So what do you want to do? Free all the non-violent offenders and find more appropriate sentences? Can you imagine the headlines?
"Trump Frees Tens of Thousands of White Men"
You cannot do anything in America if it disproportionately effects one race. Incarcerating non-violent offenders helps slightly to fix the prison gap. Treating non-violent criminals differently than violent ones is putting Black Americans at the back of the bus.
When incorrect opinions are illegal, and all content a person sees is owned by 100 international billionaires street protests are the one democratic act left.
The average Human, which is honestly not that far away from the average FB account holder, does not even make anywhere close to $1000 a year.
With all the scams FB et al. have going on in stone age societies I would not expect the average yearly salary of personal FB accounts to be much over $1000.
Where did anything indicate that? I have yet to see any study that looked at the ability of people who have passed the google interviews and compared it to the failures. The only thing this study seems to indicate is that Google seems to value education perfectly in the interview process.
The reason those dogs have bad genetics is because idiots are breeding them on mass and are completely unwilling to put any effort or money into producing better dogs. Why would these same puppy mills be willing to spend any money or time genetically editing these puppies genes which will undoubtedly be more expensive than just developing a breeding plan and testing your dogs for fitness?
The only people who will use genetic editing would be the ones already producing superior super dogs that win world tournaments and outfit the world's police and military. But this is unlikely to happen. We already have the technology, the even more profitable world of Horse Breeding have long since outlawed fake horses, and the same thing would happen in dogs if they tried it.
destroying their enthusiasm and vitality by CRIPPLING THEM WITH DEBT?
This is nonsense, half these students would not even be participating in the economy if they did not have debt to repay. More and more people are not getting married, many do not even have girlfriends, men have no reason to work if they are not raising a family or wooing a girl. In parts of the world the number of working aged men with girlfriends have dropped below 50%, imagine if the government had not convinced the majority of these men to saddle themselves with something else that requires huge sums of money on a continuing basis.
When you have a student body of 50,000 students, you need a lot of administrative staff to manage that.
You seem to be saying that the more students you have the greater the cost PER STUDENT the administration is going to be. This simply extremely non intuitive, typically you see saving in scale, and if the inverse was true you would simply see Universities fragment into smaller universities.
What we are seeing here is when you put the administrators in charge they hire more administrators, inflate administrators budgets, and continually vote to increase their own salaries. It is the same thing that happens in businesses around the globe. The second you hire someone with the job title of HR, you see the power of the HR department increase every year. Every year that cooperation will be saddled with a bigger and bigger HR department as the number and size of women the corporation hires increases.
No one ever said that students were good at room shopping. It is entirely possible that the amenities are going through the roof while the basic necessities like hot water are getting worse and worse.
Is this apparently low evaluation indicative or anything?
If you take a normal portfolio of CC loans. You have a total amount owed X, and an interest rate Y. The value of those loans is going to become value X + Z, where Z is affected linearly by X and multiplicative by Y. The Loan is going to be worth more than the principal amount because it is sold to make a profit.
Student debt, unlike credit card debt, unlike mortgages, unlike every other debt is sold under the cost of supplying the debt, and there's no collateral. The value is always going to be well under the principal, that was decided on before any loans were granted.
Face value here is another term for principal amount. This amount was always well under the value of the loan. And there's no mention that this evaluation is lower than normal.
Because the degrees are microscopic, but rise over run is a reasonable, understandable metric.
If the article had simply stated that it had moved.00825 degrees towards vertical we the audience would of needed ten minutes of mathematical calculations to figure out what that meant. But instead of needlessly trying to confuse people to try and make themselves seem like experts to try and justify some unimaginable salary, they provided the correct units.
I have worked at a High School in Canada and can confirm that transcribing data from a printed out word document into another word document is alive and well in our education system.
There's a reason that that 1.1 million doctors directly cause 250,000 death per annum, or about one every four years per doctor on average. While 400 million gun owners cause 14,000 deaths per annum.
It is funny how short people's memories are. It is not like there have never been interest in Colonizing Antarctica like landscapes. It is just that they all failed. When all the Inuit we sent to the High Arctic died Canada reconsidered the feasibility.
To be fair, Nintendo do at least offer a huge chunk of their back catalogue, often in many forms, for sale. That they do not offer official ROM releases for user to play on PCs, which is a shame, but if any company has a right to protect 20 old copyright it is the company that is still actively selling that copyright.
Nintendo does not have the authority to prevent someone from "USING nintendo ROMs" either, but when you sign an injunction saying they do for you personally....
The Judgment... The suit never went to court; instead, the couple sought to settle
Can it be said to be a "judgment", if no court, judge, police, or any official officer of justice has anything to do with the outcome?
A permanent injunction, prohibiting them from USING, sharing, or distributing Nintendo ROMs or other materials again in the future, has been included in the settlement.
Is it possible for an injunction to stripe something that is considered a right of all owners of cartridge games from someone? This would seem to not only prevent backup copies, but any sort of participation in the modding scene at all (I am assuming no one has designed something that plugs into a nintendo console to allow you to play mods of old cartridge mario games). Could the injunction just as easily of said they are prohibited from ever operating a computer, or owning a website? I have heard of judges prohibiting computer use before, but first that is a judge and second even that sounds like it has some pretty shaky foundations.
The only statement I ever attempted to make is that facts make better arguments than insults. I freely admit that I provided zero statistics to back up that statement. That it is simply my opinion. Disagree with it if you want, I am not sure how I would go about defending it.
I am just pointing out that you have provided 0 statistics that support your argument. So you go into a big opinionated rant where you attack me and everyone that disagrees with you.
If you have no actual facts, what sort of debate do you expect to have?
Clearly you expect the kind of debate were you sling personal barbs instead of even trying to make an argument.
This is not even a thing worth having an argument over. It is not a political, opinion, or anything. It is just a cold hard statistic. Ask a few hundred Muslims in America what they want and you will have your answer. It is not a debate, it's not an argument, it's a fact. Leave the arguments for the methods.
Why are you quoting completely different statistics? Of course , you might expect the Muslims in muslim minority countries will be more fanatical. But also that graph shows huge support with like 2/3 of the countries polled responding with 50%-99% in favour. How do you even get 99% of people to agree on anything?
And where are you even getting that statistic. The one graph on Sharia I am seeing shows, like I said, the majority having over 50% support.
That is the exact problem with modern media. And how do we tell a reputable source from a disreputable one, other reputable sources tell you that it is reputable. And how do you evaluate those sources? They are verified by other reputable sources. And so on and so forth. The problem with modern journalism, is that just like wikipedia since you cannot verify sources into infinity, they are all cyclic verifications eventually. And more often that not that cyclic verification is only 1 layer deep.
While wikipedia in some cases sources articles that themselves just copied information from wikipedia, CNN, et all "verifies" its integrity, but bringing on politifact experts it itself verifies by calling them experts. Fact checking sites and news organizations feed off each other and the truth quickly spirals into a deep dark pit where the person who is saying something is more important to the factuality of a statement than what they said.
You can spot how bad of an idea this whole structure is, when the same network or fact checking site says self contradictory things, sometimes in the very same paragraph, but other times simply years apart when yesterday's villain has become today's hero.
For me personally, I lost every ounce of respect in all establishment news when I realised that about ~6 years ago, teams of experts brought onto the most respected of news channels verified unequivocally that Clinton created the Obama is a foreigner moment during her time running against him. And those exact same respected establishments, in many cases the exact same reporters, with a whole new barrell of experts verified that she indeed had nothing to do with any such movement and have always fought against such lies during the 2016 political campaign. That whole controversy is also a very good illustration of fact checking websites Snopes is one of my favourite for political facts, it has a pretty good summary of all the pertinent information, but as they all operate when it gets time to write the 1 sentence summary and give it a grade in particular, they are get weasely. As it turns out years before Clinton vs Obama campaign happened a blog with 2 subscribers published an article "othering" Obama, so no Clinton did not START the othering movement.
I think we can be fairly certain that mime scanners will be designed to stop scanning as soon as possible in all cases. Meaning It will detect the format that uses data at the front. So at least in this case, it would show as a jpg file.
Slashdot Mirror
So what do you want to do? Free all the non-violent offenders and find more appropriate sentences? Can you imagine the headlines?
"Trump Frees Tens of Thousands of White Men"
You cannot do anything in America if it disproportionately effects one race. Incarcerating non-violent offenders helps slightly to fix the prison gap. Treating non-violent criminals differently than violent ones is putting Black Americans at the back of the bus.
When incorrect opinions are illegal, and all content a person sees is owned by 100 international billionaires street protests are the one democratic act left.
It has actually changed drastically in the last decade. 2008 was nearly half this number, according to the world bank the median is now $2000.
https://www.worldbank.org/en/n...
The average Human, which is honestly not that far away from the average FB account holder, does not even make anywhere close to $1000 a year.
With all the scams FB et al. have going on in stone age societies I would not expect the average yearly salary of personal FB accounts to be much over $1000.
Where did anything indicate that? I have yet to see any study that looked at the ability of people who have passed the google interviews and compared it to the failures. The only thing this study seems to indicate is that Google seems to value education perfectly in the interview process.
The reason those dogs have bad genetics is because idiots are breeding them on mass and are completely unwilling to put any effort or money into producing better dogs. Why would these same puppy mills be willing to spend any money or time genetically editing these puppies genes which will undoubtedly be more expensive than just developing a breeding plan and testing your dogs for fitness?
The only people who will use genetic editing would be the ones already producing superior super dogs that win world tournaments and outfit the world's police and military. But this is unlikely to happen. We already have the technology, the even more profitable world of Horse Breeding have long since outlawed fake horses, and the same thing would happen in dogs if they tried it.
That would be factored in. The government taxes, regulates, and gives away money. All of these are taken into consideration when doing any accounting.
destroying their enthusiasm and vitality by CRIPPLING THEM WITH DEBT?
This is nonsense, half these students would not even be participating in the economy if they did not have debt to repay. More and more people are not getting married, many do not even have girlfriends, men have no reason to work if they are not raising a family or wooing a girl. In parts of the world the number of working aged men with girlfriends have dropped below 50%, imagine if the government had not convinced the majority of these men to saddle themselves with something else that requires huge sums of money on a continuing basis.
When you have a student body of 50,000 students, you need a lot of administrative staff to manage that.
You seem to be saying that the more students you have the greater the cost PER STUDENT the administration is going to be. This simply extremely non intuitive, typically you see saving in scale, and if the inverse was true you would simply see Universities fragment into smaller universities.
What we are seeing here is when you put the administrators in charge they hire more administrators, inflate administrators budgets, and continually vote to increase their own salaries. It is the same thing that happens in businesses around the globe. The second you hire someone with the job title of HR, you see the power of the HR department increase every year. Every year that cooperation will be saddled with a bigger and bigger HR department as the number and size of women the corporation hires increases.
No one ever said that students were good at room shopping. It is entirely possible that the amenities are going through the roof while the basic necessities like hot water are getting worse and worse.
Is this apparently low evaluation indicative or anything?
If you take a normal portfolio of CC loans. You have a total amount owed X, and an interest rate Y.
The value of those loans is going to become value X + Z, where Z is affected linearly by X and multiplicative by Y. The Loan is going to be worth more than the principal amount because it is sold to make a profit.
Student debt, unlike credit card debt, unlike mortgages, unlike every other debt is sold under the cost of supplying the debt, and there's no collateral. The value is always going to be well under the principal, that was decided on before any loans were granted.
Face value here is another term for principal amount. This amount was always well under the value of the loan. And there's no mention that this evaluation is lower than normal.
Because the degrees are microscopic, but rise over run is a reasonable, understandable metric.
If the article had simply stated that it had moved .00825 degrees towards vertical we the audience would of needed ten minutes of mathematical calculations to figure out what that meant. But instead of needlessly trying to confuse people to try and make themselves seem like experts to try and justify some unimaginable salary, they provided the correct units.
I have worked at a High School in Canada and can confirm that transcribing data from a printed out word document into another word document is alive and well in our education system.
How is the scanner for the email more complicated than the scanner for the fax? Would it not be the exact same technology?
There's a reason that that 1.1 million doctors directly cause 250,000 death per annum, or about one every four years per doctor on average.
While 400 million gun owners cause 14,000 deaths per annum.
It is funny how short people's memories are. It is not like there have never been interest in Colonizing Antarctica like landscapes. It is just that they all failed. When all the Inuit we sent to the High Arctic died Canada reconsidered the feasibility.
don't know Python
College and University CS courses focus on teaching programming fundamentals and theory, not teaching students random languages.
To be fair, Nintendo do at least offer a huge chunk of their back catalogue, often in many forms, for sale. That they do not offer official ROM releases for user to play on PCs, which is a shame, but if any company has a right to protect 20 old copyright it is the company that is still actively selling that copyright.
Nintendo does not have the authority to prevent someone from "USING nintendo ROMs" either, but when you sign an injunction saying they do for you personally....
The Judgment ... The suit never went to court; instead, the couple sought to settle
Can it be said to be a "judgment", if no court, judge, police, or any official officer of justice has anything to do with the outcome?
A permanent injunction, prohibiting them from USING, sharing, or distributing Nintendo ROMs or other materials again in the future, has been included in the settlement.
Is it possible for an injunction to stripe something that is considered a right of all owners of cartridge games from someone? This would seem to not only prevent backup copies, but any sort of participation in the modding scene at all (I am assuming no one has designed something that plugs into a nintendo console to allow you to play mods of old cartridge mario games).
Could the injunction just as easily of said they are prohibited from ever operating a computer, or owning a website? I have heard of judges prohibiting computer use before, but first that is a judge and second even that sounds like it has some pretty shaky foundations.
The only statement I ever attempted to make is that facts make better arguments than insults. I freely admit that I provided zero statistics to back up that statement. That it is simply my opinion. Disagree with it if you want, I am not sure how I would go about defending it.
I am just pointing out that you have provided 0 statistics that support your argument. So you go into a big opinionated rant where you attack me and everyone that disagrees with you.
If you have no actual facts, what sort of debate do you expect to have?
Clearly you expect the kind of debate were you sling personal barbs instead of even trying to make an argument.
This is not even a thing worth having an argument over. It is not a political, opinion, or anything. It is just a cold hard statistic. Ask a few hundred Muslims in America what they want and you will have your answer. It is not a debate, it's not an argument, it's a fact. Leave the arguments for the methods.
Why are you quoting completely different statistics? Of course , you might expect the Muslims in muslim minority countries will be more fanatical.
But also that graph shows huge support with like 2/3 of the countries polled responding with 50%-99% in favour. How do you even get 99% of people to agree on anything?
And where are you even getting that statistic. The one graph on Sharia I am seeing shows, like I said, the majority having over 50% support.
That is the exact problem with modern media. And how do we tell a reputable source from a disreputable one, other reputable sources tell you that it is reputable. And how do you evaluate those sources? They are verified by other reputable sources. And so on and so forth. The problem with modern journalism, is that just like wikipedia since you cannot verify sources into infinity, they are all cyclic verifications eventually. And more often that not that cyclic verification is only 1 layer deep.
While wikipedia in some cases sources articles that themselves just copied information from wikipedia, CNN, et all "verifies" its integrity, but bringing on politifact experts it itself verifies by calling them experts. Fact checking sites and news organizations feed off each other and the truth quickly spirals into a deep dark pit where the person who is saying something is more important to the factuality of a statement than what they said.
You can spot how bad of an idea this whole structure is, when the same network or fact checking site says self contradictory things, sometimes in the very same paragraph, but other times simply years apart when yesterday's villain has become today's hero.
For me personally, I lost every ounce of respect in all establishment news when I realised that about ~6 years ago, teams of experts brought onto the most respected of news channels verified unequivocally that Clinton created the Obama is a foreigner moment during her time running against him. And those exact same respected establishments, in many cases the exact same reporters, with a whole new barrell of experts verified that she indeed had nothing to do with any such movement and have always fought against such lies during the 2016 political campaign. That whole controversy is also a very good illustration of fact checking websites Snopes is one of my favourite for political facts, it has a pretty good summary of all the pertinent information, but as they all operate when it gets time to write the 1 sentence summary and give it a grade in particular, they are get weasely. As it turns out years before Clinton vs Obama campaign happened a blog with 2 subscribers published an article "othering" Obama, so no Clinton did not START the othering movement.
I think we can be fairly certain that mime scanners will be designed to stop scanning as soon as possible in all cases. Meaning It will detect the format that uses data at the front. So at least in this case, it would show as a jpg file.