Slashdot Mirror


New Stargate Series In the Works

Skythe writes "Gateworld reports that an exclusive, third Stargate series is in the works: 'The new series is in the concept phase, and is being actively worked on by the Vancouver creatives behind Stargate SG-1 and Stargate Atlantis. No concept for the show has yet been revealed.' Gateworld also reports despite the cancellation of SG-1, the series is likely for a 2007 debut. I wonder if the direct-to-dvd movies will any influence on the new series, and what the concept behind the show will be?"

294 comments

  1. New Series by nametaken · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...oh thank god.

    1. Re:New Series by StikyPad · · Score: 2, Funny

      ...oh thank god.

      That's a novel way of spelling "Nnnoooooooo!!!"

    2. Re:New Series by MadJo · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean "Oh thank Apophis"?

    3. Re:New Series by EvilMonkeySlayer · · Score: 1

      Apophis is a false dead god.
      I believe you mean "praise the Ori".

    4. Re:New Series by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      The Ori killed SG-1. I will never consider them gods.

    5. Re:New Series by orkysoft · · Score: 1

      Talk about milking a dead cow!

      (Well, actually, I'll wait and see before I actually form an opinion.)

      --

      I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
    6. Re:New Series by Viper+Daimao · · Score: 3, Funny
      (Well, actually, I'll wait and see before I actually form an opinion.)
      You must be new here, welcome!
      --
      "In the game of life, someone always has to lose. To me, if life were fair, that someone would always be Oklahoma." -DKR
    7. Re:New Series by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically, so did Apophis...

  2. I'm all for it! by cashman73 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    . . . as long as it doesn't involve either (a) a prequel to Stargate SG-1, (b) aliens with big, floppy ears and a jamaican accent, (c) weird time travel/space-time continuum plot lines, or (d) William Shatner!

    1. Re:I'm all for it! by Kethinov · · Score: 1

      How about an explanation for why all the human cultures and aliens across three galaxies all speak English? I'd sure like to know...

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    2. Re:I'm all for it! by Jello+B. · · Score: 2, Funny

      Babel fish! Wait...Wrong story...

    3. Re:I'm all for it! by LiquidEdge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ummm....probably because if they spoke a different language, you might not understand what they're saying, which doesn't make for good television.

      --
      Saving the World: One Drink at a Time
    4. Re:I'm all for it! by Kethinov · · Score: 1

      Funny, it makes for numerous great films. Not to mention the Japanese Anime genres.

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    5. Re:I'm all for it! by TrueKonrads · · Score: 2, Interesting

      In one of the replies by crew of SG(A|-1), they said, that it was impractical, due to schedule for the actors to learn "stargate klingon". Besides, it would require heavy use of subtitling which a lot of people dislike. There is no "in-game" explanation for this.

      --
      Lone Gunmen crew.
    6. Re:I'm all for it! by wo1verin3 · · Score: 3, Funny

      >> or (d) William Shatner!

      Next, on Stargate 9-1-1.

    7. Re:I'm all for it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps English is the highest form of evolved language and all languages spoken by humans will, over time, become English. That would sure upset the French.

    8. Re:I'm all for it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps it has something to do with the Ancients, there might some of them going around providing everyone with the ability to understand each other even though they speak different languages. Because everyone speaking the same language make it easier to fight the Goa'uld/Ori/Wraith or whoever the big bad enemy happens to be.

      Or maybe it is because it would be fucking boring for them to have a linguist learning the language of a new culture every time they went somewhere different. You might not have to do this, because you could make it that because of the Goa'uld everyone in out galaxy speaks the same language and that everyone in the Pegasus galaxy also speaks a single language, but there isn't really much point to doing that.

      Apart from added realism, why is it important that they shouldn't speak English?

    9. Re:I'm all for it! by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      Oh wow, how could they ever do a prequel? ...flash forward 10 years *MY EYES BLEED*

      What I want to see? Hrm, more of the stargate tech available publicly, at least some of the medical, the rapid construction and the transportation tech. Making the world smaller requires the ability to transport people and goods much faster and much cheaper but we need better and wider medical care to cure regional diseases fast.

      Time travel stuff is so beat to death by bad writing that it's now not possible to overcome it. I have however read some novels that are fun, just nothing Ive seen for the screen is really much good but then how many times *can* you do a Connecticut Yankee in King Aurthur's Court?

      This warped continuum might work http://us-p.vclart.net/vcl/Artists/Louis-LeClerc/X file.jpg

      Will..E..Um...Shatterer..is...god, just ask him. Hell just watch that prequel of the show he made famous, compared to that captain he *is* god.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    10. Re:I'm all for it! by somersault · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think you'll find that the people in Japan actually speak that language, they didn't just invent it so that you could hear the people talk funny on Anime.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    11. Re:I'm all for it! by complete+loony · · Score: 1

      Denny Crane.

      --
      09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
    12. Re:I'm all for it! by Apoklypse · · Score: 0

      french is an obsolete language, let it die the death it so richly deserves ...

    13. Re:I'm all for it! by peragrin · · Score: 1, Funny

      Your TV auto translates for you the spoke parts.

      in Stargate SG1 most of the races speaks either goul'd or ancient Egyptian. problems with translations pop up quite frequently.
      in Atlantis most races speak a variation of Ancient, with at least 6 different written versions.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    14. Re:I'm all for it! by jaweekes · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I would like them to take a page from "The Hunt for Red October" and have them speak the first few lines in another language, and then switch to English. You still understand them but you also get the point that they talk another language.

    15. Re:I'm all for it! by Propaganda13 · · Score: 1

      Overused Sci-fi Plot gimmicks
      1. new planet and new problem every week - check
      2. new alien enemy every time the old one get boring - check
      3. lost a long ways from home and trying to get back - Looks like this will be the new Stargate series

    16. Re:I'm all for it! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Which is fine in principle, except that all of the Earth people also seem to speak all of these languages. In the first few episodes of SG-1, they needed Daniel to translate for them. Then everyone started speaking all languages. The only time they ever have language problems now is with the written forms. My experience with learning foreign languages is that the order of difficulty is:
      1. Reading
      2. Listening
      3. Speaking
      4. Writing
      Reading is the easiest, because if you miss something you can go back to it (which you can't with listening), and it's typically easier to build a large passive vocabulary than an active one. If they can speak these languages as fluently as they appear to, they ought to have no problems reading them.
      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    17. Re:I'm all for it! by haplo21112 · · Score: 1

      They used to deal with this in the original movie and in a few episodes in the first season actually. In both cases they show Daniel Jackson working out how to communicate (remember that he is actually an archeologist and language expert) with whatever new aliens they meet. As time progresses in the series they at a few points further explain that most of these human derived cultures speak langauges derived from one or the other of ancient human languages. The implication is that the SG teams are taught and/or learn on the job enough of these languages to get by. Eventually the learning phase can be despensed with for us viewers to concentrate on story.

      --
      Power Corrupts,Absolute Power Corrupts Absolutely, leaving one person(group)in charge is absolutely corrupt.
    18. Re:I'm all for it! by MPHellwig · · Score: 1

      English highest evolved language? More like the most practical lowest common denominator!

    19. Re:I'm all for it! by GeffDE · · Score: 1

      I completely agree that they should be able to read if they are fluent (unless there is some funky spelling or different writing paradigm than we have). But your experience with learning languages is really interesting. For me, it goes Reading -> Writing -> Listening/Speaking. Writing isn't all that tough because, like with reading, you can go back to a trouble spot, or look a word up in a dictionary. However, with listening and speaking, you must do it all in real-time. Listening is hard(er?) for me because half the time, the speaker sounds like s/he is speaking in English, even when I know she is not. And speaking is difficult because you have to "invent" ways to express an idea with tools that aren't very familiar to you yet.

      --
      It has been a nervous year, with people beginning to feel like Christian Scientists with appendicitis.
    20. Re:I'm all for it! by Arwing · · Score: 1

      Without all the items you have listed, you will wipeout 90% of the Sci-Fi shows out there (with possible except of BSG, God bless that show.. ..)

    21. Re:I'm all for it! by dorsey · · Score: 1

      I think we can all agree that a prequel would be pretty lame.

      "So how do we get this thing to work? Any ideas? Oh well, maybe next week."

      --
      hinderfreude ('hin-dur-"froi-d&), n. The feeling of joy derived from being in the way.
    22. Re:I'm all for it! by jahudabudy · · Score: 1

      Have you ever tried to learn Chinese? Reading/writing is quite a bit harder than listening/speaking, at least in my experience, due to the fact that, to me, the written form has no inherent relationship to the spoken form. It is basically "memorize these 1000 pictures and what they mean". I am told that there ARE conventions used such that you can eventually translate a word you have never seen before, but that has proven WAY more difficult to pick up in the written form than the spoken form.

      YMMV, IMHO, yadda yadda yadda

      As for SG-I, at some point, too much realism becomes crappy TV. How come no one ever gets diarrhea, traveling to all these exotic planets and presumably eating all this exotic food?

      --
      ...sometimes, in order to hurt someone very badly, you have to tell that person terrible lies. - PA
    23. Re:I'm all for it! by james_orr · · Score: 1

      Would that be the same if you tried to read, say, traditional Chinese? I think that would be a more accurate analogy for an english speaker rather than something like spanish, french or german.

    24. Re:I'm all for it! by Nuskrad · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wasn't aware that "Jaffa, kree!" was English

    25. Re:I'm all for it! by Fishstick · · Score: 1
      also get the point that they talk another language.
      ...with a heavy scottish accent :-)
      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    26. Re:I'm all for it! by Criterion · · Score: 1

      Oops.. looks like you missed the beginning of Atlantis.. so... NEXT!

      4. They travel through the parallel universe mirror and find a situation where they have discovered large, living ships which have developed a symbiotic relationship with another species as a traveling companion and pilot. ...

      Yeah... don't know about anybody else, but I still miss Farscape something fierce. :/

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
    27. Re:I'm all for it! by CaptnMArk · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't mind Shatner, as long as time travel was used to get the one from 40 years ago.

    28. Re:I'm all for it! by Anomalyst · · Score: 1

      Followed at 10 by "Stargate Hooker", sorry for the late hour, even though one of the characters/actors is a "little person", this aint a kiddie show.

      --
      There is no right to feel safe thru security vaudeville at the expense of everyone's freedom, privacy and tax money.
    29. Re:I'm all for it! by DarenN · · Score: 1

      I'm all for it, as long as he's Denny Crane, civilian advisor to Stargate ops.
      "You think you're a god, but I'm Denny Crane. Say it!".

      --
      Rational thought is the only true freedom
    30. Re:I'm all for it! by popeye44 · · Score: 1

      Next on Stargate TJ Hooker.

      --
      Inane Comments are Generously Disregarded
    31. Re:I'm all for it! by Mercano · · Score: 1

      When SG-A was in pre-production, one of the things they were supposed to find in the city, along with the puddle jumpers, were universal translators, which would covered this plot hole nicely. Surprised it got dropped. Of course, then you don't get Zelenka and his Czech rants or people who can't read Ancient, so its a trade off. Given that everyone's been speaking english on SG-1 for seven years at this point, its not a big deal, I guess. (Though there were those monk in Children of the Gods who didn't speak English.)

      --
      #include <signature.h>
    32. Re:I'm all for it! by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      You mean Stargate Sagittarius-Aries-Aries, right?

    33. Re:I'm all for it! by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1
      Not Chinese, but I learned a bit of Japanese, and I found it easier to read Kanji (which uses the same ideograms as Chinese) than I did to speak or understand spoken Japanese. The kana were even easier, but I didn't spend as much effort learning them because I want to learn Chinese at some point and so knowing Kanji is more useful long-term.

      To the other poster, I find speaking easier than writing, because people are more likely to notice if you mess up some grammar when you are speaking. You can get away with a lot more errors when speaking a language than you can when you write it, because other people can't go back and check you actually did make a mistake.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    34. Re:I'm all for it! by NinjaFarmer · · Score: 1

      Actually from the interviews, they simply decided that doing the whole translation thing was boring so they dropped it completely.

    35. Re:I'm all for it! by dgatwood · · Score: 1

      Intriguing thought. The ancients spoke a predecessor/variant of Latin, which would mean that everyone might have been exposed to that as a base language. I'm not sure where they would get the Germaanic influence, though. Without that, language would probably converge towards Italian or some other language that's closer to Latin than English.

      This, of course, would still require that they interacted with the ancients in some useful way. Otherwise, it should converge towards Coptic or some other language descended from ancient Egyptian... which would make it complete gibberish to almost anyone living today. The last language descended from Ancient Egyptian basically died out as a non-ecclesiastical spoken language more than three hundred years ago.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    36. Re:I'm all for it! by AJWM · · Score: 1

      How about an explanation for why all the human cultures and aliens across three galaxies all speak English?

      It's a little-known and little-understood side effect of radiation emitted by the Gate "flush". It's related technology to the Ancients' knowledge implantation device (the one that zapped O'Neill a couple of times).

      (And yes, I just made that up. Obviously it's so we don't waste a half-hour each episode going through language-learning lessons.)

      --
      -- Alastair
    37. Re:I'm all for it! by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Even if you speak a language fluently, you may not recognize the written form if it's in an unfamiliar alphabet (or worse, if it's not alphabetic at all but ideographic or hieroglyphic). Would you recognize English if it were written in cuneiform?

      (Granted, though, spoken languages tend to mutate faster than written languages. Arguably that isn't true for Goa'uld who are born (hatched? whatever) with ancestral memory. Rebellious slave species might well keep the same spoken language but adopt a new alphabet (or syllabary, etc) as a kind of code.)

      --
      -- Alastair
    38. Re:I'm all for it! by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Have you ever tried to learn Chinese? Reading/writing is quite a bit harder than listening/speaking, at least in my experience, due to the fact that, to me, the written form has no inherent relationship to the spoken form. It is basically "memorize these 1000 pictures and what they mean". I am told that there ARE conventions used such that you can eventually translate a word you have never seen before, but that has proven WAY more difficult to pick up in the written form than the spoken form.

      I'm a visual person. I have done a reasonable job of picking out the radicals. However, even if you know a character has the heart and water radicals, that doesn't tell you whether it might be blood, courage, or something else that someone could think of that is some combination of the meanings. It's something that does a much better job of helping you remember something you just finished learning, rather than letting you understand and pronounce a character you've never seen that represents a word you've never heard before.

    39. Re:I'm all for it! by AJWM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      English highest evolved language? More like the most practical lowest common denominator!

      There's some truth to that. English has never been prissy or stuck up about adopting foreign words, unlike some other languages (*cough* francais *cough*). The language itself is a hybrid of germanic and latin and freely adopts words from indigenous languages everywhere on the planet that the English went (mostly nouns - pajamas (India), boomerang (Australia), kayak (North American Arctic) - although the latter two have been verbed). It also freely adopts made-up words with foreign-language roots (telephone) or from acronyms (laser - from which we back derive the verb "lase") or even code words (compare "tank" vs the German "panzerkampfwagen", the latter being roughly "armoured war wagon", the former being a code used in WW I for the newly developed vehicles, noting the resemblence of the armor plating to water tanks). It's gained widespread use (often in bastardized form) as a trade language.

      --
      -- Alastair
    40. Re:I'm all for it! by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      And the symbols on the Stargate first being constellations as seen from Earth with other gates having symbols relating to their constellations, then to all gates having the same symbols except for the point-of-origin symbol, to the symbols actually being pronounceable in the ancients' language and a planet's future fate being predicted by its location and what the symbols spell (Proclarush Taonas, "lost in fire") (though more likely coined to mean that after its fate, like the verb "to burke" coined after the name of murderer William Burke (1792-1829)), to the gates in the Pegasus galaxy having completely different symbols than found in the Milky Way and again resembling constellations, but don't spin or change position. Gates in the Asgard home galaxy (of which we've seen only one) have symbols like Milky Way gates.

      All one can say about gates in the Ori galaxy is that the supergates they build in the Milky Way don't appear to have symbols, yet can also be dialed in extreme conditions by Pegasus gates.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    41. Re:I'm all for it! by FhnuZoag · · Score: 1

      You know, I still like them to explore the multiple universes storyline. (Remember the mysterious mirror that they discovered before Apophis' first invasion? I don't buy the idea that they really packed that away forever. What about mirror universe versions of the mirror?) A sort of Stargate version of Sliders, really.

    42. Re:I'm all for it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They said in the commentaries on one of the box sets that they all speak english to save 30 minutes of tv time from having to "learn" the language. It was just easier to have them all to where you understood them flat out.

    43. Re:I'm all for it! by Mercano · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that covered in 200?

      --
      #include <signature.h>
    44. Re:I'm all for it! by Kesh · · Score: 1

      You do realize you're about to get bludgeoned by the "subbed" vs. "dubbed" debate, right? ;)

    45. Re:I'm all for it! by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 1
      Next, on Stargate 9-1-1.

      Nah... You're thinking of T. J. Stargate, where he jumps on the hood of a pyramid.

      --
      That is all.
    46. Re:I'm all for it! by Jonavin · · Score: 1

      They explained it in one episode. Basically the gate translate the language for them. Kind of like how the TARDIS does it.

      Of course it doesn't explain why sometimes they selectively hear Ancient or Goa'uld, or why they can still understand other people when they're not traveling via the Stargate.

    47. Re:I'm all for it! by NATIK · · Score: 1

      Mayby they got the germanic part from the Asgaard, since it is pretty much established that the Asgaard have been checking out Earth for a long time...

    48. Re:I'm all for it! by Asmor · · Score: 1

      You're kidding, right? They never said anything like that in any episode that I know of. Have a citation?

      The reason they all speak English is because it's a TV show, and while it wasn't so bad in the movie having them slowly learn the natives' language, it would quickly get repetitive when every single episode spends half the time with Daniel Jackson doing a bunch of research to learn how to say "take me to your leader."

    49. Re:I'm all for it! by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      I would like a citation regarding "laser" and "lase". It is my understanding that laser derives from the acroynom "LASER". And though I haven't checked the OED, the only definition of "lase" I've found is an intransitive verb meaning "to be shown upon by a laser."

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    50. Re:I'm all for it! by roie_m · · Score: 1

      What your parent post meant was indeed that laser was derived from the acronym, and "to lase" was derived from that. So, it seems you're in agreement.

    51. Re:I'm all for it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, thanks. I misunderstood.

      -poopd

    52. Re:I'm all for it! by AJWM · · Score: 1

      Yes, precisely. Laser was coined as an acronym (light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation, in turn derived from maser, microwave amplification etc.) but the "-er" ending makes it look like a noun derived from a verb (ie, just as a runner is one who runs, a laser is that which lases). So we "back-derived" the verb "to lase", which means what the stuff in a laser does when it starts emitting stimulated radiation.

      --
      -- Alastair
    53. Re:I'm all for it! by Criterion · · Score: 1

      Not nearly enough.. but I did get a mild thrill out of it. :D

      --
      We have enough youth, how about a fountain of SMART?
  3. If they put Morena Baccarin in it by Timesprout · · Score: 1

    Then frankly I wont care too much what the show concept is, it will be watched regardless.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:If they put Morena Baccarin in it by loraksus · · Score: 1

      GIS for the lazy...

      You Firefly fans won't need it though ;)

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
    2. Re:If they put Morena Baccarin in it by Darthmalt · · Score: 1

      Maybe it's a revival of firefly codenamed Stargate Sg2 hands of blue. Hey I can dream can't I.

    3. Re:If they put Morena Baccarin in it by strider44 · · Score: 1

      I know who she it.

      (I clicked the link anyway)

    4. Re:If they put Morena Baccarin in it by xarak · · Score: 1

      Yeah, or Richard Dean Anderson
      ....
      ...
      ..
      .

      No?

      *cough* *cough*

      --
      Atheism is a non-prophet organisation
    5. Re:If they put Morena Baccarin in it by Trikenstein · · Score: 1
      Make the Stargate team Morena Baccarin, Gina Torres, Jewel Staite, and Summer Glau
      Call it Stargate: Thong

      I am sooooooooo there

    6. Re:If they put Morena Baccarin in it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IBIMB

  4. Hey! by Mullen · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know, they should totally make a Stargate movie! That would be awesome!

    --
    Linux O Muerte!
    1. Re:Hey! by joshier · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't get it..

    2. Re:Hey! by somersault · · Score: 1

      Stargate was originally a movie, SG1 was the spinoff series. If you already know that and just don't find it, I'm sorry, but you just can't tell these days. I know I've been too subtle for people sometimes on /. :p

      --
      which is totally what she said
  5. Stargate: Vice City by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yeah!

    1. Re:Stargate: Vice City by alephsmith · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or possibly.. Stargate: Miami/New York/Las Vegas The same old shit with a different filter on the lens. or how about Stargate: SVU Finally... we can prosecute all those anal probing bastards.

    2. Re:Stargate: Vice City by Jesus_666 · · Score: 3, Funny

      How about a crossover? CSI: Chulak or Jaffa CIS? Or maybe Stargate: Impossible?

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    3. Re:Stargate: Vice City by somersault · · Score: 1

      haha :D that would actually be pretty awesome, if only for one episode. Novelty would wear off after you realise every episode is the same. I've only watched a couple of episodes on CSI but they all involve blatant hollywoodification of the clues - massive chunks of glass or whatever being stuck in people's shoes for example.. and the forensics guy just happens to see the person with the soles of their shoe exposed..

      CSI: Vader could be good.

      Vader: *uses Force Grip/Choke* "tell us - what was the name of the Wookiee whos' fluff resides on your shoe"

      Extremely suspicious suspect: *gurgle*

      Vader: "perhaps a few hours alone with the mind probe will teach your ass some respect"

      etc

      --
      which is totally what she said
    4. Re:Stargate: Vice City by EMH_Mark3 · · Score: 1

      "When it comes to fighting crime, there's only one name in town.

      * random bad guy crashes through glass door *
      Teal: 'Indeed.'

      Teal, P.I., coming this fall."

      --
      Burn the land and boil the sea, you can't take the sky from me
    5. Re:Stargate: Vice City by autophile · · Score: 1

      How about The Dresden Files: Stargate Undead.

      --Rob

      --
      Towards the Singularity.
    6. Re:Stargate: Vice City by paralaxcreations · · Score: 1

      Teal'c

    7. Re:Stargate: Vice City by NinjaFarmer · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, he's blue.

      Really

    8. Re:Stargate: Vice City by Jesus_666 · · Score: 1

      Who's the black private dick
      that's a sex machine to all the chicks?
      (Teal!)
      You're damn right.
      Who is the man
      that would risk his neck for his brother man?
      (Teal!)
      Can ya dig it?
      Who's the cat that won't cop out
      when there's danger all about
      (Teal!)
      Right on.
      You see this cat Teal is a bad mother--
      (Shut your mouth!)
      But I'm talkin' about Teal!
      (Then we can dig it.)
      He's a complicated man
      but no one understands him but his woman
      (Teal'c!)

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  6. Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by pembo13 · · Score: 1

    ...it is better than Atlantis, even at this stage of its lifespan. The third series better be darn good. Fridays are now totally boring on tv, save for discovery channel.

    --
    "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    1. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Didn't we learn this lesson with Futurama vs. The Simpsons?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    2. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 4, Funny

      Learn what? Futurama was much better than The Simpsons.

      And you are like Hitler.

    3. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by messerman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      ...it is better than Atlantis, even at this stage of its lifespan. The third series better be darn good. Fridays are now totally boring on tv, save for discovery channel. You're not watching Doctor Who then, obviously.
    4. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      No, I hear it's good....just have never really given it a chance.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    5. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by Kethinov · · Score: 1

      Are you kidding? Your suspension of disbelief threshold must be high, because my bullshit meter gets set off by the "everyone inexplicably speaks English" problem, personally. The Star Treks were all way better shows than Stargate. Hell even Babylon 5 and Farscape are more consistent and believable than Stargate. Throw in BSG and Firefly and Stargate comes across as third rate.

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    6. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 1

      You're not watching Doctor Who then, obviously.

      The show where the first bad guy (of this version) was a bunch of mannequins coming to life? That would be a no.

    7. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SciFI, Discovery Channel, whats the difference, with all the recent science fiction plots about a global warming...

    8. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by NoTheory · · Score: 1

      Sir, i applaud you for the most humorously capricious invocations of Godwin's Rule i have ever encountered. Bravo.

      --
      There are lives at stake here!
    9. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by SamSim · · Score: 1
      The third series better be darn good.

      Fourth series, I think you'll find.

    10. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by big+tex · · Score: 1

      Or Battlestar Galactica, either.

      --
      I think I need a new sig here.
    11. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by Jaruzel · · Score: 1

      That was a nod to 'classic' Who. It had to be done to keep the fanbois (and grrls) happy.

      Later on it got much much betterer.

      Jury is still out on Torchwood tho...

      -Jar.

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
    12. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

      The show where the first bad guy (of this version) was a bunch of mannequins coming to life? That would be a no.

      The point of that episode was to set up the new Doc and the new companion, and make it "accessible" to viewers that had never seen Dr Who before. Later episodes are much better.

    13. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by edward2020 · · Score: 0, Troll

      You're all joking right? TV and film generally sucks. I'm gonna go out on a limb here and say that sci-fi novels and short stories make the film and TV version of the genre look like my attempts at writing fiction when I was 10. Take Herbert's Dune for example - he created an awesome world full of history and developed characters. Then take David Lynch's adaption of Dune - it blew monkey dong. Or the Sci/Fi channel's version which was better than Lynch's but of somewhat poor production value. Some stupid things in other sci-fi movies/shows - 1) Star Wars. The Deathstar is probably the stupidest sci-fi invention of all. Though we are approaching the stage in real life where we are able to blow up our own planet, the evil dudes in Star Wars evidently believe that something like the Deathstar is the best way to go about it (George Lucas had probably never heard of anti-matter). 2) Star Trek. Where to start. How about the fact that every alien looks human but have weird shit on their head. Apparently there is some sort of convergent evolution in the Star Trek universe.

      --
      Don't worry about the mule, just load the wagon.
    14. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't bother, you and your 'logic' cannot penetrate the fanboy Vulcan quantum anti-matter cloak of Alderan.

      and besides, Lynch's version of Dune was AWESOME anything with Captin Picard and Sting in it has to be awesome. right? RIGHT?

    15. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by edward2020 · · Score: 1

      OMG! You're so right. Anything with Al from Quantum Leap is good. I think. And even though Star Trek is the functional equivilent of the sitcom Friends we all have to hale it for its positive impact on tearing down the walls segregation and bigotry back in the day. Surely the first inter-racial kiss is what brought our country together. They were, and remain, heroes in every sense of the word. Please donate to the "Save Kirk from Another Telepathic Hot Alien Chick" (SKATHAC) - Kirk needs us now more than ever before!

      --
      Don't worry about the mule, just load the wagon.
    16. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Star trek did actually address the alien head thing. I mean, it's still stupid in many ways, but they mentioned it.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Chase_(TNG_episod e)

    17. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by dmnic · · Score: 1

      you hear it's good, but when you watch it you realize how campy it is.
      thw writing is horrible (makes Atlantis look good), the special efx look like early 1980s rejects, etc...

      granted, I havent watched this new season with the new Dr, but I hope its better than the last 2 seasons. I tried numerous times to get into it but to no avail.

      Dr. Who just screams "B" scifi!

    18. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In a questionable scheduling decision, TPTB put "Rose" and "The End of the World" as the first two episodes. They are the worst two episodes that the rebooted Who has to offer.

    19. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Antimatter is equally ridiculous as the deathstar, really:

      http://qntm.org/destroy#3

    20. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by mlk · · Score: 1

      Torchwood has two types of shows:
      Adult Dr Who - Normally quite good.
      CSI: Wales With Sci-Fi bits - Normally shit. Nothing all that CSI about it, very bad SciFi bits.

      The real WTF is that on paper all of the plots should work. They just don't.

      Luckly the "CSI: Wales" ones are getting less frequent. Hopefully they will soon banish the guns and SUV.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    21. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by cleocrazy · · Score: 0

      You're kidding, right?

      Anyone who considers the new Battlestar Galactica "totally boring" is not much of a sci-fi fan in my book.

      --
      always crazy,
      chris :)

      "the power to riot is anger united" - bis
    22. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Torchwood is definitely wildly variable from one episode to the next which is a shame because it has the potential to be great if they had some kind of over-arching plot linking the episodes together, the problem seems to be that largely they don't except for Captain Jack to keep mentioning everything is about to change and some references to a recent war with the Cybermen in London which appears to have passed the rest of Wales by completely.

      At the moment all that happens each week is either a new alien artifact/creature is discovered and extremely simply neutralised in the case of creatures or realised to be too dangerous for human use in the case of artifacts or random people in Cardiff die through some extremely tenuous connection with aliens.

      I realise they are probably going for a large audience ( i.e. nothing too complicated or interesting ) but I think they really need some direction with the series which might help you engage with the Torchwood team and put them under some real stress. The episode with the Cyberlady could have been great but in the end was just a bit silly.

    23. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by mikeasu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Gotta give a nod to Battlestar Galactica on Fridays. They've had their slow spots, even some of the deus ex machina endings to wrap up a storyline in the space of a single episode, but it's still gotta have some of the best writers I've seen. I love the show.

      Plus, the eye candy isn't too shabby...

      "So Say We All"

    24. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're kidding, right?

      Anyone who considers the new Battlestar Galactica "totally boring" is not much of a sci-fi fan in my book. Guess I'm not then. Not only do I find it boring, I also find it irritating.
    25. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Thats the entire POINT of the Dr. Who franchise. Its SUPPOSED to look campy!

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    26. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      As far as the Doctor Who episodes that have made it across the pond, the series is improving. The plots are getting more interesting and more serious, and the signal-to-fart-joke ratio has increased significantly. They still have a tendency to make the moral dilemmas somewhat sophomoric and obvious, and a lot of episodes still have that deus-ex-machina feel to them. The series appears to have weathered the quick change in Doctors, as well - I liked Chris Eccleston, but David Tennant is doing a good job as well.

      I say "deus ex machina" because the Tardis and the Sonic Screwdriver have scored an awful lot of points since the new series started. Those things should have more enemies than the Doctor by now. But it's different from, say, Star Trek: Voyager, which had its share of deus ex machina moments, but which also routinely terminated each episode through the use of the Magic Reset Button.

      That's where five minutes from the end of the episode, someone has an epiphany (either finally realizing what the audience has known for half an hour, or making a tremendous and impossible leap in logic), does something heroic in the space of 30 seconds, and restores everything to the way it was when the episode started. Nobody dies, nothing important happens, and you could understand the series just as well without seeing the episode.

    27. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      Best writers? The new BSG is ALL eye candy. BSG is by far the cheesiest and most unoriginal scifi show I have see in a very very long time. Here is a rule... When you have to copy your characters from Voyager, you loose any right to be called well written.

    28. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bleh you mean the series that pretty much let the public know canon folks can be considered Mary Sues?

    29. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      But it's different from, say, Star Trek: Voyager, which had its share of deus ex machina moments

      Warp Particles! Intelligent Deuterium Ore!

      Makes you long for someone reversing the polarity of the neutron flow, making the Kessel Run in less than twelve parsecs, or being lightyears ahead of one's time.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    30. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by jandrese · · Score: 1

      It would have been pretty confusing not to have "Rose" first I'd think. Perhaps they just needed to write a better doctor-companion introduction episode?

      That said, my wife really enjoys Dr. Who (despite never seeing the series before then), and she hasn't gotten into BSG at all (too heavy for her apparently).

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    31. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Very well, I shall explain myself. As you seem to have assumed completely the opposite of what I intended.

      When futurama was cancelled, much of the consensus here and elsewhere was that it was a crappy simpsons ripoff, and that it was good that they kept the "true simpsons" on the air instead of sacrificing it for the glory of the hypnotoad.

      Sadly, it turns out that the simpsons cast and writers were quite tired and depleted from their record breaking cartoon run. Further, it appears in retrospect that futurama was far superior as a whole to the simpsons as a whole. Almost as if the writers learned something from their experience on the simpsons....

      But just as we refused to let futurama find its feet, many here dismiss atlantis similarly. I'm not sure if it will turn out that atlantis is superior to sg1, but it is clear that much of the talent behind sg1 is ready for a break. (except perhaps claudia black and ben browder...)

      The only reason I can see for arguing they shouldn't go off the air yet is that the current arc with the Ori seems to be a bit too deep and epic to resolve in the half-season that remains.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    32. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      The only reason I can see for arguing they shouldn't go off the air yet is that the current arc with the Ori seems to be a bit too deep and epic to resolve in the half-season that remains.

      They could always blow up Earth. The end.

    33. Re:Damn them for cancelling SG-1 by edward2020 · · Score: 1

      You're probably right if the purpose is to totally remove a planet from orbit by smashing it into tiny bits. My point about the Deathstar is that it was stupid; if they just wanted the population of a planet gone they could have used nuclear weapons, shifted asteroids onto a collision course with the planet - whatever. And my original point is that - while films like Star Wars and shows like SG-1 were entertaining - they certainly are not a sci-fi universe on par with those created by Peter Hamilton, Frank Herbert, or Dan Simmons. And thanks for the troll mod! lol

      --
      Don't worry about the mule, just load the wagon.
  7. Come ON already by Jethro · · Score: 1

    Why don't they just acknowledge that SG1 is essentially a new Stargate series and just keep it going?

    --


    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    1. Re:Come ON already by kimvette · · Score: 1

      Because you have the fanbois whining about how O'Neill is better than Mitchell, that Mitchell is a wuss, that they should rename the show to "Fargate," and so forth. Is there an analog to the Star Trek fanbois, you know, a slur similar to "Trekkie?"

      --
      The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    2. Re:Come ON already by Jethro · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But that's exactly what I'm saying they should do - rename it Stargate:The Uncharted Territories or whatever the hell and just keep going like we were before. Why invent a 3rd series when we practically already had one?

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    3. Re:Come ON already by Darthmalt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What about Stargate SG1 The new class.

      But you are right it may as well be a new series as much as the cast and focus of the show has changed. I still really like the show but it has changed quite a bit in the past few seasons. After all how many plot lines can you have with the G'ould being the only real enemies. They also have / had the replicators but they are too static as character group to be of interest for too long.

    4. Re:Come ON already by Jesus_666 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Note: I'm from Germany and we're just getting the ninth season, so for me the Ori are still pretty new and fresh. But I'm already getting tired of it. Gone are the daays of exploring the galaxy in order to find new technology to defend Earth - now we have huge-ass warships and pretty much everyone who can hold a gun is our friend. And the Ori are so ridiculously overpowered that suspension of disbelief is getting hard; after all they could easily win by sending priors with planet-devastating powers to Earth and a couple other important planets. It's essentially a battle between godmoders.

      If the show keeps going on like this it's no wonder it didn't survive. As much as I like SG-1, it's too similar to Dragonball Z for comfort.

      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    5. Re:Come ON already by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      You raise a good point. I still really like the series. But it has changed so much so that I just don't compare the current team to the original team.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    6. Re:Come ON already by Jaruzel · · Score: 1
      Is there an analog to the Star Trek fanbois, you know, a slur similar to "Trekkie?"
      • Gaties ?
      • Starbies ?
      • SG-oners ?
      -Jar.

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
    7. Re:Come ON already by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      "pretty much everyone who can hold a gun is our friend."

      mmm, wait a few episodes :-)

    8. Re:Come ON already by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 1

      SG-onanists?

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    9. Re:Come ON already by mlk · · Score: 1

      Nah, Trekkie just think how pissed off both "real" Trekkies and "SG1" Trekkies will get.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    10. Re:Come ON already by way2trivial · · Score: 1

      sgo's
      prononuced
      sickos

      --
      every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
    11. Re:Come ON already by sadler121 · · Score: 1

      You mean like this?

    12. Re:Come ON already by physicsnick · · Score: 1

      [i]Why don't they just acknowledge that SG1 is essentially a new Stargate series and just keep it going?[/i]

      Because they still need to pay millions to the actors who've been on the show for over a decade. SG1 didn't get canned because of low ratings; it got canned because it cost too damn much to pay everyone. They're swapping out SG1 for a new series so they can get a fresh new cast of B actors that they can pay pennies to and keep to themselves all the revenue from the free viewers they'll get from starting a new series in the Stargate franchise.

    13. Re:Come ON already by Jethro · · Score: 1

      so they can get a fresh new cast of B actors that they can pay pennies to

      You'd think they could tone down or outright remove Richard Dean Anderson and the rest of the original cast, and then get someone like, say, Ben Browder or Claudia Black or Morena Baccarin or something for much much cheaper. Oh, wait.

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
    14. Re:Come ON already by physicsnick · · Score: 1

      They got rid of one main actor; they still have three more, genius. Amanda Tapping, Micheal Shanks and Christopher Judge have been on the starring cast for over a decade. They still need to pay them huge sums of money. What's more is that they are all on three year contracts; they can't get rid of the original cast until season 12 unless they cancel the entire show and start over.

      By the way, Richard Dean Anderson is still a producer for SG-1, so even though he's off the cast, he's still costing MGM millions. Starting over without all the baggage is really the best way to go to make the franchise more profitable.

    15. Re:Come ON already by Jethro · · Score: 1

      So what, people just don't know what snark and sarcasm are anymore?

      --


      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
  8. I, for one, by kimvette · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I, for one, welcome our new inter-dimensional overlords. Or something.

    Given the production quality of SG-1 and Atlantis, I'm looking forward to any new Stargate series that comes out. :) I'm kind of disappointed about the alleged "stargate universe" reboot in the rumored sequel, considering that SG-1 picked up fairly nicely from where the original movie left off. It should be entertaining, in any event.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
    1. Re:I, for one, by loraksus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Assuming you even see it... SciFi will probably just end up bumping it with a crappy wrestling show...

      --
      1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  9. Not 2007, but 2008 by Meph0 · · Score: 1

    From what I read in the original article is that it's not likely to be rushed to replace SG-1, but that a 2008 premiere is more likely.

    1. Re:Not 2007, but 2008 by benlwilson · · Score: 0

      Your right, this slashdot article is factually incorrect.

    2. Re:Not 2007, but 2008 by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      Gasp!

    3. Re:Not 2007, but 2008 by Skythe · · Score: 1

      Oops, my bad. I keep forgetting that 2007 is just around the corner.

      Why don't they just acknowledge that SG1 is essentially a new Stargate series and just keep it going?
      They were actually considering that for season 9, renaming it to something like Stargate: Command - which would apparently give better ratings due to renewed interest. However, i think they are beyond that point now, given that they have been running the 'new' SG-1 for almost 2 seasons. On top of that, talk of a third spin-off predates SG-1's axing.

      Personally, im hoping the new series will be more mature in tone, along the lines/closer to that of BSG. Stargate has had almost 13 combined seasons without any truly adult themes/tone, and i think its about time they produce a show that my 5 year old sister can't watch.

    4. Re:Not 2007, but 2008 by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      Your five-year-old sister? How old are you?

  10. It does need a reboot. by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    It's got the inevitable inconsistencies, mostly with the movie. I don't even want to guess at physics problem.

    This is a good thing, and I like the show the way it is -- I like that Daniel Jackson doesn't have to spend the first half hour of every show cracking a new alien language -- but still, it might be good to officially reboot it.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    1. Re:It does need a reboot. by modecx · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they poke fun at the inconsistencies all the time. That in itself is entertaining to me, because at least it shows a good sense of humor, a thing any "reboot" would likely be devoid of.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
    2. Re:It does need a reboot. by p0tat03 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      IMHO the series is in dire need of a reboot, which is why I find myself enjoying Atlantis more than SG1. With a show like SG1 it's far too easy to rely on prior-knowledge and previous episodes, which rewards long-time fans but make the show increasingly unapproachable by new viewers. Since the show isn't gaining many fans, it experiences a net loss of viewers until it inevitably starves itself out and gets canned.

      With Atlantis character development has to be pushed, enemies are still fresh, mysterious, and menacing. Part of the thing with the Goa'uld at the beginning was how little we knew about them. We didn't know their customs, we didn't know too much about their physiology, and we certainly had no idea how to beat them. Part of the problem right now is that they've killed off all the bad guys, necessitating the need to create ever more powerful bad guys - and now we're literally fighting gods. The show's also drifted away from the Stargate-y roots. I enjoyed episodes where the gate would meet strange new enemies through the gate, not... by going to hyperspace and waging intergalactic war in ginormous battlecruisers. Please. Leave that to Star Trek.

    3. Re:It does need a reboot. by pembo13 · · Score: 1

      Then do what I did...watch all the old episodes. We are in the 21st centrury dude, that's a poor excuse.

      --
      "Thanks for all the money you paid to us. We've used it to buy off ISO among other things" -Microsoft
    4. Re:It does need a reboot. by NoTheory · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, one of the things that i found interesting was having the terran military develop technology that let them actually compete with the alien species surrounding them. This could have been really fascinating, but they developed so quickly, and with so little effort, that it really wasn't that interesting. I think they missed a huge opportunity there. The ground they covered though is fascinating, SG-1 went from running around on foot, and having to flee or leave behind anything they couldn't carry, to being able to teleport buildings, use energy weapons and shields, and travel in hyperspace. I wish they'd been more introspective about it (although i guess O'Neil's character didn't really lend itself that).

      Oh well, SG-1 was always soft scifi. Maybe i'm just a hard scifi geek complaining too much :)

      --
      There are lives at stake here!
    5. Re:It does need a reboot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      enemies are still fresh, mysterious, and menacing I think the SG-1 and SG-A have become a bit embarrassing to watch.

    6. Re:It does need a reboot. by NinjaFarmer · · Score: 1

      I'm really not surprised that it the military didn't take long to develop new weapons and everything. SG-1 mostly covered the efforts of the point team, SG-1. It didn't cover the hearts and minds teams, the diplomatic teams, and the R&D teams that are very clearly in the background. With unlimited access to a number of alien technologies, talking to alien tech and weapons experts, etc. While experts weren't common, and it was rare that any were generally a real expert, some things like the staff weapons the military had access to in droves. Also stuff like flyers and ring transporters were easy to get, and the govmint was spending as much money as possible on the research programs.

      That's probably why SG-1 was pissed at that second gate team in the 3rd(? 4th maybe?) season, as they were just taking everything and ruining the diplomacy.

  11. Damn you, Preview button by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    How you mock me.

    That should be:

    I don't even want to guess at inconsistencies in the physics, seeing as they seem to grab anything you ever hear that sounds physicsy, especially if it has words like "quantum" or "dark matter", and include it in some random alien technology.
    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  12. i've never seen the show... by jimfinity · · Score: 2, Funny

    can someone rate it for me? say, on a scale between 1 (farscape) and 10 (the new battlestar)?

    1. Re:i've never seen the show... by nmb3000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      can someone rate it for me? say, on a scale between 1 (farscape) and 10 (the new battlestar)?

      I would have thought 1 would be where Voyager sits? :)

      I'd have to put it at 9.5 or 10, simply because I enjoy it as much as BSG.

      The thing with Stargate is that just like BSG (Black Market), it has a few episodes that just aren't that great (The Light). Also shared with BSG, it's *much* better if you know the backstory and have been watching the show instead of trying to just jump right in (though there are episodes where this would be fine).

      I've watched SG-1 since it first aired in 1997 and can say that I've enjoyed it. Overall it's been quite good and it has had some stellar episodes. Atlantis struggled the first season, but has gotten better over time and I'm looking forward to the rest of the 3rd season.

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    2. Re:i've never seen the show... by jimfinity · · Score: 1

      man, if you think voyager is the worst star trek....you're one lucky person although i'm not sure if i could even go so far as to call "enterprise" a star trek.

    3. Re:i've never seen the show... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMO that's a difficult to judge scale Farscape had some good and some bad. On average I think it would make for a decently high point to start from.

      As far as SG1 goes I think you could find some episodes/storylines that are 0 worthy and some that are 10 worthy.
      It was a good show overall, but it had some really terrible moments.

    4. Re:i've never seen the show... by sco08y · · Score: 1

      I'd give it around a 7, about the same as Next Generation after it started getting good.

      The story is engaging, the acting is very good by American standards, and the characters are well developed. Quite often the science aspect of it is outstanding.

      Downsides: the plots are often too neatly resolved (e.g. turning someone into an alien and then back again with no ill effects) and it has the same problem Deep Space Nine did in that everything revolves around the stargate. And it never builds the dramatic intensity that the new BSG does.

    5. Re:i've never seen the show... by PlasticArmyMan · · Score: 1

      You know, I always liked Voyager. The only thing that spoiled it was the absolute piss poor ending. You have about two minutes focus on Earth's solar system. That's it.

    6. Re:i've never seen the show... by Kethinov · · Score: 1

      I rank Sci Fi shows thusly:

      1. BSG (2003)
      Utterly amazing.

      2. Star Trek DS9
      Similarly utterly amazing.

      3. Star Trek TNG and Star Trek Voyager (tied)
      Damn cool.

      4. Firefly
      Great, but canceled too early.

      5. Farscape
      Great, but canceled too early.

      6. Star Trek Enterprise
      Good, but could have been as awesome as DS9 had it not been canceled so early.

      7. Star Trek TOS
      Decent, great for its time, some episodes are pretty timeless.

      8. Babylon 5
      Lots of potential drowns under bad writing. Too many monologues. Wooden characters. Only Londo and G'Kar were interesting, but didn't get anywhere near as much screentime as the boring characters.

      9. Star Trek TAS
      A travesty, but for hardcore Trek fans it's got some value. (Overly simplistic writing.)

      10. Stargate SG1
      Unresolvable technical problems in the premise and lots of filler.

      11. Stargate Atlantis
      Unresolvable technical problems in the premise and lots of filler.

      12. BSG (1978)
      Numerous unresolvable technical problems.

      13. BSG (1980)
      Numerous unresolvable technical problems.

      14. Dr. Who
      Slapstick comedy masquerading as science fiction.

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
    7. Re:i've never seen the show... by Wite_Noiz · · Score: 0

      Tsh! And where's Quantum Leap in all that? Sliders? Come on! I want /every/ sci-fi (soft, hard, slap-stick or other) listed pronto! ;)

      I find it strange that you've ranked the new BSG so highly - Apart from the high budget, there's no originality in it and they've lost key plot points that made BSG so intriguing. (IMHO, of course)
      But, then, I thought the story alone in B5 made it one of the greatest sci-fis (save for mid-series 5).

    8. Re:i've never seen the show... by fireboy1919 · · Score: 1

      That's pretty subjective. I'd put Battlestar Gallactica on the opposite end of the spectrum from Farscape because of the camera work.

      I'd just be starting to get into it and then, bam! shakey-camera-vision reminds me that I'm watching a TV show with intentionally bad camera work. And since that happens every three minutes or so, I have to give up every ten or so. I am aware that there are those who don't mind this. I am not one of them.

      You must have the same problem with puppet vision. Barring the puppets, I liked Farscape a lot. It was a bit droll at times, and something closer to fantasy than Sci-Fi, but I thought it was good.

      So...I guess I'd put it somewhere in the "3" ranking (i.e., not quite as good as Farscape, but much better than Battlestar Gallactica).

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    9. Re:i've never seen the show... by SAN66 · · Score: 1

      Confused?

      So is that a scale of 1 (Good) to 10 (Bad)? Or 1 (Bad) to 10 (Good)?

      I'd hope not, as I don't see how anyone could rate the new BSG bad. Of course Farscape fans have different tastes.

      If you're a Farscape fan you'll enjoy SG1, especially the last 2 seasons, but it may not be hokey enough for you.

      If you're a BSG fan you'll enjoy SG1, but it may not be gritty and dramatic enough for you, except a few episodes here and there.

      Stargate would fall kind of in the middle, not hokey and not overly dramatic.

      As the writers of the show have said:

      "Stargate, unbeknownst to our fans, is actually a comedy... And thats what makes it so good!"

      My scale: 1 Good to 10 Bad

      1: BSG
      2: Heroes
      3: Stargate SG1
      4: Stargate Atlantis
      5: Firefly
      6: Lost
      7: ST: DS9 (War)
      8: ST: TNG
      9: The X-Files
      10: All other Star Treks, Dr Who, Babylon 5, Farscape

    10. Re:i've never seen the show... by kria · · Score: 1

      I think I can give you a good indication, as I've never been able to watch Farscape, and I think that Battlestar Galactica is one of the best sci-fi shows ever, along with DS9 and Firefly.

      The first four seasons of SG-1 rank about 7-8. Seasons five and six were more 6-7. Season 7 was a 6. I wouldn't rank anything since then more than a five.

    11. Re:i've never seen the show... by OldeTimeGeek · · Score: 1
      It's nice to see that someone has the same problem with the show that I do.

      I'd love to be able to watch it, and, believe me, I've tried, but I can't handle the damned POV-of-someone-who's-stoned cinematography. You'd think with the budget that they have, they could afford a SteadyCam.

    12. Re:i've never seen the show... by rtaylor · · Score: 1

      have been watching the show instead of trying to just jump right in

      Stargate writers seem to love their inside jokes. You don't miss much in the episode by not knowing the back-story but there is a fair amount of humour added if you do.

      --
      Rod Taylor
    13. Re:i've never seen the show... by kyouteki · · Score: 1

      It was a better ending than Enterprise...it didn't even end in the same century that the whole rest of the show took place in. And of course TOS didn't really get an ending.

      Voyager's ending didn't upset me, though I wish they would have elaborated a bit more on the fate of the Borg. DS9's was...alright. Most of the last episode was great, but I didn't like the little clip montage at the end, and "The Sisko" ascending or whatever. TNG's ending, on the other hand, was just about perfect in every way.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    14. Re:i've never seen the show... by Kethinov · · Score: 1

      I tend to flat out ignore contemporary science fiction shows such as Quantum Leap, Sliders, X Files, etc. They tend to be quite lame.

      --
      You're right, I wouldn't steal a car. But if it were possible, I sure as hell would download one!
  13. Yay, just what I wanted by rockhome · · Score: 0

    Another sub-par science fiction show with absolutely no substance or reason to watch. I can't wait for the predicatble plot lines and the one-dimensional archetypes that will make up the dramatis personnae. LEt me guess, there will be an irritable, gung-ho, military-style commander, some kind of socially dysfunctional scientist with expertise in any and all disciplines as called for in the script, some kind strong, independant woman, and an alien.

    I can't wait to choose my costume for the con where I'll be able to nitpick the cast on small issues with continuity because the plots are so thin I can't ignore them.

    Why can't somebody come up with something more orignal than yet another spin-off from an already crappy show that is itself a spin-off of a crappy movie?

    Why not another Star Trek? Oh wait, with some minor modifcations, Stargate is Star Trek.

    1. Re:Yay, just what I wanted by nmb3000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why not another Star Trek? Oh wait, with some minor modifcations, Stargate is Star Trek.

      And with some minor modifications Star Trek is Doctor Who which with some minor modifications is Battlestar Galactica which is very similar to Lost in Space which seems a lot like Futurama, a show that brings back memories of Andromeda which is like that old show...

      Science fiction based around space travel is simply a variation on a theme. Some guys have this thing (Stargate, Enterprise, TARDIS, Galactica, Jupiter 2, Planet Express) that takes them around the galaxy and they meet these bad guys and they have to outwit them and they do nice things and sometimes bad things and gosh that's all there is to it.

      Some have more direction (new BSG, DS9) than others which just wander around (TNG, Dr Who) while some do a bit of both (SG1). Nobody is claiming that Stargate is a brilliant new idea, just that it's an idea it's been well executed and well received (based on it's 10 years on the air if nothing else).

      --
      "What do you despise? By this are you truly known." --Princess Irulan, Manual of Muad'Dib
      /)
    2. Re:Yay, just what I wanted by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      Yes it is a bit repetitive. But only a series like Stargate and SG:Atlantas could pull it off. They have some really great jokes and wit in there.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    3. Re:Yay, just what I wanted by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      And with some minor modifications Star Trek is Doctor Who which with some minor modifications is Battlestar Galactica which is very similar to Lost in Space which seems a lot like Futurama, a show that brings back memories of Andromeda which is like that old show...

      Its a shame because there is a lot of material out there. We seem to be filming anything written by Phillip Dick at the moment, but what about Gibsons Virtual Light, Heinleins Friday, Stephensons Snow Crash?

    4. Re:Yay, just what I wanted by drapeau06 · · Score: 1

      My fear is that Keanu effectively kicked a killer William Gibson silver-screen film franchise in the nuts in Johnny Mnemonic.

    5. Re:Yay, just what I wanted by OfficeSubmarine · · Score: 1

      We seem to be filming anything written by Phillip Dick at the moment

      In a way that, aside from a few exceptions, will have his reanimated zombie vengefully gnawing on our brains any minute now.

    6. Re:Yay, just what I wanted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      My fear is that Keanu effectively kicked a killer William Gibson silver-screen film franchise in the nuts in Johnny Mnemonic.
      Sony cut the film to pieces and left it to die on the cutting room floor. Even though Reeves didn't particularly shine in that film, most of the blame should be Sony's.
    7. Re:Yay, just what I wanted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still blame the godawful screenplay. And yes, I know Gibson was involved. For me, it completely changed aspects of the original story that were the reasons I enjoyed it. It's like they had to weaken all of the supporting characters so that Keaneu could have top billing and not get trampled all over.

      Even the pinball machine was better than the film, and it wasn't that great of a pinball machine.

    8. Re:Yay, just what I wanted by Lord+Ender · · Score: 1

      Ever read Asimov? Card? Sci-fi can be based in outer space but not be Trek. Trek is great, yeah, but I would love to see more variety in sci-fi on TV.

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
    9. Re:Yay, just what I wanted by instarx · · Score: 1

      And with some minor modifications Star Trek is Doctor Who which with some minor modifications is Battlestar Galactica which is very similar to Lost in Space which seems a lot like Futurama, a show that brings back memories of Andromeda which is like that old show...

      Science fiction based around space travel is simply a variation on a theme. Some guys have this thing (Stargate, Enterprise, TARDIS, Galactica, Jupiter 2, Planet Express) that takes them around the galaxy and they meet these bad guys and they have to outwit them and they do nice things and sometimes bad things and gosh that's all there is to it.
      ...and Odysseus had a thing (ship) that he used to travel around meeting bad guys to outwit during his oddysey, and gosh, that's all there is to it. Your logic has a serious flaw in that you state that "SF based on space travel" has the same travel-based theme. Well duh - of course...t r a v e l. Just as all green things have this same redundant color whether they be green beans, green bottles, green leaves or the green ocean. By your logic you have seen a beer bottle, so why should you bother to go see the ocean?

  14. Maybe they can get good actors this time...? by geekpuppySEA · · Score: 1

    Sci-fi can be any genre now - western (serenity), brooding drama (Battlestar Galactica), kids' show with puppets (all those Anakin movies.) Will the new incarnation have the same horrible acting that the old ones did - the sci fi equivalent of the poorly-scripted comedy that came on at 730 before the real thing came on at 8? Dear Sci Fi Channel producers: you CAN have a show that's good, and also not have it compete with your flagship Galactica. Please hire some actors / writers who can do more than make me cringe while I wait for Jamie Bamber and Caprica Six to show up.

    --
    Intelligent Design: because MATH is HARD.
  15. Thank you by fmlug.org · · Score: 1

    Now if we could just get them to put Firefly back on the air. :)

  16. Two words... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Funny

    Stargate Enterprise

    --
    If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    1. Re:Two words... by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sir... we can't call it the "Enterprise"

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    2. Re:Two words... by Cylix · · Score: 1

      I like Starscape better....

      I must admit, I was completely giddy during the 200th episode when they did the Farscape scene.

      Good times...

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    3. Re:Two words... by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      So: Carter wears absurdly tight clothing, but we have to see O'Neill tear his shirt every episode. Hmm...

    4. Re:Two words... by bheer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      OT, but in case anyone listens to Ron Moore's BSG podcasts, you'll be astonished at how many times he's called the Galactica the 'Enterprise' so far.

    5. Re:Two words... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope there's a Corporate Edition.

  17. Series Premier by Jerf · · Score: 1
    A routine expedition reveals what is clearly a one-way gateway of some kind (not necessarily a "Gate") to some faraway lost city-spaceship, perhaps not even in our universe proper, that promises vast new technologies, power sources, and weapons. But what really sets this apart from all the other floating tech/power/weapon depots is the promise that maybe, just maybe, this long lost depot will also including an automated schooling system so that we can actually use the fantastical powers within.

    Immediately upon the arrival of the expeditionary team, modelled after the UN team but this time once again just American, the leaders of the expedition will find themselves whisked away to meet super-dooper Ascended beings, which the Ascended beings previously only suspected the existence of (not that they bothered to tell us), and make the Ascended beings look like tiny, wimpy children. One look at our gruff military hero with his background of killing and hitting and breaking and just generally, you know, surviving in our rough-and-tumble universe will convince our Super-Dooper Ascended beings that they really ought to consider pruning our entire multiverse due to excessive violence (since they, in their Super-Dooper Ascended state, haven't faced a threat to their existence in seventy-three trillion billion years, so they have totally forgotten what that's like), thus setting off a frantic five-season story arc to convince the Super-Dooper Ascended beings to not destroy us, or, failing all else, could you consider just destroying the Ori?

    If we're lucky, our heros will fail. *smirk*

    I like Stargate. I'd even say I like it a lot. But it was already a bit implausible that Our Heros could beat the Gua'uld. Not impossible, perhaps, given the Gua'ulds cultural weaknesses and their basic inability to band together meaningfully, but implausible. Taking on Ascended beings is just utterly unbelievable, and also has the problem of that basically being it. There's nothing above Ascended beings, really. Even if there is, it wouldn't really matter to us; how would we really distinguish between Ascended beings and my Super-Dooper Ascended, considering that Ascended beings already seem to possess the ability to throw us into an arbitrary simulation if they so chose? There really is no power above that from the human point of view; Ascended beings do not seem to be what you might call Gods of the Universe but they are basically Gods over individual material beings, able to fully control their minds, senses, etc.

    I'm not sure Stargate needs a full re-boot in the comic book or the "Enterprise" sense, but they need to sit down and rethink what they want to be about: Do they want to be another Star Trek, which is where they are headed in many ways? Do they really need to have a Single Overarching Threat, especially given that they've basically maxed out that story line? Do they really want to become Yet Another Time Travel Show, which they've so far mostly managed to avoid but are in immanent danger of being sucked into that black hole? There's still a lot of interesting stories to be told, but only if they change some of their story arc templates.

    And what is it about space exploration shows that inevitably turns them into space warfare shows?
    "Do you remember when we used to be explorers?" - Captain Picard, Star Trek Insurrection
    1. Re:Series Premier by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure Stargate needs a full re-boot in the comic book or the "Enterprise" sense, but they need to sit down and rethink what they want to be about:

      They need a reboot, but I don't think they ought to go down the "prequel" route, or the time traveler route. I mean, you'll have a showdown between the Ancients and Ori somehow, because the only thing keeping the Ori from wiping out mankind is the Ancients, ref. "when the wraith ships came, I reached out with my mind and with a single thought destroyed them all" and that was just one Ancient. It's time to break the Universe. Ancients vs Ori meet like matter meets anti-matter, they're both gone and you can basicly pull any stunt you want. Since it's the clash of the gods which breaks the world, you can have it happen once (not as a solution to every problem) and have it work well.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    2. Re:Series Premier by Zembar · · Score: 1

      And what is it about space exploration shows that inevitably turns them into space warfare shows? The same things that make real exploration end in real warfare. Unless you're willing to make the case that Cortez had milk and cookies with the natives he encountered.
    3. Re:Series Premier by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Aren't they doing that a bit with the lucian alliance war?

      They're bringing in an effectively human enemy who has some idea of actually using military tactics (the gould just lost because they were stupid - they never guarded the gates, never had CCTV, etc.). The Ori were a mistake IMO - made for a good series ending but where do they go from here? You can't beat them - you can't even meaningfully fight them... the only storyline that would make any sense at all would be to drag the Ancients into the war and have a big ascended fight.

  18. Third? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about Stargate Infinity?

    This is the most blatant attempt to ignore a cartoon series' futuristic, nonsensical storyline since Highlander: The Animated Series.

    1. Re:Third? by Andrew+Kismet · · Score: 1

      Say it three times and we can pretend it doesn't exist:
      They did it for the lulz,
      They did it for the lulz,
      They did it for the lulz.

  19. No joke! by denebian+devil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've heard that they may try to simultaneously (or at least in scarily close succession) make a spinoff movie for SG1 and make a sequel to the original movie... as if they were two completely separate things. Which, if you look at the turns that SG1 has made, isn't too far from the truth.

    1. Re:No joke! by trianglman · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be surprised if that did happen. From what I have read the original movie writers had wanted to make a trilogy, but the movie didn't do very well and the idea fell by the wayside. Now that the series have boosted the movie's popularity, distributors are more willing to finance a new movie. Of course, the series went a different direction than what the movie writers intended so the movie sequel will follow a different history. Here and here are a couple of the interviews with Devlin (original producer).

      --
      Clones are people two.
  20. New series name... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
    SG-2.0

    Every week they travel to unimaginable worlds, meet (and kill) new people, then write about it on their SG blogs ...

    Wake me if Claudia Black shows up.

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  21. Can we please not have another McKay character? by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Can we please please please not have another jarring character like McKay like in Stargate: Atlantis? Not only is he completely over-the-top antisocial, but he seems to make everyone around him lose any sense of tact that they might otherwise have had.

    And that formula of having McKay/Carter start explaining the technical details of something, only to be interrupted by the superior officer who doesn't understand the jargon, is getting very very tired. Please kill it.

    1. Re:Can we please not have another McKay character? by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 1

      You're right about the annoying tech explanations, but McKay's the only joke vehicle on the show. Maybe he could just get a head injury and go retarded. Then he can be joke-fuel and not be the ridiculous tech-God device anymore.

    2. Re:Can we please not have another McKay character? by Bo'Bob'O · · Score: 4, Informative

      McKay has been one of the few SG characters that have shown any sort of development, having to learn to BE social, respect other people, work as part of a team both in the field and in the lab. Carter on the other hand, seems some sort of super human, is almost exactly the same as she was when the series started, and is about the most boring character on the show.

      Yes, the technical mumbo-jumbo thing is irritating, but thats simply a sign of bad writing. It's a plot device or easy deis ex machena that they try and legitimize, but they are by far not the only show to be guilty of it.

      I'd by far rather see an end to the lame warrior-types, I've seen more character depth from pre-gen D&D character sheets.

    3. Re:Can we please not have another McKay character? by JohnFluxx · · Score: 1

      Haha, I love McKay. He's thinks everyone around him is stupid in comparison to him. And frankly, he's right.

      If I was as smart as him, I'd turn out the same way. Cynical about everyone else.

    4. Re:Can we please not have another McKay character? by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      Being cynical is one thing. Being as antisocial as he is only results in being marginalized. And then there's his tendency for saying "it will never work" when it really will. It's poor writing all the way around.

    5. Re:Can we please not have another McKay character? by OfficeSubmarine · · Score: 1

      As I get older, I'm getting increasingly tired of characters like him for somewhat similar reasons. I got into sci-fi because I like science. Even as a kid I realized that it was the real magic of the world, and that almost every comfort in my life could be a result of it. Later I, like almost any human over 25, was able to thank it for saving my life at some point.

      Unlike novels, TV science fiction seems to actually hate science. Evolution won't be Darwinian, but Lamarkian. Trying to improve civilization or the lot of humanity, is always the mark of either the villian or tragically flawed hero who only realises his mistake at the end. I nearly wanted to strangle the writers when they had McKay's redshirt utter something along the lines of "Pft, scientists. How's it feel to know everything you discovered will be proven wrong in a hundred years." The fact that a line like that can actually come from what, sadly, is one of the most intelligent fiction based channels out there depresses me to no end. It really drives home the fact that most western countries now have a population that is, in effect, pretty much scientifically illiterate.

    6. Re:Can we please not have another McKay character? by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      I've noticed the same thing, and I've usually just assumed that it's an artifact of the reality that the writing, producing, and acting is all done by liberal arts majors, many of whom are little more than your stereotypical airheads.

    7. Re:Can we please not have another McKay character? by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 1

      I should also mention that this has been happening for a while. Spock used the word "logical" way too much, even where it didn't make any sense, for example.

      However, there is one Sci-Fi show that still amuses me: Futurama.

    8. Re:Can we please not have another McKay character? by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmm, he's anti-social because nobody listens to him and yet he's usually right. I don't remember when he said something won't work then it does though. I only remember one episode where he was really wrong and that was the one where he nearly destroys the galaxy.

      Especially in the first season though he says something, nobody listens to him, then he turns out to be right.

    9. Re:Can we please not have another McKay character? by toganet · · Score: 1

      I can relate to McKay's character -- he's a lot like the developers at work.

    10. Re:Can we please not have another McKay character? by TheSpoom · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I thought Rodney was alright in season one, but in season two, with all the other changes they made to the direction of the show (more focus on war than on exploration, Ronin instead of Aiden, etc., can you tell I don't think they're great?), it seemed like they wrote Rodney to be just a total ass in any social interactions. They seem to be letting up a bit now but I still think it's way over the top how he seems to dislike everyone he talks to.

      --
      It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
      - E. Debs
  22. canada, eh? by ILuvRamen · · Score: 1

    I would not be surprised if they did an alternate reality or sequel to SG-1 series where Canada gets a gate, since that's where it's made and that's where a lot of the people who work on it are from. As long as it's got furry little Furlongs that look like the Ewoks' cousins, I'll be happy!

    --
    Google's Super Secret Search Algorithm: SELECT @search_results FROM internet WHERE @search_results = 'good'
    1. Re:canada, eh? by Schraegstrichpunkt · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unfortunately, all the technical jargon would have to be in an incomprehensible dead language.

    2. Re:canada, eh? by ardin,mcallister · · Score: 1

      Since when does canada have an Army.. or even a government? Isn't it the 52nd state? Right after Mexico, of course.

      --
      "Some men just want to watch the world burn..."
    3. Re:canada, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a feeling this is going to come off as an insult, when it's meant as advice. But, seriously, you're coming off like an idiot who's never stepped past the border of his home country for more than a day or two, if that. Is that the case, I don't know. I'm going to assume not, which is why I'm bothering to pass this along.

  23. Gate Trek? by msobkow · · Score: 1

    Looks like Stargate is out to compete with Star Trek for the most spinoffs ever.

    Someone told me there is another Rocky movie on the way -- I guess if you're going to do one, it has to be soon, eh? Now if Cheech Marin and Tommy Chong would only stop procrastinating... :)

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:Gate Trek? by irwtdvoys · · Score: 1

      I think the idea was to start a new series called "Stargate Command" after SG1 season 8 as they had to change so many of the cast and villains. They kept it with the same name so they could get the 200+ episode award :( then cancelled it completely.

    2. Re:Gate Trek? by Mercano · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I got the feeling SG-1 seasons 9 and 10 were sort of a spin off of SG-1 that retained Teal'c and Jackson (and latter Carter) and the sets.

      Also, RE: spinoff count, don't forget the animated series. Its just the Star Trek:TAS in that it isn't considered quite canonical and it almost never on TV.

      --
      #include <signature.h>
    3. Re:Gate Trek? by msobkow · · Score: 1

      I read a blurb that ST:TAS had been released or was about to be released on DVD. I'll have to rent or borrow a set one of these days (and keep an eye out for sales.) There were a few paperbacks based on them as well, I vaguely remember one about Quetzacoatl (?sp?)

      --
      I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    4. Re:Gate Trek? by Pyrowolf · · Score: 1
      Also, RE: spinoff count, don't forget the animated series. Its just the Star Trek:TAS in that it isn't considered quite canonical and it almost never on TV.

      Are you kidding?!? Not quite canonical... absolutely nothing is the same between the SG1/Atlantis and the Infinity universe - with the exception of the gate and a few sound effects. It's absolutely horrible.
    5. Re:Gate Trek? by RxScram · · Score: 1

      "Someone told me there is another Rocky movie on the way"

      There isn't another Rocky movie on the way... there is, however, a new Rocky movie that is in theaters today, entitled "Rocky Balboa". From the reviews, it's actually quite good.

    6. Re:Gate Trek? by Truman+Starr · · Score: 1

      I think in this respect, the Star Trek animated series and the Stargate one cancel each other out. Like matter/antimatter. We'll just pretend that neither ever existed.

    7. Re:Gate Trek? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      absolutely nothing is the same between the SG1/Atlantis and the Infinity universe - with the exception of the gate and a few sound effects.

      And they couldn't even get that right, making it seem like every time you went through the gate you got shot with a Zat'nik'tel. (Didn't even the Tlak'kahn staff weapons sound like Zats?) And don't get me started on them having gates that would have from 5 to 10 chevron locks on them, the number changing with the viewing angle of the same gate, and DHDs that dialed like a rotary telephone.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    8. Re:Gate Trek? by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

      Actually, not all of the Star Trek animated series is considered retconned. IIRC, two things survive as canon, one of them being the story of Spock's childhood (though not necessarily the adult Spock's interference). I don't recall what the other was, thus the "IIRC".

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  24. I'd love to see "Ba'al, the early years" by kellererik · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seriously, of all the villains, he is the one I really like. OK, doesn't have to be the early years, I want to see Cliff Simon playing the character. But showing the other side of the fence could be interesting.

    IMHO, of course.

    1. Re:I'd love to see "Ba'al, the early years" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ba'al, before he dropped?

  25. As foretold in in the series itself... by xenoarch · · Score: 1

    StarGate: Wormhole Extreme

  26. Why not compare it to The Sopranos? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most sci-fi on TV is garbage. Most TV is garbage, but the small amount of science fiction on there is conspicuously bad. For every Next Generation or Twilight Zone, there are dozens of Stargate Atlantis's and worse.

    Why are people hoping that it will be better than Enterprise? Instead, why not hope that it does for science fiction what Deadwood did for the western. Or why not wish that it was better than, say, the Simpsons? Aiming low, which is what the Sci-Fi Channel does anyway, will only get you more junk.

  27. 9/11 by sanman2 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Usually, when a new scifi series is announced these days, it revolves around a post-9/11 plotline, whereby the heroes are having to cope with authorities who are hyper-repressive and militaristic, creating a danger of trampling upon the noble and misunderstood underdog victims.

    1. Re:9/11 by somersault · · Score: 1

      Doesn't most sci-fi do that? Or most stories in fact? Star Wars is a great example of heroes fighting against an evil authority, and I'm sure a lot of sci-fi writers will either consciously or subconsciously follow similar ideas. Firefly is pretty similar to Star Wars in that way, though it's no bad thing at all :) Most stories are on the fight between good and evil, and it would be too easy if evil were the weaker side. I don't really follow TV series, but you could be right about sci-fi movies following this trend recently (even if the original stories were written before 9/11) - Equilibrium, Aeon Flux, Ultraviolet.. it's just a good theme (though only one of those movies was any good!)

      I also thought that America only started getting big on 'terrorism' in their culture after 9/11, but after watching Speed and a couple of other older movies I realised I was being a bit unfair in that regards. Sorry America.

      --
      which is totally what she said
  28. NICE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They can REALLY take the Stargate universe places. I'd like to see some MASSIVE intergalactic war or something, with some way out there technologies and aliens that look in NO WAY humanoid.
    Lets go Stargate! Impress me again! /rabid stargate fan

  29. How about existing plotlines by drwho · · Score: 1

    During the ten seasons, the SG1 team has managed to piss off a lot of people, both on Earth and other places, and I don't mean just the Goa'uld. There's enough loose ends out there to weave together to create a practical united foe against SGC/Earth. For instance, what if someone survived from Euronda, joined up with some guys (The Trust or not - it would be interesting for us to find out what schisms happened within the NID/Trust/etc) who had become stranded off earth when using the second gate (i.e. we find out that O'Neill's double-crossing didn't clean up the whole nest of them), and manage to bust Loki out of whatever jail the Asgard are holding him in. Maybe they do some commerce with Ba'al. I'd love to see this, but it would become really confusing for people who haven't followed the series for ten years, unless it is very carefully written. This is in fact something I could do. I am available for hire :)

  30. BIG BOOM! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    All I gotta say is shit better blow up!
    big boom
    BIG BOOM!

    1. Re:BIG BOOM! by SheeEttin · · Score: 1

      BIGGER!!

    2. Re:BIG BOOM! by cynvision · · Score: 1

      It's got to be BIGGER! ---- END IN JOKE ---- honesly, let the explosion take out all of USA 2 -- er, I mean, SCIFI channel.

      --
      "I got it all together but I forgot where I put it."
  31. Re:Plot Summary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Mod parent down; this is the plot summary for the failed cartoon spinoff Stargate Infinity.

  32. Please translate from Marketing-speak by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 1

    Gateworld reports that an exclusive, third Stargate series is in the works

    In what way is it exclusive? Perhaps it excludes plot, character development, and good writing?

    The new series is in the concept phase

    OK...

    and is being actively worked on by the Vancouver creatives behind Stargate SG-1 and Stargate Atlantis

    Stop. Back up. What the hell is a "creative"? In my dictionary that's an adjective, not a noun. Nounizing adjectives is almost as bad as verbifying nouns...

    No concept for the show has yet been revealed

    which must be a tricky thing, since it is in the "concept phase". I think I'll wait for the "being phase" (assuming it gets the green light), or the "nothingness phase" (assuming it doesn't), before deciding that this is worthy of attention.

    the series is likely for a 2007 debut

    Keerist. I give up.

    --
    Soylent Green is peoplicious!
    1. Re:Please translate from Marketing-speak by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative
      Gateworld reports that an exclusive, third Stargate series is in the works
      In what way is it exclusive? Perhaps it excludes plot, character development, and good writing?

      It just means that the dipshit who submitted it took the headline of TFA "Exclusive: Third Stargate series in development" and mangled it into his summary without apparently understanding the journalistic meaning of "exclusive".

    2. Re:Please translate from Marketing-speak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jesus, I know we nerds are suppose to be sarcastic, but did you not have your coffee today?

    3. Re:Please translate from Marketing-speak by Snerk · · Score: 1

      Exclusive means someone on the set dropped them the news, but since the *news* is so limited, it's nothing people haven't speculated on. It was already stated they had ideas for another series. //and is being actively worked on by the Vancouver creatives behind Stargate SG-1 and Stargate Atlantis Stop. Back up. What the hell is a "creative"? In my dictionary that's an adjective, not a noun. Nounizing adjectives is almost as bad as verbifying nouns...// ;) If the same people are working on it who worked on SG1, you've already seen the show. They have a terrible tendency to rewrite their own scripts.

    4. Re:Please translate from Marketing-speak by instarx · · Score: 1

      Stop. Back up. What the hell is a "creative"? In my dictionary that's an adjective, not a noun. Nounizing adjectives is almost as bad as verbifying nouns...

      Well, technically its just entertainment-industry speak. Just like the actors are always referred to as "the talent" and the caterers are the "craft people".

      However, simply using terms such as "talent", "creative" and "craft" to refer to an organization that spewes out lazy brainless stuff like SG Atlantis is the real PR lie.

  33. Why not another Star Trek? by cyclomedia · · Score: 1
    --
    If you don't risk failure you don't risk success.
  34. hmmm... by TB · · Score: 0

    So theyve had Altantis, where they live on an alien base next door to the only worm hole which takes them to a place far away, so I guess next they must get lost and have to find home while adopting a hot replicator chick and finding a new drive but not being able to use it till they get home after that episode with geordi.

  35. The US government only has so much money. by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

    So I wonder where they will base their operations. At Stargate Command? They already have a series in production which was supposed to be different to SG1. Will this new series be cut off from Earth again or will they operate from Earth HQ?

    1. Re:The US government only has so much money. by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      I forgot to add. This isn't like Star Trek either where they have huge resources so the show can be based anywhere, like DS9 or VOY and stay believable. On the upside, if they do base it from earth, they get to keep the current sets, the show will be cheaper to produce won't it? You'll also keep the base Commander that keeps appearing in Atlantis as well.

    2. Re:The US government only has so much money. by vidarh · · Score: 1

      They could easily skip into a future when they do have huge resources. It would fit in with the technological advances shown in SG1, leading to their own ships with hyperdrive etc.

    3. Re:The US government only has so much money. by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      I do believe that one of the things about StarGate which was appreciated was that it was set in the current time and that it wasn't set in the future.

    4. Re:The US government only has so much money. by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      One premise that would potentially work nicely would be to set it in the near-future. In the first episode, have some massive security leak, that causes the US Government to have to go public with news that they gate exists. Play up the international tension revolving around where to site the gate once it has been opened for civilian use. Show the effects of commercial interests starting to affect gate operations; possibly even focus it around a civilian, corporate-funded, team with the mission to explore strange new worlds, bring back technology that can be commercially exploited on Earth, and make trade agreements. Possibly even centre it around Ba'al's company; if he's in non-sentient a clone body, then there are no ethical concerns about letting him stay around, and the tension between humans and Gua'ould could make for some interesting episodes as other deposed snake-heads try to integrate into human society (possibly after an amnesty is declared, which could lead to tensions with the Jaffa Nation...).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:The US government only has so much money. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Y'know, I was gonna make fun of that "non-sentient clone body" ba'al seems to have in your world, but then I thought of real-world companies and how that could explain a lot of CEO's...

      We are amused by this description. You may continue.

  36. Reboot like a Mummy? by saikou · · Score: 1

    Or some other type of series, based on the same idea of the Stargate but happening "back then when Goa'uld ruled the planets, and did the infighting, and were getting Jaffa to turn into their servants" and so on and so forth? Like Xena in Space with Goa'uld?
    Because most of other "reboots" would be more like a soft reset with similar crews and directions :)

  37. Wormhole Xtreme! by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    Actually, I always thought a spin-off of Stargate based on the campy "Wormhole Xtreme" series used in the show could offer some interesting possibilities. Granted it might only last a season at most, but Sci-Fi could easily polish it up to something on the level of their cheesy low-budget movies they show every couple weeks.

    For example, instead using of a military trained crew, they could have a completely random set of civilians who accidentally become unwitting participants, ala Sliders, where they have to contend with both each other and each world they end up on. It could also play on the campy nature of various sci-fi shows from the 1960s-1980s (like Star Trek: TOS or the original Battlestar Galactica), where things just work out for no reason other than to advance the plot.

    It'd be a nice break from the mind-numbing geek speak of Amanda Tapping/Micheal Shanks characters. It's just walk into a problem specific to the episode, fixing it and returning, only to start again next week.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
    1. Re:Wormhole Xtreme! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sliders didn't have completely random people, Quinn invented the sliding device, Arturo (sp?) was Quinn's professor, Wade was Quinn's friend, admittedly Rembrant was randomly pulled in off the street though. Sliders started to lose it when they swapped the original characters out and wasn't worth watching after the original Quinn got replaced by his completely different alternate Quinn.

      I really don't think it would be worth making a whole series out of Wormhole Extreme, I didn't really like that episode much and whilst alright for a one-off special would be (to me) unwatchable for a whole series.

  38. Why don't they by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just show Lexx reruns instead.

  39. How About The Ultimate Sci-Fi Showdown? by Whiteox · · Score: 1

    So get them all meeting somewhere in N Space: Next Gen, Farscape, Babylon 4 and 5, Kirk, Star Gate, Dr Who, DS9, Voyager. Lexx, The Fat guy from Lost, Quark, Heart of Gold and Zaphod, R2D2, The Cheddite Cheese Projector and the Bloater Drive and all those others that I've missed and just have it out in ONE BIG GIANT HUMONGOUS series where good vs evil with Mel Gibson doing the dialogue so no-one understands each other (except R2D2, Babel Fish, the characters of Lost In Space), all following the prime directive with idiotic, moronic Federation morality while the Shadows blast them all into subatomic particles that eventually coalesce into another one of those Big Bangs....
    And this time I want to be reincarnated into something completely different!

    --
    Don't be apathetic. Procrastinate!
  40. suggested titles by Scudsucker · · Score: 1
    When I heard that Atlantis was going to be about a crew marooned on another planet, searching for a way home, I thought of a few alternative titles for the series:
    • Stargate: Voyager
    • Stargate: Sliders
    • Stargate: Quantum Leap
    • Stargate: Farscape
    • Stargate: Land of the Lost
    Now that they are launching a third series, I have some more suggestions:
    • Stargate: Special Victums Unit
    • Stargate: Criminal Intent
    • Stargate: Conviction
    • Stargate: Trial by Jury
  41. 2007 debut was already a done deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe Gateworld or /. is confused.

    SciFi dropped the show this fall but the 2007 season was already planned to air on SciFi. It was already a done deal.

    It's the "what happens after 2007" part that has all the question marks.

  42. New title revealed! by the+real+darkskye · · Score: 2, Funny

    and its called ...

    CSI: Cheyenne

    --
    Music is everybody's possession.
    It's only publishers who think that people own it.
    Fuck Beta
    ~John Lenno
    1. Re:New title revealed! by cynvision · · Score: 1

      Have you been reading my mind? That was one idea for a crossover fic I toyed with... Damn your supendous super-powers!

      --
      "I got it all together but I forgot where I put it."
  43. Let's only hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it won't be an OC-like spinoff like that part in the 200th episode. That would suck.

  44. The Premise by rlp · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Stargate team encounters a powerful new enemy known as the 'Cylons'. When things start to look bleak for Earth, they are aided by a mysterious space / time traveler in a British police box.

    --
    [Insert pithy quote here]
    1. Re:The Premise by CmdrGravy · · Score: 1

      Dr Stargate Galactica, and whenever he went on holiday he could become involved in intriguing murder cases.

  45. More in Spring & Two Movies in Works by dadasys · · Score: 1

    The following is quoted from www.GateWorld.net:

    "Following the success of the 1994 film "Stargate," Stargate SG-1 debuted in 1997, and spun off Stargate Atlantis in 2004. The two shows return to SCI FI Channel in the U.S. with new episodes in April. The spring run of 10 episodes each will mark the series finale of SG-1, and the third season finale of Atlantis.

    Stargate Atlantis returns for its fourth season later in 2007.

    Meanwhile, SG-1 will continue with two movies, presumably direct-to-DVD, currently aiming for a fall 2007 release."


    http://www.gateworld.net/news/2006/12/exclusive_th ird_istargatei_serie.shtml

    1. Re:More in Spring & Two Movies in Works by Jarnin · · Score: 1

      SG-1 will end with a cliffhanger. I know it will piss a lot of viewers off, but the series finale was likely already completed several weeks before SCIFI decided to cancel the series. The first SG-1 movie will deal with wrapping up the Ori story arc, with the Ori being defeated once and for all by the end. The second movie has been referred to as a time-travel story that Brad Wright (executive producer of SG-1 & SG-A) has wanted to tell for some time, which will most likely set the stage for the new series and will probably premiere in July of 2008.

  46. Ugh.. by dentar · · Score: 1

    Puleeze.. SG1 was NOT that good. Atlantis is worse.

    --
    -- I am. Therefore, I think!
    1. Re:Ugh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you are so very cool. We get it. Now go away.

  47. I am glad to hear it. SG1 is surprisingly good by Marrow · · Score: 1

    If they think they can run two series at the same time, I am all
    for it.

    The series so far have hinged on the gate remaining a secret to the
    general populace. Perhaps they should jump ahead to a time when the
    general populace first "gets" space travel and access to the gate and ships.
    There would be a lot of problems. People often want to do things
    they arent ready for yet. There would be turf wars as people competed
    for prime locations on other planets. Clashes with natives. Opening
    various pandora's boxen. Political tensions as the wave of earthers
    hits the galaxy. The SG teams could be like rescue rangers getting
    silly colonists out of problems and dealing with various hostilities.

    Just an idea....

  48. Re:They already did! by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Wasn't the show based on a movie anyways....so they come around full circle. I havent seen an episode yet that was original, even if this is my favorite show on tv at the moment. There is a parallel episode for each one from Star Trek... and I guess now they are considering the movies as well, seeing as the other guys did it. I got to say they were clever in re utilizing all the star trek episodes and giving them a new twist, the replicators = the borg etc...but the main focus of the show was the team. Richard Dean Anderson was my fav and now that he has cut ties with stargate I feel no need to watch it further, although I guess if there is nothing else at the movies I will pay to see that one!

  49. Not the Third Series... by X86Daddy · · Score: 2, Informative

    It may have been unwatchable children's drek, but there was an animated Stargate: Infinity as well as the current two shows.

  50. Then I can gues... by DrYak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Reading is the easiest, because if you miss something you can go back to it

    Then, I can guess that most language you've learned are :
    - Using alphabets for writing (as opposed to ideograph or syllable writing systems).
    - Maybe even using some form of latin alphabet (as opposed to greek or cyrillic)

    Reading is the most easy for you because you're quite familar with the symbols used to write language. The written form of words is the only thing that is actually new to you. Your eyes and your brain is already accustomed to the shape of most letters your going to encounter (you obviously are accustomed to latin alphabet, and maybe cyrillic and greek aren't too alien for you). If you had to start to learn chinese, Korean (with its very own concept of "alphabet disguised as a syllabary"), japanesse (OMG !!! 3 different writing systems !), old egyptian (Hieroglyphs), old Sumerian (Cuneiform), alternate forms to write old Greek (Linear B wasn't even designed to encode greek words), old bulgarian (using Glagolitic) old Mayan (no, no. these aren't complexe beautiful painting, they are writings), reading won't be that easy, because you'll have to put up with a completly new writing system, that doesn't look like anything you're used to.

    SG happen to describe a universe where most human cultures were kept to a more ancient and primitive form.

    Most old real-life human civilisation had mostly an oral tradition, people spoke much more than they wrote those language. Being illiterate was quite common and normal. Writing was only a small very specialised job done by specifically trained people/slaves (scribes). Both because of it and in consequence of it, writing wasn't a practical simple system, but a very complex one, with thousands of different symbols. Language of similar linguistic groups may use completly different writing system (because of its complexity writing wasn't carried over by people over cultural evolution, but may have been reinvented adhoc when needed for very specific purposes) old greek is a good exemple (you have Linear B used during Mycenian times, then a long period of purely oral tradition, then the Greek alphabet being adopted). It's the opposite of modern situation (were Latin is the most pervasive form of writing and due to computer and internet popularity is even used in language that traditionally never used it : like romanji).

    In the fictional universe of Stargate this may translate that only earthlings did evolve their writing systems into something practical and easy to learn (in the movie, writing was showed to be forbiden). Most other population may have kept a lot of different and complex writing, some of which aren't even alphabet but much bigger character sets (syllables or ideographs).

    In which case, for a team to be able to communicate in the fictionnal SG universe :
    - for spoken language :
    they need to learn some basic words in most language. As language are supposed to be primitive, they're expected to speak different dialects of mostly old Indo-European language. This concretly could mean learning a dozen or so translation for most common words needed for basic communication. The rest is usually dialectal difference and can be completed with guess work as dialogue is going. (And as experience in other language accumulate this is becoming even easier). The actual barrier isn't as much the vocabulary as the potential social faux-pas that could exist in a fictionnal setting where culture and civilisation are scattered into a lot of small and separated sub-groups accross the galaxy.

    - for written language :
    They would need to learn several writing systems, most of which consists of thousands of different symbols and unlike spoken language, can't be grouped into closely related groups. Also, when you're not sure about the meaning you can't just ask the text to explain it.

    To make comparison with other fictionnal situations : You're m

    --
    "Sufficiently advanced satire is indistinguishable from reality." - [Tips: 1DrYakQDKCQ6y52z6QbnkxHXAocMZJE61o ]
    1. Re:Then I can gues... by AK+Marc · · Score: 1

      Reading is the most easy for you because you're quite familar with the symbols used to write language.

      I know about 200 characters I can read in Chinese, and about 200 words I understand when spoken (and there isn't a complete overlap). I find that written is harder than spoken for the first 10 words/characters. Written is easier than spoken after the first 100. Given that these people are supposedly aware of similar languages, and written languages change less over time than spoken languages, I would think that in Stargate people would be much more likely to be able to read than speak the language in question.

  51. Other planned spin-offs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Battle Stargate Gallactica
    - Tagline: Cylons versus the Replicators

    Babylon Stargate
    - Tagline: There is a hole in your Stargate.

    Stargate Extreme
    - Tagline: It's what I do.

    Quantum Stargate
    - Tagline: Oh, boy ...

    Any more? ;-)

  52. You really have to ask? by supabeast! · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...and what the concept behind the show will be?

    I'm guessing it will involve a bunch of Air Force nerds who travel through a magic gate to other planets which all oddly resemble either California or British Coloumbia, and once there, do whatever the Star Trek crew did in whatever episode of Star Trek the script for this particular episode of the new Stargate was lifted from. And they'll throw in a popular nerd or two from some other nerdy show to ensure that nerds bother to watch.

  53. Gate == TARDIS ? by sadler121 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe the gate acts like the TARDIS, and emits a telepathic field that automatically translates the native language into the native language of the traveler and vic versa.

    Of course, the gate can only translate verbal language and not written language like the TARDIS. That is a result of the Ancients not being as technologically advanced as the Time Lords.

    That being said, I think the Doctor needs to get to the Pegasus Galaxy asap. They seem to have ZPM's and sense the Eye of Harmony doesn't work anymore (hence why the Doctor has to refuel the TARDIS from time to time) it could turn out to be useful. At the very least, he won't have to make continuous trips to Cardiff.

    Hmmm, I wonder which provides more energy, an artificial black hole, or Zero Point Energy...

    1. Re:Gate == TARDIS ? by Drooling+Iguana · · Score: 1

      The artificial black hole. ZPE is the 21st century equivalent of cold fusion.

      --
      ... I'm addicted to placebos
  54. Re:I am glad to hear it. SG1 is surprisingly good by paralaxcreations · · Score: 1

    The SG teams could be like rescue rangers getting silly colonists out of problems and dealing with various hostilities.

    But are they mighty? And do they morph?

  55. oh no, the halow invaded earth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Halow invaded earth?

  56. they ran out of ideas, so they ask slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Methinks the ideas have long run out. But how would a writer come up with something to turn in.. I know, pretend to be starting a third series and leak the rumor to /. thousands of nerd will then make up all kinds of creative work that can be harnessed.

  57. Even better by Shawn+is+an+Asshole · · Score: 1

    CSI: Captain Hero

    Captain Hero: tell us - what was the name of the Wookiee whos' fluff resides on your shoe

    Captain Hero: Don't want to talk? Perhaps some neck snapping will convince you.

    Captain Hero: *snaps neck of witness*

    --
    "It ain't a war against drugs.it's a war against personal freedom" --Bill Hicks
  58. SG-1 has been unwatchable for three seasons. by kuerin · · Score: 1

    One problem is that the characters and the actors playing them have grown so familiar with the Stargate universe as to rob the show of any sense of wonder or jeopardy. They've also grown too familiar with each other. Did anyone else notice during season eight that the cast started replacing dialogue with knowing glances? It's hard to stay interested in a show when its characters are disaffected and weary. Daniel Jackson, in particular, has transformed from a bright-eyed, humanitarian idealist into a snide, jaded, and wholly unlikeable jackass.

    Another major problem is that the writers insist on injecting the show with unfunny humor. Compare early and later seasons in this regard. O'Neill admonishing Daniel not to speak metaphorically because it isn't fair to Teal'c: funny. Carter cheerily humming the Stargate theme in the SGC elevator: unfunny and cringe-inducing. I also don't understand why levity is regularly inserted at inappropriate times. It's hard to appreciate the gravity of a fictional situation when not even the characters in the situation take it seriously.

    1. Re:SG-1 has been unwatchable for three seasons. by Eli+Gottlieb · · Score: 1

      snide, jaded, and wholly unlikeable jackass. You misspelled "Prior".
  59. Stargate:Time War by sadler121 · · Score: 1

    You mean how the Time War in Doctor Who got rid of both the Time Lords and the Daleks?

    Damn, that is my third Doctor Who reference in three posts. Maybe I need to stop watching that show...

    1. Re:Stargate:Time War by jandrese · · Score: 1

      You know, considering how many Daleks the Doctor has run across now, I have to wonder if he's not going to run into another Timelord at some point. Thus far he's been galactically wrong about the "everybody died" part, at least W.R.T. the Daleks.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
  60. sound stages.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What is funny, both Stargate and BSG are shot in sound stages across the street from each other.. :)

  61. I've had this taste in my mouth before. by Orrin+Bloquy · · Score: 1
    From the link:

    Stargate Infinity is the story of veteran Stargate explorer Major Gus Bonner and a group of young Air Force Academy cadets. Wrongly accused of treason, they must flee across the universe

    If you have a problem, if no one else can help, and if you can find them, maybe you can hire...the A-Team.
    --
    "Made up/misattributed quote that makes me look smart. I am on /. and I must look smart."
    1. Re:I've had this taste in my mouth before. by kyouteki · · Score: 1

      Oh, if only I had points...

      --
      A slashdotter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber.
  62. Space channel ruined Stargate for me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here in Canada the Space Channel stopped running Stargate halfway through the final season. No explanation whatsoever. I tuned in one night for an 'all new episode' and was most disturbed to find a re-run from a few years ago. Same thing the following week and the week after. I gave up. As I'm sure many others did. Canadian ratings would have plummeted because of Space prematurely cancelling the series before it was actually over. This effect of Space's action probably had a role in the decision to end the series.

    Stargate has never been the same since. Space is running episodes from the last half of final season in dribs and drabs now, out of order, ruining the continuity.

    Stargatus Interruptus.

  63. Stargate?!?! Meh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No hottie engine mechanics, no pseudo-curse words, less capacity than Ipod.

    Not Firefly. Lame.

  64. Re:They already did! by Jarlsberg · · Score: 1

    Eh, you're not in the loop. There's more RDA on the show now than there's been for the last two seasons. :)

  65. Just another confirmation by usmc1944 · · Score: 1

    Rumor about the new series as been going on for over a year now, with some hints of that being based in a new galaxy (not the Milky Way, nor the Pegasus Galaxy). We'll see...

  66. Don't people get it? Ori == the Christ/Muslim God by Alaria+Phrozen · · Score: 1, Redundant

    For me, Stargate has always been about explaining/spinning past religions. Sure, everybody loved the Goa'uld, and I always figured that was because few people worship or take seriously the ancient Greek/Roman gods, let alone the Egyptian ones. But now everybody hates the Ori? For me the Ori are the best, simply because SG-1 is tackling the ridiculousness of fundamentalist monotheistic religions of today!

    It's absolutely crazy to me that since both the Muslim and Christian god are that of Abraham and Isaac, why the hell do we hate eachother so much? "My prophet/spin is right and yours is wrong" - ? That's nuts. And SG-1 is getting to the bottom of it. I love Daniel's monologues, and the clear paralellism between the Ori's fire believe-or-be-burned and God/Satan religious ridiculousness whereas the Ancients represent science and reason -- and whether people realize these symetries or not, NOBODY is rooting for the Ori and everybody is hoping the Ancients and the regular people get to live and be left alone -- which is at odds with what the majority of the US Christians believe and practice daily! For a show to accomplish something like this makes it great in my book.

    Plus the character development was enough to hook two girls that I know. And they're separate, distinct, unique girls! I know that's pushing it for Slashdot to even know that many, but holy cow! Girls! Stargate! They actually like it! And it's sci-fi! Holy crap!

  67. First possible cast member named by Snerk · · Score: 1

    http://stargate-sg1-solutions.com/blog/?p=720 Shanks approached to star in 3rd Stargate series! "Now Stargate SG1 Solutions can exclusively reveal that SG1's Michael Shanks, who plays Dr. Daniel Jackson on the show, has already been approached to star in the third Stargate series! We were informed by a source close to the production that Shanks would be lead actor and Daniel Jackson the main character in the spinoff." So, the scoops aren't so exclusive anymore ;) It will be interesting to see how some portions of fandom react to this tidbit.

    1. Re:First possible cast member named by phlack · · Score: 1
      From TFA:

      The many fans of the sizzling chemistry between Daniel Jackson and the roguish Vala Mal Doran, played by Claudia Black, will no doubt be gearing up to lobby The Powers That Be at Bridge Studios in Vancouver urging Wright and Cooper to secure Shanks and Black as their male and female leads. I'd go for that.

      'Course, they'd probably have to call the show "Stargate SG-1:Reloaded"

  68. chevron 9 by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    This is still one thing that has not been used on star gate yet

  69. Direct-to-dvd Movies? by adavies42 · · Score: 1

    Direct-to-dvd movies? Since when? This is the first I've heard of them.

    --
    Media that can be recorded and distributed can be recorded and distributed.
    -kfg
  70. Baka! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > I think you'll find that the people in Japan actually speak that language, they didn't just invent it so that you could hear people talk funny in Anime.

    Ahh, sumimasen. Temae desu! Baka nihongo no jutsu!

    Yoroshiku onegai itashimasu.

  71. Stargate SG2: Beating A Dead Horse by equivocal · · Score: 1

    That's right, reuse the timeline! A new exciting series follows the exploits of SG2--visiting counless uninhabited worlds, filling out paperwork, cleaning up the base after SG1 messes it up. Great fun!

  72. Poor firefly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And Firefly, you know, can't get ONE damn season, much less any more TV time. And it's a far better series, seriously.

  73. Man do I hate Stargate by glwtta · · Score: 1

    I mean, that is some seriously shitty science fiction. The first couple of seasons of SG1 were somewhat palatable, but the rest (and especially Atlantis) is just horrid, horrid tripe.

    Just had to get that off my chest. It's a sad state of affairs for TV science fiction when the Stargates are considered some of the "better" shows.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
    1. Re:Man do I hate Stargate by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Here is the line that made it so I stop watching the show:
      "The frequency is out of our hearing range; I'll turn it up so we can hear it."

      gah.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect