I consider it an experiment in what the average MS user has to go through. My pirated copy has no such issues. It just drives home what a crock WGA is.
Can you tell me what new functionality the average Acrobat 7 user gets over the average Acrobat 5 or 6 user? Newer is not always better. I prefer 6 myself.
That's okay, I do. Every time I upgrade any hardware in my machine, I have to call MS to reactivate my copy because it tells me the key has been used to many time. Luckily, the nice ladies in India never have a problem giving me an activation code. However, I shudder to think what is going to happen the first time I upgrade after they EOL XP.
Actually, the UI is attrocious for the visually impared. It also tends to be harder to fix breakage, than just about anything else.
As far as the visually impaired, I would not know, however, if hard to fix is dragging.kexts from the install media to the install folders, Then I would hate to see your definition of easy.
As far as Vista. Tried it a few weeks, went back to XP, anything that makes my system (Dual Core AMD @ 2.2ghz, 2 gb DDR667, GeForce 7900, nForce 550, WD SataII 7200 RPM HDD) about 25% slower is not an upgrade in my book.
You've reached this page because the site you were trying to visit now blocks the FireFox browser.
The Mozilla Foundation and its Commercial arm, the Mozilla Corporation, has allowed and endorsed Ad Block Plus, a plug-in that blocks advertisement on web sites and also prevents site owners from blocking people using it. Software that blocks all advertisement is an infringement of the rights of web site owners and developers. Numerous web sites exist in order to provide quality content in exchange for displaying ads. Accessing the content while blocking the ads, therefore would be no less than stealing. Millions of hard working people are being robbed of their time and effort by this type of software. Many site owners therefore install scripts that prevent people using ad blocking software from accessing their site. That is their right as the site owner to insist that the use of their resources accompanies the presence of the ads.
While blanket ad blocking in general is still theft, the real problem is Ad Block Plus's unwillingness to allow individual site owners the freedom to block people using their plug-in. Blocking FireFox is the only alternative. Demographics have shown that not only are FireFox users a somewhat small percentage of the internet, they actually are even smaller in terms of online spending, therefore blocking FireFox seems to have only minimal financial drawbacks, whereas ending resource theft has tremendous financial rewards for honest, hard-working website owners and developers..
Since the makers of Ad Block Plus as well as the filter subscriptions that accompany it refuse to allow website owners control over their own intellectual property, and since FireFox actively endorses Ad Block Plus, the sites linking to this page are now blocking FireFox until the resource theft is stopped.
Netscape users can simply set their browser to IE mode to continue to enjoy the site that sent you here. FireFox users can use Internet Explorer, Opera or Netscape (in IE mode) to access it. FireFox users also have the option of using the IE Tab plug-in which uses the IE rendering engine to display pages, but also disables the Ad Block Plus plug-in.
If you are offended by the Mozilla Corporation's endorsement of dishonesty please contact the Mozilla Foundation and ask them to stop empowering internet theft.
Other comments on ad blocking...
PopularTechnology.net--Why Adblock is bad for the "free" Internet
Adblock effectively robs these free sites of their revenue. If Internet Explorer came with a feature such as Adblock, you would effectively wipe out thousands of websites, maybe more. These are the same free sites users of Adblock frequently visit. The irony is how this is self-defeating.
Information Technology and the Law--Firefox Adblock a Contributory Infringer?
Judge Posner, elucidating the holdings of WGN v. United Video (1982) among others, reasoned in Aimster that:
"[Commercial-skipping] amounted to creating an unauthorized derivative work, namely a commercial-free copy that would reduce the copyright owner's income from his original program, since "free" television programs are financed by the purchase of commercials by advertisers."
Like free television broadcast content supported financially by advertising, much of the content on the Internet today is distributed free to end-users for an indirect exchange of advertisement revenue. When a user loads an ad-driven copyrighted website, he produces a copy of the work due to the inherent architecture of the Internet. If this user is using Adblock to screen out annoying advertisements, he is creating an unauthorized derivative work analogous to skipping television commercials. By the letter of copyright law, this practice would most likely be seen as an infringing use.
Actually I did, and the only issue I ran into is a game would crash after an hour or so if I was running Dream Scene. I experienced none of the other problems, but then my board is an nForce 550.
And this is why I have used nVidia hardware since I upgraded from my Voodoo 3 3000. While ATI and nVidia may go back and forth in hardware performance, nVidia has much better driver support on Linux or Windows.
*Still rather upset That there is no linux acceleration driver for the ATI Rage Mobility in the original iBook, I would much rather run Linux on it than OS X or OS 9.
At least here in the US part of the issue is the users as well. I cannot count the number of times a printer was down and I had users grumbling that they had to walk 20 yards as opposed to 5 to get thier printouts. It is not as simple as employee morale being inversely related to distance from printers, but the way they complain you would think it is.
Probably says something about why we have an obesity epidemic to boot.
Slashdot Mirror
Until a web 2.0 app can replace a burned out motherboard, I will not worry about it too much.
The sky is falling indeed Chicken Little....
You, Sir, Win the internets.
I consider it an experiment in what the average MS user has to go through. My pirated copy has no such issues. It just drives home what a crock WGA is.
Can you tell me what new functionality the average Acrobat 7 user gets over the average Acrobat 5 or 6 user? Newer is not always better. I prefer 6 myself.
That's okay, I do. Every time I upgrade any hardware in my machine, I have to call MS to reactivate my copy because it tells me the key has been used to many time. Luckily, the nice ladies in India never have a problem giving me an activation code. However, I shudder to think what is going to happen the first time I upgrade after they EOL XP.
Actually, the UI is attrocious for the visually impared. It also tends to be harder to fix breakage, than just about anything else.
.kexts from the install media to the install folders, Then I would hate to see your definition of easy.
As far as the visually impaired, I would not know, however, if hard to fix is dragging
Fight Club? Try the Ford Pinto Memo.
Excellent! Call me when you and your 70 yo parents windows machines are so full of cruft and malware that they choke bringing up google.
I smell a plant
As far as Vista. Tried it a few weeks, went back to XP, anything that makes my system (Dual Core AMD @ 2.2ghz, 2 gb DDR667, GeForce 7900, nForce 550, WD SataII 7200 RPM HDD) about 25% slower is not an upgrade in my book.
You've reached this page because the site you were trying to visit now blocks the FireFox browser.
The Mozilla Foundation and its Commercial arm, the Mozilla Corporation, has allowed and endorsed Ad Block Plus, a plug-in that blocks advertisement on web sites and also prevents site owners from blocking people using it. Software that blocks all advertisement is an infringement of the rights of web site owners and developers. Numerous web sites exist in order to provide quality content in exchange for displaying ads. Accessing the content while blocking the ads, therefore would be no less than stealing. Millions of hard working people are being robbed of their time and effort by this type of software. Many site owners therefore install scripts that prevent people using ad blocking software from accessing their site. That is their right as the site owner to insist that the use of their resources accompanies the presence of the ads.
While blanket ad blocking in general is still theft, the real problem is Ad Block Plus's unwillingness to allow individual site owners the freedom to block people using their plug-in. Blocking FireFox is the only alternative. Demographics have shown that not only are FireFox users a somewhat small percentage of the internet, they actually are even smaller in terms of online spending, therefore blocking FireFox seems to have only minimal financial drawbacks, whereas ending resource theft has tremendous financial rewards for honest, hard-working website owners and developers..
Since the makers of Ad Block Plus as well as the filter subscriptions that accompany it refuse to allow website owners control over their own intellectual property, and since FireFox actively endorses Ad Block Plus, the sites linking to this page are now blocking FireFox until the resource theft is stopped.
Netscape users can simply set their browser to IE mode to continue to enjoy the site that sent you here. FireFox users can use Internet Explorer, Opera or Netscape (in IE mode) to access it. FireFox users also have the option of using the IE Tab plug-in which uses the IE rendering engine to display pages, but also disables the Ad Block Plus plug-in.
If you are offended by the Mozilla Corporation's endorsement of dishonesty please contact the Mozilla Foundation and ask them to stop empowering internet theft.
Other comments on ad blocking...
PopularTechnology.net--Why Adblock is bad for the "free" Internet
Adblock effectively robs these free sites of their revenue. If Internet Explorer came with a feature such as Adblock, you would effectively wipe out thousands of websites, maybe more. These are the same free sites users of Adblock frequently visit. The irony is how this is self-defeating.
Information Technology and the Law--Firefox Adblock a Contributory Infringer?
Judge Posner, elucidating the holdings of WGN v. United Video (1982) among others, reasoned in Aimster that:
"[Commercial-skipping] amounted to creating an unauthorized derivative work, namely a commercial-free copy that would reduce the copyright owner's income from his original program, since "free" television programs are financed by the purchase of commercials by advertisers."
Like free television broadcast content supported financially by advertising, much of the content on the Internet today is distributed free to end-users for an indirect exchange of advertisement revenue. When a user loads an ad-driven copyrighted website, he produces a copy of the work due to the inherent architecture of the Internet. If this user is using Adblock to screen out annoying advertisements, he is creating an unauthorized derivative work analogous to skipping television commercials. By the letter of copyright law, this practice would most likely be seen as an infringing use.
Ditto that, LFG in Central Ohio
Money is not going to make abuse more or less likely, the abuser will just find another excuse.
I have no degree, and I can get an entry level tech support job at almost double what a new teacher would get in my state, with no student loan debt.
Importing them from Latin America
Actually I did, and the only issue I ran into is a game would crash after an hour or so if I was running Dream Scene. I experienced none of the other problems, but then my board is an nForce 550.
Fire Safe
And this is why I have used nVidia hardware since I upgraded from my Voodoo 3 3000. While ATI and nVidia may go back and forth in hardware performance, nVidia has much better driver support on Linux or Windows.
*Still rather upset That there is no linux acceleration driver for the ATI Rage Mobility in the original iBook, I would much rather run Linux on it than OS X or OS 9.
If they build a better bridge, sure, esecailly n an extreme environment like Alaska.
The US did not really take part in the WWII in Europe until 1944.
You fail at history.
Italy comes to mind, as do daylight bombing raids.
Feinstein also has not caled the Internet a "series of tubes".
Would you want to use a bridge on a regular basis built by the lowest bidder?
Before you answer, I suggest you google "Point Pleasant"+"Bridge Failure"
We're only making plans for Nigel.
At least here in the US part of the issue is the users as well. I cannot count the number of times a printer was down and I had users grumbling that they had to walk 20 yards as opposed to 5 to get thier printouts. It is not as simple as employee morale being inversely related to distance from printers, but the way they complain you would think it is.
Probably says something about why we have an obesity epidemic to boot.
They happen all the time in Africa, a veritable utopia of innovaton and progress!
Pretty Lights! The Picture even proves it!