Well I did not mean for a short period of time, I meant sustainable for you entire life (and your life is not cut far short). I sort of doubt anyone has done a longitudinal trial.
I always wondered.
These wackjobs or obviously crazy enough and these legal routes are obviously never going to get them anywhere, even they must know that.
Why not just reopen some of the long abandoned Human/Ape interbreeding studies? All it would probably take in one open minded woman and a little access to a Ape. And even if worst came to worst, and we were not that compatible, all they would need is one fertility specialist and access to some fertility equipment. It would not cost that much, even if they could not find a volunteer to do it for free.
A plan to colonise Mars is not Science, it is simply a plan.... It does not matter how many blinking lights or "Lasers" it involves, "a plan" never gets promoted to Science, as it is a completely different thing.
Mars should have loads of water, you just need to drill a big whole or melt it.
Also, worst case scenario you get Oxygen from the water as well. I would think that it might actually be the other parts of our atmosphere that are harder to recreate. You ?cant? just breath pure oxygen. And I hear that we have yet to find a good portable solution to all the radiation you encounter outside of the atmosphere.
How exactly is RHEL and its derivatives different from Ubuntu-likes? Other than I assume the business OSes do not radically overhaul their interfaces every 3 months.
I doubt that is it. You can bet that they continually audit these machine, and if missing several thousand dollars or even 10 dollars between filings, they find out what went wrong.
Grade inflation happens and even in the same school one class might have a teacher that always scores higher than another.
SO? Universities/etc. can still work out who knowns what using different methods, they just have to look at more than one single number; which ultimately leads to a better understanding of the individual, not less. Have you seen a study that compared the predictiveness of SATs to HS grades in college success, barbecue I have and HS grades won hands down.
Loads of countries do not use any kind of standardized testing to normalize school marks, and they get along just fine.
Add to that that we have had standardised testing in America for a long time and have yet to see any study show any effect except a negative one. Every study I have every heard of that concerns standardised testing is that, at the very least we have no reason to believe you they are good at predicting success. And that the tests existent seems to retard the learning ability of all who will and are taking them.
Well the study does not even seem to be that women are treated at all differential than men, just that "look at these poor women who have not be coddled and protected, above and beyond their peers"
How does that make any sense when all the tech giants have numbers of "minorities" greater than the industry mean.
How can you both discriminate against under-represented people, and end up hiring far far far more of the under-represented people who apply for your job opening than the over-represented people.
There is so much you could do with a K. Why not spend a few hundred and get internet over cellphone. At least then if they want to jam you they need to block everyone's cell and face huge jail time if caught?
Because these systems are built on milking the ugly men who have no real chance of ever doing anything but creeping out women. Banning them removes the sites bread and butter.
So without any admin access to the network they are on, or the torrent site, you can ban another random torrent user? How does that work?
Humans do not have the same number of chromosomes as other humans, and can still breed fine with them.
Well I did not mean for a short period of time, I meant sustainable for you entire life (and your life is not cut far short). I sort of doubt anyone has done a longitudinal trial.
I always wondered. These wackjobs or obviously crazy enough and these legal routes are obviously never going to get them anywhere, even they must know that.
Why not just reopen some of the long abandoned Human/Ape interbreeding studies? All it would probably take in one open minded woman and a little access to a Ape. And even if worst came to worst, and we were not that compatible, all they would need is one fertility specialist and access to some fertility equipment. It would not cost that much, even if they could not find a volunteer to do it for free.
A plan to colonise Mars is not Science, it is simply a plan.... It does not matter how many blinking lights or "Lasers" it involves, "a plan" never gets promoted to Science, as it is a completely different thing.
Mars should have loads of water, you just need to drill a big whole or melt it. Also, worst case scenario you get Oxygen from the water as well. I would think that it might actually be the other parts of our atmosphere that are harder to recreate. You ?cant? just breath pure oxygen. And I hear that we have yet to find a good portable solution to all the radiation you encounter outside of the atmosphere.
How exactly is RHEL and its derivatives different from Ubuntu-likes? Other than I assume the business OSes do not radically overhaul their interfaces every 3 months.
For those of you asking how the first online murder would play out, here is your answer.
rabble rabble rabble!
I doubt that is it. You can bet that they continually audit these machine, and if missing several thousand dollars or even 10 dollars between filings, they find out what went wrong.
What a deviously genius plan.
But the summery says it does Not operate like a democracy, so that can't be it.
This. What would even be the point of releasing a test version of windows if they were not tracking what you do?
Grade inflation happens and even in the same school one class might have a teacher that always scores higher than another.
SO? Universities/etc. can still work out who knowns what using different methods, they just have to look at more than one single number; which ultimately leads to a better understanding of the individual, not less. Have you seen a study that compared the predictiveness of SATs to HS grades in college success, barbecue I have and HS grades won hands down.
Loads of countries do not use any kind of standardized testing to normalize school marks, and they get along just fine.
Add to that that we have had standardised testing in America for a long time and have yet to see any study show any effect except a negative one. Every study I have every heard of that concerns standardised testing is that, at the very least we have no reason to believe you they are good at predicting success. And that the tests existent seems to retard the learning ability of all who will and are taking them.
I disagree, normally cops/etc. normally use the word "informant".
How do you know? Maybe they just make up 90% of all fake names? Maybe these are the type of accounts in his network of friends/likes/subscriptions?
I disagree, "snitch" is definitely synonymous with "an asshole", "a dickhead" or "a pathetic jerk"
Well the study does not even seem to be that women are treated at all differential than men, just that "look at these poor women who have not be coddled and protected, above and beyond their peers"
But in the same companies where women are refused maternity leave?
So they men get maternity leave then, I guess is what you are implying.
One of the biggest challenges is figuring out how to stitch images together across screens, both electronically and through software.
Umm, Every OS on the market already does this when you hook multiple monitors up to it.
How does that make any sense when all the tech giants have numbers of "minorities" greater than the industry mean. How can you both discriminate against under-represented people, and end up hiring far far far more of the under-represented people who apply for your job opening than the over-represented people.
Are you saying they jammed cell phone lines? Or where they onyl jamming the local wireless routers, "individual", And no one thought to buy a cable?
There is so much you could do with a K. Why not spend a few hundred and get internet over cellphone. At least then if they want to jam you they need to block everyone's cell and face huge jail time if caught?
Because these systems are built on milking the ugly men who have no real chance of ever doing anything but creeping out women. Banning them removes the sites bread and butter.