DAMN that is a horrifying indictment of the Hillary campaign. She's been exposed repeatedly as a corrupt pol, her top aide Huma has turned against her to save her own skin from jail, and Wikileaks, hero of the Left, has been ceaselessly attacking her for well over a year. Who could possibly vote for her at this point?
Please provide evidence that Huma Abedin has, in any way, "turned" on Clinton. The latest news is that she was supporting Clinton at a private fundraiser in DC the other day. Doesn't sound like someone who has "turned" on her best friend. Sounds like another conspiracy theory.
I would suspect that she would be assisting the FBI in the investigation of her husband. But there has been NO evidence or even leaks from the FBI that they have found anything new in their email investigation. In fact, it's quite likely that anything they find is just duplicates of what they already have.
Under Hillary, the Constitution will be further shredded by her Supreme Court appointees until it means nothing. Under Trump, the Left will bizarrely find meaning in this document drafted by whites and use it to bash the government by whatever means necessary. We really don't realize just how destructive it is to our Republic for the press to be working hand in glove with the government like it has been for the past 8 years. It's high time they were in opposition again.
And threatening to lock up your opposition and appoint a "special prosecutor" isn't trampling all over the constitution and the separation of powers between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches?
most smartphone manufacturers barely break even or operate at a loss. add the losses to apple's share of the profits and you get over 100%
until a little while ago only apple and samsung took home something like 95% or 99% of all profits. samsung's loss pushes apple over 100% in profits
all those cheap android phones sold all over the world that make up for 85% of all phones sold don't really make any money
I think Android counts for more than 85% of smartphone sales now, more like 99%. Which just goes to show what a price-gouger Apple is.
In other words, when they added up all of the P&L from all of the phone manufacturers Apple's share was 104% of the industry total.
For example, Samsung makes $1 in profits, Company Y has a loss of $5, and Apple makes $104. The industry total would be $100. - Apple would have made 104% of the overall industry P&L. - Samsung would have made 1% of the overall industry P&L. - Company Y would have made -5% of the overall industry P&L.
It's a way to trend which company in a sector is making most of the profits and can be a way to develop an investment strategy.
Cell Phones is a $425 Billion dollar industry. Even making tiny profits can make it worth it.
I don't understand the criticism in this case. Who uses SD cards? Photographers? Where is the use case that they are lugging around a DSLR, lenses, lights, tripods, and a laptop but are really put out by the SD reader?
I use MicroSD cards... They are great for holding movies when traveling and for backing up your photos. But I'm not a Mac fan, so I don't care either way. I'm perfectly happy with my XPS 13.
Unless you like to read with your head on a pillow at night. Hard to see a paperwhite screen there.
Obviously you haven't been following the latest in Kindles. The new models have backlight. My Kindle Voyage even has automatic backlight dimming. It starts bright and then slowly dims at night with the lights off to prevent strain on your eyes when reading at night.
Yeah... the "Abe Lincoln defence" was a classic. It's a shame that no one was there to declare "I knew Abe, and you're no Abe."
The Abe Lincoln comment was purely about having a private opinion about something and having a public position that more aligns with the group that you are talking to. The point that she was making was that Lincoln campaigned and courted different groups with slightly different messages tweaked for each group.
The problem is that nuanced reasoning goes over the head of both the media and most of the general public...
Ok but I wouldn't buy the Dell system if they paid me. Or HP. There isn't a good notebook vendor other than Apple, and now we're stuck with whatever Apple chooses to give us. Yay world.
Most people who hate Dell or HP base their opinion on low cost low quality systems ($500 to $700 range) which tend to fail more often due to cheaper components. Both HP and Dell have very nice high end quality systems, but you have to pay for the higher quality. I love my Dell XPS 13 laptop and I have several HP Workstation class desktops (Z640) running, all of which have been very reliable.
What would it actually cost to produce a MacBook in the USA? My guess is that it'll be more expensive, but not by a factor 4. And in case of iPhones, which are sold at 3x the cost of manufacturing, I bet they could sell them at only a slightly higher price if they *gasp* would accept a lower markup.
Even so, I still expect people to go for the slave labour Macbook at $1699 instead of the $1899 "proudly manufactured in the USA" model, when given a choice. Especially when no one is looking.
My prediction is that as robots become more prevalent in industry there will be a gradual shift of manufacturing/assembly back to the US. It's already slowly happening in the auto industry.
Nearly everything the mainstream news has been feeding you about Trump is either taken out of context, twisted, or just an outright lie. Assuming that people are only voting for him because they are "racist, sexist morons" is childish, simplistic thinking at its height that was also programmed into you through the media by those currently in power.
I'm amazed at how otherwise intelligent people can be so easily manipulated by lies that come from so-called experts that the media routinely trots out on stage.
Lets assume for the moment that all of that is true, even a cursory review of his speeches shows that is lacking in emotional stability, easily riled, not interested in changing his position when factual information is presented, and knows very little about the constitution (i.e. a president appointing a special prosecutor goes against the separation of powers). I would think that any one of these would be a red flag no matter what your position is on the issues.
What you are saying is that voters should ignore these very real concerns and assume that it will all work out in the end...
Or just take the money you would have spent building all of those plants deploying solar and wind all over the place. Problem solved in far less time.
Except for the pesky problems of storage, transmission, capacity, and effects on the environment.
The sun doesn't shine and the wind doesn't blow at the right times in all the right places. There isn't enough acreage to lay solar farms to meet our energy needs without affecting the ecosystem, there is no way to efficiently get the energy from point A to point B when they are long distances apart, and lets not forget about how bird kills will affect the bird population if we put wind farms everywhere.
One technology that can be added to the mix is tidal power. Trials are underway in an effort to tap tidal flows to create electricity. But there are those that are concerned that Tidal generators will harm the marine ecosystem.
Each of these technologies are part of the future mix of energy sources, but they all have limitations. We still will need power plants. Do we continue to send CO2 into the atmosphere or do we realize that modern nuclear power can be a part of an overall mix of power sources?
Some have said it's just problems with wireless connectivity and thousands of fans in the same place all using their cell phones but couldn't they overcome that if it is what the problem really is?
No... Just take a look at how often the NFL still has problems with wireless headsets and this is something that the people who put on concerts have solved long ago.
Ya, I know I've noticed this too. Mice works flawlessly on Linux and Mac OS X yet plugging in a standard mouse like a Logitech or Microsoft and it screws up on searching the drivers. It's a mouse, which is a standard HID compliant device. No special drivers should be needed for regular use. Sure, some extra fancy buttons MAY not work without the special driver.
What Windows version? Was it the OEM install? Installed from scratch? Upgraded?
What I find is that if common USB devices (keyboard, mouse) are not being detected and installed properly by any of the USB ports then that Windows computer typically does not have the right versions of the chipset drivers and/or the USB drivers installed. It's interesting that people here are willing to put a tonne of effort to get Linux to work but aren't willing to go through basic troubleshooting steps, such as downloading the latest drivers, to get Windows to work.
Yes, I really asked what a domain controller is. Neither Macs, nor any other computer, unless it is windows, uses/needs them. Obviously... white screens and such... hardware fails regardless if brand, facepalm.
In Linux it's usually a LDAP Directory Server. And yes, for any decent sized organization with LINUX or Windows, you do need a Domain Controller / Directory server to manage user accounts and permissions. Otherwise you are creating local user accounts all over the place with no control over access.
Can't we have a micro-USB to lightning connector adaptor, so that anybody w/ a common microUSB cable can just plug it into that, and the combination can be used to charge iPhones, iPads and the like? Apple can make that as well, just like they made the microUSB to 32-pin adaptor
Yes.... yes, we can... In fact, I only buy micro USB cables at the moment because most of USB devices that I have that require charging are Micro USB. For the rest, I just buy the Micro USB adapters for Lightning, Mini USB, etc. At least until USB-C starts taking over my gadgets.
Perhaps, but Television re-invented is called streaming and Kodi and other devices beat them to it.... Sorry, forgot to drink the cool-aid... Apple will do it better....
I don't entirely disagree with you, but I also think his "panties are in a wad" because while the media may have been skewed both for and against him, in this case it's at the expense of peoples lives, not just his ledger numbers.
His premise is pure bull at this time...
There is no demonstrable or concrete evidence that supports the assertion that implementing self-driving cars in the state of the technology today will save more lives than it would end up costing. In my opinion, we still need much more testing and development.
In all reality, Musk is mostly pissed because he views his company as having a lead in this area and it's being eroded by roadblocks enacted through regulations (good or bad), allowing competitors to catch up.
I used the Carrington Event as an example because its effects were so spectacular, and its effect on the modern power/communications grid (and the computers that run it) could be equally wide spread. Take your pick of any kind of disaster that brings down a major portion of the grid and the result's the same: the data centers only stay up until their reserves of generator fuel runs out.
Multiple data centers in multiple regions will keep the corporate lights on... There... solved that for you... next... (grin)
Basic networking. What's your redundancy? HSRP? What happens when someone spoofs your VIP/virtual MAC? Everything is down. I've seen large offices taken down becuase they used 192.168.1.1 as an important device, and someone plugged in a home router under their desk as an AP, causing a conflict that took down a "redundant" network.
Someone can always take it down. So, go for 802.1x on every port to combat that. Now, if you radius server has an issue, nobody can work. Brilliant. Redundancy and security reduce stability. Go back to networking 101. Even redundant SUPs in a chassis-based system have a single linked management. One wrong command in one of the SUPs and you can take down everything. Redundancy rarely survives user error, and makes it harder to bring it back up.
Um, you do realize that there are networking technologies to protect the network from practically every scenario that you mentioned? Even your port security example falls flat on it's face because you would have redundant radius servers, etc.
And no, redundancy doesn't make things harder as long as it's implemented properly (i.e. you have a well documented primary path that's always used unless there is a problem in which case the network switches to a well defined backup path). As for redundant Sups, most large companies that need up-time have redundant hardware/chassis rather than relying on line cards in a single chassis. Removes the human error and hardware failure. Because you are right that the biggest problem is human error.
The key to any network implementation, same as any other IT service, is that you have experienced network engineers to architect the network, well defined standards, and good support engineers to run it and follow the standards.
Funny thing is that he's the reason why the NFL maintains control of the equipment. The Patriot's have been caught before spying on other teams using that same tech. As for the MS Surface crap that's just part of a very lucrative deal where MS basically pays the NFL to use it so they can advertise how great it is. Bill isn't the only one caught throwing the shitty things around. Several players and coaches have been seen tossing, smashing and stomping on them. Somehow I'm sure MS isn't happy about the negative image they're getting from this. I think it's funny as hell.
There has been no "spying" using headsets or WiFi technology. The NFL controlled the wireless technology from the beginning prevent teams from intercepting the radio transmissions from the other team. There have been instances where teams have been able to hear the other team, but this has always been due to configuration or headset issues caused by the NFL tech team. Some like to blame other teams, but the whole thing is controlled by the NFL.
The biggest problem, as I see it, is that the NFL spends as much money on wireless technology as they do on Referees...
When you have a tablet, you can do things like punch in what defense the other team just used to provide statistical analysis of what the next best play is, or what kind of defense to run if your opponent is doing X often. These are things a coach can know, or have on paper, but the ability to quickly look things up for an effective response or plan is probably very beneficial.
What I don't know, however, is why they would need "connectivity." Why do you need wi-fi operating your iPad or Surface if you have all of the relevant info on the device? If they don't have all the relevant info on the device, what do they need it for?
Um... Live replay, maybe.... Oh, forgot, the NFL is the No Fun League so "No replay for you....." Actually, they are using it for downloading photos and drawing up plays, same as the paper copy.
The NHL has gone to live reply on tablets this season. Saw it being used during the Pittsburgh game a couple of nights ago.
Why should anyone trust Microsoft? They lie about surveillance, they lie about being "open", they lied about Windows 10 install options, they lied about Windows Tablet having a bigger screen than iPad, they lied to Steve Jobs about their GUI plans in the 80s, etc.
640 lies oughtta be enough for anyone. Ignore them by now.
Just to begin with, they have been working on this for a while...
Oh, you need more? How about asking Hillary what this magical "Fair Share" is that she keeps telling everyone we should be paying. Here is a hint, if she does not give you a number and we already pay the highest taxes in the world it's probably 100%. She want's fossil fuels to become stranded resources. How do we power a country with no assets exactly?
Since when does the US pay the highest personal taxes in the world? Not even close...
If you are referring to the corporate tax rate, it may be around the 2nd highest but I guarantee you that not one company pays that rate due to write offs, tax deductions, and loopholes.
Slashdot Mirror
DAMN that is a horrifying indictment of the Hillary campaign. She's been exposed repeatedly as a corrupt pol, her top aide Huma has turned against her to save her own skin from jail, and Wikileaks, hero of the Left, has been ceaselessly attacking her for well over a year. Who could possibly vote for her at this point?
Please provide evidence that Huma Abedin has, in any way, "turned" on Clinton. The latest news is that she was supporting Clinton at a private fundraiser in DC the other day. Doesn't sound like someone who has "turned" on her best friend. Sounds like another conspiracy theory.
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/hu...
I would suspect that she would be assisting the FBI in the investigation of her husband. But there has been NO evidence or even leaks from the FBI that they have found anything new in their email investigation. In fact, it's quite likely that anything they find is just duplicates of what they already have.
Under Hillary, the Constitution will be further shredded by her Supreme Court appointees until it means nothing. Under Trump, the Left will bizarrely find meaning in this document drafted by whites and use it to bash the government by whatever means necessary. We really don't realize just how destructive it is to our Republic for the press to be working hand in glove with the government like it has been for the past 8 years. It's high time they were in opposition again.
And threatening to lock up your opposition and appoint a "special prosecutor" isn't trampling all over the constitution and the separation of powers between the legislative, executive, and judicial branches?
Analog will almost always dominate digital.
Light switches (okay, mechanical), tea kettles, thermostats, car transmissions, door locks, musical recordings, a veritable smorgasbord of items.
....including the smorgasbord..... (grin)
most smartphone manufacturers barely break even or operate at a loss. add the losses to apple's share of the profits and you get over 100%
until a little while ago only apple and samsung took home something like 95% or 99% of all profits. samsung's loss pushes apple over 100% in profits
all those cheap android phones sold all over the world that make up for 85% of all phones sold don't really make any money
I think Android counts for more than 85% of smartphone sales now, more like 99%. Which just goes to show what a price-gouger Apple is.
In other words, when they added up all of the P&L from all of the phone manufacturers Apple's share was 104% of the industry total.
For example, Samsung makes $1 in profits, Company Y has a loss of $5, and Apple makes $104. The industry total would be $100.
- Apple would have made 104% of the overall industry P&L.
- Samsung would have made 1% of the overall industry P&L.
- Company Y would have made -5% of the overall industry P&L.
It's a way to trend which company in a sector is making most of the profits and can be a way to develop an investment strategy.
Cell Phones is a $425 Billion dollar industry. Even making tiny profits can make it worth it.
https://www.statista.com/topic...
I use Spybot Anti-Beacon...
https://www.safer-networking.o...
I don't understand the criticism in this case. Who uses SD cards? Photographers? Where is the use case that they are lugging around a DSLR, lenses, lights, tripods, and a laptop but are really put out by the SD reader?
I use MicroSD cards... They are great for holding movies when traveling and for backing up your photos. But I'm not a Mac fan, so I don't care either way. I'm perfectly happy with my XPS 13.
Unless you like to read with your head on a pillow at night. Hard to see a paperwhite screen there.
Obviously you haven't been following the latest in Kindles. The new models have backlight. My Kindle Voyage even has automatic backlight dimming. It starts bright and then slowly dims at night with the lights off to prevent strain on your eyes when reading at night.
Yeah... the "Abe Lincoln defence" was a classic. It's a shame that no one was there to declare "I knew Abe, and you're no Abe."
The Abe Lincoln comment was purely about having a private opinion about something and having a public position that more aligns with the group that you are talking to. The point that she was making was that Lincoln campaigned and courted different groups with slightly different messages tweaked for each group.
The problem is that nuanced reasoning goes over the head of both the media and most of the general public...
Ok but I wouldn't buy the Dell system if they paid me. Or HP. There isn't a good notebook vendor other than Apple, and now we're stuck with whatever Apple chooses to give us. Yay world.
Most people who hate Dell or HP base their opinion on low cost low quality systems ($500 to $700 range) which tend to fail more often due to cheaper components. Both HP and Dell have very nice high end quality systems, but you have to pay for the higher quality. I love my Dell XPS 13 laptop and I have several HP Workstation class desktops (Z640) running, all of which have been very reliable.
What would it actually cost to produce a MacBook in the USA? My guess is that it'll be more expensive, but not by a factor 4. And in case of iPhones, which are sold at 3x the cost of manufacturing, I bet they could sell them at only a slightly higher price if they *gasp* would accept a lower markup.
Even so, I still expect people to go for the slave labour Macbook at $1699 instead of the $1899 "proudly manufactured in the USA" model, when given a choice. Especially when no one is looking.
My prediction is that as robots become more prevalent in industry there will be a gradual shift of manufacturing/assembly back to the US. It's already slowly happening in the auto industry.
Nearly everything the mainstream news has been feeding you about Trump is either taken out of context, twisted, or just an outright lie. Assuming that people are only voting for him because they are "racist, sexist morons" is childish, simplistic thinking at its height that was also programmed into you through the media by those currently in power.
I'm amazed at how otherwise intelligent people can be so easily manipulated by lies that come from so-called experts that the media routinely trots out on stage.
Lets assume for the moment that all of that is true, even a cursory review of his speeches shows that is lacking in emotional stability, easily riled, not interested in changing his position when factual information is presented, and knows very little about the constitution (i.e. a president appointing a special prosecutor goes against the separation of powers). I would think that any one of these would be a red flag no matter what your position is on the issues.
What you are saying is that voters should ignore these very real concerns and assume that it will all work out in the end...
Or just take the money you would have spent building all of those plants deploying solar and wind all over the place. Problem solved in far less time.
Except for the pesky problems of storage, transmission, capacity, and effects on the environment.
The sun doesn't shine and the wind doesn't blow at the right times in all the right places. There isn't enough acreage to lay solar farms to meet our energy needs without affecting the ecosystem, there is no way to efficiently get the energy from point A to point B when they are long distances apart, and lets not forget about how bird kills will affect the bird population if we put wind farms everywhere.
One technology that can be added to the mix is tidal power. Trials are underway in an effort to tap tidal flows to create electricity. But there are those that are concerned that Tidal generators will harm the marine ecosystem.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/...
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/...
Each of these technologies are part of the future mix of energy sources, but they all have limitations. We still will need power plants. Do we continue to send CO2 into the atmosphere or do we realize that modern nuclear power can be a part of an overall mix of power sources?
Some have said it's just problems with wireless connectivity and thousands of fans in the same place all using their cell phones but couldn't they overcome that if it is what the problem really is?
No... Just take a look at how often the NFL still has problems with wireless headsets and this is something that the people who put on concerts have solved long ago.
The last driver update seems to have solved the only freeze problem that I've been having with my Surface Pro 4, which was wake from sleep.
https://technet.microsoft.com/...
Ya, I know I've noticed this too. Mice works flawlessly on Linux and Mac OS X yet plugging in a standard mouse like a Logitech or Microsoft and it screws up on searching the drivers. It's a mouse, which is a standard HID compliant device. No special drivers should be needed for regular use. Sure, some extra fancy buttons MAY not work without the special driver.
What Windows version? Was it the OEM install? Installed from scratch? Upgraded?
What I find is that if common USB devices (keyboard, mouse) are not being detected and installed properly by any of the USB ports then that Windows computer typically does not have the right versions of the chipset drivers and/or the USB drivers installed. It's interesting that people here are willing to put a tonne of effort to get Linux to work but aren't willing to go through basic troubleshooting steps, such as downloading the latest drivers, to get Windows to work.
Yes, I really asked what a domain controller is. ... white screens and such ... hardware fails regardless if brand, facepalm.
Neither Macs, nor any other computer, unless it is windows, uses/needs them.
Obviously
In Linux it's usually a LDAP Directory Server. And yes, for any decent sized organization with LINUX or Windows, you do need a Domain Controller / Directory server to manage user accounts and permissions. Otherwise you are creating local user accounts all over the place with no control over access.
Can't we have a micro-USB to lightning connector adaptor, so that anybody w/ a common microUSB cable can just plug it into that, and the combination can be used to charge iPhones, iPads and the like? Apple can make that as well, just like they made the microUSB to 32-pin adaptor
Yes.... yes, we can... In fact, I only buy micro USB cables at the moment because most of USB devices that I have that require charging are Micro USB. For the rest, I just buy the Micro USB adapters for Lightning, Mini USB, etc. At least until USB-C starts taking over my gadgets.
...if Apple has a new product to help with that
Perhaps, but Television re-invented is called streaming and Kodi and other devices beat them to it.... Sorry, forgot to drink the cool-aid... Apple will do it better....
I don't entirely disagree with you, but I also think his "panties are in a wad" because while the media may have been skewed both for and against him, in this case it's at the expense of peoples lives, not just his ledger numbers.
His premise is pure bull at this time...
There is no demonstrable or concrete evidence that supports the assertion that implementing self-driving cars in the state of the technology today will save more lives than it would end up costing. In my opinion, we still need much more testing and development.
In all reality, Musk is mostly pissed because he views his company as having a lead in this area and it's being eroded by roadblocks enacted through regulations (good or bad), allowing competitors to catch up.
Testing for jobs? WHAT JOBS?
Well, you have to be dead... then they take your DNA... So... Vampires vs Zombies?
I used the Carrington Event as an example because its effects were so spectacular, and its effect on the modern power/communications grid (and the computers that run it) could be equally wide spread. Take your pick of any kind of disaster that brings down a major portion of the grid and the result's the same: the data centers only stay up until their reserves of generator fuel runs out.
Multiple data centers in multiple regions will keep the corporate lights on... There... solved that for you... next... (grin)
Basic networking. What's your redundancy? HSRP? What happens when someone spoofs your VIP/virtual MAC? Everything is down. I've seen large offices taken down becuase they used 192.168.1.1 as an important device, and someone plugged in a home router under their desk as an AP, causing a conflict that took down a "redundant" network.
Someone can always take it down. So, go for 802.1x on every port to combat that. Now, if you radius server has an issue, nobody can work. Brilliant. Redundancy and security reduce stability. Go back to networking 101. Even redundant SUPs in a chassis-based system have a single linked management. One wrong command in one of the SUPs and you can take down everything. Redundancy rarely survives user error, and makes it harder to bring it back up.
Um, you do realize that there are networking technologies to protect the network from practically every scenario that you mentioned? Even your port security example falls flat on it's face because you would have redundant radius servers, etc.
And no, redundancy doesn't make things harder as long as it's implemented properly (i.e. you have a well documented primary path that's always used unless there is a problem in which case the network switches to a well defined backup path). As for redundant Sups, most large companies that need up-time have redundant hardware/chassis rather than relying on line cards in a single chassis. Removes the human error and hardware failure. Because you are right that the biggest problem is human error.
The key to any network implementation, same as any other IT service, is that you have experienced network engineers to architect the network, well defined standards, and good support engineers to run it and follow the standards.
Funny thing is that he's the reason why the NFL maintains control of the equipment. The Patriot's have been caught before spying on other teams using that same tech. As for the MS Surface crap that's just part of a very lucrative deal where MS basically pays the NFL to use it so they can advertise how great it is. Bill isn't the only one caught throwing the shitty things around. Several players and coaches have been seen tossing, smashing and stomping on them. Somehow I'm sure MS isn't happy about the negative image they're getting from this. I think it's funny as hell.
There has been no "spying" using headsets or WiFi technology. The NFL controlled the wireless technology from the beginning prevent teams from intercepting the radio transmissions from the other team. There have been instances where teams have been able to hear the other team, but this has always been due to configuration or headset issues caused by the NFL tech team. Some like to blame other teams, but the whole thing is controlled by the NFL.
The biggest problem, as I see it, is that the NFL spends as much money on wireless technology as they do on Referees...
When you have a tablet, you can do things like punch in what defense the other team just used to provide statistical analysis of what the next best play is, or what kind of defense to run if your opponent is doing X often. These are things a coach can know, or have on paper, but the ability to quickly look things up for an effective response or plan is probably very beneficial.
What I don't know, however, is why they would need "connectivity." Why do you need wi-fi operating your iPad or Surface if you have all of the relevant info on the device? If they don't have all the relevant info on the device, what do they need it for?
Um... Live replay, maybe.... Oh, forgot, the NFL is the No Fun League so "No replay for you....." Actually, they are using it for downloading photos and drawing up plays, same as the paper copy.
The NHL has gone to live reply on tablets this season. Saw it being used during the Pittsburgh game a couple of nights ago.
Why should anyone trust Microsoft? They lie about surveillance, they lie about being "open", they lied about Windows 10 install options, they lied about Windows Tablet having a bigger screen than iPad, they lied to Steve Jobs about their GUI plans in the 80s, etc.
640 lies oughtta be enough for anyone. Ignore them by now.
Just to begin with, they have been working on this for a while...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?...
Oh, you need more? How about asking Hillary what this magical "Fair Share" is that she keeps telling everyone we should be paying. Here is a hint, if she does not give you a number and we already pay the highest taxes in the world it's probably 100%. She want's fossil fuels to become stranded resources. How do we power a country with no assets exactly?
Since when does the US pay the highest personal taxes in the world? Not even close...
http://www.taxpolicycenter.org...
http://www.tradingeconomics.co...
If you are referring to the corporate tax rate, it may be around the 2nd highest but I guarantee you that not one company pays that rate due to write offs, tax deductions, and loopholes.
http://taxfoundation.org/artic...