After reading the post by Comodo's "leader," I'd suggest that Comodo abandon "Let's Encrypt" before a court shames them.
If the jackass wants a trademark, I'd suggest he try to register "90."
In the article, a Homeland Security spokesmodel says "We are running at about 78% accuracy on mal-intent detection, and 80% on deception."
I'd be very curious to see their testing protocol. Is it like the War Department, which straps big bullseyes on simulated enemy missiles and then straps them to the backs of giant turtles, so that they can claim a great interception rate?
Isn't it weird that this story has received major coverage in the British press and next to none in the American press?
Was it the timing of the release? Is it that the British press understands statistics better than the American press? Vice-versa? Or does the British press have more respect for its readership than the American press has? Or is it related to the fact that Prozac was created by an American company?
All in all, the difference in availability of this news in newspapers of the different countries is fairly astonishing.
I take an SSRI and it seems to work for me, but I'm willing to accept that a placebo would have worked as well.
I wish publication of meta-analyses like this one, including unpublished as well as published results, was required by US law.
Anyone interested in presenting information on the web would benefit from picking up two classics by Ed Tufte: The Visual Display of Quantitative Information and Envisioning Information.
Slashdot Mirror
After reading the post by Comodo's "leader," I'd suggest that Comodo abandon "Let's Encrypt" before a court shames them. If the jackass wants a trademark, I'd suggest he try to register "90."
I'd be very curious to see their testing protocol. Is it like the War Department, which straps big bullseyes on simulated enemy missiles and then straps them to the backs of giant turtles, so that they can claim a great interception rate?
Dagnabbit! Sarah Palin doesn't share 80% of her DNA with Trichoplax! http://www.whataboutcarol.com/
It's a little reassuring that Japanese bureaucrats can be as idiotic as American bureaucrats.
Isn't it weird that this story has received major coverage in the British press and next to none in the American press? Was it the timing of the release? Is it that the British press understands statistics better than the American press? Vice-versa? Or does the British press have more respect for its readership than the American press has? Or is it related to the fact that Prozac was created by an American company? All in all, the difference in availability of this news in newspapers of the different countries is fairly astonishing. I take an SSRI and it seems to work for me, but I'm willing to accept that a placebo would have worked as well. I wish publication of meta-analyses like this one, including unpublished as well as published results, was required by US law.
Anyone interested in presenting information on the web would benefit from picking up two classics by Ed Tufte: The Visual Display of Quantitative Information and Envisioning Information.