And, contrary to stupid-but-popular-belief, it does not feminize men at all to eat soy.
It absolutely does. There's a reason parents with newborn boys are told to avoid soy and lavender and all the other estrogen-like compounds swirling around us from plastics, pollutants, the birth control pill tainting our food and water supplies, etc.
It's the dock. Dell is coming out with a newer dock specifically to handle this scenario. Or maybe they already did. It's quite a bit more expensive than the regular dock, unfortunately.
No, you can't. The official recommendation for the flagship phones with USB C connectors and USB 3's fast charging / power delivery shit is to ONLY use a C to C cable. They explicitly state things are NOT supported with an A to C cable or adapter.
I read the post I replied to. It sais Android was a standard. That's utterly fucking retarded.
If you want evidence for my claims, go read up on all of the OEMs.
Take note of how Amazon said "fork you" to Google's requirements when making their Kindle devices. Pay special attention to the resulting war with regard to access to apps and services, particularly YouTube and Amazon Prime's video shit.
Go look at how Samsung is trying desperately to break Qualcomm's stranglehold on the market by making their own processors. Pay attention to how firmware updates all seem to dry up not based on how old a device is, but based on how long the Qualcomm SoC in it has been on the market.
Go and read the Slashdot articles from years back when Google decided to split off the Google Apps from Android itself when the EU was starting to whisper. Go and read the details about how OEMs had to pay up and meet various requirements to include those apps, such as not including a competing store by default.
Take a look at the advertising for all of the new flagship devices that mention a version of Android. There's never any contention about it. If you want to launch as the first device on a major Android version (one with a stupid candy/dessert name), you pay for the privilege. It's so bad that when the LG V20 was the first device to ship with Android 7, Google rushed 7.1 just so they could advertise the Pixel as being the first device to launch with it. LG got less than a month of exclusivity on advertising the latest Android version out of the deal.
And go ahead and download the official Android SDK yourself. What's the latest version tree you can pull down? Do you think an OEM has time to plan, design, build, test, manufacture, and ship devices before that version becomes irrelevant? How do you think Samsung, LG, etc. get devices out the door running the latest versions of Android? Do you think Google, who makes competing devices, gives them earlier access to future Android builds and documentation for free?
But hey, you're probably the kind of guy who will look at all the above and ignore it all, just like you'd ignore all the news about Nvidia's GeForce Partner Program because you aren't allowed to see the actual contracts involved.
Android is completely free to use, no strings attached. But note that Android really isn't a codebase, it's a standard.
AOSP is an open source project. That's what the O, S, and P stand for. It's a codebase anyone can use.
Android is a branded Google product. Using Android has come with a LOT of strings and costs attached since at least version 5. If you, as an OEM, want access to the latest versions of Android in order to build your device you need to pay up, you need to agree to include Google's other apps (and also pay for them), you need to pay again if you want to launch a flagship device running the latest version of Android at the time of release, etc.
If you don't want to pay or be contractually tied up you can use "Android", but the code you'll have access to will be 2 to 2.5 versions behind what the actual latest shit is, you'll be at the mercy of Qualcomm because they tie all their chips/drivers/firmware to support contracts, you won't be able to include the Play Store, Gmail, Google Maps, etc. At that point you may as well be using AOSP and calling it your own OS (see all of Amazon's products).
I had two schizophrenic friends, one, that uses drugs (mostly marijuana) is chronically homeless. The one that stayed clean was a co-worker at Microsoft (sadly died suddenly from a heart problem).
Anecdotal.
I have 1 schizophrenic friend. The first leads a normal life, the second is chronically depressed, and the third is a violent freak who won't stop whispering to me to burn them all, burn them all, BURN THEM ALL!
The top jobs in the gig economy are committing treason by colluding with Russia's attack on your own country, and helping Donald Trump and his co-conspirators get away with treason.
The answer is stupid people. If everyone on the planet stopped using Facebook tomorrow, the company would basically be in a state of emergency within weeks.
Within hours. It would take them about a minute or so to notice it happened, then a few hours to realize/admit it wasn't a network, monitoring, firewall, government shutdown, etc. issue and instead that people had just dumped it.
This isn't about Bitcoin. This is about shitty "ICO" scams. These almost all run on Ethereum, because the network is designed to allow "smart contracts" and there are turn key solutions for rolling your own ICO and setting up a shiny but hollow website for it.
Someone gives you Ethereum. You give them your new, worthless coin. You promise you're going place, you're doing things, etc., and that investors in your ICO will soon be able to go to those places with you and to do those things with you.
A few months later, when suckers stop hopping on, you shut it all down. The only place you go is away and the only thing you do is take all the Ethereum with you. The suckers who traded Ethereum for your worthless shit are left holding the bag while you're free to sell that Ethereum for USD.
I can't even name a single ICO running on top of Ethereum that hasn't played out exactly as described above.
Then they attack your hosting provider. And your hosting provider kicks you off their platform. And then your hosting provider says "Man, I wish we didn't do that. We don't do that in the future. Promise!", just like Valve is doing now. And just like Valve is doing now, your hosting provider won't let you back onto their platform despite having the change of heart.
Fuck you, Cloudflare. Fuck you, Valve. You can't have it both ways. Take a stance and stick to it. Don't fucking ban shit and then act like you care about free speech, open platforms, etc.
You know... because asking someone to provide proof of a claim is anti-conservative.
When you only ask one side to provide proof of something, that's bullshit. When the one side making the absurd claims is the side that has not conducted any repeatable experiments on the matter, has not been able to accurately predict things, and keeps revising both their models and data points in order to fit their hypothesis, yet they're the "accepted" side, that's bullshit.
But the most bullshit thing is not realizing the simple fact that carbon dioxide is absolutely not the primary cause of global warming. Not only is CO2 a weak greenhouse gas, human production of it doesn't account for the majority of it. The primary cause of warming and cooling is the fucking sun, by far. If you want to get into secondary factors, then plain ol' water vapor beats out CO2 by a country mile.
Not all of the forms I've dealt with let you put in anything you want. Some are drop down or radio button controls tied to a set of options. This is frequently the case when they use a data set backed by "true" info about you (that they typically pull from the 3 major credit unions).
Questions may be restricted, but the responses can be anything you choose.
Not always, unfortunately. And certainly not when they're using any info backed by the big 3 monsters (Equifax, Transunion, and Experian) that you may be forced to prove if something fucks up, such as living at a certain address, having a phone number, having a specific loan / financial account, etc.
I have in my KeePass file notes that for certain security questions I have to answer incorrectly because the data they have on file is wrong. For example, they think my main phone number is a land line when it's a cell phone. If I get that question as a challenge and I answer it truthfully, I get locked out and have to call some support jockey. The last time it happened I had to resort to paper mail and inky signatures and excessive wait times.
If your software has switched to a DRM, always-online, subscription based model, the odds are I'll ignore it completely before I'll pirate it. And I'll pirate it before I buy it if I can't figure out:
A - What it is that your product does exactly B - What specific licensing malarkey I need to do what I want C - What the 67 different versions actually restrict me from doing D - If the product even works as claimed, has decent support, gets updates, etc.
And, contrary to stupid-but-popular-belief, it does not feminize men at all to eat soy.
It absolutely does. There's a reason parents with newborn boys are told to avoid soy and lavender and all the other estrogen-like compounds swirling around us from plastics, pollutants, the birth control pill tainting our food and water supplies, etc.
It's the dock. Dell is coming out with a newer dock specifically to handle this scenario. Or maybe they already did. It's quite a bit more expensive than the regular dock, unfortunately.
No, you can't. The official recommendation for the flagship phones with USB C connectors and USB 3's fast charging / power delivery shit is to ONLY use a C to C cable. They explicitly state things are NOT supported with an A to C cable or adapter.
I've had very little problems getting USB 2.0 or 3.0 speeds over most USB 1.1 cables under 6 feet in length.
Really? Your USB 1.1 cables have the extra pins necessary for USB 3.0 speeds?
Stop lying.
It's all true.
I read the post I replied to. It sais Android was a standard. That's utterly fucking retarded.
If you want evidence for my claims, go read up on all of the OEMs.
Take note of how Amazon said "fork you" to Google's requirements when making their Kindle devices. Pay special attention to the resulting war with regard to access to apps and services, particularly YouTube and Amazon Prime's video shit.
Go look at how Samsung is trying desperately to break Qualcomm's stranglehold on the market by making their own processors. Pay attention to how firmware updates all seem to dry up not based on how old a device is, but based on how long the Qualcomm SoC in it has been on the market.
Go and read the Slashdot articles from years back when Google decided to split off the Google Apps from Android itself when the EU was starting to whisper. Go and read the details about how OEMs had to pay up and meet various requirements to include those apps, such as not including a competing store by default.
Take a look at the advertising for all of the new flagship devices that mention a version of Android. There's never any contention about it. If you want to launch as the first device on a major Android version (one with a stupid candy/dessert name), you pay for the privilege. It's so bad that when the LG V20 was the first device to ship with Android 7, Google rushed 7.1 just so they could advertise the Pixel as being the first device to launch with it. LG got less than a month of exclusivity on advertising the latest Android version out of the deal.
And go ahead and download the official Android SDK yourself. What's the latest version tree you can pull down? Do you think an OEM has time to plan, design, build, test, manufacture, and ship devices before that version becomes irrelevant? How do you think Samsung, LG, etc. get devices out the door running the latest versions of Android? Do you think Google, who makes competing devices, gives them earlier access to future Android builds and documentation for free?
But hey, you're probably the kind of guy who will look at all the above and ignore it all, just like you'd ignore all the news about Nvidia's GeForce Partner Program because you aren't allowed to see the actual contracts involved.
Android is completely free to use, no strings attached. But note that Android really isn't a codebase, it's a standard.
AOSP is an open source project. That's what the O, S, and P stand for. It's a codebase anyone can use.
Android is a branded Google product. Using Android has come with a LOT of strings and costs attached since at least version 5.
If you, as an OEM, want access to the latest versions of Android in order to build your device you need to pay up, you need to agree to include Google's other apps (and also pay for them), you need to pay again if you want to launch a flagship device running the latest version of Android at the time of release, etc.
If you don't want to pay or be contractually tied up you can use "Android", but the code you'll have access to will be 2 to 2.5 versions behind what the actual latest shit is, you'll be at the mercy of Qualcomm because they tie all their chips/drivers/firmware to support contracts, you won't be able to include the Play Store, Gmail, Google Maps, etc. At that point you may as well be using AOSP and calling it your own OS (see all of Amazon's products).
I had two schizophrenic friends, one, that uses drugs (mostly marijuana) is chronically homeless. The one that stayed clean was a co-worker at Microsoft (sadly died suddenly from a heart problem).
Anecdotal.
I have 1 schizophrenic friend. The first leads a normal life, the second is chronically depressed, and the third is a violent freak who won't stop whispering to me to burn them all, burn them all, BURN THEM ALL!
The top jobs in the gig economy are committing treason by colluding with Russia's attack on your own country, and helping Donald Trump and his co-conspirators get away with treason.
Lock him up!
#ItsHerTurn
#BlueWave2018
#Drumpf
Yeah! YEAAAAH! FUCK TRUMP! YEAAAAH! Whooooooo!
The answer is stupid people. If everyone on the planet stopped using Facebook tomorrow, the company would basically be in a state of emergency within weeks.
Within hours. It would take them about a minute or so to notice it happened, then a few hours to realize/admit it wasn't a network, monitoring, firewall, government shutdown, etc. issue and instead that people had just dumped it.
This isn't about Bitcoin. This is about shitty "ICO" scams. These almost all run on Ethereum, because the network is designed to allow "smart contracts" and there are turn key solutions for rolling your own ICO and setting up a shiny but hollow website for it.
Someone gives you Ethereum. You give them your new, worthless coin. You promise you're going place, you're doing things, etc., and that investors in your ICO will soon be able to go to those places with you and to do those things with you.
A few months later, when suckers stop hopping on, you shut it all down. The only place you go is away and the only thing you do is take all the Ethereum with you. The suckers who traded Ethereum for your worthless shit are left holding the bag while you're free to sell that Ethereum for USD.
I can't even name a single ICO running on top of Ethereum that hasn't played out exactly as described above.
Every ICO is a scam.
You're just another snake cult.
Android is free to use.
No, it isn't.
AOSP is free to use. Android has strings and costs attached.
Then you can't do anything that requires SafetyNet.
No Android Pay (or whatever they call it now), no Snapchat, no banking apps, no Pokemon GO.
Sexualizing kids is in right now with the journalist crowd. Put them in drag and you'll get glowing reviews for "progressiveness".
Sadly, it is. The media seems focused on normalizing pedophilia and ignoring child trafficking.
Then they attack your hosting provider. And your hosting provider kicks you off their platform. And then your hosting provider says "Man, I wish we didn't do that. We don't do that in the future. Promise!", just like Valve is doing now. And just like Valve is doing now, your hosting provider won't let you back onto their platform despite having the change of heart.
Fuck you, Cloudflare. Fuck you, Valve. You can't have it both ways. Take a stance and stick to it. Don't fucking ban shit and then act like you care about free speech, open platforms, etc.
We're altering the data. Pray we do not alter it further.
And the hypothesis are testable and in some cases independently reproduced.
Where are the test Earth's where we control everything from the magnetosphere to the sun and test only changes in CO2 emissions?
Christ loves you anyway.
You know... because asking someone to provide proof of a claim is anti-conservative.
When you only ask one side to provide proof of something, that's bullshit.
When the one side making the absurd claims is the side that has not conducted any repeatable experiments on the matter, has not been able to accurately predict things, and keeps revising both their models and data points in order to fit their hypothesis, yet they're the "accepted" side, that's bullshit.
But the most bullshit thing is not realizing the simple fact that carbon dioxide is absolutely not the primary cause of global warming. Not only is CO2 a weak greenhouse gas, human production of it doesn't account for the majority of it. The primary cause of warming and cooling is the fucking sun, by far. If you want to get into secondary factors, then plain ol' water vapor beats out CO2 by a country mile.
Not all of the forms I've dealt with let you put in anything you want. Some are drop down or radio button controls tied to a set of options. This is frequently the case when they use a data set backed by "true" info about you (that they typically pull from the 3 major credit unions).
Your mother's maiden name is *******?
Questions may be restricted, but the responses can be anything you choose.
Not always, unfortunately. And certainly not when they're using any info backed by the big 3 monsters (Equifax, Transunion, and Experian) that you may be forced to prove if something fucks up, such as living at a certain address, having a phone number, having a specific loan / financial account, etc.
I have in my KeePass file notes that for certain security questions I have to answer incorrectly because the data they have on file is wrong. For example, they think my main phone number is a land line when it's a cell phone. If I get that question as a challenge and I answer it truthfully, I get locked out and have to call some support jockey. The last time it happened I had to resort to paper mail and inky signatures and excessive wait times.
Your mom is a single, stupid metaparticle.
If your software has switched to a DRM, always-online, subscription based model, the odds are I'll ignore it completely before I'll pirate it. And I'll pirate it before I buy it if I can't figure out:
A - What it is that your product does exactly
B - What specific licensing malarkey I need to do what I want
C - What the 67 different versions actually restrict me from doing
D - If the product even works as claimed, has decent support, gets updates, etc.
Computer, bring up Celery Man.