Forwarding an email you've received to a wave email account to turn it into a collaborative discussion. Having a nice offline rich editor when no Wave desktop client exists is nice, too (Yes, I know Google Gears exists for that). Being able to set up mobile devices or programmatic scripts to be able to create waves would be simpler if an already-understood protocol could be used. Think of email-to-txt gateways as another example of why this is helpful.
You don't have to have all the DSLAMs in the CO. You can run fiber out to a remote point and put a DSLAM wherever you want. Yes, it costs money to do this. Maybe they should try using that Universal Service Fund for something real.
Actually, driving it 5x as often only puts them even with each other. It was a 5x higher savings on the less efficient pair. So now you'd be saving the same amount. If you drove the second scenario car MORE than 5x as often, you'd be better off replacing it instead.
I think their focus is more on coverage than raw speed. Since these tests were all done in major cities, Verizon's major selling point is instantly made irrelevant.
I'm not talking about there being too much traffic. I'm talking about mob action, like 15 people going at once from one side of a 4-way stop instead of waiting in sequence, or a mob of bicycles crossing at a red light, cutting off traffic.
Maybe you're not familiar with what ridiculously "proving the wrong point" lengths these groups go to.
Don't tell me you're defending them. Yes, people have a right to assemble. No, assembling in the middle of the street and blocking traffic doesn't count.
The government should manage it, the company should pay. That would keep the motives separate, anyway. Not that we really want to put something as slow as a government in charge. But it might prove to be better than a corporation.
If my knowledge of B-movies is correct, there's already a GUI interface with 3D graphic modelling too (in Visual Basic, no less)! It's just a matter of typing a few parameters on a keyboard. How real supercomputers got mixed up in a cheap disaster movie, I'll never know.
Slashdot Mirror
Email integration is a good idea for a server feature, not a protocol feature. I think you're confused.
If the SIM card fits (3G model).
Is that still true now that it's gone public? I thought they would open up federation at that point.
The example server they created loses all data on restart. The federation protocol works fine - write your own server.
Forwarding an email you've received to a wave email account to turn it into a collaborative discussion. Having a nice offline rich editor when no Wave desktop client exists is nice, too (Yes, I know Google Gears exists for that). Being able to set up mobile devices or programmatic scripts to be able to create waves would be simpler if an already-understood protocol could be used. Think of email-to-txt gateways as another example of why this is helpful.
In other words, Google Wave is Gmail. I want a Thunderbird. Wave might not be so freaking slow if it were running on a native desktop client.
Doesn't Google's wifi van do that pretty well?
And nobody noticed-hence, it's still news to many people.
You don't have to have all the DSLAMs in the CO. You can run fiber out to a remote point and put a DSLAM wherever you want. Yes, it costs money to do this. Maybe they should try using that Universal Service Fund for something real.
With that countdown, you are clearly cuing and not queuing.
It's just a play on the word roulette.
I think they mean
00
01
10
11
It represents 4 states the same way that 10 (decimal) represents 100 states. In other words, not at all (except for having 2 digits).
Actually, driving it 5x as often only puts them even with each other. It was a 5x higher savings on the less efficient pair. So now you'd be saving the same amount. If you drove the second scenario car MORE than 5x as often, you'd be better off replacing it instead.
I think their focus is more on coverage than raw speed. Since these tests were all done in major cities, Verizon's major selling point is instantly made irrelevant.
I'm not talking about there being too much traffic. I'm talking about mob action, like 15 people going at once from one side of a 4-way stop instead of waiting in sequence, or a mob of bicycles crossing at a red light, cutting off traffic.
Maybe you're not familiar with what ridiculously "proving the wrong point" lengths these groups go to.
Don't tell me you're defending them. Yes, people have a right to assemble. No, assembling in the middle of the street and blocking traffic doesn't count.
I thought it was a 3D printer that printed LEGO bricks themselves.
Wow...and you even used the word cuecat - but you somehow missed on the proper usage of cue.
Better question - why do they expect people to pay them to do something they can so easily do themselves with standard QR codes?
It's not forced labor if you can decide to forgo the income instead.
And you can include an Objective C app that has nothing but a UIWebView window loading a SWF file from Javascript.
woorsh?
The government should manage it, the company should pay. That would keep the motives separate, anyway. Not that we really want to put something as slow as a government in charge. But it might prove to be better than a corporation.
If my knowledge of B-movies is correct, there's already a GUI interface with 3D graphic modelling too (in Visual Basic, no less)! It's just a matter of typing a few parameters on a keyboard. How real supercomputers got mixed up in a cheap disaster movie, I'll never know.
Your first mistake was thinking they might actually try and open the PC case.