> While it's great tasting, you still know it's completely unnecessary for your survival and shame on you for it.
I know no such thing. You are as anti-science as an anti-vaxxer failing to acknowledge the limitations of human biology. I have enough medical problems without adding self-induced malnutrition.
> An animal with a face and a mother has to die for your pleasure.
Not "pleasure", lack of suitable enzymes.
A pig is the ultimate omnivore. It can eat all sorts of things we can't and convert them into things we can. It's also much better suited to modern industrial farming conditions than cattle.
I have 3 more anecdotes to add to the pile. They were all people that never bought into any sort of new age diet nonsense. They also lived into their 90s.
It's probably not even "life style". It's genetics.
The fates are cruel bitches and no amount of self flagellation is going to help you. You're just going to spend what time you have being miserable.
Although moderation might help. You don't have to bathe in bacon daily to enjoy it.
It only seems to be America where pork is supposed to be "the other white meat". This fixation doesn't seem to exist anywhere else in the world (at least until now). Other European pork also doesn't seem to have this low fat tasteless quality.
"The other white meat" needs to die a fiery death.
> I did. It's a reasonable assumption that a nuclear weapon would have saved Saddam and Iraq.
No, not really. The real nuclear powers have arsenals measured in the thousands with well tested means to deliver those weapons to targets.
None of these so-called "new nuclear powers" have that.
The best they could really do is a sneak attack with a cargo container or something along those lines. That makes them somewhat dangerous by highly unpredictable. That puts them on the same level as some non-state actor.
No. Arming yourself with nukes is a quick way to make Russia or the US think you need to be taken out before you can get really dangerous. It's painting a target on your forehead.
Do you even know how oil is processed and used? Even if we only used 3% of the raw material, we would probably still have to refine as much of it as we do now. We still need to process as much crude as it would take to extract those "non-energy" compounds.
If anything, we would then have to figure out what to do with the "energy by products".
If you aren't even present to be offended, then how can you offer reliable testimony?
Crimes have to be proven. You can't just form a lynch mob based off of half-baked accusations.
The fact that certain things are illegal now is not something to be glossed over. However you still have to prove your claims either to HR or in a court.
This inclination to engage in virtual lynchings in the press really isn't appropriate and never was.
Shenanigans in ANY science undermine ALL sciences.
You sound like a battered wife trying to defend her husband. The correct response to being abused to lied to is to be distrustful and flee. It's not to make excuses.
You kind hit at the problem in your own answer. I don't give a f*ck if MY wonder drug cures some other cancer. I want it to cure MY particular cancer. If the basic lab research was botched then there will be some very disappointed (and desperate) cancer patients when it comes time for the human trials.
ALL of that is going to cost a big pile of money and make everything more expensive. The successes will have to subsidize the failures (as they always do).
You will end up having to pay a lot more, or your insurance company will, or your government health care entity will just say "fuck it" and leave you to die because the meds are too expensive.
That's the real elephant in the room. This "poor victim" is a dominant corporation that chooses to use the current status quo to their advantage. They really shouldn't get any sympathy.
The relevant aspect of the troll metaphor is trying to charge people for something you don't own. A valid patent doesn't fall into that category. It doesn't matter if you are a "practicing entity" or not. It's pursuit of the bogus patents that make you a troll.
It's abusing the "I can't believe they got that past the PTO" kind of shit that makes you a a troll.
If it's the data of one of your country's citizens or corporations, then why not? Even our right to privacy is not a universal shield against a warrant or subpeona.
Then the US company should be held in contempt and charged with obstruction of justice and destruction of evidence. The question here is whether or not you can hide evidence from courts. The fact that it's being done with computers is really quite irrelevant.
This is not a "tech" article at all.
A corporation wants to pretend it's above the law by engaging in a shell game with their documents.
The EU? Are you fucking joking? They go ape shit any time we decide that they should pay for their own defence budget. The whole lot of them put together couldn't deal with Russia. They've been "on the dole" for far too long.
> If you worked in an organization which relied on email, you'd very quickly see the point of a good antivirus.
You mean one filled with idiots that click on the stuff that you obviously shouldn't click on?
Although the real problem isn't the dufus but the tool that even allows that to happen.
I remember when the idea of an "email virus" was laughed at. It's a shame that Microsoft changed that. It's baked in the idea of "running random untrusted shit". Almost makes it impossible to get away from.
Sorry to break it to you but a big chunk of the rust belt didn't NEED any sort of "nudge" to hate Hillary. You need to step out of your echo chamber some time. You've lost all sense of reality.
Capitalism is what generates the resources that allows philanthropy to exist. The doctor's own example is proof of this. This includes the knock off of software created by an abusive telephone trust.
Someone has to actually test the thing. That doesn't come cheap. Until governments start doing this on their own (including those socialist utopias), then individuals will have to risk large amounts of their money. They won't do that for free.
Slashdot Mirror
Has the added benefit of being completely unsympathetic if you've ever actually met one. It's like lamb without the "guilt".
> While it's great tasting, you still know it's completely unnecessary for your survival and shame on you for it.
I know no such thing. You are as anti-science as an anti-vaxxer failing to acknowledge the limitations of human biology. I have enough medical problems without adding self-induced malnutrition.
> An animal with a face and a mother has to die for your pleasure.
Not "pleasure", lack of suitable enzymes.
A pig is the ultimate omnivore. It can eat all sorts of things we can't and convert them into things we can. It's also much better suited to modern industrial farming conditions than cattle.
Depending on the particular cancer, a good bleeding is just the thing actually. It's helpful for some other blood disorders too.
A hammer might not be good for everything but it pounds in nails just fine.
I have 3 more anecdotes to add to the pile. They were all people that never bought into any sort of new age diet nonsense. They also lived into their 90s.
It's probably not even "life style". It's genetics.
The fates are cruel bitches and no amount of self flagellation is going to help you. You're just going to spend what time you have being miserable.
Although moderation might help. You don't have to bathe in bacon daily to enjoy it.
Yeah, because proper Spanish pork is "low fat".
It only seems to be America where pork is supposed to be "the other white meat". This fixation doesn't seem to exist anywhere else in the world (at least until now). Other European pork also doesn't seem to have this low fat tasteless quality.
"The other white meat" needs to die a fiery death.
> I did. It's a reasonable assumption that a nuclear weapon would have saved Saddam and Iraq.
No, not really. The real nuclear powers have arsenals measured in the thousands with well tested means to deliver those weapons to targets.
None of these so-called "new nuclear powers" have that.
The best they could really do is a sneak attack with a cargo container or something along those lines. That makes them somewhat dangerous by highly unpredictable. That puts them on the same level as some non-state actor.
No. Arming yourself with nukes is a quick way to make Russia or the US think you need to be taken out before you can get really dangerous. It's painting a target on your forehead.
Do you even know how oil is processed and used? Even if we only used 3% of the raw material, we would probably still have to refine as much of it as we do now. We still need to process as much crude as it would take to extract those "non-energy" compounds.
If anything, we would then have to figure out what to do with the "energy by products".
Yeah. That one just doesn't make any sense. You can induce a panic attack in an HR professional just by saying those three letters (ADA).
Although it makes for a nice juicy pleading. Suspiciously so in fact.
> I didn't see the word "Hispanic" in TFA.
Diaz
Probably the wrong slur.
If you aren't even present to be offended, then how can you offer reliable testimony?
Crimes have to be proven. You can't just form a lynch mob based off of half-baked accusations.
The fact that certain things are illegal now is not something to be glossed over. However you still have to prove your claims either to HR or in a court.
This inclination to engage in virtual lynchings in the press really isn't appropriate and never was.
Hollywood glorifies it. Hollywood wallows in it. It always has. Your comments are only a weak attempt at deflection.
"Don't look at us, it's really the rest of you that are scum."
Shenanigans in ANY science undermine ALL sciences.
You sound like a battered wife trying to defend her husband. The correct response to being abused to lied to is to be distrustful and flee. It's not to make excuses.
You kind hit at the problem in your own answer. I don't give a f*ck if MY wonder drug cures some other cancer. I want it to cure MY particular cancer. If the basic lab research was botched then there will be some very disappointed (and desperate) cancer patients when it comes time for the human trials.
ALL of that is going to cost a big pile of money and make everything more expensive. The successes will have to subsidize the failures (as they always do).
You will end up having to pay a lot more, or your insurance company will, or your government health care entity will just say "fuck it" and leave you to die because the meds are too expensive.
That's the real elephant in the room. This "poor victim" is a dominant corporation that chooses to use the current status quo to their advantage. They really shouldn't get any sympathy.
The relevant aspect of the troll metaphor is trying to charge people for something you don't own. A valid patent doesn't fall into that category. It doesn't matter if you are a "practicing entity" or not. It's pursuit of the bogus patents that make you a troll.
It's abusing the "I can't believe they got that past the PTO" kind of shit that makes you a a troll.
If it's the data of one of your country's citizens or corporations, then why not? Even our right to privacy is not a universal shield against a warrant or subpeona.
Then the US company should be held in contempt and charged with obstruction of justice and destruction of evidence. The question here is whether or not you can hide evidence from courts. The fact that it's being done with computers is really quite irrelevant.
This is not a "tech" article at all.
A corporation wants to pretend it's above the law by engaging in a shell game with their documents.
The EU? Are you fucking joking? They go ape shit any time we decide that they should pay for their own defence budget. The whole lot of them put together couldn't deal with Russia. They've been "on the dole" for far too long.
> If you worked in an organization which relied on email, you'd very quickly see the point of a good antivirus.
You mean one filled with idiots that click on the stuff that you obviously shouldn't click on?
Although the real problem isn't the dufus but the tool that even allows that to happen.
I remember when the idea of an "email virus" was laughed at. It's a shame that Microsoft changed that. It's baked in the idea of "running random untrusted shit". Almost makes it impossible to get away from.
> How you can just blow that off
My echo chamber consists of more than just screeching Hollywood liberals.
I also have a genuine understanding of history rather than the pathetic "Cliff Notes" version peddled by the media.
The American electorate has been split three ways since long before the Soviets were a convenient bogeyman.
Sorry to break it to you but a big chunk of the rust belt didn't NEED any sort of "nudge" to hate Hillary. You need to step out of your echo chamber some time. You've lost all sense of reality.
> Thank you for your insightful response and continued support comrade.
This is an ironic response consider who is and is not a communist these days.
You're confusing capitalism with philanthropy.
Capitalism is what generates the resources that allows philanthropy to exist. The doctor's own example is proof of this. This includes the knock off of software created by an abusive telephone trust.
Someone has to actually test the thing. That doesn't come cheap. Until governments start doing this on their own (including those socialist utopias), then individuals will have to risk large amounts of their money. They won't do that for free.