Slashdot Mirror


Bradley Manning Wants To Live As a Woman

Hugh Pickens DOT Com writes "Reuters reports that Bradley Manning, the U.S. soldier sentenced to 35 years in military prison for the biggest breach of classified documents in the nation's history, says he is female and wants to live as a woman named Chelsea. 'As I transition into this next phase of my life, I want everyone to know the real me. I am Chelsea Manning, I am a female,' Manning, 25, said in the statement read by anchorwoman Savannah Guthrie on NBC News' "Today" show. 'Given the way that I feel and have felt since childhood, I want to begin hormone therapy as soon as possible,' Manning said. 'I also request that starting today you refer to me by my new name and use the feminine pronoun.' A psychiatrist, Navy Reserve Captain David Moulton, testified during Manning's trial that Manning suffered from gender dysphoria, or wanting to be the opposite sex, as well as narcissism and obsessive-compulsive disorder."

784 comments

  1. Hormone therapy? by brian0918 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Will they really provide that in prison?

    1. Re:Hormone therapy? by alen · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      yep, just not officially
      normally its the other prisoners who pump you full of their own hormones

    2. Re: Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you not watching Orange is the New Black?

    3. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh look - a prison rape joke - and modded up no less.

      How sad is it that prison rape and rape in general is such a joke in the US that one of the first comments on any forum when somebody talks about prisoner well-being is that they not drop the soap, because HA-HA some maleficent goon might RAPE them?

      Shocking as it may be to you, Alen, rape is not a part of prisoner reformation standards, gender dysphoria is a real thing, and jokes about forced sex aren't all that funny.

    4. Re: Hormone therapy? by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Theoretically requires a Netflix subscription, so possibly not.

      But to answer the question he asked more seriously... probably not going to get hormone therapy in a US prison. Can apply for special dispensation or house arrest, where such medical care would be possible, but, especially considering that Manning hasn't started taking HRT yet (so the current status quo doesn't pose a medical/health risk), it's very unlikely that Manning will be given that kind of treatment in the US penal system.

    5. Re:Hormone therapy? by TWiTfan · · Score: 1, Informative

      No. But if they keep you in solitary confinement long enough, torture you, taunt you, threaten you, fuck with your head, and then promise you 35 more years of the same, generally turning you into a raving lunatic (which suits their purposes perfectly)--it is just the kind of crazy shit you'll ask for.

      --
      The cow says "Moo." The dog says "Woof." The Timothy says "Thanks, valued customer. We appreciate your input."
    6. Re:Hormone therapy? by madhatter256 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes. So as to avoid cruel and unusual punishment at a constitutional level, prisons have to provide adequate health care. Hell, it's worth it, you can get free chemo therapy, heart surgery, etc. Just recently, a judge struck down a law in Wisconsin that prohibited hormone therapy for inmates because it was unconstitutional.

      http://www.todaystmj4.com/news/local/89751122.html

      --
      Previewing comments are for sissies!
    7. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if he had gender dysphoria he was in the wrong job in the first place

    8. Re:Hormone therapy? by sycodon · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      There has been court fights over stuff like this. A few have won I think. You can be sure that some nutcase judge will call it a "human right". and order it be done.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    9. Re:Hormone therapy? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes because the 8th amendment is an inconvenient obstacle for official justice. Just a reminder that your position puts you on the side of a murderer.

    10. Re:Hormone therapy? by Salgak1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      No. The Armed Forces do not provide Gender Reassignment therapy or surgery. For at least the next 7 or so years, he/she's S.O.L. And then he/she's going to have to find a way to pay for it: it's not cheap (I have a friend who went f->m ) and he/she's going to have problems getting a job with a Dishonorable Discharge. . .

    11. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes they are I think you just,DROPPED THE SOAP too many times.

    12. Re:Hormone therapy? by brian0918 · · Score: 1

      Answering my own question:

      "U.S. Army says it does not provide hormones or sex-reassignment surgery after Wikileaks convict Bradley Manning says he wants to live as a woman"

    13. Re:Hormone therapy? by Trepidity · · Score: 0, Troll

      Americans aren't a civilized people, so you can't really hold them to first-world standards.

    14. Re:Hormone therapy? by F.Minusia · · Score: 0

      Yes, they are supposed to provide all of HRT, SRS, laser sessions. There is some precedent.

      --
      Prof(Miss) A Mani CU, ASL, AMS, ISRS, CLC, CMS, IEEE HomePage: http://www.logicamani.in Blog: http://logicamani.blogs
    15. Re:Hormone therapy? by robthebloke · · Score: 0

      Don't be so quick to judge...... In the documentary, you're never quite sure if she was like that anyway, or whether it's been triggered by some deep rooted psychological scar from being in the armed forces.

    16. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Mod parent a TROLL, not funny. I really do like the word-play, but I don't think this deserves anything else.

      After reading the comments section of CNN for this story, I'm already severely disheartened that, despite that the attitudes for gays has greatly improved, comments with over 700 net positive upvotes over there say he should also serve 35 years as a prisoner within what he perceives to be a wrong body as an additional punishment.

      At first I thought Manning's sudden announcement of gender identity was a ploy, but if it was mentioned in court documents prior to the case and discharge proceedings, I sympathize for this person. I know individuals who rather chose to kill themselves then reveal the(ir perceived) shame of their gender identity.

      Considering how easy it seems to get into prison these days in the US, I am not particularly finding these rape jokes very funny anymore either.

    17. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Better than being on the side of a child rapist.

    18. Re:Hormone therapy? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      and he/she's going to have problems getting a job with a Dishonorable Discharge. . .

      with millions of supporters, this seems highly unlikely.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    19. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Many poor have no choice but to join the military in the United States, FYI. Since college has become the "high heels" competitive advantage for business (and similarly, everyone is now required to get a degree despite it being a severe financial burden, that for 10% of the population cannot even find a job to repay..), most individuals only recourse is to join the military to try to pay for college.

      As for it being a "boy's club" only, I thought that has been changed for some time? Pilots, analysts, technicians, logistics personelle, there are a lot of jobs there. Aren't we even moving towards women being able to fight directly on the front line?

    20. Re:Hormone therapy? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Hell, it's worth it, you can get free chemo therapy, heart surgery, etc

      So, if I'm uninsured and facing major narrowing of the arteries, I can go smoke a joint in a police station and get free heart surgery?

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    21. Re:Hormone therapy? by bickerdyke · · Score: 5, Insightful

      How sad is it that prison rape and rape in general is such a joke in the US that one of the first comments on any forum when somebody talks about prisoner well-being is that they not drop the soap, because HA-HA some maleficent goon might RAPE them?

      Tells us a lot about how the US prison system thinks of human dignity.

      --
      bickerdyke
    22. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      He says he's felt this way since childhood, seems to have discussed the issue at length with a psychologist while in the military, and even suggested that he had joined the military in the hopes that it would somehow cure him.

    23. Re:Hormone therapy? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Yes.

      No.

      Actually, to be fair there's no actual source there, and it's followed up with a vaseline joke *rolleyes*

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    24. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find that Chelsea has far less support than Bradley.

    25. Re:Hormone therapy? by trum4n · · Score: 3, Funny

      Better than being on the side of a politician.

    26. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes. If they let you go with a warning for smoking the joint, punch one of them.

    27. Re:Hormone therapy? by Opportunist · · Score: 3, Funny

      Better than... umm...

      Ok, you won.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    28. Re:Hormone therapy? by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      I doubt it, but prisoners are renounced for their acceptance of men living as women. In fact being somewhat small and effeminate looking already, he probably would of been forced to live as a woman regardless of his choice.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    29. Re:Hormone therapy? by wisnoskij · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Comedy is a legitimate form of social/political commentary.

      Everything is funny, everything should be discussed and criticize, and joking is a way to do that.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    30. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, murder is not as bad as rape? Rape is worse than murder?

      Essentially that logic means that you're saying that if the child rapist kills the kid after raping them, he's doing them a favor because being dead isn't as bad as living as a rape victim?

      That's pretty fucked up right there.

    31. Re:Hormone therapy? by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In many cases, yes you can. There are probably rules around it, so something like a 90 day for possession isn't going to get you heart surgery, but if you were in for 35 years, you'd certainly get heart surgery. There are definitely people who try to get themselves thrown in jail for free medical care and food. Usually those are people who have already been there before and know the system, but it does happen.

      As for hormone therapy, I could have sworn I've heard of people getting that in jail before as well. Gender dysphoria is considered a legitimate psychological condition generally, so he'd have a case, but I don't know if it is life threatening or meets the usual criteria.

    32. Re:Hormone therapy? by Salgak1 · · Score: 2

      . . .but how many will remember it in 7 years ? Or get past HR, who tend to frown on things like a stint in prison and a dishonorable discharge. And even if he keeps his IT skills current (unlikely at Fort Leavenworth. . .) no employer will trust him for ANYTHING sensitive. . No, for the most part, his prospects look pretty dim for anything significant. . .

    33. Re:Hormone therapy? by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      comments with over 700 net positive upvotes over there say he should also serve 35 years as a prisoner within what he perceives to be a wrong body as an additional punishment.

      Most people are not aware that there is no effective treatment for people with gender identity problems. There is some mixed data regarding the effectiveness of reassignment surgery, but the general consensus seems to be that changing one's gender seems to be the only thing that helps keep these people from killing themselves. Once you have this conversation with people, they typically agree that it is the way to go, so don't get too upset with the CNN crowd - they aren't doctors and they aren't all caught up on gender disorders. All they see is an untreated crazy person.

      Humor is subjective. I have a very dark sense of humor, so I can empathize with people laughing about horrible things. I laughed the whole way through "The Increasingly Poor Decisions of Todd Margaret". Some of us cope with bad news through humor, it's our way of getting through a sometimes-terrible world without falling into depression.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    34. Re:Hormone therapy? by inking · · Score: 1

      More importantly, would he be put into a female prison because of this? If so, the man is a genius.

    35. Re:Hormone therapy? by MightyYar · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    36. Re:Hormone therapy? by MightyYar · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not a human right, but gender reassignment is the only treatment for gender identity problems. The rational thing to do is treat the prisoner appropriately, not hold back for some ideological reason.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    37. Re:Hormone therapy? by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Informative

      Saw this on imgur yesterday - worlds worst prisons.

      http://imgur.com/gallery/gndRs

      Only two US prisons were on it.

      No prison thinks much of human dignity.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    38. Re:Hormone therapy? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      Whistle blowers of the military, rejoice!

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    39. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and he/she's going to have problems getting a job with a Dishonorable Discharge. . .

      He's going to be in jail for the next 35 years, so I doubt job hunting is high on the priority list.

    40. Re:Hormone therapy? by firex726 · · Score: 1

      Yep, if you so much as question a woman about a rape accusation, no matter how outlandish; then you're branded a victim blaming misogynist. But prison rape jokes are A-OK!

      Think it's in part because, prison rape/all rape is generally bad; and the US has this mentality that prison should be more about making people as much as you can. Forget rehabilitation, and trying to make people a more productive member of society or showing them the error of their ways. What's really going to help is have some non-violent offender be sent to jail for years and raped by hardened criminals.

    41. Re:Hormone therapy? by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      My advice: don't try it before you knock it.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    42. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reformation? Ive never heard that word used to describe any sort of treatment in a U.S. Prison. Since when does the US, or any state within the US, actively seek to reform prisoners? It does not make financial sense.

      Imprisonment is a multi billion dollar a year industry in the US, why would we want to reform prisoners and take them OUT of the prison population? It would make more sense to encourage anti-social and criminal behavior while in prison, so that when released, there is a greater guarantee of return business from said inmate.

    43. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They did in 'Orange is the new black'

    44. Re:Hormone therapy? by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      He'll be eligible for parole in seven years. It's unlikely that he'll serve the full 35.

    45. Re:Hormone therapy? by i+kan+reed · · Score: 1

      The hell it does, it puts me on the side of rule of law, you ignorant barbarian.

    46. Re:Hormone therapy? by dywolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      when you get the Big Chicken Dinner you become flat out ineligible for something like 45% of all jobs in the US. thats just the ones where its basically flat out regulated because they have ties or are involved with the government in some way. then theres the corproations where HR is going to see it say "nope", thats probably another 30-35%.

      The best options for people with the BCD basically boils down to small companies or friends without government ties/contracts, or entrepenaurship (which is itself hard, cause you gotta get customers, and some of them (such as against the governemnt and some big corps) have rules against who they will source from).

      the dishonorable discharge is no joke and very real burden to -anyone- who gets one.

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    47. Re:Hormone therapy? by Velex · · Score: 4, Informative

      I know you're trolling, but attraction to women is fairly common in trans women. However, the desire to "be a lesbian" doesn't factor into the decision to undergo gender transition for the vast majority of trans women. All of the trans women I know have a horrible time of dating women and pretty much have to give up hope of finding a girlfriend after beginning transition. Additionally, they typically lose their current relationship if any in a spectacular explosion of drama.

      That's not to say that all trans women find women attractive. Some like me prefer men, which actually means additional soul searching before beginning transition and weighing alternatives such as adopting a homosexual identity.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
    48. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope. You are wrong. Prison rape is funny. If you bend over in a prison shower and drop a soap and I'm behind you, guess what's coming? (I mean who's coming lol lol lol)

    49. Re:Hormone therapy? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How sad is it that prison rape and rape in general is such a joke in the US that one of the first comments on any forum when somebody talks about prisoner well-being is that they not drop the soap, because HA-HA some maleficent goon might RAPE them?

      Tells us a lot about how the US prison system thinks of human dignity.

      Tells us a lot more about how US citizens think of prisoner dignity. It's always seemed to me that to the vocal minority at least, and possibly the vast majority of Americans, people stop being human when they're locked up in Jail. Innocent until proven guilty, but once proven guilty (of anything), suddenly all human rights and freedoms go out the door, because nobody "normal" could be guilty of anything....

      I recommend that anyone making prison rape jokes go visit a few prisons and talk to people... inmates AND staff. Visit a few different places; low, medium, and high if they'll let you in.

    50. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But if it's the same tired joke over and over again, only brought up out of confusion between successful rote memorization and creativity, that's... well... that's the majority of internet "humor" in a nutshell, I suppose...

    51. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrong. Prison rape has always been an unofficial punishment. Why do you think child rapists (and rapists in general) are generally put with general population? In Rome, rape was a standard punishment for both women and men. Girls and boys. Same with some areas of middle east. To this day Pastun tribes still hold the ancient Persian practice of punishment through rape of both girls and boys. So guess what? Rape and sexual degredation has always been punishment.

    52. Re:Hormone therapy? by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm a bit mystified as to why we do this. Hear me out:

      When people ask to have limbs amputated because the person feels that having the limb doesn't make them feel whole (strange how you don't feel whole until part of you is removed?! That and/or because they have a sexual fetish for amputated limbs,) modern medicine denies that request, considers it to be abhorrent, and any medical professional who obliges the request is jailed and/or has their license to practice revoked. The treatment for the above condition is the same as if the person had a mental illness, and the solution is to change thinking patterns rather than surgery.

      http://drmarkgriffiths.wordpress.com/2012/02/13/whats-your-crutch-the-bizarre-world-of-amputee-fetishes/

      Yet when they ask to have their genitals mutilated and hormones thrown so far out of whack to the point of permanently handicapping them to a degree, it is viewed as a human right, and in some cases this voluntary surgery must be provided for free by the government, and they are called brave in some circles? Worse is that today there is very little in the way of counseling done, and some half of them end up regretting it after the fact.

      http://www.experienceproject.com/stories/Want-To-Reverse-Sex-Reassignment-Surgery/1608417

      I'm not taking issue with transsexualism BTW, I'm taking issue with the idea that surgery is the answer.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    53. Re:Hormone therapy? by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 2

      How sad is it that prison rape and rape in general is such a joke in the US

      By-product of people living a sheltered life or a comment by someone not old enough to know how difficult life can be.
      There's little room for empathy when you've never had a point of reference.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    54. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nope never said that. And a child murderer deserves probably to be put on a pike and die slowly.

    55. Re:Hormone therapy? by SleazyRidr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Only" two. Why is it that the US claims to be the best country in the world, but it comfortable sharing a list mainly populated by other shining examples of leading countries, such as North Korea, Thailand and Rwanda?

    56. Re:Hormone therapy? by NatasRevol · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Egotistical nationalism?

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    57. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK imagine, a huge manly-man who one day corners a poor young teenage girl and brutally rapes her... To tell her, to prove her that he is a man and she is nothing but a slut to use for him, his pleasure. As he rapes her he tells her that a woman is not worth anything, a woman's worth is her three holes for fucking. Would it not be funny, to see this huge manly-man become a prison-yard bitch for the sexual use of everyone? I think it would not be as much funny as justice. No other way can do justice, fuck 8th amendment.

    58. Re:Hormone therapy? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      and he/she's going to have problems getting a job with a Dishonorable Discharge. . .

      with millions of supporters, this seems highly unlikely.

      Actually, it seems to me that the gender change request lines him/her up for a possible book once (s)he's out. There's probably movie rights to be sold too.

    59. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Prison rape isn't funny... mine was magical we shared a winston and cuddled all night.

    60. Re:Hormone therapy? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      wow. Thanks for the link.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    61. Re:Hormone therapy? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      It's okay to joke about rape, because he's a dude.

      Well.. shit, wait...

    62. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You "dropped the soap" one to many times, didn't you?

    63. Re:Hormone therapy? by gtall · · Score: 1

      I guess you didn't get the memo, Eric Holder has announced an initiative to reduce prison sentences and to have non-violent offenders sentenced to other penance rather than prison. Even that arch conservative Richard Viguerie is on board as well as a lot of Republican DAs.

      Mostly this is being driven by cost, prison is expensive. However, many of the proponents are well aware that sending up young non-violent offenders make them into violent offenders when they get out. I recall one conservative fellow saying that the U.S. should lock up the people society is scared of, not the people society doesn't like.

    64. Re: Hormone therapy? by Crimey+McBiggles · · Score: 1

      Ummm... last I checked, that show isn't a documentary, it's an original fiction series.

      --
      Crimey
    65. Re:Hormone therapy? by taiwanjohn · · Score: 4, Informative

      part of humor is taking controversial things and making fun of them

      Another important part of humor is originality and creativity. Prison-rape jokes lost all hope of either many years ago. The GP was not making fun of rape, he was making fun of the rape victim.

      In a democracy, We The People are responsible for the ethical treatment of inmates. It's one thing to laugh at a random "FAIL" video on YouTube, quite another to laugh at the horrid abuse of people who could EASILY be protected if we took a few simple measures to change how our prisons are managed.

      http://www.justdetention.org/

      Don't forget, a quarter of the prison population is there for non-violent drug offenses. It's not the rapists who get raped in prison (ie: people who might justifiably deserve it), it's the weak ones who get victimized.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve your problem, you're not using enough of it. --AC
    66. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I suggest you go to a rape counseling center, and ask the women there is they care that the man who raped them may face the possibility of being raped in prison.

      Go ask an adult survivor of child abuse if they feel upset that their uncle/father/priest/etc may be subjected to rape in prison.

      Keep a running tally of which one are as horrified as you are, and which one feel it is the least that should happen to them. Report back here when you are done.

    67. Re:Hormone therapy? by Crimey+McBiggles · · Score: 1

      You're suggesting that they pulled the ol' Turing act on him. I don't suspect this to be the case, as there were already reports of him seeking psychological care for gender identity disorder before even joining the military.

      --
      Crimey
    68. Re:Hormone therapy? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Really? You'd prefer they kill the children instead? I mean, if you have to take a side and "not rapists, pedophiles, OR murderes" was not an option...

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    69. Re:Hormone therapy? by Crimey+McBiggles · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find Chelsea merely has different supporters than Bradley, not fewer.

      --
      Crimey
    70. Re:Hormone therapy? by gtall · · Score: 3, Informative

      No, he's eligible for parole in 1/3 of 35 years. He's eligible for pardon in 7 years.

    71. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From TFA

      His lawyers had argued the former Army intelligence analyst suffered a sexual identity crisis when he leaked the files while serving in Iraq in 2009 and 2010.

      So it's not since he's been caught...

    72. Re:Hormone therapy? by X0563511 · · Score: 1

      Tells us more about how convicted criminals think of human dignity.

      Or would it be better for their dignity to lock them down and have a guard wash them?

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    73. Re:Hormone therapy? by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      ...and guess what. There's hardly any rape in those prisons.

      --
      No sig today...
    74. Re:Hormone therapy? by Velex · · Score: 5, Informative
      Came here for this.

      Yet when they ask to have their genitals mutilated and hormones thrown so far out of whack to the point of permanently handicapping them to a degree, it is viewed as a human right

      So delicious.

      Because she (Manning) was presumably born in the USA, her genitals were likely already mutilated at birth. Secondly, the organ between your ears also has gender just the same as the organ between your legs. The process of HRT brings one's hormone levels in line with normal female levels, so I don't understand why you think anything is going "out of whack."

      I used to experience very painful headaches on a weekly basis before I started estrogen HRT. Apparently, that's not an uncommon experience. There's definitely something going on, although research is admittedly lacking (there was a study I can't seem to find again that was able to use MRI to determine brain sex in 75% of individuals in the study).

      Worse is that today there is very little in the way of counseling done, and some half of them end up regretting it after the fact.

      Sorry, a link to Experience Project isn't evidence, and there have been many flawed, biased studies on the subject to boot, sort of like the studies that back up the practice of routine infant male genital mutilation in the USA.

      I'm not taking issue with transsexualism BTW, I'm taking issue with the idea that surgery is the answer.

      Yes, you are, because not all trans women undergo bottom surgery. Bottom surgery is a personal choice and not a requirement to live as a woman or get an ID as a woman, although it may be a requirement in certain states in order to amend or change one's birth certificate.

      If you're really as rational as you're trying to present yourself as being, I'd recommend the book Whipping Girl by Julia Serano.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
    75. Re:Hormone therapy? by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      To be fair, one of them is the ADX Florence Supermax Prison which is a "nice" prison compared to others on the list. They put it there due to the inmates being isolated, but the only people who get sent there (so far) are the so-called "worst of the worst" - people like Ted Kaczinski. I'm very against bad prison conditions but I have no problem with that one in its current usage.

      As for Rikers Island I have no doubt it's awful. I would, however, question its inclusion on that list. Look at the picture and compare to the others - it doesn't fit.

    76. Re:Hormone therapy? by kno3 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Only two US prisons were on it.

      I think you need to work on your counting skills. I counted 4 current US prisons and one closed (Alcatraz) out of a total of 20.
      25% is extremely bad given the US's self perceived high ground in all things moral. Remember this includes the entire world, most of which is comparatively very poor and lacks the resources to do much better.
      That said, imgur is hardly a reputable source and the list has clearly been skewed by US prison's notoriety in the west. I'm sure there are far worse out there.

      No prison thinks much of human dignity.

      I refer you to Norway: http://www.time.com/time/photogallery/0,29307,1989083,00.html
      Only fools support prisons that ignore the dignity of the prisoners. If you actually want to help society, you support and protect those that need it the most.

    77. Re:Hormone therapy? by Firethorn · · Score: 5, Informative

      some deep rooted psychological scar from being in the armed forces.

      I'm going to say that he was screwed up before ever entering the military; being in the military certainly didn't help though. One of the signs was that he was placed in a discharge unit. If his commanding officers had made the call he would have been kicked out and be free to transition today.

      Please note: I'm active duty and have an openly gay married* commander. I won't say that he hasn't had problems in his career, it having very much started during 'don't ask don't tell', but he hasn't been having problems with us.

      But at the same time I'm NOT going to make like the military is some utopia for trans people. It's much better for gay people, but I would state that as a category the US military is currently NOT a place you want to be if you want to transition. Bradley Manning will probably not be allowed to transition during his time at Leavenworth. The DoD just doesn't have any measures to allow it, which means that people would have to take the effort to do so.

      As a general matter, if you want to transition and you're in the military, your best option is to keep quiet and let your enlistment run out. If you're really desperate, there are a number of ways to get out quicker. A bit tougher since DADT ended, but there are still ways. You might lose some benefits, but there's plenty of things you can do where the military will decide to discharge you to be rid of you and not do much else.

      (BTW, I go by a '2 out of 3' standard: mental, physical outward, and DNA; he hasn't started transition yet so he's still a he).

      *I wrote it this way because I've known gay people who married the opposite gender for various reasons.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    78. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You ever been raped? You ignorant asshole.

      Why do you think so many rape victims commit suicide? Even after months or years of therapy and trying to forget?

      At least if the person is killed, the torment is over.

      This comment, and a few above, is from someone who knows what it feels like to have someone's dick inside them against their will. Also, someone who has contemplated suicide, as well as mass murder.

      I certainly wish my attacker had been raped in prison, and then killed, so my tax dollars doesn't keep him alive.

      If you can't appreciate that, you obviously have no experience in the subject, and can take your self-righteous indignation and shove it up your ass.

    79. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh look - a prison rape joke - and modded up no less.

      Who said alen is joking? Maybe they genuinely want Manning to be raped as some form of punishment?

      Ok, I'll admit, alen probably is joking. But not all references to prison rape are meant as jokes. Sometimes, the person saying it considers it some form of poetic justice.

    80. Re:Hormone therapy? by Kleen13 · · Score: 1

      In Canada I heard that Corrections is required to continue medications and treatments that was initiated prior to them beginning their sentence.

      --
      That sinking feeling deep in your gut when you KNOW you screwed up bad summed up with: {head desk} {head desk}
    81. Re:Hormone therapy? by NatasRevol · · Score: 1

      From your link:
      "None of the windows at Halden have bars"

      That's not a remotely typical prison.

      The prisoners make their own meals. In a typical prison, that would result in 125 dead of stab wounds.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    82. Re: Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would agree. Id rather be killed than raped, and if you are going to rape me, I would hope you would have the decency to kill me afterward....or even better yet, in advance.

    83. Re:Hormone therapy? by NatasRevol · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just lots of suicide because of complete isolation.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    84. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      But the law used to say hang the murderers and rapists. The murderers and rapists are the barbarians.

      Now you want rape victims to not only pay for their rapists' food and shelter, but also face the likelihood that they will have to face them in court repeatedly every time some bleeding heart idiot like you thinks the rapists were mistreated, or claim their civil rights were violated because of some courtroom technicality.

    85. Re:Hormone therapy? by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      Its pretty much equivalent to a felony.

      --
      Good-bye
    86. Re:Hormone therapy? by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      It comes up in EVERY discussion about prison. MANY people feel that its perfectly ok for prisoners to rape each other.

      --
      Good-bye
    87. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHAT ABOUT MONKEY RAPE?

    88. Re:Hormone therapy? by VortexCortex · · Score: 2

      How sad is it that prison rape and rape in general is such a joke in the US that one of the first comments on any forum when somebody talks about prisoner well-being is that they not drop the soap, because HA-HA some maleficent goon might RAPE them?

      It is quite sad, but you fail at comedy.

      Shocking as it may be to you, Alen, rape is not a part of prisoner reformation standards, gender dysphoria is a real thing, and jokes about forced sex aren't all that funny.

      You are incorrect. Humor is subjective. Gender dysphoria exists, but so does male pattern baldness, habitual lying, codependency, and a host of other non-life-threatening issues that prisons do not generally treat -- It makes such punishments all the more heinous, IMO, and what they label "rehabilitation" laughable. Additionally, in order to protect prisons from prisoner's suing over systemic rape, they have begun instituting a reformation: Prisoners are now required to sign a waiver acknowledging that they accept the threat of rape exists, and won't sue the prison if they get raped.

      You might not think that's funny, but it is to me. I have a very dark and twisted sense of humor. Laughing at something doesn't mean that I think the issue less serious -- That's a false dichotomy. You must have never been to a comedy club if you think serious issues can't be joked about, and more frequently the more prevalent and serious the problem. See also: The slew of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" jokes, and the current rash of NSA spying jokes.

      E.g.: Mars One, because: Who the hell wants to live in a cramped shithole with no freedom or privacy where you're doomed to die an early death when you could do all that on Mars too?

    89. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can also move to a more developed country, you would get that usually for free.
      Most European and South American countries offer free healthcare, at least for those who can't afford to pay.

    90. Re:Hormone therapy? by master_kaos · · Score: 1

      wow that list is shit. Seriously scroll down the screen quickly and you can instantly tell which 2 are the US prisons, they don't even deserve to be on the list.
      Also that guy is horrible at writing, he wrote "worst prison" for every single one.

    91. Re:Hormone therapy? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I suggest you go to a rape counseling center, and ask the women there is they care that the man who raped them may face the possibility of being raped in prison.

      Go ask an adult survivor of child abuse if they feel upset that their uncle/father/priest/etc may be subjected to rape in prison.

      Keep a running tally of which one are as horrified as you are, and which one feel it is the least that should happen to them. Report back here when you are done.

      Done that; there are some people who have been so traumatized that even the subject of rape to anyone causes them to wall themselves off. There are others who consider their attackers so inhuman for doing the things they did that they take vindictive pleasure in the concept of their attacker being subjected to what they dished out. There are others who have healed more, who just want it all to stop, and share the same sadness (not horror) that this is perpetuated in prison.

      You see, most of those rapists in prison, if you dig into their past, were sexually abused themselves. Being sexually abused seems to snap something in the brain that allows you to easily see people as "not human". Recovering from that is extremely difficult, and some people turn to a life of crime/abuse as their coping mechanism.

      So my original point stands: it says something about the perspective US citizens (or at least some vocal minorities as I said) have on human dignity. Dehumanization never ends well; forgiveness is MUCH tougher (and some things may never be fully forgiven, especially if the person never really showed any regret or sorrow about what they did), but it's the best way to break the chain.

    92. Re:Hormone therapy? by AlecC · · Score: 4, Interesting

      So, if I'm uninsured and facing major narrowing of the arteries, I can go smoke a joint in a police station and get free heart surgery?

      Yes. Somebody did that, Not smoking a joint, but a totally and obviously incompetent armed bank robbery. Go to bank with unloaded gun, hand over "give me the money" note, then drop the gun and surrender. He reckoned that he would have more life after getting out with his medical conditions treated than staying out and dying soon, and uncomfortably, from untreated conditions.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    93. Re:Hormone therapy? by tnk1 · · Score: 4, Informative

      And that's just a Bad Conduct Discharge, which isn't actually a Dishonorable. An actual Dishonorable is much, much worse. Assuming you didn't get it as a result of a felony, you might as well have committed a felony for all the trouble you are going to have making a living when you get out. With a BCD, you forfeit benefits, with a DD, you are equivalent to an actual civil felon in many states AND you are not permitted to own a firearm by Federal law.

      Still, Manning is probably going to have a few more options than most DDs get based on what he did to get there, I expect a book deal at the very least. His real problem is going to be the next seven, sixteen, or thirty-five years he is stuck in Leavenworth and how that affects him when he does get out. Depending on how well he can turn his life around afterward, he may be better off not owning a weapon anyway.

      The sad thing about all of this is that, as much as people want to portray him as a heroic whistleblower or a nefarious traitor, he was also in all sorts of emotional turmoil at the time. I'm not so sure he would have made the same decisions if he was in a more stable frame of mind.

      In any case, I am really, really annoyed with the military for not removing clearance from someone who was doing things like violent outbursts and who had a history of instability all the way from boot camp on. I am also annoyed with, although not surprised by, about his commanders' reactions to his attempts to express his issues and both their failure to not take it seriously or even to just get him the hell out of work where your lifestyle is supposed to be considered fair game for whether you get a clearance. Manning was clearly an obvious security risk.

    94. Re:Hormone therapy? by Arancaytar · · Score: 2

      Manning's gender dysphoria was on record going back to before the leaks even happened. So no, while the confinement and sentence have certainly been traumatizing, they're not the cause. Considering the timing of her announcement, I'd guess she waited until after the sentencing to avoid affecting, delaying or complicating the trial.

    95. Re:Hormone therapy? by spire3661 · · Score: 0

      What the hell is wrong with teaching people acceptance? To live with the body the universe provided? I cant exist at all points in the universe simultaneously and it bothers me, can we find a treatment for that too?

      --
      Good-bye
    96. Re:Hormone therapy? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      As for hormone therapy, I could have sworn I've heard of people getting that in jail before as well.

      The critical point here is state vs federal, and DoD federal at that. Remember, it hasn't actually been that long since DOMA was struck down, or the end of DADT. Lacking precedent, it's going to be a uphill fight for Manning to get that. Unlike integration, the DoD has been fighting anything hinting of gay/tran tooth and nail.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    97. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are tons of activist organizations who'd employ her in a heartbeat, Wikileaks being just one of them. These are largely volunteers and can't pay much, but she'd probably be able to make a living.

    98. Re:Hormone therapy? by gsslay · · Score: 2

      Indeed. Comedy is a powerful and many faceted thing. You can accomplish many things with a joke, good and bad. Amongst the bad is trivialising and victimising the subject. The acceptability of a joke doesn't depend on its subject matter, but on its content and intent.

      Where's the social/political commentary in the "don't drop the soap in prison" joke? It seems to me to be all about trivialising rape and normalising it as an acceptable (if not encouraged) part of the prison system. That makes it reprehensible and, just as bad, not funny.

    99. Re:Hormone therapy? by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      I'd say he's already got himself an award winning documentary lined up. Not sure what Hollywood itself would do with the whole story. There seems like there are mixed themes here, and Hollywood likes keeping their messages simple and hitting you over the head with them.

    100. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what youre really saying is most European and South American countries force other people to pay for your healthcare. Thats only going to be seen as a good thing by one group of people in that equation.

    101. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most people would consider "I want too loose a limb" and "I want to be a woman" two drastically different sorts of requests.

      One is wanting to transition from an "able bodied" state to a "handicapped" state (this violates the medical oath to "do no harm") whereas the other is transitioning between two hypothetically equal states (which is hard to call harmful without also lumping in other elective surgeries that are commonplace).

    102. Re: Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes but don't forget that although the US has 5% of the worlds population, it has 25% of the worlds prison population

    103. Re:Hormone therapy? by Hartree · · Score: 1, Interesting

      So, you're saying that having transgender feelings is generally due to torture and insanity?

      Do you also think this about gays?

      Does that mean you think some sort of "therapy" might cure that since you seem to think it's an illness?

      I think you've discredited yourself fairly thoroughly just in one paragraph just by letting what you really think show through.

      I know a number of trannies and gays from some of the fandoms I'm in. Let me assure you not all of them are wiggin' loonies. Are some of them? Yes, but so are a lot of heteros. And, most of the hetero loonies I know are a lot more worrisome (in terms of violence especially I've never met a gay or tranny murderer, yet. I know several hetero ones.).

    104. Re:Hormone therapy? by C0R1D4N · · Score: 2

      I would prefer to be a rape victim instead of a murder victim.

    105. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're surprised that a, "the end of the world is nigh" blog, that's been claiming it for years, isn't a valid source? He does try as hard as he can to talk up the value of his gold though. It's a shame he didn't sell it when it peaked, but bought when it was worth more than it is now. I have no evidence for that other than the fact he's still writing that crap and not sat by a pool with a cocktail served to him by a pretty lady in a bikini.

    106. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      What the hell is wrong with teaching people acceptance?

      You really should look at the scientific evidence. Your 'solution' was repeatedly tried for many years *and failed badly*. Current methods are more successful. Do you not agree with evidence-based medicine? Or do you only agree with it when it fits your pre-conceptions?

    107. Re:Hormone therapy? by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      I disagree. Your interpretation makes anything funny, a trivialization, but that would mean that there are no acceptable social/political commentary jokes possible, unless the politically correct viewpoint is to trivialize.

      Comedian activists joke about rape, atrocities, brutalities, and corruptions and that does not trivialize any of these things. I say again, it is an right and completely fine mode of political/social commentary. It is not only fine for trivial things, and it does not inherently trivialise anything.

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    108. Re:Hormone therapy? by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Still mostly a boy's club. I know female officers and enlisted, but by and large, it's much like working in IT, there's women there, and some make general even, but I don't think anyone is suggesting that something as testosterone filled as the military is even close to fully integrated yet.

      Many fewer women are interested in the military as a job to begin with, so there is more than simply a Boys' Club attitude that is the issue, but it doesn't help. The top jobs in the military come to those having combat experience, and women are simply not going to have even close to the number of opportunities for that.

    109. Re:Hormone therapy? by rjstegbauer · · Score: 1

      Then it's a Win-Win?

    110. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You can be sure that some nutcase judge will call it a "human right". and order it be done.

      If you have evidence that this is not a legitimate medical condition, then present it. Otherwise, your claim regarding "nutcase judges" is nothing more than childish playground name calling, based not on fact, but on your personal opinion regarding what is and is not a legitimate medical condition.

      By the way, how funny would it be if you found yourself in prison, with some medical condition, but a judge denied treatment because it was there personal opinion that your condition was not a legitimate medical condition? Oh, I'm sure it would not be funny for you at all. But for the rest of us, given your feelings on the subject, it'd be hilarious.

    111. Re: Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a penal system, it's a rehab system.

    112. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      The AC who you replied to here.

      I wouldn't. I wish I had been killed instead.

      You don't know the deviant shit that goes through my head, on continual basis. And the worst part is I can't say for sure I won't do something like was done to me. The whole 'cycle of abuse' thing. And since I have a child now, and the thoughts are still there, I have to force myself to not not hug her too much, or notice her body.

      You think living this way is better then finding out whether the afterlife is real?

    113. Re:Hormone therapy? by MightyYar · · Score: 2

      I cant exist at all points in the universe simultaneously and it bothers me, can we find a treatment for that too?

      Does it bother you to the extent that you will fall into depression and likely commit suicide? If so, then yes, you should probably see a doctor.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    114. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      rape is a real part of prison, and a real part of what the American psyche thinks of what is proper punishment for criminals.

      So I'd rather hear about it, even if its a bad joke, because stopping the jokes won't stop the abuse. He's doing us a favor and bringing up the topic of rape in prison.

    115. Re:Hormone therapy? by Entropius · · Score: 1

      I have no problem supporting the rights of either a murderer or a child rapist to not be assaulted while in prison. You shouldn't either.

    116. Re:Hormone therapy? by Entropius · · Score: 2

      Why should a person with XY chromosomes who identifies as a woman not be in the military? Why, in particular, does that have anything to do with someone's aptitude to be a soldier?

    117. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      To be fair, one of them is the ADX Florence Supermax Prison which is a "nice" prison compared to others on the list. They put it there due to the inmates being isolated, but the only people who get sent there (so far) are the so-called "worst of the worst" - people like Ted Kaczinski. I'm very against bad prison conditions but I have no problem with that one in its current usage.

      Long-term segregation with no contact with anyone is considered torture by many, because the observed mental health consequences are horrific. If you spend a few years in solitary confinement you will be damaged for life just as much as if they cut off your hand. Most countries only use such segregation for relatively short periods of time (a few weeks or months at both) and even dangerous prisoners are allowed some regular contact / conversation with other people.

      Ted Kaczinski certainly did some terrible things, but he is not some kind of superman. Segregating him isn't really a safety or practicality issue - it's a form of torture to add to his sentence.

    118. Re:Hormone therapy? by Cito · · Score: 1

      Rape can definitely be funny

      see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SWhS9M1p3oc :)

    119. Re:Hormone therapy? by Entropius · · Score: 1

      Because prisons are expensive, as you say, and regardless of who gets paid to run prisons in the end, taxpayers are paying for it?

    120. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      (fyi since you don't appear to be doing this on purpose, and haven't established you're trans yourself: "tranny" is a really, really insulting slur. There may be a few people who use such slurs as a matter of pride, but that's their prerogative; you wouldn't call a gay person a "fag" or a black person a "nigger" either.)

    121. Re:Hormone therapy? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      It's an Imgur list made by some random person, not any kind of official list.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    122. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doesn't mean everyone would find that being raped is preferable to death (or murder).

    123. Re:Hormone therapy? by realityimpaired · · Score: 1

      Some like me prefer men, which actually means additional soul searching before beginning transition and weighing alternatives such as adopting a homosexual identity.

      As opposed to a trans lesbian, who has to decide whether to adopt a cis-hetero role? :)

      I think it's safe to say that all trans people would rather be "normal", as best as that can be defined. Some are lucky enough to live in a country where it is socially acceptable... I know several trans people who have not had trouble finding a partner at all. I also know several who've had a really hard go of it. Individual experiences will vary, but the overriding pattern I've seen in the trans folk I know is that the ones who have it easy are in Europe, Australia, and Canada....

    124. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      So mutilated is the word now. I'll remember to use that next time I ask a doctor to stitch a wound closed and he trims away some skin.

      Infant circumcision is the deliberate wounding and sexual maiming of a child that removes 1/3 to 1/2 of the penile skin. The foreskin of an adult male is approximately FIFTEEN square inches of erogenous tissue which serves numerous functions throughout a man's lifetime. Not only does cutting up the genitals of healthy individuals without their consent violate human rights, it violates medical ethics to force unnecessary and damaging surgery upon healthy patients.

      But yes, forced genital cutting (whether the victim is male, female, or intersex) is a form of mutilation. Only someone brainwashed into thinking that cutting up the genitals of healthy children is perfectly normal would claim otherwise.

    125. Re:Hormone therapy? by Entropius · · Score: 1

      On the contrary, I think quite a few employers would trust her. I don't see why she'd be any more likely than anyone else to spill the beans about an upcoming product, or the root password to the webserver, so long as murder wasn't involved.

    126. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I see where you're coming from, I really do... but sticking a foreign object up somebody's asshole is not a "courtroom technicality." If it were, the person wouldn't be in prison in the first place -- we have to consider anything that's unlawful on the outside to be similarly unlawful on the inside, or accept that there's nothing which separates us from them other than fences and walls.

    127. Re:Hormone therapy? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Gender is not binary. It isn't controlled or defined by a single physical attribute either. Just look at the difficulty sporting organizations have deciding on a person's gender. Hormones, physical attributes, chromosomes - individually none of them are definitive.

      In some cases people are born with a feminine mind but masculine body. In theory it could be corrected either by making the mind more masculine or the body more feminine, but our understanding of psychology has advanced to the stage where we understanding that trying to alter the mind can be extremely harmful and amount to torture. It's somewhat similar to the old debate about being able to "cure" homosexuality by treating it as a mental illness.

      To address your point about people wanting amputations the key difference is that being male or female is a perfectly natural state in which the human mind can be at ease. Removing limbs is not and usually indicates some other problem, where as gender issues usually just indicate gender issues. Of course, in both cases a trained psychologist has to do all they can to determine what treatment is in the best interest of the patient.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    128. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pain teaches us to avoid what is bad for us.

    129. Re:Hormone therapy? by dirtyhippie · · Score: 2

      Yes, but I really wish she had waited a little bit longer. It's just too soon not to affect people's perceptions of the leak. And given the way many Americans feel about Manning, this will also affect people's perceptions about transgender folks.Not a well thought-out move if you ask me.

    130. Re:Hormone therapy? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there will be people lining up to employ him once he gets out of jail. At the very least an autobiography should bring in a nice chunk of change.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    131. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So you have been in this situation before either as a prisoner or a guard either at Leavenworth or Guantanamo and you've been in the military in those situations or you know because you have some sort of credentials that make you an expert on this subject or are you just another opinionated web miscreant that knows nothing about what they are saying but that likes to make themselves feel important by acting like you really know everything about the subjects you respond to in forums and blogs, when in all actuality you suffer from a small male appendage and this makes up for your feelings of inadequacy. If you don't know anything about the subject which I'm guessing is true keep your misinformed opinions to yourself.

    132. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it. How is it "cruel and unusual punishment" to force your to continue living as God made you?
      Real condition or not, live as you are. You lost the privilege to choose hormone therapy.

      That's like getting a nose job, or a face lift. I feel ugly, and that's causing low self esteem, so I need the face lift judge...honest.

    133. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bottom surgery should BE a requirement. how can you justify "you are a woman" yet insist on keeping your penis, the very external definition of manhood, intact? it's absurd on its face.

    134. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As for it being a "boy's club" only, I thought that has been changed for some time? Pilots, analysts, technicians, logistics personelle, there are a lot of jobs there. Aren't we even moving towards women being able to fight directly on the front line?

      Equality means both men and women *can* apply to those jobs. It doesn't mean men and women will *choose* to apply to those equally

      Equality doesn't mean equality in results, only equality in opportunity. In that respect, inequality favors women here, because...

      Many poor have no choice but to join the military in the United States

      ...if you're a poor man, you have no (well, little) choice but join the military.

      But if you're a poor woman, you have the choice of military... or take on one of those demeaning jobs that perpetuate the "patriarchy" and objectification of women, or just find yourself a good man (and forget going to college in the first place).

      And actually, you don't even need a "good" man. Just a "good enough" man whom you can divorce later. The state will help you confiscate his property to pay for your living, sometimes in perpetuity. If the man doesn't have enough, state welfare will step in.

    135. Re:Hormone therapy? by digitrev · · Score: 1

      As opposed to the USA, where the only people benefit are the rich and the healthy.

      --
      Cynical Idealist
    136. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      Still mostly a boy's club ... testosterone filled ... many fewer women are interested in the military ... Boys' Club attitude that is the issue

      NO!!! The issue is the foolish effort to mold the military to fit the feminist agenda. For decades, progressives have been slobbering over the idea of using the military system of indoctrination to help order society according to their vision. The purpose of the military is to use force or the threat of force in order to further the country's foreign policy goals not to promote liberal social goals. Feminizing or gayifying the military in a misguided effort to change society at large will prove disastrous to the fitness of the military to perform its legitimate function.

    137. Re:Hormone therapy? by EuclideanSilence · · Score: 2

      People should not represent themselves in court.
      Doctors should not operate on their own family.
      Juries may not have personal knowledge of the plaintiff or defendant.

      First hand involvement compromises judgement. It's a sad fact of humans. Being emotionally involved in a crime does not make a person more qualified to offer opinion on the appropriate punishment for a crime. Unfortunately, it does make them more likely to be involved, which usually results in a distorted and poorly considered legal system. Our DUI laws are one example.

      Direct experience in a subject does not make a person more reliable. Empathy and a general systematic consideration do.

    138. Re:Hormone therapy? by kno3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Of course it is not a remotely typical prison, that is why I chose it. However, it contains some of the worst criminals in Norway.
      I find your view of prisoners rather disheartening, though it is not a surprise. We are all taught to view criminals with a them and us mentality; as if people that haven't been convicted of a crime are morally sound, and those that have are a cancer ruining the rest of society. However the line between them is far more blurred. Indeed, practically all of us would be criminals if the law were omnipresent, fact is that only a tiny percentage of crime is ever dealt with.
      The vast majority of prisoners entering prison are not stab happy psychopaths that will murder everyone around them given the chance. Most of them are decent people that have responded in a predictable manner to the difficult situations they have been in, or possibly have made a extremely bad and uncharacteristic decision under extreme conditions.
      Humans are social animals, and will conform to the surroundings in which they are placed. If you put them into a prison with a system of fear from the guards, a culture of crime from the other inmates, give them no responsibilities, they will behave as such. This is why the recidivism rates are so high. Change the system, change the culture, change the outcomes. Obviously this cannot be done overnight, it will take a long time to undo the damage done by the current system, but it could be done.
      I refer you to an excellent TEDx talk done by Prof Lesley McAra, head of my universities' law school: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kWEqLcPTv9U

    139. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You may if you are in long enough but smoking a joint probably won't do it, you need to be more on the level of kidnapping, attempted murder, something thats going to give you a good long stretch. So you might just get that surgery then again you might get a knife in the back walking down the hallway someday and that could also be the remedy for your artery issue. Your choice -- it's not very pleasant in there, especially when you can't go home at night. I'd look for another way to get my surgery.

    140. Re:Hormone therapy? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      I'd say he's already got himself an award winning documentary lined up. Not sure what Hollywood itself would do with the whole story. There seems like there are mixed themes here, and Hollywood likes keeping their messages simple and hitting you over the head with them.

      Maybe more A&E than Hollywood?

    141. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How is this modded 5 for informative?

      You do realize part of his defense was that he had the whole gender crisis PRIOR to the leak?

    142. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know several hetero murderers? Maybe you should call the cops?

    143. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know several murderers? Really? Are you a prison psychologist?

      Also, Luka Magnotta was gay and batshit crazy.

    144. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Way to ruin the end of breaking bad. Walter admits to everything, hides the money for his family, and gets free chemo.

    145. Re:Hormone therapy? by cold+fjord · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Only" two. Why is it that the US claims to be the best country in the world, but it comfortable sharing a list mainly populated by other shining examples of leading countries, such as North Korea, Thailand and Rwanda?

      You're joking, right? Some random person makes up a list based on unknown data, criteria, and extremely dubious fairness, and the US as a nation should feel humiliated by it? In one of those prisons people were claimed to be engaging in cannibalism. The North Korean prison system is a study in atrocity. US prisons are nothing like that. I'm reasonably certain that an honest list would have quite a few more prisons on it before getting to US prisons.

      But to help clarify things, let's try a thought experiment:

      A thought experiment list of the worst people that ever lived:
      Stalin
      Pol Pot
      Mao
      SleazyRidr

      Should you feel humiliated? Ashamed? No? Of course you shouldn't! Why? Are you a mass murderer responsible for the death of millions? No. So you don't really fit on that list, do you? Well guess what? Including the US prisons on that list is equal nonsense.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    146. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Riker's Island has this insane slasher culture were everybody gets their face cut at some point...go through any poor neighborhood in NYC and you will see the guys with scars on their face from Riker's...

      http://assets.nydailynews.com/polopoly_fs/1.1279410.1362498298!/img/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/landscape_635/rikers5n-1-web.jpg

    147. Re:Hormone therapy? by Trailer+Trash · · Score: 1

      I don't care. He killed and maimed many people, his life is of no value. I know, that's harsh, but it's reality. I'd rather worry about the people who are in prison because they were in possession of dead plants.

    148. Re:Hormone therapy? by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      I suspect a break-down of seriously torturous serial killers would match about the same percentage of homosexuals as the general populous.

      I don't really know enough about the topic, but I can think of a couple off the top of my head, and I can't think of that many over-all.

      Your knowing a few murderers doesn't really get to the threshold of where one would expect to get a homosexual or a trangender in the sample.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    149. Re:Hormone therapy? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The correct answer is: the list is bogus.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    150. Re:Hormone therapy? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      If you actually want to help society, you support and protect those that need it the most.

      Like victims of criminals, most of whom are victims of violent crime because they are least likely to be able to defend themselves?

    151. Re:Hormone therapy? by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      I can think of one.

      But you're right. It's ridiculous to put Manning's gender identity off as insanity from torture.

      To be honest, as far as PR for the War on Fascism, this is great news. The more social norms that must be smashed to hammer home the deep, deep opposition we have to the cover-up of war crimes done in our names, the better.

      There are some on the right wing who, misguided on social issues, are actual patriots. That is, people who love their country more than their government. When they are able to stand up and say "I support a transgendered 'traitor' for bringing government corruption and war crimes to light," more people who we need to listen will listen.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    152. Re:Hormone therapy? by Cederic · · Score: 2

      Why? Women can do that job too.

    153. Re:Hormone therapy? by lgw · · Score: 3, Insightful

      As a general rule, "use some willpower and get over it" is a poor approach for any psychosis. If it merely "bothers you", meh, whatever, but if your day-to-day activities are significantly impeded by your mental state, or you're a danger to yourself or others (a couple of ways of drawing a line between neurosis and psychosis), then treatment is called for. Especially if the root cause is a "hardware problem, not a software problem", willpower isn't going to help.

      Would you really argue that someone who has a problem with psychosis shouldn't take his meds, if meds are available?

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    154. Re:Hormone therapy? by Cederic · · Score: 2

      No, it would not be funny.

      Why is it ok to rape a man and not the poor young teenage girl?

      Fuck you and your man-hating lack of morals.

    155. Re:Hormone therapy? by Hartree · · Score: 1

      2 already dead. One in jail. It's not alleged. All three were convicted.

    156. Re: Hormone therapy? by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 2

      Honest question here, why is being raped so much worse than being tortured, brutally beaten or murdered? We make fun of a lot of horrible things including the holocaust yet some people think rape is the ultimate and shouldn't be touched. I'd never wish rape on someone but it's not the murder and torture of millions in prison camps. You either give it all up or jokes about awful events are acceptable no matter which bad thing is used in the joke.

    157. Re:Hormone therapy? by HornWumpus · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think having a gay battalion would do a lot to 'further the country's foreign policy goals'.

      Could Saddam have survived the first gulf war if the republican guards where handed their asses by the 'lavender battalion'?

      Besides military bases are pretty ugly. They will get rid of all that boring olive drab.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    158. Re:Hormone therapy? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that most transgendered people retain their straight/gay preference in accordance with their current body.

      So a MTF TG that fancied women will start to fancy men.

      I'm working from a decade old review of the research though so there may be better informaton out there now.

    159. Re:Hormone therapy? by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      We don't know how to change thinking patterns.

    160. Re:Hormone therapy? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Let me assure you not all of them are wiggin' loonies

      This statement is true of many people with mental illness, but that same prejudice is there. If you have a persistent belief in something contrary to facts, seeking counseling is appropriate (as Manning did), and taking your meds is also appropriate. No, that doesn't mean your judgment is compromised in unrelated areas, nor that you're automatically prone to violence.

      While personally I used Manning had terrible judgment that got a lot of people killed, I can't believe it had anything to do (in either direction) with his gender identity problems.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    161. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I seriously doubt that any of you really know what you're talking about when it comes to prison.

      It's easy to talk about how horrible prisons but you actually have to have experienced it. I have. I served 16 months in two state prison for possession of some "very deviant, nasty shit" (and we'll leave it at that). Lots of psychotherapy has helped me understand the impulses to possess and use this stuff is directly related to my being raped by the neighborhood pedophile when I was seven who was thirteen at the time. So, not only have I been raped, I've spent some time in prison. I think I qualify as an expert witness here.

      So, what have I learned?

      1. Being raped as a child is no joke.
      2. Prison rape is no joke.
      3. Being shanked in prison is no joke.
      4. Prison in the United States is awful, even when I was in a "dorm" setting which was very little like the university dorms.
      5. The week I spent in solitary confinement was the worst week of my life. It's pure psychological torture that still gives me nightmares.

      But I've also learned to have compassion for the boy who raped me and forgive him. Pedophiles don't do their awful shit to kids simply because they are born that way. They have to have been sexually abused themselves. I recognize that this boy was himself a victim. I hope he's in some prison somewhere no longer hurting others but other than that I wish him no ill will.

      I feel the same for Bradley Manning. This boy (he really is just a child) is going to be spending the most productive years of his life in a federal hole, probably in solitary confinement "for his own protection". When he is released, it is likely he's going to be a shell of his former self, but he probably will get the hormone treatment and come out with boobs and be what were known in prison as one of the "chicks with dicks". But I hope he is able to find a way to stay sane.

    162. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What about circumcisions, male or female?
      The people you talk about, might not be the best informed people on those particular subjects and may not benefit from counseling, but at least they have a choice.

      Freedom is a dangerous thing, most people think it's a right, others think it's a privilege or an illusion, but nobody really knows what it is until they lose it.

    163. Re:Hormone therapy? by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      My question is why we would have Manning in prison anyway. If Manning were free, he/she could decide on his/her own decisions about treatment, and not at the expense of the rest of us!

    164. Re:Hormone therapy? by Stoutlimb · · Score: 1

      That's going to work towards Chelsea's favour. Now she gets put in a women's prison. Less chance of something bad happening when she drops the soap. Assuming she ever sees the light of day with the general population, and not get locked in a hole for the rest of her life. If they don't treat her with the respect she deserves as a human being, she has another way of appealing her sentence on the grounds of cruel and unusual punishment. I hope she wins.

    165. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like solitary turns a man into a woman from your description. My experience is limited though...

    166. Re:Hormone therapy? by kno3 · · Score: 1

      "Young men aged 16 to 24 are most at risk of becoming a victim of violent crime." http://collection.europarchive.org/tna/20090120202659/homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs04/rdsolr1804.pdf Not exactly a group considered to be the "least likely to be able to defend themselves". In fact, crime perpetration and victim-hood have a habit of sharing common demographies (with some obvious exceptions).

    167. Re:Hormone therapy? by kno3 · · Score: 1

      Anyway, how does sending someone to a bad prison that will make them more likely to reoffend protect the victim more than one that will rehabilitate the perpetrator?

    168. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I doubt it, but prisoners are renounced for their acceptance of men living as women.

      Renowned surely?

    169. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot of people are still conflicted on what the prison system is supposed to do. Help deliver justice, punishment or corrective behavior, nobody really knows, and USA seems more confused than most, with some states that treats their prisoners as spa clients while others still have punishment by death.

    170. Re:Hormone therapy? by Hartree · · Score: 1

      2 of them are already dead. One is in jail.
      Worked with one when I was a late teen. He shotgunned his girlfriend. Another one was a kid from the small town I grew up in. He blew away a kid from out of town at a party. The other was a well known hard case from the next town over who sometimes hung around in groups I was in as a teenager. Robbery gone bad.

      In addition, I worked with another who had been released after being on death row. He may not have committed that one, but I'd not be surprised (and suspect) he committed others. He died of vascular problems stemming from meth abuse. He was a very good worker, but I sure wouldn't have want him angry at me. I've seen him go cold angry at someone else I knew. Very scary.

      Another I knew in the National Guard was jailed for attempting to hire someone to kill someone.

      At 51, I'm older than most slashdotters, so I've had more time for people I've met to screw up. I also didn't come from a suburb, but a kinda mean blue collar farm and factory worker town.

      As to Magnotta, you're having to go a ways to find someone. Andrew Cunanon would be another, but these are people on the news, not ones either of us (correct me if I'm wrong) have met.

      Yes, there are gays/TG that are murderers, just I've not met them.

    171. Re:Hormone therapy? by keytoe · · Score: 1

      So, if I'm uninsured and facing major narrowing of the arteries, I can go smoke a joint in a police station and get free heart surgery?

      So this has been the Obama Health Care plan all along?!

      1. 1. Progressively strip rights away from the citizens criminalizing almost everything.
      2. 2. When a medical situation arises, simply arrest and treat.

      Bam, single payer public health care!

    172. Re:Hormone therapy? by Bomazi · · Score: 1

      Oh yes we do, it is called psychotherapy.

    173. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Venezuela, Rwanda, Syria... and the US.

      If that's the company you're happy to have then I suppose you can keep your rape-happy prison mentality - but we will draw the line when you pull that "USA #1 We're teh best!" shite.

         

    174. Re:Hormone therapy? by phantomfive · · Score: 1

      Did you look at the list? This is an example of a bad US prison. The primary reason it is on the list is because the prisoners are kept in isolation.

      This is another example on the list. It's on the list because of the conditions, but also because of the physical and mental torture.

      As another post said, the primary reason the US prison is on the list is because of Egotistical nationalism, not because of some rational scientific metric.

      --
      "First they came for the slanderers and i said nothing."
    175. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's called society. As in "one for all, and all for one".
      You know that concept that is still foreign to 'Murica.

    176. Re:Hormone therapy? by spleck · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the US prisons on that list were elaborate clean facilities, unlike most of the rest. One made the list for "brutal" guards, and the other for being so secure the prisoners want to kill themselves. Sounds like a different level of "bad" than rampant AIDS outbreaks or occasional massacres of the entire population.

    177. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the 99% is stealing heart surgeries from the 1%, they must see it as a bad thing.

    178. Re:Hormone therapy? by Hartree · · Score: 1

      Maybe in the broader LGBT sphere it is. Hadn't really run into a big problem among those I know, and some of them are kinda picky about slights.

      I think a lot of it is, how it's intended. When I've used it, it's not been meant as an insult.

      One of them I've used it around is an over 6 ft heavily built trucker (Given my nickname, at least a couple of posters here on Slashdot will likely recognize who I'm talking about.) who could have turned me into a pretzel if shi'd been terribly ticked about it. ;)

    179. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because *now* they're worried about cruel and unusual?

    180. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I did a whole big, long write up a few months ago on an article about trans issues about what it's like to be trans. I suggest you go read it, because you don't really know what you're talking about. The post is here: http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3870279&cid=44020623

      The salient point there is this:

      I don't WANT to transition. I don't want to do HRT for the rest of my natural life. I don't want to have to fight for jobs and housing and the right to use the bathroom that WON'T get me violently pummeled or murdered. I don't WANT this fight. I don't have a choice. Therapy didn't work. Psychiatric drugs didn't work. Therapy AND drugs didn't work. The only thing that has ever been effective has been HRT. And with HRT comes transitioning. I have breasts now that will very shortly be impossible for me to hide. My body fat distribution is going to put my in a similar place even if my breasts don't. Every week, I look in the mirror and it's more and more like a young version of my mother. It's wonderful... but it's also terrifying. It's my absolute last resort. I've tried every other avenue open to me, and none of them have worked. For me, it's either transition or die. I have no other options. If I had anything I could do, any way to just stop being trans and be a normal man, I would. If there was any way that I could not go through with this, and still live... I would. But there's not. And this is a common theme among trans persons. For us, there is no other choice. If we could pop a pill and make this go away, don't you think we would? We may be crazy, but we're not insane. We didn't ask for this, and we don't want it.

    181. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they did provide hormone pills for that transexual in the female prison in Orange is the New Black!

      How disgusting!

    182. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Oh, and SRS has one of the highest rates of patient satisfaction of any surgical procedure that is done today, period. Even more so than many surgeries for life threatening conditions. There are people who end up dissatisfied, yes... but the vast majority of people who go through HRT and SRS are very, very happy with the results. You just never hear from them because, well, why would they out themselves, and potentially ruin their lives, when they are perfectly happy?)

    183. Re:Hormone therapy? by spleck · · Score: 1

      Many are overlooking the second page... including me.

    184. Re: Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are 25 million prisoners in Best Korea alone. I think your calculations are a little off.

      Of course, if the US would just follow the lead of more oppressive countries and murder people instead of locking them up, then it could improve its rankings a lot.

    185. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right, tell it to these guys on Riker's.

      Also, the supermax isolation is the most inhumane treatment but most countries are too poor to afford it since it's expensive to keep each prisoner totally isolated but since the U.S. has a bottomless pit of tax money they actually will build it just to torture people (and create jobs).

    186. Re: Hormone therapy? by elgo · · Score: 1

      Should we hold ourselves to a higher standard? Nah! I'm glad that you feel OK about the fact that the "Land of the free," the US, has the highest rate of incarceration. I'll bet you also don't have much of a problem with privatized prisons.

      --
      - elgo
    187. Re: Hormone therapy? by DustoneGT · · Score: 1

      If it bothers you bad enough, see if a temporal agent can take you to the 24th Century delta quadrant and drop you off on the Voyager. Hitch a ride on that warp 10 shuttle they built. That would fix your problem, but you might not enjoy the side effects :)

    188. Re:Hormone therapy? by deanklear · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Let's try another thought experiment:

      Which nations on earth operate a stateless prison camp where due process and the Geneva Conventions don't apply?

      Which nations on earth have military commanders that regularly order the assassination of individuals who receive no due process before their death?

      Which nation has the highest number of prisoners, both in raw numbers and per capita?

      In each of those answers, for the first time in her history, you'd have to say the answers include America.

      These crimes are regularly committed by other nations, and they are rightfully called violations of human rights by US Citizens and the government. But when the United States engages in aggressive warfare, a suspension of basic human rights, and a campaign of persecution against individuals, including journalists, who dare to talk about these items, somehow the conversation turns to talking about another nation instead of our own.

      Putin may be a despot, but he is, by all accounts, a superior despot to Stalin. Does that excuse his behavior? Should we wait until he's got a few hundred thousand dead under his belt before we start including him in criticism?

      The abject hypocrisy, ignorance, and hollow patriotism that plagues what's left of American culture is nauseating. Not only is our citizenry unable to have an intelligent conversation about world affairs, but they can't be led by facts or argument to any truth that conflicts with their jingoist worldview.

      But America, especially in this case, has no place for pride. We treat our dissidents as poorly as our culture will allow -- the same as every other nation on earth. It wasn't too long ago that we were putting dissidents to death, or simply murdering unionists in the street back in the 1920s and 1930s.

      Ahh, but who wants to talk about actual history when we can discuss the faults of others? The true mark of any great nation is not how it actually behaves, but only the stories that placate the masses with our nobility and purpose. Our treatment of the powerless, the dissidents, and our enemies can always be justified, as long as we tell ourselves that responsibility and accountability can be abdicated by pointing our finger at a few dead despots.

      Is that the extent of your patriotism? Excusing the nonsensical corporal punishment of a dissident to protect the broken, corrupted, and unjust institutions that run our country by stooping so low as to say it's justified since we kill and torture fewer people?

      "My kind of loyalty was loyalty to one's country, not to its institutions or its officeholders. The country is the real thing, the substantial thing, the eternal thing; it is the thing to watch over, and care for, and be loyal to; institutions are extraneous, they are its mere clothing, and clothing can wear out, become ragged, cease to be comfortable, cease to protect the body from winter, disease, and death."
      --Twain

    189. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't see why she'd be any more likely than anyone else to spill the beans about an upcoming product, or the root password to the webserver, so long as murder wasn't involved.

      Because he released 10,000 documents without even looking at the majority of them? That's not whistle blowing.

    190. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Seriously? As a survivor myself, I simply cannot understand where you are coming from. It's shitty, sure, but shitty things happen to people all the time: car crashes, cancer, burns, torture, war, etc. OK, If I were a vegetable I would probably rather be dead. But even if I had a spinal cord injury or amputation, I don't think I would rather be dead. Life's just too much fun. Granted, I was a kid when it happened, so I've had a lot of time for perspective, but even two years afterwards I didn't have any more suicidal thoughts.

      I have a daughter now, too. That's probably the best thing to live for. WTF, hug too much? There's no such thing.

    191. Re:Hormone therapy? by teg · · Score: 2

      From your link: "None of the windows at Halden have bars"

      That's not a remotely typical prison.

      The prisoners make their own meals. In a typical prison, that would result in 125 dead of stab wounds.

      It's not that different from most Norwegian prisons - it just happens to be the newest one. Norway puts a huge effort into rehabilitation, and as a result the recidivism rate is 20-30% - less than half of what it is in the UK, to give one example.

      While one part of me doesn't want prison to be to comfortable and cushy, intellectually I prefer this as it makes most ex-cons a valuable part of society afterwards and they don't go back to prison.

    192. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Flawed analogy. A gender change surgery is not the same as a limb amputation. The implications of having it, and of not having it, are completely different between the two cases. So our responses to requests for such surgeries should be different.

      It makes a lot more sense to try and talk someone out of an amputation of a perfectly good limb (when some psychological issue makes them dislike the limb) than it does to try to talk someone out of a gender change surgery (when their mental gender identity is actually at odds with their physical gender identity).

      Treating them as if they were the same kind of situation shows either a clear ignorance of the facts, or a conscious rejection of those facts in deference to an inclination to force other people to live according to one's own values.

    193. Re:Hormone therapy? by znrt · · Score: 1

      Think it's in part because, prison rape/all rape is generally bad

      a prisoner makes for a bad victim because he's already a stigmatized subject, a social reject. a femenine victim has much more emotional impact, even though the act is totally equivalent. also, you should note that these kind of jokes are mostly a male phenomenon, and that's basically just defensive projection of fear (of social rejection, mostly, maybe even self disorientation). sorry for taking away credit of "north american culture" for this, but this is basically a "macho" issue, which sadly is a pervasive trait in cultures all around the planet.

      and I am also convinced that humor and jokes are the best path to criticism, discovery and knowledge, and that there should be no taboos. but sorry that's not the case with the average prison-rape or soap joke. there's no intelligent process nor reflection there to witness. it's just plain fear and social cliche.

    194. Re: Hormone therapy? by cold+fjord · · Score: 1

      You're changing the subject. The issues was the treatment of prisoners, not the incarceration rate. Do you want to argue that the US has prisons so bad that the prisoners resort to cannibalism to stay alive, or that guards force women to drown their own children? If not, then the list is still nonsense. The US treats its prisoners to a higher standard.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    195. Re:Hormone therapy? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      I've known an actual rapist (didn't know it at the time). They are not bad asses. They are pussies.

      That is the funny part of the don't drop the soap joke. It's usually being told about some sort of self perceived bad ass who is about to find out how bad he isn't.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
    196. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes it does. Try living here, shitting your pants in fear that you might end up in one of those prisons, and see how you like it.
      Must be nice to be where you are from. It's not so nice here.

    197. Re:Hormone therapy? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      Anyway, how does sending someone to a bad prison that will make them more likely to reoffend protect the victim more than one that will rehabilitate the perpetrator?

      I don't believe you will see anything in what I said that says it does. I'm merely pointing out in the statement that we should defend those that most need it we should put victims higher on the list than the people who victimized them. The victims, for the most part, are on the list through no fault of their own; those who put them there made the choices for both themselves and their victims.

      As for 16-24 year olds being on the list of victims, the person who thinks that is relevant is apparently assuming that all 16-24 year old people are highly athletic self-defense experts and thus deserving of no protection from violent criminals. I suspect if you look a bit more into the data, you'll find that excepting violence between criminals (a drug deal gone bad, e.g.) most violent criminals target those who aren't likely to defend themselves simply as a means of self-preservation. Why pick hard targets when the easy ones are so ... easy?

    198. Re:Hormone therapy? by Smauler · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You ever been raped? You ignorant asshole.

      Yes.

      Why do you think so many rape victims commit suicide? Even after months or years of therapy and trying to forget?

      It's a horrible experience. Some people can't deal with it.

      At least if the person is killed, the torment is over.

      My torment was over years ago... it was tough getting over it, but I did, and am glad to be alive.

      I certainly wish my attacker had been raped in prison, and then killed, so my tax dollars doesn't keep him alive.

      I feel nothing but pity for my attacker. He never went to prison, by the way, his punishment was being deported back to his own country. I don't hate him any more, I don't care about him at all. I used to want revenge, but I figured out it was hurting me more than it would hurt him.

      If you can't appreciate that, you obviously have no experience in the subject, and can take your self-righteous indignation and shove it up your ass.

      I do have experience of this. You're the one with the self righteous indignation. You're the one claiming murder is almost equivalent to rape. I'm a happy, relatively well adjusted person now.

      Also, I resent the fact that you imply that no one can comment on the issue unless they have been raped. People are allowed opinions on stuff that has not actually happened to them.

    199. Re:Hormone therapy? by You're+All+Wrong · · Score: 1

      > So, you're saying that having transgender feelings is generally due to torture and insanity?

      No, he said:
          Probably(A => B)

      You're claiming he's said:
          B => (Probably A)

      Compare:
          Probably, if it's peanut butter, it came in a jar
      with:
          If it came in a jar, it's probably peanut butter

      I've got some honey, jam, and case screws that would take issue with your logic.

      --
      Your head of state is a corrupt weasel, I hope you're happy.
    200. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Egotistical nationalism?

      Hell yeah! We're tied with Venezuela on the list at 2 each! Suck it, Thailand!

    201. Re:Hormone therapy? by You're+All+Wrong · · Score: 1

      > To be honest, as far as PR for the War on Fascism, this is great news. The more social norms that must be smashed to hammer home the deep, deep opposition we have to the cover-up of war crimes done in our names, the better.

      I wish you were right, but I fear the exact opposite. I suspect it'll be turned into "these queers can't be trusted". The coda to "God hates fags" will be "because fags hate the USA".

      --
      Your head of state is a corrupt weasel, I hope you're happy.
    202. Re:Hormone therapy? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 2

      See? The effects of the process are so bad, they even cause such behaviour in the past!

      --
      The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    203. Re:Hormone therapy? by Hatta · · Score: 1

      When people ask to have limbs amputated because the person feels that having the limb doesn't make them feel whole (strange how you don't feel whole until part of you is removed?! That and/or because they have a sexual fetish for amputated limbs,) modern medicine denies that request, considers it to be abhorrent, and any medical professional who obliges the request is jailed and/or has their license to practice revoked. The treatment for the above condition is the same as if the person had a mental illness, and the solution is to change thinking patterns rather than surgery.

      In that case, modern medicine is wrong. Modern medicine is wrong about a lot of things.

      I mean, you're right the real disfunction is in the brain. But we have no way to treat that disfunction. The right thing to do is to give the patient the treatment that will improve his/her life the most. In the absence of brain altering treatments that work, body alteration is the best remaining option in some cases. Try everything else first, but when all of that fails, amputate.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    204. Re:Hormone therapy? by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      You might want to forget the word "Trannies". Most of the Transgender people I have met find it offensive.

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    205. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When someone does it to this guy, I don't think he'll consider himself an unwilling sperm recipient. It sounds like he would be the first to not only enjoy it, but actively ask for it...

    206. Re:Hormone therapy? by Entropius · · Score: 1

      It doesn't matter. Her motivation wasn't anything that would come up in the course of honest employment.

    207. Re:Hormone therapy? by interkin3tic · · Score: 1

      Depending on inflation, she will get at least $30 from at least me. I'll definitely be buying the book.

    208. Re:Hormone therapy? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      My understanding is that most transgendered people retain their straight/gay preference in accordance with their current body.

      So a MTF TG that fancied women will start to fancy men.

      Umm.... No. Usually they stay attracted to the sex they were attracted to in the "before time". Though there are some instances of changing desires in "some". So there's Lesbian MTF's, MTF's attracted to men (and thusly "straight"), bisexual MTFs, and even asexual MTF's.

    209. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      USA circumcision is largely a myth to the level you're stating as fact. Hospitals have it as a default line item on all male births, but unless you request it, it doesn't get done. But it allows medical outfits to charge you or your insurance company an extra $500 to $1000. It's never mentioned, and unless you demand a full breakdown of charges, you'll never see it. In the 70s it was considered healthy, but that was shown as bollocks by all the health penises around the world that didn't have the foreskin shorted. It has been dying since the mid 80s. You have to wonder why Jews still insist on it, take it up with them.

    210. Re:Hormone therapy? by Nethead · · Score: 1

      Not here in Washington State. But the police will give you some free munchies. Oh, you will get a ticket for smoking indoors though.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    211. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, from MY fandoms I know several gay and tranny murderers, and not a single hetero murderer. There, now our arguments have equal weight and cancel each other out.

    212. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most of the documents that he released had nothing to do with murder.

      Athough, I'd actually be more afraid of employing him based on his mental state, and I am not talking about him being a tranny, but rather because he appears to just be unstable period.

    213. Re:Hormone therapy? by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      Because she (Manning) was presumably born in the USA, her genitals were likely already mutilated at birth.

      I'm not sure what you're getting at here. Is that supposed to be a counterpoint? Yes, that is also mutilation, by definition. I'm quite against circumcision without express consent of the patient as well.

      The process of HRT brings one's hormone levels in line with normal female levels, so I don't understand why you think anything is going "out of whack."

      You're taking an already healthy person with an already healthy chemical balance and then deliberately changing it. That is what I'd call out of whack. This person's normal body function will now require artificial means to maintain this different state. You know that the military doesn't permit transexuals for medical reasons right? It has nothing to do with politics, it is entirely about fitness.

      Yes, you are, because not all trans women undergo bottom surgery. Bottom surgery is a personal choice and not a requirement to live as a woman or get an ID as a woman, although it may be a requirement in certain states in order to amend or change one's birth certificate.

      Uh...WHAT? That's exactly what I'm pushing towards. I'm saying surgery isn't the answer, nor should it be.

      If you're really as rational as you're trying to present yourself as being

      How am I not being rational? Being against performing surgery on a healthy person is not rational? If not, tell me what is rational about denying amputation of a perfectly healthy limb but encouraging mutilation of genitalia?

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    214. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A micro-soft (get it lol) dick of an old man who can't get it up?

    215. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except (if you actually read the list) there are 5 US prisons on it:

      ADX Florence, Riker's, San Quentin, Alcatraz, and Attica.

      To say nothing of the fact that prisons in the US have several more polite PR-speak designations i.e. 'detention centers', 'holding facilities', 'confinement facilities', etc. Notice that Guantanamo Bay wasn't mentioned.

    216. Re:Hormone therapy? by Capt.DrumkenBum · · Score: 1

      I prefer "Reverse Phrenology"

      --
      If I were God, wouldn't I protect my churches from acts of me?
    217. Re:Hormone therapy? by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      That is probably the rule in the US Military as well. The caveat being that the military wouldn't have allowed him to be prescribed HRT drugs while he was in. In this case, he isn't already on them, and they won't give them to him in the stockade.

    218. Re:Hormone therapy? by Nethead · · Score: 1

      As opposed to a lot of inmate on inmate/guard murder from lack of isolation?

      Some Federal (BOP) inmates are sent to Florence because there is no other safe place to keep them, and those around them, alive. It costs many times more to house them there than in the normal FCI population.

      They don't send them there for revenge either. They have another program for that; transferring an inmate from one facility to another, over and over, never at one place long enough for money or mail to catch up. They call it diesel therapy.

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    219. Re:Hormone therapy? by Nethead · · Score: 1

      That, and 'merica has a lot of assholes posting in comment sections. Today's Onion article delves into it: http://www.theonion.com/articles/seemingly-mentally-ill-internet-commenter-presumab,33570/

      --
      -- I have a private email server in my basement.
    220. Re:Hormone therapy? by miroku000 · · Score: 1

      . . .but how many will remember it in 7 years ? Or get past HR, who tend to frown on things like a stint in prison and a dishonorable discharge. And even if he keeps his IT skills current (unlikely at Fort Leavenworth. . .) no employer will trust him for ANYTHING sensitive. . No, for the most part, his prospects look pretty dim for anything significant. . .

      I think he can get a job for WikiLeaks or a torrent search engine web site. He will also be able to give speeches and charge around $10,000 per speech.

    221. Re:Hormone therapy? by meta-monkey · · Score: 1

      Great. Let them further reveal their insanity. Give them more rope to hang themselves.

      --
      We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    222. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reformation? Ive never heard that word used to describe any sort of treatment in a U.S. Prison.

      Actually, reformation and rehabilitation of prisoners has been tried extensively in the US penal system, especially in the 1970s. What the do-gooder ex-hippies failed to understand is that there are people who really are permanently broken, evil does exist in the world. The lack of efficacy of prison rehabilitation programs is pretty clear and reflected in very high recidivism rates.

    223. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Uh... You might want to look into the proven medical benefits of circumcision.

    224. Re:Hormone therapy? by Hartree · · Score: 1

      Except mine have names and histories you can check out.

      Jeff Negangard. Worked with him at a loudspeaker designer in Sidney, IL. Shotgunned his girlfriend. can't find anything on Google about it, but it's been quite some years (Late 80s, I think).

      Joe Burrows, Also originally from Sidney. check it on Google. On death row for several years, commuted to life by Gov Ryan when he commuted all Illinois death sentences. Released when a witness recanted. Stories on that case ignored his past history and were very complimentary to him. I wasn't convinced even though I liked the man and and am still friends with his family.

      Another still has kin living around the Homer, Illinois area, I'd rather not tick off. Maybe given the people I grew up with, you can understand that.

      Another I didn't even mention above was PFC (William?) Smith on Camp Essayons Korea in 1984. He was in the survey platoon of my company HHC 6th Bn 37th Artillery. Murdered a Korean woman married to a US Army officer to take about a grand, then used it to pay his debts to shady Korean money lenders. He got up in my face a couple days after the murder when I was talking about it. In retrospect, I might have realized something was up, but not at the time.

      I later met up with someone from our same unit who also transferred to Fort Hood TX (where I was stationed after I came back from Korea) that said he'd died in prison. I don't know the truth of that.

      The guardsman who tried to hire a killing was my radioteletype team chief (though that was years earlier) at HHC 2 Bn 130th Infantry in Urbana, IL.

      Should I continue? So far, all you are is an AC with no info. Let's hear the cases. And if they didn't get reported, why didn't you do that?

      Now, anyone with half a bit of salt should be able to find out everything about me and who I am from all those connections and info I just gave. (Not that I've ever really tried to hide that.)

    225. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm curious - does that mean all operations such as tonsillectomies or such be withheld until the patient comes of age? (In the U.S., that's 18).

    226. Re:Hormone therapy? by shiftless · · Score: 0

      Because she (Manning) was presumably born in the USA, her genitals were likely already mutilated at birth.

      You misspelled "he." Or perhaps you weren't aware that Bradley Manning is a male?

      Secondly, the organ between your ears also has gender just the same as the organ between your legs. The process of HRT brings one's hormone levels in line with normal female levels, so I don't understand why you think anything is going "out of whack."

      Paid for at taxpayer expense? I don't think so.

      I hope you starve in the fucking streets, maggot.

    227. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I find it interesting that under 'this day on slashdot' in 2009, there is "How to Prove Someone Is Female"...

      Regardless of the rest (and I perhaps have different feelings than the majority of /.), if someone is transgendered, fine... but I would point out that (a) things are a bit different in the military than in civilian life; and (b) from a public point of view, the timing of this hitting the press is a bit odd.

    228. Re:Hormone therapy? by TheCycoONE · · Score: 1

      Probably because most violent offenders don't pick their targets randomly, or look for easy targets. Instead they go after people they have an existing conflict with like rival gang members, people who made fun of them, or that guy that slept with their sister and never called back. [citation needed]

    229. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One word: JEWS.

    230. Re:Hormone therapy? by St.Creed · · Score: 1

      Go ask an adult survivor of child abuse if they feel upset that their uncle/father/priest/etc may be subjected to rape in prison.

      Wrong question. Go ask an adult survivor of child abuse if they feel upset that their uncle/father/priest was a victim of rape before he raped them.

      You're assuming the order is always: go rape, get raped. In many cases the order is actually different. So what prison rape is doing, is brutalizing prisoners into rapists. Given the size of the prison population and the fact that prisons are the high school and universities of crime, this is actually making the USA less safe, rather than safer. To add insult to injury, it's also quite expensive.

      --
      Therefore, by the (faulty) logic you're using, you're just a cow with a keyboard - osu-neko (2604)
    231. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WHO is behind the mass mutilation of baby boys in the United States? Who could possibly benefit from this?
      Which group of people have been thrown out of 109 countries in the last 1,000 years, due to their endless crimes against their host populations, and also mutilate their own baby boys? The JEWS.
      So the filthy Jews want to be able to HIDE among their 'cattle' by mutilating their cattle's baby boys to look just like the cattle owners, and thus it becomes much more difficult to remove the parasites who infest your country.
      What sort of sick pervert came up with the idea of HIM cutting YOUR baby son's penis, and then sucking the blood with HIS MOUTH? Why, a filthy JEW, surrounded by other filthy, child abusing, animal torturing Jews, that's who.
      What is shechitah?
      What is kapparot?

    232. Re:Hormone therapy? by Livius · · Score: 1

      I'm going to say that he was screwed up before ever entering the military;

      I'm going to say that being illegally tortured was a factor.

    233. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Infant circumcision is the deliberate wounding and sexual maiming of a child that removes 1/3 to 1/2 of the penile skin."

      Pfft. Such hyperbole is ludicrous. You are saying that if asked, "Would you like to wound and sexually maim your child?", the routine, medically-approved answer would be "yes"? You did claim this outcome was "deliberate", correct?

      Fact is, there is extensive medical evidence of its benefits. No, the fact you can debate this extensively peer-reviewed fact does not call for your characterization.

      Please, do tell... I think my child might want his umbilical cord left 6" at his navel, to "express himself". Should I do that absent his informed consent? What is the difference between that and your argument?

    234. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "he hasn't started transition yet so he's still a he"

      This is where the term Transgender needs to be understood way more. You see, it appears you are calling her a 'he' because he has not went through HRT or SRS yet.. which neither are required by National or International standards to declare official Gender Dysphoria diagnosis. Gender Identity, Role, and even Gender Sexual Response is predominately all in the mind, not between the legs.

      Start here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_identity_disorder
      and follow lots of Sub-Links on that page to learn more about it.

    235. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod Parent Up.

      I wish I still had all those nerve endings my parents had removed without asking me first.

      At least my son can make an informed decision about his own dick. I wasn't afforded that opportunity. Someone forcibly took it from me. If he wants to go chopping up his cock, that's his choice, not mine.

    236. Re:Hormone therapy? by jpublic · · Score: 0

      Not funny according to you? Other people clearly find such jokes quite humorous. Maybe you're just a bit oversensitive and have trouble realizing that telling jokes or not telling jokes won't have any effect on how many people get raped in reality?

    237. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow - well written, excellent points.

      Thanks, truly!

    238. Re:Hormone therapy? by Smauler · · Score: 1

      Not her responsibility. As long as she's not doing it for publicity, then it's her choice, she has no obligation to the American public or other transgenders.

    239. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      People are allowed opinions on stuff that has not actually happened to them.

      Unless you are a man commenting that abortion might be wrong.

    240. Re: Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, you crack me up.

    241. Re:Hormone therapy? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Because everyone in prison is there because they raped someone, right?

      Also, it sounds like you''re supportive of the Sharia approach to meting out punishment for violent crimes, as implemented previously by e.g. Taliban and al-Shabaab - get the accused out in the field with a crowd, and invite the victim or one of their relatives to dispose with them as they see fit. Sounds good to you?

    242. Re:Hormone therapy? by Smauler · · Score: 1

      While personally I used Manning had terrible judgment that got a lot of people killed,

      Which people did Manning get killed?

    243. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks - the idealist in me applauds!

      [And you've brought in a little more sunshine, hope and faith in my fellow humans!]

      Cheers!

    244. Re:Hormone therapy? by lgw · · Score: 1

      Afghanis cooperating confidentially with the US Army were murdered by the hundreds when their names were outed. There's a reason you never reveal "sources and methods" in intelligence work.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    245. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just today here in Idaho I read a story about a guy who broke into a womans appartement and attacked her, then attacked some kid and took his skateboard, then kidnapped a guy in a wheelchair and dumped him out of it. I swear to God I'm not making this up. My first thought was, "hmm must've been hungry and needed a place to sleep."

    246. Re:Hormone therapy? by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I certainly wish my attacker had been raped in prison, and then killed, so my tax dollars doesn't keep him alive.

      In other words, you want personal revenge, not social justice.

      Which is fine, but prisons are not meant to be the tools of your personal revenge. Aside from your tax dollars, they're also funded by my tax dollars, and I certainly don't want them to be used for torture punishments.

    247. Re: Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are absolutly right there are lots of things worse than rape...

      Genacide
      Torture
      Murder
      Permanent disfigurement

      And thats just of the top of my head, anyone who thinks rape is wose than any of these things is a serious disturbed human being who should seek psychological help.

    248. Re: Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your europeen is showing.

    249. Re:Hormone therapy? by Kleen13 · · Score: 1

      I guess in the Military you'd be a ward of the state, stockade or not... right?

      --
      That sinking feeling deep in your gut when you KNOW you screwed up bad summed up with: {head desk} {head desk}
    250. Re:Hormone therapy? by Smauler · · Score: 2

      Circumcision is a possible health benefit, and has few side effects. I'm against habitual circumcision too, but going stark raving sexual maiming about it doesn't help.

      I was circumcised when I was about 4, I think... I had a tight foreskin. I remember it, but don't miss it.

    251. Re:Hormone therapy? by kno3 · · Score: 1

      TheCycoONE, put it fairly well. Also, the fact that 16-24 year olds are the most likely to be victims is indicative that offenders are not picking their victims based on their perceived vulnerability to attack. If they were, a different age group would be more likely. Obviously not all 16-24 year old people are highly athletic self-defense experts, but there is a hell of a lot more of them than in, say, the 65+ category (which is the least likely to be victims of violent crime).
      Placing the current victim "higher on the list" to the point where it detriments the care and rehabilitation of the offender ignores the plight of future victims. Obviously I agree that there should be care for the victims of crime, but if you actually want to solve the problem, the care of both parties is equally important.
      There is strong sympathetic relationship between victims and criminals here, as criminals are also one of the groups most at risk from crime.

    252. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite honestly, I don't care if my father was a victim of abuse before he raped me.

      Would I expect to be forgiven if I raped my child, since I was raped for 10 years as a child?

      If a person was a victim, and then makes others victims, that person should still be killed. Period.

    253. Re:Hormone therapy? by sycodon · · Score: 1

      What is the medical test for gender identity problems? Is it in the blood? Can you X-Ray it? Nope.

      It's psychiatric.

      Regardless, we should not be spending hundreds of thousands on a guy in prison for 35 years to correct a so-called condition that does not affect his health one iota.

      --
      When Fascism comes to America, it will call itself Anti-Fascism, and tell you to give up your guns.
    254. Re:Hormone therapy? by libtek · · Score: 1

      FTA "A spokeswoman said the Army did not provide hormone therapy or gender-reassignment surgery, but that military inmates have access to mental health professionals, including a psychiatrist, psychologist, social workers and behavioral science specialists."

      --
      Unequivocally the realest of the realz...
    255. Re:Hormone therapy? by Obfuscant · · Score: 1

      but if you actually want to solve the problem, the care of both parties is equally important.

      No, the care of both parties is not equally important. The victim did not choose to be one, he deserves much more concern than the person who made the decisions that led up to the problem. Yes, some people care so little for others that teaching them a well-paying craft and then turning them loose won't prevent them from doing it again. Those people need to be put someplace with others like them and kept away from their potential victims, and those are the prisons in the US that this discussion is about. Maximum security to keep them from killing each other and the guards, or the person who ratted them out and testified against them -- also known as "the victim".

      In other words, a slap on the wrist and a strong scolding won't "solve the problem", and saying that the concern for the criminal is as important as the concern for the victim is just insulting to the victims.

    256. Re:Hormone therapy? by EndlessNameless · · Score: 1

      The DoD just started offering benefits for same-sex domestic partners.

      --

      ---
      According to the latest ruleset, this post should be modded as Vorpal Flamebait +5.
    257. Re:Hormone therapy? by arth1 · · Score: 1

      Why should a person with XY chromosomes who identifies as a woman not be in the military? Why, in particular, does that have anything to do with someone's aptitude to be a soldier?

      Being a benefit to the military doesn't just mean aptitude.
      In short, it likely would not be a good idea, not because of the individual, but because of the others.
      A small number of military are psychopaths.
      A larger number have low empathy or are just assholes.
      And the great majority are bigoted (it's almost a requirement that you think the life and well-being of your own are worth more than others).

      It's hard enough for minorities in the military as is. Sure, it's doable, but it is seldom easy. And in this case, it would expose other practical problems. Should the person shower with the guys or the girls, for example?
      Would it matter what the individual felt most comfortable with, or what others felt?
      What if it is a non-operative with a fully functional penis? Should he shower with the girls? What about transgays and bigenders?

      Until we get rid of our religious ballast with gender separation, I don't think it's feasible to integrate more than we do today. We need to evolve until men and women and others can freely walk around feeling comfortable with their bodies, naked or not, whoever they are around. That day is far away, alas.

    258. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    259. Re:Hormone therapy? by Belial6 · · Score: 1

      To be fair, attraction to women is fairly common in women. If trans women truly are female in the brain, then I would expect somewhere in the range of 80%-90% of them to be attracted to women.

    260. Re:Hormone therapy? by Velex · · Score: 2

      There are two things specifically you're not being rational about because you're using hyperbole:

      • * Referring to bottom surgery as a "mutilation." It is a cosmetic procedure. I brought circumcision into my post to illustrate that. I call circumcision "mutilation" (and I'm glad you're against non-consenual circumcision), but as I understand certain individuals who are intact do decide to undergo it as adults for cosmetic reasons.
      • * Calling estrogen HRT "out of whack" when administered to trans women. Womyn-born-womyn sometimes seek estrogen HRT for menopause symptioms. Testosterone HRT is indicated in older men with "grumpyness" and trans men as well. Would you suggest withholding HRT when a doctor recommends it to a menopausal woman or to an older man just because it's not what their bodies are naturally doing? In addition, birth control pills are also typically a form of HRT. Do you believe birth control pills should be withheld as well?

      What is rational about any cosmetic operation, for that matter? What is rational about women who get breast implants? I've met a lot of men who disagree with breast implants. Yet, maybe the woman receiving the implant is a breast cancer survivor who only had mastectomy in one breast and desire a symmetric form?

      I also brought circumcision into the fold because I wanted to illustrate that your appeal to nature may not be correct as concerns somebody who was born male in the USA. It may not be a perfectly healthy limb... that's certainly the case with me, crap goes wrong, but I digress.

      The point is: A.) People have to take lots of different kinds of medications on a daily basis for a lot of different reasons; calling something "out of whack" because in your nonmedical opinion the unmedicated state of functioning is "natural" or "healthy" is simply ignorance. B.) People undergo cosmetic operations all the time; it is simply hyperbole and wrong to classify a cosmetic operation as "mutilation." (Feel free to call me a hypocrite since I refer to circumcision as mutilation, but perhaps I can justify it by saying that perhaps the difference between a mutilation and cosmetic procedure is whether or not the subject is consenting.)

      Please let me know your thoughts. Thanks

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
    261. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Hey AlphaWolf,

      I'm trans (m->f), so I can speak for myself :-)

      So ... firstly, there has been minimal success with "changing thinking patterns" - and the success rate of surgery amongst well-adjusted and carefully selected patients is so high that it's almost a routine solution. There's an inherent danger that some people might expect changing sex to "solve all their problems" - and it doesn't, so if you're in a fragile state, then the whole thing can be a huge let down. But that's a very small minority. By and large, it's highly successful, and it's a brilliant solution for those successes, because it's a dream come true. Anecdotally, I've known maybe, hmm, 30 people who've been through it, and they're almost all happier - I can think of a couple of exceptions, but that was about being rejected by the 1) family, and 2) ex-wife: both cases of foiled expectation that the other party would accept it post surgery, and they didn't. I read that link - yeah, maybe there are a few who regret it, but we're dealing with fairly large numbers here.

      Of course I've also known 7 trans-people who've committed suicide too. Maybe it's worth pointing out that the cost of an NHS sex change in the UK is about £30K, and the cost of the mandatory suicide inquest is >£50K, leaving aside the pain and horror and loss and - mustn't forget! - lost tax income. And the suicide rate amongst trans-people is an order of magnitude higher than the rest of the population, so unless you've got a good working alternative solution right now, then there are going to be a lot of dead people while you're thinking about it. Ok, my stats are flawed, as P(suicide) < 1, so I shouldn't really compare the 30K,50K thing like that... but it shows that even in the absence of a humane attitude, we're dealing with an expensive problem.

      I haven't had surgery.... I'd sort of love to, but it's icky sharp knives and stuff. Yuk, I'll leave that alone, and anyway, I'm doing all right. But do you know, it'd be fabulous if there was a non-surgical route. Problem is, we have to take the technology we've got. One day, it'll be a little tablet. Will that be mutilation? The thing is, it's not that I want to have my genitals "removed" - that's a very male way of thinking about it! - it's that I feel like I'm a woman, and it's jarring and complicated when I look down and think "damn, I'm weird and different from the other women". Fortunately, I'm smart and determined and I don't mind dealing with people, so I can handle the confusion and I get people on my side and right now, I'm happy to do without the joys of surgical transformation. And hell I'm too busy to take a few months out... :-) Anyway, my point is: it's not really "having your dick cut off" as much as "being transformed": I don't want to sound condescending, but hey this is Slashdot, so for the benefit of our readers, a woman isn't a "man with no penis" - there's really quite a lot going on down there. And physically, much of the tissue is reused, so if that's worrying you, then be at peace...

      One issue here is that I think you're using a pretty loaded and emotive term: "mutilate" - surgery is a pretty common approach to body modification, and if you aren't happy with that, then don't you need to put the entire cosmetic surgery industry on trial before you pick on the trans-people? What about surgery for diet control? Pain relief? Tattooing?

      One thing: I said above that I "feel like a woman". I can't begin to explain how that works ... although I know loads of people who feel that way - I think it's just over half the human population, in fact! I've felt this way for as long as I can remember. And when you start appreciating how different you are - because NOBODY else seems to feel the same way - then it's pretty scary. And calling it Gender Identity really hits the mark for me: this totally feels like part of who I am. I can't easily imagine that you could take this away without burning out p

    262. Re: Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a lot of rape victims blame themselves.. and if the circumstances were right were conned into having a go at it seeming it was their free will when it most certainly was not.. so I can see the cycle.. but please dont

    263. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thoughts, good, evil and everything in between chase their way through all our minds. It's what minds are for. We choose whether to act on them or not and there lies the measure of our worth - not in whether the idea ever occurred to us in the first place.

      I am sorry that you have experienced something that has left such scars. Please do not be afraid of the thoughts you think, nor think less of yourself for thinking them. Be proud that you have not chosen to act on them; that each time you have rejected the idea. I have far more admiration for someone who chooses 'good' knowing full well the range of options available to them than someone who is 'good' because the alternative never occurred to them. Take the time to recognise the strength you have already demonstrated and don't live in fear of some future weakness. You have been strong enough so far, you will be strong enough in the future.

      Fear makes the dark thoughts seem more powerful than they are. I wish it were as easy as saying 'Don't be afraid', but it's not. So - well done. I admire your courage and the battle you have fought. Hug your daughter for her sake. You are not an abuser. You've made that choice.

    264. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was raped your grandfather, Anonymous Coward the first... you damned insensitive bastard

    265. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nobody read all your crap

      USA! USA!

    266. Re: Hormone therapy? by techhead79 · · Score: 1

      Rape is far more personal and if someone is going to torture someone else chances are the vicitm isn't around to talk about it. Imagine associating that same feeling you get after you have great sex with someone to hate, mistrust, confusion, and general anxiety. I've dated several women that were raped in their past...it takes one of the few things in life that are supposed to be the best and destroys it. It's like someone reaches into your life and steals away every happy moment you might have with someone. Everyone seems to get a little bit fucked up differently from it...but don't underestimate someone having the power to mess with the chemicals in your brain for the rest of your life all through one act of violence.

    267. Re:Hormone therapy? by BitZtream · · Score: 1, Insightful

      You don't realize it, but your joke about olive drab is exactly what he was referring to. You are suggesting putting form before function. That is exactly the opposite of what the military is.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    268. Re:Hormone therapy? by FixedDice · · Score: 1

      Perhaps there was manning issues. Perhaps he was just someone filling in a slot in the numbers chart. Who's to say that in Manning's battalion there are others who have some mental instabilities. Meet some Intel weenies and come to a decision about their personalities. Take that and as far as deployments go and the Army's long deployment tours there are many who are unhappy with being there in the first place. Too much focus on one man that could be a fact of an issue throughout the military in general. Let's see how many more of these "crazies" appear from the new Insider Threat training that's being done to catch the next Snowden.

    269. Re:Hormone therapy? by Monsuco · · Score: 1

      Gender dysphoria is considered a legitimate psychological condition generally, so he'd have a case, but I don't know if it is life threatening or meets the usual criteria.

      Emotional trauma over being overweight is also real. Some people get emotionally sensitive about other aspects of how they look too. As far as I know, prisoners don't get free liposuction, nosejobs, LASIK, breast enhancements, et al. Why should being insecure about the appearance of your genitals be treated any differently than insecurity about the appearance of any other aspects of your body? If a male prisoner who wants to be a woman declares that he needs breast enhancements for his emotional health, why should he be given any preference over a flat chested female prisoner who says she doesn't feel sufficiently womanly due to her small breast.

      If Manning wants to use his own money, or if any other group wants to foot the bill, I'm fine with it but, at the end of the day, this is just a surgical procedure to make him feel better about how his body looks; to make him look like how he feels he should look. It is, in that sense, cosmetic.

    270. Re:Hormone therapy? by Immerman · · Score: 1

      If they truly managed to break her, which seems not altogether unlikely, then I imagine she doesn't much care about the fight anymore. And she's left with facing decades of imprisonment and the emotional wreckage that used to be a person. I imagine she just wants to do what she can to put herself back together and continue with life as best she can. She may even have gotten a plea deal out of it if she makes a big enough media spectacle out of herself.

      He gazed up at the enormous face. Forty years it had taken him to learn what kind of smile was hidden beneath the dark moustache. O cruel, needless misunderstanding! O stubborn, self-willed exile from the loving breast! Two gin-scented tears trickled down the sides of his nose. But it was all right, everything was all right, the struggle was finished. He had won the victory over himself. He loved Big Brother.

      1984 by George Orwell

      --
      --- Most topics have many sides worth arguing, allow me to take one opposite you.
    271. Re:Hormone therapy? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      Openly gay married commander, remember? You don't think I know that?

      It's happening, but it's been being fought from the highest levels. We're basically having to wait for enough of the 'old guard' to retire to actually make change. The fight for gay rights was so intense*, it's going to be quite a while for trans to gain acceptance.

      *Though mostly in congress/courts. They would have gotten benefits a lot quicker if it hadn't been for DOMA. DADT and the ban on gays in the military before that were policies placed upon the DoD by congress; it wasn't developed by us.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    272. Re:Hormone therapy? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      This is where the term Transgender needs to be understood way more. You see, it appears you are calling her a 'he' because he has not went through HRT or SRS yet.. which neither are required by National or International standards to declare official Gender Dysphoria diagnosis. Gender Identity, Role, and even Gender Sexual Response is predominately all in the mind, not between the legs.

      This assumes I care about 'national or international standards'.

      You can get a official declaration of Gender Dysphoria all you like. I still won't call what your mental gender until you start making serious moves to transition. The diagnosis means you can start. Once you're somewhere into the process I'll switch. Don't really know when; hasn't come up yet.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    273. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're already paying for other people's healthcare (unpaid emergency room visits, etc, leading to higher insurance rates), you're just doing it in the most expensive and least effective way possible.

    274. Re: Hormone therapy? by Badblackdog · · Score: 0

      Ouch, the truth hurts

    275. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eh, it depends.

      If you've been on the internet for the last 20 years or so, you'd notice there's over-representation of transexual individuals, and just about all of them have autism-spectrum, narcissistic, OCD disorders on top. You'll find them over-represented in geek circles, but under-represented in the general public.

      In fact this is one of the leading reasons against patriarchy, that it may be causing too much stress on individuals that do have gender dsyphoria, making them feel that surgery is the only answer.

      The thing is surgery is a last-resort, not a first one. One must first feel comfortable with transitioning and for many people, they are stuck between ruining their job/family if they do transition and compromising any "male privilege" they have.

      A real transsexual person will be stressed about being in the wrong body, and given a painless way to fix it, all of them would choose it. However surgery is not painless and is not without risks. If you die on the table, your family may not even come to claim the body. If you stop half way, or can't afford everything, you're left in a state of being neither male or female legally, and the general public doesn't recognize you as either. Hell a lot of forms still have "mr./ms./mrs" as the only options. Someone who balks at the opportunity to switch genders is not a transsexual person at all, and falls more along the lines of transvestite or cross dresser, which are people who only misrepresent their gender for fetish/joke reasons and don't identify as the other gender.

      The irony is that GLB groups tend to not be inclusive of Trans people because GLB embrace their differences while Trans people wish to erase them.

    276. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You didn't read the entire page, there's 5.

    277. Re:Hormone therapy? by dbIII · · Score: 1

      The insane privatised US prison system is the main joke. That way the taxpayer gets raped as well while the prison owners laugh their way to the bank.

    278. Re: Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lavender Battalion? The Thebans called their gay phalanx the Sacred Band, and they were, while they lasted, the strongest military unit in the ancient world: men who fought shoulder to shoulder with their lovers, whom they would die to protect. Gay doesn't have to mean weak or frivolous, and the Sacred Band didn't have any questions about their "gender identity" because no one questioned their manhood. I doubt they would have looked kindly on Manning, but that's a different question.

    279. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Would you like to wound and sexually maim your child?", the routine, medically-approved answer would be "yes"?

      Of course it wouldn't. That's why the likes of you so desperately want to rationalize it via other means, as well as call it something entirely different. But regardless of that, what it actually is doesn't change. But feel free to keep framing the matter in a way that makes you feel better.

    280. Re: Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why single the Thebans out? All the ancient Greeks were raving turd-burglars.

    281. Re:Hormone therapy? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Help deliver justice, punishment or corrective behavior, nobody really knows and USA seems more confused than most

      The USA has a large number of privately run prisons. No confusion at all about what they're supposed to do - generate profits.

      It's similar to the hotel business in that occupancy is the key to profitability. If you regularly have empty rooms, then some kind of incentive scheme is the ideal strategy.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    282. Re:Hormone therapy? by philip.paradis · · Score: 1

      I've known several transgender people myself, and none of them have ever objected in the slightest to the term "tranny." Maybe the people you know are a tad on the overly sensitive side.

      --
      Write failed: Broken pipe
    283. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. There is no "god".

      2. Just imagine for a second that you as you are now would lose your dick (assuming your are a biological guy). How would you feel. Ask a straight woman how she would feel if she suddenly had a dick.
      It's the same with Chelsea. She is cursed with a dick. That is torture.
      She wants to live as she is. That's why she needs body modification. It's not vanity. It's vital.

    284. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, you can. Because TAXPAYERS pay for everything.

    285. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's more than 5 amendments??

    286. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's serving 35 years, by the time he gets out he'll be nearing retirement.

    287. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The prisoners make their own meals. In a typical prison, that would result in 125 dead of stab wounds.

      In a typical prison in a rotten country like the USA. Corrected that for you.

      There are many civilized parts of the world where such events are the very rare exception in prison.

    288. Re:Hormone therapy? by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Geneva convention related bits don't apply to non uniformed, non flagged terrorist, never have, never will.

      American due process has never applied to non-American in-flagged terrorists ... However, there most certainly is a process at gitmo, even if you don't know or understand it. Not agreeing with it doesn't make it go away.

      China has more prisoners by what an order of magnitude or 2.

      Your thought experiments are retarded.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    289. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not in a military prison, Leavenworth does not offer those services since the military is not obligated to do so. I know there have been situations where a person already on hormone therapy that was sent to prison was able to keep doing it, much like a heart patient continues to receive heart medication, but I don't recall any situations being decided where a person already in prison deciding to then change was able to force the state to pay for the treatment.

    290. Re: Hormone therapy? by thetoadwarrior · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it does mess people up because its an awful thing. But again a lot of crimes hang with people. I know people that have had their home burgled and then they get funny about leaving home. But I wouldn't say that makes burglary off-limits and yes rape is far worse than burglary but it's not the worst thing. Personally I think it just comes down to if you're more likely to a victim. So like jokes involving WWII victims are more acceptable than 9/11 victim jokes. Which says to me people are simply selfish and only care about things that touch their lives and that's not a good enough basis for limiting speech.

    291. Re:Hormone therapy? by GodGell · · Score: 1

      I feel like I'm barking up a dead (burning) tree here, so to speak, but what you just did is exactly the kind of non-thinking knee-jerk self-defense of what America used to be that the grandparent poster was so eloquently talking about. To reiterate:

      Not only is our citizenry unable to have an intelligent conversation about world affairs, but they can't be led by facts or argument to any truth that conflicts with their jingoist worldview.

      And sure enough, here you go excusing your country's willful atrocities (ones previously reserved for third-world shitholes and dictatorships) and stating things like "there most certainly is a process at gitmo, even if you don't know or understand it" as if you temporarily forgot what "due process" actually means. (I know you know, you were probably just too pissed off to argue rationally - I hope.)

      Sadly, cementing the GP's points in the minds of international readers, you go on to display your eerie lack of understanding of the outside world - or even the willingness to read or believe a fact stated numerous times in this very discussion - by stating:

      China has more prisoners by what an order of magnitude or 2.

      Your thought experiments are retarded.

      China has more than four times the population of the United States, in addition to being an oppressive communist dictatorship, so that should be a fair assumption to make. In fact, in order for the US to have as many people in prison as there are in China, it would need to be locking up a chunk of its population 4.3 times as large.

      So, let's take a look at the facts:

      http://www.prisonstudies.org/info/worldbrief/wpb_stats.php?area=all&category=wb_poptotal
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarceration_rate

      As you can see, the United States has 1.5x as many people in prison (2.4 out of 311mil) as China does out of 1.344 billion (from a population that size, 1.6mil is not really a large amount). So in fact, despite what you were led to believe, your country actually imprisons a group of people 7 times as large as China does compared to the size of your country.

      --
      [SHOW SOME LENIENCY TOWARDS ... I mean, FUCK BETA] Eat. Survive. Reproduce. GOTO 10
    292. Re:Hormone therapy? by gsslay · · Score: 1

      Your interpretation makes anything funny, a trivialization

      Your analysis is incorrect. I said "Amongst the bad [things you can accomplish with a joke] is trivialising". No where do I say, or imply, that all jokes trivialise.

    293. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      come on... really? we should let victims decide what happens to their molesters? and you think that's a good idea?

    294. Re:Hormone therapy? by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      But then give a an example of prison rape joke that in your opinion does not trivialize and victimize. I do not remember ever hearing one that was not some form of "drop the soap", and I cannot imagine anointer way to approach this subject matter.
      Or how any other type of joking is any more or less trivializing. The entire point is to get you to laugh, so I do not think you can treat it in so uptight a manner, and say we can only laugh at the bad guys (if that is what you are doing).

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    295. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of my favorite lines is from George Bernard Shaw: "Life does not cease to be funny when people die any more than it ceases to be serious when people laugh."

    296. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the rich and stupid who keep saying they don't want to pay for other people's healthcare, end up paying even more for it.

      When people have to go to prison to get healthcare or sit in ever fewer ERs till they get sick enough to get treated, someone still ends up paying. Fewer overloaded ERs might cost you in more ways than $$$...

    297. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those prisoners in that island "prison" know that if they screw up they can get shipped back to a less idyllic prison: http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/feb/25/norwegian-prison-inmates-treated-like-people
      They were transferred from a maximum security prison to that island. If they continue behaving well they stay and eventually get out. And by the time they've served their time there's a better chance they'd continue to behave well than if they were released from some hellhole of a prison.

    298. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really wish you didn't post anonymously. People like you should band together, make up badges and put up posters, and proudly declare how you feel. Banding together is the only way to successfully fight these minority foreign invaders that you have informed us of!

    299. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When somebody tells me to educate themself and then provides to list six sources all from the exact same dubious source, you immediately ruin your own credibility.

      Link to webmd, to the Mayo or Cleveland Clinics, to a teaching medical school like John Hopkins, to an article by Sanjay Gupta, to a leading religious scholar/child care physician that says, "Hey, just because we've been doing this, doesn't mean it's actually right. I changed my views, and here's why..." -- but no.. you provided ONE dubious source six times. I'm just trying to explain to you why you have zero credibility to me.

    300. Re:Hormone therapy? by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      Circumcision is still mutilation, no matter the circumstances. Breast enlargement...In the end what you're doing is expanding the skin tissue. This happens naturally during e.g. weight gain. There are different forms of breast augmentation though, many of which have approximately zero chance of harming the patient. The ones that do probably shouldn't be done.

      Testosterone or Menopausal HRT is intended to turn an unhealthy person into a healthy one by correcting an imbalance. HRT for the purpose you are advocating is taking an already healthy patient and altering their body chemistry.

      I don't like to say my opinion is entirely nonmedical though. Yes, I don't have a medical degree. However the extent of my knowledge of microbiology and chemistry while discussing my own medical conditions with doctors (my kidney condition being the biggest one, both the cause and treatment requiring a lot of knowledge of biochemistry to manage proper) has led a few to ask me on well more than one occasion why I am not in the medical field. In fact my cardiologist told me yesterday that I already seem a little more knowledgeable on the matter than other doctors he knows.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    301. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still, Manning is probably going to have a few more options than most DDs get based on what he did to get there, I expect a book deal at the very least.

      That is not necessarily going to be a positive for him. There is also the Son of Sam law which was passed to prevent convicts from profiting from their crimes (read: book deals) not sure if that would apply here, but it is a consideration.

       

    302. Re:Hormone therapy? by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      Right, and you can say the exact same thing about people with anxiety disorders for example. Usually that problem stems from always worrying about things needlessly (what if this, I should have done that) which causes them to be the way they are. They want it to end badly. The only permanent treatment for that is altering ones thought patterns to not think so destructively. Unfortunately that isn't an easy thing to do, and some people are never able to do it.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    303. Re: Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are well informed about the military, as I might expect. For some reason I think I read an AP slug that said she joined the military in order to resolve her very painful conflicts. I guess this might be based on the meme 'make you a man". The same slug said gender disorder and only that on the diagnosis presentation. I do not know what the military press said.

      Do I have an interesting odor in my nose?

      Max

    304. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what is stupid about the people saying that the US holds has the worst prisons is that,.. neither US prison is worst because of the torture or abuse rampant in the other prisons,.. they are listed as the most "Dangerous" due to the dangerous prisoners it holds... and thoisolation the prisoners face. Seems like they are well fed,.. and given medical treatment. Based on the conditions of the others,.. the US shouldn't even be on the list.

    305. Re: Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Radiate love.

      Read Og Mandino's book with his 10 'Laws'... part of Og Mandino's trilogy.

      You are CHOOSING ( subconsciously ) to have these negative/suicidal/homicidal thoughts.

      You CAN reprogram your brain.

      Learn to meditate.

      Learn to live every day with GLOWING radiance

      LOVE. Love your child, love yourself.

      Even love your attacker.

      You are now at a point where you can choose to allow the attack to eat away at you until it kills you... ...or you can take that experience, and use it as a pivot to become the most incredible 'version' of yourself.

      Overcome it. Become love.

    306. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is actually insightful, and should be modded back up. The circles I travel in are all "pro-choice-is-obviously-right-don't-even-think-about-discussing-any-part-of-the-issue", because they know they should be as good left-wingers (like myself).

      However, if you voted the above down because you are pro-choice, you violated the rules of moderation. The comment strictly is noting that in the current society, men are simply not allowed to have an opinion on abortion because they are not the ones who carry the baby. I personally disagree with that aspect of the global discussion. I understand why, in the end, women do deserve to have that choice, although I think there should be a cut off to make the decision, and that cut-off should be somewhere closer to 20 weeks rather than 39.99 weeks.

      But me being a man (frankly one who is told by all the women in his life that he's very sensitive and thoughtful towards women), my ideas on the subject on any e-forum are automatically dismissed, no matter how carefully worded. The only thing a man is allowed to say is that he supports pro-choice or else he doesn't truly respect women, otherwise he is just bullied out of the discussion.

    307. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I never understood how jail wardens, directors, and even judges are not considered accomplices when a rape jail occurs - after all, they are the one that locked the victim with the perpetrators.

    308. Re:Hormone therapy? by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

      normally its the other prisoners who pump you full of their own hormones

      ... whereas by getting turned into a woman, it's going to be the male prison officers that'll be fucking Chelsea into a bloody pulp.

      Well, that's not exactly going to be a surprise to anyone, is it?

      --
      Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
    309. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OK, so presuming (case in point) that the brain has a gender that is dissociated with every cell in the body (i.e. every cell except sperm and ova have two sex chromosomes and the sperm and ova are particularly partial as to the gender they think the body should be) and that the genitals just go with the flow... "Oh, so I have an X and a Y chromosome. I don't want to create any waves here guys, so I'll just be docile and fall into line and create the male genitalia" and then the brain gets all rebel... "no way! I'm an individual with rights so all you Y chromosomes can go jump. 'sides, if I'm going to jail I'd prefer to be in a woman's facility rather than male - at least the warden who rapes me has more class than the inmates in a male facility." and thus you have conflict between body and brain.

      Now why is it that when someone under these conditions expresses this, to be politically correct we're supposed to side with the brain? I would have guessed that it would be way more invasive, risk prone and deleterious to health to go mucking around with the whole body knowing that, with the way the chromosomes are, they are fighting tooth and nail (literally) to get back to the original blue print (i.e. chromosomal designated design). What if, after all the hormones and surgery happens the brain then realigns with the body? Can that individual ever be brought back into "original condition"? (Note: this also means that I disagree with extreme forms of gender re-association that would cause similar scales of trauma)

      I would suggest that messing with genitalia etc. should only occur in those rare cases where some disease or congenital condition has caused different hormones to be produced than what the DNA would dictate (e.g. causing male genitals on someone who has only two X chromosomes), and what should happen is corrective rather than radical. In the rare case where there are two X chromosomes and also a Y that should then be decided by the brain.

    310. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry, this line of argument just sounds so ill considered I feel compelled to correct a few very poor assumptions that are torturing this logic to death!

      Assumption: Gender is not binary.
      Reasoning: someone felt different and decided there should be more; hey it worked for universes!
      Antithesis: Nature has demonstrated asexual reproduction and sexual reproduction. In the case of sexual reproduction there are male and female components, the sex in every living organism involved in sexual reproduction has been based on the sex-cell produced. No new sex-cell has been generated. Misalignment of mind and body does not induce a new sex.
      Corollary: Difficulty in sporting organisations determining sex is caused by gender ambiguation. i.e. it is a product of the first poor assumption and can therefore not be used as a proof without inducing circular logic.

      Assumption: Gender reassignment is more harmful that hormone and surgical intervention.
      Reasoning: someone who received a form of gender reassignment didn't like it.
      Antithesis: There have also been numerous positive cases of successful gender realignment, and also a number of cases where the individual has self corrected. If hormone and surgical intervention had been done on these individuals it could not be fully corrected. The brain appears more malleable than the body.
      Assertion from the Antithesis: For those cases where gender reassignment is traumatic those particular methods should be modified or completely discontinued.

      Assumption: Sexual deviancy is natural while other forms of deviancy aren't
      Reasoning: help me someone, I just can't work this one out!
      Antithesis: Sexual dissociation is no different than anything else in the same category of mentally expressed deviancy: Depression, Addiction, Kleptomania, Pyromania, Munchhausen, Munchhausen by proxy, Autism, self harm, Psychopathy, Sociopathy, etc.. In every case the individual should NOT be the target of abuse or prejudice though any behaviour that impinges on others rights as seen by the law should not be tolerated. Individuals with these conditions should be helped but not given legal status to do what comes naturally.
      Corollary: Should we allow kleptomaniacs to steal, pyromaniacs to commit arson, or psychopaths to kill? Should Pedophilia be legitimized? If the line is not absolute where should it be drawn and is it subject to moving again?

      Diagnosis: The problem in reasoning is subtle in nature but destructive to the whole premise; singular examples are being taken as absolute truths discounting all other examples. Additionally, it appears alternate hypotheses have not been tested, and certainly a fully inclusive proposition has not been sought. I.e you suffer from being human. Strong opinions based on emotion and formed before fully considering the stance.
      Cure: Humility, a willingness to consider other options and negotiate a superior position once all positions have been carefully weighed.

      Note: As I mentioned, this state is quite understandable so don't feel bad unless you are a Judge (in which case, quickly find a new career before you cause irreparable harm!)

    311. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are a liar.

    312. Re:Hormone therapy? by gsslay · · Score: 1

      But then give a an example of prison rape joke that in your opinion does not trivialize and victimize.

      That would be hard to do, but not impossible. It could be something about tough-guy internet vigilantes, who spend rather a lot of time fantasizing about the retribution a criminal may get in prison. It could comment on some people's expectation of a fair and civilised society and judicial system, while still being ok with sexual assault being an unofficial part of that. But it would take a better comedian than me to come up with something truly funny.

      These aren't all laughing at the bad guys.

    313. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi,

      I think you're taking a very narrow view on "healthy". If you are trans, then you are a person whose body's sex doesn't match up with your identity - and that's known to be fatal, very often. Surgery and hormones fix that. It's a highly successful treatment - I'm honestly starting to wonder what you've got against it.

      You're ignoring the humanity of it. We aren't simple machines.

      Cheers!

    314. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For your first quote:

      1. There are many beings in nature who do not sexually reproduce. Some by "design", using the word design loosely and not to imply ID nonsense (like insect drones) and some by "accident" (like barren women or impotent men).

      Furthermore, there's no particular reason that your ability to generate children should be associated with your gender role, particularly if you don't ever intend to generate children.

      Also, difficulty in sporting organisations determining sex is NOT a product of the first assumption. Not unless you literally require every athlete to first have a child. You could draw inferences from checking them for sperm and/or eggs, but what that really have to do with it? (All this said, I'm kind of in favour of abolishing the segregation of sports by sex in most cases, replacing it with something like wrestling's weight divisions that can be determined more objectively.)

      Your stated "Reasoning" for this "Assumption" (in fact a conclusion) is terrible strawman. Fact is we have these categories, and most people do slot in either by nature (he can't *help* but be a boy) or by culture (he was raised as a boy, so he's a boy), and a statistically significant number don't by several measurements, including mismatched genes to body type (eg. Y chromosome females), mismatched hormones to genitals (this is most relevant to sporting organisations), etc.. The most measure is self-reporting, since 99.999% of the time it really doesn't matter to anybody else but the person who is trans.

      2. Fine.

      3. What? I have literally no idea what you're talking about. Where did pyromania and pedophilia and autism come into this? How are we defining deviancy? I can't even tell if you're saying that all deviancy is natural or all deviancy is unnatural, nor can I tell why that matters. Pedophilia and Kleptomania is wrong because engaging in it necessarily hurts other people (*insert obligatory nattering about the 18 year old and the 17 years and 364 day old having sex not being true pedophilia*). Being trans doesn't.

    315. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ?

      How would that even work? Why?

    316. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You might want to look into the proven medical benefits of circumcision.

      Oh. Like the proven 6000 years the earth is old?

      Over here, if you believe in either of those, you are not a doctor. You are not a christian priest either. You would have to be either Muslim or a Jew.

    317. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and has few side effects

      Well, technically, losing all sensation in your foreskin (since it's gone), is only one side effect, so technically "few" is correct.

      Just like there is only one side effect of losing your heart.

    318. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When people ask to have limbs amputated because the person feels that having the limb doesn't make them feel whole (strange how you don't feel whole until part of you is removed?! That and/or because they have a sexual fetish for amputated limbs,) modern medicine denies that request, considers it to be abhorrent, and any medical professional who obliges the request is jailed and/or has their license to practice revoked.

      The sister of a guy I went to school with had two fingers removed, one on each hand. Nobody considered that to be abhorrent, and no doctor went to jail for it.

      Now she only has five fingers on each hand, like every other woman, instead of the six she was born with.

      Likewise, when a woman is born with a penis, if she chooses to get it removed (most of it is actually reused, but that's besides the point), afterwards, she has the same number of penises as every other woman. Just like the fingers, you see.

      So why not turn her into a man instead? Because brain transplants is not yet an option, and we can't change the personality of the brain (and that would be as ethically acceptable as any other form for brain washing).

    319. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Testosterone or Menopausal HRT is intended to turn an unhealthy person into a healthy one by correcting an imbalance.

      Just as with trans people. It's the only treatment (medical or otherwise) of trans people that works.

      HRT for the purpose you are advocating is taking an already healthy patient and altering their body chemistry.

      If you consider being suicidal and constantly depressed to the degree that trans people go through to be healthy, the Testosterone or Menopausal HRT you mentioned before must be very healthy.

    320. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the US as a nation should feel humiliated by it?

      No, you should just stop acting like being not quite as bad as North Korea puts you among the good guys.

      Especially when that very often is the only defence you have. "Look, North Korea is even worse". Except when you don't even have that, and need to resort to compare yourself to systems that don't even exist anymore, like Stalin era Soviet Union or WW2 Germany.

      I see all three of those way so often, that the only reasonable explanation is that things have gotten so bad that your people really do consider second worst country on the planet to be a title to strive for.

    321. Re:Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't care.

      At least you admit it.

      It's not really that you have a problem of being on the list with the worst places on the planet. It's just that you don't care.

      And that's probably the reason your country is heading towards the bottom so fast. Nobody cares anymore.

      And as long as you can keep yourself happy by telling yourself that you are still better that North Korea, like second worst was something to strive for, things won't change until North Korea starts improving enough to compete for second worst.

    322. Re:Hormone therapy? by AlphaWolf_HK · · Score: 1

      Suicidal and constantly depressed also describe those people who request amputation of perfectly functioning limbs, and indeed carrying out these amputations results in an improved mental state.

      However therapy is also known to work, in both cases.

      --
      Careful with names containing L slashdot.org/~AiphaWolf_HK slashdot.org/~AlphaWoif_HK slashdot.org/~AiphaWoif_HK
    323. Re: Hormone therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you think its ok to tell prison camp jokes to prison camp survivors? Or torture jokes to torture survivors? The why do you think its ok to tell rape jokes on any public forum?

    324. Re:Hormone therapy? by Smallpond · · Score: 1

      There's more than 2?

  2. He wants to live as a woman, big deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    So do many Slashdotters and yet who are we to judge?

    1. Re:He wants to live as a woman, big deal. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only a sociopath never judges.

  3. And this is relevant how...? by skovnymfe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No offense to transpeople, but why is this on Slashdot? I don't give a fuck if he wants to be a man or a woman in jail.

    1. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Zaldarr · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because /. has been going down the tubes for years.

      --
      I write professional videogame reviews! http://www.digitallydownloaded.net/
    2. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      If she wants to be a man or woman, you insensitive clod!

    3. Re:And this is relevant how...? by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      You mean the fallopian ones? Does that mean that /. is not an abortion?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    4. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 5, Interesting

      No offence to you, but I don't give a fuck about your opinion. And normally I wouldn't say it, but since you seem to think it's important to tell everyone what you don't care about...

      I find Manning's actions and any information about her history which would go toward explaining them both interesting and important. People do not act in a vacuum.

    5. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I concur.

    6. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense to transpeople, but why is this on Slashdot? I don't give a fuck if he wants to be a man or a woman in jail.

      This is not a story that most /.ers want to read about, but the editor correctly realized that had there been a human interest story that put Manning (or Snowden, or Swartz) in a surprising but flattering light then you know that it would've been up here.

      I haven't paid much attention to the Manning case, but it seems to me that Swartz had personal issues that went beyond his legal problems and disagreement with the journal publishers' consortium. Almost like he was looking for a way out.

    7. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 1

      Common sense tells me that it would be obtuse to define gender identity in terms of sex organs.

    8. Re:And this is relevant how...? by umafuckit · · Score: 1
    9. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 1

      homosexual judeomasonic conspiracy o nooooooooooooooooooooooooooo

    10. Re:And this is relevant how...? by h4rr4r · · Score: 0

      Says someone with bigger issues.

      Why do you care? The fact that you do says something about you.

    11. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Statistic pulled out of ass - check.
      Non sequitur - check.
      lol, bigots.

      I struggle to identify an argument, but I think you're saying:

      1. 99.99% of people identify entirely as a gender which accords somehow with the sex organs they were born with - citation please.

      2. Correlation is causation - citation please.

    12. Re:And this is relevant how...? by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Does that mean that /. is not an abortion?

      No, just an abomination. ;-)

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    13. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Salgak1 · · Score: 2

      Well, that's only appropriate, as Sen. Ted Stevens tells us, since the Internet is an entire SERIES of tubes. . .

    14. Re:And this is relevant how...? by lxs · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In one sentence: Bradley was our hero. Now Chelsea is our hero.

      It's a story that many of us have been following since the beginning. For those among us that are not robots the lives of the people involved are at least of passing interest to us. In my opinion Manning has done a great thing. He/she deserves better than being relegated to obscurity the moment the story is over.

    15. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Salgak1 · · Score: 1

      You forgot to add Anti-Microsoft (although, that's not a conspiracy, it's just good sense. . . )

    16. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would it also be obtuse to define race according to one's ancestry?

    17. Re:And this is relevant how...? by gregulator · · Score: 5, Funny

      In one sentence: Bradley was our hero. Now Chelsea is our hero.

      That is two sentences.

    18. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think mimes can still act in a vacuum, at least until they suffocate.

    19. Re:And this is relevant how...? by ganjadude · · Score: 3, Interesting

      i dont think most people do care, I do think a lot of people care that it would cost american tax payers to have it done. I know thats my issue with it, if he/she wants to be a woman more power to him/her. but dont make me pay for it and dont try and convince me that it is somehow normal.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    20. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Joining Yet Again, thank you for your defense and compassionate attitude. (I would also argue that anything related to Manning is *Stuff That Matters* as I could at least imagine myself as a conscientious nerd wanting to defend the Constitution and Right the wrongs in a similar situation, thinking I was doing the right thing.) If by chance you live outside the US and there are more individuals like you, would you be willing to share your home country? I'm not transgendered, I just have grown tired of being surrounded by bigots...

    21. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Now Chelsea is our hero.

      Bad move. Now no honest Arsenal fan can like him/her any more. :-)

    22. Re:And this is relevant how...? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He will always be a he no matter what psychological issues he has to deal with...

      Genetics is only one indicator of sex, and not even a good one when it comes to physiology, let alone psychology.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    23. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interest by association.

    24. Re:And this is relevant how...? by evendiagram · · Score: 1

      He/she should be relegated to obscurity so that we can have a healthy debate on his disclosures rather than his/her gender preference. In theory we should be able to do both but the one-dimensional 24/7 celebrity watch media will only report on the transgender aspect.

    25. Re:And this is relevant how...? by MBGMorden · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Given the current state of society as long as he insists it's one sentence then we all must agree that it is so.

      --
      "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
    26. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with you, I don't care either.

    27. Re:And this is relevant how...? by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      Because it's the woman formerly known as Bradley Manning, who is a person of great interest to the Slashdot crowd.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    28. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Somebody+Is+Using+My · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Equally important is why this is news at all?

      Yes, Bradley Manning is an important person. But the details of his personal issues are not newsworthy, except as how they may have effected his decision to provide the information to Wikileaks. Its certain his sexual identity problems played some role in his unhappiness with his position in the army. But ultimately this is a man depressed about who he is and wanting to change. At root, it's not much different from scrawny guy wanting to be big and butch and - unable to live up to that fantasy - doing something reckless. But if that were all there was to the story, you can be sure it wouldn't get half the coverage this one does.

      And why is this so much more exciting? Because transexualism is still considered indecent and indicative of severe psychological problems by our society. Manning is being demonized as a a nut, a freak; certainly not someone to look up to as a patriot standing up for the ideals of his country. The release of this information is an attempt at distracting the public from the much more important problems his actions brought to light, and as a warning to other whistleblowers. It's an underlying message that says not only says "Fuck with the government and all your dirty laundry will be made public" but also "only weirdos and loons would consider a 'traitorous' act like Manning's in the first place!")

      So, yeah, not being personally involved with Bradley Manning I find the details of the problems that led to his actions inconsequential. They are his private demons that he needs to deal with alone. I'd rather the focus be on the other, far more newsworthy problems brought up by his case, be it the revelations in the leaks themselves, the response by the government to said leaks, or even how poorly the US Army is dealing with the psychologically vulnerable members of its armed forces. THAT is news, not whether Mr. Manning is happy with his dick or not.

    29. Re:And this is relevant how...? by NatasRevol · · Score: 2

      And give him a medal for it.

      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    30. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Velex · · Score: 1

      Assuming 1 in 10,000 is accurate, 99.99% would be accurate as well. Nobody really knows for sure, though. I've heard other numbers that it might be even fewer, e.g. 1 in 50,000 or 1 in 30,000. IIRC, that doesn't count crossdressers or other genderqueer categories, only diagnoses that result in the patient pursuing gender transition. OTOH, adding in trans men (people born with their reproductive system on the inside who take testosterone HRT and live as men), you might bump to around 99.92% or so to make a wild guess.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
    31. Re:And this is relevant how...? by poity · · Score: 1

      I'm guessing it's here so when /. decides to respect Manning's wish and begins to refer to (former) him as her, there won't be a huge WTF IS GOING ON

      --
      your thin skin doesn't make me a troll
    32. Re:And this is relevant how...? by LordLimecat · · Score: 2

      99.99% of people identify entirely as a gender which accords somehow with the sex organs they were born with

      Can you find any pre-20th century literature or records showing a gender identification which was NOT based on sex organs? I dont mean adjectively referring to feminine attributes, or poetic language, and Im not talking about hermaphrodites-- I mean actually calling an individual born with testes a "she" or "female" or whatever.

      I would be really surprised if you found any at all.

    33. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Pikewake · · Score: 2

      Not at all! If your ancestry includes members of species that actually have races it's definitely worth mentioning.

    34. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 0

      If you defend the scientific method, particularly when it happens to act in favour of marginalised people, you're a self-righteous twat - gotcha.

      If this were 40 years ago, I can imagine you as one of these upstanding citizens.

    35. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      thanks

    36. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do soccer fans keep thinking this is funny?

      It's not.

    37. Re:And this is relevant how...? by ageoffri · · Score: 0

      It is on Slashdot because Manning is a "Hero" to a segment of the population who applauds oath-breaking and the indiscriminate release of classified information. Unlike Snowden, Manning acted like a two year old throwing a fit and decided to pee in his pool. Well now he has learned that his actions are going to cost him. Even when he gets out, he will have a rough time with a dishonorable discharge.

      --
      -- Slashdot, making the Left look conservative since 1997.
    38. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Velex · · Score: 1

      Because transexualism is still considered indecent and indicative of severe psychological problems by our society. Manning is being demonized as a a nut, a freak; certainly not someone to look up to as a patriot standing up for the ideals of his country. The release of this information is an attempt at distracting the public from the much more important problems his actions brought to light, and as a warning to other whistleblowers.

      Mod parent up. That's about all that's going on here. It's easier to justify locking up Buffalo Bill than a hero.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
    39. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 1

      It would be obtuse, well into the 21st century, to entertain the 19th century notion of "race". But go ahead, if you want - billions of people still entertain the several thousand year old dream of a sky fairy.

    40. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 1

      Ready when you are, dear.

    41. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it answers a lot of questions about his behavior. Makes sense now why he/she/it is such an unstable, untrustworthy security risk.
      [LET THE FLAMES BEGIN!!!]

    42. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offense to transpeople, but why is this on Slashdot? I don't give a fuck if he wants to be a man or a woman in jail.

      Because it's a story about one of our blindly-followed self-made deities. Same with anything regarding Julian Assange, Edward Snowden, and The All-High Ascended Benevolent Saint-God Steve Jobs. Bonus points in this case because we can almost taste the sweet, sweet nectar of whining about how, in two years, we'll get reports about how Manning isn't being treated like the woman he wants to be in prison.

    43. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Zero__Kelvin · · Score: 1

      Perhaps, but is merely a matter of punctuation: "Bradley was our hero; now Chelsea is our hero."

      --
      Guns don't kill people; Physics kills people! - John Lithgow as Dick Solomon on Third Rock From The Sun
    44. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Em+Adespoton · · Score: 1

      Because /. has been going down the tubes for years.

      And these days, it appears to be coming back up the tubes too....

    45. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Seumas · · Score: 2

      First, his gender identity issues are nothing new. It seems to me that they are only now coming out and being paraded around by news and other organizations that have reason to see him trampled into the ground. It seems this would have been more likely brought out a year or more ago, to fully discredit him. I presume they're doing it now to discredit him after sentencing to prevent others from finding any credibility in him and protesting or following in his steps, as far as whistleblowing.

      In short, this is not relevant in any way whatsoever. He did what he did and made the sacrifice he has been made to pay, whether he is a he, a she, or a guy who is confused.

      Now, why is it on Slashdot? Because as the Slashdot audience has gotten older, they've gone from defiant linux nerds spouting freedom, encryption, and open information to old men who can't help themselves but to spout their political, religious, and other bullshit on here even when it is only barely remotely related to anything, as if they were commenting in the Disqus forum at the bottom of a CBS or CNS news article linked to by Drudgereport.

    46. Re:And this is relevant how...? by amiga3D · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Because it's controversial and will generate tons of responses and lots of flaming. I don't care what he calls him/herself. It's Jerry Springer stuff and there is enough of that crap on TV so we sure as shit could do without it on a supposed techno/geek site.

    47. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Good luck with that. All the slashdotters from the late 90s have gone gray and now they mostly find this sort of thing abhorrent to their precious values.

    48. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Don't be willfully stupid.

      Manning didn't "indiscriminate release" any information. Let's remember the simple fact: He gave the information to long-established news papers. Those newspapers spent a lot of time and money pouring over the information with their editorial staff, legal staff, AND THE ASSISTANCE AND REFERENCE AND DIRECT INVOLVEMENT OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, ITSELF.

      The release of this data was fucking anything but god damned indiscriminate.

    49. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 1

      Are you saying that literature does not acknowledge transgendered people, or that it defines "man" as "having meat and two veg"? Because history is full of explicit descriptions of certain people as having mixed gender features, *beyond* mere sexual preference. Indeed, some parts of Islam consider transgenderism as more "normal" than homosexuality - so mukhannathun, who seem merely to have transgender characteristics in hadith, are regarded in modern Iran as "cured" homosexuals.

      Anyway, pre-20th century terms to describe human characteristics - "race", "hysteria", "invert", ... - are all so absurdly unscientific that we have eliminated them from modern discourse. So, while a hundred years ago we religiously assumed that "man" should mean "attracted to women", a hundred years ago it was also common to assume that "man" should mean "has meat and two veg". Now we see that the concepts of sexuality and gender are rather more fucking complex. As usual, more conservative members of society think about 200 years in the past, so it will take them a while to catch up - by which time the rest of the world will be 200 years further ahead.

    50. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Seumas · · Score: 1

      I don't think you understand the difference between sex and gender.

    51. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 1

      "Only rich people should be able to enjoy good healthcare. Anyway, psychology does not count as a branch of healthcare."

      USA! USA! USA!

    52. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 1

      "Oaths" are substitutes for reason. If you cannot convince a person to do something in good conscience, you tell them that having a conscience is not their department. For some reason, it's really easy to take away personhood with this approach- some fault in our evolution has made it really easy for leaders to make underlings show or support mindless allegiance.

      Yet to be loyal to evil is still to do evil.

    53. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 1

      Well, if you really think that a lot of techno/geek debate isn't "Jerry Springer stuff" too... ;-)

    54. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's pandering by the liberal media. Those that like to hold anything Obama does as a sign of enlightment and forward thinking need to discredit Manning as much as possible. Manning hurt Obama. Manning now must suffer. That's why it's plastered all over the headlines at places like MSNBC. Had this happened under Bush and Fox reported it MSNBC would call it a hate crime to question the boy. Welcome to the two party scam.

    55. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      From the wikipedia article:

      > The incidence of PAIS is estimated to be 1 in 130,000

      Seems to me, genetics is a good indicator of sex the other 129,999 times. You might want to moderate your initial statement.

    56. Re:And this is relevant how...? by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      There is only one race, the human one.

      --
      Good-bye
    57. Re:And this is relevant how...? by ganjadude · · Score: 2

      ugghh no. not what I said at all. Plus he is a criminal now and criminals should not get benefits such as this. If I told you I "feel" like a black person trapped in a white persons body, does that mean that the government should pay for me to be turned into a black person??? fuck no!

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    58. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Velex · · Score: 1

      Joining Yet Again is partially correct but also being obtuse in his/her own way.

      The brain has gender just like reproductive organs have gender. However, you need expensive equipment to measure it, and frankly that equipment is better served diagnosing people who are actually sick and just taking a transgendered person's word for it instead of wasting millions upon millions of dollars trying to "prove" that any particular individual has a legitimate claim to womanhood to every last bigoted stick in the mud out there.

      The argument comes to down to what to do with an individual for whom those two genders don't match. Currently, there's no known way to change the brain's gender. Unfortunately, we're so attached to the idea that what's in one's pants is the end-all be-all to gender that it's almost impossible to frame a debate in terms of how to bring the two different gendered parts of an individual into agreement.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
    59. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > I find Manning's actions and any information about her history which would go toward explaining them both interesting and important.

      Her who?

    60. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Transpeople can die in a fire. I don't care if they were abused as kids. Get therapy, I'll call a dude a dude and a woman a woman. Mutilating your penis/vag doesn't change your internal sex organs or chromosomes. There are truly intersex people, with both/neither sex organs and messed up chromosomes. Help them, not confused faggots.

    61. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offence to you, but I don't give a fuck about your opinion. And normally I wouldn't say it, but since you seem to think it's important to tell everyone what you don't care about...

      I find Manning's actions and any information about his history which would go toward explaining them both interesting and important. People do not act in a vacuum.

      He didn't have a sex change operation, therefore he is still a he.

    62. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Joining+Yet+Again · · Score: 1, Insightful

      1. A civilised society provides healthcare to all people, including criminals;

      2. Merely "feeling" something and actually having a gender identity disorder are completely different, and thank you for illustrating why we don't have laypeople either building jet planes or practising medicine.

    63. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Velex · · Score: 1

      What on earth are you trying to say?

      Fine. Google the term berdache.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
    64. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In one sentence: Bradley was our hero. Now Chelsea is our hero.

      That is two sentences.

      In one sentence: Bradley was our hero; now Chelsea is our hero.

    65. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Says the x-y chromosomes.

    66. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No offence to you, but I don't give a fuck about your opinion. And normally I wouldn't say it, but since you seem to think it's important to tell everyone what you don't care about...

      I find Manning's actions and any information about her history which would go toward explaining them both interesting and important. People do not act in a vacuum.

      Him. His. He's a man, he's a guy, he's a male. Not female. If you're going to tell me my opinion doesn't matter and that I should fuck off, then the same goes for you and I see no reason to refer to you as a woman just because you wish you were. If you are going to demand that I treat you as a woman, or demand that you receive treatment by society and government as if you were a woman, then my opinion damn well does matter because you're requiring me to modify my behavior based on your own personal insecurity regarding your body.

    67. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Common sense tells me that it would be obtuse to not have a clear definition for the word gender. Why fuck with definitions by adding a gray area?

      Born with cock 'n' balls = male
      Born with a cunt = female
      Born with cock 'n' balls, but wishing you had a cunt = transgender female*
      Born with a cunt, but wishing you had a cock 'n' balls = transgender male*

      *Note the definitions of male and female did not change. They were modified by the addition of the word transgender to indicate the gender they identify with.

      FYI - Chastity Bono isn't male, no matter how you slice it (or her). However, I might agree that she is a transgender male.

    68. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Having to pay for a felon's health care is not the same thing as wanting only the rich to be able to afford it. Some people have the belief that the felon earned their situation and so certain procedures may be more elective than others and should not have to be paid for while in jail.

      If there is a suggestion that not getting HRT will actually physically kill him, then perhaps it should be paid for, but it is anything less than life threatening, I don't know that HRT becomes a health care issue.

    69. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You confusion is generated by you lack of education and ability to differentiate between "sex" and "gender"

      Gender is a social construction. Chelsea is of female gender but has a male sex.

      It's that simple. No grey area needed.
      But it is NOT so simple as you would like it.

    70. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Alef · · Score: 1

      Well, those who manage the US arsenal seem to dislike him/her anyway.

    71. Re:And this is relevant how...? by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      And then Wikileaks went all pear shaped and all the shit was released anyway.

      He let out 10K pieces of information that were classified, the fact that some newspapers happened to do some work on them doesn't mean that he released them knowing how it would all go down. The newspapers were not indiscriminate, but he personally was not taking those actions. And the government becoming involved doesn't lend *him* any credence, they were pretty much obligated to do what they did because just to maintain security.

      I'm sorry, you might not like having it called that, but it was pretty damn indiscriminate. If he just released the so-called "Collateral Murder" footage and some other examples, I could see your point. But no way in Hell do you release that much data on so many widely varied topics and call it other than indiscriminate.

      And now that we know his state of mind at the time, it makes a lot more sense. He was in all sorts of turmoil. In no way was he in any state to be discriminating at the level you suggest. Not with the amount of data he released. He wasn't some sort of evil traitor, but he was having serious emotional issues. Not the type of mindset that screams "discriminating", you know?

    72. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Cederic · · Score: 1

      No interest in flaming, just fascinated that you seem to think transgenderism is in some way unstable or untrustworthy.

      Care to elaborate?

    73. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an underlying message that says not only says "Fuck with the government and all your dirty laundry will be made public" but also "only weirdos and loons would consider a 'traitorous' act like Manning's in the first place!")

      One can only wonder what Mr (3rd nipple?) Snowden is hiding in the closet?

    74. Re:And this is relevant how...? by ageoffri · · Score: 1
      What a typical uneducated response to call some stupid if they disagree with you. There is no way he could have reviewed everything that was released, let me start with a remedial English definition lesson.

      indiscriminate: done at random or without careful judgment.

      Given his emotional state and the sheer volume of information released, there is no way he used careful judgement and it would be easy to argue the information he released was random. He grabbed everything he could get his hands on and released it

      Hopefully he will be held up as an example to people who are newly granted clearances and to the people who perform the reviews. The new people need to know that it is serious, the reviewers need to do more to catch people like Manning.

      --
      -- Slashdot, making the Left look conservative since 1997.
    75. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      99.99% of people identify entirely as a gender which accords somehow with the sex organs they were born with

      Can you find any pre-20th century literature or records showing a gender identification which was NOT based on sex organs? I dont mean adjectively referring to feminine attributes, or poetic language, and Im not talking about hermaphrodites-- I mean actually calling an individual born with testes a "she" or "female" or whatever.

      I would be really surprised if you found any at all.

      That's a pretty shitty metric for determining what is a fact today - try finding pre-19th century literature on sexual or racial equality and you'll be pushed - but that doesn't negate the fact that it's quite clear common sense to me and most others.

      You might prefer the "black and white" definitions of gender, but that doesn't mean you're right. Many prefer the simple definition of animal species, but they too are simply dodging the question by dogmatically sticking to ambiguous definitions.

      Even if you can feel comfortable judging people with your limited definitions - what are you going to do when you encounter someone that does not have easily defined genitalia? Come up with a 3rd category? Or just pick a gender for them and force them to live the way you say? Where and why would you draw the line?

    76. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the current state of society as long as he insists it's one sentence then we all must agree that it is so.

      HA! This guy is on to something here.

    77. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ..." dont try and convince me that it is somehow normal."

      While I see merit in your point about considering the cost to tax payers, I believe you've weakened your statement/point by capping it with this comment about "normal".
      In the USA, for example, it's not "normal" to be:
        blind, black/asian/etc, gay, born without a limb, albino, mentally disabled (hmmm...make that - severly mentally disabled), muslim, cos-play D&D fanatic, over 6' tall, etc...
      So would you propose we treat any in this example set of "not normal" different than "the norm"? Particularly in regards to the topic of medical procedures?

      If Mr/Ms Manning was a D&D playing, blind, amputee, black, gay, mormon - well... that would be quite far from the norm. But, would that affect the decision of whether or not a medical procedure would be considered?

      Mental exercise -
      Conversely, if say there were a city where a majority of the population was trans-gender, where that was "the norm"... would you argue that it's plain to see this resident of said city, is just a "normal" person and deserves treatment?

      Again, I'm not discussing whether or not the medical procedure should be provided to this person in this situation, it's just that this - "it's not normal" argument is a pet peeve of mine. It lowers the conversation to "majority deserve rights a minority does not".

      It's somewhat similar to making some statement and including the word "but" followed by a qualifier, which in turn negates what's said before it.

      "I (might) agree with the point you made, but ...I don't really because you link your reasoning to the topic of a person being 'somehow normal'." ;)

    78. Re:And this is relevant how...? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      No offense taken. Yep I'm trans. I was sort of thinking the same thing. In part because I knew this discussion would become a clusterfuck of geek misogyny, rape jokes, and everything else that comes with the Slashdot boy's club.

      And also because I first heard that Manning was trans...last year, this isn't news, per se. There are some who say that it speaks to motivations. That one of the reasons Manning did the leak was because of how shitty transpeople are treated in the military. (It's better for teh gays, but not for teh trans.)

      Heck, if even, god forbid, RMS was to announce he was a TS. I don't think that would necessarily belong on Slashdot. I think I need some brain-bleach after imagining that. Maybe if I imagine Natalie Portman, Petrified with hot grits.

    79. Re:And this is relevant how...? by CronoCloud · · Score: 2

      The funny thing is, transpeople themselves are somewhat divided on the issue.

      The consensus among us seems to be:

      1. If treatment was started before prison, that should be continued.

      2. MTF Transpeople should probably be segregated from the men's population... that would mean women's prison for some of those into their transitions who were living as female before. For others..some kind of separate facility.

      3. No surgery while in prison.

    80. Re:And this is relevant how...? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      PAIS is under-diagnosed, because it doesn't get routinely tested for unless there are issues. It is believed to be one relatively common cause of male fertility issues. PAIS is only one of many IS conditions...so the incidence of IS folks is higher.

      CAIS on the other hand is often detected when a girl doesn't menstruate.

    81. Re:And this is relevant how...? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      He didn't have a sex change operation, therefore he is still a he.

      Usually the pronoun changes come looong before the surgery, during the RLE/RLT (Real Life Test), when one lives full time as the target gender.

    82. Re:And this is relevant how...? by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      The government doesn't consider being transgendered in and of itself a security risk. However...if one is in the military where they still kick out transpeople who admit it...and then one has to keep the secret...well then that might be something to think about.

    83. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At root, it's not much different from scrawny guy wanting to be big and butch and - unable to live up to that fantasy - doing something reckless

      No, just fucking no.

    84. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of the definitions of gender is sex. One of the definitions of sex is gender. Either term can refer to the sex organs, or the the physiological characteristics of the hot organism. There's this thing called a dictionary; you should try to learn to use one.

      So we should refer to Manning as a female-male? Or a male-female? Which is listed first - gender or sex? Sound confusing. Confusing, as in gray area.

      I have a simpler way: Manning is a transgender female.

      Yeah, its as simple as I would like it.

    85. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You would be right, it would be hard to find. Here's why your question is a problem... in the 19th century and before, Humans were treated as objects and property and below humanity (See Slavery, Native Americans, and even in the early 20th century the Nazi's treatment of the Jewish population).

      So yes, it will be hard pressed to find legitimate and accurate documents where Person(s) during that time were intelligent enough to probe the mental world, functions of the brain and psyche.. and come to the realization that Gender isn't an appendage between your legs but an Identity.

      Humans grow smarter (most of the time) and our collective knowledge base grows too. We steadily work on and study areas where we need more understanding. You can't quote the past and say because they didnt do it our way, that we in the now are wrong.

      Sorry for the Anon Coward, I read slash but never posted till today (twice on this thread)

    86. Re:And this is relevant how...? by LordLimecat · · Score: 1

      Humans grow smarter

      This is complete rubbish. Our knowledge grows, our intellect generally does not.

    87. Re:And this is relevant how...? by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Awww shit! Now I'm forced to post... THIS!!! ---> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtOoQFa5ug8

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    88. Re:And this is relevant how...? by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Says someone with bigger issues.

      Why do you care? The fact that you do says something about you.

      Stop referring to yourself in the third person. We get it that you have issues. The fact of the matter is that you cannot reassign chromosomes so Bradley Manning will always be a male genetically regardless of what you chop off or glue on.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    89. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't matter if it's the most interesting, engaging and important topic in the world. If it's not technology related it's irrelevant to Slashdot, so he was right.

    90. Re:And this is relevant how...? by ae1294 · · Score: 1

      Yeah reading this thread has depressed the shit out of me. It's like I got sent back to highschool. I'd also like to know of any country where people can just do what they like as long as it doesn't interfere with anyone elses right to do the same. Perferible a place where people just strung and say ok whatever to shit like this instead of acting like they are god's fucking gift to the universe. RAPE THIS, RAPE THAT, HE's GAY, Blah fucking blah I don't fucking give a shit if he wants to fucking wear a dress and have his junk cut off. Ok whatever man I mean lady that's fucking fine with me. Jesus Crist, honestly humans are extremely small and fucking limited pethedic cells on a grain of sand in a black void full of countless others just like it. But it's the same shit over and over and over and they really think they are justified in being total assholes and that they don't have something in their life that they don't want people to joke about every fucking day. I'm not gay, but I'm sure as hell differnt apearently because this shit is just pefectic for a site that has smart people on it? nerds? yea right whatever..... ok

      I guess i'm judging just like all these other fucking idoits but honestly if there is anywhere on earth that is sane let us know. I'm not perfect but I can agree that while something might wierd me out you do what you want. Life is to fucking short for this shit...

    91. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because /. has been going down the tubes of the Internet for years.

      Amended It For You!

    92. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This would probably be the first time a slashdot comment made me cry.

      Internet, sometimes you really exceed my expectations. Like, by a lot.

    93. Re:And this is relevant how...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's either that (well put by the way) or someone found a picture of a drunken dare at college and attempted to thoroughly humiliate the guy to stop him being viewed as a political martyr by those swayed by such things, eg.. christian fundamentalist war-disapprovers for instance..

      Or perhaps it was a ploy to get out of prison rape free... don't think someone like that could be left in the general prison population without the prison system facing a massive lawsuit in the future.

      Personally, I view the actions that got him in jail as courageous and honorable, regardless of how comfortable this guy may or may not feel in a dress.

      Bradley Manning's true crime was embarrassing the US government.

    94. Re:And this is relevant how...? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      your point one i can agree with you to a degree, your poi t 2.... no, "feeling like" IS the disorder. so plain and simple if i want to be black, i should expect the government to pay for it, because, a you said its a disorder.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    95. Re:And this is relevant how...? by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      for the same reason you cant agree with me i cant agree with you. you are not born a D and D player, you choose it. I would argue that other than race your other arguments are the same. so i cant agree with you. I did assume someone would find issue with my choice of words however

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    96. Re:And this is relevant how...? by vakuona · · Score: 1

      I call BS on this one. Statistically speaking, genetics are an excellent indicator of sex. According to the wikipedia article you have linked to, one in 24,000 XY births are "afflicted" by the condition, which means 23,999 are not. If someone asked me if I would accept an indicator that was wrong once in 24,000 tries, I would usually bite their hand off.

  4. WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Didn't see this one coming.

    1. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Never do. Gender identity people generally feel so much deeply foundational shame that they go their entire lives, telling no one. Wasn't there news media coverage of a 40 year old married man that finally decided (after raising the kids was done and they were well on their way) that she couldn't take it anymore and needed to transition. I think a lot of regular Joe's natural reaction to hearing something like this is that the TG individual must be incredibly selfish and perverse to put their family through the pain of having their family fractured in such a way (familial identity especially is immutable!) But I think the reality is that a TG is experiencing pain which equals the combined expected pain and discomfort of their loved ones -- why else would they wait so long?

      In my anecdotal story my brother only told me, but didn't mention it in their suicide note, so I've told no one.. (... quadruple check that I'm posting anonymously..)

  5. Robert Anton Wilson by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    is SO clearly behind this.

  6. Me too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    As I transition into this next phase of my life, I want everyone to know the real me. I am Anonymous Cowardess, I am a female.

    1. Re:Me too. by cold+fjord · · Score: 1
      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
    2. Re:Me too. by Cederic · · Score: 1

      Wait, 'Anonymous Coward' has a sex?

      I always thought of you as some genderless bovine.

    3. Re:Me too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As I transition into this next phase of my life, I want everyone to know the real me. I am Anonymous Cowardess, I am a female.

      I hope you realize this means giving up the internet, since there are no girls on the internet.

  7. OK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After what he... er, she's done for her country, I'll call her the damn Queen of England if it makes her happy.

  8. Sounds like they thoroughly broke him by vivaoporto · · Score: 0

    Sounds like they thoroughly broke him. First apologizing and then this. Doesn't look like he is going for insanity (trial is over), seems like he got insane for his time in solitary.

    Not saying that because he self identifies as a woman (something that happens to some people naturally) but because of the timing of the whole matter.

    1. Re:Sounds like they thoroughly broke him by rwise2112 · · Score: 2

      Sounds like they thoroughly broke him. First apologizing and then this. Doesn't look like he is going for insanity (trial is over), seems like he got insane for his time in solitary. Not saying that because he self identifies as a woman (something that happens to some people naturally) but because of the timing of the whole matter.

      This was from before. His defense (I assume) even released photos of him in a wig and lipstick.

      --

      "For every expert, there is an equal and opposite expert"
    2. Re:Sounds like they thoroughly broke him by K.+S.+Kyosuke · · Score: 1

      "Timing" of what? You mean, the thing that's been going on for five years or more for him?

      --
      Ezekiel 23:20
    3. Re:Sounds like they thoroughly broke him by eqisow · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I do believe he was struggling with gender identity issues before this whole ordeal.

    4. Re:Sounds like they thoroughly broke him by QilessQi · · Score: 1

      The issue was supposedly raised during the trial itself, but for all we know (s)he has felt this way for years (as said in the article) and just kept it VERY tightly under wraps because of the demands of a military career. Now that motivation is somewhat moot.

    5. Re:Sounds like they thoroughly broke him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There! Are! Four! Lights!

    6. Re:Sounds like they thoroughly broke him by TheCarp · · Score: 4, Informative

      All accounts I have seen indicate that he was starting to feel this way long before any of this happened. I have some Tranny friends (will be camping with them this weekend in fact) and it isn't something one just suddenly one day decide, or that people go crazy and decide to do....its usually accompanied by lifelong feelings of not really being "right".

      Hell, I met one woman who lived as a man for years, never felt right, transitioned, and not till the age of about 50 did doctors find some small ovaries inside her. Had apparently really been part woman the whole time, never knew it.

      This transition creates an odd conflict. Bradley Manning is a household name. He leaked secrets, he is either a hero of villian. He is a symbol.

      Who is Chelsea Manning? She is just a woman going to jail. Nobody knows her. She is not a household name, not a symbol.

      Maybe that works out in her favor in the long run? I don't really know, it is a bit of a toss up.... but we have been talking about the plight of Bradley Manning so long, I wonder that maybe this is bad timing, but, maybe there is no good timing.

      --
      "I opened my eyes, and everything went dark again"
    7. Re:Sounds like they thoroughly broke him by jellomizer · · Score: 1

      This is actually old news. NPR actually covered this months ago. I am surprised that other media didn't jump on this sooner.

      --
      If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
    8. Re:Sounds like they thoroughly broke him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gays

      So, does that mean Manning is going to be riding poles or munching carpet?

      Protip: Gender dysphoria has little to do with whether a person is hetero or homosexual.

      Which is actually a big disappointment for myself and others who supported him

      Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaw.

    9. Re:Sounds like they thoroughly broke him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi, while I personally am very interested in what causes a TG person to decide that they are in fact, TG, I don't think it's appropriate to make the implied assertion that these individuals are fundamentally mentally broken in some way. If we had omniscience and knew that every TG issue stems from abuse, sure, okay, but I don't think we are anywhere near having that sort of evidence in any direction on the cause of the "disease" -- if you've studied genetics and seen how messy things are implemented (in any species for that matter), how similar the male and female bodies actually are (in many instances the exact nerves connected to the same parts! just in different sizes and different sized connecting bits so that the are in different places and shapes)

      Considering I have problems distinguishing faces, if it wasn't for the societal hair length/styling I'm not sure if I would be able to identify the difference between a flat-chested woman and a slim-framed man...

    10. Re:Sounds like they thoroughly broke him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do believe he was struggling with gender identity issues before this whole ordeal.

      SHE was struggling with gender identity issues before this whole ordeal, you insensitive clod! ;)

    11. Re:Sounds like they thoroughly broke him by Shilly_McShillington · · Score: 1

      Its so nice that we get to see the personal issues of people exposed when we need to destroy them. We can get a lot of people on board this way. He could have sympathy from people who are religiously contemplative however when so many of their peers say he is an abomination then it only makes sense to go along with that line of thinking. Well done everyone!

    12. Re:Sounds like they thoroughly broke him by lxs · · Score: 1

      we were mislead into thinking that he'd put up a bigger fight.

      Why would he? One act of bravery on this scale is enough for two lifetimes. Adding an act of stupidity (putting pride above reason and risking the maximum punishment) would have accomplished nothing.

      Let's hope Snowden doesn't do the same!

      Snowden fled the country before the shit hit the fan unlike Manning who stayed put and faced the authorities on their turf. By your standards that would make Snowden the lesser man.

      Which is actually a big disappointment for myself and others who supported him

      Fickle supporters like yourself who retreat into bigotry because your hero doesn't live up to the unrealistic Hollywood template in your head must be an even greater disappointment to Manning.

    13. Re:Sounds like they thoroughly broke him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, but it wasn't headline news until right after the verdict. the media is all over it right now to help convince people that he was sick and shouldn't be trusted because he doesn't like his ding-dang-doodle.

    14. Re:Sounds like they thoroughly broke him by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

      Plastic surgeons can do shit for hands. If you want to know how old someone is that's had extensive work done, look at their hands.

      Same goes for he/shes. They can trim an Adam's apple. Nothing they can do for man hands.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  9. They are going to love him in prison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    His mangina is going to get a workout in Leavenworth.

  10. Apologies to Chelsea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like an update to the title is in order.

  11. Popcorn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Getting popcorn - I fully expect this discussion to be mature and informative.

    1. Re:Popcorn by Isaac-1 · · Score: 1

      So far this thread seems to be about debating the merits of prison rape jokes, and the topic of transgender rights, etc. in general. One thing I do not see, is any discussion about the timing, could this be a legal strategy to avoid military prison, etc.?

  12. Insane plea by rolfwind · · Score: 1, Funny

    Here we come.

    Or the torture (solitary confinement) really got to him.

    Third possibility, 35 years in the brig, he wants to go to woman's prison and be able to bang some chicks.

    1. Re:Insane plea by crazyfrenchmen · · Score: 1

      definitively 3rd option, 35 years in a women prison....

      --
      "Failure is not an option, it come bundled with the software"
    2. Re:Insane plea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The second option shows that you definitely DID NOT read the article linked in the post:
      "His lawyers had argued the former Army intelligence analyst suffered a sexual identity crisis when he leaked the files while serving in Iraq in 2009 and 2010."
      Bradley was already trans BEFORE all this happened.

      Ah but of course it is unthinkable that now that being a soldier is out of discussion, Bradley decided at least to express her identity, right?

      Damn transophobes. If you don't care enough to learn how trans people come to their decisions, at least avoid writing bullshit just because you have a keyboard to wiggle your fingers on.

      Thanks.

    3. Re:Insane plea by rolfwind · · Score: 1

      I'm on slashdot, I don't read articles, I absorb them through osmosis.

    4. Re:Insane plea by Mirage · · Score: 2

      His gender identity issues were visible in the chat logs with Lamo: http://boingboing.net/2010/06/20/was-alleged-wikileak.html

    5. Re:Insane plea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This isn't actually news. She wanted to transition even before jail. The news is that she's going to use a female name and pronouns (during the case she asked that her supporters continued use of her former name and male pronouns) and that her name will be Chelsea, not Breanna.

  13. Is this a joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this a joke?

  14. Finally by M0j0_j0j0 · · Score: 1

    An American Mata Hari. had to be the hard way!

  15. What torture did they administer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell did the MPs do to him?

  16. Another possibility by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "A psychiatrist, Navy Reserve Captain David Moulton, testified during Manning's trial that Manning suffered from gender dysphoria, or wanting to be the opposite sex, as well as narcissism and obsessive-compulsive disorder."

    Or maybe they drugged him up? Snuck something in his food?

  17. Good for her! by Noxal · · Score: 1

    As a G in the LGBT community, genuinely, I wish Chelsea as safe a transition as possible in those conditions. Probably won't be easy and it sucks that there will be a LOT of negativity thrown her way.

    1. Re:Good for her! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a G in the LGBT community, genuinely, I wish Chelsea as safe a transition as possible in those conditions. Probably won't be easy and it sucks that there will be a LOT of negativity thrown her way.

      As an American Citizen who is disgusted by the fact that a whiny, self-absorbed freak is not being executed for treasonous behavior that could have and may still needlessly cause a war somewhere, I must disagree. Manning deserves no sympathy. His leak wasn't motivated by any grand moral principle, just his own peevishness. If he disagreed with the military's personnel policies, then he shouldn't have signed up in the first place. He is a detestable person.

    2. Re:Good for her! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      As an American Citizen who is disgusted by the fact that a whiny, self-absorbed freak is not being executed for treasonous behavior that could have and may still needlessly cause a war somewhere, I must disagree.

      Does EVERYTHING have to turn into a debate about monkey boy even 4 years after he left office?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    3. Re:Good for her! by Shilly_McShillington · · Score: 1

      I love it when I write these kinds of messages. I only wish I had an automatic account maker like the ones I use on FoxNews and CNN for managing my personalitys.When all my posts say Anonymous Coward it makes me feel kind of bad.. kind of cowardly. But I know I'm a hero cause I work for the government and go along with all they say.

    4. Re:Good for her! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice try Shilly, but there is nothing good about Manning's disclosures. Snowden's leaks appear to be motivated by a real concern for the freedom of his country, but Manning's motivations were entirely selfish. Naturally, because of Manning's sexuality, the Gay Mafia has tried to turn Manning into a hero just like the usual suspects have tried to turn Trayvon Martin into a hero simply because of his race. Neither deserve admiration.

    5. Re:Good for her! by Hartree · · Score: 1

      "there will be a LOT of negativity thrown her way"

      Especially from rather shallow slashdotters and other former allies, who will over time decide that it's no longer "cool" to hold up Chelsea Manning as a shining example rather than Bradley Manning.

      How dare Chelsea interfere with their idol worship!

    6. Re:Good for her! by Entropius · · Score: 1

      may still needlessly cause a war somewhere

      If that's your concern then Manning is on your side, not against it, given that she was acting to thwart a needless war that somebody else caused.

    7. Re:Good for her! by Noxal · · Score: 0

      Nice.

    8. Re:Good for her! by Noxal · · Score: 0

      There are standards of healthcare even in prison. This is a healthcare issue. It does not matter whether you support or oppose what she did.

  18. Propaganda? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I didn't realize slashdot was in the business of character assassination. On the day of his sentencing, of course. Why is this even here?

    1. Re:Propaganda? by Gavagai80 · · Score: 1

      Says something about you that you consider it character assassination to discuss someone's [already known] transgender desires.

      --
      This space intentionally left blank
    2. Re:Propaganda? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Didn't you get the memo? You aren't allowed to refer to weirdos wanting to get their junk hacked off in any way that is negative. It's not character assassination. It's a celebration of his choice to be who he really wants to be! His criminal actions pale next to his decision to live his life as he sees fit.

    3. Re:Propaganda? by Shilly_McShillington · · Score: 1

      Indeed it we should know all of your dirty little secrets. As long as you are not part of the system that is.

    4. Re:Propaganda? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, what is the reason for discussing Mannings gender on slashdot?

      It isn't news that matter and it isn't news for geeks. It is completely irrelevant for the justification of the leaks or the arguments against them.
      Just as his favorite color it is private information that should be of no interest to anyone on a non-personal level.

      The only reason I can see for it to be brought to peoples attention would as an attempt to character assassination.

    5. Re:Propaganda? by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      And that's why you need to sometimes apply critical thought to both sides of a story. Sometimes, it isn't a psyop, sometimes truth is simply stranger than fiction. You should be skeptical of any possible knee-jerk reaction you might have to something like this.

      It probably didn't come up because both sides were not really interested in turning this into LGBT situation. Manning didn't want being gay/trans to get in the way of his message, and the Feds probably wanted to save it for trial and not have every LGBT activist on their back leading up to it.

      Now that he's safely convicted, Manning is looking towards making the best of the situation. I'd say this is to his benefit more than the Army's. He really has nothing to lose at this point and has the potential to get what he has been hoping to get.

  19. Too late sweetie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll never be as voluptuous and sensual as the brazilian trannies that start in childhood.

  20. I want stuff too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As I transition into this next phase of my life, I want everyone to know the real me. I am Lazy Coward, I am not working overtime. Given the way that I feel and have felt since childhood, I want to switch to a 4 day, 2 hour per day work schedule as soon as possible. I also request that starting today you stop calling me outside of work and allow me to work in an office with no management.

    1. Re:I want stuff too! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Want to be candidate for Congress or Senate?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  21. A public announcement on national TV. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You gotta admit this guy had balls.

    1. Re:A public announcement on national TV. by cold+fjord · · Score: 4, Funny

      Much to his distress.

      --
      much of left-wing thought is a kind of playing with fire by people who don't even know that fire is hot - George Orwell
  22. Huh. by meta-monkey · · Score: 0

    Do you ever get the feeling we're all just getting trolled? Trolled so, so very hard?

    --
    We don't have a state-run media we have a media-run state.
    1. Re:Huh. by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      What do you expect from "secret" kangaroo courts but a trolling?

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  23. Why is this on Slashdot? by schwit1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Who cares if he wants to live as a woman, a man or a chipmonk?

    This inane crap belongs on Digg not here.

    1. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by somersault · · Score: 1

      And hat difference would it even make when you're in prison? Unless he really expects to be put in a women's prison.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    2. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The inmates care... its a difference of number of holes.

    3. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It makes a pretty big difference mentally, when your freedoms are taken away and you have a lot of spare time to think about it, especially if you're a narcissist to begin with.

    4. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's RIGHT! Slashdot is a SERIOUS ongoing TECHNICAL discussion where SERIOUS TECHNICAL issues are discussed by SERIOUS PEOP... AHAHAHAhAhahahahahahah... sorry. I just can't...

    5. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More than you think.
      Gender goes through pretty much everything.

    6. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

      How about a Dolphin (http://24.media.tumblr.com/198cdd15d91b75fb66a447a9cfe2371d/tumblr_mhgnhmMYxw1rlo1q2o1_1280.jpg)

      --
      Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
    7. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Indeed. We should be discussing the technical details of such a transition.

    8. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the difference. The same difference that gender reassigning a regular straight man into a woman temporarily while they are in prison. They wouldn't just be a prisoner, but a prisoner of their own dysphoric body. Who cares what that forced transitioned regular straight male's gender is, it's not like they'll be dating anybody in prison, so what does it matter?

      (The implication incase anyone reading this is too dense to follow is, a TG individual feels like this has already been done to them once, they are merely wanting to undo it.)

    9. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by chinton · · Score: 1

      Or in a Monty Python sketch... "Its symbolic of his struggle against reality"

    10. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by somersault · · Score: 1

      I don't think I'd really mind being in a woman's body, so I don't see the problem there. Especially if as you say you're "not going to be dating anyone". It would actually be kind of fun being a woman for a while just for the unlimited boob time.

      --
      which is totally what she said
    11. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are transgendered you don't want to temporally "switch" your gender. So if you don't mind being a woman, that would include slicing open your penis, removal of your balls and inverting the penis skin into a neo-vagina. Still fun?

      Being transgendered isn't a hobby or a quirky way to get boobs to play or a fancy new way of gay living.

    12. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is reddit nowadays..

    13. Re:Why is this on Slashdot? by hey! · · Score: 1

      Because he did something which many people believe was a great service to the nation -- and other see as a betrayal. The consequences of that act are of interest to both sides.

      I happen to think we as a people are better off for Manning's actions, but I also see a certain recklessness in them. It raises interesting questions about how such a person could have got access to so much sensitive information. Clearly Manning was a deeply alienated young person -- didn't that show up in his (then ... "her" now) background check?

      I wonder whether the military ought not be looking to fill these kinds of positions with older workers, people who've lived through the most volatile phases of their lives. It's not like twenty years ago when people over thirty had no knowledge of computers. These days someone who his fifty might well know more about how technology actually works than a twenty year-old.

      I don't think being transgendered is a security risk per se, but being wracked with secret fear, uncertainty and shame certainly is. If Manning had been, say, forty years-old; had she already gone through the hormone therapy and surgery, and had come out as a transwoman to her family and associates; then she certainly would have acted differently. Maybe not with different intent, but certainly with more care and deliberation. Older people are less inclined to dramatic gestures, which has its good and bad points, but surely is a good thing in someone entrusted with access to huge volumes of sensitive data.

      --
      Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  24. *ahem*smear*ahem* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    n/c

  25. No, because it's not insanity by QilessQi · · Score: 5, Informative

    Self-identifying as a woman is not a sign of insanity. There are quite a number of transgendered people in the world today, from young to old, pre-op or post-op, leading perfectly normal lives.

    While we used to refer to the condition as Gender Identity Disorder in the DSM-IV, it was replaced with Gender Dysphoria in the DSM-V because we now don't think of it as a disorder. In fact, the general "treatment" is not to make the mind match the body, but to make the body match the mind. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender_identity_disorder .

    1. Re:No, because it's not insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is the consequence of basing psychological treatment not on objective science, but on people's feelings.

    2. Re:No, because it's not insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Self-identifying as a woman is not a sign of insanity.

      Well, not if you actually are a woman.

    3. Re:No, because it's not insanity by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      This is the consequence of basing psychological treatment not on objective science, but on people's feelings.

      You're right. Why should we treat all these people who say they're suicidal or hear voices telling them to kill everyone?

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    4. Re:No, because it's not insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The hell mods!!! PAY ATTENTION.

      Responding to
      (a) torture (solitary confinement) really got to him. (related to coming out as a woman is "crazy")
      with
      (b) Self-identifying as a woman is not a sign of insanity. (and more TG-related discussion about reclassification in the DSM-V is not "crazy") .. should NOT be rated as Offtopic. There is a lot of ignorance here, and the only way to combat it is with well-sourced information, which QilessQi provided.

    5. Re:No, because it's not insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

      When people say they're sucidial, we try to help them not feel suicidal any more.
      When people say they hear voices telling them to kill everyone, we try to help them not hear those voices anymore.
      But for some reason, if a man says he feels like he wants to be a woman, we try to help him pretend he is one, instead of trying to help him not feel that way anymore.
      It's inconsistent.

    6. Re:No, because it's not insanity by Entropius · · Score: 1

      Shouldn't we base the treatment on any genuine desires of the patient that aren't artificial manifestations of an illness (i.e. a depressed person's desire to die; a schizophrenic's desire to warn the President about Elvis zombies)?

      If an XY person with a penis perceives herself as female and would prefer to have her body modified to be more consistent with average female traits, why is that a bad thing?

    7. Re:No, because it's not insanity by Entropius · · Score: 1

      I regret posting in this discussion because I have mod points to burn, and QilessQi would get one if I could give one.

    8. Re:No, because it's not insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think your parent was joking, retard.

    9. Re:No, because it's not insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You CAN NOT treat gender dysphoria. It has been tried for decades without any result. No amount of therapy changes who you are.

      Your thoughts are wrong and outdated

    10. Re:No, because it's not insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stupid fucking trannies should have picked a new label because for the longest time "gender" meant and still means what's in between your legs.

      I don't give a fuck how you self-identify, society cares what's between your legs. Period, out, end of discussion.

    11. Re:No, because it's not insanity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You CAN NOT treat gender dysphoria. It has been tried for decades without any result.

      The same was true of syphilis, tuberculosis, and many other conditions.
      Who knows what future scientific knowledge and technology will bring?
      Helping men pretend to be women is just throwing up your hands and giving up.

  26. If only this were Snowden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There would be limitless fodder for "In Soviet Russia ..." quips

  27. Re:He's not a woman by eqisow · · Score: 2

    The idea is that sex and gender are not the same thing - one is, as you said, biological, and the other is psychological. Yes, in the end it's all biology, but you can't argue that gender dysphoria is not a real phenomenon. So, the question you have to ask, is what's the best way to treat this condition? Is it to say, "Deal with it, you were born this, you are this," or, is it to give them therapy and open the door to procedures that do, in fact, seem to lessen the psychological suffering of such individuals?

  28. Imma call him Bradley by Russ1642 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Saul: A man has the right to change his name to vatever he vants to change it to. And if a man vants to be called Chelsea, godammit this is a free country, you should respect his vishes, and call the man Chelsea!
    Morris: His mamma call him Bradley, imma call him Bradley.
    Saul: Then you're a putz. All of you are putzes. They should change the sign outside from My-T-Sharp to 'ze Three Putzes.

    1. Re:Imma call him Bradley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A Malamud reference on Slashdot? Now I've seen everything!

    2. Re:Imma call him Bradley by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Took me a minute, but this is from "Coming to America" with Muhammad/Cassius switched to Chelsea/Bradley.

  29. Congratulations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It is unfortunate that it had to come under such circumstances, but given that they have taken your freedom away, at least you can be the person you are. Congratulations Chelsea.

    (For the commenters who feel this is a result of the solitary - he was experiencing dysphoria prior to the whole affair. Their are photos of him presenting female from prior to the Wikileaks scandal)

  30. what this means for slashdot. by nimbius · · Score: 1

    UPDATE Slashdot.headline SET headline_txt=REPLACE(headline_txt, '/Bradley\ Manning', 'Chelsea\ Manning ') where headline_author != 'cmdrtaco';

    and i guess on a personal level, i have to start saying, "a prime example of a capitalist dictatorship exercising its ability to persecute political prisoners is the incarceration of Chelsea Manning"

    --
    Good people go to bed earlier.
  31. First rule of espionage by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Yeah, this was a bad idea. Unfortunately choosing to make such a public statement on this will basically give the highly vocal Conservatives some more ammunition to use against him, basically in their eyes invalidating the stuff she leaked. While we all know that it's got absolutely nothing to do with anything, that's never stopped the highly vocal Conservative minority from making a big deal of this stuff.

    The same people who were screaming for him to be hanged will now feel smug in their self-righteousness and will start finding a way to correlate this gender change with an ability and desire to fabricate the leaked information. This will then invalidate this entire process in the eyes of these people... and believe me they make a lot of noise.

    1. Re:First rule of espionage by SuricouRaven · · Score: 2

      They already are. A lot of conservative blogs and news sites have long been claiming that Manning is proof Teh Geys are a threat to national security and condemning liberals for endangering the country by letting them serve in the military. This is just going to revitalize their old gay-panic angle.

    2. Re:First rule of espionage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The gender dysphoria thing is a non-sequitur. However, 'narcissism', in the clinical sense, is exactly what dropped his, soon to be not, nuts into the grinder.

    3. Re:First rule of espionage by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this was a bad idea. Unfortunately choosing to make such a public statement on this will basically give the highly vocal Conservatives some more ammunition to use against him, basically in their eyes invalidating the stuff she leaked. While we all know that it's got absolutely nothing to do with anything, that's never stopped the highly vocal Conservative minority from making a big deal of this stuff.

      The same people who were screaming for him to be hanged will now feel smug in their self-righteousness and will start finding a way to correlate this gender change with an ability and desire to fabricate the leaked information. This will then invalidate this entire process in the eyes of these people... and believe me they make a lot of noise.

      Not that you are judging.

      --
      There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
    4. Re:First rule of espionage by geek · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      How about your conservative-panic? I mean, you did bring conservatism into an argument where politics didn't even come into play. Not sure what it has to do with this at all in fact. Your strawman is pathetic.

      You do know he was prosecuted under the liberals watch right? Your liberal messiah could have pardoned him or called off the dogs at any time. I guess that wouldn't fit into your liberal narrative though................

    5. Re:First rule of espionage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Did you think about your response at all? First off, you are acting like this was something that Manning decided based on some sort of rational choice. I assume you think being gay is a choice as well?

      Secondly, the trial is over....who cars if there is "more ammunition" to use against her.

      Lastly, these people that are screaming / not believing what she released prior are not rational...they will believe/not believe anything...it doesn't matter what facts are in anyway. Because logic doesn't enter into the equation, invalidation is never possible. These people will always make a lot of noise..nothing will change that and eventually everyone will learn to tune them out.

    6. Re:First rule of espionage by ultranova · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this was a bad idea. Unfortunately choosing to make such a public statement on this will basically give the highly vocal Conservatives some more ammunition to use against him, basically in their eyes invalidating the stuff she leaked. While we all know that it's got absolutely nothing to do with anything, that's never stopped the highly vocal Conservative minority from making a big deal of this stuff.

      Authoritarians will always find some excuse to side with authority, so what difference does this make? "Any excuse will serve a tyrant."

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    7. Re:First rule of espionage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      have long been claiming that Manning is proof Teh Geys are a threat to national security and condemning liberals for endangering the country by letting them serve in the military.

      Just look at the evidence. Sexually confused man is let into the military. (Want to take any bets on whether or not the military deliberately turned a politically correct blind eye to his confusion?) Sexually confused man leaks mountains of classified diplomatic memos simply because he doesn't like the fact that gays aren't allowed to serve openly in the military. Seems like a good argument against letting gays into the military.

      The military has an institutional purpose and that purpose has nothing to do with promoting societal change. The whining of gays and feminists should have no bearing on whether or not gays or women serve in the military. The only thing that matters is military effectiveness. There is no "right" to serve in the military. Sadly, by accepting Obama's executive orders permitting gays in the military and women in front line combat units, the military has signaled its surrender to PCness and the institution will suffer as a result. A legitimate debate can be made about the size and use of the military, but there should be no compromising of institutional competency.

    8. Re:First rule of espionage by dywolf · · Score: 1

      we can say that it shouldnt be this way, but reality is what it is. and this is going to hurt his credibility and only give his detractors further ammunition (relevent or not, character assassination is a very effective thing). it is a poor decision on his part, not that the media isnt complicit in helping him dig deeper by blasting it around on the front page.

      personally, i dont care either if he wants to be Chelsea now.

      he did what he did (wrongly imo), he got sentenced (too much imo), and his personal melodrama should be over now while we try to handle the ramifications of what he revealed (of course there's still appeals and such in the future).

      --
      The guy who said the election was rigged won the presidency with the second-most votes.
    9. Re:First rule of espionage by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Sadly, there is a huge chunk of American society who now sees this as putting a "filthy deviant" in prison for 35 years "like they all should be" and the "espionage" merely the side-snag that helped them put that "sick pervert" away.

    10. Re:First rule of espionage by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Funny, because the personal issues are suddenly not relevant, when it's a republican fucking congressional pages in the ass or major religious leaders snorting coke off the ass of a male hooker.

      The only thing that surprises me is that, in the case of Manning, they didn't drag out some sort of rape accusations or something ages ago. That's the common way we go about character assassination, as a government.

    11. Re:First rule of espionage by SuricouRaven · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of crazy liberals, too. I make fun of them when they come up for discussion. I'd be happy to mock PETA all you want, and the fringes of the environmental movement are a goldmine of well-intentioned stupidity.

      If you want more pointed criticism, I can do that too. 'Conservatism' has become a joke. The ideals of small government, individual liberty and self-determination have been burried beneath a new form of conservative movement that is more concerned with enforcing their outdate social views into law. Patriotism has become empty flag-waving, cheering for the country while forgetting just what makes it worth cheering for, and 'support the troops' has turned into some strange military ritual worship.

      That is modern conservatism. A movement that supports individual liberty and a minimal government... except for where the government needs to be endorsing Christianity as the supreme religion, making sure gays are suitably penalised, limiting access to contraception, banning abortion, banning pornography, spying on half the country on the off-chance that they might catch a terrorist, regulating the media to protect the delicate ears of children from evil dirty words, enforcing the federal War on Drugs even in cases where states have expressly passed laws saying otherwise, and maintaining plenty of regulations about work and residence permits to keep immigrants from too easily moving into the country.

      Obama is hardly a liberal messiah. Liberals by-and-large are disillusioned with him - he went into office proclaiming change, and gave nothing but a few tokens and more of the same. The only reason he still has their support at all is that he is a democrat, and thus still infinitely better to them than any republican would be.

    12. Re:First rule of espionage by Entropius · · Score: 1

      Israel seems to have no problems with "institutional competency" in its military, which allows both gays and women to serve as equals.

    13. Re:First rule of espionage by drnb · · Score: 1

      ... we all know that it's got absolutely nothing to do with anything ...

      No, it has something quite relevant to Manning's access to the information in the first place. Isn't one of the first rules of espionage not to let people ***in the midst of*** a major personal/psychological struggle handle your classified information, and to seek out such a person handling the other side's classified information? Did Manning get a pass on his struggle due to political correctness?

      Again, I emphasize "in the midst of". Once a person is happy with their preferences and identity then handling classified information should not be an issue. However a person in the midst of a major personal/psychological struggle is vulnerable to manipulation. Pose as a friend, listen, be sympathetic, ... its a classic ploy. And no the nature of the struggle does not have to be preference or identity based, it can be anything.

    14. Re:First rule of espionage by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      You did know that the guy who wrote the US Military's first training manual during the Revolutionary War was Gay-er than a Rainbow Unicorn at a Pride Parade, right?

    15. Re:First rule of espionage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Manning discredited himself when he released thousands of documents that were unrelated to any war crimes.

    16. Re:First rule of espionage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're just preaching to the choir though. It's not like any of them were considering the legitimacy of his actions before this revelation and the same goes for anyone who would take that kind of argument seriously.

  32. Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... distraction bro.

  33. I'd have gone with ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Loretta"

  34. Section 8 by sunking2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Didn't work for Klinger in MASH, won't work for him either.

    1. Re:Section 8 by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      Didn't realise M*A*S*H was a documentary...

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  35. tinfoil hat time: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok, if I were a major conspiracy theorist (sadly, I'm just a pragmatic cynic poser) I might find it suspicious that this comes out after Assage (to whom the docs were sent) gets accused of regret rape... yes, Manning's been convicted but how out there would it be to wonder if he got offered country club prison (or something like that) vs "Ben Dover - nice to meet you!" if he did this?

    it just seems suspiciously convenient to the us govt that the two highest profile figures around all the leaks/revelations turn out to be {GASP!} "sex offenders"! (yes, I know being trans isn't/shouldn't be a crime but in the pea-sized brains of people who think that way they're effectively synonymous). either at least one of these stories (this or Assage/Sweeden) is BS or Obama is the luckiest SOB to ever live...

  36. Re: He's not a woman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Tell that to androgen insensitive women who are xy.
    You are no doctor nor a judge on the human condition.

  37. This is not tech news. This is just creepy. by azav · · Score: 0

    Stop it. Just stop it.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  38. This is a dodge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To get out of hard labor.

    Ironically, he will be locked up with guys who have friends (or they themselves) were put in danger by Mannings actions.

    Also, I guess he has to change his last name also.

    1. Re:This is a dodge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ironically, he will be locked up with guys who have friends (or they themselves) were put in danger by Mannings actions.

      Has the US locked up that many of its own war criminals already?

  39. Here's an idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let him serve his time in a female prison, to acknowledge him and his statements. Believe you me, a decision like that would instantly make most of the "politically correct" leftist people who have been spreading cheeze over this news go "Hm? Female prison? Weird.", clearly showing how superficial their actions and statements following this news really are. Put it to a poll, and even in the #FreeChelsea crowd the real opinion would be clear.

  40. Re:He's not a woman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, let's see if we can change all the black people to white. It'll end their suffering, right? Why don't we treat people to live in the real world, and be who they are, instead of something else?

  41. this tactic didn't help Klinger by intermodal · · Score: 0

    and it's not going to help Manning.

    --
    In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
  42. Bravo, Washington Post by barlevg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I read about this on WaPo about half an hour ago, where I noticed they did an incredibly intelligent and thoughtful thing: they disabled comments. Now if only that were possible on /.

    1. Re:Bravo, Washington Post by h4rr4r · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Or at least for these articles ban the ACs.
      If you want to say stupid hateful shit at least let it stick with you.

    2. Re:Bravo, Washington Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eat shit

    3. Re:Bravo, Washington Post by barlevg · · Score: 1

      To be fair, on Slashdot you can make use of the moderating system and filter out low-scored comments. Most news sites (like WaPo) have no such functionality, and moderation is extremely rare, so really, it's not so much Slashdot that should be disabling comments, it's Reuters (OP), NYT and the other "traditional" media establishments that haven't yet implemented effective moderating systems that should be following WaPo's lead.

    4. Re:Bravo, Washington Post by Ardyvee · · Score: 1

      But then what would be the point of it? Half of slashdot is the comment section, the other half being the (sometimes crappy) summary of the story along with any relevant links.

      --
      I don't care if I'm wrong. I only care about everyone obtaining something from the discussion.
    5. Re:Bravo, Washington Post by ganjadude · · Score: 4, Insightful

      no. screw that. I get annoyed as hell when places decide for me what stories i can and cant comment on. Thats why digg fell apart when they got bought out, they disabled all comments.

      slashdot IS comments. I can find these stories all over the web (in fact as we all joke we usually do before its here) but we come to slashdot for the comments. Sure the quality has dropped in the past 10 years but there are still alot of good posters here, and there is no reason to disable posts on a story because of fear of what will be said. In fact the entire Idea just tells me whatever is happeneing that we would even considering such a thing, is a horrible thing to begin with or something that is clearly wrong.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    6. Re:Bravo, Washington Post by barlevg · · Score: 1

      I don't think anyone involved in /. is seriously considering making it possible to disable comments on articles. My point was really more that I applauded WaPo's decision, since they don't have any effective system in place for moderation (unlike /.)

    7. Re:Bravo, Washington Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I concur and will be removing you from my christmas card list.

    8. Re:Bravo, Washington Post by timeOday · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about. I HATE how major websites censor everything. Somebody goes on a shooting spree, Facebook suspends their account. Why? Slashdot's moderation system is the FAR better way to go.

    9. Re:Bravo, Washington Post by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Agreed. If there's one thing Bradly Manning sacrificed almost his entire lifetime for by whistleblowing, it was to eradicate privacy and free speech!

    10. Re:Bravo, Washington Post by Seumas · · Score: 1

      People are being ridiculous. As bad as Slashdot has gotten as all the old-school slashdotters turned into their grandfathers over the last fifteen years, it is nowhere near on the level of the comment sections of almost every article on the internet. Those places (the bottom of any CBS article, for example) are the most racist, ignorant, homophobic, religious-nuttery, anti-anyone-not-super-christian, rah-rah america depths of total shit on the planet.

      Those make the worst of Slashdot look like fucking poetry.

    11. Re:Bravo, Washington Post by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      yeah I know what you were referring to. I agree I dont think /. is dumb enough to try that. as far as i can recall only 1 comment has ever been deleted in the entire time its been up. I simply disagree is all, i find disabling the comments a sign that they know they wrote something that would incite a heated debate and they dont want to deal with it, they just want to get their point across without having to hear the opposition. Many papers are like this, my local papers webpages all have comments, however on anything that is even mildly controversial they will disable comments. I find that to just be a slap in the face. Sure it is their site their rules I just find it really annoying personally.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
    12. Re:Bravo, Washington Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      WaPo just wants to prevent the presentation of immediate challenges to its political narratives. If the NYT had a readership more reflective of the overall political spectrum of the US population, it would be disabling comments too. Must not allow challenges to the orthodoxy, after all.

      If you want to say stupid hateful shit at least let it stick with you.

      --> If you want to express opinions that I don't like being expressed, at least make it easier to retaliate against you.

      FTFY. Now, DIAF liberal fascist!

    13. Re:Bravo, Washington Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, let's silence people who you disagree with, by all means. That's the preferable solution!

      Oh wait, we don't want to do that... hmm... I know! Let's make sure that nobody ever has anonymity from which to express an unpopular or dangerous opinion!

      Oh wait, we don't want to do that, either. I know, let's make sure that everybody uses their full real name all the time so expressing unpopular or dangerous opinions

      Yes, it's awful when people are allowed anonymous speech online, so awful.

      Psst! Hey! Hey you! Your fascism's showing.

    14. Re:Bravo, Washington Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't want to read them? Don't go to a comment based sites.

    15. Re:Bravo, Washington Post by iroll · · Score: 1

      Insightful?!? Are you fucking kidding me? The whole point of slashdot is that it points you to a longer article and gives you a forum for discussion--a forum that, through its social moderation system, is (for all its warts) far, far superior to the comment sections on any news site.

      Why on God's Green Earth would you come to slashdot if you wanted comments disabled? You could just go to to the source (WaPo), or a no-comment aggregator like Google News.

      Asking for slashdot without comments is like asking for a hamburger minus the bread, meat, and toppings. All you're left with is the wrapper--if that's all you want, why the fuck did you order a burger?

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    16. Re:Bravo, Washington Post by barlevg · · Score: 1
      Yeah, that part of my comment was rather silly (though I agree with someone else who said that the real issue is that this article should never have been on Slashdot to begin with). I *assume* I was modded up more for the "kudos, WaPo, for disabling comments when you don't have an effective way of modding them." This opinion, I think, is pretty well validated, since they *are* allowing comments on a related blog post, and the comments are mostly along the lines of

      Woke up, to news of "Chelsea Manning", a guy who says he is a chick,
      He is doing time in prison, and no longer wants his ****.

    17. Re:Bravo, Washington Post by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Those make the worst of Slashdot look like fucking poetry.

      Yeah, even when it's about the trans, Slashdot isn't as bad as the news sites.

      When links to transgender related news are posted in trans-related forums one thing that is often said is "Triggery comments/don't read the comments"

    18. Re:Bravo, Washington Post by iroll · · Score: 1

      I'll buy that, and I did agree with that part... the second part was just too crazy to ignore ;-) The truth is I've often wondered why any respectable news site would want a comment section.

      The readers are much better served by the news on the news site and the discussion on a discussion site--whether it's slashdot or reddit or fark or 4chan. The task of moderating (or creating a culture that moderates itself) is massive, and better offloaded to sites that specialize in that sort of work. Instead, the mainstream news sites seem to still be stuck in the 90s "portal" paradigm, where keeping the viewer on their domain means providing every possible service, no matter how poorly rendered.

      Really, I think they should worry more about providing a quality, focused product that will keep bringing in hits from the aggregators.

      --
      Repetition does not transform a lie into the truth. - FDR
    19. Re:Bravo, Washington Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      See you on HuffPost!

    20. Re:Bravo, Washington Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no. screw that. I get annoyed as hell when places decide for me what stories i can and cant comment on. Thats why digg fell apart when they got bought out, they disabled all comments.

      Sadly, a lot of time comments are disabled for valid legal reasons - sub judice, or the extreme likelihood of slanderous allegations, among others.

    21. Re:Bravo, Washington Post by ganjadude · · Score: 1

      there is no valid reason.

      --
      have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  43. Utter crap by onyxruby · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Good friend of mine is transgender, this should never even make the news. Transgender is a mental disease that should first of all never take away from the person, and second of all never be used as an excuse to justify someone's behavior.

    Bradley Meaning's behavior had jack to do with being Transgender and bringing his mental illness into this is a shows a refusal to take responsibility and will only further alienate society from people who are transgender and have not committed Bradley Manning's crimes.

    1. Re:Utter crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you say that you have transgender friends, while calling transgenderism a mental illness? I smell a troll.

    2. Re:Utter crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What else would you call it? If it's not the body which is "ill" for being of the unwanted gender, is it not the mind then?

    3. Re:Utter crap by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      Good friend of mine is transgender, this should never even make the news. Transgender is a mental disease

      It's a dysphoria - it's not even considered a disorder any more, so it's not a disease or a mental illness, and if I was your friend I wouldn't want you thinking it was. There's a mismatch between his physical sex and his gender identity, but that doesn't mean it's his brain is at fault.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    4. Re:Utter crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Transgenderism is both physical and psychological, as well as social. It is not purely a mental illness.

    5. Re:Utter crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      ... There's a mismatch between his physical sex and his gender identity, but that doesn't mean it's his brain is at fault.

      Actually, the brain may in fact be at fault. There's been several small studies that show that certain areas of the brain are different in volume and number of nuerons between males and females. Transsexuals (MTF), in the study, had a volume (and number of neurons) consistent with females. Gay males were consistent with males. Gay females were consistent with females.

      This study was small, and was conducted by sectioning the brain of cadavers. However it has been replicated by a different group of researchers, with a different group of cadavers, and arrived at the same results. Co-factors such as any prior hormone use was accounted for in the study.

      The chances are pretty good that transsexuality, at least in male-to-female transsexuals, is the result of a brain that developed with some female attributes, in a male body.

      The situation with transsexuality is not that you desire to be the opposite sex, but that you "know" that you are not the sex your body is. So, to use myself as an example, I knew from an early age I was not a male. It didn't matter what my body was, I knew, just as surely as anyone else knows their own gender, that I was not a male.

      Just thought I'd add a bit of real information to the transsexuality discussion.

      As for Chelsea Manning...we'll just have to take her word.

    6. Re:Utter crap by Seumas · · Score: 2

      That's clearly untrue. There was just an AMA on reddit recently by someone who changed their sex and then desperately regretted it.

      If there is a mismatch between the gender of your physical body and its guts and what you feel you are in your head -- then there is something wrong SOMEWHERE. It isn't some magical ethereal thing compelling you to have this mixup. That isn't to say "if you have balls and no uterus, but you feel like you are supposed to be a woman, then you are mentally fucked up and need to have your head fixed". It's just to say that may sometimes be the case. Sometimes it may not be. I'm sure there are multiple potential catalysts and many are probably even a simple case of "mother nature screwed up and made me one thing but made me feel like another thing".

      It would be a disservice to the health of people, I believe, to instantly treat everyone as either clearly the physical sex they seem to be but with a fucked up brain *or* as a perfectly normal person who just needs to whack off some bits and install some others.

      To further counter your point that there's supposedly nothing wrong and it isn't a disorder or illness and has nothing to do with the brain -- you can not have a gender reassignment surgery without an IMMENSE amount of psychological counseling.

      I think it is wrong to judge people with gender identity issues. I am sure that, whatever causing them, it is fucking awful to deal with (not to mention coping with society, along with it). We are definitely a long way from clearly understanding everything about it, though. Once we do, I'm sure we will be very far along the path to society being able to cope with it more rationally.

    7. Re:Utter crap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can you say that you care about someone's well-being, when you assume that describing something as a mental illness is somehow critical of them?

      "Good friend of mine has the cold."
      "Why are you insulting your friend?"

      Gender dysphoria *is* a mental illness - your brain and self image do not match your body. Frankly, I can't imagine a more hellacious existence than to constantly feel not-at-home inside your own skin. It is a dysfunction, and it deserves our sympathy, and people suffering from it do not deserve to be stigmatized - but it is not a "normal" mode of being, in the literal sense of "normal."

    8. Re:Utter crap by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1
      I'm not saying those with gender identity issues don't also suffer a disproportionate amount of mental illness, only that the gender issue is not, in and of itself, automatically (if ever) a mental illness (whatever one of those actually is, to have a finger put on it).

      That's clearly untrue. There was just an AMA on reddit recently by someone who changed their sex and then desperately regretted it.

      That one anecdote (count it!) still doesn't indicate that his gender identity issue was a mental illness. I certainly didn't mean to suggest that anyone who feels they're the wrong physical gender only has to have the op to put everything right.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    9. Re:Utter crap by onyxruby · · Score: 1

      http://psychcentral.com/disorders/gender-dysphoria-symptoms/

      The recent proposed changes to the DSM 5 are not yet fully vetted from what I understand. I suppose if you were splitting hairs finely enough you could make your argument, you just have to ignore the previous several decades of medical science. Of course there are those who are quite opposed to changing it from a mental illness to a disorder as their are legal implications.

      That being said, unless your a psychiatrist or transgender yourself, your really probably just talking out of your ass with no clue in the world. I've wasted too much of my time with you already.

  44. Ob by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

    Well that explains why he couldn't keep a secret...

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Ob by VortexCortex · · Score: 1

      Well that explains why he couldn't keep a secret...

      So, Manning's a Chick? Huh, women, go figure!
      Always changing their mind at the last minute and blaming it on a man, right?

      I bet Chelsey Manning is kicking herself for not doing the gender swap thing
      BEFORE the government went looking for the guy who blew the whistle, eh?

      Guess they won't have to worry about Manning taking a stand and leaking anymore...

  45. Why is this relevant? by Bugler412 · · Score: 2

    Why is the gender choice or alignment or preference or whatever of Manning even relevant to any of the current discussions, and why of all things it it relevant here? Sigh....

    1. Re:Why is this relevant? by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

      It's relevant because it's happening to Manning, who, whether he likes it or not, is a figure in the public eye, and I'd guess that more than a few people here are actually interested in what's happening with him personally.

      --
      systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
    2. Re:Why is this relevant? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, technically it's relevant to THIS discussion, about the article. Your comment, however, is not relevant to THIS discussion, or likely any discussion.

  46. The Full Statement by Iridium_Hack · · Score: 5, Informative
    Actually, I heard that the following statement was made by Bradly Manning and picked up by the Associated Press. He made it to the President in a request for a pardon. In my opinion, these two statements don't sound like they came from the same person. With as much embarrassment and/or trouble as the Bradley Manning case has caused the government, adding a little spicy twist on the story in the end doesn't sound unlikely.

    Associated Press — FORT MEADE, Md. — The text of U.S. Army Pfc. Bradley Manning’s statement that will be sent to the president, as read by defense attorney David Coombs following Manning’s sentencing Wednesday, below:

    --------

    Manning's statement, in full:

    The decisions that I made in 2010 were made out of a concern for my country and the world that we live in. Since the tragic events of 9/11, our country has been at war. We’ve been at war with an enemy that chooses not to meet us on any traditional battlefield, and due to this fact we’ve had to alter our methods of combating the risks posed to us and our way of life.

    I initially agreed with these methods and chose to volunteer to help defend my country. It was not until I was in Iraq and reading secret military reports on a daily basis that I started to question the morality of what we were doing.

    It was at this time I realized that (in) our efforts to meet the risk posed to us by the enemy, we have forgotten our humanity. We consciously elected to devalue human life both in Iraq and Afghanistan. When we engaged those that we perceived were the enemy, we sometimes killed innocent civilians. Whenever we killed innocent civilians, instead of accepting responsibility for our conduct, we elected to hide behind the veil of national security and classified information in order to avoid any public accountability. In our zeal to kill the enemy, we internally debated the definition of torture. We held individuals at Guantanamo for years without due process. We inexplicably turned a blind eye to torture and executions by the Iraqi government. And we stomached countless other acts in the name of our war on terror.

    Patriotism is often the cry extolled when morally questionable acts are advocated by those in power. When these cries of patriotism drown out any logically based dissension, it is usually the American soldier that is given the order to carry out some ill-conceived mission.

    Our nation has had similar dark moments for the virtues of democracy — the Trail of Tears, the Dred Scott decision, McCarthyism, and the Japanese-American internment camps — to mention a few. I am confident that many of the actions since 9/11 will one day be viewed in a similar light.

    As the late Howard Zinn once said, “There is not a flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people.”

    I understand that my actions violated the law; I regret if my actions hurt anyone or harmed the United States. It was never my intent to hurt anyone. I only wanted to help people. When I chose to disclose classified information, I did so out of a love for my country and a sense of duty to others.

    If you deny my request for a pardon, I will serve my time knowing that sometimes you have to pay a heavy price to live in a free society.

    I will gladly pay that price if it means we could have a country that is truly conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all women and men are created equal.

    1. Re:The Full Statement by Princeofcups · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is as poignant and germane as any revolutionary war document. I'd vote for Manning as a member of the new constitutional congress.

      --
      The only thing worse than a Democrat is a Republican.
    2. Re:The Full Statement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Or his lawyer, since, you know, that's who wrote this.

    3. Re:The Full Statement by Iridium_Hack · · Score: 1

      Agreed. And I'm not going to judge Bradley Manning on his personal life one way or another. Attacks and slander on a person's sex life seem to always come up when someone goes against big people. Assange himself seems to have also (what a coincidence!) been accused of perverted behaviour. But far as judging what Manning did in releasing classified files, all sides seem to agree that he did it because in his conscience he felt the stuff had to be exposed. And who did it hurt. . . . really? The people who had decisions that were morally or ethically dark they wanted to hide. Ooops!

    4. Re:The Full Statement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's an incredible shame that he announced his transgenderism on the same day that he sent this public letter to the President. This is well-written, to the point, and should make anyone who reads it think twice about what's happening here. But 99% of the people won't ever read it because this message is being drowned in the noise about his transgenderism. Try doing a google search for "Bradley Manning statement full" and see if you find back this text or the one announcing his new name as Chelsea.

      *sigh*

  47. don't drop the soap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    don't drop the soap

  48. News for nerds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Stuff that matters

  49. So Mr. Manning "suffers from" narcissism? by Harvey+Manfrenjenson · · Score: 3, Funny

    Kind of an absurd turn of phrase, isn't it? It's a bit like saying that someone "suffers from" being an asshole.

    (Whether Manning deserves to be called a narcissist at all... that is, of course, a whole other question).

    1. Re:So Mr. Manning "suffers from" narcissism? by jimmifett · · Score: 1

      I suffer from being an egotistical prick.
      Do you know how hard it is, every single day, walking around knowing that you are smarter than 99% of the people you know, having to be surrounded by dumbasses and pretend to give their asinine opinions merit?

      Waking up every morning, dreading driving to work because one is surrounded by idiots that can't drive in the rain, signal, or put on wigs and lipstick while driving?
      Having to go to lunch and watch as your coworkers can't figure out a tip without a calculator? Slide the decimal one digit left and add half the result!

      More people should think of MY feelings, after all, the universe does in fact revolve around me. /sarcasm

    2. Re:So Mr. Manning "suffers from" narcissism? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not really. It has a fairly specific meaning in psychology (which is the context here). I'm not a psychologist, so I won't attempt to explain it (I'd do a terrible job) but it's not a condemnation of him and it doesn't even imply that he has a high opinion of himself.

  50. Re:He's not a woman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey, it worked for Michael Jackson, who am I to judge?

  51. Strategy by czernabog · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one who thinks there's a big possibility that this is just a desperate move in order to gain sympathy disguising himself as a member of an oppressed demographic?
    Not that I have any objection, if I were in his shoes I'd be desperate enough to try it too.

    1. Re:Strategy by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Right, because if there's anything most Americans are sympathetic towards, it's people who are gay or have gender identity issues.

    2. Re:Strategy by czernabog · · Score: 1

      I sense that you're being sarcastic. It's not about winning the favour of most people. It's about giving a different spin to the issue and garnering the support of people and entities that defend transgenders' rights.

  52. Rape jokes are not funny by jellybear · · Score: 3, Funny

    unless they involve prison. Am I politically correct yet?

    1. Re:Rape jokes are not funny by bitt3n · · Score: 2

      unless they involve prison. Am I politically correct yet?

      you got modded funny, so no, not yet.

  53. Let's Not Be Jerks by assertation · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Speaking as a straight, cisgendered ( transgender people's word for "normal" ), white, and quite handsome man.........please lets not make fun of Manning.

    He is a human being, some who consider to be a hero, who just happens to have problems.

    1. Re:Let's Not Be Jerks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Cisgendered means your brain gender matches your physical gender. The whole point of not using the word 'normal' is to avoid saying that people who are not cisgendered are not normal.

    2. Re:Let's Not Be Jerks by jimmifett · · Score: 0

      The actual term is "Sane".

      Really, it's no different than the delusions that one is Napoleon.
      Fierce denial of reality, construction their own delusions, self mutilation... these people need serious mental treatment, not coddling.

    3. Re:Let's Not Be Jerks by assertation · · Score: 2


      The actual term is "Sane".

      Really, it's no different than the delusions that one is Napoleon.
      Fierce denial of reality, construction their own delusions, self mutilation... these people need serious mental treatment, not coddling

      Manning and other transgender people know what reality is, therefore they are not insane.

      They have a mismatch between what their brain thinks their body should look like and what there bodies are like.

      It is similar to that story of the woman who wanted to cut her legs off because of a brain defect where the brain's sense of "normal" didn't include legs.

      She was perfectly sane, as are most transgender people, they were just born with a defective "checksum" in their brains.

      Now, hatred or loathing to people who have done nothing to you, that might just be a diagnosable neurosis, as well as one that might respond to treatment :)

    4. Re:Let's Not Be Jerks by LateArthurDent · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Cisgendered means your brain gender matches your physical gender. The whole point of not using the word 'normal' is to avoid saying that people who are not cisgendered are not normal.

      Which is stupid PC crap. Being transgendered isn't normal. Which is not to say that's a bad thing, they're just being offended for no reason. Normal means, "according with, constituting, or not deviating from a norm, rule, or principle". Think normal distribution. Most people are not transgendered, therefore being transgendered is not not normal.

      By itself, not being normal isn't offensive. Most people can't run as fast as Usain Bolt, therefore Usain Bolt isn't normal. That's not an insult.

    5. Re:Let's Not Be Jerks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll find that a binary random variable can't take a normal distribution.

    6. Re:Let's Not Be Jerks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'cisgender' is as much "transgender people's word for 'normal' as 'straight' is queer people's word for 'normal' or 'white' is black people's word for 'normal'.

    7. Re:Let's Not Be Jerks by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

      You'll find that a binary random variable can't take a normal distribution.

      You would be incorrect

    8. Re:Let's Not Be Jerks by jasenj1 · · Score: 1

      I am left handed. That is not "normal". I am not offended.

    9. Re:Let's Not Be Jerks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is similar to that story of the woman who wanted to cut her legs off because of a brain defect where the brain's sense of "normal" didn't include legs.

      She was perfectly sane, as are most transgender people, they were just born with a defective "checksum" in their brains.


      Only problem here is that for your counterexample as well, that woman was also not sane. Such thoughts are obviously extreme mental illness. To claim otherwise seem more like something someone couldn't actually believe, because it's obviously directly false on its face, and must be some kind of odd troll. Or evidence of the same kind of mental illness in oneself.

    10. Re:Let's Not Be Jerks by Kjella · · Score: 1

      Normal means, "according with, constituting, or not deviating from a norm, rule, or principle". Think normal distribution.

      Funny, since the "normal" in normal distribution has nothing to do with the definition you quoted. That would be definition 5c:

      (of an orthogonal system of real functions) defined so that the integral of the square of the absolute value of any function is 1.

      Many of the antonyms to normal are insults, like for example normal vs sick people, normal vs insane people, normal vs handicapped people, normal vs disturbing behavior, normal vs perverted desires and so on. There are some inoffensive meanings that deal with common vs obscure and average vs extreme, but generally not being counted to one of the "normals" can be rather grossly insulting. Like "there's no elevator so you have to take the stairs but that shouldn't be a problem for normal people".

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    11. Re:Let's Not Be Jerks by Khashishi · · Score: 1

      Who wants to be normal? Normals are a bunch of buffoons.

    12. Re:Let's Not Be Jerks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which is stupid PC crap. Being transgendered isn't normal. Think normal distribution. Most people are not transgendered.

      Using your logic, since most Americans are white, being white is normal.

      Perhaps you meant to say: "If you are a member of a minority that has attained some arbitrary level of recognition and acceptance, you too can be considered normal like the the majority."

    13. Re:Let's Not Be Jerks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you.

    14. Re:Let's Not Be Jerks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .Which is not to say that's a bad thing. . .

      Most "normal" people understand that whatever it currently says in the dictionary, telling someone that they are not "normal" is somewhere on the spectrum between rude and cruel.

      Care to offer an antonym of "normal" that "normal" people would not find pejorative? Here are a few that I found with some casual browsing:

      aberrant, abnormal, anomalous, antidromic, atypical, defective, deviant, deviate, different, disorderly, eccentric, exceptional, extraordinary, extreme, freakish, insane, irrational, irregular, kinky, odd, perverted, rare, strange, subnormal, supernormal, unbalanced, uncommon, unconventional, untraditional, unusual, vicarious,

      Which one of those would you use in the following sentance: "You, transgendered person, are not 'normal'. Which is not to say that's a bad thing. I prefer to call you '_________'". I assure you that when you tell people that their attempt to make room for themselves under the umbrella of "normal" is "PC Crap", they are wondering which of the above words you think is appropriate (and also what your problem is).

    15. Re:Let's Not Be Jerks by Velex · · Score: 1

      You're not objectively wrong, but that's not the problem. You're assuming the term cisgendered is a PC term, which from my understanding of what I read in Julia Serano's Whipping Girl is not where it comes from or what its intended use is.

      It's a technical term like you or I might refer to hard drive connecters as PATA, SATA, or SCSI because we understand the difference.

      The problem is that people, especially feminists, are not objective. Many, especially feminists, don't simply view trans women as not normal, but sick and mentally ill. There's a lot of baggage that needs to be cleaned up in order to have an objective discussion about trans women and cis women in the context of feminism or larger/different contexts of transgender discrimination. Therefore, it's necessary to develop terms that put trans women and cis women on equal footing by adding a prefix to qualify womyn-born-womyn that's more functional than that hyphenated mess I just used. It's like recognizing handedness by saying left handed or right handed.

      I don't think that trans women as a whole have a desire to be identified as different from cis women, so trans- and cis- are not a terms that anyone generally wants paraded around outside of discussions like this one where it's necessary to draw a distinction.

      So, of course it's not normal in a statistical sense the same way left handedness and Usain Bolt's accomplishments aren't normal.

      The problem is individuals, especially feminists, who seek to dehumanize trans women by pointing out that they're not really women despite living, working, and being gendered by strangers on sight as being that gender. So, the solution is to fire back and call womyn-born-womyn "cis women."

      Protip (somewhat unrelated, but related to the feminist contention that trans women are not real women [which is about as detached from any argument from biology or geneology as you'd expect a feminist to be because they're arguing for gender castes, not objective criteria]): I've noticed that nearly 100% of the time a trans woman is portrayed by a male actor in the media, that actor hasn't had a drop of estrogen in his blood and thus does not have any of the physical changes that estrogen HRT brings. There are a lot of trans women out there you'd probably never guess are trans (Google HaRiSoo) because their facial features, voice, and body shape match what you've come to expect a woman should look and sound like, and at the same time, there are a lot of cis women out there you've probably suspected of being trans because their facial features, (uncommonly) voice, or body shape don't match what you've come to expect a woman should look like. (Then there are trans women who utterly don't and can't "pass" and don't care.)

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
    16. Re:Let's Not Be Jerks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nevertheless it is often used as an insult.

    17. Re:Let's Not Be Jerks by LateArthurDent · · Score: 1

      You're not objectively wrong, but that's not the problem. You're assuming the term cisgendered is a PC term, which from my understanding of what I read in Julia Serano's Whipping Girl is not where it comes from or what its intended use is.

      Actually, I was just objecting directly to the sentence, "The whole point of not using the word 'normal' is to avoid saying that people who are not cisgendered are not normal." I don't have a problem with the word.

      I've got absolutely nothing against gay or transgendered individuals. I think discrimination, and especially attempts to dehumanize others for who they are, as you've described, is despicable. That said, I do tend to be very much anti-PC. I think the proper response to someone trying to dehumanize transgendered individuals by saying they're not normal is to say, "no, we're not. What's your point? I assure you there are many ways in which you are not normal." Instead of being offended by words, or trying to change the usage of such words, I think any group being dehumanized wins these battles when we teach ourselves to not fall apart when words are used against us. Doing so robs them of their power.

      I'm not saying that's easy to do, either. However, it's a better goal to aim for than trying to get everyone else to walk on eggshells.

    18. Re:Let's Not Be Jerks by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      Not all people who are mentally ill have an inability to perceive reality. Many, if not most, simply just react differently to it. A sociopath understands what is going on, they can tell right or wrong, they just don't care. Indeed, if you look at it from an individual survival angle, they are actually quite adept at turning situations to their benefit, which you cannot easily do if you are unable to perceive reality.

      As you would suggest, the transgendered can easily see reality. A transgendered person could very well see that they are male, they'd very much prefer to be female, and since they cannot make that happen without someone else's assistance or cooperation, have a serious problem precisely since they can perceive reality. They realize that they would have more material benefits as a male than as a female, but they still don't care.

      We wouldn't give transgendered people surgery if they were "okay" in the bodies they had now. I don't get to have medically required plastic surgery because I don't like my nose, or I'm fat. You are put on HRT and get surgery precisely because you are NOT all right, or at least that is the theory. There are some people who have that taken care of early on, and so never become basket cases, but in theory, there would have to be some suggestion that they would have become that way eventually, if untreated, in order to warrant that sort of medical response.

    19. Re:Let's Not Be Jerks by pdabbadabba · · Score: 1

      Read your own definition more carefully: "not deviating from a norm, rule, or principle." This is not just a statistical definition; it's not coincidence that each of those terms has a normative meaning:

      Norms are things you should follow (or at least things people think you should follow): "a required standard; a level to be complied with or reached." Same with rules: "one of a set of explicit or understood regulations or principles governing conduct within a particular activity or sphere." Same with principles: "morally correct behavior and attitudes."

      If the word "normal" were only a statistical statement, I would (maybe) agree with you. But it isn't -- in exactly the way disclosed by that definition -- and we all know it. When a person is told that she isn't "normal" most people feel the sting (though sometimes, hopefully, the sting is masked or outweighed by pride). It is a statistical word loaded with cultural baggage. (Or perhaps the other way around.)

      "Cisgendered" is a funny word. I get it. I would feel goofy writing it, let alone speaking it out loud. But it seems to me that the right thing to do is to suck it up and feel goofy when the stakes are another person's dignity.

    20. Re:Let's Not Be Jerks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only people who took stats use the word in that sense. It is a pity, but to the vast majority, "abnormal" means "abomination". Language unfortunately evolves by bastardization.

    21. Re:Let's Not Be Jerks by Maelwryth · · Score: 1
      "Which is stupid PC crap. Being transgendered isn't normal.

      It's perfectly normal. Been happening for thousands of years. Your forgetting that these are people, not a bell curve.

      --
      I reserve the write to mangle english.
    22. Re:Let's Not Be Jerks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and who has been brainwashed. frankly he's probably been pumped full of hormones and psychotropics in us 'care' already, that made him want to be a woman. it could happen to you.

    23. Re:Let's Not Be Jerks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it is cisdistributed distribution you insensitive clod!

    24. Re:Let's Not Be Jerks by Velex · · Score: 1

      Good points. Thanks for the clarification. One example I find interesting is the way the word queer has changed from being derogative to now being a legitimate label that certain people use to refer to themselves (e.g. genderqueer, queer folk, or simply queer).

      The word normal is a vague word that can be a loaded term while simultaneously having a more objective statistical meaning. Normal can mean anything from socially acceptable to pedestrian to commonplace to usual to mode (of a set) and I'm sure tons of other senses I'm not thinking about. Unfortunately, feminism, psychology, and religion have done a very good job of painting transgendered identities as a sign of serious mental illness possibly indicating the potential for violent behavior. Those attitudes are changing, particularly in psychology and clinical protocols, but those attitudes still linger fairly strongly in the public mind. I agree it's self-defeating to be overly sensitive, but there is some merit to being circumspect to whether the word normal is being used as a weapon or as an observation.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Stay away entirely Feb 10 thru Feb 17! Close all tabs to prevent autorefresh!
  54. Name change? by Hognoxious · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bradley Womanning?

    --
    Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    1. Re:Name change? by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      Bradley Womanning?

      No, Chelsea Womanning.

  55. Re:He's not a woman by ganjadude · · Score: 1

    jackson tried it right?

    --
    have you seen my sig? there are many others like it but none that are the same
  56. Instant Section Eight by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Private Cowboy: He was jerkin off ten times a day.
    Private Eightball: No shit. At least ten times a day.
    Private Cowboy: Last week he was sent down to Da Nang to see the Navy
        head shrinker, and the crazy fucker starts jerking off in the
        waiting room. Instant Section Eight. He was just waiting for his
        papers to clear division.

  57. If i was going away for 35 years by cod3r_ · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd ask to be put in a woman's jail as well.

  58. Terminology Clarification? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So is Manning still gay? And if so, is she a lesbian?

    1. Re:Terminology Clarification? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Chelsea Manning is transgendered. If she is attracted to men, she is heterosexual.

      Quite simple.

  59. Free Chelsea Manning! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whatever he/she calls him/herself.

  60. Re:He's not a woman by wonkey_monkey · · Score: 1

    Sex is biologically determined.

    Androgen insensitivity syndrome

    --
    systemd is Roko's Basilisk.
  61. It's a matter of degree by QilessQi · · Score: 3, Informative

    Narcissistic Personality Disorder is narcissism taken to unhealthy extremes; it describes only about 1 percent of the population. One might argue that "being an asshole" affects a far, far larger percentage.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissistic_personality_disorder

    1. Re:It's a matter of degree by Seumas · · Score: 1

      Being an asshole doesn't affect me. It affects people around me. :)

    2. Re:It's a matter of degree by Harvey+Manfrenjenson · · Score: 2

      Narcissistic Personality Disorder is narcissism taken to unhealthy extremes; it describes only about 1 percent of the population.

      I was being flippant, but let me try to restate my point more seriously:

      There is something problematic with the idea of classifying a "personality disorder" as a type of medical disorder-- especially when the personality disorder is defined by qualities such as "arrogance" or "lack of empathy". The implication, which of course is never stated in so many words, is that "narcissism" is a condition similar to rheumatoid arthritis, and that we musn't blame those who are "afflicted" by it.

      (The diagnosis of "gender identity disorder" is problematic too, for a different reason. Most transgendered individuals would bristle at the idea that they have a medical disorder. They would point out that prior to 1980, homosexuality was classified as a medical disorder as well).

    3. Re:It's a matter of degree by tnk1 · · Score: 2

      Being gay isn't a disorder because there are no life-threatening physical characteristics to simply being gay. A gender disorder is like you inheriting a body part that could threaten your life due to it's very existence, like perhaps a third deformed leg which might have poor circulation and have a tendency to gangrene.

      In theory, being a female in a male body is so traumatic that said "mental" female cannot handle the repercussions of their own body. I'd say that's a disorder.

      You need to remember a "disorder" does not represent any judgement about a person morally. No one is going to argue with me if I hack off an extra limb that I believe could cause my death.

      That said, I am following the logic of what is actually suggested is the way gender disorders work. You have a physical mismatch in your physical and mental gender. That mismatch is so traumatic that it affects your normal functioning, so it is pathological. It's a condition which is believed to be best treated by altering an otherwise healthy body. I'd say that is pretty much a disorder. Let's not redefine medical terminology in our zeal to see that this terminology isn't used against people.

      If you have a real argument, your argument should be against the characterization of those afflicted with diseases or disorders as somehow immoral or unclean.

      The only other argument I would have is if they had characterized him has having this disorder, but he really didn't. However, it is pretty clear he believes that he does, and did so well before he ran into trouble with the Army. So whether or not the disorder is will cause a further disadvantage to him, that disorder was not fabricated by the prosecution for their benefit.

    4. Re:It's a matter of degree by QilessQi · · Score: 1

      I believe we're basically in agreement here. (And by the way, as I understand it, the term "gender identity disorder" was retired in favor of "gender dysphoria" for the DSM-V, exactly for the reasons you point out: it's no longer considered a disorder.)

      But we haven't really classified a personality trait as a medical disorder. Ordinary narcissism is still narcissism. Extreme narcissism is still narcissism. But extreme narcissism which with the following symptoms becomes highly problematic for the individual and those around them, and thus is distinguished as "Narcissistic Personality Disorder":

      - Expects to be recognized as superior and special, without superior accomplishments
      - Expects constant attention, admiration and positive reinforcement from others
      - Envies others and believes others envy him/her
      - Is preoccupied with thoughts and fantasies of great success, enormous attractiveness, power, intelligence
      - Lacks the ability to empathize with the feelings or desires of others
      - Is arrogant in attitudes and behavior
      - Has expectations of special treatment that are unrealistic

      I mean, we could call this "Delusional Disorder #521", but since the nature of the disorder is a super-magnified version of the narcissistic personality trait, "Narcissistic Personality Disorder" is a better mnemonic.

      And I do still blame people if they're being arrogant pricks, whether they fall into this class or not. The only difference to me is that if they've been diagnosed with NPD, they go from being "arrogant pricks who need to grow up" to "arrogant pricks who should be in therapy or on meds".

  62. Political Correctness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First rule of political correctness and sensitivity on Slashdot: Never say anything bad about a conservative. They will get offended and whine. And they have mod points. A lot of them.

  63. Oh Slashdot .. by Jon_E · · Score: 1

    you shall now be referred to as .\

    ambiguous Reuters report referencing a statement from the NBC Today pseudo-news talk show, that has very little now to do with tech? where are your standards now?

    1. Re:Oh Slashdot .. by Anarchduke · · Score: 1

      i think it would be a ".o" instead of a ".\", considering chelsea wants gender reassignment.

      --
      who prays for Satan? Who in 18 centuries has had the humanity to pray for the 1 sinner that needed it most? ~Mark Twain
  64. Boo, slashdot was:Re:Bravo, Washington Post by damn_registrars · · Score: 1

    I read about this on WaPo about half an hour ago, where I noticed they did an incredibly intelligent and thoughtful thing: they disabled comments. Now if only that were possible on /.

    The right thing here for slashdot would have been to not feature this story at all. It isn't about technology in any meaningful way. This was run just to draw eyeballs in and get people excited in the discussion. Being as pretty well nobody here is discussing the technical aspects of what Manning has been sentenced to 37 years in jail for, it seems to have worked well for its intended purpose.

    --
    Damn_registrars has no butt-hole. Damn_registrars has no use for a butt-hole.
  65. Sick Freak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Typical over dramatic pillow biter looking for sympathy and attention. Can't wait until he's out of the news, but not likely as the gay agenda is top priority for the media.

    1. Re:Sick Freak by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      THE GAY AGENDA

      XD

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:Sick Freak by Crimey+McBiggles · · Score: 1

      There wouldn't be a "gay agenda" (as a concept, not an actual agenda) if there weren't bigots running about with an [actual] anti-gay agenda.

      --
      Crimey
  66. So you like homosexual rape AND murder, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...you supposedly got something against raping children?

    Sounds to me like the talk of a wannabe rapist of little boys who lacks the balls to put his dick where his mind is, so he's hiding it from everyone and most of all from himself.
    And all the hiding of your true nature is making you suicidal, which is why you're projecting your wish to murder the part of yourself you find to be "dirty" onto imaginary child rapists in imaginary prisons inside your mind.

  67. And the plan is complete. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They worked him over really good. Not only did he say he was sorry about doing anything and everything...

    They came up with the perfect way to discredit him forever.

    And make what he did seem like just yet another 'crazy' thing. Nobody will ever take him serious again.

    Ahhh american freedom. The finest punishment we can think up.

  68. Bradley Manning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no offense to Bradley Manning, but he kinda looks like a woman in the photos that I've seen already. dude just needs some makeup and a skirt. not trying to stereotype, just saying

    1. Re:Bradley Manning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you don't want to offend CHELSEA why don't you call her by her real name and say SHE and GIRL not he and dude?
      Just saying.

    2. Re:Bradley Manning by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no offense to Bradley Manning, but he kinda looks like a woman in the photos that I've seen already. dude just needs some makeup and a skirt. not trying to stereotype, just saying

      Many pre-transition transsexual people look gender-variant. I did. Many transsexual people have physical characteristics of their identified sex. I do. My body proportions are in the feminine range (small torso, long arms and legs), and I have narrow shoulders, without the guy "triangle" shape that so many trans women end up with. My relative finger lengths are in the female range.

      There are lots of pictures me in my teens where it's not immediately obvious if the person in the pictures is a boy or a girl. People often thought I was a girl, and it was nothing to do with hair length. Nothing new here.

    3. Re:Bradley Manning by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Me, I've got the triangle and I'm not currently transitioning, so I look like a short slightly chubby nerdy guy with a ponytail. But yeah, lots of trans-people (Including some crossdressers) look gender variant in "guy-mode".

      I get "sirred" now more than I did because I toned down the "slip sliding into androgyny" for work purposes.

      I've been female pronouned at drivers license renewal, while shopping, even on the phone which I consider hilarious because to me I don't sound "girly" at all. Though I've been told I tend to use a more female style enunciation and word choices.

      And yes, it happened a LOT more when I was a young slip of a thing.

  69. Swore it was an Onion headline by GameboyRMH · · Score: 2

    With this timing, I had to re-read the headline in my RSS reader 3 times to be sure it wasn't from The Onion. Apparently this isn't new information but it was the first I'd heard of it.

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  70. Nonsense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also bullshit.

    1. Re:Nonsense. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Officer: You are under arrest for torturing and murdering 47 grade school children.

      Suspect: You can't judge me!

      AC @10:12AM: Who are we to judge?

      AC @11:19AM: Yeah, who are we to judge?!

      To repeat: Only a sociopath never judges. When liberals declare "who are we to judge?" what they are really saying is "I don't like the fact that other people think less of me because of the way that I behave and I really want to shut up anyone who's values differ from mine." Unfortunately, liberals control the educational system from top to bottom and have indoctrinated gullible students to believe that it is virtuous to be "non-judgmental" and that liberals get to define what does and what does not get judged.

  71. Actually, yes, she is by QilessQi · · Score: 1

    Gender reassignment surgery helps someone "be who they are", and works very well.

    If it helps, you can think of gender reassignment in the same way as a prosthetic for people born with missing legs or arms. Those people could "live in the real world" with their disability, or we can give them a way to achieve what they desire.

    As for your "black/white" example: most people with dark skin *like* who they are, *like* their skin color, and don't see themselves as "suffering" directly because of it. Rather, their suffering is because some racist whites are *making* them suffer needlessly. It's a different thing entirely.

    1. Re:Actually, yes, she is by CronoCloud · · Score: 1

      Gender reassignment surgery helps someone "be who they are", and works very well.

      Hell, Magnus Hirschfeld figured out a century ago that the best treatment was for transpeople to live as their preferred gender.

  72. Let the discrediting begin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When the state stoops to digging up old 'dirt' on people, you can rest assured that they are truly afraid of them/really DO have something to hide. This only re-affirms Manning's position.

    Also, this was taken from a private conversation with a doctor. This is low, low, low.

    Anybody who falls for this is a complete fool who deserves to live in a fascist surveillance state.

  73. In prison, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He'll be the pie.

  74. Reprogramming therapy? by Carnivore24 · · Score: 1

    He must have gone through some intense brain zapping and heavy drugs to start thinking and wanting to do this.

    1. Re:Reprogramming therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SHE was transgendered her whole life. That's the point of being transgendered. Has nothing to do with drugs and brain zapping.

  75. Really? This GUY is nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So HE wants to be a SHE.... This is just the latest manifestation of HIS delusional quest for self importance.

    HE is a convicted felon looking at 35 years of confinement crimes that HE wants to make into something other than what they are. If HE wants to pay for HIS treatments, HE can, AFTER he gets out. If HE wants *me* to pay for them while HE rots in jail, HE can take a hike.

    I don't know if HE is trying to build an insanity defense and try to get his sentence reduced, but HIS whole mind set is NUTS. Maybe not at the "HE'S insane" level, but surely at the "HE'S NUTS!" level. You know the type, not totally insane, but they sure have a foot on that side of the fence. This GUY needs to shut HIS trap and *own* the consequences for HIS crimes.

    Go to jail BRADLY, Go Directly to Jail, don't pass GO, Don't collect $200. When you get out, THEN you can do what you want (and can afford). For your sake, I suggest you drop this "I want to be a girl" until you get out. Good Luck DUDE! In the mean time, don't pick up the soap.

  76. But he doesn't have a womb!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Where's the fetus gonna gestate?!

  77. Other wish. by dohzer · · Score: 1

    (S)he probably walso ants to live as a woman that isn't in prison, but we can't always get what we want.

  78. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are liberals in the U.S. government? Where?

  79. Re:Really? This GIRL is not nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of self entitled asshole are you? It's not up to you to decide if Chelsea Manning considers her a woman and as such deserves to be called by her chosen name and the proper pronoun.

    You must be very insecure in your own sexuality if you think dissing someone makes you stronger or superior. It does not.

  80. Kill (the character of) the Messenger by bareman · · Score: 1

    Yes, we should all focus on really important things like Bradley's gender identity and not wasting any more time on all that trivial information about what the government is doing: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contents_of_the_United_States_diplomatic_cables_leak

    Good to see priorities are in order.

    1. Re:Kill (the character of) the Messenger by dmt0 · · Score: 1

      He gets tortured for over a year.
      He gives a statement in court saying he's sorry for everything he's done.
      He does complete self character assassination saying he wants to change gender.
      Psychiatrist confirms he has a set of disorders.
      Damage control in action.

  81. Christine Jorgensen by frank249 · · Score: 1

    Christine Jorgensen in 1952 was an American who was the first person to become widely known in the United States for having sex reassignment surgery—in this case, male to female. She had served in the Army before going to Sweden for the sex change operation. I think it was Bob Hope who quiped that "Christine Jorgensen was the first guy to go abroad and come back a broad."

    --

    Today's vices may be tomorrow's virtues.

  82. Re:But she doesn't have a womb!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So do millions of genetically cis-women. Having a womb isn't what defines a woman.

    Or would you like to propose that all women undergoing a hysterectomy or have a genetic defect shall be mandatory be forced to be man? No.

  83. Worst prisons in the world? by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    What about France, Hong Kong, Venezuela, Israel, etc...?

    Oh, and it's five US prisons. ADX Florence, Riker Island, San Quentin, Alcatraz, and Attica. Did you review the list? The including of US prison ADX Florence Supermax looks sterile, compared to the preceding burned & gutted cell in Venezuela and followed by a picture of blindfolded inmates in a Syrian prison which had 2.4k inmates executed 3 decades ago.

    I have to say that I question the 'merits' by which US prisons are on the list. 'Many suicides' doesn't really have the bite of '2.4k executed by presidential order', or '111 killed in a riot'. Heck, San Quentin mentions that it holds 4k prisoners and has the largest death row in the USA, but doesn't mention WHY it's otherwise among the worst prisons in the world. I'd have to say that US prisons probably made the list more due to ease of research and the need to have 'USA' in there somewhere. They even had to reach further back into the past.

    Also, multiple prisons from Venezuela, Brazil and elsewhere are on the list

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:Worst prisons in the world? by HornWumpus · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Alcatraz hasn't been a prison for about 50 years. It is a tourist trap, and you don't want to drop the soap anywhere nearby.

      Whoever made the list had an agenda.

      --
      John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  84. Re:He's not a woman by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Androgen insensitivity syndrome, the 1 case in 130,000 that does occur, is also biology.

  85. Sounds like false flag to me. by Chas · · Score: 2

    Honestly,

    It seems like this tidbit of info, coming when it has, is pitch perfect to make people stop listening to the Bradley Manning situation and turn the whole fiasco into a bad joke.

    Isn't that just TERRIBLY convenient for the government?

    --


    Chas - The one, the only.
    THANK GOD!!!
    1. Re:Sounds like false flag to me. by Nyder · · Score: 1

      Honestly,

      It seems like this tidbit of info, coming when it has, is pitch perfect to make people stop listening to the Bradley Manning situation and turn the whole fiasco into a bad joke.

      Isn't that just TERRIBLY convenient for the government?

      agree, I have a hard time believing this. It's sounding to me the government is using whatever means to justify the sentence. "See, he think he's god, and *gasp* he wants to be a woman!"

       

      --
      Be seeing you...
    2. Re:Sounds like false flag to me. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree with this... Government knows that people still readily don't accept this kind of situation and most of the general public treat this as insanity. So his voice will be less audible.
      This is something similar to what happened to Alan Turning where they forced him to take male hormone injection.

  86. Propaganda? by imag0 · · Score: 2

    The timing seems... odd to me. Right when people are using this guy as a hero and poster boy for whistleblowing and BAM. Try to make him look "a little off in the head" instead.

    Just seems rather PSYOP-flavored story. I'm probably wrong, but it feels that way.

  87. BCD != DD by Firethorn · · Score: 2

    I'll just chime in that while it's probably 45% of jobs TOTAL, a BCD(Bad Conduct Discharge) is different and actually better than a Dishonorable. Most of them fixed on the point that people with one are felons, so any positions that ban felons also ban DDs.

    A BCD is a misdemeanor level discharge, a DD is a felony level. I'm not a military lawyer, but that's how I understand it.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
    1. Re:BCD != DD by bmk67 · · Score: 1

      Not exactly. Many states treat a DD as equivalent to a felony conviction. To get a DD, you have to do something the military considers pretty heinous. A BCD can be given after serving time in military prison for some very serious crimes, not all of which are misdemeanors. It's up to the discretion of the court-martial.

    2. Re:BCD != DD by Firethorn · · Score: 1

      "Many states"? I'd say ALL states. It's a federal level felony conviction. BCD might have confinement beforehand - but the question there is 'how long'? Remember, the standard rule is that felonies are possible confinement of more than a year, misdemeanors a year or less. And yes, even at that standard you can commit some very serious crimes.

      The mapping isn't exact, no, but like I said, that's my non-lawyer understanding of it.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
  88. Chelsea Vs. Breanna by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chelsea? I like his other female name better, http://dailyentertainmentnews.com/breaking-news/chelsea-manning-bradley-mannings-new-name-living-as-a-woman/ I pretty much doubt Fort Leavenworth will give him anything, and without sex change surgery he will have to serve his time with male inmates

  89. Message to whistle blowers: We'll do more than... by bussdriver · · Score: 1

    Risk of jail? Worth it; it's for the good of mankind.
    Risk of being so messed up I want to change genders? ah... somebody else can leak it.

  90. Re:He's not a woman by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    Heh, missed the original post and thought "Androgen insensitivity is still biological!", but went back and saw the AC mentioned 'determined by DNA', so you have a point. ;)

    Yes, I'll consider a person with total androgen insensitivity a woman. It can be more complicated if the insensitivity isn't total, there's a surprising amount of grey area.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  91. Distraction Therapy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Govt Guy 1: What news article could we put out that would completely distract and take attention away from all the NSA/Spying stuff while simultaneously turning some of the issues into complete Enquirer nonsense?.

    Govt Guy 2: Lets make Manning into a transgender sympathy case and totally turn this issue off into left field so people forget the real issue.

    Govt Guy 1: That's brilliant, they'll eat it up.

  92. but it was working by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually it was working for Bradly, that's why they were in process of kicking is ass out when the narcissist decided he didn't like that kind of behavior.

    I guess the narcissist private who was being booted out thought he deserved more respect than he got, and decided to get back as his boss.

  93. Re:Really? This GIRL is not nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What kind of self entitled asshole are you? It's not up to you to decide if Chelsea Manning considers her a woman and as such deserves to be called by her chosen name and the proper pronoun.

    Most likely, you're responding to another sock-puppet of some paid propagandist who has been employed with the explicit task of helping to create enough grass-roots noise to establish fertile ground for this smear campaign to take root.

    There's a tipping point in terms of herd mentality; when enough people believe something, everybody tends to go along with it.

    This soulless asshole is helping to destroy the world. And the karmic debt for that sin will be paid in full.

  94. Nice Try, but fail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Nice try.

    Nice try, and it might have worked; had Manning not released thousands of documents he never read as well as evidence of wrong doing.

    And since he dumped those thousands of other documents, he loses his moral high-ground, and this statement is just a reflection of the same narcissism that he had when he released those thousands of other documents to begin with.

    So fail.

  95. Scripted? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this story straight out of central casting??? This is beyond belief. Beyond the grade school humor, look at the whole thing. It is so out there that it doesn't even make sense if you look beyond the surface, a place the media doesn't go and doesn't want readers to go

  96. Re:Really? This GIRL is not nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF? Remove your tin foil hat.

    Chelsea's gender dysphoria is well known from before the trial. This has nothing to do with propaganda or a smear campaign.

    Why should it be a smear campaign? If YOU think it's something "dirty" is solely YOUR problem, not Chelsea's.

  97. A full quote from Manning by Iridium_Hack · · Score: 1
    I've put this in once already - and it appears to have gotten taken out for some reason. interesting. Here it is again. . . a full quote from Bradley Manning to the president, asking for a pardon. Doesn't sound like the same person. Here is a quote you might not have seen: "When these cries of patriotism drown out any logically based dissension, it is usually the American soldier that is given the order to carry out some ill-conceived mission." Manning's statement, in full:

    The decisions that I made in 2010 were made out of a concern for my country and the world that we live in. Since the tragic events of 9/11, our country has been at war. We’ve been at war with an enemy that chooses not to meet us on any traditional battlefield, and due to this fact we’ve had to alter our methods of combating the risks posed to us and our way of life.

    I initially agreed with these methods and chose to volunteer to help defend my country. It was not until I was in Iraq and reading secret military reports on a daily basis that I started to question the morality of what we were doing.

    It was at this time I realized that (in) our efforts to meet the risk posed to us by the enemy, we have forgotten our humanity.

    We consciously elected to devalue human life both in Iraq and Afghanistan. When we engaged those that we perceived were the enemy, we sometimes killed innocent civilians. Whenever we killed innocent civilians, instead of accepting responsibility for our conduct, we elected to hide behind the veil of national security and classified information in order to avoid any public accountability.

    In our zeal to kill the enemy, we internally debated the definition of torture. We held individuals at Guantanamo for years without due process. We inexplicably turned a blind eye to torture and executions by the Iraqi government. And we stomached countless other acts in the name of our war on terror.

    Patriotism is often the cry extolled when morally questionable acts are advocated by those in power. When these cries of patriotism drown out any logically based dissension, it is usually the American soldier that is given the order to carry out some ill-conceived mission.

    Our nation has had similar dark moments for the virtues of democracy — the Trail of Tears, the Dred Scott decision, McCarthyism, and the Japanese-American internment camps — to mention a few. I am confident that many of the actions since 9/11 will one day be viewed in a similar light.

    As the late Howard Zinn once said, “There is not a flag large enough to cover the shame of killing innocent people.”

    I understand that my actions violated the law; I regret if my actions hurt anyone or harmed the United States. It was never my intent to hurt anyone. I only wanted to help people. When I chose to disclose classified information, I did so out of a love for my country and a sense of duty to others.

    If you deny my request for a pardon, I will serve my time knowing that sometimes you have to pay a heavy price to live in a free society.

    I will gladly pay that price if it means we could have a country that is truly conceived in liberty and dedicated to the proposition that all women and men are created equal.

  98. It's the reason for the whole Manning drama by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No offense to transpeople, but why is this on Slashdot? I don't give a fuck if he wants to be a man or a woman in jail.

    His gender identity was, according to his own defense team, the reason he was disgruntled with the military (understandably, especially since this was before Don't-Ask-Don't-Tell was repealed, and he was almost certainly treated like shit by homophobic soldiers and command) and this "affected his judgement."

    If you read the chat transcripts, he is practically gloating about how, despite the military discharging him for being genderqueer, he still has access to classified files and can see with whatever he wants.

    In short, this is not irrelevant media clickbait. This is why Manning did what he did: He was treated badly by the army, and he retaliated by disclosing shit-tons of information he had access to. None of this selfless whistleblower nonsense the Slashdot community has rallied around.

  99. Of Course, You have to wonder, by Iridium_Hack · · Score: 1

    With no previous history on this before now, plus holding him for several years, naked, with torture - - - do they have anything they could use against him (ie. blackmail)? To get this kind of confession from him after being sentenced makes little sense. And if the army were to say he had gender emotional problems before he was sentenced. . . . well if that is the case, why did they hire/put him in such a sensitive position? A lot of stuff doesn't make sense here.

    1. Re:Of Course, You have to wonder, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What do you mean "no previous history". She already stated the desire to live as woman in the chat protocols that lead to her conviction. (before the trial)
      It was very well known.

  100. A New One On Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, I've heard of privates being demoted, but this is new territory.

  101. Why is it trolling? by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    What you're assuming is that he really wants to be a woman.

    Just as easily, he could CLAIM to want to be a woman. He knows the military will not do this operation, but if he convinces the physiologists well enough perhaps he could be assigned to a womans prison anyway. This would have all kinds of benefits for him, the chief one being he would be in a prison not full of guys far larger and stronger than him that all hated him. If for no other reason alone that would be worth the pretense.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
    1. Re:Why is it trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not sure that he'd be better off in the female prison. They may not be on average stronger than a man, but women are plenty mean enough. And there are likely women in those prisons who are plenty able to hand Manning his ass, even without HRT.

    2. Re:Why is it trolling? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Living as a woman for 35 years when you're not on any level can be its own kind of hell. That's *why* trans people go to such trouble in the first place.

      And if he's caught...

  102. Good for him by Meeni · · Score: 1

    Good for him, but why should I (or we) care ? This is people mags material now.

  103. Ahhh... now that explains everything... by Pav · · Score: 1

    ...the fact that a soldier with gender issues was the only one with the balls to report those coverups... nowTHAT'd threaten some fragile masculinity.

  104. Correct Gender Pronouns. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chelsea has asked to be referred to by her preferred name and pronouns. Why is this so hard? Even the Rueters article only uses her name and her correct pronouns when they are directly quoting her.

    If you can't respect this request from a woman who is a national hero, I weep for all the other trans folk in the world (like me).

  105. Re:Really? This GIRL is not nuts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF? Remove your tin foil hat.

    Chelsea's gender dysphoria is well known from before the trial. This has nothing to do with propaganda or a smear campaign.

    Why should it be a smear campaign? If YOU think it's something "dirty" is solely YOUR problem, not Chelsea's.

    I put 'dirty' in quotes for a reason. It's a convention of written language which denotes that the value of the quoted term is not agreed with by the quoting author, but is used in order to expedite communication by referring to the same common terms used in the discussion without having to re-invent modes of expression. It's also done, (as in this case), to supply additional contrary opinion by the author. ie, sarcasm.

    In your defense, it's not something everybody is quick enough to grasp. Don't feel too bad. Maybe you hadn't had your coffee yet at the time of reading.

    As for propaganda and smearing. . , if media focusing on a person's sexual orientation is not an attempt to misdirect attention from the truly important matter, (War Crimes), then the media is failing where it has classically succeeded in the past. There's no reason to believe they've suddenly gone limp in that department.

    As for Tin-Foil?

    Only the young and the woefully unlearned (and perpetually afraid of being laughed at) hold to the official version of reality these days. Blind cowards.

    There is more than enough compelling information available, even through the main stream news, to paint an accurate picture of The Way Things Are. Those who don't look are either young and forgivably ignorant, or old and mentally/spiritually infirm.

  106. What a dick. by johnlcallaway · · Score: 1

    Oh .. wait .... nevermind.....

    --
    I rarely read replies, it's my opinion and if you thought about your opinion a little more, I'm OK with that.
  107. It is not gay. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    WTF? Gender Identity is a mental problem. It is like those white kids that want to be gangstas except they are not being turned black because they get over it by the time they have the money. Subcultural identity problem vs a gender identity problem, both would be confusing the physical with the mental.

    I would say it is more of a mental condition because for healthy people it would be a phase and then they'd accept reality and just be themselves the way they are. gay or whatever.

    Your gender is static. It is DNA. Manning is a male no matter what. One could argue that man and woman are separate from male and female; but I am not such a person.

  108. Disqualified for security clearance ... by drnb · · Score: 1

    I do believe he was struggling with gender identity issues before this whole ordeal.

    Gay or straight should not matter for a security clearance. Identity should not matter for a security clearance. However ***currently struggling*** with a major psychological issue should disqualify someone from holding a security clearance. Did Manning receive a pass due to political correctness?

    1. Re:Disqualified for security clearance ... by tnk1 · · Score: 1

      He probably received a pass due to: "We need manpower, just fucking pass him."

  109. This Day on Slashdot 2009 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://science.slashdot.org/story/09/08/22/1840229/how-to-prove-someone-is-female

  110. The Final Solution by Baldrson · · Score: 1

    To the "How can a nerd get a date?" question.

  111. So now ... by somarilnos · · Score: 1

    ...the conservatives will jump ship on the 'defending Manning' bandwagon. The only force stronger than supporting the leak of classified information is pure, unbridled, fear of what they don't understand.

  112. What a fag. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not that I had much respect for this guy in the first place, but whatever respect I did have in terms of putting illegal government actions in the spotlight are now gone. Have fun with Bubba, Manning... you might want to pull a new, more feminine last name out of your ass too the next time you get a load blown up there in prison.

  113. Re: Use or over-use of word "normal" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ( AC post, sorry don't have / . account and never really reply to online discussions )
    Re: Use or over-use of word "normal"
    I replied to a post above regarding the use of "normal". In that case the (Score:5) post seemed to indicate Manning should be denied surgery because he's/she's "not normal".
    I understand what you're saying about "stupid PC crap" and transgendered not being "normal".
    However, as you yourself point out, "deviating from a norm" is "not normal".

    I might be wrong here, but I'd guess in a general sense you fit into most "normal" categories (hence the aversion to stupid PC crap).
    I propose that for a moment you put yourself in other "non-normal shoes" for moment to see how using the 'accurate' term could be seen.

    [Re-posting from my examples above]
    In the USA, for example, it's not "normal" to be:
      blind, black/asian/etc, gay, born without a limb, albino, mentally disabled (hmmm...make that - severly mentally disabled), muslim, cos-play D&D fanatic, over 6' tall, etc...

    Is it just "stupid PC crap" to avoid saying -
        [after black/mormon/albino guest exist TV interview] - "Well, that guys not normal, but he made for an excellent interview"
        [speaking to someone who's lost a limb/brain injury w/mental impairment] - "...even tho' you're not normal any more, how are you doing after the injury?"
    Would said persons be "offended for no reason" by the use of "normal" in describing what they are not?

    I'd venture to guess that most everyone, by some measure, isn't normal... so avoiding calling out said "abnormality" in polite conversation/discourse... is not simply "stupid PC crap".

    My 2-cents...

  114. re: us vs. them mentality by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'd agree with most of your statements, but only because (referring to the USA at least) our legal system and law enforcement system have become corrupt enough that it's quite profitable to keep the prisons as full as possible. When you have mandatory sentencing including jail time for victimless drug offenses, for example, it means you're definitely going to lock a lot of people up who don't mean any harm and are in all probability, pretty decent folks.

    IMO, if the system worked properly, you wouldn't waste the taxpayer's money jailing anyone for such crimes as prostitution or drug possession. You'd also not have felony crimes with prison time for consensual "sex crimes" (such as an older teenager having sex with a 15 year old minor).

    If you started reserving the prison time for the violent offenders, with the occasional sentence thrown in for the repeated theft of large dollar amounts -- then I think it really would be much more of an "us vs. them" situation that was warranted. Govt. should only be locking people up if they pose a true danger to society ... not because it's viewed as a "good, strict punishment" that will "make people think twice about committing a crime again".

  115. Trans-What?? by CryptoJones · · Score: 0

    I am totally for gay rights. If two dudes wanna bang, and they are both consenting, more power to them. But transgender people are just fucking nuts. You want to be a girl and you turned out to be a guy? Too fucking bad. I wish I was born rich instead of good looking. But them the breaks.

    --
    "Chance favors the prepared mind." ~Me
  116. What did they do to him ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First, he told us that he regret "hurting the USA", now he wants to be a woman ?

    I just think he got brainwashed hard by the Feds, tortured, tourmented, etc...

    Is he still okay to go to jail ?

  117. Wouldn't you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given the reportedly atrocious conditions and the getting-ass-raped-daily-ness of the US men's prison system ... wouldn't *you* think of this as a possible out? Would changing your gender get you into a women's prison?

  118. Re:fetal alcohol syndrome by HornWumpus · · Score: 1

    Didn't notice until you pointed it out.

    Manning has a very weak labia on his upper lip (Thats the 'cleft' in the upper lip, right under the nose, not the fun labia an actual woman has). Classic sign of fetal alcohol syndrome.

    --
    John McAfee 'It was like that time I hired that Bangkok prostitute; to do my taxes, while I fucked my accountant'
  119. Prove it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reuters is no different than the Associated Press. Blieve none of what you hear and half of what you see.

    When I see a NEW interview with him saying that, or his parents saying that, THEN i'll believe it. Not until.

    Obama knows the people are angry about his treatment, and we see him as a hero, so Obama and other globalist are trying to discredit him, any way they can.

    1. Re:Prove it. by okcdan · · Score: 1

      I agree 100%. He went beyond just pissing off and embarrassing people. I was surprised at his relatively light sentence, and then it "came out" that he wants to live as a woman and be referred to as Chelsea. I don't buy this load of shit either.

      --
      D.
  120. Chelsea 35, Bush 0 by Geste · · Score: 2

    What, 600 comments and nobody says how friggin' lopsided this is? A person with big personal issues -- but not a war criminal -- gets 35, while war criminals walk the streets unmolested, get thousands for speaking engagements and even get in our Face the Nation. Bradley, Chelsea, whatever. Not fair.

  121. Obligatory Monty Python by msobkow · · Score: 1

    "I want to be one. From now on, I want you to call me 'Loretta'."

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  122. Worth Watching by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Here is an example of a very articulate army officer in the Australian Army who is transgender.
    It is very interesting and, I think, quite moving.

    I offer this as information for those, like me, who are not transgender, but wish to gain some understanding of the complications and difficulties of transition.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wPsYWN-mW-s

    The fact that Lieutenant Colonel Cate McGregor is, like Manning, in the army makes it apposite.

  123. "HER history"... LOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You brainwashed idiot. Hilarious. The Jew could tell you the moon is made of cheese and you'd believe them.

    Still, better not THINK too hard, or the Jews' 'magic spell' will be broken...

    I laugh every time I see cretins referring to men who have, or are going to have, their penises and testicles cut off, as 'she'.

    These people are insane, and the problem is in their MINDS, not their bodies. But what the T.V. says is more important to you than the long term wellbeing of these insane people, so you go along with the Jewish perverts who enjoy cutting off men's penises and testicles, - after all, circumcision is only so much of a 'turn on' for these monsters.

    Just have a good, hard long think about what circumcision IS, and WHO thought it up, and WHY. Presumably most people here know that 'god' doesn't exist, and if there is a 'god', he/she/it certainly doesn't 'talk to people' and get them to write down in a book that they 'must' be allowed to cut off part of a baby boy's penis, and suck the blood out with their mouths...

    Didn't the filthy Jews tell you about that?

  124. Probably not by forrie · · Score: 0

    I think he'll be in for an unpleasant surprise in prison. There's nothing in the law that says they must accommodate one's sexual deviance, or provide a fashion catwalk. Just sayin'.

  125. Only pussy he gonna get for next 35 years by Yakasha · · Score: 1

    nt

  126. Only in America! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Commit a crime to get health care... what does that say about a country?

    1. Re:Only in America! by MightyYar · · Score: 1

      You may have noticed that we've been working on that lately...

      Also, it sounds like maybe the guy was kind of being a dipshit. Medicaid probably would have covered his operation, but I don't know the details. The problem with Medicaid is you have to be destitute, so many people go bankrupt over their major medical problems.

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
  127. Damn, man, what did they DO to you in Room 101? by The+Archon+V2.0 · · Score: 1

    I mean... wow.

    1. Re:Damn, man, what did they DO to you in Room 101? by Swampash · · Score: 1

      My first thought too.

      He's had three years of solitary confinement in the custody of forces determined to break him.

      If he can remember his own name after that I'd be impressed.

  128. Penal system anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No one has sex in prison, check. thank you for clarifying that.

  129. Brother Loretta? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, he should have the right to bear children.

  130. Narrcisim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Narricism seems like a thoroughly unwarranted slam in this case and a major case of projection on the government's part.

  131. its not fair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the taxpayers should not be paying for medically unnecessary procedures while people who work 2 jobs cannot afford to go to the dentist.

  132. funny by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 1

    I was just thinking yesterday that he gave the impression of someone that might have a little to tell but I wouldn't ask. Now it is confirmed. Is it okay to be straight and have a gaydar?

  133. if he has a sex change by ILongForDarkness · · Score: 0

    Would they let him stay in a women's prison? That might make it worth it: I'd imagine you are much less likely to have an unwanted rear entry when you take penises out of the equation.

  134. He's was a nut job; his bosses should be in prison by BlueCoder · · Score: 1

    Manning is a confused nut. He obviously had and has issues. I could theoretically admired him and condemned him before I found out he was a nut case. (He's not a nut for wanting to be a women; that confusion is just part of his problems.) I have to put blame of those under whom he worked. You don't let a nut job (confused and troubled individual) handle and process classified information. You supervise your employees. I believe his commanders should be the ones in jail.

    He was working with classified info. The moment he said he didn't want to be in the army his security clearance should have been revoked and he should have been moved to non secure work. It's really that simple.

    P.S. I remember my short stint in the military a long time ago. They kicked me out because I couldn't do enough pushups. My MOS was 74D. I would like had the same access as manning or probably even better since all he did was have access at a terminal. I wanted to serve, had skills far beyond my MOS training and I knew my place and yet they kicked me out because my body didn't respond to traditional physical training.

  135. It's not a TripAdvisor review. by Comboman · · Score: 1

    To be fair, the US prisons on that list were elaborate clean facilities, unlike most of the rest.

    Yes, the US prisons are clean and in good repair compared to the ones in poor third-world countries. But guess what? US schools and hospitals are also clean and in good repair compared to the ones in poor third-world countries. This isn't a review of hotels on TripAdvisor. The prisons are being judged for how humanly they treat the inmates, not whether or not they have bed bugs.

    --
    Support Right To Repair Legislation.
  136. Absolutely it's life threatening by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    Suicide rates among gender dysphorics are horrifying.

  137. Brain settings by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    Zhou et. al. (1997) found brain areas that differ in size between men and women, and which had the typical female size in trans women.

    Rational questions remain, but add that to the experiences of trans people who know their mismatched gender all the way down and can't change it, and it's a coherent theory.

  138. Joining the military is a common pattern by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    People trying to live according to their below-the-neck settings and override their brain settings often try the discipline and fixed roles of a military career.

  139. The case for saying "she" by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    All our interactions with Manning will be with Manning's brain, not with Manning's chromosomes.

    If the brain setting is "female", then "she" makes sense logically.

  140. Exactly right by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    Gender dysphoria can start in early childhood.

  141. Etiquette alert by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    Many trans people use the word "tranny" among themselves, and many experience it as a vicious slur if it comes from a stranger. It's best avoided in general.

  142. Human bodies are technology by Beryllium+Sphere(tm) · · Score: 1

    I had to give myself a crash course when a large number of trans* people suddenly landed in my online life. Human gender identity turns out to be at least as complicated as anything else in biology and the details are fascinating.

  143. Catch-all gender by TinyTiger8 · · Score: 1

    I am sorry to defecate on anyone's parade, but nobody seems to question Manning's ability to actually be a woman? Womanhood is not a default state, and not a catch-all for men's failure to have a workable and broad enough definition of themselves. Cutting off your dick does not make you a woman. If he is unable to deal with his male body, what makes you think that he will be able to deal with his female make-over? Of course for the next 35 years he won't have to put up with the issues of rape (well, maybe not), -17% average salary for the same job, and never even being heard again on technical and scientific subject-matters. And of course his make-over does not include bearing and raising children either. Woman- schwoman.

  144. America is no place for pedos, or males. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Old religions had child marraige. It isn't deviant to like young girls, except of the American religion.
    Deuteronomy 22 28-29, hebrew. Rape a young girl, keep her (pay her father).
    2 Samual 12, bathsheba was a "little lamb" when uriah took her in as his own.

    Islam with ashia at 6.
    Eastern religions with ying/yang dichotomy (male and female, old and new, etc)

    You should convert to one of these religions and leave america.
    America is no place for a male.
    Especially a heritic or dissident.
    It is a woman's cuntry through and through.