Yes, that galaxy is indeed blueshifted. Who told you that "all the stars" are redshifted? When you look at the night sky, you'll see about the same number of blueshifted as redshifted stars, since the vast majority of them are in our own galaxy and we're all just revolving around the center. And the galaxies in our immediate vicinity are kind of clumping together, not expanding. When you look at objects outside our local cluster of galaxies, yes, those do all appear redshifted. The further they are, the more redshifted they appear. And that indeeds indicates that the universe is expanding. But in our local neighbourhood, there's plenty of blueshifted stuff.
But once they "collide" (mingle), how can you still say that one galaxy is producing more stars than the other? I mean, doesn't it just become one big mess?
Exactly, if you can reset your account password by "talking to a human", all the Fed has to do is talk to that same human.
This is just because they probably had too many Apple users call them with "I lost my password, can you reset it? Recovery key? What's that?".
Since there are probably ten times as many of those, compared to the number of people who actually care about security, it makes sense for them to dumb down the system. Keeps the majority of their users happy. And the Fed, to boot.
How can someone prohibit someone from using one of their products in a particular, non-commercial way (a private test flight)? If I wanted to cross the channel with a dozen kitchen blenders and a really long extension cord, surely that's my decision? Siemens can say that the motor is not designed to be flown over water, and then, if a crash occurs, they can say "see, we told you it wasn't fit for that purpose, we take no responsibility". But preventing the flight from taking place? What allows them to do that?
The blockchain is already close to 40 GB in size, and now people want to store all sorts of other data (or metadata) in it. I can see this getting out of hand rather quickly.
Miners won't be able to store the entire chain anymore, so only a few archival nodes will still have it. Just how secure and accessible will your metadata be then?
They did not force any competitors to raise their prices. Anybody was free to offer their book for a lower price, as long as they offered the same low price on the iBookStore.
Yes, you can. It's called derivatives. Sell silver you don't have, buy gold that nobody has, eat your heart out. They can send the price pretty much anywhere they like.
The plus doesn't work very well anymore, half the result pages simply don't contain the word. They seem to use this as an indication that that word is slightly more important but not actually required. Which can be quite infuriating when you are searching for a specific site you know contains that word.
Terminating app due to uncaught exception 'NSInvalidArgumentException', reason: '-[UINavigationController setList:]: unrecognized selector sent to instance 0x6a33840'
You can search for "Terminating app due to uncaught exception" NSInvalidArgumentException "unrecognized selector sent to instance"
(In this case, the search actually does appear to work correctly)
Usually, just copying and pasting some static part of the error message is quite helpful since others will have pasted the exact same words in some help forum.
That usually does improve things, but not always. I often still get results as if I hadn't used any quotes at all, even though exact matches do exist and are displayed further down. And even a "+" in front of a word often gives sites that don't contain the word at all. Tip for Google, if someone writes "+" in front of a word, that really really really means that they really really want that word to actually appear on the page. Really. I'd rather get no results at all than a bunch of sites that don't contain the word.
In this case other countries with no reason to lie for the US have observed the landing sites too. Both China and Russia have photographed them from orbit.
No, they were just trying to fake their flights around the moon. "See, we really sent a probe around the moon, here's the proof, we've photographed the Apollo landing site!". In reality they just photoshopped a lander and craters on some sandpaper.
O, yeah, when a flaw is found in iOS, you can just switch to Android and buy all the same apps you had on iOS. And then when another flaw is found in Android a couple of weeks later, you switch right back to iOS again. This time it's even easier because you only have to rebuy the apps you bought since the last switch. And if both platforms have open holes at the same time, well, just use an oldfashioned dumb phone for a while. Oh, you might even try a Microsoft phone (do they still make those?) for a while. See, plenty of options!
Same for Mac OS X, Windows and Linux. Just buy multiple versions of all the apps you use in the office and you're all set. Or maybe try Haiku, I hear it has zero exploits in the wild.
They will get backdoored as well, since most politicians keep using normal civilian tools (hotmail, iPhones, USB sticks, etc.) no matter what ultra-secure tools you offer them.
No, the article says that 1 kg would have been enough to completely power the entire mission, and only 2 grams would have been needed for a combination of Plutonium heating and solar power. That last option would have been enough (according to the article).
Slashdot Mirror
Yes, and there was a recent incident where a cleaner was arrested for plugging his vacuum cleaner into one of those sockets.
OK, so it's just over five kilofeet then? Why don't they just say that?
Yes, that galaxy is indeed blueshifted. Who told you that "all the stars" are redshifted? When you look at the night sky, you'll see about the same number of blueshifted as redshifted stars, since the vast majority of them are in our own galaxy and we're all just revolving around the center. And the galaxies in our immediate vicinity are kind of clumping together, not expanding. When you look at objects outside our local cluster of galaxies, yes, those do all appear redshifted. The further they are, the more redshifted they appear. And that indeeds indicates that the universe is expanding. But in our local neighbourhood, there's plenty of blueshifted stuff.
But once they "collide" (mingle), how can you still say that one galaxy is producing more stars than the other? I mean, doesn't it just become one big mess?
Exactly, if you can reset your account password by "talking to a human", all the Fed has to do is talk to that same human.
This is just because they probably had too many Apple users call them with "I lost my password, can you reset it? Recovery key? What's that?".
Since there are probably ten times as many of those, compared to the number of people who actually care about security, it makes sense for them to dumb down the system. Keeps the majority of their users happy. And the Fed, to boot.
Hey, and I even know his moth... I mean... my mother's maiden name!
How can someone prohibit someone from using one of their products in a particular, non-commercial way (a private test flight)? If I wanted to cross the channel with a dozen kitchen blenders and a really long extension cord, surely that's my decision? Siemens can say that the motor is not designed to be flown over water, and then, if a crash occurs, they can say "see, we told you it wasn't fit for that purpose, we take no responsibility". But preventing the flight from taking place? What allows them to do that?
what's the going insurance rate on giving cancer to people for decades and rendering large swaths of land unlivable for generations?
I thought we were talking about nuclear power, why did you switch the subject to coal?
The blockchain is already close to 40 GB in size, and now people want to store all sorts of other data (or metadata) in it. I can see this getting out of hand rather quickly.
Miners won't be able to store the entire chain anymore, so only a few archival nodes will still have it. Just how secure and accessible will your metadata be then?
They did not force any competitors to raise their prices. Anybody was free to offer their book for a lower price, as long as they offered the same low price on the iBookStore.
It sure will be attractive compared to the new drachma.
Yes, you can. It's called derivatives. Sell silver you don't have, buy gold that nobody has, eat your heart out. They can send the price pretty much anywhere they like.
Neither do I, as long as they remain consistent and let 0 times 0 generate a random number.
I don't mind as long as they remain consistent and define multiplication of 0 times 0 to be a random number.
The plus doesn't work very well anymore, half the result pages simply don't contain the word. They seem to use this as an indication that that word is slightly more important but not actually required. Which can be quite infuriating when you are searching for a specific site you know contains that word.
Well, for example, if you get something like
Terminating app due to uncaught exception 'NSInvalidArgumentException', reason: '-[UINavigationController setList:]: unrecognized selector sent to instance 0x6a33840'
You can search for "Terminating app due to uncaught exception" NSInvalidArgumentException "unrecognized selector sent to instance"
(In this case, the search actually does appear to work correctly)
Usually, just copying and pasting some static part of the error message is quite helpful since others will have pasted the exact same words in some help forum.
That usually does improve things, but not always. I often still get results as if I hadn't used any quotes at all, even though exact matches do exist and are displayed further down. And even a "+" in front of a word often gives sites that don't contain the word at all. Tip for Google, if someone writes "+" in front of a word, that really really really means that they really really want that word to actually appear on the page. Really. I'd rather get no results at all than a bunch of sites that don't contain the word.
Nah, they just rolled out a big flat poster on the supposed lander site. Can't tell the difference from orbit.
In this case other countries with no reason to lie for the US have observed the landing sites too. Both China and Russia have photographed them from orbit.
No, they were just trying to fake their flights around the moon. "See, we really sent a probe around the moon, here's the proof, we've photographed the Apollo landing site!". In reality they just photoshopped a lander and craters on some sandpaper.
Everyone knows the moon landings were filmed on a soundstage on Mars!
Yes, they first tried to do it in the Nevada desert, but they couldn't get the sound right.
O, yeah, when a flaw is found in iOS, you can just switch to Android and buy all the same apps you had on iOS. And then when another flaw is found in Android a couple of weeks later, you switch right back to iOS again. This time it's even easier because you only have to rebuy the apps you bought since the last switch. And if both platforms have open holes at the same time, well, just use an oldfashioned dumb phone for a while. Oh, you might even try a Microsoft phone (do they still make those?) for a while. See, plenty of options!
Same for Mac OS X, Windows and Linux. Just buy multiple versions of all the apps you use in the office and you're all set. Or maybe try Haiku, I hear it has zero exploits in the wild.
Take a look in your KeyChain to see what else it stores that you may not even know about. Logins for websites, for example.
They will get backdoored as well, since most politicians keep using normal civilian tools (hotmail, iPhones, USB sticks, etc.) no matter what ultra-secure tools you offer them.
No, the article says that 1 kg would have been enough to completely power the entire mission, and only 2 grams would have been needed for a combination of Plutonium heating and solar power. That last option would have been enough (according to the article).
Oh, yeah, 2 grams of plutonium will totally cause that kind of destruction.