How can you not know this? Where have you been getting your information that left out the fact that her server contained highly classified satellite imagery?
These don't seem to work as well as the short legs. It's looks like they take more effort, and his top speed is reduced. The moment arms are too long for his shoulder muscles.
They aren't concerned about it hitting aircraft. They're concerned about several kilos of c4 hitting the white house, or presidential limousine. They literally have no defense against this. None.
...the creativity of the creator, the machine doesn't really do what it's designed to do. Now if it were to distribute copies of the music to customers who were considering purchasing the music already, he might have something. The problem is that he'd run out of "Crazy" customers in about 3 seconds.
Having worked in the firearms industry, that is exactly what this solicitation smells of. Someone already has the guns built, they've been demonstrated, and this is the way to purchase them without really allowing any other bids. Some smart enterprising individual should build something cool and snipe the contract.
Think about how much better off we would have been if there were no 3/5ths clause in the Constitution. Slave holding states would have had higher representation and been that much more powerful in the Congress. It probably would have delayed the Civil War and by extension the Emancipation Proclamation, and by extension of that the ratification of the 14th amendment. People who are opposed to the 3/5ths compromise are actually arguing in favor granting more power to slave holding states, and unless they are white supremacists it makes them look like uneducated idiots.
No it doesn't. The President can bar any non-US person from entering the country that he wishes, as long as it does not violate established law. And there's an argument that his Constituitonal Executive Power supercedes any law. An example of this was when states like Texas tried to write their own laws establishing who could cross the border from Mexico. The supreme court ruled that all authority control immigration resides with the federal government.
No it's not. He could have just as easily added persons from any and all countries to the list. He could have banned all left-handed people from entering the country if he wanted to. Or all people named Muhammed, Or all people with shoe sizes above 10. The president has absolute authority to bar any or all non-US persons from entering the country for any reason or no reason at all.
It's not a legal gray area. The United states has the absolute and legal authority to bar any non-US person from entering the country. This is common knowledge to anyone who hasn't been brainwashed by our left-wing education system and media.
Actually, you are dead wrong. I don't know who told you that, but if you paid for that information, you got ripped off and it makes you look like a fool.
The Constitution does not define who has the right to vote, and it left that decision up to the states. Most states restricted voting to FREE male land owners. But not all. There is nothing about Anglo-Saxons in there. There were numerous African Americans that had the ability to vote from the beginning.
Slashdot Mirror
What would have happened if you emailed satellite imagery to your personal gmail account?
How can you not know this? Where have you been getting your information that left out the fact that her server contained highly classified satellite imagery?
These don't seem to work as well as the short legs. It's looks like they take more effort, and his top speed is reduced. The moment arms are too long for his shoulder muscles.
They aren't concerned about it hitting aircraft. They're concerned about several kilos of c4 hitting the white house, or presidential limousine. They literally have no defense against this. None.
...ads are much more disruptive and costly to the recipient on mobile devices. I'm glad they are doing this, it's long past time.
...the creativity of the creator, the machine doesn't really do what it's designed to do. Now if it were to distribute copies of the music to customers who were considering purchasing the music already, he might have something. The problem is that he'd run out of "Crazy" customers in about 3 seconds.
Having worked in the firearms industry, that is exactly what this solicitation smells of. Someone already has the guns built, they've been demonstrated, and this is the way to purchase them without really allowing any other bids. Some smart enterprising individual should build something cool and snipe the contract.
Unfortunately, many rational people disregard arguments that they disagree with.
I don't think the 3/5th clause did what you think it did.
Are you saying there's not an argument?
Right, That's why I said the United States, instead of Congress or the President.
They apply to non-citizens, but they do not apply to non-US persons, unless otherwise indicated by law.
Think about how much better off we would have been if there were no 3/5ths clause in the Constitution. Slave holding states would have had higher representation and been that much more powerful in the Congress. It probably would have delayed the Civil War and by extension the Emancipation Proclamation, and by extension of that the ratification of the 14th amendment. People who are opposed to the 3/5ths compromise are actually arguing in favor granting more power to slave holding states, and unless they are white supremacists it makes them look like uneducated idiots.
Actually, the powers granted to the Federal Government by the people are enumerated. All other powers are reserved for the people and the states.
Legally called a US-Person.
No it doesn't. The President can bar any non-US person from entering the country that he wishes, as long as it does not violate established law. And there's an argument that his Constituitonal Executive Power supercedes any law. An example of this was when states like Texas tried to write their own laws establishing who could cross the border from Mexico. The supreme court ruled that all authority control immigration resides with the federal government.
No it's not. He could have just as easily added persons from any and all countries to the list. He could have banned all left-handed people from entering the country if he wanted to. Or all people named Muhammed, Or all people with shoe sizes above 10. The president has absolute authority to bar any or all non-US persons from entering the country for any reason or no reason at all.
It's not a legal gray area. The United states has the absolute and legal authority to bar any non-US person from entering the country. This is common knowledge to anyone who hasn't been brainwashed by our left-wing education system and media.
Actually, you are dead wrong. I don't know who told you that, but if you paid for that information, you got ripped off and it makes you look like a fool.
The Constitution does not define who has the right to vote, and it left that decision up to the states. Most states restricted voting to FREE male land owners. But not all. There is nothing about Anglo-Saxons in there. There were numerous African Americans that had the ability to vote from the beginning.
Show me a car that gets 18mpg at 140 mph. 140mph is the cruise speed of 172's with the 180hp Lycoming.
There's plenty of people saying it's not OK to have a national database of drone users.
It only uses the prop pods during takeoff and landing. The wings and rear mounted ducted fan keep it flying during forward flight.
It's a good thing this isn't a helicopter.
Because shitheads keep voting for people that want an ever more powerful federal government. The American Dream is pretty much dead.
No, you just kill terrorists until they stop, or it ceases to become much of a problem.