Why would you close down two screens instead of using them for more showings? If they anticipated a huge crowd this would maximize profits, in theory. But it would also lose them credibility in the long run with people not interested in the movie left with no alternative.
It's because flashy, empty action movies with a large effects budget draws a huge crowd. They always have - but the international market for these it's bigger than ever And the effects don't have to be perfect because it's a comic book. Just be glad it's not Michel Bay directing them. There are still good movies being made. Some of them doesn't to streaming.
If the law was actually written with the word "encrypted" in it, you might be correct. However, the actual regulation is more general - "unspecified digital codes must not be transmitted for the purpose of obscur- ing the meaning of any communica- tion. "
I'm not sure how obscured that would be considered to be under the circumstances.
That belief is why Amazon thinks they can get away with it. They have zero need to cut costs at their profit level. Pure capitalism's greed might dictate it but they would walk away with a healthy profit either way.
The vaccines worked too well. There's very little living memory of just how bad these diseases were or the relative risk compared to potential vaccine complications.
Ephemeral is cool, quirky, and fun. That is, it just saves money on storage in massive datacenters. Meanwhile, I don't want any service where I can't control how long I keep *my* data.
I don't own any physical calculators and I don't like leaving my physical keyboard to use a separate keyboard somewhere else. There are use cases out there.
I don't think the same movie should be eligible for both - but which one it falls under might be more complex than whether it's Netflix or broadcast TV.
The rules were originally there to keep out low-quality TV movies. The rules then started shifting to intentionally block all sorts of things.
They have a lot of quantity, but they're basically a major studio in their own right with flops and runaway successes. Some of these have huge effects budgets, 5.1 surround, and 4K picture quality.
Because made-for-TV movies have been around for a long time and had been mostly crap for a long time. So it's far less work to not even evaluate these as entries. Now, though, there are major films outside the traditional distribution system. HBO has had their share of self-produced movies too - Netflix is not the first - but enough had changed that it's only now that this conversation is due.
Slashdot Mirror
Why would you close down two screens instead of using them for more showings? If they anticipated a huge crowd this would maximize profits, in theory. But it would also lose them credibility in the long run with people not interested in the movie left with no alternative.
It's because flashy, empty action movies with a large effects budget draws a huge crowd. They always have - but the international market for these it's bigger than ever And the effects don't have to be perfect because it's a comic book. Just be glad it's not Michel Bay directing them. There are still good movies being made. Some of them doesn't to streaming.
Movie marketing isn't always very accurate or true to the movie. Did you ever see any trailers for the movie Kangaroo Jack?
Wider distribution.
If the law was actually written with the word "encrypted" in it, you might be correct. However, the actual regulation is more general - "unspecified digital codes must not be
transmitted for the purpose of obscur-
ing the meaning of any communica-
tion. "
I'm not sure how obscured that would be considered to be under the circumstances.
Proof it's for a conviction, not whether something is illegal. Are you one of Trump's ex-lawyers?
That would make it harder to get caught, but no less illegal.
Your premise?
That belief is why Amazon thinks they can get away with it. They have zero need to cut costs at their profit level. Pure capitalism's greed might dictate it but they would walk away with a healthy profit either way.
The vaccines worked too well. There's very little living memory of just how bad these diseases were or the relative risk compared to potential vaccine complications.
So healthy humans are defined as people who are using a 10-year old PC?
works better.
Decent ephemeral systems just ensure that the data doesn't live longer then the user decides it should.
In most two-way communication systems so far, only one side gets to decide this.
Ephemeral is cool, quirky, and fun. That is, it just saves money on storage in massive datacenters. Meanwhile, I don't want any service where I can't control how long I keep *my* data.
Does everything need to be an "experience"? How about just working?
Then you just experienced it working. Just because it's a long word doesn't mean it has to have a fancy definition.
The difference isn't even noticeable on a decent computer. Otherwise, I might care.
They already kind of are with Edge soon being based on Chromium.
You see that as a trend toward being more open and not a repeat of what they did with Java?
If ReactOS ever implements UWP, then sure. But it will be a long time before anyone would try adding that to the scope of the project.
I don't own any physical calculators and I don't like leaving my physical keyboard to use a separate keyboard somewhere else. There are use cases out there.
That would indeed slow mutation and make it easier for the immune system to finish off. We'll have to wait and see.
Unless you're the other company that isn't profiting from that treatment.
That they review (watch) eligible submissions. They don't want to watch movies that they've already decided should be crap.
I don't think the same movie should be eligible for both - but which one it falls under might be more complex than whether it's Netflix or broadcast TV.
The rules were originally there to keep out low-quality TV movies. The rules then started shifting to intentionally block all sorts of things.
They have a lot of quantity, but they're basically a major studio in their own right with flops and runaway successes. Some of these have huge effects budgets, 5.1 surround, and 4K picture quality.
Because made-for-TV movies have been around for a long time and had been mostly crap for a long time. So it's far less work to not even evaluate these as entries. Now, though, there are major films outside the traditional distribution system. HBO has had their share of self-produced movies too - Netflix is not the first - but enough had changed that it's only now that this conversation is due.