Why would you ever need so many. Only allow fives tries a minute, after the twentieth try go into deep lock-down mode and only allow some admin password to unlock. There three digit password is good enough now.
I disagree. Your interpretation makes anything funny, a trivialization, but that would mean that there are no acceptable social/political commentary jokes possible, unless the politically correct viewpoint is to trivialize.
Comedian activists joke about rape, atrocities, brutalities, and corruptions and that does not trivialize any of these things. I say again, it is an right and completely fine mode of political/social commentary. It is not only fine for trivial things, and it does not inherently trivialise anything.
I doubt it, but prisoners are renounced for their acceptance of men living as women. In fact being somewhat small and effeminate looking already, he probably would of been forced to live as a woman regardless of his choice.
"The President of the United States of America (POTUS) is the head of state and head of government of the United States. The president leads the executive branch of the federal government and is the commander-in-chief of the United States Armed Forces." "The executive is the part of government that has sole authority and responsibility for the daily administration of the state."
That is just everyone. It might just be my extreme liberal slant but any, and pretty much all, communities I join and actively participate in I tend to get banned.
Every community has some very specific agenda, and very little interest is hearing opposing views. The Richard Darwins Foundation for Reason and Science (???) for example. They are just a bunch of American Military nuts. All of their articles are 1 or two things. 1) atheists in the military articles. 2) Articles making fun of Muslims and others (most of them outright lies or factually inaccurate). I got banned for commenting that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanism and Elbert Einstein was anti war/military (and for pointing out that a few articles were full of factual inaccuracies).
Then the latest, and most ironic, I got censored by an Anarchist admin, who rejects hierarchy and believes that all decisions must be made by consensus (and get this, it was for personally offending him, a misunderstanding).
It really highlights just how awesome/. is. You can have detailed meaningful discussions here, and disagree. And by the end of the day no one is banned, the comments are not filled with trolls, and most people even end up with positively rated comments. It is not just one specific opinion that everyone up votes, and any deviance gets an immediate downvote.
He is the President of the country. Everything that the country does wrong, on purpose or by negligence is his fault. And that starts the day he took office. Even if he had only been president for a week, that is no excuse for allowing any branch of the government to break the law.
I really do not want a bar that auto searches through my history. 99% of my history is one off sites I will never visit again. Give me a bar like FF's where I can exclusively search through my bookmarks (you know the list of sites that I want to visit again).
But your own quotes show that in both situations the content was made to look illegitimate. In both situations, all the users had no expectation of legitimacy. The Pirate Bay was in a similar situation to Google. And there users of one were in the same situation as the users of the other, except in the google case they seem to have done a far better job of hiding the legitimate nature.
That is how it works. When the owner of a copyright says, here take this. That gives me the right to take it. When the owner of copyright uploads a video to YouTube, I cannot be considered breaking the law to watch it.
No, but 40% of all traffic is found using Google search reasonable. Without Google search I am stuck only using the websites that I use everyday, facebook/slachdot.
These debunking articles are always completely scientific garbage. Weather is chaos theory. Theoretically you do not need much power at all, just incredibly precise and detailed knowledge.
And of course they could spray chemicals into the contrails of aircraft, if they wanted to.
Slashdot Mirror
Why would you ever need so many. Only allow fives tries a minute, after the twentieth try go into deep lock-down mode and only allow some admin password to unlock. There three digit password is good enough now.
Driving is a privilege, that you have to earn, and comes with a thousand point list of rules and regulations.
You can only drive when they want, where they want, and how they want. So were is there any freedom to loose?
I disagree. Your interpretation makes anything funny, a trivialization, but that would mean that there are no acceptable social/political commentary jokes possible, unless the politically correct viewpoint is to trivialize.
Comedian activists joke about rape, atrocities, brutalities, and corruptions and that does not trivialize any of these things. I say again, it is an right and completely fine mode of political/social commentary. It is not only fine for trivial things, and it does not inherently trivialise anything.
How about a Dolphin (http://24.media.tumblr.com/198cdd15d91b75fb66a447a9cfe2371d/tumblr_mhgnhmMYxw1rlo1q2o1_1280.jpg)
Comedy is a legitimate form of social/political commentary.
Everything is funny, everything should be discussed and criticize, and joking is a way to do that.
I doubt it, but prisoners are renounced for their acceptance of men living as women. In fact being somewhat small and effeminate looking already, he probably would of been forced to live as a woman regardless of his choice.
"The President of the United States of America (POTUS) is the head of state and head of government of the United States. The president leads the executive branch of the federal government and is the commander-in-chief of the United States Armed Forces."
"The executive is the part of government that has sole authority and responsibility for the daily administration of the state."
That is just everyone. It might just be my extreme liberal slant but any, and pretty much all, communities I join and actively participate in I tend to get banned.
Every community has some very specific agenda, and very little interest is hearing opposing views.
The Richard Darwins Foundation for Reason and Science (???) for example. They are just a bunch of American Military nuts. All of their articles are 1 or two things. 1) atheists in the military articles. 2) Articles making fun of Muslims and others (most of them outright lies or factually inaccurate). I got banned for commenting that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Humanism and Elbert Einstein was anti war/military (and for pointing out that a few articles were full of factual inaccuracies).
Then the latest, and most ironic, I got censored by an Anarchist admin, who rejects hierarchy and believes that all decisions must be made by consensus (and get this, it was for personally offending him, a misunderstanding).
It really highlights just how awesome /. is. You can have detailed meaningful discussions here, and disagree. And by the end of the day no one is banned, the comments are not filled with trolls, and most people even end up with positively rated comments. It is not just one specific opinion that everyone up votes, and any deviance gets an immediate downvote.
He is the President of the country. Everything that the country does wrong, on purpose or by negligence is his fault. And that starts the day he took office. Even if he had only been president for a week, that is no excuse for allowing any branch of the government to break the law.
Shut down all the garbage mashers on the detention level!
So basically one person wrote half of all of the BB apps?
I really do not want a bar that auto searches through my history. 99% of my history is one off sites I will never visit again. Give me a bar like FF's where I can exclusively search through my bookmarks (you know the list of sites that I want to visit again).
And how accurate were the "clinical measures of mood and mental state" by themselves?
what makes you think that the NSA does not have it just off of your local area network?
But your own quotes show that in both situations the content was made to look illegitimate. In both situations, all the users had no expectation of legitimacy.
The Pirate Bay was in a similar situation to Google. And there users of one were in the same situation as the users of the other, except in the google case they seem to have done a far better job of hiding the legitimate nature.
That is how it works. When the owner of a copyright says, here take this. That gives me the right to take it.
When the owner of copyright uploads a video to YouTube, I cannot be considered breaking the law to watch it.
And you want the job of spying on your fellow citizens, breaking the law, abusing your power, and covering up for others who do the same?
My not just migrate To The Cloud.
"the abundance of Unix-specific apps" is killing Unix?
You think that in no one 2 minute period that anyone in the world uses Google to search for new web pages?
That is a whole new level of stupid.
No, but 40% of all traffic is found using Google search reasonable.
Without Google search I am stuck only using the websites that I use everyday, facebook/slachdot.
We just killed tens of thousands of people. woopsy!
Partner implies that he was his journalistic partner in Snowden case.
There is a novel sized amount of text here.
These debunking articles are always completely scientific garbage.
Weather is chaos theory. Theoretically you do not need much power at all, just incredibly precise and detailed knowledge.
And of course they could spray chemicals into the contrails of aircraft, if they wanted to.