Yes, but if your employer is aware of the situation but does nothing to rectify it, then your employer is also at fault. In fact one could argue that you would no longer be at fault because by doing nothing your employer is implicitly condoning your behavior.
Those people might be rare, but they're not *that* rare. While I personally wouldn't shoot someone, I see enough examples in the news of people who do reach for a gun over distinctly minor disputes that I know it's a nontrivial risk. A couple of examples right off the top of my head; A woman who opened fire in a dispute with her husband over the setting on the thermostat, and a man who shot his mail-carrier because the mail was late.
That's all well and good in theory, but the reality of the situation for many apartment dwellers such as myself is that if you can't get line-of-sight from your patio, then you just can't get a dish.
The rule does not apply to common areas that are owned by a landlord, a community association, or jointly by condominium or cooperative owners where the antenna user does not have an exclusive use area. Such common areas may include the roof or exterior wall of a multiple dwelling unit.
Sounds like you could stand to take your own advice. I wasn't arguing that he *should* be impeached, I was merely pointing out that determination of guilt for any theoretical crimes doesn't happen until after impeachment.
The big difference between talking to someone next to you and talking on the phone is that the phone conversation goes something like this:
"Hey, it's me. It's ME. MEEEEEEE!!. What's up? I said what's up. I said, what? WHAT? I CAN'T HEAR YOU! ARE YOU STILL THERE? HELLO? HELLOOOOOOO? Huh, guess the call dropped." (redials)...
In fact it was almost exactly one year ago. I seem to recall that company in question having a CEO by the name of "Ted". And in all fairness, the administration was actually in favor of that deal.
You'd have to collect them periodically anyway to replace/recharge the batteries. And you'd have to collect them more frequently if the batteries also had to power a transmitter.
could quite possibly ring [q]uite a few false positives..
Um, so what? A false positive in this case is nothing more than a page to a lifeguard who assesses the situation. Unless it's producing so many false positives that the guards are ignoring the pages, I'd say a few false positives are a good thing. After all, a false positive situation could quickly escalate into a real positive.
My friends, common sense and traditional time-tested dexterity prove that left-handedness is simply wrong. Writing with your right hand is natural law--WRITE MEANS RIGHT! Righteous people know the difference between right and left!
According to the Encylopedia Britannica (1944), "The percentage of left-handedness . . . is much higher among inmates of institutions for the feeble minded and the psychopathic." Yet these "biological errors" are campaigning for special recognition as a legitimate minority to force you to accept their immoral behavior. Worse yet, the schools are encouraging deviant-handed diversity and facilitating the use of sinful southpaw scissors!
The Bible says, "A wise man's heart is at his right hand; but a fool's heart at his left" (Ecclesiastes 10:2), and "Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into the EVERLASTING FIRE" (Matthew 25:41).
"Theories relative to handedness vary in their treatment of it as an acquired or a native trait," says the Britannica. Many experts believe that left-handedness is learned and can be corrected. With repentance and reparative therapies, sinners caught in the lecherous leftist lifestyle can be converted and cured. Yes, right righteousness and healthy handedness is possible! Many ex-southpaws have become normal, happy right-writers. Some have even held hands, gotten married, and had children!
But the militant leftist lobby says they were "born that way." They cite evidence that it's genetic, morally neutral, and normal! Well, that doesn't mean we have to teach children that it's OK to respect people who are different! Any nonjudgmental mention of left-handedness is "promotion" of wrong behavior, encouraging vulnerable young children to experiment with alternative handedness!
Since right-thinking people believe that wrong-handedness is immoral, we will force the schools to teach only OUR beliefs to YOUR children!
Ah, I love guys like you... "I have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about, but I'm not going to let that stop me from vomiting up an opinion anyway."
Slashdot Mirror
Yes, but if your employer is aware of the situation but does nothing to rectify it, then your employer is also at fault. In fact one could argue that you would no longer be at fault because by doing nothing your employer is implicitly condoning your behavior.
at least get the GIMP to the point of real feature parody
I think the word you're looking for here is 'parity'. It's already a parody, that's pretty much the problem.
Jesse Helms used to do that too.
Maybe I'm missing something, but if the test for mad cow doesn't actually detect it, what's the point of even having the test in the first place?
What you propose is no better than what she did
Exactly. If what she did is not against the law, then neither is this solution.
A "daggit" is a dog. While the robotic version looked more like a little bear, the only live "daggit" seen in the show was clearly an ordinary dog.
Those people might be rare, but they're not *that* rare. While I personally wouldn't shoot someone, I see enough examples in the news of people who do reach for a gun over distinctly minor disputes that I know it's a nontrivial risk. A couple of examples right off the top of my head; A woman who opened fire in a dispute with her husband over the setting on the thermostat, and a man who shot his mail-carrier because the mail was late.
Stupid theists... Everyone knows there's no such thing as a *nice* chianti.
Hasn't the Daily Show been on tv for more than eight years? Or do they just consider the Craig Kilborn years to be a completely different show?
That's all well and good in theory, but the reality of the situation for many apartment dwellers such as myself is that if you can't get line-of-sight from your patio, then you just can't get a dish.
The rule does not apply to common areas that are owned by a landlord, a community association, or jointly by condominium or cooperative owners where the antenna user does not have an exclusive use area. Such common areas may include the roof or exterior wall of a multiple dwelling unit.
Sounds like you could stand to take your own advice. I wasn't arguing that he *should* be impeached, I was merely pointing out that determination of guilt for any theoretical crimes doesn't happen until after impeachment.
Might want to crack a civics textbook... Impeachment happens *before* any trial can take place.
The big difference between talking to someone next to you and talking on the phone is that the phone conversation goes something like this:
"Hey, it's me. It's ME. MEEEEEEE!!. What's up? I said what's up. I said, what? WHAT? I CAN'T HEAR YOU! ARE YOU STILL THERE? HELLO? HELLOOOOOOO? Huh, guess the call dropped." (redials)...
In fact it was almost exactly one year ago. I seem to recall that company in question having a CEO by the name of "Ted". And in all fairness, the administration was actually in favor of that deal.
That's what jury nullification is for.
Calling Scientology a religion is a lot like calling Dunkin' Donuts a restaurant.
Because internet gambling makes the baby Jesus cry.
Seriously, that's all I got...
I think we can all agree that a prequel would be pretty lame.
"So how do we get this thing to work? Any ideas? Oh well, maybe next week."
Six years of signing statements
You'd have to collect them periodically anyway to replace/recharge the batteries. And you'd have to collect them more frequently if the batteries also had to power a transmitter.
Wasn't that an episode of MacGyver?
Koenig (not that they're very little ;))
On the contrary, Walter Koenig is a tiny, tiny man.
could quite possibly ring [q]uite a few false positives..
Um, so what? A false positive in this case is nothing more than a page to a lifeguard who assesses the situation. Unless it's producing so many false positives that the guards are ignoring the pages, I'd say a few false positives are a good thing. After all, a false positive situation could quickly escalate into a real positive.
My friends, common sense and traditional time-tested dexterity prove that left-handedness is simply wrong. Writing with your right hand is natural law--WRITE MEANS RIGHT! Righteous people know the difference between right and left!
According to the Encylopedia Britannica (1944), "The percentage of left-handedness . . . is much higher among inmates of institutions for the feeble minded and the psychopathic." Yet these "biological errors" are campaigning for special recognition as a legitimate minority to force you to accept their immoral behavior. Worse yet, the schools are encouraging deviant-handed diversity and facilitating the use of sinful southpaw scissors!
The Bible says, "A wise man's heart is at his right hand; but a fool's heart at his left" (Ecclesiastes 10:2), and "Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into the EVERLASTING FIRE" (Matthew 25:41).
"Theories relative to handedness vary in their treatment of it as an acquired or a native trait," says the Britannica. Many experts believe that left-handedness is learned and can be corrected. With repentance and reparative therapies, sinners caught in the lecherous leftist lifestyle can be converted and cured. Yes, right righteousness and healthy handedness is possible! Many ex-southpaws have become normal, happy right-writers. Some have even held hands, gotten married, and had children!
But the militant leftist lobby says they were "born that way." They cite evidence that it's genetic, morally neutral, and normal! Well, that doesn't mean we have to teach children that it's OK to respect people who are different! Any nonjudgmental mention of left-handedness is "promotion" of wrong behavior, encouraging vulnerable young children to experiment with alternative handedness!
Since right-thinking people believe that wrong-handedness is immoral, we will force the schools to teach only OUR beliefs to YOUR children!
AGREE WITH US OR BURN IN HELL!
-M. Dennis Moore
Ah, I love guys like you... "I have absolutely no idea what I'm talking about, but I'm not going to let that stop me from vomiting up an opinion anyway."