Slashdot Mirror


'Captain Marvel' Smashes Box Office Record, Laughs Off Review-Bombing Trolls (hollywoodreporter.com)

"With a $302 million international gross, Captain Marvel has earned $455 million overall to date, the largest ever global opening for a March release and the sixth highest of all-time," reports the Wrap. The superhero movie raked in $153 million just in America, reports Collider, "Suggesting that a sad, extremely vocal minority of idiots on the internet don't actually matter in the slightest."

They're referring to another Rotten Tomateos review-counting glitch Friday morning, as covered by the Hollywood Reporter: The Disney film had only been in theaters for hours on Friday when the female-driven superhero picture was torpedoed online via Rotten Tomatoes. As of 8 a.m., the film had more than 58,000 reviews. That is more than the total of audience score reviews for Avengers: Infinity War for its entire theatrical run.

Rotten Tomatoes explained in a statement to The Hollywood Reporter that a glitch was responsible for thousands of reviews showing up on the site when they shouldn't have. According to Rotten Tomatoes, it had included audience reviews given before the film was released, something which is no longer allowed.

Movieweb believes those pre-release reviews were generated by bots, suggesting a small handful of review-bombers who were attempting to amplify their impact. Yahoo Entertainment believes the attempted review-bombers were angry with the film's star "for, well, not giving a crap about what the trolls say. Perhaps that's the best superpower of all."

When asked about the attempt to review-bomb Captain Marvel, the film's star Brie Larson smilingly replied, "Oh... who cares?"

"Love what you love! Who cares what other people think?"

549 comments

  1. Red pilled losers #sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I guess you guys can go upstairs and complain to your mommies?

    1. Re: Red pilled losers #sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

      Odd that when I look at RT, only 57%. Not exactly the windfall they claim. Looks like it will have a good opening, but end up leaving the theater early as the rest of the population waits for it to come out on dvd.

    2. Re: Red pilled losers #sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You should look at the summary.

    3. Re:Red pilled losers #sad by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They may have been trolls, but Brie Larson is an ignorant and prejudiced piece of shit. The film was also not very good according to Mike and Jay, whom I trust far more than anyone else when it comes to films.

      Mike's thought is basically meh, Captain Marvel is barely passable and should only be watched so that you get a fuller story when Avengers: Endgame comes out, whereas Jay doesn't recommend the film at all.

  2. Well, it is the US in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    The population loves to pretend they are super-heroes, while gobbling up extra large coke with extra margarine popcorn.

    1. Re:Well, it is the US in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      Hey Euro-boy, what's it like to wear that form-fitting track suit while speed walking the perimeter of your mother's basement?

    2. Re: Well, it is the US in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sucks and I'm gonna take out of your ass

    3. Re:Well, it is the US in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wearing this form-fitting track suit on my slim body is very good, all the sexy European ladies come to me and ask me for a night out. But why speed walk a basement, who lives in one? Is this something American, too? In Europe, we prefer to live above the ground.

    4. Re: Well, it is the US in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eurotrash

    5. Re: Well, it is the US in America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, ur angry impotence is delicious

    6. Re:Well, it is the US in America by Sique · · Score: 1

      While I know some people still living with their parents, none of them actually lives in the basement. This seems to be a very U.S. only situation. Most of the still-with-the-parents people live upstairs, or even in the attic, if their parents have their own home and are not renting a flat somewhere.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    7. Re: Well, it is the US in America by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      Tell you what: you don't focus on our nation's masses of ignorant, unwashed retards... and we won't focus on yours. ;)

    8. Re:Well, it is the US in America by butchersong · · Score: 1

      The population loves to pretend they are super-heroes, while gobbling up extra large coke with extra margarine popcorn.

      As someone from the US...that's a fair statement. I guess it is a combination of secularization creating a vacuum that has to be filled and all we can come up with at the moment is this this type of fluff and the breakdown of the traditional milestones and roles for young men. The result is 30 something adolescents obsessed with escapist fantasy.... I don't think any of us are 100% immune to it, we're all on a spectrum of infantilization these days.

  3. Spreading division is profitable I guess by elrous0 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    But it doesn't make society any better, does it? Bringing more and more anger and division to our pop culture is only hastening a very ugly future in which we are at open war over our racial, ethnic, and gender divisions.

    I much preferred the Wonder Woman approach myself. Give us a great story and a great hero who unites us--not a propaganda piece that only ramps up the hate.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Oh bullshit. How could a movie in which every white male was portrayed as a villain and every woman presented as flawless and perfect possibly divide us?

    2. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      "That ugly, flat-chested broad is an eye sore. " Dude, Trump is NOT flat-chested. He WISHES.

    3. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by H_Fisher · · Score: 5, Informative

      Bringing more and more anger and division to our pop culture is only hastening a very ugly future...

      Agree 100%. But I saw Captain Marvel this morning and, unlike the remake of Ghostbusters or countless other examples, this movie doesn't have an agenda. I was worried from the early news that it might. But Marvel, in this case, did just what I hoped they'd do: Told an origin story that was fun, told us more about the world some of my favorite characters inhabit, and threw in a little 90's nostalgia without being overbearing or stupid. If you're looking for "wokeness," it's not here.

    4. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Is the film any good though?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    5. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      every white male was portrayed as a villain and every woman presented as flawless and perfect

      Hey, it's working for Star Trek Discovery. It just got renewed for a 3rd season.

    6. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the incel.

    7. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL do you think he actually saw it before shitting on it? Of course not!

    8. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Kokuyo · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Frankly I never had anything against the movie as such. I didn't KNOW enough about it to make that decision. I just didn't like the actress. And frankly, the only way Miss Marvel was ever relevant in my Nerdverse was as a power source for Rogue.

      So I'm not going to pay to see a human battery in the cinema.

      Also there was Alita, which rocked. Since I get to see about one film every quarter, that definitely had the more powerful lure for me.

    9. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by tero · · Score: 1

      Very much spot on, sir. Wish I had mod points to give you.

    10. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by magusxxx · · Score: 1

      Yes, except for the 90's songs. But I'm bias. I have to listen to them countless times when I'm at work. ;)

      --
      Care killed the cat, but satisfaction brought it back.
    11. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Oh bullshit. How could a movie in which every brown male was portrayed as a villain and every white male was presented as a flawless hero saving the day, possibly divide us?

      Said every movie about terrorists and US cities made in the past 25 years

    12. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hmm, I counted 4 males of consequence in that movie: Fury, Coulson, Talos, and Yon-Rogg. Only one of those was a villain.

    13. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by DogDude · · Score: 1

      How does this movie bring "anger and division" to our pop culture, exactly?

      --
      I don't respond to AC's.
    14. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Aighearach · · Score: 4, Funny

      flat-chested

      Yeah, this is slashdot. Chests here come in XXL and up.

      With boobs that big, it is no wonder most of these guys never leave the basement. Well, that, and that they can't reach their shoelaces.

    15. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by timholman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Is the film any good though?

      It's ... okay. Not great, but an adequate filler in the MCU.

      Part of its problem was a middling script that basically put Brie Larson in the position of smirking and making snarky remarks to everyone, posing heroically, and not much else. There wasn't much in the way of character development. Larson was very much overqualified for the role, given what she was asked to do.

    16. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's good if you haven't watched the trailer.

    17. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Darinbob · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The hate I see is only coming from the trolls. As for the movie, there's no propaganda in it anywhere, it's just a movie. Deal with it.

      White males are not the most persecuted people on the planet yet there are a few who feel that they are under siege, and it's ludicrous. Why is this an issue? Have white males been underrepresented so much that they have to unleash their review-bot army to redress their ancient grievances? The video game industry wants to market to everyone, so of course lets add some games where the girl is the hero, or a minority, etc. So what? Why does that generate so much rage? Play a different game. Watch a different movie. Don't go into some holy war over something so stupid.

      If white males actually were so underrepresented that you don't see white males in governments, no white males in movies as the stars, white males being underpaid, and so forth, then I can understand the anger. But white males are still on top - maybe not 100% of them, but certainly on average they're on top.

      As for games - checking the Steam store just now for games on sale or being features or new releases, the use of white male figures in the marketing shots (where you can see faces) white males are well represented despite the video game industry actively trying to get a broader audience. And just googling for "new games" many of the images that do have females they're often underdressed or anime loli stereotypes. Checking gamestop upcoming releases, the featured game features a male (looking white but in Anime style so is probably Japanese).

    18. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by elrous0 · · Score: 1, Troll

      I saw Captain Marvel this morning and, unlike the remake of Ghostbusters or countless other examples, this movie doesn't have an agenda.

      Admittedly, I haven't see it (only its effects and the ugly divisive firestorm surrounding it), so maybe I'm being unfair. Up to this point I've had no interest in seeing it myself, but I have heard some things about it that suggested it was pretty heavy on the propaganda side. Maybe you can clear this up. This is what I've heard:

      1) The hero is potrayed as constantly having been kicked down and told she's not good enough, exclusively by comically-over-the-top sexist men.
      2) SPOILER ALERT The one white male in the film who is her ally turns out to be the villain.
      3) Captain Marvel herself is a "Mary Sue" with no real character arc. She starts out perfect and flawless, and ends up perfect and flawless. Her only "flaw" that she overcomes is not appreciating how awesome she truly is, or appreciating how much evil men have been holding her back or deceiving her about her awesome-amazingness.
      4) Captain Marvel never faces any real challenges, nor has real character development, nor is shown to grow in any meaningful way.
      5) The feminism is presented in a clumsy heavy-handed way, such as playing the song like "I'm Just A Girl" during the climatic fight scene--and not in a funny, ironic way.

      Perhaps I've been misinformed on this, and if so, I would be legitimately interested in hearing an alternate take. Maybe Nick Fury takes her cocky attitude down a peg in a funny scene? Maybe she has some real flaws that she overcomes? Maybe there are scene(s) where she shows some real humanity or vulnerability? Maybe she makes some real mistakes and owns up to them? Those would definitely help combat the "one-dimensional Mary Sue" rumors.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    19. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you portray terrorists as Allah worshiping mideasterners, you are reflecting reality and truth. That is fine, it is what the world really is- Muslim supremacists destorying all that they can.

      Instead, movies have Russian terrorists, pretty much exclusively. At the same time, the media demonizes Russia and has a whole Busb-did-911-tier conspiracy about Russia and Trump.

      If anything, it appears that corporations and entire wings of the government are trying to manufacture casus belli as fast as possible.

    20. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Is the film any good though?

      Sadly, among most of the reviews I've seen that's the one question everyone seems to dance around without a satisfactory answer. And it's the most important question to ask, first and foremost.
       

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    21. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This kind of shit you're spewing is exactly what people have issues with. There's no need to genderize, racialize, or politicize everything as you just did.

      If they let it be just a movie, and not try to force political agendas in the marketing of this, then there wouldn't be such a big of a controversy. There's plenty of movies with female leads out there which are great. Ignoring that fact just makes Brie Larson look like a bitter moron.

    22. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Cederic · · Score: 2

      For what it's worth I've heard #3 and #4 too, from general media reviews.

      When even the media are calling out the one dimensionality of the lead character it doesn't bode well for a film - so I'm surprised that it's taken so much money.

      Me, I'm skipping it on the grounds I dislike the marketing and publicity approach. Fuck 'em.

    23. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if you were accurate about every woman being flawless in a movie and every white male being a monster, this *still* would be whiny bullshit that's not a real problem. It's not true, but even if it were. Otherwise every movie has to be carefully calculated tokenism.

      If the vast majority of movies were that way, then it would be a problem. For instance, historical blackface comedy from before any of us were born.

    24. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Cederic · · Score: 1

      People are being attacked because of their skin colour and/or their gender, and you're berating them for refusing to accept it.

      I don't give a flying fuck who is in governments (although in my country the head of state and the head of the government are both women), I don't give a fuck who is in movies, and I do care that white men are paid less than white women (check the fucking stats) but I do fully acknowledge that being attacked for your gender or skin colour is sexist and racist, and I support people standing up against sexism and racism.

      Don't you?

    25. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by PyroMosh · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The hero is potrayed as constantly having been kicked down and told she's not good enough, exclusively by comically-over-the-top sexist men.

      Wait... you're telling me that a sci-fi / fantasy / capeshit property is using allegory to make social commentary?

      This is unique and new in the history of storytelling. You should inform the press.

      clumsy heavy-handed

      In a property based on a comic book aimed at children? Really? You can't see it, but I assure you, I am making my shocked face.

    26. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blech---- X{

      Great, so they ruined what seems to be a great movie with stereotyping bullshit.

      If I ever see this movie, I'll wait until it hits the $5 DVD bargain bin. :|

      Something tells me that most of the producers (both male and female) were not onboard with this, and a wayward SJW bullied them into adding this garbage to what otherwise sounds like a fine movie.

    27. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I remember when it used to be this way with Arabs in Hollywood films. Now they're doing it with whites.

    28. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut the fuck up, faggot.

    29. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I always wonder how the feminists would take a movie celebrating white males? I'm sure they wouldn't like being labeled trolls.

    30. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by elrous0 · · Score: 5, Informative

      As for the movie, there's no propaganda in it anywhere, it's just a movie.

      That's most certainly not how it was marketed. Marvel and Brie Larson have went out of their way to insist that it's a unabashedly feminist film, even going so far as to release it on International Women's Day. If it is "just a movie," then they have done it a grave disservice by trying to market it as something with a very clear feminist agenda.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    31. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Marvel didn't spread division. Some guys got upset over one quote out of context by the lead actress, that's it.

      Expecting actors and anyone else involved to never have said anything to offend anyone ever is unrealistic and done purely to create drama and division. There are people trying to manufacture a backlash against people they consider to be "SJWs", but for all the noise they make most people really don't care.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    32. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think that might be a bit of an oversimplification. The overseas market really doesn't care too much about any political message agenda a film might or might not have unless it targets them in some way. I've seen plenty of foreign films that supposedly have political messages that go completely over my head since I'm not familiar with what was going on in the country, so it doesn't stand out to me.

      Also Ghostbusters wasn't shown in China because the government has a thing about showing films that contain ghosts or spirits in them so it didn't get any boost from China that other films would get. I guess there's a new Ghostbusters that's getting made that's supposed to be a sequel to the first two, but unless it gets the original cast back outside of cameos, I don't think it will do much better than the previous reboot attempt. Even then, I don't really know if it will be anything but a shameless cash grab.

      I think this goes to show how much everyone overreacted to some idiots trying to bot online numbers. I think it just goes to show that people need to get out more. It only seems like people give a shit about any of this because there's a small group of busy bodies on social media that don't have anything better to do and end up sounding a lot louder than they number in reality.

    33. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wasn't taken out of context. Brie Larson said exactly what she meant, and she's got a history of it. Saying its out of context would be like saying Ilhan Omar saying anti-Semetic things is out of context, while ignoring years of such behavior.

      twitter.com/brielarson/status/916072035268333568

    34. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    35. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And white men do absolutely no wrong ever and should never be portrayed as villains anywhere? Who gives a shit if the villain is a white male, sometimes shit happens. This is seriously some whiny baby bullshit that zomg someone who might be the same skin color as me is being portrayed as a villain in a movie

      On the russia thing, actual government intelligence agencies have said that yes, russia has been involved in various hacking attempts to do nefarious deeds. So is portraying them in the same manner as muslim terrorists not the same thing then? Why is it bad for there to be russian terrorists in the same vein of reflecting reality

    36. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 2

      Wait... you're telling me that a sci-fi / fantasy / capeshit property is using allegory to make social commentary?

      Wait! What? Al Gore is in Captain Marvell too?

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    37. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're talking about it on slashdot.

    38. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it's nothing like what Brie Larson threatened it would be?

    39. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whole heartedly agree.

      So glad to hear that the grand jury indicted the guy from Empire on 16 hate crimes inflicted on a person of color.

    40. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Marvel didn't spread division.

      Having your star go on every talk show bragging about it being a feminist film, insisting on dividing her interviewers up by race and gender, and releasing it on International Women's Day are not suggestive of a studio "not looking to spread division." In fact, division seems to be the very cornerstone of their entire marketing campaign. Contrast that with the way DC marketed Wonder Woman and the almost universally positive reaction that film got, from fans of every political and social stripe.

      I think Marvel knew exactly what they were doing. They're crassly playing on ugly social and political divisions, in hopes of it paying off in ticket sales. And sadly, initial box office results suggest that it worked.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    41. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for that review, that is exactly what I wanted to know.

      It is unfortunate that trolls broke the audience review system....people won't trust it now that they know trolls bomb it. And of course the professional reviewers are often just paid shills, so they are never worth reading anyway.

      I remember some top movie execs complaining about how awful rotten tomatoes is...mainly because it lets people warn others way from bad movies (which of course the movie producers hate). With trolling this bad, it no longer serves that function, since nobody will trust the negative reviews.

      Way to go trolls...you just defeated your own purposes.

    42. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Personally, I'm just turned off the entire Marvel brand. I've been a huge fan of their movies for many years, but now they just leave a rotten taste in my mouth. I don't think I'll watch their movies any more. I'm hesitant to even write this post, because I really just want to disengage from the whole thing. I feel kind of sad that something that brought a lot of joy to my life got poisoned with identity politics.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    43. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a pretty huge difference between portraying some villains as X and always portraying X characters as villains. If you claim not to understand the difference, then you're either being dishonest or you're truly obtuse.

    44. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nah, it's the basement dwellers that are rejected by the other sex. They like to blame the matriarchy, where everyone's a cunt but their momma, for being refused the sex they're 'entitled' to.
      They see a stronger female character in a movie and they enter incel tunnel vision mode and lose their shit. Then they rage about it on the internet and proceed to jerk off to the same strong character on their favourite rule34 site.
      The movie may suck for other reasons though.

    45. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see... Tilly is scatter brained.
      Michael fell in love with a Klingon.
      Giorgiou is evil.
      Robot lady has been taken over by alien probe.

      About the most honest character in the show is Pike. Who is a dude of white hue.

    46. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Putin's cock shoots vodka?!

      Oh. My. God. This explains so much.

      Thanks for sharing your experience with us, and finally revealing the basis of the man's success to the rest of us.

    47. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by elrous0 · · Score: 1, Troll

      I've been a huge fan of their movies for many years, but now they just leave a rotten taste in my mouth.

      That's the saddest thing, isn't it? Mainstream superhero movies have traditionally united us. This is the first one that feels like it has only divided us even more. And, perhaps most disheartening, Marvel seems to have chosen this approach intentionally. The certainly didn't take this approach with Black Panther. Nor did DC take this approach with Wonder Woman.

      This feels like the kind of unpleasant turning point that I had hoped would never come in this genre. They've brought divisive politics and social division into a genre that used to be noted for its universal appeal. It makes me dread what we can expect going forward.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    48. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Wokeness? I assumed the audience is teenage boys who want to see a beautiful young woman in a tight body suit to go with the usual battle scenes. I would be curious how many girls watch the movie. But I doubt it's many. The salespitch of, "Why be a woman when a woman can now be a man?" is neither feminine nor feminist. Only opportunistic.

    49. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SPOILER

      In my opinion, there is a very wide gray area between the endpoints of sexist-nonsexist, and racist-nonracist.

      For example, showing a black person eating watermelon can be a very racist statement, given the historical context of this portrayal. But if there are also several non-black people eating it in some context where it is expected (like a picnic or something), then it really isn't racist, it's just a scene that involves watermelon.

      So, the villain is a white guy. Well, if the villain is human then they must have SOME gender, and SOME color, right? There are a lot of white men in the world, including powerful and evil ones. I don't think making the villain be a white guy is, in and of itself, sufficient to qualify as a sexist or racist statement.

      Are there LOTs of white guys in this movie, all villains in some way, juxtaposed against lots of non-whites or non-males who are saints? Maybe then that is a racist or sexist statement (example: Star wars the Last Jedi).

      So, it is kind of a sliding scale, with things possibly being in a gray area. That's just because real life is complicated.

    50. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Isn't this the guy who got anally probed by Kevin Spacy?

    51. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I agree that these divisive politics are a terrible thing and they help make our world a worse place in many ways.
      However, I personally find the Captain Marvel approach (and here I am talking only about the plot of the movie) to be the more favorable one. "Captain Marvel" doesn't put its status as a 'female empowerment' movie at the forefront of its identity. It is a marvel superhero movie where the protagonist happens to be a woman. Her struggles during the plot do not relate to her gender, no one in the movie's present is even mildly surprised that she is both a capable individual and a woman. Her gender-related struggles do feature in her background as a female US airforce soldier and pilot, but mostly in support of the plot-relevant conflict between her Kree and Human heritage.
      I also like the decision not to have a romantic subplot, which might relegate Captain Marvel to the lower status of "love interest" within the greater MCU.

      What elements do you think can make a film unifying, instead of divisive, while still presenting its message?

    52. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Maelwryth · · Score: 1

      Well....that left out her greatest nemisis being a female. Perspective please.

      --
      I reserve the write to mangle english.
    53. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the one white dude who survived by telling everyone he was gay and had a black boyfriend. Smart move.

    54. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Kokuyo · · Score: 2

      I mean there is some measure you can get of the character of the Marvel company when you recall that they used Stan Lee's twitter account post mortem to push the movie.

      Can you more blatantly display that you have lost touch with your customer base?

      I don't exactly know about CM... I know that the l8ve of a fan shines all through Alita... I just don't get that vibe from a company necromancing a beloved old man for profit...

    55. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      1) The hero is potrayed as constantly having been kicked down and told she's not good enough, exclusively by comically-over-the top sexist men.

      Um yeah. She was trying to be a USAF fighter pilot in the 80's. That stuff happens to white male fighter pilots throughout the history of the air force.

      2) SPOILER ALERT The one white male in the film who is her ally turns out to be the villain.

      Fits within story. That's Yon Rogg from the comics. Google him.

      3) Captain Marvel herself is a "Mary Sue" with no real character arc. She starts out perfect and flawless, and ends up perfect and flawless. Her only "flaw" that she overcomes is not appreciating how awesome she truly is, or appreciating how much evil men have been holding her back or deceiving her about her awesome-amazingness.

      This *is* a problem for this movie. Her real flaws in this movie are her amnesia and overconfidence. They had a great opportunity to show her alcoholism, and her biggest slew of memories are related to a bar, but they ignored it.

      4) Captain Marvel never faces any real challenges, nor has real character development, nor is shown to grow in any meaningful way.

      She does learn that she's not just a killing machine, and that she has a past which she needs to explore.

      5) The feminism is presented in a clumsy heavy-handed way, such as playing the song like "I'm Just A Girl" during the climatic fight scene--and not in a funny, ironic way.

      The song is fine. The real heavy-handed feminism is that Mar Vell was made a female, possibly because having a male that she admires professionally would remove her feminine agency or whatever. It's ignorable since her character is irrelevant in every way to the story. She could have been named JNQW$TN and had the same impact.

    56. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is the "us" or even the other side that you are talking about? There were no two "sides" going in to see Wonder Woman and there isn't going in to see Captain Marvel. You are not being attacked by some imaginary female movie lead agenda, or whatever the hell you think it is, and you are not on a "side" that exists in this country.

    57. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wait, wanting to support International Women's Day by releasing your film on it (or more likely just cashing in, whatever) is divisive now?

      As I said, it's only a small number of snowflakes who get triggered and try to bomb the user scores on these things, most people either don't care or think it's a good thing.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    58. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      We already knew what the fate of Pike was before he made an appearance on the show.
      It already happened in TOS and the new show has been referencing TOS and showing the Talosians as well.
      If you're surprised that Pike isn't there to stay you're either a colossal moron or you don't want to see it because it doesn't fit your narrative.

      So far Pike has been depicted as a highly competent star fleet captain, who has conservative values and stands up to the immoral shit that Star Fleet does behind the curtains. They also chose to depict him a lot like Kirk in TOS with camera angles and facial expressions that make him highly charismatic.

    59. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      For those interested, the AC is linking to a tweet from two years ago, long before Captain Marvel was being marketed, by Brie Larson complaining about being harassed by TSA agents:

      I merely smiled at a TSA agent and he asked for my phone number. To live life as a woman is to live life on the defense.

      This is where we are now: women who are victims of harassment cannot even mention it any more without being told they're victimizing white males and having their movies boycotted.

    60. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      COMMENT HAS SPOILERS BELOW.

      If you're looking for "wokeness," it's not here.

      You're right, and I did watch the movie too, but Captain Marvel comes out as the most bland of all the Marvel heroes. It sucks too because its nearest sequel is Guardians of the Galaxy, and Starlord there has a much more fleshed out character.

      I think that the approach to the timeline juggling was a bit interesting, but falls flat because her development wasn't as fleshed out as it could have been.

      She immediately turns her back on her comrades because of some memories she instantly believes with only some scenes to say that "hey, she doubted stuff". At least, I think it would've been better if they at least focused on her character, fleshed out more what she was before she became a Kree super soldier.

      Yeah, and it looks like they put a bit of a problem with the Tesseract suddenly being with Mar-vell when "Howard Stark fished it out of the water" as said in the first Avengers movie.

    61. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by MMC+Monster · · Score: 2

      I would be curious how many girls watch the movie. But I doubt it's many.

      My daughter was excited to wait for this movie, as are most of her friends. She's 15, in high school.

      The Marvel Cinematic Universe is pretty main stream and a lot of young girls are watching the films.

      We didn't get to it this weekend, but I'm sure we'll end up watching it on video if we don't manage to get to the theater while it's still out.

      --
      Help! I'm a slashdot refugee.
    62. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Compuser · · Score: 3, Informative

      Spoiler alert for the whole post.
      1. There are explicit references to past sexism in the movie but I am not sure where the "comically-over-the-top sexist men" comment comes from. Certainly, at a critical moment seen also in the trailers when she is gathering her strength, she refers to herself as a human and not as a woman. Also certainly, the one male who gets center stage throughout the movie, Nick Fury, is not depicted as sexist.
      2. Truth be told, there is a villain female too. None are supposed to be human and the chief villain apparently has no form but its persona visible to us is female.
      3. This mostly true. She does steal some clothes and a motorcycle for no reason. But it seems to be just very weak homage to terminator 2. Otherwise, I agree. What is worse, Brie Larson seems to have trouble conveying any emotional subtlety here. The movie starts when she cannot sleep because she is so troubled by the dreams. But she speaks evenly, has no sweat and shows no outward sign of inner turmoil. She is a good actress so perhaps she was just counting all the money Marvel just paid her. In any case, this is my least favorite part of the movie.
      4. Captain Marvel is presented as basically an MCU version of Superman. She is given so much power that you never feel she is at risk of failing. And no kryptonite in sight. Then again, MCU has rarely had good villains. This is just an extreme version of a long tradition.
      5. Frankly, the music was so heavy handed that I started tuning it out long before the climactic scene. And I do not mean, feminist heavy handed. I mean the score itself felt like it traded all good taste for that extra bit of pathos.

      So in my view, CM was not a good movie, but it is not as bad as Superman IV. I think it is pretty much OK for a March movie.

    63. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by kqs · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I saw it today. Yes, it was good. My wife and I both enjoyed it, and that's all I really care about.

      If you are the kind of person who sees a powerful female lead and tries to explain your feeling of inadequacy as "I don't hate women, just SJWs", well, you're gonna hate it. But we all expected that. There are interesting and powerful women and men in this movie; some of each are good and some are evil. Kinda like life. There is a theme of "you have your own power; nobody else controls it", which will resonate well with women but also with men.

      If you are the kind of person who likes seeing good guys as good and bad guys as bad, with no shades of grey, well, you'll hate it.

      But if you want a movie with a young (and very emotive) Nick Fury, a bland-as-always Coulson, many fights and explosions, a good sound track of 90s music, and the usual Marvel wisecracks, then go see it.

    64. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Frank+Burly · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The term "Feminist" is so subjective that it really only serves as a floor: a film where the woman is nothing but a love interest or a damsel in distress is not feminist because the woman is acted upon by the events in the film rather than driving them.

      This is a movie where the superhero is a woman, therefore it is feminist unless she is texting Nick Fury all the time asking for permission.

      You have posted an awful lot in this thread about a film you haven't seen and complained that the film was divisively marketed. Is this anger and division coming from anyone but the men complaining that men are not fairly represented?

      In James Bond films, the woman are at best help-mates, and at worst murderous vixens, yet Feminist criticism is (for the most part) correctly derided and ignored as doctrinaire and humorless. Now there are legions of men who turn into scolds and vandals worse than bellbottom-wearing, hairy-armpit feminists when a movie has some of the roles reversed. It's just a movie, don't try to shoehorn your identity politics into it.

    65. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by elrous0 · · Score: 0

      Who is the "us" or even the other side that you are talking about? There were no two "sides" going in to see Wonder Woman and there isn't going in to see Captain Marvel. You are not being attacked by some imaginary female movie lead agenda, or whatever the hell you think it is, and you are not on a "side" that exists in this country.

      Well, I suppose my "side" is that of people who don't want divisive politics and social agendas in our popcorn superhero movies or their marketing, who want superhero movies to appeal to the best in *all* of us and to be inclusive not exclusive. And I'm pretty sure that there are quite a few others on this "side" too.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    66. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      not as bad as Superman IV

      How DARE you speak the movie-name-that-is-not-to-be-spoken!

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    67. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "But if you want a movie with a young (and very emotive) Nick Fury, a bland-as-always Coulson, many fights and explosions, a good sound track of 90s music, and the usual Marvel wisecracks, then go see it."

      So you're a moron, then? Sad!

    68. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Does every movie have to have a straight while male good guy now?

      What is the logic here, that it's some kind of subtle attack on white males? How does that work?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    69. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by kqs · · Score: 3, Informative

      1) The hero is potrayed as constantly having been kicked down and told she's not good enough, exclusively by comically-over-the-top sexist men.

      Not sure who told you that, but since that is ludicrously false you should treat all stories from that source with suspicion from now on. Spoilers!

      I cannot think of a single scene where she is "kicked down". We see a series of scenes from her past where she failed; sometimes men were there and sometimes not. There is a line like "women could not fly combat missions, so the only way we could contribute was by being experimental test pilots"; if that fits your comment, then you and I will likely never agree on anything.

      In fact, the main person "keeping her down" is a female (more would be very spoilery).

      2) SPOILER ALERT The one white male in the film who is her ally turns out to be the villain.

      Well, if you assume that Agent Coulson isn't a white male, then maybe? But the "white male" is a villain, as are the others on his mixed-gender-and-species team. And (more spoilers) an alien played by a white male turned out to be a good guy.

      Not worth refuting these one-by-one. Too many people believe what they want to believe and tune out what doesn't fit their notions.

    70. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Impy+the+Impiuos+Imp · · Score: 1

      These aren't deep movies. They are flashy spectacles to be seen on a huge screen.

      This is almost as bad as someone wanting to see a crappy cam rip of it on the small screen, presumably because they love studying the nuanced differences between superhero movies and Citizen Kane or Casablanca, and aren't interested in the glitz and action.

      --
      (-1: Post disagrees with my already-settled worldview) is not a valid mod option.
    71. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Darinbob · · Score: 2

      Who's being attacked?

    72. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      White males...white males...white males...white males...white males...white males...white male...white males

      Like the other poster said, people are being judged by their skin color (and sex) and are being berated for not accepting it.

      Do you know what we call people who judge others based on their race?

      Racists.

      Do you know what we call people who judge others based on their sex?

      Sexists.

      Do you know what you are?

    73. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by kqs · · Score: 1, Insightful

      If they let it be just a movie, and not try to force political agendas in the marketing of this, then there wouldn't be such a big of a controversy. There's plenty of movies with female leads out there which are great. Ignoring that fact just makes Brie Larson look like a bitter moron.

      Wait, what? I haven't seen any political agenda with this movie except from the trolls. Trolls blasted the movie on ratings sites, then complained about the controversy they created and the political agenda they are pushing.

      Was the first Iron Man, where all of the heroes and villains were male, a "political agenda"? Well, this movie, which has a female lead and males and females on both the "good" and "evil" side, is no more political. So, why do you keep on trying to make it political?

      I mean, spoiler alert, but the Big Bad in this movie is portrayed by a female for god's sake. Women can do that too; get over it.

    74. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by phantomfive · · Score: 0

      If you are the kind of person who sees a powerful female lead and tries to explain your feeling of inadequacy as "I don't hate women, just SJWs", well, you're gonna hate it. But we all expected that. There are interesting and powerful women and men in this movie; some of each are good and some are evil. Kinda like life.

      OK, now imagine I've never heard of SJWs, or Manspreading, or anything like that. Would I still be able to enjoy the movie? Or do you need to take sides to enjoy it?

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    75. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the NPC

    76. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up, faggot.

    77. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're the kind of person who thinks strong female characters are a new idea in Sci-Fi / Fantasy, you haven't been watching Sci-Fi / Fantasy.

      Generally, the complaints from people who just don't care about "statements", is that it's a "meh" movie that flows badly, does a poor job of developing Danvers, and inserted the stupidest reason in the history of Marvel for Nick Fury (junior) losing his eye. :)

    78. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being asked for your phone number is harassment now?

      Bullshit.

    79. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      This is the first one that feels like it has only divided us even more.

      Only if you're an MRA snowflake idiot.

    80. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Captain Pike and Liutenant Stamets are villains? I don't think so.

    81. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by jellomizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      1. This plat point is relatively downplayed, and is shown from a stance o faulty memory. The scene was less about her being a woman, but just being told she cannot do that, only SPOILER ALERT to show her resolve and getting up to try again after her memories returned. Being that these memories were from the 1970's and 1980's where historically they had Men and Woman's roles in society. The AI which was manipulating the was a shown as a women as well.

      2. Technically that was an Alien, the white human male with a major roll was Agent Coulson, who was a good guy.

      3. Her flaws is her self doubt, and controlling her temper. But this is similar to most of the Marvel Movie introductions. Captain America was always the good guy, he just got powers, but it didn't change his personality, just how other see him, and what he can do.

      4. The challenge is her changing alliances (I think they could had done it a little more dramatically), Overnight she had learned who the good guys are and who the bad guys are changed overnight.

      5. I keep on hearing that shows that have a strong female lead being heavy handed, while the fact that she was a woman, had little to do with the plot of the movie, Yes it was brought it . But it never was a major point.

      Perhaps you should have watched the movie before doing criticism on it. There are just too many people Afraid of Liberal Hollywood, and project the clumsy tropes of the past onto these newer shows.
      As a Middle Class White Christian Male, who live in a rural area. Diversity isn't scary or is it threatening to me and my way of life. I notice differences in how other act and react to problems, however these differences give me new perspectives on new problems.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    82. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, if your problem is that the opposite sex finds you attractive, and many of them want to have sex with you...I can't say I have much sympathy. :-P

      Hell, *I* should have such "problems"!

    83. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm hesitant to even write this post....

      ... and yet you still wrote it...

    84. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by kqs · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Since the movie has nothing about SJWs or Manspreading in it, then yes, you can enjoy the movie. In fact, taking sides is the best way to not enjoy it. No matter what side you take, you can always find something to complain about.

    85. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry about your tiny, ineffectual penis.

    86. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "That ugly, flat-chested broad is an eye sore"
      Just because she - and perhaps anyone else - will not fuck you without being paid doesn't make her unattractive.
      BTW, large breasts are a handicap for a warrior and the female warriors who inspired the legends of Amazons were likely Scythians who were steppes nomads. They probably weren't typically large-breasted although certainly wider in the hips than Gal Gadot

    87. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Some guys got upset over one quote out of context by the lead actress,

      Like they did with Liam Neeson? Oh, wait, that was different.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    88. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by sfritsche · · Score: 1

      Maybe they should fictionalize (or not) Atomwaffen Division and use them as a (too close to reality) terrorist group. I suppose it would make the film hard to classify as drama or documentary.

      --
      "I'd horsewhip you if I had a horse." -- Groucho Marx
    89. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When you tell a specific group (in this case, white males) in no uncertain terms that their opinion doesn't matter, I don't think that's triggering--it's a deliberate attack. Can you imagine if she had said that about any other group (minorities in particular)? "Fuck off, I didn't make this film for you." They'd be justified in outrage. Would you call them "snowflakes"?

      Are blacks "snowflakes" because they're offended that Will Smith is too light-skinned to play Venus + Serena's dad??

      Shit, ALL she had to do was get in front of the camera and say, "I am proud to be a part of this project, bringing a strong female hero [can't say 'heroine' anymore] to life on screen and I hope that it's especially inspiring to young women, and that everyone else enjoys the film too!"

      But nooooo....

    90. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Said every movie about terrorists and US cities made in the past 25 years.

      The Sum of All Fears dates from 2002 and features Neo-Nazi terrorists.

    91. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Said every movie about terrorists and US cities made in the past 25 years.
      > The Sum of All Fears dates from 2002 and features Neo-Nazi terrorists.

      They were Palestinians in the book. Now why did they feel the need to change that?

    92. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      They used to slice off their right boob to better facilitate firing arrows

    93. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Found the DM

    94. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Nick Fury, one of the baddest dudes in the MCU, spends most of the moving Driving Miss Marvel and ends up losing his eye to a damn cat.

      Even the left leaning reviewers were pissed over that one, I man how can you take Nick Fury, played by Samuel "it says bad motherf*cker" Jackson, and has him lose his eye to a damn cat? And when I hear multiple reviews use the word "cringe" when talking about key scenes and that the lead in an MCU flick feels like she is phoning it in harder than Bruce Willis in Die Hard 5? Nope, don't want, no thanks.

      At least Ghostbusters 2016 had an excuse, Fieg didn't have a script and just told the actors to make shit up and bless their hearts they tried, but when most reviews I'm seeing says pretty much everyone BUT Miss Marvel is good in the movie and when she walks on screen the movie just grinds to a halt as the actress has a bad case of the "I don't cares"? Yeah no thanks, sounds about as appealing as a trip to the DMV. BTW you know a movie is in trouble when the big hype building up to the movie? Is over the cat.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    95. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The project of "decentering whiteness" - that is, things like telling white people that they need to constantly be aware of their whiteness and how they may be inadvertently harming others - has some pretty significant cultural power right now, and given that it's using academic jargon and came out of universities and the like, it has institutional power as well. Phrases like "male, pale, and stale," and people who engage in "ironic misandry," are published in national newspapers.

      But there's a serious problem here. When you tell someone they need to constantly think about their identity, it's entirely possible that they'll come back with an answer you don't like.

      For instance, if they view a Nascar driver losing a sponsor over something his dad, a foreigner without a good grasp of the cultural situation in the US, said one time 30 years ago on a radio show, they may decide that they need to band together to prevent that kind of thing from happening again.

      On what basis will they band together? Well, given the terrible things that happened last time, I seriously bloody hope it's something like "being video gamers," because some of the alternatives are, uh. Not... great.

      Right now they're pushing back on being labeled, because they're the boogey man of progressive SJ and they know it, and regular Americans are much more chill than Twitter suggests. As long as the label doesn't stick it can't be used for coordination.

      If the label sticks? Well, "gay" is natural category, but do you think they would have made PACs if no one ever treated being gay as a big deal?

    96. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bringing more and more anger and division to our pop culture is only hastening a very ugly future in which we are at open war over our racial, ethnic, and gender divisions.

      That's literally what 85% of white people said about black people protesting during the civil rights era.

      Just pretend its not there has always been the line from the empowered to the dis-empowered.

      I much preferred the Wonder Woman approach myself.

      Of course you did. The status quo ain't a problem for you.

    97. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by hairyfeet · · Score: 5, Informative

      Uhh you must have missed Brie Larson on the promo circuit saying "I don't need a 40-year-old white dude to tell me what didn't work about A Wrinkle in Time. It wasn't made for him! " (so apparently you can't be a critic of a movie unless you are the correct skin color and sex, I guess someone should go tell The Black Nerd on YouTube he is fucked) and her touting the movie was "made with intersectional feminism" so sorry, you can buy the bullshit all you want but the star of the movie was waving a big ass political flag as high and as hard as she could possibly swing the damn thing.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    98. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It was neither Disney nor Marvel. Stan Lee's production company controls the Twitter account, promoting a link to its website about the Captain Marvel opening in Hollywood.

    99. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Found my wallet. Just thought you guys should know. I was getting worried.

    100. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Wider distribution.

    101. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by denzacar · · Score: 3, Informative

      Also there was Alita, which rocked. Since I get to see about one film every quarter, that definitely had the more powerful lure for me.

      Sadly, no it didn't. It wasn't god awful... didn't make me angry... But it was AT BEST serviceable.

      That's if one ignores huge and pointless plot contrivances which would mar any movie (seriously, Rodriguez is barely a mediocre director), terrible dialogue and generally bad writing very much in the vein of Kalogridis' work on Altered Carbon and Terminator Genisys.

      That movie should have been a new Star Wars... a work of fiction reshaping and presenting philosophical ideas to the general audience.
      Also it should have felt a lot more like Mad Max and a lot less like... hell... Zootopia.
      And I don't mean the uncanny valley eyes (an immediate giveaway that the movie makers don't understand the work they are adapting) - I mean the color scheme and the general feeling of cheeriness.
      Not one moment did I feel that anyone in that world was a survivor of any kind of hardship.
      It's supposed to be a post-apocalyptic world of cyborgs and mutants. A desperate world, built out of scrap and garbage of the old one.
      Not an occasionally somewhat dangerous yet oddly kid-friendly global melting pot with what I can only imagine as a Walmart on every block filled with brand new and colorful clothes and various other casually flashed gear.

      But I did notice this fake "rivalry" online.
      Alita being somehow an opposite to Captain Marvel... and its "toxic feminism"... "toxic femininity"... by the usual members of the sad and pathetic ass-clown army.

      One more reason I'm glad this movie has practically no chance for a sequel. Even on paper it barely broke even...
      And knowing how long it was in development (for a while it seemed all that would come out if it is a passing resemblance of Dark Angel to the source material) - I suspect that it drags a LOT more in pre-production cost and how much Cameron will be taking for himself.
      I'm inclined to believe its "break even" point is closer to 500 million or more.
      Hell... at one time it was Alita or Avatar. It was supposed to make THAT much.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    102. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Movie marketing isn't always very accurate or true to the movie. Did you ever see any trailers for the movie Kangaroo Jack?

    103. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      How does this movie bring "anger and division" to our pop culture, exactly?

      Same shit with ST:D (what an unfortunate abbreviation, though). Judging by Slashdot's response, you'd think it put ransomware on peoples' computers and raped their cats.

      I finally got around to binge-watching to the most recent episode and it's actually pretty good. I'll probably ruffle some feathers here, but IMHO ST:D got off to a better start than ST:V, and that didn't really hit its stride until it got Borg-y. My biggest gripe against ST:D is CBS All Access.

      As to Captain Marvel, I don't really feel one way or the other about it. It's just MCU filler until Avengers: End Game comes out. I'll probably watch it when it hits WEB-DL, if you catch my drift.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    104. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not worth refuting these one-by-one. Too many people believe what they want to believe and tune out what doesn't fit their notions.

      So the rest are true and you don't want to believe they are. Got it.

    105. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were Palestinians in the book. Now why did they feel the need to change that?

      Why don't you listen to the audio commentary and find out?

    106. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But creimer sure isn't flat chested!

      He is now trying to exploit Captain Marvel and monetize Stan Lee beyond the grave!

    107. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Z80a · · Score: 2

      No, it have to have well written characters regardless of the gender, not some uni-dimensional "safe" mary sue/gary stu.
      There are better examples out there like well, wonder woman.

    108. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      large breasts are a handicap for a warrior

      You don't say. What does Cellulita "Black Mamba" Johansson do in the same superhero "universe" then?

    109. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by UnknowingFool · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Every white male was a villain and every female was flawless? Apparently you didn’t see the movie.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    110. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's amazing the number of posts on Slashdot that do not see this point. My guess is that they are largely ignorant of what happened and bought the media's story of "trolls" when in fact those so called trolls were targeting Brie's misandry. I'm not an MRA but the hypocrisy knows no depths here.

      And let's not call it what it's not, and that's a "great" movie. Anyone who has followed the MCU aka fans will be disgusted at the plot holes, bad writing, and missed opportunities. I think this analysis is among the best.

      Truth be known, Captain Marvel will end up wrecking the MCU franchise the same way that The Last Jedi wrecked Star Wars.

    111. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      That's most certainly not how it was marketed.

      Figures that the crowd that hasn't figured out how to block ads would be the ones doing all the whining.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    112. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by jezwel · · Score: 1

      Went with my partner and our 3 month old baby (a specific parent/baby targeted session). As someone who hasn't seen any of the marketing material, comics interviews, or anything that seems SJWish (I live in the southern hemisphere and don't watch TV), it was enjoyable enough.

    113. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Powercntrl · · Score: 1

      Having your star go on every talk show bragging about it being a feminist film, insisting on dividing her interviewers up by race and gender, and releasing it on International Women's Day are

      ...first world problems.

      Fixed that for you.

      --

      ---
      DRM is like antifreeze, to the MPAA/RIAA it's sweet, to the consumers it's poison.
    114. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, his boyfriend did leave a few marks on him.

      http://www.howardandrewjones.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/pike1new.jpg

    115. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guys with capes is what tips me off that a movie is probably not worth my time.

    116. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why waste time when it is quite obvious?

      Tom Clancy was a fucked up in the head racist Christian fundamentalist nutjob, and it shows in his stories quite plainly, old chap.

    117. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deliberately triggering red-pilled shitheads for column inches isn't really "spreading division", it's good marketing, since those guys would never see it anyway.

    118. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There were terrorists in that movie? I remember the nuke scene, which was the only reason to watch that movie anyway.

    119. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by zugmeister · · Score: 1

      Only if you're an MRA snowflake idiot.

      See "nazi". It doesn't really mean anything anymore. Kinda like how incel is getting. You can call people names but if you refuse to counter their ideas with better ones nobody but your in-group will think of you as anything other than a name calling jerk, 'cause that's what you're showing the world you are.
      Think about it.
      Or you can learn nothing and fire up the ad hominem again...

    120. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Spamalope · · Score: 1

      I see you were brave enough to post under your own name.

      Oh... wait...

      But no, I don't think the actresses openly bigoted remarks are a good look, and certainly were intended to be divisive.

    121. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by zugmeister · · Score: 1

      Alita was fucking stupid.

      As are some people's opinions.

      Bug-eyed LGBTQ cunt on rollerblades

      The word you're looking for here is "cyborg". Yeah, with a boyfriend.
      Are you a silly jerk in real life too or is it just when hiding as an AC behind a keyboard?

    122. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not a cat.

    123. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by zugmeister · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Since the movie has nothing about SJWs or Manspreading in it...

      So Brie Larson didn't describe it as a "big feminist movie"?
      And it wasn't timed to be released on Woman's Day?
      And it doesn't have a Mary Sue character?
      And any legitimate criticism of the movie hasn't been met with cries of "incel" or "mysogynist" or "troll"?
      Well then, I guess you're right. Nothing to see here, move along....

    124. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by zugmeister · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but if you simply call yourself a liberal, then redefine racism and sexism carefully so they don't include you, you're all set.

    125. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by zugmeister · · Score: 1

      fuck off ivan go back to sucking putins cock for your daily vodka

      Such an eloquent rebuttal of his argument and the facts contained therein!
      Sure changed my mind, I'll tell you.

    126. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fragile ego white incel detected

    127. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      People have been review bombing sites for decades now. They didn't just start doing that. Lol

      I'm fact, companies have paid people to review bomb sites. Services actually exist to assist companies in this task.

      Why do you think it was so easy for the "trolls" to do it? Because these sites INTENTIONALLY did not even try to harden them. Likely they have either used the services themselves, are invested in them, or we're happy that they were operating because it gives them more attention.

      Regardless this is not a new problem. Not at all.

    128. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by hey! · · Score: 1

      I saw the movie. Judged in isolation from the social media furor, which I've been ignoring, it's not a divisive movie unless you're primed to see it that way.

      It's just not a very good movie. It's not "Batman and Robin" bad -- five minutes into that one and I wondered if the editors had actually ever *seen* a movie. It's more like "Tommorowland", in which no money or talent was spared, and yet the result came out... OK.

      The thing about "Wonder Woman" is that was a passion project for everyone involved -- like Lord of the Rings. Those movies were done with love and care. Nobody was clamoring to make a "Captain Marvel" movie, it doesn't exist for its own sake. It exists to perform a function, to lubricate the great pivot of the massive, 22 film Marvel Cinematic Universe from phase III to phase IV.

      This is a film which is so busy doing what it has to do, that it doesn't have time to get its storytelling in order. Key plot elements are delivered in randomly scattered flashbacks (always a bad sign), characters engaged in barely disguised exposition, and confusing battles take place in which the rules aren't clear and the (overpowered) hero isn't genuinely threatened.

      The thing is, Wonder Woman hit feminist story beats too. You just didn't notice it because the script was better. The movie *sold* them to you. That made it a great movie. Captain Marvel is merely an OK movie trying to convince you it's a great one.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    129. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Gadget_Guy · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Nick Fury, one of the baddest dudes in the MCU, spends most of the moving Driving Miss Marvel and ends up losing his eye to a damn cat.

      Do you mean the same cat (not actually a cat) that was able to kill two armed bad guys simultaneously? The one that was deemed to be a very high threat level by the alien scanners?

      And given how Fury has never told anyone how he lost his eye, you could predict that it wouldn't have happened in some heroic way. Don't forget, this was a Nick Fury origin story just as much as it was for Captain Marvel. Given that one of the criticisms about the main character was her lack of growth, it seems hypercritical to complain that another character should have been the same bad-ass mutherf*cker that we know decades later.

    130. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Coulson is in the movie, and he's a good guy.

    131. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      7% of the world is white people. Also, black people commit 217 times more violent crimes than white people.

      If you wanted a villain who represented reality, it would be a black man 99.96666% of the time.

    132. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not division, pandering. There's millions of people who will spend their days marketing for you if you pander to them (and detracting from you if you don't), so it makes simple business sense.

      The question is why those people have nothing better to do and who is funding their anti-social lifestyle.

    133. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously, GET TO THE THEATER! Here's a chance for your daughter to see one of the most powerful female super heroes in Marvel history, so don't waste this opportunity!

      I will be seeing this again next weekend. It was a crap ton of fun. Please, don't waste this opportunity.

    134. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by hey! · · Score: 1

      It's OK. The plot is poorly organized and in places confusing, the dialog is weak and exposition-y, the fights have unclear rules (exactly what are her powers and when can she use them?) and there are no really strong antagonists for the hyper-powered protagonist, and there's not much effective characterization.

      But it's quite beautiful to look at, it moves along at a reasonable pace, and its full of charismatic actors trying their best, and supplied with the very best of everything that money can buy -- except for a decent script.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    135. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      by the usual members of the sad and pathetic ass-clown army.

      I do think what is even more sad are those people who do not recognize how awful the actress was talking about white men.

      If she said the same thing about a black person or a women the world would have been at a standstill until some action was taken. But because it's a white male it's perfectly acceptable.

      What's pathetic is posts like yours that promulgate the hypocrisy.

    136. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by hairyfeet · · Score: 2

      Its still a cat, not some giant space panther or some giant tentacle monster like in Guardians II, its a fricking cat.

      I mean Good Lord its Nick Fury and he loses his eye in some throw away scene? For fucks sake the annoying kid on Walking Dead got a more dramatic eye loss than the head of Shield, Samuel "bad motherf*cker" Jackson deserved a hell of a lot better.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    137. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The star of the film did the talk show circuit explaining how this film represents the Pinnacle of her activism and how she "doesn't hate white dudes" bit they cab all just shit the fuck up, because her movies aren't "made for" them.

    138. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Retard. Colson is a man, and that Kree lady was a lady.

      "But those were the exceptions!" Fuck, there were only about a dozen main characters -- there was only one black man! One black woman! One old woman! One old man! You can find offense wherever you want (EXCEPT, ironically, where you're trying to find it), it searching desperately to be offended makes you the absolute worst kind of snowflake. Retard

    139. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Also, black people commit 217 times more violent crimes than white people.

      If you're trying to convince people of something, it's best not to feed them bullshit. They WILL fact-check.

    140. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      and supplied with the very best of everything that money can buy -- except for a decent script.

      Kind of weird because you'd think for that kind of money you could get a good script. Also, nice review, you explained it well.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    141. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're from the UK, right? The Queen and PM May. In which case, you're also impossibly stupid, because the best stats we have are gender pay gap reports from companies, which don't show racial disparities in pay but do show quite conclusively that men are still paid more than women.

      For example, HSBC has a mean gender pay gap of 61% and a median gender pay gap of 30% and, no surprise, not in the direction that benefits women.

      Stop whining and start living with the world as it is, you big baby.

    142. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus Christ! Are you really that dumb that you can't think of about 8000 movies celebrating white males?? James Bond. Jack Reacher. Every fucking movie with Liam fucking Neeson ever made. Etc.

    143. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Die Hard?

    144. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was it left in El Sugundo?

    145. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Saw the movie, much better than I expected.

      But all the drummed up hate I put at the feet of the media and the star's snide remarks.

      They poked a bear as a marketing ploy, then blamed half the forest for the reaction they got.

    146. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's most certainly not how it was marketed. Marvel and Brie Larson have went out of their way to insist that it's a unabashedly feminist film, even going so far as to release it on International Women's Day. If it is "just a movie," then they have done it a grave disservice by trying to market it as something with a very clear feminist agenda.

      As a white male, it is interesting to see how many sensitive little snowflakes there are in my skin-color/gender demographic group.

      A super-hero film with a female lead being released on the International Women's Day. How dare they.

      Oh, well. That's about all interest I can muster on the topic.

      Yawn.

    147. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Sique · · Score: 1

      Apparently, most people think differently and think you are somewhat off the tracks. Otherwise the box office numbers wouldn't be as good.

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    148. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Sique · · Score: 2

      Victims of white suprematists in the U.S. by far outnumber the victims of Allah worshipping mideasterners. So why not have a movie about them?

      --
      .sig: Sique *sigh*
    149. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by fafalone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      There's plenty of legitimate arguments against what people were actually upset about, reducing it to the strawman "omg they're sexists mad because it's a female lead!" is inaccurate and demonstrates you're every bit as intellectually dishonest as the people you're criticizing. Brie Larson has made statements objecting to white men reviewing her movies and making up too much of the press pool, such as saying about A Wrinkle In Time "I don't need a 40-year-old white dude to tell me what didn't work about A Wrinkle in Time. It wasn't made for him!".
      If you want to argue about whether that's actually anti-white male instead of pro-diversity, that's a valid debate, so instead you set up the ol' strawman and claim people were mad that a woman was given the lead in a superhero movie, which was never the issue and the same group of people love movies like Aliens, Terminator, and Wonder Woman- all movies with tough female leads. Typical sjw tactic to avoid the actual argument by painting all critics as sexists/racists. More and more people are getting sick of nonsense like that; take the statement I quoted above, if you changed 'white' to any other race, you'd be screaming about the blatant racism. A lot of people have a real problem with this idea that bigotry isn't wrong in principle, but only wrong if it's against non-whites. Then there's the fact that even milder statements are decried as 'dog-whistles' for racism, then you'll try to argue even blatant anti-white-male statements aren't.
      People who resent sexism and racism as wrong in principle instead of perfectly fine if the identity groups are right are sick of the harm sjws are doing to social justice and the regressive stance on civil rights progressives favor.

    150. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by J-1000 · · Score: 1

      If it was released on "International Women's Day" it's news to me. The trailers were the trailers of a normal movie.

      It most certainly was a feminist film though, in the sense that any film depicting women outside their traditional gender role can be considered feminist. And that's a good thing! Variety is the spice of life.

      Why didn't Wonder Woman get this mob treatment? Because The Horde didn't have their act together I guess. But they are on top of things now. They are there to make sure I know that I should be super offended, as a white male. The very same tactics they are sick of other groups using. If you can't beat 'em, join 'em, I guess.

      We must be really bored to find drama where it isn't.

    151. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid SJW Racebaiter spotted, gotta generate more hate clicks to keep your opinion blogger job.

      My advice, learn to code.

    152. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The boyfriend was a liar, a thief, a murderer, and dumb as rocks. And she only was "with him", because he was there.

    153. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by del_diablo · · Score: 1

      Dark isn't the same as gritty friend. I Agree they turned down Junkyards residents sociopathic tendencies by several miles, which is a shame when its some really good and meaningful windowdressing. There is nothing quite like a pristine scrap pile of half cobbled technology being filled with people, and you turn to the next page and a random collapsing bystander is now horribly mutilated by roaming cyborg surgeons.
      I also agree the theme isn't that intact.
      What i think i enjoyed was that it was a Hollywood movie without all the terrible parts: Gally's selv development is a focus, action scenes isn't just choreography thrown into a camera blender with cuts, and there is some good ramping escalation, and the script isn't butchered randomly. The Kung Fu is good, and so is the entire 'fight to the death' angle that Hollywood generally completely chickens out on

      As for Hollywood's encoded language? Its annoying.
      Generally its the worst part of Hollywood movies. Characters turns into stilted pieces of wood that isn't capable of any emotional range because their vocabulary is limited like a edgy toddler. You go from people having no knowledge of events, to talking about that information they don't have like its some kind of laughable injoke.

      So basically
      I think i agree with the sentiment GUNM didn't get butchered, but it didn't keep the beautiful shape that made it so endearing to read
      It simply isn't as edgy, but yet also less endearing.

    154. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be retarded if you truly believe that. Or you're one of those morons who started counting after 9/11.

    155. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most actresses are morons. If you only watched films with intelligent and reasonable actresses, you'd be down to 1 or 2 per year.

    156. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by AmiMoJo · · Score: 0

      reducing it to the strawman "omg they're sexists mad because it's a female lead!"

      Buddy, that's your strawman. I never said any such thing.

      How intellectually dishonest of you.

      "I don't need a 40-year-old white dude to tell me what didn't work about A Wrinkle in Time. It wasn't made for him!"

      At least that one is real. Perhaps you can explain what is actually wrong with it though? Arguing that someone who didn't enjoy the movie was not the target audience and you never intended to try to please them seems like a legitimate defence.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    157. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Never saw any evidence of review bombing. I saw some politically motivated negative reviews, but I also saw more politically motivated positive reviews, interesting that the latter is hardly mentioned.

      RT was already a joke. Individual rotten vs fresh ratings seem to be at random, particularly at release. Just look at the top critic reviews. Several of them are quite negative, yet they're counted as fresh. Then notice how the negative critic reviews tend to be delayed, it opened at 84% before slowly dropping to 79.

      It's almost like the site is owned by someone with a financial interest in propping up ratings in order to sell tickets.

    158. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Interesting that Wonder Woman has suddenly become a great example of a recent female lead movie, despite at the time there being all the same rage over it being extremely sexist. Remember that photo of the crew that was all female? And the complaints that Gal Gadot wasn't as hot or busty as Linda Carter?

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    159. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by c6gunner · · Score: 2

      No, I don't remember any of that. But then again I don't go around looking for things to be outraged about like you do ...

    160. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by serviscope_minor · · Score: 1

      the fights have unclear rules

      Well, that's very unusal for a marvel movie.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    161. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Arguing from a position of ignorance is never a winning strategy.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    162. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Jahoda · · Score: 1

      Imagine being so fucking triggered by "feminism". What a sad, sad, sad little person you are.

    163. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Had I tweeted:

      I merely smiled at a waitress, and she grabbed my ass. To live life as a man is to live on the defense.

      I somehow suspect you would not be explaining to everyone that I'm just a poor victim of harrasement speaking up about it.

    164. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's literally what 85% of white people said about black people protesting during the civil rights era.

      And they were absolutely right. The demonstrations did absolutely nothing but ferment more hatred, and it did break out into open warfare at times thanks to groups like the Black Panthers and the KKK.

    165. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or maybe he started counting way before that, dumb shit.

    166. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      Alita was supposed to start a franchise, but failed. Like so many other franchise starters in the last few years... Robin Hood and Mortal Engines being recent examples.

      Avatar seems to have stalled too. What was supposed to me a multi-movie franchise has failed to produce even one sequel so far.

      Personally I'm still bitter that Tron Legacy didn't do well enough to get a third movie.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    167. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. San Francisco.

    168. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, no. You have missed the nuance. Sure, go ahead and criticise. However the speaker was saying that the criticism that she would spend time on, was criticism that came from the target audience.

      I am not the target audience for opera. I can offer an opinion on an opera production, and I'd like to think I can provide some pretty nifty insights (paid reviewer for rock music monthlies here).

      But I'd be the first to admit I'm not the target audience for opera. My opinion may therefore be of little or nil interest to the opera aficionado or to someone who has skin in the production.

      So it goes.

    169. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who could forget Black Hitler, Black Stalin, Black Mao, and Black Pol Pot?
      Of course there are pretty evil pieces of shit right now in Africa and they are Blacks. But we hardly pay any attention to those for some reason.
      Do you care? It's Black on Black violence and genocide, so I doubt you give it much of a thought. What interests you is Blacks vs. Whites in the same society, right?
      What's left are those four examples of non black super villains who have the highest death tolls in human history.

    170. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Iconoclysm · · Score: 1

      I'm the last person to complain about this agenda stuff, but I think you were missing the soundtrack. This one definitely has a tom boy, girls can do anything agenda. And that's ok.

    171. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "You need to smile more"

    172. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      1. No. Neither aspect of this. About the only sexist man in the show was this one dude who asked her to smile for him outside a bar and then muttered freak when she wouldn't, and she stole his motorcycle. The only time she's kicked down is a training scene where the point of the training is to kick her down until it doesn't work anymore. There's a montage near the end of times she failed but none of these are portrayed as the fault of others.
      2. The only white male human who is her ally remains her ally. There are a bunch of white male actors playing aliens, mostly heroes. The main villain is an alien played by a white man in, admittedly, so little makeup he seems like a human white man. That's really reaching to say that one villain was portrayed by a white guy though.
      3. Everybody is a Mary Sue these days I guess. She doesn't start out perfect and flawless, she starts out as a compromised sleeper agent who is losing training matches to that ally/villain. There is one comic-booky moment at the end where she basically learns to believe in herself, and I honestly think the problem with that is it *wasn't* built up so it was kind of out of nowhere that this was a thing she needed to work on.
      4. She has to break free of mental conditioning and choose the right side.
      5. There's 90s music, read whatever into it you want. The one part that presented feminism *at all* was this scene where she and her friend were experimental test pilots because at the time women couldn't fly in the US Air Force. Which is an actually-real thing that kind of has to be addressed for her to be in a 90s movie where she's flying aircraft.

    173. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't watch the movie? There's more than one white male good guy in it. There's vilain women too! Just stop the BS.

    174. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TRAILERS LIE. A nerd should know better.

    175. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by dcw3 · · Score: 1

      Sure that's the case for some. But, let's contrast this film with Wonder Woman, where the star isn't a blatant misandrist.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    176. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      The funniest part is that they've written themselves into a corner. Barring any reality revision shenanigans with the Infinity Gauntlet either de-powering her or vastly empowering everyone else they've created a flying brick with no weaknesses. There's a reason that Superman movies tend to suck and why maybe one in ten comic book writers can pull any good storylines out of him.

    177. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Millennium · · Score: 1

      I doubt this guy is master of anything. Especially not his domain, but I digress.

    178. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      So you agree that extremest muslims are far more numerous than white supremacists?

    179. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by JackieBrown · · Score: 0

      You say that after he stated that he liked Wonder Woman and Black Panther?

    180. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Right, because depicting a terrorist attack by fucked-up-in-the-head racist Muslim fundamentalist nutjobs was a real stretch...

    181. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Studies have shown that if you cite the Washington Times as fact, you are fully retarded.

      Never go full retard.

    182. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      In a property based on a comic book aimed at children?

      Maybe that's why I am getting tired of the marvel movies. I plan on calling it quits after Endgame. I read the summary of captain marvel just because I read you need her backstory for Endgame to work.

    183. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Perhaps you can explain what is actually wrong with it though? Arguing that someone who didn't enjoy the movie was not the target audience and you never intended to try to please them seems like a legitimate defence.

      She reduced a person to their race and gender. That's racist and sexist in one sentence. No different than if someone were to dismiss a person and call them a "black chick" instead of referring to them by their name or profession.

      Q.E.D.

    184. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Personally I'm still bitter that Tron Legacy didn't do well enough to get a third movie.

      As a fan of the original, I enjoyed Tron: Legacy, but it was not all it could have been. It had new shiny, but the storyline was fairly standard, complete with "defeat the megalomaniac who wants to take over the world" and "father/son reconciliation" tropes. I just came out of it feeling like, after 30 years, that was the best story they could come up with?

      Not to mention what was visually innovative in 1981 had become cliché by 2009.

    185. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Not sure why you brought sexuality into it. I think most people loved WonderWoman who is a woman and bi and Black Panther. Most of the people posting here led with that because they could easily anticipate your type of response.

    186. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The demonstrations did absolutely nothing but ferment more hatred

      https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/foment

    187. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gays are evil sinners and of the devil. The Bible says so.
      There you can see that STD is such a SJW show that promotes spread of STDs like gays do.
      That is much worse than Kirk on TOS kissing a black woman.
      Much worse than Riker on TNG liking an androgynous alien who identifies as a woman.
      Much worse than Dr. Crusher on TNG considering a relationship with one of those transgender symbiotic species things who from a man into a woman.
      Much worse than Dax on STD:S9, being part of a transgender symbiotic species thing, liking a former lover who also happened to be a woman right now.
      Nothing wrong with lesbians. You can masturbate to lesbians. Lesbians are so hot!

      I hope the sarcasm is apparent enough.

    188. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      As a Middle Class White Christian Male, who live in a rural area. Diversity isn't scary or is it threatening to me and my way of life.

      Well it wouldn't be in that environment, would it? :)

    189. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> "I don't need a 40-year-old white dude to tell me what didn't work about A Wrinkle in Time. It wasn't made for him!"

      > At least that one is real. Perhaps you can explain what is actually wrong with it though?

      Maybe because those 40-year-old white dudes were fans of the book when they were 10-year-old white boys?

    190. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      not this gay shit again :D

    191. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by c6gunner · · Score: 2

      In this case I'll gladly defer to your expertise.

    192. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Was that determined to be true? I just read none of the GhostBuster movies where theatrically released in China for that reason.

      https://www.hollywoodreporter....

      That said, near the bottom of the story, written almost as a throwaway line, is

      Sony isn't commenting, but a Hollywood source with knowledge of the situation says the film hasn't been officially submitted for approval by Chinese regulators.

    193. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Germans have been the bad Nazis white supremacist guys for over 70 years in movies even though they've been allied to the US ever since.
      They are also a favourite among conspiracy theories for controlling the EU and overtaking Europe not through war but economic means this time around.
      For Trump "The Germans Are Bad, Very Bad" as well.

      They don't bitch and whine about it a tenth as much as Russia sympathizers do, who appear to be more sensitive and easily hurt than a special snowflake.
      Grow some balls already and start to handle it like an adult.

    194. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't been on /. in a year, I come back and AniMoJo is still as fucking stupid as ever.

      Woman: I hate men.

      Men: Fuck you!

      Cunts you like you: WHY YOU HATE WAAAAHMEN?!?!

      Disliking misandry is not misogyny.

    195. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by squiggleslash · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Marvel seems to have chosen this approach intentionally. The certainly didn't take this approach with Black Panther. Nor did DC take this approach with Wonder Woman.

      Marvel took what approach? Because all I see are:

      1. A trailer being released six months ago.
      2. The usual Internet Misogynists responding in the usual stupid way (mostly about Brie Larson not smiling enough.)
      3. Most of the comics community laughing at the misogynists.
      4. The misogynists deciding that the movie must, thus, be an "SJW" film because they got laughed at for being shitheads.
      5. Six months of re-interpretation of everything Brie Larson says to imply she hates white men. There's even an AC in this thread arguing she hates men because... she once mentioned, critically, the fact she was sexually harassed by a TSA officer. Two years before the film was released.

      There's been nothing divisive about how the film was marketed, and contrary to the gaslighting I'm seeing by you and others, WW was attacked by the usual IMs at the time too. Alita? No, but what does Alita have to do with literally anything at all, given it's about a robot who happens to appear like, eyes excepting, a girl? It says everything that the average IM thinks they can pretend liking a film about a robot somehow means they're not motivated by misogyny when they attack Captain Marvel.

      The entire controversy was whipped up by IMs. Marvel's done damage control, but they've not said a single thing that can be construed as anti-anyone other than anti-misogynists-who-hate-this-movie-before-theyve-even-seen-it. And if it's "divisive" to say "People whose hatred of women means they're running bizarre campaigns to reduce the ratings on Rotten Tomatoes of a movie they've never watched", then... I guess it fits that definition, but that's not the definition most people use.

      Not seen the film. Not particularly bothered by it generally but nonetheless feeling like I can't trust a single review at the moment thanks to the IMs poisoning the well again. This is a repeat of the same shit we saw with Ghostbusters (which turned out to be awful), Wonder Woman (which turned out to be good, great if you exclude the last 20 minutes), and Black Panther (which turned out to be great, period.)

      Stop blaming Marvel for what an anti-women campaign that had nothing to do with them. And stop interpreting the lifting up of minority voices as being an attack on white men, it's ridiculous.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    196. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      She has no struggles. She has memory loss. At no point in the movie was she in any danger whatsoever except from her own inferiority complex magnified by a purported "Supreme Intelligence" whose general plan was completely fucking moronic.

    197. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      But then again I don't go around looking for things to be outraged about like you do ...

      IRONY!

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    198. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by omnichad · · Score: 1

      That's not really the same argument at all. It's about wider society agreement in each are the movie is released in. Neo-Nazis don't really have their own countries.

    199. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure any of that follows. In a year when the same people post that they liked Captain Marvel but really hate the way Batgirl or Black Widow or whatever the superheroine tent pole movie is that season is, has been marketed, are you going to take them at face value too? Remember that Captain Marvel, like Black Panther and Wonder Woman, is immensely popular.

      Now that the movie has been out for a couple of days and there are legit and non-legit reviews coming in, while there's no certain way to determine good faith and bad faith comments, there are at least some themes that make it obvious what the writer's motivation is without going through their comment history.

      I'd argue the two that stand out are:

      1. Comparing it unfavorably to Alita, claiming the writer liked the latter (sometimes among other similar movies) and this shows they're non-sexist. It's a reasonable barometer for two reasons: Alita isn't about a woman, it's about a robot that kinda looks like an anime girl, so it doesn't actually make the point the writer thinks, and because the Internet Misogynists actually ran a whisper campaign shortly before Captain Marvel was released where Alita was supposed to be pitched as the better alternative. Why? I don't know. It seemed absurd to me, but there you have it.
      2. Comments claiming Captain Marvel is a Mary Sue. Captain Marvel is a superhero. She cannot, by definition, be a Mary Sue. The term is ludicrous in that context. It's so ludicrous it has to be in bad faith. I haven't even heard the term used against non-meta superheroes like Iron Man, despite the fact that Tony Stark can put together a battle robot suit in the middle of the Afghan desert from some junk that's just lying around, but Captain Marvel, who's been imbued with superpowers by aliens, deserves the label? Bullshit.

      At this point, at the risk of missing some legitimate reviews, I'm ignoring any reviews that do either of the two above.

      Most of the people claiming they liked Wonder Woman do not post evidence that they did at the time (which is fine, but I'm just pointing out that you can't really take it at face value that they didn't piss and moan at the time), and usually fall into one of the above traps. Sure, there's probably one or two people out there who haven't grasped the superhero concept, and who liked Wonder Woman, and who liked Alita and are mentioning it in some context other than trying to prove their feminist bona fides, but the number is likely to be a tiny proportion of those who promote the above tropes, wouldn't you agree?

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    200. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> by the usual members of the sad- and pathetic-ass clown army

      FTFY. I'm pretty sure the ass-clowns are supportive.

    201. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      By someone with the power to make your life a living hell if you refuse?

      Yes. Yes it is.

      Is it the worst form of sexual harassment? No, but it is sexual harassment.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    202. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      That would definitely sound like harassment to me, and I agree 100% with the AC you're responding to.

      I suspect the AC would agree too. That said, I'd disagree with your conclusion because you and I both know that as men we're not living on the defense all of the time. Most of the time we act as if there are no serious threats of bodily harm or worse - which doesn't mean there aren't any, just that they're rare enough they don't affect our livestyles. There's a reason why women usually don't walk alone at night, for example.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    203. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Leave APK out of this.

    204. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by skam240 · · Score: 1

      "So Brie Larson didn't describe it as a "big feminist movie"?"

      Who cares?

      "And it wasn't timed to be released on Woman's Day?"

      First female Marvel cinematic lead's movie released on Women's day? So what?

      "And it doesn't have a Mary Sue character?"

      She's a female Superman so that's just her character being her character.

      "And any legitimate criticism of the movie hasn't been met with cries of "incel" or "mysogynist" or "troll"?"

      You're clearly searching for anything you can find to fit your world view here. Please show how "any legitimate criticism of the movie hasn't been met with cries of "incel" or "mysogynist" or "troll"?""

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    205. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your words are exhausting to read. Try a period once a week please...

    206. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > That would definitely sound like harassment to me, and I agree 100% with the AC you're responding to.

      No. It's groping, which may be considered molestation or sexual assault, depending on the extent and local law.

      Harassment would require persistent, unwanted advances and a power dynamic.

    207. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > No, but it is sexual harassment.

      Absurd. Asking for a phone number may be inappropriate, but it is NOT a sexual advance in any sense. You are really reaching.

    208. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Being asked for your phone number is harassment now?

      Bullshit.

      At a bar...no. When you are in a position of power (ie can decide if you make your flight or not), then it is a mild form of sexual harassment. If you smiled at the cop who pulled you over, and they then ask for your personal number, you have a choice to make: Give up your personal number or risk a ticket or worse.

      The TSA agent was in violation of their duties and DHS policies if they had asked that question while working or even in uniform.

    209. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd be willing to bet that NO ONE who is using Wonder Woman as an example of a female lead movie done right, was campaigning against it when it first came out.

    210. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by mjwx · · Score: 1

      One more reason I'm glad this movie has practically no chance for a sequel. Even on paper it barely broke even...

      In terms of Hollywood Accounting, that means it made millions. On paper it has to lose money so they don't have to pay tax.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    211. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I don't need a 40-year-old white dude to tell me what didn't work about A Wrinkle in Time. It wasn't made for him!"

      At least that one is real. Perhaps you can explain what is actually wrong with it though? Arguing that someone who didn't enjoy the movie was not the target audience and you never intended to try to please them seems like a legitimate defence.

      Sure, but it is the way it was said that makes it a problem. And as the far-left is oh-so-fond of saying, "freedom of speech does not mean freedom from consequences".

    212. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by mjwx · · Score: 1

      I cannot think of a single scene where she is "kicked down". We see a series of scenes from her past where she failed; sometimes men were there and sometimes not. There is a line like "women could not fly combat missions, so the only way we could contribute was by being experimental test pilots"; if that fits your comment, then you and I will likely never agree on anything.

      You have to remember that the people who are bashing this film are not rational people. It's not the film that's pushing an agenda, its the people claiming it is that are pushing their own agenda and they are also the real snowflakes.

      To the rest of us it's just a film. They can be good or bad for a variety of reasons. Personally I've been turned off the MCU because the films are just more of the same genericness combined with millions of dollars in CGI. I'll wait for this one to come out on In-Flight Entertainment because it sounds like a film where you switch off your brain to enjoy it and nowhere is better for than than FL380. Nothing to do with any perceived threat to my manhood (which is secure enough that I could drive a bright pink Micra).

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    213. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by skam240 · · Score: 1

      "Having your star go on every talk show bragging about it being a feminist film, insisting on dividing her interviewers up by race and gender, and releasing it on International Women's Day are not suggestive of a studio "not looking to spread division.""

      See, here's the problem. There are people out there who hear "feminism" and some how come to the conclusion that something divisive is happening. Since you seem to be of this group here's the definition of feminism just so we can both be on the same page in regards to what you and yours are outraged about. https://www.merriam-webster.co...

      What you're illustrating in your post is how elements of our country have spun a concept most Americans are perfectly fine with into their outrage machine in an attempt to diminish it or simply as a way of being outraged about something.

      Also, your signature is stupid. Of the top 10 games of 2018 https://www.fool.com/investing... you play as either a character of your choice with "white male" being available or exclusively as a white male.

      --
      I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    214. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about Captain Marvel was sowing division?

      I bet you haven't even seen it and are just talking out your ass.

    215. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you leave a good review on Rotten tomatoes? If not I may now see why its doing so poorly on audience score. The people who actually liked it didn't review it.

    216. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While the movie doesn't have an agenda, Brie Larson does. Which is why I won't be taking my family to see it. Will just stream/download it instead.

    217. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure how the people trying to sow division profited here, but I'm glad to see that they apparently failed. I'm getting tired of these unhinged hate campaigns against genre movies starring women. If they really only want to see movies starring men, there's still plenty of those around. But apparently they need every movie to be specifically catering to them, and every movie that doesn't feels like a threat to them or something.

    218. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It's only 'poisoned with identity politics' because you want it to be.

    219. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you'd know all about getting upset over quotes taken out of context.

      Except when it's you screeching about it.. it's antifascist.

    220. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by mcvos · · Score: 1

      Yet somehow it's never movies with a white male uni-dimensional Mary Sue that get inundated in these kind of hate campaigns.

      Also, the fact that these campaigns start well before anyone has even had the chance to see the movie, show that it has nothing to do with how the character is portrayed in the movie.

    221. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't seen the film yet. Never saw any ghostbusters in entirety as the original was god awful. Just one thing.

      Validity of points is not dependent upon how many people present that point. What matters is whether the point is based upon something meaningful and whether the point contains some useful product of the application of reason. Seeing points as worthy by their popularity is intellectual failure.

    222. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I don't trust simple yes/no statistics about movies anyway. I don't necessarily like the same things everybody else likes. I like some hard cult stuff that has no chance to make it in the mainstream, and I'm bored by some mainstream stuff. I only trust reviews that address both why it's a good movie and why it's a bad movie. Anything else is useless.

      I do trust reviews from people I know to have similar tastes to my own. I know a number of those people online, and they seem to universally love Captain Marvel, so that puts it high on my list of movies to see.

    223. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think Marvel spread division either. They just used appeals to feminism as a marketing tool. That said there really isn't any context that makes the Larson quote remotely acceptable. And yes we get the "don't care" message. Actually it is more virulent and properly characterized as "don't give a fuck" and we get it LOUD AND CLEAR.

    224. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by mcvos · · Score: 1

      I assumed the audience is teenage boys who want to see a beautiful young woman in a tight body suit to go with the usual battle scenes. I would be curious how many girls watch the movie. But I doubt it's many.

      I'm curious why you would think this. The movies more aimed at women than most superhero movies. No doubt many men and boys watch it too, but why would you doubt many girls (or women?) watch it?

    225. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Funny you don't understand either 'blatant' or 'misandrist'.

      Not funny, its sad actually.

    226. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, its almost as bad as a limp-dicked incel wanker who's mansplaining why the movie isn't worth seeing.

    227. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Altus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Its not as if this clown has seen the movie in question though... I went to see it and it was absolutely not divisive and people saying that it is either haven't seen it and are trolling or are serious fucking snowflakes getting offended at nothing. How he claims to have liked other movies is irrelevant.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    228. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Wulf2k · · Score: 1

      It was a remake of a movie that originally starred men.

      Remakes invite comparison to the original.

      "This is Ghostbusters, but now they're all women" is going to make people focus on their genders.

    229. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Z80a · · Score: 2

      Indeed.
      They just bomb because people assume that it was just a shitty writer, instead of someone scared to death to add any flaws on the character due the character's gender.

    230. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

      Based on how aggressive you sound (hopefully without realizing it), they'd probably have to hit you on the head with a two by four in order for it to seem overt to you.

      The actress, herself, during interviews stated how strong and groundbreaking the message was (I guess she doesn't follow science fiction or comic book movies if she thinks this is new and groundbreaking.)

    231. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Pyramid · · Score: 1

      Being asked for your phone number is "harassment"? Uncouth to do it on the job? Yes. "Harassment" worthy of "victimhood" though?

      First world problems

      --
      ~Any apparent grammatical or typographic errors are caused by defects in your display device.
    232. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Paxtez · · Score: 1

      While I enjoyed the movie, it did seem a touch too much "girl power" for me. If you made compare it to Wonder Woman, it was never a big deal that WW was female, there was a couple "don't underestimate her" moments. But for the most part it would have worked if the gender was switched.

      Captain Marvel was trying a little bit too much. The biggest thing that stands out was the fight sequence towards the end to No Doubt's "Just a Girl".

      I'm glad the movie is doing well. It's funny is because the people who were getting the most upset over this were the people who you know are going to see it anyways. You can't skip the movie that is right before Endgame.

    233. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Was the drummed up hate on the “media”? There have always been and will always be Internet trolls. I think the studio brilliantly played this up for attention. The trolls unfortunately fell right into their trap.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    234. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Altus · · Score: 1

      Dude, the soundtrack was pulled directly from the era the movie is based in. I don't really get the dissatisfaction over the fact that they used a bunch of 90s songs in a 90s movie.

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    235. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by serviscope_minor · · Score: 0

      So what? Remakes always have different casts. They usually try to do something at least a little bit different because otherwise there truly is no point.

      The only reason people focus on their gender is because having several female leads in an action film is almost unheard of. The fact that people complained so heavily indicates strongly that it needed to be done.

      Shame the film was deeply mediocre though.

      --
      SJW n. One who posts facts.
    236. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better find that wallet before mom gets home.

    237. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. Got her.

    238. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Powwwww got em. I love this thread.

      All the holier than thou assholes getting called out. Get fucked.

    239. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL this.

      A bunch of overaged white males trying to relive their childhood thru cinema.

      But but but me and my wife liked it.

      Yea sure, if you told your wife the truth, that you didn't like it, you'd be sleeping on the couch you fucking cuck.

    240. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just hand waved away all his complaints and didn't even address them. You actually proved them. Fucking idiots.

    241. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck you for taking a 3 month old to the movies. Do your parenting elsewhere cocksucker. Nobody wants to hear your brat scream in a movie theatre.

    242. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm no, they indicted him on 16 counts of filing a false Police report you fag.

    243. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Daralantan · · Score: 2

      Brie Larson has made statements objecting to white men reviewing her movies and making up too much of the press pool, such as saying about A Wrinkle In Time "I don't need a 40-year-old white dude to tell me what didn't work about A Wrinkle in Time. It wasn't made for him!".

      That quote was about A Wrinkle in Time? I've barely paid attention to the crazed baby fight over Ms Marvel as all this stuff has been making my roll my eyes painfully hard for a while. I thought someone said she said that about Ms Marvel. And my thoughts on that were: "Did she write the movie? Because unless the director says that as well I don't think that the goal of the movie should be considered "ME HATE MEN"

      Hell a ton of people tried to say "NO WATCH BLACK PANTHER WHITE MAN" yet the movie ended with T'Challa saying we should all treat each other as the same tribe. Some people tried to say "WONDER WOMAN FOR GIRL POWER DIE BOYS" yet no one left the movie calling it toxic feminism or whatever. This crap.

    244. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So let me get this straight. A white women saying that she doesn't want men to see her film isn't sexist?

      But if a white male said "I don't want no fucking women to see my film" we wouldn't hear the end of it.

      You blame us for handwaving shit away, yet when faced with a person who legit makes a sexist comment, you guys don't even blink an eye because SHES A FEMALE.

      Imagine if a white guy said "I don't want no black peoples to watch my film, it isn't for them". Imagine how you cucks would react. That would be considered racist.

      Yet again, somehow her saying she doesn't want white men to see the film because it wasn't meant for them, gets handwaved away and replied with "what's the problem"

      The problem is you can't go around calling everyone else racist and sexist, and then when your kind does it, it's ok. Because white men don't deserve the same treatment.

      It's fucking sickening. And if you can't see the hypocrisy in that, than you are truly a fucking idiot.

    245. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      It was a giant tentacle monster. Did you not watch the movie? It was literally a giant tentacle monster.

    246. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Imagine being so closed minded and drank so much kool aid, that you've bought their agenda hook line sinker. You sad sad little man child.

    247. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but all of those had shitty potential and incompetent directors.
      As in people not competent to lead a production of a franchise starter. Mortal Engines was literally given to a storyboard artist to direct.

      All apart from Avatar, which still CAN end up at least making a lot of cash at the box office.
      Cameron knows how to make them. And perhaps more importantly, how to sell them.
      Hell... Most of the stuff that still works in the Alita movie is probably from his pre-production work.
      And there was a LOT of pre-production work on that movie.

      Same thing as with Avatar... A LOT was invested in the world building.
      Though, with Alita there is the benefit of a complete (well... somewhat) story and all previous editing and tweaking of it.
      Plus it's a much more basic (as in regard to the human condition) and philosophically deeper story.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    248. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by tbannist · · Score: 1

      There doesn't need to be a gender distinction there, most actors, male or female are picked for their looks, not their brains. The ones like Mayim Chaya Bialik who are actually smart, are a rarity regardless of gender.

      --
      Fanatically anti-fanatical
    249. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I don't want to hear from a bunch of old white dudes that they thought it sucked" is awful to you? Jesus you're a tender little man, aren't you?

      Everything in media has been made for white guys, and when something doesn't specifically target them as the audience these white guys lose their fucking minds.

      I don't want to hear from them either, and I'm one of them. "Not getting literally everything handed to you" is not oppression, dumbass

    250. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Naah... You are confusing return on an investment and turning a profit.
      They will ALWAYS present the movie as if it never turned profit. That is not the issue here.

      Movie needs to take in about 200-250% of investment, at the box office, TO BREAK EVEN.
      About half of the cash from the tickets goes to distributors. Usually more, when the movie is shown in the foreign market.
      But the studio pays for ALL the marketing.
      Either directly through promotion or indirectly by taking a smaller cut - which is what happens overseas.

      A big part of the Hollywood Accounting is hiding the marketing costs.
      Makes the product seem more profitable if you don't report all those extra millions you spent selling the product.
      Which makes the company seem more profitable.
      Which makes the stocks go up and future investment more likely.

      Then later, when it comes the time to pay the net earners, studio presents all the costs.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    251. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by butchersong · · Score: 1

      Nah, it's the basement dwellers that are rejected by the other sex.

      And why precisely did these "basement dwellers" cheer Wonder Woman?

    252. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by butchersong · · Score: 1

      There are explicit references to past sexism in the movie but I am not sure where the "comically-over-the-top sexist men"...

      I've not seen the movie but recall in the trailer the myriad instances of men yelling versions of "you'll never amount to anything" type comments in her flashback.

    253. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by butchersong · · Score: 0
      I think we've had a ton of strong female heroines in movies for quite a while and the same people being accused of insecurity and sexism toward Captain Marvel nerded out over those... Think everything from Alien movies to Underworld to Wonder Woman. I don't think it's a fair or accurate characterization of the response from the fan community and the title of this slashdot article as well as the article it cites strikes me as trolling more than anything else.

      Fair enough, there's plenty of that on the other side too.

      What I find most irritating about the feminist movies coming out of Hollywood and an area maybe where both sides can find some common ground is this approach of making females strong by making them more masculine. I think this is flawed and damaging. One way to view the message of this "feminist" movie seems to be that to be "feminine" is to be weak. -Then there is the whole Mary Sue angle of attack but I'd rather not get into that.

    254. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nobody thinks for a moment he really liked Wonder Woman or Black Panther, you gullible idiot.

    255. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Every white male was a villain and every female was flawless? Apparently you didn’t see the movie.

      Apparently *you* didn't see the movie.

      *Spoilers*

      The SI was a woman, Coulson was a white male ( as always ), Fury's "boss" was only an asshole when he had been replaced by a skrull... and the rest of the Cree were a delightfully diverse group of assholes that did happen to include a white male.

      For someone that claims he isn't an SJW, you seem awfully concerned about "representation" in movies.

    256. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Oh I saw the movie. My point was there were two “white” male characters in the movie and one of them was actually a Skrull. So the only major white male was Colson who wasn’t a villain. As for the Kree, can’t you say there were “white” as they were mostly blue aliens with Jude Law’s character being purple. They were played by an African American male, an African male, Asian female, Scandinavian male, and a British male. If you watched the film, SI takes the form that the person linked to it subconsciously reveres. It could have been a green blob if that is what Captain Marvel wanted. Was that a dumb premise? It was the same premise as Contact.

      As for representation, I never brought it up. You did as it seems you are concerned with it. I only contested what the OP said as being factually untrue.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    257. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by denzacar · · Score: 1

      Dark isn't the same as gritty friend

      No one said it is. Or that the story must be either of those.
      But there should be a sense of some kind of motivation or pressure on the characters for doing what they do.
      In this particular story it's usually a desire to free oneself from the external pressure.
      Movie presents us with none of that.

      Gally's selv development is a focus, action scenes isn't just choreography thrown into a camera blender with cuts, and there is some good ramping escalation, and the script isn't butchered randomly. The Kung Fu is good, and so is the entire 'fight to the death' angle that Hollywood generally completely chickens out on

      Sorry, but no.

      Granted... action was OK. But meaningless.
      Here's a hint. Several characters get sliced to pieces - and it may as well have been a scene of bread being sliced.
      ZERO engagement.

      Also... there's a feeling that it is all soooo perfunctory. Action for the sake of action. Zero stakes. Zero reward.
      Fighting to death? Whom? She overpowers everyone easily.
      Except in that one scene where the supposedly ultimate opponent from a moment ago is chased away by some mechanic dogs and a couple of meatbags. Because plot.
      Hell... I almost missed the "wear you as a pendant" speech. Delivery and direction of that was just SO bland.
      Then again, that's Jackie Earle Haley for ya. Zero engagement. In it for the paycheck.
      Similarly, how things and people just happen to be there when needed... like that thing which grinds up the last motorballer chasing Alita.

      Chiren character, and all her actions were also completely superfluous. But never as much as when she suddenly shows up just standing there when needed near the end.
      The entire scene felt like a Mexican soap opera. And then they just slap some character development on her right there... Because plot.
      Oh... and the scene right after where she just strolls out through the main door... well that was simply incompetence. Childlike incompetence.
      No need to show her at all - but just so that we don't confuse the audience seeing her in the next scene, here's a shot of her walking out.
      And less is said about that crashed ship the better.

      As for "development" as focus... That was bad too. Also - wrong. It's not development - it's exposition.
      She is NOT supposed to have such strong preconceptions of her past as the movie gives her.

      Her need to define herself is what is supposed to be guiding the story all the way until the end of the motorball arc.
      Not because that is a good place to dump that bit of info or because the info we get is so rich - but because there her epiphany coincides with Jashugan's.
      She is supposed to reach a higher level of self-actualization there, liberating herself from her past and any direct oppression that she knows of.
      Basically, she becomes an antithesis to Makaku's philosophy - second only to Jashugan, she is at the top of the pyramid and can't be subjected to terror or pain.
      Nor does she need to subject others to it in order to stay there. She destroys Makaku's philosophy and rejects Hugo's.
      She achieves negative liberty. And immediately jumps into achieving positive liberty through artistic expression. She is content and feels self-actualized.
      And then the whole determinism thing starts.

      Movie has NONE of that. It has flashbacks and exposition and hollow as all fuck lines which signify ZERO development.
      Hell... She basically REGRESSES to a flashback illusion of her former identity. And even that is through her contact with an object - not her instinct or skill.

      I got out of the movie feeling it was too long. Though the action was engaging.
      You could literally cut almost half an hour out of it and still have the exact same story. And that's bad. That's filler.

      --
      Mit der Dummheit kämpfen Götter selbst vergebens
    258. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by zugmeister · · Score: 1

      The boyfriend was a liar, a thief, a murderer...

      They were living in a city built around the trash falling from the "good" city floating in the sky. It's a giant anarchic slum with a murder roller derby for entertainment. I got the impression this was an accepted way to be able to do things like eat.

      ...and dumb as rocks.

      You did catch the part where he's a street hoodlum and part of a mugging gang, right? Do we really need more Mary Sues? Isn't it enough that he changed and stopped doing that by the end of the movie?

    259. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      I suspect the AC would agree too. That said, I'd disagree with your conclusion

      Yes, that's the point; neither of you would characterize my tweet in that way exactly because you disagreed with the conclusion (and/or were triggered by it).

      because you and I both know that as men we're not living on the defense all of the time.

      I also know that women are not living on the defense all the time. You may or may not know that; I won't presume.

      Most of the time we act as if there are no serious threats of bodily harm or worse - which doesn't mean there aren't any, just that they're rare enough they don't affect our livestyles. There's a reason why women usually don't walk alone at night, for example.

      And yet the statistics all show that men are FAR more often the victims of murder, assault, and even robbery than women.

    260. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alita isn't deep because it's a childrens story. Written for kids, like most other manga. Nothing "deep" is going on there.

    261. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I also know that women are not living on the defense all the time. You may or may not know that; I won't presume.

      Women feel on the defense all the time (also described as feeling "hunted like prey") because they've been taught by feminists that ALL men are potential rapists. They simply can't be sure whether a man's interest is harmless or not, so they assume that they are in danger if a man shows any sexual desire toward them.

      Now, most of the time they are NOT in danger and the man's interest is harmless. But there's that minority of men who WILL rape if they think they can get away with it, and they spoil it for everyone.

      While I don't think it's right for men to be assumed to be rapists by default (err on the side of caution) I understand the reasons for the fear. Women should not have to live in fear of men, and like it or not, only men can fix this situation. :-(

    262. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did precisely these "basement dwellers" cheer Wonder Woman?
      People make up or find superficial reasons so they can join the outrage mobs where they throw their agreement into their echo chambers where they of course resonate to a level that blows reality totally out of proportions.

      My issue is mostly that it is superficial shit, making molehills into Olympus Mons. And yes, I do realize the irony in my own comment here, complaining about these people.
      Anyway here's an opinion piece about the entire situation and Captain Marvel that I can agree with: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

    263. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting that Wonder Woman has suddenly become a great example of a recent female lead movie, despite at the time there being all the same rage over it being extremely sexist. Remember that photo of the crew that was all female? And the complaints that Gal Gadot wasn't as hot or busty as Linda Carter?

      You only have a point here if it's the same people making both statements. Wonderwoman had some awkward scenes with the assistant woman going feminist on the movie all of a sudden, but the heroine was fine and the movie overall was good - as Monty Python would say, that one didn't have very much spam in it. Some certain other movies are more like "spam, spam, spam, spam, spam with spam".

    264. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by c6gunner · · Score: 1

      Women feel on the defense all the time

      No, they don't. Some small subset may, but the vast majority do not. Even if they did, "feel" and "is" are not the same thing. You are the only one who can control your feelings. The fact of the matter is that women are victimized less often than men, and how you "feel" about that is completely inconsequential. If your feelings are a problem for you, go talk to a shrink.

    265. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hate I see is only coming from the trolls. As for the movie, there's no propaganda in it anywhere, it's just a movie. Deal with it.

      White males are not the most persecuted people on the planet yet there are a few who feel that they are under siege, and it's ludicrous. Why is this an issue? Have white males been underrepresented so much that they have to unleash their review-bot army to redress their ancient grievances?

      No one said anything about representation. That you would believe that anyone is talking about that implies that you have zero understanding of the world you live in or the people that you disagree with. That's the worst insult that there is for an educated mind.

    266. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >> Women feel on the defense all the time

      > No, they don't. Some small subset may, but the vast majority do not.

      Well, I certainly didn't mean all women, but I think it's at least half if not a majority.

      Women in the US today have very specific "appropriate" settings where they are willing to meet men, flirt, hook up. Men, OTOH, see pretty much any place any time as appropriate for chatting up an attractive woman.

      Showing any desire in the wrong context gets you labeled a "creep." Compliment a woman on her hair at the library and she's likely to call over security to throw you out.

    267. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a Middle Class White Christian Male, who live in a rural area. Diversity isn't scary or is it threatening to me and my way of life.

      Alot people i know used to think like that, until they got real life experiences with diversity, and its proponents.

    268. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Can'tNot · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Marvel's done damage control, but they've not said a single thing that can be construed as anti-anyone other than anti-misogynists-who-hate-this-movie-before-theyve-even-seen-it.

      Well... As it was described to me, the primary instigator was this:

      “Am I saying I hate white dudes?” asked the Oscar-winning “Room” actress, a question that she’d repeat twice more during her speech. She answered with a sneer, “No, I’m not [but if] you make the movie that is a love letter to women of color, there is an insanely low chance a woman of color will have a chance to see your movie and review your movie.”

      Larson continued, “[Audiences] are not allowed enough chances to read public discourse on these films by the people that the films were made for. I do not need a 70-year-old white dude to tell me what didn’t work for him about ‘[A] Wrinkle in Time.’ It wasn’t made for him. I want to know what it meant to women of color, to biracial women, to teen women of color, to teens that are biracial.”

      Calling for greater inclusivity among film critics is all well and good, but saying that white men can't or shouldn't critique a given film is discriminatory. "White men should know their place."

      In a vacuum, what she said here would not be terrible. It's easy to see her intention and the discriminatory aspect can be overlooked, as it was not her goal. (Though I do think it would be a mistake even in a vacuum; stories are how we connect to one another. If you craft your story in such an exclusionary way then you're missing the point.) However, this was not in a vacuum: ranting about 'white men' is a trigger for many people, since it's rapidly become an acceptable form of racism in certain contexts. And not tiny limited contexts that no one pays attention too, consider the story about Sarah Jeong. That's a tough nut.

      So... I'm not disagreeing with your main point, some people certainly blew this out of proportion, but it's not quite as spontaneous as you're suggesting.

    269. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I loved A Wrinkle In Time when I was a kid. It was one of the first books that taught me about multidimensional space. It made me interested in math. I bought the book for my daughter and tried so many times to get her interested in it, but she thought it was boring. But she was kind enough to buy me the sequel because she knew I really liked it.

      Then Disney came along and turned it into a movie about magic and completely removed everything that made it such a great educational story and ruined it. And now that racist sexist bitch is talking about how it was an empowerment film for black women and men shouldn't express an opinion about it?

      Fuck that bitch.

      Fortunately I was able to watch Flatland with my daughter and engage in the kinds of conversations that A Wrinkle In Time should have been provoking.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    270. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >muh basement dwellers
      $0.02 collected

    271. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want so badly to believe that you are a brave warrior fighting back against your attackers.

      But you have no attackers.

      You have never known even the slightest hardship.

      You have spent your entire life soft, safe, and sheltered - and utterly unwilling to admit to how lucky this makes you.

      And you're not fooling anyone. Not even yourself. You know how hollow your complaints are.

    272. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God, how I wish that were true.

    273. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I completely agree. My captain marvel was a black woman who turned into energy which was way cool. Ms. marvel had her memories and powers permanently absorbed by rogue and had to get massive rehabilitation to overcome that. I honestly believe Marvel made this movie to mess with DC who is forced now to call their movie shazam.

    274. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you wish is that you didn't secretly agree with every single word of it.

    275. Re: Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We knew what happened to prime universe Pike. Discovery is obviously set in a different dimension.

    276. Re:Spreading division is profitable I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You were just making justification. Don't try n change it.

  4. It's because of the old lady by ZombieCatInABox · · Score: 1

    People just couldn't wait to see in full 3D IMAX Captain Marvel beat the crap out of the old lady in the bus. :)

    1. Re:It's because of the old lady by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The copy I downloaded last night had poor video quality. Disney / Marvel should fix that.

  5. AKA Amerikuks Lack Taste, Decency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fuck your superhero distraction from your President's 8000+ drone strikes killing untold and now unreported numbers of civilians.

    Fuck you. Youre evil.

    1. Re:AKA Amerikuks Lack Taste, Decency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'll talk when you stop cutting up children's sexual organs, beheading journalists, sex-enslaving women, running people over with vans, flying planes into buildings, and organizing your lives around a fairy tale told thousands of years ago by an illiterate, murderous pedophile.

      Them's the rules.

    2. Re:AKA Amerikuks Lack Taste, Decency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We'll talk when you stop cutting up children's sexual organs

      'merica is still pretty big on lopping off foreskins.

      When 45 made his "shithole countries" remark, the rest of the world replied "takes one to know one."

  6. Similiar old poll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This reminds me of the time when there was a similar poll asking people to vote Leno vs Conan after the NBC fiasco. The poll results were overwhelmingly favoring Conan for the first few days. Then the poll owner switched the names around to make Leno appear favorable. Eventually the new Conan numbers increased and edged the Leno numbers just past 50%.

  7. Does anyone actually care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's bizarre that media outlets are obsessed with people playing pranks these days. These movies are only average at best no matter what they make at the box office.

    But I guess it makes money, otherwise Slashdot wouldn't be posting about it.

    1. Re:Does anyone actually care? by phantomfive · · Score: 0

      It's bizarre that media outlets are obsessed with people playing pranks these days.

      They don't have anything else to talk about. Trump is old news these days.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    2. Re:Does anyone actually care? by Darinbob · · Score: 0

      The real lesson is to ignore any and all reviews. Go see the movie if you want to, stay home if you don't. If a movie annoys you then just chill out and don't unleash the bot army.

    3. Re:Does anyone actually care? by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      My problem is that Marvel annoys me. It annoys me that a comic book company has come to be such an important factor in movie making. I don't like superhero-type comics. They are PlasticFantasticFake.

    4. Re:Does anyone actually care? by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I can agree there. They're really getting tiresome.

    5. Re:Does anyone actually care? by omnichad · · Score: 1

      It's because flashy, empty action movies with a large effects budget draws a huge crowd. They always have - but the international market for these it's bigger than ever And the effects don't have to be perfect because it's a comic book. Just be glad it's not Michel Bay directing them. There are still good movies being made. Some of them doesn't to streaming.

  8. Something fishy going on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Many people are reporting near-empty theatres. Could it be that the numbers are false?

    1. Re:Something fishy going on by The+Rizz · · Score: 1

      That depends ... are the showings over-saturated in those areas? All it takes for near-empty theaters for some showings is for there to be near-identical times at a good theater and a shitty theater in the same area, and enough showings that you can just wait for the next showing at the good theater.

    2. Re:Something fishy going on by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suspect that coastal cities will have full(er) theaters than flyover cities. I live in Silicon Valley and Saturday @ 4:45PM showing was full.

    3. Re:Something fishy going on by Your.Master · · Score: 1

      Or maybe both can be true? Sometimes theaters in some regions have some showtimes that people don't show up to, even on uncontroversially super popular movies?

      I think it's *way* less likely that a company is going to over-report incomes, and therefore volunteer for income tax, in order to... ...

      I don't even know what the motivation would be for this.

  9. OBEY by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you must like this movie. you must watch this movie. this movie is awesome. you should watch superhero movies. this is the best superhero movie. you do not have an opinion. we say this is a good movie. you must go see captain marvel. march is women's history month. if you didn't see movie on women's day you are a cis white male scum. the age of white men is over. this is the best movie. you are not allowed to review movie. there are no bad reviews of this movie.

    1. Re:OBEY by Scarletdown · · Score: 1

      I'm skipping this one and holding out for Shazam instead.

      --
      This space unintentionally left blank.
  10. Thanks, inflation! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Prices of everything are higher than ever, so it's becoming the norm to see and expect headlines like this.

  11. Its still a crappy film by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like all superhero movies it's formulaic, generic, and patently stupid.

    Only an idiot would like it.

    1. Re:Its still a crappy film by Cmdln+Daco · · Score: 1

      It has Marvel involved in it. It's bound to be comic book trash.

  12. Concerning Stan Lee... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know why Stan Lee tweeted ads for Captain Marvel when he's dead?

  13. That's Disney moolah talking by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Everyone knows what a piece of crap Rotten tomatoes is, and how bad Brie Larson acts in the Captain Marvel movie - and how much Disney pays to quash negative reviews.

    Rotten tomatoes is the definition of a Rotten movie review site, all thanks to Disney. They're become like IGN now, being spoilt by large studios like EA and being paid to sell terrible games.

    If anything the review bombing shows, is that it did happen in the past for many DC movies, and they quietly let it slip; Now that the focus has turned on a horrible Marvel movie, they've decided to address it. It's these double standards that we as movie watchers should care about. Don't let Disney get away with it.

    If the movie is crap, review it and let people know how bad it is. Send Marvel a message and teach Disney a lesson it will not forget.

  14. Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Millennium · · Score: 0, Troll

    Truth be told, I don't think almost anyone on either side spends any actual money for their side. Slacktivism wins in the end.

    But it does go to show how ridiculous and impotent the incels' efforts are. They can't sink a movie even when they sink its reviews. They really should forget this ridiculous nonsense and just grow the fuck up already. Then people might actually want them around for once.

    1. Re:Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      When did the left collectively decide that throwing around the term "incel" is a useful way of signalling ones social justice purity? I am absolutely baffled that the same people that purport to be harbingers of equality for all humans of any race, gender, class, creed, etc, constantly espouse this idea that society is unjust towards certain minorities, and that society should correct itself to collectively resolve the inequalities, while at the same time, casually using the pejorative short form of involuntary celibacy as a "hah, take that boogie man pepe loving nazi scum" as a ad-hominem blanket attack against this giant strawman. "These people can't get laid, they fucking suck! Fuck them! Yeah! Nazis can't get laid! People who can't get laid become Nazis! I am awesome. Fuck incels!". It makes you sound like the prototypical 80's movie jock who shit talks the scrawny pimpled freckly nerd kid who everybody ostracizes because it comes out they are a virgin. That's what you sound like. Like that asshole. Like a prototypical 80's movie jock douche bag asshole.

      It is absolutely immature and a sign of intellectual weakness to categorically lump entire segments of the population into this "incel" group for every instance where there is dissent or resistance to the popular media norms. It's actually very robotic and sheep-like to see those wielding the incel label.

      Maybe you should grow the fuck up.

      “Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.”
      - George Orwell, 1984

    2. Re:Cry moar, incels and Nazis by MightyMartian · · Score: 4, Insightful

      They'd have to accept some responsibility for why women don't want anything to do with them. That would mean self-reflection and honest self assessment. Much better to blame women, and attack women wherever they intrude upon their twisted notion of masculinity.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    3. Re:Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Who are these 'incels' and why do you think they wanted to sink this movie?

      I'm being serious here, because you appear to be fucking deluded and talking utter bollocks, because the people I've heard expressing disappointment with Captain Marvel are the very same people that enjoyed Wonder Woman and are making Alita: Battle Angel a surprise success. Y'know, superhero films headed by women.

    4. Re:Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

      Let me Google that for you: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=incels+ca...

    5. Re: Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nerds have to be ostracized. You're either with us Real People or you're an incel. So, what are you?

    6. Re:Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incels: men so deluded about their place in life that they believe their celibacy is involuntary.

    7. Re: Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Millennium · · Score: 1

      Not nerds: manchildren. There's a difference.

    8. Re:Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Cederic · · Score: 2

      Sorry, I'm not wading through the utter bullshit Google will find that consists of more nonsense such as that to which I replied.

      Strange that you utterly ignored my point that the people being written off (as though their sexual escapades are remotely fucking relevant) as incels are happy viewers of other female led superhero films. I guess it breaks your narrative.

    9. Re: Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Millennium · · Score: 0

      I tend to define it a little differently, though in practice I'm not sure how much difference it makes. Incels: creepy men who refuse to accept that their inability to get a date is all their fault.

    10. Re:Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Incel is the progressive's version of calling someone a the n-word.

      It's meant to be dehumanizing, to label someone as worthy of any abuse whatsoever.

    11. Re: Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no difference: lowlife losers are lowlife losers. We destroy them in school and we keep on destroying them through life. We ostracize and humiliate them - which is actually quite easy because the dipshits have no social intelligence and will keep ridiculing themselves over and over again - keeping them at the very edge of society. One day that same society will be ready for mandatory lifetime confinement of those non-persons. Until that day, we will pressure them into non-existence.

    12. Re: Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Umm. But why? Why would the very people that love comic books, rate Wonder Woman highly and recently flocked to see Alita: Battle Angel want to see this movie fail, and just what the fuck does it have to do with their masculinity?

      You're making wild spurious claims and I'm seeing no evidence, no facts, just idiotic name calling.

    13. Re: Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh it's way worse than just that, they actually HATE WOMEN and girls in general because of their perception that they are OWED sex from them, lol. It's literally white sexless male Republican entitlement on steroids.

      It crosses into something beyond misogyny, into actual psychopathic predator level behavior. They rile themselves up on the internet and then go shoot up a bowling alley because "life's unfair!" - Literally, this much pseudovictimstance.

      It's like Donald Trump crying "witch hunt! SO unfair!" - except women are all Mueller.

    14. Re: Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Millennium · · Score: 1

      Not remotely. There are indeed plenty of nerds who are unfairly bullied. The community formed around them.

      But in the process, we forgot something important: bullying and fair ostracism aren't the same thing. To be fair, we weren't the only ones who forgot this. It was a time when everyone had. But it makes little difference in the end: we wound up letting people into our midst that we shouldn't have, and they ruined it for everyone just as they ruined everything else they'd been part of. And now, if we're to salvage the geek community at all, there's little choice but to put them back where they belong, which is outside. Because that is the only way they will ever learn.

    15. Re: Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Millennium · · Score: 2

      Everything you say is true as far as it goes, but I'm not sure it's useful. The incels start hearing it and tune out. If you want to get through to them in any sense, you have to use something they won't just ignore right away.

      I always preferred the term "bitter unfuckables" to "incels" for that reason, but using their own chosen name is a good way to delay the argument, offering more opportunity to hit the right nerves.

    16. Re: Cry moar, incels and Nazis by squiggleslash · · Score: 2

      Why would the very people that love comic books, rate Wonder Woman highly and recently flocked to see Alita: Battle Angel want to see this movie fail

      Literally nobody has argued that the people who love comic books, rate WW highly, and flocked to see Alita, want to see Captain Marvel fail.

      The OP's comment was about incels, which, while inaccurate, is used as a kinda catch-all term for Internet misogynists largely because Incels are a rather prominent subgroup of said misogynists. Many are claiming they enjoyed WW and Alita, but there's little evidence for that - in fact, I seem to recall they hated WW at the time too.

      Your confusion may possibly be because a sizable number of the IMs decided to promote a bizarre Alita vs CA fight just before Captain America was released, but that hardly means they ever liked Alita (and frankly, Alita is about a female looking killer robot, so I'm confused as to why liking Alita means jack shit about your feminist bona fides anyway.)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    17. Re: Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Cederic · · Score: 1

      The OP's comment was about incels, which, while inaccurate, is used as a kinda catch-all term for Internet misogynists largely because Incels are a rather prominent subgroup of said misogynists.

      Oh, those Internet misogynists. That didn't rail against a female looking killer robot.

      Who the fuck are these people, why the hell are you and the media pretending that all of the dislike of Captain Marvel's marketing is from them, and just how fucking many of them are there that they can so massively influence the world at large?

      Sorry but this just fucking reeks of a witchhunt against an internet bogeyman intended to publicise a film about which even the critics trying to support it can't find anything good to say.

      The continued misinformation in the media (e.g. "review bombing" when no reviews had been posted) doesn't help convince me otherwise and every time I ask a simple question (such as "So who are these people?") people try and deflect me with google searches for the term incel or a reclassification as Internet misogynists.

      I'm confused as to why liking Alita means jack shit about your feminist bona fides anyway

      I'm confused by this whole fucking affair, unless I rationalise it as an apparently successful piece of divisive marketing that's caused a lot of hate speech towards people that can't get laid. But I guess bullying is ok when people like Millenium does it.

    18. Re: Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please tell the attendants that you need in increase in your lithium dose.

    19. Re: Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Millennium · · Score: 1

      This is why you can't get a date.

    20. Re: Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ORANGE MAN BAD!

    21. Re:Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a really weird projection thing going on here: the jocks who are trying to get laid (and failing) are calling the nerds who aren't trying to get laid "involuntary celibates." Dude, that's not what the word involuntary means.

    22. Re: Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it makes little difference in the end: we wound up letting people into our midst that we shouldn't have, and they ruined it for everyone just as they ruined everything else they'd been part of. And now, if we're to salvage the geek community at all, there's little choice but to put them back where they belong, which is outside. Because that is the only way they will ever learn.

      Just to be clear ... you're talking about women, right?

    23. Re: Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Millennium · · Score: 1

      Eww, creepy.

    24. Re: Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is, we don't give a fuck about you or women. We run our own lives. Sorry that we don't have to answer to naggy bitching wives all day. We are free to do what we want.

      For example I'm gonna go play some
      Video games, because why the fuck not? Meanwhile when you get off work, your wife wants you to stop at the store, get gas, pick the kids up from day care, put away the groceries, make sure the kids are fed and ready for bed by the time she gets home. Because she doesn't want to miss her favorite show.

      Yet somehow we are missing out? Nah fuck you and fuck women, if I wanted another women to run my life I'd go live with my mother. We figured it out, you cucks are still worried about getting laid. How fucking quaint.

    25. Re: Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Facts. Mod up.

      They can't even cite their evidence anymore. Anything on google is proof to them, why would google lie?

    26. Re: Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL you cucks are so delusional. Your wife just called,'she wants you home to help wax her camel toe.

      Hahahah fucking idiots. You really believe what you wrote? How sad.

      I find it funny that the biggest group of virtue signallers have no problems making fun of white male virgins. I guess if you can't beat em join em?

      When did we start placing sex so high on the list, is this high school again? Is it bad to be a virgin? Or are you so mad that we have the freedom to do what we want, that you envy us? You can't even go out of the house without asking for permission first, yet somehow we are labeled as the babies? Your wife is LITETALLY YOUR MOM!!!! She controls every aspect of your life.

      Do this little excercise when you get off work. Ask your wife if you can goto the bar after work with a couple friends. You want to blow off some steam. Tell her you won't be home for dinner, and probably won't be home until 11pm.

      I'm willing to bet that your ass would get chewed out. How Unthoughtful of you, that you want to go out with your wife. How dare you sir!!!

    27. Re: Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Grown men are mad that other grown men don't have to answer to nagging wives. So they become jealous. They start labeling us shit.

      Also don't you find it funny that the biggest group of virtue signalers are the ones calling OTHERS names.

    28. Re: Cry moar, incels and Nazis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nerds are not "unfairly" anything. They deserve what they get and they get what they deserve. We real people do not bully nerds: we merely show them back out of society when they become too obnoxious trying to barge in, instead of trying to fit in, which they are absolutely incapable of. The people in your midst that you "shouldn't have let in your community" have always been there. You and them are not different. You're the same. You're simply too stupid and self-centered to realize. Real people have empathy, they understand how other people feel. We care about others and we can identify in them. You can not. You are simply unable to function in a civilized society. So why don't you stay in your corner with your beloved machines and leave the rest of us in peace? Do you really want to be rejected over and over and over again? It's painful for you and it's a chore for us. It's like having around that inbred relative from a distant and degraded branch of the family that is constantly wetting himself and drooling all over and being inappropriate around people, especially children. Everybody knows he should not be around but he's too dimwitted to understand that he should leave us alone. So, let us be absolutely clear once and for all: we do not want you around. You're a nuisance. You're boring. You yak about stuff nobody cares about and you do endlessly. You're a bunch of pedants and weirdos. You cannot or will not change. We do not like you and we never will, and sure as hell we do not accept you as part of society. Go away.

    29. Re: Cry moar, incels and Nazis by MightyMartian · · Score: 1

      I think your post, rather than proving your point, proves mine.

      --
      The world's burning. Moped Jesus spotted on I50. Details at 11.
    30. Re: Cry moar, incels and Nazis by butchersong · · Score: 1

      I'm not a comic book fan but every post I've read from that community complaining about Captain Marvel has been from fans that liked Wonder Woman quite a bit. This response from you is more of a rhetorical device than anything else. A great deal of the protest for this movie took the place of people trying to pump up Alita and seeing it multiple times... i've not seen either myself.

  15. Those words by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They weren't reviews, they were "want to see" indicators. Stop lying.

    That is not trolling, trolling is saying stupid things online to get a reaction from people who should know better. Grow up.

    I don't think you know what those words mean.

  16. It wasn't about the movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And anyone who tries to tell you otherwise is lying.
    Brie Larson made some completely tone deaf and racist statements, that upset a lot of people. They expressed their dismay this way.
    It absolutely has nothing to do with the quality of the actual movie.

    But the media coverage is completely off the rails biased. Or rather let's just call it what it is they're lying about it. As they lied about the "do you want to see the movie?" poll.

    It is a coordinated campaign to protect Brie Larson, while shitting on the people she offended.

  17. There was no review bomb by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    One site had a bunch of people say they weren't going to go see it. News hungry sites and YouTubers pounced on it like a dog on steak because the anti SJW crap gets clicks. We're all being played for ad revenue. It's pissing me off and I can't do anything about it except point out.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  18. cue the counter-narrative ... by epine · · Score: 1

    Cue the counter-narrative that the troll bombs were an inside job, furthering two parallel agendas:
    * to drive insta-guerrilla publicity for the movie
    * to discredit word-of-mouth review

    In the almost-as-large-as-life MCU, this wouldn't even count as a least mustard-seed of a standard-issue dastardly plot.

  19. I did not know I am a bot by RuiFRibeiro · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I voted I did not wanted to see. Rotten tomatoes changed 47K do not want to see votes to "liked it". So much for credibility.

    1. Re:I did not know I am a bot by Patent+Lover · · Score: 1

      You're conflating Rotten Tomatoes with actual box office revenue.

    2. Re:I did not know I am a bot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rotten Tomatoes is a joke. They removed tens of thousands of reviews from "bots" but that didn't have the desired result (audience rating stayed in the 30s). So they "adjusted their algorithm" and suddenly it jumped to the 50s. Nothing suspicious here: https://i.redd.it/8c7tinx093l21.png

    3. Re:I did not know I am a bot by thegarbz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So much for credibility.

      And then found, announced and corrected the problem which occurred due to a very recent change. That is precisely how credibility works.
      Also they didn't say all the original votes were bots, but given site participation it was obvious that 90% of them were.

      Now please, stop frothing at the mouth, smoke some weed, do some yoga, or do whatever it is you do to relax after you nerd rage over nothing.

    4. Re:I did not know I am a bot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, if you define 'bot' as 'acting as programmed', then you pretty much are.

  20. As An Internet Troll by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I had no skin in this one and wouldn't waste my time on "review bombing," probably done by the marketing department to convince the people paying for the marketing department to increase their wages since it would take so much effort to overcome the "trolling." Obvious psy-op is obvious.

    1. Re:As An Internet Troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ... ye-ah. '

      Cause that's a thing.

      I guess.

      Maybe you want to check your tinfoil hat there buddy. Just, you know, run a finger inside the rim? Make sure you still have blood flowing to your brain?

    2. Re:As An Internet Troll by NicknameUnavailable · · Score: 1

      Who has more incentive to "review bomb" a comic book derived thing? Internet trolls, who would derive basically no amusement from that activity because nobody actually gives a shit about it to be offended. Or the guys getting paid to defend against "internet trolls?" You should pick up a Symantec anti-spam subscription some time, then cancel it and watch how much more spam you get - that's how marketing and sales work: you create a need then you offer a solution.

  21. Execs Bought All of the Theater Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you look at the showtime lists for any theater nationwide, it's obvious that the execs have paid to dominate the showtimes with only Captain Marvel, pushing out other films entirely. They're only trying to spin it to look like a social movement to cover up this practice and to incite people to see it, pushing away the fact that it's simply a below-average A-list movie.

  22. Reviews are Jedi Mind Tricks by TigerPlish · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Reviews sway the opinions of those who are weak-minded, may not reflect the true quality of the [thing] may actually be paid for.

    Examples: The Final Countdown. Dreadful reviews. Love the film. Down Periscope: Dreadful reviews. Love the film.

    FZ50 panasonic camera: worst camera ever if you believe the reviews. Love mine.

    If someone needs reviews to decide they like something, they're susceptible to Jedi Mind Tricks and are easy plunder.

    --
    The "Civilized World" jumped the shark ca. 1973.
    1. Re:Reviews are Jedi Mind Tricks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't even have to pay for good reviews. Professional reviews give favorable reviews just to maintain access to previews.

      And of course there's the whole fudging scores on Rotten Tomatoes where mid-range reviews count as "fresh" or all the bad audience ratings are just "bots".

  23. Your passion tells another story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly, these so-called incels occupy a large part of your existence.

    1. Re: Your passion tells another story by Millennium · · Score: 1

      Not really. I'm really more of an opportunist than anything else; I don't go out of my way to find them, I just snipe when the chance crosses my path. I also don't have to go out of my way to find them, given their increasing crises for the relevance that they don't deserve and aren't ready for.

    2. Re: Your passion tells another story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a bold face liar, I bet your wife wears the pants in your marriage. A spineless fuck like you never stands up for himself.

      I get it now, that's why you hate us so much, because we have the freedom. You sold your soul to a women just to get some pussy. Meanwhile I'm fucking different girls 2-3 nights a week. Then I move on. You guys have created a cage, and your wife is YOUR warden. Now you are mad at us because we CHOSE to live our own lives and not devote it to taking care of a worthless nagging bitchy wife. So enjoy your sex with your ONE wife that got old years ago. I think it's time for you to change the babies diaper anyway. No time for hobbies when the wife needs her pussy waxed LOL.

  24. In fairness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much of this success owes to inflation, (are these gross figures adjusted for inflation?) to the fact that the movie-going population draws from a progressively larger and larger pool, (the 350 million or whatever people we have in America alone, for example,) or the fact that the majority of the country (in America at least,) has skyrocketing incentive to want to escape reality as governments crumble under the onslaught of criminals in high offices, deliberate placement of completely incompetent submorons, (Rick Perry as Secretary of ENERGY, for fucks sake? Ben Carson (who busted the myth that a brain surgeon is necessarily smart,) as Secretary of HUD? Jesus H MF Christ! That is just to name TWO.

  25. All I care about... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 1

    Is whether a movie is any good. I don’t care about the trolls, who never venture far from the rocks they cower under anyway. And I don’t care about the flag-wavers like this review writer - feel free to listen to your Helen Reddy album on continuous loop, just don’t insist I sing along.

    I don’t care what an actor’s or actress’ opinion is, I only care whether they can act. When performers think they’re bigger than they are, we get Clint Eastwood rambling to an empty chair or Morgan Fairchild explaining why the common folk need to be told what to think about the issues of the day.

    I’m almost certainly not going to see this movie in the theater anyway. By the time it’s available to watch in my home, the dust will have settled - I can ask my friends whether they’ve see it and if it’s any good. But good grief... it’s just a movie.

    --
    #DeleteChrome
    1. Re:All I care about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All I really care about is whether or not she shows her juicy slit and bodacious ta-tas! What can I say, I guess I am a true feminist! Can she shoot photon beams out of her clit? This ability is actually canon in the Marvel Comic Universe.

  26. Good controversy is the best marketing by SchroedingersCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Investing into small team of review-bombers is a brilliant marketing move.

    1. Re:Good controversy is the best marketing by AmiMoJo · · Score: 3, Informative

      They don't even have to pay them. Just have the star say she is a feminist and let the outraged keyboard warriors do it for you.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    2. Re: Good controversy is the best marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have the star say she doesn't want white men to see her movie, it isn't made for them.

      FTFY.

  27. Re:Waaaaaaaah, I'm a white male VIIIIIICTIM!(sobbi by elrous0 · · Score: 1

    Trolls like you are part of the problem. You're making the world a shittier, more hateful place. Now go apologize to your parents for letting them down.

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  28. wrong headline by slashmydots · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually the headline should be "Brie Larson makes insanely racist and sexist comments and ignorant moviegoers see it anyway."

    1. Re:wrong headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think people care about her personal opinions enough to boycott a movie that they otherwise want to see.

      I don't think ignorance is the dominant factor here so much as apathy. Though I guess they aren't mutually-exclusive...people could be ignorant of her sexism due to apathy. But even so, it's not like anyone is going to adopt her political opinions just because they liked her role in a movie.

    2. Re:wrong headline by thegarbz · · Score: 2

      There's a big difference between being ignorant, and just not giving a shit. Brie Larson is a SJW arse, the movie however was decent and not seeing it due to something irrelevant to the movie itself doesn't achieve anything.

    3. Re:wrong headline by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      I can’t see how a white woman complaining about white men is racist but I guess you have to scapegoat for everything.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    4. Re:wrong headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a big difference between being ignorant, and just not giving a shit. Brie Larson is a SJW arse, the movie however was decent and not seeing it due to something irrelevant to the movie itself doesn't achieve anything.

      Wrong, never separate artist from art, the art is an extension of the artist. If the artist is a total piece of shit then their works reflect that.

    5. Re:wrong headline by slashmydots · · Score: 1

      I dunnon if you noticed or not but she also can't act for shit. They could have replaced her with the inflatable autopilot from the movie Airplane and he would have shown more emotion and delivered the lines better.

    6. Re:wrong headline by Jahoda · · Score: 1

      "reeeeeeee reeeeeeee reeeeeeee".

      Lolololololololol. Cry more :)

    7. Re: wrong headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So if Samuel Jackson said "nlggers are the scum of the earth and should be exterminated" you wouldn't think that was racist because he's black?

      You're both retarded and racist, apparently.

    8. Re:wrong headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Attacking and demeaning people based on race is racist. That's what the word means.

    9. Re:wrong headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider investing in a dictionary.

    10. Re:wrong headline by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Consider providing a citation.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    11. Re: wrong headline by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      So she said that? Citation needed otherwise you are just lying.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    12. Re:wrong headline by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Please provide the citation where she did that. Complaining about something isn’t attacking and demeaning unless you’re one of the individuals that confuses the two.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    13. Re: wrong headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She said that she doesn't want white men to see her film because it wasn't made for them.

      Is that racist? No.

      Is that sexist? Fuck yea.

      Imagine if a white dude said "I don't want women to see my film, It isn't for them. " how much the SJWs would come out in full force. I don't even have to imagine, because it's happen. Stating a scientific fact can now get you banned because "wrongthink".

      You assholes ignore everything
      That doesn't fit your agenda. You handwave it away but become outraged if the other side does it. It's hypocrisy at its best.

    14. Re: wrong headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What she said was sexist not racist.

    15. Re: wrong headline by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Citation needed. So now you’re saying she didn’t say “men were the scum of the Earth” but you alluded to that earlier. Considering that you’ve been less than honest and have yet to provide any evidence of what she actually said, I’m not going to believe you. Even if you she said what you claim seems like you seem butthurt about a movie that the star doesn’t think is for you. I can guarantee you that most guys don’t want to see Magic Mike and that movie wasn’t for them. So what? Did you get hurt about that one too?

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    16. Re: wrong headline by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      And what did she say? I have yet to have any cite exactly what she said.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    17. Re:wrong headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Consider using google. You living under a rock is not an argument.

    18. Re: wrong headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    19. Re: wrong headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She said she doesn't want press coverage to be overwhelmingly white male, not that she didn't want any white males...but she did make pretty clear that she doesn't care what they think IF they are male+white. Presumably male+nonwhite or female+white opinions are more juicy and flavorful.

    20. Re:wrong headline by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      No. You made the claim. You can either support it or not. It’s not my job to prove your assertion.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    21. Re: wrong headline by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      So she gave a highly nuanced and lengthy discussion about “white males” specifically saying she wanted more diversity and didn’t hate white males. So of course white males got butthurt by it. I find this part interesting: “I don’t need a 40-year-old white dude to tell me what didn’t work about A Wrinkle in Time. It wasn’t made for him! I want to know what it meant to women of color, biracial women, to teen women of color, to teens that are biracial.”

      Shouldn’t that be a given? I hate to tell you but Magic Mike wasn’t made for most white males. Neither was The Notebook.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    22. Re: wrong headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When you say "white males need not apply," that is racist and sexist.

      "I don't hate white males, some of my best friends are white males." Give me a break!

    23. Re: wrong headline by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      She didn’t say that. That’s you projecting your biases. The Notebook isn’t for you. Magic Mike isn’t for you. Transformers is for you. Baywatch is for you. You can get butthurt by it or not.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    24. Re: wrong headline by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      She said specifically: “I don’t need a 40-year-old white dude to tell me what didn’t work about A Wrinkle in Time. It wasn’t made for him! I want to know what it meant to women of color, biracial women, to teen women of color, to teens that are biracial.” She said didn’t care about what one white dude said about a movie she liked (A Wrinkle in Time). Really is that it? She didn’t say ALL white males about ALL movies. Replace A Wrinkle In Time with any chick flick and it’s the same point. Replace it with any kids movie and it’s the same point.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    25. Re: wrong headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > She didnâ(TM)t say that. Thatâ(TM)s you projecting your biases.

      She LITERALLY said she doesn't care what the white males say.

    26. Re: wrong headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's all part of this stupid, misguided liberal notion that more diversity in color + sex is going to automatically bring more diversity in thought.

      You could talk to 1000 white males about "A Wrinkle in Time" and find more diversity of opinion than amongst 1000 American Indian/African/Asian/Female/Whathaveyou, there is simply no correlation.

      Liberals think "fairness" means oppressing the past oppressors, not eliminating all oppression.

    27. Re: wrong headline by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      You’re complaining about the “liberal notion” while completely missing her point. A white male criticized the movie she liked from a completely white male viewpoint. He didn’t consider her viewpoint. It’s the same if every adult reviewer savages children’s movies as simplistic and childish without taking into account they are made for children. Some children’s movies are not made for adults at all.

      But also you missed my point. She didn’t complain about all white males on all movies. You strawmanned her argument and now on a rant about something else.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    28. Re: wrong headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You missed the point. It doesn't matter if the was talking about all movies or 1, all males or 1.

      She didn't address the criticism on its own merits, only from an identity politics standpoint. She rejected critics' opinions just because "white" + "male," how can you not see that.

    29. Re: wrong headline by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1
      No she did not. You are strawmanning her argument. This what she said:

      I don’t need A 40-year-old white dude to tell me what didn’t work about A Wrinkle in Time. It wasn’t made for him! I want to know what it meant to women of color, biracial women, to teen women of color, to teens that are biracial.” Larson would state multiple times that she doesn’t “hate white dudes” while calling for them to be replaced as film critics. “For the third time, I don’t hate white dudes. These are just facts. These are not my feelings.” Larson would add, “Am I saying I hate white dudes? No, I am not. What I am saying is you make a movie that is a love letter to women of color, there is an insanely low chance a woman of color will have a chance to see your movie, and review your movie.”

      She clearly says she doesn’t care what ONE white male said about a movie she liked. ONE. And even if she did say ALL, why are you so butthurt that a complete stranger doesn’t care about your opinion? You must think so highly about yourself.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    30. Re: wrong headline by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      She complained about one person . You turned it into “ALL” and then went off on a rant. How is that not dishonest at best in that you don’t care about what she actually said? And even if she said that why do you care so much that a complete stranger doesn’t give a damn about your opinions? Dude, grandparents everywhere haven’t given a damn about other people’s opinions since forever. Are you hurt by that?

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    31. Re: wrong headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She complained about one person because WHITE and MALE (and 40 yrs old). That is prejudice plain and simple.

    32. Re: wrong headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can think you are a n!gger without being racist because not all blacks are n!ggers.

    33. Re: wrong headline by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Sure if complaining about one specific person is prejudiced then everyone is prejudiced when they complain about someone like Janice from Accounting.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    34. Re: wrong headline by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

      Yes because using racial slurs is exactly what she did. Or maybe your example isn’t remotely the same.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  29. Kevin Feige responds to critics by Hentai007 · · Score: 0

    Your revolution is over, Mr. Redpill, Condolences. The bums lost. My advice is to do what your parents did; get a job, sir.

  30. Love the hypocrisy of the slashdot editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Cheering on a Disney movie (and an inarguably subpar one at that) because GRRL POWA.
    Where's the socialists now? GRRL POWA!
    Where's the copyright arguments? GRRL POWA!
    Rotten Tomatoes completely destroyed and subverted their own reporting system (can you ever trust their tomato scores again?) GRRL POWA.
    You guys are being suckered for pure crass-commericalism - you spent your money to see a movie from an org you hate, perpetuating capitalism and then pat yourself on the back because you support the GRRL POWA because the advertising told you to believe that's what this movie was about.
    Then, then you have the audacity to post an inflammatory summary to show your oh so righteous indignation about how you support crass commercialized movies as if you've somehow "won"?
    Well enjoy your pyrrhic victory...

    1. Re: Love the hypocrisy of the slashdot editors by Millennium · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's more that geeks have become sick and tired of Those Geeks. You know the type: the ones who weren't bullied for being different so much as ostracized for being creepy, and ran to the all-ostracism-is-evil crowd to escape the social pressure to grow that they so desperately needed? They've abused our generosity long enough, and it's time to put them back on the outside where they always belonged.

    2. Re: Love the hypocrisy of the slashdot editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pretending like you weren't bullied for a good reason I see?
      Just like creeps need to be put in their place so nerds and geeks need to understand that their social inadequacy is not acceptable in the real world.
      They need to learn to interact normally with people just like everyone else.

    3. Re: Love the hypocrisy of the slashdot editors by Millennium · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Pretending like you weren't bullied for a good reason I see?

      No, actually. The reason for my ostracism wasn't exactly the same as yours, but it was close enough for most purposes. I also faced some bullying -even fair targets can be treated unfairly- but really, most of it what happened to me was as fair for me as it was for you.

      The process of coming to understand this was extremely unpleasant. Having been in your position, I don't envy you. But there was no other way I was ever going to learn. Just like there's no other way for you. You've had years to prove it, like I did.

      Just like creeps need to be put in their place so nerds and geeks need to understand that their social inadequacy is not acceptable in the real world.

      Still no. I was basically one of Those Geeks, just as you are. I need to be clear about this: the geek community was founded by the unfairly targeted, and only co-opted for abuse by the fair targets later. Most of us are just fine, even though some of us are not. But the ones who aren't are the ones who ruin everything for everybody.

      They need to learn to interact normally with people just like everyone else.

      There is no "just like": society can withstand quite a large range of social interaction and function. This is perhaps one of the hardest lessons I had to learn, as, I suspect, it is for you: that just because my behavior and interactions were unacceptable doesn't mean that there's only one acceptable way to behave or interact. But there are boundaries.

      The bar is low, but it exists, and it is necessary. Only once I understood all three parts of that sentence could I even begin to improve things, by improving myself. And so it is, I suspect, for you as well.

    4. Re: Love the hypocrisy of the slashdot editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The editors at slashdot are getting as bad as twitter now. I noticed the extreme bias years ago. It's turning into cancer now but I stopped caring about it. Slashdot isn't what it use to be back in the day. That ship sailed away a long time ago.

    5. Re: Love the hypocrisy of the slashdot editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the all-ostracism-is-evil crowd

      it's time to put them back on the outside where they always belonged

      Jesus F. Christ Becky! I don't know what you've been smoking, but you need to quit that shit before you cost us the state cheerleading championship.

    6. Re: Love the hypocrisy of the slashdot editors by Millennium · · Score: 2

      Aww, mad to discover that even the geeks never really wanted you around, and only tolerated you out of misguided pity?

    7. Re: Love the hypocrisy of the slashdot editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're engaging in serious mental gymnastics to justify being an ass. You don't need to. You can just be an ass.

    8. Re: Love the hypocrisy of the slashdot editors by Millennium · · Score: 2

      Since when is "society has a legitimate right and need to expect a certain level of functionality from its members, and you don't measure up" mental gymnastics?

    9. Re: Love the hypocrisy of the slashdot editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people don't bear being interacted with. This past weekend I found a juvenile green lynx spider, about 8mm. I learned more from the 10 minutes I spent watching that spider react to me than I have from the past 3 weeks of dealing with people.

      There is still wonder left in this world.

    10. Re:Love the hypocrisy of the slashdot editors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It isn't inarguably "subpar". The reviews are positive, the box office numbers back it up. I watched it this weekend and thought it was a great movie. History will judge morons like you appropriately.

  31. Real World wins, internet loses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Once more, the nerds are defeated, the Beautiful People triumph. Now cry, nerdinhos. Does it hurt? Does it hurt much? How does it feel to be beaten and humiliated over and over and over again? Tears now streak your acne-ridden faces, you butthurt incel losers. Your precious internet is shit. Your computers are shit. YOU are shit. Kill yourselves so you won't have to feel the pain of living a life of eternal defeat. You will never, ever, ever have your "revenge". A lifetime of social exclusion awaits you. There is a way out, it can be painless.

    1. Re:Real World wins, internet loses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sheesh. Show us on the doll where the nerd touched you when you were a little kid.

    2. Re:Real World wins, internet loses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Welcome to slashdot. You must have gotten lost on your way to the gym after teenage years full of CTEs had affected your memory and made you more aggressive.

    3. Re:Real World wins, internet loses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Har har, I can feel the bitterness in your voice, homo nerdo. How does it taste like, weirdo, hunh? Does it taste like the dog turds I forced you and your weirdo friends to eat? Or like the contents of the unflushed toilet I shoved your head into? Remember those days, nerdinho? Because they will never end.

    4. Re:Real World wins, internet loses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look it is APK recounting his high school years pretending he is now an internet tough guy. Next up he will go on about having to work at a truck stop glory hole to pay the utility bills while living in a $1 house.

  32. A bunch of men telling her she can't do stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Her origin story is that she suffered the hardship of some man telling her baseball isn't a sport for girls.

    Batman's origin story is that criminals murdered his parents for something trivial.

  33. MRA fail by PopeRatzo · · Score: 0, Troll

    As the Melania body double famously said, "I really don’t care, do u?"

    Is anyone surprised that nobody listened to a bunch of man babies who were upset that their superhero didn't have a penis? The good news is that none of them will be procreating, so the 40 year-old overweight man baby who hangs around the comic book store and jacks off to drawings of Thor genetic profile will soon disappear and the rest of us can go on with our lives.

    However, it may drastically reduce the Anonymous Coward population, so comme ci, comme ça, which is Gaelic for "fuck them sad sacks".

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
    1. Re:MRA fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still speaking for the DNC, eh? You should save your breath!

  34. How do we know its a glitch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "They're referring to another Rotten Tomateos review-counting glitch Friday morning, as covered by the Hollywood Reporter:"
    How do you know this because rotten tomatoes told you?
    Ive been pretty interested in this debate and theres been a ton of bad actors on both sides of it. The biggest takeaway from it is you cant trust rotten tomatoes anymore since there happy to fake claim the narrative for there own ends. RT was never review bombed when they took down the want to see button for ppl saying nah no thanks. Then they remove 50k reviews because of a glitch (lol) while countless copy pasta positive reviews stay up, I say the big mouse has to much power.

    1. Re:How do we know its a glitch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does anyone expect that an industry whose job it is to make stuff up, an industry that lies so much about just these kinds of financial results that "Hollywood accounting" is an actual term, is telling the truth about this or any other film's results?

      They're lying. They're always lying. It's what they do. It's all they do.

    2. Re:How do we know its a glitch? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess your right, ive read movie reviews since i was pretty young and its just disappointed me a bit guess i naively trusted in RT, also that something like the guardian cant be accurate between the terms review bombing about an anticipation meter (want to see).

  35. The measure is too early by aepervius · · Score: 1

    I don't care about the film (I don't like any movie super heroes AT ALL, only deadpool and mostly only for the 4th wall humour - without the 4th wall humour I would not bother watching). But one thing I remark is that the first openning is not that important for any film. What is important is 1) is this sustainable after word of mouth (e.g. 155M 1st week end and 3M next is bad) and 2) how does it compare with the long tail (e.g. some film do much better on the dvd market than in cinema). I am just saying that they should wait a bit before jubilating with their chicken counting. As for the controversy.... I am not even sure there was that much. One was about rotten tomatoe "i want to watch i don't want to watch" prediction, another thing was by the blonde actress can't remember her name, but compared to say ghostbuster 2016 ? It was tame.

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
  36. Re:Waaaaaaaah, I'm a white male VIIIIIICTIM!(sobbi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Waaaaaaaaaah, as a White Conservative Victim-Beta Male, everything Hollywood makes my tiny dick even smaller, waaaaaaaaaah!" -Conservatism today.

  37. MCU tent-pole network effect by epine · · Score: 1

    I should point out that the current movie era, dominated by cartoon tent-poles, is based on network effects. Remember those? We used to discuss them on Slashdot back in the day.

    As movies gained international markets, there was a marked effect on the quality of your typical movie, which I've dubbed Dialogue for Dummies. The strong, silent protagonist of the 1950s made a splashing comeback, simply because it was easier to dub into a dozen major international markets. Witty repartee does not translate. Subtleties are inevitably Lost in Translation.

    The second effect is that this particular style of movie-making was garnering ever and ever larger budgets. The increase in the special effects budget helped to retain the traditional English-language markets (America, the Commonwealth, and its lingering enclaves—mainly English-speaking regions of Eastern India) due to far inferior dialogue and story line.

    I watched Incredibles 2 the other night, and I managed to enjoy it, because I've learned how to best tune out the plot, and there's so much going on visually, you can actually pick out where all the intelligence formerly devoted to the script went to ground.

    This is why almost all tent-pole humour is now visual there's nothing to lose in translation, and people who care about the lame plot will barely even notice it's also in there (so they don't end up feeling left out). Plus it's hard for reviewers to write about the visual humour, because it's usually aggressively sub-verbal (quirky nods to artistic conventions from decades past) so it can't even be pointed out to the dunderheads with any great force that they're definitely missing the best part.

    Long ago, I didn't suspect the word "globalization" spelled the end for intelligent dialogue in film, to be replaced by a bag of seventeen colour-coded hammers, each endowed with a distinctive visual style and unique superpower, to be "shown not told" to a tedious extreme not even replicated by 1980s television which presumed you had been off watching two other channels during every commercial break, and thus recapped every recap twice over.

    My most fascinating movie experience recently was watching Isle of Dogs (2018) more or less back-to-back with Up (2009). Both movies feature talking dogs. One of these films was widely misunderstood by idiots to be a grievous grievance-studies pillory of Japanese cultural tropes, never mind that the Japan represented in this movie was painstakingly constructed out of the whole cloth of how American culture actually encodes Japan (surely the Japanese have the same naive cultural encoding of America, which this movie invites you to contemplate, if you're not already lathering about the primacy of the thing, rather than the primacy of the perception of the thing). Because of the current tent-pole phenomena, the younger generation seems to be well on the way to forgetting that the primary subject matter of creative fiction is reality as refracted through perception.

    I think Wes Anderson explores the world of meta-attention, which is why he's not a great story teller on his own terms. But none of these tent-pole movies have a great story, either. Incredibles 2: bitter orphan v. smarmy orphan, a kind of orphan Rashomon story (neither of whom has forgotten their original name, but I guess you can't have everything). No, it hasn't really been done before—except the "orphan" part, which has been done to death.

    Wes does a great job of engaging the hypertrophic alternate attention I've had to cultivate merely to make it through your average five-star tent-pole movie (I won't even touch a four-star effort).

    Why I Hate Wes Anderson — May 2011

    I just simply don't understand the importance of Wes Anderson's films. Anderson often tells the story of an upper class white family who has no real conflict in their lives except for

  38. Re: Waaaaaaaah, I'm a white male VIIIIIICTIM!(sobb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe you should take a lesson from Captain Marvel and not let things people say on the Internet hurt your feelings :-D

  39. Re:Waaaaaaaah, I'm a white male VIIIIIICTIM!(sobbi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you seriously that fucking stupid not to notice what a hateful profane jackass you are yourself? NPCs are so goddamn brain dead that they always fail with this.

  40. Your jedi mindtrick fails then too... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    See subject: Your premise in review of REVIEWS fails too - don't you SEE it? On reviews: I'll put ones from /.ers of MY work out there & why?? FUCK, lol - hardest fucks to GET A GOOD REVIEW OUT OF (& I literally have DOZENS to my good credit) ARE from /.ers...

    * Roughest critics I've EVER seen online since 1994 (when I began putting out wares for "public consumption" which NEVER would've happened unless friends of mine liked my work & said "put it out there man...")

    LASTLY, of course: DO-NOTHING dildos HIDING behind FAKE NAMES online (like you)? WOULD bitch @ those like ME doing well in the eyes of others - now wouldn't you? FACT: YOU ARE NOW, lol!

    APK

    P.S.=> "'Nuff said" as the saying goes - think about what I said - after all, YOUR OWN "medicine" can be LEVELLED AGAINST YOU too now... apk

    1. Re:Your jedi mindtrick fails then too... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut up homo

    2. Re:Your jedi mindtrick fails then too... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw! You butthurt APK shut you up easily fake name TigerPlish https://entertainment.slashdot... ? Yes.

    3. Re:Your jedi mindtrick fails then too... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LMAO APK never beat anyone, only his own dick frequently.

    4. Re:Your jedi mindtrick fails then too... apk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You let us know your own weird outlets right there. He's right about your type. Your false accusations let us see how you yourself are.

  41. Hitler did nothing wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yeah, what about the Nazis always being the bad guys in movies. They also always white and male. That's totally racist and sexist!

  42. So in other words... by Harvey+Manfrenjenson · · Score: 1

    it's now officially impossible to have an opinion or discussion about this film, because it's become nothing more than a political litmus test. It's funny-- I don't think there has ever been a movie in the history of film where the conversation around the film has so thoroughly degenerated into a politically-motivated pissing contest. Even films with an overt and hard-edged political or social message, like "Do The Right Thing", were still viewed as works of art, which you could discuss as *films* first and as political statements second.

    I think that trolls on both sides of the political spectrum share precisely equal amounts of blame for this situation.

    1. Re:So in other words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must have missed the release of Black Panther.

    2. Re:So in other words... by Harvey+Manfrenjenson · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was thinking about Black Panther when I wrote the comment. But the conversations around Black Panther weren't even remotely as stupid-- despite the fact that the movie was more overtly political than Captain Marvel.

      Since I wrote this comment, I've actually seen some footage of Brie Larson talking-- it's part of this (highly recommended) review: https://www.youtube.com/watch?...

      And, Christ, is she ever annoying. I can't pinpoint a single thing that she says that I actually *disagree* with. But she's so unlikeable and condescending that I almost want to disagree with her based on her personality alone.

  43. the sixth highest of all-time by QuietLagoon · · Score: 1

    Of course, the steadily (in some instances, rapidly) increasing ticket prices over the years had no effect upon that accolade.

  44. Hold on by Maelwryth · · Score: 1

    Who hired the bots?

    --
    I reserve the write to mangle english.
  45. Re: Waaaaaaaah, I'm a white male VIIIIIICTIM!(sobb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Found the sock puppet network

  46. Not Really the article is deceptive by Crashmarik · · Score: 1

    ", the largest ever global opening for a March release", For march O'Rly ?

    The movie had a U.S. take of 153 million prior to review bruhaha it was targeted at 180 million so it had an underperform of roughly 20%

    Stirring up the controversy may have been able to buy them a good opening for the movie. (I have no idea if it's good or bad Hell who pays 20 bucks to see a movie when there's bit torrent and 60 inch monitors)

    1. Re:Not Really the article is deceptive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you get a good torrent print of the movie ? Asking for a friend.

  47. Slashdot is cucked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Run by weak men.

  48. Slashdot article Smashes zero Box Office Records, by triffid_98 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Thanks to new ownership and a wide understanding that comments are forever Slashdot is no longer an effective medium for discourse on many topics. This is but one of them. It may not be a #metoo echo chamber but once upon a time controversial discussions were had here without posting as AC over a VPN connection

  49. Re: Waaaaaaaah, I'm a white male VIIIIIICTIM!(sobb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are a certified troll, with a sock puppet modding you up, and we're all laughing. It's so damned obvious, stop trying so hard dude.

  50. It won't last by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just as it didn't with Star Wars. Whatever atrocity they make after Endgame will be 'the first Marvel movie to lose money'. I guarantee it. A great many people saw this in anticipation of the final Avengers film. Make no mistake - the movie is a steaming pile of Disney propaganda.

  51. captain marvel sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and so do movies with forced female leads

  52. Weird... by ASCIIxTended · · Score: 2, Informative

    When I went to see it the theater was almost empty, while the cinema as a whole had as large a crowd as I've ever seen on a Saturday. I wonder if these numbers are correct?

    --
    I do not belong to the church of the lowercase 'i'
    1. Re:Weird... by guruevi · · Score: 1

      This is hollyweird, it doesn't matter as long as the narrative works. Plenty of box office records are artificial, if you have a poor movie but want to make a lot of money, buy your own movie's tickets out and have the media fawn at how good the movie must be. Seems to happen to a lot of Marvel movies, they're cookie cutter scripted movies that keep smashing box office records but have no long-term sales income and within less than 24m you'll see them at the $5 bin.

      --
      Custom electronics and digital signage for your business: www.evcircuits.com
    2. Re:Weird... by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      They smash box office records because they're cookie cutter scripted movies. They're fun spectacles and almost entirely unobjectionable. If you have a group of friends who want to go see a movie or a bunch of teenagers or whatever, you will never go wrong picking a Marvel movie to go see together.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
  53. Hmmm by nnull · · Score: 1

    Why does bad reviews instantly mean trolling? Just because a movie was hyped up to try to get as much people to go and watch it doesn't mean the movie was excellent. You got people tricked into paying to see your crap movie, sort of like how EA hypes up games to get people to buy it only to find out it's crap. If it keeps up, you'll end up like the video gaming scene where no one buys into hype anymore and game sales drop off dramatically because of it. You can fool people up to a point, but eventually it's going to take another generation to pull off again since people remember this for a life time.

    1. Re:Hmmm by labradort · · Score: 1

      I went to see what the hype was about. It was just as boring as the recent Star Wars. Really, I couldn't tell this character apart from Rey. The main character is not invested in any relationship, but stuck in figuring out their identity. There are no points in the movie where it feels there is risk. There are no points in the movie where I feel for someone. The super seems to have no limits to powers - it is simply will power converted to megatons nuclear equivalent. There is nothing to engage me while I sit in my seat looking at good special effects.

      I enjoyed the 90's references to Internet and computing in the day.

  54. There isn't any good in you, though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This can be seen by how you only see what is in your head, not what is outside it. Your reconstruction of reality to fit what you want to see and then use it to complain that a woman has had a superhero role, and has also, gasp, not pandered to your gender in the past, shows that there is no good in you for the movies to show.

  55. Only film available in local multiplex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    My multiplex has 3 screens, for 3 days Captain Marvell was the only movie shown. They closed down 2 screens.

    There was no choice. Did Disney pay for this? don't know.

    I'm in NZ, The same happened in various cinemas in Australia and US

    1. Re:Only film available in local multiplex by omnichad · · Score: 1

      Why would you close down two screens instead of using them for more showings? If they anticipated a huge crowd this would maximize profits, in theory. But it would also lose them credibility in the long run with people not interested in the movie left with no alternative.

  56. Incel dweeb need a movie. by Patent+Lover · · Score: 0

    Quick, make a movie with an all white male cast that these spendthrifts will line up to see.

  57. "Who cares what other people think?" by fustakrakich · · Score: 1

    That should be today's mantra!

    --
    “He’s not deformed, he’s just drunk!”
  58. Boring by Jarwulf · · Score: 1

    All the Marvel movies I've seen in the past couple years have been generic and boring AF. Based upon what I've been reading from reviews from nonpartisan reviewers about this movie, it itself doesn't really have much of any politics but its also fairly generic. I just think the whole MCU and superhero genre is now tired and played out at this point with a gabillion samey movies for over a decade now. I guess its not to much of a stretch that initial ticket sales could be high since the general population is largely ignorant of any of the politicking on either side and will gobble anything up to a certain extent if its hyped enough. I mean this is the same crowd that turned out for phantom menace. But its not really any more indication of quality or a 'victory' any more than the reviewbombing.

  59. I don't think Ghostbusters had an agenda by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    it was just bad. Apparently they tried to ad-lib most of it instead of having a script and that worked out about as well as you'd expect.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:I don't think Ghostbusters had an agenda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that depends on the actors involved. IIRC Bill Murray ad-libbed most of his lines in the original and it came off perfectly. Then again, Bill Murray is a comedic genius...

  60. Re:Balogney! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A coward like you can never look yourself in the mirror. You'll feel nothing but shame at your whiny, cowardly, visage.

    the pathetic living punchline that is impersonating gerald butler

  61. Nope, but it sure got them a lot of press by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

    in the nerd community. It's almost as if do that was profitable...

    Seriously, you'd be better off ignoring them when this crap comes up. You're getting played.

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
  62. What if I told you by aliquis · · Score: 1

    Those wanting to drench our nations in immigrants are also a tiny loud minority?

    1. Re:What if I told you by Iconoclysm · · Score: 1

      Our nation has been drenched in immigrants since 1776.

    2. Re:What if I told you by Wulf2k · · Score: 1

      I thought it was since around 10-20,000 BC.

    3. Re:What if I told you by aliquis · · Score: 1

      Yeah of course some people settled the land in the first place.
      Back in mid 18th century the population size was less than 2 million.
      Early 20th century the amount of immigrants was <1%.
      Immigration picked up during WWII with a bit higher around 1969 for some reason and then in the 80s to mid 90s especially with war in former Yugoslavia and then went completely bananas since 2011 up until now. They said the new law would only bring in a few more work and relative immigrants and cost 1.7 billion SEK (/ year I assume) but clearly it attracted a lot of asylum seekers the budget for immigration is in the tens of billions of SEK of course and since that money goes to the municipalities too maybe that do a decent job covering stuff like more pressure onto schools and a demand for more teachers and such.
      However bringing those people in become a at-least two generations long commitment, I assume most of the cost fall into that migration post in the budget for the first three years when the migration office have the responsibility but then it leave them and become state and municipal responsibility through the general welfare systems and since the engagement in the job market, the salaries, the taxes paid are lower and the need for additional benefits to sustain the salaries or get a job with economical support as an encouragement for the employer, the extra needs in schools, police, courts are higher bringing people in doesn't become a cost which only exist for one or three years but rather for life. And so far the second generation of people with an immigrant background still under-performs and cause more trouble so likely there's still some cost even there. .. and that's in the old Sweden where the majority at-least were Swedes. Who knows how this new Lebanon made up of a bunch of different ethnicities and behaviors will do. Likely slightly worse I assume. Also as the country sinks more of the people who perform better than average will likely leave for something better.

  63. Good to hear it lacks an agenda.... by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    I think if people are honest, they have to admit Hollywood has a recent history of trying really hard to "preach" a certain agenda. When the star in Capt. Marvel was quoted making comments about the movie not being for white males and so on, it definitely turned me off to having interest in buying a ticket for it.

    I've heard nothing but praise for some of the throwback 90's nostalgia in it though, which I think is positive. (The throwback to 70's - 80's nostalgia found all over "Stranger Things" is part of what made that series such a success too.)

    I might check this one out, after all.

  64. Don't count your chickens before they're hatched. by Pluvius · · Score: 1

    This is an MCU movie with no competition marketed to pander to woke people so extensively that it was even released on International Women's Day. No one with a brain thought it was going to have a bad opening weekend. You won't get a good idea of how the movie has been received until next weekend. It's like The Last Jedi--that movie had a massive opening only to drop 67.5% in the second week, ending up making 33% less than The Force Awakens and having knock-on effects on the rest of the franchise. Captain Marvel probably won't turn into that sort of disaster for various reasons (primarily that it's not considered a core movie), but there's no reason to be celebrating some sort of political or moral victory just yet.

    BTW, despite Rotten Tomatoes going to every effort to purge the reviews of bad actors, the audience score for Captain Marvel is still only 57%.

    Rob

  65. good movie, not feministic, just a character story by AndrewFlagg · · Score: 1

    anyone who looks at the MCU about Captain Marvel, history shows us that it has been played by both men and women. what's next, do I dare ask? I believe the power struggle on who should wear the title is a matter of opinion and not principle. look at Into The Spiderverse where the message is anyone can be SpiderMan, as a symbol of good. With great power comes great responsibility. Captain Marvel is a character as scripted by the movie as one born from the energy exposure of the infinity stones; The Space Stone (Tesseract). its a good movie. onto phase 4.

  66. Captain Marvel Sucked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was a pile of trash.

  67. Passable origin story by LostOne · · Score: 1

    The movie is passable as an origin story. As far as I can tell, mostly the only people that are finding egregious SJW agenda driven pandering in it are people who either a) haven't seen it yet, b) decided they were going to hate it and looked for every little flaw to back their preconceived notion (confirmation bias), or c) are doubling down so they don't have to admit they might have been wrong. Sure, some people just don't like the movie. And that's fine. I thought it was okay. And that's fine too. Yet others absolutely love it. And that is also fine.

    Is Captain Marvel the best movie of all time? No. It has issues. Some of those issues are precisely because it *is* an origin story. Keep in mind that it has to lay the character groundwork for *people who know nothing about the comics*. If you already know much of what is going to happen ahead of time, of course it's going to seem slow or boring. But you'll find that *most* of the cinema-goers *gasp* don't read the comics. Some of the issues are maybe due to direction or scripts. I rather suspect a nontrivial number of them are due to editing decisions. But overall, the movie was entertaining and I don't feel like my admission price was wasted.

    I think the biggest problem with Captain Marvel is simply that the marketing was badly flawed and agenda driven. And even then, it didn't really blow up until Larson opened her yap and said something less than brilliant at which point agenda driven shills, etc., ran with it.

    --

    If it works in theory, try something else in practice.
    1. Re:Passable origin story by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      And even then, it didn't really blow up until Larson opened her yap and said something less than brilliant at which point agenda driven shills, etc., ran with it.

      It seems uncharitable to put the fault for the "controversy" on the people who believed Larson's misandrist statements rather than on Larson for making the misandrist statements.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    2. Re:Passable origin story by LostOne · · Score: 1

      >It seems uncharitable to put the fault for the "controversy" on the people who believed Larson's misandrist statements rather than on Larson for making the misandrist statements.

      Sure, Larson touched off the storm. But it would have been just another celebrity saying something stupid if not for the boatloads of internet types, etc., that all decided the movie had to be garbage, even though they hadn't seen it yet, based on the sayso boatloads of others, who also hadn't seen the movie yet. Lather, rinse, repeat, in a giant circle-jerk.

      Is that uncharitable? Yes. And they deserve it.

      Does that make me an asshole? Probably. And I'm fine with that.

      --

      If it works in theory, try something else in practice.
    3. Re:Passable origin story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You had me at "giant circle-jerk."

    4. Re:Passable origin story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really, if someone was butthurt from what she said its on them. I'm white and male and didn't take offense to her statements at all, but then again I understand my privilege and don't pose as a victim for sympathy, that tripe is so beneath me.

  68. Re: Waaaaaaaah, I'm a white male VIIIIIICTIM!(sobb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At least he is not a stupid ugly n1gger like you. Go back to your shitty n1ggerstan, dumb bitch.

  69. Re:Waaaaaaaah, I'm a white male VIIIIIICTIM!(sobbi by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    You just proved his point.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  70. Well it is a Marvel movie by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Even a baM marvel movie can make money, and what I hear from real people, is that the movie is bad.

    Second wake take will be more interesting to see.

    Personally I wasn't going to see it in a theater anyway, as I have watched pretty much every Marvel movie at home (and plan to keep up the trend even with the new Spider Man and Infinity War conclusion). I'll wait to hear from others if I even decide to rent it...

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  71. US NA sales are crap. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Success wrong.. Chances are the overseas numbers are a lie also. Theater I was in had less folks in this movie on opening weekend than Alita which was 1 month old. The paid actor they had in the front dressed like captain marvel we watched for 30 minutes waiting, 5 kids went to see, the rest walked around.

  72. Meh, still not watching it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only good thing the character has ever done was almost die to Rogue giving her the ability to fly and basic super strength permanently. Danvers is the reason War Machine dies in the comics, she lets him die.

  73. Re:good movie, not feministic, just a character st by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm not seeing any films until Danny DeVito stars as Wonder Woman.

  74. "SMASHES" Record by Khyber · · Score: 1

    For a specific month? Fuck that noise, wake me up when they do it for a fucking half-decade in a single month. That's a real record. This "story" is just marketing fucking fluff made up by idiots.

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.
  75. Headline would be different by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If it was a white male saying similar to what the movie's star did. Double standards are no standards.

  76. Re: Waaaaaaaah, I'm a white male VIIIIIICTIM!(sobb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Good work, Boris! You get a 10 ruble bonus!

  77. Re: Balogney! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is it that the people who ostensibly hate toxic masculinity consistently insult men by conservative masculine norms? Cowardice, lack of virility, unattractive, tiny dick...

    Whatever happened to muh gender is a social construct? I guess not when it comes down to it eh.

  78. Re: Balogney! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because the same reason everyone that disagrees with me is my enemy and I must win by any means necessary.

    I mean, there is literally an Antifa group called BAM, (By Any Means), and the first step to fighting an enemy with this mindset is to dehumanize them.

  79. "Who cares what other people think?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The correct answer to this is "You, obviously, or you would not have replied."

  80. Ok, then be journalists by reanjr · · Score: 1

    If ignorant pre-reviewers aren't relevant, why do journalists keep writing stories about them?

  81. Re:Don't count your chickens before they're hatche by Iconoclysm · · Score: 1

    None of that changes the fact that it has the 6th best opening weekend of all time.

  82. Re:Waaaaaaaah, I'm a white male VIIIIIICTIM!(sobbi by dcw3 · · Score: 1

    Trolls like you are part of the problem. You're making the world a shittier, more hateful place. Now go apologize to your parents for letting them down.

    His parents should apologize to us for not doing a better job.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  83. Brie confusion by sabbede · · Score: 1

    I can't seem to avoid mixing up Bries Larson and Olson. As a result, my expectations for the movie are all over the place.

  84. Re:Waaaaaaaah, I'm a white male VIIIIIICTIM!(sobbi by JackieBrown · · Score: 1

    Are you trying to prove his point with this post?

  85. Re: Balogney! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, quoting an asshole's own words back at him is total hypocrisy on the part of the ... quoter.

    How much simpering self-pity does it take to come up with that logic?

  86. Metacritic would say otherwise by Chissblue · · Score: 2

    3.3 was the User Score for Metacritic and RT deleted 55,000 Audience Scores. Take any side you want. Disney probably spent 500 million promoting the movie and making sure it played every 10 minutes all weekend in theaters.

  87. All I can say by sproketboy · · Score: 1

    is I'm glad I adblock /.

  88. Identity Politics by skam240 · · Score: 2

    A great way to avoid identity politics in movies is to do what I do and stay off Twitter, Reddit, and any other platform that gives a voice to the masses. I don't notice most of the "horrible indiscretions" on my own (probably because they aren't worth noticing) and without the outrage police screaming in my ear from either the right or the left I get to just watch and like or dislike a movie or show without a bunch of lame drama just like I used to years ago.

    I would think this would work for anybody who doesn't care about the outrage machine and identity politics. Without some one constantly telling you to be outraged, it's much easier to let things that really just dont matter slide by.

    Sadly though, this would never do a thing for those that want to be outraged. They'll keep finding reasons to be outraged because deep down that's what they want.

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  89. Fuck Disney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Disney has been a bad actor in multiple venues for decades: Bribing congress to extend copyright terms, brainwashing children into their plastic, homogenized version of reality, ruining vast swaths of the Everglades for their phony plastic castles, and now dominating pop culture through Star Wars and Marvel.

    Yes, posting as AC. If anonymity was good enough for Benjamin Franklin, it's good enough for me.

    1. Re:Fuck Disney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And yet Disney swims in cash while you can only wallow in your own filth. How does defeat taste like, sad nerd?

    2. Re:Fuck Disney by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, "survival of the fattest."

  90. Sow why is the movie getting rolled then? by skam240 · · Score: 1

    "There's plenty of legitimate arguments against what people were actually upset about, reducing it to the strawman "omg they're sexists mad because it's a female lead!" is inaccurate and demonstrates you're every bit as intellectually dishonest as the people you're criticizing."

    Captain Marvel seems to have generated a certain amount of outrage as illustrated by the online trolling it received both now and before the movie came out. The reason a lot of people blame sexism over the female lead for this is because they're searching for an explanation for the outrage and it seems to fit what is going on. If Captain Marvel was just a bad movie the outrage wouldn't have been there prior to the movie's release and it wouldn't have been there after the movie came out as bad movies happen. i don't remember outrage when John Travolta's Gotti came out and I don't remember mass internet trolling happening over how terrible that film was. Gotti certainly never had more reviews than Infinity War ever got pop up on Rotten Tomatoes on its opening day, tanking the movie's rating.

    So then is the movie, Captain Marvel itself sexist and that's the problem people are getting outraged over? Again, there certainly wouldn't have been the outrage prior to the movie coming out. After that, I think most people just don't see that as there are plenty of positive male roles in the movie and Captain Marvel herself just doesn't practice much "male bashing".

    So given all that, if sexism over the female lead isn't the driving force behind all of the outrage this movie is getting, what is it?

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
  91. It wasn't bad, it wasn't great by Rastl · · Score: 1

    Spoiler - I'm female so if you want to let that influence your responses to my post then so be it.

    I saw the movie this weekend. I have zero exposure to the Marvel comic universes and went in without seeing trailer, reading articles, etc. I went in cold expecting to be told a story. I knew it was an origin movie and adjusted my expectations accordingly.

    As an origin movie it works. The new characters are developed enough to fit into future movies, existing characters are true to what is already in the series, and there were a few "Ohhhhh....." moments for me where things clicked from previous movies.

    Do you NEED to see it before seeing the next Avengers movie? Probably not. Some simple searches on the internet will get you enough information about Captain Marvel in the MCU to get you up to speed.

    It's not in my top X list of movies but it's not something that is too much out of line with the others. Thor: Ragnarok had more things that bothered me than this one, to be honest.

    I will admit the opening scene with the Marvel logo had me tearing up and I wasn't the only one.

  92. Uhh... by skam240 · · Score: 2

    So basically Captain Marvel was a sexist movie because Brie Larson said 2 things you didn't like?

    One of them not even about the Captain Marvel movie no less...

    --
    I ignore Anonymous Coward posts. If you want to discuss something, that's awesome. Log in.
    1. Re: Uhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No you fucking white Knight cuck. The movie sucked, the actress belongs in a porn movie instead. How do you fucking nerds still like this crap that marvel puts out. Jesus Christ, marvel and DC are dead. Stan Lee is dead. They are owned by big business now, every movie going forward from them will have an agend. You can count on it.

  93. Controversy drives sales by GuB-42 · · Score: 1

    Controversy is a common sales tactics for violent video games. GTA success was built on that. They generated artificial controversy for how immoral and violent and bad that game was, yet, they were careful enough not to get an "adult only" rating so that every kid can buy it. It has proven successful. Note that while recent installments are huge and stand by their own merits, the first ones were not particularly remarkable.

    Here, the controversy played in their favor too. From people who have seen it, it seems to have enough buttkicking to be enjoyable but that's about it. But thanks the the controversy, people talk about it, are curious, etc... so they go watch that particular generic superhero movie. Too bad it eclipsed Alita, which is also a superhero-ish movie with a strong female lead, a much better one IMHO.

  94. Idiot here! by nospam007 · · Score: 1

    "Suggesting that a sad, extremely vocal minority of idiots on the internet don't actually matter in the slightest."

    We know, but we still hate it.

  95. News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stupid movie gets bad review but also makes tons of money. OUTRAGE. If you see this movie you are supporting all that is wrong with our culture. OUTRAGE. If you hate this movie you are a sexist bigot. OUTRAGE. I am soon outraged that someone made a movie I had no intention of seeing. On top of that a bunch of meanies rated poorly! To too it all of it made lots of money showing those basement dwellers who's who. I'm so OUTRAGED. This shouldn't be allowed to happen. Twitter will hear of this.

  96. Long term damage to the brand by z3razerviper · · Score: 1

    The Last Jedi did decent as well but long term it really hurt the brand. My son and I have yet to see Solo because of how bad the last jedi was....I can see the same happening because of Captain Marvel...and why is it when someone on the left hears something they dont like its always trolls....

  97. Enough Comic Book Movies by bobbutts · · Score: 1

    I'd rather watch paint dry than another dolled up rip of of the same movie for the 100'th time. I don't care about the gender aspect or anything else, I would just like it if the adult audience would grow up and stop going to these pointless children's movies.

  98. WW wasn't the lead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WW wasn't the lead, Cpt Kirk was. THAT'S why it's ok to say that it's a "good" female lead movie. She was a co-star at best.

  99. Poser gramps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh fuck off! You might be a 6 digit, but you ain't THAT LOW of a 6 digit to remember those days. GTFO, poser!

  100. Re:Don't count your chickens before they're hatche by Pluvius · · Score: 1

    And The Last Jedi had the seventh-biggest opening weekend of all time (and third-biggest domestically, while CM barely made the top 20).

    Incidentally, Avatar is still the highest-grossing movie of all time by a long way, yet it ended up almost completely disappearing from the public consciousness within a year after release.

    Rob

  101. I saw the movie on premiere day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..on a copy from the internet, a decent one also, and the movie sucked.
    Hollywood industry is laundering money with these "blockbusters" and the reason that no one discovered this before the recent years, is because most earlier blockbuster was good. But with these bad "blockbusters" beaing mad, they cant hide it anymore.

  102. review bombing? by jejones · · Score: 1

    If you want to see review bombing, just google "captain marvel" "i'll make it very simple and clear".

  103. It was still a lousy movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and yes, she was neither hot enough nor smiling enough. All in all, totally mediocre.

  104. the only real question that matters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is it better than Blade?

  105. Captain Marvel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This movie is AWFUL...the money it is making has nothing to do with Brie Larson...they could have made SO MUCH more if they had actually found someone likable. This is one of Marvel's worst.

  106. Here we go by Evtim · · Score: 1

    https://youtu.be/9pQNYeOEFJc

    Even RLM takes offence from Brie Larsen.....

  107. Re:Waaaahh!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You should be beaten, raped, and thrown in the gutter. There's your male privilege for you. Now, fucking killl yourself you worthless piece of garbage. May all that is unholy fall upon you and grind you into the worthless shit that you are! Fuck off!

    the pathetic living punchline that is impersonating gerald butler

  108. Re:Waaaahh!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Fat fuck's best skill is projection.

  109. Re:Your best skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm sorry that your retarded uncle molested you while you were watching Children's Television Workshop and Mister Rogers. That must've been traumatic. But, please, don't take it out on other children. Get help now.

    the pathetic living punchline that calls itself gerald butler

  110. Re:Your best skill? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha. Now you are just wishing. You wish you could suck your own dick. But being a fat fuck means you cant even see your own dick, much less suck it.

    As I am not a fat fuck like yourself I could suck my own dick if I wanted to. But as I am not a fat fuck like yourself I've got a beautiful woman who takes care of that on the reg. A tubolard like you just plain old sucks all by himself.

  111. Re:Bzzzt! Thank you for Playing.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's your fucking point? You don't like the words I use? So fucking what. I could give a rats ass what you think. All the CHILD MOLESTERS USING STOLEN IDENTITIES who can't be bothered to put their names to their words can fuck themselves. Also, you fucking pieces of shit who want to dictate what language people can use can fuck yourselves too. You are my mortal enemy. The time has come for violence. You and yours are on one side me and those who value freedom of expression are on the other. You seek to undermine democracy and freedom by restricting speech. I will oppose you. Violently if necessary. Simple as that. This is a war. You will lose.

    the pathetic living punchline that is impersonating gerald butler

  112. Re:Bzzzt! Thank you for Playing.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    weak

  113. Re:Bzzzt! Thank you for Playing.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yawn. Please stop eating your own shit! It's nasty. Stop molesting children! You can't hide behind anonymity you worthless coward.

    the pathetic living punchline that is impersonating gerald butler

  114. Re:Bzzzt! Thank you for Playing.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    weak.