Slashdot Mirror


Scotty To Be 'Beamed Up'

joel_archer writes "James 'Scotty' Doohan's remains will be launched into space in accord with his last wishes. Commercial space flight operator Space Services Inc. will launch the late actor's remains into space aboard its Explorers Flight on December 6. Along for the ride will be 120 others including an unidentified astronaut and Mareta West, the astrogeologist who determined the site for the first spacecraft landing on the moon. Fans can post tributes to Doohan at the Space Services Web site. Those messages will be digitized, packed with 'Scotty' and blasted into space."

127 comments

  1. I sure hope... by Atario · · Score: 1

    ...someone is screening those "tributes".

    Anyway, RIP, Mr. Doohan. You were loved.

    --
    "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    1. Re:I sure hope... by DrEldarion · · Score: 4, Funny

      They're sending it in to space, (presumably) never to be seen again by anyone ever. Does it really matter if the tributes contain a few goatse references or whatnot? As an added bonus, if an alien civilization manages to stumble across it and reverse-engineer the storage medium, it'll be the first inter-galactic goatse.

      Although that probably violates the "healthy development of alien life and culture" part of the Prime Directive...

    2. Re:I sure hope... by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      If it's never to be seen again and doesn't matter if it contains a few goatse references....why send it at all. You're totally missing the point.

    3. Re:I sure hope... by hawaiian717 · · Score: 1
      if an alien civilization manages to stumble across it and reverse-engineer the storage medium, it'll be the first inter-galactic goatse.

      Federation President: Suppose you instigate a full scale war?
      Colonel West: Quite frankly, Mr. President, we can clean their chronometers.

      --
      End of Line.
    4. Re:I sure hope... by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      If it's never to be seen again and doesn't matter if it contains a few goatse references....why send it at all.

      The rocket's being sent as a way to make money for the private space industry. Someone has paid for Doohan's remains to be put on board as a tribute to him. So those are both good things.

      Why send goatse references? Because people will be people. While it's disrespectful, there's no way to prove it was done, and no-one's going to see it anyway (unless in 50-100 years time someone decides to go up and get the remains as a piece of history, if they can be found).

    5. Re:I sure hope... by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      People spend a lot of money on fancy coffins that nobody will (ideally) see again. Does that mean the coffine is there to give the person a tribute and make more money for the funeral industry, so taping a goatse image to the inside makes no difference?

    6. Re:I sure hope... by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Hey, if you can find a way to check it that isn't time-consuming or expensive then by all means, create it. But I doubt it very much, so what're you going to do about it? There isn't anything you can do, so while I don't encourage people to do it, I'm not going to stay up all night over it.

      P.S. I didn't say it didn't matter. All I said was that it will be done, so people will have to live with it. I think the good (allowing all of his fans to send a personal message along with him) far outweigh the bad (allowing people to send up goatse references).

    7. Re:I sure hope... by Obsi · · Score: 1

      Will anyone know of Goatse in 50-100 years? Well, except the youngest among us, and by then (I hope) they'll keep it locked away in their heads and just let it die.

    8. Re:I sure hope... by DemoLiter3 · · Score: 0, Troll

      The funniest part will be where the rocket malfunctions and buries all the junk in the ocean instead.
      P.S. zOMG

    9. Re:I sure hope... by zootm · · Score: 1

      They're sending it in to space, (presumably) never to be seen again by anyone ever. Does it really matter if the tributes contain a few goatse references or whatnot?

      Probably not, but if the Ancient Egyptians were right he'll have some explaining to do when he appears in the afterlife in a box crammed half-full of child porn and profantity.

    10. Re:I sure hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As an added bonus, if an alien civilization manages to stumble across it and reverse-engineer the storage medium, it'll be the first inter-galactic goatse.

      Of course, if it encounters a super powerful alien craft, which then returns to reunite with its creator, someone is in for a big surprise!

    11. Re:I sure hope... by ptomblin · · Score: 4, Funny

      Alien Overlord: Looks like we're going to need bigger probes.

      --
      The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
    12. Re:I sure hope... by Hogwash+McFly · · Score: 1

      it'll be the first inter-galactic goatse.

      Scene: Two aliens are flying a cargo route when the ship's onboard computer presents an analysis of the foreign object they intercepted

      Alien 1: Hey, I swear I recognise that guy.
      Alien 2: He's the first human we ever probed, you know, before advances in probe technology reduced their size immensely.
      Alien 1: Oh yeah! I can't believe we used to carry those massive things around with us. Boy, that was one fun weekend.
      Alien 2: It sure was, Greg.
      Alien 1: 'Nother beer?
      Alien 2: Sure. You know, I think that guy's quite a celebrity back on Earth.
      Alien 1: Heh, cool. I know that guy. I know him.

      --
      Mother, do you think they'll like this sig?
    13. Re:I sure hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about just plain common decency? The man's dead, for $DEITY's sake.
      Send him off with a little respect, at least.

    14. Re:I sure hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, by then we will have 'Son of Goatse' /Anon 'cause I know this'll get modded down. Painfully. Like anal sex.

    15. Re:I sure hope... by mindaktiviti · · Score: 1

      I don't know whether to laugh or to cry. Luckily I did both.

  2. FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I will be on that flight.

    1. Re:FYI by saskboy · · Score: 1

      " I will be on that flight."

      Who are you? The remains of Scotty, or an Inanimate Carbon Rod?

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    2. Re:FYI by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      In Rod We Trust!

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    3. Re:FYI by Lifix · · Score: 1

      I remember flying to london with my parents when I was 8 so about ~11 years ago. We had just sat down, me next to my father, and my brother behind me with my mother. As the last passengers sat down, my father grabed my hand and gestured at the seat across the isle. Mr. Doohan sat down and while we didn't talk to him, there was something special about being in his presence. A few days later, me and my father went out to go get breakfast early in the morning, and we ran into Mr. Doohan again, getting tea in the same shop we were in, we exchanged hellos and we told him that we really appreciated his work and he winked at us and said goodbye. 3 --- ^^^^ included in his launch

      --
      In nature, there are neither rewards or punishments, there are only consequences.
  3. Godsend Jimmy by TiredGamer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Everything I've ever heard from fans and co-workers has described James "Jimmy" Doohan as a man who was funny, caring, and a great guy to be with. Unlike certain unnamed Trek actors, he was never too big to attend the smallest convention and he was always pleased just to be there for the fans. He will be truly missed.

    --
    No penguins were harmed in the making of this post.
    1. Re:Godsend Jimmy by TheEqualizer · · Score: 5, Informative

      Doohan was also a WW2 vet who took part in the Normandy landings, losing a part of his hand due to enemy fire.

    2. Re:Godsend Jimmy by bn557 · · Score: 1

      I'm just guessing that the other person is only a minor geek, pointing out that he did things that some would concider to be more noble than keeping the ship together or 'writing the spec'. Remembering ANY good thing a man does in his life is all that's important. Some will remember him for having been Scotty, others will remember him for being a husband, and yet others might remember him because he faught along side them on a beach in europe.

      --
      Humans are slow, innaccurate, and brilliant; computers are fast, acurrate, and dumb; together they are unbeatable
    3. Re:Godsend Jimmy by aussie_a · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If it weren't for his disease (and later, death) I imagine he would have been right there beside Walter Koenig in a fan-produced episode.

      While actors like the one that played Spock are much more famous then "the little guys" like Doohan and Koenig (not that they're very little ;)), for me there's something really special about them willing to go that extra mile for their fans (and enjoying it as well) that puts them above others, such as the actor who played Kirk.

    4. Re:Godsend Jimmy by 1u3hr · · Score: 1, Interesting
      there's something really special about them willing to go that extra mile for their fans (and enjoying it as well) that puts them above others, such as the actor who played Kirk.

      I'm not at all denying Doohan was a great human being; but as an actor he was typecast forever after Trek. Shatner is probably the only one who had a significant post-Trek career, and if that meant not spending so much time signing souvenirs for fanboys to sell on eBay, you shouldn't hold it against him.

    5. Re:Godsend Jimmy by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is for many people his role on Star Trek seems more important than his being a husband and father. Is anyone willing to question why playing a fictional hero seems to inspire more interest than helping to free Europe?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:Godsend Jimmy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Doohan was also a WW2 vet who took part in the Normandy landings, losing a part of his hand due to enemy fire.

      Not to take anything away from his sacrifice for freedom, but just so that on the one year anniversary the wound doesn't travel any further up his arm, I'd like to point out that he lost part of his finger. Yes, the finger is part of the hand but "losing part of his hand" seems -- to me at least -- to denote a larger area.

    7. Re:Godsend Jimmy by aussie_a · · Score: 2, Insightful

      and if that meant not spending so much time signing souvenirs for fanboys to sell on eBay, you shouldn't hold it against him.

      I don't hold him making money against him (although he IS a controversial figure when it comes to the Trek fandom, as well as an actor with what some of his co-workers have had to say in the past), I just think that those who ARE willing to put the extra effort in (regardless of the reasons) are placed a little higher in my heart.

      I do find it amusing that one of the worse actors from Star Trek (in my opinion) is one of the most successful ones post Star Trek.

    8. Re:Godsend Jimmy by dorsey · · Score: 1

      Koenig (not that they're very little ;))

      On the contrary, Walter Koenig is a tiny, tiny man.

      --
      hinderfreude ('hin-dur-"froi-d&), n. The feeling of joy derived from being in the way.
    9. Re:Godsend Jimmy by blincoln · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is anyone willing to question why playing a fictional hero seems to inspire more interest than helping to free Europe?

      My guess is that (at least in the US) WWII is a distant historical event, whereas anyone with a TV can see him playing Scotty at least once a week.

      I'm 27. Neither of my parents were born when WWII ended. When I was in high school, WWII was taught in the same way as things that really are ancient history. There was no sense of connection to it on a personal level. Maybe if I had grown up in part of the world where it was actually fought and our class could have seen and touched artifacts of it it would have been more real.

      I didn't get a sense of connection to it until 3 or 4 years ago when I watched the old World at War documentary series on DVD, and inherited a naval AA gunsight and barrel of that era from my granddad.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    10. Re:Godsend Jimmy by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 1

      I bet you're glad you didn't say that about George Takei. Never call him tiny...

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    11. Re:Godsend Jimmy by Chadhulhu · · Score: 1

      I watched Trekkie, and I have to say he was the most moving of all the trek people, a truly caring man. He was a grand man, we will all miss ya Scotty..

      --
      i do not suffer from Insanity... I revel in it.
  4. Its in a large part just publicity by TheEqualizer · · Score: 5, Informative

    Those ashes aren't really going into space, just low-earth orbit, and their orbit will decay in a decade or so.

    1. Re:Its in a large part just publicity by QuantumG · · Score: 4, Informative

      Wrong. They're boosted into a "perminate" parking orbit. These guys do good work and they're one of the few companies making a shot at space services and actually making any money. All spacecraft need balast, it might as well be something people are willing to pay to send up.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:Its in a large part just publicity by Vellmont · · Score: 0

      That's not what the article says, though obviously it could be wrong. Please provide evidence that the orbit isn't just a LEO and will decay in 50-100 years.

      --
      AccountKiller
    3. Re:Its in a large part just publicity by kfg · · Score: 5, Insightful

      . . .just publicity

      Ya mean like a tombstone? It's a memorial. Publicity is inherent in their nature.

      Those ashes aren't really going into space, just low-earth orbit. . .

      i.e., space.

      . . .their orbit will decay in a decade or so.

      I canna change the laws of physics, Cap'n, but what better way to scatter a gram or seven of Jimmy's ashes upon the face of the earth Earth? That's one shooting movie star I'd like to see with my own eyes.

      So long Jimmy, and thanks for all the Trek.

      KFG

    4. Re:Its in a large part just publicity by QuantumG · · Score: 0

      uhhh, 50 to 100 years is perminate. I suppose you think Copyrights are for "limited time" too.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    5. Re:Its in a large part just publicity by TheEqualizer · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, no orbit is permanent, all orbits eventualy decay. Here's what thair web site says... http://www.memorialspaceflights.com/faq.asp How long will the cremated remains stay in Earth orbit? The length of orbital stay depends on the final altitude of the primary satellite launched on the mission (a memorial spacecrafts is a "secondary payload" aboard each mission). For example, the orbital life span for our Celestis satellites ranged from two years to several hundred years. The anticipated orbital lifetime for each mission is posted on the dedicated flight web page, after its launch.

    6. Re:Its in a large part just publicity by kfg · · Score: 1

      . . .50 to 100 years is perminate.

      You keep using that word. . .

      A boy broke a rare, 400 year old teacup that belonged to his master.
      When he saw the master, he asked "Why does death happen?".
      The master said "It is natural. Everything lives and dies."
      The boy showed the broken cup and said "It was time for your cup to die".


      By your measure I will soon become "perminate." I rather think, however, that despite any possible legislation to the contrary, I will become rather less "perminate" than I previously was.

      The laws of physics have this nasty habit of ignoring orders from command.

      KFG

    7. Re:Its in a large part just publicity by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Informative
      Those ashes aren't really going into space, just low-earth orbit. . .
      i.e., space.
      Actually, most of the ashes aren't even going to LEO. Most will be scattered at sea. What goes into space is only a symbolic 1 or 7 gram sample (sample size dependant on service you select).
    8. Re:Its in a large part just publicity by kfg · · Score: 1

      What goes into space is only a symbolic 1 or 7 gram sample. . .

      See the paragraph after the one you quote.

      KFG

    9. Re:Its in a large part just publicity by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      Right so that makes my 80 year old WWI history books permanant too?

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    10. Re:Its in a large part just publicity by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

      No, it makes them "perminate" which is completely different from "permanent" and coincidentally is often confused with being "permanant"

      Unless you're trying to make a profit in Soviet Russia with a Beowulf cluster of ways to spell that word.

      --
      Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
  5. (activates comm link) by McCarrum · · Score: 3, Funny

    I canna do it Captain.

    Seriously.

    1. Re:(activates comm link) by xquark · · Score: 1

      Its actually:

      Ay canna doo id cap'in

      --
      Arash Partow's Philosophy: Be a person who knows what they don't know, and not a person who doesn't know.
    2. Re:(activates comm link) by Denyer · · Score: 1

      Er, Doohan did a better Scottish accent than Gregor Fisher in Rab C Nesbitt.

      Back on thread, his role in Trek made technical stuff interesting, and I'm thankful he helped spur that interest for me. RIP, dude.

      --
      Ph-nglui mglw'nafh Gates M'dna wgah'nagl fhtagn.
  6. From the CNN article.... by max99ted · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Doohan's cremated remains will be packed into a special tube that is ejected from the rocket and expected to orbit Earth for about 50 to 200 years before plunging into the planet's atmosphere and burning up
    Bummer... why couldn't they just fire it off to some random star or something? Like say, the second star on the right?
    --

    Please stop APK.. you're only hurting yourself.

    1. Re:From the CNN article.... by Vellmont · · Score: 2, Informative


      Bummer... why couldn't they just fire it off to some random star or something? Like say, the second star on the right?

      Money. It's expensive to escape the earths gravitational pull. It's even more expensive to escape the suns gravitational pull. The escape velocity of the earth is 11.2 km/sec at the surface. The escape velocity of the sun on the earths surface is 42.1 km/sec, which is about 95,000 miles an hour. Someone correct me if I'm wrong but I think the voyager and pioneer probes only managed to escape the suns gravity though planetary gravitational assists.

      --
      AccountKiller
    2. Re:From the CNN article.... by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      If it only goes on for a day I think they'll be happy enough.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    3. Re:From the CNN article.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't mind being launched into our own sun, neat way to go out :)

    4. Re:From the CNN article.... by drsquare · · Score: 1

      It's piggy-backing another mission. That other mission involves going into orbit, not to another star.

    5. Re:From the CNN article.... by meringuoid · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't mind being launched into our own sun, neat way to go out :)

      That would actually be more expensive than being sent to another star. Remember, you're already in orbit around the Sun, moving along with the Earth. That gives you a big boost towards the energy you'd need to escape the Sun altogether.

      If you want to actually send something into the Sun, you have to lose all that speed and basically drop straight down. That turns out to be a bigger job than just speeding up even more to escape completely. We're nearer to escaping the Sun than falling in :-)

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    6. Re:From the CNN article.... by Baron_Yam · · Score: 1

      Ahh, but how much energy would it take to flatten your orbit into an elipse that passes through the corona?

    7. Re:From the CNN article.... by OverlordQ · · Score: 1

      what exactly is the maths for figuring out the escape velocity for the sun?

      --
      Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
    8. Re:From the CNN article.... by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      About two-hundred-and-fourty libaries of congress.

    9. Re:From the CNN article.... by wcbarksdale · · Score: 1

      One way to do it is to calculate the total work done on a point mass m as it travels from close to the sun (starting at 1AU or wherever) to infinitely far away, using Newton's Law of Gravitation and simple calculus. Then to escape the object must start with at least the equivalent amount of KE=.5mv^2, from which you can find v.

    10. Re:From the CNN article.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That would actually be more expensive than being sent to another star. Remember, you're already in orbit around the Sun, moving along with the Earth. That gives you a big boost towards the energy you'd need to escape the Sun altogether.

      That is a completely unproven hypothesis!!
      as your school teacher will be happy to explain to you, the Sun is in fact very slowly rotating around the earth, and it should be pretty easy to launch a probe into the sun.
      If you do it at night, you might be just dropping it off the edge of the earth onto the sun as it passes under the flat earth.

    11. Re:From the CNN article.... by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      spoken by someone thats never tried to actualy DERIVE 3d Parametric functions for the motions of a balistic/orbital body from the laws of gravitation and motion... I have high school notebooks where pages have been filled with my efforts to work out a simple 2d version, the 3d mechanics and calculus are not at all "simple"

      unless of course you have someone else do them for you and just stick numbers into a formula.

      that always makes it easier.

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
  7. Why on Earth do you get Space news from CNN? by TheStonepedo · · Score: 5, Informative

    BBC ran this article months ago:
    Scotty's ashes to hit outer space

    --
    I'll be your candy shop of infinite deliciousity if you'll be my discotheque of endless rump-shaking.
    1. Re:Why on Earth do you get Space news from CNN? by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Two issues:

      First, this story is a followup. If you bothered to read the story you posted, you'd see it was mentioned that the launch was scheduled for September originally. The "news" part of this news is that the company spokesperson announced this on Friday, October 14.

      Second, this isn't a CNN story - it's a Reuters wire story. CNN is just carrying it.

      Sometimes news gets new again...just because something is mentioned once doesn't mean new things don't happen.

  8. Stupid Idea by sincewhen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not that I have anything against Mr Doohan personally, but this strikes me as an incredibly stupid idea.
    Why waste all that money, time and effort putting *dead people* into orbit so they can float around for a while being a space junk hazard?
    As Mr Spock would say...

    --
    -- Braden's law of data: All data spends some of its lifetime in an excel spreadsheet.
    1. Re:Stupid Idea by TheEqualizer · · Score: 1

      Ego.

    2. Re:Stupid Idea by Detritus · · Score: 1

      Are you volunteering to take his place?

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:Stupid Idea by The+Great+Wazzoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      because not everything needs to be of practical value...

    4. Re:Stupid Idea by SpaceAdmiral · · Score: 1

      The more private ventures to space/orbit, the cheaper the technology will get.

      Sure, compared to kick-ass NASA/ESA missions this is rather insignificant, but it's not really a waste of money. Especially since some of the money will go back to the people currently creating the technology that will let me tour Mars in 60 years.

      Oh, also, putting one's remains into space is totally awesome.

    5. Re:Stupid Idea by Kazzahdrane · · Score: 1

      Personally this has been my final wish for a few years, and though I don't expect to die for a long time I've told my family that this is the way I want to go. Why? Ego, possibly. Plus it sounds so fucking cool. And hey, much more chance of finding technology to bring dead people back to life out on some other planet than here on Earth. I just need to survive long enough for high-speed space technology to be around, don't want to be a rotted corpse by the time the big-headed aliens find me.

    6. Re:Stupid Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I going to guess he didn't want to be a victim of necrophilia or part of some geeks ultimate star trek collection.

    7. Re:Stupid Idea by bgog · · Score: 1

      They send only 1 gram of the remains and they remain attached to the rocket stage until is deorbits. The remains are a secondary payload attached to a real mission of launching sats into space. Therefore they do not cause any extra space junk. The cost is minnimal based on the amount of remains sent. RTFA

    8. Re:Stupid Idea by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
      And hey, much more chance of finding technology to bring dead people back to life out on some other planet than here on Earth. I just need to survive long enough for high-speed space technology to be around, don't want to be a rotted corpse by the time the big-headed aliens find me.

      Actually, you will be cremated first. Good luck on resuscitating that!

    9. Re:Stupid Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you. I hope someone mods that comment up. It would make a good tagline for someone's hobby website...the kind that gets ridiculed by the humorless denizens of /. because the author has "too much time on his hands."

    10. Re:Stupid Idea by Whyte+Panther · · Score: 1

      Maybe they'll clone him instead... Could be the aliens first chance to study a live human being (that is, if you don't beleive that the aliens have been anal probing the country bumpkins all along)

    11. Re:Stupid Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder why people get so touchy about necrophilia. I mean, if you are dead, I would say you are pretty well fucked anyway ;)

    12. Re:Stupid Idea by MrDiablerie · · Score: 1

      Why waste all that money, time and effort putting *dead people* into THE GROUND were they are just using up valuable real estate? Same thing. It's because it's a memorial. Not everything has to have practical value.

  9. Stylish send off by FishandChips · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, having already been incinerated once, at least Scotty will be able to consider himself an old hand at these things if the rocket explodes on launch.

    --
    Las qué passoun
    tournoun pas maï
  10. As if there was not enough crap in space by slb · · Score: 3, Insightful
    There's already enough hazards in the near space, why such ridiculous things are allowed ?

    Knowing the damage one of those capsule would cause to a satellite, it's like allowing people to put their tombstones on the highway ...

    --
    http://www.transparency.org
    1. Re:As if there was not enough crap in space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Oh, come on. It's nowhere near the orbit of satellites. It's like putting a tombstone in a field next to a seldom traveled road. Oh wait, that's kind of like what they do here on the ground. Some people simply have no concept of scale and 3 dimensional space.....

    2. Re:As if there was not enough crap in space by aussie_a · · Score: 1

      Good point. Something you don't mention though is that this debris may cause harm to vehicles attempting to escape Earth's orbit (such as on a trip to the moon). However I'm sure this was considered when permission was given to the people doing this, so it's more then likely not a problem.

      Why bother pointing this out if it's not a problem? Because someone else was likely to (and perhaps give it a more negative spin).

    3. Re:As if there was not enough crap in space by VENONA · · Score: 1

      What's wrong with tombstones on the highway?

      --
      What you do with a computer does not constitute the whole of computing.
  11. A Fitting Fortune (Cookie) by cybercobra · · Score: 5, Funny

    Q: How many members of the U.S.S. Enterprise does it take to change a
            light bulb?
    A: Seven. Scotty has to report to Captain Kirk that the light bulb in
            the Engineering Section is getting dim, at which point Kirk will send
            Bones to pronounce the bulb dead (although he'll immediately claim
            that he's a doctor, not an electrician). Scotty, after checking
            around, realizes that they have no more new light bulbs, and complains
            that he "canna" see in the dark. Kirk will make an emergency stop at
            the next uncharted planet, Alpha Regula IV, to procure a light bulb
            from the natives, who, are friendly, but seem to be hiding something.
            Kirk, Spock, Bones, Yeoman Rand and two red shirt security officers
            beam down to the planet, where the two security officers are promply
            killed by the natives, and the rest of the landing party is captured.
            As something begins to develop between the Captain and Yeoman Rand,
            Scotty, back in orbit, is attacked by a Klingon destroyer and must
            warp out of orbit. Although badly outgunned, he cripples the Klingon
            and races back to the planet in order to rescue Kirk et. al. who have
            just saved the natives' from an awful fate and, as a reward, been
            given all light bulbs they can carry. The new bulb is then inserted
            and the Enterprise continues on its five year mission.

    - fortune-mod

    May the great actor rest in peace.

    1. Re:A Fitting Fortune (Cookie) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You forgot the fact that the lightbulb wasn't getting dim in the first place, Scotty just wanted to look like more of a miracle worker for working in low-lighting conditions.

    2. Re:A Fitting Fortune (Cookie) by DJCF · · Score: 5, Funny

      Q: How many members of the original Enterprise does it take to change a light bulb?

      A:

      Captain's Log, Stardate 5187.8. Having cleared up the diplomatic crisis on Politico, I've managed to obtain a leave for my ship and crew. They are looking forward to this much needed vacation.

      (Scene: The Bridge)

      Kirk: Mr. Sulu, set course for the planet Luxuria.

      Sulu: Yes, sir!

      (Suddenly, the ship is rocked by a violent explosion which causes everyone to fall out of their chairs.)

      Kirk: Mr. Chekov, report on all Klingon ships in the area.

      Chekov: Negative, keptin. Sensors show no enemy wessel in sight.

      Kirk: Your analysis, Mr. Spock.

      Spock: I assure you, Captain, I am not operating under the influence of illicit mind-altering substances. However, if you think it necessary, regulations do stipulate that--

      Kirk: I meant your analysis of the current situation.

      Spock: My apologies, Captain. I am still sometimes unable to compensate for the vagaries of human enunciation. It would appear, Captain, that a visional catalyst source has malfunctioned to the critical overload stage. (Noticing Kirk's blank stare, he shakes his head almost imperceptably.) To rephrase my statement into what I believe you humans call `the vernacular': a light bulb blew in Engineering.

      Kirk: Sulu, you have the Bridge. Spock, come with me.

      (Scene: Engineering. A medical team is dragging off an injured engineer in a red shirt. Scotty is surveying the damage and shaking his head. He spots Kirk and Spock.)

      Scotty: Ca'en, sair, seen a' th' bulb ha' burn oot, I kinna see to oper'a' me engines!

      (Kirk smiles and nods.)

      Kirk (whispering to Spock): What did he say?

      Spock: I believe, Captain, that Mr. Scott wishes to register a complaint to the effect that there is insufficient illumination to perform the duties requisite in his capacity as Chief Engineer.

      Kirk: Oh. Well, Scotty, get a spare from storage.

      Spock: I fear such action would be inappropriate, Captain. Starfleet Regulation 171.34c requires us to travel with a full complement of spare parts at all times. If we were to remove a bulb from storage, then we would not have a full complement, and hence be in direct violation.

      Kirk: Damn the regulations, Spock, I've got a ship with 430 people aboard to think of! At least I think there are 430; come to think of it, I've never actually seen more than a couple dozen. Oh well, where is the nearest source of light bulbs?

      Spock: I believe the planet Luminos satisfies the specified parameters.

      Kirk: Scotty, do we have enough power to make it to Luminos?

      Scotty: Ach, I dinna righ'ly ken, Ca'en; we're runnin' a wee bit low. However, if we go strai' thar and dinna hurry, I thin' we migh' possibly duit.

      Kirk: Thank you, Scotty. Spock?

      Spock: Mr. Scott has formulated the opinion that there is insufficient data for complete analysis; current fuel capacity is scarcely in excess of minimal standards. However, probability dictates our vessel has the capability to sustain the journey under the following two constraints: a direct course must be set and maintained throughout and the ship's velocity must satisfy a maximality condition.

      Kirk: Then I'm afraid our little pleasure trip will have to wait.

      (Scene: The Bridge. Sulu and Chekov are engaged in conversation.)

      Sulu: I think it was Thomas Edison.

      Chekov: No, you are wrong; the light bulb is a Russian inwention.

      (Kirk and Spock enter.)

      Kirk: Mr. Sulu, set a direct course for the planet Luminos.

      Sulu (startled): But, Captain, that'll take us straight through the Romulan Neutral Zone!

      Kirk: It's a risk we'

    3. Re:A Fitting Fortune (Cookie) by dimator · · Score: 1

      I can't picture anyone reading all of this.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    4. Re:A Fitting Fortune (Cookie) by voxel · · Score: 1

      I just read the whole thing.

      Laughed out loud a couple times.

      --
      Modesty is one of life's greatest attributes
    5. Re:A Fitting Fortune (Cookie) by Murasaki+Skies · · Score: 1

      He's funny, Jim.

      --
      Waiiii!!!!!! I have bad karma!
  12. This is not good.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is just stupid. The matter from the bodys of the deceased should stay on earth and be used by plats, then eaten by animals and then eaten by us. Not launched into space - whatif this space burial thing really takes of and millions of kg of ashes is launched every year for a few hundred million years? :(

    1. Re:This is not good.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AFAIK, only a gram of the ashes are sent into orbit, and the remaining ashes are buried in the traditional way.
      Btw, in some countries it's illegal to divide the ashes...

  13. Am I the only one... by jrockway · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...who immediately submitted, "He's dead, Jim"?

    I've never watched Star Trek (*turns in geek card*), but it seems fitting.

    --
    My other car is first.
  14. Why do I care? by Leomania · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'll answer my own question. I'm 42 years old, and with that age (including a family with two amazing daughters that I scarecly deserve) comes a belief that there's something bigger than my not-so-amazing life... that the two children I fathered (and especially the wife who bore them) are somehow more wonderful than me, or anything I could imagine. A surprising consideration from someone who has developed a sense of wonder but who doesn't have a belief in the supernatural. I'm in awe of my progeny and the woman who agreed to share her life with me...

    Why is it that the news of James' passing makes me think of this, here in the wee hours of the morning? I guess it's not hard to deconstruct... I think we'd all like to be the one who worked behind the scenes, the one who made things possible but never got the credit for it. It's a romantic thought that is powerful in me...

    With the most reverent "I'm givin' 'er all she's got, Captain!",

    - Leo

    --
    You don't use science to show that you're right, you use science to become right.
    1. Re:Why do I care? by al_fruitbat · · Score: 1

      Why is it that the news of James' passing makes me think of this, here in the wee hours of the morning? I'm guessing whisky on the rocks ;-) (no offence to you or your lovely daughters intended)

    2. Re:Why do I care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm in awe of my progeny and the woman who agreed to share her life with me...

      We're all in awe about the woman thing too, I mean come on..this is slashdot

    3. Re:Why do I care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll bet you're a riot at parties.

  15. It's "aye" fool by WillerZ · · Score: 1

    n/t

    --
    I guess today is a passable day to die.
  16. The TOS crew should deserve better... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They prepared the citizens to stay calm when the NASA needed money to fly to the moon.

    The NASA should rest them in space.

  17. Some editing required by ErikZ · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Scotty To Be 'Beamed Up'


    Yeah. Just replace "Scotty" with "Pile of ashes". and "Beamed up" with "rocket launched" and we'll have an title that reflects reality.
    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    1. Re:Some editing required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I officially pronounce you a "buzzkill".

    2. Re:Some editing required by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Just replace "Scotty" with "Pile of ashes". and "Beamed up" with "rocket launched" and we'll have an title that reflects reality.

      I was disappointed as well. I completely expected an article about how Scotty has been brought back to life and then, using a secretly developed teleportation system, scientists are going to beam him into the vacuum of space as part of a sick prank.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    3. Re:Some editing required by RoadWarriorX · · Score: 1

      Hence, the term [making the quoting gesture with my hands] "Beamed up".

  18. James Doohan tribute message by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Image courtesy of STARTREK.com

    Damn-Paramount-Ferengis.

  19. Digitize messages? by nmoog · · Score: 1

    Can someone point us to a tutorial on digitizing messages for space. Sounds difficult.

    1. Re:Digitize messages? by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      Just use the established, intergalatic standard transmission format: WinZip.

  20. It's a trap! by nekojin · · Score: 1

    In 100 billion years or so, there are gonna be some seriously freaked out aliens.

  21. Amazing Grace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazing Grace bagpipes mp3 Perhaps they could record a good solo version and send it along. (linked version has an accompaniment) A song written by a captain who set his cargo of slaves free seems appropriate for the man who enslaved himself to the role of Scotty and made the best of it. (Not to mention the scene at Spock's funeral.)

  22. Scotty's the man by connah0047 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Now don't stone me for this, but I am about ten years too young to have grown up with the classic Star Trek. I grew up on TNG and that is by far my favorite. I never really cared for the Classic. However, when I was 14 (I'm now 25) and heard Scotty was coming to town for a Star Trek convention, I was there. I got a couple of autographs, got to shake his hand, and hear him tell stories.

    The thing that impressed me the most about him was that he didn't seem to have a self-inflated "I'm-an-American-Icon" attitude. He had a very gentle "grandfather" like attitude and spoke with a soft voice. James Doohan is the man.

  23. Chill out. by RoverDaddy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why do we do anything with dead people other than run them through meat grinders and then drop the result in a compost heap? Obviously, whether with or without religious convictions, most of us want to show respect to the dead and the people they have left behind. This is far more important to most people than the value of a few pounds of solid matter that make up a typical human body. When you think logically, even the practice of encasing each dead person in a wood or steel box, and then dropping said box in a plot of land, leaving that land unusable for any other purpose forever is unsustainable. If human custom remains this way long enough, the entire Earth would be one giant cemetery with billions of steel boxes wasting incredible resources. I suspect our customs will change long before this becomes an issue. On the other hand, perhaps it is hubris to assume that humanity will survive long enough for this to become a problem.

    --
    RETURN without GOSUB in line 1050
  24. This is dangerous and foolish by michaelbuddy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let's review the past few years. Space shuttle launches, gets damaged by debris on lift off. Of course, it wasn't proven, just highly speculated that the debris came from some foam that fell off during launch. Several people burned alive upon reentry because of the damage.

    Most recent shuttle launch, part of the voyage's purpose is diverted to make a repair, presumably because of more debris damage.

    Most recently, a private firm is allowed to launch a bunch of shit into orbit to make more debris danger and to commemorate a few people with enough money to waste on this kind of stuff, rather than give the wealth away to charitable organizations who are fighting disease or trying to make the world a better place. Great idea.

    --

    ...::----::...

    I am in no way affiliated with this sig.

  25. And so ... by popra · · Score: 1

    A new business is born (with a fitting PR campain I might add)
    Anyway, RIP Scotty

  26. Funny by RasendeRutje · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Very funny Scotty, now beam up my clothes!"

    --

    If Microsoft was mass, stupidity would be gravity.
  27. What to do with my ashes? by RoadWarriorX · · Score: 1

    Last year, when my father past away, I have been thinking about what to do with myself when I pass on. My father and mother have a plot in a mausoleum. Burying my remains seems to be a little boring, so I thought about cremation. But I do not want to have my dust stuck in an urn for all eternity. I am an atheist agnostic, so I do not have any predetermined requirements for my remains.

    I spend some time thinking about doing something special with my ashes if I chose cremation. A lot of people seem to like their ashes spread in ocean or in the sky. I thought about my ashes going to space, like Scotty's, but it may not be an option for a chump like me. Unless there is a service that performs this or I get connections, my family won't be able to do this practically.

    I went to the Internet to find alternatives. I found a couple that were interesting and practical. The one that seemed most attractive was creating diamonds from human ashes. I am not kidding. There are many companies, like LifeGem and Memory Jewels, that do this. I could not believe it myself. What else could be the best way for my wife and children to remember me by? I will have lasting sentimental value. Plus, loking at the price lists from Memory Jewels, it's much cheaper than buying a $3000 casket. I am seriously considering it, too.

    1. Re:What to do with my ashes? by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      I spend some time thinking about doing something special with my ashes if I chose cremation. A lot of people seem to like their ashes spread in ocean or in the sky. I thought about my ashes going to space, like Scotty's, but it may not be an option for a chump like me. Unless there is a service that performs this or I get connections, my family won't be able to do this practically.

      I don't know if you poked around the Space Services site much, but their prices are available online.

      Here's the breakdown:

      $995 - 1 gram of cremated remains into Earth orbit

      $5,300 - 7 grams into Earth orbit

      $12,500 - 1 gram into lunar orbit or lunar surface

      $12,500 - 1 gram into deep space

      The first option certainly seems affordable, especially when you consider that funerals often cost several thousand dollars.

  28. its new story because... by timelady · · Score: 1

    ..his wife has graciously and thoughtfully allowed fans to post tributes that will fly with him. given the choice between spy satellites and military hardware cluttering space, and people like gene rodenberry, and now james doohan, having some sky, hell, its a non issue, surely:)

    --
    Nothing - well thats something.
  29. First spacecraft? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Mareta West determined the landing site for Luna 9 (the first spacecraft ever to land on the Moon)? I doubt that. Perhaps what the author meant is "the first manned flight ever to land on the moon"?

  30. And the launch coordinator says... by K.B.Zod · · Score: 1

    "Beam Scotty up, me!" and pushes the big red button.

  31. To those who say this is foolish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To those who say this is foolish and a navagation hazard, please get a grip. Lets look at all the tons of space junk out there already. Are you seriously going to tell me that one vial of human ash is going to make a difference? Why don't you compare the size and mass of the vial with that of the primary cargo? "OMG, we are sending a boulder into orbit, but it's incrediby irresponsible to put a pebble up there with it!"

    Puhleeze.

    I was saddened when Jimmy Doohan died, and it makes me feel good to know that his ashes will be in space, perhaps until the 23rd century.

  32. He had an autobiography by Kobun · · Score: 1

    I loved the book. His time in the war, everything he did (invented Klingon-ese, wouldn't you know), he was always very modest about himself. Please give it a read if you feel you might at all be interested. I should hope your local library has a copy, but here is the amazon link just in case.

    http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0671 520563/qid=1129403831/sr=8-1/ref=pd_bbs_1/102-5334 151-6528956?v=glance&s=books&n=507846

  33. Also aboard - Michael Brown by infonography · · Score: 1

    Technician 1 "What you mean we have a problem with once of the passengers? They are all dead"
    Technician 2 "Not this one, he keeps banging on his container."
    Technician 1 "It's just your imagination."
    Technician 2 "No really go look, it's the big one"
    Technician 1 Looks at large 7x3 cansister, inscription reads;

    'From the Citizens of New Orleans and the Gulf Coast.'

              Michael Brown, Former FEMA director.

    Technician 1, thinks for a bit and turns to Technician 2.

    "If he doesn't like the ride tell him he can have a store credit when he gets back."

    --
    Sorry about the writing. Robot fingers, you know? Cliff Steele in DOOM PATROL #23
  34. MOD PARENT UP by kaladorn · · Score: 1

    Not everyone may know about the autobiography and it'd be 'interesting' or 'informative' in this thread, I think. This is meta-moderation of a sort - encouraging mods! ;)

    --
    -- Mal: "Well they tell you: never hit a man with a closed fist. But it is, on occasion, hilarious."
  35. Does the service create orbital debris pollution? by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

    This question seems to be coming up quite often in the threads here. From their FAQ:

    Space Services' spacecraft is carefully designed so as not to create orbital debris. Our spacecraft stays permanently attached to a rocket stage that orbits until it harmlessly re-enters and is completely consumed by Earth's atmosphere - blazing like a shooting star in final tribute to the passengers aboard.

    For missions which are launched aboard a commercially purchased launcher, the Office of Commercial Space Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration issues a license which verifies that the Space Services payload does not contribute to orbital debris. For missions not subject to FAA approval, Space Services voluntarily follows the same guidelines which prevent orbital pollution from its missions.

  36. Re: Intergalactic porn by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 1
    if an alien civilization manages to stumble across it and reverse-engineer the storage medium, it'll be the first inter-galactic goatse.
    Why do you assume that the aliens will be extra-galactic?
    Don't you think that there are aliens in our own galaxy who are just as capable at reverse-engineering human storage media?
    Assuming that our aliens are less capable than, uh, alien aliens is just being galaxist.
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  37. his last achievement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... now he will be called "space junk" instead of "great actor" ...