanks for reminding me of that.
Yea they use it. Hell when I saw that I thought it was BS and a phishing attack to I bailed on that and just bought a calling card instead. (needed to call internationally)
hat doesn't seem fair to me is the notion that companies can terminate an employment contract and expect provisions of that terminated contract to continue to be in effect, but hey, when was the last time anyone seriously thought the legal system was "fair"? Because that's what an NDA is
Are you referring to cops or to that guy that has a uniform and a badge and looks like a cop but is actually a Target employee
But we consumers are not the mindless drones that marketing execs would like us to be. Usually when we buy something, it provides us with a benefit. In this case, the benefit isn't big enough to qualify.
What about Apple users?
Half legit question, half trolling
Isn't she part of the teacher's union?
If its plasma doesn't that mean it will be over 9000?
I have to agree with SgtPepperKSU, because it seems like this wasn't a problem when they needed to raise minimum wage.
I don't think so, there is nothing inherently wrong with a self signed cert. The issue is if you goto a fake bank site and all you notice that the "security lock" is on and you just trust that lock.
When it comes down to it what the user need to know is, is there 3rd party verification, which is what a CA will provide.
The Lock only indicates that encryption is used, it doesn't indicate 3rd party verification. What's really needed is a different "security lock" that indicates 3rd party verification, because that check is what is really needed for users.
But there's one problem you understand what the error message says and means.
My parents couldn't get past that message even after I explained it. I had to downgrade FF because they would freak out when they saw that message.
From a usability point of view its terrible.
Do you really trust the CA? Its really not that hard to get a certificate, you pay them money and then they give you certificate.