It is impossible for a 2 square meter to output 6kW anywhere in the world. Even if you had a perfect solar cell that converts all forms of solar radiation to electicity at 100% efficiency you are limited to 1.361kW per square meter. You just can't make more sunlight.
What we learned was that he probably wasn't actually stealing from the store, but rather had come back in after earlier conducting an illegal Drug Transaction, and the clerk let him walk out with a pack of cigars without paying for them. (Cutting open a cigar and rolling a joint with it is called making a "blunt", just FYI, and is most likely what he wanted them for.)
Umm. No, that's not what happened. The only time he left the store with the cigars, he strong armed the clerk on the way out the door.
By saying we can afford it you imply that the money is already ours, It's not. It's theirs. You can't spend something that you never take in the first place.
A "fault" doesn't cause a machine to spontaneously program itself to kill a human, nor does it cause it to load a part where it has never been programmed to load a part. I guarantee some form of human error is responsible here. You are misunderstanding what "cell" means in this situation. I am not an idiot, I am speaking from experience as someone who manufactures and programs industrial machines.
Yep, so they wiretap the Russian Ambassador to listen to Trump affiliates they knew were talking to him. If they failed to "minimize" that information, they did something very illegal.
Communicating with Russia is not illegal. Nor was it illegal to communicate with Iran in 2008. You can see in this statue that if a US person is incidentally caught in a foreign wiretap, the communication must be "minimized". Not retained and disseminated widely throughout government and the press.
Chapter 36 of Title 50 of the US Code *War and National Defense", Subchapter 1, Section 1802
(1) Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year if the Attorney General certifies in writing under oath that— (A) the electronic surveillance is solely directed at— (i) the acquisition of the contents of communications transmitted by means of communications used exclusively between or among foreign powers, as defined in section 1801(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title; or (ii) the acquisition of technical intelligence, other than the spoken communications of individuals, from property or premises under the open and exclusive control of a foreign power, as defined in section 1801(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title; (B) there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party; and (C) the proposed minimization procedures with respect to such surveillance meet the definition of minimization procedures under section 1801(h) of this title; and if the Attorney General reports such minimization procedures and any changes thereto to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence at least thirty days prior to their effective date, unless the Attorney General determines immediate action is required and notifies the committees immediately of such minimization procedures and the reason for their becoming effective immediately.
Slashdot Mirror
It is impossible for a 2 square meter to output 6kW anywhere in the world. Even if you had a perfect solar cell that converts all forms of solar radiation to electicity at 100% efficiency you are limited to 1.361kW per square meter. You just can't make more sunlight.
That is the textbook definition of robbery.
So you think H1-B is fine, except for all the problems with it. Got it.
Do you believe that H1-B workers are the best talent?
I wonder why that is all you remember?
What we learned was that he probably wasn't actually stealing from the store, but rather had come back in after earlier conducting an illegal Drug Transaction, and the clerk let him walk out with a pack of cigars without paying for them. (Cutting open a cigar and rolling a joint with it is called making a "blunt", just FYI, and is most likely what he wanted them for.)
Umm. No, that's not what happened. The only time he left the store with the cigars, he strong armed the clerk on the way out the door.
Why will that help you? If you get arrested for firebombing a bank and they find a burner phone on you and crack it, it's still evidence.
...but solar cell efficiency only really matters when space is limited.
What did Democrats think of Comey right before and after the election?
Raising taxes at this point will retard growth and reduce revenue.
He's just restoring half of the cuts that Obama made to defense spending.
By saying we can afford it you imply that the money is already ours, It's not. It's theirs. You can't spend something that you never take in the first place.
There just aren't that many creationists.
Certainly foia requests.
It's one robot arm that is on a fixed base, that can reach multiple cells. It's not like Johnny 5 who can ride around hooting entering your cellz..
EPA head Lisa Jackson, also used an alias to communicate at the EPA. She was known as Richard Windsor. Funny how that wasn't a scandal.
A "fault" doesn't cause a machine to spontaneously program itself to kill a human, nor does it cause it to load a part where it has never been programmed to load a part. I guarantee some form of human error is responsible here. You are misunderstanding what "cell" means in this situation. I am not an idiot, I am speaking from experience as someone who manufactures and programs industrial machines.
Machines don't program themselves to load parts in a place they have never loaded parts before.
One robot can operate in multiple cells. There is probably a cell for each hitch assembly, all controlled by a sigle robot.
So for instance, would you say the Flynn transcripts were properly minimized considering their existence and some of the content was widely reported?
Yep, so they wiretap the Russian Ambassador to listen to Trump affiliates they knew were talking to him. If they failed to "minimize" that information, they did something very illegal.
No, it says if a US Person is incidentally picked up on the wiretap, that information must be "minimized".
Using this method to surveil a US Person is illegal. It is called "reverse targeting".
Communicating with Russia is not illegal. Nor was it illegal to communicate with Iran in 2008. You can see in this statue that if a US person is incidentally caught in a foreign wiretap, the communication must be "minimized". Not retained and disseminated widely throughout government and the press.
Chapter 36 of Title 50 of the US Code *War and National Defense", Subchapter 1, Section 1802
(1) Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year if the Attorney General certifies in writing under oath that—
(A) the electronic surveillance is solely directed at—
(i) the acquisition of the contents of communications transmitted by means of communications used exclusively between or among foreign powers, as defined in section 1801(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title; or
(ii) the acquisition of technical intelligence, other than the spoken communications of individuals, from property or premises under the open and exclusive control of a foreign power, as defined in section 1801(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title;
(B) there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party; and
(C) the proposed minimization procedures with respect to such surveillance meet the definition of minimization procedures under section 1801(h) of this title; and
if the Attorney General reports such minimization procedures and any changes thereto to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence at least thirty days prior to their effective date, unless the Attorney General determines immediate action is required and notifies the committees immediately of such minimization procedures and the reason for their becoming effective immediately.