How many redundant players do we need to keep us safe?
I'd suggest starting by questioning the base. Which, if any, is actually contributing significantly* to keeping someone safe?
And then I'd suggest to compare that significance to the investment in money and in degradation of privacy among other rights.
i.e.: If every life saved by HS costs some millions of dollars, it's way more efficient to spend that money in idiot-proofing vending machines and, as an added bonus, the country gets to keep being free.
Which, of course, opens the door to the simplest of international agreements : "I spy on yours, you spy on mine and we can share the results, all legally."
Of course. Here's what the car is. The car is a market. The car is cuttable into unlimited slices. Who gets the car, depends on if they get into the market. Getting into the market guarantees them a slice of the car. This is why Google entered the market. Because of capitalism, gobbling up as much car as possible is always desired, even if it's unnecessary and duplicates what's already out there a million times over.
How YouTube Music Key Will Redefine What We Consider Music
In no way, shape or form.
However, the actual question is quite more interesting:
How will YouTube redefine what THEY consider music, now that they get to ask for money for the items included in their new definition?
Or, in other words, will people be forced to replace the music in their skateboard stunt video with humming and whistling to avoid their video from being paywalled?
The reason for this is people's ignorance. They want the information and they just chose the excuse that's easiest to justify in the current situation.
If the cold war was still on, the reason to ask for all the data would be "communists!". Then it was "Drugs!". Now, it's "Terrorists!". Soon it will be "Pandemia!". Later "Organized crime!". And then "Aliens!".
For each single case of an individual's data being stolen, the current director of Europol and the one in place at the moment of the steal spend a year in prison and Europol pays to the individual $1M plus whatever is stolen from his accounts.
Why the fuck would someone post shit like that under their user account? The mods have already come down on you and there are only two posts as I type this.
Usually because at the moment of writing they found it funny. It happens often when one posts before the first coffee or minutes after leaving the workplace. In the first case, because the humor detectors are still asleep and say to the brain "Yeah, whatever, that's hilarious, go with it.". In the latter case, the thought process is more like "WOHOO! one minute to GO! Everything's great! Everything's fantastic! Share your happiness with the world!"
Drones are so much fun and you can get so many cool photos and video from them.
Yet these morons flying drones near airports are going to ruin it for everyone. Expect to see them heavily regulated or banned soon.
This is why we can't have nice things.:(
Actually, I think someone will find a way to steal them from the air and that will be the end of free roaming drones.
Once people start seeing news of "my drone suddenly took off and left", people will stop attaching $300 cameras to their bellies.
And that's why we can't have nice things unless everybody else has nice things too. Which is the most disregarded part of economic inequality and yes the easiest to sell.
I think Hydrogen energy storage is at 65%-70% nowadays. But you are right, I had forgot about the reverse dams and I think it's easier to sell to the public "We store energy in a very large pool of water." than "We store energy in a very large tank of hydrogen (which fill level is eventually going to be checked by a Darwin award with a lighter.)"
in places like Denmark, the average hour of sunshine in cloudless sky per day is, -- let me be generous and put it as, -- 5 hours a day
I understand we're all geeks here. However, I think we can be expected to have a basic academic knowledge of environmental facts. For example, even though from my basement I may see very little of The Big Fireball in the Sky, I still know, based on YouTube videos, that clouds don't entomb us in pitch darkness.
Including time in the restroom? Bedroom? Annual performance review?
Or, even worse, a combination of those three?
"In February, Mr. AC's restroom visits' length decreased by 50%. This evolution was probably unrelated to that same month's bedroom performance rate: low to very-low. A significant increase from January's performance: Abysmal. Here you can see a video in which his technique has been described by Mrs.AC as 'Uninspired and sad'."
Slashdot Mirror
How is it now obvious to them that this excuse mean nothing after release?
Are they implying they never tested their game on the platforms they specified in the minimum requirements?
Now Philae seems to be sideways and under the shadow of a cliff that only let's it have sunlight 1,5h per 12h cycle.
That amount of sunlight may not be sufficient to keep Philae operating beyond its 60h battery autonomy.
Most info seems to appear first in BBC news
I can't find Precident in the Wiktionary. Is he the guy that governed the country before the current one?
How is he related to 5 cent, the famous rapper you mention?
How many redundant players do we need to keep us safe?
I'd suggest starting by questioning the base. Which, if any, is actually contributing significantly* to keeping someone safe?
And then I'd suggest to compare that significance to the investment in money and in degradation of privacy among other rights.
i.e.: If every life saved by HS costs some millions of dollars, it's way more efficient to spend that money in idiot-proofing vending machines and, as an added bonus, the country gets to keep being free.
Which, of course, opens the door to the simplest of international agreements : "I spy on yours, you spy on mine and we can share the results, all legally."
I don't understand! Do you have a car analogy?
Of course. Here's what the car is. The car is a market. The car is cuttable into unlimited slices. Who gets the car, depends on if they get into the market. Getting into the market guarantees them a slice of the car. This is why Google entered the market. Because of capitalism, gobbling up as much car as possible is always desired, even if it's unnecessary and duplicates what's already out there a million times over.
Those fuckers at WMG would claim all rights to the sound of me taking a shit.
If you find that unfair you clearly don't follow current trends in pop music.
How YouTube Music Key Will Redefine What We Consider Music
In no way, shape or form.
However, the actual question is quite more interesting:
How will YouTube redefine what THEY consider music, now that they get to ask for money for the items included in their new definition?
Or, in other words, will people be forced to replace the music in their skateboard stunt video with humming and whistling to avoid their video from being paywalled?
No.
The reason for this is people's ignorance. They want the information and they just chose the excuse that's easiest to justify in the current situation.
If the cold war was still on, the reason to ask for all the data would be "communists!".
Then it was "Drugs!".
Now, it's "Terrorists!".
Soon it will be "Pandemia!".
Later "Organized crime!".
And then "Aliens!".
I would allow this with one condition.
For each single case of an individual's data being stolen, the current director of Europol and the one in place at the moment of the steal spend a year in prison and Europol pays to the individual $1M plus whatever is stolen from his accounts.
Why the fuck would someone post shit like that under their user account? The mods have already come down on you and there are only two posts as I type this.
Usually because at the moment of writing they found it funny. It happens often when one posts before the first coffee or minutes after leaving the workplace. In the first case, because the humor detectors are still asleep and say to the brain "Yeah, whatever, that's hilarious, go with it.". In the latter case, the thought process is more like "WOHOO! one minute to GO! Everything's great! Everything's fantastic! Share your happiness with the world!"
Drones are so much fun and you can get so many cool photos and video from them.
Yet these morons flying drones near airports are going to ruin it for everyone. Expect to see them heavily regulated or banned soon.
This is why we can't have nice things. :(
Actually, I think someone will find a way to steal them from the air and that will be the end of free roaming drones.
Once people start seeing news of "my drone suddenly took off and left", people will stop attaching $300 cameras to their bellies.
And that's why we can't have nice things unless everybody else has nice things too. Which is the most disregarded part of economic inequality and yes the easiest to sell.
10 years and 317 million miles.
3249439800 itinerary stadia!
https://twitter.com/Philae_MUP...
https://twitter.com/Philae2014
https://twitter.com/esa_rosett...
http://blogs.esa.int/rosetta/
It's the Rosetta spacecraft as seen by the Philae moments after separation.
The decision is absolutely required. The contrary would be cruel.
Why lie to them? There's is no future in IT for a person who is not able to copy code from the internet and pass it as his.
Dr. NO, is that you?
I expect some of those 20221 products to be made of dark matter and powered by dark energy. Brought to you by Dark Helmet on a dark horse.
Also, let's all agree that "Evolution" is an amazingly shitty name for an online black market after "Silk Road", which was pretty inspired.
We should start a campaign to suggest better names for the next instance after Evolution.
I suggest:
The Dark Bazaar
I think Hydrogen energy storage is at 65%-70% nowadays. But you are right, I had forgot about the reverse dams and I think it's easier to sell to the public "We store energy in a very large pool of water." than "We store energy in a very large tank of hydrogen (which fill level is eventually going to be checked by a Darwin award with a lighter.)"
in places like Denmark, the average hour of sunshine in cloudless sky per day is, -- let me be generous and put it as, -- 5 hours a day
I understand we're all geeks here. However, I think we can be expected to have a basic academic knowledge of environmental facts. For example, even though from my basement I may see very little of The Big Fireball in the Sky, I still know, based on YouTube videos, that clouds don't entomb us in pitch darkness.
Including time in the restroom? Bedroom? Annual performance review?
Or, even worse, a combination of those three?
"In February, Mr. AC's restroom visits' length decreased by 50%. This evolution was probably unrelated to that same month's bedroom performance rate: low to very-low. A significant increase from January's performance: Abysmal. Here you can see a video in which his technique has been described by Mrs.AC as 'Uninspired and sad'."
Make hydrogen when the sun shines and the wind blows. Burn hydrogen when it's dark and quiet.
Even with really bad conversion, it's cheaper than maintaining a nuclear plant just for backup.
Basements whiten people.
In 2018 the explosion of the Yellowstone caldera will block the sun for years, killing everything that needs the sun to survive.
Leaving behind only IT professionals.
Thus, Morlocks.
Mr. Wells did build the friggin machine.
Is GNOME going to challenge anyone who calls anything a gnome?
You mean the desktop environment? Or the tablet-based point of sale system.
*shouldn't..
Damn, that typo always sucks.
I hope you're not an BDO (bomb disposal officer).