Slashdot Mirror


7 Scientific Reasons a Zombie Outbreak Would Fail

Whether they spoil in the heat, freeze in the winter, or get taken out by a human-friendly venue of vultures, a zombie outbreak is unlikely to succeed. Here's 7 reasons why we should stop worrying about the shambling dead and start concentrating on a real threat: sparkly vampires.

320 comments

  1. Reason #0 by BSAtHome · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There are no zombies?

    1. Re:Reason #0 by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But there is a huge market for all things zombie, and it doesn't even seem to have peaked yet. Zombies are the new vampires, and to date none of them sparkle in the sun.

      Most of the zombie fiction is just a different approach to RPG-style problem solving, and has the same appeal. A zombie outbreak happens near you, and the zombies work this way. What do you do? What do you eat? How do you defend yourself? Do you find others, or avoid others? etc, etc. It's good fun.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:Reason #0 by strayant · · Score: 1

      yet!

    3. Re:Reason #0 by Korin43 · · Score: 2, Funny

      and to date none of them sparkle in the sun.

      Yet.

    4. Re:Reason #0 by The+Pirou · · Score: 1

      Maybe you don't read /. enough

      Yesterday for example:
      http://science.slashdot.org/story/10/08/18/2157230/Zombie-Ants-and-Killer-Fungus

      Of course, this all depends on what your definition of zombie is.
      Some people are strict with the human 'undead' moniker, but as I recall, the zombie dogs in the original Resident Evil game were the scariest aspect of Zombie-dom ~'97, so branching out to the animal kingdom and accepting Ants who are under the influence of the pod people under that Umbrella (hur hur hur) is a logical next step in recognizing that Zombies exist.

    5. Re:Reason #0 by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Thanks. You've ruined Zombie Christmas.

    6. Re:Reason #0 by gandhi_2 · · Score: 1

      Think about rabies.

      Now think what would happen if rabid humans were like rabid dogs.

      Weird, raBIES and zomBIES are even spelled alike!

      The zompocalypse is just a mutation away.

    7. Re:Reason #0 by pgmrdlm · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are no zombies?

      Constructing the Haitian Zombie: An Anthropological Study Beyond Madness

      Persons identified as zombies are to be found among the inhabitants of Haiti, an impoverished and politically unstable Caribbean country with unique cultural characteristics. Using the lens of the anthropologist, an investigation into Haitian zombiism reveals not only a basis for the bizarre phenomenon of zombiism itself, but also the underlying characteristics of Haitian society that have fostered and it. While zombiism may be fundamentally understood in terms of mental illness, particular theories related to madness are useful in further illuminating the subject, including Sigmund Freud’s signature theses on melancholia, Frantz Fanon’s views on the psychological effects of colonialism, and Emily Martin’s ideas about the performance of mental disorders. The resulting analysis will demonstrate that Haitian zombiism constitutes a cultural construct of madness that thoroughly fits within its post-colonial population, where a bereft people have transformed zombiism into a reality.

      PASSAGE OF DARKNESS: THE ETHNOBIOLOGY OF THE HAITIAN ZOMBIE

      Are there really zombies in Haiti? Wade Davis devotes two long sections to this question. He first looks at the popular views and then explores cases where there have been some attempts to carefully and more scientifically determine the status of suspected cases. His key candidate for zombiehood is Clairvius Narcisse. In spring, 1962 Narcisse "died" at the Albert Schweitzer Hospital in Deschapelles, Haiti. His death was verified by the hospital staff. 18 years later Narcisse turned up alive and well, and claimed to be an escaped zombie.

      No, I did not read through those articles. I just remember watching an interview with some scientist that researched out the sposid myth. So I knew therw was legitimate research into it.

      --
      Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
    8. Re:Reason #0 by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 5, Funny

      Keep telling yourself that. You'll be sorry one day when you don't run, and a zombie eats your face.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    9. Re:Reason #0 by stonewallred · · Score: 1

      What you think. When the government cover ups are broken through by dedicated hackers, the facts are clear. There have been over 43 reported outbreaks of zombies in the last 100 years. It is people like you who prevent the truth from being free. The dead will walk again, as they have been for hundreds of years. It is only through the brave efforts of the ZDF that have kept them in check.

    10. Re:Reason #0 by misexistentialist · · Score: 1

      People involved mass murder are pretty close to zombies. The outbreaks are more localized and there may be an ostensible purpose, but the devotion to killing is both stupid and somewhat contagious. Ideas can be pathological, and a mind can die while the body is still animated.

    11. Re:Reason #0 by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      Wait, didn't we visit this subject years ago with a story about dead frozen dogs in Australia being reanimated by having fresh blood pumped into them?

    12. Re:Reason #0 by rwa2 · · Score: 1

      Real-life zombies are probably more subtle. They probably live among us, and you don't even realize it!

      Read this about parasites that can alter human and other mammal behavior and come back and say it isn't as much of a stretch as you'd think:
      http://www.technovelgy.com/ct/Science-Fiction-News.asp?NewsNum=547

      Case in point: cat ladies.

    13. Re:Reason #0 by Dachannien · · Score: 0

      Just because you've never seen one doesn't mean they don't BRAAAAIIIINSSS aaaaauuughghghsplortnomnom

    14. Re:Reason #0 by gmuslera · · Score: 1

      Depend on your definition of zombies. Even yesterday was discussed here one of the possible definitions that happen to be real.

    15. Re:Reason #0 by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      Zombies are real in the Haitian voodoo sense, but we're talking about the classic Romero zombie I assumed, the one upon which most zombie fiction is now based.

    16. Re:Reason #0 by w0mprat · · Score: 4, Informative
      It's a called a Zimboe.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zimboe

      Real-life zombies are probably more subtle

      In fact most all of the world has been replaced with Zimboes, and there are very few of us real people left, examples being myself, and Cory Doctorow.

      --
      After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    17. Re:Reason #0 by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1
      But isn't Haiti where the whole Zombie theme came from? The movies that I remember always had someone performing some type of magic to make people into zombies. The zombie leader. And that second link refers to what could be a classic Romero zombie, or at least close to what we consider the movie zombies.

      His key candidate for zombiehood is Clairvius Narcisse. In spring, 1962 Narcisse "died" at the Albert Schweitzer Hospital in Deschapelles, Haiti. His death was verified by the hospital staff. 18 years later Narcisse turned up alive and well, and claimed to be an escaped zombie.

      We don't know if he consumed human flesh when in captivity as a zombie for 18 years or not.

      But the links were just to show there is actual research into this, thats all.

      lol, I need to stop. It almost looks like I am taking this seriously.

      --
      Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
    18. Re:Reason #0 by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      That you're not taking this seriously is a reason why the zombie apocalypse will succeed!

      Yes, I believe the zombie originated in Haiti. I think the word too comes from Haiti. I can't remember how much influence the Haitian zombie had on those classic zombie movies.. I mean like "white zombie" etc. I do remember that Romero said that he never thought of his ghouls as "zombies", and he never actually used the word to describe the monsters in his Living Dead trilogy.

      I've watched some of this genre shows that showed an interview with an escaped zombie who was sweeping his own grave in Haiti. Never said he ate humans. :D

    19. Re:Reason #0 by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Fox and CNN still have viewers, despite years of nonstop collisions with reality.

      There are zombies. They just don't go out into the light of day - where it's hard to see the screen.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    20. Re:Reason #0 by nanospook · · Score: 1

      I have to do it... BRRAAAAAAAIIINNNNSSSSS!!!!!

      http://www.zombiemeter.org/index.php?subaction=view&story_id=74

      --
      Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
    21. Re:Reason #0 by Dahamma · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Actually, my neurobiology professor (who has a definite knack for explaining complex ideas in everyday language) gives a great lecture on Haitian zombies from a neurobiological and athropological perspective.

      Basically, some Haitian (or more commonly, a bunch of Haitians) gets really pissed off at a person, and hires a witch doctor to "curse" them. The curse turns out to be slipping them some tetrodotoxin (better known in popular culture as "the thing in blowfish/fugu that paralyzes you"), which then... paralyzes them to a state in which they can be mistaken for dead.

      Most probably die. It's a pretty good poison. But once in a while one of them, after being taken for dead for up to a couple days, actually "comes back to life". This of course freaks everyone out (and gives the witch doctor some major cred). And now this person was officially cursed by the witch doctor, and came back from the dead. He's a zombie! Everyone in town is now both disgusted and somewhat frightened of him, and he starts to believe the stories (and conform to the stereotypes/myths). A zombie is born!

    22. Re:Reason #0 by AvitarX · · Score: 1

      My ex-wife's research into the subject concludes that Zombie-ism was used to explain why there were slaves (by the Haitians). And slave rebellions were because someone either accidental or intentionally got salt into the plantations food, breaking the slaves out of their zombiehood.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    23. Re:Reason #0 by dissy · · Score: 1, Troll

      There are no zombies?

      You've clearly never been to a shopping mall, or a garth brooks concert ;P

      Even Walmart has employed its share of zombies!

      I'd say extraordinary claims such as yours require extraordinary proof!

    24. Re:Reason #0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      we're talking about the classic Romero zombie I assumed, the one upon which most zombie fiction is now based.

      Is it now? There have been several movies lately with non-Romero zombies. Fast Zombies, Rage-infected humans (close enough), etc. The slow, stumbling, couldn't walk up a flight of stairs zombies are Out, the fast, viscous, could sense you from across town, run over and still kill you zombies are In.

      Which, funny enough, makes sense. The 'classic' zombie is untenable, from a biological and physical standpoint. Dead bodies that can't be stopped unless you destroy the brain? Puh-leaze. For a Z to walk, it needs to use its muscles. For the muscles to work, they need energy. Energy they get by (simplifying) taking sugar and oxygen out of the blood. That means the blood must be flowing, the lungs must be working. Shoot a Z in the leg, that wound will bleed. Lose enough blood= Z can't use muscles to move. Sure, the Z might be able to 'push through' the pain and remain active until the loss of blood affects it, but it will eventually 'die' of blood loss.

      Most of the points the article made are fine and good, for the 'classic' zombie. But for Rage-infected humans, or similar... not so much.
      7. Natural predators? They're fast, can think, even use weapons. They won't be taken down by a rogue dog.
      6. and 5.- Hot and cold- they can think enough to seek cool places in the heat, and warm places in the cold. They are alive so their bodies produce heat.
      4. Biting- a virus doesn't need to pass through biting. The common cold proves that. A 'rage' virus could be airborne, could get into water supplies, or could even linger on surfaces. Even if it's strictly carried by bodily fluids, there are more fluids than blood. A Z could spit at you. If you stab or slash one, a spurt or spray of blood could wind up being inhaled, or landing in an open wound, your mouth, or eye. As for the CDC getting involved... they would, but if the virus is airborne, it could infect a large enough number of people that it couldn't be contained.
      3. Day-to-day damage isn't a real problem for non-classic Zs.
      2. Same with rivers, bridges, and cliffs.
      1. People. People with guns. Sure, they would be effective, but people would need to get over the "Oh, gosh, is that our neighbor? I can't shoot him" feelings. Could you shoot your wife or husband? Your kids? The number one mistake people make is not accepting that their zombied friend/lover/relative is GONE. Once that happens, we'll be okay.

    25. Re:Reason #0 by hairyfeet · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to mention they are forgetting why Zombies ended up winning in the Romero flicks...human stupidity. If you remember the original Dawn of the Dead you had people believing it was part of the judgment and actively hiding dead relatives from the police and by the time they would find a "nest" it would have often spread to an entire building and made the entire building a threat.

      The problem with any of these "disaster A can't happen" is they always assume humans will band together and act logically which if anything history has taught us in a widespread panic humans are as dangerous and stupid as any other scared animal. To quote MiB "A person is smart, people are dumb, dangerous, panicky animals and you know it.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    26. Re:Reason #0 by Wyvern2005 · · Score: 1

      You are right...they DO live among us..they are that seldom seen creature, the Late Night Walmart Patron! Never out in daylight..kinda grey from the rotten bits..stumbling around making odd noises...perfect fit!

      --
      Oops..was I supposed to push that button?
    27. Re:Reason #0 by Miseph · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Vampires are ancient, evil, debauched, blood drinking, monsters who turn to ash in the sun.

      Fairies are youthful, amoral (note the difference), sparkly, supernatural beings who turn children away from their families and gain strength from human emotions.

      Twilight is about fairies. Really lame fairies.

      --
      Try not to take me more seriously than I take myself.
    28. Re:Reason #0 by fractoid · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem with any of these "disaster A can't happen" is they always assume humans will band together and act logically which if anything history has taught us in a widespread panic humans are as dangerous and stupid as any other scared animal. To quote MiB "A person is smart, people are dumb, dangerous, panicky animals and you know it.

      You know, I love that quote as much as anyone but I'm not convinced it's true. Think of the times when people really HAVE been up against the wall in large numbers, with a cause they believe in, and I think you'll find that in general, we're pretty good in a pinch. Take, for example, the British in WW2. They're having the absolute shit bombed out of them but they stayed organized for the most part and put up a hell of a fight.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    29. Re:Reason #0 by fractoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, well our vampire trope was mostly laid down by Bram Stoker, and there was nothing sexy about them back then. They were just a particular kind of mostly-mindless undead with pretty specific rules for how to dispatch them (nothing that doesn't also work on humans, mind you). Later additions by Anne Rice made vampires sexy and mysterious rather than just bloodthirsty and undead. These days they've been romanticised to the point where there are barely any drawbacks to being a vampire (gee thanks Stephanie Meyer).

      Likewise, the original Haitian zombies started off the whole "now he's dead, now he's shuffling around" trend. They've slowly been modified by successive media releases since then and the standard zombie trope is now quite removed from its roots.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    30. Re:Reason #0 by golden+age+villain · · Score: 4, Funny

      Most of the zombie fiction is just a different approach to RPG-style problem solving

      Do you mean RPG-style like in ruchnoy protivotankoviy granatomyot or RPG-7? It's a good option but you can't really run while carrying it.

    31. Re:Reason #0 by golden+age+villain · · Score: 1

      First ants, then mice http://www.economist.com/node/16271339?story_id=16271339, next stop your neighbours!

    32. Re:Reason #0 by AGMW · · Score: 2, Funny

      Keep telling yourself that. You'll be sorry one day when you don't run, and a zombie eats your face.

      I think they just eat your brains.

      --
      Eclectic beats from Leeds, UK
      handmadehands.co.uk
    33. Re:Reason #0 by Cerlyn · · Score: 1

      Or in the style of TV Tropes, Our Vampires Are Different.

    34. Re:Reason #0 by Mathness · · Score: 1

      Looking on the bright side, you don't have to worry about acne or shaving anymore.

      --
      Carbon based humanoid in training.
    35. Re:Reason #0 by pinkushun · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It all went down hill with Muffy the Vampire Layer IMHO

    36. Re:Reason #0 by hairyfeet · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But you are missing the fact that they had Churchill to lead them by example and to rally the troops, whereas in a zombie or other mass disease attack most likely the leaders would run for it like everyone else. We simply don't create leaders like Patton and Churchill anymore, instead we get politicians who will save their own ass first and foremost. Can you really picture Obama (or Palin or your choice of politician) standing there to rally folks with the risk of contagion like Churchill was willing to walk through bombed areas with the threat of further bombing looming?

      Then of course you have the religious aspect, which would REALLY bite us in the ass. If you remember Dawn of the Dead those that believed in the judgment actively helped the zombies believing that the walking monsters were really their dead relatives being risen by their God. In large cities this would create a quickly escalating situation, where just like in the movies believers would attempt to "care" for their dead relatives, getting infected themselves, and by doing so creating "nests" where whole buildings would become infected.

      In the end it would come down to whether or not we have any leaders that are willing to risk their own asses and make the hard choices on the spot. Sadly what we have now is a spoilt ruling class used to be coddled and treated like little kings that would probably abandon us at the first sign of danger to themselves. The days of leaders like Churchill that were willing to risk their lives for their people are long past I'm afraid.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    37. Re:Reason #0 by ciderbrew · · Score: 1

      On the commute to work we deal with zombies everyday. We have tea and we have cricket bats.
      We British will be fine.

    38. Re:Reason #0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bram Stoker's vampires were not mostly mindless. They were quite human.
      There were rules attached, like no walking in sunlight, and no crossing water except at specific times. But mostly it was rules about why they need to be killed. (Spawns of Satan or something.) One of the protagonists, a medical doctor, kills his dear wife with a stake and a hammer because she was a vampire. (Jealosy might also have been a contributing factor.) The reason why they didn't just shoot her was because they wanted to play it safe and go by what traditionally worked.

      The other female protagonist also turns into a vampire, but is not killed, and helps the others track down and kill Dracula, whereupon she is deemed healed (although there is no actual reason to assume that except wishful thinking on part of the male protagonists.)

      If anything, the non-vampiric humans are mostly mindless and also supersticious, which might have been the point of the story. But I think Stoker was going for "What if there was something science couldn't explain? Scary, huh?" and making fun of the suffragette movement.

    39. Re:Reason #0 by BotnetZombie · · Score: 1

      That hurts, you insensitive clod!

    40. Re:Reason #0 by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      That article's argument seems to be based on the fact that several science fiction authors have used the concept in their books, so therefore it must be possible.

      On that basis, time travel, FTL travel, immortality and all the rest are possible.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    41. Re:Reason #0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1. People. People with guns. Sure, they would be effective, but people would need to get over the "Oh, gosh, is that our neighbor? I can't shoot him" feelings. Could you shoot your wife or husband? Your kids? The number one mistake people make is not accepting that their zombied friend/lover/relative is GONE. Once that happens, we'll be okay.

      What if it's not so cut and dry - we have documented cases of zombies, humans who were pronounced dead but are still walking around. Now of course we know these were probably medical errors, or scientific anomalies (some ailment causing extremely shallow breathing/low pulse etc), but in the communities where they've been documented there is a strong belief that these people are zombies. Still, nobody is hacking them apart, so how "normal" would a true zombie have to be before people just accepted them. If they're not specifically trying to kill you, maybe having them around wouldn't be any different to a sick or senile relative you have to care for. They carry disease but we already care for people with disease, even at risk to ourselves.

      If we take the example of your zombie but remove the desire to attack and kill, we essentially have a loved one who has suffered a loss of brain function, by your definition they're not even technically dead, still breathing, still need to eat and still bleed, etc. I can't imagine we'd just mass kill those people even if they posed a serious infection risk to the rest of us, maybe it doesn't take carnage for zombism to spread, maybe kindness is sufficient?

    42. Re:Reason #0 by silentcoder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There are no zombies yet.

      FTFY.

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    43. Re:Reason #0 by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      Not as sorry as those who will have to live in the nightmarish aftermath.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    44. Re:Reason #0 by arndawg · · Score: 1

      I AM LEGEND

    45. Re:Reason #0 by MaWeiTao · · Score: 1

      I have to say, zombie lore has gotten to be amongst the more obnoxious trends out there. I think the whole thing has pretty we been beaten to death long ago. But then, I never got the appeal anyway.

    46. Re:Reason #0 by fussy_radical · · Score: 1

      ARTHUR: But if he was turning into a zombie, he wouldn't bother to write "BRAAAAIIIINSSS aaaaauuughghghsplortnomnom". He'd just say it.
      BROTHER MAYNARD: It's up there written in HTML.
      GALAHAD: Perhaps he was dictating.

    47. Re:Reason #0 by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      We simply don't create leaders like Patton and Churchill anymore, instead we get politicians who will save their own ass first and foremost. Can you really picture Obama (or Palin or your choice of politician) standing there to rally folks with the risk of contagion like Churchill was willing to walk through bombed areas with the threat of further bombing looming?

      Obama? No. Most other politicians? Also No. But Palin? You're telling me that you can't imagine Palin doing a national address from the White House rooftop, periodically stopping to fire an automatic weapon into the zombie masses below? Keep in mind, this is a woman who hunts wolves from a helicopter.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    48. Re:Reason #0 by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      A few of us are actually aliens. We come here for your ethanol and end up staying to watch Adult Swim.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    49. Re:Reason #0 by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      Wow, that's the best speech-recognition software I've ever seen. I'd ask what program your using, except, well...

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    50. Re:Reason #0 by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      Obama? No. Most other politicians? Also No. But Palin? You're telling me that you can't imagine Palin doing a national address from the White House rooftop, periodically stopping to fire an automatic weapon into the zombie masses below? Keep in mind, this is a woman who hunts wolves from a helicopter.

      You may have point. She was just ahead of her time. We certainly didn't want her in the office dealing with foreign countries today.... But if those foreign countries were full of zombies?

      Like they say, a hatchet is a great tool, just not one for waxing your car.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    51. Re:Reason #0 by geekoid · · Score: 1

      Cory is a Zombie. When was the last time he said something different?

      ZING.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    52. Re:Reason #0 by geekoid · · Score: 1

      " His death was verified by the hospital staff. 18 years later Narcisse turned up alive and well, and claimed to be an escaped zombie."

      Yes, Zombie is the most reasonable conclusion~

      Had you read through those links, you would have been embarrassed to post them. Seriously.

      You might as well ask people who believe Jesus appears in items if they have seen his face in something.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    53. Re:Reason #0 by geekoid · · Score: 1

      I'll take the nightmarish aftermath over death.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    54. Re:Reason #0 by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Actually that just shows me what a coward she is, after all, you don't have to worry about the wolf biting you in the ass from 2000 feet. Now do you honestly think that woman would stay on the roof of the White House when she is looking at 100,000+ zombies, breaking in and working their way up the building? She would run like a little girl for her chopper.

      The problem in any type of massive pandemic is how quickly law would break down and we humans would break into factions. Every group would see it as a mandate to get rid of the "undesirables" while the military would in all likelihood be relegated to being the guard dogs of the elite, who would be sitting in Stone Mountain style complexes sipping their mocha's and waiting for the herd to thin. Of course the grunts left behind wouldn't be too happy and it really wouldn't be too hard to bury them alive in their mountains thanks to the incredible amount of hardware left behind at the national guards, so it would probably be a total free for all by week three.

      Again the point is unlike Nazis in WWII as another poster brought up we are talking about a bug...a hidden danger that we wouldn't have time to research or probably even know about all the ways of transmission except for what we have observed. When you are dealing with a rapidly spreading disease that changes everything, as the "leaders" sure as hell ain't gonna stick around and risk infection, and without strong leadership the masses would quickly go tribal and would be just as big a threat to each other and the ruling class as the zombies themselves.

      Remember that in the original dead flick it wasn't that the zombies won the war, it was that the humans quickly became a threat to each other as much as the zombies were, allowing their numbers to grow quickly beyond control. Religion, Prejudice, fear, greed, all of these things would spread just as quickly as the contagion, with each guy with a few buddies and automatic rifles considering himself a mini king. It would be anarchy on a global scale.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    55. Re:Reason #0 by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 1

      1. People. People with guns. Sure, they would be effective, but people would need to get over the "Oh, gosh, is that our neighbor? I can't shoot him" feelings. Could you shoot your wife or husband? Your kids? The number one mistake people make is not accepting that their zombied friend/lover/relative is GONE. Once that happens, we'll be okay.

      Bart: "Dad! You killed the Zombie Flanders!"
      Homer: "He was a Zombie ?" ...

      --
      Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
    56. Re:Reason #0 by pgmrdlm · · Score: 1
      The links were nothing more then to show there has been scientific research into zombies. Thats all. And that point was made in my original post.

      Just because you don't like the conclusions in the links is your problem. Both my links were from universities. Different Universities. Different studies.

      Isn't this /. Isn't this where citations are generally a given when someone is going to dispute a post?

      Well, where is it?

      --
      Anonymous comments are as pathetic as the anonymous "sources" that contaminate gutless journalism from the New York Time
    57. Re:Reason #0 by loafula · · Score: 1

      Funny, I've always thought of vampires as the new zombies. We had the rash of zombie movies over the last x years- resident evil, 28 days, ect. Now we have all this vampire business going on with true blood and that god awful piece of crap that 12 year old girls and gay men go see.

      --
      FOXTROT UNIFORM CHARLIE KILO
    58. Re:Reason #0 by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Good call. Hunting wolves in your underpants > hunting wolves from a helicopter.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    59. Re:Reason #0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reeks of the Umbrella Corporation.

    60. Re:Reason #0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The tetrodotoxin theory is an old one, but iirc, nobody has ever come up with any concrete examples of this.

      Also, I believe all samples taken of "zombie potions" that contained the chemical were later found to be questionably obtained and tested.

    61. Re:Reason #0 by XiX36 · · Score: 1

      I think a better example would be the partisans fighting in German-occupied countries where they had fragmented and even nonexistent leadership. There you had small bands of people form small pockets of resistance, had to live off the land, and gather up weapons and ammunition.

      --
      Insert witty sig here.
    62. Re:Reason #0 by Darkman,+Walkin+Dude · · Score: 1

      Was that not Huffy the Muff Buffer?

    63. Re:Reason #0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The Serpent and the Rainbow" is based on such fact.

    64. Re:Reason #0 by fractoid · · Score: 1

      Actually, the French resistance movement was one of the examples I was thinking of using. Ordinary people risking their own lives and using extraordinary resourcefulness to save total strangers.

      --
      Rampant carbon sequestration destroyed the Dinosaurs' tropical paradise. I'm here to help repair the damage.
    65. Re:Reason #0 by fifedrum · · Score: 1

      pride and prejudice and zombies?

      yes. someone modified "Pride and Prejudice" and added the zombies.

    66. Re:Reason #0 by jsegal205 · · Score: 1

      the zombies work this way.

      If the zombies are working what are we worried about?

    67. Re:Reason #0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're talking about the woman who resigned from governor when the going started to get even slightly tough?

    68. Re:Reason #0 by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      The evil part is debatable.

      I suppose farm animals could regard humans as evil, but we're just doing what we need to do to survive. Is that not what vampires do?

      Of course some individuals, from both camps have a weird schadenfreude kind of thing going on, but that's not a requirement.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  2. This! by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 2, Informative

    This article is the reason why idle.slashdot.org exists.

    --
    "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    1. Re:This! by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 4, Informative
      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    2. Re:This! by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 1

      I never thought I would see the day that slashdot linked to cracked. Wow.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    3. Re:This! by blair1q · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, that article is the reason cracked.com exists.

      This response is the reason idle.slashdot.org exists.

      7. Natural predators can become zombies, too. Then where will your living natural predators be, hmm?

      6. Zombies rose from the dead, some years-dead. Making them deader by drying them out isn't going to affect them.

      6. Zombies rose from the dead. Dead is even more inert than frozen. Therefore, frozen isn't going to faze them.

      5. Biting works for rattlesnakes, black widow spiders, rabid dogs, and yucky girls with cooties. Zombies are onto a business model here.

      3. It's not like we're picking a Zombie President early in the cycle. There are zillions of them. Damage to one leaves another undamaged. You can't beat them in reasonable time with iterative solutions.

      2. You can run. You can hide. But death comes to us all. And then you'll be the zombie in the place behind the incorrectly designated zombie-proof barrier.

      1. Unless you plan to make bullets out of zombie finger bones, you're going to run out of bullets before you run out of zombies. Zillions, man. Zillions.

      Yes, there are two rule sixes, and NOOOOOOO...rule four. Clearly not a Python sketch.

    4. Re:This! by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      I didn't even notice what website it was, I was more interested in the article. (:

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    5. Re:This! by DarkKnightRadick · · Score: 1

      Actually, zombies are the recently dead. As in, still have meat that can be animated. And if you think them freezing won't stop them, you have no business on /.

      --
      "There is a way that seems right to a man, but its end is the way of death." Proverbs 16:25 (NKJV)
    6. Re:This! by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 0, Troll

      Natural predators can become zombies, too. Then where will your living natural predators be, hmm?

      Unless there are suddenly so many zombies that they're overwhelmed, those natural predators have other natural predators.

      Making them deader by drying them out isn't going to affect them.... Dead is even more inert than frozen...

      Then why should making them deader with a shotgun or a chainsaw affect them?

      Biting works for rattlesnakes, black widow spiders, rabid dogs, and yucky girls with cooties...

      No, it really doesn't -- RTFA. Biting works for rabid dogs, but it's far from an apocalyptic scenario.

      There are zillions of them.

      This article is about the beginning, so unless there are "zillions" on day 1...

      Damage to one leaves another undamaged.

      And if each of those zillions are walking into walls all the time?

      You can run. You can hide.

      Point isn't whether you can hide, it's whether there can be zillions of zombies wandering around.

      Unless you plan to make bullets out of zombie finger bones, you're going to run out of bullets before you run out of zombies.

      And baseball bats, grenades, molotov cocktails, nukes?

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    7. Re:This! by cgenman · · Score: 1

      8. To survive as a species, each zombie has to kill one person before becoming disabled. A person in an average car should be able to disable a dozen zombies before they succumb to hood damage. The zombie numbers dwindle.

    8. Re:This! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unless you're talking about Romero's "Dead world" films. Only a bite will infect a living person, true, but anyone who dies and is not disposed of properly rises again for some reason.

        That's The Night of the Living Dead's whole thing, where the zombies dig their way out of graves, unbitten, to attack the whole world at once. The following chaos and disruption greatly increases their numbers not only through bites, but through any incidental deaths that occur.

        If it's viral, and this is unknown, then living tissue is able to defend against the airborne vector but not the bite vector; or perhaps the bite is some form of poison unrelated to the actual infection, which then proceeds as usual after the person dies from the poisonous bite.

      This article's good, but only applies to some zombie scenarios.

    9. Re:This! by Wonko+the+Sane · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I never thought I would see the day that slashdot linked to cracked

      At least they didn't do it when the majority of their readers were at work. That site is highly addictive and it's likely that no one would have gotten any work done for the rest of the day. Of course, there might be a large chunk of the workforce that goes into work tired tomorrow because they get to sleep late...

    10. Re:This! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As they ended the first "Dead" film, the authorities were just wrapping up the zombie invasion problem. A night was all they got, before being wiped out by basic firepower. After that, you just have to worry about properly containing the newly dead.

      Honestly, Fido always seemed the most realistic in this respect.

    11. Re:This! by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      Night otLD didn't really explain where its Zombies came from. There's talk about radiation from Venus, and other such possible explanations, but nobody has time in the film to follow up and announce something definitive.
            But that's what makes any logical arguments unsettleable. If you know very little about how a whole complex phenomenon works, you can't be sure what its limits are, or what to expect next. If you don't even know if Zombies are a natural or supernatural phenomenon, or if they fit a disease model at all, of course you don't know how the condition is 'transmitted', because you don't even know if it is transmitted, in the way we normally use that word. If Zombies are supernatural, you can't even expect them to work according to the second law of Thermodynamics - name anything at all that you could still predict about anything if it is suddenly allowed to violate the second law at unpredictable intervals and in unpredictable ways. The Romero Dead films are one big Deus Ex Machina. In the end, they boil down to God makes the humans automatically too stupid to figure out what's going on, God arbitrarily does whatever it wants, and God wants certain humans to automatically lose, but some of them not until 90 minutes or so are up. Zombies will have whatever powers and limits God wants at that instant, and God has no longer term plan than freaking the filmgoers out. The whole thing becomes no better than those stories where the surprise ending is "the last two people are named Adam and Eve", or "It Was All A Dream". The first one was a bit better than that, laying down some rules like 'head shots stop them', and keeping the timeframe short enough that a lack of understanding on the human race's part is more plausible, but Romero's choice in the sequels was to break rule after rule until the films lose so much of their remaining grounding all debate about the Zombie problem becomes unsupportable. It could be worse - Return of the Living Dead got there in its first 30 minutes.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
  3. No Zombie Outbreaks? by dionyziz · · Score: 1

    God damnit!

    1. Re:No Zombie Outbreaks? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      We still have the raptor problem to look forward to.

      http://xkcd.com/135

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
  4. #7. They Have Too Many Natural Predators by Ocyris · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Come on now. Everyone know if you eat zombie flesh you become a zombie. Before you know it we'll be up to our necks in zombie lion, zombie tiger and zombie bears. However, zombie birds will probably be the worst considering the distances they can cover.

    1. Re:#7. They Have Too Many Natural Predators by jadin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Oh my!

    2. Re:#7. They Have Too Many Natural Predators by Nushio · · Score: 1

      Would their zombie wings be able to make birds fly? I always figured zombie birds would be harmless, as they'd simply fall to the ground over their rotten flesh.

      --
      Check out Unsealed: Whispers of Wisdom! http://unsealed.k3rnel.net It's an action-RPG about Open Sourcerers.
    3. Re:#7. They Have Too Many Natural Predators by tsadi · · Score: 1

      You're worried about zombie lions and tigers? Worry about zombie flies, zombie mosquitoes, zombie bacteria!

      We're all doomed!

    4. Re:#7. They Have Too Many Natural Predators by suicide_mission · · Score: 1

      Apart from this being utter foolishness, lets assume some virus or bacteria (either natural or man made) was indeed created that could reanimate dead humans:

      - Decomposition would cease, since the virus would likely revive cells, or potentially generate new ones, causing the heart to start pumping again, muscles and even neurons to regrow (albeit, heavily malformed)
      - Even after some heavy flesh/organ damage caused by human's attacking the undead, the regenerative capabilities of the virus/bacteria would likely heal them (unless the head was cut off) continuing their onslaught.
      - Since the virus/bacteria attaches itself to non-living humans, I find it more reasonable to believe that it incubates in humans until death (where decomposition starts in order to signal the transformation) Biting only speeds up the process towards deat. Maybe the saliva releases a deadly toxin/poison that accelerates death?
      - Zombies are also known to rise from the grave, meaning that regeneration occurred while being buried in a cemetery, meaning that if normally 146,357 die each day, the zombie population would be easily replenished, after 10 days, 1M+ army of zombies + the ones who are killed.
      - The virus/bacteria is either airborne or can be transmitted through the food chain (say goodbye to meat, say hello to vegetarianism)
      - The zombies have sense of balance, they can also stand up, handle semi basic terrain, crawl, break into houses, etc. they most likely are able to judge distances (when to attack, when to moan when far away), they are somewhat location aware, also they would be likely able to avoid falling of bridges, or getting stuck in simple structures.
      - zombies should be rather weak, otherwise their strong muscles could easily break their already weak bones, any potential regeneration of bones would likely be deformed (in theory), thus giving to rigid unmoveable corpses

      Surviving:

      - Zombies will likely die after a few days, I would imagine the energy requirements must be huge to maintain the undead alive. Just waiting them out is the best option.
      - best thing to do is to lock yourself in or head into remote areas (if you can survive the trip),
      - close combat weapons are useless, you will likely get cut or bitten, potentially the blood splatter may infect you as well
      - travel by normal vehicles cars would be a bad idea, since they would be likely to get stuck trying to get through or over piles of zombies, not to mention any potential traffic barriers or abandoned vehicles.
      - I would suggest using fire to kill the zombies, hopefully the surrounding mass will catch on fire and spread it around.
      - Food supplies will likely be hard to come by. City services would be off, going to the market would be difficult or impossible, with no tap water or even contaminated water it will be difficult to survive, worst, all the rotting zombie corpses (the ones that finally do die) will generate massive plagues, leading to even more deaths by normal means (and increasing the zombie population)
      - Anybody who has given at least 1% of their life time planning for the impending zombie apocalypse will likely survive it.

      thats almost all I have to say about this pointless topic, other than those who have survived it will be forced to engage in constant orgies, so, its not all that bad to plan ahead!.

    5. Re:#7. They Have Too Many Natural Predators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zombie birds? is that a reference to your girl-friend in the morning? oh wait, we're on /. here, no girl-friends. forgive me.

    6. Re:#7. They Have Too Many Natural Predators by AnonChef · · Score: 1

      Would that be an African flying zombie or an European flying zombie?

    7. Re:#7. They Have Too Many Natural Predators by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      Just imagine what it will be like to clean your car after a zombie bird craps on it!

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  5. So tired by LordKaT · · Score: 3, Informative

    So, so tired of zombies, pirates, ninjas, and robots. Jesus, Internet, can you please latch on to something else? Anything? I know whatever it is you latch on to will still get annoying, with 18 year old girls running around pretending to be cute and funny, but just being fucking annoying, but for the love of god, let the Zombie bullshit die.

    1. Re:So tired by sthomas · · Score: 5, Funny

      If they let it die, it might rise again. Like. a. zombie. OMG!!!!!

    2. Re:So tired by lgw · · Score: 1

      So, so tired of zombies, pirates, ninjas, and robots. Jesus, Internet

      Interesting list. So zobmie priate Jesus on the Internet isn't your thing, then?

      At least it's not Elves.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:So tired by confused+one · · Score: 1

      So, vampires and werewolves are OK? Or was that not an all inclusive list?

    4. Re:So tired by turbidostato · · Score: 1

      "tired of zombies, pirates, ninjas, and robots. Jesus"

      Jesus won't help you here for He is Master or Zombies: He turned Lazarus into a zombie and He Himself was a zombie too (while it took him three days for the conversion).

    5. Re:So tired by mhajicek · · Score: 3, Funny

      Zombie Strippers are okay though.

    6. Re:So tired by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

      Jesus, Internet, can you please latch on to something else?

      Like sex, boobs, sex, pics or it didn't happen, sex, really perverted fucked-up shit that should never exist, sex, and lolcats?

      The Internet seems to "latch on" to anything and everything. It's an expression of our collective psyches -- so if humans have latched onto anything, anywhere, the Internet has, too.

      --
      Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
    7. Re:So tired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zombies can't die. They're undead. ;)

    8. Re:So tired by Tanman · · Score: 2, Funny

      You ask to let it die, but what if it REFUSES to die. Like a zombie!

    9. Re:So tired by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      So, so tired of zombies, pirates, ninjas, and robots. Jesus, Internet

      Are you tired of the internet, and Jesus, too? You could always avoid the internet for a few hours a day if you are tired of zombies, pirates, ninjas, robots, or Jesus. But they will all find you, and probably when you least expect it. Don't forget, not everyone is as wise or experienced as you when it comes to zombies, pirates, ninjas, robots, the internet, and Jesus, and more people are discovering these things (I call them the Super Six, and think they should team up) every day.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    10. Re:So tired by oldhack · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's the problem with zombies. You keep killing them, they keep coming back. Whachagonnado, eh.

      --
      Fuck systemd. Fuck Redhat. Fuck Soylent, too. Wait, scratch the last one.
    11. Re:So tired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Zombie Pirates?

    12. Re:So tired by Type44Q · · Score: 1

      So, so tired of zombies, pirates, ninjas, and robots. Jesus, Internet, can you please latch on to something else? Anything?

      How about religion? :P

    13. Re:So tired by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      So, so tired of zombies, pirates, ninjas, and robots. Jesus, Internet, can you please latch on to something else? Anything? I know whatever it is you latch on to will still get annoying, with 18 year old girls running around pretending to be cute and funny, but just being fucking annoying, but for the love of god, let the Zombie bullshit die.

      The next big craze? ZOMG PONIES!

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    14. Re:So tired by jeepien · · Score: 1

      Unlike robots, which don't die. Zombies are quite flammable. They go up real good. Robots not so much. So, if you ask me--it's Robots. If you've got Robots, well sir; there's your problem right there.

    15. Re:So tired by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Having zombies, pirates, ninjas, robots, vampires, and werewolves in an MMORPG would be awesome!

      BTW, werewolves rule all :-p Flame on.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    16. Re:So tired by Kamokazi · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I have an idea. How about we use one of the most ferocious predators on the planet...the shark! And then, to make it unique, we need to add something. Something deadly, but impractical, for comic effect. How about lasers? Sharks with frickin' laser beams on their head...how's that?

      --
      As our way of thanking you for your positive contributions to Slashdot, you are eligible to disable Slashdot 2.0.
    17. Re:So tired by brantondaveperson · · Score: 1

      "Nietzsche makes so much more sense now!"

    18. Re:So tired by dissy · · Score: 1

      So, so tired of zombies, pirates, ninjas, and robots.

      The proper way to find things you wish to see, is to actually look for the things you wish to see.

      Purposely going around to message boards of things you Don't want to see is called doing it wrong :P

      By posting in a zombie thread, we can only conclude you really do want to hear about zombies, and are really really confused on the inside

    19. Re:So tired by pinkushun · · Score: 1
    20. Re:So tired by johndiii · · Score: 1

      Then we run through all of the permutations and combinations, leading to the ultimate Internet meme: zombie pirate ninja robot ponies!

      --
      Floating face-down in a river of regret...and thoughts of you...
    21. Re:So tired by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      You ask to let it die, but what if it REFUSES to die. Like a zombie!

      You know, I tend to do the same thing. Looks like I might be case zero.

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    22. Re:So tired by silentcoder · · Score: 1

      >Having zombies, pirates, ninjas, robots, vampires, and werewolves in an MMORPG would be awesome!

      We do - every single one of these things is present in WoW (except maybe the Ninja's though the flesheaters are basically zombie ninjas which is even better)

      --
      Unicode killed the ASCII-art *
    23. Re:So tired by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you leik Mudkips?

    24. Re:So tired by jafac · · Score: 1

      Actually, I believe that the current meme-spill is the "Man baby" meme.

      "Double-rainbow" has been trending downward for several weeks, and has begun to taper into obscurity; though the semi-related "autotune someone else's youtube video", I think, maybe has not peaked yet.

      It is very unfortunate that due to the deregulated environment, we're unable to hold those responsible to account for these hideous crimes. Look at the widespread damage and destruction to our collective zeitgeist, that the lolcats meme caused. Was anybody punished? Only the victims.

      This is the hazard of the "Free Meme" system, and ridiculous belief in the "invisible hand-job" that comes along and guides the internet in the "right" direction.

      Man-babies, sparkley vampires, omg pwnies, what atrocity is next?

      Only R. Stalmann knows.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    25. Re:So tired by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      zOMG!

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
  6. Re:One Reason Why by dlawson · · Score: 5, Funny

    You wouldn't be saying that if you'd met some of my managers.

    Brain dead - check; stumbling through life - check; rampant desire to eat people's brains (or simply recruit them to their own viewpoint) - check.

    QED.
    davel

    --
    dot-sig.
  7. obligitory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  8. This doesn't seem very scientific... by pedantic+bore · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This person is claiming that zombie outbreaks will fail, but where is the evidence? Has there ever been a zombie outbreak that has actually failed for any of these reasons?

    It all seems like blind optimism to me.

    --
    Am I part of the core demographic for Swedish Fish?
    1. Re:This doesn't seem very scientific... by Canadian_Daemon · · Score: 1

      How is it a scientific reason when there is no evidence or statistics to back it up. I hate it when people just tack on the word scientific to an argument.

      --
      This sig is definitive. Reality is frequently inaccurate.
    2. Re:This doesn't seem very scientific... by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 1

      They used the word scientific and that's adorable, but it's a website that includes videos of 'Why The Planeteers Should Never Get High'.

      Let's not expect too much.

    3. Re:This doesn't seem very scientific... by bar-agent · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Has there ever been a zombie outbreak that has actually failed for any of these reasons?

      Well, that is a good point, but let me turn that question around for a second. Has there ever been a zombie outbreak that succeeded?

      --
      i'd hit it so hard, if you pulled me out you'd be the king of britain [bash.org]
    4. Re:This doesn't seem very scientific... by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      Don't forget, we have not studied zombies in any great scientific detail, and we have a poor (at best) understanding of the mechanisms behind zombification and how it spreads. The possible interdimensional implications are intriguing, and are one facet of this phenomena that we still know absolutely nothing about, thus we can not formulate a plan to stop it. This isn't just a virus, folks.

      Don't panic.... yet. Have a disaster survival kit, and a plan, and don't forget to include provisions for earthquakes, floods, civil unrest, and a zombie apocalypse.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    5. Re:This doesn't seem very scientific... by hedwards · · Score: 1

      It failed because creating zombies is a lot of work. It's definitely real, and it involves basically poisoning a person and damaging the brain so as to remove most of the thinking part. Basically leaving you with a mindless human to use as a slave. The other problem is that having damaged the brain you're left with something that doesn't really think and is easily out witted by even the dimmest grade school child.

      Zombies, Voodoo and Tetrodotoxin: The Truth Behind the Myth

    6. Re:This doesn't seem very scientific... by DavidD_CA · · Score: 1

      Actually, 100% of all documented zombie outbreaks have failed.

      --
      -David
    7. Re:This doesn't seem very scientific... by selven · · Score: 1

      Why hasn't this zombie outbreak taken over its entire population yet?

    8. Re:This doesn't seem very scientific... by Talderas · · Score: 1

      My kit contains the following.

      x1 Bruce Willis

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    9. Re:This doesn't seem very scientific... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      The Chernobyl outbreak was contained. Came at a high cost, but they stopped it.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  9. The US by fenring · · Score: 1

    I, for one, leave it to the US to deal with zombie outbreaks. You, guys have so many weapons stashed up it would be a joke to deal with a couple of zombies. Just get to Europe, will ya?

    1. Re:The US by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      US Army in Europe will be there with guns. I know the Russians have a ton of guns in stockpiles and even at home.

      "According to Russia's gun laws, Russian citizens can buy smoothbore shotguns, such as Saiga 12, gas pistols, or revolvers shooting rubber bullets. Safe use of this arsenal for five years allows purchase of a rifle or carbine. In Moscow alone, some 400,000 people legally keep 470,000 weapons."

      So between the US and Russians the EU will be fine right?

    2. Re:The US by mhajicek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I, for one, leave it to the US to deal with zombie outbreaks. You, guys have so many weapons stashed up it would be a joke to deal with a couple of zombies. Just get to Europe, will ya?

      Sure, like how "we" handled Katrina? The BP spill? Wonderful. The first official act would be to round up all the survivors and confiscate their weapons, then leave them in a stadium with no supplies. Then just one infected gets mixed in with the others...

    3. Re:The US by Nrrqshrr · · Score: 1

      My army is stronger than yours.

    4. Re:The US by Lord_of_the_nerf · · Score: 1

      I hope they don't make it to Australia. What do we have? Unreasonable internet filtering, cheap domestic beer and poisonous animals.

      Still if they hit Queensland first, they'll starve.

      Moan this with a slight tone of disappointment:

      "BRAINS?"

    5. Re:The US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah. Y'all just need to get to Texas. The gun to person ratio is about 1:2 ;-)

    6. Re:The US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Katrina, she is hurricane. No can shoot in brain.

      As for BP, well... would not stop LAST spill. Might still work to stop NEXT.

      (On a side note... say you're a criminal in a large city after a disaster. You wanna commit some crimes, but lots of your potential victims are armed. What better a way to get the cops to go in and render everyone harmless, than to shoot at some fire fighters? You can even tell who's just been freshly disarmed, on account of all the cops leaving their house with confiscated guns.

      Keep THAT in mind when the next big emergency-service-disrupting disaster occurs... now that the test case has been proven, I guarantee we'll see it again...)

    7. Re:The US by Artifakt · · Score: 1

      What better a way to get the cops to go in and render everyone harmless, than to shoot at some fire fighters?

      Since shooting at the first responders may get you shot back at, or get the authorities to issue ammo to the national guard and issue shoot to kill all looters orders, or get the locals wanting to lynch you for causing the responders to delay, and trigger various other responses such as that, are you really sure you want to claim that its the best method?.

      --
      Who is John Cabal?
    8. Re:The US by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1

      Nah. Y'all just need to get to Texas. The gun to person ratio is about 1:2 ;-)

      I think you have that backwards. The gun to person ratio for the entire US is about 1:1. When you consider huge swaths of land like NYC, California and Chicago that would indicate that Texas is probably more like 2:1.

      I have a greater than 2:1 gun to person ratio in my house.

      LK

      --
      "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
    9. Re:The US by prefec2 · · Score: 1

      We have so many Leopard II tanks rotting in army garages since the cold war ended. I am absolutely sure that they can be used to roll over zombies.

    10. Re:The US by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      Russian citizens can buy smoothbore shotguns
      Who the hell makes rifled shotguns?

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    11. Re:The US by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      There are shotguns with rifled barrels. They are designed for firing slugs, generally for hunting deer or other large game.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
    12. Re:The US by Wyatt+Earp · · Score: 1

      Holland and Holland has since the 19th century.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slug_barrel

    13. Re:The US by jafac · · Score: 1

      yep. The FEMA Concentration Camps will save us. (

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  10. They finally did it, they finally did it... by retech · · Score: 1

    I've barely grown this to a full blown fantasy and now it's crushed (or its head has been blown off). Why can't I have one deeply warped narcissistic apocalyptic fantasy that is not ruined by science and logic? Damn you science, damn you all to hell!

    1. Re:They finally did it, they finally did it... by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      Just give it a twist. How's this: The military industrial complex has created nanobots that can live indefinitely in a soldiers blood stream, and which quickly close woulds and repair damage using the body's own resources. If their numbers in the soldiers blood stream are reduced, perhaps by significant bleeding, they will reproduce until the appropriate population density is reached. The work the nanobots do can leave the soldier quite hungry due to the consumption of bodily resources. There are a few drawbacks however. While the nanobots can repair a damaged brain, the information content of the damaged area cannot be recovered. This can lead to various mental difficulties ranging from PTSD to coma and a permanent vegetative state. Coincidentally, the amount of time it takes for a trace infection of nanobots to reproduce in the blood of a corpse and then repair its brain is just long enough for the brain to have decayed to an instinct-only state. Unfortunately, the instinct to feed when hungry is a strong one.

    2. Re:They finally did it, they finally did it... by Manos_Of_Fate · · Score: 1

      No spoiling the next Michael Crichton novel!

      --
      Isn't enough that I ruined a pony, making a gift for you?
    3. Re:They finally did it, they finally did it... by retech · · Score: 1

      Don't get all sciency with your zombie explanations. I was perfectly happy having an anomalous radiation spike inextricably raise the dead to a lumbering state. Explanations, plausible ones at that, are just unacceptable.

    4. Re:They finally did it, they finally did it... by MrNiceguy_KS · · Score: 1

      Spoiler Alert: There is no next Michael Crichton novel.

      --
      Redundancy is good And also good.
  11. #1 pretty much covers it by confused+one · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We got em, they don't. To quote another fictional character, Neo, "Guns, lots of guns"

    1. Re:#1 pretty much covers it by Shihar · · Score: 2

      It is true, zombie outbreaks are pretty much doomed from the start. I mean shit, just jump in a tank and start killing. It isn't like they can hurt you. It isn't hard to devise a shelter that zombies can't get into where you can safely kill hundreds or thousands. The military alone could probably kill a few thousand per soldier. You might think we have more people than bullets, but seriously, we don't.

      That said, there is way to get around this and let the zombie apocalypse happen. Imagine if zombies come about from a rapture type event. In other words, imagine if all of a sudden 90% of the world drops dead and rises as a zombies all at once. If 9 out of 10 people are suddenly are brainz eating zombies, you would overwhelm the militarys of the world in a few seconds. Imagine if in a barracks of 100 people suddenly all but 10 are zombies. The 10 living folks are probably dead before they wake up. The same goes for all of those well armed red necks. Sure, some will survive, but most are going to either turn into zombies themselves or find their wife or kids chomping on them before they realize anything is wrong. I would rate my scenario like this:

      Before the event - 0 zombies, 6.5 billion humans

      At the moment of the event - 5.85 billion zombies 650 million humans

      5 minutes after the event - ~6.43 billion zombies and 65 million humans (assumes another 90% of the population is killed in the first few moments... basically anyone standing next to someone else is about to get attacked)

      12 hours after the event - I wont do the calculation, but you can safely assume that the vast majority of humans that survived the first 5 minutes inside of a city are dead and the only people left are isolated, rural, and had to kill or flee from everyone they were with when the event happened. You might have just a few million or less humans in all of the world, and a 6.5 billion zombies wandering around.

      I think you would have a pretty convincing zombie apocalypse.

  12. First Page Link by II+Xion+II · · Score: 2, Funny

    There are two pages to the article. Why you link to the second one instead of the main one is beyond me.

    Yes I know people complain about the editors and the like, but is it really that much to ask to link to the main page?

    1. Re:First Page Link by alvinrod · · Score: 4, Funny

      You actually read the f'ing article?

      I'd ask if you're new here, but judging from your user ID, you actually are.

      At least you're grumbling about the editors so I think you'll fit in okay here.

    2. Re:First Page Link by snowgirl · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're really going to tell someone with a UID only 530,295 higher than yours that they're "new here"? Your UID is hardly lower than mine either. Also, do you know what the current UIDs being handed out are? I doubt it.

      I now bow out for someone with a 5 digit UID to come in and smack you around, to be followed by someone with a 4 digit, then finally a 3-digit. (Much lower than that is an extreme rarity... I mean, there ARE in theory only 90 2-digit UIDs...)

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    3. Re:First Page Link by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

      Also, do you know what the current UIDs being handed out are? I doubt it.

      The new crop of UIDS is around 1,800,000, I think 1,880,000 even. Well into seven digits basically.

      Hopefully you can accept this information from someone whose UID is only 369,864 less than yours. ;)

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    4. Re:First Page Link by conebrid · · Score: 1

      Get off my lawn. *grumble*

      ;)

    5. Re:First Page Link by nanospook · · Score: 1

      I've been here forever... when did they add whatchacallits UPEES?

      --
      Have you fscked your local propeller head today?
    6. Re:First Page Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've got you all beat. Back in my day we didn't even have UIDs

    7. Re:First Page Link by pinkushun · · Score: 1

      And there are two #6's and no #4 in TFA to boot!

    8. Re:First Page Link by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      I've been here forever...

      No you haven't, your UID isn't 1.
      There's always someone who's been here longer (unless you're #1).

    9. Re:First Page Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      pffff back in my days we had to use 1s and 0s to post into /. now you can actually do in this hyoertext language thing

    10. Re:First Page Link by snowgirl · · Score: 1

      Hopefully you can accept this information from someone whose UID is only 369,864 less than yours. ;)

      I'm so not new here, that I'm willing to accept facts from those with UIDs lower than mine. :)

      But heaven help you if you're wrong!

      --
      WARNING! This girl exceeds the MAXIMUM SAFE standards established by the FDA for BRATTINESS
    11. Re:First Page Link by Convector · · Score: 1

      Is there a #0 UID?

    12. Re:First Page Link by BranMan · · Score: 1

      You're really going to tell someone with a UID only 530,295 higher than yours that they're "new here"? Your UID is hardly lower than mine either. Also, do you know what the current UIDs being handed out are? I doubt it.

      I now bow out for someone with a 5 digit UID to come in and smack you around, to be followed by someone with a 4 digit, then finally a 3-digit. (Much lower than that is an extreme rarity... I mean, there ARE in theory only 90 2-digit UIDs...)

      Smack!!! It's about a zombie apocalypse. Of COURSE we RTFA.

  13. My reason #0 by Megahard · · Score: 2, Funny

    They're DEAD. As in no more. Ceased to be. Gone off to meet their maker. Bereft of life. Shuffled off their mortal coils.

    --
    I eat only the real part of complex carbohydrates.
    1. Re:My reason #0 by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      They're just resting.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    2. Re:My reason #0 by pinkushun · · Score: 1

      Resting?! Look, matey, I know a dead zombie when I see one, and I'm looking at one right now.

  14. max brooks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Read World War Z and the Zombie Survival Guide and you will have some sound (although I'd agree that they're hardly perfect) scientific reasons why zombies might make it.

    1. Re:max brooks by Kinky+Bass+Junk · · Score: 1

      > Citing fiction for fact

      Hurrrrrrrrrrr

      --
      Anonymous Coward
    2. Re:max brooks by eepok · · Score: 1

      The premise assumes fiction is fact. "7 Scientific reasons a Zombie Outbreak would fail" assumes there are zombies.

      derp derp

  15. Better yet, how about actual "zombies"? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know, the things that we know exist and aren't fake and don't have "evil" powers that transcend mortal worlds?
    Obviously a fictional zombie outbreak will fail. Old-style fictional zombies are dead, where has the author been for the past decade-plus?

    A mutation of several well known parasites could very easily create a very real infectious parasitical disease similar to that of zombies.
    All we need is some rage, a dash of EXTREME HUNGER, and a sprinkle of adrenaline, and some transferral method of the parasite.
    There you go, a very real and very dangerous outbreak.
    They will be able to climb, they will be able to work with doors, and will be able to think, most of the time, if anything, the rage will just make them more determined to rip your neck out in search of delicious meats.
    It certainly won't last a long time, it will be quarantined, unlike in 28 days / weeks later, pretty quickly.

    The chances of it happening? Very unlikely, mainly due to the transferral part, it would require some very smart mutations, almost shots in the dark, to get to the point where it would become an unexpected event.
    We already have the rage-inducing parasites and hunger parasites.
    An expected outbreak is more likely, however. And we could well probably make it extinct before it even becomes a threat.

    1. Re:Better yet, how about actual "zombies"? by mhajicek · · Score: 1

      A mutation of several well known parasites could very easily create a very real infectious parasitical disease similar to that of zombies. All we need is some rage, a dash of EXTREME HUNGER, and a sprinkle of adrenaline, and some transferral method of the parasite. There you go, a very real and very dangerous outbreak.

      There are several examples IRL of parasites and fungi that modify the behavior of their hosts to increase contagion. Apply this to humans as a host and there are several potential approaches. I think the aggressive approach may not be the most successful though, as people tend to kill and/or avoid overly aggressive people. A more successful approach may be for the host to experience a desire for companionship, close proximity to others, and physical contact. This would increase probability of contagion without significantly risking the host.

    2. Re:Better yet, how about actual "zombies"? by uvajed_ekil · · Score: 1

      There are several examples IRL of parasites and fungi that modify the behavior of their hosts to increase contagion.

      Yes, there have been media reports in recent days about new information regarding a fungus that "zombifies" ants, causing them to latch onto particular parts of plants with a "death grip" until they die, allowing the fungus to mature and spread. This is not the only zombie pathogen known.

      A more successful approach may be for the host to experience a desire for companionship, close proximity to others, and physical contact. This would increase probability of contagion without significantly risking the host.

      We also know of pathogens like these, though the resulting symptoms are not as dramatic as zombies. STDs spread when people are intimate (which is easiest to achieve when people are nice, or at least appear to be), and some of them can certainly produce cognitive and behavioral effects, though perhaps not rising to the level of zombification, yet. But then again, the ethics of human studies and trials do not permit truly good science, and humans are known to be deceitful, so it is hard to determine what might cause or modify actions and behavior patterns, and to what degree.

      --
      This is a hacked account, for which the owner can not be held responsible.
    3. Re:Better yet, how about actual "zombies"? by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      What makes you think some sexually transmitted diseases, e.g. syphilis, don't already do this, e.g. mess with your brain and make you more promiscuous?

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  16. Page 1 by pgn674 · · Score: 2, Informative
    1. Re:Page 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks. I had a hard time finding the word "Previous" near the bottom of the article; right next to "Page 2 of 2".

    2. Re:Page 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks. I had a hard time finding the word "Previous" near the bottom of the article; right next to "Page 2 of 2".

      Yeah! In fact, we don't even need no stinkin' links! It's not like it's hard to google "7 Scientific Reasons a Zombie Outbreak Would Fail (Quickly) | Cracked.com".

      Who the hell come to Slashdot just to just click and read news, anyway? Come on, give me a CHALLENGE for God's sake!

  17. Re:One Reason Why by iamhassi · · Score: 1
    --
    my karma will be here long after I'm gone
  18. Reason #8 by PPH · · Score: 4, Funny

    Zombies feed on brains. Thanks to our fine educational system, we'll starve them out.

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Reason #8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on what sort of Zombie you encounter... The brain Zombies are much more intelligent then the flesh zombies. Then again the modern Ninja zombies (actually infected people not really dead yet, thats why then can scream and run so good) would be a challenge.

      One thing the Author of the blog didn't consider was that in all cases at the root of it all is some pretty virulent disease, you may live longer but ultimately you would be very likely to loose to the zombies, unless you are wealthy, I don't think most of us /.ers are.

    2. Re:Reason #8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's fine for America, but what about the rest of the world?

    3. Re:Reason #8 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah unworked brains are like veal to Zombies. It will be a feast for them.

    4. Re:Reason #8 by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      That's why I moved to Alabama. They'll never even think to come here.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  19. Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by TiggertheMad · · Score: 4, Funny

    Zombies are the new vampires, and to date none of them sparkle in the sun.

    Want to know why zombies are so cool? Because Hollywood will never be able to get 14 year old girls interested in crappy zombie romance/emo books and movies....

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
    1. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by Emerssso · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's what you think. Just wait until I finalize the deal with my publisher and my first novel hits the market. It features Zack the Zombie and his star-crossed love affair with teenaged Sarah, a clumsy yet lovable girl I'm sure young women across the country will fall in love with.

    2. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It wouldn't be hard to really. Look at the average post-goth teen. They're still in love with death and the macabre. A vampire is just an undead human if you remove the demon aspect. Stephenie Meyer did that *shudder*. I suppose, you could have teen protagonists, one of which dies and comes back, and then they try to make it work. Think about Return of the Living Dead 3 and factor in some of the recent zombie mockumentaries where zombies are vying for civil rights. I think, sadly, a teen zombie romance is a logical eventuality. I'm sorry.

    3. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by Zerth · · Score: 3, Informative

      They made a comedy like that, back in the 90's: My Boyfriend's Back A couple other low-budget ones I can't remember from the 80's, too.

      Can't remember any serious/emo ones, though.

    4. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Mandatory: http://xkcd.com/591/

    5. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it's inevitable that someone will try, but I don't think it will succeed. Like you said, if you remove the demon aspect, a vampire is just an undead human. However, a zombie is not just an undead human, a zombie is a rotting undead human. If you remove the rotting, they're not really a zombie anymore, and rotting is not sexy.

    6. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by metalmaster · · Score: 1

      Wait until all of the magazines do their yearly round up, and cast one of the top 10 for the lead in a movie that requires gruesome disfigurement

    7. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      ssssssshhhhh zombie Edward isn't rotting, he's dazzling us with his sparkling.

    8. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by Abstrackt · · Score: 4, Funny

      Zombies are the new vampires, and to date none of them sparkle in the sun. Want to know why zombies are so cool? Because Hollywood will never be able to get 14 year old girls interested in crappy zombie romance/emo books and movies....

      It's true. My lack of hygiene, tattered clothes and strange grunting noises prevent any 14 year old girls from taking an interest in me.

      --
      They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    9. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by NeoMorphy · · Score: 1

      You sure about that? A lot of girls loved Brandon Lee in "The Crow"

    10. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already did this with a terrible comedy film back in the 90's called "My Boyfriends Back." Nothing but cheap laughs and bad jokes but it was basically what you talk about. A guy dies and comes back as a zombie to honor a date with his ex.

    11. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by Kilrah_il · · Score: 1

      Rotting is not sexy? Do you want a look at my two weeks old pizza? I assure you, it's still sexy as hell!

      Damn this post is making me hungry... gotta go.

      --
      Whenever in an argument, remember this.
    12. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Challenge Accepted!

    13. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by pinkushun · · Score: 1

      So Hollywood caters to those who it appeals to, and now we have Zombie Strippers!

    14. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by ubrgeek · · Score: 4, Funny

      Been done. Check out Breathers: A Zombie's Lament in which the main character is, "a newly risen zombie, he's forced to live in his parents' basement, attend Undead Anonymous meetings just to get out of the house, and endure abuse of all kinds from the living." A fun read.

      --
      Bark less. Wag more.
    15. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by delinear · · Score: 1

      Hmm, I wonder how that would work...

    16. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by Joce640k · · Score: 1

      Where's the sexy romantic/emo angle with zombies? They just shuffle around brainlessly.

      --
      No sig today...
    17. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      As a talentless hack I resent you lowering me to Stephanie Meyers level, you insensitive clod!

    18. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by Custard+Horse · · Score: 1

      That and you being 48 years old and living in your mom's basement...

    19. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

      "Fido" was a first step in that direction. The ending of "Shaun of the Dead" also supports that logical progression (I always thought that the love story in that movie was more between Shaun and Nick rather than Shaun and Liz). Your logic is flawless

    20. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's unfair to Meyer! Sure, the Twilight movies have Hollywood written all over them, but that's just because they wanted to make it livable for all those girls' boyfriends to come see it with them.

    21. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by wolfperson1 · · Score: 1

      Zombies are the new vampires, and to date none of them sparkle in the sun. Want to know why zombies are so cool? Because Hollywood will never be able to get 14 year old girls interested in crappy zombie romance/emo books and movies....

      You obviously haven't heard of the musical Zombie Prom...

    22. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by jeffmeden · · Score: 1

      Zombies are the new vampires, and to date none of them sparkle in the sun.

      Want to know why zombies are so cool? Because Hollywood will never be able to get 14 year old girls interested in crappy zombie romance/emo books and movies....

      That's what they said about JK Rowling... Didn't stop her from making boxcars of money off of one lousy (but adolescent-appealing) series, either. Fame is a bitch, huh?

    23. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by sh00z · · Score: 1

      Breathers: A Zombie's Lament

      Ditto, great book, but I didn't really want to put it on a shelf in my house. I was able to check it out form the public library.

    24. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by wickedskaman · · Score: 1

      What the hell is a public library?

      --
      Sand's overrated... it's just tiny little rocks.
    25. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by jafac · · Score: 1

      Q.E.D.:

      It would be an awesome lampoon of the typical teen-girl's neurotic low-self-esteem angst.

      It's not about whether the Zombie dude is attractive. You observe this in MANY real-life relationships: The worse the guy is, the worse he treats her, the more she loves him. Because it's not about the guy - it's about HER.

      If the guy WANTS her, it strokes her ego. "*gasp*! I'm WANTED. He WANTS me. *swoon*!"

      You could totally dress the zombie "boy" in a wifebeater.

      "Brains! Brains! I want to eat your brains!"

      "*swoon* . . . he luuuuuvs me!"

      (disclaimer: I'm not describing normal female behavior, it's neurotic, abnormal, and often the result of being brought up in an abusive or dysfunctional environment. But - isn't it so comically common? It's always the really, really, hot, unattainable chicks too.)

      The girl could have a living boy, who is a "nice guy" - who she ignores, while he's in love with her. He could kill the zombies for her, while she swoons over them. And then, as a final act of self-sacrifice, this boy intentionally infects himself, in order to gain her love.

      I think I have a winner.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    26. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Curiously, it sounds almost like the summary of slashdotter's autobiography.

    27. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      Mmmmmm zombie pizza. Pizza that can't quench its need for more pepperoni!

    28. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      Well, it would require a redefinition of zombie. Ever read Stephenie Meyer's explanation for why vampires sparkle? Their skin has turned into some kind of multifaceted diamond-like substance. I kid you not... seriously!

      Personally, I have long been tired of the vampire being a sexy figure. I think the last two really good vampires with sex appeal were Frank Langella's Dracula (1979) and Chris Sarandon's vampire in Fright Night (1985?). I liked the 30 Days of Night graphic novel, which brought back the concept of vampires as voracious demonic ghouls that rip your throat out, not put two clean holes in it.

      You could have an intelligent zombie.... okay, that's a big stretch considering what 10 minutes without oxygen does to the human brain, but my point is, it's fantasy, and someone could sell the story of a really hot zombie guy who's new to school. He has to fight off his temptation to eat his girlfriend, and that he does shows how much he loves her. *swoon*.

    29. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      Yes "Fido" did that. And "Survival of the Dead" along with "Land of the Dead" propose that some zombies could relearn how to do things. Ooh, the tagline to a new teen zombie romance would be: "She taught Edward to do his homework... But can she teach him to love?"

      I am shamed of myself.

    30. Re:Stephenie Meyer is a talentless hack by witherstaff · · Score: 1

      it's kind of like a place to store hard printed wikis and borrow at will, amazon also sells them. Printing a wiki would be very handy when the world's telecommunications fall apart when the zombie hordes start marching.

  20. Panicky Idiots by esocid · · Score: 1, Insightful

    History has shown that in most awful situations, people don't always act like the panicky idiots in a horror movie. In cities, people would likely congregate in the upper levels of high-rise buildings, where the invasion can be held at bay with simple security doors.

    Ahem. I beg to differ.

    --
    Absolute power corrupts absolutely. indymedia
    1. Re:Panicky Idiots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, seriously.

      A. People are panicky idiots. (Or "dumb, panicky, dangerous animals, and you know it.", for the MiB fans.)
      B. Hiding in the top of a hi-rise with one way in and one way out is the sort of thing a panicky idiot would do. Innumerable Hollywood rooftop chase sequences to the contrary, you'd better have something other than "jump across the street and down five stories" for a plan B exit strategy.

    2. Re:Panicky Idiots by blackraven14250 · · Score: 1

      B. Hiding in the top of a hi-rise with one way in and one way out is the sort of thing a panicky idiot would do.

      ...or someone thinking strategically, knowing that the onslaught can only last a couple weeks, thinking there's probably enough food for everyone to survive on the upper levels, and knows there's enough guns and ammo to hold that perfect choke point for a month.

    3. Re:Panicky Idiots by Spad · · Score: 1

      You know, until they run out of food and water and start fighting each other and there's always one idiot who spots their zombie grandmother outside and opens the door to try and save them.

  21. Zombies will win by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    The article is dead wrong. The zombies will win when the arise, because while we have brains and guns, they will have zombie Jesus on their side.

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  22. Monte carlo zombie models disagree by gotfork · · Score: 1

    Some graduate students in my department put together some simple models for zombie apocalypses and the results don't look well for humans: http://thevirtuosi.blogspot.com/2010/07/zombpocalypse.html

  23. Re:#1 don't mean jack by TiggertheMad · · Score: 1

    ...so explain to me how #1 will solve the problem of say, India. Oh sure, #1 will keep you safe for awhile in the lightly populated, heavily armed western united states, but what about the rest of the world? You got enough bullets to stop the other 6 billion people on the planet?

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  24. Brains 4 sale by Lliam33 · · Score: 1

    The article has two #6s and no #4.

    I didn't think editors made mistakes...

  25. Really? by MaxBooger · · Score: 1

    I know it's idle and all, but really? Linking to Cracked? I just looked at the firehose, and there is some good stuff in there.

    Seriously... Cracked?

  26. A Zombie Invasion Is Always Doomed to Failure... by interval1066 · · Score: 1

    ...because as soon as they start to animate they are snapped up by Washington DC lobbying firms and sent in to make those sweet deals.

    --
    Python: 'And then suddenly you have a language which says "we're all stuck with whatever the whiniest coder wants".'
  27. Accepting the fiction as truth.... by eepok · · Score: 1

    Some myths to accept as truth BEFORE considering why a Zombie Outbreak would fail:

    (1) Zombies are real
    (2) The Zombie infection is viral and spread by getting Zombie fluids (blood, saliva, etc) in another body. It also requires an incubation time.
    (3) Zombies need no form of sustenance (food, drink, oxygen, etc)
    (4) Zombies eat as an instinct... and it's their only instinct.
    (5) They can only be killed by destroying their brains (dealing sufficient damage)
    (6) Zombie "blood" is thick and gooey, does not evaporate, and doesn't seem to circulate
    (7) Zombies can freeze, but they can also thaw and continue killing
    (8) Zombies do not run. They shamble.
    (9) Zombies do not have super-human strength, but, when they're seeking food, they only know Full Power and No Power.
    (10) Zombies feel no pain
    (11) Zombies do not tire or need rest

    Ok, so assume all of this to be true. Also, assume that a major zombie infection begins in one metropolitan area and is spread by people who've been bitten leaving the scene and spreading the risk around larger geographic areas. So it starts, people move about, and eventually turn into zombies themselves. People panic and run, taking the wounded with them, instead of fighting back. Then the panic gets serious. People start hoarding food, water, and supplies. People become a bit more frivolous with their fire arms. Innocent people are killed. In-fighting begins. Looting. All the while, zombies are still killing and spreading the virus.

    That's the real fear... the breakdown of society. People killing people in a panic while zombies are doing the same.

    That's also the fantasy, to be honest. Those who those who romanticize about it seeing the society they despise fail and giving opportunity for a reboot.

    1. Re:Accepting the fiction as truth.... by eepok · · Score: 1

      Doh... forgot:

      (12) Zombies don't decay. It has something to do with the gooey blood.

    2. Re:Accepting the fiction as truth.... by Keen+Anthony · · Score: 1

      You're pretty much correct. Although I would say #8 is debatable. I believe that as a result of physical limitations placed on a zombies nervous system and joints and muscle due to death, a zombie likely would shamble. Maybe it's a matter of age though. A "new" zombie that turned fairly quickly could quite possibly be one of those new fast-moving zombies. A zombie of something buried many years or a zombie that's existed for a long time probably shambles. Maybe, it's the ultimate fate of every zombie to become non-moving? Sorta like 28 Days Later I suppose.

      Surely a zombie isn't capable of doing things the original living human couldn't do. Could an olympic sprinter zombie ruin your day from 100 yards away? I think maybe.

      And in #10, I am betting that zombies don't feel pain, though they might think they do. Memory makes them fear great heights, water, fire, etc. Maybe a zombie's natural tendency would be to recoil from the sight of you aiming a shotgun at it.

    3. Re:Accepting the fiction as truth.... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      (2) The Zombie infection is viral and spread by getting Zombie fluids (blood, saliva, etc) in another body. It also requires an incubation time.

      Isn't this how most blood born infections spread? Incubation time is a given. Turning instantly into a zombie is not plausible.

      (3) Zombies need no form of sustenance (food, drink, oxygen, etc)

      You have a point with oxygen, but the body can survive for some time with no food or water. Time without food will only result in the degradation of the body. Also some animals do not undergo Senescence meaning if they get sufficent food (brains) they can live forever (theoretically). Also being able to put the body into and out of a state of hibernation would reduce the need to eat when food is not readily available.

      (4) Zombies eat as an instinct... and it's their only instinct.

      Animals sometimes (often) disobey their other instincts if one is powerful enough. Self preservation is overriding but hunger can become enough to over power that.

      (7) Zombies can freeze, but they can also thaw and continue killing

      Certain kinds of frogs can survive the freezing/thawing process. Mostly warm blooded creatures have this problem.

      (8) Zombies do not run. They shamble.

      Apraxia, nuff said.

      (9) Zombies do not have super-human strength, but, when they're seeking food, they only know Full Power and No Power.

      Get enough adrenaline into someone and they'll act the same way.

      (10) Zombies feel no pain

      Easy to produce in humans chemically. This goes hand in hand with Adrenaline (above). Meth heads will seem impervious to pain.

      (11) Zombies do not tire or need rest

      See Adrenaline. If there is no higher mental functioning then tiredness may become a non-issue. Of course the body will slowly degrade under these conditions.

      (1) Zombies are real

      Got me here, the 28 days later style of zombie is plausible but highly improbable. They answer most of your questions (yes they do degrade over time). I think the most implausible thing about traditional zombies is the lack of nourishment, fluids in particular. The idea of hibernation solves this somewhat.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    4. Re:Accepting the fiction as truth.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, add:

      (13) Zombies don't eat each other. Not quite sure why this is the case, but being able to mimic the signal (whatever it is) could be useful.

    5. Re:Accepting the fiction as truth.... by eepok · · Score: 1

      Ya, accepting #1 is difficult to accept. It's fiction, after all. But if a discussion is to exist regarding zombies, then one has to accept that fiction as fact. Only after that can the discussion be fun.

      Side note: What's with the all the anti-fiction Debbie Downers here? In a Star Wars or Star Trek or Anime or whatever thread, it takes no effort whatsoever for fellow geeks to suspend disbelief and discuss the Force, hyperspace, controlled wormholes, etc and fiction turned real.

      Is the zombie fiction so scary that we have to constantly rip ourselves back to the comfort of reality?

    6. Re:Accepting the fiction as truth.... by mjwx · · Score: 1

      What's with the all the anti-fiction Debbie Downers here? In a Star Wars or Star Trek or Anime or whatever thread, it takes no effort whatsoever for fellow geeks to suspend disbelief and discuss the Force, hyperspace, controlled wormholes, etc and fiction turned

      Because /. is full of Geeks and Nerds who have a pathological need to explain everything.

      Many of us like hard sci-fi, which is quite explainable and leads to this kind of behaviour.

      Everyone like to associate themselves to their favourite fiction, geeks just do it scientifically. Go talk to a Twi-hard or Home and Away fan. They will associating their lives to that of their favourite fictional character (the soap character they wish they were). This is not strange or abnormal, well until it reaches the point of delusion where people actually believe they are Jedi, Vampire or Victor Devoroe (don't ask, my sister was a Days Of Our Lives fanatic, I still have nightmares) but most people will never reach that point, it's a form of escapism and is quite healthy.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    7. Re:Accepting the fiction as truth.... by Loquis · · Score: 1

      And I thought "The Zombie Survival Guide" was just another self help book.

  28. Re:#1 don't mean jack by confused+one · · Score: 1

    they have to get to where I am... and they aren't likely to make it across the oceans.

  29. Just be homer simpson and they will pass you over by Joe+The+Dragon · · Score: 1

    Just be as dumb as homer simpson and they will pass you over

  30. Fucktards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Go back to reading your comic books.

  31. Zombies do exist and are hidden everywhere! by Old+Flatulent+1 · · Score: 1

    At least in the world of Windows users.

  32. it's funny how the reasons are contradictory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    First they make a big deal out of how zombies would have all sorts of natural predators from carnivorous mammals to insects. Then they claim how hard it is for blood borne diseases to transfer ignoring how they just made a great case for how non-humans could be vectors. The high rises that the humans barricade themselves in certainly wouldn't be difficult barriers for zombie rats or zombie mosquitoes.

    But that's not as funny as them taking zombie movies so seriously to start with.

  33. Evil Corporations by Carebears · · Score: 1

    does anyone besides me think how awesome it would be to work for Umbrella?

  34. I don't agree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Problems with this sunny optimism:

    1) "Zombies would get eaten by insects, flies, bacteria, etc."
    This doesn't corroborate with any zombie flick I've seen. For the undead-variety zombie, it can be assumed that whatever supernatural force keeps them animated, it also keeps away the worms. For the infection-variety zombie, there's no reason that a zombie would attract insects and such any more than a casually ambling human. The infection-variety may be just as susceptible to micro-organisms as we are, so you might have some attrition due to staph infections, but localized infections aren't going to slow it down.

    2) "Zombies can't take heat."
    This is just a repeat of the above, only dealing with the normally benign intestinal microbes. There's no reason why an infection-variety zombie would have a problem with this, and a supernatural zombie has a supernatural immune system.

    3) "Zombies can't take cold."
    Possibly valid for supernatural-style zombies. Alaska will be very well defended in the winter. Zombie outbreaks are really more of a summertime pandemic.

    4) "Biting people is a terrible way to spread a disease."
    Yes, it is. On the other hand, there are a few elements that make it viable. For starters, what does a normal human normally do after another human bites them? Seek out other people. Without prior knowledge of the disease, it grows exponentially---and the hospitals are one of the first places where an outbreak will start. The guys in biohazard suits don't come until later, if they haven't already been taken out in their normal, here's-some-antibiotics lives.

    None of this has anything to do with supernatural-type zombies, anyway.

    5) "Pain insensitivity is a bad thing."
    If you're a human. If you're a zombie, as long as you can physically move (and bite), then it's A-OK.

    6) "The landscape is full of zombie-proof barriers."
    Okay, this guy has never seen a zombie movie. Don't you know that when zombies have an obstacle with people on the other side, they can execute complex plans? Or that that door will not hold forever while the undead pound on it? Or that you'll run out of food and have to come out eventually anyway... Zombies are not smart, but they're not completely stupid either---they have object permanence, for one thing, which puts them above a small child. They don't randomly go careening into rivers; there is a certain animal instinct to them.

    7) "We have guns."
    That you do. The US military has all sorts of nifty weapons, too, that should give them the absolute advantage in any military conflict with a developing nation like Afghanistan, Iraq, or Vietnam....

    1. Re:I don't agree by jimmydevice · · Score: 1

      Wow! That analysis and you copped a AC. You are ether a coward of a true hero.

    2. Re:I don't agree by eepok · · Score: 1

      Bravo! I'd +1 if I could!

  35. Re:#1 don't mean jack by swb · · Score: 1

    Most Zombie literature holds that large-scale weapons like bombs, machine guns, artillery and explosive weapons are ineffective. Some take the tack that the outbreak happens so quickly that we don't get use them because the Zombie overwhelm the delivery systems (you can't drop a bomb without a plane; no pilots? no air base? no bombing).

    I think this undersells military weapons and how effective they might be.

    A gattling-type machine gun or minigun would be devastating in massed crowds -- it'd be like using a firehose. Cluster munitions would also be pretty devastating, as would most conventional high explosives, particularly carpet bombing. Zombies don't hide or dig bunkers.

    Fire gets dismissed as "zombies-don't-feel-pain" but I think that discounts how hot napalm could burn (or be made to burn); at some point the flesh will incinerate.

    I do agree that among ordinary civilians, ordinary small arms could be ineffective among most people -- poor skills and a reasonable challenge (assuming headshots) for even skilled handgunners, limited ammo, and so on.

  36. Re:#1 don't mean jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not? Ok heres a scene.

    Zombies walk into ocean because there's no meat left where they were, they get eaten by sharks, people fishing catch sharks, you go to the local fish and chips shop, grab a nice bit of flake and a minimum of chips with vinegar on em, next thing you know, a trip to the local university for some quality brains is in order...

  37. Bad Link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You linked to page 2 of a two page article and spoiled it with just the top 3 you stuck up, half witted, scruffy looking nerf herders.

  38. They don't drive very well. by nsaspook · · Score: 1

    http://www.kgw.com/news/Car-accident-victims-dressed-like-zombies-confuse-crash-witnesses-98157894.html

    Portland Police Sergeant Greg Stewart told the news station, "We're glad that everyone is alive, despite being 'undead.'"

    --
    In GOD we trust, all others we monitor.
  39. well we'll see in november by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    if the tea party wins a lot legislative seats, then the zombie outbreak will have succeeded

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  40. Re:One Reason Why by HungryHobo · · Score: 1

    If anything like this:

    http://www.damninteresting.com/body-snatching-barnacles-and-zombie-crabs

    ever evolved to infect our species you'd have something pretty close to a zombie outbreak.

    Imagine, people infected with something which diverts their basic instincts, millions more parasites start growing in their flesh and they protect them as an otherwise sentient free humans with all the zeal and ferocity that someone will protect their children.

  41. Why Zombies Win by antirelic · · Score: 1

    TFA seems to takes only one possible zombie scenario; the dead rising from the grave. Most of the more well thought out zombie scenarios seem to have zombies as a secondary effect of a primary event. Take for example "Omega Man" where most of the population is killed off by the virus, while a large group turns into zombies, and a small group is simply immune. The primary catastrophe is the collapse of modern society due to massive population decreases. The surviving humans, even without the pressure of an undead predator, will get a fresh new perspective of mother nature.

    Modern military forces, rednecks, pistol toting fudge packers, and inner city ghetto rats will have to survive their friends, families, and loved ones suddenly turning into rabid flesh eating zombies. Soldiers seldom have access instant access to their firearms off the battle field (take a look at Fort Hood massacre), even Rednecks have to put down their weapons long enough to get into the beer dispensary and the fudge packers have to use all fours to get it on. The suddenness of the outbreak will go a long way to determine the successfulness.

    Reducing western living individuals to a pre-agrarian life style (lets face it, with less than 10% of the population still practicing agriculture in western societies), the threat of an unsleeping, undying, fleshing eating cannibal that can withstand tremendous amounts of trauma, would be extreme difficult to cope with. Most likely, these zombies would be infesting the "prime real-estate" where they formerly lived, forcing the surviving humans out into the "wilderness" where life will be even more difficult. The plains, pastures, and farm lands that humans have sought, cleared and planted will now be the swarming grounds of this now "super predator".

    Depending on the type of zombie, human beings will be unable to hold up in fortresses forever. Fresh water will be scarce. Fresh water that is safe to access will be even more so. Human beings will not only have to contend with the zombies, but with each other as well. Without the ability to grow food, humans will be forced to keep groups small and force them to protect the few sources of food that they have regular access. Without growth in numbers... western society will devolve. All of our great advances will be lost. Zombies win, we lose.

    --
    20th century Marxism is not progress...
  42. reasons the walking dead epidemic will fail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    there are billions of them (reasons), all under 4 feet tall. the innocents will be protected. down to the wire now.

    meanwhile (while we still have a while); the corepirate nazi illuminati is always hunting that patch of red on almost everyones' neck. if they cannot find yours (greed, fear ego etc...) then you can go starve. that's their (slippery/slimy) 'platform' now. see also: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antisocial_personality_disorder

    never a better time to consult with/trust in our creators. the lights are coming up rapidly all over now. see you there?

    greed, fear & ego (in any order) are unprecedented evile's primary weapons. those, along with deception & coercion, helps most of us remain (unwittingly?) dependent on its' life0cidal hired goons' agenda. most of our dwindling resources are being squandered on the 'wars', & continuation of the billionerrors stock markup FraUD/pyramid schemes. nobody ever mentions the real long term costs of those debacles in both life & any notion of prosperity for us, or our children. not to mention the abuse of the consciences of those of us who still have one, & the terminal damage to our atmosphere (see also: manufactured 'weather', hot etc...). see you on the other side of it? the lights are coming up all over now. the fairytail is winding down now. let your conscience be your guide. you can be more helpful than you might have imagined. we now have some choices. meanwhile; don't forget to get a little more oxygen on your brain, & look up in the sky from time to time, starting early in the day. there's lots going on up there.

    "The current rate of extinction is around 10 to 100 times the usual background level, and has been elevated above the background level since the Pleistocene. The current extinction rate is more rapid than in any other extinction event in earth history, and 50% of species could be extinct by the end of this century. While the role of humans is unclear in the longer-term extinction pattern, it is clear that factors such as deforestation, habitat destruction, hunting, the introduction of non-native species, pollution and climate change have reduced biodiversity profoundly.' (wiki)

    "I think the bottom line is, what kind of a world do you want to leave for your children," Andrew Smith, a professor in the Arizona State University School of Life Sciences, said in a telephone interview. "How impoverished we would be if we lost 25 percent of the world's mammals," said Smith, one of more than 100 co-authors of the report. "Within our lifetime hundreds of species could be lost as a result of our own actions, a frightening sign of what is happening to the ecosystems where they live," added Julia Marton-Lefevre, IUCN director general. "We must now set clear targets for the future to reverse this trend to ensure that our enduring legacy is not to wipe out many of our closest relatives."--

    "The wealth of the universe is for me. Every thing is explicable and practical for me .... I am defeated all the time; yet to victory I am born." --emerson

    no need to confuse 'religion' with being a spiritual being. our soul purpose here is to care for one another. failing that, we're simply passing through (excess baggage) being distracted/consumed by the guaranteed to fail illusionary trappings of man'kind'. & recently (about 10,000 years ago) it was determined that hoarding & excess by a few, resulted in negative consequences for all.

    consult with/trust in your creators. providing more than enough of everything for everyone (without any distracting/spiritdead personal gain motives), whilst badtolling unprecedented evile, using an unlimited supply of newclear power, since/until forever. see you there?

    "If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land." )one does not need to agree whois in charge to grasp the notion that there may be some assistance available to us(

    boeing, boeing, gone.
     

  43. Fun read. by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I especially like the point about the sheer number of armed individuals. Makes me think the only semi-viable zombie outbreak scenario is something like Highschool of The Dead, where an outbreak occurs in urban Japan.

    But even in Japan, I don't imagine an outbreak would last very long.

    I doubt the zombies have much to worry about from the Japanese police though, they've already had an aversion to using their guns ingrained in them through training. Add to that the stress and sheer 'omgwtfbbq'-ness of the situation, and I think it'd be more likely to see many of them either completely freaking out, or making an ultimately futile effort to use batons and riot shields against the zombies. And even the ones that actually use their firearms against the zombies will quickly go through all the ammunition they have access to and be screwed.

    I imagine the JGSDF would fare a lot better, even with the psychological factors. The question is, how badly outnumbered would they be by the time someone thinks to officially mobilize them?

    But hey, if all else fails, the US military presence in Japan could probably take care of it themselves. I wonder what kind of legal and bureaucratic messes would be involved in mobilizing the US military for actual combat operations on Japanese soil, even in an emergency...

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
    1. Re:Fun read. by boxwood · · Score: 1

      Yeah because recent history has shown how quickly the US government reacts to disasters.

      They'd have to spend at least a few weeks arguing over whether the state or the federal government should deal with the problem. By that time, zombies have spread to multiple states. Then they's spend a few weeks trying to decide if its should FEMA, Homeland Security, the CDC or the military that should deal with the outbreak. By that time 3/4 of the country is infected, with infection spreading throughout north america and into south america.

      By this time infrastructure is breaking down. Yeah your weapons are effective. So the militray massacres zombies early on. But any military strategist knows that logistics can win or lose wars. While the US is winning epic battles with the zombies, the infection has spread to venezuela. Oh shit you aren't getting oil anymore. Maybe there's some oil in the middleast, but no tankers want to come to the US because there's this whole zombie apocalypse going on. And US tankers will be denied access to foreign ports because they don't want your zombie problem to spread there.

      So now you don't have any oil. How are you going to keep your army supplied with things like food and ammunition? Doesn't take long for every soldier to be down to the ammo and rations he's carrying, with no resupply coming anytime soon.

      See your reliance on foreign oil makes you extremely vulnerable to a zombie apocalypse. Support alternative energy sources or the zombies win.

    2. Re:Fun read. by tibman · · Score: 1

      I know what you're trying to say, but there won't be a solar powered tank or bomber anytime soon.. and for good reasons. The US military would probably have to tap into the SPR to continue the zombie fight: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_Petroleum_Reserve

      There are rediculous ammounts of food, ammo, and uniforms stacked up. It would take years of all out war to deplete them with no production in place. But your point about resupply is dead on, it has to be moved from stockpiles to where the fighting is. My guess is the stockpile locations will actually be the main points of conflict because that's where all the survivors will be.

      I'm also with you on how slow the US Gov reacts to disasters.. but i would like to point out that it is quick to react to threats. Maybe it's because the military wheels move faster than the civilian ones, i don't know. Less debate involved perhaps.

      --
      http://soylentnews.org/~tibman
    3. Re:Fun read. by boxwood · · Score: 1

      Haha was just poking fun with the alternative energy thing.

      Yeah the military could react quickly if they classified it as a threat. But would they? If there's an explosion its obvious that we need to lock the place down with lots of security until we know for sure its cause.

      But this would look like a disease, and so they'd probably go to the CDC and FEMA and all those agencies first.

      They problem with the article is that it assumes everyone is prepared for zombies and know the best way to react.

      The best zombie movies portray a breakdown in society. The zombies in 28 days later weren't anywhere near as scary as the soldiers who went insane. That sort of thing is hard to prepare for.

      At first there would be looting, but thats not really as big a problem as when there are no more abandoned stores to loot. Then people start preying on each other, because hey they need more food and fuel and some other guys with less guns than us have some.

      So even if you have a good defense against zombies, it might not be good enough to stop non-zombies that want your stuff.

      The article writer is confused. Zombie movies aren't about anything biological. Because the biology of zombies is impossible. Zombie movies are a socialogical what if scenario. The biggest threat isn't zombies, its other humans that have been made desperate by the zombies.

    4. Re:Fun read. by purplepolecat · · Score: 1

      I especially like the point about the sheer number of armed individuals. Makes me think the only semi-viable zombie outbreak scenario is something like Highschool of The Dead, where an outbreak occurs in urban Japan.

      Japan would be safest of all. Why ? One word.

      KATANAS.

      (Everyone still has one of these, right ? I know anime wouldn't lie to me.)

    5. Re:Fun read. by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 1

      Nice. I lol'd. :)

      Of course, anime also depicts the majority of Japanese highschool girls as having huge racks. (I'll leave it at that and let you figure it out on your own.) ;)

      --

      Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  44. CONSPIRACY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This smells like another Umbrella cover up to me!

  45. Re:One Reason Why by greyhueofdoubt · · Score: 1

    Imagine, people infected with something which diverts their basic instincts, millions more parasites start growing in their flesh and they protect them as an otherwise sentient free humans with all the zeal and ferocity that someone will protect their children.

    I had to read this a few times before I figured out that you *weren't* talking about sex drive and childmaking.

    You want zombies, you should check out your local dive bar around closing time.

    --
    No offense, but I've stopped responding to AC's.
  46. It will fail because... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    we will kick their arses for the lord!!!

  47. It's a silly article meant for laughs by jollyreaper · · Score: 1

    But the viability of a zombie apocalypse depends upon the rules the story has in place. Romero zombies are animated by an unknown cause and are purely supernatural with no explanation given. The modern take is to try and explain it away with a virus or something but trying to explain things invites debunking. There's no way for a zombie to work. Leave the mechanism unexplained or even better show scientists explaining why the zombies simply cannot exist while still looking at the inexplicable walking dead, that's some good horror right there. No, the world is not operating the way you thought it should and no, it's not stopping to offer an explanation.

    The argument goes back and forth as to whether a zombie outbreak could be contained or is the end of the world. Is it all unburied dead who reanimate or just the people who have had direct contact with a zombie, a bite or scratch? That really changes the game. Given a general societal collapse, the post-apocalyptic scenario is difficult enough without the need of introducing zombies. Zombies just make it all the worse. Just imagine a Captain Tripps pandemic.

    There's any number of interesting stories that can be told ranging from isolated outbreaks to the end of the world and everything in between. The most interesting stories will be in scenarios that haven't been explored as frequently.

    --
    Kwisatz Haderach
    Sell the spice to CHOAM
    This Mahdi took Shaddam's Throne
  48. Not so hard to escape a "random walk" by Flash+Modin · · Score: 1

    There was some research released a few months ago that showed if you're escaping from a predator that behaves in a random walk type way (i.e. a zombie) then you're safest bet is a maze like environment. So if the $*&T does hit the fan, head to the mall, not some huge barn.

  49. What a complete nonsense by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 0

    7# They have too many natural predators

    Because having zombie bears around REALLY helps things along. Oh wait, ALL the animals are NOT affected? You see, this article starts of bad RIGHT here, it assumes the zombie apocalypse starts with ONE. It rarely does in the fantasy stories I know off. It is usually either the dead rising or living humans being converted by some event. The zombies don't come as one, they come as many. And the dogs? Either they are zombies too OR afraid of this predator that is NOT afraid of them and dares to take them on. And no, rotting human beings are NOT easy food for all predators, cats tend to stay away from rotten diseased meat. It is generally assumed that the consumption of zombie meat is not a healthy thing to do, even turning you into a zombie yourself. So now we got zombie bears, zombie maggots and zombie vultures. Does this increase our odds of survival?

    6# They can't take the heat

    Dead meat doesn't walk around (unless you leave it out REALLY long). Zombies do. So it stands to reason that whatever a zombie might be, it isn't actually dead meat anymore. SOMETHING is going on that turns them into the UNDEAD, not the actual dead. If zombies were REALLY fully dead then they would be even worse because they would be even harder to stop. How do you kill a steak? Skeletons are harder enemies in D&D precisly for this reason. Assuming that zombies will start to rot is trying to make the zombie apocalypse fit in our understanding of the natural world. But zombies don't exist in our understanding of the natural world. So either you have zombies and they can somehow escape the normal rules, or they simply don't exist. Either there is a hord of them, or not a single one. And the hord does NOT simply explode in the sun. That would make a lousy movie.

    5# They can't handle the cold

    Same deal. Either zombies work, or they don't. Zombies are NOT the dead, they are the UNDEAD. Big difference. Dead people don't move around a lot. Zombies do. So they can't be the same thing. The article is basically saying that "trucks drive on petrol, and if they run out they can't move. Ergo robots, which are not trucks stop when you empty their gas tank" Who says robots have gas tanks? And anyway, neither can we. Remember the breakdown of civilization thing? Bye bye central heating.

    The bit about freezer burned meat is just plain silly. The dead don't WALK. If they start walking then SOMETHING has changed! Really, this is like saying "Ooh look gravity has reversed, but not to worry, we won't float of into space because gravity has always kept us down." The article is argueing against the logic of a SINGLE zombie being able to exist. NOT against the zombie apocalypse itself. The zombie apocalypse takes it for granted that zombies CAN exist, it doesn't matter how. Either no zombie can exist, or any can and not suffer from the usual defects of being dead.

    #5 Biting is a terrible way to spread a disease.

    Tell that to the mosquito. And who got vampires mixed up in all this? Zombies are the undead rising OR some other event causing the living to turn into zombies (note TURN into ZOMBIES, not kill. Zombies ain't dead, they are zombies (at best they are undead)). I keep hammering on this because the article just doesn't seem to be able to get a hang of the idea. The biting part, is just a means to add extra horror to the story. The idea that just escaping the original event is not enough and that those with who you have survived might be turned at any moment. It is NOT a way for the disease to spread, it is a plot element to cause further horror.

    Zombiesm is NOT a social disease for crying out loud. Learn to seperate the apocalypse from the sniffles for crying out loud. There is a REASON the movie only joins the few survivors AFTER society has collapsed and that is because the zombie apocalypse will come with a bang, world wide, all at once. Not by some diseased foreigner going around biting people. And even if it did. That is

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:What a complete nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It always irritates me in zombie movies, like Resident Evil, when skeletal remains become reanimated from the grave and break out of the ground. They are just bones. What is moving them? The Force?

  50. In Ottawa by Kongzilla · · Score: 1

    ...we call them Senators.

    1. Re:In Ottawa by JDmetro · · Score: 1

      har har har except zombies don't get appointed by the head zombie

  51. Re:#1 don't mean jack by SvnLyrBrto · · Score: 1

    I would expect that the battering and deep-frying in hot oil procedure is fairly effective at killing off germs... including the ones that cause zombiefication. That just leaves sushi as a problem. And one would hope that the sushi chef would recognize and discard any zombified sashimi, after all.

    --
    Imagine all the people...
  52. Zombies don't need to be dead by The+Hatchet · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Large groups of pathetic unthinking masses trying to kill all non-them. At the accelerations of stupidity coming into conservative America via. Fox news using false analogies, I would say arm yourself hard right now, because in about 1-2 years, they will have degraded into manic destructive psychotic mobs. Hell, they are already bringing guns to protests and protesting several parts of the constitution. I have been attacked for being an atheist, despite all the good things I have done for my society, by people who find nothing wrong with cheating, stealing, lying, or hating. Give it a couple months. Although living zombies only take dismemberment before dying. undead zombies on the otherhand would most certainly be devoured by vultures (just look at the vultures following armies in the civil war, due to the high amount of death and long time fighting).

    --
    Where is the mod rating for "scary"? Also, ...
    1. Re:Zombies don't need to be dead by w0mprat · · Score: 1

      It's not implausible that a fast virulent virus or bacterial infection in the brain could cause a behavioral change that makes sufferers go completely off the hook. Not undead, but uncontrollable rage or desire for human contact. Infact a bacteria that produced a toxin that was mind altering.

      So what do we need for a real-world scientifically plausible zombie invasion?
      1) A virulent infection, preferably airborne and rapidly spreading (cold, flu, ebola)
      2) Sufficient incubation time to spread through population nationally/globally (flu)
      3) Virus symptoms causes delerium, rage, demented violent behaviour, insatiable need to contact humans (no need to bite), reduced if not wiped out inhibitions (perhaps even a touch of horniness... lol).
      4) Symptoms last long enough to spread the infection effectively before killing the host or being fought off by the hosts immune system.
      5) For coolness factor, the host slips into a deep death-like coma before waking up and going mental.


      Undead not required.

      --
      After logging in slashdot still does not take you back to the page you were on. It's been that way for 20 years.
    2. Re:Zombies don't need to be dead by Cadallin · · Score: 1

      Rabies causes vaguely similar symptoms, but it has a very long incubation time. A rapidly progressing rabies variant (incubation time of hours, rather than weeks to months) with the same psychological symptoms might be somewhat similar to a zombie outbreak. However, Rabies-Zombie hoards wouldn't be self-sustaining. Death follows onset of psychological symptoms (not coincidentally) in about the time it takes to die of dehydration. Zombie-Hoards are quite difficult to manage without the trick of raising the dead.

    3. Re:Zombies don't need to be dead by The+Hatchet · · Score: 1

      That is any rabies/flu recombination. but my point was that you don't even need a disease. All you really need is large groups of stupid, violent people. Tea party + Fox news + religion = this result.

      --
      Where is the mod rating for "scary"? Also, ...
  53. zombies exist and they won by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1

    zombies represent the unthinking masses . Our society is already based on their behaviour . However in reality they are called consumers .

    --
    Deleted
    1. Re:zombies exist and they won by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      You need to watch out. If you aren;t careful you are going to start using the word 'sheeple', and there's no hope for you at that point.

  54. Oh brother by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, /. is featuring posts linking to cracked.com on its frontpage? How low the world has sunk.

  55. Zombie rappers? by Joce640k · · Score: 2, Funny

    Grills glinting in the sunlight as they shuffle towards you.

    --
    No sig today...
    1. Re:Zombie rappers? by weirdcrashingnoises · · Score: 1

      shuffle and flow?

      --
      sigs... don't talk to me about sigs....
  56. The case of the missing genome. by Msdose · · Score: 1

    The interest in zombies derives from the zombification effect that religiously applied eugenics has on the human genome. Religions have been doing eugenics on their adherents for 10,000 years, breeding them into willing slaves to the administration. After all this time, and especially now, with the support the godless religion of political correctness has for letting religions continue doing eugenics (they do it too), the human genome has been reduced to a length which indicates we are not viable enough to escape extinction. It's not brains that zombies need, it's genes.

  57. Tasmanian devils by wen1454 · · Score: 1

    Tasmanian devils would disagree that biting is a terrible way to spread a disease.

  58. You want scientific? by juletre · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You want scientific? Ok, here you go: http://www.mathstat.uottawa.ca/~rsmith/Zombies.pdf It is a mathematical model of how the zombies will spread.

    It is not as optimistic as cracked.com I am afraid.

    --
    "he, who has quotes in his signature, is a douche" - unknown.
  59. They Will Go On by some+old+guy · · Score: 1

    Zombies have always been, and always will, be with us because of 1) Organized Religion, 2) Trade Unions, 3) Nation States, and 4) Marxist Collectivism. Only enlightened anarchy can spare us.

    --
    Scruting the inscrutable for over 50 years.
  60. "Ancient" as in... 19'th century? by Moraelin · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, while humanity had a ton of imagination when it comes to fearing death, nothing even came close to the modern idea of vampire.

    What Europe believed in is better described as "revenants", or what we nowadays think of as "zombies." They weren't supposed to be some clever and scheming count, but mindless bloated corpses of some peasants.

    Oh, and generally they'd transmit disease generally by just being there not by bit. Remember it was an era where even an educated medicus knew that diseases are transmitted by smells (no, really, the miasma theory of disease) and everyone else knew that corpses cause disease. A corpse walking around was a health hazard by itself.

    And just to drive the "zombie" aspect home, most of these were supposed to be literally brain dead. E.g., the ones from an outbreak in Venice could be prevented from biting anything ever again by just shoving a brick in the corpse's mouth. Your average Dracula or White Wolf kinda vampire would be sentient enough to basically go "oh, i have a brick in my mouth" and spit it out. Heck, even the dumbest animal would. But the version those people believed in would be forever thwarted by that brick because they weren't even able to figure that out.

    Other forms of thwarting an undead included the equivalent of the frat prank of tying someone's shoelaces together, except it was more like tying the ends a piece of string to the big toe on each foot. Yep, that would thwart them.

    Even when myths gave them a couple of neurons still working, then they'd be riddled with a crippling OCD, so they'd irresistably stop and count the grains in a pile of rice or whatever.

    Basically they're not quite the smart and scheming baron kind, nor the kind who'd blend in and maintain a Masquerade. They were mindless rotting corpses.

    The modern idea of a Vampire was pretty much used invented by Polidori in "The Vampyre", sort of reused in "Carmilla" (where it got some sexual part added too), but only really became mass known via "Dracula". It's really not about any single "ancient" myth, but a mix of several of those. Including a lot of the witchcraft beliefs, incubus beliefs, and various assorted other bits and ends. And yes, some stuff taken from fairies too.

    Basically what Polidori, Le Fanu and Stoker did there was already inventing a new kind of vampire and romanticizing it to appeal to their target audience. That was it, really. And each of them felt free to add a few personal touches and mix some even more unrelated mythical monsters to the definition of a Vampire, to make it even more mass-appeal. Which is basically why you've heard of Dracula over and over again, but most people never even heard of Carmilla or The Vampyre.

    Complaining that someone else did the same thing is a bit silly. Yes, Twilight included some stuff from an unrelated mythical beastie. What, unlike Stoker, Anne Rice, White Wolf and everyone else... who added bits from unrelated mythical beasties too?

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:"Ancient" as in... 19'th century? by IndustrialComplex · · Score: 1

      Complaining that someone else did the same thing is a bit silly. Yes, Twilight included some stuff from an unrelated mythical beastie. What, unlike Stoker, Anne Rice, White Wolf and everyone else... who added bits from unrelated mythical beasties too?

      Oh you will be sorry, you all will be sorry, and you will rue the day you said that.

      In my next novel, I'm giving them angelic wings... and rainbows.

      (But in all seriousness, I can complain when someone adds something that makes a story worse, even if that story was pretty bad to begin with)

      --
      Out of modpoints but really liked a post? 1BDkF6TtmmeZ3yqXbz9yhdYVqRYnwFoXDj
    2. Re:"Ancient" as in... 19'th century? by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Been done before, actually.

      Some of the Eastern European myths (that Stoker was drew inspiration from) include such things as the Zburator, which basically means "the flying one" or "the one who flies". Oh, and he was into underage unmarried girls, like the Twilight guy too. I'm not aware of any particular consensus of how those flew, so I'd imagine angelic wings wouldn't be out of the question.

      Or undead which could take pretty much every imaginable shape. The owl for example gave the name of Strigoi, though aparently they could shape-shift into everything else, from wolf to puppy or kitten. Or magical guys which could transform into dragons.

      Rainows? You're aiming low. The Scholomance is an actual myth that's mentioned right in Dracula, and apparently Dracula himself graduated it. It was a mythical school where the Devil himself taught magic, including weather magic. As in: including how to summon the most devastating storms known to man. Rainbows? Heh. Those probably got rainbows as their junior year assignment.

      Oh, and they got a dragon as an epic mount too. How pimp is that? :p

      But anyway, technically Dracula had graduated that magic college, so rainbows probably wouldn't be out of the question as it is.

      More seriously, I still don't see the problem I was answering to. The OP was pretending there's some clearly defined Vampire myth, and some clearly defined Faerie myth, and you could say that some movie was clearly one or clearly the other.

      And all I'm saying is that it's just not so. The Vampire mythology as we have it, is a very modern invention, and not something any given population ever believed in. They're just whatever some novelist wanted them to be.

      Whether it's Dracula or Twilight, it's drawing from the same pool of eastern european superstition anyway. If anything, Twilight is probably actually closer (though not identical) to something that people actually believed in, albeit that would be an incubus rather than undead.

      Sure, some authors were more talented than others, and some chose better stuff, some chose crap. Isn't that the case in all genres? But that's IMHO more of a question of just that: talent and brains of the author. Rather than just being a matter of conforming to some exact definition of which beastie does what.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    3. Re:"Ancient" as in... 19'th century? by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even when myths gave them a couple of neurons still working, then they'd be riddled with a crippling OCD, so they'd irresistably stop and count the grains in a pile of rice or whatever.

      So Sesame Street's depiction of "The Count" is spot on then.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    4. Re:"Ancient" as in... 19'th century? by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      While the "Count Dracula" type vampire is certainly pretty modern, the concept of physically and mentally superior undead that suck the life from you is very very old.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edimmu

      from

      http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A273566

    5. Re:"Ancient" as in... 19'th century? by Moraelin · · Score: 1

      Yes, well, various ideas of things that can suck your soul out are a whole other dish. (You have to look no further than modern western world for a few people who think that cats will suck the breath out of a baby.) But you have to put it in context of what I was answering to. Basically that Vampires are X, Y, and Z, and the guy from Twilight isn't a vampire because he sparkles. It was already basically a proclamation that only essentially the archetype from Dracula counts as a real vampire. Honestly, the half ghost, half air elemental Edimmu wouldn't have fit that any better. Or conversely if we include anything that could get some kind of energy out of you as Vampires, then basically the GGPs objection that the Twilight guy is a faerie because "Fairies are youthful, amoral (note the difference), sparkly, supernatural beings who turn children away from their families and gain strength from human emotions." becomes moot as then Faeries become a kind of Vampire :p

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    6. Re:"Ancient" as in... 19'th century? by jwhitener · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I read your post kinda fast. I was more responding to your comments about the old European fears of the undead, and how prior to the 19th century, is was zombie-like: no concepts of the modern vamp. Slow, dumb, ravenous, disease carrying, etc..

      I just wanted to point out that fast, smart, evil, sucking, was around prior to the 19th also:)

      100% agree that Twilight is faeries though hehe.

  61. Refuted by ewe2 · · Score: 1
    --
    insecurity asks the wrong question irritation gives the wrong answer
  62. Zombie now by Alioth · · Score: 1

    Heya Tom it's Bob, from the office down the hall,
    Good to see you buddy how ya been?
    Things have been OK with me except that I'm a zombie now
    I really wish you'd let us in....

    The *awesome* Jonathan Coulton made a song called "Re: Your Brains". Find it on YouTube, it's great :)

  63. My rebuttal by pinkushun · · Score: 1

    The "7 scientific reasons a zombie outbreak would fail" is a pretty fun read.

    I however believe, given the right circumstances, that a zombie outbreak would succeed. In that spirit of the same fun, here is my rebuttal to those points.

    #7. They Have Too Many Natural Predators
    Humans are too smart and well armed to be at risk. Maggots will infest zombies, eating out their eyes making them useless.

    Reply:
    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, as Einstein said. Fear is a primal emotion that we have forgotten how to control with out placid controlled lives. A horrific event like an outbreak would shock many into stupidity, and given guns, would even kill other humans by mistake. So much for being well-armed.
    Zombies do rot, they are short-term animals, but don't underestimate their other senses heightening to compensate.

    #6/5. They Can't Take the Heat / Cold
    Heat promotes bacterial growth in the dead's gut, causing them to bloat and explode

    Reply:
    No problem here, it's pretty much a given as zombies digestive systems become dead, their gut fills with any meat they can tear from anything that moves, until they burst open. That won't stop them from eating more though. This comes from their brains being shut down, except for the primal need to feed.
    I see them freezing, this is a good advantage for the living.

    #4. Biting is a Terrible Way to Spread a Disease
    Nobody is going to be having sex with a zombie.

    Reply:
    I wouldn't say nobody... OK back on topic. In medicine, viruses and bacteria can all spread via any of the following means:

    * droplet contact (coughing or sneezing)
    * direct (bodily fluids)
    * indirect (touching soil contamination or a contaminated surface)
    * airborne, fecal-oral transmission (contaminated food or water)
    * vector borne (via insects or animals)

    Biting is not the only means, and we should not discount any of the others just because Hollywood says so, or they didn't focus on those aspects. In reality, any of those transmission vectors are possible.

    #3. They Can't Heal from Day to Day Damage
    Claims zombies are clumsy, and accumulated damage will be their end.

    Reply:
    Zombies are not long-term creatures by any means. They rot, they don't heal, they just want to feed. That's why they are horrific and, well... zombies. But since they don't feel pain (from their broken CNS) they just keep on coming, or die trying. They can't be scared off.

    #2. The Landscape is Full of Zombie-Proof Barriers

    Reply:
    Naturally outbreaks will be focused in populated cities, I don't see how a picture of a mountain applies here. Zombies will undoubtedly walk off ledges and fall down stairs, but they are also mindless beasts who will behave unpredictably. Remember that we can't just assume the outbreak will be contained to the streets either, if the undead were shambling in a corporate head office (like they do sometimes), then the living are at risk in a enclosed space. Boundaries work both ways.

    #1. Weapons and the People Who Use Them
    Claims the total gun owners, private and governmental, is enough to blow an outbreak to hell and back.

    Reply:
    This is one thing we have going for us, but we have to get the outbreak under control before things get too fucked, ie people panic and start killing the 'wrong ones'. Considering "if Homo sapiens are good at one thing, it's killing other things", remember how we learned that fact in the first place. I recommend a melee skill, in case your gun jams, you run out of ammo, or you just feel like taking a steel pipe to that mushy skull and paint the wall with brains. Gaaaaargh!

    Links:
    original article: http://www.cracked.com/article_18683_7-scientific-r

    1. Re:My rebuttal by AdamThor · · Score: 1

      Ah, the rebuttal. More fun to write than to read. Not that anyone cares, here's mine:

      7) They have too many natural predators, something will eat them.

      - Zombified flesh is unclean, poisonous. This is generally accepted in the fiction. Animals won't eat them. Even if some bear tried, the zombie - unmoved by pain - would also bite at the bear. Dead bear rather than zombie bear is the consensus result. Insect / bacteria / rot? Yes, zombie rot is part of what happens. Zombies will be functional for weeks or months, that's long enough to result in Zombie Apocalypse.

      6) They can't handle the cold / heat.

      - Yes, they'll freeze. Then they'll thaw again and start to feast on the living. Cell damage won't stop them any more than the death they have already suffered did. Rot will stop them, maybe, but not for several weeks.

      5) Biting is ineffective, and the CDC will stop it.

      - Except that all the fiction agrees that biting is effective. You can no more say that zombie bites won't transfer the disease than you can say that zombies won't rise from the dead. Zombie bites spread zombism, it's part of the definition. The CDC will certainly work to prevent the spread, but by this time we're already into the narrative of our zombie movie, and their success certainly not guaranteed.

      3) They can't heal from damage

      - yes, of course. The wrecked zombie pulling itself after you with its one remaining arm is part of the cannon. Many reasons listed are valid for why zombies can't exist long term, but they only have to be around long enough to destroy society. "They can't heal from damage" is no objection at all.

      2) The landscape is full of zombie proof barriers

      - You don't live in a secluded mountain monastery. You live around a bunch of other people, in an environment that has been made nice for humans to get around in. Some tibetan monks will be fine. You are zombie bait.

      1) People have guns

      - Got a gun right now, do ya? Keep it with ya all the time? No? Well even if you do people get upset when you go around shooting folks. No, you won't be able to carry around a shotgun and go blasting zombies until (by definition!) the zombie apocalypse is in full swing. And by then civilization has fairly broken down.

      0) We have used science and logic to prepare you for the Zombie Apocalypse!

      - The Zombie Apocalypse is a supernatural event. Use all the science you want, when the dead rise to consume the living you'll find everything you thought you knew was wrong.

      --
      -- "Oh. This guy again."
    2. Re:My rebuttal by pinkushun · · Score: 1

      There are some people on the tubes that still actually _read_ posts! For topics that we find interesting at least.

      A /. story that holds my attention for more than a day, amazing! This calls for an ASCII emoticon for zombies

      f(O_o)f

  64. Re:#1 don't mean jack by confused+one · · Score: 1

    Right. So:

    • Live near military base... check x4
    • Go to the range regularly... check
    • stock up on ammo...

    Note to self: order bulk ammo online

  65. I, for one... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...welcome our new zombie overlords!

  66. Tasteless? by singingjim1 · · Score: 1

    My office's Web Sense blocked the site as being "Tasteless". Obviously our IT dept. has never had grilled zombie. It's pretty damn tasty with the right marinade. But be sure to cook it above 160 or you'll turn into a zombie.

  67. A good brainfap by AP31R0N · · Score: 1

    But here's my Z-day scenario:

    The virus is first spread by touch and at first is little worse than a flu. This would allow it to get through WHO and CDC. Several generations later the virus mutates rapidly causing death and eventually, zombification. By then much of the population is infected before the first death.

    The other option is alien biological weapon. They sprinkle spores through the upper atmo that descend and get the party started.

    i can has Left 4 Dead movie or TV series? i vote for Evangeline Lilly as Zoe.

    --
    Utilizing the synergization of benchmark e-solutions to pre-workaround action items!
  68. Zombies and werewolves and marijuana, oh my! by Wescotte · · Score: 1

    Finally!!! A news article I can slip in a promo for the zero budget, comedy/horror film I've been working on over the last year. It is called "The Amateur Monster Movie" and was shot in and around Milwaukee Wisconsin. You can view our trailer on Youtube via the link below. Let me know what you guys think.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3aZquMQhAmo

  69. World War Z by Stick32 · · Score: 1

    World War Z presented a very plausible "what-if" scenario for a zombie apocalypse. In the book the outbreak started in the worst possible location, China. There the infection spread quickly due to large population density. Thanks to them clamping down on communication channels and clever use of misdirection/misinformation the world didn't fully realize the zombie threat until it was gnawing on their front door and it was too late.

    The book further makes the point that a zombie is a dumb and practically harmless if encountered alone or in small numbers. What caused the most damage was when the world panicked and basically made themselves zombie food.

  70. Dude, don't mess with the Japanese Police :P by Moraelin · · Score: 1

    Actually, here's a fun bit: after WW2 Japan apparently decided they renounce war and they'll never again have an Army.

    By now someone will probably want to intervene, "wait, you dumbass, what about the Japanese Self-Defense Forces?" Yeah, that's actually the fun part. Those evolved as an departments of the police, rather than as an army.

    So, yeah, don't mess with the Japanese police. It's the only police force with aircraft carriers, submarines, tanks, and fighter-bomber planes :p

    If a horde of zombies decides to mess with the Japanese police, they might have a nasty surprise :p

    --
    A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
    1. Re:Dude, don't mess with the Japanese Police :P by Philomage · · Score: 1

      Plus, they have Gundams (if they can convince the department of agriculture).

    2. Re:Dude, don't mess with the Japanese Police :P by charlieo88 · · Score: 1

      But they are all geared to fight off giant, fire-breathing, building-stomping lizard incursions and not zombie apocalypses.

  71. What a load by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, to me it looked like the writer of this article had a conclusion, and made up a bunch of crap to try to support it. It assumes that zombies are just dead meat walking around, susceptible to maggots, bacteria, ect, except for the fact that oh..... their walking around!? Some process must be keeping them active, this article completely ignores that fact. It seems to completely ignore humans as a pathogen vector, peoples instinct to "stay alive" can sometimes overpower any reason. Zombies don't have to get from place to place, In the panic to escape infected areas people WILL be bitten, some will logically choose to isolate/terminate themselves, but many will hide their infection and eventually turn, causing outbreaks even in isolated areas which have insufficient prevention methods. Weapons are only as effective as the bullets fired from them, most people don't keep the thousands of rounds necessary to withstand a zombie outbreak. The military does, but against so many targets they would definitely have a difficult time containing the infection, as the infection spread they would also likely be pulled back to protect politicians/strategic areas, leaving the rest of the public to fend for themselves. I imagine a real world zombie outbreak as being caused by a virus/bacteria/parasite which infects its hosts cells and feeds on the waste products of those cells, secreting something that allows those cells to function (possibly as simple as an oxidizer the cells can use) in at least a limited fashion even in the event of complete circulatory collapse, along with something akin to adrenalin and a neurotoxin that degrades higher brain functions during the initial infection. It would have to have a relatively short incubation period, 8 - 36 hours from bite to zombie. Humans would be the primary "carrier", an area would become "overrun" by zombies, bitten but not yet turned individuals would flee from these areas, they would then turn and infect the location to which they had fled, rinse and repeat. Of course the real question is, could such a "pathogen" ever exist, who knows. There are some similar examples, molds and parasites effecting ants and other insects, but nothing to my knowledge in higher mammals. All it would take though would be for a pathogen to develop these or similar chararistics, infect a human in a semi-populated area, and that would be it, initial disbelief would probably allow it to spread beyond the capabilities to contain it.

  72. Not shiny, but romantic... by ka-klick · · Score: 1

    Wrote a song about it. Like to hear it? Here it Goes:

    Zombie Love Song (If anyone eats my brains)
    http://www.reverbnation.com/tunepak/2759032

    It's your basic boy is about to marry girl, she dies in a tragic car accident, but is brought back to him by the zobiepocalypse type thing.

    This is a live recording - I have a better one in the works complete w. zombie chorus.

    --

    MSRP - Tax, Title & Licence Extra Your Milage May Vary

  73. Not to rain on your humor but by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty sure your first #6 response is totally lacking in reality. I can pretty much guarantee that if you suck all the moisture (aka H2O) of a zombie you'll turn it into a pile of ash-like chemicals. Of course that's the hard part, extracting all of the moisture. Even a flamethrower is unlikely to remove the moisture from the bones. Then you'll be left with one really pissed off skeleton zombie!

    1. Re:Not to rain on your humor but by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Reducing something to ash isn't a matter of removing the H2O, it's a matter of breaking the chemical bonds in all the proteins and fats and other bits. Taking out all the water will make a mummy.

      And a mummy is just a high value-added zombie, isn't it?

      I rest my case.

    2. Re:Not to rain on your humor but by celtic_hackr · · Score: 1

      Sorry, mummies are not dried out, or rather not just dried out. They have the water both dissipated (dried out) and displaced with another chemical (usually something like sodium carbonate decahydrate). You have to break the organic compound bonds to extract *all* the water, as much of the water is bound up in large organic carbon based molecules. If you extract all the Hydrogen and all the Oxygen from a human being you'll be left with a pile of dusty carbon, liberated gases, and various other dust sized particle of chemicals (aka ashes). When I say ashes, don't think funerary ashes, which are mostly the wooden coffin used. The bones are ground up and not incinerated to ash.

      So no, if you successfully remove *all* of the water you won't get a mummy, you'll get: a few pounds worth (maybe) of dust sized chemicals a lot of water, hydrogen, nitrogen and carbon dioxide gases.

      To further prove your theory wrong, if a mummy had all the water removed it would have to be less than half down to 1/4 the size of the original person. I've not yet seen one of those mummies, yet.

  74. We should have switched over to Vampires by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1

    You know; the whole
    Republicans in the Whitehouse = Uptick in Zombie film popularity.

    Democrats = Vampire popularity.

    Well, I think that's changed now, because American politics have changed. That is; there are no American politics anymore. We all know it's a sham and people are subconsciously trying to deal with the creeping feeling that at any moment the whole of society will go all shotguns and can-openers.

    The zombies which worry me are the ones who currently wear badges. The G20 in Toronto showed that we can't count on our own police to act like sane members of society, but rather will quite willingly attack their own people. (Though, it certainly helps when you bring in police from distant areas who have a vague hate-on for the city they will be swinging truncheons in.)

    Unfortunately, when you step out of the subconscious realm and try to problem solve for the same psychological stress points in the upper reaches of your consciousness, then you come to the truly horrific awareness; The zombies have guns and tear gas.

    -FL

  75. I was by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was a zombie for a while some years ago. I got really tired of the putrid life and decided that zombie life was not my thing.
    Now I don't work for the bank system anymore.

  76. "Scientific" reasons ? by purplepolecat · · Score: 1

    The problem with most of these points is that they assume that zombies follow the normal rules of biology.

    News flash: if zombies followed the rules of biology, THEY WOULDN'T BE WALKING AROUND BITING PEOPLE.

  77. I don't think they've thought this through... by sesshomaru · · Score: 1

    ... or, "Watch out, the zombie vultures are attacking!"

    --
    "MIT betrayed all of its basic principles."
  78. Archeologists document ancient zombies ;) by Reziac · · Score: 1
    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  79. IDK about you, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I prefer that my lovers are dead. It makes it easier for consent.

  80. I'm still waiting for my zombie porn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    BRRRREEEEAAAAASSSTSSS....

  81. #5 has one thing wrong by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

    Nobody is going to be having sex with a zombie.

    haven't you ever been on the internet?

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  82. except for Nazi zombies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out the Norwegian movie "Dead Snow". The Nazi zombies in the movie are not only fast, but they can use weapons, follow orders from a zombie officer, etc.

  83. Re: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't worry. There's a rule 34 for zombies.

  84. Counter #0 by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    until they take neuroleptics

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  85. not... by Fuzzums · · Score: 1

    "And, it's made entirely out of food. It's easy prey for any animal that wants it." .. thereby infecting that animal and so on and so on. eventually there will be so many zombies that they will outnumber "us".
    and then we die.

    --
    Privacy is terrorism.