Slashdot Mirror


FBI Says American Universities Infiltrated by Spies

An anonymous reader writes, using various bits of the article: "While most international students, researchers and professors come to the U.S. for legitimate reasons, universities are an 'ideal place' for foreign intelligence services 'to find recruits, propose and nurture ideas, learn and even steal research data, or place trainees,' according to a 2011 FBI report. Tretyakov was quoted as saying, 'We often targeted academics because their job was to share knowledge and information by teaching it to others, and this made them less guarded than, say, UN diplomats.' China has 'lots of students who either are forced to or volunteer to collect information,' he said. 'I've heard it said, "If it wanted to steal a beach, Russia would send a forklift. China would send a thousand people who would pick up a grain of sand at a time."' China also has more than 3,000 front companies in the U.S. 'for the sole purpose of acquiring our technology,' said former CIA officer S. Eugene Poteat."

418 comments

  1. So it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The war on the academic sector. One more nail in our coffin.

    1. Re:So it begins by Thanshin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The war on the academic sector. One more nail in our coffin.

      It's worse than that. It's the next Great American War. The country needs one every decade or it's entire political system crumbles.

      The only difference is the movies that will be done about this one. It would be quite nice it China finally switched hollywood from sand war movies to spies, subs and intrigue like in COMMUNISTS! time.

    2. Re:So it begins by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      *its

      (ffs... Back to work as fitting punishment)

    3. Re:So it begins by Beorytis · · Score: 0

      Begins?

    4. Re:So it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great now i'm a spy because i am a univ student, and a terrorist because i want to apply that knowledge.

    5. Re:So it begins by daveschroeder · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Your last comment comment about China is interesting:

      The villain in the remake of Red Dawn was actually switched from China (realistic) to North Korea (ridiculous) in order to not upset China (and its movie audiences). I guess the producers figured that "vaguely Asian-looking" actors could just as easily be viewed by American audiences as Korean.

      There is "sand" involved here, though: heads are nestled deeply in it.

      It's interesting that you and the parent AC believe this is somehow a "war on the academic sector". There is indeed a war, but it's not coming from within. First, a backdrop, beginning with the fact that China is on track to exceed US military spending by 2025:

      Chinese Insider Offers Rare Glimpse of U.S.-China Frictions
      http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/03/world/asia/chinese-insider-offers-rare-glimpse-of-us-china-frictions.html

      "The senior leadership of the Chinese government increasingly views the competition between the United States and China as a zero-sum game, with China the likely long-range winner if the American economy and domestic political system continue to stumble, according to an influential Chinese policy analyst. China views the United States as a declining power, but at the same time believes that Washington is trying to fight back to undermine, and even disrupt, the economic and military growth that point to China’s becoming the world’s most powerful country."

      Asia's balance of power: China’s military rise
      http://www.economist.com/node/21552212

      "NO MATTER how often China has emphasised the idea of a peaceful rise, the pace and nature of its military modernisation inevitably cause alarm. As America and the big European powers reduce their defence spending, China looks likely to maintain the past decade’s increases of about 12% a year. Even though its defence budget is less than a quarter the size of America’s today, China’s generals are ambitious. The country is on course to become the world’s largest military spender in just 20 years or so."

      China’s military rise: The dragon’s new teeth
      http://www.economist.com/node/21552193

      And now on to what's happening every day in US academic and business environments:

      How China Steals Our Secrets
      http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/03/opinion/how-china-steals-our-secrets.html

      China's Cyber Thievery Is National Policy—And Must Be Challenged
      http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424052970203718504577178832338032176-lMyQjAxMTAyMDAwOTEwNDkyWj.html

      FBI Traces Trail of Spy Ring to China
      http://online.wsj.com/article_email/SB10001424052970203961204577266892884130620-lMyQjAxMTAyMDAwNzEwNDcyWj.html

      NSA: China is Destroying U.S. Economy Via Security Hacks
      http://www.dailytech.com/NSA+China+is+Destroying+US+Economy+Via+Security+Hacks/article24328.htm

      Former cybersecurity czar: Every major U.S. company has been hacked by China
      http://www.itworld.com/security/262616/former-cybersecurity-czar-every-major-us-company-has-been-hacked-china

      China Att

    6. Re:So it begins by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Educated is dangerous for two reasons.

      1 - the more educated you are the more capable of making BOMBS you are. This educated people who have degrees in science are dangerous.

      2 - the more educated you are the greater resistance to the propaganda bullshit that we need the TSA, Homeland security and the PATRIOT ACT. And that is the most dangerous of them all. Someone that can see through bullshit and think for themselves.

      WE need to round these people up and put them in concentration camps to keep society safe.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    7. Re:So it begins by BLKMGK · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You missed this one http://www.popularmechanics.com/technology/military/news/3319656

      3 years old and as pertinent as ever. I know someone who works in a manufacturing sector for highly specialized parts, China is a customer. It was VERY interesting that they sent a team of 10 to visit their plant to "inspect" and were quite pissed when they weren't given free reign to look around and were only allowed to inspect product in a sanitary room....

      --
      Build it, Drive it, Improve it! Hybridz.org
    8. Re:So it begins by c0lo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As ugly and imperfect as the US may be, don't you think its principles and ideals and those of its allies are worth protecting?

      Yes, with a single condition... that US upholds those ideals and principles and not trample them down... The end does NOT justify the means, especially when the means run contrary to the ends.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    9. Re:So it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The US Army Counter Intelligence Agency estimates that roughly 2/3 of foreign students in the USA are "Assets of their Respective Nation States". (Spies!) Israel is the number one threat. Sorry for those who fear the Asians. China is #2 in the threat category but fast coming up. The solution is quite simple. Get your state legislature to take back from any College or University 110% of the "out of state premium" charged on tuition leaving no incentive of Colleges and Universities to recruit those who come to steal our intellectual property and our national secrets. Once the Colleges don't recruit these people the gate gets a lot higher to load America with spies. At the same time the wage base of America will get a lot better.

    10. Re:So it begins by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 3, Informative

      The simple facts:

      China has more people than the USA
      China has more raw materiel than the USA
      China has more money than the USA
      China has more academics than the USA

      This is a no win situation, unless you are China

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    11. Re:So it begins by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Interesting

      That's true. And wealth is inexorably moving from the West to the East for a variety of reasons.

      But it doesn't have to be a zero-sum game, as China believes it to be.

    12. Re:So it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The villain in the remake of Red Dawn was actually switched from China (ridiculous) to North Korea (ridiculous) [latimes.com] in order to not upset China (and its movie audiences)."

      Fixed that for you.

    13. Re:So it begins by chrism238 · · Score: 1

      It's "Reds under the beds" all over gain.

    14. Re:So it begins by Idarubicin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...China’s generals are ambitious. The country is on course to become the world’s largest military spender in just 20 years or so.

      So a country with four times the population of the United States may match the U.S.'s military spending two decades from now...shocking.

      Look, what exactly did you think was going to happen when China became a developed country with a modern economy and a fully-educated workforce? They're going to have money to spend. When did not having the absolute most-powerful military become a disaster for the U.S.?

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    15. Re:So it begins by ATMAvatar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When did not having the absolute most-powerful military become a disaster for the U.S.?

      Right around the time we decided it was our job to put our fingers into every country's business and to hell with what anyone else thought.

      --
      "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    16. Re:So it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pol Pot had the same idea

    17. Re:So it begins by stedlj · · Score: 1

      China has been at war with us for seventy years, the US just doesn't want to acknowledge it!! We need to wake up!!

    18. Re:So it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China don't need to do this company's like Apple give Communism a rigging endorsement.
      And bring technology to them.

      Job makers my arse. They dont hire us.

      There is not a single bit of data not copied by China in those plants.
      They made a lot of money what did it benefit the 20 30 thousand a year worker common guy and gal in America not one bit.

    19. Re:So it begins by bkaul01 · · Score: 1

      You're assuming that culture and political systems play no role. The USA has major advantages in both areas that continue to more than offset China's advantages in sheer numbers.

    20. Re:So it begins by nedlohs · · Score: 2

      The problem there is that while the US has good university level education, particularly the postgraduate level it has quite poor high school education.

      Making it hard to sustain the university level on the back of that high school education. And of course you would also be killing an earner on the export side of the trade balance.

      Homeland Security could of course do their job with respect to visas and not let the spies in in the first place. Though of course when all the documentation you have on a person comes from the government you suspect of doing the spying that's going to be a rather hard job. And of course we don't want them to stop our spies in return....

    21. Re:So it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1
      China has a culture of top-down control that stifles innovation and frequently punishes people for challenging the status quo. The US has diversity of thought in political, academic, business and industrial sectors, and change regularly unseats established giants - observe, for instance, just to be timely, how Instagram is worth a billion dollars and Kodak is in Chapter 11.

      I'll give the US a fighting chance, if you don't mind.

    22. Re:So it begins by Ihmhi · · Score: 0

      I don't think it will be a "disaster" per se. I see a handful of likely scenarios.

      If China invades us, our allies will likely help us. I don't think most of Europe has forgotten World War II. The layperson considers the landings at Normandy the moment we turned the tide against the Nazis.

      On the other hand, if they don't help us out at all, then maybe we will get our asses kicked. Frankly, for all the shit we do to other countries around the world we really deserve it.

      There's also the possibility of China getting up to speed with us and then doing the same thing we're doing - "Nation building". Sure, we give a damn about certain Asian allies like Taiwan, but what if China invaded a Middle Eastern Country that no one in the West cared about? What if China invaded Uzbekistan or something like that...

      We'd eventually end up in this weird power struggle between Europe, Russia, China, and ourselves. What if the next time our government goes to invade some desert country, China steps in and stops us? Now these poor bastards who have the misfortune of living in Camelfuckistan have to be the battleground for a China vs. U.S. fight, all the while both sides claiming to protect the country they are currently ruining one way or another.

      The only good side I see about it is the potential for one nation to actually be able to give us pause, militarily. One country having as much power as we do in our hands is never a good thing for anyone other than the people who stand to make a lot of money from it.

    23. Re:So it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      2 - the more educated you are the greater resistance to the propaganda bullshit that we need the TSA, Homeland security and the PATRIOT ACT. And that is the most dangerous of them all. Someone that can see through bullshit and think for themselves.

      So you're saying that educated people are more resistant to propaganda? That sounds like bullshit. I'd say they're probably even more susceptible to carefully crafted propaganda due to their self-perceived intellectual superiority to the "common" man. For many decades academics have been lapping up every last drop of anti-American propaganda that comes along and then regurgitating it to their students.

    24. Re:So it begins by cyberchondriac · · Score: 1, Informative

      You had it right the first time. "It's" is a contraction of "it is", which is what you meant.
      "Its" is the proper possessive case, or it simply means plural of "it".
      So much for the academics.. ;)

      --

      Look back up at my post, now look back down, you're on the Internet. Now look back up. I'm a signature.
    25. Re:So it begins by DesScorp · · Score: 5, Informative

      The war on the academic sector. One more nail in our coffin.

      You speak as if this is ridiculous, unprecedented, or illogical. But the Soviets did this for years, poking around in colleges looking for kids ripe for their cause. Take youthful rebellion, gather those youths in a place where that rebellion is nurtured and encouraged, and it's a perfect recipe to recruit. And we're talking about people that are young enough to be angry but not old enough to be worldly or wise, smart and capable and yet putty in the hands of those that know what they're doing. Perfect place to find passionate recruits ready to fight "the system".

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    26. Re:So it begins by DesScorp · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The simple facts:

      China has more people than the USA
      China has more raw materiel than the USA
      China has more money than the USA
      China has more academics than the USA

      This is a no win situation, unless you are China

      China does not have more money than the US. They're not even the number one economy yet (though they're projected by some to be so by 2016). Also, China has a huge problem. While they've made great strides in bettering their economy, out of their 1+ billion people, the vast majority are still poor. I mean really poor, not American Poor with cable TV, cell phones, free school lunch for the kids, and two cars. There's beginning to be some problems with envy among their rural populace. And China has some financial issues in the structure of their economy that could be quite catastrophic, at least in the long term. So yes, China is our biggest potential adversary, but things are not perfect in the Middle Kingdom either, and it's going to get very interesting there.

      --
      Life is hard, and the world is cruel
    27. Re:So it begins by DigiShaman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      China is not American. Mock the culture, but the USA is where it's at precisely because they're American.

      China is also competing in a region with relatively new found global powers. The BRIC union could fall apart at the slightest provocation from one of it's neighbors. It's only held together by common interests...for now.

      Will America lose it's #1 position in the world in terms of GDP and growth? Perhaps. But assuming politics and our currency doesn't implode (which it might), the nation is rather stabile. China is stabile too. But it's stability is held together by force. Smooth and polished. But also prone to minor cracks which leads into major fissures. China's political system is simply not sustainable in the modern world of high speed communication.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    28. Re:So it begins by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1

      The USA has less people, and much more arable land.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    29. Re:So it begins by UltimaBuddy · · Score: 2

      Begins? Anti-intellectualism has been around since there have been intellectuals.

    30. Re:So it begins by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Funny how none of your links support the idea that universities should be protected from Chinese spies. It almost sounds like the fact that they might actually LEARN something there is not really surprising!

      As ugly and imperfect as the US may be, don't you think its principles and ideals and those of its allies are worth protecting?

      The problem arises when in the name of protecting principles and ideals, processes and procedures are enacted that kill off those exact principles and ideals.

      And that's exactly what is happening right now. What good is it to fight a war, when fighting the war means you are the same as your enemy?

      By the way, China holds another lesson that is far more important than all this handwringing about Communists (which they really aren't): that even if you conquer a country, you might not actually conquer the people. And that's really all that matters.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    31. Re:So it begins by russotto · · Score: 1

      If China invades us, our allies will likely help us. I don't think most of Europe has forgotten World War II. The layperson considers the landings at Normandy the moment we turned the tide against the Nazis.

      If China invades us, it's the US, Canada (which would help out of self-interest if nothing else), and the UK. The rest of Europe won't lift a hand, and there will probably be a lot of sentiment about how we had it coming from France and Spain.

      Of course, first China has to defeat the US Navy (they're building up, but they've got a long way to go). And they have to consider whether we'd go nuclear on them.

    32. Re:So it begins by timeOday · · Score: 2

      So finish your story. Did that oh-so-insidious strategy work out pretty well for the Soviet Empire?

    33. Re:So it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    34. Re:So it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "NO MATTER how often China has emphasised the idea of a peaceful rise, the pace and nature of its military modernisation inevitably cause alarm."

      Not because we have to worry about their long term international political dominance. What we really have to worry about is the Chinese dominating the manufacture of weapons. IF their industrial sector attacks our international weapons business, we'll never be able to repay the debt we owe to China.

    35. Re:So it begins by cjcela · · Score: 2

      In the long term, and if not corrected, the unequal distribution of wealth in the US will be a major factor for our country decline. In a sense, the people with power to decide is playing against our own country, because their personal interests conflict with the common interests. 50 years from now we will look back and wonder how could we have been so blind.

    36. Re:So it begins by grep_rocks · · Score: 1

      No big deal, my company exports its R&D and manufacturing to China anyway - we in the US are only upset about Chinese students because the no CEO gets a bonus or stock options in exchange for the technology.

    37. Re:So it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      China has more people than the USA
      useless unless you can deploy them, plenty of highly populated nations have been vanquished by those with inferior populations. (mongolia vs China, Greece vs Persia, ect)
      China has more raw materiel than the USA
      Where did you read this? China has few domestic energy sources and even less good agro land hence their fever pitched endeavor to acquire resources abroad. China's endowment of resources per person is much lower than canada, US, and Australia.
      China has more money than the USA Even in our debt this is not true yet. This may come to pass but only if we stand by and let it. And even then the US has beat plenty of much wealthier nations in open war. (spain, germany, Britain) Also consider that any fate the US has will be shared by china. They are our biggest investor and we are their biggest customer. Both nations will rise and fall economically in tandem unless the symbiotic relationship changes in the future..
      China has more academics than the USA Which is why they are the world leaders in innovation.... oh wait thats right they arent. As it stands all the best academics still come west for work. Western approaches to thinking have consistently proven more innovative than their more oppressed brethren.

    38. Re:So it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct that the Chinese government is not our friend, and we should not be naive about that.

      For a long time, what appeared to separate the US from the rest of the world was a blend of access to resources, a well educated populace, a superb military, and a rough approximation of capitalism and democracy. A few of those have been eroded, but more importantly, the West no longer has a monopoly on those things. We should be glad of this, it means we did something right and other countries have decided to learn and grow, to the benefit of millions of people all over the world.

      We also have a bit of a problem - we aren't invincible and just as we've lost the monopoly on those advantages our government / population has decided that in order to stay secure, it is acceptable to make sacrifices on our core values. Freedom, justice, integrity, and a government that respects it's role as a servant to the citizen sovereign. We aren't a disaster, but Americans don't want to avoid being a disaster. We want to excel.

      At some level, this country is supposed to be living proof that it doesn't matter if you have a lot of resources, education, money, a big army and a government that knows how to maintain power; if you don't also take the values of Freedom, Justice, Integrity - if you don't have a government that is out to serve the people according to those values, then America will win by every measure you can think of to such an extent as to embarrass your leaders and inspire your dissidents. And if we fail to deliver on those values with excellence, giving them up for security theatre, bank bailouts, special interest money in congress, paranoid spying and regulation of every citizen, etc., then we deserve to lose and the world loses with us.

      I don't want us to lose, but America was never about our borders or the color or religion of it's people, nor was it about having the most toys or the brightest students. We need to insist not just being more than just "not so bad" in the areas of Freedom, Justice, Integrity on every level. Victory by any other method is no victory at all.

    39. Re:So it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've quoted some of your comment, specifically the links, in an attempt to dissuade my company from doing business with China. Hopefully, they don't insist on learning the hard way.

    40. Re:So it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mock the culture, but the USA is where it's at precisely because they're American.

      I'm not disagreeing with you about the differences between the USA and China, but the USA is where it is, because world war two bombed all industrial nations back to the stone age.

    41. Re:So it begins by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      IF some words, we'll never be able to repay the debt we owe to China.

      What do you mean, if? Of course, US will never be able to repay its debt. Not just to China, to anyone. The only reason why this is tolerated, is because US predictably issues its debt, so it can be used a a currency. Not unlike sea shell used as a currency -- they do not correspond to any value, but there is a predictable supply of them, so with expected inflation they are better than things that are less predictable.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    42. Re:So it begins by BinarySolo · · Score: 1

      Agreed - the distribution of wealth in China makes 1%-ers look like child's play. As you mention, this is creating a ticking social time bomb as people inevitably harbor envy and resentment.

      Another serious problem they have is the one-child policy creating major social issues. The obvious one is the gender ratio, which was something like 56% male last I heard. That means over 20% of guys are left out in the cold. Then there are less obvious things like how you now have 2 parents and 4 grandparents all focusing their attention on raising a single kid. This is creating a generation of incredibly spoiled and entitled children. The flip side of this is that a single person may have to support his parents and grandparents when they are older which is a not insignificant financial burden.

      The bottom line is that China might have a promising economy from an outsider's perspective, but their society is massively dysfunctional. They might be able to be successful for a short period of time but in my opinion they are not built for long term success.

    43. Re:So it begins by Alex+Belits · · Score: 0

      Yes. Over millennia of their history they never pulled a small fraction of the shit US pulled over the last fifty years.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    44. Re:So it begins by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't something like the Normandy night air-drops be sufficient?

      If you have paratroopers penetrating via several hundred or several thousand small transports, I doubt you are going to be able to shoot them all down.

    45. Re:So it begins by FhnuZoag · · Score: 2

      Maybe the absence of a global steward is better than the US.

    46. Re:So it begins by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      For many decades academics have been lapping up every last drop of anti-American propaganda that comes along and then regurgitating it to their students.

      Actually they are the source of it.
      Because it's true.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    47. Re:So it begins by Alex+Belits · · Score: 2

      No, only since intellectuals started questioning religion.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    48. Re:So it begins by FhnuZoag · · Score: 1

      If the China invades the US, it's global thermonuclear war. Then it wouldn't matter at all who wins or not and what the military budgets are.

      Even if China wins and there is mysteriously no nuclear exchange, what exactly do they win? A country full of unproductive, rebellious mouths to feed, without any resources to covet, that previously was doing perfectly well buying their iPads... The status quo is the most favourable status for China. As far as I can see, the only even slightly plausible scenario for future war would be started by the US.

    49. Re:So it begins by sadboyzz · · Score: 2

      Yes, because the 1.3 billion Chinese are a borg-like entity, collectively known as "China", sharing a single hive mind and bent on a single purpose -- to destroy the US and the "West"!

      Your fantasies aside, what you refer to as "China" is really the Chinese Communist Government, the current ruling entity in the country known as China. It has been in power for a little over 60 years, and unless helped by, ironically, people like you, it is extremely unlikely to see another 60 in power. (Coincidentally, the communists would never even have risen to power in the first place without the help of the Japanese invasion at a crucial point in the Chinese civil war http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_March )

      But yes, I guess China isn't really a threat, and doesn't view the West as a threat

      If China really does view the West as threat, it is only because the history of the past one hundred and fifty years taught it to:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opium_Wars
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Old_Summer_Palace#Destruction_of_the_Summer_Palace
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shandong_Problem

      As ugly and imperfect as the US may be, don't you think its principles and ideals and those of its allies are worth protecting?

      Oh please....

    50. Re:So it begins by ultranova · · Score: 1

      As ugly and imperfect as the US may be, don't you think its principles and ideals and those of its allies are worth protecting?

      Well, I dunno. All I know is that as an European, I'd rather trust the Internet and the world to be managed by the US than the EU, UN or my own government. That First Amendment thing balances out a lot of bullshit.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    51. Re:So it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "it's [sic] entire political system"

    52. Re:So it begins by daveschroeder · · Score: 1

      I think that's the problem with the notion that "our rights are being taken away to defend them."

      How so, PROVABLY? By that I mean, not things one THINKS the government is doing, or things one THINKS are "illegal" — but actual, provable, demonstrable ways that rights are being taken away.

      What, substantively, less can you do today that you could do "before 9/11"? Twenty years ago? Fifty? How have YOUR rights been curtailed in an actual meaningful, specific, describable way?

      What can you, in real terms, NOT do now that you could do in, say, 1992?

      The trouble is that there is a lot of vague talk about, "Papers, please!", 1984, fascism, a police state, and so on, but the reality is simply that we find out more about government faster than ever before.

      But what about...[insert ANYTHING here: The PATRIOT Act, the TSA, "warrantless wiretapping", wars, perceived government abuse]? None of this — NONE — is anything new to the United States before or after 9/11. Yes the names and controversies are new, but the fact that controversy exists, the fact that abuses, real or perceived, exist — none of this is anything new. We just hear about it, faster, and in greater detail than ever before, and it enters an echo-chamber where people believe that our nation is really at a magical turning point and that we're teetering on the edge of becoming a "fascist" police state, if it hasn't already occurred. (I hope those people never have to experience actual fascism or police states.)

      I'm not saying we're perfect, I'm not saying mistakes aren't made, and I'm not saying we as a people can't always be vigilant and strive to make our nation better. What I am saying is that the ideals we stand for don't protect and preserve themselves. How you interpret that statement is up to you — but I hope people realize that there are very real threats that don't come from within, and that we didn't create, and we need to have some level of effectiveness to counter them.

    53. Re:So it begins by tftp · · Score: 1

      Even if China wins and there is mysteriously no nuclear exchange, what exactly do they win? A country full of unproductive, rebellious mouths to feed, without any resources to covet, that previously was doing perfectly well buying their iPads...

      If I were the Chinese leader who is planning such an invasion:

      • This conquest is all about land and resources, not people.
      • Cooperating ex-Americans will be permitted to live, as long as they are useful.
      • All other ex-Americans will be killed.
      • A small number of Chinese (say, 100-200 million) will be sent to populate the new land. The restriction of one child per family will be lifted from them.
    54. Re:So it begins by StopKoolaidPoliticsT · · Score: 1

      As time goes on, the US seems to resemble the Soviet Union more and more - obsessed with global expansion, spying on its citizens, increasing government control over them, etc.

      Spying isn't just about gathering information and such to bring home, it's also about influencing others from the inside through the effective use of propaganda.

      --
      Stop Koolaid Politics
    55. Re:So it begins by StopKoolaidPoliticsT · · Score: 2

      I also meant to add that former Soviet Ambassador Anatoly Fyodorovich Dobrynin wrote a book where he said less than 20% of Soviet spy activity went into trying to get state secrets/military technology, while most of their effort went into trying to boost the 60s counter-culture movement and, in particular, take over the education system so that children could be indoctrinated to accept Soviet style socialism as dogmatic truth so they could defeat us without firing a weapon in the long run.

      --
      Stop Koolaid Politics
    56. Re:So it begins by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Maybe the absence of a global steward is better than the US.

      That's not an option anymore. The world has gotten small; with the whole world less than a second away communication-wise and less than a day travel-wise, the strongest country or country-like entity (EU?) can rule it. And with natural resources getting scarce, there's plenty of incentive to.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    57. Re:So it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He was probably referring to the "it's" in reference to "it's entire political system" in the following sentence.

    58. Re:So it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I completely agree! If you went to college or are in college, you are obviously a terrorist trying to subvert the American way. Lets throw any and all educated people into concentration camps and let the country be ruled by the ignorant. Wait.. the country already is ruled by the ignorant. Oh well

    59. Re:So it begins by lightknight · · Score: 2

      Precisely the point -> spies are two-way corridors.

      For example: you're a Soviet lad who is in the US, studying at University. Your minders have asked you to pick up a few technologies of interest, and have made vague threats, directed at family members, should you fail to complete your quest. Being a good citizen, having attended all the 'right' schools, and attended party meetings, you agree to the task. During your stay, however, you start to enjoy living in the US. Perhaps it's the part where the CIA is a little less belligerent than the KGB, perhaps it's the fact that you have freedom of speech (you can speak your mind, and not worry about someone writing it down in a file somewhere), perhaps it's the weather (winters in Moscow can be harsh), or the supermarkets (food, on demand, and lots of choices). Whatever the case, you slowly begin questioning your commitments back home: you start thinking how nice it would be if you could stay here.

      So, you make one of the following choices: to return to your country, or to work to bring your family over. If you return, your minders will get some information, but they also have to deal with someone who knows, first-hand, the depth of their lies: if you're morally casual, then you may be happy with the lies, and work to continue them while profiting; if you're not, then you slowly work to introduce some of the concepts you've experienced first-hand into your native land. If you stay, you have to quietly get your family out of harm's way, which is a difficult task at best, but the CIA, supposedly, can pull things off, provided it's worth it to them (like every intelligence agency, they love defectors from the other side).

      --
      I am John Hurt.
    60. Re:So it begins by jpapon · · Score: 1

      there is a predictable supply of them, so with expected inflation they are better than things that are less predictable.

      Isn't that the case with every currency? Even gold is only valuable because we assume that only so much of it will be mined every year...

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    61. Re:So it begins by jpapon · · Score: 1

      The air drops are useless unless you can back them up with a landing force, which has to come by sea. If the Navy cuts off the main landing force, the paratroopers will be mopped up in a matter of days, weeks at most.

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    62. Re:So it begins by jpapon · · Score: 1

      And you would wind up with a massive quagmire of American freedom fighters and massive Chinese import-immigrant starvation as the Great Plains burn. Has there ever been a war where the victor simply eliminates the locals and brings in a new set of locals?

      --
      -- Let us endeavor so to live that when we pass even the undertaker shall be sorry. -- M. Twain
    63. Re:So it begins by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Culture, sure (Americans tend to be pretty innovative). Political systems? You've got to be kidding. All the infighting we do here with our political systems is a huge drain on our productivity and competitiveness. Don't forget our crappy IP laws that severely hamper innovation; these laws are products of our broken political systems. China doesn't have these problems: the government works for the good of the nation there (and to the detriment of everyone outside the nation of course). You don't see China's government trying to quash science or push religion over science, but over here our political systems are doing just that, trying to push fundamentalist religion in schools and quash science, which is the very thing that drives our technological innovation.

    64. Re:So it begins by tftp · · Score: 1

      And you would wind up with a massive quagmire of American freedom fighters

      This scenario often comes up in various discussions of TEOTWAWKI. If we talk about the US Army against the US population, there are known issues (americans are unwilling to fight their own relatives and neighbors.) However in case of foreign invasion the invading forces will not be merciful. Then the freedom fighters will have to be fierce as well - but will there be enough of them to fight a large, well equipped Chinese army? China would need US lands to grow crops. There would be a strong incentive to stay.

      With regard to the total war, yes, it had been attempted. Nazis eliminated whole villages on suspicion of support of partizanen. Many more were shipped to concentration camps. I don't want to say that China is likely to repeat this, but as a discussion point it is possible, technically. Nazis fell because they were exhausted, out of men and out of resources. It would take a lot of war to exhaust China.

      Of course in practicality, if such a conquest is ever to happen, there will be no total elimination of locals. However the principle of usefulness - the same one that determined who lives and who dies on Nazi-occupied lands - will remain. If some US people are not willing to work the fields they will be shot right there, and their bodies will be buried on the spot as fertilizer.

      In such a conquest of course a good deal of US people will gather their hunting weapons and head for the hills. From there they can annoy the invaders, just as Afghans did (and still do.) But they are not winning the land back, and they are not winning the control back. The invading forces would only need to wait them out. Guerillas need supplies - food, ammo, medicines, information, communications. In World War II that was provided by USSR by airdrops. In Afghan wars that was provided by Pakistan. Without supplies guerillas will not last long, and if the invader takes control over most of the country there will be nobody close enough to help. Guerillas will die out, of natural causes, in a few years.

    65. Re:So it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "It's interesting that you and the parent AC believe this is somehow a "war on the academic sector". There is indeed a war, but it's not coming from within. "

      Didn't the US have a war on the academic sector with Germany back in the 1930's and 40's.

      I mean rockets didn't appear out of thin air a NASA.

    66. Re:So it begins by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      Maybe, but then again Germany had forces deployed everywhere. 99% of the time military forces in America are either on base or at home.

      I honestly think they would cause more damage than you expect. What if they airdropped near an airport or other piece of important structure? They can do the sort of damage that can harm the local (or national!) economy for months, if not years.

      I just don't like this talk of "the military will stop them before they get here". It is entirely possible for them to get here before we can do anything about it and cause a lot of damage.

    67. Re:So it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did not having the absolute most-powerful military become a disaster for the U.S.?

      Right around the time we decided it was our job to put our fingers into every country's business and to hell with what anyone else thought.

      So pretty much right after WWII.

    68. Re:So it begins by russotto · · Score: 1

      I just don't like this talk of "the military will stop them before they get here". It is entirely possible for them to get here before we can do anything about it and cause a lot of damage.

      If they just want to cause a lot of damage, there's no need to send people; nukes will do just fine. If they want to control territory, they're going to need an invasion route and supply line across the Pacific.

    69. Re:So it begins by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      and quite a bit of that millatery spending is for internal control its not like they have a big blue water navy yet.

    70. Re:So it begins by alambda · · Score: 2

      No, USA is not where it is simply because it is American.

      The Western culture, as derived from Europe, is not The Universal culture, a precondition to civilization. At a glance you might think it is, as it has been the dominant culture for the past two hundred years or so, but this has more to do with luck and coincidence than with the values of ancient greece. Indeed, until the 18th century China was the GDP leader, by far, and even it's GDP per capita in the major cities surpassed that of any European city.

      China has the longest-running statecraft in history. I don't expect this to be replaced by any other system anytime soon. Take Japan, which you might think is a Western country, but had you lived there, you'd quickly realize it's not. In Japan, from where I'm currently writing this comment from, the important values are not those of democracy and justice, but that of harmony. This manifests in a multitude of forms, some difficult or long to explain, but if you look at numbers, most court cases are settled out of the court, to keep harmony, to avoid conflict. See the voter turnouts, and you'll see Japan is not really a properly functioning democracy, although on paper it is. The government is seen in a completely different light. This all is even more true in China, which has had less Western influence on it than Japan.

      Economic growth, modernization is not synonymous to Westernization. You are wrong to expect China to change to more Western values as it modernizes. In fact, quite the opposite might take place: The big global co-operation organizations, such as the IMF, were all spawned by the economic leaders, namely the West, at the time; pushing Western culture, brainwashing people to think that to have all the modern marvels, also the culture should change to resemble that of the West. Now when China is going to be No. 1, don't you think the opposite is going to happen, G7 has already largely been replaced by G20...

    71. Re:So it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So...
      You cherry-picked every article that was somehow suspicious of or outright blaming China for the US's woes, and made it sound like a credible military and economic threat to the US in a the near future. China is a big company, with a lot of people, and their rise, fast or slow will have a large effect on the world - that's true. They are playing fast and loose with some rules, written and unwritten - that's true too. But I can give you some other facts:

      When China became "The Worls's 2nd Largest Economy(tm)", everyone made a big deal about it, but keep in mind that this is GDP they're talking about, which means:
      1. That's counting their artificially inflated RMB that is currently deflating because the Chinese government/central can't prop it up any more.
      2. Those numbers are calculated at the country level. China has around 10 times the population of Japan and has just barely surpassed it in economic output.

      Economy:
      The per-capita income of China is something like $6,000 USD per year in purchase-parity dollars. (Taking into account cost of living differences (Actually much less at current exchange rates). This is much, much less than Japan or the US. And their currency is devaluing. They won't be able to stop it by buying up US treasuries for much longer. And they are starting to experience massive inflation as an effect of the growth they have had. And the disparity in income levels is very high between the haves and have-nots. Much higher than the US and even more so when compared to Japan. There are a small super wealthy people, and a large majority of super poor people - with a much smaller percentage of "middle class" than developed countries. And their growth is starting to slow down as lower cost countries like Thailand and Vietnam steal their lunch for low cost manufacturing of simple items - but they can't yet compete with Japan and Korea for state-of-the-art manufacturing either. (Hence the recent deal between Foxxcon and Sharp).

      Then there is the dismal state of healthcare for the average person, etc.

      They have a lot of internal problems to worry about before trying to attack everyone else.

      And military spending? They may be "increasing at 12% per year", but that's easy to do when they are spending so much lower to start with. Have you seen their military? They actually aren't well funded. They aren't well trained. They are low tech., and most importantly, they have no experience. Seriously? Not a threat, not any time soon. China has lost almost every conflict it has ever gotten into.

      We should hope China is successful, because a desperate animal is more dangerous. (like North Korea....)

    72. Re:So it begins by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I thought that record belonged to Ethiopia. But yes, China ranks among the highest. At any rate, none of them have managed to accomplish a running streak of multiple western (European) nations people settling on "new" land, displacing the natives, creating states, forming a union with a fully functional democratic republic government and....place man on the moon. All within the span of a few hundred years. No single nation on Earth can claim such progress in such a short period of time. It has everything to do with western culture and values. The fact China (and we should define what parts exactly) is ancient is one of the major reasons for it being held back. It has constantly been ruled by dynasties and so therefore the cultural momentum is carried forward to this day.

      Now I'm not suggesting Western values will be the model going forward. Human nature is all about the control over other peoples lives. So who knows. Maybe America was some random fluke of an experiment that will never be repeated again. But there's no mistaking the facts. Western values and culture is truly a model to emulate if you value individual freedom and rapid progress.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    73. Re:So it begins by bkaul01 · · Score: 1

      Go and learn about 20th century history, paying special attention to the distinctions between free democratic societies and those with totalitarian Communist regimes. As for your attempt at trolling with religion vs science, I'll simply note that it's not only a false dichotomy, but your facts are all wrong there too.

    74. Re:So it begins by lsatenstein · · Score: 1

      That's true. And wealth is inexorably moving from the West to the East for a variety of reasons.

      But it doesn't have to be a zero-sum game, as China believes it to be.

      When you are an American immigrating to China, you are welcome. You adjust to the ways of the country, and because of who you are, where you came from, and what you bring, you live many many times better than if you remained in your own state.

      --
      Leslie Satenstein Montreal Quebec Canada
    75. Re:So it begins by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Actually the whole problem with gold is that there is a very small amount of it available, compared to the total amount of currency that covers all world's trade and investment. If used as the currency of for backing of all currency, it would become ridiculously expensive, so all industry that uses gold as a material, would suffer. Compared to this, "fake debt" is a lesser evil, but eventually it will have to be replaced with something more trustworthy.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    76. Re:So it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says the disgruntled college dropout (or highschool dropout) who couldn't "make the grade".

    77. Re:So it begins by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      less than 20% of Soviet spy activity went into trying to get state secrets/military technology

      Yeah, I think it was because the Soviets didn't trust our open sources, they couldn't believe we would let so much real information leak out like a sieve.

      sr

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    78. Re:So it begins by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      The obvious one is the gender ratio, which was something like 56% male last I heard. That means over 20% of guys are left out in the cold

      or enlisted as ideal cannon fodder for the Great Peoples Army

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    79. Re:So it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the MOST insightful comments i have read.

    80. Re:So it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China has three trillion US dollars in its reserves - it could have bought the US after the 2008 meltdown and the only reason it didn't sell dollars was because it would have weakened the currency and thus devalued their stake in it.

    81. Re:So it begins by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      China has a huge internal debt, is not politically stable in long term ( Multicultural empire masquerading as a nation state), is heavily polluted and is hugely dependent on continued economic growth. The present economic conditions favour countries like India and China, but only as long as the costs of labour are significantly lower. As Chinese develop a middle class and grow richer, costs of production ( and of doing business) will rise. Also, when bellies are full(er), people will demand their rights.

  2. underestimated and decades late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This was a headline for the 1960's. Today its much, much worse - and sadly only now noticed. 3,000 companies? Only? And how many tens of thousands of grain-pickers? China, Iran, you name it - the US and the West are over-run....

    1. Re:underestimated and decades late by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This was a headline for the 1960's. Today its much, much worse - and sadly only now noticed. 3,000 companies? Only? And how many tens of thousands of grain-pickers? China, Iran, you name it - the US and the West are over-run....

      Since the 1960s? The Cambridge Five were recruited at university back in the 1930s. This sort of thing has probably been going on as long as there have been universities. I bet the Romans infiltrated Greek universities to steal their latest catapult technology.

      --
      Only to idiots, are orders laws.
      -- Henning von Tresckow
    2. Re:underestimated and decades late by Luckyo · · Score: 2, Informative

      Almost as if US didn't have far more front companies, students in exchange programs and "N"GOs. for stealing from other nations. This is a norm, and intelligence war for tech has been ongoing for centuries at the very least.

    3. Re:underestimated and decades late by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Insightful

      And the simple fact is i'm sure we do the same thing duh! Universities are where one often begins to question the way things are for the first time. You are a young adult, in some ways grown and others not, and many cling to idealism before that lovely jaded cynicism that so many of us have seeps in. Remember its a lot harder to recruit someone who just blindly accepts things at face value, easier when they begin to question why things are the way they are. I do find it ironic that the same things that help someone grow as a person can be labeled as "potentially subversive" depending on which flag you are waving.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    4. Re:underestimated and decades late by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      This just in: The USA has spies in other countries!

      --
      No sig today...
    5. Re:underestimated and decades late by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      what's the difference between a legitimate branch of a chinese corporation vs. one of those 3000 out to steal tech and success? friggin nothing.

      universities used to spread information to people who come to the unversity! news at 12:00!

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:underestimated and decades late by wisty · · Score: 2

      The difference is, Chinese don't often have handlers. They aren't generally spies, but know that if they can knock fo some IP, they can be very successful in a Chinese university.

      This is not too different from what other academics do - it's quite common for academics to leave with a USB stick full of the stuff they were working on, which they use in their next gig.

      I guess there might be some more active encouragement in strategic stuff.

    7. Re:underestimated and decades late by flyneye · · Score: 1

      Funny, it was the commie professors turning out commie students back then too.
      Fewer Chinese, but more hippies.
      Guess they gave up on using LSD to get some harmony going. Too bad,I guess expanding their minds doesn't work as well as dumbing them down.

      --
      *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
    8. Re:underestimated and decades late by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, the Romans conquered Greece and stole all their academics wholesale. But Greece had the last laugh because all these academics captured by the Romans became tutors who raised the next generation of Roman elite to in the image of Greece. Roman mythology and culture became Greek in all but name only. History can repeat again. All these Chinese academics coached in USA go back with a lot more culture acclimatization than the stolen grains of sand. In the end China might become America in all but name.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    9. Re:underestimated and decades late by mbone · · Score: 2

      This is not too different from what other academics do - it's quite common for academics to leave with a USB stick full of the stuff they were working on, which they use in their next gig.

      Yeah, because they wrote it.

    10. Re:underestimated and decades late by couchslug · · Score: 2

      I don't find it ironic. If my job were industrial espionage I'd be all over the low-hanging fruit. Hormonal youth whose bullshit filters only work in ONE direction are vulnerable to "affirmation exploits".

      I believe in "putting on your OPFOR hat" and considering what you'd do if you were the other guy/gal.

      "Remember its a lot harder to recruit someone who just blindly accepts things at face value, easier when they begin to question why things are the way they are"

      But harder yet again to recruit someone wise enough to trust NO ONE and to QUESTION EVERYTHING. "Lovely jaded cynicism" is HEALTHY. Innocence/ignorance is praised only because we are taught to admire it from a _religious_ perspective where being a chump is valued by mullahs (of whatever superstition). In other news, hyena value slow zebra...

      If you wish to exploit the orthodox "blindly accepting" you can use what they blindly accept. If you appeal to the naive ignorant yearnings of youth, you use their need for affirmation by a "counter-culture" to exploit what they "blindly accept".

      Nothing unusual, and done before every election.

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    11. Re:underestimated and decades late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      All these Chinese academics coached in USA go back with a lot more culture acclimatization than the stolen grains of sand. In the end China might become America in all but name.

      Very insightful observation. In many ways, that is already happening.

      This process of bridging the gap between big empires/civilizations/cultures may still be more desirable than conquering and wars for world domination. One can only hope that smart people involved in these kind of "exchange" would have a tendency to take and spread the good things from all sides.

    12. Re:underestimated and decades late by boristdog · · Score: 1

      Exactly. This has been going on forever.

      In college back in the 1980's some girls I knew were completely smitten with an older Russian male student who organized all sorts of anti-Reagan demonstrations, and they helped him out. I wasn't a huge Reagan fan, but I did think something was odd about the situation.

      After the collapse of the USSR he stayed in the US and one of the women found out he had been paid by the USSR all along. She said she felt so "used." I just laughed my ass off.

    13. Re:underestimated and decades late by ceoyoyo · · Score: 1

      They leave with the stuff they were working on because it's theirs. They also share it with the world because that's what academia does.

    14. Re:underestimated and decades late by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      And the simple fact is i'm sure we do the same thing duh!

      I think it would be harder for a Westerner to ship home Chinese information than a Chinese person to ship home Western information.

      Despite the last ten years or so of us dumping civil rights into the shitter, the United States is still a pretty free place to live. Asians aren't viewed with the same irrational suspicion as blacks, latinos, or arabs by the police AFAIK.

      Moreover, there's a cultural difference. Imagine the new potential for sleeper agents. I imagine the Chinese would be willing to settle down, lead perfectly suspicion-free lives, have kids, and then have their children infiltrate the system 20 years down the line. It's pretty much impossible to detect without a hell of a lot of oppressive surveillance and/or a lot of institutional racism.

    15. Re:underestimated and decades late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually China is already much more 'American' then most people think. Communism in China only exists in name, the country is basically supercapitalist. Safety nets do exist but are much closer to American style then European 'socialism'. If you look at issues of environment, income division, military investments, etc we are looking at a bolder version of America II, not Europe II

    16. Re:underestimated and decades late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even communism is a western idea. There's very little chinese culture left in China.

    17. Re:underestimated and decades late by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      Despite the last ten years or so of us dumping civil rights into the shitter, the United States is still a pretty free place to live. Asians aren't viewed with the same irrational suspicion as blacks, latinos, or arabs by the police AFAIK.

      Well, another thing in their favor....the Orientals do seem to have better and healthier food to offer us...

      I'll have to give a VERY close #2 to the Latinos however.....it is good, but not very high on the health scale.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    18. Re:underestimated and decades late by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      If China is going to become like US, I should better go back to Russia to deal with both your train wrecks.

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    19. Re:underestimated and decades late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      By the time that will happen, Russia - which is already a train wreck - might probably just stop smoldering.

    20. Re:underestimated and decades late by tftp · · Score: 1

      All these Chinese academics coached in USA go back with a lot more culture acclimatization than the stolen grains of sand. In the end China might become America in all but name.

      Yes and no. Yes because foreign students indeed learn the US culture, ideals and traditions. No because they are likely to take home only the best parts of it. Freedom of * ? Yes, please. Drugs? No. 2nd Amendment? Hopefully. Racism? No way. And so on.

      In the end you may end up with many Chinese, back at home, who are somewhat US-centric. However it's important to ask "What US?" they are centered around. Chances are that this will be an idealized USA of Founding Fathers, and not the current diseased body. If those Chinese want to build the idealized USA as envisioned hundreds of years ago, more power to them.

    21. Re:underestimated and decades late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1 truth

    22. Re:underestimated and decades late by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

      the funny thing is Rusia for a long time though the Cambridge five where a plot by Mi5 - as they where to good to be true.

    23. Re:underestimated and decades late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There was definitely a catapult gap!

    24. Re:underestimated and decades late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This was a headline for the 1960's. Today its much, much worse - and sadly only now noticed. 3,000 companies? Only? And how many tens of thousands of grain-pickers? China, Iran, you name it - the US and the West are over-run....

      Since the 1960s? The Cambridge Five were recruited at university back in the 1930s. This sort of thing has probably been going on as long as there have been universities. I bet the Romans infiltrated Greek universities to steal their latest catapult technology.

      Nope, they captured the Greek institutors and forced them to TEACH...

    25. Re:underestimated and decades late by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Famous playwrite Christopher Marlowe was a spy while in college, he was a contemporary of Shakespeare's.

  3. Russian spy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The first russian spy is Sergey Brin for sure!

  4. World Responds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Virtually all of us are infested with CIA. What's the problem?

    1. Re:World Responds by Thanshin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's a clear difference.

      The CIA are americans, thus inherently good.

      The chinese are:
      1 - far.
      2 - non white.
      3 - non americans.

      Thus, they are inherently bad. Now it's just a matter of finding out which kind of bad they are.

      Terrorists doesn't seem to match, they are way down on the "terrorist-brown scale". So it's obviously either druglords, or spies.

      This month we'll try "SPIES!". It it doesn't stick, we'll try "DRUGLORDS!" next month.

      As a last resort, it's always possible to go back to "COMMUNISTS!".

    2. Re:World Responds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do as we say, not as we do.

    3. Re:World Responds by 1s44c · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The CIA are americans, thus inherently good.

      Lol. You don't need the rest of the comment, that's funny enough.

    4. Re:World Responds by Thanshin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The CIA are americans, thus inherently good.

      Lol. You don't need the rest of the comment, that's funny enough.

      As happens when you watch "Idiocracy" it's funny until you remember how many people actually, seriously, believe that.

      I've not personally known any other country wide culture that values its own members so highly.

      It might not even be a bad thing if it wasn't for the other side of the coin. "We are mostly good, except for some rotten apples." isn't bad. The problem comes when the subconscious adds "Unlike everybody else."

    5. Re:World Responds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you chinese?

    6. Re:World Responds by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've not personally known any other country wide culture that values its own members so highly.

      Well, appropriately, China does. If and when they get to the top of the economic heap, all of us non-Han will be niggers.

    7. Re:World Responds by Beorytis · · Score: 1

      I've not personally known any other country wide culture that values its own members so highly.

      Probably because cultures with that attitude rarely progress beyond the "isolated backwater" stage.

    8. Re:World Responds by Tom · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've not personally known any other country wide culture that values its own members so highly.

      I do. My grandfather died fighting it. It was called the "Third Reich".

      Not a hundred years ago, patriotism to a degree that would alarm us today was pretty much the norm. Germany overdid it, but the rest of the western world wasn't all that much behind. Look at UK or US propaganda films from the early war years.

      But, over here in Europe, everyone got the idea of the nation pretty much bombed out of them. Some by the Axis, some by the Allies, a few especially lucky ones first by the one and then by the other. Afterwards, we sat down and said "ok, that was fucked up. Let's not do that again, ok?" - and the idea of the European Union was born.
      While we don't have a european identity, yet, and identify as german, french, british, etc. that spirit of Europe is there. And while the german press, for example, calls the greek dirty, lazy bastards, almost nobody in Europe would so much as contemplate the idea of bombing another European country.

      But this strong concept of national identity has remained in the US. We Europeans look with bemusement at quirks such as playing the national anthem before national(!) football games. International games, ok we did that. But national games? That simply makes no sense to us. Everyone is from the same country, so why the heck play the national anthem?

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    9. Re:World Responds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      4 - They have a flattened nose/face (well, someone had to say it)

    10. Re:World Responds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      :"Afterwards, we sat down and said "ok, that was fucked up. Let's not do that again, ok?" - and the idea of the European Union was born.:

      You do realize you guys did that after World War I as well and we all know how well that one worked. I dont care how friendly all of you are, all it takes is economic hard times for a nutjob to rise up and have public support.

      Problem is, it's not europe this time, it's the United States. And instead of one single high charisma nutjob, it is a large number of them. Look at the american Repulbican party and tell me they are not fucking insane to the point that most of europe needs to be paying close attention to this upcoming election here in the USA.

      WE have 3 men fighting to run for president that have publicly said they HATE homosexuality and homosexuals. They are FOR starting a war with IRAN as soon as possible. They are FOR more restrictions on rights and increasing military spending in a country where 75% of their spending is the military already.

      Power hungry insane war mongering people that cant wait to spread their flavor of live to the rest of the planet. I'm an american and it scares the crap out of me. They can jail me without cause for an indefinite amount of time. I don't have to have a trial as due process is gone. I can be legally strip searched for any reason by the police. WE get to be groped to ride on an airplane. And soon we will be required to carry and present our papers when travelling in our own country so that we can be identified easier.

      If you look at what is happening in the United states you will see that It's not a two party system but a single party that has a fake front to look like two parties. No laws are passed to protect or help the people, all are designed to protect the ruling class.

      Be afraid, the USA is the core of the next world war. WE will start it as our government and leaders all want it so bad they can taste it.

    11. Re:World Responds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Append this to the above list:

      4 - known for having no concept of the individual.
      5 - known for having alcohol metabolism issues.
      6 - known for having created skateboarding to divert whites from studies to continue academic superiority.
      7 - known for questionable driving skills.
      8 - known for having trouble staying assimilated under pressure from "overseas influences" (i.e. the passport may say "United States", but the mirror knows better).

    12. Re:World Responds by Reservoir+Penguin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Nice revisionism. Not so long ago Yugoslavia was bombed by the enlightened Europeans among others for daring to defend it's historic province of Kosovo against KLA Albanian narco-thugs. And prior to that, once the most economically successful and the least authoritarian country of the socialist block it had the best chance for smooth transition to post-soviet era. Yet the West actively encouraged nationalism and disintegration processes.

      --
      US-UK-Israel: The real Axis of Evil
    13. Re:World Responds by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This. One thing that amazes me is how quickly certain "Europeans" forget their own history, and their own dirty dealings. There is a reason for the saying "Those who forget history are doomed to repeat it".

      Even more so how they like to label those who are not pro-EU as "anti-european" or "un-european", even if they live in Europe (the continent), which pretty much shuts down any intelligent discourse on the path and future of Europe (the "My way or the highway" approach). Their blind faith in the whole thing is scary. Even those of us who don't like the EU are still European you know ;)

    14. Re:World Responds by JasterBobaMereel · · Score: 1

      China are very good at dealing with Terrorists and drugs....So

      Spies : Quite good at this but who isn't ...?
      Communists - Well even they don't think they are, (They are a international socialist state, working toward true communism .... or maybe not)

      --
      Puteulanus fenestra mortis
    15. Re:World Responds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those non-EU are mostly idiots and some nazi leftovers from the old age.
      after they die out, there will be an united europe of nations.

    16. Re:World Responds by Original+Replica · · Score: 1

      Virtually all of us are infested with CIA. What's the problem?

      The CIA: The cause of, and solution to, all of America's problems.

      --
      We are all just people.
    17. Re:World Responds by FranktehReaver · · Score: 1, Troll

      "We don't know anything about their race, history, or culture, but one thing's for sure. They stand for everything we stand against." - Captain Zap

    18. Re:World Responds by argStyopa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ha ha ha ha.

      "...almost nobody in Europe would so much as contemplate the idea of bombing another European country..."

      I recall reading almost exactly the same sentiment in a book written in about 1906.
      And then again, in a book written in 1931.

      And then considering the genteel, restrained conflict that took place in Europe 1992-1995 (you might remember the RAPE CAMPS?), I'm going to take those genteel protestations of "European Pacifism" with a gigantic grain of salt.

      Europe has had the longest period of interstate peace in its history, MAINLY because of the Cold War (something few Europeans I've met will credit) and the likelihood of nuclear annihilation. It's had very little to do with general Euro-amity.

      Now that the nuclear arsenals of the US and Russians are no longer necessarily hair-triggered on Europe, well, good luck with that European peace.

      Having traveled and worked extensively in Europe and with Europeans for the past 2 decades (British, German, Dutch, Belgian, Swedes, Austrians, and Italians, primarily) I find them generally MORE fundamentally racist in their judgments and assertions than any but the most redneck rural Americans.

      --
      -Styopa
    19. Re:World Responds by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      ONE person forgets to mention how Europeans were bombing each other and we are revisionists who forget our history? At least we only forget it rather than ignore it.

      The anti-european hysteria is from the right wing and the scared, again, you're generalising to a point.

    20. Re:World Responds by Tom · · Score: 2

      Good point on Yugoslavia there. However, even though I grant the point, I was talking about the european union and Yugoslavia wasn't part of it.

      There is still a border between the former east and western Europe. 50 years of forced seperation do that to people. It's still a massive difference. Travel to any french. british, spanish, italien or german city and you won't notice much difference aside from the language. But eastern Europe still is quite different.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    21. Re:World Responds by Tom · · Score: 1

      True that, though I was talking about the European Union and Yugoslavia wasn't a part of that.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    22. Re:World Responds by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 2

      Just mentioning my personal experiences that is all, from many road trips across the European continent and from talking to many many locals.

      The opinions of the original poster is not uncommon, I have come across many EUphiles who seem hell bent on forming a EU superstate, and in doing so are papering over the cracks and just brushing past history under the carpet in the attempt to form a concept of a "European nationality".

      The same people describe those that disagree with them as non-European, which is silly. So they were born in Europe, their country is in Europe, but they are not "European" because they are not pro-EU? Come on! Talk about rubbish...

      Most people in Europe are actually quite normal, and are not particularly pro EU. Many don't like it, but do admit to the benefits it brings. Personally, I like the free travel, free movement and easy ability to work in other EU countries without much hassle, but I don't see why that needs the whole political/bureaucratic machine on top of it, most of which is grossly wasteful of money, or the Euro which never made much sense from the Monetary/Economic perspective.

      Or the whole "European" identity stuff for that matter, what is wrong with your national identity? Rather than forge a new super-identity to encompass the whole of Europe, just spend all those resources on teaching tolerance of others. Both helps keep peace in Europe, and has the advantage that it extends to the rest of the world as well.

      It is only a select minority that is pushing for all the other stuff, and they are particularly vocal (and well funded). The masses don't really seem to care one way or another, as long as the economy is good, their quality of life is getting better and they can take care of their concerns.

      You make a distinction between "forgetting" and "ignoring", which I'd argue is superfluous. How else to you "forget" history if not by ignoring it? Hitler will not be forgotten because of all the memorials, remembrance days and active effort put into not ignoring it. From days to mark when it started, to days marking certain events, to days marking the end of it all.

      And you're exhibiting the same problem... "The anti-european hysteria is from the right wing and the scared," pretty much proves my point. That sentence does not really allow for any intelligent discourse on the future of Europe and the EU, it is also a common mantra trotted out (in variations, but the same concept) whenever someone dares question the wisdom of what is being done in Europe, despite the fact it affects the entire continent.

    23. Re:World Responds by idontgno · · Score: 1

      And that's symptomatic: Anything not EU or in the shadow of EU isn't really Europe, according to that mindset. It's just a slightly broader "us" with plenty of "thems" still left to bomb, and some of them are technically Europeans.

      Humanity is tribal. Pan-Europism is simply the formation of a bigger tribe. Even if we get trans-continental mega-states, there will still be "us" and "them", and we will always have been at war with Eastasia.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    24. Re:World Responds by antdude · · Score: 1

      What about Chinese Americans?

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    25. Re:World Responds by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 1

      There's a clear difference.

      The CIA are americans, thus inherently good.

      The chinese are:
      1 - far.
      2 - non white.
      3 - non americans.

      Thus, they are inherently bad. Now it's just a matter of finding out which kind of bad they are.

      Terrorists doesn't seem to match, they are way down on the "terrorist-brown scale". So it's obviously either druglords, or spies.

      This month we'll try "SPIES!". It it doesn't stick, we'll try "DRUGLORDS!" next month.

      As a last resort, it's always possible to go back to "COMMUNISTS!".

      Actually, I think your last resort is the point. The United States, although it certainly has problems, has more respect for individual autonomy than China. The First Amendment, though circumscribed, provides massive protections for thought, for political action, and for living the life of a free person. The Fourth likewise provides some, although more limited. And although the U.S. does not have as much respect for Human Rights as a number of players in the international community, it has more than quite a few, including China.

      The U.S. also provides markets that are less corrupt, and--amazingly--is often less deferential to corporations than local Chinese authority. Although the regulatory structures around certain areas are hard for business, foreign corporations find it easier to compete in the U.S.

      --
      -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    26. Re:World Responds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The bombing was a NATO operation, do you want to go into a discussion in how much it was orchestered by Europeans and how much by the US?

      Secondly, some people were reportedly happily killing said Albanian narco-thugs and their families. As in any conflict, there is some debate about whether international action is justified or not, and to bombing did cause too many civilian casualities, but that is not the point: the action of NATO was in no way comparible with earlier European wars (I do not say the actions were right or wrong, but they certainly intervened with very different arguments).

      Lastly: I do not buy that the West encouraged nationalism, you were already making a mess of the the situation way before intervention. And it was better to "disintegrate" than to keep things together by letting one group of people completely exterminate the rest....

      I hope you all learned how silly it is to feel anything for your country, if not, I guess you will have more coming in the future.

    27. Re:World Responds by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 2

      And prior to that, once the most economically successful and the least authoritarian country of the socialist block it had the best chance for smooth transition to post-soviet era

      What the fuck - Tito was the leader of the least authoritarian country of the socialist block? Really? Do you also consider Castro an englightened, democratic leader? What about that guy from Iraq - Hussein something or other. I mean, he lead a secular party, surely he was leading Iraq on the way to a post-Islamic era?

      Newsflash: the only reason Yugoslavia didn't fall apart was because Tito brutally repressed any time of dissent or splinter faction.

      Fucking moron.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    28. Re:World Responds by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      Europe has had the longest period of interstate peace in its history, MAINLY because of the Cold War (something few Europeans I've met will credit) and the likelihood of nuclear annihilation. It's had very little to do with general Euro-amity.

      You clearly have no clue. The cold war and nuclear annihilation was something that Europe would have to bear in case the pissing match between the US and Russia would turn violent. It was something that was quite outside their control, and quite something of a nightmare.

      The reason people in Europe disagree with you on this point is because they know better - they know why the wars were fought, and why they weren't. You might want to read a bit more. Travel doesn't give you historical insight.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    29. Re:World Responds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're talking about the former Yugoslavia, a non NATO, non EU member. The bombing done by NATO was intended to put a stop to the genocide not to carry it out.

    30. Re:World Responds by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      Simple solution: invent some alien bugs that are coming to infest, and presto! humanity will be one giant tribe, united against another tribe. Problem solved. FOREVER!

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    31. Re:World Responds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I've not personally known any other country wide culture that values its own members so highly."

      then you need to get out more, because I have - personally - you think Americans are nationalistic? you need to travel to some less traveled countries in Europe and get past the politeness that a weekend tourist gets..

    32. Re:World Responds by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Well, appropriately, China does. If and when they get to the top of the economic heap, all of us non-Han will be niggers.

      But don't worry, when it gets to that point, we'll get a picture of our race on their Yuan bills, like all minorities.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    33. Re:World Responds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yet the West actively encouraged nationalism and disintegration processes."

      aaah yes, and those poor little Yugoslavian souls despite all those good intentions and good-will towards each other had no choice but to comply with what the evil west wanted.. STFU , you're so full of it. You want to see what a successful transition looks like to a post-Soviet are then look at Czechoslovakia - yes, they are part of that "evil" West.

    34. Re:World Responds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But, over here in Europe, everyone got the idea of the nation pretty much bombed out of them."
      "But this strong concept of national identity has remained in the US. "

      That's only your fault. Anyway, US is not Europe, its a different country with a different history, different culture, and different customs. Realize that already. Why aren't you complaining that China is not more like EU?

    35. Re:World Responds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      japan *cough* japan...

    36. Re:World Responds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amen. My thoughts exactly having lived half of my life in the US and half in Europe. In my experience Europeans (disclaimer: some Europeans, i found a few level headed ones :) like to compare Europe's best case scenario to bottom of the barrel everywhere else (i.e. in the USA). Tisk tisk.

    37. Re:World Responds by strikethree · · Score: 1

      ...defend it's historic province of Kosovo against KLA Albanian narco-thugs.

      Really? That was the most incompetent, useless, and brutal "defense" that I have ever seen. I would go so far as to say Yugoslavia's "defense" was a non-sequitur. Seriously. What the fuck? They needed to be stopped.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    38. Re:World Responds by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      World Responds . . . Virtually all of us are infested with CIA. What's the problem?

      Could you be more specific? Is that the free world that the CIA helped keep free? Is that the freed world that the CIA helped free? Or the remainder of the Communist block and their allies that still threaten the worlds freedom and peace?

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    39. Re:World Responds by DarthVain · · Score: 1

      In soviet-russia Communist Druglord Spies, all get paid the same, and have universal health care. Also the drugs have state sanctioned prices, none of this capitialist pig profiteering in the drug trade!

    40. Re:World Responds by jafac · · Score: 1

      My great uncle died fighting FOR The Third Reich. Let me tell you, he was Austrian. He hated the annexation, he hated the Nazi Party, and everything they stood for, and was drafted in Graz, literally at gunpoint, while his best friend was beaten nearly to death by the conscription brownshirts. He did shoot down some British planes. About 3 days after d-day, he was fortunate enough to surrender to allied forces, and spent 4 years doing slave labor in a French POW camp. It became his goal to emigrate to the US and settle here, and he died a happy man at 89. He became worried about the direction he saw the US headed in the 1980's and 1990's. He said that his country had washed their hands and learned their lesson. (He showed me photos of what parts of Germany looked like after the war; from friends and relatives who were there, some who endured the Soviet invasion and occupation - it wasn't pretty). He said that the US is absolutely headed towards learning this lesson - and that it must be part of a nation's character to have to go through this.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    41. Re:World Responds by jafac · · Score: 1

      (... didn't DIE)

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    42. Re:World Responds by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      What the fuck - Tito was the leader of the least authoritarian country of the socialist block? Really?

      Yes, really, he was. What exactly do you find wrong with that statement? In comparison to other "Soviet-style" socialist countries, Yugoslavia was definitely the least authoritarian, by a very wide margin.

      Newsflash: the only reason Yugoslavia didn't fall apart was because Tito brutally repressed any time of dissent or splinter faction.

      No, the reason why Yugoslavia didn't fall apart under Tito is because he consistently promoted a single Yugoslavian identity that would gloss over the differences between Serbs, Croats etc, and generally tried to make it so that the state didn't favor one ethnicity over another.

    43. Re:World Responds by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Really? That was the most incompetent, useless, and brutal "defense" that I have ever seen. I would go so far as to say Yugoslavia's "defense" was a non-sequitur. Seriously. What the fuck? They needed to be stopped.

      You guys sure did a good job on that - where before Serbs were killing Albanians in Kosovo and burning down mosques, now Albanians are killing Serbs and burning down churches. Epic progress right there!

    44. Re:World Responds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      900,000 narco thugs? That's how many people the enlightened Yugoslavs (read Serbians) tried to kick off their rightfully stolen territory.

    45. Re:World Responds by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      How does the Euro not make sense from an economic perspective?

      Having different currencies in different countries is a trade barrier: every time you try to ship stuff from one place to another, you have to convert currencies, and pay fees to do so, and worse, the exchange rates are constantly changing, so you may pay more one day for something than you do on another day. There's a reason we have a single currency here in the USA, and not 50 different currencies: it'd be a mess. We actually did something like that under the Articles of Confederation, and it didn't work out too well.

      Of course, having a single currency shared by many sovereign nations has its own set of problems, as the Greeks are finding out. I'm not really sure what the answer is; there's obvious disadvantages to uniting into a single federal country like the USA (look at all the infighting we're experiencing, plus all the corruption), but it's a lot easier to handle monetary policy with a single country than to get a couple dozen separate nations to agree on monetary policy. Either way, having a single currency has clear advantages. The question is if its disadvantages, as applied to the specific case of the EU, are great enough to make the idea unfeasible or not.

    46. Re:World Responds by Tom · · Score: 1

      And that's symptomatic: Anything not EU or in the shadow of EU isn't really Europe, according to that mindset.

      I'm sorry, but I'm not falling for that straw man. I was specifically talking about the EU, so criticising me for focussing on the EU when that's explicitly what I was doing is an odd argument.

      But yes, having an EU to identify with instead of a nation is just one step. A few hundred years ago, identifying with a nation instead of your local barony or duchy was just as revolutionary. Maybe in another hundred years or so we'll have reached continents. Will we ever get a "world-identity"? Maybe only if we have other worlds to consider "them", because yes, a group defines itself as much by whom it excludes as by whom it includes.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    47. Re:World Responds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CIA only -ahem- "freed" countries when it was economically advantageous to replace the established regime.
      And are you really trying to argue that America is still a force of freedom in the world? Clearly, you haven't had an American corporation step into your life and tell you how things are going to be from now. Your perception of the circumstance is about 50 years outdated, my friend. Without a huge enemy, America has no choice but to bully.

    48. Re:World Responds by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      The CIA only -ahem- "freed" countries when it was economically advantageous to replace the established regime.

      The CIA helped to support local peoples fighting to roll back Communism, such as in Poland and other places.
      Was that economically advantageous in any immediate sense? What about Korea? The CIA also assisted the Kurds resist Saddam. I think you've got some bad data there.

      And are you really trying to argue that America is still a force of freedom in the world?

      There is no need to argue the point - I would say that overall it is an established fact. Recent example: Iraq is now a democracy, has been runing it's own affairs for some years, asked American to withdraw its combat troops - and it did. Iraq has many challenges as a country, the ultimate of which is to keep their democracy which is a challenge for every such country. ( Iraqi news )

      Of course it isn't just freedom, or the CIA:

      Navy sends 8 ships to provide tsunami relief (2011)
      TSUNAMI DISASTER: Relief Effort (2005)

      Clearly, you haven't had an American corporation step into your life and tell you how things are going to be from now.

      I'm pretty sure that American corporations: 1 - Aren't the government. 2 - Aren't allowed to keep slaves and serfs

      Your perception of the circumstance is about 50 years outdated, my friend.

      You might be missing a few years of news and events.

      Without a huge enemy, America has no choice but to bully.

      Without a huge enemy, America cuts its defense spending drastically (as it did in the 90's after the Cold War ended) and tries to go about its business.

      I think, my friend, that you would benefit from a wider range of news sources. Peace.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    49. Re:World Responds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uhm, but Han is an ethnic race [mainly] in China. I think the non-Han Chinese (ethnic minorities) in China will have to be worried before you guys.

    50. Re:World Responds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It amazes me how Americans not only forget history but also make it up as they go along (U-571? The mantra of "we alone beat the Nazis"?). The so-called "evil euro air raids" involved US forces. Also, the "defence" of Kosovo would have been better descibed (as it was by the Hague) as genocide.

    51. Re:World Responds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Peace.

      Well, at least we agree on peace.

    52. Re:World Responds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me? No, "Yugoslavia" was not bombed for "daring to defend it's historic province of Kosovo against KLA Albanian narco-thugs". The rump Yugoslavia (former republics of Serbia and Montenegro) were bombed when after initiating war in Slovenia, war and genocide in Croatia and Bosnia, they started war operations in Kosovo, where they had treated the Albanian minority (well, majority in that area) as second class citizens for years.

      Yes, the Albanians in Kosovo were fed up with Serbian rule, and Europe was fed up with Serbia executing, imprisoning and expelling people by the thousands.

      Saying the West "actively encouraged nationalism and disintegration processes" is an outright lie, obvious to anyone who ever opened a newspaper at the time.

    53. Re:World Responds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fail reading comprehension: he says Tito was least authoritarian, that means he was BETTER than Castro, and thus says nothing about the OP's
      opinion of Castro. And if you include "Hussein something or other" of Iraq into "socialist block", then you fail history, too. You really should avoid showing
      your ignorance in such a blatant way.

    54. Re:World Responds by sysrammer · · Score: 1

      pissing match between the US and Russia

      You're right, without US there would have been no pissing match. The tanks & apc's would have rolled right in and in three days or so you would have had the opportunity to welcome your new overlords.

      sr

      --
      His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
    55. Re:World Responds by drnb · · Score: 1

      ... patriotism to a degree that would alarm us today was pretty much the norm. Germany overdid it, but the rest of the western world wasn't all that much behind. Look at UK or US propaganda films from the early war years.

      A very silly comparison. You should not be looking at wartime films. You should be looking at pre-war films. That will provide a more realistic contrast between Germany and the US/UK in that timeframe.

      But, over here in Europe, everyone got the idea of the nation pretty much bombed out of them. Some by the Axis, some by the Allies, a few especially lucky ones first by the one and then by the other. Afterwards, we sat down and said "ok, that was fucked up. Let's not do that again, ok?" - and the idea of the European Union was born. While we don't have a european identity, yet, and identify as german, french, british, etc. that spirit of Europe is there.

      Not really, at least with the Europeans I have spoken with at international studies type events on the continent. There is still quite a bit of nationalism and tribalism. For example Bavarians will sometimes barely consider themselves German let alone some sort of pan-European. What you really have is a modern reincarnation of the old Roman system of hostages. Today you exchange portions of your economy, rather than noble born children, in order to maintain the peace.

      ... almost nobody in Europe would so much as contemplate the idea of bombing another European country.

      Really? Did you miss the 1999 NATO bombing of Yugoslavia? Or does Yugoslavia not count as "real" Europe?

      But this strong concept of national identity has remained in the US.

      That's another quite silly comment. The US doesn't have a national identity in the way that many European regions have. In the US the national identity is an ever evolving "melting pot" where we take bits and pieces from other cultures around the world. Our national identity changes with each major wave of immigration.

  5. The japanese by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Funny

    Meanwhile the Japanese would study the beach, then copy it, in miniature.

    The Brits would copy it but get all the good bits wrong and make the bad bits worse.

    The Australians would make a copy that is just better but they would never stop feeling inferior about it.

    The greeks would expect the rest of the world to pay for it.

    The saudies would just buy it and see nothing wrong with paying a fortune for sand.

    The Germans would dig a hole in it.

    The dutch wouldn't feel happy on it until they build a sand castle to protect against the tide.

    Apple would put it in a pretty box and sell it for a premium but you could only use it as Jobs intended.

    Have I insulted everyone yet? Not on topic? Oh come on, universities have always been a haven for spies and the recruitment of spies. Duh, where else to find information, underpaid people with lots of info and impressionable young minds looking for a cause?

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:The japanese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot one part:

      The americans would hire any foreigner to research the beach, while they would waste their time with anti-intellectual complains.

    2. Re:The japanese by mikael · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Patent trolls would sue anyone who had a bit of land that sloped into the ocean.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    3. Re:The japanese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have I insulted everyone yet?

      You missed out the French. And the Mexicans.

    4. Re:The japanese by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Patent trolls would sue anyone who had a bit of land that sloped into the ocean, a pool, a pond, a bird feeder, someone's iced tea or any other body of liquid.

      FTFY

    5. Re:The japanese by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      The Mexicans wouldn't bother to steal it, they just use America's beaches.

      The French wouldn't bother, until Britain stole it first. Then they'd want it.

    6. Re:The japanese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      White southerners would divide the beach in two, declare them separate but equal, then dump their sewage on it.

      Hindus would declare it sacred to some god and build a temple.

      Buddhists would declare it sacred and build a temple.

      American Indians would declare it sacred ground, then build a casino.

      Italians would declare it sacred and build a casino, cantina, brothel and cathedral.

    7. Re:The japanese by Tom · · Score: 4, Informative

      You're 50+ years behind the times.

      We Germans would put our towels down to mark our spot and then go for breakfast.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    8. Re:The japanese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I'm still a bit perplexed as to why the Russians would send a forklift to a beach.

    9. Re:The japanese by Viol8 · · Score: 0

      Being russian the driver was obviously drunk - he was supposed to stay in the warehouse.

    10. Re:The japanese by game+kid · · Score: 0

      Close. The Japanese would posterize the beach, draw action lines around it, sculpt breasts on it for wrist comfort, and shout "Oppai bichii...meka toransufaa...GO!!!!! " as they launch it from a giant robot.

      --
      You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
    11. Re:The japanese by ACE209 · · Score: 1

      Slightly off topic but that reminds me of an old joke from the DDR.

      Question: What would happen if communism gets established in the desert Sahara?

      Answer: For ten years nothing - then they would run out of sand.

      --
      "we are all atheists about most of the gods that societies have ever believed in. Some of us just go one god further."
    12. Re:The japanese by kikito · · Score: 1

      In Spain, we already have enough beaches. What we need is more industries.

    13. Re:The japanese by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Have I insulted everyone yet?

      You forgot the Linux and Windows crowds.

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    14. Re:The japanese by Forty+Two+Tenfold · · Score: 1

      Except this is more pertinent to capitalism with its artificial scarcity and planned obsolescence. Look at the crapitalist US of A - gathering rain water is a crime in some places.

      --
      Upward mobility is a slippery slope - the higher you climb the more you show your ass.
    15. Re:The japanese by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      And Americans would go to a beach that wasn't so crowded that you can't find a spot on the beach after breakfast. Because... it's our beach that everyone wants to steal :D

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    16. Re:The japanese by sycodon · · Score: 2

      I have to say, Slashdot comments are much more fun when they take place before American college students wake up.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    17. Re:The japanese by awshidahak · · Score: 1

      Have I insulted everyone yet?

      You forgot the Linux and Windows crowds.

      Linux users would claim that since soil is better for planting vegetables, everyone should move to soil.

      Windows users would be just fine with the sand where it is and get upset if anyone installed firefox on it.

    18. Re:The japanese by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      What about Black people? Where's the smart arse response to their beach! S/)

    19. Re:The japanese by LDAPMAN · · Score: 1

      Black people don't go to the beach. Not funny but generally true!

    20. Re:The japanese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amercians would concrete it over and claim it was the world standard and every one else was out of step.

    21. Re:The japanese by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      FOSS proponents would say that we can just make our own beach, then hand everyone a small plastic cup and say "get to work!"

    22. Re:The japanese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What the strag will think is that any man who can hitch the length and breadth of the galaxy, rough it, slum it, struggle against terrible odds, win through, and still knows where his towel is is clearly a man to be reckoned with. And this one has a low UID to boot.

    23. Re:The japanese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Yanks would buy it, then use copyright law to claim ownership over every other beach World-wide.

    24. Re:The japanese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only after implementing a vast security organisation to harass tourists trying to travel to that beach. Then sip them off to a completely different beach as 'guests; for daring to try and travel to the first beach

    25. Re:The japanese by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Except this is more pertinent to capitalism with its artificial scarcity and planned obsolescence. Look at the crapitalist US of A - gathering rain water is a crime in some places.

      Fortunately, I live in MD, where they have just decided to tax us for rain.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    26. Re:The japanese by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, germans can often still be found manning the pits and holes in the sandbeach around here(Dutchyland).

      I admit to building dykes in the sand at the beach to defend my property when the tide came. Its fun alright?! I didnt have a sandcastle though. I did build sand pyramides.

  6. OH MY GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Foreigners are at an university to "nurture ideas" and to "learn"!! CALL THE FBI!!!

    1. Re:OH MY GOD by boaworm · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Foreigners are at an university to "nurture ideas" and to "learn"!! CALL THE FBI!!!

      Was feeling the same. Isnt this the whole purpose of exchange students?

      --
      Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
      Aristotele
    2. Re:OH MY GOD by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Considering at one stage defence industries where bitching because they only got second string geeks and nerds because they didn't pay as well as other tech industries and most geeks and nerds have n desire to tie their life to the killing of other human beings.

      So when foreign countries donate their geeks and nerds to do US defence research the US spy vs spy types still whine and complain.

      When are those wankers ever going to be happy, even if they are spying on all of us all of the time they'd still complain about our secret thoughts and demand mind reading equipment. Those ass hats seem to be working themselves up to declaring martial law and turning the whole world into a prison, just to be safe.

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
    3. Re:OH MY GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The CIA doesn't want mind reading equipment, they want mind control. Documents from MKULTRA and various other programs suggest they want TOTAL control of the US population in the form of drug dependent and media brainwashed zombies who do as they command. The programs then were pseudoscientific garbage, but the dream today remains the same.

    4. Re:OH MY GOD by Original+Replica · · Score: 1

      The CIA will never ever be able to admit peace, safety, or success. There must always be impending doom to keep the CIA budget high and the oversight low.

      --
      We are all just people.
    5. Re:OH MY GOD by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 1

      I would wager, given how little one hand knows what the other is doing in the US Government, that there are spies in the universities - and that they are probably CIA/other domestic agencies' agents.

      --
      If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
    6. Re:OH MY GOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...and worst of all, they might bring some of those ideas back to their home countries!

      Oh, the horror! Why would we allow--

      --oh, you mean that's the PURPOSE of universities? And libraries? And the free expression of information?

      And we send our students to foreign universities for the same purpose?

      Never mind.

  7. How about sharing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seriously, knowledge is supposed to be shared.

    As for technology, one could argue that the current patent system is broken. Besides, I personally find it hard to believe that it's necessary for the Chinese to spy a lot on US universities when all the latest gizmos are produced in China anyway.

    1. Re:How about sharing? by mikael · · Score: 1

      Academics dont always publish their best ideas. Also, usually by the time a paper has been published for method X, they are working on metjod Y. First generation of a project is done with standard components. Second generation uses custom components. Third generation adds a computer control system. Fourth generation does the process automatically. Fifth generation shrinks everything down into single unit.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    2. Re:How about sharing? by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      Seriously, knowledge is supposed to be shared.

      Is it? When did the competition between countries end in your world?

      You do realise that we live quite better in the civilized world and we'd like to keep it that way even if it means enslaving the others and killing those who resist, no?

      This is not a pretty world. Stop pretending it is. Any rich country will sooner carpet bomb a poor country that lower it's standard of living to reach the average.

    3. Re:How about sharing? by martyros · · Score: 1

      Not only are universities infested with FOREIGN spies, they're also infested with CORPORATE spies! Yes, these evil corporations often find that unviersities are the "ideal place...to find recruits, propose and nurture ideas, learn and even steal research data, or place trainees". This must be STOPPED!

      Either that, or the universities are doing exactly what they are intended to do, and it should be encouraged.

      --

      TCP: Why the Internet is full of SYN.

    4. Re:How about sharing? by TheRaven64 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      DARPA has a 10 stage model for this kind of thing where, roughly speaking, stage 1 is 'wouldn't it be cool to be able to listen to all of your music wherever you are?' and stage 10 is an iPod. Typically, universities only do stages 1-4 in this, where the end result is a mostly working proof-of-concept. Corporate research does stages 3-7, where the end result is a working prototype, possibly too big, or with some other serious limitations. Corporate development does stages 6-10, where the end result of the last couple of stages is a shipping product and a revision.

      If universities are trying to do stages 5-8 in this model, then that's probably the problem. It means that they're failing badly at technology transfer.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:How about sharing? by mikael · · Score: 1

      UK universities were told to be more like corporations in that they should research, patent and license technology and create "spin-off companies" like their USA counterparts. The phrase "kicking round moneyballs" comes to mind. There was also the income from post-doc students which was around $200,000 per student. Each professor was supposed to have a lab full of students (12 max) each investigating a small part of the project. Combine that with grant applications and they were bringing in serious dough.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    6. Re:How about sharing? by damienl451 · · Score: 1

      Back in the 18th century, when mercantilism and beggar-thy-neighbor were debunked. Of course, not everyone got the memo.

      Have a read: http://www.pkarchive.org/trade/MythCompetitiveness.html

    7. Re:How about sharing? by c0lo · · Score: 1

      Seriously, knowledge is supposed to be shared.

      You mad, pal? What about patents and Intellectual Property? What about competition and individualism? And "the free market"... don't forget the free market! (look! a shiny thing, don't you look back to patents!)
      Also, what about the exams - aren't the students suppose to compete on their own?

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
    8. Re:How about sharing? by mbone · · Score: 1

      I think that you are talking about Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs), which are by means restricted to DARPA, but are pretty ubiquitous in aerospace.

    9. Re:How about sharing? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      Not only are universities infested with FOREIGN spies, they're also infested with CORPORATE spies!

      There's only one thing to do: send in DOMESTIC spies to keep an eye on things.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    10. Re:How about sharing? by Original+Replica · · Score: 1

      When did the competition between countries end in your world?

      When we realized that the competition only serves to increase the wealth and power of the aristocracy (in what ever form it takes in different countries)

      Any rich country will sooner carpet bomb a poor country that lower it's standard of living to reach the average.

      Obviously false. The US exported it's entire manufacturing sector to China to do exactly the opposite of that. It raised China towards the average and stagnated the US median, while vastly increasing the wealth of the aristocracy.

      --
      We are all just people.
    11. Re:How about sharing? by poity · · Score: 1

      This is a load of banal aphorisms masquerading as insight, and again the mods are easily fooled. First, the real tech secrets, those that are strategically important to industry and military, and thus targeted by spies, are NOT patented. You know why? Because you can figure out what they are by RTFPatent. Do you think chemical composition of ingredients necessary for advanced chip manufacturing are patented? Do you think radar reflective paint is patented? Do you think the composite materials for Boeing 787 are patented? Bringing patents into a spying debate shows a lack of comprehension. Secondly, the "latest gizmos" are not of strategic concern because they are not MADE in China, they are ASSEMBLED in China. The components are shipped in and then electrically connected. Knowing how to make motherboards does not naturally lead to knowing how to make an i7-3770.

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    12. Re:How about sharing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Typically they are only assembled in China. For example, a large percentage of parts in the iPhone 4 came from Japan and Korea. They were put together and polished in China. (And uhm, designed in the US)

  8. So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The purpose of universities is to share knowledge. That's why research gets published - for the whole world to see.
    Information can not get stolen. Not when it's about copyright and not when it's about research. It can only get copied and doing that generally leads to more knowledge.

    1. Re:So what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then again the a bomb was developed by Berkeley and Chicago. Much of the current ballistic missile defense infrastructure as split between MIT and Johns Hopkins.

      Why are universities doing such work?

      Money. Neither that or the information is to be shared.

  9. Should we believe anything the FBI tells us? by 0111+1110 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't trust anything the FBI says. Any more than I would trust an announcement from the NKVD (The People's Commissariat for Internal Affairs). What is the purpose of this announcement supposed to be? To induce paranoia and racism against any student whose genetics cannot be traced from Western Europe? Is it something along the lines of "If you see something, say something."? And look where that got us. The persecution of innocent people who look middle eastern or Indian or Pakistani. I think it's clear that our government's vision of an ideal society is to that of East Germany except more racially pure.

    The school's campus in Dubai needed a bailout and an unlikely savior had stepped forward: a Dubai-based company that offered to provide money and students.

    Simon was tempted. She also worried that the company, which had investors from Iran and wanted to recruit students from there, might be a front for the Iranian government, she said. If so, an agreement could violate federal trade sanctions and invite enemy spies.

    The CIA couldnâ(TM)t confirm that the company wasnâ(TM)t an arm of Iranâ(TM)s government. Simon rejected the offer and shut down undergraduate programs in Dubai, at a loss of $3.7 million.

    Un-fucking-believable. Paranoia, distrust, racism. It's truly a shameful time to be an American. Yes. College students are a threat. All Iranians and people from Dubai are a threat. Everyone and everything except lily white Americans of pure European descent are threats to our 'national security'. Trust no one. There are conspiracies everywhere you look and only the FBI and CIA can save us. Better increase their funding or we're all gonna die!

    --
    Quite an experience to live in fear, isn't it? That's what it is to be a slave.
    1. Re:Should we believe anything the FBI tells us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot about the Red Indians, they're still a bit of a threat.

    2. Re:Should we believe anything the FBI tells us? by kramerd · · Score: 1

      No one eats 3.7M on suspected racism. There has to be more to this.Take off the reverse tinfoil hat.

    3. Re:Should we believe anything the FBI tells us? by Thanshin · · Score: 1

      No one eats 3.7M on suspected racism. There has to be more to this.

      What's the precise amount of money a government has to invest in a threat for you to consider it as proof that the threat is real?

      3M?

      2M?

    4. Re:Should we believe anything the FBI tells us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea that last part made me go WTF. Even the CIA couldn't find anything wrong, but hey ... let's go broke and close off an institute of education before we risk getting infected with sand-ni....brown people. USA! USA! :D

    5. Re:Should we believe anything the FBI tells us? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      3.7M is wasted each year in DC on TOILET PAPER. Dont even try to tell me that 3.7M will buy something useful out of the government.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    6. Re:Should we believe anything the FBI tells us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "She also worried that the company, which had investors from Iran and wanted to recruit students from there, might be a front for the Iranian government"

      Isn't that how our glorious free market is supposed to work?

    7. Re:Should we believe anything the FBI tells us? by camperdave · · Score: 1

      3.7M is wasted each year in DC on TOILET PAPER. Dont even try to tell me that 3.7M will buy something useful out of the government.

      3.7M might buy you a Congressman or two.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    8. Re:Should we believe anything the FBI tells us? by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Hi dave!

      Everyone, dave here is one of my slashdot stalkers. He has a couple of logins here, but he mostly trolls as AC.

      I don't think I'm his only stalking target, he has several but I am one of his favorites. I love his weak attempts at trolling :-) you may my day man!
      Love ya dave! Keep up the great work!

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    9. Re:Should we believe anything the FBI tells us? by Brannoncyll · · Score: 1

      3.7M is wasted each year in DC on TOILET PAPER. Dont even try to tell me that 3.7M will buy something useful out of the government.

      That money is secretly funnelled into research on alien technologies at Area 51!

      President: I don't understand, where does all this come from? How do you get funding for something like this?

      Julius: You don't actually think they spend $20,000 on a hammer, $30,000 on a toilet seat, do you?

    10. Re:Should we believe anything the FBI tells us? by Samantha+Wright · · Score: 1

      I know how you feel! I wish I could say the same about my stalkers. The trollish ones are all creepy. (The rest are great, though.)

      Although I think this time he may have a point... congressmen are pretty affordable. 3.7 million might be enough to get a small piece of legislation introduced, even if not seriously discussed.

      --
      Bio questions? Ask me to start a Q&A journal. Computer analogies available for most topics!
    11. Re:Should we believe anything the FBI tells us? by strikethree · · Score: 1

      I think that you have correctly identified the level of insanity. The response to the donation is total nonsense. What a shame that so many people seem stuck in thinking that may have been useful a thousand years ago but has almost no relevance today.

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
    12. Re:Should we believe anything the FBI tells us? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a story intended to plant the seed. No one really notices it on a conscious level, but it registers on a subconscious level. Somehow I see it playing out in a few months. Just need some tie-ins coming in from the AM (and short wave) radio fringes to start stoking the flames before it shows up on Fox News, and then everywhere else.

    13. Re:Should we believe anything the FBI tells us? by ytpete · · Score: 1

      That sort of depends on your perspective, no? If I was a government employee I would hope that using toilet paper was pretty much mandatory for all my coworkers that I had to sit next to all day. :-)

      The thing is, the government is a large organization with a lot of employees, and employers have lots of fringe expenses that scale up per employee. Restroom expendables being one. It's easy to trot out absolute values as ridiculous and wasteful when you disregard how many people they're split across.

      For all I know you pulled that $3.7M out of your... well... let's just assume that's a real data point from somewhere. According to this page, the average person goes through ~$21 worth of toilet paper every year. The federal government has about 2.5 million employees, so if just 10% of their toilet usage occurs at work, that's $5 million the government spends on toilet paper for its employees every year. Wasted money? I dunno, good luck finding competent people willing to work in an office with no toilet paper.

  10. Dear FBI: by cbope · · Score: 0

    Xenophobic, much?

  11. Paranoia paranoia paranoia by FhnuZoag · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure that if China was intent on sending a superspy to steal your celestial mechanics precious bodily fluids, they wouldn't send someone with a space military related publication record, and have him write an article on it available over the internet: http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-XYZH200901020.htm

    Maybe people should just realise that academics are interested in all sorts of different stuff, that all research publications are gonna be read by someone combing over it in search of military applications, and that if you are actually doing military significant research, you should do it under Darpa or something and security check your staff?

    1. Re:Paranoia paranoia paranoia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know, for years I've been telling the Chinese students at my school they need to relax more, and that America's greatest technology is the weekend. And now they say Foxconn is going to improve worker conditions, coincidence or Chinese spy?

  12. Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just close all universities and turn them into LDS churches.

    1. Re:Solution by arisvega · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Just close all universities and turn them into LSD churches.

      Fixed that for you.

      --
      The three laws of thermodynamics:(1) You can't win. (2) You can't break even. (3) You can't even quit.
    2. Re:Solution by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Make everybody Amish. You'll have less stress, you won't have to worry about gas prices and there won't be any technology for the filthy foreigners to steal.

      Plus: In a couple of years their economy will be wrecked because you stopped buying their cheap exported crap. It's win-win.

      --
      No sig today...
  13. FBI anti-capitalist? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stealing ideas? So that they can create competing outfits that create the same product more cheaply? Causing consumers to "vote with their wallets?"

    Isn't this, like, exactly the sort of thing Adam Smith was dreaming about?

  14. Fifth columnist journalisim by TiggertheMad · · Score: 2

    I don't trust anything the FBI says. Any more than I would trust an announcement from the NKVD (The People's Commissariat for Internal Affairs). What is the purpose of this announcement supposed to be? To induce paranoia and racism against any student whose genetics cannot be traced from Western Europe?

    OMFG the little yellow people with the funny eyes want to steal everything we own! They are a threat to the AMURICAN WAY OF LIFE, and they would steal that too! They aren't even real commies, they are yellow instead of red!

    I too tire of this constant barrage of borderline racist propaganda from the media. While I distrust the motives of the alphabet soup agents, the real culprit is the media. Say the FBI does a study about corporate espionage in China, at the request of a senator or some other asshole in Washington that has hear there is a 'Yellow menace', and wants to know more. They do a report, and find 3k companies that are stealing shit from us. (Aside: 3k companies in a country of 1.5 BILLION people that are illicit, really? BTW, how many companies are in all of China? How do you know they are stealing stuff? How many companies are there in the US that are conducting corporate espionage?) They write the report and that would be the end of it, except some jerk editor throws a story on the wire about how China is stacked 10 people deep with thieves which causes everybody else to believe it too, because the media always tells the truth.

    Lets be real here, China has a problem with corruption, and there are some people there stealing stuff and committing IP violations. Guess what, so does every other country in the world. Enough with the propaganda.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Fifth columnist journalisim by FhnuZoag · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'd note that the 3k companies claim came not from the CIA, but from a guy who's retired from the CIA in the 90s, and was previously involved in - get this - the Gulf of Tonkin incident.

    2. Re:Fifth columnist journalisim by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      The problem is that the people who rob the people to pay for the alphabet soup agents get their info from the newspapers.

      --
      No sig today...
  15. So getting educated is now "stealing technology." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A better headline might have been, "right-wing blowhard says just what you'd expect a right-wing blowhard to say."

  16. False threats from everywhere by roman_mir · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do you notice how the ideas that there are all these threats from everywhere are invading the public discourse?

    There are all these 'stories' about spies, these have been coming out fairly consistently. Anybody remembers Anna Chapman? AFAIC it was a story about a Russian prostitute mistaken for a super-secret spy.

    But there are all these other stories, everything, from spies to the idea that there is more racism or sexism than ever, to supposed nuclear threats from Iran and such, take your pick.

    In reality of-course there are various political forces that are gaining power from proliferation of ideas that there is this huge division: us vs. them, them vs. us, divide you into international camps, then into race camps and into gender camps, again, choose your poison.

    This is a very old trick - divide and conquer, use every bit of negative news and blow it way out of proportion, use any anecdotal evidence to create various false movements, whatever.

    It's all done in order to be able to take your attention away from the real problems. How about the fact that Obama was basically an agent of the banks and the ruling elite, very skilfully disguised as a populous movement with ideology of CHANGE - changing what? Changing the way that the government works!

    All the while Ron Paul is marginalised, the guy who is building real momentum, a real movement of change - this is scary, this has to be stopped and you know it's being actively fought against by the media and the government and every dollar that is coming from the corporate ruling elite.

    Your government and your corporate monopolistic elite are one and the same. Ask yourself: exactly what is fascism? How is it possible that a Republic descends into fascism? Through the little trick of 'democracy' of-course. Democracy is a gateway drug to fascism, democracy comes after republic creates enough freedoms that the economy booms and allows a few to feed the many, allows the many to ask the few to give them more and more without bothering themselves to produce. This is 'bread and circuses' and the politicians are using it very effectively to destroy the very concept of individual freedoms on daily basis.

    Notice how they even destroyed the concept of INDIVIDUAL freedoms by introducing the false flags of so called 'civil rights' and 'women rights' and 'minority rights' and whatever else rights. Why am I saying those are false flags? Because all of those people should have the same exact rights, and all of those rights are individual rights, but creating these separate concepts of 'rights' what really is done is that some are given not rights, but privileges, while others are forced into obligations.

    And you can't have individual freedoms when some are given something at the expense of others. You NEED a powerful state to ensure that these entitlements are given to some at the expense of others, and that's just another way to 'divide and conquer'.

    --

    Closer to TFA: the universities are supposed to be these bastions of free expression of ideas, where non-mainstream ideas can be expressed and looked at without bias, but are they?

    Who will it help if the universities end up being 'secured' the way airports are with TSA agents, for example, looking for signs of 'infiltration'?

    How about FBI raiding universities with (or without) search warrants, turning papers and files over, breaking hands and throwing charges around? How about military doing it? (don't forget NDAA). What if they find a TERRORIST SYMPATHISER?! Will you ever see or hear from that person again, after all, they are terrorists, otherwise they wouldn't have been taken into the custody in the first place, right?

    You think it's too far? Where do you think this is going?

    1. Re:False threats from everywhere by bytesex · · Score: 2

      Dude. Chapman was real.

      --
      Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    2. Re:False threats from everywhere by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Really? The difference between her being 'real spy' and her being a 'real prostitute' was what exactly?

    3. Re:False threats from everywhere by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 1

      The mark she slept with? And in what form was the payment she received for services? :o)

    4. Re:False threats from everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the while Ron Paul is marginalised

      That's because Ron Paul has plenty of followers who use the same divide and conquer us vs them tactics, saying that everybody else are "political forces" out to get you and increase government and rob you of your freedoms (the "them"), while Paul is the guy to fix everything (the "us")

      People may not be smart, but they aren't so dumb to not see the hypocrisy

      It's naive to think that none of these followers wouldn't influence Paul's rule, so people 's support for Paul is reflected accordingly

      Oh sure, other parties are full of lunatics too, but people generally prefer lunatics they know over lunatics they don't know.

    5. Re:False threats from everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holy mother of LOL

    6. Re:False threats from everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well said. We need to wake up, but I doubt we will.

    7. Re:False threats from everywhere by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      All the while Ron Paul is marginalised, the guy who is building real momentum, a real movement of change

      Ron Paul has some serious problems, though.

      I admire and appreciate his policies on freedom of the individual, and I think about half of his policies (all the ones to do with personal freedom) are excellent.

      However, his policies on freedom of business (i.e. freedom to harm others) are dangerously naive. Either he seems to think that people under the guise of business wouldn't burn the entire world for a dollar extra, or he doesn't care.

      Given his ideological stance, he would actually follow through on those policies.
      I think the other politicians while much more despicable would save their own skin rather than actually follow through on policies as desctructive as some of the ones Ron Paul wants to follow.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    8. Re:False threats from everywhere by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Destructive? So under Ron Paul's understanding of Constitution no corporation would get a bail out, government wouldn't be in business of handing out moral hazards, like liability caps for any sort of mishap (deep water drilling, 75Million USD liability cap?)

      No company would be able to use government to promote its own agenda, no company would be getting free money, money would not be destroyed by the federal government, no inflation. No company would get any special privileges - level playing field. Terrible, destructive.

      No company would have the upper hand by having better lobbyists, sure, they could lobby, but they couldn't GET anything from lobbying, so what would be the point?

      The competition would actually arise again, the government wouldn't be in business of promoting, creating and maintaining and saving monopolies. Horror.

    9. Re:False threats from everywhere by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      Destructive?

      Certainly.

      You're trying to pick a bunch of random ideas to show he's not dangerous. Read my post. I wasn't claiming all of his ideas are dangerous. Half are fantastic. The other half are off the wall loopy.

      So under Ron Paul's understanding of Constitution

      there would be no FDA, no EPA, no FAA and no national parks. Somehow, he believes that the past won't repeat itself. Such organisations didn't spring out of nothing. They arrived because companies were making a right mess of things.

      He seems to somehow believe that companies (motivated by profit) will take the long-term sustainable view on things because of market forces despite a few hundred years evidence to the contrary.

      He basically as far as I can tell seems to be against any sort of strategic, long-term thinking. The free market will never be anything other than reactive, but sometimes that's too late.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    10. Re:False threats from everywhere by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      She wasn't a prostitute. I don't know where you got that idea. She was funded by the Russian government. She went back home and got a post in the Russian government.

      Also, if you thought that was scaremongering, you are tonedeaf to the news. It was hilarious, and in the news, she was mainly portrayed as harmless.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    11. Re:False threats from everywhere by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      there would be no FDA, no EPA, no FAA and no national parks. Somehow, he believes that the past won't repeat itself. Such organisations didn't spring out of nothing. They arrived because companies were making a right mess of things.

      - no, such organisations sprang out out of general public not caring to stop the federal government from grabbing powers that it was not authorised to have. He is 100% correct, those organisations have no right to exist at the federal level. It doesn't mean at all that those functions must not be handled somehow, but he is absolutely correct that the federal government has no authority to meddle with any of that. Add to that the departments of education, energy, interior, commerce, agriculture, business, Fed, FDIC, HUD, FHA, F&F, FBI and it's a good start on getting individual freedoms back (and individuals run businesses).

      He seems to somehow believe that companies (motivated by profit) will take the long-term sustainable view on things because of market forces despite a few hundred years evidence to the contrary.

      - no, it's only since about 1913 that the companies stopped thinking about the long term development, but it really took off since 1971 and it well coincides with Nixon getting the world off the gold standard - defaulting on the dollar. This is connected, as the government started printing fake money and creating inflation and pushed interest rates down artificially, it took down the rates on corporate bonds as well, so eventually people stopped viewing corporate stock and bonds as long term investment, stopped relying on ability to earn interest (indeed, with inflation being between 11% and 15% for the last 40 years, and especially since the early nineties) people now only view stock as a tool for trading - buy low sell high. This is not only about corporations themselves at all, this is about fake money and the reality of inflation destroying savings and investment. That's why the jobs are leaving as well.

    12. Re:False threats from everywhere by roman_mir · · Score: 1

      Really, she wasn't a prostitute, where did I get THAT idea? Go back and look at all the pictures, postings and look at how she was described to 'approach' all those people she was trying to get to.

    13. Re:False threats from everywhere by serviscope_minor · · Score: 2

      - no, such organisations sprang out out of general public not caring to stop the federal government from grabbing powers that it was not authorised to have.

      No, such organisations came sprang out of the general public realising that companies were basically wrecking the environment and lying about drug efficacy or selling tainted drugs.

      It doesn't mean at all that those functions must not be handled somehow

      And his methods are nuts. Apparently, rather than the EPA stopping companies wrecking the environment, land owners should all sue the company after the damage has been done. Never mind that by that stage, the damage to their land and life has already been done.

      He's full of ideas of things that shouldn't be done and wants to scrap the entities that do them. He provides absolutely no mechanism to stop same abuses happening that the entities were specifically designed to stop.

      no, it's only since about 1913 that the companies stopped thinking about the long term development, but it really took off since 1971 and it well coincides with Nixon getting the world off the gold standard

      Do you have any evidence for that at all? Companies have done bad things before 1913 and will continue to do bad thingd for as long as they exist. There is no market incentive not do bad things.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    14. Re:False threats from everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no market incentive not do bad things.

      To die hard free market believers, they believe the people/businesses who do bad things will fail on a free market, so the damage is minimal (since they'll fail before doing serious damage), and government would have done much worse

      Of course, the whole system relies on the free market to be preserved, and there's no real lasting solution to do that. It's one thing to say "uphold the Constitution", it's a different matter to actually do it

    15. Re:False threats from everywhere by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Oh, don't you realize that's how every 14-30 year old dresses now?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    16. Re:False threats from everywhere by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you need to take some Zanex or something.

      I know "the man" is trying to keep us all down and stuff - but you're so all over the place that I am not even sure what you are bitching about. Yeah the corporations have probably too much lobbying power, but then again most people are apathetic - so you have companies who care about politics vs. people who don't, of course large well funded corporations are going to be more effective at lobbying.

      But uhm... civil rights? democracy is the gateway to fascism? what? wow.

  17. Is this supposed to be news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am not an american but anything remotely important is off-limits for Chinese exchange students.

  18. People whine about outsourcing by guises · · Score: 5, Funny

    China also has more than 3,000 front companies in the U.S.

    See? That's what you call a job creator. Outsourcing works both ways.

    1. Re:People whine about outsourcing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But then, if they remove those companies from the U.S. they would be "messing with the economy". If they stop chinese/russian students from going to the U.S. universities, they would be "violating essential liberties and rights", If they don't reply, they would be "plotting something", and if they reply, they would be "lying". Best move would be not to play at all (but then they would be plotting something).

  19. What about multinationals in China? by knorthern+knight · · Score: 2

    Apple's i-everything devices are manufactured in China (e.g. Foxconn). Not only do they have the final products in their hands, they also have the individual components and the instructions to assemble them. Otherwise, Foxconn's assembly lines wouldn't work. Ditto for smartphones/laptops/computers/routers.

    --

    I'm not repeating myself
    I'm an X window user; I'm an ex-Windows user
    1. Re:What about multinationals in China? by DarwinSurvivor · · Score: 1

      This just in, wage deprived 10 year olds in China know more about your iPad than you do!

    2. Re:What about multinationals in China? by Threni · · Score: 1

      What information is in universities that's not available elsewhere anyway? Surely spying only applies to stuff that was secret in the first place? Otherwise it's calling 'learning', right?

    3. Re:What about multinationals in China? by c0lo · · Score: 1

      What information is in universities that's not available elsewhere anyway? Surely spying only applies to stuff that was secret in the first place? Otherwise it's calling 'learning', right?

      More than that... it is called "education industry" (the tuition fees being higher-towards-much-higher for foreign students).

      --
      Questions raise, answers kill. Raise questions to stay alive.
  20. Industrial Espionage by sd4f · · Score: 1

    I think this is an interesting post, because i have been thinking that a lot of countries with spy agencies are going to be stumbling across all sorts of valuable information, and in a nutshell, some of it can easily help an economy or help a country technologically advance. I have no doubt, that the spy agencies do some industrial espionage, and some companies get the benefit of that information.

  21. Paranoia by backslashdot · · Score: 1

    Is there a limit to paranoia? I fear there isn't.

    Anyone can make up stuff and get themselves paranoid over it. It'll be funny, but then one of these paranoid schizophrenics might eventually get their finger on the nuke trigger. I dont see the point of making enemies with the whole world. I mean, do we really want a war with the Russians and Chinese? Unlike some other countries, they can actually fight back some. Is it worth losing a few million lives over .. still don't care? ... well .. imagine those lives lost were you .. over what .. paranoia and economic issues? If you think the economy sucks now, let's not see how it performs during a nuclear war.

    1. Re:Paranoia by SirGarlon · · Score: 1

      Is there a limit to paranoia? I fear there isn't.

      The needle on my irony meter just twitched. :-)

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
  22. Why bother it's too much work, for china anyway. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are already getting our technology, their building it. If they want more of it offer free shipping their already making it for us cheap.

    Even my Kershaw knife is made in china, but designed in the USA. Says so right on the box, it's actually quite high quality too I may add. The only things I have off hand that aren't made in china is some of my airsoft guns which are made in Taiwan and Japan. And I think my craftsman tools are still made in the US, I think I have to double check. That is about it.

  23. stealing a beach by lkcl · · Score: 1

    "If it wanted to steal a beach, Russia would send a forklift."

    i attended a security briefing whilst working in a secure environment where i was, rather unusually, going to be going on holiday to china (hence the concern of the company i was working for, and the reason why they gave me the security briefing).

    according to that briefing, the description of china's intelligence strategy is correct: yes, china intelligence operatives will simply approach absolutely any chinese citizen and grill them. tourists who happened to be on holiday who took photos of a U.S. naval ship, which contains pictures of the antenna arrays on the top of the ship and so on. and, because of the chinese culture of rote-learning, chinese citizens memorisation abilities are legendary.

    russia on the other hand, i was told, would send in sleeper-agents, specially-trained, and activate them as needed, decades later. if you've seen the film "Red", although that's highly specialist area (assassins), it's pretty accurate as to the strategy that's deployed by russian intelligence, generally.

    from a different source, i've heard rumour of someone who found out that russia has sleeper agents in british schools. sounds far-fetched, and like all sleeper-agent intelligence operations is easily deniable as "insane conspiracy theory" ha ha ha look what he's smoking. except this guy who found out is - was - an MP - and was getting death threats. he'd come home and find that all the pictures of his family had been turned to face the wall. real comforting stuff.

    1. Re:stealing a beach by FhnuZoag · · Score: 1

      Well, I've heard rumours 9/11 was a hologram.

      It would be good if you could, you know, name this MP, because I'm pretty sure I'd have heard of it.

    2. Re:stealing a beach by daktari · · Score: 1

      If you don't bother starting your sentences with capitals, I shan't bother reading your post. Respect your readers and they shall read...

      --
      A fool sees not the same tree that a wise man sees. -- Willam Blake
    3. Re:stealing a beach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      whine more

    4. Re:stealing a beach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the capital starting letter conveys no information so dropping it is only logical. i can see how some seven digitter has never thought it through though.

  24. Irrelevant example by Kupfernigk · · Score: 4, Informative
    The Cambridge group were not academic spies looking for research and trade secrets. The idea was to infiltrate the Establishment, for which they were well placed. Attendance at a university wasn't relevant; what was relevant was their connections through the Apostles, and the contacts they made.

    Incidentally, Kim Philby maintained that he did not spy on Britain for the Soviet Union; he spied on the USA on behalf of both. Perhaps bizarrely to American ideas, the Cambridge group seem to have seen themselves as patriots, helping to protect Britain against American domination. Their motivation was completely different from the Chinese spies in the USA, and the two cases are in no way comparable.

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
  25. More concerned with law enforcement than spies by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These days, I'm more afraid of the law enforcement on campus. I'm not aware of spies braining anyone with a nightstick (and stealing their phone) for recording them, or pepper-spraying someone for sitting on the sidewalk.

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    1. Re:More concerned with law enforcement than spies by Original+Replica · · Score: 1

      How about chasing an unarmed person into their own house and shooting them dead for flushing the joint they were smoking?

      --
      We are all just people.
    2. Re:More concerned with law enforcement than spies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it was aggravated sidewalk sitting. clearly when you have your legs crossed and arms linked you are an imminent mortal threat to a bunch of guys with guns and a `do what I want and get away with it badges`

    3. Re:More concerned with law enforcement than spies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This article is just typical Law Enforcement rhetoric. If we are to take them at their word for ever part of this bogeyman piece, the US has failed at such a colossal level with our post-9/11 dragnet, that even opening up the borders would be like nothing happened.

      Funny how, even a decade after that world changing event, and after multiple pieces of rights trampling legislation hath made its way through into Law, we're now being told it's worse than ever.

      Most Americans grew up with this fairy tale. It was called, "The Boy Who Cried Wolf"!

    4. Re:More concerned with law enforcement than spies by Ihmhi · · Score: 1

      I live in Newark, NJ, and there are a bunch colleges all right next to each other. Rutgers Newark, Essex County College, UMDNJ, NJIT, and all kinds of other smaller facilities and buildings. Most of the bigger ones have their own police forces, but there is no real defined "campus" that doesn't have city roads passing through it. So in this little area we literally have four or five private police forces driving around on our city streets with nearly all of the power of the police and not nearly enough oversight IMO.

    5. Re:More concerned with law enforcement than spies by strikethree · · Score: 1

      It is worse than that. I am far far far more afraid of being viewed as a potential spy (I am not of course) and losing my ability to work or even possibly being set up and thrown in jail just to get rid of the potential undesirables.

      In other words, the people running and working in the government are much more likely to be hurting us (and in MUCH greater numbers) than the people they are supposedly protecting us from. I guess Osama was much smarter than anyone gave him credit for. The responses to his attacks are EXACTLY as he predicted.

      I wonder how much worse it will get before it gets better? I would really like to feel safe when I see a policeman or government agent. As it is, I feel fear every time.

      Dave

      --
      "Someone needs to talk to the tree of liberty about its ghoulish drinking problem." by ohnocitizen
  26. Hogwash by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'for the sole purpose of acquiring our technology,' said former CIA officer S. Eugene Poteat."

    Why would they want to go through all that trouble to "Acquire" our technology when we let them build it at the foxconn factories...

  27. However by Kupfernigk · · Score: 1

    You will be six feet deep in horse shit. I admire the Amish and respect their principles greatly, but their way of life would not support the current US population (and much of the current Western population don't have the intelligence, skills or motivation to follow it.)

    --
    From scarped cliff or quarried stone she cries "A thousand types are gone, I care for nothing, no not one."
    1. Re:However by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You will be six feet deep in horse shit.

      Doubleplusgood! No more polluting artificial fertilizer industry. Organic food for everyone.

  28. Volume control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its too bad they havent stolen the "indoor voice" from us, the Chinese apparently dont realize that if you are sitting next to someone you dont have to shout to be able to convey information.

    1. Re:Volume control by dave420 · · Score: 0

      Says an American. The irony is delicious.

  29. this is nothing compared by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to the Fifth Columnists infesting our federal government

  30. How much are those secrets worth? by west · · Score: 1

    Given the story about the inability for important cancer research results to be duplicated from a few days ago, those foreigners may just want to check all those research results they've been stealing...

  31. Protect our National Sand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Russians and Chinese are after our sand. Clearly, we must institute screening procedures at all of the entrances and exits of our beaches, deserts, and playgrounds. We must have more TSA to safeguard our National Sand!

  32. Naval history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    The Brits would copy it but get all the good bits wrong and make the bad bits worse.

    Watch any history on the the Aircraft carrier and then post about the Brits. HINT: The US' Naval power has a huge debt to the British.

    Also, the things I've been hearing about the F-35; well, the Brits did a bang up job designing the Harrier years before we got to the F-35

    1. Re:Naval history by Viol8 · · Score: 2

      Not to mention the small fact that the brits invented the jet engine but gave the design to the US for free for war costs (yes, the US charged the british for the some help in the war whereas the west germans got a nice free rebuild of their society at no cost)

    2. Re:Naval history by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Thanks to the US for not sharing the nuclear tech we helped you develop on the understanding that we could have to too. Did you know we only finished paying off out WW2 debts to the US a few years back?

      I don't know why we have a special relationship with the US. We are much closer to France - we built cool stuff with them like Concord, Eurofighter and the Channel Tunnel. In the 60s there was even talk of merging the two countries. For some reason we prefer to be the US's bitch instead.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    3. Re:Naval history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, Germany invented the jet engine under hitler, and the engine was used during WWII.

      The invention was then "stolen" like a lot of German inventions or ideas from the times. Better get your facts right.

    4. Re:Naval history by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      Umm , not it wasn't. Frank Whittle invented the turbojet which is the jet engine everyone knows today. The germans used the pulse jet in the V1 if thats what you're thinking of and they didn't even invent that.

    5. Re:Naval history by camperdave · · Score: 2

      I don't know why we have a special relationship with the US. We are much closer to France - we built cool stuff with them like Concord, Eurofighter and the Channel Tunnel. In the 60s there was even talk of merging the two countries. For some reason we prefer to be the US's bitch instead.

      It is the unspoken, subconscious hope of reuniting the empire.

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
    6. Re:Naval history by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      While I do consider myself British (though I'd rather not), I thought the Germans invented the Jet engine?

    7. Re:Naval history by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      The French respect their women, that's why we don't have a relationship with them.

    8. Re:Naval history by idontgno · · Score: 2

      How much of it was simple Cold-War realism?

      Go ahead. Align yourself with the awesome French nuclear umbrella.

      NATO was an American alliance with Europe. England hung in there because aligning with anyone else was basically going it alone. And the mindset and habits of an entire generation of politics was shaped by that.

      Yeah. The U.S. was not very generous to its WWII allies. At some point, it became a critical objective to break down all the old colonial empires and reduce them to second fiddles. U.S. hegemony couldn't tolerate competition. In exchange, you got Pax Americana and 50 years of thermonuclear brinkmanship.

      I guess it could have been worse. WWI segued into WWII largely because European empires were allowed to persist and continue their competition for power, prestige, and colonial holdings.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    9. Re:Naval history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -10, Actually Responded Seriously

    10. Re:Naval history by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      WWI segued into WWII largely because European empires were allowed to persist and continue their competition for power, prestige, and colonial holdings.

      No, it was because we completely screwed Germany after WWI. We forced them to pay reparations and their economy tanked. Inflation reached 16,000%. By late 1923 it took 200 billion marks buy a loaf of bread.

      Out of that was born Nazism. What prevented another conflict after WWII was that we helped rebuild Germany and created a European union where war was unthinkable. All nuclear did was create a cold war where everyone was afraid of sudden annihilation.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    11. Re:Naval history by chill · · Score: 1

      Why? Because what the Nazi's failed at doing the Soviet's would have been able to finish -- and France wouldn't have been able to save your asses.

      Compare and contrast the actions of the U.S. in Europe after WW2 to the actions of the Soviet Union. Which side of the Iron Curtain was better off in the aftermath?

      There is a reason Poland and the Czech Republic are not only willing, but eager to host American missile defense bases. For them the war ended decades after it did for Britain and France and the memories haven't yet faded.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    12. Re:Naval history by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Nope. The Germans independently invented turbojet engines:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_jet_engine

      In 1935 Hans von Ohain started work on a similar design in Germany, apparently unaware of Whittle's work.[11] His first device was strictly experimental and could only run under external power, but he was able to demonstrate the basic concept. Ohain was then introduced to Ernst Heinkel, one of the larger aircraft industrialists of the day, who immediately saw the promise of the design. Heinkel had recently purchased the Hirth engine company, and Ohain and his master machinist Max Hahn were set up there as a new division of the Hirth company. They had their first HeS 1 centrifugal engine running by September 1937. Unlike Whittle's design, Ohain used hydrogen as fuel, supplied under external pressure. Their subsequent designs culminated in the gasoline-fuelled HeS 3 of 1,100 lbf (5 kN), which was fitted to Heinkel's simple and compact He 178 airframe and flown by Erich Warsitz in the early morning of August 27, 1939, from Rostock-Marienehe aerodrome, an impressively short time for development. The He 178 was the world's first turbojet-powered aircraft to fly.

    13. Re:Naval history by Viol8 · · Score: 1

      "In 1928, RAF College Cranwell cadet [8] Frank Whittle formally submitted his ideas for a turbo-jet to his superiors. In October 1929 he developed his ideas further.[9] On 16 January 1930 in England, Whittle submitted his first patent (granted in 1932).["

      1932 is earlier than 1935. The british invented the jet , end of discussion.

    14. Re:Naval history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks to the US for not sharing the nuclear tech

      Publicly sharing, no. Secretly... yes we've shared a lot of tech with you. The reason it was not done publicly was because the only thing which scared the Soviets more than the US having nukes in Europe was having an Independent Nuclear Power in Europe, and the only thing which scared them more than that was if such a power was allied with the US. Which you were.

      I also noticed you forgot to say "thanks" for not having to spend billions of dollars during the cold war to keep an arsenal of fucking nukes ready to launch.

      For some reason we prefer to be the US's bitch instead.

      Well you might want to study the history of your two nations. It'll be pretty obvious once you do. Just because some Euro-Hippies smoked too much grass in the 60's doesn't mean there was ever any general public support for a merge.

  33. Oh hey! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's some FUD! I love you Americans, you're so excitable.

  34. The government is also infiltrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    by grifters and traitors.

  35. whining by Tom · · Score: 1

    Are we back at the "hippie communist students" stage again, yes? Someone has taken their regression therapy too far.

    --
    Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
  36. S. Eugene Poteat is a serial bullshitter by FhnuZoag · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm 90% certain this 3000 front companies figure is going to appear in a ton of places now. But where the hell does it come from?

    Because S. Eugene Poteat is no longer a CIA agent. He's been out of the CIA for over 10 years. So how does he have access to privileged intel on Chinese intelligence activities? How on earth could he, a man whose intel career ended well before the start of this nonsense, know?

    The answer is, by my reckoning, he doesn't. It's just a made up statistic. And there's a pattern behind this guy's statements too: he's long been a proponent of the removal of accountability from the intel services.

    "Thirty years ago," he wrote, "the Church and Pike Committees bought into the KGB perception management campaigns to discredit American intelligence and proceeded to limit the activities of the intelligence community ..."

    Since the Church and Pike Committee hearings are probably not covered in high school history courses, let me remind younger readers that these were congressional committees convened to investigate egregious excesses by an intelligence community that had come to act with little or no external accountability.

    The agency' excesses included assassinations, coups detats, revolutionary and counter-revolutionary movements, covert action to influence the elections of friends and enemies alike, mind control experiments that sometimes led to murder, and other behaviors that caused lots of reasonable people to question the agency' unlimited freedom to act without transparency or accountability. The excesses were not about how they gathered intelligence so policies could be set. The excesses were about policies devised and executed in a black box.

    Poteat is saying that citizens concerned with that unrestrained behavior were deceived by the KGB.

    http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0316-27.htm

    There's a certain wing of the US who is pushing the intel agenda. By reproducing the cold war, they get more funding and the unlimited powers they always coveted. S. Eugene Poteat's proper title is 'Intellaine security company employee, and lobbyist for greater surveillance powers without civilian oversight'. Don't buy into their bullshit, unless they show their working.

    1. Re:S. Eugene Poteat is a serial bullshitter by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      Because S. Eugene Poteat is no longer a CIA agent. He's been out of the CIA for over 10 years.

      Do you work for the CIA? If not, how do you know if Poteat works for the CIA?

    2. Re:S. Eugene Poteat is a serial bullshitter by FhnuZoag · · Score: 1

      I read his biography?

    3. Re:S. Eugene Poteat is a serial bullshitter by ThatsMyNick · · Score: 1

      And you believed it?

    4. Re:S. Eugene Poteat is a serial bullshitter by jovius · · Score: 1

      I'm 90% certain this 3000 front companies figure is going to appear in a ton of places now. But where the hell does it come from?

      Jeffrey Lewis comments on the matter (about 7 years ago...)

      http://lewis.armscontrolwonk.com/archive/727/how-many-chinese-front-companies

      The number has been the same for the last 13 years it seems.

    5. Re:S. Eugene Poteat is a serial bullshitter by FhnuZoag · · Score: 1

      So, "some of the 3000 Chinese companies in the US (maybe 12, maybe 20-30) might have relations (possibly entirely above board and legitimate) with the chinese military" has mutated into "more than 3000 Chinese companies are actually front companies for chinese intelligence trying to steal IP"?

      What a farce.

    6. Re:S. Eugene Poteat is a serial bullshitter by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Do you work for the CIA? If not, how do you know if Poteat works for the CIA?

      It doesn't matter. For his information to be credible, he needs to give evidence to back it up.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    7. Re:S. Eugene Poteat is a serial bullshitter by jafac · · Score: 1

      Yeah, my bio says I don't work for the CIA anymore either.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  37. The FBI needs more money by qbzzt · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Classified research doesn't belong in universities. They aren't equipped to handle information controls. It's that simple.

    But the FBI, of course, needs more money to investigate this issue. When the deficit is sky high and government budgets are likely to be cut, it is very important to shout loudly about the importance of your agency.

    --
    -- Support a free market in the field of government
    1. Re:The FBI needs more money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You have no clue, friend. A huge amount of classified research happens at universities. Enabling technology has to be developed somewhere. It would be horribly more expensive, and deprive universities of great STEM professors, to bring it all in-house in the military. However, with cost (not cost plus) contracts, we can fund research with strong military implications, keep professors teaching in their fields, and develop the next generation of students.

      The problem here isn't the foriegn spies in universities. The problem is that China has decided that competition with the US is a zero sum game, and destruction of the western economy is a mid-term necessity.

    2. Re:The FBI needs more money by camperdave · · Score: 1

      When the deficit is sky high and government budgets are likely to be cut, it is very important to shout loudly about the importance of your agency.

      Ah! The truth at last. If I had mod points...

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  38. Compared to Ira*, what is the biggest threat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Compared to Ira*, what is the biggest threat to the American lifestyle? My guess that no *stan or Ira* country is even close to the threat from the 1 bn headed country.

    1. Re:Compared to Ira*, what is the biggest threat by FhnuZoag · · Score: 1

      What's the biggest threat to the American lifestyle?

      Isn't it obvious?

      The USA itself.

      The Chinese could do a lot, but little of it can compare to the damage the US has dealt and will potentially continue to deal to its own economy, to its political system, to its civil liberties and justice system, its international reputation, its health system, and now, it seems, to its research community.

  39. Shock horror by jonbryce · · Score: 1

    Some people go to universities to learn things, rather than, for example, to get drunk every night of the week.

    1. Re:Shock horror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some people go to universities to learn things, rather than, for example, to get drunk every night of the week.

      [Citation needed]

  40. We were always at war with Eastasia. by hessian · · Score: 1

    Sadly, it's true: if you're the superpower, you become the police power, and all wrongdoers in the world hate you.

    Russia and China have been fighting us via proxy wars for six decades and it's not going to stop until one party wins.

    1. Re:We were always at war with Eastasia. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      US will lose. You will be bankrupt soon.

    2. Re:We were always at war with Eastasia. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So who's going to be the bad guy when America stops being a super power?

  41. Sheltered nerds by benjfowler · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Wow. Lots of people here with their heads up their arses, ranting and raving and foaming at the mouth about "RACIST" this, "RACIST" that, without even the slightest appreciation about how the worlds works.

    In your fine, shiny, squeaky clean middle class utopia. people of different races, colours and creeds DO rub along nicely. I see it at work ever day, and saw it at college. Middle class people everywhere have so much in common, a lot of sheltered, privileged middle class kids think that anybody who breaks this mould has something wrong with them. They're usually the same kids out protesting against "racism" and whatnot, not realizing that underclass/working class people of colour despise them, their culture and everything they stand for because they're rich, privileged etc and in their eyes, holding the brown man down. It's the same in Britain, America, France, wherever you go, with large communities of foreign, brown, dirt-poor and very angry people.

    The further down the social hierarchy you go, the more sharply divided people are, the more hateful they are, and the more resentful they are, regardless of who they are. Racism, bigotry, mutual suspicion and hatred is a fact of life -- even more so when you're growing up in a bad area or going to a "failing" school. Racism cuts both ways too -- most of the most disgusting bigotry I've seen has been brown-on-brown.

    I dislike right-wing skinheads and anti-Semites as much as the next guy, but "anti-racists" and antifas are almost as bad, because they are naiive, and are out "protecting" people who hate them, and would mug them and stove their heads in given half a chance.

    Left-wingers, the world is a hateful, unfair place, and crying and jumping down and crying "racist racist RACIST lalaLALALALA" every time somebody says something you disagree with, is not going to change anything. If anything, it drives the hatred into the shadows.

    1. Re:Sheltered nerds by Johann+Lau · · Score: 1

      not realizing that underclass/working class people of colour despise them, their culture and everything they stand for because they're rich, privileged etc and in their eyes, holding the brown man down.

      Oh bullshit. Have you ever tried not being a dick or something... ?

      I'm not saying resentment doesn't exist, but what's your point? That white middle class kids better start fearing the less privileged, or "stop protecting those who hate and would mug and kill them"? ---- Are you even remotely aware of the irony?

      If you're worried about resentment, stop doing what creates that resentment. Sure, you cannot easily undo colonization and whatnot all by yourself, but you can approach people coldly or openly, you can respect or ignore them. And that goes a long way. I'm not saying that's a magic bullet... yes, people can be jealous, and even poor people can be assholes. I'll give you that much, people are people. But still, my personal experience differs vastly.. I know some of the sentiments you're talking about because "brown people" talked to me about them, me being a blonde white German male. Were they just drunk, or did I genuinely listen? IT'S A FUCKING MYSTERY. Also, the coldest motherfuckers I've come across so far all have been "white", and the only person I ever "knew" and many years later heard was involved in a robbery/murder, was a "white" kid with rich parents.

      From what I've seen, poverty doesn't create criminal energy as much as it creates meekness (in the bad sense of the word, it can break people). Privilege on the other hand doesn't generate as much responsibility as we'd like, and often enough results in callousness, if not sadism. Maybe I just live on a different planet.

    2. Re:Sheltered nerds by _8553454222834292266 · · Score: 1

      Take your "social hierarchy" and racism back to the 1800s.

  42. Spying is overrated by InterGuru · · Score: 1

    In the latter half of the last century Russia and East Germany had extensive spy networks, probably the biggest in the world. Look what happened to them.

    1. Re:Spying is overrated by mdsolar · · Score: 1

      They democratized?

  43. Entropy of information by DarkOx · · Score: 2

    Information acts like just about everything else in the universe. Without constantly applied effort and energy it flows from high concentration to lower concentrations.

    We as a society need to recognize that its not possible to have it both ways. We are going to be open, and with that comes acceptance, our ideas, invention, imaginary property, etc will be making their way out in to the world; or we can close down and with concerted effort and expenditure we can keep our secrets.

    I think history shows us open *is* better. If for no other reason than closed is actually really hard. We'd have to limit what you can buy/sell/manufacture abroad in ways that would probably be the undoing of many of our biggest business when they suddenly lose their foreign plant investments over night. Locking down our boards will push American wages up but it will also push prices of things like agricultural products typically produced with lots of immigrant and alien labor high enough to stave today's poor and impoverish today's middle class.

    --
    Repeal the 17th Amendment TODAY! Also Please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/right-to-read.html
  44. Suspicious indeed by Maury+Markowitz · · Score: 1

    "China also has more than 3,000 front companies in the U.S. 'for the sole purpose of acquiring our technology,' said former CIA officer S. Eugene Poteat"

    Does anyone else get the feeling that Mr. Poteat has placed *every* Chinese company in that category?

  45. Yeah and... by Lumpy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The TSA says that everyone that has a carry on with more than 3oz of liquid is a terrorist.

    So how are we to believe these departments that make crap up to keep the fear machine going?:

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Yeah and... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear that our nation's universities are riddled with COMMUNISTS!!!!

      Senator McCarthy himself told me so!

  46. This just seems like affirmative action for whites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They know the Chinese are the best students at American tech schools and they probably think if they can ban Chinese from their schools it'll give lil' Whitey jr. a better chance at admissions. Sure, that'll work, it'll also make your schools suck.

  47. Oh noes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If the Chicoms get their hands on the latest cutting edge research into dialectical gender interpretations of the crypto patriarchy we're all f*%#ed!

  48. FBI wants an excuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To spy on hot Asian chicks.

  49. FBI squandering resources on MP3s & movie pira by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The government will chase you around the world because you might have a copy of a song off the radio but not only will they not investigate industrial spies - they'll charge you with discrimination if you refuse hire aliens.

  50. Misunderstanding by hattable · · Score: 1

    We all are just misreading the FBI jargon -- s/spies/students/g and we'll be on the same page.

    --
    OMG facts!
  51. FBI by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    If the FBI told me the sky was blue i would go out and check it.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
  52. Beach, fork-lift, fail by mbone · · Score: 1

    Any person who says that you could steal a beach with a fork-lift is not qualified to comment on public events.

    (A big grain of sand is maybe 0.5 mm in diameter, so 1000 grains of sand is maybe 1/2 a milligram, which isn't much of a beach, but I will give him that as a metaphor.)

    1. Re:Beach, fork-lift, fail by dkf · · Score: 1

      A big grain of sand is maybe 0.5 mm in diameter, so 1000 grains of sand is maybe 1/2 a milligram, which isn't much of a beach

      Oh, you fail. A miniscule amount of research leads to the conclusion that a grain of sand is 0.67–23 mg, and that a thousand of them could weigh on the order of an ounce (it depends of course on the grade of sand in use, but the order of magnitude is correct).

      --
      "Little does he know, but there is no 'I' in 'Idiot'!"
  53. Don't forget Rakim from Oakland... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget Rakim from Oakland... :)

    http://www.bannedinhollywood.com/computers-are-racist/

    You mustn't do school too difficult!

  54. We already know Ur a Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  55. Brave New World by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "We need a program of psychosurgery and political control of our society. The purpose is physical control of the mind. Everyone who deviates from the given norm can be surgically mutilated.
    The individual may think that the most important reality is his own existence, but this is only his personal point of view. This lacks historical perspective.
    Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. This kind of liberal orientation has great appeal. We must electrically control the brain. Some day armies and generals will be controlled by electrical stimulation of the brain."

    Dr. Jose Delgado
    Director of Neuropsychiatry
    Yale University Medical School
    Congressional Record No. 26, Vol. 118, February 24, 1974

  56. Coming from an undereducated fool like U? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We don't listen 2 offtopic sockpuppet usin trolls like u -> http://news.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2773441&cid=39620303

    1. Re:Coming from an undereducated fool like U? by _8553454222834292266 · · Score: 1

      We don't listen to ACs, either.

  57. it's true by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, duh! That's what tenure is for.

    Listen, foreigners should not be permitted to attend U.S. universities at U.S. taxpayer expense.
    But, the universities like the colour of their money, so it happens. Those slots should be filled
    with Americans. When I attended, at least half (from speaking with them) were foreign nationals.
    People mistake these comments as racist, etc., but it's not about the people, it's about our poor
    educational standards that allow foreign nationals to replace equally qualified potential
    American students from attending
    . Foreign nations would be crazy to not take advantage of
    a handout like this. This is an entitlement that should not exist, an entitlement everyone
    should understand is hurting our country and should be, by legislation, ended.

    1. Re:it's true by FhnuZoag · · Score: 1

      International students do not attend US universities at taxpayer expense. They instead pay much higher fees, effectively subsidising the fees of domestic students - that's why universities like them. Living expenses also contribute billions each year to the US economy.

      http://www.nafsa.org/_/file/_/eis09/usa.pdf

      Apart from the money, they also make important scientific contributions, frequently choosing to stay. Look through google scholar, and you'll see the increasing numbers of chinese names. They aren't there to steal research - they are *doing* the research, and the fact that they are choosing to do it in the US and publishing it means the US gets to benefit from both the results themselves and the reputation of having ground breaking research done there instead of in Asia or Europe.

  58. close all universities by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and any other education related things.
    we need a mass of dumb people paying the tax.

  59. Watch the bullshitter run from a question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I heard u say u wrote some books - what's their title & publisher then? Watch him run.

  60. And if they're treated nicely and see our virtues by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    maybe they'll take home values like:

      - freedom of the press
      - freedom of speech
      - the importance of one-citizen, one-vote
      - the rights of the individual and the minority to be safe from oppression

    and we can see communism in China go away as well.

  61. This is no surprise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How could anyone be surprised by hearing that spies have "infiltrated" the U.S. education system? I guess that's what we get for opening our doors to foreigners...

    If I had it my way, I'd export every one of them back to their country (i.e. - the Chinese, Russian, etc. students.) Our entire country is falling apart. We can't provide for others of foreign lands when we can't even provide for ourselves.

    Send them all home. Open the doors to our citizens. Get back on track with things between now and the next 10 to 20 years, and then we could re-allow foreign students using modified systems and programs to ensure better safeguards.

    (I know, I know--too narrow-minded or prejudice or whatever else you can come up with--but that's okay. You're entitled to your opinion.)

    1. Re:This is no surprise... by airdweller · · Score: 1

      Thank you. You're entitled to your idiocy too.

  62. FBI infiltrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    FBI infiltrated by psychotic paranoid delusional disorder...

  63. Ron Paul has the best strategy by mdsolar · · Score: 2

    Ron Paul voted against Pi Day. If we simply give up all interest in science and technology, the Chinese will have noting to steal. Just close the universities. Stop inventing stuff. Stop teaching math. That'll do the trick.

    1. Re:Ron Paul has the best strategy by camperdave · · Score: 2

      Ron Paul voted against Pi Day.

      Of course, because Pi is wrong!

      --
      When our name is on the back of your car, we're behind you all the way!
  64. You're right and you're wrong - Schrodinger's Cat! by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 2

    That's true. And wealth is inexorably moving from the West to the East for a variety of reasons.

    But it doesn't have to be a zero-sum game, as China and us believe it to be.

    There. Fixed that for'cha. Not to say there isn't aggressive competition from China, our greatest competitor/adversary for the rest of the 21st century, but it is not like us and the USSR during the Cuban Missile Crisis as many chicken haws in our political establishment want to pander to our ignorant masses (who are more than happy to believe it.)

    You are right. It is not a zero-sum game. It does not have to be. And we must not let it be.

    But you are wrong (or at least your sentence as constructed gives the wrong impression). Badly formulated perceptions are being made on both sides of the Pacific.

  65. Protect Borders by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's why it is important to protect our borders. It's just a little to late now.

  66. There's a Red under my bed ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and a little yellow man in my head ...

    Paranoia, the Destroyer.

  67. Simple solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop letting the students in.. problem solved

  68. What they might be really saying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Universities seem to be full of people who prefer other nations over the USA, for sure, and full of people who idolize dictators, etc. That doesn't necessarily make them spies, and if I was after technology, the universities are often some of the worst places to look for it. Still, China could be happy to waste its money on this, who knows what they think?

  69. 1968 by Lawrence_Bird · · Score: 1

    In other news today the FBI said that other nations are using our academic institutions to recruit spies. Thank you and have a good night.

  70. I think TV had it right by MacGyver2210 · · Score: 1

    Alias, Covert Affairs and several other TV shows have multiple in-school academics working for the CIA. Though I can't pick out any titles, I have read at least three books where the spy was a student or professor at a university.

    Clearly this isn't anything new in spy lore, and I would wager there are far less spies in schools now than during the height of the cold war.

    --
    If the only way you can accept an assertion is by faith, then you are conceding that it can't be taken on its own merits
  71. How is it stealing? by wcrowe · · Score: 1

    The Chinese don't have to steal our technology, we give it to them, gratis, so that they can build our little electronic gew-gaws that we can't live without. They come over here, learn at our educational institutions, and take what they learn back home. How is that stealing?

    --
    Proverbs 21:19
    1. Re:How is it stealing? by TheCouchPotatoFamine · · Score: 1

      "electronic gew-gaws that we can't live without" huh? Do you even know what site you are on? If you think tech = "gew-gaws" why don't you post somewhere a little more to you taste?

      --
      CS majors know the time/space tradeoff, but they never get taught the 3rd, crucial, tradeoff of the set: comprehension!
  72. A new twist on the old saying: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Publish, perish, or pilfer for the Motherland.

  73. So what is it that makes all this relevant? by 3seas · · Score: 1

    And the answer is some humans are more than others scaled by this abstract structure we call business.

  74. Counter-espionage by the_pace · · Score: 0

    Now, THAT will turn anyone who was just beginning to think of doing counter-espionage for US off. Sad. Very sad.

  75. scientist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am a scientist in academia. These people can take whatever they want. Most of it can be found on Google scholar anyway.

  76. We'll know they've really successfully infiltrated by ProfessorDoom · · Score: 1

    when these countries stop believing in evolution.

  77. "Foreigners" in Detroit at the Big 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ive lived and worked in and around the Big 3 Automotive Companies in Detroit for 20 years. When I started, the majority of the workers were white and black American employees with various race contractors, primarily WASA but an increasing number of middle-eastern decent immigrants, growing with the middle eastern population of the Detroit area. Suddenly, about 2004-2005, Asian, primarily of Chinese decent, contractors began to appear on the scene. Itr has astounded me how many Chinese contractors are at GM, Chrysler and Ford.
    Then there are the Chinese Auto companies http://www.chinacarforums.com/chinese_car_manufacturers.html. One look at their logos tell you that they are copying another company. Whether it is Chery (Say Chevy with an "asian" accent") and their "purchase" of the QQ designs through Korea/Daewoo http://www.motorindustry.org/2011/12/15/chery-qq-vs-chevy-spark-copy-theft-the-true-story/ or JAC copying the Ford F-150 http://jalopnik.com/5880837/chinese-automaker-builds-picture-perfect-copy-of-ford-f+150-pickup or Greenwheel copying Renault http://www.leftlanenews.com/chinese-automaker-copies-recently-launched-renault-zoe.html , etc.

    How much of this is cooperation? How much is corporate espionage? How much is the Chinese government demanding all third shift production in a "government co-owned production facility" http://www.just-auto.com/news/general-motors-eyes-possible-pirating-of-second-model-paper_id68089.aspx or some other method of the Chinese Government forcing "partner" companies into allowing their sponsored manufacturing companies to leverage shared production lines for both an American and a Chinese model vehicle.

    Personally, the infection is systemic and lethal. It isn't a discussion of whether or not it will kill the patient. It is a discussion of when.

  78. That manufacturer was/were/is still moron(s) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know someone who works in a manufacturing sector for highly specialized parts, China is a customer. It was VERY interesting that they sent a team of 10 to visit their plant to "inspect" and were quite pissed when they weren't given free reign to look around and were only allowed to inspect product in a sanitary room....

    Moron "small thinkers"... I would've set up an elaborate ruse of a faked "manufacturing facility", and showed them *everything* inside it but that if they simply copied what they saw, it would only result in disastrously flawed products. And if the Chinese asked for an answer, tell them it's not the manufacturing facility, but instead is the manufacturer's know-how, that resulted in quality products.

  79. Wars and rumours of wars... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Truly, we are now living in the End Times.

  80. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  81. Go 'way! Batin'! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But I was not an academic so I did nothing. Then the ecomony dun broke and them thar plants started dying becuz we used Brawndo instead of toilet water in our sprayers.

    And there was nobody to fix any of it.

  82. European Union and American Constitution by Oxford_Comma_Lover · · Score: 1

    Europe is going through what the US went through 200 years ago, only European governments have histories going back a millennium so it's harder to create a new federalist government that governs all the states (of Europe). In the U.S., the absence of strong federal government under the articles of confederation made them realize early on that they were doing it wrong, so they drafted the Constitution. They were able to do that because they had just formed the weaker large government a few years ago, so there was less political resistance than there would have been otherwise. And they had the impetus to form a common government because they had just allied against the King, so they were used to functioning together when they first became governments.

    Europe was more of a mish-mash that evolved through feudalism and the gunpowder revolution and the infantry revolution, the rise of nationalism and religious wars, etc..., so it took it longer. WW2 provided a common enemy that led to a desire to create stronger international institutions after the failure of the League of Nations to prevent the war. This led to more international cooperation, over time, which--together with a better understanding of economic theory--led to opening markets and opening borders, and the European Union.

    --
    -- IANAL, this isn't legal advice, and definitely isn't legal advice for you. Also, Squee!
    1. Re:European Union and American Constitution by Ogi_UnixNut · · Score: 1

      Yes and no, the US had the benefit of a clean slate. Once the local indigenous population problem was "solved", they had pretty much a blank slate. The settlers had no historic claim to any land.

      Contrast to Europe, where in certain areas there are land claims stretching back millenia, as well as grudges based on past events and wars/atrocities, where feuds exist almost at state level. How on earth is that supposed to be united as one, if the centuries have not blunted the problem?

      The best that has been done is the freezing of these conflicts, only for them to be thawed out from time to time due to larger geopolitical shifts. The freezing of these conflicts requires constant pumping of resources (both monetary and manpower) in keeping the status quo, which is turning out to be rather difficult to maintain in the long run.

      Also, from what I understand the US has the policy of assimilation, you come to the US and become a citizen, you leave all your old feuds, nationality, etc... at the door. Bringing your culture is ok (and the bits people like will get merged into the melting pot) but fundamentally you become an American, and are tolerant of everyone else who has decided to become American, and are expected to put America first. Europe does not have this.

      So far Europe has been united in Economic prosperity. People are surprisingly willing to suspend all sorts of national sillyness in order to chase the almighty Euro, but that only works as long as there is growth and Euros to spread around. Once the money well starts running dry people who are getting squeezed start pointing fingers.

      Not that I think there will be a massive war between European nations, I don't think there is the stomach for it, we've done it twice, and that seems to have satiated us enough for now :)

      I suspect that as the world becomes smaller the concept of the nation state will decrease in importance, being replaced by a more fluid and cross-border mash of people, as communication gets so ubiquitous that it would be easy to raise like minded people across nations in order to fulfill a goal. I guess we'll see with time.

  83. Re:You're right and you're wrong - Schrodinger's C by seyyah · · Score: 2

    That's true. And wealth is inexorably moving from the West to the East for a variety of reasons.

    But it doesn't have to be a zero-sum game, as China and we believe it to be.

    There. Fixed that for'cha. Not to say there isn't aggressive competition from China ...

    And I fixed it for you!

  84. Actually, that's the fundamental difference by daveschroeder · · Score: 1

    Capitalism generally espouses the view that wealth can be created.

    Communism generally espouses the view that wealth can only be transferred.

    Some may say, "But Communism is not an economic system!" or "Capitalism is not a political system!" But Communism absolutely informs the economic system and governmental philosophies, and that is the difference.

    That's not to say some in the West also don't view it as zero-sum, or that those in China who support the notion of "Capitalism with Chinese characteristics", as it's called, don't believe wealth can be created, or that wealth isn't indeed being transferred in part from West to East.

    But still, this dichotomy in philosophies between the political and/or economic systems associated with each is the fundamental difference.

    That said, Schrodinger's Cat: Wanted Dead AND Alive. :-)

    1. Re:Actually, that's the fundamental difference by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      Communism generally espouses the view that wealth can only be transferred.

      Your ignorance is truly amazing.

      What do you think, Marxism recognizes as the only way to create value? It's labor! The whole freaking thing is centered around labor and its relationship to capital, property, etc.

      Seriously, the people who believe, they have something to say about Communism! Shut up, morons!

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
    2. Re:Actually, that's the fundamental difference by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 2

      Communism generally espouses the view that wealth can only be transferred.

      That's plainly not true. Ever heard of this thing called "labor theory of value" that's the underpinning of Marxist economics?

    3. Re:Actually, that's the fundamental difference by daveschroeder · · Score: 1

      *Sigh*

      To you and the other commenters bringing up labor, yes, I am quite aware. But Marxists believe this is a constant, something that is tied almost exclusively to manpower alone, and that workers in a Capitalist system are always "exploited", by design, because they do not own the means of production. Except that under Marxism, almost all of the value is put on labor-power, not on innovation, special skills, new technologies, and similar — and there is no incentive to create anything.

      Do you think the internet or anything even remotely resembling a free global flow of information would exist in a Marxist utopia (aside for a moment the fact that die hard Marxists probably believe the world would be so wonderful a place that we wouldn't need free flows of information between and among people)? Do you really believe the world would be a better place? Please educate all of us on why Marxism is such a great system and worthy of any sort of respect or admiration.

    4. Re:Actually, that's the fundamental difference by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Capitalism generally espouses the view that wealth can be created.

      Communism generally espouses the view that wealth can only be transferred.

      No, both systems say that wealth can be created, and both even say it happens the same way: through labour (thus the myth of becoming rich by working hard). The only difference is in who should get the majority of the wealth thus created: in capitalism, it's the owner of the factory, in communism, it's the people who work there, and in the real world, it's the CEO who ran it bankrupt.

      Another way of saying this is that under communism, all companies are worker cooperatives.

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    5. Re:Actually, that's the fundamental difference by Alex+Belits · · Score: 1

      To you and the other commenters bringing up labor, yes, I am quite aware. But Marxists believe this is a constant, something that is tied almost exclusively to manpower alone, and that workers in a Capitalist system are always "exploited", by design, because they do not own the means of production. Except that under Marxism, almost all of the value is put on labor-power, not on innovation, special skills, new technologies, and similar — and there is no incentive to create anything.

      Under Marxism, "Innovation" is a form of labor, and "information" is just another kind of product. In 19th century there was (fallacious) claim that "innovation" is produced by Capitalists, what makes them essential in production and therefore "deserving" of their share of the profits, however same capitalists spent most of 19th and the whole 20th centuty shifting this work to just another kind of worker, thus debunking that argument.

      Do you think the internet or anything even remotely resembling a free global flow of information would exist in a Marxist utopia (aside for a moment the fact that die hard Marxists probably believe the world would be so wonderful a place that we wouldn't need free flows of information between and among people)? Do you really believe the world would be a better place? Please educate all of us on why Marxism is such a great system and worthy of any sort of respect or admiration.

      Have I said anything about the validity of Marxism? You made a massively stupid, misinformed claim about an important and widely known historical fact, the content of the Marxist theory. I have explained why your claim is stupid and misinformed. Why are you asking me all this, pretending that my opinion and political position have any effect on the established facts?

      --
      Contrary to the popular belief, there indeed is no God.
  85. Heeeeeeeeey guys! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who wants to LAN party! It's BYOLC (Bring Your Own Launch Codes).

  86. Mouth breathing Americans start talking war again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But not against China. Do you know why? China would teach US a lesson that's for sure.

  87. And the current run of capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    shows that communism was right: wealth is only being transferred. Upward.

    1. Re:And the current run of capitalism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, but you miss the fact that when China engages in international trade, that itself is capitalism.

  88. BS.... by Savage-Rabbit · · Score: 1

    No, the Romans conquered Greece and stole all their academics wholesale. But Greece had the last laugh because all these academics captured by the Romans became tutors who raised the next generation of Roman elite to in the image of Greece. Roman mythology and culture became Greek in all but name only.

    Apert from the fact that the Romans conquered Greece that is just plain wrong. By the time the Roman legions conquered Greece the Romans were already thoroughly hellenized. The nations and tribes of Italy tribes became hellenized during the Homeric age through contact with Greek colonies. This happened way before the Romans even existed as anything more than a small tribal group and certainly before they built their empire. The Romans became hellenized primarily through the Etruscans (a hellenized Italian people) and later through their naval allies which were mostly Greek city states. Sending your children to be educated in Greece or hiring a Greek tutor was fashionable among the Roman patrician class centuries before the legions ever marched off to conquer Greece.

    --
    Only to idiots, are orders laws.
    -- Henning von Tresckow
  89. The USA were in on that too, remember? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or did you forget that it was a NATO operation, I.e. North Atlantic. You know, the ocean just off the USA?

  90. Or attempt to discredit them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's HBGary who got caught in the act doing it:

    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/02/16/945768/-UPDATED:-The-HB-Gary-Email-That-Should-Concern-Us-All

    PERTINENT QUOTES/EXCERPTS:

    "According to an embedded MS Word document found in one of the HBGary emails, it involves creating an army of sockpuppets, with sophisticated "persona management" software that allows a small team of only a few people to appear to be many, while keeping the personas from accidentally cross-contaminating each other. Then, to top it off, the team can actually automate some functions so one persona can appear to be an entire Brooks Brothers riot online... And all of this is for the purposes of infiltration, data mining, and (here's the one that really worries me) ganging up on bloggers, commenters and otherwise "real" people to smear enemies and distort the truth... "

  91. Better Red ( Score: +5, UNPatRIOTic ) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    than dead.

    Yours In Arizona,
    K. Trout, Illegal Alien

  92. F35 by DarthVain · · Score: 1

    Up here in Canada there is a real scandal about the F35 aircraft and the costs associated with it and Canada seemingly going ahead no matter what.

    One political pundit bluntly stated (I was astonished), that the need for the F35 is just a rationalization. Likely the US went to its allies, and said we would like you help in controlling and containing China's growth and ambitions over the next 20-30 years. However they cannot actually SAY that politically, so countries that are apart of this group are just trying to come up with fake rationalizations as to why they need this state of the art next generation stealth fighter.

    Because realistically looking at the conflicts we have been involved with in the last 20 years, at which point were we every facing comparable technology. Have we even had a jet shot down that wasn't attributable to just overly complex systems, maintenance, or age? I mean even the US, in all the wars they have been involved with since the 90's were they ever in a situation where the opposing force had any kind of air superiority?

    Anyway I just thought it a bit scary, that someone was looking at this transaction and seeing perhaps conversations looking at the long term future.

  93. Nothing mentioned is secret by Animats · · Score: 1

    Orbital mechanics? Old technology, no secrets there. Remote underwater vehicles? Used by oil companies from many nations.

    At least China is doing useful stuff. The US is using its top brainpower in social networking and financial engineering. Who goes to a good college in the US to study production engineering, and then into industry to set up production lines in industry? That's a common career path in both Chinas, South Korea, and Japan.

  94. Another consideration by br00tus · · Score: 1

    The Franco-Prussian war led to Paris being taken over by communards for two months in 1871.

    World War I led to Russia being taken over by communists, in addition to other worrying developments for the powers that be (Hungary established a Soviet Republic until it was invaded and defeated, naval and Spartacus uprisings in Germany, Nivelle mutinies in France, Bienno rosso in the early 1920s in Italy).

    World war II led to a communist bloc eastward "from Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic" as Churchill put it. It also more-or-less led to China and North Korea becoming communist. People tend to forget communist influence among the working class in Western Europe - the PCF was the largest political party in France into the mid 1950s, and the PCI came close to winning elections in Italy into the mid 1970s, the "right" included an Italian Socialist Party with a hammer and sickle in its banner. And then of course the decolonization movements from everywhere from Cuba to Indochina to Northern Ireland to Algeria and the rest of Africa.

    The feudal, and later capitalist, powers in Europe deciding to go to war with one another has always strengthened the left. Liberal opinion is now war-tired and so forth primarily due to this. As the above poster said, bombing the Serbs and the like did not creep into this supposed war-weariness. Yeltsin bombing his own parliament was hailed by liberals and social democrats, and of course the right, as a triumph of democracy.

    The only wisdom that has been obtained by the ruling powers, is that Mario Monti and Lucas Papademos probably both realize that if they tried to set their countries to war against one another, their populations might take up the words of that old song and shoot the generals on their own side. The ruling powers realize war might possibly put their head on the chopping block, and that's the main reason they've become peaceniks, at least amongst other Europeans in the club.

  95. US intelligence students on their guard always. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A friend of mine once told me when he was on sabbatical for furthering his education, there are many Chinese student spies in our education system and they have to be on their guard at all times. IMO, as long as we have lax immigration/resident policies in place, this will be common place so it is of the utmost importance to be aware of spies who have not only their interest in mind but whose ultimate goal is to do us harm.

    For all we know our government may know who most of these pseudo students are and are conducting counter intelligence. God, I hope so.

    I'd hate to see Gitmo overcrowded. Long live Gitmo!
    : )

  96. Only buggy whip makers fear sharing knowledge by Medievalist · · Score: 2

    The Zen master Ryokan lived a simple life in a little hut high on a mountain. One evening while Ryokan was out walking, a thief made the arduous climb up the mountain, only to find there was nothing in the hut worth stealing.

    Ryokan returned and found the thief. "You have taken great pains to come a long way to visit me," he said, "and you should not return empty-handed. Please let me give you my clothes as a gift."

    The thief was confused and bewildered, but he took Ryokan's clothes and climbed back down the mountain.

    Ryokan left the hut and sat naked, watching the moon. "That poor fellow," he mused, "I wish I could have given him this beautiful moon."

    People are welcome to share all my knowledge. I don't care if they are brown, yellow, or pink with polka dots. Hoarding knowledge is a practice of the weak and foolish, it's how you can easily identify them. Smart, strong minds have new thoughts every day.

    1. Re:Only buggy whip makers fear sharing knowledge by TheCouchPotatoFamine · · Score: 1

      How will your smart, strong mind prepare yourself for when your mind is no longer as smart, or strong? Do you think you will bend the rules to assure your survival, or will you bow out, allowing newer, younger minds to flourish where you once did, watching as you die?

      This is a real question in the game theory of knowledge sharing, and i stand on your side of the argument, but i wished to phrase this contrary thought anyway knowing that I cannot enforce my morality on others.. is preparing like that /immoral/? Or a choice? Stupid?

      --
      CS majors know the time/space tradeoff, but they never get taught the 3rd, crucial, tradeoff of the set: comprehension!
    2. Re:Only buggy whip makers fear sharing knowledge by Medievalist · · Score: 2

      The principle is "pay it forward". If you have enriched the lives of those around you, the young will treat you as a respected elder, and care for you in your dotage.

      My Dad can hardly walk at this point, so I've occasionally had to carry him, and changing the sheets for a beloved uncle was only slightly harder than changing diapers on my own children. It's OK. I share the burden with others who have benefited from these men's presence in their lives, but I would do it even if it was just me. Or I'd pay someone else to help.

      And if the young lose their way, there's always sky diving and other high risk activities. Why would you want to live in a society where the young prey on the old? Hoarding knowledge will not protect you in such a system.

  97. my officemate was a spy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember back in graduate school I had an officemate from China. He went on a driving vacation and came back with a several rolls of film to develop. I happened to see his photographs when they were printed: power transmission lines, bridges, dams, refineries, you get the idea. I asked where the photos were of him and his friends. There were a few, like the one with his buddies in the corner and a large construction crane dominating the image. I asked what these photos were for. "This is America" I was told. You know what else was America? He got a speeding ticket in Montana and didn't know where he'd get the money to pay it. But when he found out it couldn't be enforced in California, he culturally adapted very quickly.

  98. Who's surprised? by frisket · · Score: 1

    ...universities are an 'ideal place' for foreign intelligence services 'to find recruits...

    Gosh. Who'd have thunk?

  99. And Now for Something Completely Different: by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    "It's..."

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  100. Chapman by mjwalshe · · Score: 1

    Was a honey trap for a senior US politician - though doing what she did under her own name when it was blindingly obvious that dad was a KGB resident took some balls (so to speak).

    You do wonder if MI5 keep an eye out for any pretty girls with eastern European accents into 40k in Cheltnham (home of GCHQ)

  101. So What? by chrismcb · · Score: 1

    My first thought was "duh" my second was "so what?"

  102. This explains the Ivy League. by elucido · · Score: 1

    And why immigrants always seem to want to go to these schools.

    Let's be realistic though, it's not difficult for the FBI or anyone else to recruit on campuses as well and counter spy.

  103. Re:You're right and you're wrong - Schrodinger's C by luis_a_espinal · · Score: 1

    Well, I learned something new today in English as my second language ;)

  104. Universities need money by WOOFYGOOFY · · Score: 1

    Come on to sustain double digit inflation year over year you need someone to pay the bills and spies pay full out of state tuition with a smile on their faces. Of course universities want them to enroll.

    This is just way #2432 that universities are determined to destroy themselves and their reputations as a reputable societal institution.

    Don't bother teaching- leave that to your TAs who are undeveloped and overly ambitious and aggressive personalities who learn to hate their unpaid teaching duties and the students which are the source of that labor.

    Jack tuition up five times the rate of inflation and more for decades on end because, hey, you could be working in the private sector making TEN TIMES this much.....

    Never ever evolve anything you do in terms of pedagogy and violently resist all efforts at changes to the lowest-effort sage-on-the-stage model that you've milked for , what is it now? Going on three centuries?

    Harass and dominate ordinary unsophisticated students who show up to your campuses by foisting on them draconic intellectual property "agreements" for anything they invent while undergraduates "using the schools computers or network"

    Keep building glass and granite monuments to yourselves and your sports teams while underfunding that "teaching thing" society expects you to do

    Please . Importing spies that will in time wreck our economy? Hey man.. I'm gonna get mine while the gettin's good. Fire up those J1s baby... American students are sooo.... yesterday...

  105. Yawn.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The highest levels of government have been taken over by traitors who ignore the Constitutional limits placed upon government power. This is a far greater threat than any number of spies on campus.

    The 2012 Defense Authorization Act not only 'legally' removes all natural and civil rights from all humans, but declares that the US government no longer recognizes any country's sovereignty.

  106. just think of it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    as another way to deal with out of control tuition

  107. Re:You're right and you're wrong - Schrodinger's C by sysrammer · · Score: 1

    "as China and us believe it to be" vs "as China and we believe it to be"

    A trick is to break it down without the "and", so you end up with "us believe it to be" or "we believe it to be".

    Another slightly different example "give it to them or us" vs "give it to them or we". In this case you'd break it down to "give it to us" and that would be correct.

    I'm not sure I'm explaining it well (I just woke up), so I hope this is useful and not confusing.

    sr

    --
    His ignorance covered the whole earth like a blanket, and there was hardly a hole in it anywhere. - Mark Twain
  108. Was Clinton a spy? by hoboroadie · · Score: 1

    "This paper is unclassified and fulfills part of the FBI's goal of building awareness with public and private entities about counterintelligence risks and national security issues."
    "...the FBI concludes that only a small percentage of foreign students or visiting professors are actively working at the behest of their government or other organizations."
    IIRC, W.J.Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar, Prolly sent by C.I.A. to infiltrate British academia for exploitation by corrupt running dog capitalists.
    "The FBI is mandated to protect the nation from internal and external threats."
    AFAICT this is a PR release from the FBI to remind people that they used to deal with this shit, long before the DHS was cloned from some paranoid phreak's nocturnal emission. A big dose of FUD from the Department of Paranoia. Or maybe just a nice Mission Structure Outline for any under-capitalized spy organization that hadn't already thought of this stuff decades ago.

    --
    They feared that it could be used to suppress protest or support unpopular rule.
  109. Re:Remake by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...And it's so much more plausible than an invasion from Cuba.

  110. i've got yer condition..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. Only in the context of the land of the free is such a consultation a safe one to answer. This question/answer would get you a sentence in North Korea, would get you censored, marginalised and fired in today's china, might get you killed in Russia ... The conditions of realpolitik are not set by anonymous wankers on slashdot. To be absolutely clear, the ends often do 'justify' the means; the idea that we should acquiesce to be impoverished in the name of 'fairness' is ridiculous and diametrically opposed to the survival of ANY entity, individual, corporate or national. We have evolved to protect and support our kin and extended kin. This means we give them preference over the other(s). Seriously, fuck the other(s) - they will return the complement given a chance.