So much for the idea that politicians effected the will of the people.
What's bizarre at this point is how is it possible that so many people don't already understand that. I think it's sufficiently clear that the government is not a tool for the people and that democracy doesn't allow changing that.
Protests have no effect. Votes have no effect. Terrorism has no effect. This is capitalism, only money has an effect. If you don't have large amounts of money, you are a production machine and your opinion matters as much as that of a cow.
The only way of stopping the absolute power of money in capitalism is revolution. Anything else is fruitless crying.
I've never studied this particular branch of stupidity. What are the arguments to leave the decision about which medical treatments to give a defenseless child to people without medical education? Are they religious?
I'm genuinely curious.
Does it apply to vaccination only? Or in America you can choose not to give other life saving treatments to your children. Seems a bit extreme as birth control system.
The war on the academic sector. One more nail in our coffin.
It's worse than that. It's the next Great American War. The country needs one every decade or it's entire political system crumbles.
The only difference is the movies that will be done about this one. It would be quite nice it China finally switched hollywood from sand war movies to spies, subs and intrigue like in COMMUNISTS! time.
Lol. You don't need the rest of the comment, that's funny enough.
As happens when you watch "Idiocracy" it's funny until you remember how many people actually, seriously, believe that.
I've not personally known any other country wide culture that values its own members so highly.
It might not even be a bad thing if it wasn't for the other side of the coin. "We are mostly good, except for some rotten apples." isn't bad. The problem comes when the subconscious adds "Unlike everybody else."
Is it? When did the competition between countries end in your world?
You do realise that we live quite better in the civilized world and we'd like to keep it that way even if it means enslaving the others and killing those who resist, no?
This is not a pretty world. Stop pretending it is. Any rich country will sooner carpet bomb a poor country that lower it's standard of living to reach the average.
I'd love to know what percentage of surgeons can see 3D images and look at them for hours without getting a headache. Personally I find 2D images much less stressful to look at.
I have so many questions...
What does your parrot think of this?
Is it tiring to walk with a wooden leg?
Do you have a map with a big red X on the spot where you hid you plunder?
Slashdot Mirror
How about the opposite? Filter everything that isn't porn.
"And I believe that if they removed all the porn from the internet, there would only be one web page, and it would be "Bring back the porn!"
I don't see the point in filtering that web page.
as ammo or target?
Yes.
This would be a better world if we just shot all politicians who used the instinct to protect children to push agendas.
So much for the idea that politicians effected the will of the people.
What's bizarre at this point is how is it possible that so many people don't already understand that. I think it's sufficiently clear that the government is not a tool for the people and that democracy doesn't allow changing that.
Protests have no effect. Votes have no effect. Terrorism has no effect. This is capitalism, only money has an effect. If you don't have large amounts of money, you are a production machine and your opinion matters as much as that of a cow.
The only way of stopping the absolute power of money in capitalism is revolution. Anything else is fruitless crying.
There are Viking Robots on Mars?
Nobody else could fight the zombie pirates.
Except the dinosaur ninja, but nobody could find them.
please don't force your kids to infect the rest of the world with your 19th century diseases
So unvaccinated kids infect your vaccinated kids with diseases that they are supposed to be vaccinated?
Yes. Exactly. Some kids can't be vaccinated because of allergies or age. And unvaccinated kids are the cause of some of those kids dying.
It's precisely that simple.
100% for a fact, eh? please cite all the studies proving without a doubt that vaccines don't cause autism.
There you go
Parents have the right to choose treatments for their children under all circumstances.
So if you wan to kill your child you can just wait for the first ilness and then deny him the treatment until he dies?
Abortion laws are just a matter of patience?
risking autism
If you're going to just ignore causality, you might as well be original and not vaccinate your kids to avoid the risk of unicorn abduction.
I would agree for adults but I don't think the innocent kids deserve to suffer for their parents' idiocy.
They will in all cases. Unless they are really lucky and lose their sub-normal parents in an accident.
If your parents are retarded enough to risk your life based on superstition, you're playing life in hard mode.
I've never studied this particular branch of stupidity. What are the arguments to leave the decision about which medical treatments to give a defenseless child to people without medical education? Are they religious?
I'm genuinely curious.
Does it apply to vaccination only? Or in America you can choose not to give other life saving treatments to your children. Seems a bit extreme as birth control system.
*its
(ffs... Back to work as fitting punishment)
The war on the academic sector. One more nail in our coffin.
It's worse than that. It's the next Great American War. The country needs one every decade or it's entire political system crumbles.
The only difference is the movies that will be done about this one. It would be quite nice it China finally switched hollywood from sand war movies to spies, subs and intrigue like in COMMUNISTS! time.
No one eats 3.7M on suspected racism. There has to be more to this.
What's the precise amount of money a government has to invest in a threat for you to consider it as proof that the threat is real?
3M?
2M?
The CIA are americans, thus inherently good.
Lol. You don't need the rest of the comment, that's funny enough.
As happens when you watch "Idiocracy" it's funny until you remember how many people actually, seriously, believe that.
I've not personally known any other country wide culture that values its own members so highly.
It might not even be a bad thing if it wasn't for the other side of the coin. "We are mostly good, except for some rotten apples." isn't bad. The problem comes when the subconscious adds "Unlike everybody else."
Seriously, knowledge is supposed to be shared.
Is it? When did the competition between countries end in your world?
You do realise that we live quite better in the civilized world and we'd like to keep it that way even if it means enslaving the others and killing those who resist, no?
This is not a pretty world. Stop pretending it is. Any rich country will sooner carpet bomb a poor country that lower it's standard of living to reach the average.
There's a clear difference.
The CIA are americans, thus inherently good.
The chinese are:
1 - far.
2 - non white.
3 - non americans.
Thus, they are inherently bad. Now it's just a matter of finding out which kind of bad they are.
Terrorists doesn't seem to match, they are way down on the "terrorist-brown scale". So it's obviously either druglords, or spies.
This month we'll try "SPIES!". It it doesn't stick, we'll try "DRUGLORDS!" next month.
As a last resort, it's always possible to go back to "COMMUNISTS!".
I'd love to know what percentage of surgeons can see 3D images and look at them for hours without getting a headache. Personally I find 2D images much less stressful to look at.
I have so many questions...
What does your parrot think of this?
Is it tiring to walk with a wooden leg?
Do you have a map with a big red X on the spot where you hid you plunder?
What do you mean by YARRR?
I read it as: "Blue Gecko is an 11 year old remote database administrator".
Which looked like the plotline for a really awesome movie about a IT DBadmin gecko. A geecko!
Ayn Rand is not a libertarian, she's an anarchist.
No, she wasn't. At all. Not even close.
We just have to accept that the bad guys are all up in our business and adjust our practices accordingly. We could do it.
And now that we're talking politics...
You can't steal a number! It's not stealing if you still have your copy of the number! It's copyright infringement at the most.
Also, if put them one after the other, they stole a single number!
73
There you are, you can keep that number in exchange. I never liked 73 anyway.
You're welcome.
How long until the american edition?
I want to measure my pressure in hundredths of yoctopounds per square pixie feet.
And, no, I don't know where I'll find a square pixie.
Time Warner, Cablevision -- will they protect their customers from "fishing expeditions"? Will they conduct expeditions of their own?
In cases like this, apply the following reasoning:
- Is the behaviour profittable?
- Is there any way of knowing about the behaviour?
If the answers are Yes and No, assume the behaviour is in course. There is no need to evaluate if it's legal or moral.
Nerds get together and do nerdy stuff en masse!
At least they weren't genetic engineers.
(a get-together of plastic surgeons, on the other hand...)