Slashdot Mirror


There Are More Jobs Than People Out of Work, Something the American Economy Has Never Experienced Before (cnbc.com)

The jobs market has reached what should be some kind of inflection point: there are now more openings than there are workers. From a report: April marked the second month in a row this historic event has occurred, and the gap is growing. According to the monthly Job Openings and Labor Turnover Survey released this week, there were just shy of 6.7 million open positions in April, the most recent month for which data are available. That represented an increase of 65,000 from March and is a record. The number of vacancies is pulling well ahead of the number the Bureau of Labor Statistics counts as unemployed. This year is the first time the level of the unemployed exceeded the jobs available since the BLS started tracking JOLTS numbers in 2000. As of April, the total workers looking and eligible for jobs fell to 6.35 million, a decrease from 6.58 million the previous month. The number fell further in May to 6.06 million, though there is no comparable JOLTS data for that month. Under normal circumstances, the mismatch would be creating a demand for higher wages. However, average hourly earnings rose just 2.7 percent annualized in May, up one-tenth of a point from April. Further reading: Why Nebraska has an amazing jobs market but nobody is moving there.

689 comments

  1. Ok by Locke2005 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So why are headhunters still calling me up and trying to lowball me on software developer contracts? With H1B Visas getting shut down, they should be especially short on software engineers, shouldn't they?

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    1. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      And why are there (more than ever) unhoused people living in the streets which society has decided to take a giant dump on? Seattle which has a hot tech job market is befuddled with a growing number of unhoused jobless people living in tents on the sidewalks. Amazing.

    2. Re:Ok by Altus · · Score: 1

      When exactly did they get shut down? I heard a lot of talk about it but haven't seen anything about real changes. Got a link?

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    3. Re:Ok by zlives · · Score: 5, Insightful

      there are jobs, but not well paying jobs. i think it has to do with all the profits the corporations are not making...

      o wait
      http://fortune.com/2017/12/07/...

    4. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      msmash

      Stop posting links to websites that don't allow adblocking.

      Fucking incompetent asshole.

    5. Re:Ok by sgt_doom · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yup, and why are employers doubling down on yearning for younger and younger workers? If there were really a demand, as neither of us believe, wages would have shot up long ago, and my old employers would be bothering me and others without let up.

    6. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why are headhunters still calling me up and trying to lowball me on software developer contracts? With H1B Visas getting shut down, they should be especially short on software engineers, shouldn't they?

      Software can be done by people who are not even physically IN the US, and those software engineers will quite likely work for far less money than you'd like to be paid while you are living in the US as a US citizen.

      Welcome to the global economy, sport.

    7. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      To be fair, as someone who lived there, Seattle people are really a "special" type. You could probably offer everyone free bars of gold if they would go to a specific place and they would still choose to lay around on the sidewalk.

    8. Re:Ok by sgt_doom · · Score: 1

      Well --- if there really were so many jobs, why are 47% of millennials working as free lancers, with 35% of the overall working population (which has been shrunk considerably with jobs offshoring and foreign visa replacement workers insourced)? And why have an estimated 94% of new job creation been those unsustainable gig economy-type jobs?

    9. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most homeless people have mental health issues.

      We don't do much for them.

      They probably wouldn't handle doing software development well.

    10. Re:Ok by bobstreo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So why are headhunters still calling me up and trying to lowball me on software developer contracts? With H1B Visas getting shut down, they should be especially short on software engineers, shouldn't they?

      Just because a job is open, doesn't mean it's either

      A) A good job

      B) A job that's offering pay commensurate with experience,,

      Nobody but the truly desperate would even bother applying for jobs like these.

      That and of course the mandatory drug tests.... /s

    11. Re:Ok by Calydor · · Score: 1

      If they provide coffee at all.

      --
      -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
    12. Re:Ok by Narcocide · · Score: 1

      Yep, I'm still waiting for those apologies to come flooding in...

      any

      day

      now...

    13. Re:Ok by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      Same reason they keep calling me. You are good at what you do and they only want to hire the best.

      Or maybe they are just fishing around for a sucker.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    14. Re:Ok by RickyShade · · Score: 2

      Probably because a great deal of millennial's have this entitlement mentality

      What a load of garbage. How does this have a score of 4.

    15. Re:Ok by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      There are places that don't provide coffee? Aw, hell no. Places I have work if the coffee maker is down you are looking at a riot.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    16. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You hit the nail on the head. Millions of people are now employed in the gig economy and part timers. Many of the new job openings are likely just that as well. It sounds really good but it explains why people are still living paycheck to paycheck if even that

    17. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just trying to explain this concept to my boss.

      I'm a millennial who seriously lucked the f*ck out and got a good job with 401, benifits, all the rest of that good stuff. Just me though. My four child hood friends are part of that lost generation that are now being overlooked because now that businesses have suddenly decided "oh! time to hire again!" they're only going for people fresh out of college... ...while I'm over here like "what about my friends that graduated 6-7yrs ago that are STILL looking for work and STILL trying to pay off their debt? Will they ever get a shot, or simply be over looked because they aren't fresh out of college as naive as a 22yo who will think "wow! a SALARY of $36,000 a year! That's a STEAL!" when the reality is it's peanuts and you could make more as a cashier at sheetz.

    18. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Millennial bashing is so tired (and I say this as a non-millennial). It's become the intellectually lazy excuse for every issue.

      Your comment cites no facts (just leads off with "probably" followed by a bunch of baseless opinions).

    19. Re:Ok by Ichijo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      With H1B Visas getting shut down, they should be especially short on software engineers, shouldn't they?

      Correct, they lowball you just so they can prove that they can't find anyone to fill the position before (ab)using the H1B program for cheap labor. They don't expect you to actually take the job, nor are they willing to pay more to fill the position.

      --
      Any sufficiently unpopular but cohesive argument is indistinguishable from trolling.
    20. Re:Ok by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 1

      It's then they realize that most employers provide coffee and not espresso or a latte

      If that were the breaking point, then employers should just fucking offer espressos. It's far cheaper than a raise would be.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    21. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Headhunters gonna hunt. It's in the company's interest to seek the best use of their dollars.
      You don't have to take those jobs and if they don't get anyone to fill those seats they will up their offers.

      The labor shortage is real and the numbers show it. Your tiny slice of the world is is only part of the larger picture.

      Without imported labor those jobs will go un-filled and economic opportunity will be lost. Your personal wages may go up as companies compete for your time, but it's harmful for the economy as a whole.

      There is demand for foreign high-tech labor. When you lobby your government to stop it you are creating artificial barriers that distort the market and harm the country as a whole.

      Look no further than Japan's severe economic stagnation to see what happens when you refuse to import foreign skilled work.

    22. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To be fair, as someone who lived there, Seattle people are really a "special" type. You could probably offer everyone free bars of gold if they would go to a specific place and they would still choose to lay around on the sidewalk.

      Yup, a good portion choose to live that way.

    23. Re:Ok by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      During my career, I got a lot of calls offering a position and then asking if I knew anyone who was available.

      My answer was that all the good people I knew already had jobs.

      The callers were, indeed, low-ballers.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    24. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "I demand to work normal working hours under sane conditions for a wage that doesn't require me to find 2 more jobs just so I can pay the fucking rent."

      "YOU ENTITLED BRAT!"

    25. Re:Ok by Dorianny · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Millenials grew up during one the longest economic downturn in history and have the heaviest student-debt burden ever. They are worst off financially then their parents at their age and are very likely to never be as wealthy as their parents. They bust their ass in the "gig economy" for little pay and no benefits and yet you consider them "entitled" because they prefer their cup of coffee differently then yours. Guess what, you are the entitled generations

    26. Re:Ok by rfengr · · Score: 2

      Mine does not, and it has 100k employees. Hell, I don’t even have dental insurance.

    27. Re:Ok by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Why shouldn't they give it a pitch? Perhaps you still think it's an employer's market, and they can get you to jump for less than you're really worth. They're doing the car dealer thing on your trade-in, trying to low-ball you. Smart move on their part - they represent the employer, not you so of course they want to low-ball you.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    28. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      because its true so I upvoted it.

    29. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everybody wants money. You feel justified in expecting employers to pay you plenty of it, and employers feel just as justified in paying you as little as they can get away with.

      Every dollar they pay you is a dollar they can't keep. They don't pay you out of a sense of charity! They want to make money off your efforts, and if you are too expensive then hiring you is self-defeating.

      The job market will never be a kind place. It is not in its nature to be kind.

    30. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it is just you. Things seem fine for everyone else.

    31. Re:Ok by r1348 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Dude, seriously, jump ship.

    32. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the cost of a mortgage of a mudhut compared to the cost of a mortgage in e.g. Columbus OH, sport?

    33. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, no. Millennials constitute a massive chunk of the population and the stuff you're spewing is the same exact thing that every generation says about every generation prior. Millennials -- why are they the worst? | Kelly Williams Brown | TEDxSalem

      Granted, there are a lot of high school and college kids that get some extremely stupid notions in their heads that are far from reality, but by the time they hit 30 they'll mostly have been punched in the dickcunt by life to the point that those stupid notions are muted or gone. Generalizing about an entire generation is rarely accurate.

    34. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't "learn to code" what we typically say to the lower class when they're rendered obsolete?

    35. Re:Ok by jwhyche · · Score: 0, Troll

      Of course you realize that the coffee comparison is nothing more than a metaphor for the real problem, right?

      Yes, the current crop of millennial's is the most entitled generation in a long time. They are not the only people affected by the economic down turn so that doesn't wash. Lots of people of all ages are working for little pay and no benefits. But millenials seem to be the least prepared for real life. The riots after the Trump election are the a good example. They lost a election so instead of preparing for the next one, they complained and moaned. For god sake there are millennials that can't even balance a check book or keep a budget.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    36. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe for referral revenue. Don't know, but it's telling how often Slashdot stories link to a paywalled article first, and then sometimes has a secondary link to a non-walled article. Shady.

    37. Re:Ok by dj245 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Mine does not, and it has 100k employees. Hell, I don’t even have dental insurance.

      They are stupid for not doing so. If people are willing to take legal stimulants, I (as the boss) am happy to facilitate that.

      If adderall was OTC I would have a big bowl full of them in the break room.

      --
      Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    38. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Divide and conquer

    39. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      They'd get a job at Google, if they cut their nuts off first.

    40. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think everything will be ok as long as the power stays on.
      If not, then the millennialâ(TM)s will have to rely on other skills

    41. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Second that , have been looking for a better opportunity in IT sector with a better company for months but somehow , its scare or folks low balling a lot.
      As pointed out in this article these job growth is not in IT https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/09/heres-where-the-jobs-are--in-one-chart.html

    42. Re: Ok by Kaenneth · · Score: 2

      I had two schizophrenic friends, one, that uses drugs (mostly marijuana) is chronically homeless. The one that stayed clean was a co-worker at Microsoft (sadly died suddenly from a heart problem).

      Anecdotal.

    43. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'd take a raise over free coffee anyway. I can bring my own damn coffee. Businesses like to sell ambiguous bullshit as something of value every waking secomd. Give me cash anyday, if it's so valuable, then you can keep it and end up ahead.

    44. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter, sport. Software is a global economy. Sink or swim. If someone else is willing to do the job cheaper than you, that's not their problem, it's your problem.

      Welcome to the world of 7B humans in a field that isn't tied to geography.

    45. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the millennial!

    46. Re:Ok by Humbubba · · Score: 4, Interesting
      An A.C wrote

      And why are there (more than ever) unhoused people living in the streets which society has decided to take a giant dump on? Seattle which has a hot tech job market is befuddled with a growing number of unhoused jobless people living in tents on the sidewalks. Amazing.

      The unemployed usually go where the jobs are, ridiculously increasing the unemployment and homeless numbers for that particular area. Some come hoping to find a toehold to a career, others come for any sort of employment, even in the secondary job market. But even the qualified might not get hired for whatever reason (gender, race, HR rules and regulations, history, etc.) Not to mention, some homeless have jobs, but just can't afford Seattle's high rent.

      It wouldn't surprise me if some of the homeless are anarchic Utopians wanting to create a practical social/economic/ecological alternative to 'authoritarian' representative democracy. Like Europe's Autonomism movement or France's Collectif la vieille Valette.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Autonomism

      https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://laboratoireurbanismeinsurrectionnel.blogspot.com/2015/10/france-magnifique-vieille-valette.html&prev=search

      https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=fr&u=http://www.passerelleco.info/article.php%3Fid_article%3D527&prev=search

    47. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Because a lot of other people who are also too stupid to properly pluralize a word upvoted it.

    48. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow you are a cunt.

    49. Re: Ok by sexconker · · Score: 2, Funny

      I had two schizophrenic friends, one, that uses drugs (mostly marijuana) is chronically homeless. The one that stayed clean was a co-worker at Microsoft (sadly died suddenly from a heart problem).

      Anecdotal.

      I have 1 schizophrenic friend. The first leads a normal life, the second is chronically depressed, and the third is a violent freak who won't stop whispering to me to burn them all, burn them all, BURN THEM ALL!

    50. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Part was their choice. I ate dorm food, can you say jello at every meal, and lived in a dorm with steel bunk beds, fluorescent lighting, cinder block construction. Basically a WWII bunker. As a result, I lived pretty cheap. Contrast that with today where I know people who have meal tickets but eat out anyway. After all, it is just more student loans. I will grant you college got more expensive, way more expensive, but part is self inflicted.

    51. Re: Ok by rwrife · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I was walking around Seattle last night and in front of a coffee shop with a âoeHelp Wantedâ sign was a guy begging for money....apparently he didnâ(TM)t need the money enough to just turn around and ask for work.

    52. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm fucking sick of seeing useless boomers, who got a helping hand from the government at every step of their privileged lives of luxury and ease, rant about the greatness of hard work and how millenials just don'try try as hard as they did.

      Your generation is the one that sold off the productive economy and pulled the ladder up after you, the first generation in a long, long time to give their children less - and even now you continue to try and siphon off wealth from the people who are forced to clean up your mess.

    53. Re: Ok by omnichad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's dissociative identity disorder. Schizophrenics will hear voices or see hallucinations - it's an issue with properly processing signal vs. noise.

    54. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      could make more as a cashier at sheetz.

      Spotted the yinzer!

    55. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they believe that society owes them a house and an income, and they will literally shit on the sidewalks until they get them.

    56. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course you realize that the coffee comparison is nothing more than a metaphor for the real problem, right?

      Yes, the current crop of millennial's is the most entitled generation in a long time. They are not the only people affected by the economic down turn so that doesn't wash. Lots of people of all ages are working for little pay and no benefits. But millenials seem to be the least prepared for real life. The riots after the Trump election are the a good example. They lost a election so instead of preparing for the next one, they complained and moaned. For god sake there are millennials that can't even balance a check book or keep a budget.

      So I guess you don't remember the 8 years of bitching and moaning with Obama in office huh? Maybe millennials seem entitled to you because they want what people have in just about every other industrialized nation. But you got yours, so fuck everyone else. Right?

    57. Re:Ok by omnichad · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If by entitled, you mean entitled to a job after paying a fortune for college, then you're probably right. That's how most if not all of them were raised, because it actually worked for their parents.

    58. Re: Ok by Bing+Tsher+E · · Score: 1

      My first quarter tuition at a Big 10 university in 1977 was about $850. That's per quarter, mind you so not that cheap.

    59. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because of your liberal progressive local government.

    60. Re:Ok by omnichad · · Score: 1

      if they don't get anyone to fill those seats they will up their offers.

      No, they won't.

      Without imported labor those jobs will go un-filled and economic opportunity will be lost.

      No. It enables the above increased offers.

    61. Re: Ok by dryeo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or was unemployable for other reasons such as no way to keep up on personal hygiene due to being homeless or perhaps he got busted many years ago for having a joint.
      As others mentioned, there's also mental illness, coffee shop probably doesn't want to hire a mumbler or someone who can't help but curse customers.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    62. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I work at a large chain hardware store.
      We actually pay monthly bonuses if you show up on time, work your entire shift, and don't miss a shift without calling in.

      We start at $13.50 an hour, and it's a minimum $300 bonus. We rarely pay bonus to the millennials.

      It's a real problem, and it's not just old grumpy people bitching about kids these days.

    63. Re:Ok by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      What exactly is a "Millenial"? Most certainly not one who was born around 2000 ... he would have trouble to be 18 now.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    64. Re:Ok by Koby77 · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's a simple matter to create more jobs than job applicants. As an example, I could want to start up a new health clinic. I need to employ ten doctors, and I'm willing to pay $7.50 an hour. Hmmm, I'm not finding any takers. But now I want to increase the size of my clinic, and now I need 15 doctors at $7.50 per hour. Of course, I could repeat this and pretend to create an infinite amount of job openings. But it's the problem that you identified as B: pay must match the value of the work.

    65. Re:Ok by dryeo · · Score: 1

      Pretty entitled workers where you work.

      --
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverted_totalitarianism
    66. Re:Ok by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 3, Informative

      Many companies, in Europe, use job offerings as a kind of "advertizement". In other words: there is no such job, no idea if that also happens in the US:

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    67. Re:Ok by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Why jump without knowing the rest of his compensation? If they paid $250K/yr for a job that normally earns $150K/yr, I'd stay put. Dental insurance is like $25/month to buy for yourself - and coffee? $2 a day covers a person with coffee...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    68. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you forgot

      C) a job that is really a job and not just some posting to make it seem there is a job

    69. Re:Ok by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      About the same ratio as the mortgage on that house in Columbus OH to a house in San Francisco...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    70. Re:Ok by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1
      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    71. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adjusted for inflation that works out to ~$15000/yr.
      For an upper end school thatâ(TM)s dirt cheap.

    72. Re:Ok by jwhyche · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sorry hoss, I'm not a baby boomer. But in a way your are correct, baby boomers are largely responsible for most if not all of this countries problems.

      The only thing my generation has been is stuck with trying to clean up the mess boomers have left us.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    73. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blaming the baby boomers is a tool of the millennials used to deflect from their apathy.

    74. Re:Ok by jwhyche · · Score: 1

      But they are not entitled to a job after college. Nobody is entitled to a job right after college. Not my generation, not their generation, not any generation.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    75. Re:Ok by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Of course that's true. But the point was, the narrative given assumed that the job market could only go up from where it was 30 years ago. Instead, it's much harder to find a job with qualifications because now everyone has a degree.

    76. Re:Ok by raymorris · · Score: 1

      > So why are headhunters still calling me up

      Does that answer your question?

      They are calling you. Bad is when they aren't returning your calls.

      Hopefully when they call, you're letting them know what rate you're looking for so they can (only) call you with opportunities that fit?

    77. Re:Ok by Pitt64 · · Score: 1

      don't be a jagov

    78. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a particularly ironic form of whining that belies a serious entitlement problem on older generations. I worked at a large company and older employees were so much fucking lazier and more entitled. I honestly have no idea where this millennials are entitled meme came from. Not reality. If I had a company, I'd age discriminate like a mother fucker.

    79. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unsolicited calls from headhunters could be your boss giving them your name, hoping you'll leave voluntarily.

    80. Re: Ok by Rakarra · · Score: 0

      Isn't "learn to code" what we typically say to the lower class when they're rendered obsolete?

      When they're not in the lower class because of mental and/or drug problems, yes.

    81. Re: Ok by Rakarra · · Score: 0

      Blaming the baby boomers is a tool of the millennials used to deflect from their apathy.

      Millennials had no input into the fucked-up world that they're inheriting.

    82. Re:Ok by jwhyche · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But who's fault is that? How many of these degree's are for markets that is already saturated? They don't find jobs in these areas because they are none. But what there is, is plenty of jobs in blue collar areas. The country needs plumbers, and welders, there are plenty of jobs there. But so many millennials think these jobs are beneath them.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    83. Re: Ok by murdocj · · Score: 0

      Even to wash dishes? A lot of jobs don't have customer interaction.

    84. Re:Ok by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      these degree's

      You were smart not to waste your money on an English Lit degree.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    85. Re:Ok by murdocj · · Score: 1

      And maybe some people who are too stupid to know "It's" is a contraction rather than a plural didn't upvote it?

    86. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they can.

      People will always try to lowball what they pay you the same way they will try and overcharge you. It's called life, man up buttercup

    87. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Balancing a checkbook is easy but nobody under 40 does it anymore because it's pointless. The vast majority of transactions these days are digital and the balance of your account is available with a few clicks on your phone. Most millennials will only write a handful of checks in their lives. Gen Z will probably kill them for good.

    88. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there are jobs, but not well paying jobs

      Strange then that the Federal Reserve is worried about wage inflation and trying to calm Wall Street fears that wages are increasing overall as the labor pool shrinks because fewer people are looking for a job.

    89. Re:Ok by jwhyche · · Score: 1

      I see proper manners also escapes so many people now days.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    90. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, for that we prefer to let our booted heels do the talking.

    91. Re:Ok by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      You need to do the opposite, tell them you won't work for less than $200 an hour. Be completely serious, because if they do offer you a good number, you'll be interested.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    92. Re:Ok by jwhyche · · Score: 4, Informative

      Balancing a checkbook is easy but nobody under 40 does it anymore because it's pointless. The vast majority of transactions these days are digital and the balance of your account is available with a few clicks on your phone. Most millennials will only write a handful of checks in their lives. Gen Z will probably kill them for good.

      No! This is the most stupidest thing I've read today. Yes, I realize I'm reading and posting to a 0 score but this thinking has to be corrected.

      Balancing your checkbook is basic accounting 101. You don't use it just to keep track of how much money you spend. You use to make sure the bank hasn't committed a error on your statement, or that someone isn't stealing money from your account. Never trust what the bank tells you.

      Not all transactions show up on a digital statement right away. Digital transactions first show up as a pending entry in your statement. Those are entries that have not cleared. Those pending transactions can vanish off your account in a few days only to come back as a cleared statement.

      Checks on the other hand do not show up on your digital statement till they are cashed. For this to happen you are at the mercy of the person holding the check. They could hold that check for a few days or in some cases a few months.

      You must keep track of your own money. Do not rely on the bank to do this.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    93. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $2 a day covers a person with coffee...

      Covering a person with coffee? That'll cost a million dollars a person.

    94. Re:Ok by elrous0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Many companies, in Europe, use job offerings as a kind of "advertizement". In other words: there is no such job, no idea if that also happens in the US

      Speaking as someone who recently had to look for work, I can assure you that this is very much the case in the U.S. as well. Very, very few advertised positions represent actual jobs. The vast majority of them fall into one of these categories:

      1) Job recruiter bait (no actual job, just a fake ad for a job recruiter basically)
      2) A job that they already have someone in mind for, but have to advertise for legal reasons
      3) A job with the unstated hidden requirement "must be a woman or minority"
      4) A continuous fake job ad that's just intended to solicit resumes to add to the pile
      5) A job that is posted with ridiculous qualification requirements or a terrible salary, just so the company can claim they can't find anyone to fill it when they apply for an H1B hiring permit.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    95. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe you just value yourself a lot higher than you are worth.

    96. Re:Ok by jwhyche · · Score: 3

      I had a corrupt bank manager that would hold on to the checks I was writing. Then instead of cashing them in the order they came in. She would shuffle them around so some of the would get a NSF charge against them Of which she was getting a bonus for.

      She was doing this for several accounts, got busted, and I think was arrested. I got all my money back for the fees but my point still stand. Do not blindly trust a bank.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    97. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretty sure a cashier doesnt make over 36k a year. At least not around here.

    98. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep, i totally remember riots in the streets after Obama won. And the media spending billions of dollars bashing him and his family. That was a thing that happened. Totally. /s

    99. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably don't want people with poor hygiene handling your dishes right before you eat off them

    100. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. The last 2 recruiters I spoke with wanted me to take a salary 20k to 30k lower than what I'm currently getting. At least it was an easy decision for me.

    101. Re:Ok by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      Um...because outsourcing+fake jobs (technically on the books, but never going to be filled at those rates)? I know the guys you're talking about. They cold call me all the time offering contracts at terrible rates when full time senior engineering positions (at higher rates) are available all over the valley. I guess some people must bite or they wouldn't bother to call, but hiring the cheapest possible developers never ends well. In the meantime the recruiters get their 30%ish cut

    102. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The rate of bank errors has dropped dramatically with the increase of electronic transactions and compliance standards have only gone up. My statement is available at any time and reflects all my credits and debts up to a few hours ago at worst. I'm automatically notified of any large deposits and withdrawals. There's nothing to actually balance. It's done and it's all digital.

      As for tracking the slow process of checks. I don't write any. I do not own a physical checkbook and I haven't written a check in at least 8 years.

    103. Re: Ok by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      To be fair, plenty of engineers also have mental health issues, it's just that it's aspergers/ocd vs dementia/ptsd. Also these things called a college education and experience. The showering and underwear on the inside of your pants policy is pure bonus.

    104. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or you can do your banking with someone trustworthy?
      Even if someone shafts me out of a few hundred it works out across a lifetime.

    105. Re: Ok by triffid_98 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Um...it's what was (collectively, not you personally) told to the machinists and steelworkers other displaced professions (soon to be taxi drivers and semi truck operators) once a million of them lose their jobs. Many are not suited for it and few of them with zero experience in their new field at 40+ are going to be snapped up like that, even if they can afford to re-skill (many cannot)

    106. Re:Ok by nehumanuscrede · · Score: 1

      "Of course that's true. But the point was, the narrative given assumed that the job market could only go up from where it was 30 years ago. Instead, it's much harder to find a job with qualifications because now everyone has a degree."

      It's much harder to find a job with qualifications because companies went completely stupid when they decide what " qualifications " you should have for even a mediocre job.

      Example: Executive Janitor

      Our Ideal Candidate:

      Fluent in English, Spanish, French and Swahili
      Must possess PH.D or fifteen+ years experience in some field we've never even heard of.
      5+ Years coding experience in $not_yet_invented language preferred
      10+ years of making coffee for ludicrous pay level executives preferred
      Willingness to work excessive hours, no OT, lots of travel, on call 24/7
      Smartphone provided, so we can track you at all times.
      Company car provided . . . . hahahahaha no. You'll be using your own car.

      Pay Range: $35k - $55k depending on qualifications

    107. Re: Ok by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Go fix it. stop expecting someone else to fix it for you.

      Not a bad idea. Though they do have to first get past the senile city council that shuts down every suggestion they've made.

    108. Re:Ok by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      There are good paying jobs out there, you just need to know latest thing X,Y and Z. X,Y and Z vary by year and by company. People on the homeless trail probably don't even know X, so it's not like those guys are getting through the interview even if they aren't wearing their underwear on the outside and smelling like a badly maintained porta-john

    109. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not against blue collar work, but my impression was that these fields are difficult to get into without already knowing someone to apprentice under? In addition to having to apprentice for multiple years for shit pay. Am I wrong about this?

    110. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The callers were, indeed, low-ballers.

      The best way to show these people the door is to make an outrageous salary demand upfront. Tell them that you want $350,000 per year with a $200,000 signing bonus, non-refundable under any circumstances and payable in cash before the first day of work begins. They will never call you again, I promise.

    111. Re:Ok by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      Funnily enough, those "dirty" jobs have the exact opposite problem. They don't want PhDs, because, they will keep looking while working, won't be motivated to work properly and leave the moment when they get another offer.

      If you're an employer, you want someone who fits the job, so they'll be motivated to work and stay working for a long time.

      And it's those "dirty" jobs that millenial generation just doesn't want to do. Hence the high education in useless field with all the student debt that comes with it, instead of a functional skill set that lets you do said "dirty" job and that would cost you a fraction of college tuition or even free on the job training.

    112. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sounds like they would make good CEO's and senior management, going by the amount of Cocaine consumed.

    113. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the job adverts may not actually be real, and have been reworded "to sound sexy" or the employers practice "matrix management" techniques. Suppose you have several skills A, B and C. You really want to use skill C, have done A and B in the past and absolutely hate them. Employer can't find anyone to do A and B, but can get cheap H1B's that also want to learn skill C. Then from the matrix managers viewpoint, since you did A and B in the past, you should be assigned onto A or B and train up the H1B's to do skill C. The only solution to get to do C is to offer your skills in C as a freelancer. Working as a permanent employee only gives the employer the right to shuffle you around as they take on new staff.

      A & B could be clearing backlogs, maintenance, help desk, legacy support while C is actually new software development and research.

    114. Re: Ok by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      Isn't that an "entitlement mentality"?

      Or is it merely an expression of widely-held social expectation about the duties of an employer to his workers? When/if the millennial generation's expectation of espresso becomes sufficiently commonplace, we'll all benefit from better coffee.

    115. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Presently there is a shortage of senior engineers wanting to move into management. Everyone who has wanted to do so has done so and moved out of the industry or into non-technical roles. Partly due to all the outsourcing that occurred a decade ago. That just leaves employers desperate to find managers, and everyone else who doesn't want do so and play corporate politics becomes consultants, freelancers and self-employed. Many jobs are highly paid like data scientists, machine learning/API and computer vision people required by startups funded by venture capitalists. But again these companies want to grow as fast as possible and get as many people into management as possible. High salaries are being used to "winkle out" the academic researchers from their post-doc research positions and get them to apply.

    116. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you pay peanuts, and you get monkeys. What a surprise!

    117. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah but legislation isnt the kind of "code" they were thinking of

    118. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pick me pick me!

    119. Re:Ok by bobstreo · · Score: 1

      you forgot

      C) a job that is really a job and not just some posting to make it seem there is a job

      I think there was a post earlier this week I read, about a place wondering why nobody was applying for a job requiring a Masters in Social Work for $14-16 an hour while the local minimum wage was $17 an hour.

    120. Re:Ok by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      I see proper manners also escapes so many people now days.

      That should be "manners also escape," not "escapes."

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    121. Re:Ok by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      now days

      And, the word you're looking for there is "nowadays." Or, "these days" would also have worked.

      Also, you could consider, just for fun, correctly processing a little humor deployed when you're opining about who has or needs which higher education degrees and the don't handle the plural form correctly.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    122. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, or maybe they in too much debt after their degree to afford to now go to trade school. Freedom to make bad and uninformed decisions is American.

    123. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was always chosen last for PE sports, dodgeball and softball, etc

    124. Re:Ok by deathguppie · · Score: 1

      the reason is simple. Everyone coming out of high school wants to do "computers". Most of the jobs available are in the blue-collar sector where kids don't want to work, even if there are plenty of good paying positions available. You are in a high competition labor market. I'm going to charge more for my work every year because of you and them because I can't be replaced, you can.

      --
      once more into the breach
    125. Re:Ok by deathguppie · · Score: 1

      the reason is simple. Everyone coming out of high school wants to do "computers". Most of the jobs available are in the blue-collar sector where kids don't want to work, even if there are plenty of good paying positions available. You are in a high competition labor market. I'm going to charge more for my work every year because of you and them because I can't be replaced, you can.

      --
      once more into the breach
    126. Re:Ok by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      The situation is recent. Corporations and headhunters are still used to being in position of a lord mercifully throwing scraps to the people looking desperately for work. They need to wake up, sober up and see the job market has changed and they need to start competing for employees.

      Never mind the spam approach; trying to find a sucker.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    127. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you, Boomer. You inherited a rich and free country - and you left to the next generations a bankrupt police state. And now you're bitching at other people about how it's their job to clean up your godawful mess.

      Enjoy eating dogfood in your retirement!

    128. Re:Ok by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Thing is, you can't just live off whatever you're leeching off indefinitely. Either you open that clinic and it starts earning you money, or you'll run out. So after a while you'll conclude "damn, maybe $7.5/h is not enough?"

      With enough job openings salaries are bound to start climbing - but the system has a rather large inertia.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    129. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Writing cheques to yourself? Just use cash, or an IOU. Or just do what the government does all the time and just pretend the money is in a different pocket, and now is somehow different.

    130. Re:Ok by DMJC · · Score: 2, Informative

      Who the fuck uses chequebooks anymore? Isn't everything on EFT/Electronic money aside from edge cases with cash or is America behind the times yet again? The only time I ever see a cheque is when a government department or business issues a refund and is too dumb to use direct bank deposit.

    131. Re: Ok by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      In my home city there are fucktons of skilled, experienced, unemployed blue collar tradesmen.

    132. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No doubt the cabal of central banking usurers is constantly vigilant against the dire threat of proles making enough money to feed and house their families without debt.

    133. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As if you would know anything about your 'home city' since you don't even live in the USA anymore.

      Peen, Peen, the magical fruit. The more you post, the more he toots ... his own horn.

    134. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh puuuuhlease. There won't be any coffee by then because all of the growing areas will have climate shifted into being too inefficient to grow coffee.

    135. Re: Ok by schure · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And slavery was a choice, right?

    136. Re:Ok by mentil · · Score: 1

      Don't tell them you have a degree and they wont' ask to see your transcript. Problem solved.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    137. Re:Ok by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      We had to get up at 3AM, walk uphill both ways, work 25 hours a day for tuppence a year and all died because there was no 'elf and safety. Why shouldn't we want our children to suffer the same thing!?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    138. Re:Ok by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      You are expecting children to make major life choices based on faulty information and then blaming them for the poor outcomes.

      I'm gen X, and I was told that a degree in a subject that interested me was the way to go. Didn't really matter what subject, employers just wanted a degree to show you could learn by yourself to that level on the job. The debt wasn't something to worry about.

      And when you look at job adverts these days, a lot of them require a degree. If you don't have one it's much harder to get anything good.

      Being a plumber or a welder is great, except that in many places it's not a steady, guaranteed income like a wage is. That makes it even harder to get a mortgage, and you have to save more to be secure. And millennials hardly think those jobs are below them, when they are clearly willing to work in the gig economy and other crappy McJobs just to get by.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    139. Re:Ok by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Because they can afford to wait for wages to go down again. No point buying when the price is high if you can wait.

      There is a power imbalance in their favour. You need a job, you can only survive on savings for so long, or put up with your crappy working conditions for so long. Eventually you will be forced to accept the lower wages unless you get lucky.

      As for favouring younger workers, it's because they are cheaper. They want to pay sub-graduate wages, so seeing a lot of experience on your CV is a pretty good indicator that you won't work for that kind of money and are less vulnerable (more savings, owned home etc.) than millennials.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    140. Re: Ok by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Why, you make it sound so easy. When the older folks have snapped up all the real estate, all the capital, all the important positions in finance, law and politics, what is left for the young people? How do you run a campaign without money? Collect it from supporters? You mean the other young people, who also don't have money? How do you feed yourself during the campaign without any savings? How do you generate savings if you can't even find a job? How do you find a job when unskilled labor has been taken over by illegal immigrants and education is prohibitively expensive? The poverty trap is not a myth. When you start with nothing, you end up with nothing.

      The young people in this country are being exploited. Even when they find a job, they work longer hours than ever before, and get paid less and less. You say there's ways out of this, that if they work hard they can change the rules so it's more fair. But that's just a lie, designed to keep them busy so they don't see the reality. Changing the rules while abiding by them is nothing short of impossible, because all those rules were put in place by those with money and power, and the last thing they want is to give that up. The young people have never been given a chance to succeed, they've been set up to fail, and by their parents no less.

      And now they even have to put up with your bullshit.

    141. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Ah, the old - "it's their choice" gambit

    142. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Funny how nobody ever says they should learn business management or HR.

    143. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on the temperature of the coffee.

    144. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Bullshit, homeless in Seattle because hiring is in fact abysmal.
      Amazon and Microsoft still advertise jobs as required by law before they hire H1B.
      Those job listings aren't meant to be filled, stop spreading lies about "healthy" job market.

    145. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They'll have plenty of opportunity to wash their hands before the dishes.

    146. Re:Ok by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      The civil service doesn't because it's large and people are stupid.

      Basically it has about 500,000 employees.

      Imagine they spent a whole 1p per employee per day on coffee. The dail fail and other inane publications go all "herp derp teh evil inefficient gubmint spends 1 MILLION POUNDS ON COFFEE FOR LAZY CIVIL SERVICE EMPLOYEES!".

      I mean a MILLION POUNDS is a lot of money, right?!

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    147. Re:Ok by Mashiki · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      In general they don't suffer the same thing. In contrast, we can already see the impact of poor work ethics from those younger kids, compared to even a generation ago. When you hand someone everything, and they never struggle, put into positions that make them grow, you end up with people who are "fine with the status quo" and are unwilling to strive for more.

      ~25 years ago when I was in high school, the school didn't shut down unless there were two things going on: Severe weather(severe snowfall 10+cm, blizzard, tornado, fog with visibility under 10m), or the bus was broken. Even then, they expected kids who didn't take the bus to show up to class. Just this last winter(in december), there were multiple cases where we got 1cm of wet snow on the ground, that will melt in 2hrs when the sun comes up. All of the schools in the area were shut down. That's in an area of Canada were +30cm snowfalls overnight are common. By all means, explain how this benefits anyone and doesn't foster a mentality of "well that's a reason to blow it off..."

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    148. Re:Ok by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      But who's fault is that? How many of these degree's are for markets that is already saturated?

      Yeah it's CLEARLY the fault of the young people with zero life expereince to draw on to make such decisions and not at all the fault of the adults who have set up the system up.

      MAKE THE KIDS SUFFER FOR THEIR IGNORANCE. I'm sure the little turds deserve it for being lactose intolerant or something.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    149. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, it's almost if you're being forced to realise that migrants weren't actually the problem and you've been hoodwinked by a combination of lazy people who want to blame foreigners rather than sort their lives out, exploitative 1%ers, and corrupt politicians who used people who were different as a form of misdirection to distract you from the actual problem and get your vote, but you're not quite there yet.

      Keep the cogs whirring, your brain might put two and two together if you keep at it.

      Now your country can't grow, because it's either having to fill growth jobs with people who can't do them, or not fill them at all. Your economy is fast heading to a brick wall because you got your way on the whole anti-immigrant thing and are rapidly being forced to realise what that means - continued low pay followed by eventual slowdown of growth, follows by being outcompeted on the world stage by more open societies.

      America didn't reach the size it did by turning away people, it reached the size it did by being an open society. Now that's been rejected, your position on the world stage and your wealth, national and personal will be adjusted downwards accordingly unless you change course before it's too late. I hope the fact you didn't get what you thought you would out of these policies will be a massive fucking wake up call to you.

    150. Re:Ok by sjames · · Score: 1

      That's got to be it. Here I am offering a perfectly good job (mow my lawn once a week, BS in agronomy+5 years experience a must, bring your own mower plus gas and water, suit+tie expected while on the job minimum wage, no benefits, schedule will be posted 12 hours in advance.) and those damned slackers won't do it.

    151. Re:Ok by Xest · · Score: 1

      Out of curiosity, what are you implying here? That the stats are cooked?

    152. Re:Ok by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 2

      According to a former co-worker/software developer who used to work for a bank they would process checks from largest to smallest which of course would have the effect of bouncing as many checks as possible should a customer have insufficient funds to cover all of them.

    153. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoosh
      The GP is actually describing 3 voices of his own schizophrenia...

    154. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Teabaggers.

      'nuff said.

    155. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember them. The morons with tea bags on their heads, walking around with assault rifles. The constant assaults on his father and mother, endless conspiracy theories involving his birth, etc.

      That's to say nothing about the hiss-fit the GOP threw, refusing to do anything, regardless of how it aligned with their own goals.

      Glenn Beck's stupid DC rally was a thing. All perfectly insane.

      You might want to get that memory of yours checked-out. It seems to be faulty.

    156. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The solution, naturally, is to not write bad checks.

      If you look towards the back of your checkbook, you'll find a ledger that you can use to track your spending. Keeping the balance accurate is what we used to call "balancing your checkbook".

    157. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am personally hiring ten million mechanics. Must have own tools, materials and certification. No relocation costs covered. Zero hour contract. Phds in self driving AI, computer vision and aerospace engineering preferred....
      Minimum wage, no benefits, mandatory uniform with rental fees required...
      There, now you know.

    158. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe Millennials who spend +3$ in shitty coffee when a good one costs a few cents aren't making the wisest choices.

    159. Re: Ok by Iamthecheese · · Score: 1

      Bullshit. He probably applied and was turned down at that very place. Many companies say they're hiring just so they can get a thicker folder of applicants and thereby treat exiting employees worse.

      --
      If video games influenced behavior the Pac Man generation would be eating pills and running away from their problems.
    160. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Worthless boomer?

      My father retired from two jobs (one federal, one state) and collects three retirement checks (federal, state, and SSI due to injuries on the federal job). He's never been out of work and now makes close to 100k a year just for being alive.

      Worthless? No. Had the intelligence to look at work as a means to a long and happy retirement? yes. He never owned a new car until he retired, now he buys my mom a new car every 3 years because he can. He never had a cell phone and watched VHS tapes because he could by them 3 for $1 at the bargin bin.

      People now a days go into debt for $1,000 phones, pay $9 for coffee and have almost nothing in retirement. All these modern conveniences yet people still don't realize that debt kills wealth and when you're 60-70 you're not gonna work and need money.

       

    161. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an ageist slur. Replace any headline's usage of millenial with jew and it's like you're reading the daily stormer.

    162. Re: Ok by argStyopa · · Score: 1

      Because there's a Republican in office.
      This will get modded troll but it's a fact: homelessness was a cause celebre in the later 80s under Bush I, then VANISHED from headlines 1993-2000 (some how these legions of homeless people found homes instantly?).
      It reappeared as an American tragedy 2000-2001 (until it was overtaken by other events) until now when it's a "new" crisis.
      Homelessness as a crisis is reported on only with Republican presidents.
      A simple LexisNexus search shows this is a fact.

      --
      -Styopa
    163. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Sorry hoss, I'm not a baby boomer.

      Oh ! Oh ! Then you are just an a

    164. Re: Ok by peragrin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Also wages are not rising. A healthy job market the wages should be jumping up a lot. But are at best medicore increases

      The tax cuts are doing more to harm economic growth as the money corporations got are going to shareholders and not bieng used to expand and growth.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    165. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You wrote more in checks than you had money to cover it, and it was someone else's fault? Order only matters if you overdraft, and the order will only cause more overdrafts. No matter what order you process my checks, that doesn't seem to happen.

      Congratulations, you just defined why people say what they do about millineals.

    166. Re:Ok by Cederic · · Score: 0

      When they're drinking $3 cups of coffee that I couldn't afford at their age then complaining that they're financially worse off than their parents, yeah, I'm thinking they're entitled.

      The only reason I'm not financially worse off than my parents is because they were so fucking poor. If I had a child they might be financially worse off than me but they'd still have seriously more options and wealth opportunities than their grandparents.

    167. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But who's fault is that? ...
      But so many millennials think these jobs are beneath them.

      Great question Bob, I'll take that one.

      All you have to do is replace the word "think" in your statement with "have been systematically conditioned by parents, schools, media, everything basically, into believing the lie that". Here, let me use that in a sentence"

      "But so many millennials have been systematically conditioned by parents, schools, media, everything basically, into believing the lie that these jobs are beneath them."

      Back to you, Bob.

    168. Re:Ok by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Not my generation, not their generation, not any generation.

      Entitlement and expectant are not too different when you look at them. If everyone with brown hair except for you got a free Mars bar on account of they had brown hair, would you complain about not being entitled to it?

      The X, boomers, and previous generations generally lived in a world where if you had a college degree, you HAD a good job. Not maybe, not more likely to, but actually had one. You were smart. People paid your for your smartness. College man will go far because he has college behind him. Then they grew up, and what did they teach their kids?

      If you spent your entire life having someone tell you if you do X and get Y as a reward, after you do X you may quite rightly feel entitled to Y and quite pissed when you find out that technically no one is entitled to it and you have been lied to all your life.

    169. Re:Ok by houghi · · Score: 0

      We do have (free) coffee. Not yet worked at a company where it was not free. I have heard of some where you pay for it, but it will be cheap.

      Not sure if I have dental or not. Also not sure if not that a health issue might not be covered anyway, while teeth whitening would certainly not be so.
      I do have extra hospitalization and a shit of other insurance, free public transport to and from work and in the whole city I work in. I also have paid sick days when I am sick. That is unlimited, although after 1 month I only get 80% pay and that goes down to 60% or so if I am sick longer.
      And I also have 34 paid holidays and am able to take 5 unpaid ones that they can not refuse if all my other days are

      Also no unpaid overtime. If I do overtime I get paid extra (150%) or get extra time off (150% as well)
      But the free coffee is the real important thing.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    170. Re:Ok by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      But who's fault is that?

      babyboomers and generation X as parents and educators.

      But so many millennials think these jobs are beneath them.

      No. So many millennials were *taught* by everyone who was more mature and thus more *knowledgeable about how the world works* that these jobs are beneath them. They didn't just make this shit up out of the blue because they are posh.

      Speaking of millennials. The vast majority of the generation you are criticising are now done with university or college after 25 years of promises that when doing that they won't need to subject themselves to these dirty jobs which are beneath them. To be honest, yes those jobs are beneath them. Ever tried to apply for a blue collar job with a university degree? Even the employers offering those jobs think they are beneath them and would rather a homeless person take it due to an educated person being high risk.

    171. Re:Ok by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Liberal policies do that.

    172. Re:Ok by houghi · · Score: 1

      Then they should be able to sue everybody, because that is how it was sold to them. "Study and you will get a job."
      This is the same shit as saying "... but it is not really limitless" after you sold it. If you need to add an asterix, you know you are trying to deceive the people.

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    173. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No problem, what are your qualifications for the position I have posted right now? Oh, you don't have any experience? You've never written code? Your degree is in SJW tactics and community organizing?

      Well even though you have no qualifications and bring absolutely no benefit to my company I guess it is my duty to give you a $120k a year job, a corner office and an expense account.

      Oh and we have free coffee too. Welcome aboard for as long as the company survives.

    174. Re:Ok by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      Not all transactions show up on a digital statement right away.

      Errr yeah they do. Maybe they don't in America where you fetishize the credit industry and pay for your chewing gum using borrowed capital, but the vast majority of the rest of the world have up to date digital statements.

      Mind you it's not like you need to balance your books constantly anyway. The very system you claim is a problem is also a solution in that it allows accounts to run temporarily negative, and I haven't been with a bank in the past 5 years that didn't give you a summary of your continuous inflows vs outflows on some app. You can very much rely on the bank to do this, and if you can't then maybe you need to use a different bank.

    175. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...and why as a double STEM income family can my wife and I barely afford to live in our city?

      She's a nurse and I have a CS master. In order to cover student loans, rent on 1-1/2 BR apartment, and child care, we're effective broke. We have one beat up old car that we share. We don't travel, don't eat out.

      We either save for retirement or a house (in a market that had gone up 2-3X in 10 years)

      Job interviews for me are like running through a wringer--if you can't do everything, and also have instant recall, you don't get a call back. My boss just bought a $120K car but "sorry, there's no money in the budget", when I look for a raise.

      I think this full employment stuff is bullshit meant to support the current administration.

    176. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah and I not they're getting incredibly picky about skill sets too. They have to understand some bit of training and acclimation is going to happen in any job.

    177. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Isn't it funny how the job market is apparently so much better but incomes have been stagnant for a decade plus? It's almost like the statistics are bullshit and your "healthy economy" is populated by minimum wage service industry jobs and $300k+ houses that only Chinese speculators can afford to actually own.

      Don't worry, those lazy millennials will get their shit together, work hard to buy your house for triple what you paid for it, pay you out twice as much social security as you ever paid in, and bail out the husk of whatever you drive into insolvency next. Maybe the auto industry again? Or medicare?

    178. Re:Ok by gx5000 · · Score: 1

      I hear ya...
      The whole IM/IT Industry is trying to turn us into low paying drones...
      The glut of jobs out there are things you'd only do if you were desperate.
      Your Tag covers the rest...."I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions."
      We bought a puppy so at least...

      --
      End of Line.
    179. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Shut the hell up with bullshit like that. Slavery is not the same as people choosing to be lazy and want handouts , be afflicted with an untreated mental condition that affects their ability to be productive.

      Just stop. They're not the same.

    180. Re:Ok by The+Cynical+Critic · · Score: 1

      I don't think any shutdown or reduction in H1B visas is going to put all that much of a dent into total U.S jobs figures... The tech sector as a whole only accounts for about 4% of all jobs in the U.S and jobs where (ab)using H1Bs is even feasible is probably only fraction of that.

      I really don't think making it harder to bring in foreign labor is going to do anything beyond pushing companies to move the jobs to the workers rather than bringing the workers here. A potential "programmer shortage" really was just an excuse to decry talk about slashing the numbers of H1B workers as it was actually going to hurt them in some way.

      --
      "Why should I want to make anything up? Life's bad enough as it is without wanting to invent any more of it."
    181. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I got a 3,500/yr raise this year and a 2,500 one last year. That's on top of my 7000/yr bonus.

      Maybe you should just be better at your job.

    182. Re:Ok by Rolgar · · Score: 1

      This only works if you are tracking everything you spend, or can identify every charge on your statement.

    183. Re: Ok by bn-7bc · · Score: 1

      Hold on thgey have to pay people an additionakl x$ tio show up and actually du what thay allready ar paid to do? while 13.50/h is not exsactly mega bucks, it's not that bad either, so what gives? Or is it just me, imho if you get paid to to a job do your best, or at least show up when you say you are going to.Incidently does being born in febrary 1980 meke me a milenial by your deffinition?

    184. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm using uMatrix and uBlock Origin with a ton of filterlists enabled. Both links loaded just fine for me.

      I don't know what the hell your problem is, but it most certainly is your problem.

    185. Re:Ok by The+Cynical+Critic · · Score: 1

      Maybe people aren't entitled to a job straight out of college/university, but with the downturn in (good or at least decent) jobs for the uneducated and the resulting increase in the share of people who get themselves an education has lead to the end result is that it's harder to get a job right out of college. At least for those going trough less employable (mostly liberal arts) programs.

      The point really is that good jobs are harder to come by these days both for the educated and the un-educated and the whole "I wasn't entitled to a job straight out of college" thing is just a straw man used by baby boomers and gen X:ers.

      --
      "Why should I want to make anything up? Life's bad enough as it is without wanting to invent any more of it."
    186. Re:Ok by The+Cynical+Critic · · Score: 1

      You're being a bit pretentious here... The fact that something isn't a person's #1 choice doesn't mean that they think it's beneath them. I'm not right now nor was I when I was still a student interested in actually pursuing a degree in history or political science, but I don't consider it beneath me and did elective courses in those subjects when I was upper secondary school (local HS equivalent). Hell, I also worked 3 summers in construction when I was a student and actually enjoyed it.

      Tech is however what I'm most interested in so when I went to university, I got a degree in Computer Engineering and that was my #1 choice when applying.

      --
      "Why should I want to make anything up? Life's bad enough as it is without wanting to invent any more of it."
    187. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention market research. My previous employer used to tell us during our annual reviews, "We received nnn applications for YOUR job, we need to hold your annual raise to 0.03% this year".

      There are also employers listed with multiple job services. I'd bet that these get counted as more jobs available.

      There are also many jobs that they will not tell you are part-time until you apply. One local employer replaces full time employees who leave with 3 people for each position. They do not offer any benefits for the part time people.

    188. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Usually some 90 year old with a long line waiting behind them in a crowded store... Of course, the entire check has to be filled out in perfect copperplate cursive and the signature is comparable to something you would see on the US Declaration of Independence. By the time Nana is done writing her masterpiece and discussing her life history with the cashier, other lines have moved 10 customers through.

    189. Re:Ok by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

      We'lls Fuckyo and Blood of Apartheid did this to thousands of customers for years, and got away with it. I have literally had it done to me by both of them.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    190. Re: Ok by trevc · · Score: 1

      I didn't realize there were different levels of homelessness. I thought you just were or were not.

    191. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > ..this thinking has to be corrected.

      This. Please!

      It baffles me that gas stations always ask "do you want your receipt" - who are the idiots who don't??

      But considering how so many new kiosks and stores don't even give you receipts any more, or force them through email, it gets harder and harder to track finances...

    192. Re: Ok by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Most homeless people have mental health issues.

      We don't do much for them.

      They probably wouldn't handle doing software development well.

      Sometimes the jokes write themselves...

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    193. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't think of that, but yeah, that seems to be true in the US.

      In the last year I finally found some promising jobs I actually wanted to get involved in - but as soon as my resume went in, each company replied "oh no, hold on" with one of: "looking for funding," "revising the position," or yet another excuse. 4 times so far, one just last week.

    194. Re:Ok by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      And why are there (more than ever) unhoused people living in the streets which society has decided to take a giant dump on?

      I think you have who is taking dumps on who reversed ...

    195. Re:Ok by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      Seattle which has a hot tech job market is befuddled with a growing number of unhoused jobless people living in tents on the sidewalks. Amazing.

      "Unhoused"? Did the euphemism treadmill advance even further while I wasn't looking?

      Anyway, are you suggesting that the "unhoused" people should be hired for the hot tech jobs? But what if they aren't up to speed on the latest JavaScript frameworks?

    196. Re:Ok by tehcyder · · Score: 2

      coffee? $2 a day covers a person with coffee

      I prefer drinking it, but each to their own.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    197. Re: Ok by bigman2003 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've owned businesses. Landscaping and printing.

      I tried to hire homeless people. I've gone to the guys holding the signs and said"hey...I have work for you...help me mow lawns for the day $12/hr. And I'll buy you breakfast and lunch."

      I did this a LOT. I did not care about appearance, criminal record, etc. They didn't need to plan ahead or meet me later. I offered immediate food, etc. Etc.

      Over the course of a year I had ONE person take me up on it. He was a good guy, worked with me for like 2 weeks before he disappeared.

      Whenever people talk about all of the hurdles for these people to get jobs, I know that when I took away every single hurdle...they said "no".

      In my experience these people are on the street because they prefer it to the other options. Not because they don't have other options.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    198. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, because those conservative policies are doing so well. *shakes my head*.

    199. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They said the same thing about my generation (I'm 40 - whatever that is). I, and all my peers of the same age, are doing MUCH better than our parents.

      Student debt is a different story of course, since the government made college "Affordable".

    200. Re:Ok by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      But in a way your are correct, baby boomers are largely responsible for most if not all of this countries problems.

      I knew it, damn hippies managed to break everything.

    201. Re: Ok by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Isn't "learn to code" what we typically say to the lower class when they're rendered obsolete?

      Yes, some people do say that. And it's a stupid thing to say. As if everyone can or wants to be a computer programmer.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    202. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and YOU are doing a swell job. . .

    203. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only time I ever see a cheque is when a government department or business issues a refund and is too dumb to use direct bank deposit.

      Or when there is an old person in front of me in the line at the grocery store...

    204. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because H1Bs aren't getting shut down? If they did a gluten of new tech positions would open up in China and India.

    205. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL, so true.

      Anyway the economy is super top heavy which perfectly explains why prices are high and pay is low. The worst entitlement mentality comes from employers whining that they can't skim enough off the back of somebody else's labor.

    206. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because of your liberal progressive local government.

      Right, because things are so different in red states. How's Kansas doing these days?

    207. Re:Ok by edtice1559 · · Score: 0

      My employer has a thousand open jobs and every one is real. I'm pretty sure they all pay over $100k. And there is 5k bonus for any employee who refers a hire. And we can't fill the jobs.

    208. Re:Ok by Gryle · · Score: 2

      It's one of two things:
      1) Skills mismatch: employers can't find personnel with the skill-set they need. I don't work in the tech sector so I won't comment on the HB1 visa debacle, but I know this is a big issue in construction and civil infrastructure sectors.
      2)Regional mismatch: the jobs are in places where people aren't.

      As for Seattle, I'd guess that most of the street people don't have the necessary skills to work in the tech sector. That said, feel free to donate your time and energy to teach a few of them how to code.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    209. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, it means "split mind", so people think it means multiple personality disorder, but the split referred to is a split with reality.

    210. Re:Ok by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      The riots after the Trump election are the a good example. They lost a election so instead of preparing for the next one, they complained and moaned.

      Were you in a coma between 2008 and 2016? Have you heard of the TEA party? You know, the one where all of a sudden, after Obama was elected, they had been Taxed Enough Already? Do you not remember the 8-year hissy fit coming from Republicans? The birth certificate nonsense? The Terrorist Fist Bump? That Obama was criticized for wearing a tan suit?

      I agree that Democrats have lost their minds over Trump. He is a boorish buffoon, but still they have kind of lost their shit. But really, this is just stupid partisan politics and the Republicans give it better than they get it.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    211. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds like VU in a nutshell...heres 'free' perks...but hope you don't mind working more than 40 hours/week!

    212. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no doubt that this is often the case, but in many segments, there truly is a worker shortage, particularly in skilled labor (machinists, etc.). I have been involved in a dozen hiring efforts over the last year and we have so much difficulty finding candidates, and the candidates we do find apparently don't have any real drive, as they routinely don't show up on the first day, or no-show for their interview.

      This has gotten to the point where, we recently had a candidate with a stellar resume, but not at all suited for the job he was applying for. We created a new position for him and hired him on the spot. After looking at hundreds of resumes and interviewing dozens of people, we have to snatch up good talent if we can find it even if it's not exactly what we are looking for.

      The open positions figure is probably not the cleanest metric for many of the reasons outlined in the thread above, but I think the conclusion still largely holds. There may not truly be more positions that people looking for jobs, but those numbers have to be within spitting distance of each other.

    213. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah!

      MY employer has a million open jobs, AND every single one is extremely real! If you refer a hire, there's a free house, a man servant, a leased jet plane and a diamond crown + free luxury food for life and all the toilet paper you can use. And we can't fill the jobs! Not any of them.

    214. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People who pay their utility bills and do not want a credit card processing fee? or an autopay fee? or people with loans at credit unions that can't do a pull/push from another bank?

      There are still uses for checks in today's age.

    215. Re: Ok by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

      There are some who are technically homeless through no fault of their own. My son has a friend (only 17 years old) whose father died of natural causes a few years ago and his mother died in a car wreck last year. He has no family other than his younger brother. He is couch surfing at friends' homes. HOWEVER, he works and is still trying to save money to get his life started after graduation next year. I do feel bad for him.

      That being said, I agree with your assessment of the bulk of the others. For example, my ex-wife who is a licensed RN refuses to work despite being frequently on the edge of homelessness. I had to contact her sister to help her because I suspected she was a couple weeks away from being thrown out before. Her most recent job was months ago when she needed to pay a bill that was nearly a year overdue. Her employment lasted a grand total of one week before she quit; just long enough to pay her bill. Yet, she wallows around in self pity complaining she can't afford to get health insurance.

    216. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder why those deranged, homeless meth addicts are still laying in the gutter covered in feces instead of getting a lucrative 6 figure tech job.

    217. Re: Ok by painandgreed · · Score: 4, Informative

      Bullshit, homeless in Seattle because hiring is in fact abysmal. Amazon and Microsoft still advertise jobs as required by law before they hire H1B. Those job listings aren't meant to be filled, stop spreading lies about "healthy" job market.

      I don't usually reply to godless lying Russian trolls, but I'm in Seattle and seeing lots of what is going on. Hiring is great in Seattle. Walk down the street and most places have help wanted signs up in the windows. Problem is that those jobs probably won't pay rent on anyplace within ten miles of downtown Seattle. As for professional jobs, we were in the market to hire somebody (because our groups people keep getting recruited for other places by their friends) and in the time that it took to post the job, collect resumes, and interview, we ended up with out fourth choice because the first three were employed someplace else before we could offer them the job.

      Most of the people that are homeless in Seattle are that way because they are living paycheck to paycheck and getting forced out of their houses and apartments by raising rates without first and last to get a new place at the drop of a hat. Housing is going up 10% a year for the past twenty years. The old, cheap places are being torn down to make new expensive places. Apartment complexes are literally doubling the rent from one month to the next to force everybody out so they can remodel and charge more. This happened to one couple I know three times in the same year. Several friends, despite good jobs find themselves having to sometimes stay with friends or family till they can find a new place to live as not too many people can handle their rent doubling long term. Those without a nest egg, friends, or family will find themselves out in the street, and according to the newspapers looking into the issue, that is what is going on in Seattle.

    218. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Meawhile, us Gen-X folk are stuck in the middle just trying to make ends meet and raise a family. Retirement, Social Security? I don't expect to see a dime of it, and actually fully expect to work until I die in the office. And that's if I'm lucky to die in the office and not out on the street!

      So honestly, When the Gen-X and Gen-Z tell both you Millennials and Boomers to STFU, you best listen! We don't want your crony capitalism, and we certainly don't want your Hugo Chavez style socialism either!

    219. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had two schizophrenic friends, one, that uses drugs (mostly marijuana) is chronically homeless. The one that stayed clean was a co-worker at Microsoft (sadly died suddenly from a heart problem).

      Anecdotal.

      I have 1 schizophrenic friend. The first leads a normal life, the second is chronically depressed, and the third is a violent freak who won't stop whispering to me to burn them all, burn them all, BURN THEM ALL!

      That's dissociative identity disorder. Schizophrenics will hear voices or see hallucinations - it's an issue with properly processing signal vs. noise.

      Plot twist: GP is the schizophrenic friend!

    220. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then maybe there is a problem with your employer.

    221. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. And we are all slaves today.

    222. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well itâ(TM)s obviously Reganomics kicking in again on its recurring schedule.

      Now where is Ice Tea and his pile of coke?

    223. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seattle hippies are lazy scumbags. Let them sleep in their own feices. Again. For the 8 th year in a row.

    224. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They just need a laptop and to read the programming book on the plane on the way to the job. Ohhhh. Thatâ(TM)s HBindians.

    225. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It will take something in the middle. Like your wife , you, and a big black cock, respectively.

    226. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why did you have a kid when you were not financially stable for one?

    227. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So republicans cause homelessness. Got it. Those rehab, shelters, and job training programs need to be shut down now!

    228. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also:

      - Job that is contingent upon contract award, with a similar position advertised by every company competing for the contract.
      - Job advertised by a staffing company that is also advertised directly by the actual employer (which is never mentioned up front but can be guessed from the location and industry).

      In most cases, there's just no urgency to fill the position. If the right candidate doesn't come around, they can just cancel the position or keep the ad running indefinitely. So you end up with way more job listings than could ever be filled, most of them targeting people who are already employed. Nobody wants to hire unemployed people, there's obviously something wrong with them...

    229. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shit in one hand and wish in the other... hehe. See which hand fills up first ... hehe.

      This is supposed to be a metaphor... HEHE

    230. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I work at a large chain hardware store. We actually pay monthly bonuses if you show up on time, work your entire shift, and don't miss a shift without calling in.

      We start at $13.50 an hour, and it's a minimum $300 bonus. We rarely pay bonus to the millennials.

      It's a real problem, and it's not just old grumpy people bitching about kids these days.

      You got that right. We had two millennials working for us that could never get to work on time. The excuses were endless: I was up late last night, My alarm didn't go off, I had to take my girlfriend to work, etc. One of them called off constantly, but it was usually afternoon when he would notify us he wasn't showing up that morning. On one of his last days here, he showed up at 4:12PM. He was a nice guy, and a decent worker when he showed up, but work was at the bottom of his priority list. Talking to him one day, he turned down a better paying job offer because he would have a 20 minute commute.

    231. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Double checking to see the âexâ(TM) part of wife ...

    232. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All of this is TRUTH. To add another to the stack:
      6) A job that is contingent on contract award. This may or may not be mentioned in the ad. Contract award may be anywhere from next week to 6 months from now, and may not happen at all. This happens a lot with US Government contractor positions.

    233. Re: Ok by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Not a valid comparison. There's a fraction of the population content to do nothing as long as they don't starve. I knew a guy who would work 6 months, go get fired and live off unemployment, repeat ad nauseum.

      Laughably, somehow he managed to be 500 pounds in spite of the poverty and suffering.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    234. Re:Ok by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

      Usually some 90 year old with a long line waiting behind them in a crowded store... Of course, the entire check has to be filled out in perfect copperplate cursive and the signature is comparable to something you would see on the US Declaration of Independence. By the time Nana is done writing her masterpiece and discussing her life history with the cashier, other lines have moved 10 customers through.

      Christ! I see you buy groceries at the same store I do. The thing that gets me is that they stand there and only fish out their checkbook after the cashier gives them the total as though it never occurred to them that they would actually have to pay for it.

    235. Re:Ok by CaptainDork · · Score: 1

      Nah.

      Headhunters are like real estate sales persons.

      It's a Bungee position.

      --
      It little behooves the best of us to comment on the rest of us.
    236. Re:Ok by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      Balancing a checkbook is easy but nobody under 40 does it anymore because it's pointless. The vast majority of transactions these days are digital and the balance of your account is available with a few clicks on your phone. Most millennials will only write a handful of checks in their lives. Gen Z will probably kill them for good.

      No! This is the most stupidest thing I've read today. Yes, I realize I'm reading and posting to a 0 score but this thinking has to be corrected.

      Balancing your checkbook is basic accounting 101. You don't use it just to keep track of how much money you spend. You use to make sure the bank hasn't committed a error on your statement, or that someone isn't stealing money from your account. Never trust what the bank tells you.

      Not all transactions show up on a digital statement right away. Digital transactions first show up as a pending entry in your statement. Those are entries that have not cleared. Those pending transactions can vanish off your account in a few days only to come back as a cleared statement.

      Checks on the other hand do not show up on your digital statement till they are cashed. For this to happen you are at the mercy of the person holding the check. They could hold that check for a few days or in some cases a few months.

      You must keep track of your own money. Do not rely on the bank to do this.

      I can't argue with anything you're saying. But I am 45 years old and have never balanced my checkbook in my life. I look at my bank statement, and if it looks right, I go on with life.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    237. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Many homeless suffer from mental illness, addiction or both (self medicating) and have limited or non existent job prospects. Some just choose the lifestyle.

    238. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they don't allow returns, funny that.

    239. Re: Ok by djinn6 · · Score: 1

      Lots of ads, right, for jobs that pay nearly nothing. Not to mention fake ones for H1B.

      Houses? It's cheap where there's no jobs.

      A quarter of the population is every single millennial. What have you ever done that is approved by every single baby boomer? You think an internet fundraiser will do anything when your message is for the local city council? What good is $50k when your opponent has 10x the funds and the support of the baby boomers, which is 1/3 the voting population?

      You're not just old. You're delusional. If you lose your house to a fire, you'll end up even worse than these millennials, because you even can't tell what is real.

      And you think this is about me. How funny. Just a reminder: the "me me me generation" isn't referring to the millennials. Unlike you, I'm fully capable of understanding some else's pain. Oh and I'm quite well off myself, probably a lot richer than you. So fuck off with the labels.

    240. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seattle is overpriced. People cant afford to live there and yet they wont leave. A dilemma in all large cities....

    241. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Millenials were already grown up in 2008 when the economic downturn hit. They'd never experienced one in their childhood, which left them pretty emotionally vulnerable to it, hence the focus on them. As opposed to Gen X who had one in their childhood, but had this one strike in their peak earning years. And Boomers who had it hit as they were heading into retirement. And Gen Z who had it hit in their childhood, affecting their education and perhaps making them more more extreme in one way or another than they would otherwise have been. And the Silent Generation, who it's killing.

      The downturn hit as all. Economies are like that.

    242. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wouldn't we have to actually have liberal policies in place for that to be the case?

    243. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Huh, I never knew that marijuana could prevent heart attacks.

    244. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So the big question is why are these markets not responding to supply and demand? If there are more jobs than people to fill them, wages should be going up. They aren't. If there are more homes available than people who want to buy homes, housing prices should be stable. They aren't.

    245. Re:Ok by urusan · · Score: 1

      At my bank, I declined to sign up for NSF and it's been amazing. In theory I might need it, but I haven't yet in 6 years even when I was getting pretty close to the edge ($20 in the account for several days) repeatedly.

    246. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But so many millennials think these jobs are beneath them.

      Today's blue collar workers make less than half what your generation's working class made adjusted for inflation. They are looked down on and treated as backwards, racist, sexist, rednecks by your generation, their elitist attitudes, and the left wing in all generations. That is why they look down on those positions. You made them second class and want to push people you don't like into an easily classified and villainized basket of deplorables.

    247. Re:Ok by urusan · · Score: 1

      Just have a few "senior" doctors you pay the correct amount to keep the business running. If it becomes rampant practice, then you can push them extra hard because all the job listings out there will be for $7.50/hr. Bonus points if you freeze their wages and let inflation wipe out their current salaries.

    248. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The slavery angle is nonsensical based on the narrative of talking about special types of homeless. Have a seat.

    249. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So why are headhunters still calling me up and trying to lowball me on software developer contracts? With H1B Visas getting shut down, they should be especially short on software engineers, shouldn't they?

      No because not everyone has the natural gifts and abilities to become a developer. The bigger issue is that many I guess millennial kids have no interest in the trades and that is an area that is desperate to train people. My #2 son just got a job as an electrician even though he is in college studying Technical Theater along with acting. It's something he never even considered until I told him how easy it is to get such a job right now. There are trade based businesses that are desperate to get the younger generation involved and 20 somethings have zero interest because it's college or nothing.

      -geekpoet

    250. Re:Ok by kilfarsnar · · Score: 1

      there are jobs, but not well paying jobs

      Strange then that the Federal Reserve is worried about wage inflation and trying to calm Wall Street fears that wages are increasing overall as the labor pool shrinks because fewer people are looking for a job.

      Not that strange, considering who the Fed works for and prioritizes in its decisions.

      --
      "What the American public doesn't know is what makes them the American public." -Ray Zalinsky (Tommy Boy)
    251. Re:Ok by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      I'll tell you why people think Millennials are entitled.

      The typical baby boomer or Gen X member realized that their parents, who had basically worked their whole lives to reach the particular stage of economic prosperity at which they lived. They also realized that when they started out living at that stage would be untenable. Prosperity and the collection of possessions held by their parents was the result of years of work, savings and wealth management. Millennials seem to feel that they have a right to that level of prosperity and accumulation of possessions without having to earn them. And they expect them now.

      Here's an example. I've got a Gen X worker. Guy has pounded out projects for years. Comes in early/works late when necessary to get things done. When work is light he sometimes asks for some slack and I give it to him.

      Millennial barely completes adequate work output. Gets pissed when he gets reprimanded because he's not on time or leaves early. Doesn't understand why the other guy gets slack and he doesn't.

      Entitled Millennial

    252. Re:Ok by farrellj · · Score: 1

      Why are there so many unfilled jobs? Especially in the High Tech sector?

      Simple: Discrimination against Women, and older adults.

      If you are over 50, and in high tech, you are practically unemployable in today's high tech field.

      And women have it even worse, they either have to constantly prove themselves again and again in terms of their knowledge, or they are objectified as women, and harassed out of the job. It that way in high tech, and most "STEM" type jobs and even education programs.

      This shortage is totally artificial.

      --
      CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    253. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worthless boomer?

      My father retired from two jobs (one federal, one state) and collects three retirement checks (federal, state, and SSI due to injuries on the federal job). He's never been out of work and now makes close to 100k a year just for being alive.

      And you don't maybe think that this guy getting $100k/year "just for being alive" is in any way perceived as unfair to the generations that will never see a dime of Social Security, much less ever be able to retire?

      If this money were a result of his own savings and investment, no problem. But it is not. It is being taken from the public by threat of force under the terms of a broken promise. Congratulations, you found the problem.

    254. Re: Ok by LunaticTippy · · Score: 1

      Your conspiracy isn't very well functioning. I've been able to read numerous high profile articles about the increasing homeless issue over the last 10 years. I know how important it is for a certain type of person to feel persecuted, but it isn't very accurate in this case.

      --
      Man, you really need that seminar!
    255. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      unemployable for other reasons such as no way to keep up on personal hygiene due to being homeless

      Well, if it was a Starbucks he could live in the bathroom.

    256. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there are more jobs than people to fill them, wages should be going up. They aren't. If there are more homes available than people who want to buy homes, housing prices should be stable. They aren't.

      Keep ignoring the central point for more of your nonsensical bootstraps rhetoric. The laws of supply and demand do not cease to exist when applied to labor.

    257. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The median price of a house in the United States is nearly $200,000. Take a statistics class and understand that that means nearly half of them cost even more. It is mathematically impossible for everyone in America to spend $20,000 on a house.

    258. Re:Ok by Luckyo · · Score: 1

      That's what people who are afraid of this and actually want the job have been doing for last decade or so. It's actually a good sign of person not really wanting the job if they have "I have higher education that isn't relevant to skills needed on this job" on their CV.

    259. Re:Ok by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

      Because a big reason why so many jobs are still not filled is because wages have not caught up to the demand.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    260. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've run into them where they are just a set up to get you to call them. Once on the line they end up bait-and-switching you and start talking about getting you back into college courses. All talk of the job position vanishes and they're trying to connect you up to some tuition loan place. Annoying.

      If some job advertisement starts frantically texting you (yes, texting) to call them back immediately, red flag!!

    261. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "They are worst off financially then their parents at their age"

      THAN not then.

      PS I am looking for work as a proofreader.

    262. Re: Ok by DeBaas · · Score: 1

      Bottom line, people need help. But help isn't necessarily welfare....

      --
      ---
    263. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So keep enough money in your account to cover all outstanding checks.

    264. Re: Ok by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      The tax cuts are doing more to harm economic growth as the money corporations got are going to shareholders and not bieng used to expand and growth.

      Even if that was true (it's clearly not an absolute truth as there are a ton of stories about increased wages and better benefits), how does tax cuts going to shareholders instead of the government hurt the economy?

      I was in a field that didn't get raises from tax cuts (the health insurance field) since those tax cuts also killed the individual mandate but I know several folks that are doing better than they were before. And without those tax cuts (if we just got rid of the mandate), we'd probably be losing jobs instead of maintaining them

    265. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If adderall was OTC I would have a big bowl full of them in the break room.

      That could be quite an incentive for the homeless mentioned above to take a job with you.

    266. Re: Ok by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

      In the case of my ex, you can't help someone who won't help themselves. She could - and has in the past - make very good money and carry great insurance in the health care industry. She chooses not to work because she does not like to be told what to do. She works only as a last resort, an issue which caused much marital stress when we were together.

    267. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No shout-out to pay? I'll add
      3) they don't want to pay people enough, because investors will put their money somewhere else if too much goes to labor rather than to Wall St, so they get people from the Philippines or India

    268. Re:Ok by DedTV · · Score: 1

      Because scanning the Unemployment site job postings in my area (midwest), there are a couple hundred job listings in my area. But 80% of them are in nursing, truck driving or other jobs that generally require certification, prior experience or a degree in the the field like accounting or systems analysis.

      When I turn on the filter to exclude jobs that require a degree, experience or bilingual abilities there's a couple listings for factory work, a couple construction jobs (must be able to lift 150lbs) and one for a dishwasher.

      There's plenty of jobs available, the issue is getting qualified for them, which isn't easy for a lot of people. There's just not a lot of people on the streets carrying a bachelor's degree around in their shopping cart.

    269. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's always the YMCA unless Seattle closed those down. He could go there, get a shower and often a hot meal and possible some decent clothes to go back and apply for the job. It doesn't take much effort or money to not have bad personal hygiene, just takes some initiative.

      (been there, done that).

    270. Re: Ok by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      The strip club you work at is doing well, then?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    271. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Schizophrenics will hear voices or see hallucinations

      I thought it was religion that did that. Maybe it is the same thing.

    272. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All bitches be crazy...

    273. Re: Ok by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      The Seattle residents were complaining that the median price of a house in Seattle is now $800k, to which the San Franciscans replied, "Oh, you poor babies! The median price of a house in San Francisco is $1.6 million!" In other words, it's all relative. Yes, apartments in Redmond cost at least $2K/month, but I'm crashing at a friend's house in Kent for free.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    274. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True story--

      Many years ago I had a job driving a Hollywood starlet around ("personal assistant"). I spent a lot of time sitting in the car waiting while she did her shopping. I used to watch the homeless people.

      Assuming every bill they were handed was a one dollar bill, or that every cluster of change equaled fifty cents, I calculated they were making at least $30 per hour, on average. Of course, some of those bills could have been fives, or even tens.

      Those were 1980's dollars too.

      In the 1990s I met an out-of-work actor in New York. His day job was begging in the subway with a guitar and an open case for people to pitch money into. He told me he emptied it every fifteen minutes or so. He drove a really nice car too. Far better than mine.

      I'm not saying everyone who begs does this well, but make no mistake, many do.

    275. Re: Ok by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      "Remember: you're never alone with a schizophrenic!" Also remember that Americans tend to confuse schizophrenia with multiple personality disorder, when they are in fact two very distinct disorders. Also, schizophrenia can usually be managed with medication, the problem being that bad things happen when people stop taking their meds.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    276. Re: Ok by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      NERD!!!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    277. Re: Ok by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Did you check, maybe he didn't have the prerequisite number of piercing and tats to be a barista... all that body modification ain't cheap, don't ya know!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    278. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mate, the USA is years behind the rest of the world in banking.

      "Checks", or "cheques" as they're known in the rest of the world are basically non-existent these days. About the only time they get used anymore is for making large payments where you get a bank cheque (cashier's check) because it's easier and safer than lugging around thousands in cash to buy a car or put a deposit on a house, but even that use is falling away because banks charge for it and it's easier to just make an electronic transfer now.

      Electronic transfers are instantaneous and debit cards are used everywhere. Credit cards have separate accounts so it's easy to track what's happening.

      You can get a notification to your phone whenever a transaction happens on your accounts. I see when Netflix charges my monthly subscription just the same as when a waiter charges my credit card or when I use my watch to pay for my groceries with my debit card or I complete an Uber ride. Nothing gets by.

      You sound like someone who floats cheques as a form of credit. You're doing it wrong - that's what credit cards and lines of credit are for.

    279. Re:Ok by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      I'm 57 and making $60/hr on my current contract in Redmond. Maybe things are different in Canada, or maybe you're full of it.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    280. Re: Ok by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Turns out condoms are not as reliable as we've been led to believe... I have a daughter, despite always using a condom.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    281. Re:Ok by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      The headhunters in the US looking for contractors do that; they advertise generic jobs that don't actually exist. I actually called the contracting company I was currently working for on that, telling them, "Hey, you're advertising this position that sounds better than than one I'm at, can I apply for it?", only to have them come right out and tell me the position didn't actually exist, they were just trolling for resumes.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    282. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like the cutoff is more like '83-'84 although some organizations say it starts with '77.

    283. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If by entitled, you mean entitled to a job after paying a fortune for college, then you're probably right.

      And that is a horrible belief that causes immense misery. Entitled to a job? It's ludicrous on the face of it. The amount of debt one is in is irrelevant.

    284. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why no, now why would anyone ever doubt the stats from various "reputable" people like NBER and their economist emeritus, Martin Feldstein, who was on the board of AIG/Financial Products when they sold $480 billion of credit default swaps with a possible payout of $20 trillion to $40 trillion --- which they could never fulfill, of course. And Feldstein was on the board of HCA when they were hit with the largest out-of-court settlement fine in US history at that time, and he was also a director at Lilly when they were hit with the then-largest fine in US history. Of course, all such people are full believable?! /sarc

      sgt_doom

    285. Re:Ok by DaChesserCat · · Score: 1

      I agree that I rarely use a check. But I do have a lot of stuff being drawn directly from my bank account. Cellphone, electric, etc. These things to NOT clear quickly in the USA. I've had occasion where I told Verizon to pay my bill today and it didn't clear until 3 business days later.

      True, I use an app to manage my finances, not an actual checkbook register. But I still need to keep track of what's coming out and plan for what will come out / should be coming out in the next few pay periods. That tells me how much cash I can afford to pull.

      They can't steal my credit card information from the grocery store registers if I never gave them that credit card info to begin with. Or the home improvement store. Etc. If I'm there in person, I'm probably paying cash. It is simply (and still) too easy to steal electronic payment info. The neighborhoods where I live, work and shop haven't really had a problem with pickpockets or mugging.

      But the fact remains: it is YOUR responsibility to track what's coming out of your account. If someone steals money from your account, but you let it slide because the transaction "looks legit," in spite of "I don't remember doing that" it's not the bank's job to catch that. It's yours. And if you aren't maintaining some kind of history / planning about what comes out when, how are you supposed to catch those?

      Oh, and if you want a refund on something, the only way to avoid a check is to have an account with the refunding organization. One which you can spend from. Don't want to have multiple such accounts, with multiple such companies? Get used to checks. My employer has no problem with electronic refunds against your account with them. Don't have an account? We'll cut you a check. Which will take a couple business days to get there. And a couple more to clear. In that regard, it's all about holding onto that money for as long as they can. Welcome to dealing with Corporate America.

      --
      ... by the Dew of Mountains the thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shakes, the shakes become a warning
    286. Re:Ok by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      Errr yeah they do. Maybe they don't in America where you fetishize the credit industry and pay for your chewing gum using borrowed capital, but the vast majority of the rest of the world have up to date digital statements.

      No they don't.. What happens to a payment when if the network is down? I doesn't go away, it gets stored till the network comes backup. Most of the time this is fairly quick. But what happens if it is a hardware issue of a holiday weekend and it takes a few days or even a week to get straighten out?

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    287. Re:Ok by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      I can't argue with anything you're saying. But I am 45 years old and have never balanced my checkbook in my life. I look at my bank statement, and if it looks right, I go on with life.

      That's fine. But let me asked you this. How much money do you think you might have lost over all those years by not keep better track? Granted, its probably very low but it is still your money that has gone missing.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    288. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in my late 30s, and I'm doing worse than both my parents.

    289. Re:Ok by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      I write, well print, 12 checks a year for my rent. The apartment complex will let me pay on line with a card but they charge a $15 "convenience" fee for it. Screw that. I just drop a check in the printer and hit print on quicken.

      Small business also still write checks and some big business too. Lots of them.

      By the way if you notice that I said quicken in my post. I would not advise people to say as far away from quicken as possible. It's a bug infested crap fest now owned by a unethical company that will advertise features on new releases while knowing they have no intention of providing those features.

      If you are looking for financial software for home I would recommend checking out Money Dance. It does everything a house hold needs. And bonus they have fully functional Linux versions as well as Windows.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    290. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How many of these homeless people have you brought into your home to help and support?

    291. Re:Ok by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      From what I understand is she was using the date the check was written on and not the date the check was presented.

      My check writing habits made it easy for her. I would sit down and write my checks at the start of the month. Naturally I would date them with that date. Then as the bills came due and I had a deposit with enough funds to clear the check I would turn it in.

      Well she would manually enter the checks with the date they where written and override any automatic process they had. So what would happen is they would show up in the system way before the deposits actually came in.

      I guess she could get away with it at first because she was only doing it to a small number of checks but in my case I had a dozen or more checks get flagged for NSF in a single month. When I started asking questions and actually showed a manager at another branch the statements and the canceled check the bank manager of my bank was arrested an all my money was refunded.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    292. Re:Ok by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      Hey. Look at that. I'm posting at +2 again. Someone finally noticed I have been posting at +3 and fixed it. Good job :)

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    293. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The strip club you work at is doing well, then?

      My first thought is that the AC is in getting paid in Venezuela Bolivares.

    294. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Part was their choice. I ate dorm food, can you say jello at every meal, and lived in a dorm with steel bunk beds, fluorescent lighting, cinder block construction. Basically a WWII bunker. As a result, I lived pretty cheap. Contrast that with today where I know people who have meal tickets but eat out anyway. After all, it is just more student loans. I will grant you college got more expensive, way more expensive, but part is self inflicted.

      The big difference between then and now is that when I went to Ga Tech in the 1960's, many people worked part-time jobs (and full-time on summer) that paid enough to cover all expenses from tuition and books to rent and food. I was one of these except for the first year. As I recall, student loans were rare and kind of allocated in the same way that scholarships were.
      I doubt there are many good colleges where costs are low enough that a person could work and pay their own way through.
      OTOH back then many, if not most of us, didn't even have a phone, TV, or other such money-wasting frippery.

    295. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Baby boomers that graduated college in the early 1970's had a hard time finding jobs of any kind, thanks to the Oil Crisis and stagflation.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1973%E2%80%9375_recession

      The later baby boomers graduated into 14% yearly inflation and 10% unemployment (back when they pretty much only counted white males, so it was actually much worse.)
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Early_1980s_recession_in_the_United_States#1981–1982

    296. Re: Ok by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      In BC, just a little north from you, there's a limit to rent increases, like 3% a year. My rent increases were $30/year.

    297. Re: Ok by Brockmire · · Score: 1

      I'm in Canada with half a dozen credit cards, and I've only noticed once where I could see a transaction within last hour from online account. So many times, shit would get buffered over the weekend and I'd have a huge Monday disappointment. Pending authorization transactions didn't appear for most of my accounts for many years. There is some sort of racket going on to get over limit fees and I've had a few overturned for having wrong default limit behaviour. They feel they are saving you embarrassment of decline on a $1 charge for a drink with a $29 fee. Then I had to remind them of all the times my pin would just stop working when they sent me replacement cards or they were compromised so spending $29 to spend $1 is fucking ludicrous.

    298. Re: Ok by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      Most homeless people have mental health issues.

      It depends on what you mean by homeless. My wife has, at some points, met some definitions for homeless, in the sense of no fixed abode, and that was financial, in terms of deposits, and supply and demand (a need to wait until property is available). She was able to sofa surf on those occasions, but for those not able to access a friend's sofa, you can be in serious problems and risk being on the streets without any mental health issues, although being on the streets will probably give you some. My wife is definitely sane, and provably so.

      For my part, after a relationship breakdown I found myself in a motel for a few weeks whilst I sorted out more permanent accommodation. Then, at a time of peak demand, it announced it had let the room I was renting to someone else, and that I had to move out. Finding another place locally was a pain. In other circumstances, had I not found somewhere, and not had friends, I might have spent a few nights in my car, which might have counted as very temporary homelessness.

      Another common cause, for younger people at least, is being forced out due to an abusive situation, and then being too young or poor to rent, and then not knowing how to access, or being denied, other housing. You could argue that running away before having a clear plan isn't sensible, but sometimes circumstances don't make it easy.

      By some definitions, sofa surfing is homeless, some count it as vulnerably housed. Some forms of having your own bed can be vulnerable (see above).

    299. Re: Ok by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      It is now believed that schizophrenia is a group of symptoms that may represent anything up to seven separate conditions.

    300. Re: Ok by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      And you know he hadn't asked the coffee shop for work how, exactly? Even if he did ask, the majority of businesses will not employ someone who doesn't have any fixed abode. Even if he managed to get over that hurdle, then it takes time to go through the hiring process (not much good if you want to eat this week), and you might fail the drugs test. Assuming you get that far, then you might not be employed due to a criminal record. So it's a bit much to assume the person didn't want to work.

    301. Re: Ok by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      In Seattle I hired Millionair Club guys like this repeatedly, though admittedly those were self-selected for wanting day labor.

    302. Re: Ok by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      s/ten/twenty/

      Lots of jobs at Amazon -- if you're an H1-B. Good luck if you're a citizen or >30 -- when I interviewed with them it was obvious I never had a chance.

    303. Re:Ok by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      This 'entitlement' mantra doesn't actually seem to be matched by any millennial I've actually talked to, who frankly seem much more go-getting and entrepenurial (i.e. LESS entitled) than my generation every was. When I entered the job market the expectation was fading, but there was still seen to be a likelihood that you could get a good job with a blue chip or government, work 40 hours a week, and retire at 60 with a good defined-benefit pension and a house paid off.

    304. Re:Ok by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      No they don't.. What happens to a payment when if the network is down?

      Typically I don't part with money in that case. You can't store non-credit transactions for later which is why places that rely on that requirement don't accept debit cards. I would say that kind of transaction would happen maybe once ever few months for me usually when I'm travelling and need to hire a car or book a hotel. Around about that time I typically realise I forgot the pin number on my credit card.

    305. Re: Ok by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      I'd take a raise over free coffee anyway. I can bring my own damn coffee.

      How great is the coffee (has it passed through the intestines of a jungle-dwelling animal, for example), how much of it do you drink, how essential is that to you, and how much is the raise? The coffee might be a better deal if you have a real habit for premium stuff.

    306. Re:Ok by q_e_t · · Score: 1

      I'm in the UK. 30 years the government paid university tuition, and living costs. Now it is $15,000 a year that students have to pay, just for tuition. 30 years ago you got tax relief on mortgage payments. No longer the case. 30 years ago the average house was around 4 times median income, rather than around 7. Millennials don't really seem that entitled in that context. The main thing they have are better IT and more TV channels. I would argue that they don't even have good music now, but then you can still listen to the Supremes or Led Zeppelin even now.

    307. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were street protests after Obama won. I think there are street protests after every presidential election, though. I suspect that the likelihood of them turning into riots is a combination of additional factors.

    308. Re: Ok by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      I'm in Canada with half a dozen credit cards

      I'm in Europe. I have a credit card which when I go to use it I often take multiple guesses at the pin.
      My point exactly, you with your half a dozend credit cards fetishize borrowed capital. Much of the rest of the world use electronic transactions that clear on the spot even when we pay with our mobile phones.

      In those places you're also most likely to find credit systems that don't store and forward transactions but rather process them instantly. In Australia credit card transactions would show up instantly on my account in a different colour as (pending), but none the less the transaction already affected the account balance.

      It could also be a North American thing. I have a Citibank Visa card from America (corporate card) and I noticed that Citi often take a day or two for transactions to show up. That genuinely confused me the first couple of times I used it.

    309. Re:Ok by r1348 · · Score: 1

      Somehow, I doubt that a company with over 100k employees that cannot find it in itself to provide coffee on the workplace is willing to pay $100K/yr over average compensation.

    310. Re: Ok by Raenex · · Score: 1

      If she's your ex, she's living on half your paycheck, right?

    311. Re:Ok by Raenex · · Score: 1

      baby boomers are largely responsible for most if not all of this countries problems

      It's always easier to blame somebody else.

    312. Re:Ok by farrellj · · Score: 1

      Or maybe a sample of one person doing contract work, not an employee, is not a significant sample size...

      --
      CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
    313. Re: Ok by stroxor · · Score: 0

      What? Wow American pensioners are milionaries!

    314. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Getting a vasectomy was the best decision of my life. No woman trying to trap me into funding her for 20 years, no extra unexpected expenses, no shitty children.

      DINK is the best life has to offer.

    315. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a friend who was told by a mother friend of hers that she was selfish for choosing not to have children.

      I would have said, "Selfish? Selfish is grabbing up more space, air, water and food from this planet's limited resources for your own squealing sucklings."

    316. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why are you writing checks for which there are insufficient funds? As long as A+B+C+D is less than the balance of funds, the order of adding them is irrelevant.

    317. Re:Ok by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

      What bank was that? Name and shame them.

      Were they held on to beyond the end of day processing? I could see that potentially being a crime but I have no expectation of the order in which my checks are processed as long as they all do get processed. Even if it takes more than a day for funds to clear the process should at least be started.

      Having insufficient funds and bouncing checks must suck. I know because I worked for a deadbeat once and had 2 of my paychecks bounce. That was back before direct deposit was common and the person who cut the checks urged me to cash them as soon as I got them - like right that minute, not a few hours later when I was driving past my bank on the way home from work.

      You can't really blame the bank if you actually wrote checks you didn't have funds to cover. As far as I know, when I give someone a check I'm supposed to make sure I have enough money to cover it.

      I can sympathize with people who have cash flow problems - maybe a bill is due the same day their paycheck gets deposited. Which will get to the bank first and which will the bank process first?

      Do deposits get processed first? It seems that would be best for whoever holds an account with them, but I have no idea what policies they have or even if that might be regulated by law. I'm fortunate to never have been in that situation but when bill-paying time comes around I make sure I transfer enough funds to cover them at least a day before those bills get paid.

      That way it doesn't matter if they process deposits first or what order they process the payments in.

      I actually think things should be processed in the order received, but I have no experience in the banking industry. I don't understand why that should be difficult today. Even if it is hard or there are other valid reasons for not doing so I can't understand why any bank big enough to have more than one location wouldn't have a policy written as to how to handle such things.

      --

      When I still had a Capitol One Visa card I was convinced they were purposely slow in processing payments so that they would be late. I can't prove that or be 100% sure, but it certainly would be to their benefit. None of the other people I wrote checks to and sent via USPS had that problem, not even other credit cards.

      So I dropped Capitol One. I'll never get those late fees and the interest back, but they'll never get another cent from me either. It is possible their mail carriers were slow, but blaming the postal service is BS 99% of the time.

      So for years when they ran their "What's in your wallet" ad campaign I just laughed to myself and said "Not Capitol One!"

    318. Re:Ok by No+Longer+an+AC · · Score: 1

      Either they're tweaking their algorithms or both you and I are right on the edge of having our comments default to either 2 or 3. I had at least one post start out as 3 but now I too am back to defaulting to 2.

    319. Re:Ok by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      For what purpose? If your salaries are not competitive, your senior doctors will happily leave for greener pastures, and in the real world not *all* job listings will be $7.50/hr.

      Without new hires your business will deteriorate as people retire, move, get disgruntled with salary-independent reasons, until a point where the salaries don't justify the increased workload for the remaining staff and they leave en masse.

      Never mind *they* can start their own clinic and buy your the equipment for peanuts as it's auctioned off to cover your debt.

      Yes, there will always be lousy offers on the job market. Some people try to run their business around poor employee retention and cutting corners everywhere they can. It's very rarely a sustainable model; it works somewhat with unskilled labor but not in situations like these. It still happens, sure - but these firms are short-lived. Someone inherits a successful business and proceeds to bleed it dry, or there's a hostile take-over and the new board wants to destroy given business/brand and gut it of resources. But in the large scheme of things these are a small piece of the market.

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    320. Re: Ok by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

      Nope. I have custody of the kids so she is supposed to pay me. I haven't seen anything in three months but she usually goes about six months before the state starts bugging her. She only pays a very small pittance anyway. It was an mutual agreement to keep her out of my retirement accounts.

      She is now living on her current husband's disability check which he gets from milking the system with a non-existent problem. They both refuse to work and truly deserve each other. Funny thing is that they both had good paying jobs when they met, but now they are each trying to out lazy the other.

    321. Re: Ok by Raenex · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised she let you have custody of the kids. That was a guaranteed paycheck from you.

    322. Re: Ok by fuzznutz · · Score: 1

      But then she would have to care for them. She was tired of being a wife and a mother. We both thought we had the better end of the bargain. Despite how hard it was when she first walked out on us, we all agree now that it was the best thing that could have possibly happened.

    323. Re: Ok by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      It's all relative, and the people moving into Seattle know what to expect and probably have a nice job or are at least willing to deal with it. It's the natives that are really having issues. My boss grew up in a small depression era house on a huge waterfront plot in Bellevue. He went an checked on it online and he could not even pay the property taxes on it these days. Of course, his house has also been torn down and rebuilt as a huge mcmansion, but most the cost is in the land. If you grew up here and don't have a nice tech job, let alone were old and on a fixed income, you really don't have a good chance to stay without moving farther and farther out. Even if your family owned the house, the property taxes are getting so high to force people to sell and buy someplace cheaper. Of course, WA doesn't have income taxes, they have property taxes, but that is hitting people in unexpected ways due to the booming economy.

    324. Re: Ok by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      In BC, just a little north from you, there's a limit to rent increases, like 3% a year. My rent increases were $30/year.

      It's gets complicated, but basically Washington doesn't have income taxes, they have property taxes instead. In a booming economy, which Seattle has been in since the mid-90's, that hits people in rents and property taxes. For which, leases aren't offered too often, but rather month to month agreements. Even the owners are being forced to remodel or sell because their property taxes are forcing them to. Even fixed rate mortgages are having issues because taxes are causing readjustments to a higher mortgage. I think there are some limits to property taxes, but then there isn't enough money to pay for services. Part of the reason for the resent head tax.

    325. Re: Ok by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      s/ten/twenty/

      Lots of jobs at Amazon -- if you're an H1-B. Good luck if you're a citizen or >30 -- when I interviewed with them it was obvious I never had a chance.

      Sort of been the issue with Amazon since it started. I've had lots of friends go through there and each department is different, but yes, they want young people or those they can overwork. From those friends, I've been told the average employment at Amazon is 18 months. By then, you've either found a better place to work or been laid off. So long as you go in with the understanding that you are just there to pad your resume and jump ship, often to a different department of Amazon, until you have enough experience to get a job will let you relax and settle down that is not at Amazon, it seems to work.

    326. Re: Ok by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the conversation. Glad it worked out for you.

    327. Re:Ok by urusan · · Score: 1

      I was mostly joking, nobody has enough market power to get doctors to work at minimum wage, though I think there's a kernel of truth here as well.

      The basic problem is that the labor market is particularly "sticky" in that you can't freely change jobs, since you are most useful when you spend at least some time with one employer and people aren't just work modules that can be freely mixed and matched with no overhead. It's also expensive (in terms of time) to find better jobs and moving to a new job can be costly as well. Due to this effect people are less likely to look elsewhere than they would be if this were not a factor. This can be exploited (for profit) by keeping new hire wages low (except in the case of highly in-demand talent, of course) and only raising the wages of senior people enough that they don't jump ship at too high a rate. This means the company can raise wages much slower than they'd otherwise have to, effectively skimming the difference in costs between staying and jumping ship from their workers. This effect becomes much more powerful once it becomes the industry norm, since if most starting positions are relatively low wage and/or low benefit, then it becomes even more expensive to the individual worker to find and acquire the limited high value opportunities that are out there, increasing how much profit can be skimmed this way.

      Of course, this isn't a problem for extremely in-demand individuals, who can command very high salaries as companies compete for their labor (or start their own business), but it is a problem for the average worker.

      It won't get a relatively in-demand field's (doctors, engineers, etc.) wages down to minimum wage, but it will reduce their wages compared to what this would be without this effect.

      Not only will these businesses not go out of business (especially if they're well entrenched for other reasons), but they often will make more profit (possibly even long term if they spend some of that profit to retain a few very high performers), and I observe this behavior all over the place.

      The wage freeze thing is realistically a tactic for recession time, since most average workers will be happy to have a job at such a time, so they will accept a wage freeze, allowing inflation to eat into their wages quietly, which they won't necessarily notice after the recession is over.

    328. Re:Ok by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      The name of the bank was Colonial and they are out of business now.

      I think you missed what was happening. I did have the funds to cover the checks. She was doing some shit with the ledger to make it look like I didn't. She was stealing money.

      Let me see if I can explain this better. I would sit down at the first of the month with my bills and make out checks for them. Naturally, I would date them the day I made them out. Then I would keep the bills and the checks together on my desk till I had the deposit to cover the check later that month. Then I would ether mail the check or drop it off.

      There was always funds to cover the check before I mailed it. What she was doing was over riding the checking process and changing the date the check came in to match the date the check was written. That would make it look like there wasn't enough funds to cover the check.

      I'm back to posting at +3 now. Whatever.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    329. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > nobody has enough market power to get doctors to work at minimum wage

      Airline pilots, OTOH...

    330. Re:Ok by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Not sure about airline pilots, but flight controllers...

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    331. Re:Ok by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Thing is, this seems to be a progressing trend, not a fixed state. As the gap between supply and demand grows, employers *will* have to get more competitive. While salaries on lowest unskilled labor positions may remain unchanged for a time, shortage for skilled labor will encourage people to get training/education and take up these better paid positions. In order, vacating unskilled labor positions, necessitating competition between employers there.

      The "stickiness" you describe is something that certainly slows down the process, and it's uncertain if the current trend will last. But if it does - so what if a lot of employers post a lot of ads for minimum wage positions? These will just hang as spam uselessly while good offers will appear and will be taken up.

      (similarly, if you're in market for a home or rent a room... the common experience is "95% of offers are total worthless crap!" - it's because crappy landlords keep their ads posted for years waiting for a sucker, while good offers vanish within hours to days; therefore on the average the volume of crap offers outweigh the good ones 20:1. Doesn't mean there's a housing crisis or a shortage of good offers, it's just that they are obscured by prevalent spam.)

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    332. Re: Ok by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      I'd imagine there is a spectrum, and it is pretty broad for schizophrenics.

      In my experience it is more of a coming to terms with and dealing with what is reality VS fantasy. Does not necessary mean auditory or visual hallucinations. From what I have seen it could simply mean that they are easily flustered by decisions or complex situation and are just unable to deal with it very well. Also a cacophony of noise or a lot of bright light may agitate them as there is too much input coming at them all at once and can't handle it. The person in question was extremely smart, but given certain situations had trouble dealing what what you or I might consider simple tasks. At the same time given other conditions could perform just as well or better. Lastly it is a condition that doesn't manifest itself until a bit later in life, meaning the individual will need time to learn how to deal with it, likely in coordination with medication. That is assuming of course that the have the support system which allows for that. Many of the homeless folks I'd guess lacked the support system and simply fell through the cracks to end up where they are, which is very sad. I'd say in likely all but the most extreme cases, probably one of the sides of homelessness that is pretty preventable if proper support was available.

    333. Re:Ok by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Well a few years ago there was a TV program (this was years ago) that detailed the actual POLICY of one of the big banks (Bank of America perhaps). Not only was this done automatically, it wasn't a random shuffle, and changes (including checks) were NOT put though necessarily in the order in which they were done, but by value. This was because the bank got a NSF charge for EVERY transaction past an overdue account. The order they did it was largest to smallest, so your rent and car payments would come out first, draining your account until NSF, then every 1$ coffee purchase after that would get a 20$ fee attached to it... The crazy part to me, was this wasn't some corrupt bank manager, this was corporate america.

    334. Re:Ok by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      Well #2 and #3 you can find anywhere, and for the last 30 years, so no sense complaining about it.

      While #5 is somewhat uniquely American, I've seen some where as the adage goes "never attribute to malice what could be stupidity".... In that many times the ridiculous qualification requirements are because the Manager and HR boffins who wrote the job specification may have a very loose (i.e. barely any at all) understanding of the job, or what it does. Could be the person that did everything left (perhaps bc felt underappreciated) or retired and they really don't have a real clue of what the job really entailed, so the list everything and the kitchen sink. Similarly with lowball salaries, they could just be overly optimistic of how much that position really costs, heck perhaps that is what they paid the last guy for 20 years before he finally got sick of being undervalued, got wind of better opportunities, and left them in the lurch to replace him, and probably has a smile of satisfaction when they try to re-hire his position at the salary they were paying him, and get no takers...

      There is also BS stuff with management and internal politics and budgets and staffing levels etc... which may result in wacky job situations, which again aren't malice purposefully directed towards a potential employee but exist none the less.

    335. Re:Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, you lost me. What the hell does that hit piece have to do with wages?

    336. Re: Ok by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

      Actually, today the Dept of Labor said that may 2017 - May 2018 saw a DROP in wages of 0.1%

    337. Re: Ok by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being "under 200k" is a far cry from 20k, but you're well aware of that and just being intentionally obtuse.

  2. Uh... World War II anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where we kinda had to allow women to work because we didn't have enough men to do the jobs available?

    1. Re:Uh... World War II anyone? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Where we kinda had to allow women to work because we didn't have enough men to do the jobs available?

      A higher percentage of women are in paid employment today than during WW2.

      We actually did a rather poor job of mobilizing women during the war. But Germany and Japan did far worse, because they were ideologically committed to keeping women at home.

    2. Re: Uh... World War II anyone? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Didn't Japan have civilians producing war materials in their houses by the end of the war? Of course, that was be ause we had bombed most of the factories, but still.....

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    3. Re: Uh... World War II anyone? by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Didn't Japan have civilians producing war materials in their houses by the end of the war?

      By then it was too late to make a difference. Much of the production was useless crap, or purely ceremonial, like the hand knitted "death shawls" issued to the Japanese soldiers sent to Iwo Jima.

      Both Japan and Germany planned for a quick "knockout" victory, and a very short war. Months, not years.

      Germany actually came close to knocking out the Russians before winter and the Moscow counteroffensive. Japan's strategy was completely delusional.

    4. Re: Uh... World War II anyone? by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      My favorite (albeit tragic) was Japan training school kids and women to defend beachheads with spears......

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    5. Re:Uh... World War II anyone? by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      A higher percentage of women are in paid employment today than during WW2.

      Also, (parts of) the 20th century has been very anomalous in terms of female employment. for most of the time, people able to work have worked, and we seem to be returning to that.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    6. Re: Uh... World War II anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope, just not true.

    7. Re:Uh... World War II anyone? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      That'll be why there's so much video footage of women working in factories in Germany during the early 40s.

      They broadcast it to encourage more women to work in the factories. They demanded children work in the factories for a day a month, more during the holidays. They imported female (and male) labour from the captured territories.

      German war production had challenges but a lack of women in the workforce was not one of them.

    8. Re: Uh... World War II anyone? by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      Yes delusional. You'd think that the War to End All Wars would have taught them something. But no their delusions of grandeur taught them nothing. Historically the Hundred Years War is a more likely result of armed conflict than the Seven Days War.

  3. Let me fix that for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There Are More Part Time/Low Paying Jobs Than People Out of Work, Something the American Economy Has Never Experienced Before

    Yeah - death by minimum wage.

    1. Re: Let me fix that for you... by saloomy · · Score: 2

      No so. Labor demand is high, so salary is how the companies will compete for labor.

    2. Re: Let me fix that for you... by Altus · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Right, I'll be over here holing my breath waiting for wages to finally go up.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    3. Re: Let me fix that for you... by jeff4747 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If that were true, salaries would be rising significantly faster than inflation. And should have been rising since the end of the last recession (roughly 2012ish, when you account for the people who lost jobs in 2008 getting re-hired).

      Salaries aren't doing that.

    4. Re: Let me fix that for you... by fluffernutter · · Score: 1

      Winner winner chicken dinner!

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    5. Re: Let me fix that for you... by fluffernutter · · Score: 2

      Of course not, most huge corporations have nowhere to grow except in the wallets of the ruling class. This is why we get five-bladed razors *cough*and 3-cameras*cough. Why try hard when you can get rich on your own corner of the market? The sad part is, all these companies will be eaten up by Amazon who is hungry, and will end up with all retail. Then we'll really be fucked.

      --
      Laws are rules for the court, but merely a bottom bar to hit for life. Think beyond laws in your actions always.
    6. Re: Let me fix that for you... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 5, Informative

      Labor demand is high, so salary is how the companies will compete for labor.

      That's the theory. But so far it isn't happening. Wages are barely keeping pace with price inflation. Economists don't really understand why. With tight labor markets and loose monetary policy, inflation should be roaring. But it isn't.

    7. Re:Let me fix that for you... by k6mfw · · Score: 2

      I guess that's why I'm not willing to take that job at $14.87/hr that is only 20 hrs a week on the other side of the SF bay.

      --
      mfwright@batnet.com
    8. Re: Let me fix that for you... by HornWumpus · · Score: 0

      Chinese currency peg. In a sense, we have one worldwide monetary policy.

      How undeclared economic wars playout:

      Developing country pegs its currency to developed country's. (aggressive act 1)
      Developed countries print money, causing inflation, including inflation in developing countries. (aggressive act 2)

      The fix is simple, let the Chinese currency float. Also fixes the two Chinese currencies nonsense.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    9. Re: Let me fix that for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Entirely correct.

      The gains are going to the top 10%, and most to a fraction of the top 1%.

      I say this as someone who's in the top 2%, and who's profited from investments made over 35+ years.

      Really, there's no way that corporations should be using stock buybacks and share-price inflation to benefit the rich at the expense of the poor. I know, greed is good....but really, it's undermining the sense that capitalism is a broadly viable economic system for *everyone*, rather than a small slice of the population.

    10. Re: Let me fix that for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be forgetting the raise everyone got with the tax cuts. Many Americans are not demanding a raise from their employer because they are already seeing a raise in their take-home.

      That said, people should be expecting lower taxes and higher pay. My guess is that these probably won't both happen in the same year.

    11. Re: Let me fix that for you... by Chocy · · Score: 2

      Economists don't want to admit their their models, ALL of their models, are inherently flawed. Money is our social blood. If it's not flowing to the right places in the right quantities AND staying mostly within a closed system, then our social body begins to atrophy. Money is being hoarded in hands/accounts of too few. Governments have tried to print new currency notes to keep normal people's needs satiated and prevent a riot, but that can only hold up for so long. Money isn't flowing freely in a closed system anymore. I don't know what these hoarders are thinking by extracting so much wealth from the lower populations, but the outcome of doing so will be (a) harsher wage and debt slavery than before, (b) harsher tactics that people have to employ to keep access to food, water, and shelter, and (c) people will leave the system of fiat currency to primarily live in small social communities where most "wealth" is generated by the actions of the people involved (food, water, shelter, and then some sort of production). Seems to me that external countries / people will grab up another country's wealth in order to FORCE it to atrophy, if necessary to gain personal profit. We have to end large scale greed ASAP. It's the only way.

    12. Re: Let me fix that for you... by iMadeGhostzilla · · Score: 1

      That's interesting. The underlying processes that drive societies and living systems evolve and change, sometimes quite quickly. Often what worked in marketing a year ago doesn't work anymore. The A that seemingly caused B in economics 20 years ago doesn't do that anymore, or not as strongly.

      Sometimes I wonder whether what works now in physics won't quite work like that in 10 billion years. And vice versa...

    13. Re: Let me fix that for you... by ShanghaiBill · · Score: 1

      Chinese currency peg. In a sense, we have one worldwide monetary policy.

      Except that China's current account surplus has mostly disappeared. China actually slipped into deficit for 1Q18.

    14. Re: Let me fix that for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the cost of necessities going up because 'everyone' got a 'raise'...

    15. Re: Let me fix that for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure about the wages, but my company has had an open req for a few developers for a few weeks now. So far, they've only received 3 applicants. I suspect that the pay is the issue so we're losing out to other opportunities. Normally I would suspect a desire to hire H1B's but the manager is a crazy Japanese guy who makes all of his employees watch Jiro Dreams of Sushi and has a son at West Point.

    16. Re: Let me fix that for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It has already started. Wages are already up about 3% this year.

    17. Re: Let me fix that for you... by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      'Mostly disappeared' doesn't exactly convey a one quarter sharp move. When I read 'Mostly disappeared', I think steady downward progress.

      'Current Account' looks to be lagging 'Balance of Trade' by about a quarter. Which makes sense. The bad trade quarter made Chinese investors recalibrate and take some profits.

      Balance of trade is back up to normal range, though it's always been noisy.

      Looking at 'Current Account' in max time range chart. It sure looks like someone likes to periodically run it down to 0, overshot this time. Up till 2005, once per year, after that, tried about once/year but failed until 2011, maxing out in 2008. Then failed again, close in 2014, close in 2017, negative in 2018. Smells like Chinese economic metrics/targets to me.

      But wait a second, doesn't all of China have a traditional weeks long 'go home' vacation and a once/year bonus cycle that leaves everybody changing jobs at the same time? Max time range on balance of trade shows yearly sharp downticks. Like clockwork. This year, Trump bluster made the Chinese (pull money out/put less money in) US investments, though 50k$/year limit for ordinary Chinese, plus bitcoin makes actual capital flows hard to track.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    18. Re: Let me fix that for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wages are currently increasing (slightly) faster than inflation for the first time in about 10 years. 2017 was the first year since the crash in which wages increased faster than inflation in every quarter.

    19. Re: Let me fix that for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably because economists and their theories are full of shit.
      Adam Smith was a moron, and those who follow his writings are too.. AC

    20. Re: Let me fix that for you... by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      You must be forgetting the raise everyone got with the tax cuts

      Nope. This is an entirely supply-and-demand issue.

      Companies are claiming they can not find workers. AKA the demand is high and the supply is low.

      If that claim was true, companies would be offering higher salaries to new employees in an attempt to out-bid the other employers. Because high demand & low supply means prices go up, right?

      That happens even if existing workers do not ask for raises. Also, your claim requires workers to be so stupid that a very small increase in average take-home pay would magically make them not ask for more money.

    21. Re: Let me fix that for you... by jeff4747 · · Score: 1

      Problem is the claimed shortage is so severe that we have reached a point we have never reached before - ya know, the whole premise of the OP. You don't hit never-before-seen states without some ramp-up.

    22. Re: Let me fix that for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We have a generation that hit the market through a few downturns, they prefer safety, so the job hopping isn't aggressive enough. When people find their dignity and start leaving their positions inflation will ramp up.

    23. Re:Let me fix that for you... by molarmass192 · · Score: 1

      Wish I had mod points, your point is exactly right.

      Well yeah, no shit. Just like there are more $25,000/year jobs in Palo Alto than people to fill them. You'd be luck to be able to rent a basement shoebox studio on $25,000 a year in Palo Alto.

      It's the most basic hour 1 of day 1 of intro to economics supply and demand situation. Not able to fill an opening? Guess what, you're to the right on the supply curve where supply (jobs) exceeds demand (labor). There is one of 2 solutions, you either raise the wage offered and move back towards equilibrium, or you hope people get demoralized, then pray supply curve rises to equilibrium at the price you want.

      People don't want low pay, part time work? Have you tried offering them above market pay, full time work? Seems to be working for Google and Facebook where they have an endless firehose of applicants.

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    24. Re: Let me fix that for you... by mapkinase · · Score: 1

      Science scope is limited to repeatable phenomena. We have been pushing spherical objects in vacuum for a long time now and we gradually accepted that for practical purposes epicycles work the best.

      From elementary particles to bioinformatics.

      --
      I do not believe in karma. "Funny"=-6. Do good and forbid evil. Yours, Oft-Offtopic Flamebaiting Troll.
    25. Re:Let me fix that for you... by serviscope_minor · · Score: 0

      I guess that's why I'm not willing to take that job at $14.87/hr that is only 20 hrs a week on the other side of the SF bay.

      You sound like an entitled millenial. Final test to check if you are: do you prefer your coffee different from how I prefer mine and/or do you place different values on any lifestyle choices than I do right now?

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    26. Re: Let me fix that for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Money hoarding is easily fixed. Just print some more money. The instant devaluation that follows such a move, is a direct tax on any "money pile". It is a way of taxing the super-rich and the criminals (and foreigners holding money) without even sending a taxman. No convoluted exemptions for anything, no way to hide. Even drug lords pays this type of tax.

      A larger percentage of the total money supply is then in the hands of the government operating the printer. If the goal is to even things out, spend on whatever benefits the poor. Handouts, job creation . . .

    27. Re: Let me fix that for you... by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      Inflation roaring in Venezuela but wages don't even cover food, economists are scammers who base their theories on whatever makes the rich richer

    28. Re: Let me fix that for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is a way of taxing the super-rich and the criminals (and foreigners holding money) without even sending a taxman.

      Unless the money you print is in the form of low-interest loans for high-risk investments. Then you're basically robbing the poor and giving to the rich.

    29. Re: Let me fix that for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Adam Smith was actually one of the few economists who wasn't a moron. It's all the neoclassical guys like John Bates Clark that proceeded him that left us with this shit.

    30. Re: Let me fix that for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe they should offer higher salaries for the developers making their software models?

      [CAPTCHA: repress]

    31. Re: Let me fix that for you... by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      That's the theory. But so far it isn't happening. Wages are barely keeping pace with price inflation. Economists don't really understand why. With tight labor markets and loose monetary policy, inflation should be roaring. But it isn't.

      Economists fully understand why - bad data in yields bad data out. The unemployment rate number is a farce and everyone knows it. Acting like it's real is disingenuous. Along the same lines, not all job postings are in fact real jobs. Again common knowledge. Lastly if things *really* were as tight as the "official" numbers suggest then you most definitely would be seeing large wage gains.

    32. Re: Let me fix that for you... by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      True. Got the biggest raise I've seen in at least a decade this year.

    33. Re: Let me fix that for you... by Chocy · · Score: 1

      LOL, wait, seriously? "Hoarding isn't a problem, just print more money!" -What does this solve?- What you fail to understand is no matter how many notes fall into the hands of citizens, the systems in place force people to give up those notes to hoarders. The hoarders have the money on hand to create & run businesses that make them money. The common person who actually needs those notes to survive must give away their precious notes to businesses who simply don't care about the plight their own economy has created. If you print more money, you devalue existing currency. So, the common person could have the same notes to use, but they are worth less towards the items they need to survive. The hoarder doesn't worry about this, as the hoarder is generally someone with their hands in money making business(es) and stocks, thus enough currency to supply them with fresh food and water and extravagant dwellings. IF YOU DEVALUE THE CURRENCY OF A HOARDER, WHAT WILL THEY DO? ATTEMPT TO EXTRACT MORE WEALTH FROM OTHERS TO COMPENSATE, JUST LIKE THEY ALWAYS HAVE. Stock market fluctuations also destroy opportunities for the common man to get ahead, and it's really only possible for people with a lot of money to make the kind of moves that influence stock prices. SO, HOW ABOUT YOU EXPLAIN AGAIN HOW JUST PRINTING MORE MONEY WILL HAVE A POSITIVE IMPACT ON ANYTHING?

    34. Re: Let me fix that for you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know what these hoarders are thinking by extracting so much wealth from the lower populations

      “If I like chocolate, it won't surprise you that I have a few chocolates in my fridge, but if you find out I've got 16 warehouses full of chocolate, you'd think I was insane.

      “All these rich guys are insane, obsessive compulsive twits obsessed with money—money is all they think about—they're all nuts.”
        - John Cleese

  4. Re: Job #1 Treason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not so. Just keep crying snowflake. America is #WINNING.

  5. Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Before you give credit to Trump, this is the tail of the economy that Obama revived. See Bare Stearns.

    1. Re:Thanks Obama by John+Jorsett · · Score: 1

      Before you give credit to Trump, this is the tail of the economy that Obama revived. See Bare Stearns.

      Yep. All it took was an 8-year-long runway and now we're airborne!

    2. Re: Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Free falls right after take off are exciting.

    3. Re:Thanks Obama by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Do you give Clinton credit for the last 8 years of the Reagan boom?

      Hypocrite.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    4. Re:Thanks Obama by jwhyche · · Score: 1, Troll

      Yeah, no. Obama was a disaster for this country. I can give you 10 trillion reasons. In 25 years once all the infatuation with him has worn off he will be regarded as one of the worse presidents in history.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    5. Re:Thanks Obama by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 0

      Can you give us one good reason out of the 10 trillion total, or will you leave us hanging?

      He wasn't perfect in many ways. But he did:
      (1) Start us on the path to criminal justice/drug law reform. Mass incarceration is hugely expensive.
      (2) Shore up the economy after the 2008 crash, and push regulations to keep the same thing from repeating.
      (3) Help set up a (mediocre, but better than pre-2010) insurance system that allowed the self-employed with pre-existing conditions to get health care. Also, loosened the ties between insurance and employment, increasing worker mobility. ACA does a bad job at cost control, but it's still better than what existed before 2010.

    6. Re:Thanks Obama by jwhyche · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Before you give credit to Trump, this is the tail of the economy that Obama revived. See Bare Stearns

      Trump cure cancer, contact friendly alien life, and solve all the worlds problems, and you would still find something to bitch about him. Why can't you people just accept, despite his personal faults, he is actually doing a pretty decent job?

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    7. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll take "Rightwing Nonsense" for $500, Alex

    8. Re:Thanks Obama by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because he actually isn't? Somehow, I really don't care how good the economy is if my country is being looted by a bunch of crooks. And Trump's administration is the most corrupt in history.

      --
      That is all.
    9. Re:Thanks Obama by jwhyche · · Score: 2, Informative

      I thought it would be pretty evident but here is a link to help out.

      https://www.usnews.com/opinion...

      Depending on who runs the numbers under Obama the national deficit rose by 7 to 10 trillion dollars. Almost doubling or doubling, again on who runs the numbers, off all presidents before him combine. That alone is a disaster.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    10. Re: Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep and Obama was just recovering from bushes economy for eight years. Funny how denial works for the left.

    11. Re:Thanks Obama by jwhyche · · Score: 3, Insightful

      More corrupt than Nixon? An you can prove this how?

      More likely, he is doing a good job and it sticks in your craw that he is.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    12. Re: Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Sure, item one. He doubled healthcare industry profit. Great for people like me who followed the money, but hard fucked the working class.

      He was amazing at race baiting. That usaf likely inn itself to be the trigger punt that destroys or country.

    13. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "worst."

      Trumpers need to learn basic grammar. You support both Trump and the abrogation of basic literacy.

    14. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, but credit should go where credit is due. With his tendency to inflate his successes, exaggerate facts, and claim things that he didn't actually do makes it hard to know what he's actually done. We have to use metrics and facts (more than just his one-and-only favorite news site), ignoring what he says. And one of those is the unemployment record, which shows no noticeable change in trend after he was elected.

      This individual has given evidence of nothing but a high degree of skepticism when he makes a claim - even before he was elected.

      We don't have to compliment him on anything he spends most of his time doing that already.

    15. Re:Thanks Obama by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Our national debt per person is actually lower than many other developed countries. Americans are also often the creditors as well as the debtors -- in the form of bonds and bond holding funds.

    16. Re: Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even funnier is how they forget Obama's explanation that sluggish growth is the "new normal" for America.

      The growth we are seeing was not the result of his plan. The economy started turning around immediately after the election, but before Trump went into office. Why? Not because of Obama. But because companies had an expectation that Trump would implement practices that woudl allwo them to grow. Somewhat of a self-fulling prophecy, but it was not happening without someone like Trump winning.

    17. Re:Thanks Obama by Dorianny · · Score: 2

      Obama should have invented a magical accounting method where healthcare spending pays for itself, like the Republicans did for tax-cuts

    18. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      One reason? He killed 11times more people than bush with drones. He dropped more bombs. More soldiers died under his watch than Bush. He bombed more nations than Bush. He made aspects the the patriot act permanent. Some of the worst intelligence failures happed under his administration. Basically eradicating international trust in America. He was epically ineffectual against North Korea. Many would argue that his net neutrality laws disincentivized the bandwidth war and caused consumer bandwidth accessibility to grind to a halt. And the worst crime of all... he created a vacume and distrust in the left that alienated centrists that led to.... trump...

    19. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump likes 'em stupid

      I love the poorly educated!

    20. Re:Thanks Obama by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Had nothing to do with Bush's wars. Nope, nothing at all. The cost and benefit of prior administrations never carries over to the next.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    21. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (4) Make it a crime to have an opinion different than his
      (5) Make it legit to give shit to cops based on color and then have your friends riot if the cops said boo

    22. Re:Thanks Obama by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Mass incarceration is hugely expensive.

      Not to the people profiting from it, it isn't.

    23. Re:Thanks Obama by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let's see how these trade wars, financial and environmental deregulation, consumer protection gutting, etc. pan out first before we assign the "pretty decent job" title to him. The state of the nation doesn't turn on a dime. For good or bad, the momentum from previous administrations has a rather significant reach into the next. Unless your definition of "pretty decent job" translates to "hasn't caused nuclear winter," we've some wait and see to do.

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    24. Re:Thanks Obama by Chocy · · Score: 1

      Because he's not. How about you lead off and tell us what "a pretty decent job" entails for the US President? And tell us what other presidents you BELIEVE did "a pretty decent job"? And note that I'm not glorifying any other president either, but it's painfully obvious on a daily basis that President Trump is a complete disgrace in terms of unifying and leading the majority people in this country. The Trump presidency isn't the dumpster fire; our whole nation is the dumpster fire, and Trump is just more dirty fuel being thrown in to make everything worse.

    25. Re:Thanks Obama by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      I would argue that the ACA was a net negative, though, and possibly worse than doing nothing in the long term because of the backlash. ACA was the Republican plan, and it sucked in a lot of ways. This got in the way of the single-payer system that we actually need, which would actually work.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    26. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You confused media coverage with job performance. Try, just TRY to set back and objectively see what policies and results we have gotten out of the Trump Presidency. I know it's hard with the daily barrage of hate spewed form the media, but it can be done. The best jobs report ever comes out and all MSNBC has to say is "HOW DARE THIS IDIOT SAY A GOOD REPORT IS COMING OUT IN THE MORING!" Even though Obama, Bush, Clinton, all did the same thing. Use your thinking more than your listener and you will be surprised at what you see.

    27. Re:Thanks Obama by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      If all your friends put themselves into crippling debt, would you do it too? / mom

      There is a basic truth to your point. When the bill comes due, there will be no place for capital to flee to.

      Bets on first major currency to pop? I want the British pound.

      The real question: 'When the first currency goes 'shite', will it strengthen the others or cascade failure?' I'm thinking cascade failure, too many interdependencies that fall on each other. Too many banks with exposure in all currencies that are 'too big to fail'.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    28. Re:Thanks Obama by Kaenneth · · Score: 0

      Proof isn't the problem, the problem is the Republicans not impeaching him despite it all.

    29. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump could shoot a man in cold blood on national television and you would still find a way to excuse his behavior and praise him for it.

      Why can't you people just accept, because of his personal faults,the man a terrible president by all basic standards and metrics.

      America is doing well despite him, not with his help.

    30. Re: Thanks Obama by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      Because if we wanted to live in a country where complete adoration of the ruler was required we'd live in North Korea or Thailand with its lese majeste laws. You should always be critical of your rulers, because that's how you make things improve.

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    31. Re:Thanks Obama by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      This is truth and so many people don't realize it. The state of the world economy is tied to U.S. economy. If the U.S. economy goes south we take the rest of the world with it.

      I expect this will not always be true with China's rising economy, but it currently is.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    32. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is one strange fantasy world you describe.

    33. Re: Thanks Obama by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 2, Informative

      Accusations of race-baiting are cr@p. He called asshat cops on some of their worse actions (harassing a man "breaking into" his own house, Holder's attempt to dial back civil forfeiture) instead of calling them "heroes" even if what they did was wrong.

      The race-baiting came mainly from people who couldn't stand a Black president actually standing up for civil rights. Many "constitutional conservatives" are only conservative until people who don't look like them demand their Constitutional rights. When that happens, only the Second Amendment seems to matter.

    34. Re:Thanks Obama by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Agreed that Romneycare was worse than single-payer (or ideally, a hybrid public-private system like in UK or Germany).

    35. Re:Thanks Obama by jwhyche · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Proof isn't the problem, the problem is the Republicans not impeaching him despite it all.

      Proof is a problem, in that there is none. There is a lot of hearsay, but no proof. Can't impeach without proof.

      But then what? Have you thought what happens if Trump is impeached? Do you think there will be a do over in the election or that Hillary will be carried in on a gold throne? No you get Mike Pence, think about that for a moment.

      You progressives so worried about what Trump might do, you never think about what removing him will do. Trump is a political outsider. He spends most of his time fighting his own congress. Pence will not have that problem. He is a political animal, and knows how to get things done. He has the contacts and clout to pull it off. Plus he is thinks he is on a mission from god to put gays back in the closet and women back in the kitchen. He will set our country back 30 years.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    36. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obama's job numbers no where near this. Lowest black unemployment ever. Best foreign policy since Reagan. Enough said. Trump is tearing it up out there. The Trump tax cuts are going to last generations. More companies are now hiring. You must not read the real news and get most of your news from liberal outlets that will be lying out their asses. Just like they lied out their asses during the election. Proudly wearing my make America Great again hat. Go Trump. Best president we've had since Reagan.

    37. Re:Thanks Obama by jwhyche · · Score: 1, Troll

      Let's see how these trade wars,

      What trade wars? All there has been has been a talk brought up in the liberal media but nothing has happened.

      Here is what will happen. There will be all of sabre rattling, bitching and moaning. A lot of panic in the press. But in the end both sides will sit down and come up with a trade agreement that nobody is happy with. That is how this works.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    38. Re:Thanks Obama by dfenstrate · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I would argue that the ACA was a net negative, though, and possibly worse than doing nothing in the long term because of the backlash. ACA was the Republican plan, and it sucked in a lot of ways. This got in the way of the single-payer system that we actually need, which would actually work.

      Republican plan? Are you out of your mind? The ACA was passed on a party-line vote with procedural tricks to ensure no Republican opposition could stand in the way.

      --
      Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms should be the name of a store, not a government agency.
    39. Re:Thanks Obama by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      He was right -- Obamacare ~= Romneycare.

    40. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't care for Trump either but it falls the same way in the opposite direction: he could literally cure cancer and give away all his personal assets and money and people would still hate him.

      That's fanaticism for you. For and against him.

    41. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People toss the term impeach around way much and don't really understand what its for. I would suggest picking up a copy of the constitution and educate yourself.

    42. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean, it's not like Obama finally put the goddamned war on the actual books. Trumptards gonna trumptard.

    43. Re:Thanks Obama by phantomfive · · Score: 4, Informative

      Depending on who runs the numbers under Obama the national deficit rose by 7 to 10 trillion dollars.

      No, you are wrong! At least get the terms "deficit" and "debt" right. The federal deficit will be $985 billion in 2019 (estimate). Deficit is completely different than debt, and using those terms wrong make you look ignorant. Here are several charts that show the historical and current deficit numbers.

      For people who are too lazy to look it up:
      National debt: total amount of money we owe.
      National deficit: amount we are adding to the debt (this year).

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    44. Re:Thanks Obama by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      Yes, it was passed by the Democrats, but that kind of plan was historically backed by Nixon, the Heritage Foundation, and Romney.

      They didn't oppose it because they hated the plan, they opposed it because they had to be anti-Obama, and they were left without a plan of their because Obama stole their plan.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    45. Re:Thanks Obama by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      It's worse than that. The EU can also take us all out. Likely so can independent Britain. Certainly China. Hopefully the EU can ride out its southern clowns shenanigans, which are inevitable.

      They all have serious problems, every one. My bet is on Britain, they're accounting tricks are the most 'advanced', taking all pensions off book is brilliant!

      There is a reason productive farmland is worth about 2-5x what it was 20 years ago, more than lease income can justify. Capital parked, to ride out whatever comes.

      It's a chaotic system. A medium sized player like Japan, Korea or India could be the trigger. No telling where.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    46. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It certainly had nothing to do with the financial crisis, either, nosiree.

    47. Re:Thanks Obama by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Didn't help that Obama started a few more on his own...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    48. Re:Thanks Obama by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 0, Troll

      At least Trump has not weaponized the IRS to go after his political opponents... I guess that doesn't count for corruption though, does it?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    49. Re:Thanks Obama by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      What is the impeachable offense, and what is the proof to back up the offense?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    50. Re:Thanks Obama by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      Again the HornyWumpus speaks truthfully. I don't know what will trigger it but I do know this. If it does fall down it will be the

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    51. Re:Thanks Obama by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Economy is in good shape and getting better. We're finally addressing the failures of NAFTA, killed the TPP, and getting China (and the EU, to a lesser extent) to have real talks about protectionism and free trade. Not to mention getting a little sit-down with North and South Korea. And pulling us out of insane agreements with Iran (who never signed in the first place) that exclude inspections of all military sites. Great jobs report. Positive trends among public opinion that we're on the right track. Actual progress on prison reform. Unleashed the dogs of war against ISIS and effectively ended them (via elimination of 99% of all ISIS-held territory).

      But other than those, and many more, yeah - what's he ever done for us?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    52. Re:Thanks Obama by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      Crap. My hand bump mouse button when it was on submit before I finished.

      If it does fall down it will be a disaster of Biblical proportions.

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    53. Re: Thanks Obama by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Dissent is patriotic! Except when it was against President Obama, then it was just racism...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    54. Re:Thanks Obama by Peter+P+Peters · · Score: 2

      Trump cure cancer, contact friendly alien life, and solve all the worlds problems, and you would still find something to bitch about him. Why can't you people just accept, despite his personal faults, he is actually doing a pretty decent job?

      I will when you tell me what he's done? (seriously, I'm not anti-Trump, I'll give credit where it's due)
      I'll start you off:
      Tax cuts. This is what I consider his biggest achievement. Unfortunately it's only good if you are rich, for everyone else it's a shocker.
      Employment. I give him credit for maintaining Obama's hard work to turn around the sinking ship, however there are two caveats. Job growth is slightly less than it was under Obama, so even though it's good it's not as good, and it's a lot easier to maintain short term momentum when you're already headed in that direction. The second caveat is that a lot of pro-business policy will only be good short term. These types of moves come with a risk of long term damage (see GWB and the GFC).
      North Korea. This is a wait and see as nothing has actually happened yet. And the stuff that has happened seem to have nothing to do with Trump even though he makes claim for them (eg the united Korea Winter Olympic team)
      That's all I got. To balance, here's the list of bad things...Oh wait... I don't have a hundred years to list them all in detail....

    55. Re:Thanks Obama by omnichad · · Score: 1

      This. It actually made things more expensive for the middle class, but brought the lower class up. That's not really a good compromise, because now it's cheaper relative to income for the poor to be insured.

      Single payer works elsewhere, but partly only because the US pays disproportionately for all the R&D of new drugs. We would have to be willing to fund more medical research, not just collectively pay the hospital bills.

    56. Re:Thanks Obama by Nethemas+the+Great · · Score: 1

      My mistake, 1, 2

      --
      Two of my imaginary friends reproduced once ... with negative results.
    57. Re:Thanks Obama by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Proof is a problem, in that there is none. There is a lot of hearsay, but no proof. Can't impeach without proof.

      There's the dozens of businesses he opened in Saudi Arabia while running for president - and then gave them billions in weapons once he was president. Democrats would rather talk about Stormy Daniels while going full McCarthyite, though.

      Trump is a political outsider. He spends most of his time fighting his own congress. Pence will not have that problem. He is a political animal, and knows how to get things done. He has the contacts and clout to pull it off. Plus he is thinks he is on a mission from god to put gays back in the closet and women back in the kitchen. He will set our country back 30 years.

      Is this performance art, or is your head really so far up Trump that he can skip his annual prostate exam, because he can rely on an eyewitness account?

    58. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't look to China for economic growth. Their numbers are fabricated lately, and in actuality they are in deep, deep trouble. Massive dept to GDP, one-child policy long term effects, massive wave of retirees coming down the pipeline, and not enough young workers to support them. China is screwed and in denial. They can't allow a loss of face, so they make shit up.

      Meanwhile, US economy passes the $100-trillion mark. I blame Trump.
      https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-net-worth-surpasses-100-trillion-1528387386

    59. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure. Name three Trump policies that led to this outcome.

      I'll wait.

    60. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who needs proof when there isn't even a fucking crime?

    61. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but Pence is an idiological tool and way more incompetent than Trump at governing. Just look at what he did as the governor of Indiana and how they started fixing them the minute he left. Trump will sign anything put in front of him, Pence will only sign ultra conservative bills, which will never pass the senate.

    62. Re:Thanks Obama by Lisandro · · Score: 1

      The US is already in a (useless) trade war with some of his closest economical allies. Just last week Trump imposed a 25% on imported steel and a 10% tariff in imported aluminum. Canada, Mexico and most of Western Europe retaliated with tariffs of their own.

      http://uk.businessinsider.com/...

      I'm kinda surprised Republicans are not keeping track as this is exactly the same thing Bush Jr. tried in 2002. It was such a shitshow that they had to withdraw in less than a year.

    63. Re:Thanks Obama by king+neckbeard · · Score: 2

      Your argument about single payer working elsewhere is ridiculous. There's no rational reason for US citizens to subsidize private profits from legal monopolies with severe regulatory capture, just for the sake of medical research of the rest of the world. Other countries with similar resources should be pulling their own weight, and it's a horribly inefficient way to fund research.

      Basically all of the useful research is taxpayer funded while still being under unchecked, for-profit monopolies, with only a nominal amount going back to the researchers and universities that engage in said research. Take the NIH grants and university spending, tack on money from 10% of our military budget, release them to the public in a generics process that consists of making untainted chemical equivalents, and we'll get at least twice as many useful drugs at a fraction of the cost.

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    64. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This.

      The party of fiscal responsibility signed a tax cut law which burnt a $1.3 trillion hole in the deficit overnight, but who's counting?

    65. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Wow, you really have no clue.

      Depending on who runs the numbers under Obama the national deficit rose by 7 to 10 trillion dollars. Almost doubling or doubling, again on who runs the numbers, off all presidents before him combine. That alone is a disaster.

      You're talking debt not deficit. The debt jumped because he put all that off-the-books military spending in Iraq and Afghanistan under Bush back in the budget, where it belong. It wasn't being counted before, because [neocon magic]. Deficits actually decreased throughout the Obama years after jumping at the beginning.

      More corrupt than Nixon? An you can prove this how?

      Easy, by measuring the number of investigations and scandal-related resignations among cabinet members in the first year of his Presidency. Trump is off the charts. Go ahead, complain about "nothing proven in a court of law". Neither was Watergate. It's only a year in, give it time. Pruitt's leading the charge rather well.

      Why can't you people just accept, despite his personal faults, he is actually doing a pretty decent job?

      Because by any reasonable measure, he's not. His govt is plagued by dysfunction, can't get out of their own way. All he does is tweet about how awesome he is and how he's making America great again. Actual accomplishments: zero. Economic policy impacts: zero. We're still riding out the crest of the Obama economy. After that it's all downhill.

      The one thing businesses need most is certainty. The Mad Tweeter changes his mind every few hours on matters of national security. There's zero consistency, zero planning, zero rational decision making. In short we're fucked.

    66. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the deficit during Obama's years can be attributed to 5 things.
      1) Reduction of federal income and automatic increases caused by the recession.
      2) Wars in Iraq/Afghanistan
      3) Bushes Tax Cuts, and by extension Obama after 2011
      4) Legislation passed by Obama that actually increased the deficit by a meaningful amount
      5) interest on debt

      1, 2, most of 3, and 5 are out of Obama's control.

      If you look at #4, it is basically 3 things.
      1) Increase in military spending(partly because of #2) over the previous administration by ~10B$
      2) ARRA cost ~900B$, but saved the economy from going into a full blown depression.
      3) ACA ended up costing ~100B$.

      So out of the ~9T$ increase from the day Obama left office from the day he began, only about 15% of it can be attributed to him.

      Where did the rest come from?
      3.2T$ alone is interest payments on previous debt, most of it accumulated by Reagan, Bush Sr., and Bush Jr.
      ~3T$ is because of the effects of the recession and mandatory payments(1T$ alone in 2009)
      ~1.5T$ is because of the inherited wars in Iraq/Afghanistan and the Bush tax cuts before Obama renewed them.

      So, 7.7T$ for policies outside of his control, and ~1.3T$ for him.

    67. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, Pence as president would be bad. That's a terrible reason to ignore rule of law and allow Trump to continue to be blatantly corrupt. Your post assumes that the argument for impeachment is 100% political, ignoring that Trump has, in fact, broken the law.

      On the other hand, any investigation into Trump that finds Pence innocent would obviously be a farce. Of course, there's been little evidence that any investigations into this administration will be anything other than a farce, so worrying about a President Pence does make sense.

    68. Re:Thanks Obama by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

      The sensible thing to do is to go into massive debt like everyone else, but only if everyone else is.

      The assets you buy with the debt, say housing, will rise along with everyone else and you will happy. If you didn't go into debt, you would just end up unhappy and jealous of all those who did.

      If there is a problem, daddy government will save everyone anyway, interest rates to zero, stimulus packages, that kind of thing. Everyone just dusts themselves off and climbs back on for the next ride.

    69. Re:Thanks Obama by jwhyche · · Score: 2

      An again, where is the proof?

      You really that dumb or do you actually believe that Pence would be better than Trump?

      --
      I read at +2. If your post doesn't reach that level I will not see or respond to it.
    70. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And lesbians go where, the kitchen closet?

    71. Re:Thanks Obama by Chocy · · Score: 1

      You can claim that the economy is doing fine, but you don't understand the incredible burden capitalism places on its land, its resources, and its people. Capitalism has failed most of this country, and it's going to take some 1%-ers or 0.1%-ers naturally losing their wealth before they realize their destructive game is coming to an end.

    72. Re:Thanks Obama by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

      So other than capitalism, what do you think we should use? What non-capitalist economy has shown itself to be better for resources, the land, and people?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    73. Re:Thanks Obama by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Proof is a problem, in that there is none. There is a lot of hearsay, but no proof.

      If that is true then why is the president always upset about the probe into election tampering? Why won't he release his tax returns? Why has he tried to fire Mueller? He literally cannot go 24 hours without tweeting about it.

      Can't impeach without proof.

      Incorrect. Impeachment does not have any prerequisites.

      You progressives so worried about what Trump might do, you never think about what removing him will do. Trump is a political outsider. He spends most of his time fighting his own congress. Pence will not have that problem. He is a political animal, and knows how to get things done. He has the contacts and clout to pull it off.

      That would be an improvement over the current situation. You seem to misunderstand people's grievances about the current president.

      Plus he is thinks he is on a mission from god to put gays back in the closet and women back in the kitchen. He will set our country back 30 years.

      Much as the current president is finding out, things in government are easier said than done. Should the need arise, he too could be impeached.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    74. Re: Thanks Obama by Chocy · · Score: 1

      I'm not in a good position to respond in great length, but remember: capitalism has directly opposed all forms of communism throughout the world, going so far as to try and eradicate all active communist governments. This eradication has been mostly successful, as it pushed most counties involved into a position to be amicable to trade with the US. Communism had its back against the wall, fighting for its existence. I don't think those governments ever stood a chance merely because of the open opposition of the USA and capitalist allies. We'll never actually know of communism COULD succeed, just that it hasn't done too well so far. Then take a look at Nordic countries. They used their association to capitalism to grow a more sustainable system of democratic socialism. I'm not an expert on their policies, but they are genuinely working for the betterment of their citizens. Capitalism doesn't do that unless forced with impending crisis, or unless someone dons the name of "philanthropist" and gives something for the social kickbacks of looking like a kind and generous rich person. Greed motivates capitalism, which makes it inherently untrustable to me.

    75. Re:Thanks Obama by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Or it could totter on, for a long, long time. Every crooked body holding up the one that threatens to fall. Knowing that's the cheaper option, short term. Just putting the nitrous to the printing presses.

      That's the tiny % of my brain that thinks something like bitcoin is inevitable, in the long run. Government money will get too 'expensive' to use. Banks already are, when you're flexible about how much tax you owe...

      Always wanted to build a reverse 'turbotax'...Start with how much you can 'afford', what the IRS knows, tells you the figures you need to justify. I digress.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    76. Re: Thanks Obama by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      Capitalism is an economic philosophy. The Nordic countries are capitalistic, too (called the Nordic Model) from an economics perspective. The opposite of capitalism would be communism, and I'm wondering if anyone can point to a communist economy that is better for the resources, the land, and the people than capitalist economies?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    77. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So other than capitalism, what do you think we should use?

      I think we should give democratic capitalism a try.

    78. Re: Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhh, please see the post I just made. Communism hasn't had a chance to work. Communism has always been forced into war over attempting socialist policies. China has been put in its current position because of the the USA's biggest export is "democracy" or "capitalism", though people often have faith that these two things belong together... when they don't even realize we don't live in a real democracy at all. I also mentioned that Nordic countries used capitalism to create their current models of democratic socialism that dwarfs the USA's own currently implemented socialist systems. Nordic countries are using capitalism for greedy gains less than America, and they're progressing more and more in the direction of taking care of their own people first. "Capitalism is an economic philosophy" is a cop out. Capitalism isn't that hard to sum up: It's greed. Just greed. That's all that drives modern capitalism, aside from those impoverished by the system who are still trying to work within its confines, propping up capitalism on their backs because otherwise they wouldn't be able to move at all. Do you think these wage slaves think highly of capitalism? Because I don't think they do. I think they're just trying to hang on and make the best of things, too burdened to pursue bigger and substantial change in this country. To quote the current US president.... "Sad!"

    79. Re: Thanks Obama by Chocy · · Score: 1

      (Login) mistakes were made.

    80. Re: Thanks Obama by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 2

      So we haven't had real communism yet? Perhaps the failure of communism is the way it is so easily hung-up at dictatorship - the concentration of all power into the State immediately corrupts those heading the State to simply stop there and not share with anyone. Meaning that communism will never be realized, because the fatal flaw of dictatorship in its path.

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    81. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are comparing apples and oranges.

      Pence is a guy that has grown up in American politics, knows how to work a crowd but "knows how to get things done", again, in American politics. He knows how the wheels need to be greased for things to keep running the way they are. He wants the wheels to be greased.

      Trump is not anything like that. He's a showman who doesn't have a lot of connection with the way American politics runs right now, and thinks he can do everything better. He's looking around thinking "why do people let things run like this? I'm surrounded by nincompoops!" and he's making changes. This is most of the problem with him.

      I don't think Pence would have dared to push any sort of steel tariffs, and Trump won't listen to any reason against it. These two are cringe-inducingly different. I think, compared to Trump, with Pence you're basically getting Hillary, except with an (R) after the name instead of (D), and that really doesn't matter because it's 2018 - both sides are screwing us the same just slightly different angles.

    82. Re:Thanks Obama by mentil · · Score: 1

      GMO crops, and improved fertilizer and water application, have led to a huge increase in crop production on the same area of land. That's a big reason farmland is worth more. Organic crops are less productive, but worth a premium, which creates more competition for intensive farming land.

      --
      Corruption is convincing someone that the selfless ideal is the same as their selfish ideal.
    83. Re: Thanks Obama by Mashiki · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You mean the guy who was trying to break into his own house, and when the cop asked him for ID. The guy became belligerent. Yes, very racist. It's not like police ask for ID all the time when they give the person the benefit of the doubt, to see if they were the person in question. And then Obama jumping into the entire thing, and flaming the "well maybe he was a racist." Nope, no race-baiting there. How about "his son trayvon" who had a long history of petty crime, and was well on his way to being yet another banger? Nope that wasn't race-baiting at all. Especially when the media got on board and called the guy who shot him white(because it fit the narrative). Remember, the progressives set the standard on what racism is on that. They attacked McCain, Bush, and several other people and used hispanic as race. You don't get to play one-off with this. Same rules for both sides hypocrite.

      How about his race baiting statement in front of the UN with regards to Ferguson. He was a race baiting piece of shit, and no different then any other. The fact that you immediately jump to the "people who were his critics were the real race-baiters" simply shows that you, yourself have a serious racism issue.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    84. Re:Thanks Obama by Mashiki · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Tax cuts. This is what I consider his biggest achievement. Unfortunately it's only good if you are rich, for everyone else it's a shocker.

      You mean it's good for everyone who doesn't live in a big city, or in specific coastal areas. Where the state was using tax-offsets via federal taxes to lower what they were actually charging people. Suddenly, when those places got to pay their fair share, their taxes went up. While everyone in flyover country as democrats like to say, went down.

      Employment. I give him credit for maintaining Obama's hard work to turn around the sinking ship, however there are two caveats. Job growth is slightly less than it was under Obama, so even though it's good it's not as good, and it's a lot easier to maintain short term momentum when you're already headed in that direction.

      Here's the problem. The regulations Obama put into place, hurt wages a lot. It discentivized employers to hire new people or increasing the rate of pay. With things like the ACA, forced mandates and so on, that further pushed employers to cut back, or even lay people off. Which is why when the regulations dropped off wages started spiking upwards(something they haven't done since ~2002). Remember Obama's words that low GDP growth was the new normal? Why did it spike just after Trump was elected. Why have we seen a double GDP rate(not real GDP), but flat GDP go up when regulations were removed. Especially when the GDP is now being revised upwards towards 4%. Don't confuse the two either. One is a measurement without inflation, the other with.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    85. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And obama never did either.

      But I guess when it's hillary that cannot keep state secrets, that's corruption, whilst when it's trump doing it, it's totes legal.

      So how IS trump's prostate?

    86. Re:Thanks Obama by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      Incorrect. Impeachment does not have any prerequisites.

      Incorrect. Impeachment requires a felony, misdemeanor, or high crimes.

      With none of that, you have nothing. Clinton was impeached for lying. Nixon for evidence tampering. And ONLY the house can determine that level if at all.

      That would be an improvement over the current situation. You seem to misunderstand people's grievances about the current president.

      Get out of your social and political bubble, and go find the people who spent a decade suffering under Obama's shit policies and regulations. You'll find they're quite happy vs the big metropolitan city folk. Just like those of us in Ontario, that suffered under the 'big city' pandering by the Liberal Party, to Toronto and the GTA. Guess what? They no longer exist as a official political party.

      Much as the current president is finding out, things in government are easier said than done. Should the need arise, he too could be impeached.

      Yes, it's far more difficult to get things done when both sides are playing for the same team isn't it. That same team? Well it doesn't appear to be the average person in the US. But you seem to be quite happy to get in the way of it as well.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    87. Re:Thanks Obama by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      to have real talks about protectionism and free trade.

      Yes, I suppose tit-for-tat tarriffs with the EU are "talks" for sufficiently small values of "talk".

      And pulling us out of insane agreements with Iran

      Right so he's giving Iran a good reason to restart their nuke program. Great!

      (who never signed in the first place)

      Daily Fail links have no credibility and ad nothing but noise to the discussion. Posting one says more about you than it dos about facts.

      Actual progress on prison reform.

      I'll believe it when I see it. Of course he could have done something already via an exective order. As far as I can tell all he's done himself is promise to not refuse to sign a bill that may or may not come across his desk. That's super inspiring.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    88. Re:Thanks Obama by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      You really that dumb or do you actually believe that Pence would be better than Trump?

      I always figured Pence was the Republican insurance policy against impeachment.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    89. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And those talks consist of "Hey America why are you becoming more protectionist?" Retalitory tariffs raise all your costs even higher than the original shoot yourself in the foot tariffs will do.

    90. Re:Thanks Obama by sjames · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Naturally, the Republicans hate the Democrats so much they won't even vote for their own plan if a Democrat agrees with it.

      That's what the party of NO is all about these days.

    91. Re: Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bollocks. Even some of his critics have said if he sorts out north korea they will praise him for that. They just think he is more likely to cock it up.

    92. Re:Thanks Obama by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      People just aren't paying attention... Trump's style is confrontational, much like you see in business. And it works. Re-opening discussions with China RE: trade. Getting North Korea to the table. He'll start a bit of a tiff with the EU and Canada, and parties will come to the table and actually talk and discuss and results will happen (like we've seen elsewhere).

      As far as prison reform, your desire to use executive orders speaks volumes... Haven't you learned yet? Live by the EO, die by the EO. Push for actual legislation that lasts. But hey, that's not dictatorial - which apparently you crave?

      PS: if you look at the Daily Mail link, you'll see another link to the actual letter from John Kerry's State Department that confirmed that, yes, months after the "agreement", Iran still had NOT signed it. But that's OK, intention is more valuable than results, right?

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    93. Re:Thanks Obama by Gravis+Zero · · Score: 1

      Incorrect. Impeachment requires a felony, misdemeanor, or high crimes.

      And there lies the problem, "high crimes" isn't a legal term and thus anything can be considered a high crime. Though, I think obstruction of justice is currently the most apparent crime. We'll find out more after the FBI probe is completed. Why isn't your guy willing to talk to Mueller?

      go find the people who spent a decade suffering under Obama's shit policies and regulations.

      Which policies and regulations were they suffering from? Was it the retaliatory tariffs? Oh wait, that's what they are enjoying from Trump.

      You'll find they're quite happy vs the big metropolitan city folk.

      Their actual conditions have not improved but they may perceive it as being better.

      Yes, it's far more difficult to get things done when both sides are playing for the same team isn't it. That same team? Well it doesn't appear to be the average person in the US.

      So, you thing Congress enabling a president that "thinks he is on a mission from god to put gays back in the closet and women back in the kitchen" which would "set our country back 30 years" is what the "average person in the US" would want?

      I'm not sure why you think this is a partisan issue but you seem to be blinded by tribalism.

      --
      Anons need not reply. Questions end with a question mark.
    94. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that's OK, intention is more valuable than results, right?

      But the result was that they stopped developing nukes, and after Trumps dummy spit, the result is that they now can and will again.
      That's fine with you, because results don't count, just retweets and the votes of idiots do.

    95. Re: Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trump is not doing a good job. You are a deluded person.

    96. Re:Thanks Obama by Grog6 · · Score: 1

      Trump is riding the wave Obama made.

      It's starting to come to an end; the random BS Putin is having him do is having an effect.

      We're screwed, long term, unless we get an impeachment soon.

      I just hope they drag Trump and the rest of his Repub conspirators out, and hang them from those nice trees around the Mall.

      --
      Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
    97. Re:Thanks Obama by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      People just aren't paying attention... Trump's style is confrontational, much like you see in business. And it works.

      Speaking of not paying attention... You haven't seemed to notice that his confrontational business style has led to multiple bankruptcies. It's also kind of hilarious that you seem to think it's a business thing not an international relations thing. Because yeah international relations never got confrontational.

      True story.

      As far as prison reform, your desire to use executive orders speaks volumes... Haven't you learned yet? Live by the EO, die by the EO. Push for actual legislation that lasts. But hey, that's not dictatorial - which apparently you crave?

      Well at least you're both miss representing me as well as the original article. It's kind of telling that the only way you can come up for support for Trump is to invent an alternative reality. Given that though there's little point in debating further since you seem only lightly tethered to this reality.

      PS: if you look at the Daily Mail link,

      Not gonna. If what you say is true it'll be available from a reputable source as well. I'm not going to waste time reading an unreliable source since I'd only have to double check it anyway. The fact you're insistent on using known unreliable sources makes me think you have done motivating too do so.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    98. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's the problem. The regulations Obama put into place, hurt wages a lot. It discentivized employers to hire new people or increasing the rate of pay. With things like the ACA, forced mandates and so on, that further pushed employers to cut back, or even lay people off. Which is why when the regulations dropped off wages started spiking upwards(something they haven't done since ~2002).

      Really? Because I found this chart
      https://tradingeconomics.com/u...

      I don't know what your definition of wages spiking is but the chart shows wages had its share of ups during the Obama years, even after Obamacare went into effect, with those peaks being higher % than the parts when Trump is in office.

      Remember Obama's words that low GDP growth was the new normal? Why did it spike just after Trump was elected.

      Again, where are you getting this?

      https://tradingeconomics.com/u...

      This chart shows GDP growth has just been going back and forth around 2% even after Trump. Perhaps it is you who are conflating GDP growth with some other number, and you meant something else?

      If you can provide a citation or something, it would clear up a lot of things.

    99. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really wouldn't remind liberals about McCarthy if I was you. Liberalism was all but illegal from the 50s through the 90s (Particularly with marijuana as a felony, and the worst excesses of the Hoover FBI), and it seems to me like the national-level political systems have been skewed right ever since. I'd like to think going "full McCarthy" to balance the scales wouldn't be necessary, but I think they're about done giving a shit.

      In reference to Ms. Daniels, you also seem to be confusing "democrats" with "the media". The "liberal media" has been bollocks since at least 9/11, between the full throated support for (and condemnation of opposition to) the Iraq war, enthusiastic coverage of tan-suit dijon arugulaghazi, and staring for 30 minutes at an empty Trump podium while Hillary was giving a speech elsewhere. Daniels is literally a porn star, sex sells, so she gets the airtime. (And Avenatti seems to be a competent showman himself, which only sucks more air out of the other stories.)

    100. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's worse than that. The EU can also take us all out. Likely so can independent Britain. Certainly China.

      Yes, welcome to the post-WW2 integrated economy of paranoia.

      Between WW1 and WW2, Germany did some economic tricks and basically fell off the trade map. Everyone thought that just meant is was trying to catch up with Poland and France before coming up with something worth trading. However, what Germany had been doing is dedicated advancement of their own weapon technology with a closed market so people not willing to flee the nation (while the warning signs were fairly mild) quickly found themselves either working for the government or their properties claimed by the government to pay others.

      Japan also spent much of that time cut off from international society in general.

      Then, Japan, Germany, and, to a less memorable extent, Italy started invading neighboring countries with military assets that no one imagined they could have built in that short of a timeframe. A few bloody years that get a lot of attention later, and the League of Nations is trying to decide how to prevent that from ever happening again. Many things were proposed, but at least two were implemented: 1) national specialization and minimal barriers to trade; 2) the UN to serve as a replacement for the LoN, but open to everybody (almost) so all voices are heard and warning signs can be noticed sooner.

      Point 1 has caused a lot of trouble for the US and parts of Europe over the years. This is why some politicians want to remove that and try to repair their nations. The people with some knowledge of history do not want to risk that any nation become self-sufficient, even for a few years. This quickly decays to asserting that any effort to rebuild a damaged nation is fascism, or with even more explicit insults.

      I won't get into the problems with point 2, but the UN has more than earned all the disdain pointed their way.

    101. Re: Thanks Obama by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      Prof. Gates showed his papers. Cop should have seen he lived there, told him to have a nice day, and gone to fuck off. Instead, he chose to stay, probably go on a fishing expedition for warrants. That's when Gates (tired after a long trip) got snippy. BTW, it's not actually illegal to be rude to a cop. Nah. Screw that cop. The US would be better off with less powerful cops who are too scared of bad publicity to do their jobs zealously.

      Regardless of Trayvon Martin's past history, he was being stalked by an armed man. An armed man with a recent history of armed domestic abuse.

      Regarding Ferguson, the shooting may or may not have had merit. But their police force and town government are pure corrupt scum, deriving a large % of their revenue from tickets for very minor offenses and associated court costs. Basically a parasitic local government, similar to (but not quite as bad as) Tenaha, TX.

      Obama brought some very real issues about overzealous, corrupt law enforcement to the front, and I'm glad they're finally being discussed. Cops are humans, not the blameless "heroes" that many Americans liked to think of them as after 9/11.

    102. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He would be better on the world stage; he could have intelligent conversations with foreign leaders without sounding like a complete moron.

      That said, your assessment is correct; Pence is competent and very intent on sending the country to the past making President Pence one of the few things I want less than President Trump.

    103. Re:Thanks Obama by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      I really wouldn't remind liberals about McCarthy if I was you.

      Today's "liberals" would make the Reagan Democrats look like hippies. They're screaming "Russia Russia Russia" 24/7, blaming them for every bump in the night, going so far as to red bait right-wing Fox News hosts, and engage in a prosecutorial witch hunt with zero basis for an investigation, so yeah, they've gone full McCarthy.

      In reference to Ms. Daniels, you also seem to be confusing "democrats" with "the media".

      Democratic voters or democratic politicians? Constant propaganda from the latter has snowed much of the former. Russian interference is just accepted as fact, like Saddam's WMD's.

    104. Re:Thanks Obama by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      An again, where is the proof?

      Just gave it to you. Heard of the persecution of Don Siegleman? If the DOJ can throw him in prison for an actual nothingburger, it could easily nail Trump for his Saudi deals. But the Mueller witch hunt isn't about finding corruption, it's about the Deep State telling Trump who's boss.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

      You really that dumb or do you actually believe that Pence would be better than Trump?

      Pence is less likely to start WWIII. Why democrats thought it would be a great idea to red bait a thin skinned blowhard, attacking him every time he announces a deescalation as a Putin puppet...they're making the Birthers look like nobel prize winners at this point. Trump could have missiles in the air to Moscow and those idiots would still find a way to claim that's what a Putin Puppet would do. Even as nuclear winter is coming.

    105. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the international stage, yes, he would stop pissing off all our allies and stop saber rattling.

      On the domestic side, yeah, he'd probably be worse.

    106. Re: Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lucky we haven't had real Capitalism yet either or we would find ourselves in the same position. Government oversite is a very key point of the current capitalist lite system we now have.

    107. Re:Thanks Obama by Gryle · · Score: 1

      Can you back up those assertions or is this just doom-and-gloom prognostication? I don't like Trump, but we're Slashdot, we should be holding ourselves to a higher standard of conversation.

      --
      Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not entirely sure about the universe - Einstein
    108. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Can't impeach without proof."

      No impeachment has been successfully proven in the Senate trial. There have been impeachments.

    109. Re:Thanks Obama by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Most people go into debt to buy rapidly depreciating assets, shiney.

      'Crippling debt' more or less means your going to lose anything that secured any debt in the long run, leaving you with the now old car and memories.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    110. Re:Thanks Obama by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Not really, Very little farmland is used to grow 'organic', bumper crops lead to low prices, nothing has fundamentally changed in the last 20 years. Huge increases? Nonsense, they were already using very productive hybrids 20+ years ago.

      Farmland is still INXS in America, but is now worth much more. It's parked capital.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    111. Re:Thanks Obama by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Obama slowed the recovery with his money wasting programs. Face facts. We have hindsight now, there is no more argument.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    112. Re: Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes we have never had "perfect" Communism and never will. We will never have this idealized Communism you imagine because it is an absurd philosophy that doesn't work in the real world. Most places that have implemented Communism have had to murder a few million of their fellow citizens in order to get everyone else on board with the program. Give up this child-like fantasy.

    113. Re: Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...it is an absurd philosophy that doesn't work in the real world

      It's actually a fairly consistent philosophy, but it doesn't work because it demands a change in human nature. Any system that demands large-scale change from people is doomed to fail.

    114. Re: Thanks Obama by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      The economy started turning around immediately after the election, but before Trump went into office

      The economy was starting to boom well before the election. Trump campaigned against it, saying it was a bubble, that the high stock market couldn't be trusted. Of course he changed his tune after the election and frequently talked about how great the stock market was, but he sure trashed that sort of thinking when the credit went to someone else.

    115. Re:Thanks Obama by Rakarra · · Score: 1

      One reason? He killed 11times more people than bush with drones.

      A number of reasons, but one of them is: technology marches on. Drone strikes became more feasible under Obama than Bush, because drone technology become a hell of a lot better. Drones become more easy to control, could carry more payload, able to enter areas previously inaccessible.

      Drone strikes sure beat dropping a bomb from a plane onto a building, or a tomahawk fired from a cruiser offshore. More of a chance of hitting the target you want to hit and missing the people you don't want to hit.

      Many would argue that his net neutrality laws disincentivized the bandwidth war and caused consumer bandwidth accessibility to grind to a halt.

      ...
      Yeah. Sure.

    116. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Something credited to a Republican from a blue state can be hardly attributed to Republicans in general.

    117. Re:Thanks Obama by CaffeinatedBacon · · Score: 1

      You do know what an asset is don't you?
      You obviously have to not be a moron. Buy the assets that everyone else is buying, houses, stocks, etc, tulips if that's what the rest are into. The demand will keep them rising by itself. You need to also understand the difference between massive and crippling.

      Smart people will be ready for the problem and the first to dust themselves off. Now they get a headstart for the next ride too.

    118. Re:Thanks Obama by king+neckbeard · · Score: 1

      Something attributed to Nixon and the Heritage Foundation can, though. It's a right-wing alternative to single payer/

      --
      This is my signature. There are many like it, but this one is mine.
    119. Re: Thanks Obama by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      No Gates did not show his papers. He refused, that's why he got arrested. Read the arresting log, go on. DO IT.

      Regardless of Trayvon Martin's past history, he was being stalked by an armed man. An armed man with a recent history of armed domestic abuse.

      And Martin went all the way back home, called his GF. Then went looking for the guy. - That's court testimony. He went looking for a fight, and Zimmerman had facial and body injuries consistent with self-defense, and being jumped. That's again the court testimony.

      You're not disproving any point on Ferguson, or the fact that the guy was shot for a far different reason.

      The only thing Obama did was lie. Especially since whites are more likely to be shot by police then blacks. That this isn't an overzealous issue, as we're seeing by all that bodycam footage these days. That when they started demanding bodycams, and the police said SURE WE'LL DO THAT! And now these black protest groups are screeching that they no longer want the cams. You're a damned racist by your own words, that's spewing the same shit that you're accusing others of. And you don't like it.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    120. Re: Thanks Obama by b0s0z0ku · · Score: 1

      It's not only a racial issue. It's an issue of many American cops being overzealous assholes, drunk on power, that don't know to leave well enough alone. They're the agents of a vicious set of governments that imprisons more people per capita than any civilized country and which tried to force people to conform to anti-pleasure victimless crime laws. Anything that erodes their power and authority is a good thing.

      As far as the Gates case, it's not like cops whose widdle feewings get hurt ever lie. Cops are the most honest, upstanding citizens, right?

    121. Re:Thanks Obama by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      So myopic of you, ignore the message because you don't like the messenger! The JCPOA was never signed and Kerry's State Department confirmed this fact in their own letter to Mike Pompeo. The fact you aren't aware of this - but sources you shame as untrustworthy are - should give any thinking person pause about their own beliefs in the quality of sources. Stick with your own slanted coverage, and fail to learn what is really happening in the world...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    122. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can provide a citation or something, it would clear up a lot of things.

      Try the BLS. FYI those charts show real gdp.

    123. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incorrect. Impeachment requires a felony, misdemeanor, or high crimes.

      Bullshit. Impeachment requires whatever the hell the House says it requires.

    124. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the messenger was a known liar, why would you bother to consider the message unless there was an alternate source?
      That goes for both you and the daily fail.

    125. Re:Thanks Obama by Peter+P+Peters · · Score: 1

      Here's the problem. The regulations Obama put into place, hurt wages a lot. It discentivized employers to hire new people

      Yet employment increased the most under Obama than either Bush or Trump. I'm not making a political statement, merely pointing out that the observations don't match your claim.

      Remember Obama's words that low GDP growth was the new normal? Why did it spike just after Trump was elected. Why have we seen a double GDP...

      Removing regulations improves GDP because it usually means someone is being shit on for profit, and the cost of the shitting-on is being deferred to the future where it will ultimately cost more to fix. It happened under Reagan in 1987 and Bush jnr in 2007, and if Trump gets 8 years it will happen again.
      This is why we have regulations, not because we love red tape, but because appropriate regulations applied appropriately actually improve the quality of life for everyone, not just rich people.

    126. Re: Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Benefit of the doubt? BENEFIT?

      "Oh mighty and glorious law enforcement officer thanks for not beating me too hard to day your lordship!"

    127. Re: Thanks Obama by Chocy · · Score: 1

      Communism's big flaw is its implementation. Its implementation has been too big to succeed. Socialism at the local / community level is what's needed, not an overarching communist system of control. But socialism requires people working together towards a common goal. That goal should be enough of a reward for the community to continue working towards, or create new goals to strive for. Often, we have to join companies in order to work towards a goal (usually, it's someone else's goal, not necessarily shared by you), but due to the profit motive, net increase of worth is always the main goal of a capitalist business. If we could set up small sustainable systems that work towards goals, we'll be setting up an infrastructure to keep our communities stable regardless of what politicians and the federal government decide. I'm working towards a community model that doesn't need or want input from the feds except when absolutely necessary.

    128. Re:Thanks Obama by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      So myopic of you, ignore the message because you don't like the messenger!

      You'd like to think that wouldn't you? Ignoring a known liar is rational.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    129. Re: Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You realize you're not actually fooling anyone right? We all know you're lying, and mostly ignore you because you're so laughably wrong. You can join the discussion again when you've grown up, child.

    130. Re:Thanks Obama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You poor child. How is life in your fantasy world where Trump isn't a criminal pedophile?

  6. most of them are "fake jobs" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like MLMs and sales. Even traditional low wage jobs are getting automated away. When real jobs come back and don't require years of experience for entry level jobs then we can say there is an employment glut.

  7. Uh no by MikeRT · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There are anywhere from a few million to tens of millions depending on the accounting who just gave up on finding a new job and are not counted anymore.

    Labor pool stats are just relative to what we call a proper labor distribution anyway. If 10m millennial women suddenly dropped out of the workforce over a decade to be stay at home wives**, they'd probably call them unemployed. When men who did jobs that were outsourced give up, they call them participants in a ghost economy we won't^H^H^H^H^Hcan't measure Because Reasons.

    (**bwahaha you don't think corporate America welcomed a massive influx of women into the workplace out of "repentance for sexism," do you? They found religion on "equality" because adding tens of millions of working women to the economy crippled the ability of the men and lower class women to negotiate with them a la wages.)

    1. Re:Uh no by Actually,+I+do+RTFA · · Score: 2

      If 10m millennial women suddenly dropped out of the workforce over a decade to be stay at home wives**, they'd probably call them unemployed.

      The rules on who is unemployed are pretty simple (if possibly erroneous.) You have to want a job not have a job be healthy enough for a job and have had a job in the past two years. The last one is probably to detect people unwilling to admit they are unemployable because of skills/disabilities. However, post-2008, it caught lots of other people.

      --
      Your ad here. Ask me how!
    2. Re:Uh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      This^

      I have two friends who got burned out on their jobs (one quit, the other got fired) and were under such stress/anxiety that they've both been jobless, and get this, HAPPY, for the past year and a half. Only one is just now starting to look for a different, lower paying (hence, less stressful) job.

      But during the interim? If you'd told them to look for a job they just would've laughed at you.

      And I don't blame them... companies are still trying to do more and more with fewer and fewer employees. I've a buddy with a great degree that cant find work that is all the time saying "god I would give ANYTHING for a boring 9 to 5" and I'm over here like "dude I'll happily give up mine because losing sleep/weight". About the only real thing I get from my job are the added points on my blood pressure.

    3. Re:Uh no by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're looking for the Labor Force Participation Rate. 62% of the people who could work are currently working.

      The u3 unemployment number is just rigged nonsense, so the headline of this story is also nonsense.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    4. Re:Uh no by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      If 10m millennial women suddenly dropped out of the workforce over a decade to be stay at home wives**, they'd probably call them unemployed.

      What adjustments to your measurements would you make to detect such a thing? Maybe you could ask them if they are currently looking for a job, or if they want a job. Do you think the labor statistics department does that?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:Uh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not rigged, it's just a differently computed number. The other participation rates are also published in the exact same document that the unemployment rate is. The only difference is the unemployment rate tends to be published in mass media more often because that's the number they've traditionally used. No one is rigging or hiding anything, which is why you can pull that 62% labor force participation rate out so easily.

    6. Re:Uh no by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

      (**bwahaha you don't think corporate America welcomed a massive influx of women into the workplace out of "repentance for sexism," do you? They found religion on "equality" because adding tens of millions of working women to the economy crippled the ability of the men and lower class women to negotiate with them a la wages.)

      Oh, you caught on to that, did you?

      You mean they aren't doing all this "teach/force everything with a pulse to code" just because of "you go girl"?

    7. Re:Uh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You left out one important thing: be someone they want to hire and work with.
      I've got a nephew who shows up for job interviews without showering, in rumpled clothes, is generally argumentative even about things he doesn't know well.
      They thank him, send him on his way, and never call him again.
      He then sits around wondering why nobody will hire him.
      Because they don't want to work with you. You're unpleasant.

    8. Re:Uh no by al0ha · · Score: 1

      Mod this up - I was just going to post the same thing...

      These numbers always lie; because they never count in the people who have given up on looking for a job and from what I've read that totals in the millions too.

      --
      Did you ever wake up in the morning, with a Zombie Woof behind your eyes? -- FZ
  8. Of course, it is a common tactic . . . by sgt_doom · · Score: 5, Interesting

    for corporations doing poorly to advertise for nonexisting jobs. I recall back in the 1990s, when a local company called Traveling Software, kept advertising for positions after they had laid off over 60% of their workforce --- and surprise of surprises --- they never bothered to fill any of those advertised-for positions.

    1. Re:Of course, it is a common tactic . . . by crow · · Score: 1

      They also advertise for jobs where they already have a H1-B worker doing the job to prove that they can't find a qualified American to do it.

    2. Re:Of course, it is a common tactic . . . by Cyberax · · Score: 1

      This is BS. H1B does not require "proving" anything. You don't even need to post a job opening publicly.

    3. Re:Of course, it is a common tactic . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is BS. H1B does not require "proving" anything. You don't even need to post a job opening publicly.

      Second that. They need to post the job offer "inside" their work place for H1B. Only Green card application will require to post the job in a major government job site and also a few major local newspapers.

  9. Misleading Statistic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, there are more jobs available, but employers don't want to take a risk or train anyone who doesn't immediately fit what they're looking for, so they don't hire anyone.
    They're also not willing to raise pay, so there's no real reason to switch jobs.
    Anyone on the sidelines can't get those jobs without the qualifications and anyone with them won't change because they're not willing to offer any pay increase.

    1. Re:Misleading Statistic by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      I call BS. My place of employment just hired a programmer. We have three more positions posted, all of which will be filled within the next month. All four of these people will be trained in our systems, since there is no other way to get workers who can perform these jobs.

  10. Trump's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He is trying to put the people working at the unemployment office out of a job.

    1. Re:Trump's fault by Lab+Rat+Jason · · Score: 1

      The people with the best skills to get themselves out of that position... I don't feel too bad for them. ;)

      --
      Which has more power: the hammer, or the anvil?
  11. Sounds like bullshit by Cornwallis · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ignoring the U6 column on the labor statistics again?

    I bet so. Howzabouts all the people - especially us 60+ - experiencing age discrimination who aren't even being counted any longer?

    1. Re:Sounds like bullshit by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2

      Of course they aren't counting U6. Nor are they counting the under-employed - after all, one should be happy just to have a job.

      And you're right about age discrimination for aged-60+ people. All of those are now "discouraged workers" who aren't counted in the unemployment stats.

      --
      That is all.
    2. Re:Sounds like bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unemployment claims are down for this year. That is a good sign. However, total employment is still flat. Has been for 10 years. Not a good sign. Total posted jobs being up is also a good sign. Looking at 1 number and saying 'dooooooom' then ignoring all the others is a way to make yourself rationalize whatever you want. Which is why the gov cherry picks what number it wants to show.

    3. Re:Sounds like bullshit by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      U6 is low, too. But anyway, U6 is the wrong number to use: unemployed people who can't be bothered to even apply for one job a month have mental problems not economy problems.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    4. Re:Sounds like bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep. The unemployment rate, like inflation, is not accurately depicted to the american public.

      If you don't have a job right now, now may be the time to just take any work that comes your way and hunker down for this next storm.

      The recession to end all recessions is nigh.

    5. Re:Sounds like bullshit by micahraleigh · · Score: 1

      My 50+ friends can't get any SW dev work :(

  12. Wages not rising? by TJHook3r · · Score: 1

    Why are wages not rising? Middle class jobs disappearing?

    1. Re:Wages not rising? by Tailhook · · Score: 1

      Because these are BLS numbers; political fiction. There is a large pool of unemployed and underemployed and this supply keeps wages from climbing. BLS factored large numbers of people out of the workforce to produce good employment figures under Obama. You'll know when the pool is drained when wages start climbing. Until then we're still working through 8 years of BLS bullshit.

      --
      Maw! Fire up the karma burner!
  13. And all of these jobs are soul crushing underpaid by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    garbage

  14. Re:Job #1 Treason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one knows treason like the Russians. Isn't that how Putin got into power.. by blowing up an apartment block and blaming it on terrorists?

  15. What kind of jobs are going unfilled? by Streetlight · · Score: 1

    Are these jobs those that require knowing how to use a shovel or jobs knowing how to use advanced programming languages, jobs requiring advanced knowledge and experience in synthetic chemistry, chemical engineering, health care positions such as nursing, structural engineering, architecture, financial management, finish carpentry....? The nature of the openings will make a big difference in the statistic discussed.

    --
    In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    1. Re:What kind of jobs are going unfilled? by DontBeAMoran · · Score: 1

      Or is jobs with impossible requirements, like 50 years of experience with Swift?

      --
      #DeleteFacebook
    2. Re:What kind of jobs are going unfilled? by AHuxley · · Score: 1

      Jobs for people who can be left without a person looking over them so they don't:
      Take drugs.
      Sleep.
      Remove things to sell after work.
      Copy software to use after work.
      Install malware to help copy software to use after work.
      Use the company internet for recreational use.
      Not been able to work without direct and constant supervision.
      Jobs people have to move to another part of the USA for. Jobs in small towns and cities that pay well but have an airport or hours of driving.
      The ability to learn a complex OS, computer system.

      --
      Domestic spying is now "Benign Information Gathering"
  16. Re: Job #1 Treason by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh look it's the asshat who cries Donald again.

  17. Fake by quonset · · Score: 4, Informative

    First, there are plenty of people for these jobs but the government doesn't consider them "looking" because they haven't actually looked for a job in the last week or so. It's why the unemployment numbers aren't really that accurate.

    Second, and this has been going on for decades, employers will put up fake jobs in that the position doesn't exist, but the employer wants to get a feel for who is out there and what they want in pay.

    Third, as the most recent jobs numbers showed, the largest portion of job creation is service jobs. i.e. low wage positions. One could argue that an increase in service jobs is a reflection of a growing economy, it could also mean that automation is taking away some of the more manual jobs which pushes down employment for those who would have done those jobs, thus revealing the only job growth is at your local Kwik E Mart rather than a production line. Since one can't live off those wages, they don't bother applying for such jobs.

    While the numbers indicate more jobs than people looking, as the con artist would say, they're fake.

  18. Too much Fox News for you by DogDude · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You've been ingesting too much Fox News. They've been lying about California's economy for years.
    http://www.foxnews.com/opinion...

    I guess the idea that high taxes and reasonable regulations work pisses off the Ayn Rand-ites, so they have to constantly say that it's failing? That's some serious cognitive dissonance. You should probably get your head out of your ass.
    http://www.latimes.com/busines...

    --
    I don't respond to AC's.
    1. Re:Too much Fox News for you by renegadesx · · Score: 0, Troll

      The people paying the high taxes posses off the people that have to pay them. That's why they are leaving. The water restrictions you just linked further proves my point because California can't even afford to build new dams to support the migrant influx! Why do you think the likes of Chevrolet & Toyota moved to Texas! Why California's top burger franchise Carl Jr's is now based out of Tennessee! The middle class exodus from California since 2008 has been estimated in the hundreds of thousands, and businesses (including small businesses) in the tens of thousands.
      High taxes are not reasonable, taking money from people who earned it and giving it to people that didn't is not reasonable. Telling people you can't use water to do things that require water is not reasonable.
      When you try to get more tax money out of people that can afford to move, they will move which means you get no tax money from them, this is why socialist regimes always go broke. That is happening in real time in California.
      Maybe it's time to support the California secession movement, let it break off and turn into Venezuela, but geographically most of the state is red and would rather break off from San Francisco and LA than leave the Union.

      --
      Make SELinux enforcing again!
    2. Re:Too much Fox News for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the meantime, in the real world, California grew from the worlds 8th to the 4th largest economy.

    3. Re:Too much Fox News for you by DogDude · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That's why they are leaving.

      That's a lie. California continues to grow.

      http://worldpopulationreview.c...

      socialist regimes always go broke. That is happening in real time in California.

      Also a lie. See last post.

      If you want to discuss facts, that'd be great. All you're doing is lying.

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    4. Re:Too much Fox News for you by zieroh · · Score: 2

      You've been ingesting too much Fox News. They've been lying about California's economy for years.

      http://www.foxnews.com/opinion...

      Shhhhh! Don't tell them! The news that California is failing is actually a clever PR campaign to keep people in the flyover states from coming here. As the nation's most populous state, we have too many people here already.

      Earthquakes, mudslides, drought, riot, stay away!

      --
      People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
    5. Re:Too much Fox News for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The people paying the high taxes posses off the people that have to pay them. That's why they are leaving.

      Good for them. If they honestly believe they would be happier elsewhere, they have a duty to go.

      The water restrictions you just linked further proves my point because California can't even afford to build new dams to support the migrant influx!

      Way to lose any credibility you may have thought you have!

      Why do you think the likes of Chevrolet & Toyota moved to Texas!

      Um, it was a business decision? This entire concept is difficult for you to understand, isn't it?

      Why California's top burger franchise Carl Jr's is now based out of Tennessee!

      I'm sure those employees are enjoying every bit as good a quality of life as they used to, right? And let's face it, that one move alone should have taught California a lesson what with its tens of jobs leaving all at one time.

      The middle class exodus from California since 2008 has been estimated in the hundreds of thousands, and businesses (including small businesses) in the tens of thousands.

      And yet, the California economy just keeps growing. How do you reconcile your assertions with that reality? Did California have too many businesses and job previously?

      High taxes are not reasonable, taking money from people who earned it and giving it to people that didn't is not reasonable. Telling people you can't use water to do things that require water is not reasonable.

      The idea of a society is something you really don't seem to understand. Amazing!

      When you try to get more tax money out of people that can afford to move, they will move which means you get no tax money from them, this is why socialist regimes always go broke. That is happening in real time in California.

      And yet, even after 10 years that you pointed out, California isn't broke. Typically, this realization would cause a thinking person to reevaluate their beliefs - but not you.

      Maybe it's time to support the California secession movement, let it break off and turn into Venezuela, but geographically most of the state is red and would rather break off from San Francisco and LA than leave the Union.

      Absolutely! Let's cut the impoverished, rural areas off from the part of the state that earns all the money and see which part prospers. That's a brilliant idea.

      In case it hasn't occurred to you (or maybe your news sources haven't let you in on this secret) the Socialist part of the state sends a lot more money to the red part than they get back in tax revenue. Why don't you think about that.

    6. Re:Too much Fox News for you by zieroh · · Score: 1

      The water restrictions you just linked further proves my point because California can't even afford to build new dams to support the migrant influx!

      You're pretty gullible, you know? No, you probably don't.

      https://www.snopes.com/fact-ch...

      --
      People who say "sheeple" have about as much sophistication as an AOL user, and in fact are probably actually AOL users.
    7. Re:Too much Fox News for you by schwit1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      And the worst quality of life.
      https://www.usnews.com/news/be...

      California has worst US air pollution in the nation
      https://phys.org/news/2018-04-...

      California has the highest poverty rate in the nation
      https://www.latimes.com/opinio...

      Schools are 39/51
      https://wallethub.com/edu/stat...

      This is with a high state income and sales tax.

    8. Re:Too much Fox News for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      except they weren't really paying high taxes.
      state taxes were deductable from the fed bills.

      They'll be paying it next year tho!

    9. Re:Too much Fox News for you by LynnwoodRooster · · Score: 1

      But we do have $750 billion in unfunded pension benefits, so we have that going for us...

      Oh, wait...

      --
      Browsing at +1 - no ACs, I ignore their posts. So refreshing!
    10. Re:Too much Fox News for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, have you ever been to California?

      Hint: just a couple days ago its economy surpassed the UK in size. It is now the 5th largest economy in the world by itself, well ahead of many first-world countries.

    11. Re:Too much Fox News for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Worst quality of life according to a subjective measure that lists North Dakota as number 1.

      California has the highest poverty rate in the nation using a supplementary measure that takes into consideration things like housing costs. The poverty level threshold in California is significantly higher than in other states; you can't directly compare them this way.

    12. Re:Too much Fox News for you by Mittengrabber · · Score: 1

      I would have loved to have read the LA Times article. Sadly, what I view as a very reasonable regulation has prevented me - GDRP strikes again.

    13. Re: Too much Fox News for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats so serious cherry picking of data. The middle class IS LEAVING CA.

      https://www.dailynews.com/2018/03/11/california-dream-project-despite-states-immense-wealth-middle-class-in-decline/

    14. Re: Too much Fox News for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or this
      http://www.latimes.com/local/california/la-me-lopez-vegas-transplants-20171203-story.html

    15. Re:Too much Fox News for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazing how the population in sanctuary cities grows unimpeded! I'm sure all of those undocumented workers will greatly add to the state's tax base.

    16. Re:Too much Fox News for you by liquid_schwartz · · Score: 1

      That's why they are leaving. That's a lie. California continues to grow. http://worldpopulationreview.c...

      California is trading a middle class that is leaving to the tune of 150k/yr for a larger number of illegal immigrants that they plan on giving free healthcare to. If you think that's a good trade then please stay in California.

    17. Re:Too much Fox News for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yep, he's lying. We moved to low tax Arizona a few years ago to be closer to family, from high tax California.

      Low tax states are great if you enjoy super low wages, uneducated children, little oversight of business (and Arizona is listed as the most corrupt state in poll after poll, and Mississippi is a state, so...), and never ending attempts to pretend Darwin never existed and teach human children that magic created the Universe.

      California is a far better place to live if you enjoy other cultures, better food, entertainment, parks, bike lanes, and for the most part, sensible people. And if it wasn't for Florida, AZ would be the most racist (aka 'stupid') state in the union.

      Then there's the wing nuts, and hardly a day goes by when I don't see some fat old white guy (I can say that, I'm a fat old white guy) supporting Freedom with his Glock holstered on his fat hip, and we live in a low crime, upscale neighborhood.

      Can't be too careful, some doctor or hedge fund manager may want to jack your BWM. Those Harvard bastards are known thugs!

      The only reason we don't move back to Cali is the cost of housing, our old house has doubled in price since we moved to The Hate State, I mean, AZ.

      California has problems, it's huge, so the numbers associated with those problems look huge, too, but it's a great place to live, with a populace and government that tries to do better.

    18. Re:Too much Fox News for you by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I havent read the data, but CA (or any place) can have a large exodus (even unprecedented) while still growing.

      They are not mutually exclusive.

  19. Minimum wage / gig economy or bad headhunting? by ErichTheRed · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Something tells me these numbers are being manipulated. If things really were that good, employers would raise wages. You'd have fast food places offering $20/hr to flip burgers if they needed the labor that badly. Also, including every "job" regardless of full/part time status and suitability is misleading. No one who spent a reasonable effort getting a college degree wants to be working a minimum wage retail job. If all the jobs advertised were professional jobs, or even high-paying factory work this would be an actual story.

    One other problem especially in the tech and IT fields is the huge mismatch between employers/employees and the absolutely crappy hiring/headhunting process. Employees lowball their offers, headhunters have zero clue about the jobs they're advertising, and there's a massive fetish for anyone under 30. God help you if you're in your mid-50s and end up on the wrong end of an offshoring/outsourcing. The 28 year old MBA in HR is going to assume you're a dinosaur and immediately pass you over.

    It's sure better than 10+% unemployment, but let me know when employers are offering solid, well paying, stable full time work. You can't expect anyone with a family to want to string together 3 part time gigs plus some Uber driving on the side. It's great for the unattached, but a bad way to encourage stable home lives for people.

    1. Re:Minimum wage / gig economy or bad headhunting? by barc0001 · · Score: 1

      > Something tells me these numbers are being manipulated. If things really were that good, employers would raise wages. You'd have fast food places offering $20/hr to flip burgers if they needed the labor that badly.

      Absolutely. We have seen this, or at least I did when I visited family in Alberta during the mid 2000s boom times. Jobs everywhere and nobody to fill them so Wendys and McDonalds were offering $15 an hour with $1000 SIGNING BONUSES on big advertising boards out in front of the stores.

      I'm thinking a good chunk of these so called jobs are in reality so poorly paying and/or unstable that nobody qualified will consider bothering to apply.

    2. Re:Minimum wage / gig economy or bad headhunting? by omnichad · · Score: 3

      You'd have fast food places offering $20/hr to flip burgers

      Would you settle for chicken?

      Skilled people can't find good enough jobs to have a place to live and still pay off student loans. Unskilled people don't just not learn, they also don't always try very hard. There is still a lot of underemployment, though.

    3. Re:Minimum wage / gig economy or bad headhunting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its getting there. In my area, fast food places are routinely offering 13-18$/hour starting.

    4. Re:Minimum wage / gig economy or bad headhunting? by painandgreed · · Score: 1

      Something tells me these numbers are being manipulated. If things really were that good, employers would raise wages. You'd have fast food places offering $20/hr to flip burgers if they needed the labor that badly.

      Knowing people who work professionally in the food industry, what employers are actually doing is offering $35k salary plus health care to people as sous chefs and managers and making them work 60-80 hours a week when they can't find more hourly workers. Meanwhile, worthwhile hourly workers who don't fall for that trap are getting overtime and making that $20/hr.

    5. Re:Minimum wage / gig economy or bad headhunting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, because of high minimum wages in many areas, employers are essentially leaving jobs unfilled, but demanding that existing employees do the extra work. So, you work at a coffee shop, making $15 due to the minimum wage, but you do the work of two people, cutting your true wage to $7.50. However, the position is still advertised, even if an interview is only scheduled because someone is fired or quits.

    6. Re:Minimum wage / gig economy or bad headhunting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Finding candidates that can pass a drug test is probably killing a number of employers with regard to the opioid crisis. Schools have also been pushing students at college over trade skills for years now which is probably also a factor in difficulty in finding adequate candidates.

    7. Re:Minimum wage / gig economy or bad headhunting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dont't want to pay $20/h because that'd mean increasing prices which is not possible because nobody would be able to afford the new burgers because they aren't getting paid $20/h.

      The more housing increases the less burgers you can afford.

      And what better place to put those sacrosanct burger profits than in real estate?

    8. Re:Minimum wage / gig economy or bad headhunting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter when the system is broken.

      The rich end up with all the gains in productivity.

      So does it matter if we raise minimum wage from $10 an hour to $15 an hour, if in the end that $5 ends up in the hands of the rich anyway?

      (In case you're wondering how it gets there: one of the most common methods today is consumer debt)

    9. Re:Minimum wage / gig economy or bad headhunting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Finding candidates that can pass a drug test is probably killing a number of employers with regard to the opioid crisis."

      I've read articles that say this too. Why not just drop the requirement? In a modern industrial workplace there are so many safety systems in place that no one employee could cause that much damage. Machines have safety systems on them, human-required tasks have been idiot-proofed, etc.

      It seems like employers want to hang onto this puritanical notion of a drug-free workplace. But if it makes it impossible to find workers, then it's not helping them at all other than making them feel good about themselves.

  20. Irony by manu0601 · · Score: 1

    There is some irony that Trump got elected promising to cut work immigration and revive coal, and the time economy would need more work immigration, and coal energy gets more expensive than renewable.

  21. Recruiters ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I keep getting recruiters trying to recruit me for things that I am not qualified for. If I don't need to know XYZ Tech don't put it on the job listing, but if I in fact really do need experience with XYZ Tech then why the fuck are you spamming me for something you won't actually hire me for?

    1. Re:Recruiters ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are general mailing shots. The social media systems let agencies "personalize" these mail shots by using your first name, even though it's just a bot. I've found it better to just unsubscribe from these messaging systems altogether than to constantly be badgered by headhunters sending LinkedIn messages, emailing me when I don't respond to those messages, then phoning me up when I don't reply to those Emails. All because I did Dark Voodoo 2.0 ten years ago, they think I still I want to do Dark Voodoo now, even when I've now moved onto Brilliant Sunlight 5.0

  22. We would have had the workers we need by reboot246 · · Score: 2, Funny

    We'd have all the workers we need had we not aborted millions of Americans. Who knows, we may have killed the one who would have discovered the cure for cancer or invented warp drive.

    Science calls it "cause and effect". I call it, "You reap what you sow."

    1. Re:We would have had the workers we need by Streetlight · · Score: 1

      The same could be said of the children of legal and illegal immigrants were they given the opportunity to be educated to the extent of their ability.

      --
      In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act. George Orwell
    2. Re:We would have had the workers we need by Kaenneth · · Score: 1

      Or killed the next Hitler or Zombie plague inventor.

      Who knows?

    3. Re: We would have had the workers we need by Archangel_Azazel · · Score: 1

      Logic motherfucker...
      Do you use it?

      --
      Your mind is like a parachute. It works best when it's been opened.
    4. Re: We would have had the workers we need by Nidi62 · · Score: 1

      And would you have helped pay for all those kids education, food stamps, healthcare, etc? Or was one of those millions of kids just going to pop out of their mom holding a warp drive?

      --
      The only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for it to be pitted against a slightly greater evil
    5. Re:We would have had the workers we need by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lmao! How did you even find this place?

  23. misleading.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    misleading as fuck. the 'jobless' or 'job seekers' is based upon new unemployment claims for a given period, which many don't apply for or are eligible for.

    so it's not that there are that many new jobs out there.. it's that sooooo many people have given up looking, have taken shitty part time work instead, or simply exhausted their unemployment.. and none of them count anymore

  24. Why all the protectionism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't understand why the sudden need for deporting immigrants and all those tariffs (even on goods from coutries doing nothing wrong) if the economy is doing so great that there aren't enough employees for all the jobs.

    Could it be that it's all bullshit? Or maybe deporting tens of thousands of workers is why there are so many unfilled jobs?

    dom

    1. Re:Why all the protectionism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good question.

      The economy is doing well because of a number of administration policies which have allowed people with money to spend it on their pet projects and from corporate tax cuts. That was the President's limited role. Like it or not, people make emotional choices based on who is in power. Historically when leftist progressives are in power, people save their money because they know anything they do will be stolen through taxation or social welfare programs.

      Deporting illegal immigrants is because:
      1) they're illegally in the U.S. (Mexico does the same thing if you went there illegally)
      2) Financial accountability. They are not properly matriculated into the system and they become people whom cannot be accounted for properly in the "system". For example, they may pay sales taxes but not federal taxes yet collect massive federal benefits.

      Tariffs:
      - The US doesn't tax anywhere near (or at all) compared to tariffs American companies pay when selling in countries like China.
      - Why should a country like China make it so hard/impossible for us to sell over there, yet we put Americans out of business because Chinese are willing to do it for slave wages (think Foxconn) AND not get tariffed at all selling in the USA?
          -- Is it fair to Americans that China gets to use slave wages?
          -- We should have equal tariffs or none at all.

      Love or hate Trump, he has been 100% right about financial accountability.

    2. Re:Why all the protectionism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's not deporting immigrants. He's deporting illegal aliens. You know people who broke the law and entered the country illegally. There is a huge difference. We still have a very high number of immigrants entering this country the legal way. You know so they can come into this county and acclimate to our culture and eventually become Americans. You people have been so brainwashed. I feel so sad for your education levels.

    3. Re:Why all the protectionism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's leveling the playing field. Did you know Europe charges 4 times the amount in tariffs to import American cars. How can you call that fair and let the Europeans import their cars here for practically nothing. Yeah makes sense to me raising tariffs.

    4. Re: Why all the protectionism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The consumer always ends up absorbing the cost. The only way Americans can afford those nice European cars is the low tariffs. Europeans aren't as badly affected by the higher tariffs because they have higher wages

    5. Re:Why all the protectionism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's leveling the playing field.

      But, but... Isn't that... SOCIALISM ! GASP !

    6. Re:Why all the protectionism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's leveling the playing field. Did you know Europe charges 4 times the amount in tariffs to import American cars.

      One cannot know something that is not true.

      How can you call that fair and let the Europeans import their cars here for practically nothing.

      'Only' 25% for a large part of the market...

  25. lol - Hail Trump! by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1, Funny

    The comments in this thread are HILARIOUS.

    Lib types, falling all over themselves trying to avoid the ugly truth...Trump is GOOD for the economy.

    Sorry, but Obama = record unemployment.

    Trump = inverse unemployment, for the first time since they've been keeping track.

    NewOOOOOOO! ( Cartman voice)

    1. Re:lol - Hail Trump! by skam240 · · Score: 1

      What blinders you wear.

      The economy saw continuous and substancial growth under Obama ( https://www.statista.com/stati... ). The massive economic crash prior to him getting elected is the source of his poor numbers on things such as unemployment. Our current situation where the economy is finally showing some strength is due to all the growth under Obama.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    2. Re:lol - Hail Trump! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and conservative/alt-right type (like you) falling all over themselves taking all the craps as truth... Lip service is cheap and is just an out right lie when the reality doesn't go along with what the lip is trying to present.

  26. opposite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This year is the first time the level of the unemployed exceeded the jobs available since the BLS started tracking JOLTS numbers in 2000.

    That's what it says, from the fumble-foot mouth of the government.

  27. Correction by Archangel_Azazel · · Score: 1

    "There are now more jobs with shit pay and zero benefits than people willing to suffer working them."

    That needed fixing.

    --
    Your mind is like a parachute. It works best when it's been opened.
  28. What magic wand does Drumpf have? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This must be Obama's doing even though he said the jobs weren't coming back.

  29. It's Trump's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's Trump's fault. Blame him!!!

    1. Re:It's Trump's fault by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Thanks, Trump!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  30. Don't worry, the bubble will pop by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    We are overdue for a recession. I warned you.

  31. I hire by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm hiring just for like 40% less than market rate. Otherwise HR just stops the process.

  32. And Trump is trying to Undo it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Obama forced the country to do the difficult thing and build an economy slowly, that could stand the test of time and grow at a REASONABLE rate and sustain jobs and a better standard of living. Just look at what Obama's economy has done for minorities. The unemployment rate among blacks is lower than it has ever been.

    Now we have a bigot in the White House trying his best to torpedo the economy, but thank God Obama did things smartly and in ways that would be difficult or even illegal to try to undo. I just pray we can elect more democratic socialists like Bernie Sanders the next time around so we can get the economy back on track in a way that is fair for everyone.

    1. Re:And Trump is trying to Undo it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Venezuela forever!

  33. Bullshit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Trumps rigged apparatus produced this bullshit.

  34. Wage Growth by Luthair · · Score: 1

    The article isn't specific as far as I can tell but is this in terms of dollars or in terms of percentage? e.g. an increase from $5/hour to $8/hour is a 60% improvement but the end result is still terrible.

  35. Re:Thanks Obama. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The analysis you refer to is an egregious deception.

    It states, "Thirteen days before Obama took the oath of office, the CBO forecast a total 2009-19 budget deficit of $4.32 trillion. Instead, Washington is set to complete that decade with cumulative deficits of $8.93 trillion – $4.6 trillion higher than projected."

    Obama took office in FY2009 - the final Bush budget year. The deficit peaked at $1,413 billion in FY2009, due mainly to the collapse in tax revenue after the 2008 financial crisis. As the economy recovered, under Obama, the deficit decreased by more than half, falling to $665 billion in FY2017, the final Obama budget year.

    https://www.usgovernmentspending.com/federal_deficit_chart.html

    The real explosion in the deficit occurred under Bush. He inherited a balanced budget and through wars of choice, tax cuts during those wars, and a collapsed economy, turned it into a record $1.4 trillion deficit.

    But as Bush's own vice-president infamously said, "Reagan proved, deficits don't matter."

  36. Sneers from an Old Economy Steve by Uberbah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But who's fault is that? How many of these degree's are for markets that is already saturated? They don't find jobs in these areas because they are none. But what there is, is plenty of jobs in blue collar areas. The country needs plumbers, and welders, there are plenty of jobs there. But so many millennials think these jobs are beneath them.

    First, millennials are sneered at if they want a living wage without having a degree. Have to better yourselves to be employed, doncha know.

    Next, millennials are sneered at for not being clairvoyant to pick the exact degree that will be in demand when they graduate (You Are Here).

    Finally, don't forget to sneer at those millennials for "taking on student loans they couldn't afford".

    1. Re: Sneers from an Old Economy Steve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Turns out that the gender studies degree just doesn't qualify you for anything except teaching gender studies.

    2. Re:Sneers from an Old Economy Steve by terrycarlino · · Score: 1

      It doesn't take an enormous amount of genius to know that a degree in Library Science or Transgender Eskimo Woman Studies is not going to pay off. Let me break down for you. Markets don't change that fast. An engineering degree will pay off. A English Lit, not so much. I pretty much guarantee the top five academic degree fields for employment this year will still be top fields for employment four years from now.

      As for getting a job without a degree. There are lots of them, but no mistake if they're for trades you're not getting in them without some kind of vocational training school. So the point isn't don't get education past high school. It's don't borrow $80,000 to get a college degree in a field that doesn't pay. Spend $5,000 getting a one year certificate from a trade school.

    3. Re:Sneers from an Old Economy Steve by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      It doesn't take an enormous amount of genius to know that a degree in [insert half-assed caricature here] is not going to pay off.

      STEM grads are as screwed as much as people who took Underwater Basket Weaving or whatever other stereotype you Old Economy Steve's dredge up.

    4. Re:Sneers from an Old Economy Steve by Raenex · · Score: 1

      STEM grads are as screwed as much as people who took Underwater Basket Weaving or whatever other stereotype

      Bullshit.

    5. Re:Sneers from an Old Economy Steve by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      You bullshit. STEM grads enter a market where employers want everyone to be under 30 while at the same time already having a decade of professional experience. Where their own government works to suppress their wages with the H1B visa program. Where their industry tries to offshore or outsource as much as possible - and colludes to suppress wages when they can't.

    6. Re:Sneers from an Old Economy Steve by Raenex · · Score: 1

      There's still demand for STEM workers, much more so than somebody getting a degree fit for Starbucks.

    7. Re:Sneers from an Old Economy Steve by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      And there was some demand for some jobs even at the height of the Great Depression. And yeah, its not like workers haven't had to deal with challenging job markets before - but not with today's astronomical housing and student loan costs. That's why the Old Economy Steve's are asshats, because they didn't have five figures of student loan debt or efficiencies that rent for over $1,000/mo to deal with, but lecture millennials who do.

    8. Re:Sneers from an Old Economy Steve by Raenex · · Score: 1

      That's why the Old Economy Steve's are asshats

      I'm going to call you Obama Economy Matt, for being so out of touch with current economics. The economy has improved a lot since it cratered in 2008. Educate yourself.

    9. Re:Sneers from an Old Economy Steve by Uberbah · · Score: 1

      Oh, do step out of the bubble. All the economic gains since 2008 have flown to the top 10%, and most of that to the top .01%. For the poor and working class, the economy has stayed in recession or even great depression levels. The new jobs being created are shitty service sector positions that pay less, while housing and health care costs continue to rise.

    10. Re:Sneers from an Old Economy Steve by Raenex · · Score: 1

      Who's in the bubble, me or you? You think somebody with a STEM degree is in the same Starbuck's position as somebody with a degree in gender studies. Enjoy your bubble, Obama Economy Matt.

  37. impetus for the Old Economy Steve meme by Uberbah · · Score: 1

    They bust their ass in the "gig economy" for little pay and no benefits and yet you consider them "entitled" because they prefer their cup of coffee differently then yours. Guess what, you are the entitled generations

    As epitomized by:

    • 'Bought a house in his 20's with a 9-5 job that didn't require a degree'
    • 'KIDS THESE DAYS HAVE IT EASY BECAUSE $200 SMART PHONES'
  38. So? by DaMattster · · Score: 1

    CNBC states it, so it must be true? Come on ... I don't believe this article on little bit. The jobs I see posted in my area for "entry level" are asking for all kinds of experience. I just have a general distrust of corporate media.

  39. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  40. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China purchased US treasury debt for control of US policy, but also to prevent American economic problems. There is inflation that provided a long-term boom in the stock market without any fundamentals, though prices of goods have been kept under control, including energy/oil which is of great importance still. Wages are the last thing to rise due to inflation, and that assumes the labor market is fair. That means, it assumes that technology companies don't blacklist people to prevent pouching in-between technology companies. There is no union for technology workers and there is no trustworthy certification for technology workers, so all technology jobs focus on entry-level skills with projects that normally fail, because it makes financial sense. If they have to do a project 2 or 3 times to have something worth using, that must be cheaper than having highly paid people that everyone agrees have the appropriate skills.

  41. On what fucking planet? by BankRobberMBA · · Score: 1

    $850 in 1977 is about $2500 today.

    https://www.saving.org/inflati...

    That literally took less than 10 seconds on Google

    1. Re: On what fucking planet? by Reverend+Green · · Score: 1

      The official inflation numbers are VERY obviously wrong.

    2. Re: On what fucking planet? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says the guy who makes absolutely no effort to back up his claims with even the tiniest amount of evidence. Its all feels and truthiness with you angry little anti-intellectuals.

  42. But.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But the problem is that some of these jobs require attributes that many out of work people don't possess. You can't make a person who has the IQ of a chimp do the job of a man.

  43. Short-term contracts and redundant job listings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    While probably not fully explaining the numbers, one can reasonably surmise that these factors pushed the needle a bit. Companies post job listings for short-term contracts for specialized developers all the time, some before their project can even hope to see funding. Then the headhunters see the job listings and make redundant job listings. I dealt with a lot of that crap after my last contract but now I'm somewhere I like :)

  44. Re:Thanks Obama. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn, should have typed FY2018 not FY2017. FY2018 was the final Obama budget year. But the point still holds, the deficit fell by half under Obama, and the build up in debt was mostly due to Bush's wars, tax cuts, and the financial crisis.

    https://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/historical-tables/

  45. Re:Thanks Obama. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dammit again, had it right the first time. Election was 2016, last Obama budget year was FY2017.

  46. *sigh* by zkiwi34 · · Score: 2

    Nothing said about the nature of the jobs or the wages for them. Nothing about the cost of health and accommodation. Nothing about the numbers of people that are no longer counted as looking for work.

    So, things are clearly looking up. There are even concerns over wage inflation. Translation, research worth less than a used happy meal.

  47. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  48. Someone is making America great again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone had to say it. :-)

  49. Garbage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have friends with 4 year networking degrees, certs and 4+ years in the field working at KFC and Walmart. This may be true, but but only because people have given up on real jobs and are working garbage jobs just to get by.

    1. Re:Garbage by ledow · · Score: 1

      Precisely. I could create a million jobs. If you want to get minimum wage for an 18 hour variable shift developing high-end HPC systems for life-critical systems with personal responsibility if it should not work for some reason.

      I mean, why aren't you all flocking to it?

      Oh, by the way, the jobs are all the other end of the country, 200 miles from the nearest town, there's no houses available in that town anyway, there are no direct roads (you have to take kayak, a hot air balloon, and two steam trains every day to get to work, and it take 5 hours to do so).

      There's a very big difference between "a job exists" and "a job someone might take exists" and "a job that YOU might take exists".

      It's really easy to create jobs. Pay people minimum wage to pick up litter, or sew fishing nets, subsidise it via government funds. That doesn't mean that ANYONE will do those things for that price.

      I think it's quite telling the job situation versus who your president is. Sure, there are many jobs. Even in the upper echelons of government. Just sign your soul away here, and expect to get screwed over.

  50. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  51. Those are not mental health issues. by Qbertino · · Score: 2

    Those are genetic dispositions and socializations. If I'm trying to fix a full stack web Problem every day all day for months or years in a row it will have an impact on my emotional and mental composition. ADHDs are hunters and gatherers in a settler and farmer world.

    I've enrolled in college recently and have a Projekt group made up of me (48, senior developer) and three 19 year old nerdboys. And I mean total all out over the top excess nerds. These guys couldn't care less about their appearance or habitus. They do still care but only to the utmost minimum. They care orders of magnitude more about getting our little Java thing done with and back to playing with a bazillion PLs, getting into C++ and trying out that new Tensor Flow thing.

    Linus Torwalds would be a abysmally shitty dancer (I presume) but he's one of the best Programmers in the world. That's also due to his mental composition.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
    1. Re:Those are not mental health issues. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Linus Torwalds would be a abysmally shitty dancer (I presume) but he's one of the best Programmers in the world. That's also due to his mental composition.

      Depends on the type of dancing. Partner dancing is a bit like programming, you're using a very simple syntax to put together complex constructs that obey defined rules.

      In programming you can then redefine the rules on the fly, if you're good enough. In dancing you do exactly the same, and use feedback from the compiler (i.e. your follower) to debug and make adjustments.

      Dancing is actually easier; it's transient in nature, so you never have to go back and fix the bugs. It's also more varied; the underlying architecture changes each dance - new partner, different music.

      Beginner dancers will use the simple languages. Easy high level complete moves, in time to the main beat of the music. Once you're more experienced you can go lower level, or drop right to the registers; leading a complex interaction by curving a single finger is extremely rewarding. You also get to exploit more of the musical hardware, dancing to the melody of the lyrics, or one specific instrument, or the actual words themselves.

      But you're still using that simple underlying syntax, creating fluid dynamic complex beauty using basic constructs engineered into a greater whole. So I reckon Linus is probably a bloody great dancer.

    2. Re:Those are not mental health issues. by triffid_98 · · Score: 1

      I am in no way implying that such people are in any way 'inferior', merely different (each with their own advantages and disadvantages). Doctors and society made up these terms not me.

      I am one of those people and freely admit it. I see those tendencies in many others of my profession. So do many medical professions who have written peer reviewed articles about the subject. Given a choice people self-select for things they are good at. I would be terrible in a sales/marketing role for example. I'm don't think I would even make a decent manager...but I can fix most problems that don't involve human psychology better than most people who aren't er..."special"

      Also ADHD (much like Autism) is a new term. We used to say Johnny was "slow"/"crazy"/"weird" or but now they've invented medical terms for these things. It doesn't mean they can actually fix them, just that the diagnostic techniques have gotten a lot better so things like this "drastic rise in autism" aren't necessarily a real thing. We've had autism since at least at least 1822 and probably since forever. ADHD is similar. If you're old it's hard to remember but many kids are hyperactive by nature and the fact that you want to medicate that away seems...curious. Again, it's a "spectrum" condition. It's only when it's expressed fully that you run into serious problems functioning in normal society without said medication.

    3. Re:Those are not mental health issues. by DeBaas · · Score: 1

      Don Tillman, is that you?

      --
      ---
    4. Re:Those are not mental health issues. by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Steve Wozniak lost miserably on Dancing with the Stars, but he was still one of the most likable contestants. Turns out most nerds in their 70's suck at dancing, but props to him for trying.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  52. Mod Patent Up! by Qbertino · · Score: 1

    This is pretty spot on. In a cyberpunk post scarcity economy practical stoicism is an attractive option. As an IT expert I could easyly earn 80 000 Euros and more even without having a degree but I chose not to.

    I spent the better part of my last decade working part time, social dancing as a Tango Bum / Tango Nomad (yeah, there is such a thing :-) ) and generally taking it easy. I'm now ramping up to rake in a little cash to get myself some Microappartment or micro house for my old age while at the same time embracing minimalism even further. But still it's part time work and part time college. Wouldn't want it any other way right now. I'm ok with wearing 8 Euro t-shirts as standard garb and riding the bike and public transport. And doing my yoga with YouTube and not in some expensive class.

    --
    We suffer more in our imagination than in reality. - Seneca
  53. You can't get a job without an address. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And guess what the homeless don't have?

  54. It ain't the millenials' fault. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The ones you blame aren't at fault, all YOU are doing is whining and JAQing off all over the thread to make it the "brats" fault. It isn't. The fault is the ones in power AND THE EMPLOYERS NOW WHINING. You wanted to cut costs by getting pre-skilled workers and now that every other company does it, nobody is getting skilled any more and so you aren't getting hires like you want. And yet you blathered on about how they needed an education (like you) and they will get that job that pays well. But you also then pointed to the wide world and said "I cannot afford to pay you a better wage because other people are paid less so I would go and get them instead".

    Whose fault?

    Yours.

  55. So what's the problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    This is supposed to be a free market for jobs and if you don't like the pay or conditions, you're told not to take the job. So now people are not taking the job, it's suddenly a BAD thing??? How does THAT work?

    If the only way you can get people to accept your job vacancy is by putting the threat of starvation and death for their family on your side, then you're NOT offering a job. You're demanding a slave.

    1. Re:So what's the problem? by mikael · · Score: 1

      +infinity insightful

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  56. corruption. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The personal enrichment he got from china for helping them get jobs is illegal.

  57. But... but... Trump is evil! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or so the idiots who worship the television keep parrotting - after all, the TV told them so!

  58. Why work? by Nocturrne · · Score: 0

    Why work when you can collect unemployment and food stamps, while living with your parent's until you are 45? Plus, the more illegitimate children you have, the more benefits you receive - bang away!

    1. Re:Why work? by skam240 · · Score: 1

      Right, the government just hands out unemployment and food stamps infinitly.

      Your understanding of such programs seems rather limited.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  59. Ragnarok. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Northern Europeans would fight to the death rather than be dishonored by Slavery.

    At the first opportunity, kill the masters and burn their plantation to the ground.

    A little fire and some grease is all that takes.

    1. Re:Ragnarok. by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      Concentration camps, on the other hand...

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    2. Re:Ragnarok. by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Not all Northern Europeans would do that. If you kill all the people that rebel against slavery, pretty soon all you are left with are the people that do the bare minimum necessary to survive under the oppressive system and the attractive women that decide letting themselves be raped at will is preferable to being beaten. It sounds kind of racist, but in effect that is what was done to the involuntary immigrants to the Americas. The Africans that came here under their own free will are a different stock, they are the ones that had the resources to escape the poverty and bad government in their own home countries.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  60. Holy shit! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MAGA, Motherfuckers.

  61. Collusion! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is all part of TrumPutin's plan! Stop trolling, Ivan! Traitor! Collusion!

  62. I bet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I dont trust any numbers that come from the Trump admin. How can we know these numbers are not fudged? Many of his dept heads have been very manipulative with data they put out.

  63. Bullshit. by Grog6 · · Score: 2

    I graduated HS under Regan; the guy who started the whole "War on Drugs" while importing Cocaine for money for weapons for Iran.

    They MADE the entire Drug war, which we know now was a war on the poorer classes.

    Hell it wasn't a problem until little White Girls started fucking Black men for Cocaine, then it was a Scourge.

    We are still living that lie, as a country.

    This is just the latest round.

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
    1. Re:Bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I realize you're pissed because "the man" is trying to take away your precious recreational pharmaceuticals which help you cope with your shitty life but you ought to at least get your facts straight if you're going to go tilting at windmills. It was Nixon who started the "war on drugs" not Reagan.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...

  64. Pruitt apparently like sleeping in piss. by Grog6 · · Score: 1

    Who the fuck would buy a used mattress from Trump?

    lol.

    --
    Truth isn't Truth - Guliani
  65. Living wage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And how many of those jobs does someone need for a living wage? There's a rise in insecure and part time jobs.

  66. They all got deported by Gunstick · · Score: 1

    Trump deported many low wage jobs as illegal immigrants. Now of course those positions are open for takers. but no American wants to do this dirty task for so low earning.

    --
    Atari rules... ermm... ruled.
  67. provide? by nten · · Score: 1

    My employer provides a vending machine that produces weak coffee that tastes like a mixture of all the flavored options it has ever vended with just a touch of machine grease. It costs slightly less than the Starbucks in the cafeteria. They also provide a k cup machine with a filtered water supply, but it has the same flavor problem and you have to provide the kcup. "Mmmm, hazelnut mocha vanilla oolong cinnamon lady grey Columbian French breakfast Vienna roast, my favorite!"

    --
    refactor the law, its bloated, confusing and unmaintainable.
  68. And so you are illustrating part of the problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When times appear tough, do we pull together? Or do we point fingers and continue tearing things apart? One can see the answer just by reading all the other comments here. Each generation has turns against the others, rather than sticking together. I'm telling you, folks, this is how things fall apart. Don't say we didn't tell you.

  69. BULL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The jobs are crap jobs that make minimum or below minimum wage.

    Restaurants are cutting back employees.
    Stores are closing all over the place.
    Factories are replacing workers with robots.

    This story is nothing but propaganda used to justify more immigrants coming into the country.

  70. So. . . Hooray for President Trump? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whether or not he actually had anything to do with it and whether or not these are real jobs or temp jobs at fast food places doesn't matter. He will take credit for it and his approval ratings will remain high enough for reelection.

  71. Do They Pay Enough to Afford Local Housing? by eepok · · Score: 1

    Housing speculation has absolutely screwed up the cost of living for any job center and thus a company's profitability standards are at odds with being able to pay people enough to work their jobs. As a result, people need to commute farther than in the past, those transportation systems get over-burdened, and then we all pay higher taxes for freeway widening which never actually improves one's commute. It just allows more people to have the same slow commute.

    It all still comes down to property policy. Investors went NUTS banking on the profitability of housing from the 1990s through 2007. They made a lot of money so when the smoke cleared and homes started bottoming out, they invested again. And it's not just corporate investors, it's private investors who probably don't even consider themselves "investors". The trend of "buy, appreciate, move, and then rent-out" is now a private home finance staple. In fact, there are so many companies out there now to HELP you become a land lord, it seems like you'd be crazy not to do it. "I got mine."

    And we're in another housing bubble. A colleague of mine recently retired and is downsizing from his 3b/2ba home to a 2b/2ba condo. He and his wife just sold for $70,000 over asking... all in cash.

    It's not a wage problem, it's a housing speculation problem. If we want to solve the problem, the main problem areas the states where this is a bigger issue NEED to make big change... likely by increasing property taxes on non-owner-occupied single family homes. Then the cost of housing will drop and THEN you'll see demand for a more rational minimum wage increase... because right now the $15 minimum wage doesn't prop anyone up but landlords.

    1. Re:Do They Pay Enough to Afford Local Housing? by mikael · · Score: 1

      "It's not a wage problem, it's a housing speculation problem. If we want to solve the problem, the main problem areas the states where this is a bigger issue NEED to make big change... likely by increasing property taxes on non-owner-occupied single family homes. Then the cost of housing will drop and THEN you'll see demand for a more rational minimum wage increase... because right now the $15 minimum wage doesn't prop anyone up but landlords."

      They tried that in the UK. It was called "The Poll Tax". The property taxes paid were based on the number of residents in the property. A millionaire living in a mansion house would end up paying less property tax than a group of minimum wage earners sharing a home. There were exceptions for those who were retired, unemployed or full-time students.

      Anyone who was going abroad to work wouldn't register as having moved out or gone abroad. They would just rent the property out to friends/family.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  72. enchalle by epine · · Score: 1

    To be fair, plenty of engineers also have mental health issues, it's just that it's aspergers/ocd vs dementia/ptsd.

    There's no health issue at all with most of the spectrum.

    Probably the correct term is environmentally challenged—they just don't fit the Department of Education's main-sequence all-weather Cinderella slipper, not without great difficulty.

    But, inshallah, they often get along in life just fine, once they dial into their unique groove, sufficiently off the beaten track of the main sequence.

    The rare Anchorage Ethiopian also has a his own special personal "health" consultant, only in this case it's not some doctor with extensive training in the vagaries of human cognition and a well-thumbed DSM-V groaning under his desk, it's some junior sales flunky at Mark's Work Warehouse (or the Alaskan equivalent) who's A+ on layering pull-over parkas.

    Lay it on me!

    Baby, it's cold out there!

    And then they set to work.

  73. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  74. "Jobs"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So exactly what do they mean by "jobs"?
    Are these positions that a person can work at and not need to have a 2nd or 3rd job just to make a living wage?
    Or are they all minimum wage, no benefits, no chance of advancement type jobs?
    Since the pretendsident is scaring away people who normally take those kinds of jobs, it's no wonder there are a lot of them.

  75. By Intention... by Doctrinsograce · · Score: 1

    Hasn't the administration been working on this very thing diligently?

  76. Missing info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would like to see a study that compares the average salary unemployed people were earning prior to unemployment in comparison to the average salary of the unfilled jobs.

  77. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  78. I think the cause is pretty obvious by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    A small number of companies have bought up just about everything and they don't compete with each other on wages. Add outsourcing and H1-Bs and wages stagnant. The final piece to the puzzle is that labor is no longer organized and so there's no pressure to increase wages from Unions.

    As for why economists aren't talking about this, well, the Koch Bros and the like have been buying out cash strapped University departments with hefty donations. When that doesn't work they just get buddy buddy with deans and the like. And if all else fails these are public Universities and they can use their political connections to get what they want. Some of the big schools like MIT will still buck the trend, but then again they own the media now so they can keep the occasional study that blows up their narrative out of sight and mind.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  79. Fun fact by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    we could pay off the national debt in about 15 years from the money we'd save switching to single payer healthcare. Look it up.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:Fun fact by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      You think we can save a trillion dollars a year off the budget by switching to single payer? Not going to happen.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
  80. Never experienced before? Since 2000. Deceptive. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn deceptive headline.

  81. Pitty the writer can't proofread... by akayani · · Score: 1

    "This year is the first time the level of the unemployed exceeded the jobs available since the BLS started tracking JOLTS numbers in 2000."

    Is that not the opposite of the heading?

  82. Bullshit lead by AutodidactLabrat · · Score: 1

    Not only have there been labor under-runs, in the 1940's even ditch diggers were in demand
    It is only now that Capitalists think there is something wrong with paying high enough wages to get the people they need.
    Housing shortage for workers? Not if you pay them $200K!