Select top left cell, format as table, make sure "my data has headers" is checked. Click just below the header row to select and entire column of data (excluding the header row). Format as you please, validate as you please. You can even right click, insert a new column, then create a formula that verifies the data and outputs nothing when it's good and "OHSHIT" when it fails verification. Then you can non-destructively filter your table on "OHSHIT".
If you're using Excel at least learn to use it. This shit is up there with people who hit Enter/Return twice to generate a blank line in Word.
No, that's not "responsive design". That's just a minimal design, which is great if you have minimal content. Responsive design means fucking shit up all over the place on different devices (based on resolution, browser strings, etc.). Sane navigation on a desktop site? It better be a javascript-enabled, overlaying shitshow behind a "swipe" action or a "hamburger" button on the mobile site!
"Responsive" design is a wasp's nest of complicated, half-working, hacky CSS with javascripty shit on top . Unless your layout and content are brain dead simple.
Not all content works that way, and not all web sites can focus on style or presentation. Many websites need to get shit done and need to present a lot of content cleanly. And yes, sometimes we have to use tables!!
Oh, I've been threatened. I've never had anyone dumb enough to even try to follow up on their laughable bullshit. The closest anyone came was crying to the police and having them contact me with bogus "we'll open a harassment investigation" horseshit. Guess what never happened.
But in a heavily-stylized font such that the u is symmetrical, the l and t are nearly identical, and the B and H are very similar as well. Then you can do it up so the second half is angled off of the first a bit, such that one half appears to be a reflection of the other half. Make the left half of the logo one color and the right half another color. We'll probably go with a dark or grey-blue on the left, and then a desaturated version on the right. For plaintext use we'll prescribe black for the left half and grey, italics for the right. For monotone use it'll be black on the left and white (or grey) on the right.
Somebody get on this shit now. I need vector illustrations.
I disagree about the "openness being a disadvantage." Seriously, name one thing that the carriers/OEMs do, in terms of software, that adds any significant value. I throw down the gauntlet.
Samsung added multi-window support years and years ago and gave us the stylus and all its features.
Are you assuming the "editors" edit? Are you assuming the "anonymous reader" who posted this submission wasn't a bot or a Slashdot "editor" filling a daily quota of shitty front page articles?
Something that is "10 times cheaper" that something else that costs 1 dollar would itself cost negative 9 dollars. It is 10 times (1 dollar) cheaper (than the 1 dollar item). 10 times 1 dollar is 10 dollars. Cheaper indicates a cost of fewer dollars, so we subtract 10 from 1 and get negative 9 dollars.
Alternatively, we can reserve this interpretation for "less expensive" and use "cheaper" as a bounded modifier, with direction self-contained, thus capping the result at 0 dollars on the low end. This would make any relative comparison past "1 time cheaper" useless, though it does make sense, just as deceleration means velocity stops at zero, while negative acceleration (similar to "less expensive") is unbounded.
It'll just fill up a secret, super-hidden file while it can't access those IPs. Then when you allow the IPs to get your updates, it'll send off the files.
Firefox maintains its own certificate store. This is annoying if you're pushing out trusted certs because you have to do it for the OS and then also do it for FF. But it is much safer. You absolutely can store certs permanently.
Firefox forces me to obtain the self-signed certificate each time afresh, so each time it could be intercepted. Making hacking the cert very much easier.
WTF are you talking about? Do you know how SSL works? (No, you don't. A self-signed cert is no different from a cert from a major CA in this regard.)
Wrong. ALl those fucking boxes do is model normal traffic and watch for anomalous patterns, bandwidth usage, and IPs. They're next to useless, but cost big fucking bucks because people are retards.
Slashdot Mirror
Select top left cell, format as table, make sure "my data has headers" is checked.
Click just below the header row to select and entire column of data (excluding the header row). Format as you please, validate as you please. You can even right click, insert a new column, then create a formula that verifies the data and outputs nothing when it's good and "OHSHIT" when it fails verification. Then you can non-destructively filter your table on "OHSHIT".
If you're using Excel at least learn to use it. This shit is up there with people who hit Enter/Return twice to generate a blank line in Word.
In finance, you're not supposed to use any floating point math.
No, that's not "responsive design". That's just a minimal design, which is great if you have minimal content. Responsive design means fucking shit up all over the place on different devices (based on resolution, browser strings, etc.). Sane navigation on a desktop site? It better be a javascript-enabled, overlaying shitshow behind a "swipe" action or a "hamburger" button on the mobile site!
"Responsive" design is a wasp's nest of complicated, half-working, hacky CSS with javascripty shit on top . Unless your layout and content are brain dead simple.
Not all content works that way, and not all web sites can focus on style or presentation. Many websites need to get shit done and need to present a lot of content cleanly. And yes, sometimes we have to use tables!!
Oh, I've been threatened. I've never had anyone dumb enough to even try to follow up on their laughable bullshit. The closest anyone came was crying to the police and having them contact me with bogus "we'll open a harassment investigation" horseshit. Guess what never happened.
Why would you comply with such a demand? It's newsworthy and they have no standing to have it removed.
My phone has a large enough screen and a high enough resolution that I just prefer to browse the full site. Can we stop the "mobile web" shit?
But in a heavily-stylized font such that the u is symmetrical, the l and t are nearly identical, and the B and H are very similar as well.
Then you can do it up so the second half is angled off of the first a bit, such that one half appears to be a reflection of the other half.
Make the left half of the logo one color and the right half another color. We'll probably go with a dark or grey-blue on the left, and then a desaturated version on the right. For plaintext use we'll prescribe black for the left half and grey, italics for the right. For monotone use it'll be black on the left and white (or grey) on the right.
Somebody get on this shit now. I need vector illustrations.
Blu][utH
It's means "it is".
It's been nice proving you wrong.
I disagree about the "openness being a disadvantage." Seriously, name one thing that the carriers/OEMs do, in terms of software, that adds any significant value. I throw down the gauntlet.
Samsung added multi-window support years and years ago and gave us the stylus and all its features.
Bloatware is profitable. They are either paid to bundle that shit in there or they are hoping to hook you into their ecosystem.
Slider keyboards.
Flip phones.
Shut up, Wesley!
Are you assuming the "editors" edit?
Are you assuming the "anonymous reader" who posted this submission wasn't a bot or a Slashdot "editor" filling a daily quota of shitty front page articles?
Let them eat bits.
10 times cheaper.
You likely meant one of the following:
1/10th as expensive.
90% less expensive.
Something that is "10 times cheaper" that something else that costs 1 dollar would itself cost negative 9 dollars.
It is 10 times (1 dollar) cheaper (than the 1 dollar item). 10 times 1 dollar is 10 dollars. Cheaper indicates a cost of fewer dollars, so we subtract 10 from 1 and get negative 9 dollars.
Alternatively, we can reserve this interpretation for "less expensive" and use "cheaper" as a bounded modifier, with direction self-contained, thus capping the result at 0 dollars on the low end. This would make any relative comparison past "1 time cheaper" useless, though it does make sense, just as deceleration means velocity stops at zero, while negative acceleration (similar to "less expensive") is unbounded.
Their main presenter, during their main presentation. Up on stage. Made fun of Microsoft for launching new consoles. Everyone saw it.
That's not what happened. Quote it, I dare you.
Uber has its own regulations as well.
Please detail the regulations Uber abides by.
I'll wait.
Should've gone with unotbootin.
It'll just fill up a secret, super-hidden file while it can't access those IPs. Then when you allow the IPs to get your updates, it'll send off the files.
That's not applicable to Windows 7. That's for 8.1 and Server 2012 R2.
Firefox maintains its own certificate store. This is annoying if you're pushing out trusted certs because you have to do it for the OS and then also do it for FF. But it is much safer. You absolutely can store certs permanently.
Firefox forces me to obtain the self-signed certificate each time afresh, so each time it could be intercepted. Making hacking the cert very much easier.
WTF are you talking about? Do you know how SSL works? (No, you don't. A self-signed cert is no different from a cert from a major CA in this regard.)
Wrong. ALl those fucking boxes do is model normal traffic and watch for anomalous patterns, bandwidth usage, and IPs. They're next to useless, but cost big fucking bucks because people are retards.
You can avoid it if you choose to not install the individual updates,