Wow. 45% of gross revenues? Holy crap I read 45% of gross revenues as profit. I think my mind did a substitution without realizing it to account for the stupidity of that value.
First off, it's run on E85. That means it gets something like 50mpg and they say "theoretically" the car gets 110mpg in "gasoline numbers." i.e. if you switch it to pure gasoline, you should get 110mpg by some magic due to additional fuel density. (Imaginary, I'm convinced this won't happen; otherwise why wouldn't you just build a gasoline engine?)
To be fair, I constantly see E85 marketed as a green fuel not a more energy efficient fuel. Some quick reading says that on average E85 is 25-30% less efficient than gasoline. Is it possible that a car could be 50% less efficient when running on E85? I would say yes if the car was specifically engineered to increase MPG and ignored other features.
At first I read "grant theft auto" instead of just "theft". I thought to myself, "How does grand theft auto occur more often in prison than outside of it."
Now I realize we can create a new spectator racing sport using miniature cities with a bunch of cars and prisoners. Didn't they already make a movie about this?
Well, at least Slashdot continues the tradition of not naming the party of a politician when it's a Democrat and making sure to note when the politician is a Republican.
Specifically, the law in question if passed would allow the President to nominate a new Justice to the court for every justice that was at least 70.5 years of age and had served at least 10 years on the Supreme Court. Six of the justices met that requirement. If the law had passed, which the Democrats had massive majorities in the House and Senate so they just needed to corral the party, you would have six new justices that would have been rubber stamps for FDR on top of the three justices that pretty much rubber stamped him already. At the time public opinion was also against the Supreme Court because it was seen that their striking down of law after law "designed" to help the public was not a desire to get the country out of the depression.
FDR came very close to destroying one branch of our government and completely dissolving the checks and balances we had.
It's not really asshats as much as the people around them feel as though they're entitled to free tech support for their computer woes just because they know someone who can do it.
iLaughed because they don't like the latrine/bathroom link to their products failing to realize that the iPad has forever been linked to feminine hygiene products.
Fair Use is defined under the four criteria of Fair Use. The fact that its intent is for comment, criticism, or educational purposes does not matter if the stated purpose doesn't meet the criteria for Fair Use.
Don't poke me there!
Wow. 45% of gross revenues? Holy crap I read 45% of gross revenues as profit. I think my mind did a substitution without realizing it to account for the stupidity of that value.
Indeed. Because a piece of software is just like a relatively simple structure.
How many times have volunteers come to put up a steel building?
Everything is a poison, there is poison in everything. Only the dose makes a thing not a poison.
And humans do live in the exclusion zone.
Not many but some do.
I like to call them stalkers.
First off, it's run on E85. That means it gets something like 50mpg and they say "theoretically" the car gets 110mpg in "gasoline numbers." i.e. if you switch it to pure gasoline, you should get 110mpg by some magic due to additional fuel density. (Imaginary, I'm convinced this won't happen; otherwise why wouldn't you just build a gasoline engine?)
To be fair, I constantly see E85 marketed as a green fuel not a more energy efficient fuel. Some quick reading says that on average E85 is 25-30% less efficient than gasoline. Is it possible that a car could be 50% less efficient when running on E85? I would say yes if the car was specifically engineered to increase MPG and ignored other features.
Fool-proof method to fool that...
Step 1: Use wikipedia for information
Step 2: View cited sources for wikipedia.
Step 3: Cite cited wikipedia sources.
Step 4: ???
Step 5: Profit!
But if we don't, they'll just become the newest generation of lobbyists.
At first I read "grant theft auto" instead of just "theft". I thought to myself, "How does grand theft auto occur more often in prison than outside of it."
Now I realize we can create a new spectator racing sport using miniature cities with a bunch of cars and prisoners. Didn't they already make a movie about this?
What could Superman do against BP or the RIAA?
Given that Superman has been documented on many occasions to be a super dick, he'd probably destroy Earth to deal with BP and the RIAA.
Well, at least Slashdot continues the tradition of not naming the party of a politician when it's a Democrat and making sure to note when the politician is a Republican.
Specifically, the law in question if passed would allow the President to nominate a new Justice to the court for every justice that was at least 70.5 years of age and had served at least 10 years on the Supreme Court. Six of the justices met that requirement. If the law had passed, which the Democrats had massive majorities in the House and Senate so they just needed to corral the party, you would have six new justices that would have been rubber stamps for FDR on top of the three justices that pretty much rubber stamped him already. At the time public opinion was also against the Supreme Court because it was seen that their striking down of law after law "designed" to help the public was not a desire to get the country out of the depression.
FDR came very close to destroying one branch of our government and completely dissolving the checks and balances we had.
How does this affect the porn industry?
My kit contains the following.
x1 Bruce Willis
And remember to hit preview.
How can I forgot to hit preview? It's required before you can post the comment.
It does feel like we're getting closer to the FF6/FF9 style of airship....
Personally I would prefer a more FF7/FF8 or FF12 style of airship....
Bacon that cooks itself, what's better than that, other than bacon with ketchup.
Bacon coated bacon that cooks itself in bacon fat.
(With a side of ketchup)
I know. The major manufacturing sectors don't use night shifts.
Oh wait....
The show "Lost" fucked up my definition of the word lost.
Now I don't know what it means anymore.
It's not really asshats as much as the people around them feel as though they're entitled to free tech support for their computer woes just because they know someone who can do it.
Maybe we could attack a friggin laser to Steve Ballmer's head so that he can have warm meals.
Nah, he's going to release the iPee in honor of Will Wright's Pee.
iLaughed because they don't like the latrine/bathroom link to their products failing to realize that the iPad has forever been linked to feminine hygiene products.
Considering that Battle.net 2.0 is pretty much Activision's idea, I expect that Real ID and the real names with it are Activision's idea.
Fair Use is defined under the four criteria of Fair Use. The fact that its intent is for comment, criticism, or educational purposes does not matter if the stated purpose doesn't meet the criteria for Fair Use.